Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.checkmate > #255556 > unrolled thread

No one answers this

Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate

Contents

  No one answers this Lamey <teandson@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 06:21 -0800
    Re: No one answers this Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-28 08:29 -0600
      Re: No one answers this Lamey <teandson@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 06:35 -0800
      Re: No one answers this Pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2019-01-28 18:01 +0000
        Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 11:23 -0700
          Re: No one answers this Pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2019-01-28 18:50 +0000
            Re: No one answers this mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-28 14:02 -0500
              Re: No one answers this % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 14:21 -0700
                Re: No one answers this mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-28 17:11 -0500
              Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:40 -0700
            Re: No one answers this % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 14:20 -0700
            Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:39 -0700
          Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ No one answers this ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-28 13:09 -0600
            Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 13:08 -0700
              Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-28 14:27 -0600
        Re: No one answers this mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-28 13:39 -0500
          Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 13:05 -0700
            Re: No one answers this mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-28 15:43 -0500
              Re: No one answers this Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-28 15:01 -0600
              Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 14:04 -0700
                Re: No one answers this vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-28 22:54 +0000
                  Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 07:02 -0700
                  Re: No one answers this vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-30 07:27 +0000
                    Re: No one answers this vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-30 08:52 +0000
                      Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:35 -0700
                      Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:38 -0700
                    Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:34 -0700
                    Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:35 -0700
      Re: No one answers this vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-28 22:50 +0000
        Re: No one answers this vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-30 08:07 +0000
          Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:48 -0700
          Re: No one answers this mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-30 09:34 -0500
            Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:20 -0700
              Re: No one answers this mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-30 10:49 -0500
          Re: No one answers this mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-31 13:59 -0500
            Re: No one answers this mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-02 12:52 -0500
          Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-31 12:49 -0700
            Re: No one answers this mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-31 15:32 -0500
        Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:33 -0700
        Re: No one answers this mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-30 09:39 -0500
          Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 08:21 -0700
            Re: No one answers this mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-30 10:43 -0500
              Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 09:46 -0700
    Re: No one answers this mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-28 09:46 -0500
      Re: No one answers this Lamey <teandson@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 06:59 -0800
        Re: No one answers this mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-28 10:07 -0500
          Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 08:23 -0700
            Re: No one answers this mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-28 10:44 -0500
              Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 11:23 -0700
                Re: No one answers this mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-28 13:45 -0500
                  Re: No one answers this Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-28 13:04 -0600
                    Re: No one answers this Lamey <teandson@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 11:29 -0800
                      Re: No one answers this Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-28 13:36 -0600
                        Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 13:07 -0700
                      Re: No one answers this % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-28 14:19 -0700
                        Re: No one answers this Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-28 15:21 -0600
                    Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 13:06 -0700
              Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:45 -0700
              Re: No one answers this mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-30 09:49 -0500
            Re: No one answers this vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-28 22:58 +0000
              Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 07:02 -0700
                Re: No one answers this vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-29 20:36 +0000
                  Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 13:46 -0700
                    Re: No one answers this vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-30 01:30 +0000
                      Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-29 19:52 -0700
                        Re: No one answers this vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-30 07:45 +0000
                          Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:46 -0700
                        Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:43 -0700
                Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:42 -0700
          Re: No one answers this Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2019-01-28 10:54 -0800
            Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 13:06 -0700
          Re: No one answers this Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-30 05:44 -0700
          Re: No one answers this mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-30 10:00 -0500

Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]

#256201

In article <gb9fopFlfmvU4@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org 
says...
>
>On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 08:23:28 -0700, Skeeter wrote:
>
>> In article <q2n5qq$1dcu$2@gioia.aioe.org>,
>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>>>
>>>On 1/28/2019 9:59 AM, Lamey wrote:
>>>> Another "I cant really answer this" added to the list.
>>>
>>>Would you like a peom about happy wall?
>> 
>> Another answer that fits into the "I don't know " list.
>> 
>> 2 things the scardy cat libs wont answer
>> 
>> 1 How has Trump personally affected your life?
>
>I can't answer that in detail just yet, but not to put too fine a point 
>on it:  the State Department being shut down impacted my business affairs.
>
>> 
>> 2. Why don't you think we need a wall?
>
>You seem to think denying Trump his monument means doing away with border 
>security.  False dichotomy -- and you're poisoning the well.

