Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #225919 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-11-15 01:53 -0800 |
| Last post | 2018-11-15 19:50 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 539 — 35 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
Fake News ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-15 01:53 -0800
Re: Fake News ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-15 09:29 -0500
Re: Fake News ? Sir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-15 13:46 -0800
Re: Fake News ? Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-15 14:03 -0500
Re: Fake News ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-11-15 19:10 +0000
Re: Fake News ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-15 14:13 -0500
Re: Fake News ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-11-15 20:36 +0000
Re: Fake News ? Sir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-15 14:21 -0800
Re: Fake News ? Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-15 14:29 -0500
Re: Fake News ? Sir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-15 18:57 -0800
Re: Fake News ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-15 17:02 -0700
Re: Fake News ? Sir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-15 20:38 -0800
Re: Fake News ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-11-15 12:34 -0800
Re: Fake News ? Sir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-15 14:16 -0800
Kensi's idiot, dice throwing, God. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-15 11:21 -0800
Re: Relf's idiot, wavefunction collapsing God. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-16 10:34 -0500
Re: Relf's idiot, wavefunction collapsing God. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 08:40 -0700
Kenzi's (psedo)multiverse protects her (psedo)pride. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-16 14:28 -0800
Re: Kenzi's (psedo)multiverse protects her (psedo)pride. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-17 12:15 -0500
Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-17 12:07 -0800
Re: Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-18 13:00 -0500
Re: Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-18 13:56 -0700
Re: Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-21 12:16 -0600
You can't prove the non existence of an UnImagined variable. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-18 14:45 -0800
Re: You can't prove the non existence of an UnImagined variable. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-18 15:52 -0700
Re: You can't prove the non existence of an UnImagined variable. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-19 11:16 -0500
I'm not mainstream. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-19 14:03 -0800
Re: I'm not mainstream. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-20 12:41 -0500
" this loophole cannot be ignored " -- Alain Aspect, 2015. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-20 17:22 -0800
Re: " this loophole cannot be ignored " -- Alain Aspect, 2015. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-21 11:16 -0500
Re: " this loophole cannot be ignored " -- Alain Aspect, 2015. Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 11:57 -0600
Re: " this loophole cannot be ignored " -- Alain Aspect, 2015. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:02 -0500
Choose your cult. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-22 14:27 -0800
Re: Choose your cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:46 -0500
Re: Choose your cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 10:55 -0700
Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-23 14:37 -0800
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 05:39 -0500
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 10:04 -0500
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-11-25 15:40 +0000
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 10:44 -0500
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-11-25 15:55 +0000
Jordan Peterson is quite rare. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-25 08:48 -0800
Re: Jordan Peterson is quite rare. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-25 23:55 -0500
Re: Jordan Peterson is quite rare. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 05:18 +0000
Jordan Peterson is quite rare. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-25 22:19 -0800
Re: Jordan Peterson is quite rare. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 06:24 +0000
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 05:17 +0000
By definition, geniuses are rare. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-25 08:12 -0800
Einstein was right. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-21 10:57 -0800
Re: Einstein was right. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 00:32 +0000
72 robotic alien virgins. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-21 17:16 -0800
Re: 72 robotic alien virgins. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 02:03 +0000
There's a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell to you. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-21 20:32 -0800
Re: There's a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell to you. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 05:46 +0000
Re: There's a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell to you. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:11 -0500
Kenzi's SciFi cult. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-22 12:02 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-23 10:08 -0600
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:51 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 12:56 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 13:23 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 13:47 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 21:53 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:57 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 16:58 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 22:06 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 17:13 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 15:23 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 17:32 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 15:36 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 17:40 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 15:48 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:47 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 10:01 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 08:56 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:41 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 16:46 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 14:51 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 14:46 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:42 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 19:44 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-24 00:04 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 09:46 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 08:56 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 11:04 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 09:04 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 11:06 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 11:14 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 11:26 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 14:45 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad813b404@gmail.invallid> - 2018-11-24 16:52 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 14:56 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:56 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 15:00 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 22:05 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 15:08 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 17:13 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Fly Tape <flÿ@tape.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:21 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 15:26 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Fly Tape <flÿ@tape.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:31 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 15:38 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 17:46 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-24 20:46 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:04 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 17:15 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:32 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 19:20 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Fly Tape" <fly@tape.invalid> - 2018-11-25 00:23 -0600
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-25 00:46 -0600
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 05:49 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 09:17 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 23:23 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:07 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-25 01:17 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 20:25 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-24 17:50 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 05:55 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 01:44 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 19:08 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-25 04:51 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 00:05 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 05:41 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 08:51 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 05:20 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 22:37 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 05:43 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 23:33 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 07:37 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:03 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-11-25 06:58 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 05:43 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 09:20 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 09:32 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 09:49 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-26 03:19 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 14:56 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:59 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 15:04 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 16:16 -0600
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 16:14 -0600
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 19:06 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 19:29 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:32 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 19:43 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 20:05 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 06:00 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 19:48 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 05:59 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 10:57 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 11:02 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 09:05 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 11:20 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 09:45 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 23:04 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 16:08 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:36 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 01:29 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 19:31 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:53 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 09:41 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:48 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 10:04 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:21 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 17:51 -0800
