Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.checkmate > #237481 > unrolled thread

Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience

Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate

Contents

  Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-17 05:21 -0500
    Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-17 08:34 -0700
      Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-17 09:43 -0600
        Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-17 09:45 -0600
    Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-17 13:55 -0500
      Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-17 19:00 +0000
        Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-17 15:22 -0600
        Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Scatboitoy g8dgc <g8dgc@noneya.none> - 2018-12-17 16:26 -0500
          Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <%> - 2018-12-17 14:33 -0700
          Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-12-17 21:58 +0000
      Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-17 15:57 -0700
    Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-17 17:32 -0800
      Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-17 18:46 -0700
        Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-18 04:38 -0800
          Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-18 07:47 -0500
            Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 13:28 +0000
              Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-18 05:45 -0800
            Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 08:28 -0500
              Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 13:54 +0000
                Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-18 05:58 -0800
                  Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-12-18 14:16 +0000
                    Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:33 +0000
                      Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-18 06:50 -0800
                      Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 09:29 -0700
                        Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 17:08 +0000
                          Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 11:18 -0600
                            Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 10:20 -0700
                          Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-18 11:53 -0800
                            Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 14:34 -0700
                              Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:55 -0700
                                Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 15:13 -0700
                                  Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 16:57 -0600
                                  Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 16:15 -0700
                                    Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 16:16 -0700
                                    Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-18 17:13 -0800
                                Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-18 17:12 -0800
                    Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Greysat <hrumme4224@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 08:19 -0700
                      Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 08:47 -0700
                        Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-18 08:12 -0800
                        Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-12-18 16:47 +0000
                          Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 17:08 +0000
                            Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-12-18 17:17 +0000
                              Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 10:20 -0700
                                Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 12:56 -0600
                            Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 11:22 -0600
                              Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 10:32 -0700
                                Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 12:54 -0600
                                  Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:24 -0700
                                    Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 16:56 -0600
                                      Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 16:12 -0700
                                        Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 16:16 -0700
                          Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 10:16 -0700
                            Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-12-18 17:18 +0000
                              Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 10:21 -0700
                              Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 12:29 -0700
                                Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:21 -0700
                                  Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 14:26 -0700
                                    Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:29 -0700
                                      Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 14:54 -0700
                      Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 17:08 +0000
                  Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Lamey <teandson@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 06:24 -0800
                  Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 09:20 -0600
                    Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-18 10:25 -0500
                      Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 10:30 -0600
                      Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 17:08 +0000
                        Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 11:24 -0600
                          Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-18 11:26 -0600
                            Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 12:58 -0600
                              Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 14:30 -0600
                                Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 16:55 -0600
                          Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 10:32 -0700
                        Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 14:33 -0700
                          Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 16:55 -0600
                          Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 16:24 -0700
                          Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience roach <roach4994@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 15:28 -0800
                    Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 17:08 +0000
                      Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 11:25 -0600
                        Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 10:33 -0700
                          Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 12:15 -0700
                            Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:21 -0700
                              Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 14:27 -0700
                                Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:28 -0700
                                Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 14:51 -0700
                              Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-19 12:27 -0600
                          Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 14:18 -0600
                            Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:18 -0700
                              Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 14:50 -0700
                                Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 16:22 -0700
                              Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-19 12:25 -0600
                  Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-18 20:25 +0000
                    Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 13:28 -0700
                    Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 14:16 -0700
                    Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 14:37 -0700
                      Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-18 21:42 +0000
                        Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-18 14:52 -0700
                          Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-19 20:07 +0000
                            Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-19 13:13 -0700
                            Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-19 13:45 -0800
                            Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-19 15:38 -0700
                              Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-20 07:37 -0500
                                Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 06:13 -0700
                                Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Lamey <teandson@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 06:18 -0800
                                Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-20 08:22 -0700
                                Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-20 12:48 -0800
                                  Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 13:57 -0700
        Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 09:18 -0600
          Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 17:08 +0000
            Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 11:37 -0600
              Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-18 10:52 -0700
          Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-18 16:58 -0500
            Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-18 23:37 -0600
    Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-12-21 12:30 +0000
      Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-21 17:56 -0500
        Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-22 10:57 -0500
          Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 09:02 -0700
          Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 09:12 -0700
    Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-12-21 23:54 +0000
      Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 17:09 -0700
        Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-12-22 01:31 +0000
          Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-21 20:36 -0500
        Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-22 01:25 -0500
          Re: Death by neti pot: The lesson in one woman's tragic experience Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-21 22:42 -0800

Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7  Next page →

#238035

On 2018-12-18 2:21 p.m., Snit wrote:
> On 12/18/18 12:15 PM, % wrote:
>> On 2018-12-18 10:33 a.m., Snit wrote:
>>> On 12/18/18 10:25 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>> On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote:
>>>>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:58 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER
>>>>>>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could 
>>>>>>>>>>> impact
>>>>>>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Both, actually.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate.
>>>>>>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science 
>>>>>>>>> screed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Who said they were the same?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw 
>>>>>>>> a tantrum
>>>>>>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert
>>>>>>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- 
>>>>>>> cannot
>>>>>>> make any attempt to refute what was said.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> More on Snit's trolling
>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit
>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Typical Snit trolling methods
>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the 
>>>>>> argument.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     -Snit the Emotional-  (STE)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I quoted the study. You guys are the ones running. Of course. It is 
>>>>> what
>>>>> you do.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> from "treehugger"  STEM
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What is driving the right wingers crazy:
>>>
>>> https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/6/805/290592
>>> -----
>>> In conclusion, in the context of climate trends resulting in 
>>> Minnesota’s consistently warmer temperatures during the past 3 
>>> decades, this organism can no longer be assumed to be an exposure 
>>> risk only in southern-tier states.
>>> -----
>>>
>>> There is at least evidence that man-made global climate change is 
>>> impacting even this. They LOATH evidence.
>>>
>> did you snit
> 
> Not sure if you are using "snit" as a noun or a verb. Sentence does not 
> seem to make sense either way.
> 
neither does snit but did you

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#238039

On 12/18/18 2:27 PM, % wrote:
> On 2018-12-18 2:21 p.m., Snit wrote:
>> On 12/18/18 12:15 PM, % wrote:
>>> On 2018-12-18 10:33 a.m., Snit wrote:
>>>> On 12/18/18 10:25 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>> On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote:
>>>>>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:58 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL 
>>>>>>>>>>>> WEATHER
>>>>>>>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change 
>>>>>>>>>>>> could impact
>>>>>>>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Both, actually.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate.
>>>>>>>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science 
>>>>>>>>>> screed.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Who said they were the same?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now 
>>>>>>>>> throw a tantrum
>>>>>>>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert
>>>>>>>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- 
>>>>>>>> cannot
>>>>>>>> make any attempt to refute what was said.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> More on Snit's trolling
>>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit
>>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Typical Snit trolling methods
>>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the 
>>>>>>> argument.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     -Snit the Emotional-  (STE)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I quoted the study. You guys are the ones running. Of course. It 
>>>>>> is what
>>>>>> you do.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> from "treehugger"  STEM
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What is driving the right wingers crazy:
>>>>
>>>> https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/6/805/290592
>>>> -----
>>>> In conclusion, in the context of climate trends resulting in 
>>>> Minnesota’s consistently warmer temperatures during the past 3 
>>>> decades, this organism can no longer be assumed to be an exposure 
>>>> risk only in southern-tier states.
>>>> -----
>>>>
>>>> There is at least evidence that man-made global climate change is 
>>>> impacting even this. They LOATH evidence.
>>>>
>>> did you snit
>>
>> Not sure if you are using "snit" as a noun or a verb. Sentence does 
>> not seem to make sense either way.
>>
> neither does snit but did you

You are out order of.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#238084

In article <br8e8p.cbh.19.28@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says...
>
>On 2018-12-18 2:21 p.m., Snit wrote:
>> On 12/18/18 12:15 PM, % wrote:
>>> On 2018-12-18 10:33 a.m., Snit wrote:
>>>> On 12/18/18 10:25 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>> On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote:
>>>>>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:58 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER
>>>>>>>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could 
>>>>>>>>>>>> impact
>>>>>>>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Both, actually.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate.
>>>>>>>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science 
>>>>>>>>>> screed.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Who said they were the same?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw 
>>>>>>>>> a tantrum
>>>>>>>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert
>>>>>>>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- 
>>>>>>>> cannot
>>>>>>>> make any attempt to refute what was said.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> More on Snit's trolling
>>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit
>>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Typical Snit trolling methods
>>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the 
>>>>>>> argument.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     -Snit the Emotional-  (STE)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I quoted the study. You guys are the ones running. Of course. It is 
>>>>>> what
>>>>>> you do.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> from "treehugger"  STEM
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What is driving the right wingers crazy:
>>>>
>>>> https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/6/805/290592
>>>> -----
>>>> In conclusion, in the context of climate trends resulting in 
>>>> Minnesota?s consistently warmer temperatures during the past 3 
>>>> decades, this organism can no longer be assumed to be an exposure 
>>>> risk only in southern-tier states.
>>>> -----
>>>>
>>>> There is at least evidence that man-made global climate change is 
>>>> impacting even this. They LOATH evidence.
>>>>
>>> did you snit
>> 
>> Not sure if you are using "snit" as a noun or a verb. Sentence does not 
>> seem to make sense either way.
>> 
>neither does snit but did you

