Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #230347 > unrolled thread
| Started by | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-11-26 20:06 -0500 |
| Last post | 2018-11-27 08:37 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 634 — 28 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-26 20:06 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 18:23 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-26 19:29 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 19:36 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-26 19:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 19:49 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 07:31 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 09:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 08:16 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 09:17 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 08:30 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-28 06:21 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 03:52 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-28 07:35 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 01:34 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 07:47 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 10:53 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:09 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 11:31 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-28 12:40 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 16:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 17:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 19:07 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 18:25 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 17:30 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 18:36 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 21:46 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 12:37 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-28 20:20 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 19:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 22:38 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 21:45 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-28 21:58 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 09:05 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 07:41 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 10:54 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 08:16 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 12:34 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 13:40 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:08 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 22:02 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:16 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 06:59 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:31 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:35 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:45 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:30 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:35 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:15 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 19:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:26 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-01 09:26 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 07:45 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 21:55 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 15:44 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 13:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:04 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:42 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:08 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:05 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 18:57 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:59 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 19:19 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:22 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 19:18 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 01:28 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 05:52 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 01:19 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 05:49 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 01:06 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 05:47 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:48 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 21:41 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:48 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 07:49 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:21 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 08:07 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-29 14:57 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 13:59 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-29 15:19 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 14:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-30 10:48 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 09:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 20:45 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 17:03 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 15:07 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:30 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:12 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:16 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 19:02 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:10 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 16:29 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 16:58 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 18:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:18 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 16:28 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:46 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:12 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.orq> - 2018-11-29 17:40 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 18:13 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:32 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:33 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-30 10:54 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-30 12:01 -0500
Re: ๐ซ๐ซ๐ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐ซ๐ซ๐ซ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ๐ซ๐ซ๐ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐ซ๐ซ๐ซโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โ The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. โ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-30 11:04 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-12-02 18:17 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%.com> - 2018-12-02 17:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-02 20:21 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 18:23 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 12:07 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-02 20:55 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-03 00:20 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-03 08:36 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 07:17 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 18:40 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-30 10:59 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 13:09 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 11:16 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 20:43 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-30 21:57 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 02:23 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 09:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-01 09:30 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 10:43 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 17:12 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 17:59 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 16:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 19:52 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 17:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 17:00 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 15:09 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 18:01 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 16:06 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:51 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 06:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-02 10:10 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 08:13 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 19:55 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 18:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:25 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:21 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-30 10:56 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-30 12:02 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-12-02 18:18 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 17:29 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 18:17 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 16:00 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:10 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:13 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 19:21 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:24 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 22:02 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 19:45 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:46 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 06:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 16:59 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 18:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 17:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 18:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 17:06 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 18:08 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 00:03 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 05:40 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 19:48 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 20:56 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:49 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 14:41 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 15:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 15:12 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 16:17 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 16:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 15:55 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%.com> - 2018-12-02 17:17 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-03 15:10 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 16:16 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 19:38 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 17:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 20:22 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 18:24 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 21:50 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 07:13 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-03 09:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 07:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-03 10:17 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 08:36 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 23:53 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-28 20:19 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-28 12:27 -0500
Re: ๐ซ๐ซ๐ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐ซ๐ซ๐ซ The psychotic racist white-supremacist taking a break from the stormfront discussion boards to post as "SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>" ๐ซ๐ซ๐ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐ซ๐ซ๐ซโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โ The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. โ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 12:21 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-28 20:17 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:46 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-29 13:11 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-30 21:08 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:26 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:51 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-29 13:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 12:17 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 11:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:58 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:58 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 00:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:24 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:31 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:41 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:46 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:10 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 09:16 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:46 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:32 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:35 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-30 21:04 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-12-01 13:03 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 10:06 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 15:21 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-28 13:04 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:58 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-29 01:01 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-29 01:10 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 10:27 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-28 11:21 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 09:22 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 11:35 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 16:49 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:57 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:22 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 10:14 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:31 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-29 13:05 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:52 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 16:18 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 00:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-28 07:34 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 01:33 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 10:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:04 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 10:20 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:50 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:49 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:49 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 20:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 06:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 09:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 15:18 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 16:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:50 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 05:21 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 10:10 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 10:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 11:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 13:30 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 14:43 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 12:31 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 15:39 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 13:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-29 15:18 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 14:58 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:26 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:31 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-30 09:55 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:58 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:36 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <teandson@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 06:38 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 09:55 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 10:09 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:29 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:33 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:14 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:12 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:23 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-30 10:36 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-29 15:16 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:38 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 18:55 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:36 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:52 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:37 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 20:12 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 13:37 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 16:14 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 17:17 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:03 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:10 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-30 09:52 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 09:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-30 11:14 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 08:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:11 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 05:56 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 06:13 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 09:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:49 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:24 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:48 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:49 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 07:03 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:05 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 07:13 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:12 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 08:14 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 07:00 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 07:57 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:01 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:28 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 10:23 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 13:10 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 13:06 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 16:12 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 18:42 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 20:42 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-30 10:13 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 09:53 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-30 10:02 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 10:19 