Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #240077 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-22 20:50 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-12-24 10:25 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 207 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-22 20:50 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 13:59 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-24 00:35 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 17:43 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-24 17:25 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 10:31 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-24 20:00 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 13:02 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-24 21:16 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 14:23 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-24 21:46 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 14:48 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-25 01:09 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 18:37 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-25 19:58 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 13:09 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-25 20:46 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 13:51 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-25 22:57 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 15:59 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 23:43 -0800
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 05:46 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-25 18:25 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 11:28 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 12:36 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-25 19:44 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 12:56 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-25 19:59 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 13:06 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 19:44 -0800
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 06:02 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 14:32 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 07:38 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 16:23 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 09:32 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 17:13 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 10:15 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 11:40 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 11:45 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 11:47 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 11:53 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 18:57 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 06:50 +1100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 16:13 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 18:57 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 12:08 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 16:12 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 16:21 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 18:57 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 12:09 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-26 11:48 -0800
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 12:50 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 20:12 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 07:20 +1100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 20:59 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:48 +1100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 22:50 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 11:11 +1100
Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> - 2018-12-27 01:23 +0100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 15:50 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 23:08 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 11:22 +1100
Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> - 2018-12-27 01:38 +0100
Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> - 2018-12-27 00:27 +0100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 16:29 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 16:32 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 11:31 +1100
Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> - 2018-12-27 01:39 +0100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 17:40 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 19:31 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 14:07 +1100
Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> - 2018-12-27 09:59 +0100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 15:43 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 09:21 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 16:58 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 10:10 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 17:16 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 10:18 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:31 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 17:43 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:49 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 18:32 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 11:37 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 11:31 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:10 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 17:15 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:32 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 17:43 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:48 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 09:26 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 16:56 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:08 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 01:02 -0800
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 04:33 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-27 14:25 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:42 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-27 18:16 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 05:50 +1100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 12:33 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-27 20:12 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 13:20 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-27 20:13 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 13:20 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 09:07 +1100
Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> - 2018-12-27 23:49 +0100
Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> - 2018-12-27 22:49 +0100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 12:32 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-27 20:13 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 13:23 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 15:42 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 09:21 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 09:26 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 16:57 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:09 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 17:16 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:30 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 17:44 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:49 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 18:32 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 11:36 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Terry Casey <k.type@example.invalid> - 2018-12-29 14:32 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <bzs@TheWor1d.cam> - 2018-12-26 12:08 -0800
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 20:12 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 07:19 +1100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 21:00 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:49 +1100
Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> - 2018-12-27 00:30 +0100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 16:31 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 13:25 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 20:59 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 14:16 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 22:11 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 15:13 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 15:20 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 10:02 +1100
Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> - 2018-12-27 00:31 +0100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 23:06 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 16:27 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 15:44 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 09:28 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 09:35 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 16:56 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:08 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 11:17 +1100
Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> - 2018-12-27 01:25 +0100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:56 +1100
Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> - 2018-12-27 00:32 +0100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 14:33 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 08:27 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 15:39 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 08:40 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 08:46 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 08:53 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 09:31 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 11:38 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 11:42 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 11:45 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 11:49 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 18:52 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 12:07 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 16:09 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 16:22 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 18:49 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 11:54 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 18:59 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 16:20 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 11:39 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 18:59 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 06:56 +1100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 22:12 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:58 +1100
Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> - 2018-12-27 00:33 +0100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 16:25 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 15:45 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 09:22 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 16:57 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 10:09 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 17:16 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 10:20 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:32 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 17:43 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:46 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 06:07 +1100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 05:59 +1100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <bzs@TheWor1d.cam> - 2018-12-26 07:52 -0800
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 11:37 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <bzs@TheWor1d.cam> - 2018-12-26 10:46 -0800
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 22:13 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 16:34 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 05:55 +1100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 18:58 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 06:54 +1100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 16:11 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 08:21 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-23 20:41 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-24 12:08 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 05:54 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-24 13:55 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 06:57 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-24 14:10 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 07:15 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-24 17:24 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 10:30 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-24 20:00 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-24 08:58 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-24 17:23 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? William Gothberg <WG@internet.com> - 2018-12-24 10:25 -0700
Page 4 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 11 Next page →
| From | "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-26 23:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <op.zunjwaqko5piw3@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan> |
| In reply to | #241864 |
On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 22:50:45 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2018-12-26 3:48 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> wrote in message >> news:op.zundxvt1o5piw3@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan... >>> On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 20:20:20 -0000, Rod Speed >>> <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> wrote in message >>>> news:op.zunbrg17o5piw3@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan... >>>>> On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 19:50:32 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>> says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> < >>>>>>> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>> posts >>>>>>> by >>>>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>> < > says... >>>>>>> < > >>>>>>> < > >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % >>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 -0000, % >>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William >>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 -0000, % >>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William >>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in that >>>>>>> trick >>>>>>> cyclist bullshit. >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know what >>>>>>> it is >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's >>>>>>> heard of >>>>>>> it. >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak for them >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant twat. >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish you were >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful than >>>>>>> you. >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact >>>>>>> generally >>>>>>> you're a burden >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the >>>>>>> largest of >>>>>>> my endless >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and >>>>>>> alcoholics >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said Catholicoholics. >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those programs, you >>>>>>> just ease it off >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can score >>>>>>> some dope from. >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and drink >>>>>>> right in the >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean up , >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a year >>>>>>> < > >>>>>>> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court made >>>>>>> them >>>>>>> go. >>>>>>> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>>>>>> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>>>> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug addiction >>>>>>> programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>>>> >>>>>> how do they make them stay their >>>>> >>>>> It's America, they just shoot you if you don't. They're stuck 200 >>>>> years >>>>> in the past. >>>> >>>> Must be why you are using that dinosaur system for communicating. >>> >>> Usenet? >> >> And the internet too. > > i go to the other internet usually , > bur right now i need something from this one Did you know there are three GPS systems? The Americans can now go fuck themselves.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 11:22 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <g8ikadFj2grU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #241870 |
"William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> wrote in message news:op.zunjwaqko5piw3@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan... > On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 22:50:45 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2018-12-26 3:48 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: >>> >>> >>> "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> wrote in message >>> news:op.zundxvt1o5piw3@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan... >>>> On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 20:20:20 -0000, Rod Speed >>>> <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> wrote in >>>>> message >>>>> news:op.zunbrg17o5piw3@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan... >>>>>> On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 19:50:32 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>>> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>>> posts >>>>>>>> by >>>>>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>> < > says... >>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % >>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William >>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 -0000, % >>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William >>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 -0000, % >>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William >>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in that >>>>>>>> trick >>>>>>>> cyclist bullshit. >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know what >>>>>>>> it is >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's >>>>>>>> heard of >>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak for >>>>>>>> them >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant >>>>>>>> twat. >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish you >>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful than >>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact >>>>>>>> generally >>>>>>>> you're a burden >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the >>>>>>>> largest of >>>>>>>> my endless >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and >>>>>>>> alcoholics >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said Catholicoholics. >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those programs, >>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>> just ease it off >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can >>>>>>>> score >>>>>>>> some dope from. >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and >>>>>>>> drink >>>>>>>> right in the >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean up , >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a year >>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court made >>>>>>>> them >>>>>>>> go. >>>>>>>> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>>>>>>> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>>>>> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug addiction >>>>>>>> programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> how do they make them stay their >>>>>> >>>>>> It's America, they just shoot you if you don't. They're stuck 200 >>>>>> years >>>>>> in the past. >>>>> >>>>> Must be why you are using that dinosaur system for communicating. >>>> >>>> Usenet? >>> >>> And the internet too. >> >> i go to the other internet usually , >> bur right now i need something from this one > > Did you know there are three GPS systems? The Americans can now go fuck > themselves. In fact it's the UK that gets to do that post brexit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 01:38 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL |
| Message-ID | <DaVUD.66485$N45.14716@usenetxs.com> |
| In reply to | #241894 |
On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 11:22:29 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rot Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: <FLUSH another 172 lines of stinking trollshit> -- Another typical retarded conversation between our two village idiots, Birdbrain and Rot Speed: Birdbrain: "You beat me to it. Plain sex is boring." Senile Rot: "Then fuck the cats. That wont be boring." Birdbrain: "Sell me a de-clawing tool first." Senile Rot: "Wont help with the teeth." Birdbrain: "They've never gone for me with their mouths." Rot Speed: "They will if you are stupid enough to try fucking them." Birdbrain: "No, they always use claws." Rot Speed: "They wont if you try fucking them. Try it and see." Message-ID: <g3cjf7FavtgU1@mid.individual.net>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 00:27 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL |
| Message-ID | <F7UUD.67717$MC5.1662@usenetxs.com> |
| In reply to | #241861 |
On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 09:48:38 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rot Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: >> Usenet? > > And the internet too. Without which you two abnormal fucked up sociopathic trolls would have NO life AT ALL, senile Rot? <BG> -- MrTurnip@down.the.farm about senile Rot Speed: "This is like having a conversation with someone with brain damage." MID: <ps10v9$uo2$1@gioia.aioe.org>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-26 16:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368dbcc0627863087f9@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #241817 |
In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > >On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >> says... >> >> >> < >> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >> < > says... >> < > >> < > >> < > @@@@@ >> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >> < > @@@@@ > says... >> < > @@@@@ > >> < > @@@@@ > >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in that trick cyclist bullshit. >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know what it is >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's heard of it. >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak for them >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant twat. >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish you were >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful than you. >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact generally you're a burden >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the largest of my endless >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and alcoholics >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said Catholicoholics. >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those programs, you just ease it off >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >> < > @@@@@ > >> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can score some dope from. >> < > @@@@@ > >> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and drink right in the >> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean up , >> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a year >> < > >> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court made them go. >> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >> >> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug addiction >> programs, and make them pay for it too. >> >how do they make them stay their No swinging doors here. Once you enter you can't leave until you are clean. The law say they are responsible for you once you enter and if they let you leave while you still have something in your system and get hurt they can hold the detox responsible.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-26 16:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <brtoka.uos.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #241882 |
On 2018-12-26 4:29 p.m., Skeeter wrote: > In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... >> >> On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >>> says... >>> >>> >>> < >>> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >>> < > says... >>> < > >>> < > >>> < > @@@@@ >>> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >>> < > @@@@@ > says... >>> < > @@@@@ > >>> < > @@@@@ > >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in that trick cyclist bullshit. >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know what it is >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's heard of it. >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak for them >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant twat. >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish you were >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful than you. >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact generally you're a burden >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the largest of my endless >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and alcoholics >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said Catholicoholics. >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those programs, you just ease it off >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>> < > @@@@@ > >>> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can score some dope from. >>> < > @@@@@ > >>> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and drink right in the >>> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean up , >>> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a year >>> < > >>> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court made them go. >>> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>> >>> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug addiction >>> programs, and make them pay for it too. >>> >> how do they make them stay their > > No swinging doors here. Once you enter you can't leave until you are > clean. The law say they are responsible for you once you enter and if > they let you leave while you still have something in your system and get > hurt they can hold the detox responsible. > mandated recovery , i wonder how successful that is
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 11:31 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <g8ikqkFj6psU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #241886 |
