Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.checkmate > #205378 > unrolled thread

Trillion dollar deficit

Started byNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
First post2018-09-17 04:51 +0000
Last post2018-09-17 22:51 -0400
Articles 20 on this page of 324 — 17 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate

Contents

  Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-17 04:51 +0000
    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 08:54 -0600
      Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 11:15 -0400
        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 09:50 -0600
        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 13:16 -0600
          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:21 +0000
            Re: DId Checkmate rape someone in his high school? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Trillion dollar deficit โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-17 14:46 -0500
              Re: DId Checkmate rape someone in his high school? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 15:12 -0600
                Re: DId Checkmate rape someone in his high school? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 16:22 -0600
                  Re: DId Checkmate rape someone in his high school? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:20 -0600
              Re: DId Checkmate rape someone in his high school? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 07:34 +0000
                Re: ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ DId Checkmate rape someone in his high school? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„  Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-18 10:50 -0500
            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 14:56 -0600
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 17:41 -0400
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 15:50 -0600
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 18:42 -0400
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 12:01 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 11:05 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 12:59 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:18 -0600
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 15:55 -0600
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-17 23:38 +0100
            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 15:11 -0600
            Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-17 23:16 +0100
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-17 23:45 +0100
            Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 11:49 -0500
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 11:04 -0600
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 12:58 -0500
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:21 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:17 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:13 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 17:06 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-19 20:32 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:18 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-20 13:11 -0400
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:23 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-20 17:52 -0400
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:06 -0600
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:16 +0000
                                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:18 -0600
                                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:13 -0600
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-20 18:21 -0400
                                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 19:16 -0600
                                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 18:37 -0700
                                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 23:04 -0700
                                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 09:06 -0400
                                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:15 -0600
                                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-21 12:03 -0700
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 21:19 -0600
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 12:24 -0500
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:00 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 19:14 +0000
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:32 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:03 +0000
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:08 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 14:53 -0700
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 15:17 -0700
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:05 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:10 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-20 23:35 +0100
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 21:50 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 23:39 -0700
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 11:42 -0400
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:17 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-21 13:10 -0700
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 16:35 -0400
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-21 16:25 -0700
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 21:53 +0100
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:14 +0000
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 23:45 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:07 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:17 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:16 -0500
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-25 12:16 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:30 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-22 12:20 -0700
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:31 -0500
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:31 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 19:59 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-25 13:07 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:16 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:34 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 12:17 -0400
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:24 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:26 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:17 -0600
                      Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Trillion dollar deficit โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-19 09:45 -0500
                        Re: รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„  Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowfla ke รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snow flake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ S nowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ Trillion d ollar deficit รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowfla ke รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snow flake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ S nowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowfla ke รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-19 09:50 -0500
                        Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snow Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 09:01 -0600
                          Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snow โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-19 22:00 -0500
                        Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Trillion dollar deficit โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-23 11:46 -0700
                          Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-23 18:29 -0500
                            Re: รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„  Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowfla ke รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snow flake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ S nowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ ? Snowflak e ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowf lake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Sn owflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowfla ke ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowfla ke ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snow flake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? S nowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? รขยย„ Snow flake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ S nowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowfla ke รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snow flake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ S nowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-23 18:40 -0500
                          Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 09:57 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 20:17 +0100
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-19 11:20 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 15:32 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 16:20 -0500
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:16 -0600
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 11:31 -0600
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-18 14:26 -0400
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:22 -0600
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 08:45 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 10:57 -0400
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 09:03 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 11:29 -0400
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 11:19 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 15:17 -0400
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-21 17:06 -0700
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 11:48 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:53 -0600
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-21 17:05 -0700
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-21 17:05 -0700
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:19 +0000
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 17:07 -0600
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 12:56 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:16 +0000
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 17:07 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 23:30 +0000
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 08:30 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 09:00 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 12:07 -0400
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 11:19 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 01:39 +0000
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Tommy <tom@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 17:34 +0000
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:28 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 19:53 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 09:11 -0400
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:26 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 20:09 +0100
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 18:09 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:05 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:30 -0600
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:04 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:24 -0500
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-19 11:22 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-19 20:49 +0000
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:20 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:22 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:19 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-21 02:26 +0000
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 17:57 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-22 04:08 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:24 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 17:02 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:38 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 13:43 -0600
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 05:18 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 20:10 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:55 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 23:23 +0100
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 23:40 +0100
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 23:54 +0100
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 00:08 +0100
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit g8dgc <g8dgc@noneya.none> - 2018-09-22 18:53 -0400
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit tripeco.2@parody.personae.invalid (Tr!pe) - 2018-09-22 23:57 +0100
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 23:54 +0100
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 00:29 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 00:10 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 05:21 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 06:13 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 14:36 +0100
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 08:32 -0600
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-23 11:06 -0400
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 08:11 +0100
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:00 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-23 12:02 -0700
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:15 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:27 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 12:13 -0400
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:23 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 01:44 +0000
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 20:17 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 19:16 +0000
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:34 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:01 +0000
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:09 -0600
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 09:08 -0400
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit tripeco.2@parody.personae.invalid (Tr!pe) - 2018-09-21 20:22 +0100
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:12 +0000
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:34 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:05 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:14 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 11:43 -0700
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:35 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:22 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:36 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:41 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit % <perscent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 04:30 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit invalid@invalid.invalid (ร) - 2018-09-23 08:45 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:36 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:33 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:21 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:32 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 19:13 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 13:45 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 11:23 -0400
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:27 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 13:21 -0400
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 13:10 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 16:23 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 13:53 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:25 -0600
                        Please fact-check your assertions vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-24 03:05 +0000
                          Re: Please fact-check your assertions mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-24 01:42 -0400
                            Re: Please fact-check your assertions Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-23 23:10 -0700
                          Re: Please fact-check your assertions vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-24 07:17 +0000
                            Re: Please fact-check your assertions Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:44 -0600
                            Re: Please fact-check your assertions kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 12:23 -0400
                              Re: Please fact-check your assertions Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:30 -0600
                              Re: Please fact-check your assertions snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 19:41 +0100
                                Re: Please fact-check your assertions snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 23:36 +0100
                          Re: Please fact-check your assertions kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 12:18 -0400
                            Re: Please fact-check your assertions Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:29 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-25 12:19 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 12:25 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 12:16 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-25 19:32 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-26 11:45 -0500
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-26 18:49 -0500
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 09:06 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:07 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:33 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-23 23:31 -0700
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-24 06:52 -0400
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:43 -0600
                            Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Trillion dollar deficit โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:47 -0500
                              Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:14 -0600
                                Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 11:46 -0500
                                  Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 11:58 -0500
                                    Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 14:34 -0500
                                      Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 14:59 -0500
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 12:37 -0400
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:03 +0000
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 17:53 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-22 04:06 +0000
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 13:57 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 13:58 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:09 +0000
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:18 -0600
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-19 20:34 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 20:15 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 18:07 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:19 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:21 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:17 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:41 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:18 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-22 11:44 -0400
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:44 -0500
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:08 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:32 -0500
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-18 14:18 -0400
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:22 -0500
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-18 14:41 -0400
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:22 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-18 16:44 -0400
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:48 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-18 16:57 -0400
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 17:03 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-18 19:23 -0400
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 08:30 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-19 11:20 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:21 -0600
            Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 12:18 -0500
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 11:31 -0600
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:14 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-18 19:35 +0100
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:23 +0000
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 17:08 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 23:31 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 08:32 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 12:08 -0400
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 11:20 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 01:39 +0000
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 20:16 -0600
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:45 -0400
                                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:20 -0600
                                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 11:22 -0400
                                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:41 -0600
                                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 12:22 -0400
                                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:23 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-20 23:06 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:15 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-20 23:41 +0100
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-20 12:38 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 19:18 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:26 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:24 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:25 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 21:59 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:09 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:25 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:40 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:23 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 13:42 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-22 16:11 -0400
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:42 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 05:17 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 06:12 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:33 -0500
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-19 11:18 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-19 20:39 +0100
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 16:06 -0400
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-19 21:09 +0000
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 17:33 -0400
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:14 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 17:56 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:21 +0000
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:17 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 15:39 -0500
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:24 -0600
    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:13 -0700
      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 13:15 -0600
        Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 17:53 -0400
          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 15:54 -0600
            Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 18:16 -0400
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 16:22 -0600
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 18:46 -0400
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:06 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:29 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:55 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 22:18 -0400
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 22:51 -0400

Page 11 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 17  Next page →

#206913

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2018-09-21 16:23 -0500
Message-ID<g4ydnYrxQeek_DjGnZ2dnUU7-U-dnZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#206131
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:42:14 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <vbednT3b2NUv6j_GnZ2dnUU7-
> SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> 
> 
> 
>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:41:35 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> 
>> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>> > by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnbhpWpFk3zzGnZ2dnUU7-
>> > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:21:43 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnYZpWpHYozzGnZ2dnUU7-
>> >> > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:16:01 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> >> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7-
>> >> >> > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> > <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid
>> >> >> >> > says...
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>> >> >> >> >> snowflakes,
>> >> >> >> >> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> > In article <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
>> >> >> >> >> > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >> >> >> >> >> reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> >> >> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> hobnobbing with white supremacists, abysmal
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> conditions in the concentration camps in the
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> southwest, attacks on programs to combat climate
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> change, attacks on women and minorities, attacks on
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> the poor, attacks on the citizenship rights of
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> minorities, brain drains, adverse court rulings,
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> cooperating witnesses,
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> In other words, just another week in the Trump
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> regime:
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from Deutsche
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Bank. Uh-oh!
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > anyday now foil hat collector.
>> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Manafort's going to tell the truth and there won't be
>> >> >> >> >> >> > any collusion and even if there is, it's not illegal
>> >> >> >> >> >> > when The President does it, and if it is then
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Manafort's lying and 3,000 Puerto Ricans didn't die so
>> >> >> >> >> >> > The President gets A+ for his amazing management
>> >> >> >> >> >> > skills!
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then date
>> >> >> >> >> >> graped him!!!!2!
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> > It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret" letter
>> >> >> >> >> > from a "sekret"
>> >> >> >> >> > so<SPANK>
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/kavanaugh-
>> >> >> allegations-
>> >> >> >> ford-
>> >> >> >> >> palo-alto.html
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor.  Most
>> >> >> >> > people get attracted to that field because of their own
>> >> >> >> > issues.
>> >> >> >> >  Now she claims she never told anyone because she was afraid
>> >> >> >> > he'd "kill" her.
>> >> >> >> > Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high school
>> >> >> >> > ever touches other people's naughty parts, and if they do,
>> >> >> >> > they should never ever be employed by anyone.  Are you
>> >> >> >> > prepared to live in a world where you can lose your job
>> >> >> >> > anytime someone utters some accusation that you did
>> >> >> >> > something naughty 35 years ago in high school?  Did YOU ever
>> >> >> >> > do anything naughty in high school, Ko0k?
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than
>> >> >> >> other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > Does a person's reputation become spotted with the flimsiest of
>> >> >> > accusations alone... suddenly popping up after 36 years?
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> The accusation(s) must be investigated, yes.  Especially for as
>> >> >> important a job as a Supreme Court Justice.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> If so, NO one
>> >> >> > would have a spotless reputation... ever.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Possibly.  However, I don't believe that everyone would be
>> >> >> accused of attempted rape in their past.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> This woman is unsure where or
>> >> >> > when this happened, and the third party she claims was there,
>> >> >> > says he never witnessed any such incident anywhere.  Her
>> >> >> > accounts of the alleged incident have varied at different
>> >> >> > times.  She claims she just "remembered" it after decades had
>> >> >> > passed.  There's not a scintilla of evidence from anyone to
>> >> >> > suggest this actually happened.  NO one should be judged by
>> >> >> > something this vague and vacuous.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> The claim will be investigated as it should be, especially for as
>> >> >> important a position as a Supreme Court Judge.
>> >> > 
>> >> > The point is, the Democrats have already decided he's guilty...
>> >> > not out of any effort to be fair or objective, but simply because
>> >> > Trump is the President and nominated him.
>> >> 
>> >> And you know this how?  You're  a mind reader now?  Or just showing
>> >> your bias?  I suggest we take a wait and see stance.
>> > 
>> > Nads has already convicted him, and so have virtually all the
>> > Democratic leaders in various news articles.  To continue this
>> > discussion with you at this point, is beyond the limits of my
>> > patience.  Perhaps you should go out and do some gardening.
>> 
>> I'm terribly sorry that discussing things with someone who has a
>> different opinion is so upsetting to you.
> 
> You lack any objectivity about this.  You automatically oppose
> Kavanaugh,
> despite the lack of any details or facts from his accuser, simply
> because you hate Trump.  A fact you make quite clear every day, despite
> the fact you're not even a citizen of this country.

