Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #245411 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ted <ted@sam.street> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-05 01:53 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-01-07 04:05 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 196 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-05 01:53 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 20:00 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-04 20:03 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-05 12:48 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Meteorite Debris <WTF@whoknows.com> - 2019-01-05 15:03 +1030
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-05 07:32 -0600
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-05 13:59 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-05 06:42 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks bookwurm <bookwurm8@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 14:22 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Meteorite Debris <WTF@whoknows.com> - 2019-01-05 15:05 +1030
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-05 12:48 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-05 03:11 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-05 12:48 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-05 04:57 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-05 13:04 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-05 09:20 -0500
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-05 14:27 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 15:28 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-05 23:41 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 15:43 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-05 23:53 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 15:56 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 00:11 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 16:24 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 00:57 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 10:14 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:30 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 21:20 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-06 14:44 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 22:00 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-06 15:06 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 22:12 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 22:32 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:42 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 22:53 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:00 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 23:32 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:36 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 23:42 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:45 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 00:42 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-07 22:02 -0500
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 22:43 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 22:53 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 22:00 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:13 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 22:23 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:25 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 22:43 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:51 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 22:53 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 22:53 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:02 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 23:32 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:00 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 23:34 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 16:47 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 00:42 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:43 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 01:07 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:31 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 01:51 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:58 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 13:07 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:13 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 15:16 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:28 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 16:02 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 17:19 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 16:49 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 17:57 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 17:12 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 18:40 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 22:28 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 07:01 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 23:09 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 13:58 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 11:48 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 13:11 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-08 15:25 -0500
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 14:26 -0600
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 12:54 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 14:59 -0600
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb - 2019-01-08 14:01 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 14:25 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-08 15:22 -0500
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 12:56 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 14:00 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 16:46 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:54 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:07 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:27 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:33 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:56 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:06 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:12 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:35 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:42 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:47 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-06 17:54 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-06 17:57 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 04:17 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 04:56 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 19:08 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-06 18:13 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 02:37 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-07 12:29 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 04:17 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-06 20:21 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 04:56 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-07 01:18 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 14:11 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-07 22:00 -0500
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Clave <ChrisShitbagious@TheMonastery.com> - 2019-01-07 19:24 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-07 22:59 -0500
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 06:18 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 18:48 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 18:48 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 17:56 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 19:09 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 02:16 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 19:27 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 02:37 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 19:41 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 03:06 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 20:11 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 03:35 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 20:50 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 20:12 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 20:36 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 22:00 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 09:22 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:13 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 10:16 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:30 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:03 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 16:07 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 23:32 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 16:48 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 00:45 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:48 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 01:12 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:35 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 02:13 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 02:37 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:51 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:12 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:30 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:37 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:58 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:04 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:09 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:32 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:40 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:45 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 18:12 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 02:37 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-06 17:52 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 19:03 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-06 18:12 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 02:30 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-07 12:29 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 22:05 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-07 14:10 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:27 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-07 15:29 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 18:14 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 02:37 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 13:17 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 04:17 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 04:56 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 00:45 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:51 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:11 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:30 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:36 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:03 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:30 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:37 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:41 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:47 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:55 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 18:08 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 02:13 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 02:37 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 18:39 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:43 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 02:13 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 20:05 -0600