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message news:brtoka.uos.17.1@news.alt.net... > On 2018-12-26 4:29 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >> In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... >>> >>> On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>> persent@gmail.com >>>> says... >>>> >>>> >>>> < >>>> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>> posts by >>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>> persent@gmail.com >>>> < > says... >>>> < > >>>> < > >>>> < > @@@@@ >>>> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>> reading posts by >>>> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, >>>> persent@gmail.com >>>> < > @@@@@ > says... >>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William Gothberg >>>> wrote: >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % >>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William Gothberg >>>> wrote: >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 -0000, % >>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William Gothberg >>>> wrote: >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 -0000, % >>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William >>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in that trick >>>> cyclist bullshit. >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know what it is >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's heard of >>>> it. >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak for them >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant twat. >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish you were >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful than you. >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact generally >>>> you're a burden >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the largest of >>>> my endless >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and >>>> alcoholics >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said Catholicoholics. >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those programs, you >>>> just ease it off >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can score >>>> some dope from. >>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and drink >>>> right in the >>>> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean up , >>>> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a year >>>> < > >>>> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court made them >>>> go. >>>> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>>> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>> >>>> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug addiction >>>> programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>> >>> how do they make them stay their >> >> No swinging doors here. Once you enter you can't leave until you are >> clean. The law say they are responsible for you once you enter and if >> they let you leave while you still have something in your system and get >> hurt they can hold the detox responsible. >> > mandated recovery , i wonder how successful that is Hopeless. Not even 1 in 50.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 01:39 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL |
| Message-ID | <pbVUD.67519$fy7.10820@usenetxs.com> |
| In reply to | #241897 |
On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 11:31:09 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rot Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: > Hopeless. You are, you 85-year-old, abnormal troll! -- Richard addressing Rot Speed: "Shit you're thick/pathetic excuse for a troll." MID: <ogoa38$pul$1@news.mixmin.net>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-26 17:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <brtsjh.h8c.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #241897 |
On 2018-12-26 5:31 p.m., Rod Speed wrote: > > > "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:brtoka.uos.17.1@news.alt.net... >> On 2018-12-26 4:29 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... >>>> >>>> On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>> posts by >>>>> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>> says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> < >>>>> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>> posts by >>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>> < > says... >>>>> < > >>>>> < > >>>>> < > @@@@@ >>>>> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>> reading posts by >>>>> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>> < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>> wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William Gothberg >>>>> wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % >>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William >>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 -0000, % >>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William >>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 -0000, % >>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William >>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in that >>>>> trick cyclist bullshit. >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know what >>>>> it is >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's heard >>>>> of it. >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak for them >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant twat. >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish you were >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful than you. >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact >>>>> generally you're a burden >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the largest >>>>> of my endless >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and >>>>> alcoholics >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said Catholicoholics. >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those programs, >>>>> you just ease it off >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can >>>>> score some dope from. >>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and >>>>> drink right in the >>>>> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean up , >>>>> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a year >>>>> < > >>>>> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court made >>>>> them go. >>>>> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>>>> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>> >>>>> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug addiction >>>>> programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>> >>>> how do they make them stay their >>> >>> No swinging doors here. Once you enter you can't leave until you are >>> clean. The law say they are responsible for you once you enter and if >>> they let you leave while you still have something in your system and get >>> hurt they can hold the detox responsible. >>> >> mandated recovery , i wonder how successful that is > > Hopeless. Not even 1 in 50. we don't even except mandated people
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-26 19:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368de780f6a74eb0800@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #241897 |
In article <g8ikqkFj6psU1@mid.individual.net>, rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com says... > >"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:brtoka.uos.17.1@news.alt.net... >> On 2018-12-26 4:29 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... >>>> >>>> On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>>> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>> says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> < >>>>> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>> posts by >>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>> < > says... >>>>> < > >>>>> < > >>>>> < > @@@@@ >>>>> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>> reading posts by >>>>> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>> < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William Gothberg >>>>> wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % >>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>> wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 -0000, % >>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>> wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 -0000, % >>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William >>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in that trick >>>>> cyclist bullshit. >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know what it is >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's heard of >>>>> it. >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak for them >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant twat. >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish you were >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful than you. >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact generally >>>>> you're a burden >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the largest of >>>>> my endless >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and >>>>> alcoholics >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said Catholicoholics. >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those programs, you >>>>> just ease it off >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can score >>>>> some dope from. >>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and drink >>>>> right in the >>>>> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean up , >>>>> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a year >>>>> < > >>>>> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court made them >>>>> go. >>>>> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>>>> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>> >>>>> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug addiction >>>>> programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>> >>>> how do they make them stay their >>> >>> No swinging doors here. Once you enter you can't leave until you are >>> clean. The law say they are responsible for you once you enter and if >>> they let you leave while you still have something in your system and get >>> hurt they can hold the detox responsible. >>> >> mandated recovery , i wonder how successful that is Only detox is like that, not the treatment centers. > >Hopeless. Not even 1 in 50. You have proof? Or maybe you're just spouting off.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 14:07 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <g8itv8Fkv01U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #241919 |
