Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #240013 > unrolled thread
| Started by | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-22 11:58 -0500 |
| Last post | 2018-12-23 18:58 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 166 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 11:58 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-22 22:33 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-22 17:53 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-23 01:59 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 19:14 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-22 23:54 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 08:57 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-23 09:21 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 07:22 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-23 09:10 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-23 14:26 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-23 11:36 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 10:54 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 14:01 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-23 11:08 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 13:31 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 11:38 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 13:55 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 11:11 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 14:24 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-23 11:33 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 10:53 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-23 10:57 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-23 22:35 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 20:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 18:11 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-24 11:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 11:31 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 11:11 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 15:15 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 13:47 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 13:26 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 18:10 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 16:16 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 16:28 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 17:05 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 17:26 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 17:43 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 18:01 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 18:43 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 22:49 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 05:48 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:27 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-27 16:33 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 16:19 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 19:39 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 18:09 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 19:32 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-24 19:39 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:29 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-27 16:34 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-24 16:54 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 19:41 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 19:26 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 20:32 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 21:00 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 05:47 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 19:45 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 06:04 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 01:16 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 04:34 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 08:11 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:44 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 10:46 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 08:58 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:02 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 09:07 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:30 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 11:51 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 12:02 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Lamey <teandson@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 09:03 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 09:31 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 09:07 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 12:30 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 12:05 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-26 12:09 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 12:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 10:09 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 21:03 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 12:39 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 12:49 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-28 12:21 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 10:23 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-28 12:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:52 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-29 13:00 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 10:28 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 13:47 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-27 11:19 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 17:55 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 12:23 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 16:27 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 14:29 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 21:03 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 10:48 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 10:55 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 12:16 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 13:09 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 12:17 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 15:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:42 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 12:13 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 10:15 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 12:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 08:47 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Lamey <teandson@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 08:50 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 12:48 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 11:47 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 10:56 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-25 18:02 