qBism [cubism]: correlations without correlata. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-24 04:41 -0800
Re: qBism [cubism]: correlations without correlata. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 05:44 -0500
Re: 72 robotic alien virgins. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:10 -0500
Re: 72 robotic alien virgins. Skeeter <tom@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:08 +0000
Re: Einstein was right. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:07 -0500
Re: Einstein was right. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 20:29 +0000
Re: Einstein was right. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 13:34 -0700
Re: Einstein was right. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:52 -0500
Kooky like Einstein. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-22 14:35 -0800
Re: Kooky like Einstein. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 01:14 +0000
Re: Kooky like Einstein. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-23 01:36 +0000
Re: Kooky like Einstein. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:47 -0700
I am crazy. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-22 20:17 -0800
Re: I am crazy. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 11:30 -0500
Re: I am crazy. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:55 -0500
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 10:58 -0700
Re: I am crazy. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 13:24 -0500
Re: I am crazy. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 13:48 -0500
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:05 -0700
Re: I am crazy. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 14:27 -0500
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:29 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 17:30 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 17:07 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 12:54 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 18:02 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:33 -0700
Re: I am crazy. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 19:48 -0500
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:54 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 16:58 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:55 -0800
Re: I am crazy. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 12:28 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:30 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:04 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 21:55 +0000
Re: I am crazy. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:58 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:38 -0800
Re: I am crazy. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 12:28 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:37 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 01:30 +0000
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 19:32 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 03:48 +0000
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:37 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 19:43 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 17:55 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:38 -0700
Re: Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-19 02:16 -0800
Re: Kenzi's (psedo)multiverse protects her (psedo)pride. Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 15:39 -0800
Re: Kenzi's (psedo)multiverse protects her (psedo)pride. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 18:06 -0500
Re: Kenzi's (psedo)multiverse protects her (psedo)pride. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-18 13:01 -0500
When your drunk, DiceTossing god might pass out. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-18 14:06 -0800
Re: When your drunk, DiceTossing god might pass out. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-19 11:21 -0500
Re: When your drunk, DiceTossing god might pass out. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-19 10:53 -0600
The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-19 14:16 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-20 12:45 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-20 13:07 -0500
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The psychotic racist white-supremacist taking a break from the stormfront discussion boards to post as "SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-20 12:30 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-20 12:36 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-20 18:33 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-21 12:23 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-21 12:46 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-21 17:00 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 16:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 22:16 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 21:08 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 06:23 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 17:28 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-22 12:01 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 11:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 11:04 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-22 12:56 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 12:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <tom@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:01 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. skimmer <skimmy@icanthearu.net> - 2018-11-22 14:13 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 12:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 16:26 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 18:07 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:45 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 12:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 16:27 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-20 20:29 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-20 13:34 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-20 18:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-20 18:20 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-20 19:22 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 17:24 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-20 21:13 -0500
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The psychotic racist white-supremacist taking a break from the stormfront discussion boards to post as "SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-20 20:18 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-20 19:21 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-21 12:25 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-11-20 23:35 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-20 21:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-20 19:23 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-20 20:29 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-21 05:17 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. ":2 Berger:" <hrumme4224@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 23:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-21 11:18 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 11:31 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-21 11:42 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 14:30 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 17:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 17:39 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 15:48 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-21 22:48 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 17:57 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 16:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 21:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 21:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 05:48 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-21 23:11 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 17:26 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 00:33 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 18:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 01:50 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 21:06 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 05:27 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 05:29 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 22:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 21:14 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 02:35 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 17:27 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 00:42 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 21:18 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 21:04 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 17:28 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 00:35 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 17:38 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-21 18:52 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 01:49 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 21:36 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 05:54 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-22 12:18 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:15 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <tom@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:03 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 20:33 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 13:36 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 16:29 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 01:15 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 18:57 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:46 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 03:29 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 00:33 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 11:07 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 09:28 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 16:50 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 12:52 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 11:42 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 11:57 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 16:53 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 17:50 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 16:49 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 12:11 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 16:59 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 15:17 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 13:21 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 15:27 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 13:35 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 12:52 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 13:58 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 