Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #255927 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ted <ted@sam.street> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-29 01:20 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-01-29 16:50 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 873 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 01:20 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Vachagan Robert Yengibaryan <I_suck_Mark_Wieber@taft.ca> - 2019-01-28 17:55 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 01:59 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Vachagan Robert Yengibaryan <I_suck_Mark_Wieber@taft.ca> - 2019-01-28 18:06 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 02:16 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-28 23:12 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-28 21:20 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 06:42 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-28 23:44 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 08:29 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 17:45 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 16:35 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 14:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 22:12 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:36 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 00:37 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:32 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:40 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 20:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:51 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 22:12 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 16:55 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:17 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 08:28 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 17:45 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 16:36 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 16:55 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:07 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:17 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:21 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:24 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 08:29 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 14:03 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:15 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:41 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:30 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:33 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:39 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:04 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:07 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:11 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:40 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-30 09:59 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:24 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:34 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:05 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:08 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:30 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 12:18 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 17:01 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:12 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 15:00 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 15:40 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 15:50 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:02 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:21 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:27 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:31 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:38 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 17:13 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 17:16 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 17:33 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 17:39 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 18:06 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 18:14 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 18:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 19:11 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 20:02 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:45 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:54 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:09 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 17:38 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:44 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:05 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:20 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:13 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 17:34 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 18:04 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:13 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 13:02 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:11 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:42 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:31 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:36 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:06 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick - 2019-01-30 16:09 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:32 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:14 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:26 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:23 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:24 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 08:29 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:11 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:42 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:31 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 20:11 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 13:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 13:43 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 13:50 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 16:39 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:31 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 16:34 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:08 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 18:12 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:33 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 22:12 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 22:12 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 15:25 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 23:43 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:09 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 18:13 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 13:51 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 14:30 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 14:40 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:38 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 16:38 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 14:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 17:38 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:37 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 00:21 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:11 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 01:37 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 18:40 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 02:06 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 19:07 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 02:14 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 19:39 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:40 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:28 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:29 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 08:31 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 19:10 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 02:16 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 19:19 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-29 22:13 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:28 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-30 02:49 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:27 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 08:33 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 14:02 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:12 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:43 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:24 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:38 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:43 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:07 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick - 2019-01-30 16:10 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:33 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:14 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 14:59 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 15:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:10 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:12 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:18 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:35 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:18 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:37 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:39 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 13:47 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 12:44 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 16:58 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 15:04 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 18:12 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 16:17 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 16:22 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-31 23:03 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 16:14 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 16:18 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 16:26 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:08 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:16 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:39 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:40 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 13:47 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-01 05:41 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:20 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:21 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:40 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 13:48 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 12:15 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 16:59 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 15:05 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 15:16 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 15:45 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 15:50 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 16:05 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 16:16 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 16:24 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-31 23:53 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 17:11 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-01 02:55 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 18:19 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 16:28 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 20:13 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 05:04 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 11:26 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 16:28 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 16:29 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 16:31 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 20:14 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 20:14 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 18:15 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 16:24 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 20:15 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 05:05 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 11:25 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 10:20 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-02-01 13:08 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 15:29 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 13:37 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 18:17 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-02-01 18:19 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 16:28 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 16:37 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 19:42 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 17:53 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-02 03:06 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 19:40 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 17:52 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-02 