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 11:05 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-26 19:53 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 13:00 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 13:15 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 11:26 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 14:08 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 12:23 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 14:51 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 12:17 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 13:19 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 11:28 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 10:43 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 12:14 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 14:36 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 12:39 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 11:49 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 15:09 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 12:15 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 16:27 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 14:37 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 18:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 15:24 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 17:24 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 16:27 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 22:15 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 20:42 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:49 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-27 10:43 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 10:14 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-27 16:35 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 14:11 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-27 19:25 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 17:47 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-27 23:15 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-25 16:11 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-25 17:59 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 08:40 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:49 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 09:27 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 19:22 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-24 23:06 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:25 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:44 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 11:51 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:56 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 12:42 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 10:27 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 19:25 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-25 11:31 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 08:17 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:36 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 12:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-26 12:15 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-24 09:38 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 18:58 -0800
Page 3 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 22:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g8dumnFis1aU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #241117 |
On 12/24/18 6:43 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-12-24 6:01 p.m., Snit wrote: >> On 12/24/18 5:43 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2018-12-24 5:26 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>> On 12/24/18 5:05 PM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2018-12-24 4:28 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 12/24/18 4:16 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>> On 2018-12-24 4:10 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 13:26:32 -0800, Checkmate >>>>>>>> <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <...> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Heat radiates out towards colder places (a gradient), making >>>>>>>>> the space it >>>>>>>>> left colder. Cold does not "radiate" in to a warmer place. >>>>>>>>> Dumbass! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "And, a double dumbass on you!" Here's why. People >>>>>>>> who live where it gets below freezing often have to >>>>>>>> scrape ice and frost off the outside of their windshields. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> According to you, the ice would be on the insides of their >>>>>>>> windshields because what little heat that got trapped >>>>>>>> inside the car would be radiating out and the inside of >>>>>>>> the windshield would get colder than the outside of the >>>>>>>> windshield and so the frost would be on the inside. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Try to weasel your way out of THAT one, Einstein! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> watch this , gerk'll have a fix for it , lol , " gerk'll " >>>>>> >>>>>> Great. Now I am stuck running around my house screaming "GERK'LL" >>>>>> for the next hour or two just because it is so silly. >>>>>> >>>>> merry gerk'll >>>> >>>> May you be touched by his Noodly appendages. >>>> >>> well lets not get mental >> >> Too late. >> > i know but i went for the bluff Just don't get too close and fall off. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 05:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <brpugl.7af.17.17@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #241180 |
On 2018-12-24 10:49 p.m., Snit wrote: > On 12/24/18 6:43 PM, % wrote: >> On 2018-12-24 6:01 p.m., Snit wrote: >>> On 12/24/18 5:43 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2018-12-24 5:26 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>> On 12/24/18 5:05 PM, % wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 4:28 p.m., Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/24/18 4:16 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-24 4:10 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 13:26:32 -0800, Checkmate >>>>>>>>> <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <...> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Heat radiates out towards colder places (a gradient), making >>>>>>>>>> the space it >>>>>>>>>> left colder. Cold does not "radiate" in to a warmer place. >>>>>>>>>> Dumbass! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "And, a double dumbass on you!" Here's why. People >>>>>>>>> who live where it gets below freezing often have to >>>>>>>>> scrape ice and frost off the outside of their windshields. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> According to you, the ice would be on the insides of their >>>>>>>>> windshields because what little heat that got trapped >>>>>>>>> inside the car would be radiating out and the inside of >>>>>>>>> the windshield would get colder than the outside of the >>>>>>>>> windshield and so the frost would be on the inside. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Try to weasel your way out of THAT one, Einstein! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> watch this , gerk'll have a fix for it , lol , " gerk'll " >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Great. Now I am stuck running around my house screaming "GERK'LL" >>>>>>> for the next hour or two just because it is so silly. >>>>>>> >>>>>> merry gerk'll >>>>> >>>>> May you be touched by his Noodly appendages. >>>>> >>>> well lets not get mental >>> >>> Too late. >>> >> i know but i went for the bluff > > Just don't get too close and fall off. > you got the wrong pandora she's got the cliffs of diver , dover , one flew over
