Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #242532 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ted <ted@sam.street> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-28 22:18 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-01-01 11:31 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 921 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-28 22:18 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 15:50 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The Truth - BeamMeUpScotty" <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-28 18:27 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:35 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 16:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:45 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 16:53 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:06 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 00:52 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:14 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:36 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 10:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:29 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:46 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:19 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 20:08 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 20:59 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 23:35 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 17:33 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:54 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:49 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 12:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:42 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 14:44 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:55 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 15:28 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 15:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 15:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 16:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 16:08 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 23:17 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 16:33 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 16:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 17:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:15 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 23:24 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 19:30 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:25 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:20 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:14 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:35 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:09 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:11 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The Truth - BeamMeUpScotty" <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 18:20 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:30 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 17:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:43 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 17:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 18:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:20 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 18:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:25 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:28 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 20:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:05 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 17:47 -0800
Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 18:28 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:33 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 19:46 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:56 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 20:47 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 18:44 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:32 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 19:52 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 18:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 20:44 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:04 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 16:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 20:22 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:06 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:41 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 00:57 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 10:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:23 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:25 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:25 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 11:36 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:51 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 11:02 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 12:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-03 14:36 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 12:45 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 07:17 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 13:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 13:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-04 07:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-03 09:07 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:12 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Delvin BenĂȘt <DB@cnbc.nyc> - 2019-01-04 07:33 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-04 12:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:52 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:10 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:12 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:22 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:26 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:28 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 11:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 11:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:51 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-03 14:27 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 12:28 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 11:42 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 07:17 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 07:42 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:03 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-04 09:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:40 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 15:07 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-04 15:16 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 08:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:40 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 08:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-03 14:44 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-03 14:00 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-03 17:05 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 07:17 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 12:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 12:55 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 11:57 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 13:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 13:32 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 12:39 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 13:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 15:16 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-03 13:47 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 11:57 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 13:12 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 13:22 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 13:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 13:59 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:50 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 16:04 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 15:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 14:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-04 05:49 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 13:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 12:45 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 13:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:50 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 15:20 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 14:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 16:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 15:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 16:00 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 17:20 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 16:25 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 16:25 -0800
Snit Complains To TPG Troll Board About Being Trolled- Board Takes It Under Advisement Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 16:31 -0800
Re: Snit Complains To TPG Troll Board About Being Trolled- Board Takes It Under Advisement Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-01-04 00:44 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:11 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 17:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 17:30 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 18:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:30 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 20:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 20:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 21:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:45 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:50 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:52 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:54 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-04 01:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 21:52 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:01 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-05 03:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-07 22:18 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-07 23:07 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 06:19 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 02:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 13:58 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 12:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 19:41 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 12:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 12:56 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 13:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 13:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 13:52 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 14:25 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 14:36 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 22:27 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 15:32 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 15:45 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 15:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 16:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-08 16:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-09 00:05 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 17:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 17:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner đ¶çŹ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-08 15:42 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 16:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-09 00:05 +0000
Snit Is So Dumb... [How Dumb Is He Johnny?"] Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-08 12:06 -0800
Re: Snit Is So Dumb... [How Dumb Is He Johnny?"] Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 13:16 -0700
Re: Snit Is So Dumb... [How Dumb Is He Johnny?"] Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 13:18 -0700
Re: Snit Is So Dumb... [How Dumb Is He Johnny?"] Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-08 12:23 -0800
Re: Snit Is So Dumb... [How Dumb Is He Johnny?"] Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-08 12:22 -0800
