Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #242532 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ted <ted@sam.street> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-28 22:18 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-01-01 11:31 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 921 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-28 22:18 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 15:50 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The Truth - BeamMeUpScotty" <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-28 18:27 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:35 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 16:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:45 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 16:53 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:06 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 00:52 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:14 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:36 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 10:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:29 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:46 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:19 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 20:08 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 20:59 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 23:35 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 17:33 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:54 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:49 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 12:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:42 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 14:44 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:55 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 15:28 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 15:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 15:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 16:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 16:08 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 23:17 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 16:33 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 16:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 17:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:15 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 23:24 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 19:30 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:25 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:20 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:14 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:35 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:09 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:11 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The Truth - BeamMeUpScotty" <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 18:20 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:30 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 17:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:43 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 17:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 18:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:20 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 18:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:25 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:28 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 20:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:05 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 17:47 -0800
Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 18:28 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:33 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 19:46 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:56 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 20:47 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 18:44 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:32 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 19:52 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 18:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 20:44 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:04 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 16:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 20:22 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:06 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:41 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 00:57 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 10:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:23 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:25 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:25 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 11:36 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:51 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 11:02 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 12:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-03 14:36 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 12:45 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 07:17 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 13:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 13:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-04 07:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-03 09:07 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:12 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Delvin Benêt <DB@cnbc.nyc> - 2019-01-04 07:33 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-04 12:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:52 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:10 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:12 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:22 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:26 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:28 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 11:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 11:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:51 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-03 14:27 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 12:28 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 11:42 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 07:17 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 07:42 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:03 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-04 09:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:40 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 15:07 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-04 15:16 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 08:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:40 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 08:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-03 14:44 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-03 14:00 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-03 17:05 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 07:17 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 12:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 12:55 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 11:57 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 13:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 13:32 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 12:39 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 13:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 15:16 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-03 13:47 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 11:57 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 13:12 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 13:22 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 13:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 13:59 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:50 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 16:04 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 15:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 14:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-04 05:49 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 13:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 12:45 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 13:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:50 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 15:20 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 14:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 16:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 15:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 16:00 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 17:20 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 16:25 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 16:25 -0800
Snit Complains To TPG Troll Board About Being Trolled- Board Takes It Under Advisement Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 16:31 -0800
Re: Snit Complains To TPG Troll Board About Being Trolled- Board Takes It Under Advisement Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-04 00:44 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:11 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 17:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 17:30 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 18:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:30 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 20:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 20:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 21:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:45 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:50 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:52 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:54 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-04 01:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 21:52 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:01 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-05 03:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-07 22:18 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-07 23:07 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 06:19 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 02:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 13:58 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 12:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 19:41 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 12:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 12:56 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 13:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 13:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 13:52 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 14:25 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 14:36 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 22:27 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 15:32 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 15:45 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 15:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 16:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 16:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-09 00:05 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 17:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 17:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-08 15:42 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 16:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-09 00:05 +0000
Snit Is So Dumb... [How Dumb Is He Johnny?"] Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-08 12:06 -0800
Re: Snit Is So Dumb... [How Dumb Is He Johnny?"] Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 13:16 -0700
Re: Snit Is So Dumb... [How Dumb Is He Johnny?"] Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 13:18 -0700
Re: Snit Is So Dumb... [How Dumb Is He Johnny?"] Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-08 12:23 -0800
Re: Snit Is So Dumb... [How Dumb Is He Johnny?"] Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-08 12:22 -0800
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The psychotic racist white-supremacist who sounds a lot like neal warren AKA greg hall taking a break from the stormfront discussion boards to post on usenet as "Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Snit Is So Dumb... [How Dumb Is He Johnny?"] ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-08 14:23 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 13:32 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-08 14:35 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 14:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-08 04:17 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 02:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 13:59 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 12:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 19:41 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-08 14:18 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 13:12 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-08 04:21 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:46 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 16:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:13 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 17:14 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 18:16 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:30 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 17:38 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 17:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 17:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 18:05 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 18:26 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:50 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 17:33 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 20:53 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 21:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:36 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:49 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:53 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 21:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-04 08:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-04 01:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 21:54 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:02 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:48 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:50 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 01:11 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-04 16:22 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 18:59 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:12 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-05 10:22 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 18:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-05 10:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 19:16 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-05 11:34 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 19:56 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-05 13:40 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-05 