See? No answer, just diversion.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#256308

On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 07:02:56 -0700, Skeeter wrote:

> In article <gb9fopFlfmvU4@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org
> says...
>>
>>On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 08:23:28 -0700, Skeeter wrote:
>>
>>> In article <q2n5qq$1dcu$2@gioia.aioe.org>,
>>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>>>>
>>>>On 1/28/2019 9:59 AM, Lamey wrote:
>>>>> Another "I cant really answer this" added to the list.
>>>>
>>>>Would you like a peom about happy wall?
>>> 
>>> Another answer that fits into the "I don't know " list.
>>> 
>>> 2 things the scardy cat libs wont answer
>>> 
>>> 1 How has Trump personally affected your life?
>>
>>I can't answer that in detail just yet, but not to put too fine a point
>>on it:  the State Department being shut down impacted my business
>>affairs.
>>
>>
>>> 2. Why don't you think we need a wall?
>>
>>You seem to think denying Trump his monument means doing away with
>>border security.  False dichotomy -- and you're poisoning the well.
> 
> See? No answer, just diversion.

You'd think that after so many years on the USENET, this gentleman would 
understand how to avoid logical fallacies.

https://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html#manyq

Plurium interrogationum / Many questions
This fallacy occurs when someone demands a simple (or simplistic) answer 
to a complex question.

"Are higher taxes an impediment to business or not? Yes or no?"

-- 
-v

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#256316

In article <gbbrr3F51ebU2@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org 
says...
>
>On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 07:02:56 -0700, Skeeter wrote:
>
>> In article <gb9fopFlfmvU4@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org
>> says...
>>>
>>>On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 08:23:28 -0700, Skeeter wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <q2n5qq$1dcu$2@gioia.aioe.org>,
>>>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>>>>>
>>>>>On 1/28/2019 9:59 AM, Lamey wrote:
>>>>>> Another "I cant really answer this" added to the list.
>>>>>
>>>>>Would you like a peom about happy wall?
>>>> 
>>>> Another answer that fits into the "I don't know " list.
>>>> 
>>>> 2 things the scardy cat libs wont answer
>>>> 
>>>> 1 How has Trump personally affected your life?
>>>
>>>I can't answer that in detail just yet, but not to put too fine a point
>>>on it:  the State Department being shut down impacted my business
>>>affairs.
>>>
>>>
>>>> 2. Why don't you think we need a wall?
>>>
>>>You seem to think denying Trump his monument means doing away with
>>>border security.  False dichotomy -- and you're poisoning the well.
>> 
>> See? No answer, just diversion.
>
>You'd think that after so many years on the USENET, this gentleman would 
>understand how to avoid logical fallacies.
>
>https://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html#manyq
>
>Plurium interrogationum / Many questions
>This fallacy occurs when someone demands a simple (or simplistic) answer 
>to a complex question.
>
>"Are higher taxes an impediment to business or not? Yes or no?"

Simple answers are something the left has a hard time with.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#256461

On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 13:46:58 -0700, Skeeter wrote:

> In article <gbbrr3F51ebU2@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org
> says...
>>You'd think that after so many years on the USENET, this gentleman would
>>understand how to avoid logical fallacies.
>>
>>https://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html#manyq
>>
>>Plurium interrogationum / Many questions This fallacy occurs when
>>someone demands a simple (or simplistic) answer to a complex question.
>>
>>"Are higher taxes an impediment to business or not? Yes or no?"
> 
> Simple answers are something the left has a hard time with.

Avoiding logical fallacies is something that the gentleman has a big 
problem with.

(And he wonders why people don't answer him seriously when he poisons the 
well!)

