Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #213393 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-10-12 10:11 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-10-14 04:10 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 190 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-12 10:11 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-12 08:15 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-10-12 11:49 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 12:21 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-13 03:42 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-10-13 10:28 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-14 01:06 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-13 19:44 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 23:40 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-14 09:52 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 12:24 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-14 16:34 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-14 20:57 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-14 11:31 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-14 11:35 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 12:52 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-14 20:43 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 21:31 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-15 09:42 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 12:02 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 08:11 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-10-13 22:31 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 23:22 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-14 04:13 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-10-14 00:53 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-14 11:33 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-14 09:45 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-14 13:07 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 17:34 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-14 20:43 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 17:46 -0600
35 years ago, Kensi asked me for $200. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-14 19:17 -0700
Re: 35 years ago, Kensi asked me for $200. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 08:24 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-14 20:53 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 20:04 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-15 04:38 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 23:35 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-15 09:47 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-10-14 15:15 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-10-14 20:11 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-10-14 16:17 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-14 20:49 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-10-14 16:54 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-14 20:58 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-10-14 17:06 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-14 21:24 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-10-14 18:01 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 15:04 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-15 04:41 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-10-15 07:09 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 12:16 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Rogue Cormac <kremvax2004@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-15 10:21 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-23 17:53 -0500
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> - 2018-10-15 09:33 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-15 19:36 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-25 10:15 -0500
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-25 12:14 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-25 12:58 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-25 13:19 -0500
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-25 14:23 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-25 11:36 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-25 19:15 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Skeeter <teandson@gmail.com> - 2018-10-25 11:44 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-25 16:36 -0400
Plants want _ more warmth and carbon dioxide. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-15 14:38 -0700
Re: Plants want _ more warmth and carbon dioxide. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-16 02:07 +0000
Re:Nads chants "kill the plants" Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-15 20:13 -0600
Re: Nads chants "kill the plants" benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 22:57 -0400
Re: Nads chants "kill the plants" "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-16 15:45 -0400
Re: Nads chants "kill the plants" % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 00:48 -0700
Re: Nads chants "kill the plants" Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 20:38 -0700
Re: Nads chants "kill the plants" "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-17 11:16 -0400
Re: Nads chants "kill the plants" Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 08:47 -0700
Re: Nads chants "kill the plants" kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-17 13:14 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-15 16:12 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-14 20:56 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-14 16:55 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 14:08 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-14 20:47 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-10-14 16:56 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-14 21:24 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 14:29 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-10-14 18:05 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 17:31 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-15 04:42 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 23:32 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 12:17 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-15 13:21 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 12:23 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-15 19:38 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-15 16:14 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-16 02:08 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-15 20:14 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-15 23:33 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-16 08:04 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-16 10:24 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-16 08:25 