Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #242532 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ted <ted@sam.street> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-28 22:18 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-01-01 11:31 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 921 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-28 22:18 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 15:50 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The Truth - BeamMeUpScotty" <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-28 18:27 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:35 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 16:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:45 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 16:53 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:06 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 00:52 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:14 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:36 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 10:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:29 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:46 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:19 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 20:08 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 20:59 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 23:35 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 17:33 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:54 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:49 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 12:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:42 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 14:44 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:55 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 15:28 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 15:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 15:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 16:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 16:08 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 23:17 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 16:33 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 16:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 17:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:15 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 23:24 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 19:30 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:25 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:20 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:14 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:35 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:09 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:11 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The Truth - BeamMeUpScotty" <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 18:20 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:30 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 17:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:43 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 17:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 18:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:20 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 18:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:25 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:28 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 20:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:05 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 17:47 -0800
Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 18:28 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:33 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 19:46 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:56 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 20:47 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 18:44 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:32 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 19:52 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 18:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 20:44 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:04 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 16:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 20:22 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:06 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:41 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 00:57 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 10:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:23 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:25 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:25 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 11:36 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:51 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 11:02 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 12:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-03 14:36 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 12:45 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 07:17 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 13:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 13:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-04 07:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-03 09:07 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:12 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Delvin Benêt <DB@cnbc.nyc> - 2019-01-04 07:33 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-04 12:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:52 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:10 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:12 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:22 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:26 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:28 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 11:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 11:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:51 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-03 14:27 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 12:28 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 11:42 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 07:17 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 07:42 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:03 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-04 09:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:40 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 15:07 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-04 15:16 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 08:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:40 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 08:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-03 14:44 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-03 14:00 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-03 17:05 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 07:17 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 12:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 12:55 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 11:57 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 13:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 13:32 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 12:39 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 13:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 15:16 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-03 13:47 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 11:57 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 13:12 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 13:22 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 13:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 13:59 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:50 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 16:04 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 15:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 14:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-04 05:49 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 13:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 12:45 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 13:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:50 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 15:20 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 14:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 16:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 15:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 16:00 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 17:20 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 16:25 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 16:25 -0800
Snit Complains To TPG Troll Board About Being Trolled- Board Takes It Under Advisement Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 16:31 -0800
Re: Snit Complains To TPG Troll Board About Being Trolled- Board Takes It Under Advisement Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-04 00:44 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:11 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 17:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 17:30 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 18:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:30 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 20:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 20:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 21:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:45 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:50 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:52 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:54 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-04 01:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 21:52 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:01 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-05 03:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-07 22:18 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-07 23:07 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 06:19 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 02:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 13:58 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 12:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 19:41 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 12:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 12:56 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 13:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 13:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 13:52 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 14:25 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 14:36 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 22:27 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 15:32 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 15:45 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 15:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 16:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 16:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-09 00:05 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 17:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 17:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-08 15:42 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 16:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-09 00:05 +0000
Snit Is So Dumb... [How Dumb Is He Johnny?"] Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-08 12:06 -0800
Re: Snit Is So Dumb... [How Dumb Is He Johnny?"] Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 13:16 -0700
Re: Snit Is So Dumb... [How Dumb Is He Johnny?"] Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 13:18 -0700
Re: Snit Is So Dumb... [How Dumb Is He Johnny?"] Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-08 12:23 -0800
Re: Snit Is So Dumb... [How Dumb Is He Johnny?"] Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-08 12:22 -0800
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The psychotic racist white-supremacist who sounds a lot like neal warren AKA greg hall taking a break from the stormfront discussion boards to post on usenet as "Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Snit Is So Dumb... [How Dumb Is He Johnny?"] ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-08 14:23 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 13:32 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-08 14:35 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 14:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-08 04:17 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 02:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 13:59 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 12:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 19:41 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-08 14:18 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 13:12 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-08 04:21 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:46 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 16:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:13 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 17:14 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 18:16 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:30 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 17:38 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 17:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 17:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 18:05 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 18:26 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:50 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 17:33 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 20:53 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 21:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:36 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:49 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:53 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 21:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-04 08:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-04 01:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 21:54 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:02 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:48 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:50 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 01:11 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-04 16:22 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 18:59 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:12 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-05 10:22 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 18:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-05 10:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 19:16 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-05 11:34 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 19:56 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-05 13:40 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-05 12:05 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 13:17 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-05 12:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:17 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 20:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 21:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:48 