-- 
-v

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#256512

In article <gbcd0oFqko4U2@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org 
says...
>
>On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 13:46:58 -0700, Skeeter wrote:
>
>> In article <gbbrr3F51ebU2@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org
>> says...
>>>You'd think that after so many years on the USENET, this gentleman would
>>>understand how to avoid logical fallacies.
>>>
>>>https://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html#manyq
>>>
>>>Plurium interrogationum / Many questions This fallacy occurs when
>>>someone demands a simple (or simplistic) answer to a complex question.
>>>
>>>"Are higher taxes an impediment to business or not? Yes or no?"
>> 
>> Simple answers are something the left has a hard time with.
>
>Avoiding logical fallacies is something that the gentleman has a big 
>problem with.
>
>(And he wonders why people don't answer him seriously when he poisons the 
>well!)

Take a drink and shut the hell up.




<jus kidden>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#256628

On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 19:52:05 -0700, Skeeter wrote:

> In article <gbcd0oFqko4U2@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org
> says...
>>
>>On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 13:46:58 -0700, Skeeter wrote:
>>
>>> In article <gbbrr3F51ebU2@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org
>>> says...
>>>>You'd think that after so many years on the USENET, this gentleman
>>>>would understand how to avoid logical fallacies.
>>>>
>>>>https://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html#manyq
>>>>
>>>>Plurium interrogationum / Many questions This fallacy occurs when
>>>>someone demands a simple (or simplistic) answer to a complex question.
>>>>
>>>>"Are higher taxes an impediment to business or not? Yes or no?"
>>> 
>>> Simple answers are something the left has a hard time with.
>>
>>Avoiding logical fallacies is something that the gentleman has a big
>>problem with.
>>
>>(And he wonders why people don't answer him seriously when he poisons
>>the well!)
> 
> Take a drink and shut the hell up.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> <jus kidden>

Heh, well sure then.

So, I'll ask you something:  Are higher taxes an impediment to business 
or not?  Yes or no?

You can see the problem with that type of question, right?

-- 
-v

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#256672

In article <gbd30fFeo1dU2@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org 
says...
>
>On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 19:52:05 -0700, Skeeter wrote:
>
>> In article <gbcd0oFqko4U2@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org
>> says...
>>>
>>>On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 13:46:58 -0700, Skeeter wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <gbbrr3F51ebU2@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org
>>>> says...
>>>>>You'd think that after so many years on the USENET, this gentleman
>>>>>would understand how to avoid logical fallacies.
>>>>>
>>>>>https://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html#manyq
>>>>>
>>>>>Plurium interrogationum / Many questions This fallacy occurs when
>>>>>someone demands a simple (or simplistic) answer to a complex question.
>>>>>
>>>>>"Are higher taxes an impediment to business or not? Yes or no?"
>>>> 
>>>> Simple answers are something the left has a hard time with.
>>>
>>>Avoiding logical fallacies is something that the gentleman has a big
>>>problem with.
>>>
>>>(And he wonders why people don't answer him seriously when he poisons
>>>the well!)
>> 
>> Take a drink and shut the hell up.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> <jus kidden>
>
>Heh, well sure then.
>
>So, I'll ask you something:  Are higher taxes an impediment to business 
>or not?  Yes or no?
>
>You can see the problem with that type of question, right?

You never answered my question. This has got to stop.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#256669

In article <MPG.36bad39a28fe35159961c2@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
@gmail.com says...
>
>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
>Checkmate!  In article <MPG.36babf417b8e2714eee@news.eternal-
>september.org>, chico@invalid.invalid says...
>
>
># 
># In article <gbcd0oFqko4U2@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org 
># says...
># >
># >On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 13:46:58 -0700, Skeeter wrote:
># >
># >> In article <gbbrr3F51ebU2@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org
># >> says...
># >>>You'd think that after so many years on the USENET, this gentleman would
># >>>understand how to avoid logical fallacies.
># >>>
># >>>https://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html#manyq
># >>>
># >>>Plurium interrogationum / Many questions This fallacy occurs when
># >>>someone demands a simple (or simplistic) answer to a complex question.
># >>>
># >>>"Are higher taxes an impediment to business or not? Yes or no?"
># >> 
># >> Simple answers are something the left has a hard time with.
># >
># >Avoiding logical fallacies is something that the gentleman has a big 
># >problem with.
># >
># >(And he wonders why people don't answer him seriously when he poisons the 
># >well!)
># 
># Take a drink and shut the hell up.
># 
># 
># 
># 
># <jus kidden>
>
>"This water tastes like almonds..."