I took a healthy snit this morning.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#238512

On 12/18/2018 3:21 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 12/18/18 12:15 PM, % wrote:
>> On 2018-12-18 10:33 a.m., Snit wrote:
>>> On 12/18/18 10:25 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>> On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote:
>>>>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:58 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER
>>>>>>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could
>>>>>>>>>>> impact
>>>>>>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Both, actually.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate.
>>>>>>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science
>>>>>>>>> screed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Who said they were the same?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw
>>>>>>>> a tantrum
>>>>>>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert
>>>>>>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note--
>>>>>>> cannot
>>>>>>> make any attempt to refute what was said.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> More on Snit's trolling
>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit
>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Typical Snit trolling methods
>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the
>>>>>> argument.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     -Snit the Emotional-  (STE)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I quoted the study. You guys are the ones running. Of course. It is
>>>>> what
>>>>> you do.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> from "treehugger"  STEM
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What is driving the right wingers crazy:
>>>
>>> https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/6/805/290592
>>> -----
>>> In conclusion, in the context of climate trends resulting in
>>> Minnesota’s consistently warmer temperatures during the past 3
>>> decades, this organism can no longer be assumed to be an exposure
>>> risk only in southern-tier states.
>>> -----
>>>
>>> There is at least evidence that man-made global climate change is
>>> impacting even this. They LOATH evidence.
>>>
>> did you snit
> 
> Not sure if you are using "snit" as a noun or a verb. Sentence does not
> seem to make sense either way.
> 

?  ?
snit
snot
snat
snet
snut
snyt

snitty
snotty
snatty
snetty
snutty
snytty

nothing Motor Vehicles Dept recognizes

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#237926

On 12/18/2018 11:33 AM, Snit wrote:
> On 12/18/18 10:25 AM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote:
>>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:58 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER
>>>>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could
>>>>>>>>> impact
>>>>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Both, actually.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate.
>>>>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science screed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Who said they were the same?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a
>>>>>> tantrum
>>>>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old.
>>>>>
>>>>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert
>>>>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot
>>>>> make any attempt to refute what was said.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated.
>>>>>
>>>>> More on Snit's trolling
>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit
>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Typical Snit trolling methods
>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the
>>>> argument.
>>>>
>>>>     -Snit the Emotional-  (STE)
>>>>
>>>
>>> I quoted the study. You guys are the ones running. Of course. It is what
>>> you do.
>>>
>>
>> from "treehugger"  STEM
>>
> 
> 
> What is driving the right wingers crazy:
> 
> https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/6/805/290592
> -----
> In conclusion, in the context of climate trends resulting in Minnesota’s
> consistently warmer temperatures during the past 3 decades, this
> organism can no longer be assumed to be an exposure risk only in
> southern-tier states.
> -----
> 
> There is at least evidence that man-made global climate change is
> impacting even this. They LOATH evidence.
> 

nope, *NO EVIDENCE at all*

read it again for the first time.

look for the *weasel words*, their use indicates NO EVIDENCE

could, assumed, may, might, possible, usally, if, might, sorta, should,
shoulda, maybe, ...... etc.


Snit, find a paper with evidence...  and no weasel words.....