13:02 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:04 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 18:10 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-11-23 16:26 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:29 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-23 20:48 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 18:51 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:33 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 12:25 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 14:29 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 12:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 13:23 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:25 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 16:00 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 13:20 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:24 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Fly Tape" <fly@tape.invalid> - 2018-11-24 00:12 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 16:28 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 18:50 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 16:53 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:31 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 10:15 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:43 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 14:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:56 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 14:59 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 22:02 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 15:06 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 22:08 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 19:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-25 01:18 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 19:15 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-25 04:52 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-24 18:53 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-24 16:52 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-24 21:20 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 19:30 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-24 22:08 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-25 07:08 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 08:57 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-25 08:12 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 11:59 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-25 07:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 10:06 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Emmett BADASS Gulley <emmettgulley71@qmail.com> - 2018-11-25 10:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 08:57 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-25 08:11 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 11:58 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Fly Tape" <fly@tape.invalid> - 2018-11-25 16:24 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-25 15:30 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 17:40 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 15:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-25 21:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-25 20:41 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-25 12:40 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 12:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-25 12:22 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 11:59 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-25 14:33 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Fly Tape" <fly@tape.invalid> - 2018-11-25 16:30 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-25 15:36 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 15:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Fly Tape" <fly@tape.invalid> - 2018-11-25 17:39 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-25 21:04 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 16:59 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 15:03 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 15:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:29 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 17:36 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:26 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 11:48 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-22 12:19 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 10:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 01:53 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. ":2 Berger:" <hrumme4224@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 23:59 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-21 07:35 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 10:44 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-21 07:51 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 11:02 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-21 08:23 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 11:30 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-21 08:36 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 10:36 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 10:35 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 11:10 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 10:37 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 11:09 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 22:24 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 11:09 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 11:49 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 01:04 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 21:32 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 06:05 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-22 12:30 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Tommy <tom@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 17:37 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-22 12:04 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 16:27 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-22 18:32 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 16:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 10:45 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 09:27 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 11:41 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 08:56 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 10:52 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 16:55 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 13:04 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 20:39 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 13:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 16:31 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 18:06 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 03:29 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 11:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-23 08:28 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 09:26 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-23 20:31 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 19:33 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 13:14 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-11-23 13:38 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-23 20:37 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 05:45 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-11-25 09:26 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 09:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 08:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-26 03:20 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 08:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-26 03:17 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 06:27 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-26 03:45 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 07:39 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 12:04 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:14 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-23 14:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 12:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 22:00 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:17 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 01:33 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 18:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 19:34 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 03:50 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 19:34 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:35 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 17:53 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-23 20:36 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-23 18:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 19:36 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-23 19:46 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 03:51 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-23 18:52 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 19:37 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 03:56 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 23:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 07:00 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-24 07:12 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 00:36 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-24 09:02 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 08:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:44 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 14:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:59 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 15:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 22:08 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-25 01:20 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 19:15 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-25 04:55 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 02:59 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 00:07 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 05:47 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 08:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 05:30 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-26 03:18 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 06:28 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 23:35 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-26 04:12 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-24 07:12 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 00:36 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:45 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 14:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-24 03:12 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 07:01 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-24 04:20 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-11-24 10:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-22 21:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 19:46 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-22 19:31 -0300
