Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #245411 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ted <ted@sam.street> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-05 01:53 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-01-07 04:05 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 196 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-05 01:53 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 20:00 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-04 20:03 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-05 12:48 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Meteorite Debris <WTF@whoknows.com> - 2019-01-05 15:03 +1030
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-05 07:32 -0600
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-05 13:59 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-05 06:42 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks bookwurm <bookwurm8@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 14:22 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Meteorite Debris <WTF@whoknows.com> - 2019-01-05 15:05 +1030
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-05 12:48 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-05 03:11 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-05 12:48 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-05 04:57 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-05 13:04 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-05 09:20 -0500
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-05 14:27 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 15:28 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-05 23:41 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 15:43 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-05 23:53 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 15:56 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 00:11 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 16:24 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 00:57 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 10:14 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:30 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 21:20 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-06 14:44 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 22:00 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-06 15:06 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 22:12 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 22:32 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:42 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 22:53 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:00 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 23:32 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:36 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 23:42 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:45 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 00:42 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-07 22:02 -0500
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 22:43 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 22:53 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 22:00 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:13 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 22:23 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:25 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 22:43 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:51 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 22:53 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 22:53 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:02 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 23:32 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:00 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 23:34 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 16:47 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 00:42 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:43 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 01:07 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:31 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 01:51 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:58 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 13:07 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:13 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 15:16 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:28 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 16:02 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 17:19 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 16:49 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 17:57 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 17:12 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 18:40 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 22:28 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 07:01 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 23:09 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 13:58 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 11:48 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 13:11 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-08 15:25 -0500
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 14:26 -0600
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 12:54 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 14:59 -0600
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb - 2019-01-08 14:01 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 14:25 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-08 15:22 -0500
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 12:56 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 14:00 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 16:46 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:54 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:07 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:27 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:33 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:56 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:06 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:12 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:35 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:42 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:47 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-06 17:54 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-06 17:57 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 04:17 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 04:56 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 19:08 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-06 18:13 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 02:37 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-07 12:29 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 04:17 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-06 20:21 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 04:56 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-07 01:18 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 14:11 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-07 22:00 -0500
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Clave <ChrisShitbagious@TheMonastery.com> - 2019-01-07 19:24 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-07 22:59 -0500