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 19:16 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 19:18 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 19:27 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-06 13:18 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:13 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-07 04:05 +0000
Page 4 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 10 Next page →
| From | Ted <ted@sam.street> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 01:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1354469442568516010.510258ted-sam.street@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #246060 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 1/6/19 5:42 PM, Ted wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 1/6/19 4:34 PM, Ted wrote: >>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 21:20:13 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:57:43 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:11:46 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:53:10 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:41:11 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL. I read recently that Biden is the most popular so far. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we can get Romney and Biden? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Or Kang and Kodos. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://tv.avclub.com/the-simpsons-classic-treehouse-of-horror-vii-1798181639 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> There was a Warren underneath. ;-)) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 1/2020th. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I would rather Romney run than Trump. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Maybe you will have a Bernie/Warren ticket on the Dem side. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The left would like that. But the DNC won't let it happen. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If this Ocasio-Cortez keep talking Bernie won't have a chance. Bernie >>>>>>> style has a chance with this Ocasio-Cortez's brand of socialism being >>>>>>> pushed as representing the Dems most logical people will reject it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The Dems want a 70% tax rate? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >>>>> >>>>> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. >>>>>> She does give that impression. >>>> >>> Nope. You are likely projecting. >>>> That's silly, Snit. Of course I'm not projecting. > > You made up a claim about her targeting a specific class and political > group. She has never said anything to suggest this is true. You seem to be projecting. She has, Snit. (And how on earth could it be "projection"?) > >> She tows the line of >> identity politics like any good faux leftist. (And btw, neither Matt nor I >> would be considered 'white'.) She seems a bit hopeful, but the jury is >> still out on her (which, from your previous posts, I'm surprised you don't >> know). >>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 18:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9fof5Fu1t8U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #246073 |
On 1/6/19 6:07 PM, Ted wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 1/6/19 5:42 PM, Ted wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 1/6/19 4:34 PM, Ted wrote: >>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 21:20:13 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:57:43 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:11:46 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:53:10 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:41:11 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL. I read recently that Biden is the most popular so far. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we can get Romney and Biden? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Or Kang and Kodos. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://tv.avclub.com/the-simpsons-classic-treehouse-of-horror-vii-1798181639 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> There was a Warren underneath. ;-)) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 1/2020th. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I would rather Romney run than Trump. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Maybe you will have a Bernie/Warren ticket on the Dem side. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The left would like that. But the DNC won't let it happen. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If this Ocasio-Cortez keep talking Bernie won't have a chance. Bernie >>>>>>>> style has a chance with this Ocasio-Cortez's brand of socialism being >>>>>>>> pushed as representing the Dems most logical people will reject it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The Dems want a 70% tax rate? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >>>>>> >>>>>> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. >>>>>>> She does give that impression. >>>>> >>>> Nope. You are likely projecting. >>>>> That's silly, Snit. Of course I'm not projecting. >> >> You made up a claim about her targeting a specific class and political >> group. She has never said anything to suggest this is true. You seem to be projecting. > > She has, Snit. (And how on earth could it be "projection"?) You made up claims about her a specific class and political group. I am guessing it is projection. You have offered no alternative idea. > >> >>> She tows the line of >>> identity politics like any good faux leftist. (And btw, neither Matt nor I >>> would be considered 'white'.) She seems a bit hopeful, but the jury is >>> still out on her (which, from your previous posts, I'm surprised you don't >>> know). >>> -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ted <ted@sam.street> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 01:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1969094869568517818.305133ted-sam.street@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #246081 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 1/6/19 6:07 PM, Ted wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 1/6/19 5:42 PM, Ted wrote: >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 1/6/19 4:34 PM, Ted wrote: >>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 21:20:13 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:57:43 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:11:46 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:53:10 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:41:11 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bernie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL. I read recently that Biden is the most popular so far. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we can get Romney and Biden? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or Kang and Kodos. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://tv.avclub.com/the-simpsons-classic-treehouse-of-horror-vii-1798181639 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> There was a Warren underneath. ;-)) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1/2020th. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I would rather Romney run than Trump. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you will have a Bernie/Warren ticket on the Dem side. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The left would like that. But the DNC won't let it happen. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If this Ocasio-Cortez keep talking Bernie won't have a chance. Bernie >>>>>>>>> style has a chance with this Ocasio-Cortez's brand of socialism being >>>>>>>>> pushed as representing the Dems most logical people will reject it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The Dems want a 70% tax rate? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. >>>>>>>> She does give that impression. >>>>>> >>>>> Nope. You are likely projecting. >>>>>> That's silly, Snit. Of course I'm not projecting. >>> >>> You made up a claim about her targeting a specific class and political >>> group. She has never said anything to suggest this is true. You seem to be projecting. >>> She has, Snit. (And how on earth could it be "projection"?) > > You made up claims about her a specific class and political group. I am > guessing it is projection. You have offered no alternative idea. "Alternative" to what? Matt and I react to the things she's already said. Whether intentionally or not, she's sowing division. I assume you read Chris Hedges, right?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 18:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9fq30FubogU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #246095 |