Re: đ«đ«đ«â° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°đ«đ«đ« The psychotic racist white-supremacist who sounds a lot like neal warren AKA greg hall taking a break from the stormfront discussion boards to post on usenet as "Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net>" đ«đ«đ«â° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°đ«đ«đ«â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Snit Is So Dumb... [How Dumb Is He Johnny?"] â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner đ¶çŹ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-08 14:23 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 13:32 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner đ¶çŹ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-08 14:35 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 14:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-08 04:17 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 02:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 13:59 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-08 12:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 19:41 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner đ¶çŹ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-08 14:18 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-08 13:12 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-08 04:21 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:46 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 16:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:13 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 17:14 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 18:16 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:30 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 17:38 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 17:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 17:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 18:05 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 18:26 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:50 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 17:33 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 20:53 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 21:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:36 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:49 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:53 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 21:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-04 08:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-04 01:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 21:54 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:02 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:48 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:50 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 20:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 01:11 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-04 16:22 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 18:59 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:12 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-05 10:22 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 18:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-05 10:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 19:16 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-05 11:34 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 19:56 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-05 13:40 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-05 12:05 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 13:17 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-05 12:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:17 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 20:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 21:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 21:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:48 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:05 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 21:44 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:34 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:44 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 15:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:20 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 15:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 11:03 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 12:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 12:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:51 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 11:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 12:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 13:13 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 12:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 13:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:39 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:19 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 07:35 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:14 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 07:33 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:04 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-04 08:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:40 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 08:42 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 18:03 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-04 12:02 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-04 11:59 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 08:17 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:40 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 08:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-04 09:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-03 11:17 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 00:58 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:13 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 21:46 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:37 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 07:17 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-29 19:59 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 18:16 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 23:47 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:34 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 08:59 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 17:05 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:15 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:25 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:26 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 10:30 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 23:35 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:03 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:50 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 18:54 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 19:07 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:08 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 22:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:00 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 13:32 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 14:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 13:21 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 19:33 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 14:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 15:03 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 23:20 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:43 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:21 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:05 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:33 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 04:57 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:12 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 20:16 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 04:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 00:56 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 04:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:23 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:36 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:50 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 20:19 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:30 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 04:53 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:48 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 19:11 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:36 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 21:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 08:29 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 23:42 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 04:54 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:29 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:54 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 12:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 14:45 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 07:50 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 12:44 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:39 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:52 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:48 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:19 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:20 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 23:43 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:19 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 11:56 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:56 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:02 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 20:04 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 12:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:02 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 01:21 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 19:12 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 04:55 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 13:06 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 15:56 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 16:09 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:38 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 09:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:04 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:19 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:17 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 11:54 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:06 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:45 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:29 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-29 20:14 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 12:22 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:03 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 08:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:07 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 12:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:22 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:27 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 12:45 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:54 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 14:33 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:44 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 15:31 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 16:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:09 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:00 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 11:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 13:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:42 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 14:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 13:22 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:06 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 19:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:07 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 20:35 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:44 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-31 00:14 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:10 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 09:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 17:02 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 17:11 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:13 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:25 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-03 15:44 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 13:56 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 20:56 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 08:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 17:02 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:14 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:17 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:23 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:28 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:37 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:47 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 11:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 10:05 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 10:17 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 19:33 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 18:42 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:38 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 10:26 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:26 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:37 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:47 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 11:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 10:05 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 11:12 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 10:15 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 10:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:23 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 11:44 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 13:14 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 13:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 13:51 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 15:26 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:44 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-03 15:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 15:45 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 16:10 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 17:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 16:24 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 21:19 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 15:54 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 15:03 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 21:37 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:39 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-05 03:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:04 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-04 15:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 21:43 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 02:31 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 19:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:53 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:04 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 20:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 22:44 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 