That is a patent lie.  I have been very objective about this issue when 
you have not been.  You automatically believe her accusation is false 
without giving her even a chance.  And my not being a citizen has nothing 
to do with anything, except for you to attempt to sling insults at me.  
You are as biased as anyone could possibly be.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#207605

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2018-09-23 13:53 -0500
Message-ID<t4idnapbhPqlfDrGnZ2dnUU7-Y-dnZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#206913
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 14:45:18 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <g4ydnYrxQeek_DjGnZ2dnUU7-U-
> dnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> 
> 
> 
>> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:42:14 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> 
>> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>> > by Checkmate!  In article <vbednT3b2NUv6j_GnZ2dnUU7-
>> > SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:41:35 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnbhpWpFk3zzGnZ2dnUU7-
>> >> > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:21:43 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> >> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnYZpWpHYozzGnZ2dnUU7-
>> >> >> > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:16:01 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> > <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7- audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>> >> >> >> > pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >> >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> >> > <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid
>> >> >> >> >> > says...
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>> >> >> >> >> >> snowflakes,
>> >> >> >> >> >> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > In article
>> >> >> >> >> >> > <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> when reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> hobnobbing with white supremacists, abysmal
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> conditions in the concentration camps in the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> southwest, attacks on programs to combat climate
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> change, attacks on women and minorities, attacks
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> on the poor, attacks on the citizenship rights
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> of minorities, brain drains, adverse court
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> rulings, cooperating witnesses,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> In other words, just another week in the Trump
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> regime:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Deutsche Bank. Uh-oh!
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > anyday now foil hat collector.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Manafort's going to tell the truth and there won't
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > be any collusion and even if there is, it's not
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > illegal when The President does it, and if it is
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > then Manafort's lying and 3,000 Puerto Ricans
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > didn't die so The President gets A+ for his amazing
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > management skills!
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> date graped him!!!!2!
>> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret" letter
>> >> >> >> >> >> > from a "sekret"
>> >> >> >> >> >> > so<SPANK>
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/
kavanaugh-
>> >> >> >> allegations-
>> >> >> >> >> ford-
>> >> >> >> >> >> palo-alto.html
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> > Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor. 
>> >> >> >> >> > Most people get attracted to that field because of their
>> >> >> >> >> > own issues.
>> >> >> >> >> >  Now she claims she never told anyone because she was
>> >> >> >> >> >  afraid
>> >> >> >> >> > he'd "kill" her.
>> >> >> >> >> > Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high
>> >> >> >> >> > school ever touches other people's naughty parts, and if
>> >> >> >> >> > they do, they should never ever be employed by anyone. 
>> >> >> >> >> > Are you prepared to live in a world where you can lose
>> >> >> >> >> > your job anytime someone utters some accusation that you
>> >> >> >> >> > did something naughty 35 years ago in high school?  Did
>> >> >> >> >> > YOU ever do anything naughty in high school, Ko0k?
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different
>> >> >> >> >> than other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > Does a person's reputation become spotted with the flimsiest
>> >> >> >> > of accusations alone... suddenly popping up after 36 years?
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> The accusation(s) must be investigated, yes.  Especially for
>> >> >> >> as important a job as a Supreme Court Justice.
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> If so, NO one
>> >> >> >> > would have a spotless reputation... ever.
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> Possibly.  However, I don't believe that everyone would be
>> >> >> >> accused of attempted rape in their past.
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> This woman is unsure where or
>> >> >> >> > when this happened, and the third party she claims was
>> >> >> >> > there, says he never witnessed any such incident anywhere. 
>> >> >> >> > Her accounts of the alleged incident have varied at
>> >> >> >> > different times.  She claims she just "remembered" it after
>> >> >> >> > decades had passed.  There's not a scintilla of evidence
>> >> >> >> > from anyone to suggest this actually happened.  NO one
>> >> >> >> > should be judged by something this vague and vacuous.
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> The claim will be investigated as it should be, especially for
>> >> >> >> as important a position as a Supreme Court Judge.
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > The point is, the Democrats have already decided he's guilty...
>> >> >> > not out of any effort to be fair or objective, but simply
>> >> >> > because Trump is the President and nominated him.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> And you know this how?  You're  a mind reader now?  Or just
>> >> >> showing your bias?  I suggest we take a wait and see stance.
>> >> > 
>> >> > Nads has already convicted him, and so have virtually all the
>> >> > Democratic leaders in various news articles.  To continue this
>> >> > discussion with you at this point, is beyond the limits of my
>> >> > patience.  Perhaps you should go out and do some gardening.
>> >> 
>> >> I'm terribly sorry that discussing things with someone who has a
>> >> different opinion is so upsetting to you.
>> > 
>> > You lack any objectivity about this.  You automatically oppose
>> > Kavanaugh,
>> > despite the lack of any details or facts from his accuser, simply
>> > because you hate Trump.  A fact you make quite clear every day,
>> > despite the fact you're not even a citizen of this country.
>> 
>> That is a patent lie.  I have been very objective about this issue when
>> you have not been.  You automatically believe her accusation is false
>> without giving her even a chance.  And my not being a citizen has
>> nothing to do with anything, except for you to attempt to sling insults
>> at me. You are as biased as anyone could possibly be.
> 
> Giving her a chance for WHAT?  She hasn't given anyone anything to be
> objective about.  NO details, location, time, other witnesses... not ONE
> detail.  Now she's apparently not willing to even come forward to clear
> any of her allegations up.  

She's testifying next Thursday.

WHAT is anybody going to investigate?  Her
> latest "demand," is that he testify first... about something he says he
> knows nothing about.  What in hell is he supposed to say?  If someone
> makes an accusation, they have to state what that accusation is, so he
> can respond.  That's how it works.  There is no reason to give any
> credence to a nebulous statement that takes us nowhere.  

We won't know that for certain until it has been investigated.

This is purely
> political, and I suspect the Democrats know she's a nutcase, but are
> using her anyway.  I think this whole thing is going to blow up when we
> learn more about the accuser.  As for your constant snarky comments
> about my President, I don't like them, and I think they're offensive,
> especially coming from someone who chose to live here rather in your own
> country.  I've always stuck up and defended you in here, but I also say
> what's on my mind, and will continue to do so.

As will I.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#207736

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-23 20:25 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.3611f90e360c6b8f989a92@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#207605
In article <MPG.36118d5fa0d1bc9e994bc5@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
@gmail.com says...
> I'll believe that when I see it.  How many promises to testify has she 
> backed out of so far?  By the way... are you aware of the fact that in 
> 1996, her parents lost a home to foreclosure, and the judge who ruled 
> against them was Kavanaugh's mother?
> 

She wants to drive from California rather than fly because she doesn't 
like enclosed places. Now I'm thinking 4-5 days in a car..<a very closed 
in space> is much worse than a 3 hour flight.

It's an attempt to delay the seat, nothing more.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#207745 — Please fact-check your assertions

Fromvallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
Date2018-09-24 03:05 +0000
SubjectPlease fact-check your assertions
Message-ID<g0r2jeFi0l4U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#207605
On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 12:46:09 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

By the way... are you aware of the fact that in
> 1996, her parents lost a home to foreclosure, and the judge who ruled
> against them was Kavanaugh's mother?

Please fact-check your assertions:

''
Martha Kavanaugh did preside for certain parts of a 1996 foreclosure case 
involving Ralph and Paula Blasey, who are indeed Christine Blasey Fordโ€™s 
parents. However, Kavanaugh actually ruled favorably toward the Blaseys, 
who ended up keeping their home. These two facts cause the logic of the 
conspiracy theory, such as it ever was, to collapse.
''

Rating: FALSE

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/brett-kavanaugh-foreclosure-accuser-
parents/

-- 
-v

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#207762 — Re: Please fact-check your assertions

Frommixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie>
Date2018-09-24 01:42 -0400
SubjectRe: Please fact-check your assertions
Message-ID<po9th5$bt1$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#207745
On 9/23/2018 11:05 PM, vallor wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 12:46:09 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> 
> By the way... are you aware of the fact that in
>> 1996, her parents lost a home to foreclosure, and the judge who ruled
>> against them was Kavanaugh's mother?
> 
> Please fact-check your assertions:
> 
> ''
> Martha Kavanaugh did preside for certain parts of a 1996 foreclosure case
> involving Ralph and Paula Blasey, who are indeed Christine Blasey Fordโ€™s
> parents. However, Kavanaugh actually ruled favorably toward the Blaseys,
> who ended up keeping their home. These two facts cause the logic of the
> conspiracy theory, such as it ever was, to collapse.
> ''
> 
> Rating: FALSE
> 
> https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/brett-kavanaugh-foreclosure-accuser-
> parents/

Well, some of the words were accurate:

1996
her parents
foreclosure
ruled
Kavanaugh's mother

-- 
Grizzly H.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#207764 — Re: Please fact-check your assertions

FromJanithor <Janithor@comcast.net>
Date2018-09-23 23:10 -0700
SubjectRe: Please fact-check your assertions
Message-ID<po9v4f$3av$1@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#207762
x-no-archive: yes

On 9/23/2018 10:42 PM, mixed nuts wrote:
> On 9/23/2018 11:05 PM, vallor wrote:
>> On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 12:46:09 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>>
>> By the way... are you aware of the fact that in
>>> 1996, her parents lost a home to foreclosure, and the judge who ruled
>>> against them was Kavanaugh's mother?
>>
>> Please fact-check your assertions:
>>
>> ''
>> Martha Kavanaugh did preside for certain parts of a 1996 foreclosure case
>> involving Ralph and Paula Blasey, who are indeed Christine Blasey Fordโ€™s
>> parents. However, Kavanaugh actually ruled favorably toward the Blaseys,
>> who ended up keeping their home. These two facts cause the logic of the
>> conspiracy theory, such as it ever was, to collapse.
>> ''
>>
>> Rating: FALSE
>>
>> https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/brett-kavanaugh-foreclosure-accuser-
>> parents/
> 
> Well, some of the words were accurate:
> 
> 1996
> her parents
> foreclosure
> ruled
> Kavanaugh's mother

I wonder if Kavanaugh eats food.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#207770 — Re: Please fact-check your assertions

Fromvallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
Date2018-09-24 07:17 +0000
SubjectRe: Please fact-check your assertions
Message-ID<g0rhctFi0l4U2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#207745
On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 23:47:20 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <g0r2jeFi0l4U1@mid.individual.net>,
> vallor@cultnix.org says...
> 
> 
> 
>> On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 12:46:09 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> 
>> By the way... are you aware of the fact that in
>> > 1996, her parents lost a home to foreclosure, and the judge who ruled
>> > against them was Kavanaugh's mother?
>> 
>> Please fact-check your assertions:
>> 
>> ''
>> Martha Kavanaugh did preside for certain parts of a 1996 foreclosure
>> case involving Ralph and Paula Blasey, who are indeed Christine Blasey
>> Ford?s parents. However, Kavanaugh actually ruled favorably toward the
>> Blaseys, who ended up keeping their home. These two facts cause the
>> logic of the conspiracy theory, such as it ever was, to collapse.
>> ''
>> 
>> Rating: FALSE
>> 
>> https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/brett-kavanaugh-foreclosure-accuser-
>> parents/
> 
> Not according to Judge Jeanine Pirro, as reported last night.