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-16 10:37 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-16 08:39 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-10-16 17:35 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-10-16 11:40 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-16 08:05 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-10-16 18:43 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-17 13:17 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-17 13:20 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 14:49 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-17 18:10 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-17 15:12 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-17 21:15 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-17 20:11 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-17 20:11 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-17 11:28 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-17 13:36 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-10-18 11:38 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-19 05:28 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-19 08:31 +0100
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-19 07:35 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-19 09:44 +0100
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-19 06:04 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-19 11:38 +0100
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-19 15:25 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-19 15:34 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-19 21:42 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-19 15:24 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-19 15:32 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-10-19 22:37 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-19 21:43 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-19 09:40 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-19 11:48 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-10-19 10:59 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-16 08:04 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-10-16 00:05 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 21:09 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-16 02:09 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher lunar delegate <kremvax2004@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-15 20:48 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher lunar delegate <kremvax2004@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-15 21:06 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-16 08:03 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-25 09:31 -0500
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 17:29 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher tripeco.2@parody.personae.invalid (Tr!pe) - 2018-10-15 10:56 +0100
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-15 19:39 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher tripeco.2@parody.personae.invalid (Tr!pe) - 2018-10-15 21:03 +0100
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-10-16 00:38 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-15 20:57 -0500
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher tripeco.2@parody.personae.invalid (Tr!pe) - 2018-10-16 08:45 +0100
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-16 10:32 -0500
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-10-16 17:51 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 10:56 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 11:12 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 11:10 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 11:18 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 10:27 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 17:32 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 23:21 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-10-14 12:08 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-14 09:55 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-14 09:22 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-14 11:27 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-14 09:44 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-14 11:34 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-14 09:45 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-14 11:46 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-14 09:50 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 21:27 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-15 09:45 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 12:03 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 12:25 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 23:37 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-10-14 12:09 +0000
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 14:11 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-14 09:56 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 12:26 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-14 09:23 -0600
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-15 20:55 -0500
To fight climate change, we need to be truly deluded Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-10-12 15:51 -0400
Re: To fight climate change, we need to be truly deluded benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 17:26 -0400
Re: To fight climate change, we need to be truly deluded vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-10-12 21:33 +0000
Re: To fight climate change, we need to be truly deluded Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-10-12 17:46 -0400
Re: To fight climate change, we need to be truly deluded benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 12:35 -0400
Re: To fight climate change, we need to be truly deluded "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-10-12 20:02 -0400
Re: To fight climate change, we need to be truly deluded Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-10-12 20:19 -0400
Re: To fight climate change, we need to be truly deluded "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-10-12 20:29 -0400
Re: To fight climate change, we need to be truly deluded Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-12 19:21 -0500
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 13:40 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-12 17:40 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-10-12 17:42 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 21:15 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-12 22:45 -0400
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 22:33 -0700
Re: To truly fight climate change, we need to set our sights higher Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-10-14 04:10 +0000
Page 5 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 10 Next page →