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#238014

On 12/18/18 1:18 PM, Sergio wrote:
> On 12/18/2018 11:33 AM, Snit wrote:
>> On 12/18/18 10:25 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>> On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote:
>>>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:58 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER
>>>>>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could
>>>>>>>>>> impact
>>>>>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Both, actually.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate.
>>>>>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science screed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Who said they were the same?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a
>>>>>>> tantrum
>>>>>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert
>>>>>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot
>>>>>> make any attempt to refute what was said.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> More on Snit's trolling
>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit
>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Typical Snit trolling methods
>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the
>>>>> argument.
>>>>>
>>>>>      -Snit the Emotional-  (STE)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I quoted the study. You guys are the ones running. Of course. It is what
>>>> you do.
>>>>
>>>
>>> from "treehugger"  STEM
>>>
>>
>>
>> What is driving the right wingers crazy:
>>
>> https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/6/805/290592
>> -----
>> In conclusion, in the context of climate trends resulting in Minnesota’s
>> consistently warmer temperatures during the past 3 decades, this
>> organism can no longer be assumed to be an exposure risk only in
>> southern-tier states.
>> -----
>>
>> There is at least evidence that man-made global climate change is
>> impacting even this. They LOATH evidence.
>>
> 
> nope, *NO EVIDENCE at all*
> 
> read it again for the first time.
> 
> look for the *weasel words*, their use indicates NO EVIDENCE
> 
> could, assumed, may, might, possible, usally, if, might, sorta, should,
> shoulda, maybe, ...... etc.
> 
> 
> Snit, find a paper with evidence...  and no weasel words.....
> 

Do you have any evidence the evidence you deny is evidence is, actually, 
not evidence? It is evident you do not.

Hmmm, when snowflakes such as yourself have a meltdown do you become 
water? LOL!

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#238083

In article <g7t6hnFtufrU4@mid.individual.net>, 
usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says...
>
>On 12/18/18 1:18 PM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 12/18/2018 11:33 AM, Snit wrote:
>>> On 12/18/18 10:25 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>> On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote:
>>>>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:58 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER
>>>>>>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could
>>>>>>>>>>> impact
>>>>>>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Both, actually.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate.
>>>>>>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science screed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Who said they were the same?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a
>>>>>>>> tantrum
>>>>>>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert
>>>>>>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot
>>>>>>> make any attempt to refute what was said.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> More on Snit's trolling
>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit
>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Typical Snit trolling methods
>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the
>>>>>> argument.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      -Snit the Emotional-  (STE)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I quoted the study. You guys are the ones running. Of course. It is what
>>>>> you do.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> from "treehugger"  STEM
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What is driving the right wingers crazy:
>>>
>>> https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/6/805/290592
>>> -----
>>> In conclusion, in the context of climate trends resulting in Minnesota?s
>>> consistently warmer temperatures during the past 3 decades, this
>>> organism can no longer be assumed to be an exposure risk only in
>>> southern-tier states.
>>> -----
>>>
>>> There is at least evidence that man-made global climate change is
>>> impacting even this. They LOATH evidence.
>>>
>> 
>> nope, *NO EVIDENCE at all*
>> 
>> read it again for the first time.
>> 
>> look for the *weasel words*, their use indicates NO EVIDENCE
>> 
>> could, assumed, may, might, possible, usally, if, might, sorta, should,
>> shoulda, maybe, ...... etc.
>> 
>> 
>> Snit, find a paper with evidence...  and no weasel words.....
>> 
>
>Do you have any evidence the evidence you deny is evidence is, actually, 
>not evidence? It is evident you do not.
>
>Hmmm, when snowflakes such as yourself have a meltdown do you become 
>water? LOL!

So no evidence and as usual you try to spin away.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#238195

On 12/18/18 2:50 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <g7t6hnFtufrU4@mid.individual.net>,
> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says...
>>
>> On 12/18/18 1:18 PM, Sergio wrote:
>>> On 12/18/2018 11:33 AM, Snit wrote:
>>>> On 12/18/18 10:25 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>> On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote:
>>>>>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:58 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER
>>>>>>>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could
>>>>>>>>>>>> impact
>>>>>>>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Both, actually.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate.
>>>>>>>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science screed.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Who said they were the same?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a
>>>>>>>>> tantrum
>>>>>>>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert
>>>>>>>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot
>>>>>>>> make any attempt to refute what was said.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> More on Snit's trolling
>>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit
>>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Typical Snit trolling methods
>>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the
>>>>>>> argument.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       -Snit the Emotional-  (STE)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I quoted the study. You guys are the ones running. Of course. It is what
>>>>>> you do.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> from "treehugger"  STEM
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What is driving the right wingers crazy:
>>>>
>>>> https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/6/805/290592
>>>> -----
>>>> In conclusion, in the context of climate trends resulting in Minnesota?s
>>>> consistently warmer temperatures during the past 3 decades, this
>>>> organism can no longer be assumed to be an exposure risk only in
>>>> southern-tier states.
>>>> -----
>>>>
>>>> There is at least evidence that man-made global climate change is
>>>> impacting even this. They LOATH evidence.
>>>>
>>>
>>> nope, *NO EVIDENCE at all*
>>>
>>> read it again for the first time.
>>>
>>> look for the *weasel words*, their use indicates NO EVIDENCE
>>>
>>> could, assumed, may, might, possible, usally, if, might, sorta, should,
>>> shoulda, maybe, ...... etc.
>>>
>>>
>>> Snit, find a paper with evidence...  and no weasel words.....
>>>
>>
>> Do you have any evidence the evidence you deny is evidence is, actually,
>> not evidence? It is evident you do not.
>>
>> Hmmm, when snowflakes such as yourself have a meltdown do you become
>> water? LOL!
> 
> So no evidence and as usual you try to spin away.
> 
So you again deny the evidence is evidence but you have no evidence the 
evidence is not evidence. Can you now provide the evidence that the 
evidence is not evidence? I doubt it.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#238511