03:08 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-02 01:13 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 18:24 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-02-01 20:25 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 15:03 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-02-01 20:31 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 16:24 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 12:45 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 17:00 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 15:06 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 18:20 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 16:29 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 20:16 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 05:06 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 11:24 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-31 23:03 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:12 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:44 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:32 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:39 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:44 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:11 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:19 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:41 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 13:46 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 12:43 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 16:57 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 15:03 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 18:11 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 16:22 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 16:30 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 16:32 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 16:34 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 17:10 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 20:10 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 05:03 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 20:10 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-01 03:31 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 06:16 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 05:03 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 11:24 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-31 23:03 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 16:13 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 16:20 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 16:29 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 23:42 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:29 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:42 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 12:18 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 17:03 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 15:08 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 18:20 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 16:30 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 20:17 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 05:07 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 11:24 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 10:19 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-01 21:24 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 18:16 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 16:27 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-02 01:13 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 18:25 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-02 02:05 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-02 00:27 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 17:37 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-01 09:52 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:26 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:26 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 08:37 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:14 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:47 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:34 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:41 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 12:37 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:45 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:12 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick - 2019-01-30 16:16 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:43 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:20 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:43 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 13:44 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 12:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 16:55 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 15:01 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 18:09 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 16:21 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 20:08 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 05:02 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 12:36 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:13 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:17 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:20 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:10 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 18:13 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:34 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:40 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:33 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:30 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 08:38 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:15 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 10:48 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:34 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:42 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:45 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:14 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick - 2019-01-30 16:19 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:44 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:22 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:45 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:43 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 13:44 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 23:42 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 05:56 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 23:43 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 22:12 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 21:44 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 17:39 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:34 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 23:43 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:45 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 00:21 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:31 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:12 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 01:40 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 20:11 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:34 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 16:37 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 22:12 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 08:27 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 17:45 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 11:15 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:19 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 12:01 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-29 11:19 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 12:47 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-29 14:16 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 12:40 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 12:47 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 16:48 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:35 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 16:58 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:15 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:25 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 18:28 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:33 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 18:36 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 19:00 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 19:06 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 19:11 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 19:37 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-29 17:49 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 20:10 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 19:14 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 19:37 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 19:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 20:06 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:40 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 20:43 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:51 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 20:52 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 04:23 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-30 04:36 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 19:24 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-30 04:35 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:46 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:30 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 09:07 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 08:14 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 11:03 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-30 10:03 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:39 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:24 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:40 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:44 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 14:58 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 15:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:18 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick - 2019-01-30 16:22 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:01 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:24 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:02 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 12:23 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 16:25 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 21:23 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 05:57 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:23 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:04 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:44 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 13:39 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:35 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 09:38 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:54 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:16 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 11:03 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-30 10:05 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:24 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:52 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-30 15:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 15:52 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:19 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick - 2019-01-30 16:23 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:04 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:24 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 17:25 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:07 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:06 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:45 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 13:40 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 12:41 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 12:40 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 16:26 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 14:40 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 17:57 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 16:08 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-31 23:53 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 19:45 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 17:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 04:52 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 10:48 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 10:14 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 16:21 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 16:30 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 19:54 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 04:54 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 10:50 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 10:15 