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:05 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 21:44 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:34 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:44 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 15:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:20 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 15:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 11:03 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 12:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 12:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:51 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 11:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 12:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 13:13 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 12:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 13:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:39 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:19 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 07:35 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:14 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 07:33 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:04 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-04 08:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:40 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 08:42 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 18:03 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-04 12:02 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-04 11:59 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 08:17 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:40 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 08:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-04 09:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-03 11:17 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:58 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:13 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 21:46 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:37 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 07:17 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 19:59 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 18:16 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 23:47 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:34 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 08:59 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 17:05 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:15 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:25 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:26 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 10:30 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 23:35 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:03 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:50 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 18:54 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 19:07 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:08 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 22:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:00 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 13:32 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 14:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 13:21 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 19:33 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 14:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 15:03 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 23:20 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:43 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:21 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:05 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:33 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 04:57 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:12 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 20:16 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 04:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 00:56 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 04:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:23 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:36 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:50 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 20:19 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:30 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 04:53 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:48 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 19:11 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:36 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 21:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 08:29 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 23:42 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 04:54 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:29 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:54 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 12:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 14:45 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 07:50 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 12:44 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:39 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:52 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:48 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:19 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:20 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 23:43 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:19 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 11:56 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:56 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:02 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 20:04 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 12:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:02 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 01:21 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 19:12 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 04:55 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 13:06 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 15:56 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 16:09 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:38 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 09:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:04 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:19 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:17 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 11:54 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:06 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:45 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:29 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 20:14 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 12:22 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:03 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 08:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:07 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 12:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:22 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:27 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 12:45 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:54 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 14:33 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:44 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 15:31 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 16:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:09 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:00 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 11:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 13:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:42 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 14:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 13:22 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:06 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 19:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:07 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 20:35 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:44 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-31 00:14 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:10 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 09:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 17:02 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 17:11 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:13 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:25 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-03 15:44 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 13:56 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 20:56 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 08:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 17:02 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:14 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:17 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:23 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:28 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:37 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:47 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 11:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 10:05 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 10:17 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 19:33 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:42 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:38 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:26 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:26 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:37 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:47 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 11:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 10:05 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 11:12 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 10:15 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:23 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 11:44 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 13:14 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 13:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 13:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 15:26 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:44 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 15:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:45 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 16:10 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 17:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 16:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 21:19 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 15:54 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 15:03 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 21:37 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:39 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-05 03:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:04 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 15:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 21:43 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:31 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 19:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:53 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:04 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 20:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 22:44 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 11:29 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:15 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:17 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:02 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:56 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 01:21 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 19:11 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 20:13 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:35 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 12:13 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:31 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 15:46 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:53 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 17:46 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:35 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 17:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 18:14 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:20 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 18:59 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:11 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:16 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:25 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:25 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:32 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:36 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:41 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:53 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:55 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:59 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:13 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:21 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:33 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:37 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:42 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:07 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:13 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:19 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:22 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:25 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:30 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:38 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:07 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:14 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:26 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:32 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:39 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:06 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 20:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:51 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 21:05 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 22:15 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 21:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 22:56 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 22:06 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 23:14 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 22:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 00:17 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 07:53 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:16 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:02 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:27 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:54 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The Truth - BeamMeUpScotty" <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-28 21:52 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 16:56 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:33 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 10:36 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:53 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 11:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:08 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:05 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 12:44 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:55 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-28 23:40 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:59 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 01:21 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 19:11 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 12:44 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 05:03 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:53 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:26 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:28 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:10 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:56 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:04 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 20:49 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:38 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 05:02 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 20:13 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 05:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:14 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:35 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:46 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:38 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:19 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 11:55 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:45 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 12:25 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:57 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:12 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 17:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 11:50 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 14:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:59 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:03 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:50 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 11:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 13:38 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 14:04 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 13:23 -0800