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-14 21:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pq0c7b$pb6$15@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #214577 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 16:56:33 -0400, Wally W. wrote: > On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 20:47:31 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: > >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 15:15:38 -0400, Wally W. wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 11:33:58 -0400, kensi wrote: >>> >>>>On 10/14/2018 12:53 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 04:13:12 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 22:31:00 -0400, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 01:06:42 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>>> snowflakes, >>>>>>>> melt! >>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 10:28:25 -0400, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 03:42:29 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 11:49:28 -0400, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 10:11:40 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> The leaders of the Republic of Fiji and Republic of the >>>>>>>>>>>> Marshall >>>>... >>>>>>>>>>> OT in sci.physics: "Please feel guilty and send me money." >>>>>> Now admit that kensi has not requested to be sent money. >>>>> >>>>> I didn't say she did. >>>> >>>>A bald-faced lie! It's right there in the quoted material! >>> >>> Why do you think I was "quoting" you? >>> >>> Is *eve<SPANK> >> >>You were following up to her article AND THE BIT ABOUT SENDING MONEY WAS >>IN FUCKING QUOTATION MARKS. >> >>???? ??? you people are dense... > > Others got it. There is nothing to "get". You made yet another false accusation about kensi. You were proved a liar. It's over. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-14 14:29 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <blt20v.egb.19.6@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #214606 |
On 2018-10-14 3:24 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 16:56:33 -0400, Wally W. wrote: > >> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 20:47:31 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 15:15:38 -0400, Wally W. wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 11:33:58 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 10/14/2018 12:53 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 04:13:12 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 22:31:00 -0400, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 01:06:42 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>>>> snowflakes, >>>>>>>>> melt! >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 10:28:25 -0400, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 03:42:29 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 11:49:28 -0400, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 10:11:40 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> The leaders of the Republic of Fiji and Republic of the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Marshall >>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>>> OT in sci.physics: "Please feel guilty and send me money." >>>>>>> Now admit that kensi has not requested to be sent money. >>>>>> >>>>>> I didn't say she did. >>>>> >>>>> A bald-faced lie! It's right there in the quoted material! >>>> >>>> Why do you think I was "quoting" you? >>>> >>>> Is *eve<SPANK> >>> >>> You were following up to her article AND THE BIT ABOUT SENDING MONEY WAS >>> IN FUCKING QUOTATION MARKS. >>> >>> ???? ??? you people are dense... >> >> Others got it. > > There is nothing to "get". You made yet another false accusation about > kensi. You were proved a liar. It's over. > if it was an accusation then it can't be made false
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-14 18:05 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <i7f7sdlcvlmbkqf7hav2ghu6fslvvl41ri@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #214606 |
On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 21:24:59 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 16:56:33 -0400, Wally W. wrote: > >> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 20:47:31 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: >> >>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 15:15:38 -0400, Wally W. wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 11:33:58 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>> >>>>>On 10/14/2018 12:53 AM, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 04:13:12 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 22:31:00 -0400, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 01:06:42 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>>>> snowflakes, >>>>>>>>> melt! >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 10:28:25 -0400, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 03:42:29 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 11:49:28 -0400, Wally W. wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 10:11:40 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> The leaders of the Republic of Fiji and Republic of the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Marshall >>>>>... >>>>>>>>>>>> OT in sci.physics: "Please feel guilty and send me money." >>>>>>> Now admit that kensi has not requested to be sent money. >>>>>> >>>>>> I didn't say she did. >>>>> >>>>>A bald-faced lie! It's right there in the quoted material! >>>> >>>> Why do you think I was "quoting" you? >>>> >>>> Is *eve<SPANK> >>> >>>You were following up to her article AND THE BIT ABOUT SENDING MONEY WAS >>>IN FUCKING QUOTATION MARKS. >>> >>>???? ??? you people are dense... >> >> Others got it. > >There is nothing to "get". <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/there_are_none_so_blind_as_those_who_will_not_see> Understanding cannot be forced on someone who chooses to be ignorant. Similar: You can lead a jackass to water, but he's still a jackass. >It's over. Then you're done posting about this, right?