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 11:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q02uhi$18jr$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #241078 |
On 12/24/2018 7:26 PM, Snit wrote: > On 12/24/18 5:05 PM, % wrote: >> merry gerk'll > > May you be touched by his Noodly appendages. Ew. No. Not in a million years. Not if puddles and I were the last human beings on Earth (and the least believable part of *that* scenario is puddles somehow magically becoming a human being). Never. Nada. No. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 16:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g8kd7cF7atU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #242043 |
kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > On 12/24/2018 7:26 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 12/24/18 5:05 PM, % wrote: >>> merry gerk'll >> >> May you be touched by his Noodly appendages. > > Ew. No. Not in a million years. Not if puddles and I were the last human > beings on Earth (and the least believable part of *that* scenario is > puddles somehow magically becoming a human being). Never. Nada. No. > You have to be touched by them or you would float off into space.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 16:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g8d7reFec8fU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #241051 |
On 12/24/18 4:10 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 13:26:32 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: > > <...> > >> Heat radiates out towards colder places (a gradient), making the space it >> left colder. Cold does not "radiate" in to a warmer place. Dumbass! > > "And, a double dumbass on you!" Here's why. People > who live where it gets below freezing often have to > scrape ice and frost off the outside of their windshields. > > According to you, No... this is not according to him. This is what YOU are saying. You do not get to speak for others: > the ice would be on the insides of their > windshields because what little heat that got trapped > inside the car would be radiating out and the inside of > the windshield would get colder than the outside of the > windshield and so the frost would be on the inside. Nope. The heat from inside the car would radiate out until the temperatures MATCH. Then the heat transfer stops. For it to keep going you would have to do the exact opposite of what he just said... have heat radiate from the colder place to the warmer! And then the frost forms more on the outside because there is more moisture there. > Try to weasel your way out of THAT one, Einstein! I do hope you were kidding... really. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 19:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5iu22et9peqi1vrpdigjjhm8au4b442e7c@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #241056 |
On Mon, 24 Dec 2018, Snitidiot <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 12/24/18 4:10 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >> >> <...> >> >>> Heat radiates out towards colder places (a gradient), making the space it >>> left colder. Cold does not "radiate" in to a warmer place. Dumbass! >> >> "And, a double dumbass on you!" Here's why. People >> who live where it gets below freezing often have to >> scrape ice and frost off the outside of their windshields. >> >> According to you, > >No... this is not according to him. This is what YOU are saying. You do >not get to speak for others: No, it was according to teh Checktard. I know of which I speak, you don't Snitidiot! >> the ice would be on the insides of their >> windshields because what little heat that got trapped >> inside the car would be radiating out and the inside of >> the windshield would get colder than the outside of the >> windshield and so the frost would be on the inside. > >Nope. The heat from inside the car would radiate out until the >temperatures MATCH. Then the heat transfer stops. For it to keep going >you would have to do the exact opposite of what he just said... have >heat radiate from the colder place to the warmer! If the temperatures match then one would also have to scrape frost off the inside of the windshield, too. So, you theory is incorrect as proven by the empirical facts of the matter. >And then the frost forms more on the outside because there is more >moisture there. Wrong! When the doors of an automobile are opened the relative humidity on the inside and on the outside equal out. As a matter of fact, given that human being emit a lot of water vapor, chances are the humidity inside the car will be higher than the humidity outside the car and that means MORE frost should form on the inside of the windshield than on the outside. And, another thing, there is no wind inside the windshield to sublimate the frost whereas there is usually some wind on the outside of the windshield to do the same. No, it is clear that the outside of the windshield is colder than the inside of the windshield and that is due to the FACT that the cold is coming IN from the outside not the other way around. Doh! >> Try to weasel your way out of THAT one, Einstein! > >I do hope you were kidding... really. No, I'm giving the facts, Mam, just the facts. I know my physics and you pretenders only know the erroneous teachings of know-nothing physicists who are stuck in the past and haven't had an original thought in centuries. -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 18:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g8deb4FflkdU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #241081 |
