Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.checkmate > #653076 > unrolled thread

21 F AND MY THING SAYS

Started by% <pursent100@gmail.com>
First post2025-01-06 06:45 -0700
Last post2025-01-06 18:31 +0000
Articles 20 on this page of 86 — 10 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate


Contents

  21 F AND MY THING SAYS % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 06:45 -0700
    Re: 21 F AND MY THING SAYS mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2025-01-06 08:53 -0500
      Re: 21 F AND MY THING SAYS % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 07:28 -0700
      Re: 21 F AND MY THING SAYS William Stickers <bill.stickers@innocent.com> - 2025-01-06 15:14 +0000
        Re: 21 F AND MY THING SAYS mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2025-01-06 10:59 -0500
          Re: 21 F AND MY THING SAYS % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 09:31 -0700
            Re: 21 F AND MY THING SAYS mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2025-01-06 13:05 -0500
              Re: 21 F AND MY THING SAYS Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> - 2025-01-06 18:48 +0000
      Re: 21 F AND MY THING SAYS Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> - 2025-01-06 17:39 +0000
      Re: 21 F AND MY THING SAYS Tard Wrangler <youknowit@alphamale.corn> - 2025-01-06 10:48 -0800
        Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ21 F AND MY THING SAYSπŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ (Was: πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ21 F AND MY THING SAYSπŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ) πŸŒˆπŸ’πŸŒ»πŸŒΊπŸŒΉπŸŒ»πŸ’πŸŒ·πŸŒΊπŸŒˆJenπŸŒˆπŸ’πŸŒ»πŸŒΊπŸŒΉπŸŒ»πŸ’πŸŒ·πŸŒΊπŸŒˆ Dershmender πŸ’πŸŒ»πŸŒΊπŸŒΉπŸŒ»πŸ’πŸŒ·πŸŒΊπŸΆη¬›πŸŒˆπŸ’πŸŒ»πŸŒΊπŸŒΉπŸŒ»πŸ’πŸŒ·πŸŒΊπŸŒˆ <root@127.0.0.1>  - 2025-01-06 18:58 +0000
          Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ????21 F AND MY THING SAYS???? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? (Was: ????21 F AND MY THING SAYS????) Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2025-01-06 12:12 -0700
            Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ (Was: πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?) πŸŒˆπŸ’πŸŒ»πŸŒΊπŸŒΉπŸŒ»πŸ’πŸŒ·πŸŒΊπŸŒˆJenπŸŒˆπŸ’πŸŒ»πŸŒΊπŸŒΉπŸŒ»πŸ’πŸŒ·πŸŒΊπŸŒˆ Dershmender πŸ’πŸŒ»πŸŒΊπŸŒΉπŸŒ»πŸ’πŸŒ·πŸŒΊπŸΆη¬›πŸŒˆπŸ’πŸŒ»πŸŒΊπŸŒΉπŸŒ»πŸ’πŸŒ·πŸŒΊπŸŒˆ <root@127.0.0.1>  - 2025-01-06 19:14 +0000
              Re: ?  QUEER GAY FOOL Tard Wrangler <youknowit@alphamale.corn> - 2025-01-06 11:28 -0800
                Bill Carson Peter Steele <snakesbloodpussycat@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-06 15:33 -0600
                  Re: Bill Carson Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> - 2025-01-07 02:49 +0000
                    Re: Bill Carson Tard Wrangler <youknowit@alphamale.corn> - 2025-01-06 20:31 -0800
                      Re: Bill Carson Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> - 2025-01-07 14:03 +0000
                        Re: Bill Carson Tard Wrangler <youknowit@alphamale.corn> - 2025-01-07 08:02 -0800
                          Re: Bill Carson Peter Steele <snakesbloodpussycat@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-07 11:03 -0600
                            Re: Bill Carson % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 10:06 -0700
                              Re: Bill Carson Peter Steele <snakesbloodpussycat@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-07 11:19 -0600
                                Re: Bill Carson Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> - 2025-01-07 23:24 +0000
                                  Re: Bill Carson Tard Wrangler <youknowit@alphamale.corn> - 2025-01-07 20:21 -0800
                                    Re: Bill Carson Peter Steele <snakesbloodpussycat@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-07 22:35 -0600
                                      Re: Bill Carson snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-01-08 18:46 +0000
                                        Re: Bill Carson % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 11:50 -0700
                                          Re: Bill Carson snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-01-08 19:16 +0000
                                            Re: Bill Carson Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> - 2025-01-08 19:20 +0000
                                              Re: Bill Carson % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 12:24 -0700
                                                Re: Bill Carson Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> - 2025-01-08 21:54 +0000
                                                  Re: Bill Carson % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 15:01 -0700
                                                    Re: Bill Carson Peter Steele <snakesbloodpussycat@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-08 16:26 -0600
                                                      Re: Bill Carson % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 15:53 -0700
                                                        Re: Bill Carson Peter Steele <snakesbloodpussycat@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-08 16:55 -0600
                                                          Re: Bill Carson % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 15:57 -0700
                                                    Re: Bill Carson Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> - 2025-01-09 13:08 +0000
                                                      Re: Bill Carson % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 06:11 -0700
                                                        Re: Bill Carson Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> - 2025-01-09 13:13 +0000
                                                          Re: Bill Carson % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 07:17 -0700
                                                            Re: Bill Carson Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> - 2025-01-09 14:23 +0000
                                                              Re: Bill Carson % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 07:28 -0700
                                                                Re: Bill Carson Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> - 2025-01-09 14:30 +0000
                                                                  Re: Bill Carson % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 07:40 -0700
                                                                    Re: Bill Carson Peter Steele <snakesbloodpussycat@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-09 09:09 -0600
                                                                    Re: Bill Carson Casa <casa@nomail.invalid> - 2025-01-09 10:14 -0500
                                                      Re: Bill Carson William Stickers <bill.stickers@innocent.com> - 2025-01-10 15:44 +0000
                                                        Re: Bill Carson % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 12:20 -0700
                                                        Re: Bill Carson % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 12:38 -0700
                                                        Re: Bill Carson % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 16:12 -0700
                                              Re: Bill Carson snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-01-08 19:27 +0000
                                            Re: Bill Carson % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 12:22 -0700
                                              Re: Bill Carson snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-01-08 19:28 +0000
                                        Re: Bill Carson Peter Steele <snakesbloodpussycat@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-08 13:20 -0600
                                          Re: Bill Carson % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 12:22 -0700
                                            Re: Bill Carson Peter Steele <snakesbloodpussycat@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-08 13:24 -0600
                                              Re: Bill Carson % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 12:43 -0700
                                                Re: Bill Carson Peter Steele <snakesbloodpussycat@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-08 13:46 -0600
                                                  Re: Bill Carson % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 12:55 -0700
                                          Re: Bill Carson snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-01-08 19:33 +0000
                                            Re: Bill Carson % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 12:45 -0700
                                              Re: Bill Carson snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-01-08 20:06 +0000
                                    Re: Bill Carson Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> - 2025-01-08 05:59 +0000
                                      Re: Bill Carson Tard Wrangler <youknowit@alphamale.corn> - 2025-01-07 22:04 -0800
                                        Re: Bill Carson Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> - 2025-01-08 06:15 +0000
                                          Re: Bill Carson Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2025-01-08 02:58 -0700
                                          Re: Bill Carson Tard Wrangler <youknowit@alphamale.corn> - 2025-01-08 07:55 -0800
                                            Re: Bill Carson Peter Steele <snakesbloodpussycat@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-08 10:23 -0600
                              Re: Bill Carson Tard Wrangler <youknowit@alphamale.corn> - 2025-01-07 11:26 -0800
                                Re: Bill Carson % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 12:41 -0700
                                  Re: Bill Carson Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2025-01-07 13:26 -0700
                                    Re: Bill Carson % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 13:37 -0700
                                      Re: Bill Carson Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2025-01-07 14:29 -0700
                                        Re: Bill Carson % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 15:54 -0700
                                          Re: Bill Carson Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> - 2025-01-07 23:43 +0000
                                          Re: Bill Carson Tard Wrangler <youknowit@alphamale.corn> - 2025-01-07 19:34 -0800
                                          Re: Bill Carson Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2025-01-08 02:54 -0700
                                      Re: Bill Carson Doc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth> - 2025-01-07 23:36 +0000
                            Re: Bill Carson Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2025-01-07 10:19 -0700
                              Re: Bill Carson Tard Wrangler <youknowit@alphamale.corn> - 2025-01-07 12:02 -0800
                                Re: Bill Carson Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2025-01-07 13:28 -0700
                                  Re: Bill Carson Tard Wrangler <youknowit@alphamale.corn> - 2025-01-07 12:44 -0800
          Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ????21 F AND MY THING SAYS???? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? (Was: ????21 F AND MY THING SAYS????) Tard Wrangler <youknowit@alphamale.corn> - 2025-01-06 11:20 -0800
    Re: 21 F AND MY THING SAYS snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-01-06 14:31 +0000
      Re: 21 F AND MY THING SAYS % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 09:30 -0700
        Re: 21 F AND MY THING SAYS snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-01-06 18:31 +0000

Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5  Next page →


#653319 — Re: Bill Carson

From% <pursent100@gmail.com>
Date2025-01-07 10:06 -0700
SubjectRe: Bill Carson
Message-ID<KXudnXPj4dKlwuD6nZ2dnZfqn_oAAAAA@giganews.com>
In reply to#653318
Peter Steele wrote:
> Tard Wrangler wrote:
>> Once upon a time, on or about Tue, 07 Jan 2025 14:03:16 GMT, Doc
>> Hammerslack allegedly stated the following, and is solely responsible
>> for its content:
>>
>>
>> F00P!
>> F00P!NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 20:31:32 -0800, Tard
>> F00P!Wrangler wrote:
>> F00P!
>> F00P!> Once upon a time, on or about Tue, 07 Jan 2025 02:49:41 GMT, Doc
>> F00P!> Hammerslack allegedly stated the following, and is solely 
>> responsible
>> F00P!> for its content:
>> F00P!>
>> F00P!>
>> F00P!> F00P!
>> F00P!> F00P!NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 15:33:06 
>> -0600, Peter
>> F00P!> Steele F00P!wrote:
>> F00P!> F00P!
>> F00P!> F00P!> Tard Wrangler wrote:
>> F00P!> F00P!>> Once upon a time, on or about Mon, 06 Jan 2025 19:14:47 
>> +0000,
>> F00P!> F00P!>> ??????????Jen?????????? Dershmender ????????????????????
>> F00P!> allegedly F00P!>> stated the following, and is solely 
>> responsible for
>> F00P!> its content: F00P!>>
>> F00P!> F00P!>>
>> F00P!> F00P!>>
>> F00P!> 
>> F00P!<https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-video-shows-capitol-
>> F00P!> 
>> F00P!mob-calling-for-the-death-of-the-vice-president-plaskett-says>
>> F00P!> F00P!>> F00P!
>> F00P!> F00P!>>
>> F00P!> F00P!>> WHO "setup the makeshift gallows"?Β  Oh... "the MOB" 
>> did?Β  And
>> F00P!> after all F00P!>> this bullshit, we can't even name that person?
>> F00P!> There's only one F00P!>> explanation for that, and Occam says 
>> it was a
>> F00P!> paid FBI informant F00P!>> straight outta Central Casting.Β  Fool!
>> F00P!> F00P!>>
>> F00P!> F00P!>>
>> F00P!> F00P!> I'm afraid there is an equally likely possibility, BY 
>> OCCAM's
>> F00P!> RAZOR that F00P!> the Erector was covered by the same policy that
>> F00P!> resulted in no collusion F00P!> and no rape.Β  I watched them 
>> cover up
>> F00P!> the Russian connection gradually F00P!> as time went on and 
>> less and
>> F00P!> less people spoke of it until the F00P!> investigation.Β  I 
>> believe it's
>> F00P!> there except it was adequately covered up F00P!> to meet the rigid
>> F00P!> statutes of not guilty of what you were most afraid F00P!> of.  
>> I'd
>> F00P!> prefer to talk about that, the collusion.Β  Unfortunately, 
>> F00P!> that's
>> F00P!> not one of the games you are interested in because I might pry 
>> F00P!>
>> F00P!> something loose.Β  The name the Erector is going under is 
>> Carson.Β  Bill
>> F00P!> F00P!> Carson.
>> F00P!> F00P!
>> F00P!> F00P!Spoiler:
>> F00P!> F00P!.
>> F00P!> F00P!.
>> F00P!> F00P!.
>> F00P!> F00P!.
>> F00P!> F00P!.
>> F00P!> F00P!.
>> F00P!> F00P!.
>> F00P!> F00P!.
>> F00P!> F00P!.
>> F00P!> F00P!.
>> F00P!> F00P!Turns out, he was buried in the grave next to Bill Carson's.
>> F00P!>
>> F00P!> WTF is Steel Peter even babbling about now, and who is this 
>> "Erector"
>> F00P!> guy?Β  This is why I don't follow that dood, he doesn't even 
>> make scents!
>> F00P!
>> F00P!He's talking about the identity of the person(s) who erected
>> F00P!the gallows.
>> F00P!
>> F00P!You know, the thing you've been harping on about incessantly.
>> F00P!
>> F00P!His cultural reference was a plot point for _The Good, The Bad,
>> F00P!and The Ugly_ -- I guess you missed that detail when you saw
>> F00P!the movie, assuming you've seen it.Β  (It's pretty good, you
>> F00P!should watch it if you haven't.)
>>
>> Yeah, I Giggled that yesterday, then filed it under non sequiturs.Β  If
>> we could get back to the point I've been futilely attempting to drive
>> home... so far unsuccessfully, IF that Pelosified version of the
>> January 6th story was even half of what a couple of you on the other
>> side of the isle are trying to turn it into, how could someone parade
>> around the grounds toting an "erected" gallows, a thousand people get
>> arrested, and yet we STILL have no clue who built, constructed, or
>> "erected" said gallows?Β  In fact, where is the gallows assembly today?
>> Is it collecting dust in some hidden corner of an "evidence" locker
>> somewhere?Β  The entire nexus to the dubious claim that an unruly and
>> impromptu mob was in fact, "murderous," rests on a prop that I must
>> conclude at this point, was supplied by the FBI's prop department, and
>> then quickly vanished, never to be seen or heard from again.Β  Can
>> either of you address this point without dragging Clint Eastwood or
>> any other obscure misdirections into that question?
>>
> 
> 
> Your argument about a supposedly missing tool that the crowd of rioters 
> brought with them is not very apropos to anything.Β  I've never heard 
> anyone before you say that this escaped evidence.Β  Just like you engage 
> your mind to wish the gallows away, you wish my instructions and 
> writings to be more complex or circuitous than they are.Β  You will look 
> at a sentence 'I AM NORMAL' on the page and you will say, "what does 
> this mean?"Β  I deal with this on a daily basis.Β  The common thread is 
> you don't like what I said and are trying to dismiss it without 
> addressing the content.