Rudy is pedantic and wrong. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:16 -0700
Re: Rudy is pedantic and wrong. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:17 -0700
Re: Rudy is pedantic and wrong. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 03:41 -0800
Re: Rudy is pedantic and wrong. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 11:47 +0000
Re: Rudy is pedantic and wrong. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 03:40 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 11:43 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Snit agrees he should be banned. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:19 -0700
Re: Snit agrees he should be banned. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:16 -0700
Re: Snit agrees he should be banned. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 03:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns -------------- Atheist --------------- <a@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-31 06:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 07:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 06:20 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-31 08:07 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 17:05 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-31 09:23 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 17:29 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-31 09:30 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 18:09 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-31 10:45 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 12:12 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-31 09:34 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 18:09 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-31 10:47 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 12:14 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 02:00 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:11 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 20:17 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 13:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-31 12:30 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-31 12:35 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:58 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 19:56 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:22 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:15 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 03:44 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 02:03 -0500
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:12 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 11:47 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 12:56 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 11:58 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 12:03 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 11:59 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 01:01 -0500
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:14 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 22:03 -0500
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Delvin Benêt <DB@cnbc.nyc> - 2019-01-04 20:30 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-05 03:29 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-05 07:57 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership John Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> - 2019-01-05 10:47 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-05 12:33 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 13:49 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-05 13:59 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 15:40 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-05 13:39 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-05 14:14 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 03:43 -0500
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:31 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 12:00 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 15:01 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 11:58 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 15:01 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 12:10 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 11:30 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:08 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:20 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 19:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:26 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:55 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 12:29 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:21 -0800
Snit's OK With Bans- Especially if They Don't Come Out And Say It. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:20 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 00:52 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 18:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:11 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 01:21 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 05:04 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 18:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 19:04 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 19:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:23 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:55 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:50 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-28 18:50 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-28 23:37 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 07:47 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-29 08:28 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:59 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-29 23:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 16:15 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 13:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 14:57 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 16:05 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 17:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 18:55 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 19:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 21:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 06:23 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 23:22 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns -------------- Atheist --------------- <a@hotmail.com> - 2019-01-01 11:21 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-01 13:06 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-01 15:33 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-01 14:53 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns -------------- Atheist --------------- <a@hotmail.com> - 2019-01-01 17:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-01 21:25 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:34 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 05:05 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 00:18 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 16:15 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 11:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 13:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 22:02 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 17:02 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:55 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:03 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:05 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:55 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 18:54 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 19:07 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 19:54 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:25 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 12:44 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 20:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 16:25 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 09:33 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 16:56 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 10:06 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 17:13 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 10:22 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:36 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 10:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:52 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 12:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:23 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:27 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 12:30 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 11:54 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:28 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-29 00:45 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 12:18 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-29 08:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 08:37 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 17:02 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "%" <vaginalover1969@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 23:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "%" <vaginalover1969@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 11:31 -0800
Page 9 of 47 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 47 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 15:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g97httF5hteU7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #244976 |
On 1/3/19 1:59 PM, % wrote: > On 2019-01-03 1:42 p.m., Snit wrote: >> On 1/3/19 1:22 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2019-01-03 1:12 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 1/3/2019 12:55 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 1/3/19 12:48 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 1/3/2019 12:28 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/3/19 12:27 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>>>>> On 1/3/19 1:51 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 11:39 a.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 10:28 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:26 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:22 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:12 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:10 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 17:32:43 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes Show me exactly where it says that Congress has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delegated power >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to regulate the *RIGHT* of the people to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think I have the right to ricin and nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dirty bombs? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does this mean you admit that all firearms are covered >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by the 2nd? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *NO* arms are "covered by the 2nd". Some arms are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> covered by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right secured by the second amendment, and other arms >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> covered by the right. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, then let's deal with the current subject >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before trying >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to expand it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into another area. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are arms. Covered like all arms, such as nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oh yea >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. The right secured by the second amendment does not >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover nukes >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> you're not reading it right >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm reading the amendment exactly right. The exclusion of >>>>>>>>>>>> nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>> ricin isn't found in the amendment - it's found in the >>>>>>>>>>>> right. The >>>>>>>>>>>> amendment neither creates nor defines the right. It secures >>>>>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>>>> 2A protects a right to keep and bear arms. >>>>>>>>>>> Make your case that a nuke is an arm in that context. >>>>>>>>>>> Make your case that ricin is an arm. >>>>>>>>>>> How is it possible for you to let loose a WMD without violating >>>>>>>>>>> other people's rights to life, liberty, and property? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You could do it on a ship in the ocean far enough away from >>>>>>>> populations >>>>>>>> and it would only be a problem for ocean traffic and air >>>>>>>> traffic, but >>>>>>>> that could infringe on the rights of others so it might be a >>>>>>>> violation >>>>>>>> of others and that making it illegal by the very fact that you >>>>>>>> don't >>>>>>>> have a RIGHT "to violate other people's RIGHTS". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But MY owning a rifle, in no way violates your RIGHTS, and >>>>>>>> technically >>>>>>>> my owning a nuclear weapon doesn't violate your RIGHTS. If I >>>>>>>> used a >>>>>>>> nuclear weapon I would probably violate someones rights. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So I can own a nuke and ricin, just not use it. OK. >>>>>> >>>>>> You just argued, "People’s have a right to relative safety >>>>>> from others." Mere ownership of a WMD by someone like you >>>>>> endangers the relative safety of everyone in the vicinity. >>>>> >>>>> That is my point. Glad you are understanding it. >>>> >>>> What you have are rights to life, liberty, and property. >>>> A person could not use a WMD without violating those rights. >>> >>> check your rights again >> >> He should check his wrongs, too. >> > i didn't want to over burden him He can at least check his lefts. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 16:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bsipuj.q01.19.5@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #244999 |