On 12/24/18 5:39 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018, Snitidiot <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 12/24/18 4:10 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >>> >>> <...> >>> >>>> Heat radiates out towards colder places (a gradient), making the space it >>>> left colder. Cold does not "radiate" in to a warmer place. Dumbass! >>> >>> "And, a double dumbass on you!" Here's why. People >>> who live where it gets below freezing often have to >>> scrape ice and frost off the outside of their windshields. >>> >>> According to you, >> >> No... this is not according to him. This is what YOU are saying. You do >> not get to speak for others: > > No, it was according to teh Checktard. I know of which > I speak, you don't Snitidiot! You speak for yourself. Not others. Simple concept... and below you show a DEEP lack of understanding, so deep I sincerely hope you are just joking. >>> the ice would be on the insides of their >>> windshields because what little heat that got trapped >>> inside the car would be radiating out and the inside of >>> the windshield would get colder than the outside of the >>> windshield and so the frost would be on the inside. >> >> Nope. The heat from inside the car would radiate out until the >> temperatures MATCH. Then the heat transfer stops. For it to keep going >> you would have to do the exact opposite of what he just said... have >> heat radiate from the colder place to the warmer! > > If the temperatures match then one would also > have to scrape frost off the inside of the windshield, > too. Why would you assume equal levels of moisture inside and out? > So, you theory is incorrect as proven by the > empirical facts of the matter. Please tell me you are merely joking and poking fun at yourself. >> And then the frost forms more on the outside because there is more >> moisture there. > > Wrong! When the doors of an automobile are opened > the relative humidity on the inside and on the outside > equal out. And when they close this can change. > As a matter of fact, given that human > being emit a lot of water vapor, chances are the > humidity inside the car will be higher than the humidity > outside the car and that means MORE frost should > form on the inside of the windshield than on the outside. This is what we see when people are driving in a cold car. > And, another thing, there is no wind inside the windshield > to sublimate the frost whereas there is usually some wind > on the outside of the windshield to do the same. No, it > is clear that the outside of the windshield is colder than > the inside of the windshield and that is due to the FACT > that the cold is coming IN from the outside not the other > way around. Doh! Again, please tell me you are joking. >>> Try to weasel your way out of THAT one, Einstein! >> >> I do hope you were kidding... really. > > No, I'm giving the facts, Mam, just the facts. I know > my physics and you pretenders only know the erroneous > teachings of know-nothing physicists who are stuck in > the past and haven't had an original thought in centuries. Next can you explain how bumble bees fly? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 19:32 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368b449769c021d9995c96@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #241081 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <5iu22et9peqi1vrpdigjjhm8au4b442e7c@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... @@@@@ @@@@@ On Mon, 24 Dec 2018, Snitidiot <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: @@@@@ >On 12/24/18 4:10 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: @@@@@ >> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: @@@@@ >> @@@@@ >> <...> @@@@@ >> @@@@@ >>> Heat radiates out towards colder places (a gradient), making the space it @@@@@ >>> left colder. Cold does not "radiate" in to a warmer place. Dumbass! @@@@@ >> @@@@@ >> "And, a double dumbass on you!" Here's why. People @@@@@ >> who live where it gets below freezing often have to @@@@@ >> scrape ice and frost off the outside of their windshields. @@@@@ >> @@@@@ >> According to you, @@@@@ > @@@@@ >No... this is not according to him. This is what YOU are saying. You do @@@@@ >not get to speak for others: @@@@@ @@@@@ No, it was according to teh Checktard. I know of which @@@@@ I speak, you don't Snitidiot! @@@@@ @@@@@ >> the ice would be on the insides of their @@@@@ >> windshields because what little heat that got trapped @@@@@ >> inside the car would be radiating out and the inside of @@@@@ >> the windshield would get colder than the outside of the @@@@@ >> windshield and so the frost would be on the inside. @@@@@ > @@@@@ >Nope. The heat from inside the car would radiate out until the @@@@@ >temperatures MATCH. Then the heat transfer stops. For it to keep going @@@@@ >you would have to do the exact opposite of what he just said... have @@@@@ >heat radiate from the colder place to the warmer! @@@@@ @@@@@ If the temperatures match then one would also @@@@@ have to scrape frost off the inside of the windshield, @@@@@ too. So, you theory is incorrect as proven by the @@@@@ empirical facts of the matter. @@@@@ @@@@@ >And then the frost forms more on the outside because there is more @@@@@ >moisture there. @@@@@ @@@@@ Wrong! When the doors of an automobile are opened @@@@@ the relative humidity on the inside and on the outside @@@@@ equal out. As a matter of fact, given that human @@@@@ being emit a lot of water vapor, chances are the @@@@@ humidity inside the car will be higher than the humidity @@@@@ outside the car and that means MORE frost should @@@@@ form on the inside of the windshield than on the outside. @@@@@ @@@@@ And, another thing, there is no wind inside the windshield @@@@@ to sublimate the frost whereas there is usually some wind @@@@@ on the outside of the windshield to do the same. No, it @@@@@ is clear that the outside of the windshield is colder than @@@@@ the inside of the windshield and that is due to the FACT @@@@@ that the cold is coming IN from the outside not the other @@@@@ way around. Doh! @@@@@ @@@@@ >> Try to weasel your way out of THAT one, Einstein! @@@@@ > @@@@@ >I do hope you were kidding... really. @@@@@ @@@@@ No, I'm giving the facts, Mam, just the facts. I know @@@@@ my physics and you pretenders only know the erroneous @@@@@ teachings of know-nothing physicists who are stuck in @@@@@ the past and haven't had an original thought in centuries. You may very well be the most ignorant person in AC at the moment, because everyone else knows you're wrong... just as you are about almost everything else you think you know. What a stupid person you are! -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 19:39 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <pvs8p2$tbv$3@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #241148 |