is this about Cill Barson

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#653322 — Re: Bill Carson

FromPeter Steele <snakesbloodpussycat@yahoo.com>
Date2025-01-07 11:19 -0600
SubjectRe: Bill Carson
Message-ID<lu560pF1ugfU3@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#653319
% wrote:
> Peter Steele wrote:
>> Tard Wrangler wrote:
>>> Once upon a time, on or about Tue, 07 Jan 2025 14:03:16 GMT, Doc
>>> Hammerslack allegedly stated the following, and is solely responsible
>>> for its content:
>>>
>>>
>>> F00P!
>>> F00P!NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 20:31:32 -0800, Tard
>>> F00P!Wrangler wrote:
>>> F00P!
>>> F00P!> Once upon a time, on or about Tue, 07 Jan 2025 02:49:41 GMT, Doc
>>> F00P!> Hammerslack allegedly stated the following, and is solely 
>>> responsible
>>> F00P!> for its content:
>>> F00P!>
>>> F00P!>
>>> F00P!> F00P!
>>> F00P!> F00P!NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 15:33:06 
>>> -0600, Peter
>>> F00P!> Steele F00P!wrote:
>>> F00P!> F00P!
>>> F00P!> F00P!> Tard Wrangler wrote:
>>> F00P!> F00P!>> Once upon a time, on or about Mon, 06 Jan 2025 
>>> 19:14:47 +0000,
>>> F00P!> F00P!>> ??????????Jen?????????? Dershmender ????????????????????
>>> F00P!> allegedly F00P!>> stated the following, and is solely 
>>> responsible for
>>> F00P!> its content: F00P!>>
>>> F00P!> F00P!>>
>>> F00P!> F00P!>>
>>> F00P!> 
>>> F00P!<https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-video-shows-capitol-
>>> F00P!> 
>>> F00P!mob-calling-for-the-death-of-the-vice-president-plaskett-says>
>>> F00P!> F00P!>> F00P!
>>> F00P!> F00P!>>
>>> F00P!> F00P!>> WHO "setup the makeshift gallows"?Β  Oh... "the MOB" 
>>> did?Β  And
>>> F00P!> after all F00P!>> this bullshit, we can't even name that person?
>>> F00P!> There's only one F00P!>> explanation for that, and Occam says 
>>> it was a
>>> F00P!> paid FBI informant F00P!>> straight outta Central Casting.Β  Fool!
>>> F00P!> F00P!>>
>>> F00P!> F00P!>>
>>> F00P!> F00P!> I'm afraid there is an equally likely possibility, BY 
>>> OCCAM's
>>> F00P!> RAZOR that F00P!> the Erector was covered by the same policy that
>>> F00P!> resulted in no collusion F00P!> and no rape.Β  I watched them 
>>> cover up
>>> F00P!> the Russian connection gradually F00P!> as time went on and 
>>> less and
>>> F00P!> less people spoke of it until the F00P!> investigation.Β  I 
>>> believe it's
>>> F00P!> there except it was adequately covered up F00P!> to meet the 
>>> rigid
>>> F00P!> statutes of not guilty of what you were most afraid F00P!> of. 
>>> I'd
>>> F00P!> prefer to talk about that, the collusion.Β  Unfortunately, 
>>> F00P!> that's
>>> F00P!> not one of the games you are interested in because I might pry 
>>> F00P!>
>>> F00P!> something loose.Β  The name the Erector is going under is 
>>> Carson.Β  Bill
>>> F00P!> F00P!> Carson.
>>> F00P!> F00P!
>>> F00P!> F00P!Spoiler:
>>> F00P!> F00P!.
>>> F00P!> F00P!.
>>> F00P!> F00P!.
>>> F00P!> F00P!.
>>> F00P!> F00P!.
>>> F00P!> F00P!.
>>> F00P!> F00P!.
>>> F00P!> F00P!.
>>> F00P!> F00P!.
>>> F00P!> F00P!.
>>> F00P!> F00P!Turns out, he was buried in the grave next to Bill Carson's.
>>> F00P!>
>>> F00P!> WTF is Steel Peter even babbling about now, and who is this 
>>> "Erector"
>>> F00P!> guy?Β  This is why I don't follow that dood, he doesn't even 
>>> make scents!
>>> F00P!
>>> F00P!He's talking about the identity of the person(s) who erected
>>> F00P!the gallows.
>>> F00P!
>>> F00P!You know, the thing you've been harping on about incessantly.
>>> F00P!
>>> F00P!His cultural reference was a plot point for _The Good, The Bad,
>>> F00P!and The Ugly_ -- I guess you missed that detail when you saw
>>> F00P!the movie, assuming you've seen it.Β  (It's pretty good, you
>>> F00P!should watch it if you haven't.)
>>>
>>> Yeah, I Giggled that yesterday, then filed it under non sequiturs.Β  If
>>> we could get back to the point I've been futilely attempting to drive
>>> home... so far unsuccessfully, IF that Pelosified version of the
>>> January 6th story was even half of what a couple of you on the other
>>> side of the isle are trying to turn it into, how could someone parade
>>> around the grounds toting an "erected" gallows, a thousand people get
>>> arrested, and yet we STILL have no clue who built, constructed, or
>>> "erected" said gallows?Β  In fact, where is the gallows assembly today?
>>> Is it collecting dust in some hidden corner of an "evidence" locker
>>> somewhere?Β  The entire nexus to the dubious claim that an unruly and
>>> impromptu mob was in fact, "murderous," rests on a prop that I must
>>> conclude at this point, was supplied by the FBI's prop department, and
>>> then quickly vanished, never to be seen or heard from again.Β  Can
>>> either of you address this point without dragging Clint Eastwood or
>>> any other obscure misdirections into that question?
>>>
>>
>>
>> Your argument about a supposedly missing tool that the crowd of 
>> rioters brought with them is not very apropos to anything.Β  I've never 
>> heard anyone before you say that this escaped evidence.Β  Just like you 
>> engage your mind to wish the gallows away, you wish my instructions 
>> and writings to be more complex or circuitous than they are.Β  You will 
>> look at a sentence 'I AM NORMAL' on the page and you will say, "what 
>> does this mean?"Β  I deal with this on a daily basis.Β  The common 
>> thread is you don't like what I said and are trying to dismiss it 
>> without addressing the content.
> 
> is this about Cill Barson


I'm telling Wrangler he's the pot calling the kettle black.  Where is 
this discipline to not grasp out for random off-color objects in his 
arguments?  I'm not really interested in discussing the 'gallows.' 
There were scores of other happenings that went on.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#653349 — Re: Bill Carson

FromDoc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth>
Date2025-01-07 23:24 +0000
SubjectRe: Bill Carson
Message-ID<KIifP.546149$0O61.307026@fx15.iad>
In reply to#653322
NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Tue, 7 Jan 2025 11:19:20 -0600, Peter Steele
wrote:

