Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #432319 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2020-11-06 17:47 +0000 |
| Last post | 2020-11-10 08:24 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 144 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
A feminist win Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2020-11-06 17:47 +0000
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-06 10:59 -0700
Re: A feminist win Skeeter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-06 11:02 -0700
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-06 11:09 -0700
Re: A feminist win Skeeter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-06 11:12 -0700
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-06 11:20 -0700
Re: A feminist win The Right And The Powerful <power2019@gmail.com> - 2020-11-06 18:44 -0600
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-06 17:59 -0700
Re: A feminist win The Right And The Powerful <power2019@gmail.com> - 2020-11-07 13:03 -0600
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-06 12:07 -0800
Re: A feminist win Skeeter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-06 16:30 -0700
Re: A feminist win Raven <raven@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-06 18:38 -0500
Re: A feminist win Skeeter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-06 17:03 -0700
Re: A feminist win Raven <raven@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-06 19:16 -0500
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-06 16:46 -0700
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-07 01:18 -0800
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-07 01:17 -0800
Re: A feminist win Skeeter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-07 07:44 -0700
Re: A feminist win snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2020-11-07 14:58 +0000
Re: A feminist win Raven <raven@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-07 11:28 -0500
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-07 11:18 -0700
Re: A feminist win Raven <raven@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-07 13:29 -0500
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-07 11:38 -0700
Re: A feminist win Raven <raven@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-07 13:46 -0500
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-07 11:48 -0700
Re: A feminist win Raven <raven@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-07 13:49 -0500
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-07 11:55 -0700
Re: A feminist win Raven <raven@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-07 13:56 -0500
Re: A feminist win kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2020-11-06 22:12 -0500
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-07 01:09 -0800
Re: A feminist win kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2020-11-08 22:13 -0500
Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-09 03:16 +0000
Re: A feminist win kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2020-11-08 22:23 -0500
De-radicalization rehab clinics (was Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-09 03:47 +0000
Re: De-radicalization rehab clinics (was Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-09 20:41 +0000
Re: De-radicalization rehab clinics (was Re: A feminist win Skeeter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-10 08:22 -0700
Re: De-radicalization rehab clinics (was Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-10 12:49 -0800
Re: De-radicalization rehab clinics (was Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-10 14:06 -0700
Re: De-radicalization rehab clinics (was Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-10 23:42 +0000
Re: De-radicalization rehab clinics (was Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-10 22:27 -0800
Re: De-radicalization rehab clinics (was Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-11 20:19 +0000
Re: De-radicalization rehab clinics (was Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 13:47 -0800
Re: De-radicalization rehab clinics tripeco.2@parody.personae.invalid (Tr!pe) - 2020-11-11 22:06 +0000
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-08 23:39 -0800
Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-09 20:42 +0000
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-09 15:20 -0800
Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-10 01:08 +0000
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-09 18:11 -0700
qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-10 01:39 +0000
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2020-11-09 17:47 -0800
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-10 01:53 +0000
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2020-11-09 17:57 -0800
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-09 19:16 -0700
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-10 02:41 +0000
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-09 19:49 -0700
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2020-11-09 19:05 -0800
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-10 03:14 +0000
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-09 22:06 -0800
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2020-11-09 22:09 -0800
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-09 22:37 -0800
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Skeeter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-10 09:43 -0700
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-09 19:15 -0700
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-09 22:05 -0800
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-10 23:46 +0000
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-11 00:36 +0000
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-10 17:44 -0700
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Skeeter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-10 19:39 -0700
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-11 03:15 +0000
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2020-11-09 23:26 -0500
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-09 22:09 -0800
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-10 23:45 +0000
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2020-11-10 22:35 -0500
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Skeeter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-10 09:42 -0700
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-10 12:53 -0800
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-10 23:47 +0000
Re: A feminist win kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2020-11-09 23:21 -0500
Re: A feminist win Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2020-11-09 20:26 -0800
Re: A feminist win kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2020-11-09 23:39 -0500
Re: A feminist win Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2020-11-09 21:25 -0800
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-09 21:49 -0800
Re: A feminist win Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2020-11-09 21:56 -0800
Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-10 23:49 +0000