I don't know what to tell you, except go look at the source documents:

 _ _ _ _ _

Background

Maryland state land records show that Ralph and Paula Blasey
purchased a house in Potomac, Maryland, in June 1977. According
to Montgomery County Circuit Court records, in August 1996 a
company called UMLIC-Eight Corporation initiated foreclosure
proceedings against the couple.

However, by December of that year the Blaseys were able to
refinance the mortgage, and in January 1997 UMLIC filed a
motion to dismiss their earlier petition. Judge Martha
Kavanaugh granted that motion on 4 February 1997, thus formally
bringing an end to the foreclosure proceedings against the
Blaseys.

The claim that Kavanaugh โ€œruled againstโ€ Ralph and Paul
Blasey, central to the conspiracy theory about their
daughterโ€™s sexual assault allegations made 21 years later, is
therefore false.

The couple kept their house, ownership of which they
transferred into a Blasey family trust in June 2014. This fact
also undermines the putative logic of the claim that Christine
Blasey Ford was motivated by vengeance against Martha
Kavanaugh: not only did Judge Kavanaugh not โ€œrule againstโ€
the Blaseys in 1996, but the outcome of the case in question
was favorable to the family, who ended up keeping the house.
 _ _ _ _ _

The documents are linked in the paragraph above in the
original link.  Here is the deed:

https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2018/09/1AD635E1-0C0A-AA63-31F510FF0CA01170.pdf

After the refinance:

https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2018/09/1EB51414-0AB1-6790-626B785369BAEEE4.pdf

And the transfer to the family trust:

https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2018/09/1F9031F7-98A5-5304-375CA4F1A223573C.pdf

But I'm sure "Judge" Pirouette knows all that -- that's
what Fox news watchers like about her:  her attention to detail.

-- 
-v

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#207821 — Re: Please fact-check your assertions

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-24 09:44 -0600
SubjectRe: Please fact-check your assertions
Message-ID<MPG.3612b45ad27bf9e0989aac@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#207770
In article <g0rhctFi0l4U2@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org 
says...
> 
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 23:47:20 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> 
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate!  In article <g0r2jeFi0l4U1@mid.individual.net>,
> > vallor@cultnix.org says...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >> On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 12:46:09 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> >> 
> >> By the way... are you aware of the fact that in
> >> > 1996, her parents lost a home to foreclosure, and the judge who ruled
> >> > against them was Kavanaugh's mother?
> >> 
> >> Please fact-check your assertions:
> >> 
> >> ''
> >> Martha Kavanaugh did preside for certain parts of a 1996 foreclosure
> >> case involving Ralph and Paula Blasey, who are indeed Christine Blasey
> >> Ford?s parents. However, Kavanaugh actually ruled favorably toward the
> >> Blaseys, who ended up keeping their home. These two facts cause the
> >> logic of the conspiracy theory, such as it ever was, to collapse.
> >> ''
> >> 
> >> Rating: FALSE
> >> 
> >> https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/brett-kavanaugh-foreclosure-accuser-
> >> parents/
> > 
> > Not according to Judge Jeanine Pirro, as reported last night.
> 
> I don't know what to tell you, except go look at the source documents:
> 
>  _ _ _ _ _
> 
> Background
> 
> Maryland state land records show that Ralph and Paula Blasey
> purchased a house in Potomac, Maryland, in June 1977. According
> to Montgomery County Circuit Court records, in August 1996 a
> company called UMLIC-Eight Corporation initiated foreclosure
> proceedings against the couple.
> 
> However, by December of that year the Blaseys were able to
> refinance the mortgage, and in January 1997 UMLIC filed a
> motion to dismiss their earlier petition. Judge Martha
> Kavanaugh granted that motion on 4 February 1997, thus formally
> bringing an end to the foreclosure proceedings against the
> Blaseys.
> 
> The claim that Kavanaugh ?ruled against? Ralph and Paul
> Blasey, central to the conspiracy theory about their
> daughter?s sexual assault allegations made 21 years later, is
> therefore false.
> 
> The couple kept their house, ownership of which they
> transferred into a Blasey family trust in June 2014. This fact
> also undermines the putative logic of the claim that Christine
> Blasey Ford was motivated by vengeance against Martha
> Kavanaugh: not only did Judge Kavanaugh not ?rule against?
> the Blaseys in 1996, but the outcome of the case in question
> was favorable to the family, who ended up keeping the house.
>  _ _ _ _ _
> 
> The documents are linked in the paragraph above in the
> original link.  Here is the deed:
> 
> https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2018/09/1AD635E1-0C0A-AA63-31F510FF0CA01170.pdf
> 
> After the refinance:
> 
> https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2018/09/1EB51414-0AB1-6790-626B785369BAEEE4.pdf
> 
> And the transfer to the family trust:
> 
> https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2018/09/1F9031F7-98A5-5304-375CA4F1A223573C.pdf
> 
> But I'm sure "Judge" Pirouette knows all that -- that's
> what Fox news watchers like about her:  her attention to detail.

Yea, not Snopes.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#207848 — Re: Please fact-check your assertions

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-09-24 12:23 -0400
SubjectRe: Please fact-check your assertions
Message-ID<pob31b$fdu$4@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#207770
On 9/24/2018 3:17 AM, vallor wrote:
! On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 23:47:20 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
!
!> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
!> Checkmate!  In article <g0r2jeFi0l4U1@mid.individual.net>,
!> vallor@cultnix.org says...
!>
!>
!>
!>> On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 12:46:09 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
!>>
!>> By the way... are you aware of the fact that in
!>>> 1996, her parents lost a home to foreclosure, and the judge who ruled
!>>> against them was Kavanaugh's mother?
!>>
!>> Please fact-check your assertions:
!>>
!>> ''
!>> Martha Kavanaugh did preside for certain parts of a 1996 foreclosure
!>> case involving Ralph and Paula Blasey, who are indeed Christine Blasey
!>> Ford?s parents. However, Kavanaugh actually ruled favorably toward the
!>> Blaseys, who ended up keeping their home. These two facts cause the
!>> logic of the conspiracy theory, such as it ever was, to collapse.
!>> ''
!>>
!>> Rating: FALSE
!>>
!>> https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/brett-kavanaugh-foreclosure-accuser-
!>> parents/
!>
!> Not according to Judge Jeanine Pirro, as reported last night.
!
! I don't know what to tell you, except go look at the source documents:
!
!   _ _ _ _ _
!
! Background
!
! Maryland state land records show that Ralph and Paula Blasey
! purchased a house in Potomac, Maryland, in June 1977. According
! to Montgomery County Circuit Court records, in August 1996 a
! company called UMLIC-Eight Corporation initiated foreclosure
! proceedings against the couple.
!
! However, by December of that year the Blaseys were able to
! refinance the mortgage, and in January 1997 UMLIC filed a
! motion to dismiss their earlier petition. Judge Martha
! Kavanaugh granted that motion on 4 February 1997, thus formally
! bringing an end to the foreclosure proceedings against the
! Blaseys.
!
! The claim that Kavanaugh โ€œruled againstโ€ Ralph and Paul
! Blasey, central to the conspiracy theory about their
! daughterโ€™s sexual assault allegations made 21 years later, is
! therefore false.
!
! The couple kept their house, ownership of which they
! transferred into a Blasey family trust in June 2014. This fact
! also undermines the putative logic of the claim that Christine
! Blasey Ford was motivated by vengeance against Martha
! Kavanaugh: not only did Judge Kavanaugh not โ€œrule againstโ€
! the Blaseys in 1996, but the outcome of the case in question
! was favorable to the family, who ended up keeping the house.
!   _ _ _ _ _
!
! The documents are linked in the paragraph above in the
! original link.  Here is the deed:
!
! 
https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2018/09/1AD635E1-0C0A-AA63-31F510FF0CA01170.pdf
!
! After the refinance:
!
! 
https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2018/09/1EB51414-0AB1-6790-626B785369BAEEE4.pdf
!
! And the transfer to the family trust:
!
! 
https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2018/09/1F9031F7-98A5-5304-375CA4F1A223573C.pdf
!
! But I'm sure "Judge" Pirouette knows all that -- that's
! what Fox news watchers like about her:  her attention to detail.

Spanky-Spanky-SpankSpankSpank!

*snicker*

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#207854 — Re: Please fact-check your assertions

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-24 10:30 -0600
SubjectRe: Please fact-check your assertions
Message-ID<MPG.3612bf1a31372948989ad1@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#207848
In article <pob31b$fdu$4@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
> 
> On 9/24/2018 3:17 AM, vallor wrote:
> ! On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 23:47:20 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> !
> !> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> !> Checkmate!  In article <g0r2jeFi0l4U1@mid.individual.net>,
> !> vallor@cultnix.org says...
> !>
> !>
> !>
> !>> On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 12:46:09 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> !>>
> !>> By the way... are you aware of the fact that in
> !>>> 1996, her parents lost a home to foreclosure, and the judge who ruled
> !>>> against them was Kavanaugh's mother?
> !>>
> !>> Please fact-check your assertions:
> !>>
> !>> ''
> !>> Martha Kavanaugh did preside for certain parts of a 1996 foreclosure
> !>> case involving Ralph and Paula Blasey, who are indeed Christine Blasey
> !>> Ford?s parents. However, Kavanaugh actually ruled favorably toward the
> !>> Blaseys, who ended up keeping their home. These two facts cause the
> !>> logic of the conspiracy theory, such as it ever was, to collapse.
> !>> ''
> !>>
> !>> Rating: FALSE
> !>>
> !>> https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/brett-kavanaugh-foreclosure-accuser-
> !>> parents/
> !>
> !> Not according to Judge Jeanine Pirro, as reported last night.
> !
> ! I don't know what to tell you, except go look at the source documents:
> !
> !   _ _ _ _ _
> !
> ! Background
> !
> ! Maryland state land records show that Ralph and Paula Blasey
> ! purchased a house in Potomac, Maryland, in June 1977. According
> ! to Montgomery County Circuit Court records, in August 1996 a
> ! company called UMLIC-Eight Corporation initiated foreclosure
> ! proceedings against the couple.
> !
> ! However, by December of that year the Blaseys were able to
> ! refinance the mortgage, and in January 1997 UMLIC filed a
> ! motion to dismiss their earlier petition. Judge Martha
> ! Kavanaugh granted that motion on 4 February 1997, thus formally
> ! bringing an end to the foreclosure proceedings against the
> ! Blaseys.
> !
> ! The claim that Kavanaugh ?ruled against? Ralph and Paul
> ! Blasey, central to the conspiracy theory about their
> ! daughter?s sexual assault allegations made 21 years later, is
> ! therefore false.
> !
> ! The couple kept their house, ownership of which they
> ! transferred into a Blasey family trust in June 2014. This fact
> ! also undermines the putative logic of the claim that Christine
> ! Blasey Ford was motivated by vengeance against Martha
> ! Kavanaugh: not only did Judge Kavanaugh not ?rule against?
> ! the Blaseys in 1996, but the outcome of the case in question
> ! was favorable to the family, who ended up keeping the house.
> !   _ _ _ _ _
> !
> ! The documents are linked in the paragraph above in the
> ! original link.  Here is the deed:
> !
> ! 
> https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2018/09/1AD635E1-0C0A-AA63-31F510FF0CA01170.pdf
> !
> ! After the refinance:
> !
> ! 
> https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2018/09/1EB51414-0AB1-6790-626B785369BAEEE4.pdf
> !
> ! And the transfer to the family trust:
> !
> ! 
> https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2018/09/1F9031F7-98A5-5304-375CA4F1A223573C.pdf
> !
> ! But I'm sure "Judge" Pirouette knows all that -- that's
> ! what Fox news watchers like about her:  her attention to detail.
> 
> Spanky-Spanky-SpankSpankSpank!
> 
> *snicker*