> % wrote:
>> Peter Steele wrote:
>>> Tard Wrangler wrote:
>>>> Once upon a time, on or about Tue, 07 Jan 2025 14:03:16 GMT, Doc
>>>> Hammerslack allegedly stated the following, and is solely responsible
>>>> for its content:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> F00P!
>>>> F00P!NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 20:31:32 -0800,
>>>> Tard F00P!Wrangler wrote:
>>>> F00P!
>>>> F00P!> Once upon a time, on or about Tue, 07 Jan 2025 02:49:41 GMT,
>>>> Doc F00P!> Hammerslack allegedly stated the following, and is solely
>>>> responsible F00P!> for its content:
>>>> F00P!>
>>>> F00P!>
>>>> F00P!> F00P!
>>>> F00P!> F00P!NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 15:33:06
>>>> -0600, Peter F00P!> Steele F00P!wrote:
>>>> F00P!> F00P!
>>>> F00P!> F00P!> Tard Wrangler wrote:
>>>> F00P!> F00P!>> Once upon a time, on or about Mon, 06 Jan 2025
>>>> 19:14:47 +0000,
>>>> F00P!> F00P!>> ??????????Jen?????????? Dershmender
>>>> ???????????????????? F00P!> allegedly F00P!>> stated the following,
>>>> and is solely responsible for F00P!> its content: F00P!>>
>>>> F00P!> F00P!>>
>>>> F00P!> F00P!>>
>>>> F00P!>
>>>> F00P!<https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-video-shows-
capitol-
>>>> F00P!>
>>>> F00P!mob-calling-for-the-death-of-the-vice-president-plaskett-says>
>>>> F00P!> F00P!>> F00P!
>>>> F00P!> F00P!>>
>>>> F00P!> F00P!>> WHO "setup the makeshift gallows"?Β  Oh... "the MOB"
>>>> did?Β  And F00P!> after all F00P!>> this bullshit, we can't even name
>>>> that person? F00P!> There's only one F00P!>> explanation for that,
>>>> and Occam says it was a F00P!> paid FBI informant F00P!>> straight
>>>> outta Central Casting.Β  Fool!
>>>> F00P!> F00P!>>
>>>> F00P!> F00P!>>
>>>> F00P!> F00P!> I'm afraid there is an equally likely possibility, BY
>>>> OCCAM's F00P!> RAZOR that F00P!> the Erector was covered by the same
>>>> policy that F00P!> resulted in no collusion F00P!> and no rape.Β  I
>>>> watched them cover up F00P!> the Russian connection gradually F00P!>
>>>> as time went on and less and F00P!> less people spoke of it until the
>>>> F00P!> investigation.Β  I believe it's F00P!> there except it was
>>>> adequately covered up F00P!> to meet the rigid F00P!> statutes of not
>>>> guilty of what you were most afraid F00P!> of. I'd F00P!> prefer to
>>>> talk about that, the collusion.Β  Unfortunately,
>>>> F00P!> that's F00P!> not one of the games you are interested in
>>>> because I might pry F00P!>
>>>> F00P!> something loose.Β  The name the Erector is going under is
>>>> Carson.Β  Bill F00P!> F00P!> Carson.
>>>> F00P!> F00P!
>>>> F00P!> F00P!Spoiler:
>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
>>>> F00P!> F00P!Turns out, he was buried in the grave next to Bill
>>>> Carson's. F00P!>
>>>> F00P!> WTF is Steel Peter even babbling about now, and who is this
>>>> "Erector"
>>>> F00P!> guy?Β  This is why I don't follow that dood, he doesn't even
>>>> make scents!
>>>> F00P!
>>>> F00P!He's talking about the identity of the person(s) who erected
>>>> F00P!the gallows.
>>>> F00P!
>>>> F00P!You know, the thing you've been harping on about incessantly.
>>>> F00P!
>>>> F00P!His cultural reference was a plot point for _The Good, The Bad,
>>>> F00P!and The Ugly_ -- I guess you missed that detail when you saw
>>>> F00P!the movie, assuming you've seen it.Β  (It's pretty good, you
>>>> F00P!should watch it if you haven't.)
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, I Giggled that yesterday, then filed it under non sequiturs.Β 
>>>> If we could get back to the point I've been futilely attempting to
>>>> drive home... so far unsuccessfully, IF that Pelosified version of
>>>> the January 6th story was even half of what a couple of you on the
>>>> other side of the isle are trying to turn it into, how could someone
>>>> parade around the grounds toting an "erected" gallows, a thousand
>>>> people get arrested, and yet we STILL have no clue who built,
>>>> constructed, or "erected" said gallows?Β  In fact, where is the
>>>> gallows assembly today? Is it collecting dust in some hidden corner
>>>> of an "evidence" locker somewhere?Β  The entire nexus to the dubious
>>>> claim that an unruly and impromptu mob was in fact, "murderous,"
>>>> rests on a prop that I must conclude at this point, was supplied by
>>>> the FBI's prop department, and then quickly vanished, never to be
>>>> seen or heard from again.Β  Can either of you address this point
>>>> without dragging Clint Eastwood or any other obscure misdirections
>>>> into that question?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Your argument about a supposedly missing tool that the crowd of
>>> rioters brought with them is not very apropos to anything.Β  I've never
>>> heard anyone before you say that this escaped evidence.Β  Just like you
>>> engage your mind to wish the gallows away, you wish my instructions
>>> and writings to be more complex or circuitous than they are.Β  You will
>>> look at a sentence 'I AM NORMAL' on the page and you will say, "what
>>> does this mean?"Β  I deal with this on a daily basis.Β  The common
>>> thread is you don't like what I said and are trying to dismiss it
>>> without addressing the content.
>> 
>> is this about Cill Barson
> 
> 
> I'm telling Wrangler he's the pot calling the kettle black.  Where is
> this discipline to not grasp out for random off-color objects in his
> arguments?  I'm not really interested in discussing the 'gallows.' There
> were scores of other happenings that went on.

It was just an example that I brought up, which he's glommed onto.

I'm going to call this one "common knowledge", since a quick Google
brings up this:

https://cha.house.gov/2024/2/chairman-barry-loudermilk-releases-new-information-in-the-january-6-2021-gallows-investigation

This, coupled with TW's "Bill Carson" debacle, lead me to
believe he's getting old in his senile age.

And as a sufferer of cultural illiteracy myself, I can sympathize.

-- 
Doc Hammerslack

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#653358 — Re: Bill Carson

FromTard Wrangler <youknowit@alphamale.corn>
Date2025-01-07 20:21 -0800
SubjectRe: Bill Carson
Message-ID<MPG.41e79d378dde4a9c989cc5@usnews.blocknews.net>
In reply to#653349
Once upon a time, on or about Tue, 07 Jan 2025 23:24:26 GMT, Doc 
Hammerslack allegedly stated the following, and is solely responsible 
for its content: 