Re: A feminist win Skeeter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-10 12:26 -0700
Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-11 06:15 +0000
Re: A feminist win Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2020-11-11 00:34 -0600
Re: A feminist win "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> - 2020-11-11 12:53 -0600
Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-11 19:22 +0000
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 12:30 -0700
Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-11 19:35 +0000
Re: A feminist win "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> - 2020-11-11 15:39 -0600
Re: A feminist win Skeeter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-11 12:12 -0700
Re: โ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โ A feminist win โ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โ (Was: A feminist win) Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2020-11-11 13:20 -0600
Re: โ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โ A feminist win โ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โ (Was: A feminist win) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 12:23 -0700
Re: โ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โ A feminist win โ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โ (Was: A feminist win) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-11 19:25 +0000
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-09 21:27 -0700
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-09 21:58 -0800
Re: A feminist win Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2020-11-09 22:05 -0800
Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-10 23:50 +0000
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-10 22:29 -0800
Re: A feminist win Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2020-11-11 17:28 +0000
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 11:15 -0700
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 11:39 -0800
Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-11 20:35 +0000
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 13:42 -0800
Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-11 23:17 +0000
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 17:42 -0800
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 19:21 -0700
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 19:22 -0800
Re: A feminist win kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2020-11-11 22:24 -0500
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 19:32 -0800
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 20:36 -0700
Re: A feminist win kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2020-11-11 23:23 -0500
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 21:27 -0800
Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-12 20:08 +0000
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-12 13:29 -0800
Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-12 22:00 +0000
Re: A feminist win Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2020-11-12 17:03 -0600
Re: A feminist win Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2020-11-12 15:27 -0800
Re: A feminist win snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2020-11-12 23:32 +0000
Re: A feminist win kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2020-11-12 22:57 -0500
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-12 21:41 -0700
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-12 17:06 -0800
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 20:31 -0700
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 21:25 -0800
Re: A feminist win kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2020-11-11 22:06 -0500
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 19:23 -0800
Re: A feminist win kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2020-11-11 22:27 -0500
Re: A feminist win Paul - 2020-11-11 20:32 -0700
Re: A feminist win Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2020-11-11 19:37 -0800
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 21:26 -0800
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 21:25 -0800
Re: A feminist win "Scout" <me4guns@centurylink.removeme.this2.net> - 2020-11-12 07:45 -0500
Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-12 20:10 +0000
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-12 13:18 -0700
Re: A feminist win "Scout" <me4guns@centurylink.removeme.this2.net> - 2020-11-13 07:21 -0500
Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-13 13:32 +0000
Re: A feminist win "Scout" <me4guns@centurylink.removeme.this2.net> - 2020-11-13 09:04 -0500
Re: A feminist win snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2020-11-13 18:07 +0000
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-13 11:24 -0700
Re: A feminist win Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2020-11-13 08:55 -0600
Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-13 15:06 +0000
Re: A feminist win Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2020-11-13 09:33 -0600
Re: A feminist win snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2020-11-13 18:09 +0000
Re: A feminist win Skeeter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-10 08:24 -0700
Page 7 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 Next page →
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-12 21:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <dkhob2.nc.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #434293 |
On 2020-11-12 8:57 p.m., kensi wrote: > On 11/12/2020 6:32 PM, Sn!pe wrote: >> Nadegda wrote:- >> >> - in his > > HER!!!! > either or
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-12 17:06 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3a177beb208677439898eb@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #434214 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate. On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 22:00:33 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda had the audacity to say the following: > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 13:29:07 -0800, Checkmate wrote: > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > Checkmate. > > > > On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 20:08:42 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda had the audacity to say > > the following: > > > > > >> > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > >> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 21:27:04 -0800, Checkmate wrote: > >> > >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > >> > Checkmate. > >> > > >> > On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 23:23:13 -0500, kensi had the audacity to say the > >> > following: > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> On 11/11/2020 10:32 PM, Checkmate wrote: > >> >> > On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 22:24:20 -0500, kensi had the audacity to say the > >> >> >> On 11/11/2020 10:22 PM, Checkmate wrote: > >> >> >>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 19:21:01 -0700, % had the audacity to say the > >> >> >>>> On 2020-11-11 6:42 p.m., Checkmate wrote: > >> >> >>>>> I said I KNOW, so I don't need proof, and now I stole it from you. > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>> yea but would you bicker with him as much if he wasn't a woman > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> He isn't a woman. I'm an equal opportunity bickerer. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Who isn't a woman? > >> >> > > >> >> > u > >> >> > >> >> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. > >> > > >> > More letters, I win. > >> > >> Specifically, a Looney Maroon Award, by FNVWe fiat. > >> > >> SPNAK!! > > > > I win again. > > Your kook award collection is somewhat impressive, though not yet as > legendary as those of Richard Bullis, Edmond Wollmann, or murphy. uh-huh -- Checkmate ยฎ Copyright ยฉ 2020 all rights reserved https://youtu.be/wT-8Dm1VThc *************************************************** "I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed..." --Vallor Message-ID: <hqhbp9F9i1dU4@mid.individual.net> *************************************************** "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me> *************************************************** AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-11 20:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <dkevri.116.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #434044 |
On 2020-11-11 8:22 p.m., Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate. > > On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 19:21:01 -0700, % had the audacity to say the > following: > > >> >> On 2020-11-11 6:42 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate. >>> >>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 23:17:32 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda had the audacity to say >>> the following: >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:42:37 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>>> >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>>> Checkmate. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 20:35:39 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda had the audacity to say >>>>> the following: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:39:14 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>>>>> Checkmate. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:28:56 -0000 (UTC), Libtard had the audacity to say >>>>>>> the following: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> HER!! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nicely foamed, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Correcting someone's use of the wrong pronoun is not "foam", kook. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sarcastically referring to the Nadsington post characterizing a three word >>>>>>> reply from me as "foam". >>>>>> >>>>>> Judges, please score this backpedal attempt by Checkmate. >>>>>> >>>>>> |"| ___ . . _ _ >>>>>> _|_|_ ()_() .|||. . .:::. '\\-//` >>>>>> (o o) (o o) (o o) :(o o): . (o o) >>>>>> ooO--(_)--Ooo-ooO--`o'--Ooo-ooO--(_)--Ooo-ooO--(_)--Ooo-ooO--(_)--Ooo- >>>>>> _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ >>>>>> ' ` ' ` ' ` ' ` ' ` >>>>>> | 2.0 | | 1.3 | | 1.1 | | 0.4 | | 2.1 | >>>>>> `---------' `---------' `---------' `---------' `---------' >>>>>> >>>>>> Oh, kooky, that's too bad. Better luck next time. >>>>>> >>>>>> <snicker> >>>>> >>>>> That's a complete bubble bath... with a bit of rusty irony... KO0K! >>>> >>>> No. >>>> >>>>> (I know you stole that ASCII from somewhere) >>>> >>>> Proof, kook? >>> >>> I said I KNOW, so I don't need proof, and now I stole it from you. >>> >> yea but would you bicker with him as much if he wasn't a woman > > He isn't a woman. I'm an equal opportunity bickerer. > well he says he's a woman
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-11 21:25 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3a16670ef480f5279898c0@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #434048 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate. On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 20:31:12 -0700, % had the audacity to say the following: > > On 2020-11-11 8:22 p.m., Checkmate wrote: > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > Checkmate. > > > > On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 19:21:01 -0700, % had the audacity to say the > > following: > > > > > >> > >> On 2020-11-11 6:42 p.m., Checkmate wrote: > >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > >>> Checkmate. > >>> > >>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 23:17:32 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda had the audacity to say > >>> the following: > >>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > >>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:42:37 -0800, Checkmate wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > >>>>> Checkmate. > >>>>> > >>>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 20:35:39 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda had the audacity to say > >>>>> the following: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > >>>>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:39:14 -0800, Checkmate wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > >>>>>>> Checkmate. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:28:56 -0000 (UTC), Libtard had the audacity to say > >>>>>>> the following: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> HER!! > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Nicely foamed, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Correcting someone's use of the wrong pronoun is not "foam", kook. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Sarcastically referring to the Nadsington post characterizing a three word > >>>>>>> reply from me as "foam". > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Judges, please score this backpedal attempt by Checkmate. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> |"| ___ . . _ _ > >>>>>> _|_|_ ()_() .|||. . .:::. '\\-//` > >>>>>> (o o) (o o) (o o) :(o o): . (o o) > >>>>>> ooO--(_)--Ooo-ooO--`o'--Ooo-ooO--(_)--Ooo-ooO--(_)--Ooo-ooO--(_)--Ooo- > >>>>>> _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ > >>>>>> ' ` ' ` ' ` ' ` ' ` > >>>>>> | 2.0 | | 1.3 | | 1.1 | | 0.4 | | 2.1 | > >>>>>> `---------' `---------' `---------' `---------' `---------' > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Oh, kooky, that's too bad. Better luck next time. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> <snicker> > >>>>> > >>>>> That's a complete bubble bath... with a bit of rusty irony... KO0K! > >>>> > >>>> No. > >>>> > >>>>> (I know you stole that ASCII from somewhere) > >>>> > >>>> Proof, kook? > >>> > >>> I said I KNOW, so I don't need proof, and now I stole it from you. > >>> > >> yea but would you bicker with him as much if he wasn't a woman > > > > He isn't a woman. I'm an equal opportunity bickerer. > > > well he says he's a woman So does Pussy Willow... and he ain't. -- Checkmate ยฎ Copyright ยฉ 2020 all rights reserved https://youtu.be/wT-8Dm1VThc *************************************************** "I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed..." --Vallor Message-ID: <hqhbp9F9i1dU4@mid.individual.net> *************************************************** "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me> *************************************************** AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-11 22:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <roi8rt$1a9j$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #434013 |