On 2019-01-03 3:50 p.m., Snit wrote: > On 1/3/19 1:59 PM, % wrote: >> On 2019-01-03 1:42 p.m., Snit wrote: >>> On 1/3/19 1:22 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2019-01-03 1:12 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> On 1/3/2019 12:55 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 1/3/19 12:48 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 12:28 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 1/3/19 12:27 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 1/3/19 1:51 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 11:39 a.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 10:28 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:26 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:22 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:12 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:10 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 17:32:43 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes Show me exactly where it says that Congress >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delegated power >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to regulate the *RIGHT* of the people to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think I have the right to ricin and nukes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and dirty bombs? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does this mean you admit that all firearms are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> covered by the 2nd? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *NO* arms are "covered by the 2nd". Some arms are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> covered by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right secured by the second amendment, and other arms >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> covered by the right. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, then let's deal with the current subject >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before trying >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to expand it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into another area. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are arms. Covered like all arms, such as nukes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oh yea >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. The right secured by the second amendment does not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover nukes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're not reading it right >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm reading the amendment exactly right. The exclusion of >>>>>>>>>>>>> nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>> ricin isn't found in the amendment - it's found in the >>>>>>>>>>>>> right. The >>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment neither creates nor defines the right. It >>>>>>>>>>>>> secures it. >>>>>>>>>>>> 2A protects a right to keep and bear arms. >>>>>>>>>>>> Make your case that a nuke is an arm in that context. >>>>>>>>>>>> Make your case that ricin is an arm. >>>>>>>>>>>> How is it possible for you to let loose a WMD without violating >>>>>>>>>>>> other people's rights to life, liberty, and property? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You could do it on a ship in the ocean far enough away from >>>>>>>>> populations >>>>>>>>> and it would only be a problem for ocean traffic and air >>>>>>>>> traffic, but >>>>>>>>> that could infringe on the rights of others so it might be a >>>>>>>>> violation >>>>>>>>> of others and that making it illegal by the very fact that you >>>>>>>>> don't >>>>>>>>> have a RIGHT "to violate other people's RIGHTS". >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But MY owning a rifle, in no way violates your RIGHTS, and >>>>>>>>> technically >>>>>>>>> my owning a nuclear weapon doesn't violate your RIGHTS. If I >>>>>>>>> used a >>>>>>>>> nuclear weapon I would probably violate someones rights. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So I can own a nuke and ricin, just not use it. OK. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You just argued, "People’s have a right to relative safety >>>>>>> from others." Mere ownership of a WMD by someone like you >>>>>>> endangers the relative safety of everyone in the vicinity. >>>>>> >>>>>> That is my point. Glad you are understanding it. >>>>> >>>>> What you have are rights to life, liberty, and property. >>>>> A person could not use a WMD without violating those rights. >>>> >>>> check your rights again >>> >>> He should check his wrongs, too. >>> >> i didn't want to over burden him > > He can at least check his lefts. > perhaps his you eees
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 16:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g97jo9F60ieU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #245011 |
On 1/3/19 4:04 PM, % wrote: > On 2019-01-03 3:50 p.m., Snit wrote: >> On 1/3/19 1:59 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2019-01-03 1:42 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>> On 1/3/19 1:22 PM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2019-01-03 1:12 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 1/3/2019 12:55 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/3/19 12:48 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 12:28 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 1/3/19 12:27 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/19 1:51 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 11:39 a.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 10:28 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:26 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:22 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:12 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:10 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 17:32:43 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes Show me exactly where it says that Congress >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delegated power >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to regulate the *RIGHT* of the people to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think I have the right to ricin and nukes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and dirty bombs? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does this mean you admit that all firearms are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> covered by the 2nd? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *NO* arms are "covered by the 2nd". Some arms are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> covered by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right secured by the second amendment, and other arms >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> covered by the right. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, then let's deal with the current subject >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before trying >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to expand it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into another area. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are arms. Covered like all arms, such as nukes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oh yea >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. The right secured by the second amendment does not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover nukes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're not reading it right >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm reading the amendment exactly right. The exclusion of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ricin isn't found in the amendment - it's found in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> right. The >>>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment neither creates nor defines the right. It >>>>>>>>>>>>>> secures it. >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2A protects a right to keep and bear arms. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Make your case that a nuke is an arm in that context. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Make your case that ricin is an arm. >>>>>>>>>>>>> How is it possible for you to let loose a WMD without >>>>>>>>>>>>> violating >>>>>>>>>>>>> other people's rights to life, liberty, and property? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You could do it on a ship in the ocean far enough away from >>>>>>>>>> populations >>>>>>>>>> and it would only be a problem for ocean traffic and air >>>>>>>>>> traffic, but >>>>>>>>>> that could infringe on the rights of others so it might be a >>>>>>>>>> violation >>>>>>>>>> of others and that making it illegal by the very fact that you >>>>>>>>>> don't >>>>>>>>>> have a RIGHT "to violate other people's RIGHTS". >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But MY owning a rifle, in no way violates your RIGHTS, and >>>>>>>>>> technically >>>>>>>>>> my owning a nuclear weapon doesn't violate your RIGHTS. If I >>>>>>>>>> used a >>>>>>>>>> nuclear weapon I would probably violate someones rights. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So I can own a nuke and ricin, just not use it. OK. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You just argued, "People’s have a right to relative safety >>>>>>>> from others." Mere ownership of a WMD by someone like you >>>>>>>> endangers the relative safety of everyone in the vicinity. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That is my point. Glad you are understanding it. >>>>>> >>>>>> What you have are rights to life, liberty, and property. >>>>>> A person could not use a WMD without violating those rights. >>>>> >>>>> check your rights again >>>> >>>> He should check his wrongs, too. >>>> >>> i didn't want to over burden him >> >> He can at least check his lefts. >> > perhaps his you eees OK, I admit you got me.... whoooosh. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 15:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <HTvXD.195043$e%3.43400@fx42.iad> |
| In reply to | #244961 |
On 1/3/2019 1:22 PM, % wrote: > On 2019-01-03 1:12 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >> On 1/3/2019 12:55 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 1/3/19 12:48 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 1/3/2019 12:28 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 1/3/19 12:27 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>>> On 1/3/19 1:51 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 11:39 a.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 10:28 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:26 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:22 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:12 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:10 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 17:32:43 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes Show me exactly where it says that Congress has the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delegated power >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to regulate the *RIGHT* of the people to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think I have the right to ricin and nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dirty bombs? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does this mean you admit that all firearms are covered >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by the 2nd? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *NO* arms are "covered by the 2nd". Some arms are covered >>>>>>>>>>>>>> by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> right secured by the second amendment, and other arms are not >>>>>>>>>>>>>> covered by the right. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, then let's deal with the current subject before >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trying >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to expand it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into another area. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are arms. Covered like all arms, such as nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> oh yea >>>>>>>>>>>> No. The right secured by the second amendment does not >>>>>>>>>>>> cover nukes >>>>>>>>>>>> and ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> you're not reading it right >>>>>>>>>> I'm reading the amendment exactly right. The exclusion of >>>>>>>>>> nukes and >>>>>>>>>> ricin isn't found in the amendment - it's found in the right. >>>>>>>>>> The >>>>>>>>>> amendment neither creates nor defines the right. It secures it. >>>>>>>>> 2A protects a right to keep and bear arms. >>>>>>>>> Make your case that a nuke is an arm in that context. >>>>>>>>> Make your case that ricin is an arm. >>>>>>>>> How is it possible for you to let loose a WMD without violating >>>>>>>>> other people's rights to life, liberty, and property? >>>>>> >>>>>> You could do it on a ship in the ocean far enough away from >>>>>> populations >>>>>> and it would only be a problem for ocean traffic and air traffic, but >>>>>> that could infringe on the rights of others so it might be a >>>>>> violation >>>>>> of others and that making it illegal by the very fact that you don't >>>>>> have a RIGHT "to violate other people's RIGHTS". >>>>>> >>>>>> But MY owning a rifle, in no way violates your RIGHTS, and >>>>>> technically >>>>>> my owning a nuclear weapon doesn't violate your RIGHTS. If I used a >>>>>> nuclear weapon I would probably violate someones rights. >>>>> >>>>> So I can own a nuke and ricin, just not use it. OK. >>>> >>>> You just argued, "People’s have a right to relative safety >>>> from others." Mere ownership of a WMD by someone like you >>>> endangers the relative safety of everyone in the vicinity. >>> >>> That is my point. Glad you are understanding it. >> >> What you have are rights to life, liberty, and property. >> A person could not use a WMD without violating those rights. > > check your rights again OK, people have other rights. I wasn't attempting an exhaustive list. If someone sets off a nuke in your vicinity you will die, therefore being deprived of all your rights.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 15:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g97hqtF5hteU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #244984 |