x-no-archive: yes On 12/24/2018 7:32 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <5iu22et9peqi1vrpdigjjhm8au4b442e7c@4ax.com>, > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On Mon, 24 Dec 2018, Snitidiot <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > @@@@@ >On 12/24/18 4:10 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > @@@@@ >> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: > @@@@@ >> > @@@@@ >> <...> > @@@@@ >> > @@@@@ >>> Heat radiates out towards colder places (a gradient), making the space it > @@@@@ >>> left colder. Cold does not "radiate" in to a warmer place. Dumbass! > @@@@@ >> > @@@@@ >> "And, a double dumbass on you!" Here's why. People > @@@@@ >> who live where it gets below freezing often have to > @@@@@ >> scrape ice and frost off the outside of their windshields. > @@@@@ >> > @@@@@ >> According to you, > @@@@@ > > @@@@@ >No... this is not according to him. This is what YOU are saying. You do > @@@@@ >not get to speak for others: > @@@@@ > @@@@@ No, it was according to teh Checktard. I know of which > @@@@@ I speak, you don't Snitidiot! > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> the ice would be on the insides of their > @@@@@ >> windshields because what little heat that got trapped > @@@@@ >> inside the car would be radiating out and the inside of > @@@@@ >> the windshield would get colder than the outside of the > @@@@@ >> windshield and so the frost would be on the inside. > @@@@@ > > @@@@@ >Nope. The heat from inside the car would radiate out until the > @@@@@ >temperatures MATCH. Then the heat transfer stops. For it to keep going > @@@@@ >you would have to do the exact opposite of what he just said... have > @@@@@ >heat radiate from the colder place to the warmer! > @@@@@ > @@@@@ If the temperatures match then one would also > @@@@@ have to scrape frost off the inside of the windshield, > @@@@@ too. So, you theory is incorrect as proven by the > @@@@@ empirical facts of the matter. > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >And then the frost forms more on the outside because there is more > @@@@@ >moisture there. > @@@@@ > @@@@@ Wrong! When the doors of an automobile are opened > @@@@@ the relative humidity on the inside and on the outside > @@@@@ equal out. As a matter of fact, given that human > @@@@@ being emit a lot of water vapor, chances are the > @@@@@ humidity inside the car will be higher than the humidity > @@@@@ outside the car and that means MORE frost should > @@@@@ form on the inside of the windshield than on the outside. > @@@@@ > @@@@@ And, another thing, there is no wind inside the windshield > @@@@@ to sublimate the frost whereas there is usually some wind > @@@@@ on the outside of the windshield to do the same. No, it > @@@@@ is clear that the outside of the windshield is colder than > @@@@@ the inside of the windshield and that is due to the FACT > @@@@@ that the cold is coming IN from the outside not the other > @@@@@ way around. Doh! > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> Try to weasel your way out of THAT one, Einstein! > @@@@@ > > @@@@@ >I do hope you were kidding... really. > @@@@@ > @@@@@ No, I'm giving the facts, Mam, just the facts. I know > @@@@@ my physics and you pretenders only know the erroneous > @@@@@ teachings of know-nothing physicists who are stuck in > @@@@@ the past and haven't had an original thought in centuries. > > You may very well be the most ignorant person in AC at the moment, > because everyone else knows you're wrong... just as you are about almost > everything else you think you know. What a stupid person you are! Merry Christmas, Checky.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 11:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q02uli$18jr$6@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #241056 |
On 12/24/2018 6:19 PM, Snit wrote: > On 12/24/18 4:10 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> Try to weasel your way out of THAT one, Einstein! > > I do hope you were kidding... really. He wasn't. There's a photo of him accompanying the article on Dunning-Krueger Syndrome in the encyclopedia. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 16:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g8kd9eF7moU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #242045 |
kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > On 12/24/2018 6:19 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 12/24/18 4:10 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> Try to weasel your way out of THAT one, Einstein! >> >> I do hope you were kidding... really. > > He wasn't. There's a photo of him accompanying the article on > Dunning-Krueger Syndrome in the encyclopedia. > :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 16:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368b1fb59ae3fa9f77b@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #241051 |
In article <ggp22etv60fic8tie874p3imqq8o9a3nad@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 13:26:32 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: > ><...> > >>Heat radiates out towards colder places (a gradient), making the space it >>left colder. Cold does not "radiate" in to a warmer place. Dumbass! > >"And, a double dumbass on you!" Here's why. People >who live where it gets below freezing often have to >scrape ice and frost off the outside of their windshields. > >According to you, the ice would be on the insides of their >windshields because what little heat that got trapped >inside the car would be radiating out and the inside of >the windshield would get colder than the outside of the >windshield and so the frost would be on the inside. > >Try to weasel your way out of THAT one, Einstein! He's right, heat gives itself to cold. The faster moving molecules try to balance and they do so by moving to the slower moving ones. An air conditioner does not make cold air, it removes the heat.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 19:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <92v22e9p85jk3jjk1tpc4r6lsdb9pumt2d@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #241071 |
On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 16:54:51 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >In article <ggp22etv60fic8tie874p3imqq8o9a3nad@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 13:26:32 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >> >><...> >> >>>Heat radiates out towards colder places (a gradient), making the space it >>>left colder. Cold does not "radiate" in to a warmer place. Dumbass! >> >>"And, a double dumbass on you!" Here's why. People >>who live where it gets below freezing often have to >>scrape ice and frost off the outside of their windshields. >> >>According to you, the ice would be on the insides of their >>windshields because what little heat that got trapped >>inside the car would be radiating out and the inside of >>the windshield would get colder than the outside of the >>windshield and so the frost would be on the inside. >> >>Try to weasel your way out of THAT one, Einstein! > >He's right, heat gives itself to cold. The faster moving molecules try >to balance and they do so by moving to the slower moving ones. An air >conditioner does not make cold air, it removes the heat. Moron! Faster moving molecules SURE do not pass through a window pane. You are talking about a free flow of air where a free flow of air doesn't happen. Doh! -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 19:26 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368b435df0e5d125995c95@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #241082 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <92v22e9p85jk3jjk1tpc4r6lsdb9pumt2d@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... @@@@@ @@@@@ On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 16:54:51 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: @@@@@ >In article <ggp22etv60fic8tie874p3imqq8o9a3nad@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... @@@@@ >>On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 13:26:32 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: @@@@@ >> @@@@@ >><...