On 1/6/19 6:51 PM, Ted wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 1/6/19 6:07 PM, Ted wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 1/6/19 5:42 PM, Ted wrote: >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 1/6/19 4:34 PM, Ted wrote: >>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 21:20:13 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:57:43 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:11:46 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:53:10 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:41:11 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bernie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL. I read recently that Biden is the most popular so far. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we can get Romney and Biden? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or Kang and Kodos. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://tv.avclub.com/the-simpsons-classic-treehouse-of-horror-vii-1798181639 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was a Warren underneath. ;-)) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1/2020th. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I would rather Romney run than Trump. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you will have a Bernie/Warren ticket on the Dem side. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The left would like that. But the DNC won't let it happen. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If this Ocasio-Cortez keep talking Bernie won't have a chance. Bernie >>>>>>>>>> style has a chance with this Ocasio-Cortez's brand of socialism being >>>>>>>>>> pushed as representing the Dems most logical people will reject it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The Dems want a 70% tax rate? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. >>>>>>>>> She does give that impression. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Nope. You are likely projecting. >>>>>>> That's silly, Snit. Of course I'm not projecting. >>>> >>>> You made up a claim about her targeting a specific class and political >>>> group. She has never said anything to suggest this is true. You seem to be projecting. >>>> She has, Snit. (And how on earth could it be "projection"?) >> >> You made up claims about her a specific class and political group. I am >> guessing it is projection. You have offered no alternative idea. > > "Alternative" to what? Matt and I react to the things she's already said. But nothing where she focused on class or political group in terms of who should pay taxes. Not a word. Nothing to back: ----- Probably just White people and any that vote republican. She does give that impression. ----- I am guessing projection. Maybe there is a better explanation but none has been offered. > Whether intentionally or not, she's sowing division. How? By pushing for an economic policy similar to what we had before our disastrous growth in income inequality? By dancing? Just what do you think she has done... be specific. > I assume you read Chris Hedges, right? I do not, at least as a rule. I may have read some things by him but had to look up the name to even know who he was. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 13:07 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6rf73e5tbddiig92bs5t1knve19mqoo92v@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #246022 |
On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 23:34:30 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 21:20:13 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >> >>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:57:43 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:11:46 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:53:10 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:41:11 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> LOL. I read recently that Biden is the most popular so far. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Maybe we can get Romney and Biden? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Or Kang and Kodos. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://tv.avclub.com/the-simpsons-classic-treehouse-of-horror-vii-1798181639 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There was a Warren underneath. ;-)) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1/2020th. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I would rather Romney run than Trump. >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe you will have a Bernie/Warren ticket on the Dem side. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The left would like that. But the DNC won't let it happen. >>>> >>>> If this Ocasio-Cortez keep talking Bernie won't have a chance. Bernie >>>> style has a chance with this Ocasio-Cortez's brand of socialism being >>>> pushed as representing the Dems most logical people will reject it. >>>> >>>> The Dems want a 70% tax rate? >>> >>> >>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >> >> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. > > >She does give that impression. That she does.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 16:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9i4ofFfm05U6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #246297 |
On 1/7/19 2:07 PM, Mattb wrote: > On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 23:34:30 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: > >> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 21:20:13 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>> >>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:57:43 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:11:46 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:53:10 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:41:11 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> LOL. I read recently that Biden is the most popular so far. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we can get Romney and Biden? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Or Kang and Kodos. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://tv.avclub.com/the-simpsons-classic-treehouse-of-horror-vii-1798181639 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There was a Warren underneath. ;-)) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1/2020th. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would rather Romney run than Trump. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Maybe you will have a Bernie/Warren ticket on the Dem side. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The left would like that. But the DNC won't let it happen. >>>>> >>>>> If this Ocasio-Cortez keep talking Bernie won't have a chance. Bernie >>>>> style has a chance with this Ocasio-Cortez's brand of socialism being >>>>> pushed as representing the Dems most logical people will reject it. >>>>> >>>>> The Dems want a 70% tax rate? >>>> >>>> >>>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >>> >>> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. >> >> >> She does give that impression. > > That she does. > How so. Be specific. But you will not be. This is predictable. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 15:16 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <pbn73e5jqbnh82a7239cd4qgb14qgct3ui@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #246343 |
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 16:13:19 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 1/7/19 2:07 PM, Mattb wrote: >> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 23:34:30 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >> >>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 21:20:13 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:57:43 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:11:46 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:53:10 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:41:11 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL. I read recently that Biden is the most popular so far. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we can get Romney and Biden? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Or Kang and Kodos. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://tv.avclub.com/the-simpsons-classic-treehouse-of-horror-vii-1798181639 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> There was a Warren underneath. ;-)) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 1/2020th. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I would rather Romney run than Trump. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Maybe you will have a Bernie/Warren ticket on the Dem side. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The left would like that. But the DNC won't let it happen. >>>>>> >>>>>> If this Ocasio-Cortez keep talking Bernie won't have a chance. Bernie >>>>>> style has a chance with this Ocasio-Cortez's brand of socialism being >>>>>> pushed as representing the Dems most logical people will reject it. >>>>>> >>>>>> The Dems want a 70% tax rate? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >>>> >>>> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. >>> >>> >>> She does give that impression. >> >> That she does. >> > >How so. Be specific. You decide for yourself. She to me looks rather like a ugly socialist bitch. > >But you will not be. This is predictable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 16:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9i5lqFfvv4U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #246350 |
On 1/7/19 4:16 PM, Mattb wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 16:13:19 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > >> On 1/7/19 2:07 PM, Mattb wrote: >>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 23:34:30 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>> >>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 21:20:13 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:57:43 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:11:46 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:53:10 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:41:11 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL. I read recently that Biden is the most popular so far. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we can get Romney and Biden? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Or Kang and Kodos. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://tv.avclub.com/the-simpsons-classic-treehouse-of-horror-vii-1798181639 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> There was a Warren underneath. ;-)) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 1/2020th. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I would rather Romney run than Trump. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Maybe you will have a Bernie/Warren ticket on the Dem side. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The left would like that. But the DNC won't let it happen. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If this Ocasio-Cortez keep talking Bernie won't have a chance. Bernie >>>>>>> style has a chance with this Ocasio-Cortez's brand of socialism being >>>>>>> pushed as representing the Dems most logical people will reject it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The Dems want a 70% tax rate? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >>>>> >>>>> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. >>>> >>>> >>>> She does give that impression. >>> >>> That she does. >>> >> >> How so. Be specific. > > You decide for yourself. She to me looks rather like a ugly socialist > bitch >> >> But you will not be. This is predictable. As predicted... nothing... just what she "looks" like. Hmmm, when do you use such terms for me? Seems you just outed yourself as a misogynist. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 16:02 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <atp73epocu3patb55g003mjuauhif8uskf@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #246359 |