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 13:08 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 11:15 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-01 21:24 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-01 12:33 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 14:52 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-01 15:54 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 14:51 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-01 21:59 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 15:44 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-02 00:27 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 17:39 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 20:06 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 18:17 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-02 03:23 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-01 21:56 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 15:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-02 00:27 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 17:35 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 20:07 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 18:18 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 19:50 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 21:37 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-01 10:09 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 04:53 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 10:52 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 10:15 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 13:19 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 11:22 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 14:55 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 18:06 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 16:24 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 16:26 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 16:45 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 16:48 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 16:56 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-01 18:59 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 17:01 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 17:03 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 17:27 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-02 00:27 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 17:35 -0700
Re: Trump is White turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-02-01 19:43 -0500
Re: Trump is White Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 17:57 -0700
Re: Trump is White turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-02-01 20:03 -0500
Re: Trump is White Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 18:07 -0700
Re: Trump is White turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-02-01 20:15 -0500
Re: Trump is White Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 18:28 -0700
Re: Trump is White turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-02-01 20:45 -0500
Re: Trump is White Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 19:10 -0700
Re: Trump is White turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-02-01 21:21 -0500
Re: Trump is White mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-01 21:13 -0500
Re: Trump is White % <parsint@aol.com> - 2019-02-01 21:36 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 19:45 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 17:54 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-01 12:32 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 14:54 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 18:12 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 16:14 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 16:25 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 19:49 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 17:55 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-02 03:12 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-02 00:27 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 17:36 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-02 03:16 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 09:01 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-01 21:56 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-02-02 09:45 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 14:51 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 15:45 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:38 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:26 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 17:32 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:47 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:33 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 14:09 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 10:44 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 12:19 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 12:48 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 16:27 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-31 21:58 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-31 23:03 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:32 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 14:09 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 10:45 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 12:17 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 16:29 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 14:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 17:59 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 16:08 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 19:55 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-31 23:53 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 19:55 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 04:55 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 10:52 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 10:16 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 13:20 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 14:58 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 18:23 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 16:44 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-02 01:13 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 18:19 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-01 21:56 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 15:45 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-02 00:27 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:27 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 14:09 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 10:46 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 12:22 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 16:45 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 14:49 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 18:01 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 16:09 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 19:57 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 04:55 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 10:54 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 10:16 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 13:21 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 14:59 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-01 22:11 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Michael Christ <jesusisthelordofall@hotmail.con> - 2019-02-02 09:25 +1100
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 18:13 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 16:26 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-02 01:21 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-01 21:56 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-31 20:40 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 06:03 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 05:08 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 10:58 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-02-01 07:41 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 11:05 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-02-01 11:54 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-01 11:58 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 13:23 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-02-01 13:04 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 15:01 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 15:00 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-01 22:18 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 18:15 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 16:26 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 19:38 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 17:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 14:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 13:41 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 12:40 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 16:47 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 14:50 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 18:02 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 16:10 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 19:58 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 04:56 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 11:06 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 10:17 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 13:23 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-01 12:35 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 15:03 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 11:56 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 15:27 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 15:40 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 19:52 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 15:02 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 18:26 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 16:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 19:53 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-31 23:03 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 19:59 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-01 03:31 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:17 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 14:09 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 10:48 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 12:16 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 12:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 16:50 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 14:53 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 18:03 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 16:10 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 16:50 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 14:53 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 18:05 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 16:17 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 20:01 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-31 20:44 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-31 23:23 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-01 03:31 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-31 23:20 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-01 05:41 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 06:05 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-01 13:24 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 07:43 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-01 15:07 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 08:12 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-01 15:20 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 08:28 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-01 15:34 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 10:13 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-01 19:22 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 15:28 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-01 13:37 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-01 21:24 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 18:22 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 16:29 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-02 00:27 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 17:34 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-02 01:44 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-02 03:18 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 15:04 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-02 01:13 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 18:26 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-01 19:30 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-02 01:44 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-02 06:15 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-02 08:12 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-02 12:18 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <francisgerard@tutanota.com> - 2019-02-02 17:29 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-02 15:39 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-01 21:56 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 11:08 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-01 21:56 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 15:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-02 00:27 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 17:38 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-02 01:13 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 18:26 -0700