On 11/11/2020 8:42 PM, Checkmate wrote: > On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 23:17:32 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda had the audacity to say >> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:42:37 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>> (I know you stole that ASCII from somewhere) >> >> Proof, kook? > > I said I KNOW, so I don't need proof You do if you want anyone else to believe your ko0ky accusation. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-11 19:23 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3a164a7c118167259898b4@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #434040 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate. On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 22:06:31 -0500, kensi had the audacity to say the following: > > On 11/11/2020 8:42 PM, Checkmate wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 23:17:32 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda had the audacity to say > >> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:42:37 -0800, Checkmate wrote: > >>> (I know you stole that ASCII from somewhere) > >> > >> Proof, kook? > > > > I said I KNOW, so I don't need proof > > You do if you want anyone else to believe your ko0ky accusation. They do believe it, Paul. -- Checkmate ยฎ Copyright ยฉ 2020 all rights reserved https://youtu.be/wT-8Dm1VThc *************************************************** "I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed..." --Vallor Message-ID: <hqhbp9F9i1dU4@mid.individual.net> *************************************************** "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me> *************************************************** AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-11 22:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <roia34$1ov4$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #434045 |
On 11/11/2020 10:23 PM, Checkmate wrote: > On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 22:06:31 -0500, kensi had the audacity to say the >> On 11/11/2020 8:42 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 23:17:32 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda had the audacity to say >>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:42:37 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> (I know you stole that ASCII from somewhere) >>>> >>>> Proof, kook? >>> >>> I said I KNOW, so I don't need proof >> >> You do if you want anyone else to believe your ko0ky accusation. > > They do believe it, Proof, k0ok? > Paul. Who is "Paul", ko0k? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-11 20:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <dkevtg.116.19.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #434047 |
On 2020-11-11 8:27 p.m., kensi wrote: > On 11/11/2020 10:23 PM, Checkmate wrote: >> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 22:06:31 -0500, kensi had the audacity to say the >>> On 11/11/2020 8:42 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 23:17:32 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda had the audacity >>>> to say >>>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:42:37 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>> (I know you stole that ASCII from somewhere) >>>>> >>>>> Proof, kook? >>>> >>>> I said I KNOW, so I don't need proof >>> >>> You do if you want anyone else to believe your ko0ky accusation. >> >> They do believe it, > > Proof, k0ok? > >> Paul. > > Who is "Paul", ko0k? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias. > sure there is ya stupid fk head
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-11 19:37 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <roial1$u6c$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #434049 |
x-no-archive: yes On 11/11/2020 7:32 PM, Paul wrote: > On 2020-11-11 8:27 p.m., kensi wrote: >> On 11/11/2020 10:23 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 22:06:31 -0500, kensi had the audacity to say the >>>> On 11/11/2020 8:42 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 23:17:32 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda had the audacity >>>>> to say >>>>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:42:37 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> (I know you stole that ASCII from somewhere) >>>>>> >>>>>> Proof, kook? >>>>> >>>>> I said I KNOW, so I don't need proof >>>> >>>> You do if you want anyone else to believe your ko0ky accusation. >>> >>> They do believe it, >> >> Proof, k0ok? >> >>> Paul. >> >> Who is "Paul", ko0k? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias. >> > sure there is ya stupid fk head lol
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-11 21:26 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3a166755d5d41c389898c2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #434053 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate. On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 19:37:04 -0800, Janithor had the audacity to say the following: > > x-no-archive: yes > > On 11/11/2020 7:32 PM, Paul wrote: > > On 2020-11-11 8:27 p.m., kensi wrote: > >> On 11/11/2020 10:23 PM, Checkmate wrote: > >>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 22:06:31 -0500, kensi had the audacity to say the > >>>> On 11/11/2020 8:42 PM, Checkmate wrote: > >>>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 23:17:32 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda had the audacity > >>>>> to say > >>>>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:42:37 -0800, Checkmate wrote: > >>>>>>> (I know you stole that ASCII from somewhere) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Proof, kook? > >>>>> > >>>>> I said I KNOW, so I don't need proof > >>>> > >>>> You do if you want anyone else to believe your ko0ky accusation. > >>> > >>> They do believe it, > >> > >> Proof, k0ok? > >> > >>> Paul. > >> > >> Who is "Paul", ko0k? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias. > >> > > sure there is ya stupid fk head > > lol That's what I said! Except I gave it an all caps LOL. -- Checkmate ยฎ Copyright ยฉ 2020 all rights reserved https://youtu.be/wT-8Dm1VThc *************************************************** "I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed..." --Vallor Message-ID: <hqhbp9F9i1dU4@mid.individual.net> *************************************************** "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me> *************************************************** AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-11 21:25 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3a16672c7be1e58c9898c1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #434049 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate. On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 20:32:15 -0700, Paul had the audacity to say the following: > > On 2020-11-11 8:27 p.m., kensi wrote: > > On 11/11/2020 10:23 PM, Checkmate wrote: > >> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 22:06:31 -0500, kensi had the audacity to say the > >>> On 11/11/2020 8:42 PM, Checkmate wrote: > >>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 23:17:32 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda had the audacity > >>>> to say > >>>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:42:37 -0800, Checkmate wrote: > >>>>>> (I know you stole that ASCII from somewhere) > >>>>> > >>>>> Proof, kook? > >>>> > >>>> I said I KNOW, so I don't need proof > >>> > >>> You do if you want anyone else to believe your ko0ky accusation. > >> > >> They do believe it, > > > > Proof, k0ok? > > > >> Paul. > > > > Who is "Paul", ko0k? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias. > > > sure there is ya stupid fk head Oh, LOL... -- Checkmate ยฎ Copyright ยฉ 2020 all rights reserved https://youtu.be/wT-8Dm1VThc *************************************************** "I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed..." --Vallor Message-ID: <hqhbp9F9i1dU4@mid.individual.net> *************************************************** "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me> *************************************************** AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@centurylink.removeme.this2.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-12 07:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <rojfru$rne$12@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #433985 |
"Nadegda" <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in message news:rohreb$gun$3@dont-email.me... > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:42:37 -0800, Checkmate wrote: > >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate. >> >> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 20:35:39 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda had the audacity to say >> the following: >> >> >>> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:39:14 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>> >>> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>> > by >>> > Checkmate. >>> > >>> > On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:28:56 -0000 (UTC), Libtard had the audacity to >>> > say >>> > the following: >>> > >>> > >>> >> >> HER!! >>> >> > >>> >> > Nicely foamed, >>> >> >>> >> Correcting someone's use of the wrong pronoun is not "foam", kook. >>> > >>> > Sarcastically referring to the Nadsington post characterizing a three >>> > word >>> > reply from me as "foam". >>> >>> Judges, please score this backpedal attempt by Checkmate. >>> >>> |"| ___ . . _ _ >>> _|_|_ ()_() .|||. . .:::. '\\-//` >>> (o o) (o o) (o o) :(o o): . (o o) >>> ooO--(_)--Ooo-ooO--`o'--Ooo-ooO--(_)--Ooo-ooO--(_)--Ooo-ooO--(_)--Ooo- >>> _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ >>> ' ` ' ` ' ` ' ` ' ` >>> | 2.0 | | 1.3 | | 1.1 | | 0.4 | | 2.1 | >>> `---------' `---------' `---------' `---------' `---------' >>> >>> Oh, kooky, that's too bad. Better luck next time. >>> >>> <snicker> >> >> That's a complete bubble bath... with a bit of rusty irony... KO0K! > > No. > >> (I know you stole that ASCII from somewhere) > > Proof, kook? Simple your formatting is off. If you had actually produced it then you wouldn't have such simplistic errors in your formatting. QED.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-12 20:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <rok4rg$ioi$10@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #434097 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 07:45:37 -0500, Scout wrote: > "Nadegda" <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in message > news:rohreb$gun$3@dont-email.me... >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:42:37 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >> >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate. >>> >>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 20:35:39 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda had the audacity to say >>> the following: >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:39:14 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>>> >>>> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>> > by >>>> > Checkmate. >>>> > >>>> > On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:28:56 -0000 (UTC), Libtard had the audacity to >>>> > say >>>> > the following: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >> >> HER!! >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Nicely foamed, >>>> >> >>>> >> Correcting someone's use of the wrong pronoun is not "foam", kook. >>>> > >>>> > Sarcastically referring to the Nadsington post characterizing a three >>>> > word >>>> > reply from me as "foam". >>>> >>>> Judges, please score this backpedal attempt by Checkmate. >>>> >>>> |"| ___ . . _ _ >>>> _|_|_ ()_() .|||. . .:::. '\\-//` >>>> (o o) (o o) (o o) :(o o): . (o o) >>>> ooO--(_)--Ooo-ooO--`o'--Ooo-ooO--(_)--Ooo-ooO--(_)--Ooo-ooO--(_)--Ooo- >>>> _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ >>>> ' ` ' ` ' ` ' ` ' ` >>>> | 2.0 | | 1.3 | | 1.1 | | 0.4 | | 2.1 | >>>> `---------' `---------' `---------' `---------' `---------' >>>> >>>> Oh, kooky, that's too bad. Better luck next time. >>>> >>>> <snicker> >>> >>> That's a complete bubble bath... with a bit of rusty irony... KO0K! >> >> No. >> >>> (I know you stole that ASCII from somewhere) >> >> Proof, kook? > > Simple your formatting is off. If you had actually produced it then you > wouldn't have such simplistic errors in your formatting. > > QED. I don't see any errors, kook. Perhaps you viewed the post in a proportional font instead of a terminal font? It's a common newbie mistake that I would not at all be shocked to see you make. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Checkmate admits that, for all intents and purposes, he carries a teddy bear in public: <d6cnes.ket.17.19@news.alt.net>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-12 13:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <dkgqsa.2op.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #434179 |