11:29 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:15 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:17 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:02 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:56 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 01:21 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 19:11 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 20:13 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:35 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 12:13 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:31 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 15:46 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:53 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 17:46 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:35 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 17:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 18:14 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:20 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 18:59 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:09 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:11 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:16 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:25 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:25 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:32 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:36 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:41 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:53 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:55 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 18:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:59 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:13 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:21 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:33 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:37 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:42 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:07 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:13 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:15 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:19 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:22 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:25 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:30 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:38 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:07 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:14 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:26 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:32 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:42 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 20:39 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 19:48 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:06 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 20:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 21:51 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 21:05 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 22:15 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 21:27 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 22:56 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 22:06 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 23:14 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 22:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "DoD" <danskisanjar@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 00:17 -0600
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 07:53 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:16 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:02 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:27 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:54 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Annoy A Leftist And Save Humanity, Tell The Truth - BeamMeUpScotty" <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-28 21:52 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 16:56 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 17:33 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 10:36 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:53 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 11:10 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:08 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:05 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 12:44 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:55 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-28 23:40 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 16:59 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 01:21 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 19:11 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 12:44 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 05:03 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:53 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:26 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:28 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:10 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:56 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:04 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 20:49 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:38 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 05:02 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-28 20:13 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:41 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 05:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:14 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:35 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-28 16:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:46 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:38 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:40 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:19 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 11:55 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:45 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 12:25 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:47 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:57 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:12 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 17:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 11:50 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 14:39 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:59 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:03 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:50 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 11:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 13:38 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 12:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 14:04 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 13:23 -0800
Rudy is pedantic and wrong. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:16 -0700
Re: Rudy is pedantic and wrong. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:17 -0700
Re: Rudy is pedantic and wrong. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 03:41 -0800
Re: Rudy is pedantic and wrong. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 11:47 +0000
Re: Rudy is pedantic and wrong. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 03:40 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 11:43 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Snit agrees he should be banned. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:19 -0700
Re: Snit agrees he should be banned. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:16 -0700
Re: Snit agrees he should be banned. was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 03:43 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns -------------- Atheist --------------- <a@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-31 06:13 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 07:18 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 06:20 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-31 08:07 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 17:05 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-31 09:23 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 17:29 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-31 09:30 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 18:09 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-31 10:45 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 12:12 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-31 09:34 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 18:09 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-31 10:47 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 12:14 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 02:00 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:11 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 20:17 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 13:29 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-31 12:30 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2018-12-31 12:35 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 01:58 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 19:56 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800
WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-30 19:22 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 20:15 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-31 03:44 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-03 02:03 -0500
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 09:12 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 11:47 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-03 12:56 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-03 11:58 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 12:03 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 11:59 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 01:01 -0500
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-04 16:14 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-04 22:03 -0500
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Delvin BenĂȘt <DB@cnbc.nyc> - 2019-01-04 20:30 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-05 03:29 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-05 07:57 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership John Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> - 2019-01-05 10:47 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-05 12:33 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 13:49 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-05 13:59 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 15:40 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-01-05 13:39 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-05 14:14 -0800
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-05 06:07 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2019-01-05 03:43 -0500
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-07 16:31 -0700
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 12:00 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 15:01 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 11:58 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 15:01 +0000
Re: WMDs are not arms was Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-03 12:10 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-31 11:30 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 18:08 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 14:20 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 19:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:34 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:26 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:55 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 12:29 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:21 -0800
Snit's OK With Bans- Especially if They Don't Come Out And Say It. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:20 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 00:52 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 18:00 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 16:11 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 01:21 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 05:04 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 18:57 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 19:04 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 19:58 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:19 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:23 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:52 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:55 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:50 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-28 18:50 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-28 23:37 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 07:47 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-29 08:28 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:59 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-29 23:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 16:15 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 13:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 14:57 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 16:05 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 17:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 18:55 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 19:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 21:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-31 06:23 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 23:22 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns -------------- Atheist --------------- <a@hotmail.com> - 2019-01-01 11:21 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-01-01 13:06 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-01 15:33 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2019-01-01 14:53 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns -------------- Atheist --------------- <a@hotmail.com> - 2019-01-01 17:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns BeamMeUpScotty <Not-Sure@idiocracy.gov> - 2019-01-01 21:25 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:34 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 05:05 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 00:18 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 16:15 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-30 11:41 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 21:49 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 13:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-30 22:02 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 14:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:01 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-30 15:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:49 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:58 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 17:02 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:55 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:03 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:05 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 09:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:55 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:51 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 18:54 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 19:07 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 19:54 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 20:21 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 10:25 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 12:44 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-28 20:01 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 16:25 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 09:33 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 16:56 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 10:06 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 17:13 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 10:22 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:36 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 10:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:52 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 10:37 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 12:02 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:23 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:27 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 12:30 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-12-29 11:54 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-29 12:24 -0700
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> - 2018-12-29 11:28 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-29 00:45 -0500
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 12:18 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-12-29 08:32 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-29 08:37 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2018-12-29 17:02 +0000
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "%" <vaginalover1969@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 23:08 -0800
Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands Between Being Safe and Imminent Slaughter By Other Americans Carrying Guns "%" <vaginalover1969@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 11:31 -0800
Page 26 of 47 — ← Prev page 1 … 24 25 [26] 27 28 … 47 Next page →
| From | Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-30 15:31 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <DAcWD.68449$hN7.34839@fx23.iad> |
| In reply to | #243523 |
On 12/30/2018 1:49 PM, Snit wrote: > Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> wrote: >> On 12/29/2018 1:44 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 12/29/18 2:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure freedom >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those rights >>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context different >>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which includes the context of >>>>>>> the militia. Sorry if that was not clear to you. >>>>>> >>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which restricts the >>>>>> government from restricting your individual right to keep and >>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right to protect >>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was not clear to you. >>>>> >>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's pretending not to know. >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then surely I should be >>>>>>> able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms I want, right? >>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>> >>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding people's >>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>> >>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - secured by the >>>>> amendment is not an unlimited right to just whatever arms you wish. I >>>>> know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the asses of all the other >>>>> right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and that cowardly fuckstain >>>>> Doddering, that learned scholars like Blackstone and Story talk about >>>>> the right covering arms "suitable to their condition", and that more >>>>> recent learned scholars like Justice Scalia fully embrace that idea. >>>>> What pisses you off is you think you have some *unlimited* right to >>>>> decide what is suitable to *your* condition, and that's just not how >>>>> rights operate, and never was. >>>>> >>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and bear arms is not >>>>> unlimited. The limits are not defined in any amendment addressing the >>>>> right - those limits are taken by the authors of the amendment as given >>>>> elsewhere. The lack of mention of the limits in the text of the >>>>> amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those limits do not exist - they exist. >>>>> They have to be teased out of the writings of learned scholars like >>>>> Blackstone and Story and Scalia >>>> >>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to weapons of >>>> mass destructions, and briefly explained why. Did you miss that? >>> >>> I get how you agree with me that arms should be limited. >> >> He doesn't agree with you that there should be no private gun ownership. >> > > Who does agree with your idea âthere should be no private gun ownershipâ? Not my idea, of course. It's yours. About half of Democrats agree with it. You said "no one" - virtually - agrees with it. Looks like you've been caught lying again. -- Snot's '.sig' is wrong, sophomoric and indicative of his bloated ego. Snot fancies himself the Great Tribune of Usenet, who is going to tell all the rest of us What It All Means. Well...no. Just no.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-30 11:58 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <cr9WD.140402$IR7.135895@fx40.iad> |
| In reply to | #243069 |
On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure freedom >>>>>> >>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>> >>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life and liberty. >>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those rights >>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context different >>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>> >>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which includes the context of >>>> the militia. Sorry if that was not clear to you. >>> >>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which restricts the >>> government from restricting your individual right to keep and >>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right to protect >>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was not clear to you. >> >> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's pretending not to know. >> >>>> >>>> And if the government is not always there, then surely I should be able >>>> to have nukes and ricin and any other arms I want, right? >>>> If not, why not? >>> >>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding people's >>> rights to life and liberty. >> >> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - secured by the >> amendment is not an unlimited right to just whatever arms you wish. I >> know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the asses of all the other >> right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and that cowardly fuckstain >> Doddering, that learned scholars like Blackstone and Story talk about the >> right covering arms "suitable to their condition", and that more recent >> learned scholars like Justice Scalia fully embrace that idea. What pisses >> you off is you think you have some *unlimited* right to decide what is >> suitable to *your* condition, and that's just not how rights operate, and >> never was. >> >> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and bear arms is not >> unlimited. The limits are not defined in any amendment addressing the >> right - those limits are taken by the authors of the amendment as given >> elsewhere. The lack of mention of the limits in the text of the >> amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those limits do not exist - they exist. >> They have to be teased out of the writings of learned scholars like >> Blackstone and Story and Scalia > > I just said that I think the right does not extend to weapons of > mass destructions, It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think it does. -- Snot's '.sig' is wrong, sophomoric and indicative of his bloated ego. Snot fancies himself the Great Tribune of Usenet, who is going to tell all the rest of us What It All Means. Well...no. Just no.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-30 13:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <KZ9WD.198860$zj1.133625@fx34.iad> |
| In reply to | #243435 |
On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: > On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure freedom >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life and liberty. >>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those rights >>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context different >>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>> >>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which includes the context >>>>> of the militia. Sorry if that was not clear to you. >>>> >>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which restricts the >>>> government from restricting your individual right to keep and >>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right to protect >>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was not clear to you. >>> >>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's pretending not to know. >>> >>>>> >>>>> And if the government is not always there, then surely I should be >>>>> able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms I want, right? >>>>> If not, why not? >>>> >>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding people's >>>> rights to life and liberty. >>> >>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - secured by the >>> amendment is not an unlimited right to just whatever arms you wish. >>> I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the asses of all the other >>> right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and that cowardly fuckstain >>> Doddering, that learned scholars like Blackstone and Story talk about >>> the right covering arms "suitable to their condition", and that more >>> recent learned scholars like Justice Scalia fully embrace that idea. >>> What pisses you off is you think you have some *unlimited* right to >>> decide what is suitable to *your* condition, and that's just not how >>> rights operate, and never was. >>> >>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and bear arms is not >>> unlimited. The limits are not defined in any amendment addressing >>> the right - those limits are taken by the authors of the amendment as >>> given elsewhere. The lack of mention of the limits in the text of >>> the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those limits do not exist - they >>> exist. They have to be teased out of the writings of learned scholars >>> like Blackstone and Story and Scalia >> >> I just said that I think the right does not extend to weapons of >> mass destructions, > > It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think it does. What arms are those?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-30 12:42 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <u4aWD.163254$oo4.122441@fx24.iad> |
| In reply to | #243461 |