F00P!
F00P!NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Tue, 7 Jan 2025 11:19:20 -0600, Peter Steele
F00P!wrote:
F00P!
F00P!> % wrote:
F00P!>> Peter Steele wrote:
F00P!>>> Tard Wrangler wrote:
F00P!>>>> Once upon a time, on or about Tue, 07 Jan 2025 14:03:16 GMT, Doc
F00P!>>>> Hammerslack allegedly stated the following, and is solely responsible
F00P!>>>> for its content:
F00P!>>>>
F00P!>>>>
F00P!>>>> F00P!
F00P!>>>> F00P!NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 20:31:32 -0800,
F00P!>>>> Tard F00P!Wrangler wrote:
F00P!>>>> F00P!
F00P!>>>> F00P!> Once upon a time, on or about Tue, 07 Jan 2025 02:49:41 GMT,
F00P!>>>> Doc F00P!> Hammerslack allegedly stated the following, and is solely
F00P!>>>> responsible F00P!> for its content:
F00P!>>>> F00P!>
F00P!>>>> F00P!>
F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!
F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 15:33:06
F00P!>>>> -0600, Peter F00P!> Steele F00P!wrote:
F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!
F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!> Tard Wrangler wrote:
F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!>> Once upon a time, on or about Mon, 06 Jan 2025
F00P!>>>> 19:14:47 +0000,
F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!>> ??????????Jen?????????? Dershmender
F00P!>>>> ???????????????????? F00P!> allegedly F00P!>> stated the following,
F00P!>>>> and is solely responsible for F00P!> its content: F00P!>>
F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!>>
F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!>>
F00P!>>>> F00P!>
F00P!>>>> F00P!<https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-video-shows-
F00P!capitol-
F00P!>>>> F00P!>
F00P!>>>> F00P!mob-calling-for-the-death-of-the-vice-president-plaskett-says>
F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!>> F00P!
F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!>>
F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!>> WHO "setup the makeshift gallows"?Β  Oh... "the MOB"
F00P!>>>> did?Β  And F00P!> after all F00P!>> this bullshit, we can't even name
F00P!>>>> that person? F00P!> There's only one F00P!>> explanation for that,
F00P!>>>> and Occam says it was a F00P!> paid FBI informant F00P!>> straight
F00P!>>>> outta Central Casting.Β  Fool!
F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!>>
F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!>>
F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!> I'm afraid there is an equally likely possibility, BY
F00P!>>>> OCCAM's F00P!> RAZOR that F00P!> the Erector was covered by the same
F00P!>>>> policy that F00P!> resulted in no collusion F00P!> and no rape.Β  I
F00P!>>>> watched them cover up F00P!> the Russian connection gradually F00P!>
F00P!>>>> as time went on and less and F00P!> less people spoke of it until the
F00P!>>>> F00P!> investigation.Β  I believe it's F00P!> there except it was
F00P!>>>> adequately covered up F00P!> to meet the rigid F00P!> statutes of not
F00P!>>>> guilty of what you were most afraid F00P!> of. I'd F00P!> prefer to
F00P!>>>> talk about that, the collusion.Β  Unfortunately,
F00P!>>>> F00P!> that's F00P!> not one of the games you are interested in
F00P!>>>> because I might pry F00P!>
F00P!>>>> F00P!> something loose.Β  The name the Erector is going under is
F00P!>>>> Carson.Β  Bill F00P!> F00P!> Carson.
F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!
F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!Spoiler:
F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!Turns out, he was buried in the grave next to Bill
F00P!>>>> Carson's. F00P!>
F00P!>>>> F00P!> WTF is Steel Peter even babbling about now, and who is this
F00P!>>>> "Erector"
F00P!>>>> F00P!> guy?Β  This is why I don't follow that dood, he doesn't even
F00P!>>>> make scents!
F00P!>>>> F00P!
F00P!>>>> F00P!He's talking about the identity of the person(s) who erected
F00P!>>>> F00P!the gallows.
F00P!>>>> F00P!
F00P!>>>> F00P!You know, the thing you've been harping on about incessantly.
F00P!>>>> F00P!
F00P!>>>> F00P!His cultural reference was a plot point for _The Good, The Bad,
F00P!>>>> F00P!and The Ugly_ -- I guess you missed that detail when you saw
F00P!>>>> F00P!the movie, assuming you've seen it.Β  (It's pretty good, you
F00P!>>>> F00P!should watch it if you haven't.)
F00P!>>>>
F00P!>>>> Yeah, I Giggled that yesterday, then filed it under non sequiturs.Β 
F00P!>>>> If we could get back to the point I've been futilely attempting to
F00P!>>>> drive home... so far unsuccessfully, IF that Pelosified version of
F00P!>>>> the January 6th story was even half of what a couple of you on the
F00P!>>>> other side of the isle are trying to turn it into, how could someone
F00P!>>>> parade around the grounds toting an "erected" gallows, a thousand
F00P!>>>> people get arrested, and yet we STILL have no clue who built,
F00P!>>>> constructed, or "erected" said gallows?Β  In fact, where is the
F00P!>>>> gallows assembly today? Is it collecting dust in some hidden corner
F00P!>>>> of an "evidence" locker somewhere?Β  The entire nexus to the dubious
F00P!>>>> claim that an unruly and impromptu mob was in fact, "murderous,"
F00P!>>>> rests on a prop that I must conclude at this point, was supplied by
F00P!>>>> the FBI's prop department, and then quickly vanished, never to be
F00P!>>>> seen or heard from again.Β  Can either of you address this point
F00P!>>>> without dragging Clint Eastwood or any other obscure misdirections
F00P!>>>> into that question?
F00P!>>>>
F00P!>>>>
F00P!>>>
F00P!>>> Your argument about a supposedly missing tool that the crowd of
F00P!>>> rioters brought with them is not very apropos to anything.Β  I've never
F00P!>>> heard anyone before you say that this escaped evidence.Β  Just like you
F00P!>>> engage your mind to wish the gallows away, you wish my instructions
F00P!>>> and writings to be more complex or circuitous than they are.Β  You will
F00P!>>> look at a sentence 'I AM NORMAL' on the page and you will say, "what
F00P!>>> does this mean?"Β  I deal with this on a daily basis.Β  The common
F00P!>>> thread is you don't like what I said and are trying to dismiss it
F00P!>>> without addressing the content.
F00P!>> 
F00P!>> is this about Cill Barson
F00P!> 
F00P!> 
F00P!> I'm telling Wrangler he's the pot calling the kettle black.  Where is
F00P!> this discipline to not grasp out for random off-color objects in his
F00P!> arguments?  I'm not really interested in discussing the 'gallows.' There
F00P!> were scores of other happenings that went on.
F00P!
F00P!It was just an example that I brought up, which he's glommed onto.
F00P!
F00P!I'm going to call this one "common knowledge", since a quick Google
F00P!brings up this:
F00P!
F00P!https://cha.house.gov/2024/2/chairman-barry-loudermilk-releases-new-information-in-the-january-6-2021-gallows-investigation
F00P!
F00P!This, coupled with TW's "Bill Carson" debacle, lead me to
F00P!believe he's getting old in his senile age.
F00P!
F00P!And as a sufferer of cultural illiteracy myself, I can sympathize.


(watch this...)

You're free to sound blissfully ignorant and "call it" whatever you 
want, but you should have thought this through before you hit "send," 
because your official link only strengthens my point:

"Despite the infamy of this image, the individuals who constructed the 
gallows have never been identified."

But wait... there's more!

"It is inconceivable that a gallows could be constructed on U.S. 
Capitol property and left up all day," said Chairman Loudermilk. 
"These men arrived early in the morning, several hours before the 
rally even started or anyone had gathered, to construct the gallows 
platform, yet this structure was allowed to stay intact for all to 
see. These actions raise more serious and troubling questions. Why 
didn't the U.S. Capitol Police take down the gallows once it was seen 
on Capitol property, and why have the individuals never been 
identified?"

Yes, it IS inconceivable... UNLESS THOSE INVOLVED HAD CARTE BLANCHE 
FROM "SOMEONE" TO DO SO!  Like... I don't know... maybe FBI stooges?  
It's either that, or the FBI and Capitol Police are so severely 
feckless that all that activity went on unnoticed and unhampered on 
the supposedly "secure" grounds of the Capitol, ALL-FUCKING-DAY-LONG!

Oh, and as for your other assertion of my "Bill Carson" debacle, are 
you really that desperate to try to make that construct out of dog 
shit?  I told you I had Googled that reference, was aware of its 
origin, but failed to see the relevance of anything so obscure to my 
point about the gallows, which you just willingly helped me drive 
home.  Do you still feel the need to drive any more nails into that 
coffin? 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#653361 — Re: Bill Carson