12:05 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 13:17 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-05 12:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:17 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 20:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 21:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:48 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:05 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 21:44 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:34 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:44 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 15:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:20 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 15:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 11:03 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 12:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 12:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:51 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 11:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 12:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 13:13 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 12:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 13:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:39 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:19 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 07:35 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:14 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 07:33 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:04 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-04 08:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:40 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 08:42 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 18:03 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-04 12:02 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-04 11:59 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 08:17 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:40 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 08:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-04 09:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-03 11:17 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:58 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:13 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 21:46 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:37 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 07:17 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 19:59 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 18:16 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 23:47 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:34 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 08:59 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 17:05 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:15 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:25 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:26 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 10:30 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 23:35 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:03 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:50 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 18:54 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 19:07 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:08 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 22:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:00 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 13:32 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 14:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 13:21 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 19:33 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 14:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 15:03 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 23:20 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:43 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:21 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:05 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:33 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 04:57 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:12 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 20:16 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 04:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 00:56 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 04:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:23 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:36 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:50 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 20:19 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:30 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 04:53 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:48 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 19:11 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:36 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 21:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 08:29 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 23:42 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 04:54 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:29 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:54 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 12:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 14:45 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 07:50 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 12:44 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:39 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:52 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:48 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:19 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:20 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 23:43 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:19 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 11:56 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:56 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:02 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 20:04 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 12:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:02 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 01:21 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 19:12 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 04:55 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 13:06 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 15:56 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 16:09 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:38 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 09:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:04 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:19 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:17 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 11:54 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:06 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:45 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:29 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 20:14 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 12:22 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:03 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 08:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:07 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 12:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:22 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:27 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 12:45 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:54 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 14:33 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:44 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 15:31 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 16:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:09 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:00 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 11:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 13:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:42 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 14:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 13:22 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:06 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 19:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:07 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 20:35 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:44 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-31 00:14 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:10 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 09:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 17:02 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 17:11 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:13 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:25 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-03 15:44 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 13:56 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 20:56 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 08:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 17:02 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:14 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:17 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:23 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:28 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:37 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:47 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 11:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 10:05 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 10:17 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 19:33 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:42 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:38 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:26 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:26 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:37 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:47 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 11:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 10:05 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 11:12 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 10:15 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:23 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 11:44 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 13:14 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 13:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 13:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 15:26 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:44 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 15:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:45 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 16:10 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 17:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 16:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 21:19 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 15:54 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 15:03 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 21:37 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:39 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-05 03:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:04 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 15:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 21:43 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:31 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 19:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:53 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:04 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 20:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 22:44 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 11:29 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:15 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:17 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:02 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:56 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 01:21 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 19:11 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 20:13 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:35 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 12:13 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:31 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 15:46 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:53 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 17:46 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:35 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 17:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 18:14 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:20 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 18:59 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:11 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:16 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:25 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:25 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:32 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:36 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:41 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:53 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:55 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:59 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:13 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:21 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:33 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:37 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:42 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:07 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:13 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:19 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:22 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:25 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:30 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:38 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:07 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:14 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:26 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:32 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:39 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:06 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 20:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:51 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 21:05 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 22:15 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 21:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 22:56 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 22:06 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 23:14 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 22:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 00:17 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 07:53 