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-22 17:37 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-22 18:02 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 01:27 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-22 21:40 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 03:32 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 00:36 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 03:39 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 10:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 16:44 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 11:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 12:29 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 11:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-20 18:33 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-21 09:49 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 19:44 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-20 18:33 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-20 18:35 -0700
Venezuela's Marxist dictator. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-20 17:48 -0800
Re: Venezuela's Marxist dictator. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 16:51 -0500
Re: Venezuela's Marxist dictator. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-21 19:31 -0600
Re: Venezuela's Marxist dictator. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 20:40 -0500
Re: Venezuela's Marxist dictator. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-22 12:07 -0600
Fanatics. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-15 19:50 -0800
Page 22 of 27 — ← Prev page 1 … 20 21 [22] 23 24 … 27 Next page →
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-22 06:05 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <pt5h02$m5o$181@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #228595 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 21:32:48 -0500, SilverSlimer wrote: > On 2018-11-21 8:04 p.m., Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 11:49:08 -0500, SilverSlimeball burbled: >> >>> On 2018-11-21 12:17 a.m., Nadegda wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 21:12:00 -0500, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>> >>>>> In Communism, they expect you to work hard yet be content with >>>>> getting the same salary as your neighbour who sits on his ass and >>>>> does nothing. >>>> >>>> In Capitalism, they expect you (the rank and file laborer) to work >>>> hard yet be content with getting 1/300th the salary as your neighbor >>>> (the "manager" in a suit and tie) who sits on his ass and does >>>> nothing. >>> >>> You're disregarding the fact that you have a _choice_ not to work for >>> that manager because other companies >> >> Tee hee. >> >> As if "other companies" aren't all offering the same lousy pay for you, >> and the same upper middle class pay for their suited-and-tied managers. > > That's how capitalism works. You work hard in the hope of one day > because the guy who looks like he's sitting on his ass and not doing > much. If the position didn't seem to awesome, people wouldn't be working > so hard to be in that position. No, capitalism works by investors investing in growing the means of production in return for a cut of future revenues. Don't you know *anything*? >>> Additionally, the manager often got to his position because, at some >>> point in his life, he was in yours. >> >> Yep, but now he's pulled up the ladder behind him so no-one else can >> climb up. The only way to a "respectable" >> suit-and-tie-and-six-figure-salary job now is to get an MBA from >> Harvard *and* have been born to a family full of same so one of them >> can put in a word for you while whispering in the right ears. If not, >> it's the burger-flipping line for you, degree or no degree. > > Complete lie. My wife was born to a family of 4th-grade educated parents > and went to a standard university here in Montreal and she is now the > Director of Underwriting at a financial institution making over $100k > and calling the shots. She's only turning 34 on Sunday. Just because > _you_ failed miserably as a human being doesn't mean that nobody else > will. The plural of "anecdote" is not "data", especially when the anecdote could be a total fabrication for all we know. And for the record I *didn't* fail. I've got an upper five figure salary at a software company. But lots of people who graduated alongside me are saddled with debt and haven't found any decent work. Something is rotten in the state of Arizona, and in the rest of the union as well. >>> So while it may appear that he "sits on his ass and does nothing," he >>> is doing things which aren't obvious to you because you don't >>> understand his role. >> >> Oh, I understand his role alright: it's to do something ranging from >> "completely useless" to "a computer could do it" while soaking up >> hundreds of grand a year, because such job positions exist to reward >> the latter-day pseudo-aristocrats' family members for having been born >> to them instead of to somebody else. > > Assumption based on no evidence whatsoever, like a true leftist. You're > such an embarrassment to yourself, your cause and humanity in general > that you should just give up and become a prostitute. Misogyny alert. And there is evidence. I even posted a link. >> See also: >> https://www.vox.com/2018/5/8/17308744/bullshit-jobs-book-david- >> graeber-occupy-wall-street-karl-marx Yeah, that link. > <https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/vox/> > > I don't consider vox.com to be worth a click. Of course you don't, since you're a Fox-brainwashed idiot. But that does not alter the facts, any more than sticking your head in the sand re: climate change will stop the ocean from swallowing any beachfront property you might own. >>> Nevertheless, his position can be yours one day if you do what he did >>> at some point and work hard. >> >> No, it can't. Hard work doesn't get you ahead anymore. >> >> https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/in-plain-sight/middle-class-betrayal- why- >> working-hard-no-longer-enough-america-n291741 >> >> https://phys.org/news/2017-04-upward-mobility-fallen-sharply.html >> >> https://www.businessinsider.com/social-mobility-is-on-the-decline-and- with- >> it-american-dream-2017-7 >> >> https://www.brookings.edu/blog/social-mobility-memos/2018/06/05/seven- >> reasons-to-worry-about-the-american-middle-class/ >> >> https://www.thedailybeast.com/in-the-future-well-all-be-renters- americas- >> disappearing-middle-class >> >> https://www.theodysseyonline.com/american-plutocracy-income-inequality- >> social-mobility > > Wow, leftist media sure is pessimistic. Phys.org is leftist? BUSINESSINSIDER is leftist? Well ... they are probably both somewhat to the left of Hitler. Which speaks volumes about where *you* are. > It's no wonder you losers are always so angry about everything from > snowmen being sexist to milk being racisté What have you been smoking, and is it legal yet in your state? >>> No such upward mobility exists in Communism. >> >> Nor in America, not since the fucking Reagan Revolution. > > Like I said before, if _you_ failed, it doesn't mean that everyone will. > On the bright side, you might become an awesome low-priced prostitute. More misogyny. A pattern is emerging. It's what you use when you've got nothing. >>> In Capitalism, if you put an effort into your studies and understand >>> that a minimum wage job is meant to be nothing more than a stepping >>> stone, >> >> The suit-and-tie set seem to have forgotten that a minimum wage job is >> meant to be nothing more than a stepping stone, because they won't >> offer most people anything better, even if they have been working for a >> long time, even if they have a degree. > > Because your side is intent on importing people just as poorly-educated > and useless as you from poor countries who are willing to do the same > job, better at a lower salary. By the time you all figure out what > you've opened the door to, those wretches have already learned English > and can now do your job, using your language and seem to be a better fit > for the job because they're bilingual whereas you aren't. People DO get > opportunities and if you haven't gotten one, it might be because you > simply suck at what you do and that's not society's fault. And now you're race-baiting and fearmongering about immigration. I think we're just about done here. >>> then you will find yourself in work which allows you to comfortably >>> pay for a house, a new car and actually afford the iPhone you insist >>> on having. You are writing from the perspective of a dumbass barista >>> who never bothered to study and has to work at the lowest end of the >>> employment spectrum but that poor fool has nobody but themselves to >>> blame for their poor state. They were given the opportunity to make >>> something out of themselves and wasted it so now the only thing that >>> they are qualified to do is serve coffee and it's somehow everyone >>> else's fault? I reject that as would anyone else with even the >>> slightest amount of common sense. >> >> All of your information is out of date. You're describing 1965, not >> 2018. > > Years pulled out of your ass Proof, kook? > to describe a year you probably didn't live through. > >>> The result is that the people, just like your posts, are barely worth >>> a glance. >> >> Is that so? Then why do you keep drooling out followups to them with >> triple-digit line counts, kooky? >> >> <snicker> > > Because I had a free period at work In the dead of night? > and it was so much fun to respond to oblivious morons to pass the time. ... says the willfully-blind moron, who makes any merely oblivious moron look smart by comparison. <snicker> >>>>> How the Heck are you supposed to encourage people to become doctors, >>>>> engineers or inventors if their compensation will be the same or >>>>> barely better than that of a plumber? >>>> >>>> I don't know. It's one reason I favor democratic socialism over >>>> Communism. >>> >>> There is no difference you hysterical twit. >> >> Sure there is. Think Finland vs. the Soviet Union. > > Government of Finland: Unitary parliamentary republic > > More or less like Canada and England and neither consider themselves > Socialist. That's because democratic socialism is, well, democratic. Duh. >>> Here's a quote from your messiah: >>> <https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/vladimir_lenin_136421> >> >> Not my "messiah". Marx had some good ideas, but Lenin went off the >> rails and Stalin was just a murderous psychopath. > > Karl Marx was the 19th century Richard Stallman: a fat, repulsive man > with poor hygiene and an obnoxious behaviour. I'm sure Marx also thought > that voluntary pedophilia didn't hurt a child. More conservative moral-panic fearmongering pulled directly out of nowhere. Please to be providing proof that Marx was a pedophile, kook? Your attempt to tar all socialists with that brush bears the stench of sheer desperation. You know your side of the political debate is losing. The election of people like Ocasio-Cortez proves it: you racist, misogynist fiscal conservatives are a dying breed who will soon not even be able to win gerrymandered elections you cheat in anymore. <snicker> -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-22 12:30 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <%IBJD.937112$LK2.813337@fx36.iad> |
| In reply to | #228652 |