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-14 17:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.362d7fd4f0f1df3f995038@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #214606 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pq0c7b$pb6$15@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 16:56:33 -0400, Wally W. wrote: > > > On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 20:47:31 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: > > > >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > >>On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 15:15:38 -0400, Wally W. wrote: > >> > >>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 11:33:58 -0400, kensi wrote: > >>> > >>>>On 10/14/2018 12:53 AM, Wally W. wrote: > >>>>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 04:13:12 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: > >>>>>> On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 22:31:00 -0400, Wally W. wrote: > >>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 01:06:42 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: > >>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, > >>>>>>>> snowflakes, > >>>>>>>> melt! > >>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 10:28:25 -0400, Wally W. wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 03:42:29 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 11:49:28 -0400, Wally W. wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 10:11:40 -0400, kensi wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> The leaders of the Republic of Fiji and Republic of the > >>>>>>>>>>>> Marshall > >>>>... > >>>>>>>>>>> OT in sci.physics: "Please feel guilty and send me money." > >>>>>> Now admit that kensi has not requested to be sent money. > >>>>> > >>>>> I didn't say she did. > >>>> > >>>>A bald-faced lie! It's right there in the quoted material! > >>> > >>> Why do you think I was "quoting" you? > >>> > >>> Is *eve<SPANK> > >> > >>You were following up to her article AND THE BIT ABOUT SENDING MONEY WAS > >>IN FUCKING QUOTATION MARKS. > >> > >>???? ??? you people are dense... > > > > Others got it. > > There is nothing to "get". You made yet another false accusation about > kensi. You were proved a liar. It's over. Your lesbian lover... Kensi, was begging for money on Usenet, just like Emmett used to do, and everybody here knows it. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-15 04:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pq15r8$pb6$20@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #214698 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:31:52 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > Your lesbian lover... Kensi, was begging for money on Usenet MID? -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-14 23:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.362dd455e6c9fcdf995054@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #214766 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pq15r8$pb6$20@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:31:52 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > > > Your lesbian lover... Kensi, was begging for money on Usenet > > MID? Why would I need an MID? -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-15 12:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pq2ej0$nt8$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #214793 |
On 10/15/2018 2:32 AM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <pq15r8$pb6$20@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > @gmail.invalid says... > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:31:52 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >>> Your lesbian lover... Kensi, was begging for money on Usenet >> >> MID? > > Why would I need an MID? To substantiate your scurrilous k'lame, if that were possible, which it is not, because you're a liar. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-15 13:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mti9sd150mtaol3ffr4ud64b69bulv6r25@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #214892 |
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:17:36 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 10/15/2018 2:32 AM, Checkmate wrote: >> In article <pq15r8$pb6$20@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:31:52 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>> >>>> Your lesbian lover... Kensi, was begging for money on Usenet >>> >>> MID? >> >> Why would I need an MID? > >To substantiate your scurrilous k'lame, if that were possible, which it >is not, because you're a liar. Why should the Checkmate have to substantiate his claim when you moved at the speed of light to embrace Blah Blah Ford's unsubstantiated and scurrilous claim that US Supreme Court Justice the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh attempted to rape her 35 years ago. Shouldn't you, for the sake of consistency, also embrace Checky's claim? -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall "Sometimes it's hard to tell them apart. When he drowns in his shit bucket, I plan to nominate him for a Darwin." --Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-15 12:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.362e890cfa5e1c3c99506e@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #214916 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <mti9sd150mtaol3ffr4ud64b69bulv6r25@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:17:36 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >On 10/15/2018 2:32 AM, Checkmate wrote: > >> In article <pq15r8$pb6$20@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > >>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:31:52 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >>> > >>>> Your lesbian lover... Kensi, was begging for money on Usenet > >>> > >>> MID? > >> > >> Why would I need an MID? > > > >To substantiate your scurrilous k'lame, if that were possible, which it > >is not, because you're a liar. > > Why should the Checkmate have to substantiate his claim > when you moved at the speed of light to embrace Blah > Blah Ford's unsubstantiated and scurrilous claim that > US Supreme Court Justice the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh > attempted to rape her 35 years ago. > > Shouldn't you, for the sake of consistency, also embrace > Checky's claim? She blew up my hypocrisy meter. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-15 19:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pq2qbp$a6q$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #214916 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:21:12 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:17:36 -0400, kensi > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>On 10/15/2018 2:32 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>> In article <pq15r8$pb6$20@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>> says... >>>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:31:52 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>> >>>>> Your lesbian lover... Kensi, was begging for money on Usenet >>>> >>>> MID? >>> >>> Why would I need an MID? >> >>To substantiate your scurrilous k'lame, if that were possible, which it >>is not, because you're a liar. > > Why should the Checkmate have to substantiate his claim when you moved > at the speed of light to embrace Blah Blah Ford's unsubstantiated and > scurrilous claim that US Supreme Court Justice the Honorable Brett > Kavanaugh attempted to rape her 35 years ago. > > Shouldn't you, for the sake of consistency, also embrace Checky's claim? It doesn't work like that. Multiple independently-acting people have corroborated the claim that Kavanaugh is a dangerous sexual predator, and then there's the evidence from his yearbook and the testimony of other people who knew him around that time. On the other hand the k'lame made about kensi rests on nothing whatsoever. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-15 16:14 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.362ebf284e043eb8989818@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #214966 |