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 06:18 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 18:48 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 18:48 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 17:56 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 19:09 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 02:16 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 19:27 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 02:37 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 19:41 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 03:06 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 20:11 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 03:35 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 20:50 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 20:12 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 20:36 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 22:00 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 09:22 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:13 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 10:16 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:30 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:03 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 16:07 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 23:32 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 16:48 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 00:45 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:48 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 01:12 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:35 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 02:13 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 02:37 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:51 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:12 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:30 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:37 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:58 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:04 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:09 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:32 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:40 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:45 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 18:12 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 02:37 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-06 17:52 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 19:03 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-06 18:12 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 02:30 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-07 12:29 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 22:05 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-07 14:10 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:27 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-07 15:29 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 18:14 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 02:37 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 13:17 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 04:17 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 04:56 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 00:45 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:51 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:11 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:30 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:36 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:03 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:30 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:37 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:41 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:47 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:55 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 18:08 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 02:13 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 02:37 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 18:39 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:43 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 02:13 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 20:05 -0600
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 19:16 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 19:18 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 19:27 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-06 13:18 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:13 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-07 04:05 +0000
Page 5 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 10 Next page →
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-08 15:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bm1a3ehhq124qum15fna61ce6arisraue0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #246600 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 1/8/19 12:48 PM, Mattb wrote: a bunch of troll shit.... like usual. >I am asking about your "free loader" claim -- the one you keep running >from. You made up the claim. No, most vets and others making use our our >safety net systems are not doing so even if they could work. They are >doing as AS they work for the most part, or because they are disabled, >or because they are children. > >Your claim is simply without any merit at all. Looks like you are starting to learn more about matty. He is a troll and a liar.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-08 14:26 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <q13113$2mt$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #246623 |
"Patrick" <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote in message news:bm1a3ehhq124qum15fna61ce6arisraue0@4ax.com... > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>On 1/8/19 12:48 PM, Mattb wrote: > a bunch of troll shit.... like usual. > >>I am asking about your "free loader" claim -- the one you keep running >>from. You made up the claim. No, most vets and others making use our our >>safety net systems are not doing so even if they could work. They are >>doing as AS they work for the most part, or because they are disabled, >>or because they are children. >> >>Your claim is simply without any merit at all. > > Looks like you are starting to learn more about matty. > He is a troll and a liar. Snit is most likely a rude-olf sock...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-08 12:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <je3a3e9fotjthfvhj8bjuvaa16dt00e0qh@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #246625 |
On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 14:26:10 -0600, "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> wrote: > > >"Patrick" <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote in message >news:bm1a3ehhq124qum15fna61ce6arisraue0@4ax.com... >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>>On 1/8/19 12:48 PM, Mattb wrote: >> a bunch of troll shit.... like usual. >> >>>I am asking about your "free loader" claim -- the one you keep running >>>from. You made up the claim. No, most vets and others making use our our >>>safety net systems are not doing so even if they could work. They are >>>doing as AS they work for the most part, or because they are disabled, >>>or because they are children. >>> >>>Your claim is simply without any merit at all. >> >> Looks like you are starting to learn more about matty. >> He is a troll and a liar. > >Snit is most likely a rude-olf sock... Hasn't thought of that. Bozo bin?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-08 14:59 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <q1330e$gt7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #246639 |