"Skeeter" <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote in message news:MPG.368de780f6a74eb0800@news.eternal-september.org... > In article <g8ikqkFj6psU1@mid.individual.net>, rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com > says... >> >>"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>news:brtoka.uos.17.1@news.alt.net... >>> On 2018-12-26 4:29 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>> In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... >>>>> >>>>> On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>>>> by >>>>>> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>> says... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> < >>>>>> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>> posts by >>>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>> < > says... >>>>>> < > >>>>>> < > >>>>>> < > @@@@@ >>>>>> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William Gothberg >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % >>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 -0000, % >>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William >>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 -0000, % >>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William >>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in that >>>>>> trick >>>>>> cyclist bullshit. >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know what it >>>>>> is >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's heard >>>>>> of >>>>>> it. >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak for them >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant twat. >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish you were >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful than >>>>>> you. >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact >>>>>> generally >>>>>> you're a burden >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the largest >>>>>> of >>>>>> my endless >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and >>>>>> alcoholics >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said Catholicoholics. >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those programs, you >>>>>> just ease it off >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can score >>>>>> some dope from. >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and drink >>>>>> right in the >>>>>> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean up , >>>>>> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a year >>>>>> < > >>>>>> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court made >>>>>> them >>>>>> go. >>>>>> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>>>>> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>>> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>>> >>>>>> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug addiction >>>>>> programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>>> >>>>> how do they make them stay their >>>> >>>> No swinging doors here. Once you enter you can't leave until you are >>>> clean. The law say they are responsible for you once you enter and if >>>> they let you leave while you still have something in your system and >>>> get >>>> hurt they can hold the detox responsible. >>>> >>> mandated recovery , i wonder how successful that is > > Only detox is like that, not the treatment centers. >> >>Hopeless. Not even 1 in 50. > > You have proof? Yep, the official stats on them never touching it again is that bad.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 09:59 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL |
| Message-ID | <vw0VD.190079$DWh1.86729@usenetxs.com> |
| In reply to | #241935 |
On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 14:07:13 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rot Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: >> >> Only detox is like that, not the treatment centers. >>> >>>Hopeless. Not even 1 in 50. >> >> You have proof? > > Yep, the official stats on them never touching it again is that bad. Now ALSO an expert in the treatment of drug addiction, senile Mr Know-it-all? Fucking HILARIOUS! LOL -- pamela about Rot Speed: "His off the cuff expertise demonstrates how little he knows..." MID: <XnsA90B720A381A2D4AM2@81.171.92.183>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 15:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <op.zuqomatu7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan> |
| In reply to | #241919 |
On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 02:31:49 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > In article <g8ikqkFj6psU1@mid.individual.net>, rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com > says... >> >> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:brtoka.uos.17.1@news.alt.net... >>> On 2018-12-26 4:29 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>> In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... >>>>> >>>>> On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>>>> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>> says... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> < >>>>>> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>> posts by >>>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>> < > says... >>>>>> < > >>>>>> < > >>>>>> < > @@@@@ >>>>>> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William Gothberg >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % >>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 -0000, % >>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 -0000, % >>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William >>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in that trick >>>>>> cyclist bullshit. >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know what it is >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's heard of >>>>>> it. >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak for them >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant twat. >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish you were >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful than you. >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact generally >>>>>> you're a burden >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the largest of >>>>>> my endless >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and >>>>>> alcoholics >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said Catholicoholics. >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those programs, you >>>>>> just ease it off >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can score >>>>>> some dope from. >>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and drink >>>>>> right in the >>>>>> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean up , >>>>>> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a year >>>>>> < > >>>>>> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court made them >>>>>> go. >>>>>> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>>>>> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>>> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>>> >>>>>> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug addiction >>>>>> programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>>> >>>>> how do they make them stay their >>>> >>>> No swinging doors here. Once you enter you can't leave until you are >>>> clean. The law say they are responsible for you once you enter and if >>>> they let you leave while you still have something in your system and get >>>> hurt they can hold the detox responsible. >>>> >>> mandated recovery , i wonder how successful that is > > Only detox is like that, not the treatment centers. >> >> Hopeless. Not even 1 in 50. > > You have proof? Or maybe you're just spouting off. Have you not noticed % is running out of brain cells?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 09:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368ffb83508d2d4481f@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #242321 |
