Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #240013 > unrolled thread
| Started by | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-22 11:58 -0500 |
| Last post | 2018-12-23 18:58 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 166 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 11:58 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-22 22:33 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-22 17:53 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-23 01:59 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 19:14 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-22 23:54 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 08:57 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-23 09:21 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 07:22 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-23 09:10 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-23 14:26 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-23 11:36 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 10:54 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 14:01 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-23 11:08 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 13:31 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 11:38 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 13:55 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 11:11 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 14:24 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-23 11:33 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 10:53 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-23 10:57 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-23 22:35 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 20:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 18:11 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-24 11:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 11:31 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 11:11 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 15:15 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 13:47 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 13:26 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 18:10 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 16:16 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 16:28 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 17:05 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 17:26 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 17:43 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 18:01 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 18:43 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 22:49 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 05:48 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:27 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-27 16:33 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 16:19 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 19:39 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 18:09 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 19:32 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-24 19:39 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:29 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-27 16:34 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-24 16:54 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 19:41 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 19:26 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 20:32 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 21:00 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 05:47 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 19:45 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 06:04 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 01:16 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 04:34 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 08:11 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:44 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 10:46 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 08:58 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:02 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 09:07 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:30 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 11:51 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 12:02 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Lamey <teandson@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 09:03 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 09:31 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 09:07 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 12:30 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 12:05 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-26 12:09 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 12:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 10:09 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 21:03 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 12:39 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 12:49 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-28 12:21 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 10:23 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-28 12:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:52 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-29 13:00 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 10:28 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 13:47 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-27 11:19 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 17:55 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 12:23 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 16:27 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 14:29 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 21:03 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 10:48 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 10:55 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 12:16 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 13:09 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 12:17 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 15:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:42 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 12:13 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 10:15 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 12:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 08:47 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Lamey <teandson@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 08:50 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 12:48 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 11:47 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 10:56 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-25 18:02 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 11:05 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-26 19:53 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 13:00 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 13:15 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 11:26 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 14:08 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 12:23 