On 1/3/19 3:19 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 1/3/2019 1:22 PM, % wrote: >> On 2019-01-03 1:12 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 1/3/2019 12:55 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 1/3/19 12:48 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> On 1/3/2019 12:28 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 1/3/19 12:27 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/3/19 1:51 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 11:39 a.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 10:28 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:26 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:22 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:12 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:10 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 17:32:43 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes Show me exactly where it says that Congress has the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delegated power >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to regulate the *RIGHT* of the people to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think I have the right to ricin and nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dirty bombs? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does this mean you admit that all firearms are covered >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by the 2nd? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *NO* arms are "covered by the 2nd". Some arms are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> covered by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right secured by the second amendment, and other arms are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> covered by the right. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, then let's deal with the current subject before >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trying >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to expand it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into another area. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are arms. Covered like all arms, such as nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> oh yea >>>>>>>>>>>>> No. The right secured by the second amendment does not >>>>>>>>>>>>> cover nukes >>>>>>>>>>>>> and ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> you're not reading it right >>>>>>>>>>> I'm reading the amendment exactly right. The exclusion of >>>>>>>>>>> nukes and >>>>>>>>>>> ricin isn't found in the amendment - it's found in the right. >>>>>>>>>>> The >>>>>>>>>>> amendment neither creates nor defines the right. It secures it. >>>>>>>>>> 2A protects a right to keep and bear arms. >>>>>>>>>> Make your case that a nuke is an arm in that context. >>>>>>>>>> Make your case that ricin is an arm. >>>>>>>>>> How is it possible for you to let loose a WMD without violating >>>>>>>>>> other people's rights to life, liberty, and property? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You could do it on a ship in the ocean far enough away from >>>>>>> populations >>>>>>> and it would only be a problem for ocean traffic and air traffic, >>>>>>> but >>>>>>> that could infringe on the rights of others so it might be a >>>>>>> violation >>>>>>> of others and that making it illegal by the very fact that you don't >>>>>>> have a RIGHT "to violate other people's RIGHTS". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But MY owning a rifle, in no way violates your RIGHTS, and >>>>>>> technically >>>>>>> my owning a nuclear weapon doesn't violate your RIGHTS. If I used a >>>>>>> nuclear weapon I would probably violate someones rights. >>>>>> >>>>>> So I can own a nuke and ricin, just not use it. OK. >>>>> >>>>> You just argued, "People’s have a right to relative safety >>>>> from others." Mere ownership of a WMD by someone like you >>>>> endangers the relative safety of everyone in the vicinity. >>>> >>>> That is my point. Glad you are understanding it. >>> >>> What you have are rights to life, liberty, and property. >>> A person could not use a WMD without violating those rights. >> >> check your rights again > > OK, people have other rights. I wasn't attempting an exhaustive > list. If someone sets off a nuke in your vicinity you will die, > therefore being deprived of all your rights. > And if someone shoots you it can end with the same result. Heck, if someone has their gun not secured well and someone else uses it then it can have the same result. We have to balance these things and the answers are not always black and white. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 14:52 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <YmwXD.361282$2A7.165998@fx48.iad> |
| In reply to | #244997 |
On 1/3/2019 2:49 PM, Snit wrote: > On 1/3/19 3:19 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 1/3/2019 1:22 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2019-01-03 1:12 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 1/3/2019 12:55 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 1/3/19 12:48 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 1/3/2019 12:28 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/3/19 12:27 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>>>>> On 1/3/19 1:51 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 11:39 a.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 10:28 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:26 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:22 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:12 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:10 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 17:32:43 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes Show me exactly where it says that Congress has the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delegated power >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to regulate the *RIGHT* of the people to keep and bear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arms, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think I have the right to ricin and nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dirty bombs? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does this mean you admit that all firearms are covered by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 2nd? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *NO* arms are "covered by the 2nd". Some arms are covered >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right secured by the second amendment, and other arms are not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> covered by the right. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, then let's deal with the current subject before >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trying >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to expand it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into another area. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are arms. Covered like all arms, such as nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oh yea >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. The right secured by the second amendment does not cover >>>>>>>>>>>>>> nukes >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> you're not reading it right >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm reading the amendment exactly right. The exclusion of >>>>>>>>>>>> nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>> ricin isn't found in the amendment - it's found in the right. The >>>>>>>>>>>> amendment neither creates nor defines the right. It secures it. >>>>>>>>>>> 2A protects a right to keep and bear arms. >>>>>>>>>>> Make your case that a nuke is an arm in that context. >>>>>>>>>>> Make your case that ricin is an arm. >>>>>>>>>>> How is it possible for you to let loose a WMD without violating >>>>>>>>>>> other people's rights to life, liberty, and property? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You could do it on a ship in the ocean far enough away from >>>>>>>> populations >>>>>>>> and it would only be a problem for ocean traffic and air traffic, but >>>>>>>> that could infringe on the rights of others so it might be a violation >>>>>>>> of others and that making it illegal by the very fact that you don't >>>>>>>> have a RIGHT "to violate other people's RIGHTS". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But MY owning a rifle, in no way violates your RIGHTS, and technically >>>>>>>> my owning a nuclear weapon doesn't violate your RIGHTS. If I used a >>>>>>>> nuclear weapon I would probably violate someones rights. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So I can own a nuke and ricin, just not use it. OK. >>>>>> >>>>>> You just argued, "People’s have a right to relative safety >>>>>> from others." Mere ownership of a WMD by someone like you >>>>>> endangers the relative safety of everyone in the vicinity. >>>>> >>>>> That is my point. Glad you are understanding it. >>>> >>>> What you have are rights to life, liberty, and property. >>>> A person could not use a WMD without violating those rights. >>> >>> check your rights again >> >> OK, people have other rights. I wasn't attempting an exhaustive >> list. If someone sets off a nuke in your vicinity you will die, >> therefore being deprived of all your rights. >> > > And if someone shoots you I thought you were talking about gun possession. Now you're moved the goalposts and are talking about gun use. Got it. -- Snot's '.sig' is wrong, sophomoric and indicative of his bloated ego. Snot fancies himself the Great Tribune of Usenet, who is going to tell all the rest of us What It All Means. Well...no. Just no.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-04 05:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <2TGXD.278818$J8.199487@fx37.iad> |
| In reply to | #244984 |
On 1/3/19 5:19 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 1/3/2019 1:22 PM, % wrote: >> On 2019-01-03 1:12 p.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 1/3/2019 12:55 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 1/3/19 12:48 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> On 1/3/2019 12:28 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 1/3/19 12:27 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/3/19 1:51 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 11:39 a.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 10:28 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:26 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:22 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:12 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:10 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 17:32:43 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes Show me exactly where it says that Congress has the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delegated power >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to regulate the *RIGHT* of the people to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think I have the right to ricin and nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dirty bombs? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does this mean you admit that all firearms are covered >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by the 2nd? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *NO* arms are "covered by the 2nd". Some arms are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> covered by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right secured by the second amendment, and other arms are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> covered by the right. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, then let's deal with the current subject before >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trying >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to expand it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into another area. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are arms. Covered like all arms, such as nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> oh yea >>>>>>>>>>>>> No. The right secured by the second amendment does not >>>>>>>>>>>>> cover nukes >>>>>>>>>>>>> and ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> you're not reading it right >>>>>>>>>>> I'm reading the amendment exactly right. The exclusion of >>>>>>>>>>> nukes and >>>>>>>>>>> ricin isn't found in the amendment - it's found in the >>>>>>>>>>> right. The >>>>>>>>>>> amendment neither creates nor defines the right. It secures it. >>>>>>>>>> 2A protects a right to keep and bear arms. >>>>>>>>>> Make your case that a nuke is an arm in that context. >>>>>>>>>> Make your case that ricin is an arm. >>>>>>>>>> How is it possible for you to let loose a WMD without violating >>>>>>>>>> other people's rights to life, liberty, and property? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You could do it on a ship in the ocean far enough away from >>>>>>> populations >>>>>>> and it would only be a problem for ocean traffic and air traffic, >>>>>>> but >>>>>>> that could infringe on the rights of others so it might be a >>>>>>> violation >>>>>>> of others and that making it illegal by the very fact that you don't >>>>>>> have a RIGHT "to violate other people's RIGHTS". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But MY owning a rifle, in no way violates your RIGHTS, and >>>>>>> technically >>>>>>> my owning a nuclear weapon doesn't violate your RIGHTS. If I used a >>>>>>> nuclear weapon I would probably violate someones rights. >>>>>> >>>>>> So I can own a nuke and ricin, just not use it. OK. >>>>> >>>>> You just argued, "People’s have a right to relative safety >>>>> from others." Mere ownership of a WMD by someone like you >>>>> endangers the relative safety of everyone in the vicinity. >>>> >>>> That is my point. Glad you are understanding it. >>> >>> What you have are rights to life, liberty, and property. >>> A person could not use a WMD without violating those rights. >> >> check your rights again > > OK, people have other rights. I wasn't attempting an exhaustive > list. If someone sets off a nuke in your vicinity you will die, > therefore being deprived of all your rights. We have a right to keep and bear arms, so others rights are diminished by your right to protect your own life... which is why we have what is called self defense. It's also extended to the Government trying to kill you, you can wage war against a government that wages war against you and violates your rights. That requires at a minimum, that you have arms. You probably don't need a RIGHT to nuclear or chemical weapons to protect your life, because if used it would mean death for you and/or innocent people. You can't control the nuclear weapons kill zone as you can with a rifle. So the Liberal argument of owning nuclear and chemical weapons is really a moot point. And technically our Government probably has no powers to use or own nuclear except when war is declared. The Constitution decided for legislators and the courts.... that arms for self defense NOT the murder/suicide of the nuclear weapons are legal. Of course the Liberals can get an ARTICLE 5 amendment to the Constitution if they need nuclear weapons, or if they want the "arms race" to be Constitutional they can "declare war" or change the Constitution. Because a rifle can be used against the persons you point them at, the difference between nuclear bombs and arms is that bombs are indiscriminate killers like booby-traps that are automatic and are also indiscriminate. Much like lethal and wounding "land mines" (and I would argue "ship mines") which are or should be internationally illegal in war. Ricin and nuclear bombs are generally considered illegal internationally when they are used. But then the English thought that gorilla warfare tactics were uncivilized as well. The irony being that "The Democrats" were the only people "in power" to ever drop a nuclear bomb on a city. And Democrats supported plantation slavery, and Jim Crow laws.... And today they still support *Fractional Slavery* like they used to create ObamaCare. And like they have in Massachusetts which is NOW a NEW slave state in the Union violating the 13th Amendment. That said I don't really think Democrats have a MORAL leg to stand on when preaching against one man owning a rifle for defense against the evils that man or in particular Democrats do. -- That's Karma
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 13:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g97ab7F4185U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #244957 |