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:39 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 11:58 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:40 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 22:16 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:37 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 20:47 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:43 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 09:43 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:43 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:27 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-02 10:15 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 08:21 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 11:43 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:37 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:44 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-11-30 11:00 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 10:07 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-11-30 11:35 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 22:32 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-01 07:36 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:01 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-01 08:29 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 09:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-30 21:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 20:25 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-30 21:38 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 21:00 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-01 06:58 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 15:38 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 16:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-12-01 18:49 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 16:13 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 07:56 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-03 14:27 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-04 07:26 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-04 09:45 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-04 09:25 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-04 13:06 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-04 11:08 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-04 12:37 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 00:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 16:28 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 19:30 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 18:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 00:21 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 07:40 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:06 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 16:18 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 09:01 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:07 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-12-02 14:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:16 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-12-02 14:17 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 09:25 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:28 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 09:41 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 07:54 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-12-02 16:00 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 08:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-12-02 16:19 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:07 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 10:53 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 07:50 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 11:18 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 08:24 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 11:54 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 09:01 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 12:39 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 09:45 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 13:22 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 11:33 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 08:05 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-03 09:26 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> - 2018-12-02 17:29 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 10:40 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 19:34 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> - 2018-12-02 21:20 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 14:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> - 2018-12-02 21:46 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 14:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> - 2018-12-02 22:04 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "% tammy"@tammy - 2018-12-02 15:12 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-02 18:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 16:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-03 23:47 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 16:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. nobody <nobodyuknow@kinky.org> - 2018-12-02 17:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 16:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> - 2018-12-02 23:37 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Tammy - 2018-12-02 16:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-03 00:22 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 07:29 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 21:01 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-01 07:18 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:06 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-01 17:54 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-01 17:54 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 12:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 12:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 15:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 15:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 18:38 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-01 23:36 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 18:39 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 16:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 00:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 19:26 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 17:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:32 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 20:57 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:29 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 16:30 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 19:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 17:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:30 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:29 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 06:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 17:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:20 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:14 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 18:40 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 00:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 07:40 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 08:11 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-03 14:29 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-03 14:54 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 13:06 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:15 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:28 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:33 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:56 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:58 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:48 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 09:41 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:49 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:36 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 17:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 15:11 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 18:03 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 16:10 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:39 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-02 10:13 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 08:16 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:48 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:37 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:38 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:26 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 19:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:32 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 10:23 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 07:29 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:40 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-28 11:44 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 09:48 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 11:11 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 17:20 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 12:02 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 20:17 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. AOC <AOC@mineshot.org> - 2018-11-28 16:11 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:46 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. skimmer <skimmy@icanthearu.net> - 2018-11-29 10:29 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:24 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 10:46 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:59 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 16:52 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 16:51 -0700
Re: โ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โ The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. โ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 17:58 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 17:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 18:13 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 17:21 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 18:59 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 18:21 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 19:33 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 18:38 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-28 17:49 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 18:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 19:49 -0700
Re: โ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โ The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. โ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 21:06 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 19:11 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 17:14 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 15:59 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 14:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-28 16:44 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 19:51 -0700
Re: โ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โ The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. โ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 21:10 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 23:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 23:05 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-29 00:43 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 07:41 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-29 06:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 13:28 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-29 13:45 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 12:52 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-29 15:14 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 14:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 12:38 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 13:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:45 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 15:46 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:41 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:10 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-28 16:48 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-28 20:15 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:45 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 11:01 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:54 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-29 06:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-29 13:06 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 11:08 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 13:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:35 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-29 19:23 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 12:12 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 11:16 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 16:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 17:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 07:01 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 10:18 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 10:24 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 20:12 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:30 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 07:20 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:57 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 22:28 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 08:13 -0600
Re: โ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โ The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. โ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โโ Snowflake โ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-30 10:55 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 19:14 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:52 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:35 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:36 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 14:59 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-01 12:01 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 13:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-01 12:07 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 13:10 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 15:08 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 15:23 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 15:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-01 12:24 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 15:07 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 15:07 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 18:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-01 20:39 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 15:59 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 13:32 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 19:04 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-27 08:37 -0700
Page 23 of 32 — ← Prev page 1 … 21 22 [23] 24 25 … 32 Next page →
| From | Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 21:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pu1ib4$g33$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #232541 |
On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 15:50:35 -0500, benny b wrote: > On 2 Dec 2018 19:34:28 GMT, Snit wrote: > >> Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 11:25:37 -0500, benny b wrote: >>> >>>> On 2 Dec 2018 06:09:28 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> benny b <bennybee67linko@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 00:09:36 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 10:58 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from making >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a run across the border while screaming "I seek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asylum"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose asylum >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> claims are specious will be deported after those claims >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have been evaluated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable.ย Coming here without first >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> getting permission is, by definition, breaking the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. Seeking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asylum is *not*, is *never*, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Key word: apply. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain- protection- >>> us-embassy-consulate.html >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the process >>>>>>>>>>>> of applying for legal US citizenship. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Being at the border is fine, legally. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Okay, however, I am wondering if, technically, they are >>>>>>>>>> violating Mexico's sovereignty right now? Forget about the US >>>>>>>>>> for a moment... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Read an article saying they were following Mexican laws, but >>>>>>>>> that was some time ago and far out of my area of expertise even >>>>>>>>> general knowledge. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I care more about the moral side than the legal all around. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As the asylum process is being adjudicated, who should make sure >>>>>>>> that they are properly feed? They need to take showers and clean >>>>>>>> their clothes as well. US, Mexico, both? Perhaps even the UN? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [...] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Let them in the US and we can help. Do the right thing and donโt >>>>>>> sweat it. >>>>>>> We have plenty of resources to do so. >>>>>> >>>>>> That's rich coming from a person who doesn't have a job, stays at >>>>>> home 24x7 and has a disability scam going. >>>>> >>>>> We all speak for ourselves. >>>> >>>> Seeing as you, snit, are a parasite and don't contribute to the tax >>>> system you have no say in how tax dollars are spent. >>>> >>>> >>>>>> That person would be you snit. >>>>>> >>>>>> You sure like spending the taxpayers money don't you snit? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> I have more respect for the migrants who walked thousands of miles >>>> and at least for most of them, just want to work, than I have for you >>>> snit. >>>> You have been able to fool various doctor pills with your imagined >>>> psychological and anxiety diseases all so you can sit home, troll the >>>> Internet and collect a government disability check. >>>> You'll get yours someday snit. Karma is a bitch. >>> >>> Just KF the snit troll because he's been trolling usenet for decades >>> and shows no sign of slowing down. If he is indeed defrauding the US >>> government, they will eventually catch up with him at which point >>> things are going to quickly become quite unpleasant for snit. There's >>> a new sheriff in town and Obama is no longer around to protect lazy >>> scammers like snit. Welfare/disability fraud is near the top of the >>> list of Trump's agenda and it's going to take a hell of a lot more >>> proof of eligibility than a doctor's note. >>> I digress, just KF the snit loser and cut off his O2 supply. >>> >>> >> Those who cannot defend their arguments often make up stories of >> peopleโs personal lives. > > It took 5 minutes to disprove your statement. > > http://www.faqs.org/faqs/support/anxiety-panic/Weekly-miniFAQ/ > > And many, many more posts like that Michael 'snit' Glasser. We can > venture into the CSMA archives if you wish. > Your call. > I really don't think you want to go there. Snit will go anywhere he gets attention. He literally sits at his computer 24 hours per day waiting for replies to his trolls. You are just encouraging his bad behavior. So instead of earning money to support his family, he chooses to troll and live off a fraudulent disability claim. As I've suggested it's best to ignore him and don't engage him in any direct dialog no matter how correct your data might be. Snit will just spin it so you are wasting your time. He was shunned in comp.sys.mac.advocacy where every single poster ignored him so he had no choice but to get his attention fix elsewhere, in comp.os.linux.advocacy where for some reason there is always someone there to engage him. Most times it's just one of his socks though.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <%@%> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 14:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bpu956.rvb.17.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #232585 |