Snopes is paid for.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#207894 — Re: Please fact-check your assertions

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2018-09-24 19:41 +0100
SubjectRe: Please fact-check your assertions
Message-ID<1nvnd5l.1gb574ckut19iN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#207848
Paul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist Professor 
"kensi" Kensington Fu.D. outfit confidently declared: 

> On 9/24/2018 3:17 AM, vallor wrote:
> ! On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 23:47:20 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> !
> !> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> !> Checkmate!  In article <g0r2jeFi0l4U1@mid.individual.net>,
> !> vallor@cultnix.org says...
> !>
> !>
> !>
> !>> On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 12:46:09 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> !>>
> !>> By the way... are you aware of the fact that in
> !>>> 1996, her parents lost a home to foreclosure, and the judge who ruled
> !>>> against them was Kavanaugh's mother?
> !>>
> !>> Please fact-check your assertions:
> !>>
> !>> ''
> !>> Martha Kavanaugh did preside for certain parts of a 1996 foreclosure
> !>> case involving Ralph and Paula Blasey, who are indeed Christine Blasey
> !>> Ford?s parents. However, Kavanaugh actually ruled favorably toward the
> !>> Blaseys, who ended up keeping their home. These two facts cause the
> !>> logic of the conspiracy theory, such as it ever was, to collapse.
> !>> ''
> !>>
> !>> Rating: FALSE
> !>>
> !>> https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/brett-kavanaugh-foreclosure-accuser-
> !>> parents/
> !>
> !> Not according to Judge Jeanine Pirro, as reported last night.
> !
> ! I don't know what to tell you, except go look at the source documents:
> !
> !   _ _ _ _ _
> !
> ! Background
> !
> ! Maryland state land records show that Ralph and Paula Blasey
> ! purchased a house in Potomac, Maryland, in June 1977. According
> ! to Montgomery County Circuit Court records, in August 1996 a
> ! company called UMLIC-Eight Corporation initiated foreclosure
> ! proceedings against the couple.
> !
> ! However, by December of that year the Blaseys were able to
> ! refinance the mortgage, and in January 1997 UMLIC filed a
> ! motion to dismiss their earlier petition. Judge Martha
> ! Kavanaugh granted that motion on 4 February 1997, thus formally
> ! bringing an end to the foreclosure proceedings against the
> ! Blaseys.
> !
> ! The claim that Kavanaugh "ruled against" Ralph and Paul
> ! Blasey, central to the conspiracy theory about their
> ! daughter's sexual assault allegations made 21 years later, is
> ! therefore false.
> !
> ! The couple kept their house, ownership of which they
> ! transferred into a Blasey family trust in June 2014. This fact
> ! also undermines the putative logic of the claim that Christine
> ! Blasey Ford was motivated by vengeance against Martha
> ! Kavanaugh: not only did Judge Kavanaugh not "rule against"
> ! the Blaseys in 1996, but the outcome of the case in question
> ! was favorable to the family, who ended up keeping the house.
> !   _ _ _ _ _
> !
> ! The documents are linked in the paragraph above in the
> ! original link.  Here is the deed:
> !
> ! 
> https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2018/09/1AD635E1-0C0A-AA63-31F510FF0CA01170.pdf
> !
> ! After the refinance:
> !
> ! 
> https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2018/09/1EB51414-0AB1-6790-626B785369BAEEE4.pdf
> !
> ! And the transfer to the family trust:
> !
> ! 
> https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2018/09/1F9031F7-98A5-5304-375CA4F1A223573C.pdf
> !
> ! But I'm sure "Judge" Pirouette knows all that -- that's
> ! what Fox news watchers like about her:  her attention to detail.
> 
> Spanky-Spanky-SpankSpankSpank!
> 
> *snicker*
>

Custom quote marking on NewsTap, "kensi"?  Since when 
has NewsTap been able to use "!" as a quote indicator??  
Some might think that your posting agent is masquerading 
as something that it is not.

-- 
^ร^     My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#207934 — Re: Please fact-check your assertions

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2018-09-24 23:36 +0100
SubjectRe: Please fact-check your assertions
Message-ID<1nvno1y.1q5r76915vy37lN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#207894
Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote:

> On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 19:41:41 +0100, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
> 
> ยงPaul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist Professor 
> ยง"kensi" Kensington Fu.D. outfit confidently declared: 
> ยง
> ยง> On 9/24/2018 3:17 AM, vallor wrote:
> ยง> ! On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 23:47:20 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> ยง> !
> ยง> !> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> ยง> !> Checkmate!  In article <g0r2jeFi0l4U1@mid.individual.net>,
> ยง> !> vallor@cultnix.org says...
> ยง> !>
> ยง> !>
> ยง> !>
> ยง> !>> On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 12:46:09 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> ยง> !>>
> ยง> !>> By the way... are you aware of the fact that in
> ยง> !>>> 1996, her parents lost a home to foreclosure, and the judge who ruled
> ยง> !>>> against them was Kavanaugh's mother?
> ยง> !>>
> ยง> !>> Please fact-check your assertions:
> ยง> !>>
> ยง> !>> ''
> ยง> !>> Martha Kavanaugh did preside for certain parts of a 1996 foreclosure
> ยง> !>> case involving Ralph and Paula Blasey, who are indeed Christine Blasey
> ยง> !>> Ford?s parents. However, Kavanaugh actually ruled favorably toward the
> ยง> !>> Blaseys, who ended up keeping their home. These two facts cause the
> ยง> !>> logic of the conspiracy theory, such as it ever was, to collapse.
> ยง> !>> ''
> ยง> !>>
> ยง> !>> Rating: FALSE
> ยง> !>>
> ยง> !>> https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/brett-kavanaugh-foreclosure-accuser-
> ยง> !>> parents/
> ยง> !>
> ยง> !> Not according to Judge Jeanine Pirro, as reported last night.
> ยง> !
> ยง> ! I don't know what to tell you, except go look at the source documents:
> ยง> !
> ยง> !   _ _ _ _ _
> ยง> !
> ยง> ! Background
> ยง> !
> ยง> ! Maryland state land records show that Ralph and Paula Blasey
> ยง> ! purchased a house in Potomac, Maryland, in June 1977. According
> ยง> ! to Montgomery County Circuit Court records, in August 1996 a
> ยง> ! company called UMLIC-Eight Corporation initiated foreclosure
> ยง> ! proceedings against the couple.
> ยง> !
> ยง> ! However, by December of that year the Blaseys were able to
> ยง> ! refinance the mortgage, and in January 1997 UMLIC filed a
> ยง> ! motion to dismiss their earlier petition. Judge Martha
> ยง> ! Kavanaugh granted that motion on 4 February 1997, thus formally
> ยง> ! bringing an end to the foreclosure proceedings against the
> ยง> ! Blaseys.
> ยง> !
> ยง> ! The claim that Kavanaugh "ruled against" Ralph and Paul
> ยง> ! Blasey, central to the conspiracy theory about their
> ยง> ! daughter's sexual assault allegations made 21 years later, is
> ยง> ! therefore false.
> ยง> !
> ยง> ! The couple kept their house, ownership of which they
> ยง> ! transferred into a Blasey family trust in June 2014. This fact
> ยง> ! also undermines the putative logic of the claim that Christine
> ยง> ! Blasey Ford was motivated by vengeance against Martha
> ยง> ! Kavanaugh: not only did Judge Kavanaugh not "rule against"
> ยง> ! the Blaseys in 1996, but the outcome of the case in question
> ยง> ! was favorable to the family, who ended up keeping the house.
> ยง> !   _ _ _ _ _
> ยง> !
> ยง> ! The documents are linked in the paragraph above in the
> ยง> ! original link.  Here is the deed:
> ยง> !
> ยง> ! 
> ยง> https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2018/09/1AD635E1-0C0A-AA63-31F510FF0CA01170.pdf
> ยง> !
> ยง> ! After the refinance:
> ยง> !
> ยง> ! 
> ยง> https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2018/09/1EB51414-0AB1-6790-626B785369BAEEE4.pdf
> ยง> !
> ยง> ! And the transfer to the family trust:
> ยง> !
> ยง> ! 
> ยง> https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2018/09/1F9031F7-98A5-5304-375CA4F1A223573C.pdf
> ยง> !
> ยง> ! But I'm sure "Judge" Pirouette knows all that -- that's
> ยง> ! what Fox news watchers like about her:  her attention to detail.
> ยง> 
> ยง> Spanky-Spanky-SpankSpankSpank!
> ยง> 
> ยง> *snicker*
> ยง>
> ยง
> ยงCustom quote marking on NewsTap, "kensi"?  Since when 
> ยงhas NewsTap been able to use "!" as a quote indicator??  
> ยงSome might think that your posting agent is masquerading 
> ยงas something that it is not.
> 
> Indeed!  New Maestro can even use totally non-standard 
> custome quote marks.  LOL.
>

Well, I think that's very naughty of it, and so is 
any lowlife t0rll who uses that sneaky stuff, TAAAW. 

-- 
^ร^     My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#207847 — Re: Please fact-check your assertions

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-09-24 12:18 -0400
SubjectRe: Please fact-check your assertions
Message-ID<pob2o2$fdu$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#207745
On 9/23/2018 11:05 PM, vallor wrote:
! On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 12:46:09 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
!
! By the way... are you aware of the fact that in
!> 1996, her parents lost a home to foreclosure, and the judge who ruled
!> against them was Kavanaugh's mother?
!
! Please fact-check your assertions:
!
! ''
! Martha Kavanaugh did preside for certain parts of a 1996 foreclosure case
! involving Ralph and Paula Blasey, who are indeed Christine Blasey Fordโ€™s
! parents. However, Kavanaugh actually ruled favorably toward the Blaseys,
! who ended up keeping their home. These two facts cause the logic of the
! conspiracy theory, such as it ever was, to collapse.
! ''
!
! Rating: FALSE
!
! https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/brett-kavanaugh-foreclosure-accuser-
! parents/

SPANKY-SPANKY!