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:16 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:02 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:27 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:54 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The Truth - BeamMeUpScotty" <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-28 21:52 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 16:56 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:33 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 10:36 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:53 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 11:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:08 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:05 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 12:44 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:55 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-28 23:40 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:59 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 01:21 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 19:11 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 12:44 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 05:03 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:53 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:26 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:28 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:10 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:56 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:04 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 20:49 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:38 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 05:02 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 20:13 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 05:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:14 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:35 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:46 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:38 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:19 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 11:55 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:45 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 12:25 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:57 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:12 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 17:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 11:50 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 14:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:59 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:03 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:50 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 11:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 13:38 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 14:04 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 13:23 -0800
Rudy is pedantic and wrong. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:16 -0700
Re: Rudy is pedantic and wrong. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:17 -0700
Re: Rudy is pedantic and wrong. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 03:41 -0800
Re: Rudy is pedantic and wrong. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 11:47 +0000
Re: Rudy is pedantic and wrong. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 03:40 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 11:43 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Snit agrees he should be banned. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:19 -0700
Re: Snit agrees he should be banned. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:16 -0700
Re: Snit agrees he should be banned. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 03:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns -------------- Atheist --------------- <a@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-31 06:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 07:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 06:20 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-31 08:07 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 17:05 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-31 09:23 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 17:29 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-31 09:30 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 18:09 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-31 10:45 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 12:12 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-31 09:34 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 18:09 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-31 10:47 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 12:14 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 02:00 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:11 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 20:17 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 13:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-31 12:30 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-31 12:35 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:58 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 19:56 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:22 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:15 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 03:44 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 02:03 -0500
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:12 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 11:47 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 12:56 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 11:58 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 12:03 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 11:59 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 01:01 -0500
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:14 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 22:03 -0500
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Delvin Benêt <DB@cnbc.nyc> - 2019-01-04 20:30 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-05 03:29 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-05 07:57 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership John Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> - 2019-01-05 10:47 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-05 12:33 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 13:49 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-05 13:59 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 15:40 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-05 13:39 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-05 14:14 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 03:43 -0500
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:31 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 12:00 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 15:01 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 11:58 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 15:01 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 12:10 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 11:30 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:08 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:20 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 19:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:26 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:55 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 12:29 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:21 -0800
Snit's OK With Bans- Especially if They Don't Come Out And Say It. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:20 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 00:52 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 18:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:11 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 01:21 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 05:04 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 18:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 19:04 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 19:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:23 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:55 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:50 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-28 18:50 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-28 23:37 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 07:47 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-29 08:28 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:59 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-29 23:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 16:15 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 13:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 14:57 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 16:05 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 17:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 18:55 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 19:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 21:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 06:23 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 23:22 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns -------------- Atheist --------------- <a@hotmail.com> - 2019-01-01 11:21 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-01 13:06 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-01 15:33 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-01 14:53 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns -------------- Atheist --------------- <a@hotmail.com> - 2019-01-01 17:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-01 21:25 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:34 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 05:05 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 00:18 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 16:15 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 11:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 13:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 22:02 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 17:02 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:55 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:03 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:05 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:55 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 18:54 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 19:07 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 19:54 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:25 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 12:44 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 20:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 16:25 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 09:33 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 16:56 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 10:06 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 17:13 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 10:22 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:36 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 10:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:52 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 12:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:23 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:27 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 12:30 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 11:54 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:28 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-29 00:45 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 12:18 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-29 08:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 08:37 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 17:02 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "%" <vaginalover1969@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 23:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "%" <vaginalover1969@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 11:31 -0800
Page 28 of 47 — ← Prev page 1 … 26 27 [28] 29 30 … 47 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 18:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g973coF2glbU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #244882 |
% <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2019-01-03 10:47 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >> On 1/3/2019 9:41 AM, % wrote: >>> On 2019-01-03 10:37 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>> On 1/3/2019 9:28 AM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:24 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:23 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/3/19 10:17 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:14 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:02 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:WQeWD.65693$4D2.35349@fx22.iad... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 2:22 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ensure freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> includes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clear to you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restricts the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> government from restricting your individual right >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to protect >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was not clear to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretending not to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surely I should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> abiding people's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - secured by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the amendment is not an unlimited right to just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whatever arms you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asses of all the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that cowardly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blackstone and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Story talk about the right covering arms "suitable >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> condition", and that more recent learned scholars >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like Justice >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scalia fully embrace that idea. What pisses you off >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is you think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you have some *unlimited* right to decide what is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suitable to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *your* condition, and that's just not how rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operate, and never >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> authors of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of mention >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the limits in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limits do not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the writings of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and Scalia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weapons of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mass destructions, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think it does. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What arms are those? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already given a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partial list. There are others. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in this context. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Heck, if Rudy thinks the 2nd protects WMD....why fight him >>>>>>>>>>>>> on it. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> After all, we can all see he's surrendered on the issue of >>>>>>>>>>>>> firearms by >>>>>>>>>>>>> changing the topic. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The Constitution speaks of arms, not firearms. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Firearms are arms, Snot. Don't you know anything? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Glad you figured that out. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We're wondering when you might figure it out. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> no , " we're " not , at least i'm not and i'm part of , " we " , >>>>>>>> so don't say , " we " when you mean you >>>>>>> >>>>>>> He is wondering when I will figure out what I noted >>>>>> >>>>>> We're all wondering when you're going to stop trolling. It looks >>>>>> like "never", but that's just how things appear at present. >>>>>> >>>>> no , " we " aren't >>>> >>>> Yes, we are. >>>> >>> too late i already said we're not so we aren't >> >> No, it's not too late. It's a fait accompli. >> > now you car wrap yourself in my tough shit blanket > Your typo was so problematic to Rudy he claimed to be unable to figure out your meaning. I van see why he is so confused by other text.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 10:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g96vcmF1jb2U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #244849 |