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 16:28:57 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 1/7/19 4:16 PM, Mattb wrote: >> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 16:13:19 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 1/7/19 2:07 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 23:34:30 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 21:20:13 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:57:43 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:11:46 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:53:10 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:41:11 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL. I read recently that Biden is the most popular so far. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we can get Romney and Biden? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Or Kang and Kodos. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://tv.avclub.com/the-simpsons-classic-treehouse-of-horror-vii-1798181639 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> There was a Warren underneath. ;-)) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 1/2020th. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I would rather Romney run than Trump. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Maybe you will have a Bernie/Warren ticket on the Dem side. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The left would like that. But the DNC won't let it happen. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If this Ocasio-Cortez keep talking Bernie won't have a chance. Bernie >>>>>>>> style has a chance with this Ocasio-Cortez's brand of socialism being >>>>>>>> pushed as representing the Dems most logical people will reject it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The Dems want a 70% tax rate? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >>>>>> >>>>>> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> She does give that impression. >>>> >>>> That she does. >>>> >>> >>> How so. Be specific. >> >> You decide for yourself. She to me looks rather like a ugly socialist >> bitch >> >>> But you will not be. This is predictable. > >As predicted... nothing... just what she "looks" like. Hmmm, when do you >use such terms for me? What she says what she suggest and Yes her looks she reminds me of Trump with dark hair. > Seems you just outed yourself as a misogynist. How so? Didn't say all women are a ugly socialist bitch just her. I say Trump is a whiny little birth also. If she isn't a equal tell her to get back to the kitchen. All people should be treated as equals with limited respect no matter Race, Sex, Religion or Orientation, with no preferential treatment for Race, Sex, Religion or Orientation.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 17:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9i8juFgh8uU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #246376 |
On 1/7/19 5:02 PM, Mattb wrote: ... >>>>>>>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> She does give that impression. >>>>> >>>>> That she does. >>>>> >>>> >>>> How so. Be specific. >>> >>> You decide for yourself. She to me looks rather like a ugly socialist >>> bitch >> >>>> But you will not be. This is predictable. >> >> As predicted... nothing... just what she "looks" like. Hmmm, when do you >> use such terms for me? > > What she says what she suggest and Yes her looks she reminds me of > Trump with dark hair. > >> Seems you just outed yourself as a misogynist. > > How so? Didn't say all women are a ugly socialist bitch just her. I > say Trump is a whiny little birth also. If she isn't a equal tell her > to get back to the kitchen. > > All people should be treated as equals with limited respect no matter > Race, Sex, Religion or Orientation, with no preferential treatment for > Race, Sex, Religion or Orientation. > Notice no apology for your misogynistic comments nor any evidence to back the claim she wants everyone to be taxed at 70%. But, hey, you are not alone in your ignorance of what she said and how how marginal tax rates work. The GOP Minority Whip shares your ignorance: https://twitter.com/SteveScalise/status/1081579535114608640 ----- Republicans: Let Americans keep more of their own hard-earned money Democrats: Take away 70% of your income and give it to leftist fantasy programs ----- And her response: https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1081761714096476160 ----- You’re the GOP Minority Whip. How do you not know how marginal tax rates work? Oh that’s right, almost forgot: GOP works for the corporate CEOs showering themselves in multi-million💰bonuses; not the actual working people whose wages + healthcare they’re ripping off for profit. ----- -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 16:49 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <8ms73edgu7teutu9mb5lqa95nu0f08q8gb@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #246384 |
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:19:10 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 1/7/19 5:02 PM, Mattb wrote: >... >>>>>>>>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> She does give that impression. >>>>>> >>>>>> That she does. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> How so. Be specific. >>>> >>>> You decide for yourself. She to me looks rather like a ugly socialist >>>> bitch >> >>>>> But you will not be. This is predictable. >>> >>> As predicted... nothing... just what she "looks" like. Hmmm, when do you >>> use such terms for me? >> >> What she says what she suggest and Yes her looks she reminds me of >> Trump with dark hair. >> >>> Seems you just outed yourself as a misogynist. >> >> How so? Didn't say all women are a ugly socialist bitch just her. I >> say Trump is a whiny little birth also. If she isn't a equal tell her >> to get back to the kitchen. >> >> All people should be treated as equals with limited respect no matter >> Race, Sex, Religion or Orientation, with no preferential treatment for >> Race, Sex, Religion or Orientation. >> > >Notice no apology for your misogynistic comments nor any evidence to >back the claim she wants everyone to be taxed at 70%. But, hey, you are >not alone in your ignorance of what she said and how how marginal tax >rates work. The GOP Minority Whip shares your ignorance: I didn't make any misogynistic comments I happen to have respect for women just not all. Used to be if you critiqued Obama on anything you liberals screamed racist. Guess you will use this for any who disagree with Ocasio-Cortez. > >https://twitter.com/SteveScalise/status/1081579535114608640 >----- >Republicans: Let Americans keep more of their own hard-earned money >Democrats: Take away 70% of your income and give it to leftist fantasy >programs >----- > >And her response: > >https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1081761714096476160 >----- >You’re the GOP Minority Whip. How do you not know how marginal tax rates >work? > >Oh that’s right, almost forgot: GOP works for the corporate CEOs >showering themselves in multi-million?bonuses; not the actual working >people whose wages + healthcare they’re ripping off for profit. >----- Whatever. I don't like wall street for the most part or liberal freeloaders.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 17:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9iaslFh1a5U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #246386 |
On 1/7/19 5:49 PM, Mattb wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:19:10 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > >> On 1/7/19 5:02 PM, Mattb wrote: >> ... >>>>>>>>>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> She does give that impression. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That she does. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> How so. Be specific. >>>>> >>>>> You decide for yourself. She to me looks rather like a ugly socialist >>>>> bitch >> >>>>>> But you will not be. This is predictable. >>>> >>>> As predicted... nothing... just what she "looks" like. Hmmm, when do you >>>> use such terms for me? >>> >>> What she says what she suggest and Yes her looks she reminds me of >>> Trump with dark hair. >>> >>>> Seems you just outed yourself as a misogynist. >>> >>> How so? Didn't say all women are a ugly socialist bitch just her. I >>> say Trump is a whiny little birth also. If she isn't a equal tell her >>> to get back to the kitchen. >>> >>> All people should be treated as equals with limited respect no matter >>> Race, Sex, Religion or Orientation, with no preferential treatment for >>> Race, Sex, Religion or Orientation. >>> >> >> Notice no apology for your misogynistic comments nor any evidence to >> back the claim she wants everyone to be taxed at 70%. But, hey, you are >> not alone in your ignorance of what she said and how how marginal tax >> rates work. The GOP Minority Whip shares your ignorance: > > I didn't make any misogynistic comments I happen to have respect for > women just not all. Used to be if you critiqued Obama on anything you > liberals screamed racist. Guess you will use this for any who > disagree with Ocasio-Cortez. I have no issue with criticism... but you did not criticize her ideas, you joined the GOP Minority Whip in not even understanding how marginal tax rates work and then used sexist language in your attacks. Instead of facing that you are moving to the all too inevitable meta-debate mode of trolling. Can you stop yourself? Can you admit your claim of her wanting ANYONE to pay 70% taxes was you misunderstanding her comments? Can you admit that the nonsense about her pushing to have whites and Republicans pay more was just something made up to troll? >> https://twitter.com/SteveScalise/status/1081579535114608640 >> ----- >> Republicans: Let Americans keep more of their own hard-earned money >> Democrats: Take away 70% of your income and give it to leftist fantasy >> programs >> ----- >> >> And her response: >> >> https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1081761714096476160 >> ----- >> You’re the GOP Minority Whip. How do you not know how marginal tax rates >> work? >> >> Oh that’s right, almost forgot: GOP works for the corporate CEOs >> showering themselves in multi-million?bonuses; not the actual working >> people whose wages + healthcare they’re ripping off for profit. >> ----- > > Whatever. I don't like wall street for the most part or liberal > freeloaders. Remember: it is the red states who tend to be the takers.... and the liberals who tend to be better educated, have higher IQs, and higher incomes. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 17:12 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <53u73ehankigg5odmgtdoja9fkp51degn5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #246387 |