On 2018-12-02 2:20 p.m., Tammy wrote: > On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 15:50:35 -0500, benny b wrote: > >> On 2 Dec 2018 19:34:28 GMT, Snit wrote: >> >>> Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 11:25:37 -0500, benny b wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 06:09:28 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> benny b <bennybee67linko@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 00:09:36 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 10:58 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from making >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a run across the border while screaming "I seek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asylum"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose asylum >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> claims are specious will be deported after those claims >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have been evaluated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable.ย Coming here without first >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> getting permission is, by definition, breaking the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. Seeking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asylum is *not*, is *never*, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Key word: apply. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain- > protection- >>>> us-embassy-consulate.html >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the process >>>>>>>>>>>>> of applying for legal US citizenship. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Being at the border is fine, legally. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Okay, however, I am wondering if, technically, they are >>>>>>>>>>> violating Mexico's sovereignty right now? Forget about the US >>>>>>>>>>> for a moment... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Read an article saying they were following Mexican laws, but >>>>>>>>>> that was some time ago and far out of my area of expertise even >>>>>>>>>> general knowledge. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I care more about the moral side than the legal all around. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As the asylum process is being adjudicated, who should make sure >>>>>>>>> that they are properly feed? They need to take showers and clean >>>>>>>>> their clothes as well. US, Mexico, both? Perhaps even the UN? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [...] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Let them in the US and we can help. Do the right thing and donโt >>>>>>>> sweat it. >>>>>>>> We have plenty of resources to do so. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's rich coming from a person who doesn't have a job, stays at >>>>>>> home 24x7 and has a disability scam going. >>>>>> >>>>>> We all speak for ourselves. >>>>> >>>>> Seeing as you, snit, are a parasite and don't contribute to the tax >>>>> system you have no say in how tax dollars are spent. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> That person would be you snit. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You sure like spending the taxpayers money don't you snit? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> I have more respect for the migrants who walked thousands of miles >>>>> and at least for most of them, just want to work, than I have for you >>>>> snit. >>>>> You have been able to fool various doctor pills with your imagined >>>>> psychological and anxiety diseases all so you can sit home, troll the >>>>> Internet and collect a government disability check. >>>>> You'll get yours someday snit. Karma is a bitch. >>>> >>>> Just KF the snit troll because he's been trolling usenet for decades >>>> and shows no sign of slowing down. If he is indeed defrauding the US >>>> government, they will eventually catch up with him at which point >>>> things are going to quickly become quite unpleasant for snit. There's >>>> a new sheriff in town and Obama is no longer around to protect lazy >>>> scammers like snit. Welfare/disability fraud is near the top of the >>>> list of Trump's agenda and it's going to take a hell of a lot more >>>> proof of eligibility than a doctor's note. >>>> I digress, just KF the snit loser and cut off his O2 supply. >>>> >>>> >>> Those who cannot defend their arguments often make up stories of >>> peopleโs personal lives. >> >> It took 5 minutes to disprove your statement. >> >> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/support/anxiety-panic/Weekly-miniFAQ/ >> >> And many, many more posts like that Michael 'snit' Glasser. We can >> venture into the CSMA archives if you wish. >> Your call. >> I really don't think you want to go there. > > Snit will go anywhere he gets attention. He literally sits at his > computer 24 hours per day waiting for replies to his trolls. > You are just encouraging his bad behavior. > So instead of earning money to support his family, he chooses to troll > and live off a fraudulent disability claim. > > As I've suggested it's best to ignore him and don't engage him in any > direct dialog no matter how correct your data might be. Snit will just > spin it so you are wasting your time. > > He was shunned in comp.sys.mac.advocacy where every single poster ignored > him so he had no choice but to get his attention fix elsewhere, in > comp.os.linux.advocacy where for some reason there is always someone > there to engage him. Most times it's just one of his socks though. > why do you keep changing the spelling of your name
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 21:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pu1jr9$g33$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #232595 |
On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:42:30 -0700, % wrote: > On 2018-12-02 2:20 p.m., Tammy wrote: >> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 15:50:35 -0500, benny b wrote: >> >>> On 2 Dec 2018 19:34:28 GMT, Snit wrote: >>> >>>> Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 11:25:37 -0500, benny b wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 06:09:28 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> benny b <bennybee67linko@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 00:09:36 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 10:58 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making a run across the border while screaming "I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seek asylum"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose asylum >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> claims are specious will be deported after those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> claims have been evaluated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable.ย Coming here without >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first getting permission is, by definition, breaking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. Seeking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asylum is *not*, is *never*, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Key word: apply. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain- >> protection- >>>>> us-embassy-consulate.html >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the process >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of applying for legal US citizenship. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Being at the border is fine, legally. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Okay, however, I am wondering if, technically, they are >>>>>>>>>>>> violating Mexico's sovereignty right now? Forget about the US >>>>>>>>>>>> for a moment... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Read an article saying they were following Mexican laws, but >>>>>>>>>>> that was some time ago and far out of my area of expertise >>>>>>>>>>> even general knowledge. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I care more about the moral side than the legal all around. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> As the asylum process is being adjudicated, who should make >>>>>>>>>> sure that they are properly feed? They need to take showers and >>>>>>>>>> clean their clothes as well. US, Mexico, both? Perhaps even the >>>>>>>>>> UN? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [...] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Let them in the US and we can help. Do the right thing and donโt >>>>>>>>> sweat it. >>>>>>>>> We have plenty of resources to do so. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That's rich coming from a person who doesn't have a job, stays at >>>>>>>> home 24x7 and has a disability scam going. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We all speak for ourselves. >>>>>> >>>>>> Seeing as you, snit, are a parasite and don't contribute to the >>>>>> tax system you have no say in how tax dollars are spent. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> That person would be you snit. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You sure like spending the taxpayers money don't you snit? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> I have more respect for the migrants who walked thousands of miles >>>>>> and at least for most of them, just want to work, than I have for >>>>>> you snit. >>>>>> You have been able to fool various doctor pills with your imagined >>>>>> psychological and anxiety diseases all so you can sit home, troll >>>>>> the Internet and collect a government disability check. >>>>>> You'll get yours someday snit. Karma is a bitch. >>>>> >>>>> Just KF the snit troll because he's been trolling usenet for decades >>>>> and shows no sign of slowing down. If he is indeed defrauding the US >>>>> government, they will eventually catch up with him at which point >>>>> things are going to quickly become quite unpleasant for snit. >>>>> There's a new sheriff in town and Obama is no longer around to >>>>> protect lazy scammers like snit. Welfare/disability fraud is near >>>>> the top of the list of Trump's agenda and it's going to take a hell >>>>> of a lot more proof of eligibility than a doctor's note. >>>>> I digress, just KF the snit loser and cut off his O2 supply. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Those who cannot defend their arguments often make up stories of >>>> peopleโs personal lives. >>> >>> It took 5 minutes to disprove your statement. >>> >>> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/support/anxiety-panic/Weekly-miniFAQ/ >>> >>> And many, many more posts like that Michael 'snit' Glasser. We can >>> venture into the CSMA archives if you wish. >>> Your call. >>> I really don't think you want to go there. >> >> Snit will go anywhere he gets attention. He literally sits at his >> computer 24 hours per day waiting for replies to his trolls. >> You are just encouraging his bad behavior. >> So instead of earning money to support his family, he chooses to troll >> and live off a fraudulent disability claim. >> >> As I've suggested it's best to ignore him and don't engage him in any >> direct dialog no matter how correct your data might be. Snit will just >> spin it so you are wasting your time. >> >> He was shunned in comp.sys.mac.advocacy where every single poster >> ignored him so he had no choice but to get his attention fix elsewhere, >> in comp.os.linux.advocacy where for some reason there is always someone >> there to engage him. Most times it's just one of his socks though. >> > why do you keep changing the spelling of your name In order to give idiots like you something to do.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <%@%> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 14:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bpu9ja.171.17.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #232599 |
On 2018-12-02 2:46 p.m., Tammy wrote: > On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:42:30 -0700, % wrote: > >> On 2018-12-02 2:20 p.m., Tammy wrote: >>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 15:50:35 -0500, benny b wrote: >>> >>>> On 2 Dec 2018 19:34:28 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 11:25:37 -0500, benny b wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 06:09:28 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> benny b <bennybee67linko@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 00:09:36 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 10:58 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making a run across the border while screaming "I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seek asylum"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose asylum >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> claims are specious will be deported after those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> claims have been evaluated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable.ย Coming here without >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first getting permission is, by definition, breaking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. Seeking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asylum is *not*, is *never*, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Key word: apply. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain- >>> protection- >>>>>> us-embassy-consulate.html >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the process >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of applying for legal US citizenship. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Being at the border is fine, legally. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Okay, however, I am wondering if, technically, they are >>>>>>>>>>>>> violating Mexico's sovereignty right now? Forget about the US >>>>>>>>>>>>> for a moment... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Read an article saying they were following Mexican laws, but >>>>>>>>>>>> that was some time ago and far out of my area of expertise >>>>>>>>>>>> even general knowledge. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I care more about the moral side than the legal all around. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> As the asylum process is being adjudicated, who should make >>>>>>>>>>> sure that they are properly feed? They need to take showers and >>>>>>>>>>> clean their clothes as well. US, Mexico, both? Perhaps even the >>>>>>>>>>> UN? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [...] >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Let them in the US and we can help. Do the right thing and donโt >>>>>>>>>> sweat it. >>>>>>>>>> We have plenty of resources to do so. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That's rich coming from a person who doesn't have a job, stays at >>>>>>>>> home 24x7 and has a disability scam going. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We all speak for ourselves. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Seeing as you, snit, are a parasite and don't contribute to the >>>>>>> tax system you have no say in how tax dollars are spent. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That person would be you snit. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You sure like spending the taxpayers money don't you snit? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have more respect for the migrants who walked thousands of miles >>>>>>> and at least for most of them, just want to work, than I have for >>>>>>> you snit. >>>>>>> You have been able to fool various doctor pills with your imagined >>>>>>> psychological and anxiety diseases all so you can sit home, troll >>>>>>> the Internet and collect a government disability check. >>>>>>> You'll get yours someday snit. Karma is a bitch. >>>>>> >>>>>> Just KF the snit troll because he's been trolling usenet for decades >>>>>> and shows no sign of slowing down. If he is indeed defrauding the US >>>>>> government, they will eventually catch up with him at which point >>>>>> things are going to quickly become quite unpleasant for snit. >>>>>> There's a new sheriff in town and Obama is no longer around to >>>>>> protect lazy scammers like snit. Welfare/disability fraud is near >>>>>> the top of the list of Trump's agenda and it's going to take a hell >>>>>> of a lot more proof of eligibility than a doctor's note. >>>>>> I digress, just KF the snit loser and cut off his O2 supply. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Those who cannot defend their arguments often make up stories of >>>>> peopleโs personal lives. >>>> >>>> It took 5 minutes to disprove your statement. >>>> >>>> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/support/anxiety-panic/Weekly-miniFAQ/ >>>> >>>> And many, many more posts like that Michael 'snit' Glasser. We can >>>> venture into the CSMA archives if you wish. >>>> Your call. >>>> I really don't think you want to go there. >>> >>> Snit will go anywhere he gets attention. He literally sits at his >>> computer 24 hours per day waiting for replies to his trolls. >>> You are just encouraging his bad behavior. >>> So instead of earning money to support his family, he chooses to troll >>> and live off a fraudulent disability claim. >>> >>> As I've suggested it's best to ignore him and don't engage him in any >>> direct dialog no matter how correct your data might be. Snit will just >>> spin it so you are wasting your time. >>> >>> He was shunned in comp.sys.mac.advocacy where every single poster >>> ignored him so he had no choice but to get his attention fix elsewhere, >>> in comp.os.linux.advocacy where for some reason there is always someone >>> there to engage him. Most times it's just one of his socks though. >>> >> why do you keep changing the spelling of your name > > In order to give idiots like you something to do. > no no no , i didn't say why do you take it up the ass