On 1/3/19 1:12 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 1/3/2019 12:55 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 1/3/19 12:48 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 1/3/2019 12:28 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 1/3/19 12:27 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>> On 1/3/19 1:51 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 11:39 a.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 10:28 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:26 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:22 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:12 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:10 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 17:32:43 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes Show me exactly where it says that Congress has the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delegated power >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to regulate the *RIGHT* of the people to keep and bear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arms, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think I have the right to ricin and nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dirty bombs? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does this mean you admit that all firearms are covered by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 2nd? >>>>>>>>>>>>> *NO* arms are "covered by the 2nd". Some arms are covered >>>>>>>>>>>>> by the >>>>>>>>>>>>> right secured by the second amendment, and other arms are not >>>>>>>>>>>>> covered by the right. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, then let's deal with the current subject before >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trying >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to expand it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into another area. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are arms. Covered like all arms, such as nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>>> No. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> oh yea >>>>>>>>>>> No. The right secured by the second amendment does not cover >>>>>>>>>>> nukes >>>>>>>>>>> and ricin. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> you're not reading it right >>>>>>>>> I'm reading the amendment exactly right. The exclusion of >>>>>>>>> nukes and >>>>>>>>> ricin isn't found in the amendment - it's found in the right. The >>>>>>>>> amendment neither creates nor defines the right. It secures it. >>>>>>>> 2A protects a right to keep and bear arms. >>>>>>>> Make your case that a nuke is an arm in that context. >>>>>>>> Make your case that ricin is an arm. >>>>>>>> How is it possible for you to let loose a WMD without violating >>>>>>>> other people's rights to life, liberty, and property? >>>>> >>>>> You could do it on a ship in the ocean far enough away from >>>>> populations >>>>> and it would only be a problem for ocean traffic and air traffic, but >>>>> that could infringe on the rights of others so it might be a violation >>>>> of others and that making it illegal by the very fact that you don't >>>>> have a RIGHT "to violate other people's RIGHTS". >>>>> >>>>> But MY owning a rifle, in no way violates your RIGHTS, and technically >>>>> my owning a nuclear weapon doesn't violate your RIGHTS. If I used a >>>>> nuclear weapon I would probably violate someones rights. >>>> >>>> So I can own a nuke and ricin, just not use it. OK. >>> >>> You just argued, "People’s have a right to relative safety >>> from others." Mere ownership of a WMD by someone like you >>> endangers the relative safety of everyone in the vicinity. >> >> That is my point. Glad you are understanding it. > > What you have are rights to life, liberty, and property. > A person could not use a WMD without violating those rights. So merely having them puts those rights at risk... much like evidence suggests having guns be more available does. Interesting. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 12:45 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <YvuXD.4$t54.1@fx31.iad> |
| In reply to | #244966 |
On 1/3/2019 12:41 PM, Snit wrote: > On 1/3/19 1:12 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 1/3/2019 12:55 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 1/3/19 12:48 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 1/3/2019 12:28 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 1/3/19 12:27 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>>> On 1/3/19 1:51 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 11:39 a.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 10:28 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:26 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:22 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:12 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:10 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 17:32:43 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes Show me exactly where it says that Congress has the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delegated power >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to regulate the *RIGHT* of the people to keep and bear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arms, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think I have the right to ricin and nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dirty bombs? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does this mean you admit that all firearms are covered by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 2nd? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *NO* arms are "covered by the 2nd". Some arms are covered by >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> right secured by the second amendment, and other arms are not >>>>>>>>>>>>>> covered by the right. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, then let's deal with the current subject before trying >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to expand it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into another area. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are arms. Covered like all arms, such as nukes and ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> oh yea >>>>>>>>>>>> No. The right secured by the second amendment does not cover >>>>>>>>>>>> nukes >>>>>>>>>>>> and ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> you're not reading it right >>>>>>>>>> I'm reading the amendment exactly right. The exclusion of nukes and >>>>>>>>>> ricin isn't found in the amendment - it's found in the right. The >>>>>>>>>> amendment neither creates nor defines the right. It secures it. >>>>>>>>> 2A protects a right to keep and bear arms. >>>>>>>>> Make your case that a nuke is an arm in that context. >>>>>>>>> Make your case that ricin is an arm. >>>>>>>>> How is it possible for you to let loose a WMD without violating >>>>>>>>> other people's rights to life, liberty, and property? >>>>>> >>>>>> You could do it on a ship in the ocean far enough away from populations >>>>>> and it would only be a problem for ocean traffic and air traffic, but >>>>>> that could infringe on the rights of others so it might be a violation >>>>>> of others and that making it illegal by the very fact that you don't >>>>>> have a RIGHT "to violate other people's RIGHTS". >>>>>> >>>>>> But MY owning a rifle, in no way violates your RIGHTS, and technically >>>>>> my owning a nuclear weapon doesn't violate your RIGHTS. If I used a >>>>>> nuclear weapon I would probably violate someones rights. >>>>> >>>>> So I can own a nuke and ricin, just not use it. OK. >>>> >>>> You just argued, "People’s have a right to relative safety >>>> from others." Mere ownership of a WMD by someone like you >>>> endangers the relative safety of everyone in the vicinity. >>> >>> That is my point. Glad you are understanding it. >> >> What you have are rights to life, liberty, and property. >> A person could not use a WMD without violating those rights. > > So merely having them puts those rights at risk Merely having guns does not. -- Snot's '.sig' is wrong, sophomoric and indicative of his bloated ego. Snot fancies himself the Great Tribune of Usenet, who is going to tell all the rest of us What It All Means. Well...no. Just no.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 13:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bsiiij.6s8.19.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #244971 |
On 2019-01-03 1:45 p.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: > On 1/3/2019 12:41 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 1/3/19 1:12 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 1/3/2019 12:55 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 1/3/19 12:48 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> On 1/3/2019 12:28 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 1/3/19 12:27 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/3/19 1:51 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 11:39 a.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 10:28 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:26 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:22 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:12 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:10 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 17:32:43 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes Show me exactly where it says that Congress has the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delegated power >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to regulate the *RIGHT* of the people to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think I have the right to ricin and nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dirty bombs? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does this mean you admit that all firearms are covered >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by the 2nd? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *NO* arms are "covered by the 2nd". Some arms are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> covered by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right secured by the second amendment, and other arms are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> covered by the right. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, then let's deal with the current subject before >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trying >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to expand it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into another area. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are arms. Covered like all arms, such as nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> oh yea >>>>>>>>>>>>> No. The right secured by the second amendment does not >>>>>>>>>>>>> cover nukes >>>>>>>>>>>>> and ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> you're not reading it right >>>>>>>>>>> I'm reading the amendment exactly right. The exclusion of >>>>>>>>>>> nukes and >>>>>>>>>>> ricin isn't found in the amendment - it's found in the >>>>>>>>>>> right. The >>>>>>>>>>> amendment neither creates nor defines the right. It secures it. >>>>>>>>>> 2A protects a right to keep and bear arms. >>>>>>>>>> Make your case that a nuke is an arm in that context. >>>>>>>>>> Make your case that ricin is an arm. >>>>>>>>>> How is it possible for you to let loose a WMD without violating >>>>>>>>>> other people's rights to life, liberty, and property? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You could do it on a ship in the ocean far enough away from >>>>>>> populations >>>>>>> and it would only be a problem for ocean traffic and air traffic, >>>>>>> but >>>>>>> that could infringe on the rights of others so it might be a >>>>>>> violation >>>>>>> of others and that making it illegal by the very fact that you don't >>>>>>> have a RIGHT "to violate other people's RIGHTS". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But MY owning a rifle, in no way violates your RIGHTS, and >>>>>>> technically >>>>>>> my owning a nuclear weapon doesn't violate your RIGHTS. If I used a >>>>>>> nuclear weapon I would probably violate someones rights. >>>>>> >>>>>> So I can own a nuke and ricin, just not use it. OK. >>>>> >>>>> You just argued, "People’s have a right to relative safety >>>>> from others." Mere ownership of a WMD by someone like you >>>>> endangers the relative safety of everyone in the vicinity. >>>> >>>> That is my point. Glad you are understanding it. >>> >>> What you have are rights to life, liberty, and property. >>> A person could not use a WMD without violating those rights. >> >> So merely having them puts those rights at risk > > Merely having guns does not. > here's a secret not everyone knows , you can't shoot anything if you don't have a gun
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 15:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g97hurF5hteU8@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #244975 |
On 1/3/19 1:58 PM, % wrote: > On 2019-01-03 1:45 p.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >> On 1/3/2019 12:41 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 1/3/19 1:12 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 1/3/2019 12:55 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 1/3/19 12:48 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 1/3/2019 12:28 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/3/19 12:27 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>>>>> On 1/3/19 1:51 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 11:39 a.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 10:28 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:26 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:22 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:12 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:10 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 17:32:43 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes Show me exactly where it says that Congress has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delegated power >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to regulate the *RIGHT* of the people to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think I have the right to ricin and nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dirty bombs? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does this mean you admit that all firearms are covered >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by the 2nd? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *NO* arms are "covered by the 2nd". Some arms are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> covered by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right secured by the second amendment, and other arms >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> covered by the right. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, then let's deal with the current subject >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before trying >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to expand it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into another area. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are arms. Covered like all arms, such as nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oh yea >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. The right secured by the second amendment does not >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover nukes >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> you're not reading it right >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm reading the amendment exactly right. The exclusion of >>>>>>>>>>>> nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>> ricin isn't found in the amendment - it's found in the >>>>>>>>>>>> right. The >>>>>>>>>>>> amendment neither creates nor defines the right. It secures >>>>>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>>>> 2A protects a right to keep and bear arms. >>>>>>>>>>> Make your case that a nuke is an arm in that context. >>>>>>>>>>> Make your case that ricin is an arm. >>>>>>>>>>> How is it possible for you to let loose a WMD without violating >>>>>>>>>>> other people's rights to life, liberty, and property? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You could do it on a ship in the ocean far enough away from >>>>>>>> populations >>>>>>>> and it would only be a problem for ocean traffic and air >>>>>>>> traffic, but >>>>>>>> that could infringe on the rights of others so it might be a >>>>>>>> violation >>>>>>>> of others and that making it illegal by the very fact that you >>>>>>>> don't >>>>>>>> have a RIGHT "to violate other people's RIGHTS". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But MY owning a rifle, in no way violates your RIGHTS, and >>>>>>>> technically >>>>>>>> my owning a nuclear weapon doesn't violate your RIGHTS. If I >>>>>>>> used a >>>>>>>> nuclear weapon I would probably violate someones rights. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So I can own a nuke and ricin, just not use it. OK. >>>>>> >>>>>> You just argued, "People’s have a right to relative safety >>>>>> from others." Mere ownership of a WMD by someone like you >>>>>> endangers the relative safety of everyone in the vicinity. >>>>> >>>>> That is my point. Glad you are understanding it. >>>> >>>> What you have are rights to life, liberty, and property. >>>> A person could not use a WMD without violating those rights. >>> >>> So merely having them puts those rights at risk >> >> Merely having guns does not. >> > here's a secret not everyone knows , > you can't shoot anything if you don't have a gun I can shoot someone with a rubber band with no gun. You are wrong. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-04 00:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q0n0b5$rb$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #244975 |