In article <pq2qbp$a6q$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:21:12 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > > > On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:17:36 -0400, kensi > > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>On 10/15/2018 2:32 AM, Checkmate wrote: > >>> In article <pq15r8$pb6$20@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > >>> says... > >>>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:31:52 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Your lesbian lover... Kensi, was begging for money on Usenet > >>>> > >>>> MID? > >>> > >>> Why would I need an MID? > >> > >>To substantiate your scurrilous k'lame, if that were possible, which it > >>is not, because you're a liar. > > > > Why should the Checkmate have to substantiate his claim when you moved > > at the speed of light to embrace Blah Blah Ford's unsubstantiated and > > scurrilous claim that US Supreme Court Justice the Honorable Brett > > Kavanaugh attempted to rape her 35 years ago. > > > > Shouldn't you, for the sake of consistency, also embrace Checky's claim? > > It doesn't work like that. Multiple independently-acting people have > corroborated the claim that Kavanaugh is a dangerous sexual predator, and > then there's the evidence from his yearbook and the testimony of other > people who knew him around that time. > > On the other hand the k'lame made about kensi rests on nothing whatsoever. Then why didn't the FBI find that? If you know it and know other people do, I would think they would to.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-16 02:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pq3h6r$a6q$15@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #215041 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 16:14:20 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pq2qbp$a6q$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > says... >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:21:12 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. >> wrote: >> >> > On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:17:36 -0400, kensi >> > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> >>On 10/15/2018 2:32 AM, Checkmate wrote: >> >>> In article <pq15r8$pb6$20@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >> >>> says... >> >>>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:31:52 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> Your lesbian lover... Kensi, was begging for money on Usenet >> >>>> >> >>>> MID? >> >>> >> >>> Why would I need an MID? >> >> >> >>To substantiate your scurrilous k'lame, if that were possible, which >> >>it is not, because you're a liar. >> > >> > Why should the Checkmate have to substantiate his claim when you >> > moved at the speed of light to embrace Blah Blah Ford's >> > unsubstantiated and scurrilous claim that US Supreme Court Justice >> > the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh attempted to rape her 35 years ago. >> > >> > Shouldn't you, for the sake of consistency, also embrace Checky's >> > claim? >> >> It doesn't work like that. Multiple independently-acting people have >> corroborated the claim that Kavanaugh is a dangerous sexual predator, >> and then there's the evidence from his yearbook and the testimony of >> other people who knew him around that time. >> >> On the other hand the k'lame made about kensi rests on nothing >> whatsoever. > > Then why didn't the FBI find that? Because of political interference with their investigation. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-15 20:14 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.362ef7615924e93798982d@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #215143 |
In article <pq3h6r$a6q$15@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 16:14:20 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > > > In article <pq2qbp$a6q$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > > says... > >> > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> melt! On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:21:12 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. > >> wrote: > >> > >> > On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:17:36 -0400, kensi > >> > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >> >>On 10/15/2018 2:32 AM, Checkmate wrote: > >> >>> In article <pq15r8$pb6$20@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > >> >>> says... > >> >>>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:31:52 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> Your lesbian lover... Kensi, was begging for money on Usenet > >> >>>> > >> >>>> MID? > >> >>> > >> >>> Why would I need an MID? > >> >> > >> >>To substantiate your scurrilous k'lame, if that were possible, which > >> >>it is not, because you're a liar. > >> > > >> > Why should the Checkmate have to substantiate his claim when you > >> > moved at the speed of light to embrace Blah Blah Ford's > >> > unsubstantiated and scurrilous claim that US Supreme Court Justice > >> > the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh attempted to rape her 35 years ago. > >> > > >> > Shouldn't you, for the sake of consistency, also embrace Checky's > >> > claim? > >> > >> It doesn't work like that. Multiple independently-acting people have > >> corroborated the claim that Kavanaugh is a dangerous sexual predator, > >> and then there's the evidence from his yearbook and the testimony of > >> other people who knew him around that time. > >> > >> On the other hand the k'lame made about kensi rests on nothing > >> whatsoever. > > > > Then why didn't the FBI find that? > > Because of political interference with their investigation. All 7 of them?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-15 23:33 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pq3m6b$ms8$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #215146 |