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:57:56 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 1/7/19 5:49 PM, Mattb wrote: >> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:19:10 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 1/7/19 5:02 PM, Mattb wrote: >>> ... >>>>>>>>>>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> She does give that impression. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That she does. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How so. Be specific. >>>>>> >>>>>> You decide for yourself. She to me looks rather like a ugly socialist >>>>>> bitch >> >>>>>>> But you will not be. This is predictable. >>>>> >>>>> As predicted... nothing... just what she "looks" like. Hmmm, when do you >>>>> use such terms for me? >>>> >>>> What she says what she suggest and Yes her looks she reminds me of >>>> Trump with dark hair. >>>> >>>>> Seems you just outed yourself as a misogynist. >>>> >>>> How so? Didn't say all women are a ugly socialist bitch just her. I >>>> say Trump is a whiny little birth also. If she isn't a equal tell her >>>> to get back to the kitchen. >>>> >>>> All people should be treated as equals with limited respect no matter >>>> Race, Sex, Religion or Orientation, with no preferential treatment for >>>> Race, Sex, Religion or Orientation. >>>> >>> >>> Notice no apology for your misogynistic comments nor any evidence to >>> back the claim she wants everyone to be taxed at 70%. But, hey, you are >>> not alone in your ignorance of what she said and how how marginal tax >>> rates work. The GOP Minority Whip shares your ignorance: >> >> I didn't make any misogynistic comments I happen to have respect for >> women just not all. Used to be if you critiqued Obama on anything you >> liberals screamed racist. Guess you will use this for any who >> disagree with Ocasio-Cortez. > >I have no issue with criticism... but you did not criticize her ideas, >you joined the GOP Minority Whip in not even understanding how marginal >tax rates work and then used sexist language in your attacks. I have no9 idea what the GOP Minority Whip said. She is a potty mouth bitch to me every bit as bad as Trump. > >Instead of facing that you are moving to the all too inevitable >meta-debate mode of trolling. Can you stop yourself? Can you admit your >claim of her wanting ANYONE to pay 70% taxes was you misunderstanding >her comments? Can you admit that the nonsense about her pushing to have >whites and Republicans pay more was just something made up to troll? > >>> https://twitter.com/SteveScalise/status/1081579535114608640 >>> ----- >>> Republicans: Let Americans keep more of their own hard-earned money >>> Democrats: Take away 70% of your income and give it to leftist fantasy >>> programs >>> ----- >>> >>> And her response: >>> >>> https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1081761714096476160 >>> ----- >>> You’re the GOP Minority Whip. How do you not know how marginal tax rates >>> work? >>> >>> Oh that’s right, almost forgot: GOP works for the corporate CEOs >>> showering themselves in multi-million?bonuses; not the actual working >>> people whose wages + healthcare they’re ripping off for profit. >>> ----- >> >> Whatever. I don't like wall street for the most part or liberal >> freeloaders. > >Remember: it is the red states who tend to be the takers.... and the >liberals who tend to be better educated, have higher IQs, and higher >incomes. Not true if you remove federal wages from your survey. California pays out over 100 billion a year in welfare, with over half going to non citizens.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 18:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9idctFhgbjU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #246389 |
On 1/7/19 6:12 PM, Mattb wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:57:56 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > >> On 1/7/19 5:49 PM, Mattb wrote: >>> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:19:10 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 1/7/19 5:02 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> She does give that impression. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That she does. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How so. Be specific. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You decide for yourself. She to me looks rather like a ugly socialist >>>>>>> bitch >> >>>>>>>> But you will not be. This is predictable. >>>>>> >>>>>> As predicted... nothing... just what she "looks" like. Hmmm, when do you >>>>>> use such terms for me? >>>>> >>>>> What she says what she suggest and Yes her looks she reminds me of >>>>> Trump with dark hair. >>>>> >>>>>> Seems you just outed yourself as a misogynist. >>>>> >>>>> How so? Didn't say all women are a ugly socialist bitch just her. I >>>>> say Trump is a whiny little birth also. If she isn't a equal tell her >>>>> to get back to the kitchen. >>>>> >>>>> All people should be treated as equals with limited respect no matter >>>>> Race, Sex, Religion or Orientation, with no preferential treatment for >>>>> Race, Sex, Religion or Orientation. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Notice no apology for your misogynistic comments nor any evidence to >>>> back the claim she wants everyone to be taxed at 70%. But, hey, you are >>>> not alone in your ignorance of what she said and how how marginal tax >>>> rates work. The GOP Minority Whip shares your ignorance: >>> >>> I didn't make any misogynistic comments I happen to have respect for >>> women just not all. Used to be if you critiqued Obama on anything you >>> liberals screamed racist. Guess you will use this for any who >>> disagree with Ocasio-Cortez. >> >> I have no issue with criticism... but you did not criticize her ideas, >> you joined the GOP Minority Whip in not even understanding how marginal >> tax rates work and then used sexist language in your attacks. > > I have no9 idea what the GOP Minority Whip said. She is a potty mouth > bitch to me every bit as bad as Trump. >> >> Instead of facing that you are moving to the all too inevitable >> meta-debate mode of trolling. Can you stop yourself? Can you admit your >> claim of her wanting ANYONE to pay 70% taxes was you misunderstanding >> her comments? Can you admit that the nonsense about her pushing to have >> whites and Republicans pay more was just something made up to troll? >> >>>> https://twitter.com/SteveScalise/status/1081579535114608640 >>>> ----- >>>> Republicans: Let Americans keep more of their own hard-earned money >>>> Democrats: Take away 70% of your income and give it to leftist fantasy >>>> programs >>>> ----- >>>> >>>> And her response: >>>> >>>> https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1081761714096476160 >>>> ----- >>>> You’re the GOP Minority Whip. How do you not know how marginal tax rates >>>> work? >>>> >>>> Oh that’s right, almost forgot: GOP works for the corporate CEOs >>>> showering themselves in multi-million?bonuses; not the actual working >>>> people whose wages + healthcare they’re ripping off for profit. >>>> ----- >>> >>> Whatever. I don't like wall street for the most part or liberal >>> freeloaders. >> >> Remember: it is the red states who tend to be the takers.... and the >> liberals who tend to be better educated, have higher IQs, and higher >> incomes. > > Not true if you remove federal wages from your survey. Cite. > California > pays out over 100 billion a year in welfare, with over half going to > non citizens. How many of them are working? How many are truly "free loading"? How do you define that? And say it is 100 billion... that is a drop in the bucket to the amount of wealthfare we have in the US (I do realize you speak of just CA). Heck, a single business meal can lead to more financial benefits for a company than a family of four on SNAP gets in a month. When I hear right wingers focus on the BIG picture I will worry about the money we have helping the disabled vet and the like. Personally, though, I think we should help those in need MORE than we do. It is absurd how many vets are in poverty, for example. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 22:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <fhg83eheedidjac1tinoqdljbbblsvflpu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #246398 |
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 18:40:45 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 1/7/19 6:12 PM, Mattb wrote: >> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:57:56 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 1/7/19 5:49 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:19:10 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 1/7/19 5:02 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>>>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> She does give that impression. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That she does. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> How so. Be specific. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You decide for yourself. She to me looks rather like a ugly socialist >>>>>>>> bitch >> >>>>>>>>> But you will not be. This is predictable. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As predicted... nothing... just what she "looks" like. Hmmm, when do you >>>>>>> use such terms for me? >>>>>> >>>>>> What she says what she suggest and Yes her looks she reminds me of >>>>>> Trump with dark hair. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Seems you just outed yourself as a misogynist. >>>>>> >>>>>> How so? Didn't say all women are a ugly socialist bitch just her. I >>>>>> say Trump is a whiny little birth also. If she isn't a equal tell her >>>>>> to get back to the kitchen. >>>>>> >>>>>> All people should be treated as equals with limited respect no matter >>>>>> Race, Sex, Religion or Orientation, with no preferential treatment for >>>>>> Race, Sex, Religion or Orientation. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Notice no apology for your misogynistic comments nor any evidence to >>>>> back the claim she wants everyone to be taxed at 70%. But, hey, you are >>>>> not alone in your ignorance of what she said and how how marginal tax >>>>> rates work. The GOP Minority Whip shares your ignorance: >>>> >>>> I didn't make any misogynistic comments I happen to have respect for >>>> women just not all. Used to be if you critiqued Obama on anything you >>>> liberals screamed racist. Guess you will use this for any who >>>> disagree with Ocasio-Cortez. >>> >>> I have no issue with criticism... but you did not criticize her ideas, >>> you joined the GOP Minority Whip in not even understanding how marginal >>> tax rates work and then used sexist language in your attacks. >> >> I have no9 idea what the GOP Minority Whip said. She is a potty mouth >> bitch to me every bit as bad as Trump. >>> >>> Instead of facing that you are moving to the all too inevitable >>> meta-debate mode of trolling. Can you stop yourself? Can you admit your >>> claim of her wanting ANYONE to pay 70% taxes was you misunderstanding >>> her comments? Can you admit that the nonsense about her pushing to have >>> whites and Republicans pay more was just something made up to troll? >>> >>>>> https://twitter.com/SteveScalise/status/1081579535114608640 >>>>> ----- >>>>> Republicans: Let Americans keep more of their own hard-earned money >>>>> Democrats: Take away 70% of your income and give it to leftist fantasy >>>>> programs >>>>> ----- >>>>> >>>>> And her response: >>>>> >>>>> https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1081761714096476160 >>>>> ----- >>>>> You’re the GOP Minority Whip. How do you not know how marginal tax rates >>>>> work? >>>>> >>>>> Oh that’s right, almost forgot: GOP works for the corporate CEOs >>>>> showering themselves in multi-million?bonuses; not the actual working >>>>> people whose wages + healthcare they’re ripping off for profit. >>>>> ----- >>>> >>>> Whatever. I don't like wall street for the most part or liberal >>>> freeloaders. >>> >>> Remember: it is the red states who tend to be the takers.... and the >>> liberals who tend to be better educated, have higher IQs, and higher >>> incomes. >> >> Not true if you remove federal wages from your survey. > >Cite. You claim it you prove you are correct. > >> California >> pays out over 100 billion a year in welfare, with over half going to >> non citizens. > >How many of them are working? How many are truly "free loading"? How do >you define that? LOL If they are liberals most are freeloaders. > >And say it is 100 billion... that is a drop in the bucket to the amount >of wealthfare we have in the US (I do realize you speak of just CA). >Heck, a single business meal can lead to more financial benefits for a >company than a family of four on SNAP gets in a month. > >When I hear right wingers focus on the BIG picture I will worry about >the money we have helping the disabled vet and the like. Personally, >though, I think we should help those in need MORE than we do. It is >absurd how many vets are in poverty, for example. Those that are disables true. Vets true. Able bodied but Lazy not so much.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-08 07:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g9j066Fl8b4U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #246452 |
Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 18:40:45 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > >> On 1/7/19 6:12 PM, Mattb wrote: >>> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:57:56 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 1/7/19 5:49 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:19:10 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 1/7/19 5:02 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> She does give that impression. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That she does. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> How so. Be specific. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You decide for yourself. She to me looks rather like a ugly socialist >>>>>>>>> bitch >> >>>>>>>>>> But you will not be. This is predictable. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As predicted... nothing... just what she "looks" like. Hmmm, when do you >>>>>>>> use such terms for me? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What she says what she suggest and Yes her looks she reminds me of >>>>>>> Trump with dark hair. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Seems you just outed yourself as a misogynist. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How so? Didn't say all women are a ugly socialist bitch just her. I >>>>>>> say Trump is a whiny little birth also. If she isn't a equal tell her >>>>>>> to get back to the kitchen. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All people should be treated as equals with limited respect no matter >>>>>>> Race, Sex, Religion or Orientation, with no preferential treatment for >>>>>>> Race, Sex, Religion or Orientation. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Notice no apology for your misogynistic comments nor any evidence to >>>>>> back the claim she wants everyone to be taxed at 70%. But, hey, you are >>>>>> not alone in your ignorance of what she said and how how marginal tax >>>>>> rates work. The GOP Minority Whip shares your ignorance: >>>>> >>>>> I didn't make any misogynistic comments I happen to have respect for >>>>> women just not all. Used to be if you critiqued Obama on anything you >>>>> liberals screamed racist. Guess you will use this for any who >>>>> disagree with Ocasio-Cortez. >>>> >>>> I have no issue with criticism... but you did not criticize her ideas, >>>> you joined the GOP Minority Whip in not even understanding how marginal >>>> tax rates work and then used sexist language in your attacks. >>> >>> I have no9 idea what the GOP Minority Whip said. She is a potty mouth >>> bitch to me every bit as bad as Trump. >>>> >>>> Instead of facing that you are moving to the all too inevitable >>>> meta-debate mode of trolling. Can you stop yourself? Can you admit your >>>> claim of her wanting ANYONE to pay 70% taxes was you misunderstanding >>>> her comments? Can you admit that the nonsense about her pushing to have >>>> whites and Republicans pay more was just something made up to troll? >>>> >>>>>> https://twitter.com/SteveScalise/status/1081579535114608640 >>>>>> ----- >>>>>> Republicans: Let Americans keep more of their own hard-earned money >>>>>> Democrats: Take away 70% of your income and give it to leftist fantasy >>>>>> programs >>>>>> ----- >>>>>> >>>>>> And her response: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1081761714096476160 >>>>>> ----- >>>>>> Youre the GOP Minority Whip. How do you not know how marginal tax rates >>>>>> work? >>>>>> >>>>>> Oh thats right, almost forgot: GOP works for the corporate CEOs >>>>>> showering themselves in multi-million?bonuses; not the actual working >>>>>> people whose wages + healthcare theyre ripping off for profit. >>>>>> ----- >>>>> >>>>> Whatever. I don't like wall street for the most part or liberal >>>>> freeloaders. >>>> >>>> Remember: it is the red states who tend to be the takers.... and the >>>> liberals who tend to be better educated, have higher IQs, and higher >>>> incomes. >>> >>> Not true if you remove federal wages from your survey. >> >> Cite. > > You claim it you prove you are correct. So no support for your claim. Fair enough. >> >>> California >>> pays out over 100 billion a year in welfare, with over half going to >>> non citizens. >> >> How many of them are working? How many are truly "free loading"? How do >> you define that? > > LOL If they are liberals most are freeloaders. You determine it with a false definition. Got it. > >> >> And say it is 100 billion... that is a drop in the bucket to the amount >> of wealthfare we have in the US (I do realize you speak of just CA). >> Heck, a single business meal can lead to more financial benefits for a >> company than a family of four on SNAP gets in a month. >> >> When I hear right wingers focus on the BIG picture I will worry about >> the money we have helping the disabled vet and the like. Personally, >> though, I think we should help those in need MORE than we do. It is >> absurd how many vets are in poverty, for example. > > Those that are disables true. Vets true. Able bodied but Lazy not so > much. > > Above you included all, right? Well, accept the rich who get so much more.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-07 23:09 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <nni83ehet3oect8suarr7dkld4inlokniq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #246453 |
On 8 Jan 2019 07:01:26 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 18:40:45 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 1/7/19 6:12 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:57:56 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 1/7/19 5:49 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:19:10 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 1/7/19 5:02 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> She does give that impression. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> That she does. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> How so. Be specific. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You decide for yourself. She to me looks rather like a ugly socialist >>>>>>>>>> bitch >> >>>>>>>>>>> But you will not be. This is predictable. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As predicted... nothing... just what she "looks" like. Hmmm, when do you >>>>>>>>> use such terms for me? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What she says what she suggest and Yes her looks she reminds me of >>>>>>>> Trump with dark hair. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Seems you just outed yourself as a misogynist. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How so? Didn't say all women are a ugly socialist bitch just her. I >>>>>>>> say Trump is a whiny little birth also. If she isn't a equal tell her >>>>>>>> to get back to the kitchen. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> All people should be treated as equals with limited respect no matter >>>>>>>> Race, Sex, Religion or Orientation, with no preferential treatment for >>>>>>>> Race, Sex, Religion or Orientation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Notice no apology for your misogynistic comments nor any evidence to >>>>>>> back the claim she wants everyone to be taxed at 70%. But, hey, you are >>>>>>> not alone in your ignorance of what she said and how how marginal tax >>>>>>> rates work. The GOP Minority Whip shares your ignorance: >>>>>> >>>>>> I didn't make any misogynistic comments I happen to have respect for >>>>>> women just not all. Used to be if you critiqued Obama on anything you >>>>>> liberals screamed racist. Guess you will use this for any who >>>>>> disagree with Ocasio-Cortez. >>>>> >>>>> I have no issue with criticism... but you did not criticize her ideas, >>>>> you joined the GOP Minority Whip in not even understanding how marginal >>>>> tax rates work and then used sexist language in your attacks. >>>> >>>> I have no9 idea what the GOP Minority Whip said. She is a potty mouth >>>> bitch to me every bit as bad as Trump. >>>>> >>>>> Instead of facing that you are moving to the all too inevitable >>>>> meta-debate mode of trolling. Can you stop yourself? Can you admit your >>>>> claim of her wanting ANYONE to pay 70% taxes was you misunderstanding >>>>> her comments? Can you admit that the nonsense about her pushing to have >>>>> whites and Republicans pay more was just something made up to troll? >>>>> >>>>>>> https://twitter.com/SteveScalise/status/1081579535114608640 >>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>> Republicans: Let Americans keep more of their own hard-earned money >>>>>>> Democrats: Take away 70% of your income and give it to leftist fantasy >>>>>>> programs >>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And her response: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1081761714096476160 >>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>> You?re the GOP Minority Whip. How do you not know how marginal tax rates >>>>>>> work? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Oh that?s right, almost forgot: GOP works for the corporate CEOs >>>>>>> showering themselves in multi-million?bonuses; not the actual working >>>>>>> people whose wages + healthcare they?re ripping off for profit. >>>>>>> ----- >>>>>> >>>>>> Whatever. I don't like wall street for the most part or liberal >>>>>> freeloaders. >>>>> >>>>> Remember: it is the red states who tend to be the takers.... and the >>>>> liberals who tend to be better educated, have higher IQs, and higher >>>>> incomes. >>>> >>>> Not true if you remove federal wages from your survey. >>> >>> Cite. >> >> You claim it you prove you are correct. > >So no support for your claim. Fair enough. >>> >>>> California >>>> pays out over 100 billion a year in welfare, with over half going to >>>> non citizens. >>> >>> How many of them are working? How many are truly "free loading"? How do >>> you define that? >> >> LOL If they are liberals most are freeloaders. > >You determine it with a false definition. Got it. Here is a good example https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpAOwJvTOio https://www.cnn.com/2017/08/18/us/unmasking-antifa-anti-fascists-hard-left/index.html Anti-fascists and the black bloc tactic originated in Nazi Germany and resurfaced in United Kingdom in the 1980s. Large numbers of Antifa activists first appeared in the United States at anti-World Trade Organization protests in 1999 in Seattle, and then more recently during the Occupy Wall Street movement. But their profile has been rising. Antifa demonstrators have marched in more than a half dozen protests since Election Day in Portland, Oregon, according to police. Earlier this year, Antifa activists were among those who smashed windows and set fires during protests at the University of California, Berkeley, leading to the cancellation of far-right provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos and withdrawal of Ann Coulter as speakers. Antifa activists were in New York City on May Day. > >> >>> >>> And say it is 100 billion... that is a drop in the bucket to the amount >>> of wealthfare we have in the US (I do realize you speak of just CA). >>> Heck, a single business meal can lead to more financial benefits for a >>> company than a family of four on SNAP gets in a month. >>> >>> When I hear right wingers focus on the BIG picture I will worry about >>> the money we have helping the disabled vet and the like. Personally, >>> though, I think we should help those in need MORE than we do. It is >>> absurd how many vets are in poverty, for example. >> >> Those that are disables true. Vets true. Able bodied but Lazy not so >> much. >> >> > >Above you included all, right? What do you call I? People sitting watching TV in a government supplies home screaming they don't have enough to eat all the while smoking crack or doing Heroin. They should not get welfare to buy drugs. >Well, accept the rich who get so much more. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-08 13:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g9jokvFqga7U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #246454 |
Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: > On 8 Jan 2019 07:01:26 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 18:40:45 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 1/7/19 6:12 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:57:56 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 1/7/19 5:49 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:19:10 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 1/7/19 5:02 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> She does give that impression. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That she does. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> How so. Be specific. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You decide for yourself. She to me looks rather like a ugly socialist >>>>>>>>>>> bitch >> >>>>>>>>>>>> But you will not be. This is predictable. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> As predicted... nothing... just what she "looks" like. Hmmm, when do you >>>>>>>>>> use such terms for me? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What she says what she suggest and Yes her looks she reminds me of >>>>>>>>> Trump with dark hair. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Seems you just outed yourself as a misogynist. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> How so? Didn't say all women are a ugly socialist bitch just her. I >>>>>>>>> say Trump is a whiny little birth also. If she isn't a equal tell her >>>>>>>>> to get back to the kitchen. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> All people should be treated as equals with limited respect no matter >>>>>>>>> Race, Sex, Religion or Orientation, with no preferential treatment for >>>>>>>>> Race, Sex, Religion or Orientation. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Notice no apology for your misogynistic comments nor any evidence to >>>>>>>> back the claim she wants everyone to be taxed at 70%. But, hey, you are >>>>>>>> not alone in your ignorance of what she said and how how marginal tax >>>>>>>> rates work. The GOP Minority Whip shares your ignorance: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I didn't make any misogynistic comments I happen to have respect for >>>>>>> women just not all. Used to be if you critiqued Obama on anything you >>>>>>> liberals screamed racist. Guess you will use this for any who >>>>>>> disagree with Ocasio-Cortez. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have no issue with criticism... but you did not criticize her ideas, >>>>>> you joined the GOP Minority Whip in not even understanding how marginal >>>>>> tax rates work and then used sexist language in your attacks. >>>>> >>>>> I have no9 idea what the GOP Minority Whip said. She is a potty mouth >>>>> bitch to me every bit as bad as Trump. >>>>>> >>>>>> Instead of facing that you are moving to the all too inevitable >>>>>> meta-debate mode of trolling. Can you stop yourself? Can you admit your >>>>>> claim of her wanting ANYONE to pay 70% taxes was you misunderstanding >>>>>> her comments? Can you admit that the nonsense about her pushing to have >>>>>> whites and Republicans pay more was just something made up to troll? >>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/SteveScalise/status/1081579535114608640 >>>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>>> Republicans: Let Americans keep more of their own hard-earned money >>>>>>>> Democrats: Take away 70% of your income and give it to leftist fantasy >>>>>>>> programs >>>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And her response: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1081761714096476160 >>>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>>> You?re the GOP Minority Whip. How do you not know how marginal tax rates >>>>>>>> work? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Oh that?s right, almost forgot: GOP works for the corporate CEOs >>>>>>>> showering themselves in multi-million?bonuses; not the actual working >>>>>>>> people whose wages + healthcare they?re ripping off for profit. >>>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Whatever. I don't like wall street for the most part or liberal >>>>>>> freeloaders. >>>>>> >>>>>> Remember: it is the red states who tend to be the takers.... and the >>>>>> liberals who tend to be better educated, have higher IQs, and higher >>>>>> incomes. >>>>> >>>>> Not true if you remove federal wages from your survey. >>>> >>>> Cite. >>> >>> You claim it you prove you are correct. >> >> So no support for your claim. Fair enough. >>>> >>>>> California >>>>> pays out over 100 billion a year in welfare, with over half going to >>>>> non citizens. >>>> >>>> How many of them are working? How many are truly "free loading"? How do >>>> you define that? >>> >>> LOL If they are liberals most are freeloaders. >> >> You determine it with a false definition. Got it. > > Here is a good example > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpAOwJvTOio > > https://www.cnn.com/2017/08/18/us/unmasking-antifa-anti-fascists-hard-left/index.html > > Anti-fascists and the black bloc tactic originated in Nazi Germany and > resurfaced in United Kingdom in the 1980s. Large numbers of Antifa > activists first appeared in the United States at anti-World Trade > Organization protests in 1999 in Seattle, and then more recently > during the Occupy Wall Street movement. > But their profile has been rising. > Antifa demonstrators have marched in more than a half dozen protests > since Election Day in Portland, Oregon, according to police. > Earlier this year, Antifa activists were among those who smashed > windows and set fires during protests at the University of California, > Berkeley, leading to the cancellation of far-right provocateur Milo > Yiannopoulos and withdrawal of Ann Coulter as speakers. > Antifa activists were in New York City on May Day. Nothing to do with freeloading and as shown even Fox admits the bigger issue is right wing violence. > > >> >>> >>>> >>>> And say it is 100 billion... that is a drop in the bucket to the amount >>>> of wealthfare we have in the US (I do realize you speak of just CA). >>>> Heck, a single business meal can lead to more financial benefits for a >>>> company than a family of four on SNAP gets in a month. >>>> >>>> When I hear right wingers focus on the BIG picture I will worry about >>>> the money we have helping the disabled vet and the like. Personally, >>>> though, I think we should help those in need MORE than we do. It is >>>> absurd how many vets are in poverty, for example. >>> >>> Those that are disables true. Vets true. Able bodied but Lazy not so >>> much. >>> >>> >> >> Above you included all, right? > > What do you call I? People sitting watching TV in a government > supplies home screaming they don't have enough to eat all the while > smoking crack or doing Heroin. They should not get welfare to buy > drugs. Why do you assume vets do that? Why assume others do? You present it like a norm. > > >> Well, accept the rich who get so much more. >> > Should be except. Silly error. But you still ignore the rich who get so much more.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-08 11:48 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <c9v93eth0ihone99ca2qd5mj8rl98e7mnn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #246479 |