On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure freedom >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those rights >>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context different >>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>> >>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which includes the context of >>>>>> the militia. Sorry if that was not clear to you. >>>>> >>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which restricts the >>>>> government from restricting your individual right to keep and >>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right to protect >>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was not clear to you. >>>> >>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's pretending not to know. >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then surely I should be >>>>>> able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms I want, right? >>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>> >>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding people's >>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>> >>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - secured by the >>>> amendment is not an unlimited right to just whatever arms you wish. I >>>> know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the asses of all the other >>>> right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and that cowardly fuckstain >>>> Doddering, that learned scholars like Blackstone and Story talk about >>>> the right covering arms "suitable to their condition", and that more >>>> recent learned scholars like Justice Scalia fully embrace that idea. >>>> What pisses you off is you think you have some *unlimited* right to >>>> decide what is suitable to *your* condition, and that's just not how >>>> rights operate, and never was. >>>> >>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and bear arms is not >>>> unlimited. The limits are not defined in any amendment addressing the >>>> right - those limits are taken by the authors of the amendment as given >>>> elsewhere. The lack of mention of the limits in the text of the >>>> amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those limits do not exist - they exist. >>>> They have to be teased out of the writings of learned scholars like >>>> Blackstone and Story and Scalia >>> >>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to weapons of >>> mass destructions, >> >> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think it does. > > What arms are those? I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have already given a partial list. There are others. -- Snot's '.sig' is wrong, sophomoric and indicative of his bloated ego. Snot fancies himself the Great Tribune of Usenet, who is going to tell all the rest of us What It All Means. Well...no. Just no.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-30 14:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <NnaWD.73311$R85.51361@fx03.iad> |
| In reply to | #243470 |
On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: > On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure freedom >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those rights >>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context different >>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which includes the >>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not clear to you. >>>>>> >>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which restricts the >>>>>> government from restricting your individual right to keep and >>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right to protect >>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was not clear to >>>>>> you. >>>>> >>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's pretending not to know. >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then surely I should >>>>>>> be able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms I want, right? >>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>> >>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding people's >>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>> >>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - secured by >>>>> the amendment is not an unlimited right to just whatever arms you >>>>> wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the asses of all the >>>>> other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and that cowardly >>>>> fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars like Blackstone and >>>>> Story talk about the right covering arms "suitable to their >>>>> condition", and that more recent learned scholars like Justice >>>>> Scalia fully embrace that idea. What pisses you off is you think >>>>> you have some *unlimited* right to decide what is suitable to >>>>> *your* condition, and that's just not how rights operate, and never >>>>> was. >>>>> >>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and bear arms is >>>>> not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any amendment >>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by the authors of the >>>>> amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of mention of the limits in >>>>> the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those limits do not >>>>> exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of the writings of >>>>> learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and Scalia >>>> >>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to weapons of >>>> mass destructions, >>> >>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think it does. >> >> What arms are those? > > I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have already > given a partial list. There are others. I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. Would you please identify just one single solitary example of "arms" meeting your description?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rudy Canoza <cap@philhendrie.con> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-30 13:22 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <pGaWD.121386$NE6.49870@fx11.iad> |
| In reply to | #243480 |
On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure freedom >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those rights >>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context different >>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which includes the context >>>>>>>> of the militia. Sorry if that was not clear to you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which restricts the >>>>>>> government from restricting your individual right to keep and >>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right to protect >>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was not clear to you. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's pretending not to know. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then surely I should be >>>>>>>> able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms I want, right? >>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding people's >>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>> >>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - secured by the >>>>>> amendment is not an unlimited right to just whatever arms you wish. I >>>>>> know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the asses of all the other >>>>>> right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and that cowardly fuckstain >>>>>> Doddering, that learned scholars like Blackstone and Story talk about >>>>>> the right covering arms "suitable to their condition", and that more >>>>>> recent learned scholars like Justice Scalia fully embrace that idea. >>>>>> What pisses you off is you think you have some *unlimited* right to >>>>>> decide what is suitable to *your* condition, and that's just not how >>>>>> rights operate, and never was. >>>>>> >>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and bear arms is not >>>>>> unlimited. The limits are not defined in any amendment addressing >>>>>> the right - those limits are taken by the authors of the amendment as >>>>>> given elsewhere. The lack of mention of the limits in the text of >>>>>> the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those limits do not exist - they >>>>>> exist. They have to be teased out of the writings of learned scholars >>>>>> like Blackstone and Story and Scalia >>>>> >>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to weapons of >>>>> mass destructions, >>>> >>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think it does. >>> >>> What arms are those? >> >> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have already given a >> partial list. There are others. > > I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that > I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and > bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered, dummy. You're on the slope, and you're picking up speed... -- Snot's '.sig' is wrong, sophomoric and indicative of his bloated ego. Snot fancies himself the Great Tribune of Usenet, who is going to tell all the rest of us What It All Means. Well...no. Just no.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-30 19:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <WQeWD.65693$4D2.35349@fx22.iad> |
| In reply to | #243489 |
On 12/30/2018 2:22 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: > On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure freedom >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those rights >>>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context different >>>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which includes the >>>>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not clear to you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which restricts the >>>>>>>> government from restricting your individual right to keep and >>>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right to protect >>>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was not clear >>>>>>>> to you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's pretending not to know. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then surely I should >>>>>>>>> be able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms I want, right? >>>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding people's >>>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - secured by >>>>>>> the amendment is not an unlimited right to just whatever arms you >>>>>>> wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the asses of all >>>>>>> the other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and that >>>>>>> cowardly fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars like >>>>>>> Blackstone and Story talk about the right covering arms "suitable >>>>>>> to their condition", and that more recent learned scholars like >>>>>>> Justice Scalia fully embrace that idea. What pisses you off is >>>>>>> you think you have some *unlimited* right to decide what is >>>>>>> suitable to *your* condition, and that's just not how rights >>>>>>> operate, and never was. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and bear arms is >>>>>>> not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any amendment >>>>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by the authors of >>>>>>> the amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of mention of the >>>>>>> limits in the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those >>>>>>> limits do not exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of >>>>>>> the writings of learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and >>>>>>> Scalia >>>>>> >>>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to weapons of >>>>>> mass destructions, >>>>> >>>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think it does. >>>> >>>> What arms are those? >>> >>> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have already given a >>> partial list. There are others. >> >> I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that >> I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and >> bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. > > You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" in this context. You keep being equivocal because you made a claim and now you can't back it up with actual facts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-30 19:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g8tc2fFt0blU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #243666 |
On 12/30/18 7:06 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 12/30/2018 2:22 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >> On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure freedom >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those rights >>>>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context different >>>>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which includes the >>>>>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not clear to you. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which restricts the >>>>>>>>> government from restricting your individual right to keep and >>>>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right to protect >>>>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was not clear >>>>>>>>> to you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's pretending not to >>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then surely I >>>>>>>>>> should be able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms I >>>>>>>>>> want, right? >>>>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding people's >>>>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - secured by >>>>>>>> the amendment is not an unlimited right to just whatever arms >>>>>>>> you wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the asses of >>>>>>>> all the other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and that >>>>>>>> cowardly fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars like >>>>>>>> Blackstone and Story talk about the right covering arms >>>>>>>> "suitable to their condition", and that more recent learned >>>>>>>> scholars like Justice Scalia fully embrace that idea. What >>>>>>>> pisses you off is you think you have some *unlimited* right to >>>>>>>> decide what is suitable to *your* condition, and that's just not >>>>>>>> how rights operate, and never was. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and bear arms >>>>>>>> is not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any amendment >>>>>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by the authors of >>>>>>>> the amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of mention of the >>>>>>>> limits in the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those >>>>>>>> limits do not exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of >>>>>>>> the writings of learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and >>>>>>>> Scalia >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to weapons of >>>>>>> mass destructions, >>>>>> >>>>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think it does. >>>>> >>>>> What arms are those? >>>> >>>> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have already given >>>> a partial list. There are others. >>> >>> I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that >>> I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and >>> bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. >> >> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. > > No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of > mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that > I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. > I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" > in this context. > > You keep being equivocal because you made a claim and now you > can't back it up with actual facts. Can you define a WMD better than others define an "assault weapon"? And where in the Constitution do you think it separates your WMD from other "arms"? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-30 19:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <LufWD.97782$VV6.3556@fx10.iad> |
