Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #245411 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ted <ted@sam.street> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-05 01:53 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-01-07 04:05 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 196 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-05 01:53 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 20:00 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-04 20:03 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-05 12:48 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Meteorite Debris <WTF@whoknows.com> - 2019-01-05 15:03 +1030
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2019-01-05 07:32 -0600
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-05 13:59 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-05 06:42 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks bookwurm <bookwurm8@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 14:22 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Meteorite Debris <WTF@whoknows.com> - 2019-01-05 15:05 +1030
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-05 12:48 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-05 03:11 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-05 12:48 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-05 04:57 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-05 13:04 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-05 09:20 -0500
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-05 14:27 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 15:28 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-05 23:41 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 15:43 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-05 23:53 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 15:56 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 00:11 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 16:24 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 00:57 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 10:14 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:30 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 21:20 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-06 14:44 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 22:00 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-06 15:06 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 22:12 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 22:32 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:42 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 22:53 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:00 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 23:32 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:36 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 23:42 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:45 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 00:42 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-07 22:02 -0500
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 22:43 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 22:53 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 22:00 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:13 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 22:23 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:25 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 22:43 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:51 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 22:53 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 22:53 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:02 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 23:32 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:00 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 23:34 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 16:47 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 00:42 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:43 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 01:07 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:31 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 01:51 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:58 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 13:07 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:13 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 15:16 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:28 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 16:02 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 17:19 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 16:49 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 17:57 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 17:12 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 18:40 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 22:28 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 07:01 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 23:09 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 13:58 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 11:48 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 13:11 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-08 15:25 -0500
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 14:26 -0600
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 12:54 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 14:59 -0600
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb - 2019-01-08 14:01 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 14:25 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Patrick <PBARKER002@woh.rr.com> - 2019-01-08 15:22 -0500
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 12:56 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 14:00 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 16:46 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:54 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:07 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:27 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:33 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:56 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:06 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:12 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:35 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:42 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:47 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-06 17:54 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-06 17:57 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 04:17 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 04:56 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 19:08 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-06 18:13 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 02:37 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-07 12:29 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 04:17 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-06 20:21 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 04:56 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-07 01:18 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 14:11 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-07 22:00 -0500