In article <op.zuqomatu7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan>, William_Gothberg@internet.co.is says... > >On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 02:31:49 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> In article <g8ikqkFj6psU1@mid.individual.net>, rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com >> says... >>> >>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:brtoka.uos.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>> On 2018-12-26 4:29 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>>>>> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>> says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> < >>>>>>> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>> < > says... >>>>>>> < > >>>>>>> < > >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % >>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 -0000, % >>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 -0000, % >>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William >>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in that trick >>>>>>> cyclist bullshit. >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know what it is >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's heard of >>>>>>> it. >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak for them >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant twat. >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish you were >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful than you. >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact generally >>>>>>> you're a burden >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the largest of >>>>>>> my endless >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and >>>>>>> alcoholics >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said Catholicoholics. >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those programs, you >>>>>>> just ease it off >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can score >>>>>>> some dope from. >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and drink >>>>>>> right in the >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean up , >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a year >>>>>>> < > >>>>>>> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court made them >>>>>>> go. >>>>>>> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>>>>>> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>>>> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug addiction >>>>>>> programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>>>> >>>>>> how do they make them stay their >>>>> >>>>> No swinging doors here. Once you enter you can't leave until you are >>>>> clean. The law say they are responsible for you once you enter and if >>>>> they let you leave while you still have something in your system and get >>>>> hurt they can hold the detox responsible. >>>>> >>>> mandated recovery , i wonder how successful that is >> >> Only detox is like that, not the treatment centers. >>> >>> Hopeless. Not even 1 in 50. >> >> You have proof? Or maybe you're just spouting off. > >Have you not noticed % is running out of brain cells? He sure isn't getting any from your direction.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 16:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <op.zuqr2zb27uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan> |
| In reply to | #242338 |
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 16:21:44 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > In article <op.zuqomatu7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan>, > William_Gothberg@internet.co.is says... >> >> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 02:31:49 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> >>> In article <g8ikqkFj6psU1@mid.individual.net>, rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com >>> says... >>>> >>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:brtoka.uos.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>>> On 2018-12-26 4:29 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>>>>>> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>> < > says... >>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % >>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 -0000, % >>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 -0000, % >>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William >>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in that trick >>>>>>>> cyclist bullshit. >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know what it is >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's heard of >>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak for them >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant twat. >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish you were >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful than you. >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact generally >>>>>>>> you're a burden >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the largest of >>>>>>>> my endless >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and >>>>>>>> alcoholics >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said Catholicoholics. >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those programs, you >>>>>>>> just ease it off >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can score >>>>>>>> some dope from. >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and drink >>>>>>>> right in the >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean up , >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a year >>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court made them >>>>>>>> go. >>>>>>>> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>>>>>>> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>>>>> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug addiction >>>>>>>> programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> how do they make them stay their >>>>>> >>>>>> No swinging doors here. Once you enter you can't leave until you are >>>>>> clean. The law say they are responsible for you once you enter and if >>>>>> they let you leave while you still have something in your system and get >>>>>> hurt they can hold the detox responsible. >>>>>> >>>>> mandated recovery , i wonder how successful that is >>> >>> Only detox is like that, not the treatment centers. >>>> >>>> Hopeless. Not even 1 in 50. >>> >>> You have proof? Or maybe you're just spouting off. >> >> Have you not noticed % is running out of brain cells? > > He sure isn't getting any from your direction. If I gave him one of mine it would overload his own and cause spontaneous combustion. However if you're willing to video that for youtube and share half the dividends....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 10:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.369006f9275c70c782c@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #242358 |
In article <op.zuqr2zb27uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan>, William_Gothberg@internet.co.is says... > >On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 16:21:44 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> In article <op.zuqomatu7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan>, >> William_Gothberg@internet.co.is says... >>> >>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 02:31:49 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> In article <g8ikqkFj6psU1@mid.individual.net>, rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com >>>> says... >>>>> >>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:brtoka.uos.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>> On 2018-12-26 4:29 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>>>>>>> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> < > says... >>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % >>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 -0000, % >>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 -0000, % >>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William >>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in that trick >>>>>>>>> cyclist bullshit. >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know what it is >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's heard of >>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak for them >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant twat. >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish you were >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful than you. >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact generally >>>>>>>>> you're a burden >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the largest of >>>>>>>>> my endless >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and >>>>>>>>> alcoholics >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said Catholicoholics. >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those programs, you >>>>>>>>> just ease it off >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can score >>>>>>>>> some dope from. >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and drink >>>>>>>>> right in the >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean up , >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a year >>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court made them >>>>>>>>> go. >>>>>>>>> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>>>>>>>> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>>>>>> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug addiction >>>>>>>>> programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> how do they make them stay their >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No swinging doors here. Once you enter you can't leave until you are >>>>>>> clean. The law say they are responsible for you once you enter and if >>>>>>> they let you leave while you still have something in your system and get >>>>>>> hurt they can hold the detox responsible. >>>>>>> >>>>>> mandated recovery , i wonder how successful that is >>>> >>>> Only detox is like that, not the treatment centers. >>>>> >>>>> Hopeless. Not even 1 in 50. >>>> >>>> You have proof? Or maybe you're just spouting off. >>> >>> Have you not noticed % is running out of brain cells? >> >> He sure isn't getting any from your direction. > >If I gave him one of mine it would overload his own and cause spontaneous combustion. However if you're willing to video that for youtube and share half the dividends.... So you admit that just one more would overload, thereby saying he already had some making you a liar.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 17:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <op.zuqsw9uk7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan> |