On 2018-11-22 1:05 a.m., Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 21:32:48 -0500, SilverSlimer wrote: > >> On 2018-11-21 8:04 p.m., Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 11:49:08 -0500, SilverSlimeball burbled: >>> >>>> On 2018-11-21 12:17 a.m., Nadegda wrote: >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 21:12:00 -0500, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In Communism, they expect you to work hard yet be content with >>>>>> getting the same salary as your neighbour who sits on his ass and >>>>>> does nothing. >>>>> >>>>> In Capitalism, they expect you (the rank and file laborer) to work >>>>> hard yet be content with getting 1/300th the salary as your neighbor >>>>> (the "manager" in a suit and tie) who sits on his ass and does >>>>> nothing. >>>> >>>> You're disregarding the fact that you have a _choice_ not to work for >>>> that manager because other companies >>> >>> Tee hee. >>> >>> As if "other companies" aren't all offering the same lousy pay for you, >>> and the same upper middle class pay for their suited-and-tied managers. >> >> That's how capitalism works. You work hard in the hope of one day >> because the guy who looks like he's sitting on his ass and not doing >> much. If the position didn't seem to awesome, people wouldn't be working >> so hard to be in that position. > > No, capitalism works by investors investing in growing the means of > production in return for a cut of future revenues. Don't you know > *anything*? Goalpost change noted. We were talking from the perspective of the citizen within a capitalist nation and you know that very well. >>>> Additionally, the manager often got to his position because, at some >>>> point in his life, he was in yours. >>> >>> Yep, but now he's pulled up the ladder behind him so no-one else can >>> climb up. The only way to a "respectable" >>> suit-and-tie-and-six-figure-salary job now is to get an MBA from >>> Harvard *and* have been born to a family full of same so one of them >>> can put in a word for you while whispering in the right ears. If not, >>> it's the burger-flipping line for you, degree or no degree. >> >> Complete lie. My wife was born to a family of 4th-grade educated parents >> and went to a standard university here in Montreal and she is now the >> Director of Underwriting at a financial institution making over $100k >> and calling the shots. She's only turning 34 on Sunday. Just because >> _you_ failed miserably as a human being doesn't mean that nobody else >> will. > > The plural of "anecdote" is not "data", especially when the anecdote could > be a total fabrication for all we know. > > And for the record I *didn't* fail. I've got an upper five figure salary > at a software company. But lots of people who graduated alongside me are > saddled with debt and haven't found any decent work. Something is rotten > in the state of Arizona, and in the rest of the union as well. It's called Snit. >>>> So while it may appear that he "sits on his ass and does nothing," he >>>> is doing things which aren't obvious to you because you don't >>>> understand his role. >>> >>> Oh, I understand his role alright: it's to do something ranging from >>> "completely useless" to "a computer could do it" while soaking up >>> hundreds of grand a year, because such job positions exist to reward >>> the latter-day pseudo-aristocrats' family members for having been born >>> to them instead of to somebody else. >> >> Assumption based on no evidence whatsoever, like a true leftist. You're >> such an embarrassment to yourself, your cause and humanity in general >> that you should just give up and become a prostitute. > > Misogyny alert. And there is evidence. I even posted a link. Only women are prostitutes? Your assumption is sexist. >>> See also: >>> https://www.vox.com/2018/5/8/17308744/bullshit-jobs-book-david- >>> graeber-occupy-wall-street-karl-marx > > Yeah, that link. > >> <https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/vox/> >> >> I don't consider vox.com to be worth a click. > > Of course you don't, since you're a Fox-brainwashed idiot. But that does > not alter the facts, any more than sticking your head in the sand re: > climate change will stop the ocean from swallowing any beachfront property > you might own. I don't subscribe to Fox News and wouldn't anymore anyway since they defended CNN in their ridiculous lawsuit. They've lost any support they had from me. However, Vox does _not_ deserve a click because they will blatantly lie for their mentally retarded, leftist audience of which you are a part. >>>> Nevertheless, his position can be yours one day if you do what he did >>>> at some point and work hard. >>> >>> No, it can't. Hard work doesn't get you ahead anymore. >>> >>> https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/in-plain-sight/middle-class-betrayal- > why- >>> working-hard-no-longer-enough-america-n291741 >>> >>> https://phys.org/news/2017-04-upward-mobility-fallen-sharply.html >>> >>> https://www.businessinsider.com/social-mobility-is-on-the-decline-and- > with- >>> it-american-dream-2017-7 >>> >>> https://www.brookings.edu/blog/social-mobility-memos/2018/06/05/seven- >>> reasons-to-worry-about-the-american-middle-class/ >>> >>> https://www.thedailybeast.com/in-the-future-well-all-be-renters- > americas- >>> disappearing-middle-class >>> >>> https://www.theodysseyonline.com/american-plutocracy-income-inequality- >>> social-mobility >> >> Wow, leftist media sure is pessimistic. > > Phys.org is leftist? BUSINESSINSIDER is leftist? > > Well ... they are probably both somewhat to the left of Hitler. Which > speaks volumes about where *you* are. I didn't comment on individual sources and made a general statement. You simply interpreted that as you wished which is what you do with reality in general. >> It's no wonder you losers are always so angry about everything from >> snowmen being sexist to milk being racisté > > What have you been smoking, and is it legal yet in your state? Leftist sources: <https://mic.com/articles/168188/milk-nazis-white-supremacists-creamy-pseudo-science-trump-shia-labeouf#.OHDRFF7kT> <https://www.rt.com/usa/444486-weather-channel-snowperson-tweet/> Try to exit your bubble from time to time. >>>> No such upward mobility exists in Communism. >>> >>> Nor in America, not since the fucking Reagan Revolution. >> >> Like I said before, if _you_ failed, it doesn't mean that everyone will. >> On the bright side, you might become an awesome low-priced prostitute. > > More misogyny. A pattern is emerging. It's what you use when you've got > nothing. Once again, sexism on your part assuming that only women can be prostitutes. >>>> In Capitalism, if you put an effort into your studies and understand >>>> that a minimum wage job is meant to be nothing more than a stepping >>>> stone, >>> >>> The suit-and-tie set seem to have forgotten that a minimum wage job is >>> meant to be nothing more than a stepping stone, because they won't >>> offer most people anything better, even if they have been working for a >>> long time, even if they have a degree. >> >> Because your side is intent on importing people just as poorly-educated >> and useless as you from poor countries who are willing to do the same >> job, better at a lower salary. By the time you all figure out what >> you've opened the door to, those wretches have already learned English >> and can now do your job, using your language and seem to be a better fit >> for the job because they're bilingual whereas you aren't. People DO get >> opportunities and if you haven't gotten one, it might be because you >> simply suck at what you do and that's not society's fault. > > And now you're race-baiting and fearmongering about immigration. I think > we're just about done here. Stating facts is racism. Noted. >>>> then you will find yourself in work which allows you to comfortably >>>> pay for a house, a new car and actually afford the iPhone you insist >>>> on having. You are writing from the perspective of a dumbass barista >>>> who never bothered to study and has to work at the lowest end of the >>>> employment spectrum but that poor fool has nobody but themselves to >>>> blame for their poor state. They were given the opportunity to make >>>> something out of themselves and wasted it so now the only thing that >>>> they are qualified to do is serve coffee and it's somehow everyone >>>> else's fault? I reject that as would anyone else with even the >>>> slightest amount of common sense. >>> >>> All of your information is out of date. You're describing 1965, not >>> 2018. >> >> Years pulled out of your ass > > Proof, kook? Proof that what I'm describing is out of 1965, kook? >> More or less like Canada and England and neither consider themselves >> Socialist. > > That's because democratic socialism is, well, democratic. Duh. Show me where both England and Canada consider their political system to be "Democratic Socialism," prostitute kook. >>>> Here's a quote from your messiah: >>>> <https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/vladimir_lenin_136421> >>> >>> Not my "messiah". Marx had some good ideas, but Lenin went off the >>> rails and Stalin was just a murderous psychopath. >> >> Karl Marx was the 19th century Richard Stallman: a fat, repulsive man >> with poor hygiene and an obnoxious behaviour. I'm sure Marx also thought >> that voluntary pedophilia didn't hurt a child. > > More conservative moral-panic fearmongering pulled directly out of nowhere. > > Please to be providing proof that Marx was a pedophile, kook? Your attempt > to tar all socialists with that brush bears the stench of sheer > desperation. You know your side of the political debate is losing. The > election of people like Ocasio-Cortez proves it: you racist, misogynist > fiscal conservatives are a dying breed who will soon not even be able to > win gerrymandered elections you cheat in anymore. All the election of Ocasio-Cortez - in an already leftist placed called New York - proves is that intelligence, pertinent experience and a decent plan are no longer necessities for leftists such as yourself to elect a leader. -- SilverSlimer Minds: @silverslimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tommy <tom@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-22 17:37 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <XnsA9A26C0D3DC19tominvalidinvalid@178.63.61.175> |
| In reply to | #228722 |
SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote in news:%IBJD.937112$LK2.813337@fx36.iad: >>> Like I said before, if _you_ failed, it doesn't mean that everyone >>> will. On the bright side, you might become an awesome low-priced >>> prostitute. >> >> More misogyny. A pattern is emerging. It's what you use when you've >> got nothing. > > Once again, sexism on your part assuming that only women can be > prostitutes. So women are not equal to men.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-22 12:04 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <pt6r3r$d4o$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #228725 |
On 11/22/2018 11:37 AM, Tommy wrote: > SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote in > news:%IBJD.937112$LK2.813337@fx36.iad: > >>>> Like I said before, if _you_ failed, it doesn't mean that everyone >>>> will. On the bright side, you might become an awesome low-priced >>>> prostitute. >>> >>> More misogyny. A pattern is emerging. It's what you use when you've >>> got nothing. >> >> Once again, sexism on your part assuming that only women can be >> prostitutes. > > So women are not equal to men. > of course not, women are female, men are male.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-22 16:27 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3660e964ca0a68fdb@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #228740 |