*snicker*

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#207853 — Re: Please fact-check your assertions

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-24 10:29 -0600
SubjectRe: Please fact-check your assertions
Message-ID<MPG.3612bee679a9db40989ad0@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#207847
In article <pob2o2$fdu$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
> 
> On 9/23/2018 11:05 PM, vallor wrote:
> ! On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 12:46:09 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> !
> ! By the way... are you aware of the fact that in
> !> 1996, her parents lost a home to foreclosure, and the judge who ruled
> !> against them was Kavanaugh's mother?
> !
> ! Please fact-check your assertions:
> !
> ! ''
> ! Martha Kavanaugh did preside for certain parts of a 1996 foreclosure case
> ! involving Ralph and Paula Blasey, who are indeed Christine Blasey Ford?s
> ! parents. However, Kavanaugh actually ruled favorably toward the Blaseys,
> ! who ended up keeping their home. These two facts cause the logic of the
> ! conspiracy theory, such as it ever was, to collapse.
> ! ''
> !
> ! Rating: FALSE
> !
> ! https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/brett-kavanaugh-foreclosure-accuser-
> ! parents/
> 
> SPANKY-SPANKY!
> 
> *snicker*


How come no one likes you?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#208123

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2018-09-25 12:19 -0500
Message-ID<GsOdnfaHM8q78zfGnZ2dnUU7-bmdnZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#207605
On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 12:46:09 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <t4idnapbhPqlfDrGnZ2dnUU7-Y-
> dnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> 
> 
> 
>> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 14:45:18 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> 
>> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>> > by Checkmate!  In article <g4ydnYrxQeek_DjGnZ2dnUU7-U-
>> > dnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> >> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:42:14 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <vbednT3b2NUv6j_GnZ2dnUU7-
>> >> > SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:41:35 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> >> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnbhpWpFk3zzGnZ2dnUU7-
>> >> >> > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:21:43 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> > <CsWdnYZpWpHYozzGnZ2dnUU7- audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>> >> >> >> > pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:16:01 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >> >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> >> > <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7- audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>> >> >> >> >> > pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >> >> >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> >> >> > <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>> >> >> >> >> >> > @gmail.invalid says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Melt, snowflakes,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > In article
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> when reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> hobnobbing with white supremacists, abysmal
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> conditions in the concentration camps in the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> southwest, attacks on programs to combat
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> climate change, attacks on women and
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> minorities, attacks on the poor, attacks on
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> the citizenship rights of minorities, brain
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> drains, adverse court rulings, cooperating
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> witnesses,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> In other words, just another week in the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Trump regime:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/
week-96/
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Deutsche Bank. Uh-oh!
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > anyday now foil hat collector.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Manafort's going to tell the truth and there
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > won't be any collusion and even if there is,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > it's not illegal when The President does it, and
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > if it is then Manafort's lying and 3,000 Puerto
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Ricans didn't die so The President gets A+ for
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > his amazing management skills!
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> then date graped him!!!!2!
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > letter from a "sekret"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > so<SPANK>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> toast:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/
>> kavanaugh-
>> >> >> >> >> allegations-
>> >> >> >> >> >> ford-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> palo-alto.html
>> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor.
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Most people get attracted to that field because of
>> >> >> >> >> >> > their own issues.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >  Now she claims she never told anyone because she was
>> >> >> >> >> >> >  afraid
>> >> >> >> >> >> > he'd "kill" her.
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high
>> >> >> >> >> >> > school ever touches other people's naughty parts, and
>> >> >> >> >> >> > if they do, they should never ever be employed by
>> >> >> >> >> >> > anyone. Are you prepared to live in a world where you
>> >> >> >> >> >> > can lose your job anytime someone utters some
>> >> >> >> >> >> > accusation that you did something naughty 35 years ago
>> >> >> >> >> >> > in high school?  Did YOU ever do anything naughty in
>> >> >> >> >> >> > high school, Ko0k?
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different
>> >> >> >> >> >> than other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> > Does a person's reputation become spotted with the
>> >> >> >> >> > flimsiest of accusations alone... suddenly popping up
>> >> >> >> >> > after 36 years?
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> The accusation(s) must be investigated, yes.  Especially
>> >> >> >> >> for as important a job as a Supreme Court Justice.
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> If so, NO one
>> >> >> >> >> > would have a spotless reputation... ever.
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> Possibly.  However, I don't believe that everyone would be
>> >> >> >> >> accused of attempted rape in their past.
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> This woman is unsure where or
>> >> >> >> >> > when this happened, and the third party she claims was
>> >> >> >> >> > there, says he never witnessed any such incident
>> >> >> >> >> > anywhere. Her accounts of the alleged incident have
>> >> >> >> >> > varied at different times.  She claims she just
>> >> >> >> >> > "remembered" it after decades had passed.  There's not a
>> >> >> >> >> > scintilla of evidence from anyone to suggest this
>> >> >> >> >> > actually happened.  NO one should be judged by something
>> >> >> >> >> > this vague and vacuous.
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> The claim will be investigated as it should be, especially
>> >> >> >> >> for as important a position as a Supreme Court Judge.
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > The point is, the Democrats have already decided he's
>> >> >> >> > guilty...
>> >> >> >> > not out of any effort to be fair or objective, but simply
>> >> >> >> > because Trump is the President and nominated him.
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> And you know this how?  You're  a mind reader now?  Or just
>> >> >> >> showing your bias?  I suggest we take a wait and see stance.
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > Nads has already convicted him, and so have virtually all the
>> >> >> > Democratic leaders in various news articles.  To continue this
>> >> >> > discussion with you at this point, is beyond the limits of my
>> >> >> > patience.  Perhaps you should go out and do some gardening.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> I'm terribly sorry that discussing things with someone who has a
>> >> >> different opinion is so upsetting to you.
>> >> > 
>> >> > You lack any objectivity about this.  You automatically oppose
>> >> > Kavanaugh,
>> >> > despite the lack of any details or facts from his accuser, simply
>> >> > because you hate Trump.  A fact you make quite clear every day,
>> >> > despite the fact you're not even a citizen of this country.
>> >> 
>> >> That is a patent lie.  I have been very objective about this issue
>> >> when you have not been.  You automatically believe her accusation is
>> >> false without giving her even a chance.  And my not being a citizen
>> >> has nothing to do with anything, except for you to attempt to sling
>> >> insults at me. You are as biased as anyone could possibly be.
>> > 
>> > Giving her a chance for WHAT?  She hasn't given anyone anything to be
>> > objective about.  NO details, location, time, other witnesses... not
>> > ONE detail.  Now she's apparently not willing to even come forward to
>> > clear any of her allegations up.
>> 
>> She's testifying next Thursday.
> 
> I'll believe that when I see it.  How many promises to testify has she
> backed out of so far?  By the way... are you aware of the fact that in
> 1996, her parents lost a home to foreclosure, and the judge who ruled
> against them was Kavanaugh's mother?

I did not know that.  Thanx.
> 
>> WHAT is anybody going to investigate?  Her
>> > latest "demand," is that he testify first... about something he says
>> > he knows nothing about.  What in hell is he supposed to say?  If
>> > someone makes an accusation, they have to state what that accusation
>> > is, so he can respond.  That's how it works.  There is no reason to
>> > give any credence to a nebulous statement that takes us nowhere.
>> 
>> We won't know that for certain until it has been investigated.
> 
> If she ever manages to keep her promise to show up and testify.
> 
Indeed.  
 
>> This is purely
>> > political, and I suspect the Democrats know she's a nutcase, but are
>> > using her anyway.  I think this whole thing is going to blow up when
>> > we learn more about the accuser.  As for your constant snarky
>> > comments about my President, I don't like them, and I think they're
>> > offensive, especially coming from someone who chose to live here
>> > rather in your own country.  I've always stuck up and defended you in
>> > here, but I also say what's on my mind, and will continue to do so.
>> 
>> As will I.
> 
> It's amazing how easily you turn on the only person in here who's
> defended you from numerous personal attacks for years.  Perhaps the
> others saw something that I completely missed.

If you say so.  I haven't turned on you, merely surprised at your back 
stabbing.  Whatever....

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#208124

FromYour Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2018-09-25 12:25 -0500
Message-ID<spSdncDwWYod8jfGnZ2dnUU7-XfNnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#208123
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 12:19:34 -0500, LO AND BEHOLD; "pandora
<pandora@peak.org>" determined that the following was of great
importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
<GsOdnfaHM8q78zfGnZ2dnUU7-bmdnZ2d@scnresearch.com>:
 
>On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 12:46:09 -0700, ๐Ÿ’ฉ wrote:
>
>>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
>>๐Ÿ’ฉ!  In article <t4idnapbhPqlfDrGnZ2dnUU7-Y- dnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>>pandora@peak.org says... 
>>>On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 14:45:18 -0700, ๐Ÿ’ฉ wrote: 
>>>>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
>>>>๐Ÿ’ฉ!  In article <g4ydnYrxQeek_DjGnZ2dnUU7-U- dnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>>>>pandora@peak.org says... 
>>>>>On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:42:14 -0700, ๐Ÿ’ฉ wrote: 
>>>>>>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
>>>>>>๐Ÿ’ฉ!  In article <vbednT3b2NUv6j_GnZ2dnUU7- SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>>>>>>pandora@peak.org says... 
>>>>>>>On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:41:35 -0700, ๐Ÿ’ฉ wrote: 
>>>>>>>>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
>>>>>>>>๐Ÿ’ฉ!  In article <CsWdnbhpWpFk3zzGnZ2dnUU7- audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>>>>>>>>pandora@peak.org says... 
>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:21:43 -0700, ๐Ÿ’ฉ wrote: 
>>>>>>>>>>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
>>>>>>>>>>๐Ÿ’ฉ!  In article <CsWdnYZpWpHYozzGnZ2dnUU7- audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>pandora@peak.org says... 
>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:16:01 -0700, ๐Ÿ’ฉ wrote: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
>>>>>>>>>>>>๐Ÿ’ฉ!  In article <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7- audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>pandora@peak.org says... 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, ๐Ÿ’ฉ wrote: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>๐Ÿ’ฉ!  In article <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>@gmail.invalid says... 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter wrote: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In article <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>๐Ÿ’ฉ!  In article <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess hobnobbing with white
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>supremacists, abysmal conditions in the concentration camps in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>southwest, attacks on programs to combat climate change, attacks on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>women and minorities, attacks on the poor, attacks on the citizenship
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>rights of minorities, brain drains, adverse court rulings, cooperating 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>witnesses, and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist. In other words, just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>another week in the Trump regime:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/
>week-96/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from Deutsche Bank. Uh-oh!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>anyday now foil hat collector.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Manafort's going to tell the truth and there won't be any collusion and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>even if there is, it's not illegal when The President does it, and if it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>is then Manafort's lying and 3,000 Puerto Ricans didn't die so The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>President gets A+ for his amazing management skills!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then date graped
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>him!!!!2!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret" letter from a "sekret"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>so<SPANK>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/
>>>kavanaugh-
>>>>>>>>>>>allegations-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>ford-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>palo-alto.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor. Most people get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>attracted to that field because of their own issues.  Now she claims
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>she never told anyone because she was  afraid he'd "kill" her. Yeah,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>right. I'm going to believe that no one in high school ever touches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>other people's naughty parts, and if they do, they should never ever be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>employed by anyone. Are you prepared to live in a world where you can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>lose your job anytime someone utters some accusation that you did
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>something naughty 35 years ago in high school?  Did YOU ever do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>anything naughty in high school, Ko0k?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
>>>>>>>>>>>>Does a person's reputation become spotted with the flimsiest of
>>>>>>>>>>>>accusations alone... suddenly popping up after 36 years?
>>>>>>>>>>>The accusation(s) must be investigated, yes.  Especially for as
>>>>>>>>>>>important a job as a Supreme Court Justice. If so, NO one
>>>>>>>>>>>>would have a spotless reputation... ever.
>>>>>>>>>>>Possibly.  However, I don't believe that everyone would be accused of
>>>>>>>>>>>attempted rape in their past. This woman is unsure where or
>>>>>>>>>>>>when this happened, and the third party she claims was there, says he
>>>>>>>>>>>>never witnessed any such incident anywhere. Her accounts of the alleged
>>>>>>>>>>>>incident have varied at different times.  She claims she just
>>>>>>>>>>>>"remembered" it after decades had passed.  There's not a scintilla of
>>>>>>>>>>>>evidence from anyone to suggest this actually happened.  NO one should 
>>>>>>>>>>>>be judged by something this vague and vacuous.
>>>>>>>>>>>The claim will be investigated as it should be, especially for as
>>>>>>>>>>>important a position as a Supreme Court Judge.
>>>>>>>>>>The point is, the Democrats have already decided he's guilty... not out 
>>>>>>>>>>of any effort to be fair or objective, but simply because Trump is the
>>>>>>>>>>President and nominated him.
>>>>>>>>>And you know this how?  You're  a mind reader now?  Or just showing your
>>>>>>>>>bias?  I suggest we take a wait and see stance.
>>>>>>>>Nads has already convicted him, and so have virtually all the Democratic
>>>>>>>>leaders in various news articles.  To continue this discussion with you
>>>>>>>>at this point, is beyond the limits of my patience.  Perhaps you should
>>>>>>>>go out and do some gardening.
>>>>>>>I'm terribly sorry that discussing things with someone who has a
>>>>>>>different opinion is so upsetting to you.
>>>>>>You lack any objectivity about this.  You automatically oppose
>>>>>>Kavanaugh, despite the lack of any details or facts from his accuser,
>>>>>>simply because you hate Trump.  A fact you make quite clear every day, 
>>>>>>despite the fact you're not even a citizen of this country.
>>>>>That is a patent lie.  I have been very objective about this issue when 
>>>>>you have not been.  You automatically believe her accusation is false
>>>>>without giving her even a chance.  And my not being a citizen has
>>>>>nothing to do with anything, except for you to attempt to sling insults
>>>>>at me. You are as biased as anyone could possibly be.
>>>>Giving her a chance for WHAT?  She hasn't given anyone anything to be
>>>>objective about.  NO details, location, time, other witnesses... not
>>>>ONE detail.  Now she's apparently not willing to even come forward to
>>>>clear any of her allegations up.
>>>She's testifying next Thursday.
>>I'll believe that when I see it.  How many promises to testify has she
>>backed out of so far?  By the way... are you aware of the fact that in 
>>1996, her parents lost a home to foreclosure, and the judge who ruled
>>against them was Kavanaugh's mother?
>
>I did not know that.  Thanx.
>>
>>>WHAT is anybody going to investigate?  Her
>>>>latest "demand," is that he testify first... about something he says he 
>>>>knows nothing about.  What in hell is he supposed to say?  If someone
>>>>makes an accusation, they have to state what that accusation is, so he 
>>>>can respond.  That's how it works.  There is no reason to give any
>>>>credence to a nebulous statement that takes us nowhere.
>>>We won't know that for certain until it has been investigated.
>>If she ever manages to keep her promise to show up and testify. 
>Indeed.   
>>>This is purely
>>>>political, and I suspect the Democrats know she's a nutcase, but are
>>>>using her anyway.  I think this whole thing is going to blow up when we
>>>>learn more about the accuser.  As for your constant snarky comments
>>>>about my President, I don't like them, and I think they're offensive,
>>>>especially coming from someone who chose to live here rather in your
>>>>own country.  I've always stuck up and defended you in here, but I also
>>>>say what's on my mind, and will continue to do so.
>>>As will I.
>>It's amazing how easily you turn on the only person in here who's
>>defended you from numerous personal attacks for years.  Perhaps the
>>others saw something that I completely missed.
>
>If you say so.  I haven't turned on you, merely surprised at your back
>stabbing.  Whatever....