Lock 'em up? was Re: Trump White Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-02-01 18:27 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-02 01:44 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-02 06:20 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-02 08:12 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 04:58 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-01 13:24 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 07:43 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-01 15:07 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 08:11 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-01 15:16 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 08:27 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-01 15:34 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 04:57 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-31 23:03 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 16:14 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 20:04 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 20:03 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 04:59 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-01 21:56 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-02 01:13 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 18:27 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-02 01:44 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 21:17 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 06:15 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-01 13:24 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 11:20 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:20 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:23 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-30 11:49 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 14:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-30 15:43 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 15:49 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:00 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:53 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:47 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:36 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:40 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:25 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:35 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:48 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 13:42 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 12:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 16:51 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 14:54 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 18:05 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 16:18 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 20:06 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 05:00 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 11:21 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 10:18 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-01 21:56 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:27 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 20:11 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 13:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 21:44 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:33 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 00:01 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:16 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 01:49 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 05:47 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:31 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 09:19 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:18 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 11:08 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-30 10:10 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:44 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 13:00 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-30 13:09 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:50 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:50 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:43 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 16:47 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:30 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:46 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:50 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 13:44 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 14:29 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 23:58 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 17:10 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:47 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 16:57 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 15:06 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 23:43 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-29 23:43 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 16:46 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 16:51 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 00:21 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-29 20:18 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 18:20 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:27 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 01:49 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 18:55 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 02:11 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:37 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 19:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 20:00 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:37 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 19:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:59 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 20:07 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 20:10 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 20:48 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:40 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 20:41 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:48 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-29 23:48 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:23 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:40 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 20:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:48 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 20:57 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-29 20:59 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 04:23 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 05:20 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 05:30 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:22 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 14:03 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:16 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 09:11 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 07:56 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 11:06 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 16:24 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:56 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:48 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 14:43 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 14:44 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:37 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-30 17:14 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:36 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 14:09 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 10:49 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:25 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:43 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:56 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:48 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 20:59 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-01-31 00:11 -0800
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:39 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:17 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 11:07 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:44 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 12:57 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:49 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:40 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:27 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:40 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 08:49 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 13:43 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 12:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 16:53 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 14:56 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-31 23:03 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 18:08 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 16:19 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 20:07 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 05:01 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-02-01 11:22 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-01 10:19 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-02-01 21:56 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 13:04 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-30 13:08 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:53 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 14:56 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 13:20 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:42 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:28 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-30 21:01 -0600
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:43 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-30 12:00 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:52 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 18:42 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:30 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:44 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-30 11:54 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 12:51 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-30 15:59 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 17:08 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-30 17:15 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-31 06:45 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-31 14:09 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:10 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 09:08 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:17 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-30 11:04 -0500
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:42 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:40 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 20:45 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <street@sam.ted> - 2019-01-30 03:51 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-30 01:49 +0000
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:35 -0700
Re: Trump White Supremacism Investigation By Congress Corwin Esterness <woolcross@gmail.com> - 2019-01-29 16:50 -0800
Page 21 of 44 — ← Prev page 1 … 19 20 [21] 22 23 … 44 Next page →
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 09:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36bb816de3fa254df59@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #256788 |
In article <gbe1dlFljf2U1@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> I give Trump credit for not screwing up the momentum he inherited... >>> though to do so he had to screw us in the long term with an unfunded tax >>> cut. >> >> The momentum started when Trump decided to run for presidnet. It took >> off the day after the election. And it has continued since he took >> the oath of office. >> > >Started about eight years before he took office. When he was grabbing pussy? Lucky fucker.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 12:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8ho35e1msnd8ko53u5e02uq0lr4i53e0qu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #256788 |