"Mattb" <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote in message news:je3a3e9fotjthfvhj8bjuvaa16dt00e0qh@4ax.com... > On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 14:26:10 -0600, "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >>"Patrick" <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote in message >>news:bm1a3ehhq124qum15fna61ce6arisraue0@4ax.com... >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On 1/8/19 12:48 PM, Mattb wrote: >>> a bunch of troll shit.... like usual. >>> >>>>I am asking about your "free loader" claim -- the one you keep running >>>>from. You made up the claim. No, most vets and others making use our our >>>>safety net systems are not doing so even if they could work. They are >>>>doing as AS they work for the most part, or because they are disabled, >>>>or because they are children. >>>> >>>>Your claim is simply without any merit at all. >>> >>> Looks like you are starting to learn more about matty. >>> He is a troll and a liar. >> >>Snit is most likely a rude-olf sock... > > Hasn't thought of that. Bozo bin? rude-olf has admitted to having over 100 socks... Sometimes he has them have conversations with each other. He must be one bored mo-fo....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mattb |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-08 14:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bsvokp.8rr.17.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #246639 |
On 2019-01-08 1:54 p.m., Mattb wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 14:26:10 -0600, "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> "Patrick" <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote in message >> news:bm1a3ehhq124qum15fna61ce6arisraue0@4ax.com... >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 1/8/19 12:48 PM, Mattb wrote: >>> a bunch of troll shit.... like usual. >>> >>>> I am asking about your "free loader" claim -- the one you keep running >>>> from. You made up the claim. No, most vets and others making use our our >>>> safety net systems are not doing so even if they could work. They are >>>> doing as AS they work for the most part, or because they are disabled, >>>> or because they are children. >>>> >>>> Your claim is simply without any merit at all. >>> >>> Looks like you are starting to learn more about matty. >>> He is a troll and a liar. >> >> Snit is most likely a rude-olf sock... > > Hasn't thought of that. Bozo bin? > bozo bin this
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-08 14:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9kiqmF1jnhU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #246625 |
On 1/8/19 1:26 PM, DoD wrote: > > > "Patrick" <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote in message > news:bm1a3ehhq124qum15fna61ce6arisraue0@4ax.com... >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 1/8/19 12:48 PM, Mattb wrote: >> a bunch of troll shit.... like usual. >> >>> I am asking about your "free loader" claim -- the one you keep running >>> from. You made up the claim. No, most vets and others making use our our >>> safety net systems are not doing so even if they could work. They are >>> doing as AS they work for the most part, or because they are disabled, >>> or because they are children. >>> >>> Your claim is simply without any merit at all. >> >> Looks like you are starting to learn more about matty. >> He is a troll and a liar. > > Snit is most likely a rude-olf sock... With a decades-long posting history. LOL! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-08 15:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <uf1a3e1de9ta08a29utm7nosn86lfq6dku@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #246582 |
Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >Doesn't make left wing violence OK. The Liberals claim to be better >but still do what the Nazis did with there brownshirts. And you wonder why we laugh AT you? >Liberals have a different level of proof for leftist. If a person is >white or rich they are automatically right wing. Liberals are so >racist. >Wall Street is a problem as is the stock market. I agree >Yet lack of a work ethic in liberals is also a problem. And you wonder why we laugh AT you?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-08 12:56 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <qh3a3ede5smecur6gd6qjnd8t8jjnc1qfp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #246619 |
On Tue, 08 Jan 2019 15:22:32 -0500, Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> wrote: >Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: > >>Doesn't make left wing violence OK. The Liberals claim to be better >>but still do what the Nazis did with there brownshirts. > >And you wonder why we laugh AT you? You don't believe the antifa use the same tactics as the Brownshirts? > > >>Liberals have a different level of proof for leftist. If a person is >>white or rich they are automatically right wing. Liberals are so >>racist. > >>Wall Street is a problem as is the stock market. I agree >>Yet lack of a work ethic in liberals is also a problem. > >And you wonder why we laugh AT you? You area blind Trumper. That makes you a idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-08 14:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bsvojd.8rr.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #246640 |
On 2019-01-08 1:56 p.m., Mattb wrote: > On Tue, 08 Jan 2019 15:22:32 -0500, Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> > wrote: > >> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Doesn't make left wing violence OK. The Liberals claim to be better >>> but still do what the Nazis did with there brownshirts. >> >> And you wonder why we laugh AT you? > > You don't believe the antifa use the same tactics as the Brownshirts? >> >> >>> Liberals have a different level of proof for leftist. If a person is >>> white or rich they are automatically right wing. Liberals are so >>> racist. >> >>> Wall Street is a problem as is the stock market. I agree >>> Yet lack of a work ethic in liberals is also a problem. >> >> And you wonder why we laugh AT you? > > You area blind Trumper. That makes you a idiot. > you area , lol
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 16:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9fibaFsrnvU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #246003 |
On 1/6/19 4:00 PM, Mattb wrote: > On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 21:20:13 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: > >> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:57:43 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>> >>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:11:46 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:53:10 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:41:11 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> LOL. I read recently that Biden is the most popular so far. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Maybe we can get Romney and Biden? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Or Kang and Kodos. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://tv.avclub.com/the-simpsons-classic-treehouse-of-horror-vii-1798181639 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There was a Warren underneath. ;-)) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 1/2020th. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I would rather Romney run than Trump. >>>>> >>>>> Maybe you will have a Bernie/Warren ticket on the Dem side. >>>> >>>> >>>> The left would like that. But the DNC won't let it happen. >>> >>> If this Ocasio-Cortez keep talking Bernie won't have a chance. Bernie >>> style has a chance with this Ocasio-Cortez's brand of socialism being >>> pushed as representing the Dems most logical people will reject it. >>> >>> The Dems want a 70% tax rate? >> >> >> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? > > Probably just White people and any that vote republican. > What? Where the hell would you get that? The reality is she has not called for ANYONE to be taxed at 70%. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 15:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <m7553ed20ffpupqnnlqnc7enersrdsvl9n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #246027 |