the refuge of a coward, and whatnot...

-- 
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA

"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this 
seems to be the new norm in the world.  It's spreading like a cancer, 
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil.  We need to put an 
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell 
everywhere.  We need to get these people out of every civilized 
country, and there's only one way to do it.  IOW, we have to become 
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) 

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working.  We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too.  One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode 

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#208153

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-25 12:16 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.3614295bb0a6afae989b39@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#208123
In article <GsOdnfaHM8q78zfGnZ2dnUU7-bmdnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, 
pandora@peak.org says...
> 
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 12:46:09 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> 
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate!  In article <t4idnapbhPqlfDrGnZ2dnUU7-Y-
> > dnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 14:45:18 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> >> 
> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
> >> > by Checkmate!  In article <g4ydnYrxQeek_DjGnZ2dnUU7-U-
> >> > dnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> >> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:42:14 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> >> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <vbednT3b2NUv6j_GnZ2dnUU7-
> >> >> > SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:41:35 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> >> >> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnbhpWpFk3zzGnZ2dnUU7-
> >> >> >> > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:21:43 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
> >> >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
> >> >> >> >> > <CsWdnYZpWpHYozzGnZ2dnUU7- audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
> >> >> >> >> > pandora@peak.org says...
> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:16:01 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
> >> >> >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
> >> >> >> >> >> > <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7- audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
> >> >> >> >> >> > pandora@peak.org says...
> >> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > @gmail.invalid says...
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again.
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Melt, snowflakes,
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > In article
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> when reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> hobnobbing with white supremacists, abysmal
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> conditions in the concentration camps in the
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> southwest, attacks on programs to combat
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> climate change, attacks on women and
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> minorities, attacks on the poor, attacks on
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> the citizenship rights of minorities, brain
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> drains, adverse court rulings, cooperating
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> witnesses,
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> In other words, just another week in the
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Trump regime:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/
> week-96/
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Deutsche Bank. Uh-oh!
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > anyday now foil hat collector.
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Manafort's going to tell the truth and there
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > won't be any collusion and even if there is,
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > it's not illegal when The President does it, and
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > if it is then Manafort's lying and 3,000 Puerto
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Ricans didn't die so The President gets A+ for
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > his amazing management skills!
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> then date graped him!!!!2!
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret"
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > letter from a "sekret"
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > so<SPANK>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully,
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> toast:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/
> >> kavanaugh-
> >> >> >> >> >> allegations-
> >> >> >> >> >> >> ford-
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> palo-alto.html
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor.
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Most people get attracted to that field because of
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > their own issues.
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  Now she claims she never told anyone because she was
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  afraid
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > he'd "kill" her.
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > school ever touches other people's naughty parts, and
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > if they do, they should never ever be employed by
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > anyone. Are you prepared to live in a world where you
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > can lose your job anytime someone utters some
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > accusation that you did something naughty 35 years ago
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > in high school?  Did YOU ever do anything naughty in
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > high school, Ko0k?
> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different
> >> >> >> >> >> >> than other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
> >> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> >> > Does a person's reputation become spotted with the
> >> >> >> >> >> > flimsiest of accusations alone... suddenly popping up
> >> >> >> >> >> > after 36 years?
> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> The accusation(s) must be investigated, yes.  Especially
> >> >> >> >> >> for as important a job as a Supreme Court Justice.
> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> If so, NO one
> >> >> >> >> >> > would have a spotless reputation... ever.
> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> Possibly.  However, I don't believe that everyone would be
> >> >> >> >> >> accused of attempted rape in their past.
> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> This woman is unsure where or
> >> >> >> >> >> > when this happened, and the third party she claims was
> >> >> >> >> >> > there, says he never witnessed any such incident
> >> >> >> >> >> > anywhere. Her accounts of the alleged incident have
> >> >> >> >> >> > varied at different times.  She claims she just
> >> >> >> >> >> > "remembered" it after decades had passed.  There's not a
> >> >> >> >> >> > scintilla of evidence from anyone to suggest this
> >> >> >> >> >> > actually happened.  NO one should be judged by something
> >> >> >> >> >> > this vague and vacuous.
> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> The claim will be investigated as it should be, especially
> >> >> >> >> >> for as important a position as a Supreme Court Judge.
> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> > The point is, the Democrats have already decided he's
> >> >> >> >> > guilty...
> >> >> >> >> > not out of any effort to be fair or objective, but simply
> >> >> >> >> > because Trump is the President and nominated him.
> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> And you know this how?  You're  a mind reader now?  Or just
> >> >> >> >> showing your bias?  I suggest we take a wait and see stance.
> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> > Nads has already convicted him, and so have virtually all the
> >> >> >> > Democratic leaders in various news articles.  To continue this
> >> >> >> > discussion with you at this point, is beyond the limits of my
> >> >> >> > patience.  Perhaps you should go out and do some gardening.
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> I'm terribly sorry that discussing things with someone who has a
> >> >> >> different opinion is so upsetting to you.
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > You lack any objectivity about this.  You automatically oppose
> >> >> > Kavanaugh,
> >> >> > despite the lack of any details or facts from his accuser, simply
> >> >> > because you hate Trump.  A fact you make quite clear every day,
> >> >> > despite the fact you're not even a citizen of this country.
> >> >> 
> >> >> That is a patent lie.  I have been very objective about this issue
> >> >> when you have not been.  You automatically believe her accusation is
> >> >> false without giving her even a chance.  And my not being a citizen
> >> >> has nothing to do with anything, except for you to attempt to sling
> >> >> insults at me. You are as biased as anyone could possibly be.
> >> > 
> >> > Giving her a chance for WHAT?  She hasn't given anyone anything to be
> >> > objective about.  NO details, location, time, other witnesses... not
> >> > ONE detail.  Now she's apparently not willing to even come forward to
> >> > clear any of her allegations up.
> >> 
> >> She's testifying next Thursday.
> > 
> > I'll believe that when I see it.  How many promises to testify has she
> > backed out of so far?  By the way... are you aware of the fact that in
> > 1996, her parents lost a home to foreclosure, and the judge who ruled
> > against them was Kavanaugh's mother?
> 
> I did not know that.  Thanx.
> > 
> >> WHAT is anybody going to investigate?  Her
> >> > latest "demand," is that he testify first... about something he says
> >> > he knows nothing about.  What in hell is he supposed to say?  If
> >> > someone makes an accusation, they have to state what that accusation
> >> > is, so he can respond.  That's how it works.  There is no reason to
> >> > give any credence to a nebulous statement that takes us nowhere.
> >> 
> >> We won't know that for certain until it has been investigated.
> > 
> > If she ever manages to keep her promise to show up and testify.
> > 
> Indeed.  
>  
> >> This is purely
> >> > political, and I suspect the Democrats know she's a nutcase, but are
> >> > using her anyway.  I think this whole thing is going to blow up when
> >> > we learn more about the accuser.  As for your constant snarky
> >> > comments about my President, I don't like them, and I think they're
> >> > offensive, especially coming from someone who chose to live here
> >> > rather in your own country.  I've always stuck up and defended you in
> >> > here, but I also say what's on my mind, and will continue to do so.
> >> 
> >> As will I.
> > 
> > It's amazing how easily you turn on the only person in here who's
> > defended you from numerous personal attacks for years.  Perhaps the
> > others saw something that I completely missed.
> 
> If you say so.  I haven't turned on you, merely surprised at your back 
> stabbing.  Whatever....