FromPeter Steele <snakesbloodpussycat@yahoo.com>
Date2025-01-07 22:35 -0600
SubjectRe: Bill Carson
Message-ID<lu6dkbF843lU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#653358
Tard Wrangler wrote:
> Once upon a time, on or about Tue, 07 Jan 2025 23:24:26 GMT, Doc
> Hammerslack allegedly stated the following, and is solely responsible
> for its content:
> 
> 
> F00P!
> F00P!NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Tue, 7 Jan 2025 11:19:20 -0600, Peter Steele
> F00P!wrote:
> F00P!
> F00P!> % wrote:
> F00P!>> Peter Steele wrote:
> F00P!>>> Tard Wrangler wrote:
> F00P!>>>> Once upon a time, on or about Tue, 07 Jan 2025 14:03:16 GMT, Doc
> F00P!>>>> Hammerslack allegedly stated the following, and is solely responsible
> F00P!>>>> for its content:
> F00P!>>>>
> F00P!>>>>
> F00P!>>>> F00P!
> F00P!>>>> F00P!NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 20:31:32 -0800,
> F00P!>>>> Tard F00P!Wrangler wrote:
> F00P!>>>> F00P!
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> Once upon a time, on or about Tue, 07 Jan 2025 02:49:41 GMT,
> F00P!>>>> Doc F00P!> Hammerslack allegedly stated the following, and is solely
> F00P!>>>> responsible F00P!> for its content:
> F00P!>>>> F00P!>
> F00P!>>>> F00P!>
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 15:33:06
> F00P!>>>> -0600, Peter F00P!> Steele F00P!wrote:
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!> Tard Wrangler wrote:
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!>> Once upon a time, on or about Mon, 06 Jan 2025
> F00P!>>>> 19:14:47 +0000,
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!>> ??????????Jen?????????? Dershmender
> F00P!>>>> ???????????????????? F00P!> allegedly F00P!>> stated the following,
> F00P!>>>> and is solely responsible for F00P!> its content: F00P!>>
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!>>
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!>>
> F00P!>>>> F00P!>
> F00P!>>>> F00P!<https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-video-shows-
> F00P!capitol-
> F00P!>>>> F00P!>
> F00P!>>>> F00P!mob-calling-for-the-death-of-the-vice-president-plaskett-says>
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!>> F00P!
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!>>
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!>> WHO "setup the makeshift gallows"?Β  Oh... "the MOB"
> F00P!>>>> did?Β  And F00P!> after all F00P!>> this bullshit, we can't even name
> F00P!>>>> that person? F00P!> There's only one F00P!>> explanation for that,
> F00P!>>>> and Occam says it was a F00P!> paid FBI informant F00P!>> straight
> F00P!>>>> outta Central Casting.Β  Fool!
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!>>
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!>>
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!> I'm afraid there is an equally likely possibility, BY
> F00P!>>>> OCCAM's F00P!> RAZOR that F00P!> the Erector was covered by the same
> F00P!>>>> policy that F00P!> resulted in no collusion F00P!> and no rape.Β  I
> F00P!>>>> watched them cover up F00P!> the Russian connection gradually F00P!>
> F00P!>>>> as time went on and less and F00P!> less people spoke of it until the
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> investigation.Β  I believe it's F00P!> there except it was
> F00P!>>>> adequately covered up F00P!> to meet the rigid F00P!> statutes of not
> F00P!>>>> guilty of what you were most afraid F00P!> of. I'd F00P!> prefer to
> F00P!>>>> talk about that, the collusion.Β  Unfortunately,
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> that's F00P!> not one of the games you are interested in
> F00P!>>>> because I might pry F00P!>
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> something loose.Β  The name the Erector is going under is
> F00P!>>>> Carson.Β  Bill F00P!> F00P!> Carson.
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!Spoiler:
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!.
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> F00P!Turns out, he was buried in the grave next to Bill
> F00P!>>>> Carson's. F00P!>
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> WTF is Steel Peter even babbling about now, and who is this
> F00P!>>>> "Erector"
> F00P!>>>> F00P!> guy?Β  This is why I don't follow that dood, he doesn't even
> F00P!>>>> make scents!
> F00P!>>>> F00P!
> F00P!>>>> F00P!He's talking about the identity of the person(s) who erected
> F00P!>>>> F00P!the gallows.
> F00P!>>>> F00P!
> F00P!>>>> F00P!You know, the thing you've been harping on about incessantly.
> F00P!>>>> F00P!
> F00P!>>>> F00P!His cultural reference was a plot point for _The Good, The Bad,
> F00P!>>>> F00P!and The Ugly_ -- I guess you missed that detail when you saw
> F00P!>>>> F00P!the movie, assuming you've seen it.Β  (It's pretty good, you
> F00P!>>>> F00P!should watch it if you haven't.)
> F00P!>>>>
> F00P!>>>> Yeah, I Giggled that yesterday, then filed it under non sequiturs.
> F00P!>>>> If we could get back to the point I've been futilely attempting to
> F00P!>>>> drive home... so far unsuccessfully, IF that Pelosified version of
> F00P!>>>> the January 6th story was even half of what a couple of you on the
> F00P!>>>> other side of the isle are trying to turn it into, how could someone
> F00P!>>>> parade around the grounds toting an "erected" gallows, a thousand
> F00P!>>>> people get arrested, and yet we STILL have no clue who built,
> F00P!>>>> constructed, or "erected" said gallows?Β  In fact, where is the
> F00P!>>>> gallows assembly today? Is it collecting dust in some hidden corner
> F00P!>>>> of an "evidence" locker somewhere?Β  The entire nexus to the dubious
> F00P!>>>> claim that an unruly and impromptu mob was in fact, "murderous,"
> F00P!>>>> rests on a prop that I must conclude at this point, was supplied by
> F00P!>>>> the FBI's prop department, and then quickly vanished, never to be
> F00P!>>>> seen or heard from again.Β  Can either of you address this point
> F00P!>>>> without dragging Clint Eastwood or any other obscure misdirections
> F00P!>>>> into that question?
> F00P!>>>>
> F00P!>>>>
> F00P!>>>
> F00P!>>> Your argument about a supposedly missing tool that the crowd of
> F00P!>>> rioters brought with them is not very apropos to anything.Β  I've never
> F00P!>>> heard anyone before you say that this escaped evidence.Β  Just like you
> F00P!>>> engage your mind to wish the gallows away, you wish my instructions
> F00P!>>> and writings to be more complex or circuitous than they are.Β  You will
> F00P!>>> look at a sentence 'I AM NORMAL' on the page and you will say, "what
> F00P!>>> does this mean?"Β  I deal with this on a daily basis.Β  The common
> F00P!>>> thread is you don't like what I said and are trying to dismiss it
> F00P!>>> without addressing the content.
> F00P!>>
> F00P!>> is this about Cill Barson
> F00P!>
> F00P!>
> F00P!> I'm telling Wrangler he's the pot calling the kettle black.  Where is
> F00P!> this discipline to not grasp out for random off-color objects in his
> F00P!> arguments?  I'm not really interested in discussing the 'gallows.' There
> F00P!> were scores of other happenings that went on.
> F00P!
> F00P!It was just an example that I brought up, which he's glommed onto.
> F00P!
> F00P!I'm going to call this one "common knowledge", since a quick Google
> F00P!brings up this:
> F00P!
> F00P!https://cha.house.gov/2024/2/chairman-barry-loudermilk-releases-new-information-in-the-january-6-2021-gallows-investigation
> F00P!
> F00P!This, coupled with TW's "Bill Carson" debacle, lead me to
> F00P!believe he's getting old in his senile age.
> F00P!
> F00P!And as a sufferer of cultural illiteracy myself, I can sympathize.
> 
> 
> (watch this...)
> 
> You're free to sound blissfully ignorant and "call it" whatever you
> want, but you should have thought this through before you hit "send,"
> because your official link only strengthens my point:
> 
> "Despite the infamy of this image, the individuals who constructed the
> gallows have never been identified."
> 
> But wait... there's more!
> 
> "It is inconceivable that a gallows could be constructed on U.S.
> Capitol property and left up all day," said Chairman Loudermilk.
> "These men arrived early in the morning, several hours before the
> rally even started or anyone had gathered, to construct the gallows
> platform, yet this structure was allowed to stay intact for all to
> see. These actions raise more serious and troubling questions. Why
> didn't the U.S. Capitol Police take down the gallows once it was seen
> on Capitol property, and why have the individuals never been
> identified?"
> 
> Yes, it IS inconceivable... UNLESS THOSE INVOLVED HAD CARTE BLANCHE
> FROM "SOMEONE" TO DO SO!  Like... I don't know... maybe FBI stooges?
> It's either that, or the FBI and Capitol Police are so severely
> feckless that all that activity went on unnoticed and unhampered on
> the supposedly "secure" grounds of the Capitol, ALL-FUCKING-DAY-LONG!
> 
> Oh, and as for your other assertion of my "Bill Carson" debacle, are
> you really that desperate to try to make that construct out of dog
> shit?  I told you I had Googled that reference, was aware of its
> origin, but failed to see the relevance of anything so obscure to my
> point about the gallows, which you just willingly helped me drive
> home.  Do you still feel the need to drive any more nails into that
> coffin?
> 


It's because next you are going to say that my argument had the same 
texture as "The Stuff." and that vanishing of a gallows signifies some 
Republican point.  You're just not very gracious, Tard.  I don't want to 
hate you forever because you can't treat me with a modicum of dignity 
and have me scrambling to defend myself meanwhile kicking me in the side 
all the way.  I'm not twenty yrs old, halfway through college.  I'm not 
your whipping boy and I have achievements which it is said that you do 
not.  I have value that you are smoothing over in your search to 
demonize me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#653387 — Re: Bill Carson

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2025-01-08 18:46 +0000
SubjectRe: Bill Carson
Message-ID<1r5uuju.jh0bpc1pkearxN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#653361
[ac only]

Peter Steele <snakesbloodpussycat@yahoo.com> wrote:

[...]

> I don't want to 
> hate you forever because you can't treat me with a modicum of dignity
> and have me scrambling to defend myself meanwhile kicking me in the side
> all the way.  I'm not twenty yrs old, halfway through college.  I'm not
> your whipping boy and I have achievements which it is said that you do
> not.  I have value that you are smoothing over in your search to 
> demonize me.
>

You're demonising yourself, no external agency is needed.