In article <pt6r3r$d4o$3@gioia.aioe.org>, invalid@invalid.com says... > >On 11/22/2018 11:37 AM, Tommy wrote: >> SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote in >> news:%IBJD.937112$LK2.813337@fx36.iad: >> >>>>> Like I said before, if _you_ failed, it doesn't mean that everyone >>>>> will. On the bright side, you might become an awesome low-priced >>>>> prostitute. >>>> >>>> More misogyny. A pattern is emerging. It's what you use when you've >>>> got nothing. >>> >>> Once again, sexism on your part assuming that only women can be >>> prostitutes. >> >> So women are not equal to men. >> > > >of course not, women are female, men are male. They won't hear any of that in California.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-22 18:32 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <21fevd9i2kf2kqivoreoo60bedu79r1doh@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #228845 |
On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 16:27:49 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >They won't hear any of that in California. I heard on the Radio where the respected magazine, "Nature" has an article in the current issue where they say a doctor in a birthing room may no longer look at the genitalia and assign gender because doing so is unscientific. They now claim that gender is more a function of the individual's mind than it's a function of genitalia. -- Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall Message-ID: <MPG.365d48f8837fd68d99575a@news.altopia.com> "My time is correct. Maybe you forget to change your time to match mine the last time you forged me, punk." --Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-22 16:50 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3660ee9be41c157718@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #228848 |
In article <21fevd9i2kf2kqivoreoo60bedu79r1doh@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 16:27:49 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > > >>They won't hear any of that in California. > >I heard on the Radio where the respected magazine, "Nature" >has an article in the current issue where they say a doctor >in a birthing room may no longer look at the genitalia and >assign gender because doing so is unscientific. They now claim >that gender is more a function of the individual's mind than >it's a function of genitalia. Yea? I been hearing that too. I wonder if it's retroactive? I could sue the hospital in California who said I was a male without getting my permission.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-23 10:45 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <sv7gvdppvu1l03ftp5clvljadbbfkdtl47@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #228859 |
On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 16:50:21 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >In article <21fevd9i2kf2kqivoreoo60bedu79r1doh@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 16:27:49 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> >>>They won't hear any of that in California. >> >>I heard on the Radio where the respected magazine, "Nature" >>has an article in the current issue where they say a doctor >>in a birthing room may no longer look at the genitalia and >>assign gender because doing so is unscientific. They now claim >>that gender is more a function of the individual's mind than >>it's a function of genitalia. > >Yea? I been hearing that too. I wonder if it's retroactive? I could sue >the hospital in California who said I was a male without getting my >permission. Yah, just think how nice it would have been going around all your life saying stupid things and demonstrating your total ignorance and illogical thinking just like kensi and Nadegda have been doing here and have it recognized as acceptable behavior just because you are a girl. -- Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall Message-ID: <MPG.365d48f8837fd68d99575a@news.altopia.com> "My time is correct. Maybe you forget to change your time to match mine the last time you forged me, punk." --Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-23 09:27 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3661d849d51815e928@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #228978 |
In article <sv7gvdppvu1l03ftp5clvljadbbfkdtl47@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 16:50:21 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>In article <21fevd9i2kf2kqivoreoo60bedu79r1doh@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 16:27:49 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>They won't hear any of that in California. >>> >>>I heard on the Radio where the respected magazine, "Nature" >>>has an article in the current issue where they say a doctor >>>in a birthing room may no longer look at the genitalia and >>>assign gender because doing so is unscientific. They now claim >>>that gender is more a function of the individual's mind than >>>it's a function of genitalia. >> >>Yea? I been hearing that too. I wonder if it's retroactive? I could sue >>the hospital in California who said I was a male without getting my >>permission. > >Yah, just think how nice it would have been going around all >your life saying stupid things and demonstrating your total >ignorance and illogical thinking just like kensi and Nadegda >have been doing here and have it recognized as acceptable >behavior just because you are a girl. I could accuse you of trying to feel me up 40 years ago and own that shack you live in.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-23 11:41 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <r2bgvd5pftb0u0fgsnnrq1lqk3l6es3m4r@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #228985 |
On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 09:27:08 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >In article <sv7gvdppvu1l03ftp5clvljadbbfkdtl47@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 16:50:21 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>In article <21fevd9i2kf2kqivoreoo60bedu79r1doh@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 16:27:49 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>>They won't hear any of that in California. >>>> >>>>I heard on the Radio where the respected magazine, "Nature" >>>>has an article in the current issue where they say a doctor >>>>in a birthing room may no longer look at the genitalia and >>>>assign gender because doing so is unscientific. They now claim >>>>that gender is more a function of the individual's mind than >>>>it's a function of genitalia. >>> >>>Yea? I been hearing that too. I wonder if it's retroactive? I could sue >>>the hospital in California who said I was a male without getting my >>>permission. >> >>Yah, just think how nice it would have been going around all >>your life saying stupid things and demonstrating your total >>ignorance and illogical thinking just like kensi and Nadegda >>have been doing here and have it recognized as acceptable >>behavior just because you are a girl. > >I could accuse you of trying to feel me up 40 years ago and own that >shack you live in. It would seem many folks dream about acquiring my fine log cabin in the mountains. Checkturd, in particular, is very envious. While he's probably wasted hundreds of hours tending to his stupid lawn I have spent zero, zip, nada. Lawns are something one works on in order to assure continued such work in the future and it's all so brainwashed into people. Plant some trees and eschew the stupid, expensive, time-consuming and environmentally destructive lawns. It's amazing the destructive stupidity the American male can be brainwashed into exhibiting and the irony is he's actually proud of being a slave to his little plot of destruction. -- Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall Message-ID: <MPG.365d48f8837fd68d99575a@news.altopia.com> "My time is correct. Maybe you forget to change your time to match mine the last time you forged me, punk." --Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-23 08:56 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <pt9bfc$hc$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #228994 |
x-no-archive: yes On 11/23/2018 8:41 AM, "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." wrote: > It would seem many folks dream about acquiring my fine > log cabin in the mountains. Checkturd, in particular, is > very envious. While he's probably wasted hundreds of > hours tending to his stupid lawn I have spent zero, zip, > nada. Lawns are something one works on in order to > assure continued such work in the future and it's all > so brainwashed into people. Plant some trees and > eschew the stupid, expensive, time-consuming and > environmentally destructive lawns. > > It's amazing the destructive stupidity the American > male can be brainwashed into exhibiting and the irony > is he's actually proud of being a slave to his little > plot of destruction. I have to say, I don't like lawns either. One of the benefits of apartment living, someone else deals with that shit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-23 10:52 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3661ec39f88d0b42f@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #228994 |
In article <r2bgvd5pftb0u0fgsnnrq1lqk3l6es3m4r@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 09:27:08 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>In article <sv7gvdppvu1l03ftp5clvljadbbfkdtl47@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 16:50:21 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>In article <21fevd9i2kf2kqivoreoo60bedu79r1doh@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>>On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 16:27:49 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>They won't hear any of that in California. >>>>> >>>>>I heard on the Radio where the respected magazine, "Nature" >>>>>has an article in the current issue where they say a doctor >>>>>in a birthing room may no longer look at the genitalia and >>>>>assign gender because doing so is unscientific. They now claim >>>>>that gender is more a function of the individual's mind than >>>>>it's a function of genitalia. >>>> >>>>Yea? I been hearing that too. I wonder if it's retroactive? I could sue >>>>the hospital in California who said I was a male without getting my >>>>permission. >>> >>>Yah, just think how nice it would have been going around all >>>your life saying stupid things and demonstrating your total >>>ignorance and illogical thinking just like kensi and Nadegda >>>have been doing here and have it recognized as acceptable >>>behavior just because you are a girl. >> >>I could accuse you of trying to feel me up 40 years ago and own that >>shack you live in. > >It would seem many folks dream about acquiring my fine >log cabin in the mountains. Checkturd, in particular, is >very envious. While he's probably wasted hundreds of >hours tending to his stupid lawn I have spent zero, zip, >nada. Lawns are something one works on in order to >assure continued such work in the future and it's all >so brainwashed into people. Plant some trees and >eschew the stupid, expensive, time-consuming and >environmentally destructive lawns. > >It's amazing the destructive stupidity the American >male can be brainwashed into exhibiting and the irony >is he's actually proud of being a slave to his little >plot of destruction. You sound like a lazy person.