"Nutty"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#256668

In article <MPG.36bad034ff1101959961bc@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
@gmail.com says...
>
>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
>Checkmate!  In article <MPG.36b93eb33726cef8e78@news.eternal-
>september.org>, chico@invalid.invalid says...
>
>
># 
># In article <gb9fopFlfmvU4@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org 
># says...
># >
># >On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 08:23:28 -0700, Skeeter wrote:
># >
># >> In article <q2n5qq$1dcu$2@gioia.aioe.org>,
># >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
># >>>
># >>>On 1/28/2019 9:59 AM, Lamey wrote:
># >>>> Another "I cant really answer this" added to the list.
># >>>
># >>>Would you like a peom about happy wall?
># >> 
># >> Another answer that fits into the "I don't know " list.
># >> 
># >> 2 things the scardy cat libs wont answer
># >> 
># >> 1 How has Trump personally affected your life?
># >
># >I can't answer that in detail just yet, but not to put too fine a point 
># >on it:  the State Department being shut down impacted my business affairs.
># >
># >> 
># >> 2. Why don't you think we need a wall?
># >
># >You seem to think denying Trump his monument means doing away with border 
># >security.  False dichotomy -- and you're poisoning the well.
># 
># See? No answer, just diversion.
>
>Maybe if we called it The Nancy Pelosi Honorary Wall Monument, the 
>Dummycrats would go for it.

I don't care who gets the credit, just build the damn thing. I say hire 
a bunch of them sneaking over to build it from the Mexican side. When 
it's finished just wave bye bye to them.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#255716

x-no-archive: yes

On 1/28/2019 7:07 AM, mixed nuts wrote:
> On 1/28/2019 9:59 AM, Lamey wrote:
>> Another "I cant really answer this" added to the list.
> 
> Would you like a peom about happy wall?

Don't worry about him, Lamey is just another racist.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#255771

In article <q2nj4i$r84$1@news.albasani.net>, Janithor@comcast.net 
says...
>
>x-no-archive: yes
>
>On 1/28/2019 7:07 AM, mixed nuts wrote:
>> On 1/28/2019 9:59 AM, Lamey wrote:
>>> Another "I cant really answer this" added to the list.
>> 
>> Would you like a peom about happy wall?
>
>Don't worry about him, Lamey is just another racist.

Well hell yea! I like Nascar and they always go to the "left".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#256670

In article <MPG.36bad58fea7806c99961c8@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
@gmail.com says...
>
>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
>Checkmate!  In article <q2n5qq$1dcu$2@gioia.aioe.org>, 
>melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>
>
># 
># On 1/28/2019 9:59 AM, Lamey wrote:
># > Another "I cant really answer this" added to the list.
># 
># Would you like a peom about happy wall?
>
>Do you know the one about Humpty-Dumpty?

Wats a peom?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#256728

On 1/30/2019 12:27 AM, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <q2n5qq$1dcu$2@gioia.aioe.org>,
> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>> On 1/28/2019 9:59 AM, Lamey wrote:
>>> Another "I cant really answer this" added to the list.
>>
>> Would you like a peom about happy wall?
> 
> Do you know the one about Humpty-Dumpty?

Egg yolks are orange,
Cheetos are too,
Lets build a very amazing wall that unbelievably beautiful,
And chew on a shoe.

-- 
Grizzly H.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]

Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate

csiph-web