On 10/15/2018 10:14 PM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pq3h6r$a6q$15@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > says... >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 16:14:20 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >> >>> In article <pq2qbp$a6q$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>> says... >>>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:21:12 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:17:36 -0400, kensi >>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> On 10/15/2018 2:32 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> In article <pq15r8$pb6$20@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:31:52 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Your lesbian lover... Kensi, was begging for money on Usenet >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> MID? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why would I need an MID? >>>>>> >>>>>> To substantiate your scurrilous k'lame, if that were possible, which >>>>>> it is not, because you're a liar. >>>>> >>>>> Why should the Checkmate have to substantiate his claim when you >>>>> moved at the speed of light to embrace Blah Blah Ford's >>>>> unsubstantiated and scurrilous claim that US Supreme Court Justice >>>>> the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh attempted to rape her 35 years ago. >>>>> >>>>> Shouldn't you, for the sake of consistency, also embrace Checky's >>>>> claim? >>>> >>>> It doesn't work like that. Multiple independently-acting people have >>>> corroborated the claim that Kavanaugh is a dangerous sexual predator, >>>> and then there's the evidence from his yearbook and the testimony of >>>> other people who knew him around that time. >>>> >>>> On the other hand the k'lame made about kensi rests on nothing >>>> whatsoever. >>> >>> Then why didn't the FBI find that? >> >> Because of political interference with their investigation. > > All 7 of them? Yep. All 7. Had to protect The President. No looking at secret stuff. No interviewing anybody the White House didn't approve. Makes the flag happy and destroys Nike's business. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-16 08:04 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.362f9ded8a2f42d898983c@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #215188 |
In article <pq3m6b$ms8$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... > > On 10/15/2018 10:14 PM, Skeeter wrote: > > In article <pq3h6r$a6q$15@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > > says... > >> > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > >> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 16:14:20 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > >> > >>> In article <pq2qbp$a6q$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > >>> says... > >>>> > >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >>>> melt! On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:21:12 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:17:36 -0400, kensi > >>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>> On 10/15/2018 2:32 AM, Checkmate wrote: > >>>>>>> In article <pq15r8$pb6$20@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > >>>>>>> says... > >>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:31:52 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Your lesbian lover... Kensi, was begging for money on Usenet > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> MID? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Why would I need an MID? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> To substantiate your scurrilous k'lame, if that were possible, which > >>>>>> it is not, because you're a liar. > >>>>> > >>>>> Why should the Checkmate have to substantiate his claim when you > >>>>> moved at the speed of light to embrace Blah Blah Ford's > >>>>> unsubstantiated and scurrilous claim that US Supreme Court Justice > >>>>> the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh attempted to rape her 35 years ago. > >>>>> > >>>>> Shouldn't you, for the sake of consistency, also embrace Checky's > >>>>> claim? > >>>> > >>>> It doesn't work like that. Multiple independently-acting people have > >>>> corroborated the claim that Kavanaugh is a dangerous sexual predator, > >>>> and then there's the evidence from his yearbook and the testimony of > >>>> other people who knew him around that time. > >>>> > >>>> On the other hand the k'lame made about kensi rests on nothing > >>>> whatsoever. > >>> > >>> Then why didn't the FBI find that? > >> > >> Because of political interference with their investigation. > > > > All 7 of them? > > Yep. All 7. Had to protect The President. No looking at secret stuff. > No interviewing anybody the White House didn't approve. Makes the > flag happy and destroys Nike's business. So you really don't know...I get that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-16 10:24 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pq4sac$l7s$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #215287 |
On 10/16/2018 10:04 AM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pq3m6b$ms8$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie > says... >> On 10/15/2018 10:14 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <pq3h6r$a6q$15@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>> says... >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 16:14:20 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <pq2qbp$a6q$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>> says... >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>> melt! On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:21:12 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:17:36 -0400, kensi >>>>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 10/15/2018 2:32 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>> In article <pq15r8$pb6$20@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:31:52 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Your lesbian lover... Kensi, was begging for money on Usenet >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> MID? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why would I need an MID? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To substantiate your scurrilous k'lame, if that were possible, which >>>>>>>> it is not, because you're a liar. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why should the Checkmate have to substantiate his claim when you >>>>>>> moved at the speed of light to embrace Blah Blah Ford's >>>>>>> unsubstantiated and scurrilous claim that US Supreme Court Justice >>>>>>> the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh attempted to rape her 35 years ago. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Shouldn't you, for the sake of consistency, also embrace Checky's >>>>>>> claim? >>>>>> >>>>>> It doesn't work like that. Multiple independently-acting people have >>>>>> corroborated the claim that Kavanaugh is a dangerous sexual predator, >>>>>> and then there's the evidence from his yearbook and the testimony of >>>>>> other people who knew him around that time. >>>>>> >>>>>> On the other hand the k'lame made about kensi rests on nothing >>>>>> whatsoever. >>>>> >>>>> Then why didn't the FBI find that? >>>> >>>> Because of political interference with their investigation. >>> >>> All 7 of them? >> >> Yep. All 7. Had to protect The President. No looking at secret stuff. >> No interviewing anybody the White House didn't approve. Makes the >> flag happy and destroys Nike's business. > > So you really don't know...I get that. I read it on Breitbart so it must be true. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-16 08:25 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.362fa2c269eb8527989854@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #215300 |