On 12/18/2018 3:18 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 12/18/18 1:18 PM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 12/18/2018 11:33 AM, Snit wrote:
>>> On 12/18/18 10:25 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>> On 12/18/2018 11:08 AM, Snit wrote:
>>>>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:58 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER
>>>>>>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could
>>>>>>>>>>> impact
>>>>>>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Both, actually.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate.
>>>>>>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science
>>>>>>>>> screed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Who said they were the same?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a
>>>>>>>> tantrum
>>>>>>>> as he begs for attention. Same old same old.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert
>>>>>>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note--
>>>>>>> cannot
>>>>>>> make any attempt to refute what was said.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> More on Snit's trolling
>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit
>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Typical Snit trolling methods
>>>>>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Snit throws in the "emotional" red herring when he has lost the
>>>>>> argument.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      -Snit the Emotional-  (STE)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I quoted the study. You guys are the ones running. Of course. It is
>>>>> what
>>>>> you do.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> from "treehugger"  STEM
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What is driving the right wingers crazy:
>>>
>>> https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/6/805/290592
>>> -----
>>> In conclusion, in the context of climate trends resulting in Minnesota’s
>>> consistently warmer temperatures during the past 3 decades, this
>>> organism can no longer be assumed to be an exposure risk only in
>>> southern-tier states.
>>> -----
>>>
>>> There is at least evidence that man-made global climate change is
>>> impacting even this. They LOATH evidence.
>>>
>>
>> nope, *NO EVIDENCE at all*
>>
>> read it again for the first time.
>>
>> look for the *weasel words*, their use indicates NO EVIDENCE
>>
>> could, assumed, may, might, possible, usally, if, might, sorta, should,
>> shoulda, maybe, ...... etc.
>>
>>
>> Snit, find a paper with evidence...  and no weasel words.....
>>
> 
> Do you have any evidence the evidence you deny is evidence is, actually,
> not evidence? It is evident you do not.

word salad  =>  try putting them in order first.

> 
> Hmmm, when snowflakes such as yourself have a meltdown do you become
> water? LOL!
> 

don't change the topic,  Snitsnowflake   (na...)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#237932

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 05:58:53 -0800, Klaus  Schadenfreude wrote:

> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> 
>>benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER
>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could impact
>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location.
>>>> 
>>>> Both, actually.
>>>> 
>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate.
>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science screed.
>>> 
>>> 
>>Who said they were the same?
>>
>>Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a
>>tantrum as he begs for attention. Same old same old.
> 
> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert
> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot
> make any attempt to refute what was said.
> 
> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated.
> 
> More on Snit's trolling http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
> 
> Over 100 people ridicule Snit http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
> 
> Typical Snit trolling methods
> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

And in the Tantrum Throw event, we have:

First place (gold) - AB, for the Great Christmas Meltdown of '12 which 
culminated in his receiving the only UDP ever issued against a single 
person rather than a server.

Second place (silver) - murphy, for his infamous "I just do not fskn 
believe!" rant.

Third place (bronze) - % for his recent foamy breakdown and spate of 
frogging me.

4th through 16th places - Donald Trump for assorted midnight tweetstorms, 
mostly ranting about Robert Mueller.

17th place - Klaus, for the above.