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Clave <ChrisShitbagious@TheMonastery.com> - 2019-01-07 19:24 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-07 22:59 -0500
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 06:18 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 18:48 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 18:48 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 17:56 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 19:09 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 02:16 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 19:27 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 02:37 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 19:41 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 03:06 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 20:11 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 03:35 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 20:50 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 20:12 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 20:36 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 22:00 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 09:22 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:13 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 10:16 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:30 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:03 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 16:07 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-06 23:32 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 16:48 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 00:45 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:48 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 01:12 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:35 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 02:13 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 02:37 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:51 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:12 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:30 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:37 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:58 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:04 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:09 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:32 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:40 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:45 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 18:12 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 02:37 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-06 17:52 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 19:03 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-06 18:12 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 02:30 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-07 12:29 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 22:05 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-07 14:10 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:27 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-07 15:29 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 18:14 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 02:37 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 13:17 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 04:17 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 04:56 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 00:45 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 15:51 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:11 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 16:30 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 17:36 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:03 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:30 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:37 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:41 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:47 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:55 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 18:08 -0800
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 02:13 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 02:37 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 18:39 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:43 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-07 02:13 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 20:05 -0600
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 19:16 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 19:18 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 19:27 -0700
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-06 13:18 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-06 18:13 +0000
Re: Bernie Sanders' fans can't be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-07 04:05 +0000
Page 7 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-05 19:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9d6asFct9hU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #245790 |