On 1/3/19 10:24 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: > On 1/3/2019 9:23 AM, Snit wrote: >> On 1/3/19 10:17 AM, % wrote: >>> On 2019-01-03 10:14 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>> On 1/3/2019 9:02 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>> Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: >>>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:WQeWD.65693$4D2.35349@fx22.iad... >>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 2:22 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which includes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not clear to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which restricts >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> government from restricting your individual right to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protect >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not clear to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's pretending >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then surely >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> secured by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the amendment is not an unlimited right to just whatever >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arms you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the asses >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of all the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cowardly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blackstone and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Story talk about the right covering arms "suitable to their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> condition", and that more recent learned scholars like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Justice >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scalia fully embrace that idea. What pisses you off is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you have some *unlimited* right to decide what is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suitable to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *your* condition, and that's just not how rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operate, and never >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any amendment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> authors of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of mention of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the limits in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limits do not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> writings of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and Scalia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weapons of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mass destructions, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> does. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What arms are those? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have >>>>>>>>>>>> already given a >>>>>>>>>>>> partial list. There are others. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that >>>>>>>>>>> I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and >>>>>>>>>>> bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of >>>>>>>>> mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that >>>>>>>>> I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. >>>>>>>>> I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" >>>>>>>>> in this context. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Heck, if Rudy thinks the 2nd protects WMD....why fight him on it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> After all, we can all see he's surrendered on the issue of >>>>>>>> firearms by >>>>>>>> changing the topic. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The Constitution speaks of arms, not firearms. >>>>>> >>>>>> Firearms are arms, Snot. Don't you know anything? >>>>> >>>>> Glad you figured that out. >>>> >>>> We're wondering when you might figure it out. >>>> >>> no , " we're " not , at least i'm not and i'm part of , " we " , >>> so don't say , " we " when you mean you >> >> He is wondering when I will figure out what I noted > > We're all wondering when you're going to stop trolling. It looks like > "never", but that's just how things appear at present. > Meta-debate accusations show you wish to leave any reasonable topic behind. You are insecure about your views. Fair enough. Meanwhile I am happy to talk about the Constitution... specifically the second amendment. It starts with setting the context, though many who push for rights and ignore responsibilities pretend otherwise. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 09:38 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <jMrXD.287697$vH3.277783@fx36.iad> |
| In reply to | #244865 |
On 1/3/2019 9:34 AM, Snit wrote: > On 1/3/19 10:24 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >> On 1/3/2019 9:23 AM, Snit wrote: >>> On 1/3/19 10:17 AM, % wrote: >>>> On 2019-01-03 10:14 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:02 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:WQeWD.65693$4D2.35349@fx22.iad... >>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 2:22 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which includes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not clear to you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which restricts the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> government from restricting your individual right to keep >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protect >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clear to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's pretending >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then surely I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> secured by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the amendment is not an unlimited right to just whatever >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arms you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the asses >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of all the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cowardly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars like Blackstone >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Story talk about the right covering arms "suitable to their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> condition", and that more recent learned scholars like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Justice >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scalia fully embrace that idea. What pisses you off is you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you have some *unlimited* right to decide what is suitable to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *your* condition, and that's just not how rights operate, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and never >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and bear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arms is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any amendment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> authors of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of mention of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limits in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limits do not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> writings of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and Scalia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weapons of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mass destructions, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What arms are those? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have already >>>>>>>>>>>>> given a >>>>>>>>>>>>> partial list. There are others. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that >>>>>>>>>>>> I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of >>>>>>>>>> mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that >>>>>>>>>> I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. >>>>>>>>>> I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" >>>>>>>>>> in this context. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Heck, if Rudy thinks the 2nd protects WMD....why fight him on it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> After all, we can all see he's surrendered on the issue of >>>>>>>>> firearms by >>>>>>>>> changing the topic. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The Constitution speaks of arms, not firearms. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Firearms are arms, Snot. Don't you know anything? >>>>>> >>>>>> Glad you figured that out. >>>>> >>>>> We're wondering when you might figure it out. >>>>> >>>> no , " we're " not , at least i'm not and i'm part of , " we " , >>>> so don't say , " we " when you mean you >>> >>> He is wondering when I will figure out what I noted >> >> We're all wondering when you're going to stop trolling. It looks like >> "never", but that's just how things appear at present. >> > > Meta-debate accusations Just stop trolling. -- Snot's '.sig' is wrong, sophomoric and indicative of his bloated ego. Snot fancies himself the Great Tribune of Usenet, who is going to tell all the rest of us What It All Means. Well...no. Just no.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 10:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g96utsF1ds5U6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #244834 |
On 1/3/19 10:14 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: > On 1/3/2019 9:02 AM, Snit wrote: >> Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: >>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:WQeWD.65693$4D2.35349@fx22.iad... >>>>>> On 12/30/2018 2:22 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which includes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not clear to you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which restricts the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> government from restricting your individual right to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> protect >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was not >>>>>>>>>>>>>> clear to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's pretending not to >>>>>>>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then surely I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>>>>>>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding people's >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - >>>>>>>>>>>>> secured by >>>>>>>>>>>>> the amendment is not an unlimited right to just whatever >>>>>>>>>>>>> arms you >>>>>>>>>>>>> wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the asses of >>>>>>>>>>>>> all the >>>>>>>>>>>>> other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and that >>>>>>>>>>>>> cowardly >>>>>>>>>>>>> fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars like Blackstone and >>>>>>>>>>>>> Story talk about the right covering arms "suitable to their >>>>>>>>>>>>> condition", and that more recent learned scholars like Justice >>>>>>>>>>>>> Scalia fully embrace that idea. What pisses you off is you >>>>>>>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>>>>>> you have some *unlimited* right to decide what is suitable to >>>>>>>>>>>>> *your* condition, and that's just not how rights operate, >>>>>>>>>>>>> and never >>>>>>>>>>>>> was. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and bear >>>>>>>>>>>>> arms is >>>>>>>>>>>>> not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any amendment >>>>>>>>>>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by the >>>>>>>>>>>>> authors of the >>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of mention of the >>>>>>>>>>>>> limits in >>>>>>>>>>>>> the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those limits >>>>>>>>>>>>> do not >>>>>>>>>>>>> exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of the >>>>>>>>>>>>> writings of >>>>>>>>>>>>> learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and Scalia >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to >>>>>>>>>>>> weapons of >>>>>>>>>>>> mass destructions, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think it does. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What arms are those? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have already >>>>>>>>> given a >>>>>>>>> partial list. There are others. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that >>>>>>>> I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and >>>>>>>> bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. >>>>>> >>>>>> No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of >>>>>> mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that >>>>>> I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. >>>>>> I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" >>>>>> in this context. >>>>> >>>>> Heck, if Rudy thinks the 2nd protects WMD....why fight him on it. >>>>> >>>>> After all, we can all see he's surrendered on the issue of firearms by >>>>> changing the topic. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> The Constitution speaks of arms, not firearms. >>> >>> Firearms are arms, Snot. Don't you know anything? >> >> Glad you figured that out. > > We're wondering when you might figure it out. > How many people are you, and why do you all wonder when things that already exist will come into existence? Seems like a waste of time to me. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 09:26 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ABrXD.408629$_35.276649@fx46.iad> |