Top Tip, meant kindly:  just STFU and keep up with your meds.

-- 
^Ï^.    Sn!pe, PTB, FIBS         My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#653389 — Re: Bill Carson

From% <pursent100@gmail.com>
Date2025-01-08 11:50 -0700
SubjectRe: Bill Carson
Message-ID<ENicnVyiXvWNVOP6nZ2dnZfqn_oAAAAA@giganews.com>
In reply to#653387
Sn!pe wrote:
> [ac only]
> 
> Peter Steele <snakesbloodpussycat@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>> I don't want to
>> hate you forever because you can't treat me with a modicum of dignity
>> and have me scrambling to defend myself meanwhile kicking me in the side
>> all the way.  I'm not twenty yrs old, halfway through college.  I'm not
>> your whipping boy and I have achievements which it is said that you do
>> not.  I have value that you are smoothing over in your search to
>> demonize me.
>>
> 
> You're demonising yourself, no external agency is needed.
> 
> Top Tip, meant kindly:  just STFU and keep up with your meds.
> 
you and i have to bicker again

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#653396 — Re: Bill Carson

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2025-01-08 19:16 +0000
SubjectRe: Bill Carson
Message-ID<1r5uw70.9nqdii1cb8u2gN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#653389
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:

> you and i have to bicker again

You and whose army, Buster?

-- 
^Ï^.    Sn!pe, PTB, FIBS         My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#653398 — Re: Bill Carson

FromDoc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth>
Date2025-01-08 19:20 +0000
SubjectRe: Bill Carson
Message-ID<keAfP.422736$DPl.320493@fx13.iad>
In reply to#653396
NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 19:16:50 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:

> % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> you and i have to bicker again
> 
> You and whose army, Buster?

 From fortune(1):

(definitions)
%
Famous last words:
	(1) "Don't worry, I can handle it."
	(2) "You and what army?"
	(3) "If you were as smart as you think you are, you wouldn't be
	     a cop."
%

-- 
Doc Hammerslack

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#653402 — Re: Bill Carson

From% <pursent100@gmail.com>
Date2025-01-08 12:24 -0700
SubjectRe: Bill Carson
Message-ID<ENicnU6iXvV2TeP6nZ2dnZfqn_oAAAAA@giganews.com>
In reply to#653398
Doc Hammerslack wrote:
> NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 19:16:50 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:
> 
>> % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> you and i have to bicker again
>>
>> You and whose army, Buster?
> 
>   From fortune(1):
> 
> (definitions)
> %
> Famous last words:
> 	(1) "Don't worry, I can handle it."
> 	(2) "You and what army?"
> 	(3) "If you were as smart as you think you are, you wouldn't be
> 	     a cop."
> %
> 
i love it when i get a retard all spun out and chasing me

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#653427 — Re: Bill Carson

FromDoc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth>
Date2025-01-08 21:54 +0000
SubjectRe: Bill Carson
Message-ID<GuCfP.443328$DPl.370635@fx13.iad>
In reply to#653402
NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 12:24:05 -0700, % wrote:

> Doc Hammerslack wrote:
>> NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 19:16:50 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:
>> 
>>> % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> you and i have to bicker again
>>>
>>> You and whose army, Buster?
>> 
>>   From fortune(1):
>> 
>> (definitions)
>> %
>> Famous last words:
>> 	(1) "Don't worry, I can handle it."
>> 	(2) "You and what army?"
>> 	(3) "If you were as smart as you think you are, you wouldn't be
>> 	     a cop."
>> %
>> 
> i love it when i get a retard all spun out and chasing me

Nice non sequitur.

(The fortune(1) file format has nothing do do with you.)

-- 
Doc Hammerslack

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#653428 — Re: Bill Carson

From% <pursent100@gmail.com>
Date2025-01-08 15:01 -0700
SubjectRe: Bill Carson
Message-ID<i5ycnSqhY6dSaOP6nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#653427
Doc Hammerslack wrote:
> NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 12:24:05 -0700, % wrote:
> 
>> Doc Hammerslack wrote:
>>> NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 19:16:50 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:
>>>
>>>> % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> you and i have to bicker again
>>>>
>>>> You and whose army, Buster?
>>>
>>>    From fortune(1):
>>>
>>> (definitions)
>>> %
>>> Famous last words:
>>> 	(1) "Don't worry, I can handle it."
>>> 	(2) "You and what army?"
>>> 	(3) "If you were as smart as you think you are, you wouldn't be
>>> 	     a cop."
>>> %
>>>
>> i love it when i get a retard all spun out and chasing me
> 
> Nice non sequitur.
> 
> (The fortune(1) file format has nothing do do with you.)
> 

sequit the end of my knob gummy lips ,
i love it when i get a retard chasing me through usenet

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#653429 — Re: Bill Carson

FromPeter Steele <snakesbloodpussycat@yahoo.com>
Date2025-01-08 16:26 -0600
SubjectRe: Bill Carson
Message-ID<lu8ccaFhqn0U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#653428
% wrote:
> Doc Hammerslack wrote:
>> NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 12:24:05 -0700, % wrote:
>>
>>> Doc Hammerslack wrote:
>>>> NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 19:16:50 +0000, Sn!pe 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> you and i have to bicker again
>>>>>
>>>>> You and whose army, Buster?
>>>>
>>>> Β Β  From fortune(1):
>>>>
>>>> (definitions)
>>>> %
>>>> Famous last words:
>>>> Β Β Β Β (1) "Don't worry, I can handle it."
>>>> Β Β Β Β (2) "You and what army?"
>>>> Β Β Β Β (3) "If you were as smart as you think you are, you wouldn't be
>>>> Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β  a cop."
>>>> %
>>>>
>>> i love it when i get a retard all spun out and chasing me
>>
>> Nice non sequitur.
>>
>> (The fortune(1) file format has nothing do do with you.)
>>
> 
> sequit the end of my knob gummy lips ,
> i love it when i get a retard chasing me through usenet


I'm not chasing you I'm trying to give you a boot to the head.  Does it 
feel the same?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#653432 — Re: Bill Carson

From% <pursent100@gmail.com>
Date2025-01-08 15:53 -0700
SubjectRe: Bill Carson
Message-ID<JDGdneF6Lc5unOL6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#653429
Peter Steele wrote:
> % wrote:
>> Doc Hammerslack wrote:
>>> NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 12:24:05 -0700, % wrote:
>>>
>>>> Doc Hammerslack wrote:
>>>>> NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 19:16:50 +0000, Sn!pe 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> you and i have to bicker again
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You and whose army, Buster?
>>>>>
>>>>> Β Β  From fortune(1):
>>>>>
>>>>> (definitions)
>>>>> %
>>>>> Famous last words:
>>>>> Β Β Β Β (1) "Don't worry, I can handle it."
>>>>> Β Β Β Β (2) "You and what army?"
>>>>> Β Β Β Β (3) "If you were as smart as you think you are, you wouldn't be
>>>>> Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β  a cop."
>>>>> %
>>>>>
>>>> i love it when i get a retard all spun out and chasing me
>>>
>>> Nice non sequitur.
>>>
>>> (The fortune(1) file format has nothing do do with you.)
>>>
>>
>> sequit the end of my knob gummy lips ,
>> i love it when i get a retard chasing me through usenet
> 
> 
> I'm not chasing you I'm trying to give you a boot to the head.Β  Does it 
> feel the same?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#653433 — Re: Bill Carson