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 14:51 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 12:17 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 13:19 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 11:28 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 10:43 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 12:14 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 14:36 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 12:39 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 11:49 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 15:09 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 12:15 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 16:27 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 14:37 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 18:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 15:24 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 17:24 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 16:27 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 22:15 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 20:42 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:49 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-27 10:43 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 10:14 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-27 16:35 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 14:11 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-27 19:25 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 17:47 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-27 23:15 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-25 16:11 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-25 17:59 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 08:40 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:49 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 09:27 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 19:22 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-24 23:06 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:25 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:44 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 11:51 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:56 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 12:42 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 10:27 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 19:25 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-25 11:31 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 08:17 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:36 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 12:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-26 12:15 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-24 09:38 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 18:58 -0800
Page 8 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 Next page →
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 16:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1o0h7ct.xqr6ig1n4e24tN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #242024 |
mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: > On 12/27/2018 5:43 AM, Sn!pe wrote: > > mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: > > > >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDTp_YQizqE> > > > > Wow. Thank you. > > Here it is with the words: > > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqpFjsMtCb0> Nice, but I think I prefer the instrumental version with the pretty lady. -- ^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 14:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q0384e$qv6$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #242048 |
On 12/27/2018 11:35 AM, Sn!pe wrote: > mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: >> On 12/27/2018 5:43 AM, Sn!pe wrote: >>> mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: >>> >>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDTp_YQizqE> >>> >>> Wow. Thank you. >> >> Here it is with the words: >> >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqpFjsMtCb0> > > Nice, but I think I prefer the instrumental version > with the pretty lady. I had to learn the words when I was learning Japanese language and culture so I could go there without getting lost or pissing off too many people and embarrassing the company. I used to sing it to my kids. They learned the words too. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 19:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1o0hf05.xv53xb18w55krN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #242121 |
mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: > On 12/27/2018 11:35 AM, Sn!pe wrote: > > mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: > >> On 12/27/2018 5:43 AM, Sn!pe wrote: > >>> mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: > >>> > >>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDTp_YQizqE> > >>> > >>> Wow. Thank you. > >> > >> Here it is with the words: > >> > >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqpFjsMtCb0> > > > > Nice, but I think I prefer the instrumental version > > with the pretty lady. > > I had to learn the words when I was learning Japanese language and > culture so I could go there without getting lost or pissing off too many > people and embarrassing the company. I used to sing it to my kids. > They learned the words too. They're a strange lot, yer Nipponese, very inscrutable. When you speak the language, how do you get on with their l/r oddness? I was very aware of it in that vocal when she sang 'saku[l/r]a'. I tried to make that sound myself and somehow just couldn't. -- ^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 17:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q03kq7$kro$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #242127 |
On 12/27/2018 2:25 PM, Sn!pe wrote: > mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: > >> On 12/27/2018 11:35 AM, Sn!pe wrote: >>> mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: >>>> On 12/27/2018 5:43 AM, Sn!pe wrote: >>>>> mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDTp_YQizqE> >>>>> >>>>> Wow. Thank you. >>>> >>>> Here it is with the words: >>>> >>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqpFjsMtCb0> >>> >>> Nice, but I think I prefer the instrumental version >>> with the pretty lady. >> >> I had to learn the words when I was learning Japanese language and >> culture so I could go there without getting lost or pissing off too many >> people and embarrassing the company. I used to sing it to my kids. >> They learned the words too. > > They're a strange lot, yer Nipponese, very inscrutable. > When you speak the language, how do you get on with > their l/r oddness? I was very aware of it in that vocal > when she sang 'saku[l/r]a'. I tried to make that sound > myself and somehow just couldn't. We had production documents specifying hormel wire (Formvar covered magnet wire) and user manuals showing froppy dlives. The 'to' ending was thought by most Japanese to be added by some other Japanese guy to make things match Japanese convention so converting 'Monsanto' or 'Toronto' to English meant that the terminal 'o' got dropped. Vowels tand to get swepped arund or drupped - but that happens with native English speakers too (Vatamans). -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 23:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1o0hows.136v9gw133rhpzN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #242169 |
mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: > On 12/27/2018 2:25 PM, Sn!pe wrote: > > mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: > > > >> On 12/27/2018 11:35 AM, Sn!pe wrote: > >>> mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: > >>>> On 12/27/2018 5:43 AM, Sn!pe wrote: > >>>>> mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDTp_YQizqE> > >>>>> > >>>>> Wow. Thank you. > >>>> > >>>> Here it is with the words: > >>>> > >>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqpFjsMtCb0> > >>> > >>> Nice, but I think I prefer the instrumental version > >>> with the pretty lady. > >> > >> I had to learn the words when I was learning Japanese language and > >> culture so I could go there without getting lost or pissing off too many > >> people and embarrassing the company. I used to sing it to my kids. > >> They learned the words too. > > > > They're a strange lot, yer Nipponese, very inscrutable. > > When you speak the language, how do you get on with > > their l/r oddness? I was very aware of it in that vocal > > when she sang 'saku[l/r]a'. I tried to make that sound > > myself and somehow just couldn't. > > We had production documents specifying hormel wire (Formvar covered > magnet wire) and user manuals showing froppy dlives. The 'to' ending > was thought by most Japanese to be added by some other Japanese guy to > make things match Japanese convention so converting 'Monsanto' or > 'Toronto' to English meant that the terminal 'o' got dropped. Vowels > tand to get swepped arund or drupped - but that happens with native > English speakers too (Vatamans). > [possibly apocryphal but OTOH somewhat credible] Back in the day our UK homebrew mainframe mfr. ICL tied up with a Nipponese company (I think Fujitsu, BICBR) to jointly do the next machine in ICL's range, the Series 3. Came the day that Fujitsu's Head Honcho came to visit, just to see the new 'puter. So there was the sharply-suited little yellow man and his entourage being shown the latest incarnation of the new machine:- "Is good computer, what it's name?" "It's the S3L, [Fujitsu] San. "Ah so, Estriel, ver' nice name." - and so it came to pass... <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICL_Series_39> -- ^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 16:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g8f34vFoodrU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #241316 |
On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 10:46:16 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> > wrote: > >>Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer side >>of the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a >>stupid fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. > > You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a gas. > > The two have different physical properties. While the molecules of the > solid are *fixed* the gas molecules are in constant motion. > > This means that the air on the outside of a window can bombard the fixed > window pane molecules with a new supply of warmer molecules while the > fixed molecules of the window pane can't move around to do so > efficiently. That's why the window acts like a fixed barrier to the air. > Nobody is stupid enough to claim the air passes through the window pane > so why are you so stupid to claim the cold air doesn't cause the window > pane to become cold as well as deny that a cold window pane causes the > air molecules bumping up against the pane to NOT become cold themselves. > The entire process is not like an air conditioner and or a refrigerator. > There is no air blowing through anything like it does through a > condenser or an evaporator, you fool! > > You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and oranges in your > scientific folly. I think Poe's Law applies here, Snit. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law Too bad everyone in sci.physics has him plonked, or maybe they could set him straight. -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 17:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g8f9guFrlogU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #241335 |
vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: > On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 10:46:16 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> >> wrote: >> >>> Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer side >>> of the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a >>> stupid fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. >> >> You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a gas. >> >> The two have different physical properties. While the molecules of the >> solid are *fixed* the gas molecules are in constant motion. >> >> This means that the air on the outside of a window can bombard the fixed >> window pane molecules with a new supply of warmer molecules while the >> fixed molecules of the window pane can't move around to do so >> efficiently. That's why the window acts like a fixed barrier to the air. >> Nobody is stupid enough to claim the air passes through the window pane >> so why are you so stupid to claim the cold air doesn't cause the window >> pane to become cold as well as deny that a cold window pane causes the >> air molecules bumping up against the pane to NOT become cold themselves. >> The entire process is not like an air conditioner and or a refrigerator. >> There is no air blowing through anything like it does through a >> condenser or an evaporator, you fool! >> >> You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and oranges in your >> scientific folly. > > I think Poe's Law applies here, Snit. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law > > Too bad everyone in sci.physics has him plonked, or maybe they could set > him straight. > Could they in a way he would understand?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 08:40 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368bfd613c0e4caa995cc7@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #241316 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <dnj42eljvpl26l9i7tlif2r8l756fsujf0@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... @@@@@ @@@@@ On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:26:59 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: @@@@@ @@@@@ >Are the molecules of glass moving at the same speed on the warmer side of @@@@@ >the glass as they are on the colder side? If a dumb fuck and a stupid @@@@@ >fuck mated and had offspring, it would be just like you. @@@@@ @@@@@ You moron, you. The glass is a solid while the air is a gas. @@@@@ @@@@@ The two have different physical properties. While the @@@@@ molecules of the solid are *fixed* the gas molecules are @@@@@ in constant motion. Oh really? Why does glass break if you subject it to extreme changes in temperature? All molecules vibrate unless you figure out a way to get them to absolute zero. Here's a *Middle School* primer that proves you don't know shit: http://www.middleschoolchemistry.com/lessonplans/chapter1/lesson4 @@@@@ This means that the air on the outside of a window @@@@@ can bombard the fixed window pane molecules with @@@@@ a new supply of warmer molecules while the fixed @@@@@ molecules of the window pane can't move