> @@@@@ >> @@@@@ >>>Heat radiates out towards colder places (a gradient), making the space it @@@@@ >>>left colder. Cold does not "radiate" in to a warmer place. Dumbass! @@@@@ >> @@@@@ >>"And, a double dumbass on you!" Here's why. People @@@@@ >>who live where it gets below freezing often have to @@@@@ >>scrape ice and frost off the outside of their windshields. @@@@@ >> @@@@@ >>According to you, the ice would be on the insides of their @@@@@ >>windshields because what little heat that got trapped @@@@@ >>inside the car would be radiating out and the inside of @@@@@ >>the windshield would get colder than the outside of the @@@@@ >>windshield and so the frost would be on the inside. @@@@@ >> @@@@@ >>Try to weasel your way out of THAT one, Einstein! @@@@@ > @@@@@ >He's right, heat gives itself to cold. The faster moving molecules try @@@@@ >to balance and they do so by moving to the slower moving ones. An air @@@@@ >conditioner does not make cold air, it removes the heat. @@@@@ @@@@@ Moron! Faster moving molecules SURE do not pass @@@@@ through a window pane. You are talking about a free @@@@@ flow of air where a free flow of air doesn't happen. @@@@@ @@@@@ Doh! Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer side of the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 20:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <brotuh.nic.17.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #241146 |
On 2018-12-24 8:26 p.m., Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <92v22e9p85jk3jjk1tpc4r6lsdb9pumt2d@4ax.com>, > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 16:54:51 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > @@@@@ >In article <ggp22etv60fic8tie874p3imqq8o9a3nad@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > @@@@@ >>On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 13:26:32 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: > @@@@@ >> > @@@@@ >><...> > @@@@@ >> > @@@@@ >>>Heat radiates out towards colder places (a gradient), making the space it > @@@@@ >>>left colder. Cold does not "radiate" in to a warmer place. Dumbass! > @@@@@ >> > @@@@@ >>"And, a double dumbass on you!" Here's why. People > @@@@@ >>who live where it gets below freezing often have to > @@@@@ >>scrape ice and frost off the outside of their windshields. > @@@@@ >> > @@@@@ >>According to you, the ice would be on the insides of their > @@@@@ >>windshields because what little heat that got trapped > @@@@@ >>inside the car would be radiating out and the inside of > @@@@@ >>the windshield would get colder than the outside of the > @@@@@ >>windshield and so the frost would be on the inside. > @@@@@ >> > @@@@@ >>Try to weasel your way out of THAT one, Einstein! > @@@@@ > > @@@@@ >He's right, heat gives itself to cold. The faster moving molecules try > @@@@@ >to balance and they do so by moving to the slower moving ones. An air > @@@@@ >conditioner does not make cold air, it removes the heat. > @@@@@ > @@@@@ Moron! Faster moving molecules SURE do not pass > @@@@@ through a window pane. You are talking about a free > @@@@@ flow of air where a free flow of air doesn't happen. > @@@@@ > @@@@@ Doh! > > Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer side of > the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid > fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. > yea , each side half fk'ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 21:00 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368b5931b16182f3995ca2@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #241150 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <brotuh.nic.17.3@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... @@@@@ @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 8:26 p.m., Checkmate wrote: @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <92v22e9p85jk3jjk1tpc4r6lsdb9pumt2d@4ax.com>, @@@@@ > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ @@@@@ > @@@@@ On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 16:54:51 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: @@@@@ > @@@@@ >In article <ggp22etv60fic8tie874p3imqq8o9a3nad@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 13:26:32 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> @@@@@ > @@@@@ >><...> @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>Heat radiates out towards colder places (a gradient), making the space it @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>left colder. Cold does not "radiate" in to a warmer place. Dumbass! @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>"And, a double dumbass on you!" Here's why. People @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>who live where it gets below freezing often have to @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>scrape ice and frost off the outside of their windshields. @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>According to you, the ice would be on the insides of their @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>windshields because what little heat that got trapped @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>inside the car would be radiating out and the inside of @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>the windshield would get colder than the outside of the @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>windshield and so the frost would be on the inside. @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>Try to weasel your way out of THAT one, Einstein! @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >He's right, heat gives itself to cold. The faster moving molecules try @@@@@ > @@@@@ >to balance and they do so by moving to the slower moving ones. An air @@@@@ > @@@@@ >conditioner does not make cold air, it removes the heat. @@@@@ > @@@@@ @@@@@ > @@@@@ Moron! Faster moving molecules SURE do not pass @@@@@ > @@@@@ through a window pane. You are talking about a free @@@@@ > @@@@@ flow of air where a free flow of air doesn't happen. @@@@@ > @@@@@ @@@@@ > @@@@@ Doh! @@@@@ > @@@@@ > Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer side of @@@@@ > the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid @@@@@ > fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. @@@@@ > @@@@@ yea , each side half fk'ed That was a brand new spankage, custom made for Gweggles. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 05:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <brpuen.7af.17.16@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #241168 |