On 1/5/19 6:56 PM, Mattb wrote: > On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 18:48:00 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > >> On 1/5/19 4:28 PM, Mattb wrote: >>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>> >>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>> >>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>> >> >> She is too young to be able to... but she is an interesting person. We >> shall have to see where she goes. Will she let her knew-found celebrity >> status get to her? I hope not. > > > Think it already has suggesting a 70% tax rate. > It? Anyway, that is what the highest tax rate was before the 1980s when our economy started to really tank, so I would be open to going back to what we know worked. I would also be open to other ideas and techniques... including taxes NOT so high but blocking shelters and the like. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ted <ted@sam.street> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 02:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <936608620568433688.600243ted-sam.street@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #245804 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 1/5/19 6:56 PM, Mattb wrote: >> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 18:48:00 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >>>> On 1/5/19 4:28 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>> >>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>> >>> >>> She is too young to be able to... but she is an interesting person. We >>> shall have to see where she goes. Will she let her knew-found celebrity >>> status get to her? I hope not. >>>> Think it already has suggesting a 70% tax rate. >> > It? > > Anyway, that is what the highest tax rate was before the 1980s when our > economy started to really tank, so I would be open to going back to what > we know worked. I would also be open to other ideas and techniques... > including taxes NOT so high but blocking shelters and the like. Why did the economy start to tank in the 1980s?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-05 19:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9d7daFd2p4U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #245808 |
On 1/5/19 7:16 PM, Ted wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 1/5/19 6:56 PM, Mattb wrote: >>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 18:48:00 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>>>> On 1/5/19 4:28 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>> >>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>> >>>> >>>> She is too young to be able to... but she is an interesting person. We >>>> shall have to see where she goes. Will she let her knew-found celebrity >>>> status get to her? I hope not. >>>>> Think it already has suggesting a 70% tax rate. >>> >> It? >> >> Anyway, that is what the highest tax rate was before the 1980s when our >> economy started to really tank, so I would be open to going back to what >> we know worked. I would also be open to other ideas and techniques... >> including taxes NOT so high but blocking shelters and the like. > > > Why did the economy start to tank in the 1980s? > Trickle down was accepted and BOTH parties have pretty much gone with it since. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ted <ted@sam.street> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 02:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1620271140568434927.268496ted-sam.street@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #245812 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 1/5/19 7:16 PM, Ted wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 1/5/19 6:56 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 18:48:00 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> On 1/5/19 4:28 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> She is too young to be able to... but she is an interesting person. We >>>>> shall have to see where she goes. Will she let her knew-found celebrity >>>>> status get to her? I hope not. >>>>>> Think it already has suggesting a 70% tax rate. >>>> >>> It? >>> >>> Anyway, that is what the highest tax rate was before the 1980s when our >>> economy started to really tank, so I would be open to going back to what >>> we know worked. I would also be open to other ideas and techniques... >>> including taxes NOT so high but blocking shelters and the like. >>>> Why did the economy start to tank in the 1980s? >> > Trickle down was accepted and BOTH parties have pretty much gone with it since. Thanks Snit. What are the underlying reasons for trickle-down's acceptance and for the Democrats adopting it as well?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-05 19:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9d861Fd8mmU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #245815 |
On 1/5/19 7:37 PM, Ted wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 1/5/19 7:16 PM, Ted wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 1/5/19 6:56 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 18:48:00 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/5/19 4:28 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> She is too young to be able to... but she is an interesting person. We >>>>>> shall have to see where she goes. Will she let her knew-found celebrity >>>>>> status get to her? I hope not. >>>>>>> Think it already has suggesting a 70% tax rate. >>>>> >>>> It? >>>> >>>> Anyway, that is what the highest tax rate was before the 1980s when our >>>> economy started to really tank, so I would be open to going back to what >>>> we know worked. I would also be open to other ideas and techniques... >>>> including taxes NOT so high but blocking shelters and the like. >>>>> Why did the economy start to tank in the 1980s? >>> >> Trickle down was accepted and BOTH parties have pretty much gone with it since. > > > Thanks Snit. What are the underlying reasons for trickle-down's acceptance > and for the Democrats adopting it as well? > I do not know the full reasons... but largely it is tied to campaign finance I would think. When you let the wealthy control both parties then both parties serve the wealthy. We live in an oligarchy. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ted <ted@sam.street> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 03:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <46873715568436585.506425ted-sam.street@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #245817 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 1/5/19 7:37 PM, Ted wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 1/5/19 7:16 PM, Ted wrote: >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 1/5/19 6:56 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 18:48:00 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 1/5/19 4:28 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> She is too young to be able to... but she is an interesting person. We >>>>>>> shall have to see where she goes. Will she let her knew-found celebrity >>>>>>> status get to her? I hope not. >>>>>>>> Think it already has suggesting a 70% tax rate. >>>>>> >>>>> It? >>>>> >>>>> Anyway, that is what the highest tax rate was before the 1980s when our >>>>> economy started to really tank, so I would be open to going back to what >>>>> we know worked. I would also be open to other ideas and techniques... >>>>> including taxes NOT so high but blocking shelters and the like. >>>>>> Why did the economy start to tank in the 1980s? >>>> >>> Trickle down was accepted and BOTH parties have pretty much gone with it since. >>>> Thanks Snit. What are the underlying reasons for trickle-down's acceptance >> and for the Democrats adopting it as well? >> > I do not know the full reasons... but largely it is tied to campaign > finance I would think. When you let the wealthy control both parties then > both parties serve the wealthy. > > We live in an oligarchy. > I read that Jimmy Carter recently said the same. Thanks for explaining, Snit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-05 20:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9d9ulFdjqnU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #245821 |