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 22:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pu1kt1$g33$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #232600 |
On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:50:01 -0700, % wrote: > On 2018-12-02 2:46 p.m., Tammy wrote: >> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:42:30 -0700, % wrote: >> >>> On 2018-12-02 2:20 p.m., Tammy wrote: >>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 15:50:35 -0500, benny b wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 19:34:28 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 11:25:37 -0500, benny b wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 06:09:28 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> benny b <bennybee67linko@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 00:09:36 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 10:58 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making a run across the border while screaming "I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seek asylum"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asylum claims are specious will be deported after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those claims have been evaluated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable.ย Coming here without >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first getting permission is, by definition, breaking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. Seeking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asylum is *not*, is *never*, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Key word: apply. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain- >>>> protection- >>>>>>> us-embassy-consulate.html >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process of applying for legal US citizenship. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Being at the border is fine, legally. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Okay, however, I am wondering if, technically, they are >>>>>>>>>>>>>> violating Mexico's sovereignty right now? Forget about the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> US for a moment... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Read an article saying they were following Mexican laws, but >>>>>>>>>>>>> that was some time ago and far out of my area of expertise >>>>>>>>>>>>> even general knowledge. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I care more about the moral side than the legal all around. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> As the asylum process is being adjudicated, who should make >>>>>>>>>>>> sure that they are properly feed? They need to take showers >>>>>>>>>>>> and clean their clothes as well. US, Mexico, both? Perhaps >>>>>>>>>>>> even the UN? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> [...] >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Let them in the US and we can help. Do the right thing and >>>>>>>>>>> donโt sweat it. >>>>>>>>>>> We have plenty of resources to do so. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That's rich coming from a person who doesn't have a job, stays >>>>>>>>>> at home 24x7 and has a disability scam going. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We all speak for ourselves. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Seeing as you, snit, are a parasite and don't contribute to the >>>>>>>> tax system you have no say in how tax dollars are spent. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That person would be you snit. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You sure like spending the taxpayers money don't you snit? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have more respect for the migrants who walked thousands of >>>>>>>> miles and at least for most of them, just want to work, than I >>>>>>>> have for you snit. >>>>>>>> You have been able to fool various doctor pills with your >>>>>>>> imagined psychological and anxiety diseases all so you can sit >>>>>>>> home, troll the Internet and collect a government disability >>>>>>>> check. >>>>>>>> You'll get yours someday snit. Karma is a bitch. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Just KF the snit troll because he's been trolling usenet for >>>>>>> decades and shows no sign of slowing down. If he is indeed >>>>>>> defrauding the US government, they will eventually catch up with >>>>>>> him at which point things are going to quickly become quite >>>>>>> unpleasant for snit. There's a new sheriff in town and Obama is no >>>>>>> longer around to protect lazy scammers like snit. >>>>>>> Welfare/disability fraud is near the top of the list of Trump's >>>>>>> agenda and it's going to take a hell of a lot more proof of >>>>>>> eligibility than a doctor's note. >>>>>>> I digress, just KF the snit loser and cut off his O2 supply. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Those who cannot defend their arguments often make up stories of >>>>>> peopleโs personal lives. >>>>> >>>>> It took 5 minutes to disprove your statement. >>>>> >>>>> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/support/anxiety-panic/Weekly-miniFAQ/ >>>>> >>>>> And many, many more posts like that Michael 'snit' Glasser. We can >>>>> venture into the CSMA archives if you wish. >>>>> Your call. >>>>> I really don't think you want to go there. >>>> >>>> Snit will go anywhere he gets attention. He literally sits at his >>>> computer 24 hours per day waiting for replies to his trolls. >>>> You are just encouraging his bad behavior. >>>> So instead of earning money to support his family, he chooses to >>>> troll and live off a fraudulent disability claim. >>>> >>>> As I've suggested it's best to ignore him and don't engage him in any >>>> direct dialog no matter how correct your data might be. Snit will >>>> just spin it so you are wasting your time. >>>> >>>> He was shunned in comp.sys.mac.advocacy where every single poster >>>> ignored him so he had no choice but to get his attention fix >>>> elsewhere, >>>> in comp.os.linux.advocacy where for some reason there is always >>>> someone there to engage him. Most times it's just one of his socks >>>> though. >>>> >>> why do you keep changing the spelling of your name >> >> In order to give idiots like you something to do. >> > no no no , i didn't say why do you take it up the ass Grow up. *PLONK*
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "% tammy"@tammy |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 15:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bpuat2.ddr.17.5@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #232607 |
On 2018-12-02 3:04 p.m., Tammy wrote: > On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:50:01 -0700, % wrote: > >> On 2018-12-02 2:46 p.m., Tammy wrote: >>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:42:30 -0700, % wrote: >>> >>>> On 2018-12-02 2:20 p.m., Tammy wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 15:50:35 -0500, benny b wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 19:34:28 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 11:25:37 -0500, benny b wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 06:09:28 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> benny b <bennybee67linko@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 00:09:36 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 10:58 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making a run across the border while screaming "I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seek asylum"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asylum claims are specious will be deported after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those claims have been evaluated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable.ย Coming here without >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first getting permission is, by definition, breaking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. Seeking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asylum is *not*, is *never*, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Key word: apply. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain- >>>>> protection- >>>>>>>> us-embassy-consulate.html >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process of applying for legal US citizenship. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Being at the border is fine, legally. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Okay, however, I am wondering if, technically, they are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violating Mexico's sovereignty right now? Forget about the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> US for a moment... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Read an article saying they were following Mexican laws, but >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that was some time ago and far out of my area of expertise >>>>>>>>>>>>>> even general knowledge. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I care more about the moral side than the legal all around. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> As the asylum process is being adjudicated, who should make >>>>>>>>>>>>> sure that they are properly feed? They need to take showers >>>>>>>>>>>>> and clean their clothes as well. US, Mexico, both? Perhaps >>>>>>>>>>>>> even the UN? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [...] >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Let them in the US and we can help. Do the right thing and >>>>>>>>>>>> donโt sweat it. >>>>>>>>>>>> We have plenty of resources to do so. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That's rich coming from a person who doesn't have a job, stays >>>>>>>>>>> at home 24x7 and has a disability scam going. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We all speak for ourselves. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Seeing as you, snit, are a parasite and don't contribute to the >>>>>>>>> tax system you have no say in how tax dollars are spent. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That person would be you snit. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You sure like spending the taxpayers money don't you snit? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have more respect for the migrants who walked thousands of >>>>>>>>> miles and at least for most of them, just want to work, than I >>>>>>>>> have for you snit. >>>>>>>>> You have been able to fool various doctor pills with your >>>>>>>>> imagined psychological and anxiety diseases all so you can sit >>>>>>>>> home, troll the Internet and collect a government disability >>>>>>>>> check. >>>>>>>>> You'll get yours someday snit. Karma is a bitch. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Just KF the snit troll because he's been trolling usenet for >>>>>>>> decades and shows no sign of slowing down. If he is indeed >>>>>>>> defrauding the US government, they will eventually catch up with >>>>>>>> him at which point things are going to quickly become quite >>>>>>>> unpleasant for snit. There's a new sheriff in town and Obama is no >>>>>>>> longer around to protect lazy scammers like snit. >>>>>>>> Welfare/disability fraud is near the top of the list of Trump's >>>>>>>> agenda and it's going to take a hell of a lot more proof of >>>>>>>> eligibility than a doctor's note. >>>>>>>> I digress, just KF the snit loser and cut off his O2 supply. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Those who cannot defend their arguments often make up stories of >>>>>>> peopleโs personal lives. >>>>>> >>>>>> It took 5 minutes to disprove your statement. >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/support/anxiety-panic/Weekly-miniFAQ/ >>>>>> >>>>>> And many, many more posts like that Michael 'snit' Glasser. We can >>>>>> venture into the CSMA archives if you wish. >>>>>> Your call. >>>>>> I really don't think you want to go there. >>>>> >>>>> Snit will go anywhere he gets attention. He literally sits at his >>>>> computer 24 hours per day waiting for replies to his trolls. >>>>> You are just encouraging his bad behavior. >>>>> So instead of earning money to support his family, he chooses to >>>>> troll and live off a fraudulent disability claim. >>>>> >>>>> As I've suggested it's best to ignore him and don't engage him in any >>>>> direct dialog no matter how correct your data might be. Snit will >>>>> just spin it so you are wasting your time. >>>>> >>>>> He was shunned in comp.sys.mac.advocacy where every single poster >>>>> ignored him so he had no choice but to get his attention fix >>>>> elsewhere, >>>>> in comp.os.linux.advocacy where for some reason there is always >>>>> someone there to engage him. Most times it's just one of his socks >>>>> though. >>>>> >>>> why do you keep changing the spelling of your name >>> >>> In order to give idiots like you something to do. >>> >> no no no , i didn't say why do you take it up the ass > > Grow up. > *PLONK* > not a fk'in chance of that happening chicken lips so you're fk'ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 18:03 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.366e2ec2598663059959c5@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #232611 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <bpuat2.ddr.17.5@news.alt.net>, "% tammy"@tammy says... @ @ On 2018-12-02 3:04 p.m., Tammy wrote: @ > On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:50:01 -0700, % wrote: @ > @ >> On 2018-12-02 2:46 p.m., Tammy wrote: @ >>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:42:30 -0700, % wrote: @ >>> @ >>>> On 2018-12-02 2:20 p.m., Tammy wrote: @ >>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 15:50:35 -0500, benny b wrote: @ >>>>> @ >>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 19:34:28 GMT, Snit wrote: @ >>>>>> @ >>>>>>> Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> wrote: @ >>>>>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 11:25:37 -0500, benny b wrote: @ >>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 06:09:28 GMT, Snit wrote: @ >>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>> benny b <bennybee67linko@gmail.com> wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 00:09:36 GMT, Snit wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> @ >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 10:58 PM, Snit wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making a run across the border while screaming "I @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seek asylum"? @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asylum claims are specious will be deported after @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those claims have been evaluated. @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable.ย Coming here without @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first getting permission is, by definition, breaking @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the rules. @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. Seeking @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asylum is *not*, is *never*, breaking the rules. @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Key word: apply. @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain- @ >>>>> protection- @ >>>>>>>> us-embassy-consulate.html @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process of applying for legal US citizenship. @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Being at the border is fine, legally. @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Okay, however, I am wondering if, technically, they are @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violating Mexico's sovereignty right now? Forget about the @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> US for a moment... @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Read an article saying they were following Mexican laws, but @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that was some time ago and far out of my area of expertise @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> even general knowledge. @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I care more about the moral side than the legal all around. @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> As the asylum process is being adjudicated, who should make @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> sure that they are properly feed? They need to take showers @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> and clean their clothes as well. US, Mexico, both? Perhaps @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> even the UN? @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> [...] @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>> Let them in the US and we can help. Do the right thing and @ >>>>>>>>>>>> don?t sweat it. @ >>>>>>>>>>>> We have plenty of resources to do so. @ >>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>> That's rich coming from a person who doesn't have a job, stays @ >>>>>>>>>>> at home 24x7 and has a disability scam going. @ >>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>> We all speak for ourselves. @ >>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>> Seeing as you, snit, are a parasite and don't contribute to the @ >>>>>>>>> tax system you have no say in how tax dollars are spent. @ >>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>> That person would be you snit. @ >>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>> You sure like spending the taxpayers money don't you snit? @ >>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>> I have more respect for the migrants who walked thousands of @ >>>>>>>>> miles and at least for most of them, just want to work, than I @ >>>>>>>>> have for you snit. @ >>>>>>>>> You have been able to fool various doctor pills with your @ >>>>>>>>> imagined psychological and anxiety diseases all so you can sit @ >>>>>>>>> home, troll the Internet and collect a government disability @ >>>>>>>>> check. @ >>>>>>>>> You'll get yours someday snit. Karma is a bitch. @ >>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>> Just KF the snit troll because he's been trolling usenet for @ >>>>>>>> decades and shows no sign of slowing down. If he is indeed @ >>>>>>>> defrauding the US government, they will eventually catch up with @ >>>>>>>> him at which point things are going to quickly become quite @ >>>>>>>> unpleasant for snit. There's a new sheriff in town and Obama is no @ >>>>>>>> longer around to protect lazy scammers like snit. @ >>>>>>>> Welfare/disability fraud is near the top of the list of Trump's @ >>>>>>>> agenda and it's going to take a hell of a lot more proof of @ >>>>>>>> eligibility than a doctor's note. @ >>>>>>>> I digress, just KF the snit loser and cut off his O2 supply. @ >>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>> Those who cannot defend their arguments often make up stories of @ >>>>>>> people?s personal lives. @ >>>>>> @ >>>>>> It took 5 minutes to disprove your statement. @ >>>>>> @ >>>>>> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/support/anxiety-panic/Weekly-miniFAQ/ @ >>>>>> @ >>>>>> And many, many more posts like that Michael 'snit' Glasser. We can @ >>>>>> venture into the CSMA archives if you wish. @ >>>>>> Your call. @ >>>>>> I really don't think you want to go there. @ >>>>> @ >>>>> Snit will go anywhere he gets attention. He literally sits at his @ >>>>> computer 24 hours per day waiting for replies to his trolls. @ >>>>> You are just encouraging his bad behavior. @ >>>>> So instead of earning money to support his family, he chooses to @ >>>>> troll and live off a fraudulent disability claim. @ >>>>> @ >>>>> As I've suggested it's best to ignore him and don't engage him in any @ >>>>> direct dialog no matter how correct your data might be. Snit will @ >>>>> just spin it so you are wasting your time. @ >>>>> @ >>>>> He was shunned in comp.sys.mac.advocacy where every single poster @ >>>>> ignored him so he had no choice but to get his attention fix @ >>>>> elsewhere, @ >>>>> in comp.os.linux.advocacy where for some reason there is always @ >>>>> someone there to engage him. Most times it's just one of his socks @ >>>>> though. @ >>>>> @ >>>> why do you keep changing the spelling of your name @ >>> @ >>> In order to give idiots like you something to do. @ >>> @ >> no no no , i didn't say why do you take it up the ass @ > @ > Grow up. @ > *PLONK* @ > @ not a fk'in chance of that happening chicken lips so you're fk'ed LERN TO PRUNE! -- Checkmate ยฎ Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright ยฉ 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <%@%> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 16:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bpue1j.pka.17.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #232640 |