On 2020-11-12 1:10 p.m., Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 07:45:37 -0500, Scout wrote: > >> "Nadegda" <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in message >> news:rohreb$gun$3@dont-email.me... >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:42:37 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>> >>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>> Checkmate. >>>> >>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 20:35:39 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda had the audacity to say >>>> the following: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:39:14 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>>>> by >>>>>> Checkmate. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:28:56 -0000 (UTC), Libtard had the audacity to >>>>>> say >>>>>> the following: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> HER!! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nicely foamed, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Correcting someone's use of the wrong pronoun is not "foam", kook. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sarcastically referring to the Nadsington post characterizing a three >>>>>> word >>>>>> reply from me as "foam". >>>>> >>>>> Judges, please score this backpedal attempt by Checkmate. >>>>> >>>>> |"| ___ . . _ _ >>>>> _|_|_ ()_() .|||. . .:::. '\\-//` >>>>> (o o) (o o) (o o) :(o o): . (o o) >>>>> ooO--(_)--Ooo-ooO--`o'--Ooo-ooO--(_)--Ooo-ooO--(_)--Ooo-ooO--(_)--Ooo- >>>>> _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ >>>>> ' ` ' ` ' ` ' ` ' ` >>>>> | 2.0 | | 1.3 | | 1.1 | | 0.4 | | 2.1 | >>>>> `---------' `---------' `---------' `---------' `---------' >>>>> >>>>> Oh, kooky, that's too bad. Better luck next time. >>>>> >>>>> <snicker> >>>> >>>> That's a complete bubble bath... with a bit of rusty irony... KO0K! >>> >>> No. >>> >>>> (I know you stole that ASCII from somewhere) >>> >>> Proof, kook? >> >> Simple your formatting is off. If you had actually produced it then you >> wouldn't have such simplistic errors in your formatting. >> >> QED. > > I don't see any errors, kook. Perhaps you viewed the post in a proportional > font instead of a terminal font? It's a common newbie mistake that I would > not at all be shocked to see you make. > if you pretended to be a male you'd see it
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@centurylink.removeme.this2.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-13 07:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <rolu6a$hbo$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #434179 |
"Nadegda" <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in message news:rok4rg$ioi$10@dont-email.me... > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 07:45:37 -0500, Scout wrote: > >> "Nadegda" <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in message >> news:rohreb$gun$3@dont-email.me... >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:42:37 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>> >>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>> Checkmate. >>>> >>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 20:35:39 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda had the audacity to >>>> say >>>> the following: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! >>>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:39:14 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>>> > by >>>>> > Checkmate. >>>>> > >>>>> > On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:28:56 -0000 (UTC), Libtard had the audacity >>>>> > to >>>>> > say >>>>> > the following: >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> >> >> HER!! >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Nicely foamed, >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Correcting someone's use of the wrong pronoun is not "foam", kook. >>>>> > >>>>> > Sarcastically referring to the Nadsington post characterizing a >>>>> > three >>>>> > word >>>>> > reply from me as "foam". >>>>> >>>>> Judges, please score this backpedal attempt by Checkmate. >>>>> >>>>> |"| ___ . . _ _ >>>>> _|_|_ ()_() .|||. . .:::. '\\-//` >>>>> (o o) (o o) (o o) :(o o): . (o o) >>>>> ooO--(_)--Ooo-ooO--`o'--Ooo-ooO--(_)--Ooo-ooO--(_)--Ooo-ooO--(_)--Ooo- >>>>> _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ >>>>> ' ` ' ` ' ` ' ` ' ` >>>>> | 2.0 | | 1.3 | | 1.1 | | 0.4 | | 2.1 | >>>>> `---------' `---------' `---------' `---------' `---------' >>>>> >>>>> Oh, kooky, that's too bad. Better luck next time. >>>>> >>>>> <snicker> >>>> >>>> That's a complete bubble bath... with a bit of rusty irony... KO0K! >>> >>> No. >>> >>>> (I know you stole that ASCII from somewhere) >>> >>> Proof, kook? >> >> Simple your formatting is off. If you had actually produced it then you >> wouldn't have such simplistic errors in your formatting. >> >> QED. > > I don't see any errors, kook. Perhaps you viewed the post in a > proportional > font instead of a terminal font? It's a common newbie mistake that I would > not at all be shocked to see you make. Then it really isn't authentic ASCII art then.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-13 13:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <i17g73FctiU8@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #434341 |
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 07:21:08 -0500, Scout wrote:
> "Nadegda" <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in message
> news:rok4rg$ioi$10@dont-email.me...
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt! On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 07:45:37 -0500, Scout wrote:
>>
>>> "Nadegda" <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:rohreb$gun$3@dont-email.me...
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>> melt!
>>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:42:37 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>>>>> by Checkmate.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 20:35:39 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda had the audacity
>>>>> to say the following:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:39:14 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>>>>> > posts by Checkmate.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:28:56 -0000 (UTC), Libtard had the
>>>>>> > audacity to say the following:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >> >> HER!!
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Nicely foamed,
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Correcting someone's use of the wrong pronoun is not "foam",
>>>>>> >> kook.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Sarcastically referring to the Nadsington post characterizing a
>>>>>> > three word reply from me as "foam".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Judges, please score this backpedal attempt by Checkmate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> |"| ___ . . _ _
>>>>>> _|_|_ ()_() .|||. . .:::. '\\-//`
>>>>>> (o o) (o o) (o o) :(o o): . (o o)
>>>>>> ooO--(_)--Ooo-ooO--`o'--Ooo-ooO--(_)--Ooo-ooO--(_)--Ooo-ooO--(_)--
Ooo-
>>>>>> _________ _________ _________ _________ _________
>>>>>> ' ` ' ` ' ` ' ` '
>>>>>> `
>>>>>> | 2.0 | | 1.3 | | 1.1 | | 0.4 | | 2.1
>>>>>> |
>>>>>> `---------' `---------' `---------' `---------'
>>>>>> `---------'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, kooky, that's too bad. Better luck next time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snicker>
>>>>>
>>>>> That's a complete bubble bath... with a bit of rusty irony... KO0K!
>>>>
>>>> No.
>>>>
>>>>> (I know you stole that ASCII from somewhere)
>>>>
>>>> Proof, kook?
>>>
>>> Simple your formatting is off. If you had actually produced it then
>>> you wouldn't have such simplistic errors in your formatting.
>>>
>>> QED.
>>
>> I don't see any errors, kook. Perhaps you viewed the post in a
>> proportional font instead of a terminal font? It's a common newbie
>> mistake that I would not at all be shocked to see you make.
>
> Then it really isn't authentic ASCII art then.
_ ___
___ _ __| |_ |__ \
/ _ \| '__| | | | |/ /
| (_) | | | | |_| |_|
\___/|_| |_|\__, (_)
|___/
terminal font is a fixed font, which I've never _not_ seen used for ASCII
art.
Do you have a counterexample?
And above all...