Checky is no back stabber.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#208261

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2018-09-25 19:32 -0500
Message-ID<daqdnQbv3dQATjfGnZ2dnUU7-SGdnZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#208153
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 12:16:13 -0600, Skeeter wrote:

> In article <GsOdnfaHM8q78zfGnZ2dnUU7-bmdnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
> pandora@peak.org says...
>> 
>> On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 12:46:09 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> 
>> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>> > by Checkmate!  In article <t4idnapbhPqlfDrGnZ2dnUU7-Y-
>> > dnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> >> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 14:45:18 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <g4ydnYrxQeek_DjGnZ2dnUU7-U-
>> >> > dnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> >> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:42:14 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> >> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <vbednT3b2NUv6j_GnZ2dnUU7-
>> >> >> > SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:41:35 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> > <CsWdnbhpWpFk3zzGnZ2dnUU7- audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>> >> >> >> > pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:21:43 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >> >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> >> > <CsWdnYZpWpHYozzGnZ2dnUU7- audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>> >> >> >> >> > pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:16:01 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >> >> >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> >> >> > <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7- audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> > pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > when reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > @gmail.invalid says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Melt, snowflakes,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > In article
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> goggles when reading posts by Checkmate!  In
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> article <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> hobnobbing with white supremacists,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> abysmal conditions in the concentration
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> camps in the southwest, attacks on
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> programs to combat climate change, attacks
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> on women and minorities, attacks on the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> poor, attacks on the citizenship rights of
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> minorities, brain drains, adverse court
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> rulings, cooperating witnesses,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> In other words, just another week in the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Trump regime:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/
>> week-96/
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Deutsche Bank. Uh-oh!
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > anyday now foil hat collector.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Manafort's going to tell the truth and there
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > won't be any collusion and even if there is,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > it's not illegal when The President does it,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > and if it is then Manafort's lying and 3,000
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Puerto Ricans didn't die so The President
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > gets A+ for his amazing management skills!
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> then date graped him!!!!2!
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > letter from a "sekret"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > so<SPANK>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> toast:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/
>> >> kavanaugh-
>> >> >> >> >> >> allegations-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> ford-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> palo-alto.html
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Not surprising the accuser is a psychology
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > professor. Most people get attracted to that field
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > because of their own issues.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  Now she claims she never told anyone because she
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  was afraid
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > he'd "kill" her.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > high school ever touches other people's naughty
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > parts, and if they do, they should never ever be
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > employed by anyone. Are you prepared to live in a
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > world where you can lose your job anytime someone
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > utters some accusation that you did something
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > naughty 35 years ago in high school?  Did YOU ever
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > do anything naughty in high school, Ko0k?
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> different than other jobs.  His reputation has to be
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> spotless.
>> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Does a person's reputation become spotted with the
>> >> >> >> >> >> > flimsiest of accusations alone... suddenly popping up
>> >> >> >> >> >> > after 36 years?
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> The accusation(s) must be investigated, yes.  Especially
>> >> >> >> >> >> for as important a job as a Supreme Court Justice.
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> If so, NO one
>> >> >> >> >> >> > would have a spotless reputation... ever.
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> Possibly.  However, I don't believe that everyone would
>> >> >> >> >> >> be accused of attempted rape in their past.
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> This woman is unsure where or
>> >> >> >> >> >> > when this happened, and the third party she claims was
>> >> >> >> >> >> > there, says he never witnessed any such incident
>> >> >> >> >> >> > anywhere. Her accounts of the alleged incident have
>> >> >> >> >> >> > varied at different times.  She claims she just
>> >> >> >> >> >> > "remembered" it after decades had passed.  There's not
>> >> >> >> >> >> > a scintilla of evidence from anyone to suggest this
>> >> >> >> >> >> > actually happened.  NO one should be judged by
>> >> >> >> >> >> > something this vague and vacuous.
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> The claim will be investigated as it should be,
>> >> >> >> >> >> especially for as important a position as a Supreme
>> >> >> >> >> >> Court Judge.
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> > The point is, the Democrats have already decided he's
>> >> >> >> >> > guilty...
>> >> >> >> >> > not out of any effort to be fair or objective, but simply
>> >> >> >> >> > because Trump is the President and nominated him.
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> And you know this how?  You're  a mind reader now?  Or just
>> >> >> >> >> showing your bias?  I suggest we take a wait and see
>> >> >> >> >> stance.
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > Nads has already convicted him, and so have virtually all
>> >> >> >> > the Democratic leaders in various news articles.  To
>> >> >> >> > continue this discussion with you at this point, is beyond
>> >> >> >> > the limits of my patience.  Perhaps you should go out and do
>> >> >> >> > some gardening.
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> I'm terribly sorry that discussing things with someone who has
>> >> >> >> a different opinion is so upsetting to you.
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > You lack any objectivity about this.  You automatically oppose
>> >> >> > Kavanaugh,
>> >> >> > despite the lack of any details or facts from his accuser,
>> >> >> > simply because you hate Trump.  A fact you make quite clear
>> >> >> > every day, despite the fact you're not even a citizen of this
>> >> >> > country.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> That is a patent lie.  I have been very objective about this
>> >> >> issue when you have not been.  You automatically believe her
>> >> >> accusation is false without giving her even a chance.  And my not
>> >> >> being a citizen has nothing to do with anything, except for you
>> >> >> to attempt to sling insults at me. You are as biased as anyone
>> >> >> could possibly be.
>> >> > 
>> >> > Giving her a chance for WHAT?  She hasn't given anyone anything to
>> >> > be objective about.  NO details, location, time, other
>> >> > witnesses... not ONE detail.  Now she's apparently not willing to
>> >> > even come forward to clear any of her allegations up.
>> >> 
>> >> She's testifying next Thursday.
>> > 
>> > I'll believe that when I see it.  How many promises to testify has
>> > she backed out of so far?  By the way... are you aware of the fact
>> > that in 1996, her parents lost a home to foreclosure, and the judge
>> > who ruled against them was Kavanaugh's mother?
>> 
>> I did not know that.  Thanx.
>> > 
>> >> WHAT is anybody going to investigate?  Her
>> >> > latest "demand," is that he testify first... about something he
>> >> > says he knows nothing about.  What in hell is he supposed to say? 
>> >> > If someone makes an accusation, they have to state what that
>> >> > accusation is, so he can respond.  That's how it works.  There is
>> >> > no reason to give any credence to a nebulous statement that takes
>> >> > us nowhere.
>> >> 
>> >> We won't know that for certain until it has been investigated.
>> > 
>> > If she ever manages to keep her promise to show up and testify.
>> > 
>> Indeed.
>>  
>> >> This is purely
>> >> > political, and I suspect the Democrats know she's a nutcase, but
>> >> > are using her anyway.  I think this whole thing is going to blow
>> >> > up when we learn more about the accuser.  As for your constant
>> >> > snarky comments about my President, I don't like them, and I think
>> >> > they're offensive, especially coming from someone who chose to
>> >> > live here rather in your own country.  I've always stuck up and
>> >> > defended you in here, but I also say what's on my mind, and will
>> >> > continue to do so.
>> >> 
>> >> As will I.
>> > 
>> > It's amazing how easily you turn on the only person in here who's
>> > defended you from numerous personal attacks for years.  Perhaps the
>> > others saw something that I completely missed.
>> 
>> If you say so.  I haven't turned on you, merely surprised at your back
>> stabbing.  Whatever....
> 
> Checky is no back stabber.

He has been to me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#208429

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2018-09-26 11:45 -0500
Message-ID<daqdnQHv3dQpKjbGnZ2dnUU7-SGdnZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#208123
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 11:34:09 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <GsOdnfaHM8q78zfGnZ2dnUU7-
> bmdnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> 
> 
> 
>> On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 12:46:09 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> 
>> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>> > by Checkmate!  In article <t4idnapbhPqlfDrGnZ2dnUU7-Y-
>> > dnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> >> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 14:45:18 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <g4ydnYrxQeek_DjGnZ2dnUU7-U-
>> >> > dnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> >> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:42:14 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> >> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <vbednT3b2NUv6j_GnZ2dnUU7-
>> >> >> > SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:41:35 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> > <CsWdnbhpWpFk3zzGnZ2dnUU7- audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>> >> >> >> > pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:21:43 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >> >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> >> > <CsWdnYZpWpHYozzGnZ2dnUU7- audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>> >> >> >> >> > pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:16:01 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >> >> >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> >> >> > <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7- audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> > pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > when reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > @gmail.invalid says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Melt, snowflakes,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > In article
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> goggles when reading posts by Checkmate!  In
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> article <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> hobnobbing with white supremacists,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> abysmal conditions in the concentration
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> camps in the southwest, attacks on
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> programs to combat climate change, attacks
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> on women and minorities, attacks on the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> poor, attacks on the citizenship rights of
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> minorities, brain drains, adverse court
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> rulings, cooperating witnesses,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> In other words, just another week in the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Trump regime:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/
>> week-96/
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Deutsche Bank. Uh-oh!
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > anyday now foil hat collector.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Manafort's going to tell the truth and there
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > won't be any collusion and even if there is,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > it's not illegal when The President does it,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > and if it is then Manafort's lying and 3,000
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Puerto Ricans didn't die so The President
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > gets A+ for his amazing management skills!
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> then date graped him!!!!2!
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > letter from a "sekret"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > so<SPANK>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> toast:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/
>> >> kavanaugh-
>> >> >> >> >> >> allegations-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> ford-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> palo-alto.html
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Not surprising the accuser is a psychology
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > professor. Most people get attracted to that field
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > because of their own issues.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  Now she claims she never told anyone because she
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  was afraid
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > he'd "kill" her.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > high school ever touches other people's naughty
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > parts, and if they do, they should never ever be
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > employed by anyone. Are you prepared to live in a
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > world where you can lose your job anytime someone
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > utters some accusation that you did something
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > naughty 35 years ago in high school?  Did YOU ever
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > do anything naughty in high school, Ko0k?
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> different than other jobs.  His reputation has to be
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> spotless.
>> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Does a person's reputation become spotted with the
>> >> >> >> >> >> > flimsiest of accusations alone... suddenly popping up
>> >> >> >> >> >> > after 36 years?
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> The accusation(s) must be investigated, yes.  Especially
>> >> >> >> >> >> for as important a job as a Supreme Court Justice.
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> If so, NO one
>> >> >> >> >> >> > would have a spotless reputation... ever.
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> Possibly.  However, I don't believe that everyone would
>> >> >> >> >> >> be accused of attempted rape in their past.
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> This woman is unsure where or
>> >> >> >> >> >> > when this happened, and the third party she claims was
>> >> >> >> >> >> > there, says he never witnessed any such incident
>> >> >> >> >> >> > anywhere. Her accounts of the alleged incident have
>> >> >> >> >> >> > varied at different times.  She claims she just
>> >> >> >> >> >> > "remembered" it after decades had passed.  There's not
>> >> >> >> >> >> > a scintilla of evidence from anyone to suggest this
>> >> >> >> >> >> > actually happened.  NO one should be judged by
>> >> >> >> >> >> > something this vague and vacuous.
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> The claim will be investigated as it should be,
>> >> >> >> >> >> especially for as important a position as a Supreme
>> >> >> >> >> >> Court Judge.
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> > The point is, the Democrats have already decided he's
>> >> >> >> >> > guilty...
>> >> >> >> >> > not out of any effort to be fair or objective, but simply
>> >> >> >> >> > because Trump is the President and nominated him.
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> And you know this how?  You're  a mind reader now?  Or just
>> >> >> >> >> showing your bias?  I suggest we take a wait and see
>> >> >> >> >> stance.
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > Nads has already convicted him, and so have virtually all
>> >> >> >> > the Democratic leaders in various news articles.  To
>> >> >> >> > continue this discussion with you at this point, is beyond
>> >> >> >> > the limits of my patience.  Perhaps you should go out and do
>> >> >> >> > some gardening.
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> I'm terribly sorry that discussing things with someone who has
>> >> >> >> a different opinion is so upsetting to you.
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > You lack any objectivity about this.  You automatically oppose
>> >> >> > Kavanaugh,
>> >> >> > despite the lack of any details or facts from his accuser,
>> >> >> > simply because you hate Trump.  A fact you make quite clear
>> >> >> > every day, despite the fact you're not even a citizen of this
>> >> >> > country.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> That is a patent lie.  I have been very objective about this
>> >> >> issue when you have not been.  You automatically believe her
>> >> >> accusation is false without giving her even a chance.  And my not
>> >> >> being a citizen has nothing to do with anything, except for you
>> >> >> to attempt to sling insults at me. You are as biased as anyone
>> >> >> could possibly be.
>> >> > 
>> >> > Giving her a chance for WHAT?  She hasn't given anyone anything to
>> >> > be objective about.  NO details, location, time, other
>> >> > witnesses... not ONE detail.  Now she's apparently not willing to
>> >> > even come forward to clear any of her allegations up.
>> >> 
>> >> She's testifying next Thursday.
>> > 
>> > I'll believe that when I see it.  How many promises to testify has
>> > she backed out of so far?  By the way... are you aware of the fact
>> > that in 1996, her parents lost a home to foreclosure, and the judge
>> > who ruled against them was Kavanaugh's mother?
>> 
>> I did not know that.  Thanx.
> 
> Apparently the initial statement by Judge Jeanine Pirro was inaccurate,
> as to Mrs. Kavanaugh's part in that case.