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-23 16:55 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36624173831c20cf995803@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #228994 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <r2bgvd5pftb0u0fgsnnrq1lqk3l6es3m4r@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... ^v^v^v ^v^v^vOn Fri, 23 Nov 2018 09:27:08 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: ^v^v^v>In article <sv7gvdppvu1l03ftp5clvljadbbfkdtl47@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... ^v^v^v>>On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 16:50:21 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: ^v^v^v>>>In article <21fevd9i2kf2kqivoreoo60bedu79r1doh@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... ^v^v^v>>>>On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 16:27:49 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: ^v^v^v>>>> ^v^v^v>>>>>They won't hear any of that in California. ^v^v^v>>>> ^v^v^v>>>>I heard on the Radio where the respected magazine, "Nature" ^v^v^v>>>>has an article in the current issue where they say a doctor ^v^v^v>>>>in a birthing room may no longer look at the genitalia and ^v^v^v>>>>assign gender because doing so is unscientific. They now claim ^v^v^v>>>>that gender is more a function of the individual's mind than ^v^v^v>>>>it's a function of genitalia. ^v^v^v>>> ^v^v^v>>>Yea? I been hearing that too. I wonder if it's retroactive? I could sue ^v^v^v>>>the hospital in California who said I was a male without getting my ^v^v^v>>>permission. ^v^v^v>> ^v^v^v>>Yah, just think how nice it would have been going around all ^v^v^v>>your life saying stupid things and demonstrating your total ^v^v^v>>ignorance and illogical thinking just like kensi and Nadegda ^v^v^v>>have been doing here and have it recognized as acceptable ^v^v^v>>behavior just because you are a girl. ^v^v^v> ^v^v^v>I could accuse you of trying to feel me up 40 years ago and own that ^v^v^v>shack you live in. ^v^v^v ^v^v^vIt would seem many folks dream about acquiring my fine ^v^v^vlog cabin in the mountains. Checkturd, in particular, is ^v^v^vvery envious. While he's probably wasted hundreds of ^v^v^vhours tending to his stupid lawn I have spent zero, zip, ^v^v^vnada. Lawns are something one works on in order to ^v^v^vassure continued such work in the future and it's all ^v^v^vso brainwashed into people. Plant some trees and ^v^v^veschew the stupid, expensive, time-consuming and ^v^v^venvironmentally destructive lawns. ^v^v^v ^v^v^vIt's amazing the destructive stupidity the American ^v^v^vmale can be brainwashed into exhibiting and the irony ^v^v^vis he's actually proud of being a slave to his little ^v^v^vplot of destruction. I don't really have a lawn, and you don't really have "acreage". Again, your rant is moot. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-23 13:04 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <bp6c1g.ih6.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #229097 |
On 2018-11-23 5:55 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <r2bgvd5pftb0u0fgsnnrq1lqk3l6es3m4r@4ax.com>, > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > > ^v^v^v > ^v^v^vOn Fri, 23 Nov 2018 09:27:08 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > ^v^v^v>In article <sv7gvdppvu1l03ftp5clvljadbbfkdtl47@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > ^v^v^v>>On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 16:50:21 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > ^v^v^v>>>In article <21fevd9i2kf2kqivoreoo60bedu79r1doh@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > ^v^v^v>>>>On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 16:27:49 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > ^v^v^v>>>> > ^v^v^v>>>>>They won't hear any of that in California. > ^v^v^v>>>> > ^v^v^v>>>>I heard on the Radio where the respected magazine, "Nature" > ^v^v^v>>>>has an article in the current issue where they say a doctor > ^v^v^v>>>>in a birthing room may no longer look at the genitalia and > ^v^v^v>>>>assign gender because doing so is unscientific. They now claim > ^v^v^v>>>>that gender is more a function of the individual's mind than > ^v^v^v>>>>it's a function of genitalia. > ^v^v^v>>> > ^v^v^v>>>Yea? I been hearing that too. I wonder if it's retroactive? I could sue > ^v^v^v>>>the hospital in California who said I was a male without getting my > ^v^v^v>>>permission. > ^v^v^v>> > ^v^v^v>>Yah, just think how nice it would have been going around all > ^v^v^v>>your life saying stupid things and demonstrating your total > ^v^v^v>>ignorance and illogical thinking just like kensi and Nadegda > ^v^v^v>>have been doing here and have it recognized as acceptable > ^v^v^v>>behavior just because you are a girl. > ^v^v^v> > ^v^v^v>I could accuse you of trying to feel me up 40 years ago and own that > ^v^v^v>shack you live in. > ^v^v^v > ^v^v^vIt would seem many folks dream about acquiring my fine > ^v^v^vlog cabin in the mountains. Checkturd, in particular, is > ^v^v^vvery envious. While he's probably wasted hundreds of > ^v^v^vhours tending to his stupid lawn I have spent zero, zip, > ^v^v^vnada. Lawns are something one works on in order to > ^v^v^vassure continued such work in the future and it's all > ^v^v^vso brainwashed into people. Plant some trees and > ^v^v^veschew the stupid, expensive, time-consuming and > ^v^v^venvironmentally destructive lawns. > ^v^v^v > ^v^v^vIt's amazing the destructive stupidity the American > ^v^v^vmale can be brainwashed into exhibiting and the irony > ^v^v^vis he's actually proud of being a slave to his little > ^v^v^vplot of destruction. > > I don't really have a lawn, and you don't really have "acreage". Again, > your rant is moot. > if the woman i live with wants a tree planted , in a pacific place in the cleared part of my 10 acres , i like to put in in the ground for here because , ]latter in the summer she will remind me that we , haven't done it under the new tree yet then , while i'm get blown like a cork in the spokane river , and you sit wondering how long you'll last in assisted living care , think you got 10 more years left , i don't think you do now watch the total evasion except to state something like ... foamage , but that won't get you the next 10 years back
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-22 20:39 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <pt7468$m5o$186@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #228722 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 12:30:36 -0500, SilverSlimer wrote: > On 2018-11-22 1:05 a.m., Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 21:32:48 -0500, SilverSlimer wrote: >> >>> On 2018-11-21 8:04 p.m., Nadegda wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 11:49:08 -0500, SilverSlimeball burbled: >>>> >>>>> On 2018-11-21 12:17 a.m., Nadegda wrote: >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>> melt! On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 21:12:00 -0500, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> In Communism, they expect you to work hard yet be content with >>>>>>> getting the same salary as your neighbour who sits on his ass and >>>>>>> does nothing. >>>>>> >>>>>> In Capitalism, they expect you (the rank and file laborer) to work >>>>>> hard yet be content with getting 1/300th the salary as your >>>>>> neighbor (the "manager" in a suit and tie) who sits on his ass and >>>>>> does nothing. >>>>> >>>>> You're disregarding the fact that you have a _choice_ not to work >>>>> for that manager because other companies >>>> >>>> Tee hee. >>>> >>>> As if "other companies" aren't all offering the same lousy pay for >>>> you, >>>> and the same upper middle class pay for their suited-and-tied >>>> managers. >>> >>> That's how capitalism works. You work hard in the hope of one day >>> because the guy who looks like he's sitting on his ass and not doing >>> much. If the position didn't seem to awesome, people wouldn't be >>> working so hard to be in that position. >> >> No, capitalism works by investors investing in growing the means of >> production in return for a cut of future revenues. Don't you know >> *anything*? > > Goalpost change noted. There was no goalpost change, kook. >>>>> Additionally, the manager often got to his position because, at some >>>>> point in his life, he was in yours. >>>> >>>> Yep, but now he's pulled up the ladder behind him so no-one else can >>>> climb up. The only way to a "respectable" >>>> suit-and-tie-and-six-figure-salary job now is to get an MBA from >>>> Harvard *and* have been born to a family full of same so one of them >>>> can put in a word for you while whispering in the right ears. If not, >>>> it's the burger-flipping line for you, degree or no degree. >>> >>> Complete lie. My wife was born to a family of 4th-grade educated >>> parents and went to a standard university here in Montreal and she is >>> now the Director of Underwriting at a financial institution making >>> over $100k and calling the shots. She's only turning 34 on Sunday. >>> Just because _you_ failed miserably as a human being doesn't mean that >>> nobody else will. >> >> The plural of "anecdote" is not "data", especially when the anecdote >> could be a total fabrication for all we know. >> >> And for the record I *didn't* fail. I've got an upper five figure >> salary at a software company. But lots of people who graduated >> alongside me are saddled with debt and haven't found any decent work. >> Something is rotten in the state of Arizona, and in the rest of the >> union as well. > > It's called Snit. Personal attacks and deflection noted. Meanwhile, the point about declining upward mobility remains unaddressed, your tacit admission that you *can't* address it because I'm right and you're wrong. >>> I don't consider vox.com to be worth a click. >> >> Of course you don't, since you're a Fox-brainwashed idiot. But that >> does not alter the facts, any more than sticking your head in the sand >> re: climate change will stop the ocean from swallowing any beachfront >> property you might own. > > I don't subscribe to Fox News and wouldn't anymore anyway since they > defended CNN in their ridiculous lawsuit. They've lost any support they > had from me. So you're rejecting Fox now because to you, they're too far *left*? Figures. My point stands. > However, Vox does _not_ deserve a click because they will blatantly lie Proof, kook? >>>>> Nevertheless, his position can be yours one day if you do what he >>>>> did at some point and work hard. >>>> >>>> No, it can't. Hard work doesn't get you ahead anymore. >>>> >>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/in-plain-sight/middle-class-betrayal- >> why- >>>> working-hard-no-longer-enough-america-n291741 >>>> >>>> https://phys.org/news/2017-04-upward-mobility-fallen-sharply.html >>>> >>>> https://www.businessinsider.com/social-mobility-is-on-the-decline-and- >> with- >>>> it-american-dream-2017-7 >>>> >>>> https://www.brookings.edu/blog/social-mobility-memos/2018/06/05/seven- >>>> reasons-to-worry-about-the-american-middle-class/ >>>> >>>> https://www.thedailybeast.com/in-the-future-well-all-be-renters- >> americas- >>>> disappearing-middle-class >>>> >>>> https://www.theodysseyonline.com/american-plutocracy-income- inequality- >>>> social-mobility >>> >>> Wow, leftist media sure is pessimistic. >> >> Phys.org is leftist? BUSINESSINSIDER is leftist? >> >> Well ... they are probably both somewhat to the left of Hitler. Which >> speaks volumes about where *you* are. > > I didn't comment on individual sources and made a general statement. Then I just proved your "general statement" wrong. >>> It's no wonder you losers are always so angry about everything from >>> snowmen being sexist to milk being racisté >> >> What have you been smoking, and is it legal yet in your state? > > Leftist sources: > > <https://mic.com/articles/168188/milk-nazis-white-supremacists-creamy- pseudo-science-trump-shia-labeouf#.OHDRFF7kT> > > <https://www.rt.com/usa/444486-weather-channel-snowperson-tweet/> RT isn't "leftist", RT is run by right-wing Russian oligarchs, some