On 8 Jan 2019 13:58:55 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 8 Jan 2019 07:01:26 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 18:40:45 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 1/7/19 6:12 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:57:56 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 1/7/19 5:49 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>>> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:19:10 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 1/7/19 5:02 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She does give that impression. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That she does. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> How so. Be specific. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You decide for yourself. She to me looks rather like a ugly socialist >>>>>>>>>>>> bitch >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But you will not be. This is predictable. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> As predicted... nothing... just what she "looks" like. Hmmm, when do you >>>>>>>>>>> use such terms for me? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What she says what she suggest and Yes her looks she reminds me of >>>>>>>>>> Trump with dark hair. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Seems you just outed yourself as a misogynist. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> How so? Didn't say all women are a ugly socialist bitch just her. I >>>>>>>>>> say Trump is a whiny little birth also. If she isn't a equal tell her >>>>>>>>>> to get back to the kitchen. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> All people should be treated as equals with limited respect no matter >>>>>>>>>> Race, Sex, Religion or Orientation, with no preferential treatment for >>>>>>>>>> Race, Sex, Religion or Orientation. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Notice no apology for your misogynistic comments nor any evidence to >>>>>>>>> back the claim she wants everyone to be taxed at 70%. But, hey, you are >>>>>>>>> not alone in your ignorance of what she said and how how marginal tax >>>>>>>>> rates work. The GOP Minority Whip shares your ignorance: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I didn't make any misogynistic comments I happen to have respect for >>>>>>>> women just not all. Used to be if you critiqued Obama on anything you >>>>>>>> liberals screamed racist. Guess you will use this for any who >>>>>>>> disagree with Ocasio-Cortez. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have no issue with criticism... but you did not criticize her ideas, >>>>>>> you joined the GOP Minority Whip in not even understanding how marginal >>>>>>> tax rates work and then used sexist language in your attacks. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have no9 idea what the GOP Minority Whip said. She is a potty mouth >>>>>> bitch to me every bit as bad as Trump. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Instead of facing that you are moving to the all too inevitable >>>>>>> meta-debate mode of trolling. Can you stop yourself? Can you admit your >>>>>>> claim of her wanting ANYONE to pay 70% taxes was you misunderstanding >>>>>>> her comments? Can you admit that the nonsense about her pushing to have >>>>>>> whites and Republicans pay more was just something made up to troll? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/SteveScalise/status/1081579535114608640 >>>>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>>>> Republicans: Let Americans keep more of their own hard-earned money >>>>>>>>> Democrats: Take away 70% of your income and give it to leftist fantasy >>>>>>>>> programs >>>>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And her response: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1081761714096476160 >>>>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>>>> You?re the GOP Minority Whip. How do you not know how marginal tax rates >>>>>>>>> work? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Oh that?s right, almost forgot: GOP works for the corporate CEOs >>>>>>>>> showering themselves in multi-million?bonuses; not the actual working >>>>>>>>> people whose wages + healthcare they?re ripping off for profit. >>>>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Whatever. I don't like wall street for the most part or liberal >>>>>>>> freeloaders. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Remember: it is the red states who tend to be the takers.... and the >>>>>>> liberals who tend to be better educated, have higher IQs, and higher >>>>>>> incomes. >>>>>> >>>>>> Not true if you remove federal wages from your survey. >>>>> >>>>> Cite. >>>> >>>> You claim it you prove you are correct. >>> >>> So no support for your claim. Fair enough. >>>>> >>>>>> California >>>>>> pays out over 100 billion a year in welfare, with over half going to >>>>>> non citizens. >>>>> >>>>> How many of them are working? How many are truly "free loading"? How do >>>>> you define that? >>>> >>>> LOL If they are liberals most are freeloaders. >>> >>> You determine it with a false definition. Got it. >> >> Here is a good example >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpAOwJvTOio >> >> https://www.cnn.com/2017/08/18/us/unmasking-antifa-anti-fascists-hard-left/index.html >> >> Anti-fascists and the black bloc tactic originated in Nazi Germany and >> resurfaced in United Kingdom in the 1980s. Large numbers of Antifa >> activists first appeared in the United States at anti-World Trade >> Organization protests in 1999 in Seattle, and then more recently >> during the Occupy Wall Street movement. >> But their profile has been rising. >> Antifa demonstrators have marched in more than a half dozen protests >> since Election Day in Portland, Oregon, according to police. >> Earlier this year, Antifa activists were among those who smashed >> windows and set fires during protests at the University of California, >> Berkeley, leading to the cancellation of far-right provocateur Milo >> Yiannopoulos and withdrawal of Ann Coulter as speakers. >> Antifa activists were in New York City on May Day. > >Nothing to do with freeloading and as shown even Fox admits the bigger >issue is right wing violence. Doesn't make left wing violence OK. The Liberals claim to be better but still do what the Nazis did with there brownshirts. Liberals have a different level of proof for leftist. If a person is white or rich they are automatically right wing. Liberals are so racist. >> >> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> And say it is 100 billion... that is a drop in the bucket to the amount >>>>> of wealthfare we have in the US (I do realize you speak of just CA). >>>>> Heck, a single business meal can lead to more financial benefits for a >>>>> company than a family of four on SNAP gets in a month. >>>>> >>>>> When I hear right wingers focus on the BIG picture I will worry about >>>>> the money we have helping the disabled vet and the like. Personally, >>>>> though, I think we should help those in need MORE than we do. It is >>>>> absurd how many vets are in poverty, for example. >>>> >>>> Those that are disables true. Vets true. Able bodied but Lazy not so >>>> much. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Above you included all, right? >> >> What do you call I? People sitting watching TV in a government >> supplies home screaming they don't have enough to eat all the while >> smoking crack or doing Heroin. They should not get welfare to buy >> drugs. > >Why do you assume vets do that? Why assume others do? You present it like a >norm. Good try. non sequitur >> >> >>> Well, accept the rich who get so much more. >>> >> > >Should be except. Silly error. But you still ignore the rich who get so >much more. Wall Street is a problem as is the stock market. I agree Yet lack of a work ethic in liberals is also a problem. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-08 13:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9kefoFo7iU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #246582 |
On 1/8/19 12:48 PM, Mattb wrote: ... >>>>>>> California >>>>>>> pays out over 100 billion a year in welfare, with over half going to >>>>>>> non citizens. >>>>>> >>>>>> How many of them are working? How many are truly "free loading"? How do >>>>>> you define that? >>>>> >>>>> LOL If they are liberals most are freeloaders. >>>> >>>> You determine it with a false definition. Got it. >>> >>> Here is a good example >>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpAOwJvTOio >>> >>> https://www.cnn.com/2017/08/18/us/unmasking-antifa-anti-fascists-hard-left/index.html >>> >>> Anti-fascists and the black bloc tactic originated in Nazi Germany and >>> resurfaced in United Kingdom in the 1980s. Large numbers of Antifa >>> activists first appeared in the United States at anti-World Trade >>> Organization protests in 1999 in Seattle, and then more recently >>> during the Occupy Wall Street movement. >>> But their profile has been rising. >>> Antifa demonstrators have marched in more than a half dozen protests >>> since Election Day in Portland, Oregon, according to police. >>> Earlier this year, Antifa activists were among those who smashed >>> windows and set fires during protests at the University of California, >>> Berkeley, leading to the cancellation of far-right provocateur Milo >>> Yiannopoulos and withdrawal of Ann Coulter as speakers. >>> Antifa activists were in New York City on May Day. >> >> Nothing to do with freeloading and as shown even Fox admits the bigger >> issue is right wing violence. > > Doesn't make left wing violence OK. Nobody said it did... but what you are doing is running from your claim that people receiving aid are, in general, "free loading". You are doing what you can to change the topic. I am OK changing the topic, but let us first acknowledge your claim was one you have not and likely cannot back. > The Liberals claim to be better > but still do what the Nazis did with there brownshirts. > > Liberals have a different level of proof for leftist. If a person is > white or rich they are automatically right wing. Liberals are so > racist. As we keep in mind your moving of goal posts to try to obfuscate your last failure, let us now move to this claim of yours: please provide a quote of ANYONE saying what you attribute to the left in general. Then show how it applies to the left in general. You will fail. This is a given. >>>>>> And say it is 100 billion... that is a drop in the bucket to the amount >>>>>> of wealthfare we have in the US (I do realize you speak of just CA). >>>>>> Heck, a single business meal can lead to more financial benefits for a >>>>>> company than a family of four on SNAP gets in a month. >>>>>> >>>>>> When I hear right wingers focus on the BIG picture I will worry about >>>>>> the money we have helping the disabled vet and the like. Personally, >>>>>> though, I think we should help those in need MORE than we do. It is >>>>>> absurd how many vets are in poverty, for example. >>>>> >>>>> Those that are disables true. Vets true. Able bodied but Lazy not so >>>>> much. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Above you included all, right? >>> >>> What do you call I? People sitting watching TV in a government >>> supplies home screaming they don't have enough to eat all the while >>> smoking crack or doing Heroin. They should not get welfare to buy >>> drugs. >> >> Why do you assume vets do that? Why assume others do? You present it like a >> norm. > > Good try. non sequitur I am asking about your "free loader" claim -- the one you keep running from. You made up the claim. No, most vets and others making use our our safety net systems are not doing so even if they could work. They are doing as AS they work for the most part, or because they are disabled, or because they are children. Your claim is simply without any merit at all. > >>> >>> >>>> Well, accept the rich who get so much more. >>>> >>> >> >> Should be except. Silly error. But you still ignore the rich who get so >> much more. > > Wall Street is a problem as is the stock market. I agree > > Yet lack of a work ethic in liberals is also a problem. A claim you will never back. You have shown no sign of liberals having a lower work ethic than conservatives. You MIGHT be able to show that those who have hit hard times better understand the need for having safety nets, but that would not back your claim. And, face it, you cannot back your claim in any way. You made it up. You lie, repeatedly. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web