It's a wonder Klaus made it past the qualifying round. I've seen better 
tantrums from David Tholen, and he's widely suspected to be a robot.

<snicker>

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#237933

On 2018-12-18 1:25 p.m., Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 05:58:53 -0800, Klaus  Schadenfreude wrote:
> 
>> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>
>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER
>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could impact
>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location.
>>>>>
>>>>> Both, actually.
>>>>>
>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate.
>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science screed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Who said they were the same?
>>>
>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a
>>> tantrum as he begs for attention. Same old same old.
>>
>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert
>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot
>> make any attempt to refute what was said.
>>
>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated.
>>
>> More on Snit's trolling http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
>>
>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
>>
>> Typical Snit trolling methods
>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html
> 
> And in the Tantrum Throw event, we have:
> 
> First place (gold) - AB, for the Great Christmas Meltdown of '12 which
> culminated in his receiving the only UDP ever issued against a single
> person rather than a server.
> 
> Second place (silver) - murphy, for his infamous "I just do not fskn
> believe!" rant.
> 
> Third place (bronze) - % for his recent foamy breakdown and spate of
> frogging me.
> 
> 4th through 16th places - Donald Trump for assorted midnight tweetstorms,
> mostly ranting about Robert Mueller.
> 
> 17th place - Klaus, for the above.
> 
> It's a wonder Klaus made it past the qualifying round. I've seen better
> tantrums from David Tholen, and he's widely suspected to be a robot.
> 
> <snicker>
> 
have you seen the stuff you're suspected to be

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#238012

On 12/18/18 1:25 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 05:58:53 -0800, Klaus  Schadenfreude wrote:
> 
>> On 18 Dec 2018 13:54:25 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>
>>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:47 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> On 12/18/2018 7:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>> That doesn't support your view, numb nuts. It says LOCAL WEATHER
>>>>>> PATTERNS could impact FREQUENCY. It says Climate change could impact
>>>>>> FREQUENCY. Not location.
>>>>>
>>>>> Both, actually.
>>>>>
>>>> Actually real science says weather is not climate.
>>>> The weather = climate rule is only true in media non-science screed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Who said they were the same?
>>>
>>> Klaus made an ignorant claim, was called out, and will now throw a
>>> tantrum as he begs for attention. Same old same old.
>>
>> Snit will use Snit Lying Technique #20 to feebly attempt to divert
>> attention from his lies and hypocrisy, but-- as you will note-- cannot
>> make any attempt to refute what was said.
>>
>> This is because Snit is here to troll and be humiliated.
>>
>> More on Snit's trolling http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
>>
>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
>>
>> Typical Snit trolling methods
>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html
> 
> And in the Tantrum Throw event, we have:
> 
> First place (gold) - AB, for the Great Christmas Meltdown of '12 which
> culminated in his receiving the only UDP ever issued against a single
> person rather than a server.
> 
> Second place (silver) - murphy, for his infamous "I just do not fskn
> believe!" rant.
> 
> Third place (bronze) - % for his recent foamy breakdown and spate of
> frogging me.
> 
> 4th through 16th places - Donald Trump for assorted midnight tweetstorms,
> mostly ranting about Robert Mueller.
> 
> 17th place - Klaus, for the above.
> 
> It's a wonder Klaus made it past the qualifying round. I've seen better
> tantrums from David Tholen, and he's widely suspected to be a robot.
> 
> <snicker>
> 
Bigdog should be in their, too... for his utter meltdown when faced with 
his own lies.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#238052

In article <pvbl4a$gh0$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
says...


>It's a wonder Klaus made me cry so close to my beloved Christmas.
>


You poor thing.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#238058

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 14:37:18 -0700, Skeeter wrote:

> In article <pvbl4a$gh0$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> says...

I have restored the context that causes you such extreme fear.

>> And in the Tantrum Throw event, we have:
>> 
>> First place (gold) - AB, for the Great Christmas Meltdown of '12 which
>> culminated in his receiving the only UDP ever issued against a single
>> person rather than a server.
>> 
>> Second place (silver) - murphy, for his infamous "I just do not fskn
>> believe!" rant.
>> 
>> Third place (bronze) - % for his recent foamy breakdown and spate of
>> frogging me.
>> 
>> 4th through 16th places - Donald Trump for assorted midnight 
tweetstorms,
>> mostly ranting about Robert Mueller.
>> 
>> 17th place - Klaus, for the above.
>> 
>> It's a wonder Klaus made it past the qualifying round. I've seen better
>> tantrums from David Tholen, and he's widely suspected to be a robot.
>> 
>> <snicker>
> 
> You poor thing.