around to @@@@@ do so efficiently. That's why the window acts like @@@@@ a fixed barrier to the air. Nobody is stupid enough @@@@@ to claim the air passes through the window pane @@@@@ so why are you so stupid to claim the cold air doesn't @@@@@ cause the window pane to become cold as well as @@@@@ deny that a cold window pane causes the air molecules @@@@@ bumping up against the pane to NOT become cold @@@@@ themselves. The entire process is not like an @@@@@ air conditioner and or a refrigerator. There is no @@@@@ air blowing through anything like it does through @@@@@ a condenser or an evaporator, you fool! Of course air doesn't "blow through the glass," you moron. Warm air on one side and cold air on the other creates a gradient, where the heat migrates from the warmer side to the colder side. Cold does NOT migrate towards the warmer side, because cold is a condition, not a thing. Heat is a thing. Cold is what's left when heat is removed. @@@@@ You and the Snitidiot are comparing apples and @@@@@ oranges in your scientific folly. This is middle school stuff, you ignorant simpleton. Stop embarrassing yourself. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 11:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <shn42e9i6sjnu9bfsqbfatpdq11e04ajpj@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #241345 |
On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 08:40:35 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >Of course air doesn't "blow through the glass," you moron. Warm air on >one side and cold air on the other creates a gradient, . . . Yes, good so far... > . . .where the heat >migrates from the warmer side to the colder side. And, conversely, the cold migrates from the colder side to the warmer side. Action/reaction. You just proved my point, dude. So the cold outside air does migrate through the window pane causing the pane to transfer the cold into the house. >Cold does NOT migrate >towards the warmer side, because cold is a condition, not a thing. >Heat is a thing. Cold is what's left when heat is removed. Heat is also a condition, so why two different rules? <trim gratuitous insults> -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 09:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368c0846c0c12ff995cd3@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #241349 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <shn42e9i6sjnu9bfsqbfatpdq11e04ajpj@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... @@@@@ @@@@@ On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 08:40:35 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: @@@@@ @@@@@ >Of course air doesn't "blow through the glass," you moron. Warm air on @@@@@ >one side and cold air on the other creates a gradient, . . . @@@@@ @@@@@ Yes, good so far... @@@@@ @@@@@ > . . .where the heat @@@@@ >migrates from the warmer side to the colder side. @@@@@ @@@@@ And, conversely, the cold migrates from the colder @@@@@ side to the warmer side. Action/reaction. You just @@@@@ proved my point, dude. So the cold outside air does @@@@@ migrate through the window pane causing the pane @@@@@ to transfer the cold into the house. @@@@@ @@@@@ >Cold does NOT migrate @@@@@ >towards the warmer side, because cold is a condition, not a thing. @@@@@ >Heat is a thing. Cold is what's left when heat is removed. @@@@@ @@@@@ Heat is also a condition, so why two different rules? @@@@@ @@@@@ <trim gratuitous insults> Come back when you've studied the middle school physics lesson I provided for you. I have little patience for your ongoing ignorance... and nobody says "dude" anymore. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 19:22 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368b425a5c24a4e2995c94@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #241051 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <ggp22etv60fic8tie874p3imqq8o9a3nad@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... @@@@@ @@@@@ On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 13:26:32 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: @@@@@ @@@@@ <...> @@@@@ @@@@@ >Heat radiates out towards colder places (a gradient), making the space it @@@@@ >left colder. Cold does not "radiate" in to a warmer place. Dumbass! @@@@@ @@@@@ "And, a double dumbass on you!" Here's why. People @@@@@ who live where it gets below freezing often have to @@@@@ scrape ice and frost off the outside of their windshields. @@@@@ @@@@@ According to you, the ice would be on the insides of their @@@@@ windshields because what little heat that got trapped @@@@@ inside the car would be radiating out and the inside of @@@@@ the windshield would get colder than the outside of the @@@@@ windshield and so the frost would be on the inside. @@@@@ @@@@@ Try to weasel your way out of THAT one, Einstein! What is ice made out of, and how much of it do you have floating around on the inside of your crappy little van, Dumber-Than-Most? You can't possibly be as stupid as you appear to be! -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 23:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pvsabi$117b$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #241145 |
On 12/24/2018 10:22 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <ggp22etv60fic8tie874p3imqq8o9a3nad@4ax.com>, > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 13:26:32 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >> >> <...> >> >>> Heat radiates out towards colder places (a gradient), making the space it >>> left colder. Cold does not "radiate" in to a warmer place. Dumbass! >> >> "And, a double dumbass on you!" Here's why. People >> who live where it gets below freezing often have to >> scrape ice and frost off the outside of their windshields. >> >> According to you, the ice would be on the insides of their >> windshields because what little heat that got trapped >> inside the car would be radiating out and the inside of >> the windshield would get colder than the outside of the >> windshield and so the frost would be on the inside. >> >> Try to weasel your way out of THAT one, Einstein! > > What is ice made out of, and how much of it do you have floating around > on the inside of your crappy little van, Dumber-Than-Most? You can't > possibly be as stupid as you appear to be! Southern boy living on a dirt road out in the forest with the squirrels who doesn't own a diesel pickup with 40" mudgrips can't be all that bright. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 11:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q02udn$18jr$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #240991 |
On 12/24/2018 3:15 PM, stinky puddles piddled: > So, you are just plain wrong as the dense > cold outside air definitely radiates through > the double-pane glass. > > If the warmer room air was radiating OUT > then it would push the drapes up against > the glass panes. As a physicist, let me be the first to tell you that the above is brain-hurtingly bizarre bullshit totally unsupported by science. Now someone fetch me a Tylenol. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 09:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <brvl32.csm.17.10@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #242042 |