| In reply to | #242374 |
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:10:35 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > In article <op.zuqr2zb27uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan>, > William_Gothberg@internet.co.is says... >> >> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 16:21:44 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> >>> In article <op.zuqomatu7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan>, >>> William_Gothberg@internet.co.is says... >>>> >>>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 02:31:49 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <g8ikqkFj6psU1@mid.individual.net>, rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com >>>>> says... >>>>>> >>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:brtoka.uos.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 4:29 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>>>>>>>> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>> < > says... >>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in that trick >>>>>>>>>> cyclist bullshit. >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know what it is >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's heard of >>>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak for them >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant twat. >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish you were >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful than you. >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact generally >>>>>>>>>> you're a burden >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the largest of >>>>>>>>>> my endless >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and >>>>>>>>>> alcoholics >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said Catholicoholics. >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those programs, you >>>>>>>>>> just ease it off >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can score >>>>>>>>>> some dope from. >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and drink >>>>>>>>>> right in the >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean up , >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a year >>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court made them >>>>>>>>>> go. >>>>>>>>>> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>>>>>>>>> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>>>>>>> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug addiction >>>>>>>>>> programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> how do they make them stay their >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No swinging doors here. Once you enter you can't leave until you are >>>>>>>> clean. The law say they are responsible for you once you enter and if >>>>>>>> they let you leave while you still have something in your system and get >>>>>>>> hurt they can hold the detox responsible. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> mandated recovery , i wonder how successful that is >>>>> >>>>> Only detox is like that, not the treatment centers. >>>>>> >>>>>> Hopeless. Not even 1 in 50. >>>>> >>>>> You have proof? Or maybe you're just spouting off. >>>> >>>> Have you not noticed % is running out of brain cells? >>> >>> He sure isn't getting any from your direction. >> >> If I gave him one of mine it would overload his own and cause spontaneous combustion. However if you're willing to video that for youtube and share half the dividends.... > > So you admit that just one more would overload, thereby saying he > already had some making you a liar. I said RUNNING OUT, what part of running out = zero in your language?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 10:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.369008e4bfa06bb6834@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #242385 |
In article <op.zuqsw9uk7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan>, William_Gothberg@internet.co.is says... > >On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:10:35 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> In article <op.zuqr2zb27uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan>, >> William_Gothberg@internet.co.is says... >>> >>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 16:21:44 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> In article <op.zuqomatu7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan>, >>>> William_Gothberg@internet.co.is says... >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 02:31:49 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In article <g8ikqkFj6psU1@mid.individual.net>, rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com >>>>>> says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:brtoka.uos.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 4:29 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>> In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>>>>>>>>> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>>>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>> < > says... >>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in that trick >>>>>>>>>>> cyclist bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know what it is >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's heard of >>>>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak for them >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant twat. >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish you were >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful than you. >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact generally >>>>>>>>>>> you're a burden >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the largest of >>>>>>>>>>> my endless >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and >>>>>>>>>>> alcoholics >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said Catholicoholics. >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those programs, you >>>>>>>>>>> just ease it off >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can score >>>>>>>>>>> some dope from. >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and drink >>>>>>>>>>> right in the >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean up , >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a year >>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court made them >>>>>>>>>>> go. >>>>>>>>>>> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>>>>>>>>>> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>>>>>>>> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug addiction >>>>>>>>>>> programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> how do they make them stay their >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No swinging doors here. Once you enter you can't leave until you are >>>>>>>>> clean. The law say they are responsible for you once you enter and if >>>>>>>>> they let you leave while you still have something in your system and get >>>>>>>>> hurt they can hold the detox responsible. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> mandated recovery , i wonder how successful that is >>>>>> >>>>>> Only detox is like that, not the treatment centers. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hopeless. Not even 1 in 50. >>>>>> >>>>>> You have proof? Or maybe you're just spouting off. >>>>> >>>>> Have you not noticed % is running out of brain cells? >>>> >>>> He sure isn't getting any from your direction. >>> >>> If I gave him one of mine it would overload his own and cause spontaneous combustion. However if you're willing to video that for youtube and share half the dividends.... >> >> So you admit that just one more would overload, thereby saying he >> already had some making you a liar. > >I said RUNNING OUT, what part of running out = zero in your language? I don't speak moron.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 10:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bs2c6v.ha4.17.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #242385 |