On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 16:46:50 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 1/6/19 4:00 PM, Mattb wrote: >> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 21:20:13 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >> >>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:57:43 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:11:46 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:53:10 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:41:11 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> LOL. I read recently that Biden is the most popular so far. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Maybe we can get Romney and Biden? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Or Kang and Kodos. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://tv.avclub.com/the-simpsons-classic-treehouse-of-horror-vii-1798181639 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There was a Warren underneath. ;-)) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1/2020th. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I would rather Romney run than Trump. >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe you will have a Bernie/Warren ticket on the Dem side. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The left would like that. But the DNC won't let it happen. >>>> >>>> If this Ocasio-Cortez keep talking Bernie won't have a chance. Bernie >>>> style has a chance with this Ocasio-Cortez's brand of socialism being >>>> pushed as representing the Dems most logical people will reject it. >>>> >>>> The Dems want a 70% tax rate? >>> >>> >>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >> >> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. >> > >What? Where the hell would you get that? That seems to be her way. > >The reality is she has not called for ANYONE to be taxed at 70%. The what do you believe she is saying?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 17:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9fjhcFt3j1U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #246032 |
On 1/6/19 4:54 PM, Mattb wrote: > On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 16:46:50 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > >> On 1/6/19 4:00 PM, Mattb wrote: >>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 21:20:13 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>> >>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:57:43 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:11:46 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:53:10 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:41:11 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> LOL. I read recently that Biden is the most popular so far. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we can get Romney and Biden? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Or Kang and Kodos. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://tv.avclub.com/the-simpsons-classic-treehouse-of-horror-vii-1798181639 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There was a Warren underneath. ;-)) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1/2020th. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would rather Romney run than Trump. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Maybe you will have a Bernie/Warren ticket on the Dem side. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The left would like that. But the DNC won't let it happen. >>>>> >>>>> If this Ocasio-Cortez keep talking Bernie won't have a chance. Bernie >>>>> style has a chance with this Ocasio-Cortez's brand of socialism being >>>>> pushed as representing the Dems most logical people will reject it. >>>>> >>>>> The Dems want a 70% tax rate? >>>> >>>> >>>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >>> >>> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. >>> >> >> What? Where the hell would you get that? > > That seems to be her way. How do you figure? Wait... I asked and you had no answer. >> The reality is she has not called for ANYONE to be taxed at 70%. > > The what do you believe she is saying? That the top rate would be 70%... and this would apply only to money made after you made so many millions. Oh, and she says "as high as" that but does not specify it is that. Oh, and she quotes economists who back her plan... where Paul Ryan quotes Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 16:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <62753epmhfrj36lbadsevvs6sicot4nl8o@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #246037 |
On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 17:07:07 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 1/6/19 4:54 PM, Mattb wrote: >> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 16:46:50 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 1/6/19 4:00 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 21:20:13 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:57:43 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:11:46 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:53:10 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:41:11 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL. I read recently that Biden is the most popular so far. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we can get Romney and Biden? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Or Kang and Kodos. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://tv.avclub.com/the-simpsons-classic-treehouse-of-horror-vii-1798181639 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> There was a Warren underneath. ;-)) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 1/2020th. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I would rather Romney run than Trump. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Maybe you will have a Bernie/Warren ticket on the Dem side. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The left would like that. But the DNC won't let it happen. >>>>>> >>>>>> If this Ocasio-Cortez keep talking Bernie won't have a chance. Bernie >>>>>> style has a chance with this Ocasio-Cortez's brand of socialism being >>>>>> pushed as representing the Dems most logical people will reject it. >>>>>> >>>>>> The Dems want a 70% tax rate? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >>>> >>>> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. >>>> >>> >>> What? Where the hell would you get that? >> >> That seems to be her way. > >How do you figure? Wait... I asked and you had no answer. Because that is what I believe. That is my opinion and sure as fuck don't have to justify it to the likes of you. You be wuss. Antifa be wuss. > >>> The reality is she has not called for ANYONE to be taxed at 70%. >> >> The what do you believe she is saying? > >That the top rate would be 70%... and this would apply only to money >made after you made so many millions. Oh, and she says "as high as" that >but does not specify it is that. > >Oh, and she quotes economists who back her plan... where Paul Ryan >quotes Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged. I don't support the her. She is free to move to Venezuela where her type of government has failed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 17:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9fl29FtcvuU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #246043 |