On 1/5/19 8:06 PM, Ted wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 1/5/19 7:37 PM, Ted wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 1/5/19 7:16 PM, Ted wrote: >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 1/5/19 6:56 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 18:48:00 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 1/5/19 4:28 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> She is too young to be able to... but she is an interesting person. We >>>>>>>> shall have to see where she goes. Will she let her knew-found celebrity >>>>>>>> status get to her? I hope not. >>>>>>>>> Think it already has suggesting a 70% tax rate. >>>>>>> >>>>>> It? >>>>>> >>>>>> Anyway, that is what the highest tax rate was before the 1980s when our >>>>>> economy started to really tank, so I would be open to going back to what >>>>>> we know worked. I would also be open to other ideas and techniques... >>>>>> including taxes NOT so high but blocking shelters and the like. >>>>>>> Why did the economy start to tank in the 1980s? >>>>> >>>> Trickle down was accepted and BOTH parties have pretty much gone with it since. >>>>> Thanks Snit. What are the underlying reasons for trickle-down's acceptance >>> and for the Democrats adopting it as well? >>> >> I do not know the full reasons... but largely it is tied to campaign >> finance I would think. When you let the wealthy control both parties then >> both parties serve the wealthy. >> >> We live in an oligarchy. >> > > > I read that Jimmy Carter recently said the same. Thanks for explaining, > Snit. > Did he? I would like to see that. Here is more on the oligarchy. http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746 Our voices are pretty much ignored. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ted <ted@sam.street> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 03:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1091326937568438261.574209ted-sam.street@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #245822 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 1/5/19 8:06 PM, Ted wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 1/5/19 7:37 PM, Ted wrote: >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 1/5/19 7:16 PM, Ted wrote: >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/5/19 6:56 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 18:48:00 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 1/5/19 4:28 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> She is too young to be able to... but she is an interesting person. We >>>>>>>>> shall have to see where she goes. Will she let her knew-found celebrity >>>>>>>>> status get to her? I hope not. >>>>>>>>>> Think it already has suggesting a 70% tax rate. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> It? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Anyway, that is what the highest tax rate was before the 1980s when our >>>>>>> economy started to really tank, so I would be open to going back to what >>>>>>> we know worked. I would also be open to other ideas and techniques... >>>>>>> including taxes NOT so high but blocking shelters and the like. >>>>>>>> Why did the economy start to tank in the 1980s? >>>>>> >>>>> Trickle down was accepted and BOTH parties have pretty much gone with it since. >>>>>> Thanks Snit. What are the underlying reasons for trickle-down's acceptance >>>> and for the Democrats adopting it as well? >>>> >>> I do not know the full reasons... but largely it is tied to campaign >>> finance I would think. When you let the wealthy control both parties then >>> both parties serve the wealthy. >>> >>> We live in an oligarchy. >>> >>>> I read that Jimmy Carter recently said the same. Thanks for explaining, >> Snit. >> > Did he? I would like to see that. > > Here is more on the oligarchy. > > http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746 > > Our voices are pretty much ignored. Do you know about the Princeton study? Thanks for the info, Snit. I'm guessing one could google (or duckduckgo) for the Carter quote. He used the words "oligarchy" and "democracy" IIRC.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-05 20:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9dc7bFe1ihU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #245824 |
On 1/5/19 8:35 PM, Ted wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 1/5/19 8:06 PM, Ted wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 1/5/19 7:37 PM, Ted wrote: >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 1/5/19 7:16 PM, Ted wrote: >>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 1/5/19 6:56 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 18:48:00 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/5/19 4:28 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> She is too young to be able to... but she is an interesting person. We >>>>>>>>>> shall have to see where she goes. Will she let her knew-found celebrity >>>>>>>>>> status get to her? I hope not. >>>>>>>>>>> Think it already has suggesting a 70% tax rate. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Anyway, that is what the highest tax rate was before the 1980s when our >>>>>>>> economy started to really tank, so I would be open to going back to what >>>>>>>> we know worked. I would also be open to other ideas and techniques... >>>>>>>> including taxes NOT so high but blocking shelters and the like. >>>>>>>>> Why did the economy start to tank in the 1980s? >>>>>>> >>>>>> Trickle down was accepted and BOTH parties have pretty much gone with it since. >>>>>>> Thanks Snit. What are the underlying reasons for trickle-down's acceptance >>>>> and for the Democrats adopting it as well? >>>>> >>>> I do not know the full reasons... but largely it is tied to campaign >>>> finance I would think. When you let the wealthy control both parties then >>>> both parties serve the wealthy. >>>> >>>> We live in an oligarchy. >>>> >>>>> I read that Jimmy Carter recently said the same. Thanks for explaining, >>> Snit. >>> >> Did he? I would like to see that. >> >> Here is more on the oligarchy. >> >> http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746 >> >> Our voices are pretty much ignored. > > Do you know about the Princeton study? The one linked to in the article? If so, yes. > Thanks for the info, Snit. I'm guessing one could google (or duckduckgo) > for the Carter quote. He used the words "oligarchy" and "democracy" IIRC. Thanks. Found it: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/jimmy-carter-u-s-is-an-oligarchy-with-unlimited-political-bribery-63262/ ----- Jimmy Carter: U.S. Is an ‘Oligarchy With Unlimited Political Bribery’ Former President Jimmy Carter had some harsh words to say about the current state of America’s electoral process, calling the country “an oligarchy with unlimited political bribery” resulting in “nominations for president or to elect the president.” When asked this week by The Thom Hartmann Program (via The Intercept) about the Supreme Court’s April 2014 decision to eliminate limits on campaign donations, Carter said the ruling “violates the essence of what made America a great country in its political system.” ----- And he is right. Have heard this before... but been some time since I read it. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-05 20:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bsoh8a.i22.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #245821 |
On 2019-01-05 8:06 p.m., Ted wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 1/5/19 7:37 PM, Ted wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 1/5/19 7:16 PM, Ted wrote: >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 1/5/19 6:56 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 18:48:00 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 1/5/19 4:28 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> She is too young to be able to... but she is an interesting person. We >>>>>>>> shall have to see where she goes. Will she let her knew-found celebrity >>>>>>>> status get to her? I hope not. >>>>>>>>> Think it already has suggesting a 70% tax rate. >>>>>>> >>>>>> It? >>>>>> >>>>>> Anyway, that is what the highest tax rate was before the 1980s when our >>>>>> economy started to really tank, so I would be open to going back to what >>>>>> we know worked. I would also be open to other ideas and techniques... >>>>>> including taxes NOT so high but blocking shelters and the like. >>>>>>> Why did the economy start to tank in the 1980s? >>>>> >>>> Trickle down was accepted and BOTH parties have pretty much gone with it since. >>>>> Thanks Snit. What are the underlying reasons for trickle-down's acceptance >>> and for the Democrats adopting it as well? >>> >> I do not know the full reasons... but largely it is tied to campaign >> finance I would think. When you let the wealthy control both parties then >> both parties serve the wealthy. >> >> We live in an oligarchy. >> > > > I read that Jimmy Carter recently said the same. Thanks for explaining, > Snit. > hey i remember him he was a mean guy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-05 20:36 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <dc133e593j730ivlobd6ifmt62rodnntmd@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #245804 |
On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 19:09:31 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 1/5/19 6:56 PM, Mattb wrote: >> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 18:48:00 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 1/5/19 4:28 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>> >>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>> >>> >>> She is too young to be able to... but she is an interesting person. We >>> shall have to see where she goes. Will she let her knew-found celebrity >>> status get to her? I hope not. >> >> >> Think it already has suggesting a 70% tax rate. >> > >It? > >Anyway, that is what the highest tax rate was before the 1980s when our >economy started to really tank, so I would be open to going back to what >we know worked. I would also be open to other ideas and techniques... >including taxes NOT so high but blocking shelters and the like. I would suggest a flat tax that way if liberals want this program or that they can help pay for it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-05 22:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9dgatFeqsfU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #245837 |
On 1/5/19 9:36 PM, Mattb wrote: > On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 19:09:31 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > >> On 1/5/19 6:56 PM, Mattb wrote: >>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 18:48:00 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 1/5/19 4:28 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>> >>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>> >>>> >>>> She is too young to be able to... but she is an interesting person. We >>>> shall have to see where she goes. Will she let her knew-found celebrity >>>> status get to her? I hope not. >>> >>> >>> Think it already has suggesting a 70% tax rate. >>> >> >> It? >> >> Anyway, that is what the highest tax rate was before the 1980s when our >> economy started to really tank, so I would be open to going back to what >> we know worked. I would also be open to other ideas and techniques... >> including taxes NOT so high but blocking shelters and the like. > > > I would suggest a flat tax that way if liberals want this program or > that they can help pay for it. > Are you going with no deductions, no corporate tax benefits, no allowed offshore shelters, no games at all? And then a minimum amount that is not taxed (or we help those who cannot pay it). If so I am open to seeing the research on it. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 09:22 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <25e43e109nrgiq8km547p9pkb0elgmmmr6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #245838 |