| In reply to | #244856 |
On 1/3/2019 9:26 AM, Snit wrote: > On 1/3/19 10:14 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >> On 1/3/2019 9:02 AM, Snit wrote: >>> Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: >>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:WQeWD.65693$4D2.35349@fx22.iad... >>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 2:22 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which includes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not clear to you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which restricts the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> government from restricting your individual right to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right to protect >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clear to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's pretending not to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then surely I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms I want, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding people's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - secured by >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the amendment is not an unlimited right to just whatever arms >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the asses of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> all the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and that cowardly >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars like Blackstone and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Story talk about the right covering arms "suitable to their >>>>>>>>>>>>>> condition", and that more recent learned scholars like Justice >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scalia fully embrace that idea. What pisses you off is you think >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you have some *unlimited* right to decide what is suitable to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *your* condition, and that's just not how rights operate, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> never >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and bear >>>>>>>>>>>>>> arms is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any amendment >>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by the authors >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of mention of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> limits in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those limits >>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not >>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> writings of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and Scalia >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to weapons of >>>>>>>>>>>>> mass destructions, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think it does. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What arms are those? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have already >>>>>>>>>> given a >>>>>>>>>> partial list. There are others. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that >>>>>>>>> I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and >>>>>>>>> bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of >>>>>>> mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that >>>>>>> I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. >>>>>>> I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" >>>>>>> in this context. >>>>>> >>>>>> Heck, if Rudy thinks the 2nd protects WMD....why fight him on it. >>>>>> >>>>>> After all, we can all see he's surrendered on the issue of firearms by >>>>>> changing the topic. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The Constitution speaks of arms, not firearms. >>>> >>>> Firearms are arms, Snot. Don't you know anything? >>> >>> Glad you figured that out. >> >> We're wondering when you might figure it out. >> > How many people are you Several. -- Snot's '.sig' is wrong, sophomoric and indicative of his bloated ego. Snot fancies himself the Great Tribune of Usenet, who is going to tell all the rest of us What It All Means. Well...no. Just no.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 10:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bsi6bc.g3f.17.18@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #244859 |
On 2019-01-03 10:26 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: > On 1/3/2019 9:26 AM, Snit wrote: >> On 1/3/19 10:14 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>> On 1/3/2019 9:02 AM, Snit wrote: >>>> Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: >>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:WQeWD.65693$4D2.35349@fx22.iad... >>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 2:22 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which includes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not clear to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which restricts the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> government from restricting your individual right to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protect >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clear to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's pretending >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then surely >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> secured by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the amendment is not an unlimited right to just whatever >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arms you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the asses >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of all the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cowardly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blackstone and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Story talk about the right covering arms "suitable to their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> condition", and that more recent learned scholars like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Justice >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scalia fully embrace that idea. What pisses you off is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you have some *unlimited* right to decide what is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suitable to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *your* condition, and that's just not how rights operate, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and never >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and bear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arms is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any amendment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> authors of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of mention of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limits in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limits do not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> writings of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and Scalia >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> weapons of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> mass destructions, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think it >>>>>>>>>>>>> does. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What arms are those? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have already >>>>>>>>>>> given a >>>>>>>>>>> partial list. There are others. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that >>>>>>>>>> I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and >>>>>>>>>> bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of >>>>>>>> mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that >>>>>>>> I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. >>>>>>>> I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" >>>>>>>> in this context. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Heck, if Rudy thinks the 2nd protects WMD....why fight him on it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> After all, we can all see he's surrendered on the issue of >>>>>>> firearms by >>>>>>> changing the topic. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The Constitution speaks of arms, not firearms. >>>>> >>>>> Firearms are arms, Snot. Don't you know anything? >>>> >>>> Glad you figured that out. >>> >>> We're wondering when you might figure it out. >>> >> How many people are you > > Several. > i believe you think that
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 09:37 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vLrXD.287696$vH3.74558@fx36.iad> |
| In reply to | #244863 |
On 1/3/2019 9:29 AM, % wrote: > On 2019-01-03 10:26 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >> On 1/3/2019 9:26 AM, Snit wrote: >>> On 1/3/19 10:14 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>> On 1/3/2019 9:02 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>> Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: >>>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:WQeWD.65693$4D2.35349@fx22.iad... >>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 2:22 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which includes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not clear to you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which restricts the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> government from restricting your individual right to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protect >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clear to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's pretending not to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then surely I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding people's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> secured by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the amendment is not an unlimited right to just whatever >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arms you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the asses of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cowardly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars like Blackstone and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Story talk about the right covering arms "suitable to their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> condition", and that more recent learned scholars like Justice >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scalia fully embrace that idea. What pisses you off is you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you have some *unlimited* right to decide what is suitable to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *your* condition, and that's just not how rights operate, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and never >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and bear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arms is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any amendment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> authors of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of mention of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limits in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those limits >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> writings of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and Scalia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weapons of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mass destructions, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think it does. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What arms are those? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have already >>>>>>>>>>>> given a >>>>>>>>>>>> partial list. There are others. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that >>>>>>>>>>> I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and >>>>>>>>>>> bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of >>>>>>>>> mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that >>>>>>>>> I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. >>>>>>>>> I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" >>>>>>>>> in this context. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Heck, if Rudy thinks the 2nd protects WMD....why fight him on it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> After all, we can all see he's surrendered on the issue of firearms by >>>>>>>> changing the topic. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The Constitution speaks of arms, not firearms. >>>>>> >>>>>> Firearms are arms, Snot. Don't you know anything? >>>>> >>>>> Glad you figured that out. >>>> >>>> We're wondering when you might figure it out. >>>> >>> How many people are you >> >> Several. >> > i believe you think that It's a fact. -- Snot's '.sig' is wrong, sophomoric and indicative of his bloated ego. Snot fancies himself the Great Tribune of Usenet, who is going to tell all the rest of us What It All Means. Well...no. Just no.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 10:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bsi710.g3f.17.26@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #244870 |