| In reply to | #243668 |
On 12/30/2018 7:09 PM, Snit wrote: > On 12/30/18 7:06 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 12/30/2018 2:22 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>> On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those rights >>>>>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context different >>>>>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which includes the >>>>>>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not clear to you. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which restricts the >>>>>>>>>> government from restricting your individual right to keep and >>>>>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right to protect >>>>>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was not clear >>>>>>>>>> to you. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's pretending not to >>>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then surely I >>>>>>>>>>> should be able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms I >>>>>>>>>>> want, right? >>>>>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding people's >>>>>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - secured >>>>>>>>> by the amendment is not an unlimited right to just whatever >>>>>>>>> arms you wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the >>>>>>>>> asses of all the other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter >>>>>>>>> and that cowardly fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars >>>>>>>>> like Blackstone and Story talk about the right covering arms >>>>>>>>> "suitable to their condition", and that more recent learned >>>>>>>>> scholars like Justice Scalia fully embrace that idea. What >>>>>>>>> pisses you off is you think you have some *unlimited* right to >>>>>>>>> decide what is suitable to *your* condition, and that's just >>>>>>>>> not how rights operate, and never was. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and bear arms >>>>>>>>> is not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any amendment >>>>>>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by the authors of >>>>>>>>> the amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of mention of the >>>>>>>>> limits in the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those >>>>>>>>> limits do not exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of >>>>>>>>> the writings of learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and >>>>>>>>> Scalia >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to weapons of >>>>>>>> mass destructions, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think it does. >>>>>> >>>>>> What arms are those? >>>>> >>>>> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have already given >>>>> a partial list. There are others. >>>> >>>> I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that >>>> I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and >>>> bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. >>> >>> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. >> >> No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of >> mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that >> I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. >> I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" >> in this context. >> >> You keep being equivocal because you made a claim and now you >> can't back it up with actual facts. > > Can you define a WMD better than others define an "assault weapon"? I'll start with this. A device that is designed or intended to cause death or serious bodily injury to a group of people through the general release, dissemination, or impact of explosive, toxic or poisonous chemicals, biological agents, toxins, or radioactivity. > And where in the Constitution do you think it separates your > WMD from other "arms"? I take issue with your use of the word "other". I already explained why I think people don't have a right to WMDs. If you weren't paying attention, that's your problem not mine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-30 20:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g8tferFtm7jU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #243681 |
On 12/30/18 7:51 PM, Just Wondering wrote: ... >>>> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. >>> >>> No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of >>> mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that >>> I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. >>> I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" >>> in this context. >>> >>> You keep being equivocal because you made a claim and now you >>> can't back it up with actual facts. >> >> Can you define a WMD better than others define an "assault weapon"? > > I'll start with this. A device that is designed or intended > to cause death or serious bodily injury to a group of people > through the general release, dissemination, or impact of > explosive, toxic or poisonous chemicals, biological agents, > toxins, or radioactivity. So if it is using physical items you exclude it as a WMD... even if it killed many? >> And where in the Constitution do you think it separates your WMD from >> other "arms"? > > I take issue with your use of the word "other". We are talking about a subset of arms. The word "other" to differentiate them is perfectly fine. > I already > explained why I think people don't have a right to WMDs. If > you weren't paying attention, that's your problem not mine. You want to limit arms. Good. The debate is where to have the limits... not IF there should be limits. You speak of arms that cause harm or death to a group of people. Well, that includes MANY arms. You then tried to exclude some by speaking about the MEANS of death or harm, which I think you will find hard to defend. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-30 20:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <S7gWD.195656$x92.83812@fx39.iad> |
| In reply to | #243686 |
On 12/30/2018 8:07 PM, Snit wrote: > On 12/30/18 7:51 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > ... >>>>> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. >>>> >>>> No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of >>>> mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that >>>> I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. >>>> I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" >>>> in this context. >>>> >>>> You keep being equivocal because you made a claim and now you >>>> can't back it up with actual facts. >>> >>> Can you define a WMD better than others define an "assault weapon"? >> >> I'll start with this. A device that is designed or intended >> to cause death or serious bodily injury to a group of people >> through the general release, dissemination, or impact of >> explosive, toxic or poisonous chemicals, biological agents, >> toxins, or radioactivity. > > So if it is using physical items you exclude it as a WMD... even if it > killed many? How is a physical item not a device? How is "many" not a group of people? >>> And where in the Constitution do you think it separates your WMD from >>> other "arms"? >> >> I take issue with your use of the word "other". > > We are talking about a subset of arms. The word "other" to differentiate > them is perfectly fine. > >> I already explained why I think people don't have a right to WMDs. If >> you weren't paying attention, that's your problem not mine. > > You want to limit arms. Good. The debate is where to have the limits... > not IF there should be limits. You speak of arms that cause harm or > death to a group of people. Well, that includes MANY arms. You then > tried to exclude some by speaking about the MEANS of death or harm, > which I think you will find hard to defend. Again, I already explained. It's not my problem if you weren't paying attention.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-30 20:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g8thkiFu3okU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #243697 |
On 12/30/18 8:35 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 12/30/2018 8:07 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 12/30/18 7:51 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> ... >>>>>> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. >>>>> >>>>> No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of >>>>> mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that >>>>> I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. >>>>> I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" >>>>> in this context. >>>>> >>>>> You keep being equivocal because you made a claim and now you >>>>> can't back it up with actual facts. >>>> >>>> Can you define a WMD better than others define an "assault weapon"? >>> >>> I'll start with this. A device that is designed or intended >>> to cause death or serious bodily injury to a group of people >>> through the general release, dissemination, or impact of >>> explosive, toxic or poisonous chemicals, biological agents, >>> toxins, or radioactivity. >> >> So if it is using physical items you exclude it as a WMD... even if it >> killed many? > > How is a physical item not a device? > How is "many" not a group of people? So you accept that if it uses physical items, such as bullets, it can be included. Fair enough and I am sorry to misunderstand. And now we get to see you back pedal. :) >>>> And where in the Constitution do you think it separates your WMD >>>> from other "arms"? >>> >>> I take issue with your use of the word "other". >> >> We are talking about a subset of arms. The word "other" to >> differentiate them is perfectly fine. >> >>> I already explained why I think people don't have a right to WMDs. If >>> you weren't paying attention, that's your problem not mine. >> >> You want to limit arms. Good. The debate is where to have the >> limits... not IF there should be limits. You speak of arms that cause >> harm or death to a group of people. Well, that includes MANY arms. You >> then tried to exclude some by speaking about the MEANS of death or >> harm, which I think you will find hard to defend. > > Again, I already explained. It's not my problem if you weren't > paying attention. You set a standard (risking great harm and death) and then try to word it to exclude guns. But the principle is there -- you want to limit arms based on the level of risk. Fair enough. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-31 00:14 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Fact: Gun Ownership Is All That Stands |
| Message-ID | <YkjWD.99126$L44.81996@fx07.iad> |
| In reply to | #243701 |
On 12/30/2018 8:44 PM, Snit wrote: > On 12/30/18 8:35 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 12/30/2018 8:07 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 12/30/18 7:51 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> In a Snit queried: >>>>> >>>>> Can you define a WMD better than others define an "assault weapon"? >>>> >>>> I'll start with this. A device that is designed or intended >>>> to cause death or serious bodily injury to a group of people >>>> through the general release, dissemination, or impact of >>>> explosive, toxic or poisonous chemicals, biological agents, >>>> toxins, or radioactivity. >>> >>> So if it is using physical items you exclude it as a WMD... >>> even if it killed many? >> >> How is a physical item not a device? >> How is "many" not a group of people? > > So you accept that if it uses physical items, such as bullets, > it can be included. Why do you persist in spouting bullshit? My criteria for a WMD - a device that is designed or intended to cause death or serious bodily injury to a group of people through the general release, dissemination, or impact of explosive, toxic or poisonous chemicals, biological agents, toxins, or radioactivity. No bullet does those things. > You set a standard (risking great harm and death) and then > try to word it to exclude guns. More bullshit. I set no standard. You asked me if I could define a WMD. I gave you one. Atomic bombs are WMDs. Firearms are NOT WMDs. Everyone except you agrees, you wizened little troll.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 01:10 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q0khg7$1a7$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243666 |
"Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message news:WQeWD.65693$4D2.35349@fx22.iad... > On 12/30/2018 2:22 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >> On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure freedom >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those rights >>>>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context different >>>>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which includes the >>>>>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not clear to you. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which restricts the >>>>>>>>> government from restricting your individual right to keep and >>>>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right to protect >>>>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was not clear to >>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's pretending not to >>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then surely I should >>>>>>>>>> be able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms I want, right? >>>>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding people's >>>>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - secured by >>>>>>>> the amendment is not an unlimited right to just whatever arms you >>>>>>>> wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the asses of all the >>>>>>>> other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and that cowardly >>>>>>>> fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars like Blackstone and >>>>>>>> Story talk about the right covering arms "suitable to their >>>>>>>> condition", and that more recent learned scholars like Justice >>>>>>>> Scalia fully embrace that idea. What pisses you off is you think >>>>>>>> you have some *unlimited* right to decide what is suitable to >>>>>>>> *your* condition, and that's just not how rights operate, and never >>>>>>>> was. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and bear arms is >>>>>>>> not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any amendment >>>>>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by the authors of the >>>>>>>> amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of mention of the limits in >>>>>>>> the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those limits do not >>>>>>>> exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of the writings of >>>>>>>> learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and Scalia >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to weapons of >>>>>>> mass destructions, >>>>>> >>>>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think it does. >>>>> >>>>> What arms are those? >>>> >>>> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have already given a >>>> partial list. There are others. >>> >>> I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that >>> I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and >>> bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. >> >> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. > > No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of > mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that > I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. > I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" > in this context. Heck, if Rudy thinks the 2nd protects WMD....why fight him on it. After all, we can all see he's surrendered on the issue of firearms by changing the topic.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 16:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g96sgkFuuuU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #244702 |
Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: > > > "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message > news:WQeWD.65693$4D2.35349@fx22.iad... >> On 12/30/2018 2:22 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>> On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those rights >>>>>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context different >>>>>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which includes the >>>>>>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not clear to you. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which restricts the >>>>>>>>>> government from restricting your individual right to keep and >>>>>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right to protect >>>>>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was not clear to >>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's pretending not to >>>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then surely I should >>>>>>>>>>> be able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms I want, right? >>>>>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding people's >>>>>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - secured by >>>>>>>>> the amendment is not an unlimited right to just whatever arms you >>>>>>>>> wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the asses of all the >>>>>>>>> other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and that cowardly >>>>>>>>> fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars like Blackstone and >>>>>>>>> Story talk about the right covering arms "suitable to their >>>>>>>>> condition", and that more recent learned scholars like Justice >>>>>>>>> Scalia fully embrace that idea. What pisses you off is you think >>>>>>>>> you have some *unlimited* right to decide what is suitable to >>>>>>>>> *your* condition, and that's just not how rights operate, and never >>>>>>>>> was. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and bear arms is >>>>>>>>> not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any amendment >>>>>>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by the authors of the >>>>>>>>> amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of mention of the limits in >>>>>>>>> the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those limits do not >>>>>>>>> exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of the writings of >>>>>>>>> learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and Scalia >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to weapons of >>>>>>>> mass destructions, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think it does. >>>>>> >>>>>> What arms are those? >>>>> >>>>> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have already given a >>>>> partial list. There are others. >>>> >>>> I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that >>>> I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and >>>> bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. >>> >>> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. >> >> No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of >> mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that >> I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. >> I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" >> in this context. > > Heck, if Rudy thinks the 2nd protects WMD....why fight him on it. > > After all, we can all see he's surrendered on the issue of firearms by > changing the topic. > > > The Constitution speaks of arms, not firearms.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 09:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bsi3tr.a7m.19.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #244802 |
On 2019-01-03 9:45 a.m., Snit wrote: > Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >> >> >> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >> news:WQeWD.65693$4D2.35349@fx22.iad... >>> On 12/30/2018 2:22 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>> On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those rights >>>>>>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context different >>>>>>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which includes the >>>>>>>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not clear to you. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which restricts the >>>>>>>>>>> government from restricting your individual right to keep and >>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right to protect >>>>>>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was not clear to >>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's pretending not to >>>>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then surely I should >>>>>>>>>>>> be able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms I want, right? >>>>>>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>>>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding people's >>>>>>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - secured by >>>>>>>>>> the amendment is not an unlimited right to just whatever arms you >>>>>>>>>> wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the asses of all the >>>>>>>>>> other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and that cowardly >>>>>>>>>> fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars like Blackstone and >>>>>>>>>> Story talk about the right covering arms "suitable to their >>>>>>>>>> condition", and that more recent learned scholars like Justice >>>>>>>>>> Scalia fully embrace that idea. What pisses you off is you think >>>>>>>>>> you have some *unlimited* right to decide what is suitable to >>>>>>>>>> *your* condition, and that's just not how rights operate, and never >>>>>>>>>> was. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and bear arms is >>>>>>>>>> not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any amendment >>>>>>>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by the authors of the >>>>>>>>>> amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of mention of the limits in >>>>>>>>>> the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those limits do not >>>>>>>>>> exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of the writings of >>>>>>>>>> learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and Scalia >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to weapons of >>>>>>>>> mass destructions, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think it does. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What arms are those? >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have already given a >>>>>> partial list. There are others. >>>>> >>>>> I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that >>>>> I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and >>>>> bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. >>>> >>>> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. >>> >>> No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of >>> mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that >>> I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. >>> I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" >>> in this context. >> >> Heck, if Rudy thinks the 2nd protects WMD....why fight him on it. >> >> After all, we can all see he's surrendered on the issue of firearms by >> changing the topic. >> >> >> > > The Constitution speaks of arms, not firearms. > can i throw raisins
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 17:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g96tgbF15nnU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #244810 |
% <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2019-01-03 9:45 a.m., Snit wrote: >> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>> news:WQeWD.65693$4D2.35349@fx22.iad... >>>> On 12/30/2018 2:22 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context different >>>>>>>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which includes the >>>>>>>>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not clear to you. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which restricts the >>>>>>>>>>>> government from restricting your individual right to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right to protect >>>>>>>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was not clear to >>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's pretending not to >>>>>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then surely I should >>>>>>>>>>>>> be able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms I want, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>>>>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding people's >>>>>>>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - secured by >>>>>>>>>>> the amendment is not an unlimited right to just whatever arms you >>>>>>>>>>> wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the asses of all the >>>>>>>>>>> other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and that cowardly >>>>>>>>>>> fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars like Blackstone and >>>>>>>>>>> Story talk about the right covering arms "suitable to their >>>>>>>>>>> condition", and that more recent learned scholars like Justice >>>>>>>>>>> Scalia fully embrace that idea. What pisses you off is you think >>>>>>>>>>> you have some *unlimited* right to decide what is suitable to >>>>>>>>>>> *your* condition, and that's just not how rights operate, and never >>>>>>>>>>> was. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and bear arms is >>>>>>>>>>> not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any amendment >>>>>>>>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by the authors of the >>>>>>>>>>> amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of mention of the limits in >>>>>>>>>>> the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those limits do not >>>>>>>>>>> exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of the writings of >>>>>>>>>>> learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and Scalia >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to weapons of >>>>>>>>>> mass destructions, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think it does. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What arms are those? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have already given a >>>>>>> partial list. There are others. >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that >>>>>> I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and >>>>>> bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. >>>>> >>>>> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. >>>> >>>> No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of >>>> mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that >>>> I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. >>>> I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" >>>> in this context. >>> >>> Heck, if Rudy thinks the 2nd protects WMD....why fight him on it. >>> >>> After all, we can all see he's surrendered on the issue of firearms by >>> changing the topic. >>> >>> >>> >> >> The Constitution speaks of arms, not firearms. >> > can i throw raisins > Not with your legs.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 10:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bsi54t.g3f.17.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #244816 |