On 2018-12-28 10:16 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: > On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:10:35 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> In article <op.zuqr2zb27uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan>, >> William_Gothberg@internet.co.is says... >>> >>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 16:21:44 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> In article <op.zuqomatu7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan>, >>>> William_Gothberg@internet.co.is says... >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 02:31:49 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In article <g8ikqkFj6psU1@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>> rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com >>>>>> says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:brtoka.uos.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 4:29 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>> In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>>>>>> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>>>>>> reading >>>>>>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>>>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>> < > says... >>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles >>>>>>>>>>> when >>>>>>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article >>>>>>>>>>> <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William >>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 >>>>>>>>>>> -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 >>>>>>>>>>> -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in >>>>>>>>>>> that trick >>>>>>>>>>> cyclist bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know >>>>>>>>>>> what it is >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's >>>>>>>>>>> heard of >>>>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak >>>>>>>>>>> for them >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless >>>>>>>>>>> ignorant twat. >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish >>>>>>>>>>> you were >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful >>>>>>>>>>> than you. >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact >>>>>>>>>>> generally >>>>>>>>>>> you're a burden >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the >>>>>>>>>>> largest of >>>>>>>>>>> my endless >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and >>>>>>>>>>> alcoholics >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said >>>>>>>>>>> Catholicoholics. >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those >>>>>>>>>>> programs, you >>>>>>>>>>> just ease it off >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they >>>>>>>>>>> can score >>>>>>>>>>> some dope from. >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back >>>>>>>>>>> and drink >>>>>>>>>>> right in the >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean >>>>>>>>>>> up , >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for >>>>>>>>>>> a year >>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court >>>>>>>>>>> made them >>>>>>>>>>> go. >>>>>>>>>>> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>>>>>>>>>> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>>>>>>>> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug >>>>>>>>>>> addiction >>>>>>>>>>> programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> how do they make them stay their >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No swinging doors here. Once you enter you can't leave until >>>>>>>>> you are >>>>>>>>> clean. The law say they are responsible for you once you enter >>>>>>>>> and if >>>>>>>>> they let you leave while you still have something in your >>>>>>>>> system and get >>>>>>>>> hurt they can hold the detox responsible. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> mandated recovery , i wonder how successful that is >>>>>> >>>>>> Only detox is like that, not the treatment centers. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hopeless. Not even 1 in 50. >>>>>> >>>>>> You have proof? Or maybe you're just spouting off. >>>>> >>>>> Have you not noticed % is running out of brain cells? >>>> >>>> He sure isn't getting any from your direction. >>> >>> If I gave him one of mine it would overload his own and cause >>> spontaneous combustion. However if you're willing to video that for >>> youtube and share half the dividends.... >> >> So you admit that just one more would overload, thereby saying he >> already had some making you a liar. > > I said RUNNING OUT, what part of running out = zero in your language? the part where you lied
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 17:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <op.zuqt7iwo7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan> |
| In reply to | #242404 |
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:31:31 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2018-12-28 10:16 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: >> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:10:35 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> >>> In article <op.zuqr2zb27uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan>, >>> William_Gothberg@internet.co.is says... >>>> >>>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 16:21:44 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <op.zuqomatu7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan>, >>>>> William_Gothberg@internet.co.is says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 02:31:49 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> In article <g8ikqkFj6psU1@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>>> rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com >>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:brtoka.uos.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 4:29 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>>>>>>> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>>>>>>> reading >>>>>>>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>>>>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>> < > says... >>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles >>>>>>>>>>>> when >>>>>>>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article >>>>>>>>>>>> <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 >>>>>>>>>>>> -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 >>>>>>>>>>>> -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in >>>>>>>>>>>> that trick >>>>>>>>>>>> cyclist bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know >>>>>>>>>>>> what it is >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's >>>>>>>>>>>> heard of >>>>>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak >>>>>>>>>>>> for them >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless >>>>>>>>>>>> ignorant twat. >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish >>>>>>>>>>>> you were >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful >>>>>>>>>>>> than you. >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact >>>>>>>>>>>> generally >>>>>>>>>>>> you're a burden >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the >>>>>>>>>>>> largest of >>>>>>>>>>>> my endless >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and >>>>>>>>>>>> alcoholics >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said >>>>>>>>>>>> Catholicoholics. >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those >>>>>>>>>>>> programs, you >>>>>>>>>>>> just ease it off >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they >>>>>>>>>>>> can score >>>>>>>>>>>> some dope from. >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back >>>>>>>>>>>> and drink >>>>>>>>>>>> right in the >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean >>>>>>>>>>>> up , >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for >>>>>>>>>>>> a year >>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court >>>>>>>>>>>> made them >>>>>>>>>>>> go. >>>>>>>>>>>> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>>>>>>>>>>> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>>>>>>>>> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug >>>>>>>>>>>> addiction >>>>>>>>>>>> programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> how do they make them stay their >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No swinging doors here. Once you enter you can't leave until >>>>>>>>>> you are >>>>>>>>>> clean. The law say they are responsible for you once you enter >>>>>>>>>> and if >>>>>>>>>> they let you leave while you still have something in your >>>>>>>>>> system and get >>>>>>>>>> hurt they can hold the detox responsible. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> mandated recovery , i wonder how successful that is >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Only detox is like that, not the treatment centers. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hopeless. Not even 1 in 50. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You have proof? Or maybe you're just spouting off. >>>>>> >>>>>> Have you not noticed % is running out of brain cells? >>>>> >>>>> He sure isn't getting any from your direction. >>>> >>>> If I gave him one of mine it would overload his own and cause >>>> spontaneous combustion. However if you're willing to video that for >>>> youtube and share half the dividends.... >>> >>> So you admit that just one more would overload, thereby saying he >>> already had some making you a liar. >> >> I said RUNNING OUT, what part of running out = zero in your language? > > the part where you lied Quote this part.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web