FromPeter Steele <snakesbloodpussycat@yahoo.com>
Date2025-01-08 16:55 -0600
SubjectRe: Bill Carson
Message-ID<lu8e3eFi2ifU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#653432
% wrote:
> Peter Steele wrote:
>> % wrote:
>>> Doc Hammerslack wrote:
>>>> NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 12:24:05 -0700, % wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Doc Hammerslack wrote:
>>>>>> NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 19:16:50 +0000, 
>>>>>> Sn!pe wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> you and i have to bicker again
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You and whose army, Buster?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Β Β  From fortune(1):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (definitions)
>>>>>> %
>>>>>> Famous last words:
>>>>>> Β Β Β Β (1) "Don't worry, I can handle it."
>>>>>> Β Β Β Β (2) "You and what army?"
>>>>>> Β Β Β Β (3) "If you were as smart as you think you are, you wouldn't be
>>>>>> Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β  a cop."
>>>>>> %
>>>>>>
>>>>> i love it when i get a retard all spun out and chasing me
>>>>
>>>> Nice non sequitur.
>>>>
>>>> (The fortune(1) file format has nothing do do with you.)
>>>>
>>>
>>> sequit the end of my knob gummy lips ,
>>> i love it when i get a retard chasing me through usenet
>>
>>
>> I'm not chasing you I'm trying to give you a boot to the head.Β  Does 
>> it feel the same?
> 


Come back here and face me!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#653434 — Re: Bill Carson

From% <pursent100@gmail.com>
Date2025-01-08 15:57 -0700
SubjectRe: Bill Carson
Message-ID<JDGdneN6Lc4jn-L6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#653433
Peter Steele wrote:
> % wrote:
>> Peter Steele wrote:
>>> % wrote:
>>>> Doc Hammerslack wrote:
>>>>> NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 12:24:05 -0700, % wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Doc Hammerslack wrote:
>>>>>>> NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 19:16:50 +0000, 
>>>>>>> Sn!pe wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> you and i have to bicker again
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You and whose army, Buster?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Β Β  From fortune(1):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (definitions)
>>>>>>> %
>>>>>>> Famous last words:
>>>>>>> Β Β Β Β (1) "Don't worry, I can handle it."
>>>>>>> Β Β Β Β (2) "You and what army?"
>>>>>>> Β Β Β Β (3) "If you were as smart as you think you are, you wouldn't be
>>>>>>> Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β  a cop."
>>>>>>> %
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> i love it when i get a retard all spun out and chasing me
>>>>>
>>>>> Nice non sequitur.
>>>>>
>>>>> (The fortune(1) file format has nothing do do with you.)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> sequit the end of my knob gummy lips ,
>>>> i love it when i get a retard chasing me through usenet
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not chasing you I'm trying to give you a boot to the head.Β  Does 
>>> it feel the same?
>>
> 
> 
> Come back here and face me!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#653484 — Re: Bill Carson

FromDoc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth>
Date2025-01-09 13:08 +0000
SubjectRe: Bill Carson
Message-ID<dTPfP.28727$q1_9.7407@fx03.iad>
In reply to#653428
NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 15:01:03 -0700, % wrote:

> Doc Hammerslack wrote:
>> NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 12:24:05 -0700, % wrote:
>> 
>>> Doc Hammerslack wrote:
>>>> NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 19:16:50 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> you and i have to bicker again
>>>>>
>>>>> You and whose army, Buster?
>>>>
>>>>    From fortune(1):
>>>>
>>>> (definitions)
>>>> %
>>>> Famous last words:
>>>> 	(1) "Don't worry, I can handle it."
>>>> 	(2) "You and what army?"
>>>> 	(3) "If you were as smart as you think you are, you wouldn't be
>>>> 	     a cop."
>>>> %
>>>>
>>> i love it when i get a retard all spun out and chasing me
>> 
>> Nice non sequitur.
>> 
>> (The fortune(1) file format has nothing do do with you.)
>> 
> 
> sequit the end of my knob gummy lips ,
> i love it when i get a retard chasing me through usenet

Except, you replied to me.

I'm flattered.

-- 
Doc Hammerslack

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#653485 — Re: Bill Carson

From% <pursent100@gmail.com>
Date2025-01-09 06:11 -0700
SubjectRe: Bill Carson
Message-ID<Uu6dnYZNRryVVuL6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#653484
Doc Hammerslack wrote:
> NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 15:01:03 -0700, % wrote:
> 
>> Doc Hammerslack wrote:
>>> NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 12:24:05 -0700, % wrote:
>>>
>>>> Doc Hammerslack wrote:
>>>>> NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 19:16:50 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> you and i have to bicker again
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You and whose army, Buster?
>>>>>
>>>>>     From fortune(1):
>>>>>
>>>>> (definitions)
>>>>> %
>>>>> Famous last words:
>>>>> 	(1) "Don't worry, I can handle it."
>>>>> 	(2) "You and what army?"
>>>>> 	(3) "If you were as smart as you think you are, you wouldn't be
>>>>> 	     a cop."
>>>>> %
>>>>>
>>>> i love it when i get a retard all spun out and chasing me
>>>
>>> Nice non sequitur.
>>>
>>> (The fortune(1) file format has nothing do do with you.)
>>>
>>
>> sequit the end of my knob gummy lips ,
>> i love it when i get a retard chasing me through usenet
> 
> Except, you replied to me.
> 
> I'm flattered.
> 
i have never replied to you ,
i just spoke in the same place

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#653486 — Re: Bill Carson

FromDoc Hammerslack <dochammerslack@creon.earth>
Date2025-01-09 13:13 +0000
SubjectRe: Bill Carson
Message-ID<QXPfP.612568$DYF8.312595@fx14.iad>
In reply to#653485
NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Thu, 9 Jan 2025 06:11:35 -0700, % wrote:

> Doc Hammerslack wrote:
>> NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 15:01:03 -0700, % wrote:
>> 
>>> Doc Hammerslack wrote:
>>>> NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 12:24:05 -0700, % wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Doc Hammerslack wrote:
>>>>>> NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 19:16:50 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> you and i have to bicker again
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You and whose army, Buster?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     From fortune(1):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (definitions)
>>>>>> %
>>>>>> Famous last words:
>>>>>> 	(1) "Don't worry, I can handle it."
>>>>>> 	(2) "You and what army?"
>>>>>> 	(3) "If you were as smart as you think you are, you wouldn't be
>>>>>> 	     a cop."
>>>>>> %
>>>>>>
>>>>> i love it when i get a retard all spun out and chasing me
>>>>
>>>> Nice non sequitur.
>>>>
>>>> (The fortune(1) file format has nothing do do with you.)
>>>>
>>>
>>> sequit the end of my knob gummy lips ,
>>> i love it when i get a retard chasing me through usenet
>> 
>> Except, you replied to me.
>> 
>> I'm flattered.
>> 
> i have never replied to you ,
> i just spoke in the same place

Oh, so this must not be for me then.

Thanks for clearing that up!

-- 
Doc Hammerslack

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#653487 — Re: Bill Carson

From% <pursent100@gmail.com>
Date2025-01-09 07:17 -0700
SubjectRe: Bill Carson
Message-ID<XjCdnavu6tfnR-L6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#653486
Doc Hammerslack wrote:
> NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Thu, 9 Jan 2025 06:11:35 -0700, % wrote:
> 
>> Doc Hammerslack wrote:
>>> NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 15:01:03 -0700, % wrote:
>>>
>>>> Doc Hammerslack wrote:
>>>>> NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 12:24:05 -0700, % wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Doc Hammerslack wrote:
>>>>>>> NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 19:16:50 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> you and i have to bicker again
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You and whose army, Buster?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      From fortune(1):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (definitions)
>>>>>>> %
>>>>>>> Famous last words:
>>>>>>> 	(1) "Don't worry, I can handle it."
>>>>>>> 	(2) "You and what army?"
>>>>>>> 	(3) "If you were as smart as you think you are, you wouldn't be
>>>>>>> 	     a cop."
>>>>>>> %
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> i love it when i get a retard all spun out and chasing me
>>>>>
>>>>> Nice non sequitur.
>>>>>
>>>>> (The fortune(1) file format has nothing do do with you.)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> sequit the end of my knob gummy lips ,
>>>> i love it when i get a retard chasing me through usenet
>>>
>>> Except, you replied to me.
>>>
>>> I'm flattered.
>>>
>> i have never replied to you ,
>> i just spoke in the same place
> 
> Oh, so this must not be for me then.
> 
> Thanks for clearing that up!
> 
its for those who read what i say about you

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate


csiph-web