________________________
< Don't have a cow, man! >
------------------------
\ ^__^
\ (oo)\_______
(__)\ )\/\
||----w |
|| ||
--
-v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@centurylink.removeme.this2.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-13 09:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <rom3pp$oe6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #434346 |
"vallor" <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote in message news:i17g73FctiU8@mid.individual.net... > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 07:21:08 -0500, Scout wrote: > >> "Nadegda" <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in message >> news:rok4rg$ioi$10@dont-email.me... >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 07:45:37 -0500, Scout wrote: >>> >>>> "Nadegda" <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:rohreb$gun$3@dont-email.me... >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! >>>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:42:37 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>>>> by Checkmate. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 20:35:39 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda had the audacity >>>>>> to say the following: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>> melt! >>>>>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:39:14 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>> > posts by Checkmate. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:28:56 -0000 (UTC), Libtard had the >>>>>>> > audacity to say the following: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >> >> HER!! >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > Nicely foamed, >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Correcting someone's use of the wrong pronoun is not "foam", >>>>>>> >> kook. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Sarcastically referring to the Nadsington post characterizing a >>>>>>> > three word reply from me as "foam". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Judges, please score this backpedal attempt by Checkmate. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> |"| ___ . . _ _ >>>>>>> _|_|_ ()_() .|||. . .:::. '\\-//` >>>>>>> (o o) (o o) (o o) :(o o): . (o o) >>>>>>> ooO--(_)--Ooo-ooO--`o'--Ooo-ooO--(_)--Ooo-ooO--(_)--Ooo-ooO--(_)-- > Ooo- >>>>>>> _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ >>>>>>> ' ` ' ` ' ` ' ` ' >>>>>>> ` >>>>>>> | 2.0 | | 1.3 | | 1.1 | | 0.4 | | 2.1 >>>>>>> | >>>>>>> `---------' `---------' `---------' `---------' >>>>>>> `---------' >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Oh, kooky, that's too bad. Better luck next time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <snicker> >>>>>> >>>>>> That's a complete bubble bath... with a bit of rusty irony... KO0K! >>>>> >>>>> No. >>>>> >>>>>> (I know you stole that ASCII from somewhere) >>>>> >>>>> Proof, kook? >>>> >>>> Simple your formatting is off. If you had actually produced it then >>>> you wouldn't have such simplistic errors in your formatting. >>>> >>>> QED. >>> >>> I don't see any errors, kook. Perhaps you viewed the post in a >>> proportional font instead of a terminal font? It's a common newbie >>> mistake that I would not at all be shocked to see you make. >> >> Then it really isn't authentic ASCII art then. > > _ ___ > ___ _ __| |_ |__ \ > / _ \| '__| | | | |/ / > | (_) | | | | |_| |_| > \___/|_| |_|\__, (_) > |___/ > > terminal font is a fixed font, which I've never _not_ seen used for ASCII > art. > > Do you have a counterexample? > > And above all... > > ________________________ > < Don't have a cow, man! > > ------------------------ > \ ^__^ > \ (oo)\_______ > (__)\ )\/\ > ||----w | > || || > > -- > -v Well, I'm using a fix font. Courier New, and his art is way off. Yours on the other hand looks good. However, I did think he was saying I should be using a proportionate font so I made a mistake there.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-13 18:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1oztjli.1cb7mf41w4ajnxN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #434367 |
Scout <me4guns@centurylink.removeme.this2.net> wrote: > >> Then it really isn't authentic ASCII art then. > > > > _ ___ > > ___ _ __| |_ |__ \ > > / _ \| '__| | | | |/ / > > | (_) | | | | |_| |_| > > \___/|_| |_|\__, (_) > > |___/ > > > > terminal font is a fixed font, which I've never _not_ seen used for ASCII > > art. > > > > Do you have a counterexample? > > > > And above all... > > > > ________________________ > > < Don't have a cow, man! > > > ------------------------ > > \ ^__^ > > \ (oo)\_______ > > (__)\ )\/\ > > ||----w | > > || || > > > > -- > > -v > > Well, I'm using a fix font. Courier New, and his art is way off. > > Yours on the other hand looks good. > Yes, folks, it's the 1993 Show! [cue: intro music] -- ^ร^ <https://youtu.be/_kqytf31a8E> My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-13 11:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <dkj8ir.5t2.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #434393 |
On 2020-11-13 11:07 a.m., Sn!pe wrote: > Scout <me4guns@centurylink.removeme.this2.net> wrote: > >>>> Then it really isn't authentic ASCII art then. >>> >>> _ ___ >>> ___ _ __| |_ |__ \ >>> / _ \| '__| | | | |/ / >>> | (_) | | | | |_| |_| >>> \___/|_| |_|\__, (_) >>> |___/ >>> >>> terminal font is a fixed font, which I've never _not_ seen used for ASCII >>> art. >>> >>> Do you have a counterexample? >>> >>> And above all... >>> >>> ________________________ >>> < Don't have a cow, man! > >>> ------------------------ >>> \ ^__^ >>> \ (oo)\_______ >>> (__)\ )\/\ >>> ||----w | >>> || || >>> >>> -- >>> -v >> >> Well, I'm using a fix font. Courier New, and his art is way off. >> >> Yours on the other hand looks good. >> > > Yes, folks, it's the 1993 Show! [cue: intro music] > this is what i meant when i said what valor said i said
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-13 08:55 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <tA$7KxaET.-B======D-nothingForWhingingIdiotsToCryAbout@alt.checkmate.orgy> |
| In reply to | #434346 |
On 13 Nov 2020 13:32:19 GMT, LO AND BEHOLD; vallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently
decided to freely share it with us in
<i17g73FctiU8@mid.individual.net>:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 07:21:08 -0500, Scout wrote:
"Nadegda" <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in message
news:rok4rg$ioi$10@dont-email.me...
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 07:45:37 -0500, Scout wrote:
"Nadegda" <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in message
news:rohreb$gun$3@dont-email.me...