On 1/6/19 5:27 PM, Mattb wrote: > On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 17:07:07 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > >> On 1/6/19 4:54 PM, Mattb wrote: >>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 16:46:50 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 1/6/19 4:00 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 21:20:13 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:57:43 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:11:46 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:53:10 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:41:11 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL. I read recently that Biden is the most popular so far. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we can get Romney and Biden? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Or Kang and Kodos. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://tv.avclub.com/the-simpsons-classic-treehouse-of-horror-vii-1798181639 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> There was a Warren underneath. ;-)) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 1/2020th. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I would rather Romney run than Trump. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Maybe you will have a Bernie/Warren ticket on the Dem side. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The left would like that. But the DNC won't let it happen. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If this Ocasio-Cortez keep talking Bernie won't have a chance. Bernie >>>>>>> style has a chance with this Ocasio-Cortez's brand of socialism being >>>>>>> pushed as representing the Dems most logical people will reject it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The Dems want a 70% tax rate? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >>>>> >>>>> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. >>>>> >>>> >>>> What? Where the hell would you get that? >>> >>> That seems to be her way. >> >> How do you figure? Wait... I asked and you had no answer. > > Because that is what I believe. That is my opinion and sure as fuck > don't have to justify it to the likes of you. You be wuss. Antifa be > wuss. You have a bizarre and derogatory opinion about another person based on your biases but no evidence. Thank you, that answers the question. >>>> The reality is she has not called for ANYONE to be taxed at 70%. >>> >>> The what do you believe she is saying? >> >> That the top rate would be 70%... and this would apply only to money >> made after you made so many millions. Oh, and she says "as high as" that >> but does not specify it is that. >> >> Oh, and she quotes economists who back her plan... where Paul Ryan >> quotes Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged. > > I don't support the her. She is free to move to Venezuela where her > type of government has failed. When Reagan took office, people paid 70% taxes on money they made over $216,000. In today's money that is about $5 million. Her plan would include having that tax rate be only for money made over $10 million, about double what it was in the 1970s, and she would do this to pay for things we need. Do you have a better plan for paying for a transition to renewable energy and other things she proposes? Or do you just want us to continue to bury our heads in the sand and pretend these things are not needed, and have us ALL pay more in the end? To be clear, there are other reasonable methods... but I bet you do not know of them. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 16:56 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <lq853e91qso43so8re204hulbhlade6gvp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #246052 |
On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 17:33:13 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 1/6/19 5:27 PM, Mattb wrote: >> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 17:07:07 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 1/6/19 4:54 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 16:46:50 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 1/6/19 4:00 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 21:20:13 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:57:43 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:11:46 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:53:10 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:41:11 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL. I read recently that Biden is the most popular so far. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we can get Romney and Biden? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Or Kang and Kodos. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://tv.avclub.com/the-simpsons-classic-treehouse-of-horror-vii-1798181639 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> There was a Warren underneath. ;-)) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 1/2020th. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I would rather Romney run than Trump. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Maybe you will have a Bernie/Warren ticket on the Dem side. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The left would like that. But the DNC won't let it happen. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If this Ocasio-Cortez keep talking Bernie won't have a chance. Bernie >>>>>>>> style has a chance with this Ocasio-Cortez's brand of socialism being >>>>>>>> pushed as representing the Dems most logical people will reject it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The Dems want a 70% tax rate? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >>>>>> >>>>>> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> What? Where the hell would you get that? >>>> >>>> That seems to be her way. >>> >>> How do you figure? Wait... I asked and you had no answer. >> >> Because that is what I believe. That is my opinion and sure as fuck >> don't have to justify it to the likes of you. You be wuss. Antifa be >> wuss. > >You have a bizarre and derogatory opinion about another person based on >your biases but no evidence. Thank you, that answers the question. I go by what I see of her. That and I totally oppose pure socialism of her kind., > >>>>> The reality is she has not called for ANYONE to be taxed at 70%. >>>> >>>> The what do you believe she is saying? >>> >>> That the top rate would be 70%... and this would apply only to money >>> made after you made so many millions. Oh, and she says "as high as" that >>> but does not specify it is that. >>> >>> Oh, and she quotes economists who back her plan... where Paul Ryan >>> quotes Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged. >> >> I don't support the her. She is free to move to Venezuela where her >> type of government has failed. > >When Reagan took office, people paid 70% taxes on money they made over >$216,000. In today's money that is about $5 million. Her plan would >include having that tax rate be only for money made over $10 million, >about double what it was in the 1970s, and she would do this to pay for >things we need. > >Do you have a better plan for paying for a transition to renewable >energy and other things she proposes? Or do you just want us to continue >to bury our heads in the sand and pretend these things are not needed, >and have us ALL pay more in the end? > >To be clear, there are other reasonable methods... but I bet you do not >know of them. Well why do you want a tax rate that high? Where would the money go?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 18:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9fn1aFto60U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #246066 |