In article <pq4sac$l7s$2@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... > > On 10/16/2018 10:04 AM, Skeeter wrote: > > In article <pq3m6b$ms8$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie > > says... > >> On 10/15/2018 10:14 PM, Skeeter wrote: > >>> In article <pq3h6r$a6q$15@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > >>> says... > >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > >>>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 16:14:20 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > >>>>> In article <pq2qbp$a6q$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > >>>>> says... > >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >>>>>> melt! On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:21:12 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:17:36 -0400, kensi > >>>>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 10/15/2018 2:32 AM, Checkmate wrote: > >>>>>>>>> In article <pq15r8$pb6$20@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > >>>>>>>>> says... > >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:31:52 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Your lesbian lover... Kensi, was begging for money on Usenet > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> MID? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Why would I need an MID? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> To substantiate your scurrilous k'lame, if that were possible, which > >>>>>>>> it is not, because you're a liar. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Why should the Checkmate have to substantiate his claim when you > >>>>>>> moved at the speed of light to embrace Blah Blah Ford's > >>>>>>> unsubstantiated and scurrilous claim that US Supreme Court Justice > >>>>>>> the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh attempted to rape her 35 years ago. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Shouldn't you, for the sake of consistency, also embrace Checky's > >>>>>>> claim? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It doesn't work like that. Multiple independently-acting people have > >>>>>> corroborated the claim that Kavanaugh is a dangerous sexual predator, > >>>>>> and then there's the evidence from his yearbook and the testimony of > >>>>>> other people who knew him around that time. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On the other hand the k'lame made about kensi rests on nothing > >>>>>> whatsoever. > >>>>> > >>>>> Then why didn't the FBI find that? > >>>> > >>>> Because of political interference with their investigation. > >>> > >>> All 7 of them? > >> > >> Yep. All 7. Had to protect The President. No looking at secret stuff. > >> No interviewing anybody the White House didn't approve. Makes the > >> flag happy and destroys Nike's business. > > > > So you really don't know...I get that. > > I read it on Breitbart so it must be true. So you really don't know, we already know that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-16 10:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pq4t39$mmu$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #215303 |
On 10/16/2018 10:25 AM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pq4sac$l7s$2@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie > says... >> On 10/16/2018 10:04 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <pq3m6b$ms8$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie >>> says... >>>> On 10/15/2018 10:14 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <pq3h6r$a6q$15@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>> says... >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 16:14:20 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> In article <pq2qbp$a6q$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>>> melt! On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:21:12 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:17:36 -0400, kensi >>>>>>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 10/15/2018 2:32 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In article <pq15r8$pb6$20@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:31:52 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Your lesbian lover... Kensi, was begging for money on Usenet >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> MID? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why would I need an MID? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> To substantiate your scurrilous k'lame, if that were possible, which >>>>>>>>>> it is not, because you're a liar. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why should the Checkmate have to substantiate his claim when you >>>>>>>>> moved at the speed of light to embrace Blah Blah Ford's >>>>>>>>> unsubstantiated and scurrilous claim that US Supreme Court Justice >>>>>>>>> the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh attempted to rape her 35 years ago. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Shouldn't you, for the sake of consistency, also embrace Checky's >>>>>>>>> claim? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It doesn't work like that. Multiple independently-acting people have >>>>>>>> corroborated the claim that Kavanaugh is a dangerous sexual predator, >>>>>>>> and then there's the evidence from his yearbook and the testimony of >>>>>>>> other people who knew him around that time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On the other hand the k'lame made about kensi rests on nothing >>>>>>>> whatsoever. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then why didn't the FBI find that? >>>>>> >>>>>> Because of political interference with their investigation. >>>>> >>>>> All 7 of them? >>>> >>>> Yep. All 7. Had to protect The President. No looking at secret stuff. >>>> No interviewing anybody the White House didn't approve. Makes the >>>> flag happy and destroys Nike's business. >>> >>> So you really don't know...I get that. >> >> I read it on Breitbart so it must be true. > > So you really don't know, we already know that. Everything on Breitbart is well know to be true fact by conservatards and neo-Nazis everywhere. Please try to keep up on all the fact stuff. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-16 08:39 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.362fa600b254d9fc98985c@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #215311 |