On 2018-12-24 10:00 p.m., Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <brotuh.nic.17.3@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com > says... > > > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 8:26 p.m., Checkmate wrote: > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <92v22e9p85jk3jjk1tpc4r6lsdb9pumt2d@4ax.com>, > @@@@@ > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > @@@@@ > > @@@@@ > > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 16:54:51 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >In article <ggp22etv60fic8tie874p3imqq8o9a3nad@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 13:26:32 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >><...> > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>Heat radiates out towards colder places (a gradient), making the space it > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>left colder. Cold does not "radiate" in to a warmer place. Dumbass! > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>"And, a double dumbass on you!" Here's why. People > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>who live where it gets below freezing often have to > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>scrape ice and frost off the outside of their windshields. > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>According to you, the ice would be on the insides of their > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>windshields because what little heat that got trapped > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>inside the car would be radiating out and the inside of > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>the windshield would get colder than the outside of the > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>windshield and so the frost would be on the inside. > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>Try to weasel your way out of THAT one, Einstein! > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >He's right, heat gives itself to cold. The faster moving molecules try > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >to balance and they do so by moving to the slower moving ones. An air > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >conditioner does not make cold air, it removes the heat. > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ Moron! Faster moving molecules SURE do not pass > @@@@@ > @@@@@ through a window pane. You are talking about a free > @@@@@ > @@@@@ flow of air where a free flow of air doesn't happen. > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ Doh! > @@@@@ > > @@@@@ > Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer side of > @@@@@ > the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid > @@@@@ > fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. > @@@@@ > > @@@@@ yea , each side half fk'ed > > That was a brand new spankage, custom made for Gweggles. > i like it i'm trying to work it into a sentence , oh and as far as i know , i said it first
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 19:45 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368c9925913f7db995ceb@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #241237 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <brpuen.7af.17.16@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... @@@@@ @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 10:00 p.m., Checkmate wrote: @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <brotuh.nic.17.3@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com @@@@@ > says... @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 8:26 p.m., Checkmate wrote: @@@@@ > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by @@@@@ > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <92v22e9p85jk3jjk1tpc4r6lsdb9pumt2d@4ax.com>, @@@@@ > @@@@@ > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 16:54:51 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >In article <ggp22etv60fic8tie874p3imqq8o9a3nad@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 13:26:32 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >><...> @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>Heat radiates out towards colder places (a gradient), making the space it @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>left colder. Cold does not "radiate" in to a warmer place. Dumbass! @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>"And, a double dumbass on you!" Here's why. People @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>who live where it gets below freezing often have to @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>scrape ice and frost off the outside of their windshields. @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>According to you, the ice would be on the insides of their @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>windshields because what little heat that got trapped @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>inside the car would be radiating out and the inside of @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>the windshield would get colder than the outside of the @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>windshield and so the frost would be on the inside. @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>Try to weasel your way out of THAT one, Einstein! @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >He's right, heat gives itself to cold. The faster moving molecules try @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >to balance and they do so by moving to the slower moving ones. An air @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >conditioner does not make cold air, it removes the heat. @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ Moron! Faster moving molecules SURE do not pass @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ through a window pane. You are talking about a free @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ flow of air where a free flow of air doesn't happen. @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ Doh! @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer side of @@@@@ > @@@@@ > the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid @@@@@ > @@@@@ > fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ yea , each side half fk'ed @@@@@ > @@@@@ > That was a brand new spankage, custom made for Gweggles. @@@@@ > @@@@@ i like it i'm trying to work it into a sentence , @@@@@ oh and as far as i know , i said it first Go ahead and use it, there's plenty more where that came from. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-26 06:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <brsjq9.hr9.17.6@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #241596 |