On 2018-12-27 9:25 a.m., kensi wrote: > On 12/24/2018 3:15 PM, stinky puddles piddled: >> So, you are just plain wrong as the dense >> cold outside air definitely radiates through >> the double-pane glass. >> >> If the warmer room air was radiating OUT >> then it would push the drapes up against >> the glass panes. > > As a physicist, let me be the first to tell you that the above is > brain-hurtingly bizarre bullshit totally unsupported by science. > > Now someone fetch me a Tylenol. > then you'll be a dope on dope
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 11:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oe0a2e1kgoh1r08vubh5957geuil71924k@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #242042 |
On Thu, 27 Dec 2018, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 12/24/2018 3:15 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq typed: > >> So, you are just plain wrong as the dense >> cold outside air definitely radiates through >> the double-pane glass. >> >> If the warmer room air was radiating OUT >> then it would push the drapes up against >> the glass panes. > >As a physicist, let me be the first to tell you that the above is >brain-hurtingly bizarre bullshit totally unsupported by science. > >Now someone fetch me a Tylenol. No, it's called observational physics as opposed to your *theoretical* physics. It can be rightly assumed that warmer room air radiating outward from the room would cause the drapes to be pushed outward. Since exactly the opposite happens (drapes being pushed into the room by the cold radiating inwardly) that proves your theoretical physics is incorrect. You physicists are so full of it. Bah! You get all caught up in your math and in your grants that you totally ignore what your eyes and other senses tell you. -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 09:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <brvlon.l48.19.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #242056 |
On 2018-12-27 9:51 a.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Thu, 27 Dec 2018, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 12/24/2018 3:15 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq typed: >> >>> So, you are just plain wrong as the dense >>> cold outside air definitely radiates through >>> the double-pane glass. >>> >>> If the warmer room air was radiating OUT >>> then it would push the drapes up against >>> the glass panes. >> >> As a physicist, let me be the first to tell you that the above is >> brain-hurtingly bizarre bullshit totally unsupported by science. >> >> Now someone fetch me a Tylenol. > > No, it's called observational physics as opposed to > your *theoretical* physics. > > It can be rightly assumed that warmer room air > radiating outward from the room would cause the > drapes to be pushed outward. Since exactly the > opposite happens (drapes being pushed into the > room by the cold radiating inwardly) that proves > your theoretical physics is incorrect. > > You physicists are so full of it. Bah! You get all > caught up in your math and in your grants that > you totally ignore what your eyes and other > senses tell you. > if you mean they don't listen to you , they don't
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 12:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q032us$2fi$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #242056 |
On 12/27/2018 11:51 AM, stinky puddles piddled: > You physicists are so full of it. ... says the *complete retard* who has his radiation and his convection all mixed up. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 10:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368eb94ed459ab9d995d27@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #242056 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <oe0a2e1kgoh1r08vubh5957geuil71924k@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... < < On Thu, 27 Dec 2018, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: < >On 12/24/2018 3:15 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq typed: < > < >> So, you are just plain wrong as the dense < >> cold outside air definitely radiates through < >> the double-pane glass. < >> < >> If the warmer room air was radiating OUT < >> then it would push the drapes up against < >> the glass panes. < > < >As a physicist, let me be the first to tell you that the above is < >brain-hurtingly bizarre bullshit totally unsupported by science. < > < >Now someone fetch me a Tylenol. < < No, it's called observational physics as opposed to < your *theoretical* physics. < < It can be rightly assumed that warmer room air < radiating outward from the room would cause the < drapes to be pushed outward. Since exactly the < opposite happens (drapes being pushed into the < room by the cold radiating inwardly) that proves < your theoretical physics is incorrect. < < You physicists are so full of it. Bah! You get all < caught up in your math and in your grants that < you totally ignore what your eyes and other < senses tell you. I knew Kensi would be along to participate in your public spanking, IF she hadn't plonked your stupid ass completely. I was right, and you are wrong, and everybody in AC is LOLing@you. <LOLITY-LOL-LOL-LOL> -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 19:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <g9ra2e5c0ve6cl1lhjv7c07du0r2du9v3k@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #242109 |
On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 10:27:00 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: <...> >I knew Kensi would be along to participate in your public spanking, IF >she hadn't plonked your stupid ass completely. I was right, and you are >wrong, and everybody in AC is LOLing@you. > ><LOLITY-LOL-LOL-LOL> You know nothing, Jon Snow! -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 11:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g8eiogFmn5pU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #240948 |
On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 11:11:35 -0800, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <3c222et9h87e1t6lsh233vn8e6992tnksv@4ax.com>, > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 11:07:26 -0500, kensi > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: @@@@@ >On 12/23/2018 8:07 > PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > @@@@@ >> On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 22:35:57 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > @@@@@ >> > @@@@@ >>> The earth's SURFACE is warming. The earth's vast bulky > INTERIOR is COOLING @@@@@ >>> and has been for billions of years. The > earth as a whole is therefore @@@@@ >>> SHRINKING, though not by much. > Learn to read kensi's posts for @@@@@ >>> comprehension, lametard! > @@@@@ >> > @@@@@ >> Nice foot bullet, woman! If the Earth is shrinking that means > @@@@@ >> the Earth is becoming cooler. You can't have it both ways and > @@@@@ >> that's what you warmingtards are attempting to do. > @@@@@ > > @@@@@ >The earth's *interior* (the vast majority of its volume) is > becoming @@@@@ >cooler, while its surface (the tiny bit where we live) > is becoming @@@@@ >warmer. No contradiction. > @@@@@ > @@@@@ So, you are attempting to claim convection doesn't @@@@@ exist? > That's unscientific of you, carrot top. > > Maybe it's something like the cold that "radiates in" through your one > window. I wonder if mylar would be a good material for lining drapes -- it should reflect the cold rays back out of the window. -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web