On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 22:00:13 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 1/5/19 9:36 PM, Mattb wrote: >> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 19:09:31 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 1/5/19 6:56 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 18:48:00 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 1/5/19 4:28 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> She is too young to be able to... but she is an interesting person. We >>>>> shall have to see where she goes. Will she let her knew-found celebrity >>>>> status get to her? I hope not. >>>> >>>> >>>> Think it already has suggesting a 70% tax rate. >>>> >>> >>> It? >>> >>> Anyway, that is what the highest tax rate was before the 1980s when our >>> economy started to really tank, so I would be open to going back to what >>> we know worked. I would also be open to other ideas and techniques... >>> including taxes NOT so high but blocking shelters and the like. >> >> >> I would suggest a flat tax that way if liberals want this program or >> that they can help pay for it. >> > >Are you going with no deductions, no corporate tax benefits, no allowed >offshore shelters, no games at all? And then a minimum amount that is >not taxed (or we help those who cannot pay it). If so I am open to >seeing the research on it. I'd set the starting amount just above the poverty level. Business taxes on profit only.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 18:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g9eupnFom1tU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #245903 |
Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 22:00:13 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > >> On 1/5/19 9:36 PM, Mattb wrote: >>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 19:09:31 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 1/5/19 6:56 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 18:48:00 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 1/5/19 4:28 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> She is too young to be able to... but she is an interesting person. We >>>>>> shall have to see where she goes. Will she let her knew-found celebrity >>>>>> status get to her? I hope not. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Think it already has suggesting a 70% tax rate. >>>>> >>>> >>>> It? >>>> >>>> Anyway, that is what the highest tax rate was before the 1980s when our >>>> economy started to really tank, so I would be open to going back to what >>>> we know worked. I would also be open to other ideas and techniques... >>>> including taxes NOT so high but blocking shelters and the like. >>> >>> >>> I would suggest a flat tax that way if liberals want this program or >>> that they can help pay for it. >>> >> >> Are you going with no deductions, no corporate tax benefits, no allowed >> offshore shelters, no games at all? And then a minimum amount that is >> not taxed (or we help those who cannot pay it). If so I am open to >> seeing the research on it. > > I'd set the starting amount just above the poverty level. Business > taxes on profit only. > Personal taxes on profit only, too — or do you want that special entitlement only for those with their own corporations?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 10:16 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <feh43edbm4o7i0ptupifqq4faqkgau123n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #245920 |
On 6 Jan 2019 18:13:11 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 22:00:13 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 1/5/19 9:36 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 19:09:31 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 1/5/19 6:56 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 18:48:00 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 1/5/19 4:28 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> She is too young to be able to... but she is an interesting person. We >>>>>>> shall have to see where she goes. Will she let her knew-found celebrity >>>>>>> status get to her? I hope not. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Think it already has suggesting a 70% tax rate. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It? >>>>> >>>>> Anyway, that is what the highest tax rate was before the 1980s when our >>>>> economy started to really tank, so I would be open to going back to what >>>>> we know worked. I would also be open to other ideas and techniques... >>>>> including taxes NOT so high but blocking shelters and the like. >>>> >>>> >>>> I would suggest a flat tax that way if liberals want this program or >>>> that they can help pay for it. >>>> >>> >>> Are you going with no deductions, no corporate tax benefits, no allowed >>> offshore shelters, no games at all? And then a minimum amount that is >>> not taxed (or we help those who cannot pay it). If so I am open to >>> seeing the research on it. >> >> I'd set the starting amount just above the poverty level. Business >> taxes on profit only. >> > >Personal taxes on profit only, too — or do you want that special >entitlement only for those with their own corporations? Define what you mean by "Personal taxes on profit only"?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 18:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g9evpiFotlrU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #245924 |
Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: > On 6 Jan 2019 18:13:11 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 22:00:13 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 1/5/19 9:36 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 19:09:31 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 1/5/19 6:56 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 18:48:00 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 1/5/19 4:28 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> She is too young to be able to... but she is an interesting person. We >>>>>>>> shall have to see where she goes. Will she let her knew-found celebrity >>>>>>>> status get to her? I hope not. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Think it already has suggesting a 70% tax rate. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It? >>>>>> >>>>>> Anyway, that is what the highest tax rate was before the 1980s when our >>>>>> economy started to really tank, so I would be open to going back to what >>>>>> we know worked. I would also be open to other ideas and techniques... >>>>>> including taxes NOT so high but blocking shelters and the like. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I would suggest a flat tax that way if liberals want this program or >>>>> that they can help pay for it. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Are you going with no deductions, no corporate tax benefits, no allowed >>>> offshore shelters, no games at all? And then a minimum amount that is >>>> not taxed (or we help those who cannot pay it). If so I am open to >>>> seeing the research on it. >>> >>> I'd set the starting amount just above the poverty level. Business >>> taxes on profit only. >>> >> >> Personal taxes on profit only, too or do you want that special >> entitlement only for those with their own corporations? > > > Define what you mean by "Personal taxes on profit only"? > > Same thing you meant for businesses. You did not define it. Do we tax only profit (however we define that) or all income? Are the rules the same go me and for Walmart? Or do I get stuck paying on all income where they do not?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 15:03 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <o5253eha4f32jbmerqd1cj59rkf0bc7qde@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #245937 |