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message news:bsiiij.6s8.19.3@news.alt.net... > On 2019-01-03 1:45 p.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >> On 1/3/2019 12:41 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 1/3/19 1:12 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 1/3/2019 12:55 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 1/3/19 12:48 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 1/3/2019 12:28 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/3/19 12:27 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>>>>> On 1/3/19 1:51 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 11:39 a.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 10:28 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:26 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:22 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:12 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:10 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 17:32:43 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes Show me exactly where it says that Congress has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delegated power >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to regulate the *RIGHT* of the people to keep and bear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arms, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think I have the right to ricin and nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dirty bombs? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does this mean you admit that all firearms are covered by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 2nd? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *NO* arms are "covered by the 2nd". Some arms are covered >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right secured by the second amendment, and other arms are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> covered by the right. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, then let's deal with the current subject before >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trying >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to expand it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into another area. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are arms. Covered like all arms, such as nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oh yea >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. The right secured by the second amendment does not cover >>>>>>>>>>>>>> nukes >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> you're not reading it right >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm reading the amendment exactly right. The exclusion of >>>>>>>>>>>> nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>> ricin isn't found in the amendment - it's found in the right. >>>>>>>>>>>> The >>>>>>>>>>>> amendment neither creates nor defines the right. It secures >>>>>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>>>> 2A protects a right to keep and bear arms. >>>>>>>>>>> Make your case that a nuke is an arm in that context. >>>>>>>>>>> Make your case that ricin is an arm. >>>>>>>>>>> How is it possible for you to let loose a WMD without violating >>>>>>>>>>> other people's rights to life, liberty, and property? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You could do it on a ship in the ocean far enough away from >>>>>>>> populations >>>>>>>> and it would only be a problem for ocean traffic and air traffic, >>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>> that could infringe on the rights of others so it might be a >>>>>>>> violation >>>>>>>> of others and that making it illegal by the very fact that you >>>>>>>> don't >>>>>>>> have a RIGHT "to violate other people's RIGHTS". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But MY owning a rifle, in no way violates your RIGHTS, and >>>>>>>> technically >>>>>>>> my owning a nuclear weapon doesn't violate your RIGHTS. If I used >>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>> nuclear weapon I would probably violate someones rights. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So I can own a nuke and ricin, just not use it. OK. >>>>>> >>>>>> You just argued, "People’s have a right to relative safety >>>>>> from others." Mere ownership of a WMD by someone like you >>>>>> endangers the relative safety of everyone in the vicinity. >>>>> >>>>> That is my point. Glad you are understanding it. >>>> >>>> What you have are rights to life, liberty, and property. >>>> A person could not use a WMD without violating those rights. >>> >>> So merely having them puts those rights at risk >> >> Merely having guns does not. >> > here's a secret not everyone knows , > you can't shoot anything if you don't have a gun Bow Crossbow Both with shoot you just dandy without any gun being around.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 15:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <SUvXD.195062$e%3.50195@fx42.iad> |
| In reply to | #244966 |
On 1/3/2019 1:41 PM, Snit wrote: > On 1/3/19 1:12 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 1/3/2019 12:55 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 1/3/19 12:48 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 1/3/2019 12:28 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 1/3/19 12:27 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>>> On 1/3/19 1:51 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 11:39 a.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 10:28 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:26 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:22 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:12 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:10 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 17:32:43 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes Show me exactly where it says that Congress has the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delegated power >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to regulate the *RIGHT* of the people to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think I have the right to ricin and nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dirty bombs? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does this mean you admit that all firearms are covered >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by the 2nd? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *NO* arms are "covered by the 2nd". Some arms are covered >>>>>>>>>>>>>> by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> right secured by the second amendment, and other arms are not >>>>>>>>>>>>>> covered by the right. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, then let's deal with the current subject before >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trying >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to expand it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into another area. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are arms. Covered like all arms, such as nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> oh yea >>>>>>>>>>>> No. The right secured by the second amendment does not >>>>>>>>>>>> cover nukes >>>>>>>>>>>> and ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> you're not reading it right >>>>>>>>>> I'm reading the amendment exactly right. The exclusion of >>>>>>>>>> nukes and >>>>>>>>>> ricin isn't found in the amendment - it's found in the right. >>>>>>>>>> The >>>>>>>>>> amendment neither creates nor defines the right. It secures it. >>>>>>>>> 2A protects a right to keep and bear arms. >>>>>>>>> Make your case that a nuke is an arm in that context. >>>>>>>>> Make your case that ricin is an arm. >>>>>>>>> How is it possible for you to let loose a WMD without violating >>>>>>>>> other people's rights to life, liberty, and property? >>>>>> >>>>>> You could do it on a ship in the ocean far enough away from >>>>>> populations >>>>>> and it would only be a problem for ocean traffic and air traffic, but >>>>>> that could infringe on the rights of others so it might be a >>>>>> violation >>>>>> of others and that making it illegal by the very fact that you don't >>>>>> have a RIGHT "to violate other people's RIGHTS". >>>>>> >>>>>> But MY owning a rifle, in no way violates your RIGHTS, and >>>>>> technically >>>>>> my owning a nuclear weapon doesn't violate your RIGHTS. If I used a >>>>>> nuclear weapon I would probably violate someones rights. >>>>> >>>>> So I can own a nuke and ricin, just not use it. OK. >>>> >>>> You just argued, "People’s have a right to relative safety >>>> from others." Mere ownership of a WMD by someone like you >>>> endangers the relative safety of everyone in the vicinity. >>> >>> That is my point. Glad you are understanding it. >> >> What you have are rights to life, liberty, and property. >> A person could not use a WMD without violating those rights. > > So merely having them puts those rights at risk... much like evidence > suggests having guns be more available does. Interesting. I could have a thousand guns and a million rounds of ammo, without putting anyone else's rights at risk.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 15:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g97horF5hteU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #244985 |
On 1/3/19 3:20 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 1/3/2019 1:41 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 1/3/19 1:12 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 1/3/2019 12:55 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 1/3/19 12:48 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> On 1/3/2019 12:28 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 1/3/19 12:27 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/3/19 1:51 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 11:39 a.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 10:28 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:26 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:22 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:12 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:10 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 17:32:43 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes Show me exactly where it says that Congress has the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delegated power >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to regulate the *RIGHT* of the people to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think I have the right to ricin and nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dirty bombs? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does this mean you admit that all firearms are covered >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by the 2nd? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *NO* arms are "covered by the 2nd". Some arms are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> covered by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right secured by the second amendment, and other arms are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> covered by the right. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, then let's deal with the current subject before >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trying >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to expand it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into another area. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are arms. Covered like all arms, such as nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> oh yea >>>>>>>>>>>>> No. The right secured by the second amendment does not >>>>>>>>>>>>> cover nukes >>>>>>>>>>>>> and ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> you're not reading it right >>>>>>>>>>> I'm reading the amendment exactly right. The exclusion of >>>>>>>>>>> nukes and >>>>>>>>>>> ricin isn't found in the amendment - it's found in the right. >>>>>>>>>>> The >>>>>>>>>>> amendment neither creates nor defines the right. It secures it. >>>>>>>>>> 2A protects a right to keep and bear arms. >>>>>>>>>> Make your case that a nuke is an arm in that context. >>>>>>>>>> Make your case that ricin is an arm. >>>>>>>>>> How is it possible for you to let loose a WMD without violating >>>>>>>>>> other people's rights to life, liberty, and property? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You could do it on a ship in the ocean far enough away from >>>>>>> populations >>>>>>> and it would only be a problem for ocean traffic and air traffic, >>>>>>> but >>>>>>> that could infringe on the rights of others so it might be a >>>>>>> violation >>>>>>> of others and that making it illegal by the very fact that you don't >>>>>>> have a RIGHT "to violate other people's RIGHTS". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But MY owning a rifle, in no way violates your RIGHTS, and >>>>>>> technically >>>>>>> my owning a nuclear weapon doesn't violate your RIGHTS. If I used a >>>>>>> nuclear weapon I would probably violate someones rights. >>>>>> >>>>>> So I can own a nuke and ricin, just not use it. OK. >>>>> >>>>> You just argued, "People’s have a right to relative safety >>>>> from others." Mere ownership of a WMD by someone like you >>>>> endangers the relative safety of everyone in the vicinity. >>>> >>>> That is my point. Glad you are understanding it. >>> >>> What you have are rights to life, liberty, and property. >>> A person could not use a WMD without violating those rights. >> >> So merely having them puts those rights at risk... much like evidence >> suggests having guns be more available does. Interesting. > > I could have a thousand guns and a million rounds of ammo, > without putting anyone else's rights at risk. And someone could argue they are the exception and are safe when driving drunk or grossly over the speed limit or without insurance, but we set up laws based on the evidence, not the claims of the individual. Still, what needs to be shown is the risk... and that is the type evidence we need to research. It is NOT research into criminal violence, as many in here (maybe even you) have suggested. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 14:51 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <bmwXD.361281$2A7.23981@fx48.iad> |