On 30 Jan 2019 16:24:21 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> I give Trump credit for not screwing up the momentum he inherited... >>> though to do so he had to screw us in the long term with an unfunded tax >>> cut. >> >> The momentum started when Trump decided to run for presidnet. It took >> off the day after the election. And it has continued since he took >> the oath of office. >> > >Started about eight years before he took office. LIAR. Prove it. US Jobless Rate Down to Near 49-Year Low of 3.7% The unemployment rate in the US declined to 3.7 percent in September of 2018 from 3.9 percent in each of the previous two months and below market expectations of 3.8 percent. It is the lowest jobless rate since December of 1969. The number of unemployed persons decreased by 270,000 to 6.0 million. Over the year, the unemployment rate and the number of unemployed persons declined by 0.5 percentage point and 795,000, respectively. Published on 2018-10-05 https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/unemployment-rate https://www.macrotrends.net/1316/us-national-unemployment-rate Dow Jones Jan 2016: 15099. Dow Jones Jan 2019: 24569 http://forexcentral.info/dow-jones-futures +++ How about a CNN report from late 2017: It's hard to find fault with the latest jobs numbers. The unemployment rate is 4.3%, a 16-year low. The economy has added more than 1 million jobs since Trump took office. (HINT: The numbers are even lower today!!) https://money.cnn.com/2017/08/07/investing/trump-economy-report-card/index.html Housing prices They're red hot. The average price for an existing home in June was a record $263,800, or 6.5% higher than a year ago. June was the 64th consecutive month of gains compared with a year earlier. Lending Consumers aren't borrowing just to buy homes. They're taking on debt for cars and using credit cards for lots of other things. Americans had $3.843 trillion in loans outstanding in May, up from $3.766 trillion at the end of last year, according to the Fed. And businesses are borrowing more, reversing a trend from earlier this year. That could be a good sign for Trump and the economy. Consumers can't prop up the economy alone: Companies need to pull their weight and invest. Consumer spending Spending has increased 2.8% over the past 12 months, a bit below the 3% pace many experts feel is necessary to keep the economy on track. Trade Trump wants more consumers -- in the United States and around the globe -- to buy American. And it looks like that's starting to happen. The trade deficit fell slightly in June from three months ago, to $43.6 billion. That's the lowest since just before the election. America's suddenly vibrant oil industry is a big reason the balance is shifting. Thanks to technologies like fracking, the United States exported more crude in June and imported less. Exports to Canada and Mexico rose in June, too, a possible sign that Trump's tough talk is working with America's two big North American trading partners. Stocks An undeniable win for the president. Fears of a market collapse under Trump have proved to be misguided. The Dow keeps hitting records and is up 12% this year. (2017) (Hint: it is much higher this year.) CNNMoney (New York) First published August 7, 2017: 3:29 PM ET
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 14:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gbekvnFpthnU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #256846 |
On 1/30/19 10:44 AM, Patrick wrote: > On 30 Jan 2019 16:24:21 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > >> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I give Trump credit for not screwing up the momentum he inherited... >>>> though to do so he had to screw us in the long term with an unfunded tax >>>> cut. >>> >>> The momentum started when Trump decided to run for presidnet. It took >>> off the day after the election. And it has continued since he took >>> the oath of office. >>> >> >> Started about eight years before he took office. > > LIAR. Prove it. > Prove it. Easy to show the trend started under Obama: https://www.npr.org/2018/09/12/646708799/fact-check-who-gets-credit-for-the-booming-u-s-economy ----- So while the White House can certainly point to some yardsticks that indicate a meaningful turnaround on Trump's watch — including small business sentiment, business investment and goods-producing job growth — broader measures of the overall job market and wages show the economy continues to follow the steady, upward glide path that began under Obama. ----- I mean, really, did you think that would be a challenge? And Trump has been there for two years... it has long been predicted that around tax season things will slow down when people realize the tax cut claims were lies. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/21/trump-economy-expected-to-slow-down-in-2019-before-possible-recession-in-2020.html Add to that Trump has a HORRIBLE deficit even when he inherited a good economy. That is BAD news. ... -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 15:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36bbd736a28d18f3fbb@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #256988 |
In article <gbekvnFpthnU1@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >On 1/30/19 10:44 AM, Patrick wrote: >> On 30 Jan 2019 16:24:21 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I give Trump credit for not screwing up the momentum he inherited... >>>>> though to do so he had to screw us in the long term with an unfunded tax >>>>> cut. >>>> >>>> The momentum started when Trump decided to run for presidnet. It took >>>> off the day after the election. And it has continued since he took >>>> the oath of office. >>>> >>> >>> Started about eight years before he took office. >> >> LIAR. > >Prove it. > >> Prove it. > >Easy to show the trend started under Obama: > >https://www.npr.org/2018/09/12/646708799/fact-check-who-gets-credit-for-the-booming-u-s-economy >----- >So while the White House can certainly point to some yardsticks that >indicate a meaningful turnaround on Trump's watch ? including small >business sentiment, business investment and goods-producing job growth ? >broader measures of the overall job market and wages show the economy >continues to follow the steady, upward glide path that began under Obama. >----- > >I mean, really, did you think that would be a challenge? > >And Trump has been there for two years... it has long been predicted >that around tax season things will slow down when people realize the tax >cut claims were lies. > >https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/21/trump-economy-expected-to-slow-down-in-2019-before-possible-recession-in-2020.html > >Add to that Trump has a HORRIBLE deficit even when he inherited a good >economy. That is BAD news. > >... Still drinking the Obama lies?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 18:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <d1c45elo93c9hkkra9u5fkrt9hefe9uok5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #256988 |
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:58:14 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 1/30/19 10:44 AM, Patrick wrote: >> On 30 Jan 2019 16:24:21 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I give Trump credit for not screwing up the momentum he inherited... >>>>> though to do so he had to screw us in the long term with an unfunded tax >>>>> cut. >>>> >>>> The momentum started when Trump decided to run for presidnet. It took >>>> off the day after the election. And it has continued since he took >>>> the oath of office. >>>> >>> >>> Started about eight years before he took office. >> >> LIAR. > >Prove it. > >> Prove it. > >Easy to show the trend started under Obama: > >https://www.npr.org/2018/09/12/646708799/fact-check-who-gets-credit-for-the-booming-u-s-economy >----- >So while the White House can certainly point to some yardsticks that >indicate a meaningful turnaround on Trump's watch — including small >business sentiment, business investment and goods-producing job growth — >broader measures of the overall job market and wages show the economy >continues to follow the steady, upward glide path that began under Obama. >----- > >I mean, really, did you think that would be a challenge? > >And Trump has been there for two years... it has long been predicted >that around tax season things will slow down when people realize the tax >cut claims were lies. > >https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/21/trump-economy-expected-to-slow-down-in-2019-before-possible-recession-in-2020.html > >Add to that Trump has a HORRIBLE deficit even when he inherited a good >economy. That is BAD news. Did you post any real facts here? Under Trump's presidency, the economic factors in America have all gone in the right direction. If you wish to debate this, pick a subject, any subject. I cannot read your mind - especially when you wear yout tin foil hat.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 16:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <buq15e.3q8.17.13@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #257038 |
On 2019-01-30 4:18 p.m., Patrick wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:58:14 -0700, Snit > <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 1/30/19 10:44 AM, Patrick wrote: >>> On 30 Jan 2019 16:24:21 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I give Trump credit for not screwing up the momentum he inherited... >>>>>> though to do so he had to screw us in the long term with an unfunded tax >>>>>> cut. >>>>> >>>>> The momentum started when Trump decided to run for presidnet. It took >>>>> off the day after the election. And it has continued since he took >>>>> the oath of office. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Started about eight years before he took office. >>> >>> LIAR. >> >> Prove it. >> >>> Prove it. >> >> Easy to show the trend started under Obama: >> >> https://www.npr.org/2018/09/12/646708799/fact-check-who-gets-credit-for-the-booming-u-s-economy >> ----- >> So while the White House can certainly point to some yardsticks that >> indicate a meaningful turnaround on Trump's watch — including small >> business sentiment, business investment and goods-producing job growth — >> broader measures of the overall job market and wages show the economy >> continues to follow the steady, upward glide path that began under Obama. >> ----- >> >> I mean, really, did you think that would be a challenge? >> >> And Trump has been there for two years... it has long been predicted >> that around tax season things will slow down when people realize the tax >> cut claims were lies. >> >> https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/21/trump-economy-expected-to-slow-down-in-2019-before-possible-recession-in-2020.html >> >> Add to that Trump has a HORRIBLE deficit even when he inherited a good >> economy. That is BAD news. > > > Did you post any real facts here? > Under Trump's presidency, the economic factors in America have all > gone in the right direction. > If you wish to debate this, pick a subject, any subject. > I cannot read your mind - especially when you wear yout tin foil hat. > what's a yout
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-31 06:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mbl55e5crn2gksiu97j6ghps0bsurtckif@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #257050 |
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 16:22:51 -0700, Patrick wrote: >On 2019-01-30 4:18 p.m., Patrick wrote: >> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:58:14 -0700, Snit >> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 1/30/19 10:44 AM, Patrick wrote: >>>> On 30 Jan 2019 16:24:21 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I give Trump credit for not screwing up the momentum he inherited... >>>>>>> though to do so he had to screw us in the long term with an unfunded tax >>>>>>> cut. >>>>>> >>>>>> The momentum started when Trump decided to run for presidnet. It took >>>>>> off the day after the election. And it has continued since he took >>>>>> the oath of office. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Started about eight years before he took office. >>>> >>>> LIAR. >>> >>> Prove it. >>> >>>> Prove it. >>> >>> Easy to show the trend started under Obama: >>> >>> https://www.npr.org/2018/09/12/646708799/fact-check-who-gets-credit-for-the-booming-u-s-economy >>> ----- >>> So while the White House can certainly point to some yardsticks that >>> indicate a meaningful turnaround on Trump's watch — including small >>> business sentiment, business investment and goods-producing job growth — >>> broader measures of the overall job market and wages show the economy >>> continues to follow the steady, upward glide path that began under Obama. >>> ----- >>> >>> I mean, really, did you think that would be a challenge? >>> >>> And Trump has been there for two years... it has long been predicted >>> that around tax season things will slow down when people realize the tax >>> cut claims were lies. >>> >>> https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/21/trump-economy-expected-to-slow-down-in-2019-before-possible-recession-in-2020.html >>> >>> Add to that Trump has a HORRIBLE deficit even when he inherited a good >>> economy. That is BAD news. >> >> >> Did you post any real facts here? >> Under Trump's presidency, the economic factors in America have all >> gone in the right direction. >> If you wish to debate this, pick a subject, any subject. >> I cannot read your mind - especially when you wear yout tin foil hat. >> >what's a yout shadup larry.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 16:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gbeq0iFqsqbU7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #257038 |