of the same ones responsible for Trump and Brexit. Try again. >>>>> In Capitalism, if you put an effort into your studies and understand >>>>> that a minimum wage job is meant to be nothing more than a stepping >>>>> stone, >>>> >>>> The suit-and-tie set seem to have forgotten that a minimum wage job >>>> is meant to be nothing more than a stepping stone, because they won't >>>> offer most people anything better, even if they have been working for >>>> a long time, even if they have a degree. >>> >>> Because your side is intent on importing people just as >>> poorly-educated and useless as you from poor countries who are willing >>> to do the same job, better at a lower salary. By the time you all >>> figure out what you've opened the door to, those wretches have already >>> learned English and can now do your job, using your language and seem >>> to be a better fit for the job because they're bilingual whereas you >>> aren't. People DO get opportunities and if you haven't gotten one, it >>> might be because you simply suck at what you do and that's not >>> society's fault. >> >> And now you're race-baiting and fearmongering about immigration. I >> think we're just about done here. > > Stating facts You didn't state any facts. You engaged in xenophobic fearmongering. >>>>> then you will find yourself in work which allows you to comfortably >>>>> pay for a house, a new car and actually afford the iPhone you insist >>>>> on having. You are writing from the perspective of a dumbass barista >>>>> who never bothered to study and has to work at the lowest end of the >>>>> employment spectrum but that poor fool has nobody but themselves to >>>>> blame for their poor state. They were given the opportunity to make >>>>> something out of themselves and wasted it so now the only thing that >>>>> they are qualified to do is serve coffee and it's somehow everyone >>>>> else's fault? I reject that as would anyone else with even the >>>>> slightest amount of common sense. >>>> >>>> All of your information is out of date. You're describing 1965, not >>>> 2018. >>> >>> Years pulled out of your ass >> >> Proof, kook? > Proof that what I'm describing is out of 1965 Upward mobility existed then. It largely doesn't now. >>> More or less like Canada and England and neither consider themselves >>> Socialist. >> >> That's because democratic socialism is, well, democratic. Duh. > > Show me where both England and Canada consider their political system to > be "Democratic Socialism," I didn't claim they did, kook. > prostitute kook. More misogyny. >>>>> Here's a quote from your messiah: >>>>> <https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/vladimir_lenin_136421> >>>> >>>> Not my "messiah". Marx had some good ideas, but Lenin went off the >>>> rails and Stalin was just a murderous psychopath. >>> >>> Karl Marx was the 19th century Richard Stallman: a fat, repulsive man >>> with poor hygiene and an obnoxious behaviour. I'm sure Marx also >>> thought that voluntary pedophilia didn't hurt a child. >> >> More conservative moral-panic fearmongering pulled directly out of >> nowhere. >> >> Please to be providing proof that Marx was a pedophile, kook? Your >> attempt to tar all socialists with that brush bears the stench of sheer >> desperation. You know your side of the political debate is losing. The >> election of people like Ocasio-Cortez proves it: you racist, misogynist >> fiscal conservatives are a dying breed who will soon not even be able >> to win gerrymandered elections you cheat in anymore. > > All the election of Ocasio-Cortez - in an already leftist placed called > New York - proves is that intelligence, pertinent experience and a > decent plan are no longer necessities for leftists such as yourself to > elect a leader. Baseless insults against Ocasio-Cortez noted. The OCDS is strong with this one ... -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-22 13:44 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <g5oipcFpgafU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #228782 |
On 11/22/18 1:39 PM, Nadegda wrote: ... >>> The plural of "anecdote" is not "data", especially when the anecdote >>> could be a total fabrication for all we know. >>> >>> And for the record I *didn't* fail. I've got an upper five figure >>> salary at a software company. But lots of people who graduated >>> alongside me are saddled with debt and haven't found any decent work. >>> Something is rotten in the state of Arizona, and in the rest of the >>> union as well. >> >> It's called Snit. > > Personal attacks and deflection noted. Meanwhile, the point about > declining upward mobility remains unaddressed, your tacit admission that > you *can't* address it because I'm right and you're wrong. Slimer attacks me with absurd insult because he knows he cannot refute my backing of equal rights, nor defend his support for special entitlements. ... -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-22 16:31 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3660ea4040c7d3b1d@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #228786 |
In article <g5oipcFpgafU4@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >On 11/22/18 1:39 PM, Nadegda wrote: >... >>>> The plural of "anecdote" is not "data", especially when the anecdote >>>> could be a total fabrication for all we know. >>>> >>>> And for the record I *didn't* fail. I've got an upper five figure >>>> salary at a software company. But lots of people who graduated >>>> alongside me are saddled with debt and haven't found any decent work. >>>> Something is rotten in the state of Arizona, and in the rest of the >>>> union as well. >>> >>> It's called Snit. >> >> Personal attacks and deflection noted. Meanwhile, the point about >> declining upward mobility remains unaddressed, your tacit admission that >> you *can't* address it because I'm right and you're wrong. > >Slimer attacks me with absurd insult because he knows he cannot refute >my backing of equal rights, nor defend his support for special >entitlements. >... It's the fags and libs that want special entitlements.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-22 18:06 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <g5p258Fslp4U7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #228847 |
On 11/22/18 4:31 PM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <g5oipcFpgafU4@mid.individual.net>, > usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >> >> On 11/22/18 1:39 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> ... >>>>> The plural of "anecdote" is not "data", especially when the anecdote >>>>> could be a total fabrication for all we know. >>>>> >>>>> And for the record I *didn't* fail. I've got an upper five figure >>>>> salary at a software company. But lots of people who graduated >>>>> alongside me are saddled with debt and haven't found any decent work. >>>>> Something is rotten in the state of Arizona, and in the rest of the >>>>> union as well. >>>> >>>> It's called Snit. >>> >>> Personal attacks and deflection noted. Meanwhile, the point about >>> declining upward mobility remains unaddressed, your tacit admission that >>> you *can't* address it because I'm right and you're wrong. >> >> Slimer attacks me with absurd insult because he knows he cannot refute >> my backing of equal rights, nor defend his support for special >> entitlements. >> ... > > It's the fags and libs that want special entitlements. > A claim you will never back. Got it. Meanwhile look at Slimer and his attacks against Muslims... attacks and restrictions he NEVER applies to a similar religion, Christianity. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-22 19:44 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36611776f443ab341e@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #228866 |
In article <g5p258Fslp4U7@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >On 11/22/18 4:31 PM, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <g5oipcFpgafU4@mid.individual.net>, >> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>> >>> On 11/22/18 1:39 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> ... >>>>>> The plural of "anecdote" is not "data", especially when the anecdote >>>>>> could be a total fabrication for all we know. >>>>>> >>>>>> And for the record I *didn't* fail. I've got an upper five figure >>>>>> salary at a software company. But lots of people who graduated >>>>>> alongside me are saddled with debt and haven't found any decent work. >>>>>> Something is rotten in the state of Arizona, and in the rest of the >>>>>> union as well. >>>>> >>>>> It's called Snit. >>>> >>>> Personal attacks and deflection noted. Meanwhile, the point about >>>> declining upward mobility remains unaddressed, your tacit admission that >>>> you *can't* address it because I'm right and you're wrong. >>> >>> Slimer attacks me with absurd insult because he knows he cannot refute >>> my backing of equal rights, nor defend his support for special >>> entitlements. >>> ... >> >> It's the fags and libs that want special entitlements. >> > >A claim you will never back. Got it. Meanwhile look at Slimer and his >attacks against Muslims... attacks and restrictions he NEVER applies to >a similar religion, Christianity. I dunno bout that, but if ya wanna be a fag, then by all means be a fag, but you don't have to have a parade every other week and damn sure don't need "pride" marches. Straight Lives Matter!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-23 03:29 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <pt7s6u$m5o$194@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #228912 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 19:44:31 -0700, Skeeter wrote: > In article <g5p258Fslp4U7@mid.individual.net>, > usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >> >>On 11/22/18 4:31 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <g5oipcFpgafU4@mid.individual.net>, >>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>>> >>>> On 11/22/18 1:39 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> ... >>>>>>> The plural of "anecdote" is not "data", especially when the >>>>>>> anecdote could be a total fabrication for all we know. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And for the record I *didn't* fail. I've got an upper five figure >>>>>>> salary at a software company. But lots of people who graduated >>>>>>> alongside me are saddled with debt and haven't found any decent >>>>>>> work. >>>>>>> Something is rotten in the state of Arizona, and in the rest of >>>>>>> the union as well. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's called Snit. >>>>> >>>>> Personal attacks and deflection noted. Meanwhile, the point about >>>>> declining upward mobility remains unaddressed, your tacit admission >>>>> that you *can't* address it because I'm right and you're wrong. >>>> >>>> Slimer attacks me with absurd insult because he knows he cannot >>>> refute my backing of equal rights, nor defend his support for special >>>> entitlements. >>>> ... >>> >>> It's the fags and libs that want special entitlements. >>> >>> >>A claim you will never back. Got it. Meanwhile look at Slimer and his >>attacks against Muslims... attacks and restrictions he NEVER applies to >>a similar religion, Christianity. > > I dunno bout that, but if ya wanna be a fag, then by all means be a fag, > but you don't have to have a parade every other week and damn sure don't > need "pride" marches. > > St<SMACKAKOOK!> Fuck off, homophobe. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 22 of 27 — ← Prev page 1 … 20 21 [22] 23 24 … 27 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web