In article <pq4t39$mmu$2@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... > > On 10/16/2018 10:25 AM, Skeeter wrote: > > In article <pq4sac$l7s$2@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie > > says... > >> On 10/16/2018 10:04 AM, Skeeter wrote: > >>> In article <pq3m6b$ms8$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie > >>> says... > >>>> On 10/15/2018 10:14 PM, Skeeter wrote: > >>>>> In article <pq3h6r$a6q$15@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > >>>>> says... > >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > >>>>>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 16:14:20 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > >>>>>>> In article <pq2qbp$a6q$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > >>>>>>> says... > >>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >>>>>>>> melt! On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:21:12 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:17:36 -0400, kensi > >>>>>>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On 10/15/2018 2:32 AM, Checkmate wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> In article <pq15r8$pb6$20@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > >>>>>>>>>>> says... > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:31:52 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Your lesbian lover... Kensi, was begging for money on Usenet > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> MID? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Why would I need an MID? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> To substantiate your scurrilous k'lame, if that were possible, which > >>>>>>>>>> it is not, because you're a liar. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Why should the Checkmate have to substantiate his claim when you > >>>>>>>>> moved at the speed of light to embrace Blah Blah Ford's > >>>>>>>>> unsubstantiated and scurrilous claim that US Supreme Court Justice > >>>>>>>>> the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh attempted to rape her 35 years ago. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Shouldn't you, for the sake of consistency, also embrace Checky's > >>>>>>>>> claim? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> It doesn't work like that. Multiple independently-acting people have > >>>>>>>> corroborated the claim that Kavanaugh is a dangerous sexual predator, > >>>>>>>> and then there's the evidence from his yearbook and the testimony of > >>>>>>>> other people who knew him around that time. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On the other hand the k'lame made about kensi rests on nothing > >>>>>>>> whatsoever. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Then why didn't the FBI find that? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Because of political interference with their investigation. > >>>>> > >>>>> All 7 of them? > >>>> > >>>> Yep. All 7. Had to protect The President. No looking at secret stuff. > >>>> No interviewing anybody the White House didn't approve. Makes the > >>>> flag happy and destroys Nike's business. > >>> > >>> So you really don't know...I get that. > >> > >> I read it on Breitbart so it must be true. > > > > So you really don't know, we already know that. > > Everything on Breitbart is well know to be true fact by conservatards > and neo-Nazis everywhere. Please try to keep up on all the fact stuff. You alreay proved you don't know, give it a rest.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-16 17:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g2mlrgFpffnU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #215311 |
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 10:37:27 -0400, mixed nuts wrote: > On 10/16/2018 10:25 AM, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <pq4sac$l7s$2@gioia.aioe.org>, >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>> On 10/16/2018 10:04 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>> In article <pq3m6b$ms8$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>>>> On 10/15/2018 10:14 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> In article <pq3h6r$a6q$15@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>>> says... >>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>> melt! >>>>>>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 16:14:20 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> In article <pq2qbp$a6q$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>>>> snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:21:12 -0400, Sir >>>>>>>>> Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:17:36 -0400, kensi >>>>>>>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 10/15/2018 2:32 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> In article <pq15r8$pb6$20@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>>>>>>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:31:52 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your lesbian lover... Kensi, was begging for money on >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Usenet >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> MID? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why would I need an MID? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> To substantiate your scurrilous k'lame, if that were possible, >>>>>>>>>>> which it is not, because you're a liar. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why should the Checkmate have to substantiate his claim when >>>>>>>>>> you moved at the speed of light to embrace Blah Blah Ford's >>>>>>>>>> unsubstantiated and scurrilous claim that US Supreme Court >>>>>>>>>> Justice the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh attempted to rape her 35 >>>>>>>>>> years ago. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Shouldn't you, for the sake of consistency, also embrace >>>>>>>>>> Checky's claim? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It doesn't work like that. Multiple independently-acting people >>>>>>>>> have corroborated the claim that Kavanaugh is a dangerous sexual >>>>>>>>> predator, >>>>>>>>> and then there's the evidence from his yearbook and the >>>>>>>>> testimony of other people who knew him around that time. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On the other hand the k'lame made about kensi rests on nothing >>>>>>>>> whatsoever. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Then why didn't the FBI find that? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Because of political interference with their investigation. >>>>>> >>>>>> All 7 of them? >>>>> >>>>> Yep. All 7. Had to protect The President. No looking at secret >>>>> stuff. >>>>> No interviewing anybody the White House didn't approve. Makes >>>>> the >>>>> flag happy and destroys Nike's business. >>>> >>>> So you really don't know...I get that. >>> >>> I read it on Breitbart so it must be true. >> >> So you really don't know, we already know that. > > Everything on Breitbart is well know to be true fact by conservatards > and neo-Nazis everywhere. Please try to keep up on all the fact stuff. Breitbart has only the very very best facts. Very fine, and very alternative. You wouldn't believe how alternative those facts are. Believe me. -- -v [s.p. %< ]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web