On 2018-12-25 8:45 p.m., Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <brpuen.7af.17.16@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com > says... > > > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 10:00 p.m., Checkmate wrote: > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <brotuh.nic.17.3@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com > @@@@@ > says... > @@@@@ > > @@@@@ > > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 8:26 p.m., Checkmate wrote: > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <92v22e9p85jk3jjk1tpc4r6lsdb9pumt2d@4ax.com>, > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 16:54:51 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >In article <ggp22etv60fic8tie874p3imqq8o9a3nad@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 13:26:32 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >><...> > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>Heat radiates out towards colder places (a gradient), making the space it > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>left colder. Cold does not "radiate" in to a warmer place. Dumbass! > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>"And, a double dumbass on you!" Here's why. People > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>who live where it gets below freezing often have to > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>scrape ice and frost off the outside of their windshields. > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>According to you, the ice would be on the insides of their > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>windshields because what little heat that got trapped > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>inside the car would be radiating out and the inside of > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>the windshield would get colder than the outside of the > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>windshield and so the frost would be on the inside. > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>Try to weasel your way out of THAT one, Einstein! > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >He's right, heat gives itself to cold. The faster moving molecules try > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >to balance and they do so by moving to the slower moving ones. An air > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >conditioner does not make cold air, it removes the heat. > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ Moron! Faster moving molecules SURE do not pass > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ through a window pane. You are talking about a free > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ flow of air where a free flow of air doesn't happen. > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ Doh! > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer side of > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > > @@@@@ > @@@@@ yea , each side half fk'ed > @@@@@ > > @@@@@ > That was a brand new spankage, custom made for Gweggles. > @@@@@ > > @@@@@ i like it i'm trying to work it into a sentence , > @@@@@ oh and as far as i know , i said it first > > Go ahead and use it, there's plenty more where that came from. > i'm working on it i need to be in mid bicker to use it
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 01:16 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368e382aec2f8e91995d17@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #241635 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <brsjq9.hr9.17.6@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... < < On 2018-12-25 8:45 p.m., Checkmate wrote: < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by < > Checkmate! In article <brpuen.7af.17.16@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com < > says... < > < > < > @@@@@ < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 10:00 p.m., Checkmate wrote: < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <brotuh.nic.17.3@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com < > @@@@@ > says... < > @@@@@ > < > @@@@@ > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 8:26 p.m., Checkmate wrote: < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <92v22e9p85jk3jjk1tpc4r6lsdb9pumt2d@4ax.com>, < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 16:54:51 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >In article <ggp22etv60fic8tie874p3imqq8o9a3nad@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 13:26:32 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >><...> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>Heat radiates out towards colder places (a gradient), making the space it < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>left colder. Cold does not "radiate" in to a warmer place. Dumbass! < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>"And, a double dumbass on you!" Here's why. People < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>who live where it gets below freezing often have to < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>scrape ice and frost off the outside of their windshields. < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>According to you, the ice would be on the insides of their < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>windshields because what little heat that got trapped < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>inside the car would be radiating out and the inside of < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>the windshield would get colder than the outside of the < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>windshield and so the frost would be on the inside. < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>Try to weasel your way out of THAT one, Einstein! < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >He's right, heat gives itself to cold. The faster moving molecules try < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >to balance and they do so by moving to the slower moving ones. An air < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >conditioner does not make cold air, it removes the heat. < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ Moron! Faster moving molecules SURE do not pass < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ through a window pane. You are talking about a free < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ flow of air where a free flow of air doesn't happen. < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ Doh! < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer side of < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ yea , each side half fk'ed < > @@@@@ > < > @@@@@ > That was a brand new spankage, custom made for Gweggles. < > @@@@@ > < > @@@@@ i like it i'm trying to work it into a sentence , < > @@@@@ oh and as far as i know , i said it first < > < > Go ahead and use it, there's plenty more where that came from. < > < i'm working on it i need to be in mid bicker to use it Well, the only condition is you can't use it on me. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web