Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.checkmate > #242896 > unrolled thread

Major health study shows benefits of combatting climate change

Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate

Contents

  Major health study shows benefits of combatting climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-29 12:49 -0500
    Re: Major health study shows benefits of combatting climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 10:56 -0700
    Re: Major health study shows benefits of combatting climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:56 -0700
    Re: Major health study shows benefits of combatting climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-29 13:02 -0500
      Re: Major health study shows benefits of combatting climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-29 13:04 -0500
        Re: Major health study shows benefits of combatting climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-29 13:08 -0500
          Re: Major health study shows benefits of combatting climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-29 13:12 -0500
            Re: Major health study shows benefits of combatting climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-29 13:19 -0500
              Re: Major health study shows benefits of combatting climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-31 06:01 -0500
            Re: Major health study shows benefits of combatting climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:59 -0500
              Re: Major health study shows benefits of combatting climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-30 09:46 -0500
          Re: Major health study shows benefits of combatting climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-29 13:57 -0500
    Kensi's "Major health study" is just "The Lancet Countdown". Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-29 10:15 -0800
      Re: Kensi's "Major health study" is just "The Lancet Countdown". Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-29 12:21 -0600
        Re: Kensi's "Major health study" is just "The Lancet Countdown". "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-29 13:27 -0500
    Re: Major health study shows benefits of combatting climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 12:31 -0700
      Re: Major health study shows benefits of combatting climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-31 06:02 -0500
        Re: Major health study shows benefits of combatting climate change Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-31 13:33 -0500
          Re: Major health study shows benefits of combatting climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 18:41 +0000
            Re: Major health study shows benefits of combatting climate change Lamey <teandson@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 11:20 -0800
              Re: Major health study shows benefits of combatting climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-31 14:50 -0500

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#242896 — Major health study shows benefits of combatting climate change

Recent reports conclude that health gains from meeting climate change 
commitments would more than make up for the financial costs to achieve 
those goals:

https://davidsuzuki.org/story/major-health-study-shows-benefits-of-combatting-climate-change/

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#242911

On 2018-12-29 10:49 a.m., kensi wrote:
> Recent reports conclude that health gains from meeting climate change 
> commitments would more than make up for the financial costs to achieve 
> those goals:
> 
> https://davidsuzuki.org/story/major-health-study-shows-benefits-of-combatting-climate-change/ 
> 
> 
suzuki lies , he's canadian

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#242912

On 12/29/18 10:49 AM, kensi wrote:
> Recent reports conclude that health gains from meeting climate change 
> commitments would more than make up for the financial costs to achieve 
> those goals:
> 
> https://davidsuzuki.org/story/major-health-study-shows-benefits-of-combatting-climate-change/ 
> 
> 

Right now we already have a 1% tax on our economy... and that is only 
going to grow.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#242921

On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 12:49:57 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:

>Recent reports conclude that health gains from meeting climate change 
>commitments would more than make up for the financial costs to achieve 
>those goals:
>
>https://davidsuzuki.org/story/major-health-study-shows-benefits-of-combatting-climate-change/

Just how much does George Soros pay you to
plague Usenet with your warmballer Newspeak 
where *climate change commitments* actually
means *carbon tax* which is just a modern day
version of robbing the rich to give to the poor?

Kensi Soros Shill!

-- 

Everybody here likes Yours Truly, 
Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#242922

On 12/29/2018 1:02 PM, stinky puddles piddled:
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 12:49:57 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> Recent reports conclude that health gains from meeting climate change
>> commitments would more than make up for the financial costs to achieve
>> those goals:
>>
>> https://davidsuzuki.org/story/major-health-study-shows-benefits-of-combatting-climate-change/
> 
> Just how much does George Soros pay you

Zero.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#242924

On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 13:04:48 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>On 12/29/2018 1:02 PM, stinky puddles piddled:
>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 12:49:57 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>> Recent reports conclude that health gains from meeting climate change
>>> commitments would more than make up for the financial costs to achieve
>>> those goals:
>>>
>>> https://davidsuzuki.org/story/major-health-study-shows-benefits-of-combatting-climate-change/
>> 
>> Just how much does George Soros pay you
>
>Zero.

How much does the George Soros PAC pay you then?

-- 

Everybody here likes Yours Truly, 
Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#242929

On 12/29/2018 1:08 PM, stinky puddles piddled:
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 13:04:48 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> On 12/29/2018 1:02 PM, stinky puddles piddled:
>>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 12:49:57 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>> Recent reports conclude that health gains from meeting climate change
>>>> commitments would more than make up for the financial costs to achieve
>>>> those goals:
>>>>
>>>> https://davidsuzuki.org/story/major-health-study-shows-benefits-of-combatting-climate-change/
>>>
>>> Just how much does George Soros pay you
>>
>> Zero.
> 
> How much does the George Soros PAC pay you then?

Zero.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#242939

On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 13:12:04 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>On 12/29/2018 1:08 PM, stinky puddles piddled:
>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 13:04:48 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 12/29/2018 1:02 PM, stinky puddles piddled:
>>>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 12:49:57 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> Recent reports conclude that health gains from meeting climate change
>>>>> commitments would more than make up for the financial costs to achieve
>>>>> those goals:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://davidsuzuki.org/story/major-health-study-shows-benefits-of-combatting-climate-change/
>>>>
>>>> Just how much does George Soros pay you
>>>
>>> Zero.
>> 
>> How much does the George Soros PAC pay you then?
>
>Zero.

Well, then, who are you working so hard for spreading
your constant warmball propaganda the purpose of which
is to impose a carbon tax to redistribute wealth and 
turn the world into a socialist disaster when 9/10ths
of the population starves to death?