On 2019-01-03 10:37 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: > On 1/3/2019 9:29 AM, % wrote: >> On 2019-01-03 10:26 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>> On 1/3/2019 9:26 AM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 1/3/19 10:14 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:02 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:WQeWD.65693$4D2.35349@fx22.iad... >>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 2:22 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> includes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not clear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restricts the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> government from restricting your individual right to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protect >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not clear to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's pretending >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surely I should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> secured by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the amendment is not an unlimited right to just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whatever arms you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asses of all the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cowardly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blackstone and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Story talk about the right covering arms "suitable to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> condition", and that more recent learned scholars like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Justice >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scalia fully embrace that idea. What pisses you off is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you have some *unlimited* right to decide what is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suitable to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *your* condition, and that's just not how rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operate, and never >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> authors of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of mention of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the limits in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limits do not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> writings of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and Scalia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weapons of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mass destructions, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it does. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What arms are those? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have >>>>>>>>>>>>> already given a >>>>>>>>>>>>> partial list. There are others. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that >>>>>>>>>>>> I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of >>>>>>>>>> mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that >>>>>>>>>> I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. >>>>>>>>>> I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" >>>>>>>>>> in this context. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Heck, if Rudy thinks the 2nd protects WMD....why fight him on it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> After all, we can all see he's surrendered on the issue of >>>>>>>>> firearms by >>>>>>>>> changing the topic. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The Constitution speaks of arms, not firearms. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Firearms are arms, Snot. Don't you know anything? >>>>>> >>>>>> Glad you figured that out. >>>>> >>>>> We're wondering when you might figure it out. >>>>> >>>> How many people are you >>> >>> Several. >>> >> i believe you think that > > It's a fact. > i believe you think that
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 09:47 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <UUrXD.347739$2A7.134580@fx48.iad> |
| In reply to | #244875 |
On 1/3/2019 9:41 AM, % wrote: > On 2019-01-03 10:37 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >> On 1/3/2019 9:29 AM, % wrote: >>> On 2019-01-03 10:26 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>> On 1/3/2019 9:26 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 1/3/19 10:14 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:02 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:WQeWD.65693$4D2.35349@fx22.iad... >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 2:22 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which includes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not clear to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which restricts the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> government from restricting your individual right to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protect >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clear to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's pretending >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then surely >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> secured by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the amendment is not an unlimited right to just whatever >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arms you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the asses >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of all the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cowardly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blackstone and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Story talk about the right covering arms "suitable to their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> condition", and that more recent learned scholars like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Justice >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scalia fully embrace that idea. What pisses you off is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you have some *unlimited* right to decide what is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suitable to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *your* condition, and that's just not how rights operate, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and never >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and bear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arms is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any amendment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> authors of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of mention of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limits in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limits do not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> writings of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and Scalia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weapons of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mass destructions, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What arms are those? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have already >>>>>>>>>>>>>> given a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> partial list. There are others. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of >>>>>>>>>>> mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that >>>>>>>>>>> I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. >>>>>>>>>>> I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" >>>>>>>>>>> in this context. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Heck, if Rudy thinks the 2nd protects WMD....why fight him on it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> After all, we can all see he's surrendered on the issue of >>>>>>>>>> firearms by >>>>>>>>>> changing the topic. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The Constitution speaks of arms, not firearms. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Firearms are arms, Snot. Don't you know anything? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Glad you figured that out. >>>>>> >>>>>> We're wondering when you might figure it out. >>>>>> >>>>> How many people are you >>>> >>>> Several. >>>> >>> i believe you think that >> >> It's a fact. >> > i believe you think that I believe it because it is so. -- Snot's '.sig' is wrong, sophomoric and indicative of his bloated ego. Snot fancies himself the Great Tribune of Usenet, who is going to tell all the rest of us What It All Means. Well...no. Just no.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 10:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bsi80b.ute.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #244877 |
On 2019-01-03 10:47 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: > On 1/3/2019 9:41 AM, % wrote: >> On 2019-01-03 10:37 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>> On 1/3/2019 9:29 AM, % wrote: >>>> On 2019-01-03 10:26 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:26 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 1/3/19 10:14 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:02 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:WQeWD.65693$4D2.35349@fx22.iad... >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 2:22 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> includes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not clear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restricts the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> government from restricting your individual right to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to protect >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not clear to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretending not to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surely I should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> secured by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the amendment is not an unlimited right to just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whatever arms you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asses of all the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that cowardly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blackstone and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Story talk about the right covering arms "suitable to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> condition", and that more recent learned scholars >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like Justice >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scalia fully embrace that idea. What pisses you off >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is you think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you have some *unlimited* right to decide what is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suitable to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *your* condition, and that's just not how rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operate, and never >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> authors of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of mention of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the limits in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limits do not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> writings of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and Scalia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weapons of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mass destructions, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it does. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What arms are those? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already given a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partial list. There are others. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of >>>>>>>>>>>> mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that >>>>>>>>>>>> I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. >>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" >>>>>>>>>>>> in this context. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Heck, if Rudy thinks the 2nd protects WMD....why fight him on >>>>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> After all, we can all see he's surrendered on the issue of >>>>>>>>>>> firearms by >>>>>>>>>>> changing the topic. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The Constitution speaks of arms, not firearms. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Firearms are arms, Snot. Don't you know anything? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Glad you figured that out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We're wondering when you might figure it out. >>>>>>> >>>>>> How many people are you >>>>> >>>>> Several. >>>>> >>>> i believe you think that >>> >>> It's a fact. >>> >> i believe you think that > > I believe it because it is so. > maybe for you
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 09:58 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <53sXD.194492$IR7.116914@fx40.iad> |
| In reply to | #244880 |
On 1/3/2019 9:57 AM, % wrote: > On 2019-01-03 10:47 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >> On 1/3/2019 9:41 AM, % wrote: >>> On 2019-01-03 10:37 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>> On 1/3/2019 9:29 AM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:26 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:26 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/3/19 10:14 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:02 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:WQeWD.65693$4D2.35349@fx22.iad... >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 2:22 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> includes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not clear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restricts the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> government from restricting your individual right to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protect >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not clear to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's pretending >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surely I should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> secured by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the amendment is not an unlimited right to just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whatever arms you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asses of all the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cowardly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blackstone and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Story talk about the right covering arms "suitable to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> condition", and that more recent learned scholars like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Justice >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scalia fully embrace that idea. What pisses you off is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you have some *unlimited* right to decide what is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suitable to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *your* condition, and that's just not how rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operate, and never >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> authors of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of mention of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the limits in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limits do not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> writings of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and Scalia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weapons of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mass destructions, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it does. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What arms are those? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already given a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partial list. There are others. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of >>>>>>>>>>>>> mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. >>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" >>>>>>>>>>>>> in this context. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Heck, if Rudy thinks the 2nd protects WMD....why fight him on it. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> After all, we can all see he's surrendered on the issue of >>>>>>>>>>>> firearms by >>>>>>>>>>>> changing the topic. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The Constitution speaks of arms, not firearms. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Firearms are arms, Snot. Don't you know anything? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Glad you figured that out. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We're wondering when you might figure it out. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> How many people are you >>>>>> >>>>>> Several. >>>>>> >>>>> i believe you think that >>>> >>>> It's a fact. >>>> >>> i believe you think that >> >> I believe it because it is so. >> > maybe for you Universally. -- Snot's '.sig' is wrong, sophomoric and indicative of his bloated ego. Snot fancies himself the Great Tribune of Usenet, who is going to tell all the rest of us What It All Means. Well...no. Just no.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 11:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bsi86r.ute.19.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #244881 |