On 1/30/19 4:18 PM, Patrick wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:58:14 -0700, Snit > <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 1/30/19 10:44 AM, Patrick wrote: >>> On 30 Jan 2019 16:24:21 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I give Trump credit for not screwing up the momentum he inherited... >>>>>> though to do so he had to screw us in the long term with an unfunded tax >>>>>> cut. >>>>> >>>>> The momentum started when Trump decided to run for presidnet. It took >>>>> off the day after the election. And it has continued since he took >>>>> the oath of office. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Started about eight years before he took office. >>> >>> LIAR. >> >> Prove it. >> >>> Prove it. >> >> Easy to show the trend started under Obama: >> >> https://www.npr.org/2018/09/12/646708799/fact-check-who-gets-credit-for-the-booming-u-s-economy >> ----- >> So while the White House can certainly point to some yardsticks that >> indicate a meaningful turnaround on Trump's watch — including small >> business sentiment, business investment and goods-producing job growth — >> broader measures of the overall job market and wages show the economy >> continues to follow the steady, upward glide path that began under Obama. >> ----- >> >> I mean, really, did you think that would be a challenge? >> >> And Trump has been there for two years... it has long been predicted >> that around tax season things will slow down when people realize the tax >> cut claims were lies. >> >> https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/21/trump-economy-expected-to-slow-down-in-2019-before-possible-recession-in-2020.html >> >> Add to that Trump has a HORRIBLE deficit even when he inherited a good >> economy. That is BAD news. > > Did you post any real facts here? Of course. And of course you will ignore them. > Under Trump's presidency, the economic factors in America have all > gone in the right direction. The momentum has not broken from the Obama years... and that is commendable. > If you wish to debate this, pick a subject, any subject. > I cannot read your mind - especially when you wear yout tin foil hat. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-31 06:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8dl55e507lqf5sb4qj8h6guba8d7ks5sum@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #257054 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >The momentum has not broken from the Obama years... and that is >commendable. Your only way up from the bottom of a hole.... is up.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-31 12:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gbh09lFb30eU8@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #257240 |
On 1/31/19 4:02 AM, Patrick wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> The momentum has not broken from the Obama years... and that is >> commendable. > > Your only way up from the bottom of a hole.... is up. > What measures do you think were not improving under Obama? Be specific. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-31 16:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <88p65epmbrbsucl1fm9com0msf12cn7dak@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #257380 |
On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 12:23:32 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 1/31/19 4:02 AM, Patrick wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> The momentum has not broken from the Obama years... and that is >>> commendable. >> >> Your only way up from the bottom of a hole.... is up. >> > >What measures do you think were not improving under Obama? Be specific. Do you really want a list? At home and abroad, Obama’s trail of disasters from the BOSTON GLOBE.... In 2010, two years after electing him president, voters trounced Obama’s party, handing Democrats the biggest midterm losses in 72 years. Obama was reelected in 2012, but by nearly 4 million fewer votes than in his first election, making him the only president ever to win a second term with shrunken margins in both the popular and electoral vote. Two years later, with Obama imploring voters, “[My] policies are on the ballot — every single one of them,” Democrats were clobbered again. And in 2016, as he campaigned hard for Hillary Clinton, Obama was increasingly adamant that his legacy was at stake. “I’m not on this ballot,” he told campaign rallies in a frequent refrain, “but everything we’ve done these last eight years is on the ballot.” The voters heard him out, and once more turned him down. https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/editorials/2017/01/08/home-and-abroad-obama-trail-disasters/YOaU1KuAT3hSHaGHkmGCeN/story.html The economy. Obama took office during a painful recession and (with Congress’s help) made it even worse. Historically, the deeper a recession, the more robust the recovery that follows, but the economy’s rebound under Obama was the worst in seven decades. Annual GDP growth since the recession ended has averaged a feeble 2.1 percent, by far the puniest economic performance of any president since World War II. In 2008, when Obama was first elected president, 63 percent of Americans considered themselves middle class. Seven years later, only 51 percent still felt the same way. Obama argues energetically that his economic policies have delivered prosperity and employment. Countless people disagree — including many who aren’t Republican.. Health care. The Affordable Care Act should never have been enacted. Survey after survey confirmed that it lacked majority support, and only through hard-knuckled, party-line maneuvering was the wrenching health-care overhaul rammed through Congress. But Obama was certain the measure would win public support, because of three promises he made over and over: that the law would extend health insurance to the 47 million uninsured, that it would significantly reduce health insurance costs, and that Americans who had health plans or doctors they liked could keep them. But Obamacare has been a fiasco. At least 27 million Americans are still without health insurance, and many of those who are newly insured have simply been added to the Medicaid rolls. Far from reducing costs, Obamacare sent premiums and deductibles skyrocketing. Foreign policy. The 44th president came to office vowing not to repeat the foreign-policy mistakes of his predecessor. His own were exponentially worse. In his rush to pull US troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan, he created a power vacuum into which terror networks expanded and the Taliban revived. Islamic State’s jihadist savagery not only plunged a stabilized Iraq back into shuddering violence, but also inspired scores of lethal terrorist attacks in the West. For months, Obama and his lieutenants insisted that Syrian dictator Bashar Assad could be induced to “reform,” and pointedly refused to intervene as an uprising against him metastasized into genocidal slaughter. At last Obama vowed to take action if Assad crossed a “red line” by deploying chemical weapons — but when those weapons were used, Obama blinked. For eight years the nation has been led by a president intent on lowering America’s global profile, not projecting military power, and “leading from behind.” The consequences have been stark: a Middle East awash in blood and bombs, US troops re-embroiled in Iraq and Afghanistan, aggressive dictators ascendant, human rights and democracy in retreat, rivers of refugees destabilizing nations across three continents, the rise of neo-fascism in Europe, and the erosion of US credibility to its lowest level since the Carter years. National unity. As a candidate for president, Obama promised to soothe America’s bitter and divisive politics, and to replace red state/blue state animosity with cooperation and bipartisanship. But the healer-in-chief millions of Americans voted for never showed up. According to Gallup, Obama became the most polarizing president in modern history. Like all presidents, he faced partisan opposition, but Obama worsened things by regularly taking the low road and disparaging his critics’ motives. In his own words, his political strategy was one of ruthless escalation: “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun.” During his 2012 reelection campaign, Politico reported that “Obama and his top campaign aides have engaged far more frequently in character attacks and personal insults than the Romney campaign ++++++++++ Obama’s accession in 2008 as the nation’s first elected black president was an achievement that even Republicans and conservatives could cheer. It marked a moment of hope and transformation; it genuinely did change America for the better. It was also the high point of Obama’s presidency. What followed, alas, was eight long years of disenchantment and incompetence. ++++++++ This is the same president who, during his tenure, an advanced military drone being used in the Iraqi War somehow flew over the Iranian border and crash landed. We knew exactly where it was, and could have used US warplanes to totally destroy it, so the Iranians could not use its technology. Instead of doing so, Obama chose to “ask” the Iranians to give it back. The Iranians instead dismantled it, copied it, and are now flying advanced drones just like ours. Thanks, Obama! In 1945, there were 41 people working for every American receiving Social Security benefits. By 2030, there will be two workers for every American receiving Social Security and Medicare benefits. If any issue needs a president to “bend the arc of history,” it is this one. But Obama, like Bush and Bill Clinton before him, not only gave up on entitlement reform after grasping the political pain involved in such changes, he basically stopped talking about this gigantic problem. The Obama administration has been the least transparent and the most antagonistic toward the media since the Nixon administration. A 2013 report by the Committee to Protect Journalists documents case after case of whistleblowers being punished and public documents being kept from the public. So much for Obama’s promise to lead “the most transparent administration in history.” ++++ Shall we next discuss all the crooks that obammy hired on?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-31 21:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gbhvuaFhjr3U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #257420 |
On 1/31/19 2:25 PM, Patrick wrote: > On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 12:23:32 -0700, Snit > <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 1/31/19 4:02 AM, Patrick wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>>> The momentum has not broken from the Obama years... and that is >>>> commendable. >>> >>> Your only way up from the bottom of a hole.... is up. >>> >> >> What measures do you think were not improving under Obama? Be specific. > > Do you really want a list? Yes, please. > At home and abroad, Obama’s trail of disasters > from the BOSTON GLOBE.... > > In 2010, two years after electing him president, voters trounced > Obama’s party, handing Democrats the biggest midterm losses in 72 > years. Obama was reelected in 2012, but by nearly 4 million fewer > votes than in his first election, making him the only president ever > to win a second term with shrunken margins in both the popular and > electoral vote. So nothing about the topic of the economy. And not as badly as as Trump was trounced. > Two years later, with Obama imploring voters, “[My] policies are on > the ballot — every single one of them,” Democrats were clobbered > again. And in 2016, as he campaigned hard for Hillary Clinton, Obama > was increasingly adamant that his legacy was at stake. “I’m not on > this ballot,” he told campaign rallies in a frequent refrain, “but > everything we’ve done these last eight years is on the ballot.” The > voters heard him out, and once more turned him down. > https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/editorials/2017/01/08/home-and-abroad-obama-trail-disasters/YOaU1KuAT3hSHaGHkmGCeN/story.html > > The economy. Obama took office during a painful recession and > (with Congress’s help) made it even worse. Historically, the deeper a > recession, the more robust the recovery that follows, but the > economy’s rebound under Obama was the worst in seven decades. Annual > GDP growth since the recession ended has averaged a feeble 2.1 > percent, by far the puniest economic performance of any president > since World War II. Nope. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GDPC1 And below you go in ten different directions. > In 2008, when Obama was first elected president, 63 percent of > Americans considered themselves middle class. Seven years later, only > 51 percent still felt the same way. Obama argues energetically that > his economic policies have delivered prosperity and employment. > Countless people disagree — including many who aren’t Republican.. > > Health care. The Affordable Care Act should never have been enacted. > Survey after survey confirmed that it lacked majority support, and > only through hard-knuckled, party-line maneuvering was the wrenching > health-care overhaul rammed through Congress. But Obama was certain > the measure would win public support, because of three promises he > made over and over: that the law would extend health insurance to the > 47 million uninsured, that it would significantly reduce health > insurance costs, and that Americans who had health plans or doctors > they liked could keep them. But Obamacare has been a fiasco. > > At least 27 million Americans are still without health insurance, and > many of those who are newly insured have simply been added to the > Medicaid rolls. Far from reducing costs, Obamacare sent premiums and > deductibles skyrocketing. > > Foreign policy. The 44th president came to office vowing not to repeat > the foreign-policy mistakes of his predecessor. His own were > exponentially worse. > In his rush to pull US troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan, he created > a power vacuum into which terror networks expanded and the Taliban > revived. Islamic State’s jihadist savagery not only plunged a > stabilized Iraq back into shuddering violence, but also inspired > scores of lethal terrorist attacks in the West. For months, Obama and > his lieutenants insisted that Syrian dictator Bashar Assad could be > induced to “reform,” and pointedly refused to intervene as an uprising > against him metastasized into genocidal slaughter. At last Obama vowed > to take action if Assad crossed a “red line” by deploying chemical > weapons — but when those weapons were used, Obama blinked. > > For eight years the nation has been led by a president intent on > lowering America’s global profile, not projecting military power, and > “leading from behind.” The consequences have been stark: a Middle East > awash in blood and bombs, US troops re-embroiled in Iraq and > Afghanistan, aggressive dictators ascendant, human rights and > democracy in retreat, rivers of refugees destabilizing nations across > three continents, the rise of neo-fascism in Europe, and the erosion > of US credibility to its lowest level since the Carter years. > > National unity. As a candidate for president, Obama promised to > soothe America’s bitter and divisive politics, and to replace red > state/blue state animosity with cooperation and bipartisanship. But > the healer-in-chief millions of Americans voted for never showed up. > According to Gallup, Obama became the most polarizing president in > modern history. Like all presidents, he faced partisan opposition, but > Obama worsened things by regularly taking the low road and disparaging > his critics’ motives. In his own words, his political strategy was one > of ruthless escalation: “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring > a gun.” During his 2012 reelection campaign, Politico reported that > “Obama and his top campaign aides have engaged far more frequently in > character attacks and personal insults than the Romney campaign > > ++++++++++ > > Obama’s accession in 2008 as the nation’s first elected black > president was an achievement that even Republicans and conservatives > could cheer. It marked a moment of hope and transformation; it > genuinely did change America for the better. > It was also the high point of Obama’s presidency. What followed, alas, > was eight long years of disenchantment and incompetence. > > ++++++++ > > This is the same president who, during his tenure, an advanced > military drone being used in the Iraqi War somehow flew over the > Iranian border and crash landed. We knew exactly where it was, and > could have used US warplanes to totally destroy it, so the Iranians > could not use its technology. Instead of doing so, Obama chose to > “ask” the Iranians to give it back. The Iranians instead dismantled > it, copied it, and are now flying advanced drones just like ours. > Thanks, Obama! > > In 1945, there were 41 people working for every American receiving > Social Security benefits. By 2030, there will be two workers for every > American receiving Social Security and Medicare benefits. If any issue > needs a president to “bend the arc of history,” it is this one. But > Obama, like Bush and Bill Clinton before him, not only gave up on > entitlement reform after grasping the political pain involved in such > changes, he basically stopped talking about this gigantic problem. > > The Obama administration has been the least transparent and the most > antagonistic toward the media since the Nixon administration. A 2013 > report by the Committee to Protect Journalists documents case after > case of whistleblowers being punished and public documents being kept > from the public. So much for Obama’s promise to lead “the most > transparent administration in history.” > > ++++ > > Shall we next discuss all the crooks that obammy hired on? > -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-01 05:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <i8985elncqsqua7nt6js4kt3vlp0b25q71@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #257627 |
On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 21:23:38 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 1/31/19 2:25 PM, Patrick wrote: >> On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 12:23:32 -0700, Snit >> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 1/31/19 4:02 AM, Patrick wrote: >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The momentum has not broken from the Obama years... and that is >>>>> commendable. >>>> >>>> Your only way up from the bottom of a hole.... is up. >>>> >>> >>> What measures do you think were not improving under Obama? Be specific. >> >> Do you really want a list? > >Yes, please. OK then. Improvements under Obammy. >> At home and abroad, Obama’s trail of disasters >> from the BOSTON GLOBE.... >> >> In 2010, two years after electing him president, voters trounced >> Obama’s party, handing Democrats the biggest midterm losses in 72 >> years. Obama was reelected in 2012, but by nearly 4 million fewer >> votes than in his first election, making him the only president ever >> to win a second term with shrunken margins in both the popular and >> electoral vote. > >So nothing about the topic of the economy. And not as badly as as Trump >was trounced. Maybe you consider this an improvement under obammy. >> Two years later, with Obama imploring voters, “[My] policies are on >> the ballot — every single one of them,” Democrats were clobbered >> again. And in 2016, as he campaigned hard for Hillary Clinton, Obama >> was increasingly adamant that his legacy was at stake. “I’m not on >> this ballot,” he told campaign rallies in a frequent refrain, “but >> everything we’ve done these last eight years is on the ballot.” The >> voters heard him out, and once more turned him down. >> https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/editorials/2017/01/08/home-and-abroad-obama-trail-disasters/YOaU1KuAT3hSHaGHkmGCeN/story.html >> >> The economy. Obama took office during a painful recession and >> (with Congress’s help) made it even worse. Historically, the deeper a >> recession, the more robust the recovery that follows, but the >> economy’s rebound under Obama was the worst in seven decades. Annual >> GDP growth since the recession ended has averaged a feeble 2.1 >> percent, by far the puniest economic performance of any president >> since World War II. > >Nope. >https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GDPC1 Annual GDP growth since the recession ended has averaged a feeble 2.1 percent, by far the puniest economic performance of any president since World War II. FACT. Read the Boston Globe reference. >And below you go in ten different directions. Maybe you consider these improvements under obammy. ?? The items listed below show that obammy was a lousy president. >> In 2008, when Obama was first elected president, 63 percent of >> Americans considered themselves middle class. Seven years later, only >> 51 percent still felt the same way. Obama argues energetically that >> his economic policies have delivered prosperity and employment. >> Countless people disagree — including many who aren’t Republican.. >> >> Health care. The Affordable Care Act should never have been enacted. >> Survey after survey confirmed that it lacked majority support, and >> only through hard-knuckled, party-line maneuvering was the wrenching >> health-care overhaul rammed through Congress. But Obama was certain >> the measure would win public support, because of three promises he >> made over and over: that the law would extend health insurance to the >> 47 million uninsured, that it would significantly reduce health >> insurance costs, and that Americans who had health plans or doctors >> they liked could keep them. But Obamacare has been a fiasco. >> >> At least 27 million Americans are still without health insurance, and >> many of those who are newly insured have simply been added to the >> Medicaid rolls. Far from reducing costs, Obamacare sent premiums and >> deductibles skyrocketing. >> >> Foreign policy. The 44th president came to office vowing not to repeat >> the foreign-policy mistakes of his predecessor. His own were >> exponentially worse. >> In his rush to pull US troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan, he created >> a power vacuum into which terror networks expanded and the Taliban >> revived. Islamic State’s jihadist savagery not only plunged a >> stabilized Iraq back into shuddering violence, but also inspired >> scores of lethal terrorist attacks in the West. For months, Obama and >> his lieutenants insisted that Syrian dictator Bashar Assad could be >> induced to “reform,” and pointedly refused to intervene as an uprising >> against him metastasized into genocidal slaughter. At last Obama vowed >> to take action if Assad crossed a “red line” by deploying chemical >> weapons — but when those weapons were used, Obama blinked. >> >> For eight years the nation has been led by a president intent on >> lowering America’s global profile, not projecting military power, and >> “leading from behind.” The consequences have been stark: a Middle East >> awash in blood and bombs, US troops re-embroiled in Iraq and >> Afghanistan, aggressive dictators ascendant, human rights and >> democracy in retreat, rivers of refugees destabilizing nations across >> three continents, the rise of neo-fascism in Europe, and the erosion >> of US credibility to its lowest level since the Carter years. >> >> National unity. As a candidate for president, Obama promised to >> soothe America’s bitter and divisive politics, and to replace red >> state/blue state animosity with cooperation and bipartisanship. But >> the healer-in-chief millions of Americans voted for never showed up. >> According to Gallup, Obama became the most polarizing president in >> modern history. Like all presidents, he faced partisan opposition, but >> Obama worsened things by regularly taking the low road and disparaging >> his critics’ motives. In his own words, his political strategy was one >> of ruthless escalation: “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring >> a gun.” During his 2012 reelection campaign, Politico reported that >> “Obama and his top campaign aides have engaged far more frequently in >> character attacks and personal insults than the Romney campaign >> >> ++++++++++ >> >> Obama’s accession in 2008 as the nation’s first elected black >> president was an achievement that even Republicans and conservatives >> could cheer. It marked a moment of hope and transformation; it >> genuinely did change America for the better. >> It was also the high point of Obama’s presidency. What followed, alas, >> was eight long years of disenchantment and incompetence. >> >> ++++++++ >> >> This is the same president who, during his tenure, an advanced >> military drone being used in the Iraqi War somehow flew over the >> Iranian border and crash landed. We knew exactly where it was, and >> could have used US warplanes to totally destroy it, so the Iranians >> could not use its technology. Instead of doing so, Obama chose to >> “ask” the Iranians to give it back. The Iranians instead dismantled >> it, copied it, and are now flying advanced drones just like ours. >> Thanks, Obama! >> >> In 1945, there were 41 people working for every American receiving >> Social Security benefits. By 2030, there will be two workers for every >> American receiving Social Security and Medicare benefits. If any issue >> needs a president to “bend the arc of history,” it is this one. But >> Obama, like Bush and Bill Clinton before him, not only gave up on >> entitlement reform after grasping the political pain involved in such >> changes, he basically stopped talking about this gigantic problem. >> >> The Obama administration has been the least transparent and the most >> antagonistic toward the media since the Nixon administration. A 2013 >> report by the Committee to Protect Journalists documents case after >> case of whistleblowers being punished and public documents being kept >> from the public. So much for Obama’s promise to lead “the most >> transparent administration in history.” >> >> ++++ >> >> Shall we next discuss all the crooks that obammy hired on? >>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 17:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36bbede62e5a2418fd5@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #257038 |