On 2019-01-03 10:02 a.m., Snit wrote: > % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 2019-01-03 9:45 a.m., Snit wrote: >>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>> news:WQeWD.65693$4D2.35349@fx22.iad... >>>>> On 12/30/2018 2:22 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which includes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not clear to you. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which restricts the >>>>>>>>>>>>> government from restricting your individual right to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right to protect >>>>>>>>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was not clear to >>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's pretending not to >>>>>>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then surely I should >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms I want, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>>>>>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding people's >>>>>>>>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - secured by >>>>>>>>>>>> the amendment is not an unlimited right to just whatever arms you >>>>>>>>>>>> wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the asses of all the >>>>>>>>>>>> other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and that cowardly >>>>>>>>>>>> fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars like Blackstone and >>>>>>>>>>>> Story talk about the right covering arms "suitable to their >>>>>>>>>>>> condition", and that more recent learned scholars like Justice >>>>>>>>>>>> Scalia fully embrace that idea. What pisses you off is you think >>>>>>>>>>>> you have some *unlimited* right to decide what is suitable to >>>>>>>>>>>> *your* condition, and that's just not how rights operate, and never >>>>>>>>>>>> was. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and bear arms is >>>>>>>>>>>> not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any amendment >>>>>>>>>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by the authors of the >>>>>>>>>>>> amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of mention of the limits in >>>>>>>>>>>> the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those limits do not >>>>>>>>>>>> exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of the writings of >>>>>>>>>>>> learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and Scalia >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to weapons of >>>>>>>>>>> mass destructions, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think it does. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What arms are those? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have already given a >>>>>>>> partial list. There are others. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that >>>>>>> I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and >>>>>>> bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. >>>>>> >>>>>> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. >>>>> >>>>> No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of >>>>> mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that >>>>> I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. >>>>> I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" >>>>> in this context. >>>> >>>> Heck, if Rudy thinks the 2nd protects WMD....why fight him on it. >>>> >>>> After all, we can all see he's surrendered on the issue of firearms by >>>> changing the topic. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> The Constitution speaks of arms, not firearms. >>> >> can i throw raisins >> > > Not with your legs. > aww , well what good is that for long range raisins
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 17:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g96u1dF19i7U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #244822 |
% <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2019-01-03 10:02 a.m., Snit wrote: >> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 2019-01-03 9:45 a.m., Snit wrote: >>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:WQeWD.65693$4D2.35349@fx22.iad... >>>>>> On 12/30/2018 2:22 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which includes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not clear to you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which restricts the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> government from restricting your individual right to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right to protect >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was not clear to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's pretending not to >>>>>>>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then surely I should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms I want, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>>>>>>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding people's >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - secured by >>>>>>>>>>>>> the amendment is not an unlimited right to just whatever arms you >>>>>>>>>>>>> wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the asses of all the >>>>>>>>>>>>> other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and that cowardly >>>>>>>>>>>>> fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars like Blackstone and >>>>>>>>>>>>> Story talk about the right covering arms "suitable to their >>>>>>>>>>>>> condition", and that more recent learned scholars like Justice >>>>>>>>>>>>> Scalia fully embrace that idea. What pisses you off is you think >>>>>>>>>>>>> you have some *unlimited* right to decide what is suitable to >>>>>>>>>>>>> *your* condition, and that's just not how rights operate, and never >>>>>>>>>>>>> was. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and bear arms is >>>>>>>>>>>>> not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any amendment >>>>>>>>>>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by the authors of the >>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of mention of the limits in >>>>>>>>>>>>> the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those limits do not >>>>>>>>>>>>> exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of the writings of >>>>>>>>>>>>> learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and Scalia >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to weapons of >>>>>>>>>>>> mass destructions, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think it does. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What arms are those? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have already given a >>>>>>>>> partial list. There are others. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that >>>>>>>> I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and >>>>>>>> bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. >>>>>> >>>>>> No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of >>>>>> mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that >>>>>> I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. >>>>>> I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" >>>>>> in this context. >>>>> >>>>> Heck, if Rudy thinks the 2nd protects WMD....why fight him on it. >>>>> >>>>> After all, we can all see he's surrendered on the issue of firearms by >>>>> changing the topic. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> The Constitution speaks of arms, not firearms. >>>> >>> can i throw raisins >>> >> >> Not with your legs. >> > aww , well what good is that for long range raisins > Use grapes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-03 10:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bsi5ck.g3f.17.8@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #244827 |
On 2019-01-03 10:11 a.m., Snit wrote: > % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 2019-01-03 10:02 a.m., Snit wrote: >>> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 2019-01-03 9:45 a.m., Snit wrote: >>>>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:WQeWD.65693$4D2.35349@fx22.iad... >>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 2:22 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:02 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:42 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:34 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 12:58 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 1:33 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:54 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 11:45 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 12:22 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/18 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 8:56 AM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct. The 2nd Amendment was written to ensure freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The context of what it was written for has changed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freedom encompasses the individual rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People have a right to defend and protect those rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> themselves, because government is not always there to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defend those rights for them. How is that context different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than it was in 1787? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the second amendment, which includes the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context of the militia. Sorry if that was not clear to you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was speaking of the Second Amendment, which restricts the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> government from restricting your individual right to keep and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms, the context of which is you have a right to protect >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defend your life and liberty. Sorry if that was not clear to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's clear to the snotty little troll. He's pretending not to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if the government is not always there, then surely I should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be able to have nukes and ricin and any other arms I want, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, why not? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, because weapons of mass destruction cannot be used >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without indiscriminately violating other law abiding people's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rights to life and liberty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is clear that the right - the pre-existing right - secured by >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the amendment is not an unlimited right to just whatever arms you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wish. I know it just chaps your ass, and chaps the asses of all the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> other right-wingnuts like Hartung and Scooter and that cowardly >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuckstain Doddering, that learned scholars like Blackstone and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Story talk about the right covering arms "suitable to their >>>>>>>>>>>>>> condition", and that more recent learned scholars like Justice >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scalia fully embrace that idea. What pisses you off is you think >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you have some *unlimited* right to decide what is suitable to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *your* condition, and that's just not how rights operate, and never >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are left with these facts. The right to keep and bear arms is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not unlimited. The limits are not defined in any amendment >>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressing the right - those limits are taken by the authors of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> amendment as given elsewhere. The lack of mention of the limits in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the text of the amendment *DOES NOT MEAN* that those limits do not >>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist - they exist. They have to be teased out of the writings of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> learned scholars like Blackstone and Story and Scalia >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I just said that I think the right does not extend to weapons of >>>>>>>>>>>>> mass destructions, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't extend to quite a lot of arms that you think it does. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What arms are those? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I don't have to enumerate a list of them. *You* have already given a >>>>>>>>>> partial list. There are others. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I don't recall preparing even a partial list of arms that >>>>>>>>> I think are covered by "the right of the people to keep and >>>>>>>>> bear arms" that the right does not actually cover. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You provided a partial list of those that *aren't* covered. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No I didn't. I identified a category of WEAPONS (weapons of >>>>>>> mass destruction or WMDs), NOT a partial list of "arms", that >>>>>>> I think the right to keep and bear arms applies to. >>>>>>> I don't think WMDs even meet the definition of "arms" >>>>>>> in this context. >>>>>> >>>>>> Heck, if Rudy thinks the 2nd protects WMD....why fight him on it. >>>>>> >>>>>> After all, we can all see he's surrendered on the issue of firearms by >>>>>> changing the topic. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The Constitution speaks of arms, not firearms. >>>>> >>>> can i throw raisins >>>> >>> >>> Not with your legs. >>> >> aww , well what good is that for long range raisins >> > > Use grapes. > i'll get my pants wet
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 26 of 47 — ← Prev page 1 … 24 25 [26] 27 28 … 47 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web