| In reply to | #244996 |
On 1/3/2019 2:47 PM, Snit wrote: > On 1/3/19 3:20 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 1/3/2019 1:41 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 1/3/19 1:12 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 1/3/2019 12:55 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 1/3/19 12:48 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 1/3/2019 12:28 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/3/19 12:27 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>>>>> On 1/3/19 1:51 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 11:39 a.m., Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 10:28 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:26 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:22 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:12 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:10 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 17:32:43 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes Show me exactly where it says that Congress has the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delegated power >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to regulate the *RIGHT* of the people to keep and bear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arms, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think I have the right to ricin and nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dirty bombs? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does this mean you admit that all firearms are covered by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 2nd? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *NO* arms are "covered by the 2nd". Some arms are covered >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right secured by the second amendment, and other arms are not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> covered by the right. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, then let's deal with the current subject before >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trying >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to expand it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into another area. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are arms. Covered like all arms, such as nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oh yea >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. The right secured by the second amendment does not cover >>>>>>>>>>>>>> nukes >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and ricin. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> you're not reading it right >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm reading the amendment exactly right. The exclusion of >>>>>>>>>>>> nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>> ricin isn't found in the amendment - it's found in the right. The >>>>>>>>>>>> amendment neither creates nor defines the right. It secures it. >>>>>>>>>>> 2A protects a right to keep and bear arms. >>>>>>>>>>> Make your case that a nuke is an arm in that context. >>>>>>>>>>> Make your case that ricin is an arm. >>>>>>>>>>> How is it possible for you to let loose a WMD without violating >>>>>>>>>>> other people's rights to life, liberty, and property? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You could do it on a ship in the ocean far enough away from >>>>>>>> populations >>>>>>>> and it would only be a problem for ocean traffic and air traffic, but >>>>>>>> that could infringe on the rights of others so it might be a violation >>>>>>>> of others and that making it illegal by the very fact that you don't >>>>>>>> have a RIGHT "to violate other people's RIGHTS". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But MY owning a rifle, in no way violates your RIGHTS, and technically >>>>>>>> my owning a nuclear weapon doesn't violate your RIGHTS. If I used a >>>>>>>> nuclear weapon I would probably violate someones rights. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So I can own a nuke and ricin, just not use it. OK. >>>>>> >>>>>> You just argued, "People’s have a right to relative safety >>>>>> from others." Mere ownership of a WMD by someone like you >>>>>> endangers the relative safety of everyone in the vicinity. >>>>> >>>>> That is my point. Glad you are understanding it. >>>> >>>> What you have are rights to life, liberty, and property. >>>> A person could not use a WMD without violating those rights. >>> >>> So merely having them puts those rights at risk... much like evidence >>> suggests having guns be more available does. Interesting. >> >> I could have a thousand guns and a million rounds of ammo, >> without putting anyone else's rights at risk. > > And someone could argue they are the exception and are safe when driving > drunk No, driving drunk is inherently dangerous and puts others at risk. Someone owning guns and ammunition does not put anyone else at risk. -- Snot's '.sig' is wrong, sophomoric and indicative of his bloated ego. Snot fancies himself the Great Tribune of Usenet, who is going to tell all the rest of us What It All Means. Well...no. Just no.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 16:09 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands |
| Message-ID | <wCwXD.169356$R85.157692@fx03.iad> |
| In reply to | #244996 |
On 1/3/2019 3:47 PM, Snit wrote: > On 1/3/19 3:20 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 1/3/2019 1:41 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 1/3/19 1:12 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 1/3/2019 12:55 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> >>>> What you have are rights to life, liberty, and property. >>>> A person could not use a WMD without violating those rights. >>> >>> So merely having them puts those rights at risk... much like evidence >>> suggests having guns be more available does. Interesting. >> >> I could have a thousand guns and a million rounds of ammo, >> without putting anyone else's rights at risk. > > And someone could argue they are the exception and are safe when driving > drunk or grossly over the speed limit or without insurance, but we set > up laws based on the evidence, not the claims of the individual. > > Still, what needs to be shown is the risk... and that is the type > evidence we need to research. It is NOT research into criminal violence, > as many in here (maybe even you) have suggested. You admit your claimed penchant for evidence is directed at gun control, not at crime prevention. That makes you a clear and present danger to constitutional rights, not to be taken seriously.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 16:24 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands |
| Message-ID | <g97jskF60ieU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #245012 |
On 1/3/19 4:09 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 1/3/2019 3:47 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 1/3/19 3:20 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 1/3/2019 1:41 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 1/3/19 1:12 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> On 1/3/2019 12:55 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> >>>>> What you have are rights to life, liberty, and property. >>>>> A person could not use a WMD without violating those rights. >>>> >>>> So merely having them puts those rights at risk... much like >>>> evidence suggests having guns be more available does. Interesting. >>> >>> I could have a thousand guns and a million rounds of ammo, >>> without putting anyone else's rights at risk. >> >> And someone could argue they are the exception and are safe when >> driving drunk or grossly over the speed limit or without insurance, >> but we set up laws based on the evidence, not the claims of the >> individual. >> >> Still, what needs to be shown is the risk... and that is the type >> evidence we need to research. It is NOT research into criminal >> violence, as many in here (maybe even you) have suggested. > > You admit your claimed penchant for evidence is directed at > gun control, not at crime prevention. I want research on cars, guns, food, carpet, stairs, ... > That makes you a > clear and present danger to constitutional rights, not to > be taken seriously. An emotional reaction to a conclusion you have now shown you understand and agree to the reasoning of, at least in principle. You agree with not allowing all arms... because of the risks involved. This is what I noted some time ago was likely the case and you have now confirmed. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 15:32 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands |
| Message-ID | <yYwXD.154484$W_2.127199@fx05.iad> |
| In reply to | #245015 |
On 1/3/2019 3:24 PM, Snit wrote: > On 1/3/19 4:09 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 1/3/2019 3:47 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 1/3/19 3:20 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 1/3/2019 1:41 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 1/3/19 1:12 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 1/3/2019 12:55 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> What you have are rights to life, liberty, and property. >>>>>> A person could not use a WMD without violating those rights. >>>>> >>>>> So merely having them puts those rights at risk... much like evidence >>>>> suggests having guns be more available does. Interesting. >>>> >>>> I could have a thousand guns and a million rounds of ammo, >>>> without putting anyone else's rights at risk. >>> >>> And someone could argue they are the exception and are safe when driving >>> drunk or grossly over the speed limit or without insurance, but we set >>> up laws based on the evidence, not the claims of the individual. >>> >>> Still, what needs to be shown is the risk... and that is the type >>> evidence we need to research. It is NOT research into criminal violence, >>> as many in here (maybe even you) have suggested. >> >> You admit your claimed penchant for evidence is directed at >> gun control, not at crime prevention. > > I want research on cars, guns, food, carpet, stairs, No, you don't. >> That makes you a >> clear and present danger to constitutional rights, not to >> be taken seriously. > > An emotional reaction to No, he's right. You want to confiscate guns, violating our rights. -- Snot's '.sig' is wrong, sophomoric and indicative of his bloated ego. Snot fancies himself the Great Tribune of Usenet, who is going to tell all the rest of us What It All Means. Well...no. Just no.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 16:57 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands |
| Message-ID | <g97lqjF6dkmU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #245015 |
On 1/3/19 4:24 PM, Snit wrote: > On 1/3/19 4:09 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 1/3/2019 3:47 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 1/3/19 3:20 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 1/3/2019 1:41 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 1/3/19 1:12 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 1/3/2019 12:55 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> What you have are rights to life, liberty, and property. >>>>>> A person could not use a WMD without violating those rights. >>>>> >>>>> So merely having them puts those rights at risk... much like >>>>> evidence suggests having guns be more available does. Interesting. >>>> >>>> I could have a thousand guns and a million rounds of ammo, >>>> without putting anyone else's rights at risk. >>> >>> And someone could argue they are the exception and are safe when >>> driving drunk or grossly over the speed limit or without insurance, >>> but we set up laws based on the evidence, not the claims of the >>> individual. >>> >>> Still, what needs to be shown is the risk... and that is the type >>> evidence we need to research. It is NOT research into criminal >>> violence, as many in here (maybe even you) have suggested. >> >> You admit your claimed penchant for evidence is directed at >> gun control, not at crime prevention. > > I want research on cars, guns, food, carpet, stairs, ... > >> That makes you a >> clear and present danger to constitutional rights, not to >> be taken seriously. > > An emotional reaction to a conclusion you have now shown you understand > and agree to the reasoning of, at least in principle. > > You agree with not allowing all arms... because of the risks involved. > > This is what I noted some time ago was likely the case and you have now > confirmed. > Rudy responded demonstrating he had no reasoned counter but did have a strong negative emotional response. Interesting. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 16:00 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands |
| Message-ID | <LmxXD.169358$R85.86316@fx03.iad> |
| In reply to | #245017 |
On 1/3/2019 3:57 PM, Snit wrote: > On 1/3/19 4:24 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 1/3/19 4:09 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 1/3/2019 3:47 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 1/3/19 3:20 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> On 1/3/2019 1:41 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 1/3/19 1:12 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 12:55 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What you have are rights to life, liberty, and property. >>>>>>> A person could not use a WMD without violating those rights. >>>>>> >>>>>> So merely having them puts those rights at risk... much like evidence >>>>>> suggests having guns be more available does. Interesting. >>>>> >>>>> I could have a thousand guns and a million rounds of ammo, >>>>> without putting anyone else's rights at risk. >>>> >>>> And someone could argue they are the exception and are safe when >>>> driving drunk or grossly over the speed limit or without insurance, but >>>> we set up laws based on the evidence, not the claims of the individual. >>>> >>>> Still, what needs to be shown is the risk... and that is the type >>>> evidence we need to research. It is NOT research into criminal >>>> violence, as many in here (maybe even you) have suggested. >>> >>> You admit your claimed penchant for evidence is directed at >>> gun control, not at crime prevention. >> >> I want research on cars, guns, food, carpet, stairs, ... >> >>> That makes you a >>> clear and present danger to constitutional rights, not to >>> be taken seriously. >> >> An emotional reaction to a conclusion you have now shown you understand >> and agree to the reasoning of, at least in principle. >> >> You agree with not allowing all arms... because of the risks involved. >> >> This is what I noted some time ago was likely the case and you have now >> confirmed. >> > > Rudy Snot replied to his own post again in a section of the thread in which I haven't been participating, proving again Snot is not a serious participant. -- Snot's '.sig' is wrong, sophomoric and indicative of his bloated ego. Snot fancies himself the Great Tribune of Usenet, who is going to tell all the rest of us What It All Means. Well...no. Just no.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 47 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 47 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web