In article <d1c45elo93c9hkkra9u5fkrt9hefe9uok5@4ax.com>, PBARKER002 @woh.rr.com says... > >On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:58:14 -0700, Snit ><usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>On 1/30/19 10:44 AM, Patrick wrote: >>> On 30 Jan 2019 16:24:21 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I give Trump credit for not screwing up the momentum he inherited... >>>>>> though to do so he had to screw us in the long term with an unfunded tax >>>>>> cut. >>>>> >>>>> The momentum started when Trump decided to run for presidnet. It took >>>>> off the day after the election. And it has continued since he took >>>>> the oath of office. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Started about eight years before he took office. >>> >>> LIAR. >> >>Prove it. >> >>> Prove it. >> >>Easy to show the trend started under Obama: >> >>https://www.npr.org/2018/09/12/646708799/fact-check-who-gets-credit-for-the-booming-u-s-economy >>----- >>So while the White House can certainly point to some yardsticks that >>indicate a meaningful turnaround on Trump's watch ? including small >>business sentiment, business investment and goods-producing job growth ? >>broader measures of the overall job market and wages show the economy >>continues to follow the steady, upward glide path that began under Obama. >>----- >> >>I mean, really, did you think that would be a challenge? >> >>And Trump has been there for two years... it has long been predicted >>that around tax season things will slow down when people realize the tax >>cut claims were lies. >> >>https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/21/trump-economy-expected-to-slow-down-in-2019-before-possible-recession-in-2020.html >> >>Add to that Trump has a HORRIBLE deficit even when he inherited a good >>economy. That is BAD news. > > >Did you post any real facts here? >Under Trump's presidency, the economic factors in America have all >gone in the right direction. What about the farmers and the tariffs? >If you wish to debate this, pick a subject, any subject. >I cannot read your mind - especially when you wear yout tin foil hat. That was weak cupcake, please try harder.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-31 06:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ifl55ept7gshmeqdfe3oabbgh0son0tjmo@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #257101 |
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 17:23:20 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >In article <d1c45elo93c9hkkra9u5fkrt9hefe9uok5@4ax.com>, PBARKER002 >@woh.rr.com says... >> >>On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:58:14 -0700, Snit >><usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>>On 1/30/19 10:44 AM, Patrick wrote: >>>> On 30 Jan 2019 16:24:21 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I give Trump credit for not screwing up the momentum he inherited... >>>>>>> though to do so he had to screw us in the long term with an unfunded tax >>>>>>> cut. >>>>>> >>>>>> The momentum started when Trump decided to run for presidnet. It took >>>>>> off the day after the election. And it has continued since he took >>>>>> the oath of office. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Started about eight years before he took office. >>>> >>>> LIAR. >>> >>>Prove it. >>> >>>> Prove it. >>> >>>Easy to show the trend started under Obama: >>> >>>https://www.npr.org/2018/09/12/646708799/fact-check-who-gets-credit-for-the-booming-u-s-economy >>>----- >>>So while the White House can certainly point to some yardsticks that >>>indicate a meaningful turnaround on Trump's watch ? including small >>>business sentiment, business investment and goods-producing job growth ? >>>broader measures of the overall job market and wages show the economy >>>continues to follow the steady, upward glide path that began under Obama. >>>----- >>> >>>I mean, really, did you think that would be a challenge? >>> >>>And Trump has been there for two years... it has long been predicted >>>that around tax season things will slow down when people realize the tax >>>cut claims were lies. >>> >>>https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/21/trump-economy-expected-to-slow-down-in-2019-before-possible-recession-in-2020.html >>> >>>Add to that Trump has a HORRIBLE deficit even when he inherited a good >>>economy. That is BAD news. >> >> >>Did you post any real facts here? >>Under Trump's presidency, the economic factors in America have all >>gone in the right direction. > >What about the farmers and the tariffs? They are in progress. The office of the president cannot do everything all at once. >>If you wish to debate this, pick a subject, any subject. >>I cannot read your mind - especially when you wear yout tin foil hat. >That was weak cupcake, please try harder. I'm getting tired. I am old.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-31 08:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36bcc5d1907cfef8ffb@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #257241 |
In article <ifl55ept7gshmeqdfe3oabbgh0son0tjmo@4ax.com>, PBARKER002 @woh.rr.com says... > >On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 17:23:20 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >wrote: > >>In article <d1c45elo93c9hkkra9u5fkrt9hefe9uok5@4ax.com>, PBARKER002 >>@woh.rr.com says... >>> >>>On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:58:14 -0700, Snit >>><usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On 1/30/19 10:44 AM, Patrick wrote: >>>>> On 30 Jan 2019 16:24:21 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I give Trump credit for not screwing up the momentum he inherited... >>>>>>>> though to do so he had to screw us in the long term with an unfunded tax >>>>>>>> cut. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The momentum started when Trump decided to run for presidnet. It took >>>>>>> off the day after the election. And it has continued since he took >>>>>>> the oath of office. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Started about eight years before he took office. >>>>> >>>>> LIAR. >>>> >>>>Prove it. >>>> >>>>> Prove it. >>>> >>>>Easy to show the trend started under Obama: >>>> >>>>https://www.npr.org/2018/09/12/646708799/fact-check-who-gets-credit-for-the-booming-u-s-economy >>>>----- >>>>So while the White House can certainly point to some yardsticks that >>>>indicate a meaningful turnaround on Trump's watch ? including small >>>>business sentiment, business investment and goods-producing job growth ? >>>>broader measures of the overall job market and wages show the economy >>>>continues to follow the steady, upward glide path that began under Obama. >>>>----- >>>> >>>>I mean, really, did you think that would be a challenge? >>>> >>>>And Trump has been there for two years... it has long been predicted >>>>that around tax season things will slow down when people realize the tax >>>>cut claims were lies. >>>> >>>>https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/21/trump-economy-expected-to-slow-down-in-2019-before-possible-recession-in-2020.html >>>> >>>>Add to that Trump has a HORRIBLE deficit even when he inherited a good >>>>economy. That is BAD news. >>> >>> >>>Did you post any real facts here? >>>Under Trump's presidency, the economic factors in America have all >>>gone in the right direction. >> >>What about the farmers and the tariffs? > >They are in progress. >The office of the president cannot do everything all at once. > > >>>If you wish to debate this, pick a subject, any subject. >>>I cannot read your mind - especially when you wear yout tin foil hat. > >>That was weak cupcake, please try harder. > >I'm getting tired. I am old. Same excuse used everytime he fails.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-31 13:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <36g65etr4uk4msebg5ntmd8acnj9lre83q@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #257294 |
On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 08:44:38 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >In article <ifl55ept7gshmeqdfe3oabbgh0son0tjmo@4ax.com>, PBARKER002 >@woh.rr.com says... >> >>On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 17:23:20 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>wrote: >> >>>In article <d1c45elo93c9hkkra9u5fkrt9hefe9uok5@4ax.com>, PBARKER002 >>>@woh.rr.com says... >>>> >>>>On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:58:14 -0700, Snit >>>><usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On 1/30/19 10:44 AM, Patrick wrote: >>>>>> On 30 Jan 2019 16:24:21 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I give Trump credit for not screwing up the momentum he inherited... >>>>>>>>> though to do so he had to screw us in the long term with an unfunded tax >>>>>>>>> cut. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The momentum started when Trump decided to run for presidnet. It took >>>>>>>> off the day after the election. And it has continued since he took >>>>>>>> the oath of office. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Started about eight years before he took office. >>>>>> >>>>>> LIAR. >>>>> >>>>>Prove it. >>>>> >>>>>> Prove it. >>>>> >>>>>Easy to show the trend started under Obama: >>>>> >>>>>https://www.npr.org/2018/09/12/646708799/fact-check-who-gets-credit-for-the-booming-u-s-economy >>>>>----- >>>>>So while the White House can certainly point to some yardsticks that >>>>>indicate a meaningful turnaround on Trump's watch ? including small >>>>>business sentiment, business investment and goods-producing job growth ? >>>>>broader measures of the overall job market and wages show the economy >>>>>continues to follow the steady, upward glide path that began under Obama. >>>>>----- >>>>> >>>>>I mean, really, did you think that would be a challenge? >>>>> >>>>>And Trump has been there for two years... it has long been predicted >>>>>that around tax season things will slow down when people realize the tax >>>>>cut claims were lies. >>>>> >>>>>https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/21/trump-economy-expected-to-slow-down-in-2019-before-possible-recession-in-2020.html >>>>> >>>>>Add to that Trump has a HORRIBLE deficit even when he inherited a good >>>>>economy. That is BAD news. >>>> >>>> >>>>Did you post any real facts here? >>>>Under Trump's presidency, the economic factors in America have all >>>>gone in the right direction. >>> >>>What about the farmers and the tariffs? >> >>They are in progress. >>The office of the president cannot do everything all at once. >> >> >>>>If you wish to debate this, pick a subject, any subject. >>>>I cannot read your mind - especially when you wear yout tin foil hat. >> >>>That was weak cupcake, please try harder. >> >>I'm getting tired. I am old. > >Same excuse used everytime he fails. Huh?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 09:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36bb80457f1defa8f57@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #256772 |
In article <hji35edqlrllsqrm4l882o6dntavc6kjgj@4ax.com>, PBARKER002 @woh.rr.com says... > > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>I give Trump credit for not screwing up the momentum he inherited... >>though to do so he had to screw us in the long term with an unfunded tax >>cut. > >The momentum started when Trump decided to run for presidnet. It took >off the day after the election. And it has continued since he took >the oath of office. You mean the Russian collusion and the racism?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 09:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gbe28rFlopkU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #256798 |
On 1/30/19 9:35 AM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <hji35edqlrllsqrm4l882o6dntavc6kjgj@4ax.com>, PBARKER002 > @woh.rr.com says... >> >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> I give Trump credit for not screwing up the momentum he inherited... >>> though to do so he had to screw us in the long term with an unfunded tax >>> cut. >> >> The momentum started when Trump decided to run for presidnet. It took >> off the day after the election. And it has continued since he took >> the oath of office. > > You mean the Russian collusion and the racism? The racism started earlier than that. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 09:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36bb84a58aba2742f67@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #256799 |
In article <gbe28rFlopkU1@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >On 1/30/19 9:35 AM, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <hji35edqlrllsqrm4l882o6dntavc6kjgj@4ax.com>, PBARKER002 >> @woh.rr.com says... >>> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I give Trump credit for not screwing up the momentum he inherited... >>>> though to do so he had to screw us in the long term with an unfunded tax >>>> cut. >>> >>> The momentum started when Trump decided to run for presidnet. It took >>> off the day after the election. And it has continued since he took >>> the oath of office. >> >> You mean the Russian collusion and the racism? > >The racism started earlier than that. I have never seen any from him, but I guess majority rules.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 21 of 44 — ← Prev page 1 … 19 20 [21] 22 23 … 44 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web