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:42:37 -0800, ๐ฉ wrote:
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
๐ฉ. On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 20:35:39 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda had the
audacity to say the following:
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:39:14 -0800, ๐ฉ wrote:
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
๐ฉ. On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:28:56 -0000 (UTC), Libtard had the
audacity to say the following:
HER!!
Nicely foamed,
Correcting someone's use of the wrong pronoun is not "foam", kook.
Sarcastically referring to the Nadsington post characterizing a three
word reply from me as "foam".
Judges, please score this backpedal attempt by ๐ฉ. |"|
___ . . _ _ _|_|_
()_() .|||. . .:::. '\\-//` (o o) (o
o) (o o) :(o o): . (o o)
ooO--(_)--Ooo-ooO--`o'--Ooo-ooO--(_)--Ooo-ooO--(_)--Ooo-ooO--(_)--
Ooo-
_________ _________ _________ _________ _________ '
` ' ` ' ` ' ` ' ` |
2.0 | | 1.3 | | 1.1 | | 0.4 | | 2.1 |
`---------' `---------' `---------' `---------' `---------' Oh,
kooky, that's too bad. Better luck next time. <๐ฉsnickerTurd๐ฉ>
That's a complete bubble bath... with a bit of rusty irony... KO0K!
No.
(I know you stole that ASCII from somewhere)
Proof, kook?
Simple your formatting is off. If you had actually produced it then you
wouldn't have such simplistic errors in your formatting. QED.
I don't see any errors, kook. Perhaps you viewed the post in a
proportional font instead of a terminal font? It's a common newbie
mistake that I would not at all be shocked to see you make.
Then it really isn't authentic ASCII art then.
_ ___ ___ _ __| |_ |__ \ / _ \| '__| | | | |/ / |
(_) | | | | |_| |_| \___/|_| |_|\__, (_) |___/
terminal font is a fixed font, which I've never _not_ seen used for
ASCII art.
Do you have a counterexample?
And above all...
________________________ < Don't have a cow, man! >
------------------------ \ ^__^ \ (oo)\_______
(__)\ )\/\ ||----w | ||
||
gerg is a formatting stickler...
"4 out of 5 pet rocks" won't comment on this poast...
--
[THIS POAST HAS PASSED TRIMCHECKยฎ VALIDATION]
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA
"It will always be with you. Why do you think I hate those bastards as much as I do? I've been watching a lecture series on the history of the muzzies... many hour's worth, in fact, and the muzzies have been that way for thousands of years. It's in their culture. Every few hundred years, they try to invade Europe or some other region nearby, and have to be beaten back. They just need to be eliminated to whatever extent that's possible. You can't kill ideas completely, but you can set them back a few generations when necessary.
One important distinction between islam and christianity, is both religions have historically used their "beliefs" as a means to control the ignorant Unwashed Masses, only Western civilization became educated enough to take that power away from the clergy. The muzzies like their citizens to remain dumb, brainwashed, and obedient. That's why the radical ones are nearly all from The Land That Time Forgot. They're still stuck back in the fourteenth century, and suffer from the delusional notion that they're going to drag the rest of the world back there with them. As I see it, there's only one solution to that problem, and it's the same one we use to rid ourselves of rats, cockroaches, and other vermin." - Checkmate said this psycho lunatic shit in <MPG.34138d3d6e7bb33c991772@news.altopia.com>
-
"What you see happening in Europe now... defiant muzzies openly proclaiming that they have no desire to "assimilate" or co-exist with Europeans, and stating that their objective is to turn all of Europe into a muzzie dominated region under sharia law, is the harbinger of what they have planned for the US. To what extent they'll be successful with that here can be debated, but should not be underestimated. I wish I could share your optimism in that regard, but I don't.
Terror attacks are only one page out of the muzzie play book. They serve more as a distraction. The real goal is occupation, and that's already well underway. They've got that frog pretty well boiled in Europe now, and they're getting bolder by the day. The longer the Europeans wait to do something about it, the harder it's going to be TO do anything about it. It may already be too late IMO. This is going to get real messy in a hurry." - Checkmate crying about some bullshit about muslims in europe that's he's convinced himself is true.
-
"Bitches don't get to use the Pussy Card when they initiate an
assault." - Cuckmate the Wonder Klown in <dfrauh.8sn.17.129@news.alt.net>
-
"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Herr Fuhrer Checkmate (of alt.checkmate)
-
"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)
-
"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor
-
STOP! (janithor time.):
i hope his sails weren't torn asunder with words on a screen, or
somesuch, but also i hope that his pain is not as bad as the murderguy
who got hit with a skateboard. - anynonymous
-
"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode
-
"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com>
-
"I wasn't even aware that I HAD a religion. I'm pretty-much against all of The Big Three, but the muzzies are at the top of the list." - Checkmate
-
"Such "places of worship" are terrorist breeding grounds, as has been proven on many occasions. Please refrain from morphing out of my
killfile." - Checkmate on his belief that all Mosques are where terrorists are.
-
"Is Pussy Willow saying you're a bigger nazi puke than me? You didn't even suggest that maybe we ought to burn down all the mosques. This just isn't fair!" - Checkmate admits to suggesting burning down mosques.
-
"The world IS shit, and getting closer to hitting the fan every day. We'll be at war before the end of this decade, and nearly everybody
already knows it." - Checkmate teh war hawk, in 2017
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web