On 6 Jan 2019 18:30:10 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 6 Jan 2019 18:13:11 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 22:00:13 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 1/5/19 9:36 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 19:09:31 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 1/5/19 6:56 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 18:48:00 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 1/5/19 4:28 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> She is too young to be able to... but she is an interesting person. We >>>>>>>>> shall have to see where she goes. Will she let her knew-found celebrity >>>>>>>>> status get to her? I hope not. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Think it already has suggesting a 70% tax rate. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Anyway, that is what the highest tax rate was before the 1980s when our >>>>>>> economy started to really tank, so I would be open to going back to what >>>>>>> we know worked. I would also be open to other ideas and techniques... >>>>>>> including taxes NOT so high but blocking shelters and the like. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I would suggest a flat tax that way if liberals want this program or >>>>>> that they can help pay for it. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Are you going with no deductions, no corporate tax benefits, no allowed >>>>> offshore shelters, no games at all? And then a minimum amount that is >>>>> not taxed (or we help those who cannot pay it). If so I am open to >>>>> seeing the research on it. >>>> >>>> I'd set the starting amount just above the poverty level. Business >>>> taxes on profit only. >>>> >>> >>> Personal taxes on profit only, too ? or do you want that special >>> entitlement only for those with their own corporations? >> >> >> Define what you mean by "Personal taxes on profit only"? >> >> > >Same thing you meant for businesses. You did not define it. > >Do we tax only profit (however we define that) or all income? Are the rules >the same go me and for Walmart? Or do I get stuck paying on all income >where they do not? OK Say I am hired to do a service and will get 100K for this service yet the cost of supplies and wages cost me 80K so my profit is 20K do you want me to pay a 70% tax rate on the whole 100K or just the 20K? What do you believe is fair and right?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 16:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9fg0nFsak6U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #246008 |
On 1/6/19 4:03 PM, Mattb wrote: > On 6 Jan 2019 18:30:10 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 6 Jan 2019 18:13:11 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 22:00:13 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 1/5/19 9:36 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 19:09:31 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 1/5/19 6:56 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 18:48:00 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 1/5/19 4:28 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> She is too young to be able to... but she is an interesting person. We >>>>>>>>>> shall have to see where she goes. Will she let her knew-found celebrity >>>>>>>>>> status get to her? I hope not. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Think it already has suggesting a 70% tax rate. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Anyway, that is what the highest tax rate was before the 1980s when our >>>>>>>> economy started to really tank, so I would be open to going back to what >>>>>>>> we know worked. I would also be open to other ideas and techniques... >>>>>>>> including taxes NOT so high but blocking shelters and the like. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would suggest a flat tax that way if liberals want this program or >>>>>>> that they can help pay for it. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you going with no deductions, no corporate tax benefits, no allowed >>>>>> offshore shelters, no games at all? And then a minimum amount that is >>>>>> not taxed (or we help those who cannot pay it). If so I am open to >>>>>> seeing the research on it. >>>>> >>>>> I'd set the starting amount just above the poverty level. Business >>>>> taxes on profit only. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Personal taxes on profit only, too ? or do you want that special >>>> entitlement only for those with their own corporations? >>> >>> >>> Define what you mean by "Personal taxes on profit only"? >>> >>> >> >> Same thing you meant for businesses. You did not define it. >> >> Do we tax only profit (however we define that) or all income? Are the rules >> the same go me and for Walmart? Or do I get stuck paying on all income >> where they do not? > > OK Say I am hired to do a service and will get 100K for this service > yet the cost of supplies and wages cost me 80K so my profit is 20K do > you want me to pay a 70% tax rate on the whole 100K or just the 20K? > What do you believe is fair and right? Why would you pay 70% on that amount at all? Makes no sense. And you did not answer my question: do you want to allow businesses to deduct their expenses but people to not be able to? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ted <ted@sam.street> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 23:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <545561572568510207.840199ted-sam.street@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #246012 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 1/6/19 4:03 PM, Mattb wrote: >> On 6 Jan 2019 18:30:10 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 6 Jan 2019 18:13:11 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 22:00:13 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 1/5/19 9:36 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 19:09:31 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 1/5/19 6:56 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 18:48:00 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/5/19 4:28 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> She is too young to be able to... but she is an interesting person. We >>>>>>>>>>> shall have to see where she goes. Will she let her knew-found celebrity >>>>>>>>>>> status get to her? I hope not. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Think it already has suggesting a 70% tax rate. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Anyway, that is what the highest tax rate was before the 1980s when our >>>>>>>>> economy started to really tank, so I would be open to going back to what >>>>>>>>> we know worked. I would also be open to other ideas and techniques... >>>>>>>>> including taxes NOT so high but blocking shelters and the like. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I would suggest a flat tax that way if liberals want this program or >>>>>>>> that they can help pay for it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Are you going with no deductions, no corporate tax benefits, no allowed >>>>>>> offshore shelters, no games at all? And then a minimum amount that is >>>>>>> not taxed (or we help those who cannot pay it). If so I am open to >>>>>>> seeing the research on it. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd set the starting amount just above the poverty level. Business >>>>>> taxes on profit only. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Personal taxes on profit only, too ? or do you want that special >>>>> entitlement only for those with their own corporations? >>>> >>>> >>>> Define what you mean by "Personal taxes on profit only"? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Same thing you meant for businesses. You did not define it. >>> >>> Do we tax only profit (however we define that) or all income? Are the rules >>> the same go me and for Walmart? Or do I get stuck paying on all income >>> where they do not? >>> OK Say I am hired to do a service and will get 100K for this service >> yet the cost of supplies and wages cost me 80K so my profit is 20K do >> you want me to pay a 70% tax rate on the whole 100K or just the 20K? >> What do you believe is fair and right? > > Why would you pay 70% on that amount at all? Makes no sense. > > And you did not answer my question: do you want to allow businesses to > deduct their expenses but people to not be able to? It would be nice to have the options available to me when I was self-employed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-06 16:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g9fie8FsrnvU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #246019 |
On 1/6/19 4:32 PM, Ted wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 1/6/19 4:03 PM, Mattb wrote: >>> On 6 Jan 2019 18:30:10 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On 6 Jan 2019 18:13:11 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Mattb <trdell12345@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 22:00:13 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 1/5/19 9:36 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 19:09:31 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 1/5/19 6:56 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 18:48:00 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/5/19 4:28 PM, Mattb wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 01:53:06 +0000 (UTC), Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've already posted links to NYT, HuffPo, and WaPo articles exposing Bernie >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanders as a misogynist who ignores people of color and whom Russia >>>>>>>>>>>>>> supported during the 2016 primary (and I'll repost them on request), so >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's obvious that we can't allow him to repeat his shenanigans in 2020. We >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to take whatever steps are necessary to silence him and other Russian >>>>>>>>>>>>>> stooges like Jill Stein and Julian Assange. Our freedom depends on it. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you rather Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> She is too young to be able to... but she is an interesting person. We >>>>>>>>>>>> shall have to see where she goes. Will she let her knew-found celebrity >>>>>>>>>>>> status get to her? I hope not. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Think it already has suggesting a 70% tax rate. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Anyway, that is what the highest tax rate was before the 1980s when our >>>>>>>>>> economy started to really tank, so I would be open to going back to what >>>>>>>>>> we know worked. I would also be open to other ideas and techniques... >>>>>>>>>> including taxes NOT so high but blocking shelters and the like. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I would suggest a flat tax that way if liberals want this program or >>>>>>>>> that they can help pay for it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Are you going with no deductions, no corporate tax benefits, no allowed >>>>>>>> offshore shelters, no games at all? And then a minimum amount that is >>>>>>>> not taxed (or we help those who cannot pay it). If so I am open to >>>>>>>> seeing the research on it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd set the starting amount just above the poverty level. Business >>>>>>> taxes on profit only. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Personal taxes on profit only, too ? or do you want that special >>>>>> entitlement only for those with their own corporations? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Define what you mean by "Personal taxes on profit only"? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Same thing you meant for businesses. You did not define it. >>>> >>>> Do we tax only profit (however we define that) or all income? Are the rules >>>> the same go me and for Walmart? Or do I get stuck paying on all income >>>> where they do not? >>>> OK Say I am hired to do a service and will get 100K for this service >>> yet the cost of supplies and wages cost me 80K so my profit is 20K do >>> you want me to pay a 70% tax rate on the whole 100K or just the 20K? >>> What do you believe is fair and right? >> >> Why would you pay 70% on that amount at all? Makes no sense. >> >> And you did not answer my question: do you want to allow businesses to >> deduct their expenses but people to not be able to? > > > It would be nice to have the options available to me when I was > self-employed. > Right. Or just to deduct living expenses when you are trying to make a living. Heck, right now businesses can deduct LIVING expenses such as food and entertainment. A business is NOT a person. It has no need to eat. It has no need to be entertained. Those are LIVING expenses. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web