On 2019-01-03 10:58 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: > On 1/3/2019 9:57 AM, % wrote: >> On 2019-01-03 10:47 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>> On 1/3/2019 9:41 AM, % wrote: >>>> On 2019-01-03 10:37 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:29 AM, % wrote: >>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:26 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:26 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 1/3/19 10:14 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:02 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:WQeWD.65693$4D2.35349@fx22.iad... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 2:22 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ensure freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> includes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clear to you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restricts the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> government from restricting your individual right >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right to protect >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was not clear to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretending not to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surely I should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be able to have nukes and ricin and any other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arms I want, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> abiding people's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - secured by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the amendment is not an unlimited right to just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whatever arms you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asses of all the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that cowardly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blackstone and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Story talk about the right covering arms "suitable >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> condition", and that more recent learned scholars >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like Justice >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scalia fully embrace that idea. What pisses you off >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is you think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you have some *unlimited* right to decide what is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suitable to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *your* condition, and that's just not how rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operate, and never >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and bear arms is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the authors of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of mention >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the limits in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those limits do not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the writings of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and Scalia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to weapons of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mass destructions, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think it does. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What arms are those? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already given a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partial list. There are others. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in this context. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Heck, if Rudy thinks the 2nd protects WMD....why fight him >>>>>>>>>>>>> on it. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> After all, we can all see he's surrendered on the issue of >>>>>>>>>>>>> firearms by >>>>>>>>>>>>> changing the topic. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The Constitution speaks of arms, not firearms. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Firearms are arms, Snot. Don't you know anything? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Glad you figured that out. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We're wondering when you might figure it out. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How many people are you >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Several. >>>>>>> >>>>>> i believe you think that >>>>> >>>>> It's a fact. >>>>> >>>> i believe you think that >>> >>> I believe it because it is so. >>> >> maybe for you > > Universally. > ok show me two people that agree with you
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 10:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <1asXD.178505$lx7.170224@fx44.iad> |
| In reply to | #244883 |
On 1/3/2019 10:01 AM, % wrote: > On 2019-01-03 10:58 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >> On 1/3/2019 9:57 AM, % wrote: >>> On 2019-01-03 10:47 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>> On 1/3/2019 9:41 AM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:37 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:29 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:26 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:26 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 1/3/19 10:14 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:02 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:WQeWD.65693$4D2.35349@fx22.iad... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 2:22 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> includes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not clear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restricts the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> government from restricting your individual right to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to protect >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not clear to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretending not to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surely I should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> secured by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the amendment is not an unlimited right to just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whatever arms you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asses of all the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that cowardly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blackstone and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Story talk about the right covering arms "suitable to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> condition", and that more recent learned scholars >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like Justice >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scalia fully embrace that idea. What pisses you off >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is you think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you have some *unlimited* right to decide what is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suitable to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *your* condition, and that's just not how rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operate, and never >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> authors of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of mention of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the limits in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limits do not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> writings of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and Scalia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weapons of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mass destructions, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it does. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What arms are those? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already given a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partial list. There are others. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in this context. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Heck, if Rudy thinks the 2nd protects WMD....why fight him on >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> After all, we can all see he's surrendered on the issue of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> firearms by >>>>>>>>>>>>>> changing the topic. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The Constitution speaks of arms, not firearms. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Firearms are arms, Snot. Don't you know anything? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Glad you figured that out. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We're wondering when you might figure it out. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> How many people are you >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Several. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> i believe you think that >>>>>> >>>>>> It's a fact. >>>>>> >>>>> i believe you think that >>>> >>>> I believe it because it is so. >>>> >>> maybe for you >> >> Universally. >> > ok Okay. -- Snot's '.sig' is wrong, sophomoric and indicative of his bloated ego. Snot fancies himself the Great Tribune of Usenet, who is going to tell all the rest of us What It All Means. Well...no. Just no.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 11:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bsi8ro.alu.19.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #244885 |
On 2019-01-03 11:05 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: > On 1/3/2019 10:01 AM, % wrote: >> On 2019-01-03 10:58 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>> On 1/3/2019 9:57 AM, % wrote: >>>> On 2019-01-03 10:47 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:41 AM, % wrote: >>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:37 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:29 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:26 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:26 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/19 10:14 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:02 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:WQeWD.65693$4D2.35349@fx22.iad... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 2:22 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ensure freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> includes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clear to you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restricts the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> government from restricting your individual >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right to protect >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was not clear to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretending not to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surely I should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be able to have nukes and ricin and any other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arms I want, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be used >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> abiding people's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right - secured by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the amendment is not an unlimited right to just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whatever arms you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the asses of all the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that cowardly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blackstone and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Story talk about the right covering arms >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "suitable to their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> condition", and that more recent learned scholars >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like Justice >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scalia fully embrace that idea. What pisses you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> off is you think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you have some *unlimited* right to decide what is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suitable to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *your* condition, and that's just not how rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operate, and never >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and bear arms is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the authors of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mention of the limits in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those limits do not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the writings of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scalia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to weapons of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mass destructions, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think it does. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What arms are those? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already given a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partial list. There are others. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think are covered by "the right of the people to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> covered. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (weapons of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in this context. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Heck, if Rudy thinks the 2nd protects WMD....why fight >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him on it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After all, we can all see he's surrendered on the issue >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of firearms by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changing the topic. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Constitution speaks of arms, not firearms. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Firearms are arms, Snot. Don't you know anything? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Glad you figured that out. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We're wondering when you might figure it out. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> How many people are you >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Several. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> i believe you think that >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's a fact. >>>>>>> >>>>>> i believe you think that >>>>> >>>>> I believe it because it is so. >>>>> >>>> maybe for you >>> >>> Universally. >>> >> ok > > Okay. > i believe you think its ok