On 2018-12-02 7:03 p.m., Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <bpuat2.ddr.17.5@news.alt.net>, "% tammy"@tammy > says... > > > @ > @ On 2018-12-02 3:04 p.m., Tammy wrote: > @ > On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:50:01 -0700, % wrote: > @ > > @ >> On 2018-12-02 2:46 p.m., Tammy wrote: > @ >>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:42:30 -0700, % wrote: > @ >>> > @ >>>> On 2018-12-02 2:20 p.m., Tammy wrote: > @ >>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 15:50:35 -0500, benny b wrote: > @ >>>>> > @ >>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 19:34:28 GMT, Snit wrote: > @ >>>>>> > @ >>>>>>> Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> wrote: > @ >>>>>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 11:25:37 -0500, benny b wrote: > @ >>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 06:09:28 GMT, Snit wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>> benny b <bennybee67linko@gmail.com> wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 00:09:36 GMT, Snit wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 10:58 PM, Snit wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making a run across the border while screaming "I > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seek asylum"? > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asylum claims are specious will be deported after > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those claims have been evaluated. > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable.ย Coming here without > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first getting permission is, by definition, breaking > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the rules. > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. Seeking > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asylum is *not*, is *never*, breaking the rules. > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Key word: apply. > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain- > @ >>>>> protection- > @ >>>>>>>> us-embassy-consulate.html > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process of applying for legal US citizenship. > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Being at the border is fine, legally. > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Okay, however, I am wondering if, technically, they are > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violating Mexico's sovereignty right now? Forget about the > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> US for a moment... > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Read an article saying they were following Mexican laws, but > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that was some time ago and far out of my area of expertise > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> even general knowledge. > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I care more about the moral side than the legal all around. > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> As the asylum process is being adjudicated, who should make > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> sure that they are properly feed? They need to take showers > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> and clean their clothes as well. US, Mexico, both? Perhaps > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> even the UN? > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> [...] > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>> Let them in the US and we can help. Do the right thing and > @ >>>>>>>>>>>> don?t sweat it. > @ >>>>>>>>>>>> We have plenty of resources to do so. > @ >>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>> That's rich coming from a person who doesn't have a job, stays > @ >>>>>>>>>>> at home 24x7 and has a disability scam going. > @ >>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>> We all speak for ourselves. > @ >>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>> Seeing as you, snit, are a parasite and don't contribute to the > @ >>>>>>>>> tax system you have no say in how tax dollars are spent. > @ >>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>> That person would be you snit. > @ >>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>> You sure like spending the taxpayers money don't you snit? > @ >>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>> I have more respect for the migrants who walked thousands of > @ >>>>>>>>> miles and at least for most of them, just want to work, than I > @ >>>>>>>>> have for you snit. > @ >>>>>>>>> You have been able to fool various doctor pills with your > @ >>>>>>>>> imagined psychological and anxiety diseases all so you can sit > @ >>>>>>>>> home, troll the Internet and collect a government disability > @ >>>>>>>>> check. > @ >>>>>>>>> You'll get yours someday snit. Karma is a bitch. > @ >>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>> Just KF the snit troll because he's been trolling usenet for > @ >>>>>>>> decades and shows no sign of slowing down. If he is indeed > @ >>>>>>>> defrauding the US government, they will eventually catch up with > @ >>>>>>>> him at which point things are going to quickly become quite > @ >>>>>>>> unpleasant for snit. There's a new sheriff in town and Obama is no > @ >>>>>>>> longer around to protect lazy scammers like snit. > @ >>>>>>>> Welfare/disability fraud is near the top of the list of Trump's > @ >>>>>>>> agenda and it's going to take a hell of a lot more proof of > @ >>>>>>>> eligibility than a doctor's note. > @ >>>>>>>> I digress, just KF the snit loser and cut off his O2 supply. > @ >>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>> Those who cannot defend their arguments often make up stories of > @ >>>>>>> people?s personal lives. > @ >>>>>> > @ >>>>>> It took 5 minutes to disprove your statement. > @ >>>>>> > @ >>>>>> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/support/anxiety-panic/Weekly-miniFAQ/ > @ >>>>>> > @ >>>>>> And many, many more posts like that Michael 'snit' Glasser. We can > @ >>>>>> venture into the CSMA archives if you wish. > @ >>>>>> Your call. > @ >>>>>> I really don't think you want to go there. > @ >>>>> > @ >>>>> Snit will go anywhere he gets attention. He literally sits at his > @ >>>>> computer 24 hours per day waiting for replies to his trolls. > @ >>>>> You are just encouraging his bad behavior. > @ >>>>> So instead of earning money to support his family, he chooses to > @ >>>>> troll and live off a fraudulent disability claim. > @ >>>>> > @ >>>>> As I've suggested it's best to ignore him and don't engage him in any > @ >>>>> direct dialog no matter how correct your data might be. Snit will > @ >>>>> just spin it so you are wasting your time. > @ >>>>> > @ >>>>> He was shunned in comp.sys.mac.advocacy where every single poster > @ >>>>> ignored him so he had no choice but to get his attention fix > @ >>>>> elsewhere, > @ >>>>> in comp.os.linux.advocacy where for some reason there is always > @ >>>>> someone there to engage him. Most times it's just one of his socks > @ >>>>> though. > @ >>>>> > @ >>>> why do you keep changing the spelling of your name > @ >>> > @ >>> In order to give idiots like you something to do. > @ >>> > @ >> no no no , i didn't say why do you take it up the ass > @ > > @ > Grow up. > @ > *PLONK* > @ > > @ not a fk'in chance of that happening chicken lips so you're fk'ed > > LERN TO PRUNE! > be my guest prune away
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-03 23:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pu4fb6$pt3$11@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #232611 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 15:12:17 -0700, % tammy wrote: > On 2018-12-02 3:04 p.m., Tammy wrote: >> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:50:01 -0700, % wrote: >> >>> On 2018-12-02 2:46 p.m., Tammy wrote: >>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:42:30 -0700, % wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2018-12-02 2:20 p.m., Tammy wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 15:50:35 -0500, benny b wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 19:34:28 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 11:25:37 -0500, benny b wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 06:09:28 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> benny b <bennybee67linko@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 00:09:36 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 10:58 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making a run across the border while screaming >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "I seek asylum"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asylum claims are specious will be deported after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those claims have been evaluated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable.ย Coming here without >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first getting permission is, by definition, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seeking asylum is *not*, is *never*, breaking the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Key word: apply. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain- >>>>>> protection- >>>>>>>>> us-embassy-consulate.html >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process of applying for legal US citizenship. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Being at the border is fine, legally. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Okay, however, I am wondering if, technically, they are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violating Mexico's sovereignty right now? Forget about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the US for a moment... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Read an article saying they were following Mexican laws, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but that was some time ago and far out of my area of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expertise even general knowledge. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I care more about the moral side than the legal all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> As the asylum process is being adjudicated, who should make >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure that they are properly feed? They need to take showers >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and clean their clothes as well. US, Mexico, both? Perhaps >>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the UN? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Let them in the US and we can help. Do the right thing and >>>>>>>>>>>>> donโt sweat it. >>>>>>>>>>>>> We have plenty of resources to do so. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> That's rich coming from a person who doesn't have a job, >>>>>>>>>>>> stays at home 24x7 and has a disability scam going. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We all speak for ourselves. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Seeing as you, snit, are a parasite and don't contribute to >>>>>>>>>> the tax system you have no say in how tax dollars are spent. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> That person would be you snit. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You sure like spending the taxpayers money don't you snit? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have more respect for the migrants who walked thousands of >>>>>>>>>> miles and at least for most of them, just want to work, than I >>>>>>>>>> have for you snit. >>>>>>>>>> You have been able to fool various doctor pills with your >>>>>>>>>> imagined psychological and anxiety diseases all so you can sit >>>>>>>>>> home, troll the Internet and collect a government disability >>>>>>>>>> check. >>>>>>>>>> You'll get yours someday snit. Karma is a bitch. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Just KF the snit troll because he's been trolling usenet for >>>>>>>>> decades and shows no sign of slowing down. If he is indeed >>>>>>>>> defrauding the US government, they will eventually catch up with >>>>>>>>> him at which point things are going to quickly become quite >>>>>>>>> unpleasant for snit. There's a new sheriff in town and Obama is >>>>>>>>> no longer around to protect lazy scammers like snit. >>>>>>>>> Welfare/disability fraud is near the top of the list of Trump's >>>>>>>>> agenda and it's going to take a hell of a lot more proof of >>>>>>>>> eligibility than a doctor's note. >>>>>>>>> I digress, just KF the snit loser and cut off his O2 supply. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Those who cannot defend their arguments often make up stories of >>>>>>>> peopleโs personal lives. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It took 5 minutes to disprove your statement. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/support/anxiety-panic/Weekly-miniFAQ/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And many, many more posts like that Michael 'snit' Glasser. We can >>>>>>> venture into the CSMA archives if you wish. >>>>>>> Your call. >>>>>>> I really don't think you want to go there. >>>>>> >>>>>> Snit will go anywhere he gets attention. He literally sits at his >>>>>> computer 24 hours per day waiting for replies to his trolls. >>>>>> You are just encouraging his bad behavior. >>>>>> So instead of earning money to support his family, he chooses to >>>>>> troll and live off a fraudulent disability claim. >>>>>> >>>>>> As I've suggested it's best to ignore him and don't engage him in >>>>>> any direct dialog no matter how correct your data might be. Snit >>>>>> will just spin it so you are wasting your time. >>>>>> >>>>>> He was shunned in comp.sys.mac.advocacy where every single poster >>>>>> ignored him so he had no choice but to get his attention fix >>>>>> elsewhere, >>>>>> in comp.os.linux.advocacy where for some reason there is always >>>>>> someone there to engage him. Most times it's just one of his socks >>>>>> though. >>>>>> >>>>> why do you keep changing the spelling of your name >>>> >>>> In order to give idiots like you something to do. >>>> >>> no no no , i didn't say why do you take it up the ass >> >> Grow up. >> *PLONK* >> > not a fk'in chance of that happening chicken lips so you're fk'ed Morphing weasel! Re*PLONK* -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <%@%> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-03 16:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bq15bn.i25.19.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #233027 |
On 2018-12-03 4:47 p.m., Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 15:12:17 -0700, % tammy wrote: > >> On 2018-12-02 3:04 p.m., Tammy wrote: >>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:50:01 -0700, % wrote: >>> >>>> On 2018-12-02 2:46 p.m., Tammy wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:42:30 -0700, % wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2018-12-02 2:20 p.m., Tammy wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 15:50:35 -0500, benny b wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 19:34:28 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 11:25:37 -0500, benny b wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 06:09:28 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> benny b <bennybee67linko@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 00:09:36 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 10:58 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making a run across the border while screaming >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "I seek asylum"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asylum claims are specious will be deported after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those claims have been evaluated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable.ย Coming here without >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first getting permission is, by definition, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seeking asylum is *not*, is *never*, breaking the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Key word: apply. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain- >>>>>>> protection- >>>>>>>>>> us-embassy-consulate.html >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process of applying for legal US citizenship. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Being at the border is fine, legally. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Okay, however, I am wondering if, technically, they are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violating Mexico's sovereignty right now? Forget about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the US for a moment... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Read an article saying they were following Mexican laws, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but that was some time ago and far out of my area of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expertise even general knowledge. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I care more about the moral side than the legal all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As the asylum process is being adjudicated, who should make >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure that they are properly feed? They need to take showers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and clean their clothes as well. US, Mexico, both? Perhaps >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the UN? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let them in the US and we can help. Do the right thing and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> donโt sweat it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have plenty of resources to do so. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That's rich coming from a person who doesn't have a job, >>>>>>>>>>>>> stays at home 24x7 and has a disability scam going. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We all speak for ourselves. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Seeing as you, snit, are a parasite and don't contribute to >>>>>>>>>>> the tax system you have no say in how tax dollars are spent. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That person would be you snit. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You sure like spending the taxpayers money don't you snit? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I have more respect for the migrants who walked thousands of >>>>>>>>>>> miles and at least for most of them, just want to work, than I >>>>>>>>>>> have for you snit. >>>>>>>>>>> You have been able to fool various doctor pills with your >>>>>>>>>>> imagined psychological and anxiety diseases all so you can sit >>>>>>>>>>> home, troll the Internet and collect a government disability >>>>>>>>>>> check. >>>>>>>>>>> You'll get yours someday snit. Karma is a bitch. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Just KF the snit troll because he's been trolling usenet for >>>>>>>>>> decades and shows no sign of slowing down. If he is indeed >>>>>>>>>> defrauding the US government, they will eventually catch up with >>>>>>>>>> him at which point things are going to quickly become quite >>>>>>>>>> unpleasant for snit. There's a new sheriff in town and Obama is >>>>>>>>>> no longer around to protect lazy scammers like snit. >>>>>>>>>> Welfare/disability fraud is near the top of the list of Trump's >>>>>>>>>> agenda and it's going to take a hell of a lot more proof of >>>>>>>>>> eligibility than a doctor's note. >>>>>>>>>> I digress, just KF the snit loser and cut off his O2 supply. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Those who cannot defend their arguments often make up stories of >>>>>>>>> peopleโs personal lives. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It took 5 minutes to disprove your statement. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/support/anxiety-panic/Weekly-miniFAQ/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And many, many more posts like that Michael 'snit' Glasser. We can >>>>>>>> venture into the CSMA archives if you wish. >>>>>>>> Your call. >>>>>>>> I really don't think you want to go there. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Snit will go anywhere he gets attention. He literally sits at his >>>>>>> computer 24 hours per day waiting for replies to his trolls. >>>>>>> You are just encouraging his bad behavior. >>>>>>> So instead of earning money to support his family, he chooses to >>>>>>> troll and live off a fraudulent disability claim. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As I've suggested it's best to ignore him and don't engage him in >>>>>>> any direct dialog no matter how correct your data might be. Snit >>>>>>> will just spin it so you are wasting your time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> He was shunned in comp.sys.mac.advocacy where every single poster >>>>>>> ignored him so he had no choice but to get his attention fix >>>>>>> elsewhere, >>>>>>> in comp.os.linux.advocacy where for some reason there is always >>>>>>> someone there to engage him. Most times it's just one of his socks >>>>>>> though. >>>>>>> >>>>>> why do you keep changing the spelling of your name >>>>> >>>>> In order to give idiots like you something to do. >>>>> >>>> no no no , i didn't say why do you take it up the ass >>> >>> Grow up. >>> *PLONK* >>> >> not a fk'in chance of that happening chicken lips so you're fk'ed > > Morphing weasel! > > Re*PLONK* > oh you didn't know it was me , puffy slit lapper
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nobody <nobodyuknow@kinky.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 17:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1rhnj0xwj6tpk.9rx9bambjka0.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #232607 |
On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 17:44:33 -0500, benny b wrote: > On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 22:04:17 -0000 (UTC), Tammy wrote: > >> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:50:01 -0700, % wrote: >> >>> On 2018-12-02 2:46 p.m., Tammy wrote: >>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:42:30 -0700, % wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2018-12-02 2:20 p.m., Tammy wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 15:50:35 -0500, benny b wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 19:34:28 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 11:25:37 -0500, benny b wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 06:09:28 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> benny b <bennybee67linko@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 00:09:36 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 10:58 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making a run across the border while screaming "I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seek asylum"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asylum claims are specious will be deported after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those claims have been evaluated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable.ย Coming here without >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first getting permission is, by definition, breaking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. Seeking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asylum is *not*, is *never*, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Key word: apply. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain- >>>>>> protection- >>>>>>>>> us-embassy-consulate.html >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process of applying for legal US citizenship. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Being at the border is fine, legally. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Okay, however, I am wondering if, technically, they are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violating Mexico's sovereignty right now? Forget about the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> US for a moment... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Read an article saying they were following Mexican laws, but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that was some time ago and far out of my area of expertise >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even general knowledge. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I care more about the moral side than the legal all around. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> As the asylum process is being adjudicated, who should make >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure that they are properly feed? They need to take showers >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and clean their clothes as well. US, Mexico, both? Perhaps >>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the UN? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Let them in the US and we can help. Do the right thing and >>>>>>>>>>>>> donโt sweat it. >>>>>>>>>>>>> We have plenty of resources to do so. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> That's rich coming from a person who doesn't have a job, stays >>>>>>>>>>>> at home 24x7 and has a disability scam going. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We all speak for ourselves. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Seeing as you, snit, are a parasite and don't contribute to the >>>>>>>>>> tax system you have no say in how tax dollars are spent. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> That person would be you snit. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You sure like spending the taxpayers money don't you snit? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have more respect for the migrants who walked thousands of >>>>>>>>>> miles and at least for most of them, just want to work, than I >>>>>>>>>> have for you snit. >>>>>>>>>> You have been able to fool various doctor pills with your >>>>>>>>>> imagined psychological and anxiety diseases all so you can sit >>>>>>>>>> home, troll the Internet and collect a government disability >>>>>>>>>> check. >>>>>>>>>> You'll get yours someday snit. Karma is a bitch. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Just KF the snit troll because he's been trolling usenet for >>>>>>>>> decades and shows no sign of slowing down. If he is indeed >>>>>>>>> defrauding the US government, they will eventually catch up with >>>>>>>>> him at which point things are going to quickly become quite >>>>>>>>> unpleasant for snit. There's a new sheriff in town and Obama is no >>>>>>>>> longer around to protect lazy scammers like snit. >>>>>>>>> Welfare/disability fraud is near the top of the list of Trump's >>>>>>>>> agenda and it's going to take a hell of a lot more proof of >>>>>>>>> eligibility than a doctor's note. >>>>>>>>> I digress, just KF the snit loser and cut off his O2 supply. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Those who cannot defend their arguments often make up stories of >>>>>>>> peopleโs personal lives. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It took 5 minutes to disprove your statement. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/support/anxiety-panic/Weekly-miniFAQ/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And many, many more posts like that Michael 'snit' Glasser. We can >>>>>>> venture into the CSMA archives if you wish. >>>>>>> Your call. >>>>>>> I really don't think you want to go there. >>>>>> >>>>>> Snit will go anywhere he gets attention. He literally sits at his >>>>>> computer 24 hours per day waiting for replies to his trolls. >>>>>> You are just encouraging his bad behavior. >>>>>> So instead of earning money to support his family, he chooses to >>>>>> troll and live off a fraudulent disability claim. >>>>>> >>>>>> As I've suggested it's best to ignore him and don't engage him in any >>>>>> direct dialog no matter how correct your data might be. Snit will >>>>>> just spin it so you are wasting your time. >>>>>> >>>>>> He was shunned in comp.sys.mac.advocacy where every single poster >>>>>> ignored him so he had no choice but to get his attention fix >>>>>> elsewhere, >>>>>> in comp.os.linux.advocacy where for some reason there is always >>>>>> someone there to engage him. Most times it's just one of his socks >>>>>> though. >>>>>> >>>>> why do you keep changing the spelling of your name >>>> >>>> In order to give idiots like you something to do. >>>> >>> no no no , i didn't say why do you take it up the ass >> >> Grow up. >> *PLONK* > > Looks like the % dork needs a fresh diaper. > What a fscking fool. Well known loser from alt.checkmate. He thinks he is funny but he's really pathetic. Send him to the bozo bin and you won't need to smell the stench from his loaded diaper. You might want to toss him a baba as well.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <%@%> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 16:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bpudpi.pka.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #232630 |
On 2018-12-02 3:51 p.m., nobody wrote: > On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 17:44:33 -0500, benny b wrote: > >> On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 22:04:17 -0000 (UTC), Tammy wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:50:01 -0700, % wrote: >>> >>>> On 2018-12-02 2:46 p.m., Tammy wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:42:30 -0700, % wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2018-12-02 2:20 p.m., Tammy wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 15:50:35 -0500, benny b wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 19:34:28 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 11:25:37 -0500, benny b wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 06:09:28 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> benny b <bennybee67linko@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 00:09:36 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 10:58 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making a run across the border while screaming "I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seek asylum"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asylum claims are specious will be deported after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those claims have been evaluated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable.ย Coming here without >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first getting permission is, by definition, breaking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. Seeking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asylum is *not*, is *never*, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Key word: apply. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain- >>>>>>> protection- >>>>>>>>>> us-embassy-consulate.html >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process of applying for legal US citizenship. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Being at the border is fine, legally. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Okay, however, I am wondering if, technically, they are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violating Mexico's sovereignty right now? Forget about the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> US for a moment... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Read an article saying they were following Mexican laws, but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that was some time ago and far out of my area of expertise >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even general knowledge. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I care more about the moral side than the legal all around. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As the asylum process is being adjudicated, who should make >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure that they are properly feed? They need to take showers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and clean their clothes as well. US, Mexico, both? Perhaps >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the UN? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let them in the US and we can help. Do the right thing and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> donโt sweat it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have plenty of resources to do so. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That's rich coming from a person who doesn't have a job, stays >>>>>>>>>>>>> at home 24x7 and has a disability scam going. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We all speak for ourselves. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Seeing as you, snit, are a parasite and don't contribute to the >>>>>>>>>>> tax system you have no say in how tax dollars are spent. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That person would be you snit. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You sure like spending the taxpayers money don't you snit? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I have more respect for the migrants who walked thousands of >>>>>>>>>>> miles and at least for most of them, just want to work, than I >>>>>>>>>>> have for you snit. >>>>>>>>>>> You have been able to fool various doctor pills with your >>>>>>>>>>> imagined psychological and anxiety diseases all so you can sit >>>>>>>>>>> home, troll the Internet and collect a government disability >>>>>>>>>>> check. >>>>>>>>>>> You'll get yours someday snit. Karma is a bitch. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Just KF the snit troll because he's been trolling usenet for >>>>>>>>>> decades and shows no sign of slowing down. If he is indeed >>>>>>>>>> defrauding the US government, they will eventually catch up with >>>>>>>>>> him at which point things are going to quickly become quite >>>>>>>>>> unpleasant for snit. There's a new sheriff in town and Obama is no >>>>>>>>>> longer around to protect lazy scammers like snit. >>>>>>>>>> Welfare/disability fraud is near the top of the list of Trump's >>>>>>>>>> agenda and it's going to take a hell of a lot more proof of >>>>>>>>>> eligibility than a doctor's note. >>>>>>>>>> I digress, just KF the snit loser and cut off his O2 supply. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Those who cannot defend their arguments often make up stories of >>>>>>>>> peopleโs personal lives. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It took 5 minutes to disprove your statement. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/support/anxiety-panic/Weekly-miniFAQ/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And many, many more posts like that Michael 'snit' Glasser. We can >>>>>>>> venture into the CSMA archives if you wish. >>>>>>>> Your call. >>>>>>>> I really don't think you want to go there. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Snit will go anywhere he gets attention. He literally sits at his >>>>>>> computer 24 hours per day waiting for replies to his trolls. >>>>>>> You are just encouraging his bad behavior. >>>>>>> So instead of earning money to support his family, he chooses to >>>>>>> troll and live off a fraudulent disability claim. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As I've suggested it's best to ignore him and don't engage him in any >>>>>>> direct dialog no matter how correct your data might be. Snit will >>>>>>> just spin it so you are wasting your time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> He was shunned in comp.sys.mac.advocacy where every single poster >>>>>>> ignored him so he had no choice but to get his attention fix >>>>>>> elsewhere, >>>>>>> in comp.os.linux.advocacy where for some reason there is always >>>>>>> someone there to engage him. Most times it's just one of his socks >>>>>>> though. >>>>>>> >>>>>> why do you keep changing the spelling of your name >>>>> >>>>> In order to give idiots like you something to do. >>>>> >>>> no no no , i didn't say why do you take it up the ass >>> >>> Grow up. >>> *PLONK* >> >> Looks like the % dork needs a fresh diaper. >> What a fscking fool. > > Well known loser from alt.checkmate. He thinks he is funny but he's really > pathetic. Send him to the bozo bin and you won't need to smell the stench > from his loaded diaper. You might want to toss him a baba as well. > hurry up and killfile me i'm changing my e-mail address in a minute , i don't think i'm funny so you're lying with that cock sucker of yours , and no you can't wrap your tongue around my ass and call it a diaper , as for a baba , i'd love one what kind of beer have you got
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 23:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pu1qbe$g33$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #232630 |