-- 

Everybody here likes Yours Truly, 
Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243759

On 12/29/2018 1:19 PM, stinky puddles piddled:
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 13:12:04 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> On 12/29/2018 1:08 PM, stinky puddles piddled:
>>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 13:04:48 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:02 PM, stinky puddles piddled:
>>>>> Just how much does George Soros pay you
>>>> Zero.
>>> How much does the George Soros PAC pay you then?
>> Zero.
> Well, then, who are you working so hard for spreading
> your constant warmball propaganda the purpose of which
> is to impose a carbon tax to redistribute wealth and
> turn the world into a socialist disaster when 9/10ths
> of the population starves to death?

Classic erroneous presupposition.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243299

On 12/29/2018 1:12 PM, kensi wrote:
> On 12/29/2018 1:08 PM, stinky puddles piddled:
>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 13:04:48 -0500, kensi 
>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 12/29/2018 1:02 PM, stinky puddles piddled:
>>>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 12:49:57 -0500, kensi 
>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> Recent reports conclude that health gains from meeting climate change
>>>>> commitments would more than make up for the financial costs to achieve
>>>>> those goals:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://davidsuzuki.org/story/major-health-study-shows-benefits-of-combatting-climate-change/ 
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Just how much does George Soros pay you
>>>
>>> Zero.
>>
>> How much does the George Soros PAC pay you then?
> 
> Zero.
> 
Then yhou are a fool, "kensi" because there is big bucks to be made 
promoting this climate fraud. They need more sales...um...persons.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243377

On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 21:59:21 -0500, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 12/29/2018 1:12 PM, kensi wrote:
>> On 12/29/2018 1:08 PM, stinky puddles piddled:

<...>

>>>>> Just how much does George Soros pay you
>>>>
>>>> Zero.
>>>
>>> How much does the George Soros PAC pay you then?
>> 
>> Zero.
>> 
>Then yhou are a fool, "kensi" because there is big bucks to be made 
>promoting this climate fraud. They need more sales...um...persons.

BINGO!

-- 

Everybody here likes Yours Truly, 
Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#242974

On 12/29/2018 1:08 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 13:04:48 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> On 12/29/2018 1:02 PM, stinky puddles piddled:
>>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 12:49:57 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Recent reports conclude that health gains from meeting climate change
>>>> commitments would more than make up for the financial costs to achieve
>>>> those goals:
>>>>
>>>> https://davidsuzuki.org/story/major-health-study-shows-benefits-of-combatting-climate-change/
>>>
>>> Just how much does George Soros pay you
>>
>> Zero.
> 
> How much does the George Soros PAC pay you then?

He's not running for ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE!! so he doesn't have to pay to 
get NDAs signed to stymie DEEP STATE!!! NO COLLUSION!!! WITCH HUNT!!! so 
he can be WINNER!!!.


-- 
Grizzly H.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#242932 — Kensi's "Major health study" is just "The Lancet Countdown".

Kensi's "Major health study" is just "The Lancet Countdown"
starting with her favorite conclusion and working backwards.

She needs her apocalypse cult, Kool-Aid and all.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#242941 — Re: Kensi's "Major health study" is just "The Lancet Countdown".

On 12/29/2018 12:15 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> Kensi's "Major health study" is just "The Lancet Countdown"
> starting with her favorite conclusion and working backwards.
> 
> She needs her apocalypse cult, Kool-Aid and all.
> 

    it comes from 'her' childhood, where parents provided everything for
free.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#242947 — Re: Kensi's "Major health study" is just "The Lancet Countdown".

On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 12:21:24 -0600, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:

>On 12/29/2018 12:15 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>> Kensi's "Major health study" is just "The Lancet Countdown"
>> starting with her favorite conclusion and working backwards.
>> 
>> She needs her apocalypse cult, Kool-Aid and all.
>> 
>
>    it comes from 'her' childhood, where parents provided everything for
>free.

I think you pinpointed kensi's problem. Her parents were 
liberal loons who waited on little kensi hand and foot and
gave her anything she wanted. Her parents never taught
her anything about work ethic and production. So kensi 
grew up a totally self-centered liberal who has no clue
how a capitalist economy actually works. Having no economic
foundation, kensi actually thinks socialism is a viable system
if only it could, for once, be enforced by honest dictators.

Yah, right!  Kensi hasn't clue one about real world human
nature due to having had kumbayah parents who wrecked
her forever.

-- 

Everybody here likes Yours Truly, 
Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243004

On 12/29/2018 10:49 AM, kensi wrote:
> Recent reports conclude that health gains from meeting climate change 
> commitments would more than make up for the financial costs to achieve 
> those goals:
> 
> https://davidsuzuki.org/story/major-health-study-shows-benefits-of-combatting-climate-change/ 

We would benefit from reducing pollution.  But that's not the
same as climate change, not at all.  Trying to combat climate
change is like pissing into the wind.
And the globe could use a little warming.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243760

On 12/29/2018 2:31 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
> the globe could use a little warming.

Proof, k0ok?

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243847

On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 06:02:52 -0500, kensi wrote:

>On 12/29/2018 2:31 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
>> the globe could use a little warming.
>
>Proof, k0ok?

... says kensi who may be among the most frequent users of "could."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243849

Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 06:02:52 -0500, kensi wrote:
> 
>> On 12/29/2018 2:31 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
>>> the globe could use a little warming.
>> 
>> Proof, k0ok?
> 
> ... says kensi who may be among the most frequent users of "could."
> 
> 

Bottom line is you deny science. Maybe not all but climate science and, it
seems, gender science. Likely more but you refused to answer (which is your
right). 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#243866

Gender science?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate

csiph-web