On 1/6/19 5:56 PM, Mattb wrote: > On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 17:33:13 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > >> On 1/6/19 5:27 PM, Mattb wrote: >>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 17:07:07 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 1/6/19 4:54 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 16:46:50 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 1/6/19 4:00 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 21:20:13 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:57:43 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:11:46 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:53:10 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:41:11 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL. I read recently that Biden is the most popular so far. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we can get Romney and Biden? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or Kang and Kodos. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://tv.avclub.com/the-simpsons-classic-treehouse-of-horror-vii-1798181639 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> There was a Warren underneath. ;-)) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1/2020th. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I would rather Romney run than Trump. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you will have a Bernie/Warren ticket on the Dem side. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The left would like that. But the DNC won't let it happen. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If this Ocasio-Cortez keep talking Bernie won't have a chance. Bernie >>>>>>>>> style has a chance with this Ocasio-Cortez's brand of socialism being >>>>>>>>> pushed as representing the Dems most logical people will reject it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The Dems want a 70% tax rate? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> What? Where the hell would you get that? >>>>> >>>>> That seems to be her way. >>>> >>>> How do you figure? Wait... I asked and you had no answer. >>> >>> Because that is what I believe. That is my opinion and sure as fuck >>> don't have to justify it to the likes of you. You be wuss. Antifa be >>> wuss. >> >> You have a bizarre and derogatory opinion about another person based on >> your biases but no evidence. Thank you, that answers the question. > > I go by what I see of her. That and I totally oppose pure socialism > of her kind., >> >>>>>> The reality is she has not called for ANYONE to be taxed at 70%. >>>>> >>>>> The what do you believe she is saying? >>>> >>>> That the top rate would be 70%... and this would apply only to money >>>> made after you made so many millions. Oh, and she says "as high as" that >>>> but does not specify it is that. >>>> >>>> Oh, and she quotes economists who back her plan... where Paul Ryan >>>> quotes Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged. >>> >>> I don't support the her. She is free to move to Venezuela where her >>> type of government has failed. >> >> When Reagan took office, people paid 70% taxes on money they made over >> $216,000. In today's money that is about $5 million. Her plan would >> include having that tax rate be only for money made over $10 million, >> about double what it was in the 1970s, and she would do this to pay for >> things we need. >> >> Do you have a better plan for paying for a transition to renewable >> energy and other things she proposes? Or do you just want us to continue >> to bury our heads in the sand and pretend these things are not needed, >> and have us ALL pay more in the end? >> >> To be clear, there are other reasonable methods... but I bet you do not >> know of them. > > Well why do you want a tax rate that high? Where would the money go? > > Investments into the country... infrastructure, education, going to greener tech, energy infrastructure, data infrastructure, roads and bridges and the like, oversight where needed, etc. And where did the money go in the 1970s and before? In the '60s some of it went to getting us to the moon. I am all for going back. And beyond. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 17:12 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <in953e9h3bn8h5pr7i5es1olo7thh91ubk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #246072 |
On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 18:06:50 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 1/6/19 5:56 PM, Mattb wrote: >> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 17:33:13 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 1/6/19 5:27 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 17:07:07 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 1/6/19 4:54 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 16:46:50 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 1/6/19 4:00 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 21:20:13 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:57:43 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:11:46 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:53:10 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:41:11 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL. I read recently that Biden is the most popular so far. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we can get Romney and Biden? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or Kang and Kodos. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://tv.avclub.com/the-simpsons-classic-treehouse-of-horror-vii-1798181639 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was a Warren underneath. ;-)) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1/2020th. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I would rather Romney run than Trump. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you will have a Bernie/Warren ticket on the Dem side. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The left would like that. But the DNC won't let it happen. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If this Ocasio-Cortez keep talking Bernie won't have a chance. Bernie >>>>>>>>>> style has a chance with this Ocasio-Cortez's brand of socialism being >>>>>>>>>> pushed as representing the Dems most logical people will reject it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The Dems want a 70% tax rate? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What? Where the hell would you get that? >>>>>> >>>>>> That seems to be her way. >>>>> >>>>> How do you figure? Wait... I asked and you had no answer. >>>> >>>> Because that is what I believe. That is my opinion and sure as fuck >>>> don't have to justify it to the likes of you. You be wuss. Antifa be >>>> wuss. >>> >>> You have a bizarre and derogatory opinion about another person based on >>> your biases but no evidence. Thank you, that answers the question. >> >> I go by what I see of her. That and I totally oppose pure socialism >> of her kind., >>> >>>>>>> The reality is she has not called for ANYONE to be taxed at 70%. >>>>>> >>>>>> The what do you believe she is saying? >>>>> >>>>> That the top rate would be 70%... and this would apply only to money >>>>> made after you made so many millions. Oh, and she says "as high as" that >>>>> but does not specify it is that. >>>>> >>>>> Oh, and she quotes economists who back her plan... where Paul Ryan >>>>> quotes Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged. >>>> >>>> I don't support the her. She is free to move to Venezuela where her >>>> type of government has failed. >>> >>> When Reagan took office, people paid 70% taxes on money they made over >>> $216,000. In today's money that is about $5 million. Her plan would >>> include having that tax rate be only for money made over $10 million, >>> about double what it was in the 1970s, and she would do this to pay for >>> things we need. >>> >>> Do you have a better plan for paying for a transition to renewable >>> energy and other things she proposes? Or do you just want us to continue >>> to bury our heads in the sand and pretend these things are not needed, >>> and have us ALL pay more in the end? >>> >>> To be clear, there are other reasonable methods... but I bet you do not >>> know of them. >> >> Well why do you want a tax rate that high? Where would the money go? >> >> >Investments into the country... infrastructure, education, going to >greener tech, energy infrastructure, data infrastructure, roads and >bridges and the like, oversight where needed, etc. I'd agree to a limited tax increase I pay about 33% now but won't go for 70%. > >And where did the money go in the 1970s and before? In the '60s some of >it went to getting us to the moon. I am all for going back. And beyond. We had less freeloaders in those days and the Democrats didn't buy votes with entitlements.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 18:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9fomfFu1t8U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #246076 |
On 1/6/19 6:12 PM, Mattb wrote: > On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 18:06:50 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > >> On 1/6/19 5:56 PM, Mattb wrote: >>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 17:33:13 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 1/6/19 5:27 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 17:07:07 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 1/6/19 4:54 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 16:46:50 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 1/6/19 4:00 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 21:20:13 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:57:43 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:11:46 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:53:10 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:41:11 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL. I read recently that Biden is the most popular so far. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we can get Romney and Biden? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or Kang and Kodos. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://tv.avclub.com/the-simpsons-classic-treehouse-of-horror-vii-1798181639 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was a Warren underneath. ;-)) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1/2020th. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I would rather Romney run than Trump. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you will have a Bernie/Warren ticket on the Dem side. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The left would like that. But the DNC won't let it happen. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If this Ocasio-Cortez keep talking Bernie won't have a chance. Bernie >>>>>>>>>>> style has a chance with this Ocasio-Cortez's brand of socialism being >>>>>>>>>>> pushed as representing the Dems most logical people will reject it. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The Dems want a 70% tax rate? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What? Where the hell would you get that? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That seems to be her way. >>>>>> >>>>>> How do you figure? Wait... I asked and you had no answer. >>>>> >>>>> Because that is what I believe. That is my opinion and sure as fuck >>>>> don't have to justify it to the likes of you. You be wuss. Antifa be >>>>> wuss. >>>> >>>> You have a bizarre and derogatory opinion about another person based on >>>> your biases but no evidence. Thank you, that answers the question. >>> >>> I go by what I see of her. That and I totally oppose pure socialism >>> of her kind., >>>> >>>>>>>> The reality is she has not called for ANYONE to be taxed at 70%. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The what do you believe she is saying? >>>>>> >>>>>> That the top rate would be 70%... and this would apply only to money >>>>>> made after you made so many millions. Oh, and she says "as high as" that >>>>>> but does not specify it is that. >>>>>> >>>>>> Oh, and she quotes economists who back her plan... where Paul Ryan >>>>>> quotes Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged. >>>>> >>>>> I don't support the her. She is free to move to Venezuela where her >>>>> type of government has failed. >>>> >>>> When Reagan took office, people paid 70% taxes on money they made over >>>> $216,000. In today's money that is about $5 million. Her plan would >>>> include having that tax rate be only for money made over $10 million, >>>> about double what it was in the 1970s, and she would do this to pay for >>>> things we need. >>>> >>>> Do you have a better plan for paying for a transition to renewable >>>> energy and other things she proposes? Or do you just want us to continue >>>> to bury our heads in the sand and pretend these things are not needed, >>>> and have us ALL pay more in the end? >>>> >>>> To be clear, there are other reasonable methods... but I bet you do not >>>> know of them. >>> >>> Well why do you want a tax rate that high? Where would the money go? >>> >>> >> Investments into the country... infrastructure, education, going to >> greener tech, energy infrastructure, data infrastructure, roads and >> bridges and the like, oversight where needed, etc. > > I'd agree to a limited tax increase I pay about 33% now but won't go > for 70%. I would want to see studies to show what works best. There will be disagreement in those studies, of course, and biases. But we had 70% before the 1980s... moving away from it may very well be a big part of our growing income inequality. >> And where did the money go in the 1970s and before? In the '60s some of >> it went to getting us to the moon. I am all for going back. And beyond. > > We had less freeloaders in those days and the Democrats didn't buy > votes with entitlements. What makes you think the Democrats are pushing more to fund the wealthy "freeloaders", as you call them, than are the Republicans? And both sides are paid for and beholden to those wealthy "freeloaders". http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746 -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 17:42 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <khb53edidk412i6ualfjvdpmckcki2mi08@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #246083 |