On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 17:51:37 -0500, nobody wrote: > On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 17:44:33 -0500, benny b wrote: > >> On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 22:04:17 -0000 (UTC), Tammy wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:50:01 -0700, % wrote: >>> >>>> On 2018-12-02 2:46 p.m., Tammy wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:42:30 -0700, % wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2018-12-02 2:20 p.m., Tammy wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 15:50:35 -0500, benny b wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 19:34:28 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 11:25:37 -0500, benny b wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 06:09:28 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> benny b <bennybee67linko@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 00:09:36 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 10:58 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making a run across the border while screaming >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "I seek asylum"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asylum claims are specious will be deported >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after those claims have been evaluated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable.ย Coming here >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without first getting permission is, by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seeking asylum is *not*, is *never*, breaking the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Key word: apply. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain- >>>>>>> protection- >>>>>>>>>> us-embassy-consulate.html >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process of applying for legal US citizenship. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Being at the border is fine, legally. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Okay, however, I am wondering if, technically, they are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violating Mexico's sovereignty right now? Forget about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the US for a moment... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Read an article saying they were following Mexican laws, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but that was some time ago and far out of my area of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expertise even general knowledge. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I care more about the moral side than the legal all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As the asylum process is being adjudicated, who should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make sure that they are properly feed? They need to take >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> showers and clean their clothes as well. US, Mexico, both? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps even the UN? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let them in the US and we can help. Do the right thing and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> donโt sweat it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have plenty of resources to do so. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That's rich coming from a person who doesn't have a job, >>>>>>>>>>>>> stays at home 24x7 and has a disability scam going. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We all speak for ourselves. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Seeing as you, snit, are a parasite and don't contribute to >>>>>>>>>>> the tax system you have no say in how tax dollars are spent. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That person would be you snit. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You sure like spending the taxpayers money don't you snit? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I have more respect for the migrants who walked thousands of >>>>>>>>>>> miles and at least for most of them, just want to work, than I >>>>>>>>>>> have for you snit. >>>>>>>>>>> You have been able to fool various doctor pills with your >>>>>>>>>>> imagined psychological and anxiety diseases all so you can sit >>>>>>>>>>> home, troll the Internet and collect a government disability >>>>>>>>>>> check. >>>>>>>>>>> You'll get yours someday snit. Karma is a bitch. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Just KF the snit troll because he's been trolling usenet for >>>>>>>>>> decades and shows no sign of slowing down. If he is indeed >>>>>>>>>> defrauding the US government, they will eventually catch up >>>>>>>>>> with him at which point things are going to quickly become >>>>>>>>>> quite unpleasant for snit. There's a new sheriff in town and >>>>>>>>>> Obama is no longer around to protect lazy scammers like snit. >>>>>>>>>> Welfare/disability fraud is near the top of the list of Trump's >>>>>>>>>> agenda and it's going to take a hell of a lot more proof of >>>>>>>>>> eligibility than a doctor's note. >>>>>>>>>> I digress, just KF the snit loser and cut off his O2 supply. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Those who cannot defend their arguments often make up stories of >>>>>>>>> peopleโs personal lives. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It took 5 minutes to disprove your statement. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/support/anxiety-panic/Weekly-miniFAQ/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And many, many more posts like that Michael 'snit' Glasser. We >>>>>>>> can venture into the CSMA archives if you wish. >>>>>>>> Your call. >>>>>>>> I really don't think you want to go there. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Snit will go anywhere he gets attention. He literally sits at his >>>>>>> computer 24 hours per day waiting for replies to his trolls. >>>>>>> You are just encouraging his bad behavior. >>>>>>> So instead of earning money to support his family, he chooses to >>>>>>> troll and live off a fraudulent disability claim. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As I've suggested it's best to ignore him and don't engage him in >>>>>>> any direct dialog no matter how correct your data might be. Snit >>>>>>> will just spin it so you are wasting your time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> He was shunned in comp.sys.mac.advocacy where every single poster >>>>>>> ignored him so he had no choice but to get his attention fix >>>>>>> elsewhere, >>>>>>> in comp.os.linux.advocacy where for some reason there is always >>>>>>> someone there to engage him. Most times it's just one of his socks >>>>>>> though. >>>>>>> >>>>>> why do you keep changing the spelling of your name >>>>> >>>>> In order to give idiots like you something to do. >>>>> >>>> no no no , i didn't say why do you take it up the ass >>> >>> Grow up. >>> *PLONK* >> >> Looks like the % dork needs a fresh diaper. >> What a fscking fool. > > Well known loser from alt.checkmate. He thinks he is funny but he's > really pathetic. Send him to the bozo bin and you won't need to smell > the stench from his loaded diaper. You might want to toss him a baba as > well. +1000000000000000000000000000000 A massive idiot if ever there was one.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tammy |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 16:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bpugv2.12k.17.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #232656 |
On 2018-12-02 4:37 p.m., Tammy wrote: > On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 17:51:37 -0500, nobody wrote: > >> On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 17:44:33 -0500, benny b wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 22:04:17 -0000 (UTC), Tammy wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:50:01 -0700, % wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2018-12-02 2:46 p.m., Tammy wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:42:30 -0700, % wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2018-12-02 2:20 p.m., Tammy wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 15:50:35 -0500, benny b wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 19:34:28 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 11:25:37 -0500, benny b wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 06:09:28 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> benny b <bennybee67linko@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 00:09:36 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 10:58 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making a run across the border while screaming >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "I seek asylum"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asylum claims are specious will be deported >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after those claims have been evaluated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable.ย Coming here >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without first getting permission is, by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seeking asylum is *not*, is *never*, breaking the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rules. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Key word: apply. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain- >>>>>>>> protection- >>>>>>>>>>> us-embassy-consulate.html >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process of applying for legal US citizenship. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Being at the border is fine, legally. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Okay, however, I am wondering if, technically, they are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violating Mexico's sovereignty right now? Forget about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the US for a moment... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Read an article saying they were following Mexican laws, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but that was some time ago and far out of my area of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expertise even general knowledge. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I care more about the moral side than the legal all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As the asylum process is being adjudicated, who should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make sure that they are properly feed? They need to take >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> showers and clean their clothes as well. US, Mexico, both? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps even the UN? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let them in the US and we can help. Do the right thing and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> donโt sweat it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have plenty of resources to do so. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's rich coming from a person who doesn't have a job, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> stays at home 24x7 and has a disability scam going. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> We all speak for ourselves. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Seeing as you, snit, are a parasite and don't contribute to >>>>>>>>>>>> the tax system you have no say in how tax dollars are spent. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That person would be you snit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You sure like spending the taxpayers money don't you snit? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have more respect for the migrants who walked thousands of >>>>>>>>>>>> miles and at least for most of them, just want to work, than I >>>>>>>>>>>> have for you snit. >>>>>>>>>>>> You have been able to fool various doctor pills with your >>>>>>>>>>>> imagined psychological and anxiety diseases all so you can sit >>>>>>>>>>>> home, troll the Internet and collect a government disability >>>>>>>>>>>> check. >>>>>>>>>>>> You'll get yours someday snit. Karma is a bitch. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Just KF the snit troll because he's been trolling usenet for >>>>>>>>>>> decades and shows no sign of slowing down. If he is indeed >>>>>>>>>>> defrauding the US government, they will eventually catch up >>>>>>>>>>> with him at which point things are going to quickly become >>>>>>>>>>> quite unpleasant for snit. There's a new sheriff in town and >>>>>>>>>>> Obama is no longer around to protect lazy scammers like snit. >>>>>>>>>>> Welfare/disability fraud is near the top of the list of Trump's >>>>>>>>>>> agenda and it's going to take a hell of a lot more proof of >>>>>>>>>>> eligibility than a doctor's note. >>>>>>>>>>> I digress, just KF the snit loser and cut off his O2 supply. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Those who cannot defend their arguments often make up stories of >>>>>>>>>> peopleโs personal lives. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It took 5 minutes to disprove your statement. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/support/anxiety-panic/Weekly-miniFAQ/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And many, many more posts like that Michael 'snit' Glasser. We >>>>>>>>> can venture into the CSMA archives if you wish. >>>>>>>>> Your call. >>>>>>>>> I really don't think you want to go there. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Snit will go anywhere he gets attention. He literally sits at his >>>>>>>> computer 24 hours per day waiting for replies to his trolls. >>>>>>>> You are just encouraging his bad behavior. >>>>>>>> So instead of earning money to support his family, he chooses to >>>>>>>> troll and live off a fraudulent disability claim. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As I've suggested it's best to ignore him and don't engage him in >>>>>>>> any direct dialog no matter how correct your data might be. Snit >>>>>>>> will just spin it so you are wasting your time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> He was shunned in comp.sys.mac.advocacy where every single poster >>>>>>>> ignored him so he had no choice but to get his attention fix >>>>>>>> elsewhere, >>>>>>>> in comp.os.linux.advocacy where for some reason there is always >>>>>>>> someone there to engage him. Most times it's just one of his socks >>>>>>>> though. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> why do you keep changing the spelling of your name >>>>>> >>>>>> In order to give idiots like you something to do. >>>>>> >>>>> no no no , i didn't say why do you take it up the ass >>>> >>>> Grow up. >>>> *PLONK* >>> >>> Looks like the % dork needs a fresh diaper. >>> What a fscking fool. >> >> Well known loser from alt.checkmate. He thinks he is funny but he's >> really pathetic. Send him to the bozo bin and you won't need to smell >> the stench from his loaded diaper. You might want to toss him a baba as >> well. > > +1000000000000000000000000000000 > A massive idiot if ever there was one. > i never put any value in what girls say , especially the physically handicapped ones
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-03 00:22 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.366e87951d109c4a9959d4@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #232630 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <1rhnj0xwj6tpk.9rx9bambjka0.dlg@40tude.net>, nobodyuknow@kinky.org says... @ @ On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 17:44:33 -0500, benny b wrote: @ @ > On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 22:04:17 -0000 (UTC), Tammy wrote: @ > @ >> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:50:01 -0700, % wrote: @ >> @ >>> On 2018-12-02 2:46 p.m., Tammy wrote: @ >>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:42:30 -0700, % wrote: @ >>>> @ >>>>> On 2018-12-02 2:20 p.m., Tammy wrote: @ >>>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 15:50:35 -0500, benny b wrote: @ >>>>>> @ >>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 19:34:28 GMT, Snit wrote: @ >>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>> Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> wrote: @ >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 11:25:37 -0500, benny b wrote: @ >>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 06:09:28 GMT, Snit wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>> benny b <bennybee67linko@gmail.com> wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 00:09:36 GMT, Snit wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 10:58 PM, Snit wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making a run across the border while screaming "I @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seek asylum"? @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asylum claims are specious will be deported after @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those claims have been evaluated. @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable.ย Coming here without @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first getting permission is, by definition, breaking @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the rules. @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. Seeking @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asylum is *not*, is *never*, breaking the rules. @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Key word: apply. @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain- @ >>>>>> protection- @ >>>>>>>>> us-embassy-consulate.html @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process of applying for legal US citizenship. @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Being at the border is fine, legally. @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Okay, however, I am wondering if, technically, they are @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violating Mexico's sovereignty right now? Forget about the @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> US for a moment... @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Read an article saying they were following Mexican laws, but @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that was some time ago and far out of my area of expertise @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even general knowledge. @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I care more about the moral side than the legal all around. @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> As the asylum process is being adjudicated, who should make @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure that they are properly feed? They need to take showers @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and clean their clothes as well. US, Mexico, both? Perhaps @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the UN? @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...] @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Let them in the US and we can help. Do the right thing and @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> don?t sweat it. @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> We have plenty of resources to do so. @ >>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>> That's rich coming from a person who doesn't have a job, stays @ >>>>>>>>>>>> at home 24x7 and has a disability scam going. @ >>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>> We all speak for ourselves. @ >>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>> Seeing as you, snit, are a parasite and don't contribute to the @ >>>>>>>>>> tax system you have no say in how tax dollars are spent. @ >>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>> That person would be you snit. @ >>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>> You sure like spending the taxpayers money don't you snit? @ >>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>>> I have more respect for the migrants who walked thousands of @ >>>>>>>>>> miles and at least for most of them, just want to work, than I @ >>>>>>>>>> have for you snit. @ >>>>>>>>>> You have been able to fool various doctor pills with your @ >>>>>>>>>> imagined psychological and anxiety diseases all so you can sit @ >>>>>>>>>> home, troll the Internet and collect a government disability @ >>>>>>>>>> check. @ >>>>>>>>>> You'll get yours someday snit. Karma is a bitch. @ >>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>> Just KF the snit troll because he's been trolling usenet for @ >>>>>>>>> decades and shows no sign of slowing down. If he is indeed @ >>>>>>>>> defrauding the US government, they will eventually catch up with @ >>>>>>>>> him at which point things are going to quickly become quite @ >>>>>>>>> unpleasant for snit. There's a new sheriff in town and Obama is no @ >>>>>>>>> longer around to protect lazy scammers like snit. @ >>>>>>>>> Welfare/disability fraud is near the top of the list of Trump's @ >>>>>>>>> agenda and it's going to take a hell of a lot more proof of @ >>>>>>>>> eligibility than a doctor's note. @ >>>>>>>>> I digress, just KF the snit loser and cut off his O2 supply. @ >>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>>> @ >>>>>>>> Those who cannot defend their arguments often make up stories of @ >>>>>>>> people?s personal lives. @ >>>>>>> @ >>>>>>> It took 5 minutes to disprove your statement. @ >>>>>>> @ >>>>>>> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/support/anxiety-panic/Weekly-miniFAQ/ @ >>>>>>> @ >>>>>>> And many, many more posts like that Michael 'snit' Glasser. We can @ >>>>>>> venture into the CSMA archives if you wish. @ >>>>>>> Your call. @ >>>>>>> I really don't think you want to go there. @ >>>>>> @ >>>>>> Snit will go anywhere he gets attention. He literally sits at his @ >>>>>> computer 24 hours per day waiting for replies to his trolls. @ >>>>>> You are just encouraging his bad behavior. @ >>>>>> So instead of earning money to support his family, he chooses to @ >>>>>> troll and live off a fraudulent disability claim. @ >>>>>> @ >>>>>> As I've suggested it's best to ignore him and don't engage him in any @ >>>>>> direct dialog no matter how correct your data might be. Snit will @ >>>>>> just spin it so you are wasting your time. @ >>>>>> @ >>>>>> He was shunned in comp.sys.mac.advocacy where every single poster @ >>>>>> ignored him so he had no choice but to get his attention fix @ >>>>>> elsewhere, @ >>>>>> in comp.os.linux.advocacy where for some reason there is always @ >>>>>> someone there to engage him. Most times it's just one of his socks @ >>>>>> though. @ >>>>>> @ >>>>> why do you keep changing the spelling of your name @ >>>> @ >>>> In order to give idiots like you something to do. @ >>>> @ >>> no no no , i didn't say why do you take it up the ass @ >> @ >> Grow up. @ >> *PLONK* @ > @ > Looks like the % dork needs a fresh diaper. @ > What a fscking fool. @ @ Well known loser from alt.checkmate. SUBSCRIBE! -- Checkmate ยฎ Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright ยฉ 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <%@%> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-03 07:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bq044s.h86.19.11@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #232733 |
On 2018-12-03 1:22 a.m., Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <1rhnj0xwj6tpk.9rx9bambjka0.dlg@40tude.net>, > nobodyuknow@kinky.org says... > > > @ > @ On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 17:44:33 -0500, benny b wrote: > @ > @ > On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 22:04:17 -0000 (UTC), Tammy wrote: > @ > > @ >> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:50:01 -0700, % wrote: > @ >> > @ >>> On 2018-12-02 2:46 p.m., Tammy wrote: > @ >>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:42:30 -0700, % wrote: > @ >>>> > @ >>>>> On 2018-12-02 2:20 p.m., Tammy wrote: > @ >>>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 15:50:35 -0500, benny b wrote: > @ >>>>>> > @ >>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 19:34:28 GMT, Snit wrote: > @ >>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>> Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 11:25:37 -0500, benny b wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 06:09:28 GMT, Snit wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>> benny b <bennybee67linko@gmail.com> wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2 Dec 2018 00:09:36 GMT, Snit wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 10:58 PM, Snit wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making a run across the border while screaming "I > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seek asylum"? > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asylum claims are specious will be deported after > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those claims have been evaluated. > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable.ย Coming here without > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first getting permission is, by definition, breaking > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the rules. > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. Seeking > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asylum is *not*, is *never*, breaking the rules. > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Key word: apply. > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain- > @ >>>>>> protection- > @ >>>>>>>>> us-embassy-consulate.html > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process of applying for legal US citizenship. > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Being at the border is fine, legally. > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Okay, however, I am wondering if, technically, they are > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violating Mexico's sovereignty right now? Forget about the > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> US for a moment... > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Read an article saying they were following Mexican laws, but > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that was some time ago and far out of my area of expertise > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even general knowledge. > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I care more about the moral side than the legal all around. > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> As the asylum process is being adjudicated, who should make > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure that they are properly feed? They need to take showers > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and clean their clothes as well. US, Mexico, both? Perhaps > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> even the UN? > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...] > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Let them in the US and we can help. Do the right thing and > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> don?t sweat it. > @ >>>>>>>>>>>>> We have plenty of resources to do so. > @ >>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>> That's rich coming from a person who doesn't have a job, stays > @ >>>>>>>>>>>> at home 24x7 and has a disability scam going. > @ >>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>> We all speak for ourselves. > @ >>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>> Seeing as you, snit, are a parasite and don't contribute to the > @ >>>>>>>>>> tax system you have no say in how tax dollars are spent. > @ >>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>> That person would be you snit. > @ >>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>> You sure like spending the taxpayers money don't you snit? > @ >>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>>> I have more respect for the migrants who walked thousands of > @ >>>>>>>>>> miles and at least for most of them, just want to work, than I > @ >>>>>>>>>> have for you snit. > @ >>>>>>>>>> You have been able to fool various doctor pills with your > @ >>>>>>>>>> imagined psychological and anxiety diseases all so you can sit > @ >>>>>>>>>> home, troll the Internet and collect a government disability > @ >>>>>>>>>> check. > @ >>>>>>>>>> You'll get yours someday snit. Karma is a bitch. > @ >>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>> Just KF the snit troll because he's been trolling usenet for > @ >>>>>>>>> decades and shows no sign of slowing down. If he is indeed > @ >>>>>>>>> defrauding the US government, they will eventually catch up with > @ >>>>>>>>> him at which point things are going to quickly become quite > @ >>>>>>>>> unpleasant for snit. There's a new sheriff in town and Obama is no > @ >>>>>>>>> longer around to protect lazy scammers like snit. > @ >>>>>>>>> Welfare/disability fraud is near the top of the list of Trump's > @ >>>>>>>>> agenda and it's going to take a hell of a lot more proof of > @ >>>>>>>>> eligibility than a doctor's note. > @ >>>>>>>>> I digress, just KF the snit loser and cut off his O2 supply. > @ >>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>>> Those who cannot defend their arguments often make up stories of > @ >>>>>>>> people?s personal lives. > @ >>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>> It took 5 minutes to disprove your statement. > @ >>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/support/anxiety-panic/Weekly-miniFAQ/ > @ >>>>>>> > @ >>>>>>> And many, many more posts like that Michael 'snit' Glasser. We can > @ >>>>>>> venture into the CSMA archives if you wish. > @ >>>>>>> Your call. > @ >>>>>>> I really don't think you want to go there. > @ >>>>>> > @ >>>>>> Snit will go anywhere he gets attention. He literally sits at his > @ >>>>>> computer 24 hours per day waiting for replies to his trolls. > @ >>>>>> You are just encouraging his bad behavior. > @ >>>>>> So instead of earning money to support his family, he chooses to > @ >>>>>> troll and live off a fraudulent disability claim. > @ >>>>>> > @ >>>>>> As I've suggested it's best to ignore him and don't engage him in any > @ >>>>>> direct dialog no matter how correct your data might be. Snit will > @ >>>>>> just spin it so you are wasting your time. > @ >>>>>> > @ >>>>>> He was shunned in comp.sys.mac.advocacy where every single poster > @ >>>>>> ignored him so he had no choice but to get his attention fix > @ >>>>>> elsewhere, > @ >>>>>> in comp.os.linux.advocacy where for some reason there is always > @ >>>>>> someone there to engage him. Most times it's just one of his socks > @ >>>>>> though. > @ >>>>>> > @ >>>>> why do you keep changing the spelling of your name > @ >>>> > @ >>>> In order to give idiots like you something to do. > @ >>>> > @ >>> no no no , i didn't say why do you take it up the ass > @ >> > @ >> Grow up. > @ >> *PLONK* > @ > > @ > Looks like the % dork needs a fresh diaper. > @ > What a fscking fool. > @ > @ Well known loser from alt.checkmate. > > SUBSCRIBE! > they come to see the star attraction , %
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-30 21:01 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ptt4k9$es6$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #231897 |
On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: > On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from making a run >>>>>>>>> across the >>>>>>>>> border while screaming "I seek asylum"? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose asylum claims are >>>>>>>> specious >>>>>>>> will be deported after those claims have been evaluated. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You are not being reasonable.ย Coming here without first getting >>>>>>> permission is, by definition, breaking the rules. >>>>>> >>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. Seeking asylum is >>>>>> *not*, is *never*, breaking the rules. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? >>>> >>>> Key word: apply. >> >> >>> >>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! >> >> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. >> >> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain-protection-us-embassy-consulate.html >> >> >> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the process of >> applying for legal US citizenship. > > Being at the border is fine, legally. The overall process might go faster if they executed some sort of a divide-and-conquer technique by showing up at multiple embassies, and demanding paperwork to begin the asylum application process. > > >>>> These people don't feel that they need to ask for it. They've been >>>> told that they deserve it merely because they exist. >>> >>> A claim you made up. >>> >>> >> > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 07:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g6equhFmbe8U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #231901 |
Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from making a run >>>>>>>>>> across the >>>>>>>>>> border while screaming "I seek asylum"? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose asylum claims are >>>>>>>>> specious >>>>>>>>> will be deported after those claims have been evaluated. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable.ย Coming here without first getting >>>>>>>> permission is, by definition, breaking the rules. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. Seeking asylum is >>>>>>> *not*, is *never*, breaking the rules. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? >>>>> >>>>> Key word: apply. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! >>> >>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. >>> >>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain-protection-us-embassy-consulate.html >>> >>> >>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the process of >>> applying for legal US citizenship. >> >> Being at the border is fine, legally. > > The overall process might go faster if they executed some sort of a > divide-and-conquer technique by showing up at multiple embassies, and > demanding paperwork to begin the asylum application process. > > >> >> >>>>> These people don't feel that they need to ask for it. They've been >>>>> told that they deserve it merely because they exist. >>>> >>>> A claim you made up. >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > > They are doing this in large numbers, in part, because of being ignored as individuals. The world is now watching.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 08:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.366c5988cd86afe6277@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #231908 |
In article <g6equhFmbe8U1@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from making a run >>>>>>>>>>> across the >>>>>>>>>>> border while screaming "I seek asylum"? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose asylum claims are >>>>>>>>>> specious >>>>>>>>>> will be deported after those claims have been evaluated. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable.ย Coming here without first getting >>>>>>>>> permission is, by definition, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. Seeking asylum is >>>>>>>> *not*, is *never*, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? >>>>>> >>>>>> Key word: apply. >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! >>>> >>>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. >>>> >>>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain-protection-us-embassy-consulate.html >>>> >>>> >>>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the process of >>>> applying for legal US citizenship. >>> >>> Being at the border is fine, legally. >> >> The overall process might go faster if they executed some sort of a >> divide-and-conquer technique by showing up at multiple embassies, and >> demanding paperwork to begin the asylum application process. >> >> >>> >>> >>>>>> These people don't feel that they need to ask for it. They've been >>>>>> told that they deserve it merely because they exist. >>>>> >>>>> A claim you made up. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >They are doing this in large numbers, in part, because of being ignored as >individuals. The world is now watching. They are watching something that was put together to cause hate and discontent.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 11:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ptubi7$15er$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #231981 |
On 12/1/2018 10:41 AM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <g6equhFmbe8U1@mid.individual.net>, > usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >> Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> On 11/30/2018 8:38 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 11/30/18 9:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:02 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 11/30/18 8:13 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>>> On 2018-11-29 4:06 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 6:01 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/29/2018 8:57 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> What prevents every Tom, Dick, and Miguel from making a run >>>>>>>>>>>> across the >>>>>>>>>>>> border while screaming "I seek asylum"? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Nothing. Why do you care if they do? Any whose asylum claims are >>>>>>>>>>> specious will be deported after those claims have been evaluated. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You are not being reasonable.ย Coming here without first getting >>>>>>>>>> permission is, by definition, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You keep missing the point Nadegda is making. Seeking asylum is >>>>>>>>> *not*, is *never*, breaking the rules. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can they apply for asylum at a US embassy? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Key word: apply. >>>>> >>>>>> That is what they are at the border trying to do! >>>>> >>>>> Tijuana seems like it is getting overwhelmed. >>>>> >>>>> https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-obtain-protection-us-embassy-consulate.html >>>>> >>>>> Seek Temporary refuge at an embassy, then start the process of >>>>> applying for legal US citizenship. >>>> >>>> Being at the border is fine, legally. >>> >>> The overall process might go faster if they executed some sort of a >>> divide-and-conquer technique by showing up at multiple embassies, and >>> demanding paperwork to begin the asylum application process. >>> >>>>>>> These people don't feel that they need to ask for it. They've been >>>>>>> told that they deserve it merely because they exist. >>>>>> >>>>>> A claim you made up. >>> >> They are doing this in large numbers, in part, because of being ignored as >> individuals. The world is now watching. > > They are watching something that was put together to cause hate and > discontent. Don't you hate it when presidents do that? What the hell is he thinking? It's stuff straight off the tv news after you take out the ads. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 23 of 32 — ← Prev page 1 … 21 22 [23] 24 25 … 32 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web