Non sequitur.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#238087

In article <pvbpjc$gh0$25@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
says...
>
>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 14:37:18 -0700, Skeeter wrote:
>
>> In article <pvbl4a$gh0$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
>> says...
>
>I have restored the context that causes you such extreme fear.
>
>>> And in the Tantrum Throw event, we have:
>>> 
>>> First place (gold) - AB, for the Great Christmas Meltdown of '12 which
>>> culminated in his receiving the only UDP ever issued against a single
>>> person rather than a server.
>>> 
>>> Second place (silver) - murphy, for his infamous "I just do not fskn
>>> believe!" rant.
>>> 
>>> Third place (bronze) - % for his recent foamy breakdown and spate of
>>> frogging me.
>>> 
>>> 4th through 16th places - Donald Trump for assorted midnight 
>tweetstorms,
>>> mostly ranting about Robert Mueller.
>>> 
>>> 17th place - Klaus, for the above.
>>> 
>>> It's a wonder Klaus made it past the qualifying round. I've seen better
>>> tantrums from David Tholen, and he's widely suspected to be a robot.
>>> 
>>> <snicker>
>> 
>> You poor thing.
>
>Non sequitur.

You snipped the part that hurt you. But libs are known for that.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#238531

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 14:52:01 -0700, Skeeter wrote:

> In article <pvbpjc$gh0$25@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> says...
>>
>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 14:37:18 -0700, Skeeter wrote:
>>
>>> In article <pvbl4a$gh0$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
>>> says...
>>
>>I have restored the context that causes you such extreme fear.
>>
>>>> And in the Tantrum Throw event, we have:
>>>> 
>>>> First place (gold) - AB, for the Great Christmas Meltdown of '12
>>>> which culminated in his receiving the only UDP ever issued against a
>>>> single person rather than a server.
>>>> 
>>>> Second place (silver) - murphy, for his infamous "I just do not fskn
>>>> believe!" rant.
>>>> 
>>>> Third place (bronze) - % for his recent foamy breakdown and spate of
>>>> frogging me.
>>>> 
>>>> 4th through 16th places - Donald Trump for assorted midnight
>>tweetstorms,
>>>> mostly ranting about Robert Mueller.
>>>> 
>>>> 17th place - Klaus, for the above.
>>>> 
>>>> It's a wonder Klaus made it past the qualifying round. I've seen
>>>> better tantrums from David Tholen, and he's widely suspected to be a
>>>> robot.
>>>> 
>>>> <snicker>
>>> 
>>> You poor thing.
>>
>>Non sequitur.
> 
> You snipped

*You* snipped *everything* in the previous round, so you don't get to pull 
the "you snipped" thing to dismiss what I've said.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#238543

On 2018-12-19 1:07 p.m., Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 14:52:01 -0700, Skeeter wrote:
> 
>> In article <pvbpjc$gh0$25@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
>> says...
>>>
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>> On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 14:37:18 -0700, Skeeter wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <pvbl4a$gh0$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
>>>> says...
>>>
>>> I have restored the context that causes you such extreme fear.
>>>
>>>>> And in the Tantrum Throw event, we have:
>>>>>
>>>>> First place (gold) - AB, for the Great Christmas Meltdown of '12
>>>>> which culminated in his receiving the only UDP ever issued against a
>>>>> single person rather than a server.
>>>>>
>>>>> Second place (silver) - murphy, for his infamous "I just do not fskn
>>>>> believe!" rant.
>>>>>
>>>>> Third place (bronze) - % for his recent foamy breakdown and spate of
>>>>> frogging me.
>>>>>
>>>>> 4th through 16th places - Donald Trump for assorted midnight
>>> tweetstorms,
>>>>> mostly ranting about Robert Mueller.
>>>>>
>>>>> 17th place - Klaus, for the above.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's a wonder Klaus made it past the qualifying round. I've seen
>>>>> better tantrums from David Tholen, and he's widely suspected to be a
>>>>> robot.
>>>>>
>>>>> <snicker>
>>>>
>>>> You poor thing.
>>>
>>> Non sequitur.
>>
>> You snipped
> 
> *You* snipped *everything* in the previous round, so you don't get to pull
> the "you snipped" thing to dismiss what I've said.
> 
but what if he does will you die