On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 18:35:11 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 1/6/19 6:12 PM, Mattb wrote: >> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 18:06:50 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 1/6/19 5:56 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 17:33:13 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 1/6/19 5:27 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 17:07:07 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 1/6/19 4:54 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 16:46:50 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 1/6/19 4:00 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 21:20:13 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:57:43 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 00:11:46 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:53:10 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 23:41:11 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL. I read recently that Biden is the most popular so far. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we can get Romney and Biden? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or Kang and Kodos. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://tv.avclub.com/the-simpsons-classic-treehouse-of-horror-vii-1798181639 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was a Warren underneath. ;-)) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1/2020th. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would rather Romney run than Trump. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you will have a Bernie/Warren ticket on the Dem side. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The left would like that. But the DNC won't let it happen. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> If this Ocasio-Cortez keep talking Bernie won't have a chance. Bernie >>>>>>>>>>>> style has a chance with this Ocasio-Cortez's brand of socialism being >>>>>>>>>>>> pushed as representing the Dems most logical people will reject it. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The Dems want a 70% tax rate? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Does she want for everybody to be taxed at 70%? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Probably just White people and any that vote republican. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What? Where the hell would you get that? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That seems to be her way. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How do you figure? Wait... I asked and you had no answer. >>>>>> >>>>>> Because that is what I believe. That is my opinion and sure as fuck >>>>>> don't have to justify it to the likes of you. You be wuss. Antifa be >>>>>> wuss. >>>>> >>>>> You have a bizarre and derogatory opinion about another person based on >>>>> your biases but no evidence. Thank you, that answers the question. >>>> >>>> I go by what I see of her. That and I totally oppose pure socialism >>>> of her kind., >>>>> >>>>>>>>> The reality is she has not called for ANYONE to be taxed at 70%. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The what do you believe she is saying? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That the top rate would be 70%... and this would apply only to money >>>>>>> made after you made so many millions. Oh, and she says "as high as" that >>>>>>> but does not specify it is that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Oh, and she quotes economists who back her plan... where Paul Ryan >>>>>>> quotes Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged. >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't support the her. She is free to move to Venezuela where her >>>>>> type of government has failed. >>>>> >>>>> When Reagan took office, people paid 70% taxes on money they made over >>>>> $216,000. In today's money that is about $5 million. Her plan would >>>>> include having that tax rate be only for money made over $10 million, >>>>> about double what it was in the 1970s, and she would do this to pay for >>>>> things we need. >>>>> >>>>> Do you have a better plan for paying for a transition to renewable >>>>> energy and other things she proposes? Or do you just want us to continue >>>>> to bury our heads in the sand and pretend these things are not needed, >>>>> and have us ALL pay more in the end? >>>>> >>>>> To be clear, there are other reasonable methods... but I bet you do not >>>>> know of them. >>>> >>>> Well why do you want a tax rate that high? Where would the money go? >>>> >>>> >>> Investments into the country... infrastructure, education, going to >>> greener tech, energy infrastructure, data infrastructure, roads and >>> bridges and the like, oversight where needed, etc. >> >> I'd agree to a limited tax increase I pay about 33% now but won't go >> for 70%. > >I would want to see studies to show what works best. There will be >disagreement in those studies, of course, and biases. But we had 70% >before the 1980s... moving away from it may very well be a big part of >our growing income inequality. I believe you want to fix the current system it is the deductions that are the problem. > >>> And where did the money go in the 1970s and before? In the '60s some of >>> it went to getting us to the moon. I am all for going back. And beyond. >> >> We had less freeloaders in those days and the Democrats didn't buy >> votes with entitlements. > >What makes you think the Democrats are pushing more to fund the wealthy >"freeloaders", as you call them, than are the Republicans? YAWN. Forget it. Liberals all they can do is play head games and lie. > >And both sides are paid for and beholden to those wealthy "freeloaders". > >http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 18:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9fpcmFu87nU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #246090 |
On 1/6/19 6:42 PM, Mattb wrote: ... >>>> Investments into the country... infrastructure, education, going to >>>> greener tech, energy infrastructure, data infrastructure, roads and >>>> bridges and the like, oversight where needed, etc. >>> >>> I'd agree to a limited tax increase I pay about 33% now but won't go >>> for 70%. >> >> I would want to see studies to show what works best. There will be >> disagreement in those studies, of course, and biases. But we had 70% >> before the 1980s... moving away from it may very well be a big part of >> our growing income inequality. > > I believe you want to fix the current system it is the deductions that > are the problem. I absolutely agree we need to fix that. And to be fair, when we had 70% top tax rates, or even up to 93% (I think) we had all sorts of deductions. I would like to see that fixed and then would be happy with a lower top rate. Completely fair of you to note that. Thanks. >>>> And where did the money go in the 1970s and before? In the '60s some of >>>> it went to getting us to the moon. I am all for going back. And beyond. >>> >>> We had less freeloaders in those days and the Democrats didn't buy >>> votes with entitlements. >> >> What makes you think the Democrats are pushing more to fund the wealthy >> "freeloaders", as you call them, than are the Republicans? > > YAWN. Forget it. Liberals all they can do is play head games and > lie. You have no backing for your claim. Got it. >> And both sides are paid for and beholden to those wealthy "freeloaders". >> >> http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746 > > -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web