Thanx for clearing that up. 
> 
>> >> WHAT is anybody going to investigate?  Her
>> >> > latest "demand," is that he testify first... about something he
>> >> > says he knows nothing about.  What in hell is he supposed to say? 
>> >> > If someone makes an accusation, they have to state what that
>> >> > accusation is, so he can respond.  That's how it works.  There is
>> >> > no reason to give any credence to a nebulous statement that takes
>> >> > us nowhere.
>> >> 
>> >> We won't know that for certain until it has been investigated.
>> > 
>> > If she ever manages to keep her promise to show up and testify.
>> > 
>> Indeed.
> 
> And now, even more ridiculous claims are coming forward.  The latest one
> from someone who just determined that Judge Kavanaugh exposed himself to
> her... a notion that she just "came to realize" after talking to an
> attorney about it for six days.  She then reportedly started calling
> some of her friends to see if any of them thought she was right that
> Kavanaugh had done such a thing to her.  Apparently none of them felt
> so.
> 
> Then it gets even more ludicrous... notorious attention whore and porn
> star lawyer Michael Avenatti has apparently decided to join the circus,
> throwing out teasers yesterday that he has a "secret bombshell witness"
> that he plans to unleash upon the public after he manages to drum up
> enough drama.  Avenatti has also reportedly floated the idea of running
> for President in 2020.  I want the peanut concession for THAT circus.
> 
> Do you see the pattern?  Out of a pool of millions of people, you're
> always going to have a few nutcases who crave attention, or think lying
> serves a greater political agenda, and the longer this drags on, the
> more ridiculous it gets.
> 
> By all credible accounts, Brett Kavanaugh has lived a choir-boy type of
> life.  In his interview with Martha McCallum yesterday, the man looked
> absolutely devastated that people he doesn't even know would come
> forward and do this to him... and all the people coming right out and
> calling him a rapist, based on nothing but a flimsy, unsupported
> accusation.  U.S. Senators making outrageous statements like we MUST
> believe her simply because she's a woman.  No one's heard a shred of
> credible evidence from Blasey-Ford, who seems to be doing her damndest
> to avoid any scrutiny, and U.S. Senators (all Democrats, BTW) are
> actually calling Kavanaugh a rapist!  It's simply outrageous!
> 
We will just have to wait and see what comes out of this.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#208544

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2018-09-26 18:49 -0500
Message-ID<w-adnYClMbWJhjHGnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#208429
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 15:33:19 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <daqdnQHv3dQpKjbGnZ2dnUU7-
> SGdnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> 
> 
> 
>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 11:34:09 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> 
>> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>> > by Checkmate!  In article <GsOdnfaHM8q78zfGnZ2dnUU7-
>> > bmdnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> >> On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 12:46:09 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <t4idnapbhPqlfDrGnZ2dnUU7-Y-
>> >> > dnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> >> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 14:45:18 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> >> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <g4ydnYrxQeek_DjGnZ2dnUU7-U-
>> >> >> > dnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:42:14 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> > <vbednT3b2NUv6j_GnZ2dnUU7- SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>> >> >> >> > pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:41:35 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >> >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> >> > <CsWdnbhpWpFk3zzGnZ2dnUU7- audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>> >> >> >> >> > pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:21:43 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >> >> >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> >> >> > <CsWdnYZpWpHYozzGnZ2dnUU7- audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> > pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:16:01 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > when reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > goggles when reading posts by Checkmate!  In
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > article <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Skeeter wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > In article
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
<MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> goggles when reading posts by Checkmate!  In
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> article <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > In article
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> appointess hobnobbing with white
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> supremacists, abysmal conditions in the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> concentration camps in the southwest,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> attacks on programs to combat climate
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> change, attacks on women and
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> minorities, attacks on the poor,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> attacks on the citizenship rights of
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> minorities, brain drains, adverse court
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> rulings, cooperating witnesses,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> rapist.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> In other words, just another week in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> the Trump regime:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/
>> >> week-96/
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> from Deutsche Bank. Uh-oh!
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > anyday now foil hat collector.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Manafort's going to tell the truth and
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > there won't be any collusion and even if
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > there is,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > it's not illegal when The President does
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > it,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > and if it is then Manafort's lying and
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 3,000 Puerto Ricans didn't die so The
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > President gets A+ for his amazing
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > management skills!
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> and then date graped him!!!!2!
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > It is to laugh watching Diane with her
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > "sekret"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > letter from a "sekret"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > so<SPANK>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> toast:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/
>> >> >> kavanaugh-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> allegations-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ford-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> palo-alto.html
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Not surprising the accuser is a psychology
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > professor. Most people get attracted to that
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > field because of their own issues.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  Now she claims she never told anyone because
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >  she was afraid
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > he'd "kill" her.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > high school ever touches other people's naughty
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > parts, and if they do, they should never ever be
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > employed by anyone. Are you prepared to live in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > a world where you can lose your job anytime
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > someone utters some accusation that you did
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > something naughty 35 years ago in high school? 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Did YOU ever do anything naughty in high school,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Ko0k?
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> different than other jobs.  His reputation has to
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> be spotless.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Does a person's reputation become spotted with the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > flimsiest of accusations alone... suddenly popping
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > up after 36 years?
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> The accusation(s) must be investigated, yes. 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Especially for as important a job as a Supreme Court
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Justice.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> If so, NO one
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > would have a spotless reputation... ever.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Possibly.  However, I don't believe that everyone
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> would be accused of attempted rape in their past.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> This woman is unsure where or
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > when this happened, and the third party she claims
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > was there, says he never witnessed any such
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > incident anywhere. Her accounts of the alleged
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > incident have varied at different times.  She
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > claims she just "remembered" it after decades had
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > passed.  There's not a scintilla of evidence from
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > anyone to suggest this actually happened.  NO one
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > should be judged by something this vague and
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > vacuous.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> The claim will be investigated as it should be,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> especially for as important a position as a Supreme
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Court Judge.
>> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > The point is, the Democrats have already decided he's
>> >> >> >> >> >> > guilty...
>> >> >> >> >> >> > not out of any effort to be fair or objective, but
>> >> >> >> >> >> > simply because Trump is the President and nominated
>> >> >> >> >> >> > him.
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> And you know this how?  You're  a mind reader now?  Or
>> >> >> >> >> >> just showing your bias?  I suggest we take a wait and
>> >> >> >> >> >> see stance.
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> > Nads has already convicted him, and so have virtually all
>> >> >> >> >> > the Democratic leaders in various news articles.  To
>> >> >> >> >> > continue this discussion with you at this point, is
>> >> >> >> >> > beyond the limits of my patience.  Perhaps you should go
>> >> >> >> >> > out and do some gardening.
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> I'm terribly sorry that discussing things with someone who
>> >> >> >> >> has a different opinion is so upsetting to you.
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > You lack any objectivity about this.  You automatically
>> >> >> >> > oppose Kavanaugh,
>> >> >> >> > despite the lack of any details or facts from his accuser,
>> >> >> >> > simply because you hate Trump.  A fact you make quite clear
>> >> >> >> > every day, despite the fact you're not even a citizen of
>> >> >> >> > this country.
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> That is a patent lie.  I have been very objective about this
>> >> >> >> issue when you have not been.  You automatically believe her
>> >> >> >> accusation is false without giving her even a chance.  And my
>> >> >> >> not being a citizen has nothing to do with anything, except
>> >> >> >> for you to attempt to sling insults at me. You are as biased
>> >> >> >> as anyone could possibly be.
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > Giving her a chance for WHAT?  She hasn't given anyone anything
>> >> >> > to be objective about.  NO details, location, time, other
>> >> >> > witnesses... not ONE detail.  Now she's apparently not willing
>> >> >> > to even come forward to clear any of her allegations up.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> She's testifying next Thursday.
>> >> > 
>> >> > I'll believe that when I see it.  How many promises to testify has
>> >> > she backed out of so far?  By the way... are you aware of the fact
>> >> > that in 1996, her parents lost a home to foreclosure, and the
>> >> > judge who ruled against them was Kavanaugh's mother?
>> >> 
>> >> I did not know that.  Thanx.
>> > 
>> > Apparently the initial statement by Judge Jeanine Pirro was
>> > inaccurate, as to Mrs. Kavanaugh's part in that case.
>> 
>> Thanx for clearing that up.
>> > 
>> >> >> WHAT is anybody going to investigate?  Her
>> >> >> > latest "demand," is that he testify first... about something he
>> >> >> > says he knows nothing about.  What in hell is he supposed to
>> >> >> > say? If someone makes an accusation, they have to state what
>> >> >> > that accusation is, so he can respond.  That's how it works. 
>> >> >> > There is no reason to give any credence to a nebulous statement
>> >> >> > that takes us nowhere.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> We won't know that for certain until it has been investigated.
>> >> > 
>> >> > If she ever manages to keep her promise to show up and testify.
>> >> > 
>> >> Indeed.
>> > 
>> > And now, even more ridiculous claims are coming forward.  The latest
>> > one from someone who just determined that Judge Kavanaugh exposed
>> > himself to her... a notion that she just "came to realize" after
>> > talking to an attorney about it for six days.  She then reportedly
>> > started calling some of her friends to see if any of them thought she
>> > was right that Kavanaugh had done such a thing to her.  Apparently
>> > none of them felt so.
>> > 
>> > Then it gets even more ludicrous... notorious attention whore and
>> > porn star lawyer Michael Avenatti has apparently decided to join the
>> > circus, throwing out teasers yesterday that he has a "secret
>> > bombshell witness" that he plans to unleash upon the public after he
>> > manages to drum up enough drama.  Avenatti has also reportedly
>> > floated the idea of running for President in 2020.  I want the peanut
>> > concession for THAT circus.
>> > 
>> > Do you see the pattern?  Out of a pool of millions of people, you're
>> > always going to have a few nutcases who crave attention, or think
>> > lying serves a greater political agenda, and the longer this drags
>> > on, the more ridiculous it gets.
>> > 
>> > By all credible accounts, Brett Kavanaugh has lived a choir-boy type
>> > of life.  In his interview with Martha McCallum yesterday, the man
>> > looked absolutely devastated that people he doesn't even know would
>> > come forward and do this to him... and all the people coming right
>> > out and calling him a rapist, based on nothing but a flimsy,
>> > unsupported accusation.  U.S. Senators making outrageous statements
>> > like we MUST believe her simply because she's a woman.  No one's
>> > heard a shred of credible evidence from Blasey-Ford, who seems to be
>> > doing her damndest to avoid any scrutiny, and U.S. Senators (all
>> > Democrats, BTW) are actually calling Kavanaugh a rapist!  It's simply
>> > outrageous!
>> > 
>> We will just have to wait and see what comes out of this.
> 
> I'll be surprised if she even shows up, but I hope she does.  

I hope she does.  

It's not
> going to make a difference one way or the other, as far as people like
> Nads are concerned.  She's somehow already managed to find him guilty,
> knowing virtually nothing.  I have no respect whatsoever for people who
> think that way, as they obviously lack any sense of fairness or
> objectivity.

I concur.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 11 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 17  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate

csiph-web