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#238595

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <pve8dc$ml8$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


booger
boogerTime to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
boogerOn Tue, 18 Dec 2018 14:52:01 -0700, Skeeter wrote:
booger
booger> In article <pvbpjc$gh0$25@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
booger> says...
booger>>
booger>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
booger>>On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 14:37:18 -0700, Skeeter wrote:
booger>>
booger>>> In article <pvbl4a$gh0$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
booger>>> says...
booger>>
booger>>I have restored the context that causes you such extreme fear.
booger>>
booger>>>> And in the Tantrum Throw event, we have:
booger>>>> 
booger>>>> First place (gold) - AB, for the Great Christmas Meltdown of '12
booger>>>> which culminated in his receiving the only UDP ever issued against a
booger>>>> single person rather than a server.
booger>>>> 
booger>>>> Second place (silver) - murphy, for his infamous "I just do not fskn
booger>>>> believe!" rant.
booger>>>> 
booger>>>> Third place (bronze) - % for his recent foamy breakdown and spate of
booger>>>> frogging me.
booger>>>> 
booger>>>> 4th through 16th places - Donald Trump for assorted midnight
booger>>tweetstorms,
booger>>>> mostly ranting about Robert Mueller.
booger>>>> 
booger>>>> 17th place - Klaus, for the above.
booger>>>> 
booger>>>> It's a wonder Klaus made it past the qualifying round. I've seen
booger>>>> better tantrums from David Tholen, and he's widely suspected to be a
booger>>>> robot.
booger>>>> 
booger>>>> <snicker>
booger>>> 
booger>>> You poor thing.
booger>>
booger>>Non sequitur.
booger> 
booger> You snipped
booger
booger*You* snipped *everything* in the previous round, so you don't get to pull 
boogerthe "you snipped" thing to dismiss what I've said.

It's amazing how two people who fancy themselves as rilly L337 torlls 
continue to spoon-feed hooks to each other day after day.

-- 
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved 

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#238642

In article <pve8dc$ml8$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
says...
>
>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 14:52:01 -0700, Skeeter wrote:
>
>> In article <pvbpjc$gh0$25@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
>> says...
>>>
>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>>On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 14:37:18 -0700, Skeeter wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <pvbl4a$gh0$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
>>>> says...
>>>
>>>I have restored the context that causes you such extreme fear.
>>>
>>>>> And in the Tantrum Throw event, we have:
>>>>> 
>>>>> First place (gold) - AB, for the Great Christmas Meltdown of '12
>>>>> which culminated in his receiving the only UDP ever issued against a
>>>>> single person rather than a server.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Second place (silver) - murphy, for his infamous "I just do not fskn
>>>>> believe!" rant.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Third place (bronze) - % for his recent foamy breakdown and spate of
>>>>> frogging me.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 4th through 16th places - Donald Trump for assorted midnight
>>>tweetstorms,
>>>>> mostly ranting about Robert Mueller.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 17th place - Klaus, for the above.
>>>>> 
>>>>> It's a wonder Klaus made it past the qualifying round. I've seen
>>>>> better tantrums from David Tholen, and he's widely suspected to be a
>>>>> robot.
>>>>> 
>>>>> <snicker>
>>>> 
>>>> You poor thing.
>>>
>>>Non sequitur.
>> 
>> You snipped
>
>*You* snipped *everything* in the previous round, so you don't get to pull 
>the "you snipped" thing to dismiss what I've said.

Why must you lie? I snipped nothing.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#238858

On 12/19/2018 5:38 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <pve8dc$ml8$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> says...
>> *You* snipped *everything* in the previous round, so you don't get to pull
>> the "you snipped" thing to dismiss what I've said.
> 
> Why must you lie? I snipped nothing.

Why must you lie? Audience, compare <pvbl4a$gh0$3@dont-email.me> and 
<MPG.3683167a7fe168de5f4@news.eternal-september.org>. You'll find that 
nothing Nadegda wrote in the former is quoted in the latter, i.e. she is 
right and Skeeter snipped *massively* right before accusing her of snipping.

Every irony meter in Manhattan has now filed suit against Skeeter for 
creating a hostile working environment.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate

csiph-web