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 10:15 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <OisXD.195132$IR7.101409@fx40.iad> |
| In reply to | #244886 |
On 1/3/2019 10:12 AM, % wrote: > On 2019-01-03 11:05 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >> On 1/3/2019 10:01 AM, % wrote: >>> On 2019-01-03 10:58 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>> On 1/3/2019 9:57 AM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:47 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:41 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:37 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:29 AM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2019-01-03 10:26 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:26 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/19 10:14 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 9:02 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:WQeWD.65693$4D2.35349@fx22.iad... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 2:22 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ensure freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> includes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clear to you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restricts the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> government from restricting your individual right >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right to protect >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was not clear to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretending not to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surely I should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be able to have nukes and ricin and any other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arms I want, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> abiding people's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - secured by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the amendment is not an unlimited right to just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whatever arms you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asses of all the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that cowardly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blackstone and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Story talk about the right covering arms "suitable >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> condition", and that more recent learned scholars >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like Justice >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scalia fully embrace that idea. What pisses you off >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is you think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you have some *unlimited* right to decide what is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suitable to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *your* condition, and that's just not how rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operate, and never >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and bear arms is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the authors of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of mention >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the limits in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those limits do not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the writings of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and Scalia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to weapons of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mass destructions, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think it does. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What arms are those? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already given a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partial list. There are others. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in this context. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Heck, if Rudy thinks the 2nd protects WMD....why fight him >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After all, we can all see he's surrendered on the issue of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> firearms by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changing the topic. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Constitution speaks of arms, not firearms. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Firearms are arms, Snot. Don't you know anything? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Glad you figured that out. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We're wondering when you might figure it out. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> How many people are you >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Several. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> i believe you think that >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's a fact. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> i believe you think that >>>>>> >>>>>> I believe it because it is so. >>>>>> >>>>> maybe for you >>>> >>>> Universally. >>>> >>> ok >> >> Okay. >> > i believe you You should. -- Snot's '.sig' is wrong, sophomoric and indicative of his bloated ego. Snot fancies himself the Great Tribune of Usenet, who is going to tell all the rest of us What It All Means. Well...no. Just no.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 10:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bsi579.g3f.17.4@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #244812 |
On 2019-01-03 9:58 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: > On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>> news:WQeWD.65693$4D2.35349@fx22.iad... >>>> On 12/30/2018 2:22 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context different >>>>>>>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which includes the >>>>>>>>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not clear to you. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which restricts the >>>>>>>>>>>> government from restricting your individual right to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right to protect >>>>>>>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was not >>>>>>>>>>>> clear to >>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's pretending not to >>>>>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then surely I >>>>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>>> be able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms I want, >>>>>>>>>>>>> right? >>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>>>>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding people's >>>>>>>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - secured by >>>>>>>>>>> the amendment is not an unlimited right to just whatever arms >>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>> wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the asses of >>>>>>>>>>> all the >>>>>>>>>>> other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and that cowardly >>>>>>>>>>> fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars like Blackstone and >>>>>>>>>>> Story talk about the right covering arms "suitable to their >>>>>>>>>>> condition", and that more recent learned scholars like Justice >>>>>>>>>>> Scalia fully embrace that idea. What pisses you off is you think >>>>>>>>>>> you have some *unlimited* right to decide what is suitable to >>>>>>>>>>> *your* condition, and that's just not how rights operate, and >>>>>>>>>>> never >>>>>>>>>>> was. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and bear >>>>>>>>>>> arms is >>>>>>>>>>> not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any amendment >>>>>>>>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by the authors >>>>>>>>>>> of the >>>>>>>>>>> amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of mention of the >>>>>>>>>>> limits in >>>>>>>>>>> the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those limits >>>>>>>>>>> do not >>>>>>>>>>> exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of the >>>>>>>>>>> writings of >>>>>>>>>>> learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and Scalia >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to weapons of >>>>>>>>>> mass destructions, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think it does. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What arms are those? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have already >>>>>>> given a >>>>>>> partial list. There are others. >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that >>>>>> I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and >>>>>> bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. >>>>> >>>>> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. >>>> >>>> No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of >>>> mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that >>>> I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. >>>> I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" >>>> in this context. >>> >>> Heck, if Rudy thinks the 2nd protects WMD....why fight him on it. >>> >>> After all, we can all see he's surrendered on the issue of firearms by >>> changing the topic. >>> >>> >>> >> >> The Constitution speaks of arms, not firearms. > > Firearms are arms, Snot. Don't you know anything? > so when you hold your lover in your arms , you're actually wrapping them in your guns
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 09:23 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <fyrXD.408588$_35.384224@fx46.iad> |
| In reply to | #244824 |
On 1/3/2019 9:10 AM, % wrote: > On 2019-01-03 9:58 a.m., Rudy Canoza wrote: >> On 1/3/2019 8:45 AM, Snit wrote: >>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>> news:WQeWD.65693$4D2.35349@fx22.iad... >>>>> On 12/30/2018 2:22 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which includes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not clear to you. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which restricts the >>>>>>>>>>>>> government from restricting your individual right to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right to protect >>>>>>>>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was not clear to >>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's pretending not to >>>>>>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then surely I should >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms I want, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>>>>>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding people's >>>>>>>>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - secured by >>>>>>>>>>>> the amendment is not an unlimited right to just whatever arms you >>>>>>>>>>>> wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the asses of all >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and that cowardly >>>>>>>>>>>> fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars like Blackstone and >>>>>>>>>>>> Story talk about the right covering arms "suitable to their >>>>>>>>>>>> condition", and that more recent learned scholars like Justice >>>>>>>>>>>> Scalia fully embrace that idea. What pisses you off is you think >>>>>>>>>>>> you have some *unlimited* right to decide what is suitable to >>>>>>>>>>>> *your* condition, and that's just not how rights operate, and >>>>>>>>>>>> never >>>>>>>>>>>> was. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and bear arms is >>>>>>>>>>>> not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any amendment >>>>>>>>>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by the authors of >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of mention of the >>>>>>>>>>>> limits in >>>>>>>>>>>> the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those limits do not >>>>>>>>>>>> exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of the writings of >>>>>>>>>>>> learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and Scalia >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to weapons of >>>>>>>>>>> mass destructions, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think it does. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What arms are those? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have already given a >>>>>>>> partial list. There are others. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that >>>>>>> I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and >>>>>>> bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. >>>>>> >>>>>> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. >>>>> >>>>> No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of >>>>> mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that >>>>> I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. >>>>> I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" >>>>> in this context. >>>> >>>> Heck, if Rudy thinks the 2nd protects WMD....why fight him on it. >>>> >>>> After all, we can all see he's surrendered on the issue of firearms by >>>> changing the topic. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> The Constitution speaks of arms, not firearms. >> >> Firearms are arms, Snot. Don't you know anything? >> > so when you hold your lover in your arms , > you're actually wrapping them in your guns You specialize in willful stupidity, don't you? -- Snot's '.sig' is wrong, sophomoric and indicative of his bloated ego. Snot fancies himself the Great Tribune of Usenet, who is going to tell all the rest of us What It All Means. Well...no. Just no.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 11:44 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <3hps2e9toc07rnf2u662jirtui4upqoqti@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #244802 |
On 3 Jan 2019 16:45:09 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >The Constitution speaks of arms, not firearms. It speaks of firearms.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 13:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <03uXD.193324$e%3.63141@fx42.iad> |
| In reply to | #244928 |
On 1/3/2019 12:44 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: > On 3 Jan 2019 16:45:09 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> The Constitution speaks of arms, not firearms. > > It speaks of firearms. Not as such, only as a subset of arms. Arms includes knives, crossbows and pointy sticks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 13:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g97acsF4185U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #244959 |
On 1/3/19 1:14 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 1/3/2019 12:44 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >> On 3 Jan 2019 16:45:09 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> The Constitution speaks of arms, not firearms. >> >> It speaks of firearms. > > Not as such, only as a subset of arms. Arms includes knives, > crossbows and pointy sticks. But only bear arms are mentioned. They tend to be hairy. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 28 of 47 — ← Prev page 1 … 26 27 [28] 29 30 … 47 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web