Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #206649 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-21 08:18 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-09-21 13:36 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 81 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:18 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:33 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-21 10:56 -0500
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 12:05 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:40 -0600
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:43 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 19:51 +0000
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:11 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:16 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 21:15 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 14:18 -0600
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 14:24 -0600
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 14:33 -0600
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 22:00 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 17:04 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-21 19:41 -0500
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 09:00 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 16:38 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:55 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:15 -0600
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:17 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 09:07 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-22 11:37 -0600
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 13:47 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 12:22 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:28 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:24 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 01:21 +0000
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:36 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:38 +0000
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-09-22 11:14 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:14 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-09-22 15:02 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:12 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-09-22 17:53 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 13:44 -0500
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 12:17 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-09-22 20:36 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:44 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 08:45 -0600
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 09:07 -0600
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 12:17 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 14:08 -0600
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 20:25 +0000
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:35 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 20:54 +0000
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:18 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:43 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-21 23:05 +0000
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 16:07 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:21 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 20:02 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:26 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:39 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-22 04:00 +0000
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-22 11:17 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 15:56 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-23 00:06 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 16:10 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-23 00:27 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 16:31 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 09:04 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 15:06 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:16 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 16:36 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:44 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:53 +0100
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:13 -0600
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 16:19 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:25 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 09:06 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:23 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 23:32 +0000
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:56 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 17:06 -0400
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:14 -0700
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:28 +0000
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:36 -0600
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:40 -0600
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:39 -0600
Re: The Colorado River is evaporating, and climate change is a big culprit Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-09-21 13:36 -0500
Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 Next page →
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-23 09:07 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36115a2030cc7622989a80@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #207530 |
In article <bk4uqk.efs.19.4@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > On 2018-09-23 7:45 AM, Skeeter wrote: > > In article <po88s8$1pii$11@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 > > @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >> > >> On 9/22/2018 3:36 PM, Ï wrote: > >>> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> On 2018-09-22 7:02 AM, Ï wrote: > >>>>> kensi declared: > >>>>>> On 9/22/2018 6:14 AM, Ï wrote: > >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>> Sounds like a multiple personality disorder to me. > >>>>>>> Ïn Pembroke where we all live. > >>>>>> You're a poster boy for Fregoli syndrome, B!lge. > >>>>> Ï had to look that up. > >>>> did you like what you found > >>> Ït was a bit confusing. > >> > >> I don't see why it would be. It should seem really familiar; the > >> description fits you to a T. > > > > You really need to get out more often. > > > its cold out here now , 32 87 today here, have to help a friend replace a counter top, don't feel like it, my team plays today.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 12:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bk2q1o.a89.17.6@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #207141 |
On 2018-09-22 3:14 AM, Ï wrote: > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: > >> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 2018-09-21 6:21 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On 9/21/2018 1:51 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2018-09-21 12:40 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>> On 9/21/2018 10:05 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 9/21/2018 11:33 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 9/21/2018 8:18 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Climate scientists found that the Colorado River's diminishing flow >>>>>>>>>>> over the last century is largely due to rising temperatures >>>>>>>>>>> evaporating the river: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://mashable.com/article/colorado-river-drought-global-warming/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "Mashable"!!! Bwhahahahaha! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nobody is supposed to notice that evaporation is caused by larger >>>>>>>>>> areas of water behind the dam that<SPANK> >>>>>>>>> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. >>>>>>>>> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, as >>>>>>>>> a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. >>>>>>>>> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Would not a global temperature increase result in more >>>>>>>> evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor >>>>>>>> in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more >>>>>>>> rainfall over land? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level >>>>>> >>>>>> Thus demonstrating the technical acumen of a gold fish. >>>>> >>>>> See how you fail to refute IDEAS and instead attack me as a person -- >>>>> and do so with absurd lies. >>>> >>>> Unless % is you posting as someone else, I wasn't talking to you, idiot. >>>> >>>> <snip babble> >>>> >>>> >>> i'm everybody here except you >> >> Sounds like a multiple personality disorder to me. > > Ïn Pembroke where we all live. > i'm still waiting to see a personality in order
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 14:08 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <6dcpD.65644$um3.8415@fx32.iad> |
| In reply to | #206830 |
On 9/21/2018 1:43 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-09-21 12:40 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 9/21/2018 10:05 AM, kensi wrote: >>> On 9/21/2018 11:33 AM, benj wrote: >>>> On 9/21/2018 8:18 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>> Climate scientists found that the Colorado River's diminishing flow >>>>> over the last century is largely due to rising temperatures >>>>> evaporating the river: >>>>> >>>>> https://mashable.com/article/colorado-river-drought-global-warming/ >>>> >>>> "Mashable"!!! Bwhahahahaha! >>>> >>>> Nobody is supposed to notice that evaporation is caused by larger >>>> areas of water behind the dam that<SPANK> >>> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. >>> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, >>> as a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. >>> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). >> >> Would not a global temperature increase result in more >> evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor >> in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more >> rainfall over land? >> > no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level Virtually all rain on land originates as water vapor from ocean evaporation. More evaporation = greater humidity = more rain. Yes, that would include more ocean rain, but how can you possibly say it would not also include more landfall rain?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 20:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <6m0g7f-m4k.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #206840 |
In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: > On 9/21/2018 1:43 PM, % wrote: >> On 2018-09-21 12:40 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 9/21/2018 10:05 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> On 9/21/2018 11:33 AM, benj wrote: >>>>> On 9/21/2018 8:18 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>> Climate scientists found that the Colorado River's diminishing flow >>>>>> over the last century is largely due to rising temperatures >>>>>> evaporating the river: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://mashable.com/article/colorado-river-drought-global-warming/ >>>>> >>>>> "Mashable"!!! Bwhahahahaha! >>>>> >>>>> Nobody is supposed to notice that evaporation is caused by larger >>>>> areas of water behind the dam that<SPANK> >>>> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. >>>> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, >>>> as a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. >>>> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). >>> >>> Would not a global temperature increase result in more >>> evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor >>> in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more >>> rainfall over land? >>> >> no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level > > Virtually all rain on land originates as water vapor > from ocean evaporation. More evaporation = greater > humidity = more rain. Yes, that would include more > ocean rain, but how can you possibly say it would not > also include more landfall rain? It's education apparently stopped at about the third grade. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 13:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bk0a7j.qi3.17.6@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #206862 |
On 2018-09-21 1:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >> On 9/21/2018 1:43 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2018-09-21 12:40 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 9/21/2018 10:05 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>> On 9/21/2018 11:33 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>> On 9/21/2018 8:18 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> Climate scientists found that the Colorado River's diminishing flow >>>>>>> over the last century is largely due to rising temperatures >>>>>>> evaporating the river: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://mashable.com/article/colorado-river-drought-global-warming/ >>>>>> >>>>>> "Mashable"!!! Bwhahahahaha! >>>>>> >>>>>> Nobody is supposed to notice that evaporation is caused by larger >>>>>> areas of water behind the dam that<SPANK> >>>>> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. >>>>> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, >>>>> as a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. >>>>> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). >>>> >>>> Would not a global temperature increase result in more >>>> evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor >>>> in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more >>>> rainfall over land? >>>> >>> no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level >> >> Virtually all rain on land originates as water vapor >> from ocean evaporation. More evaporation = greater >> humidity = more rain. Yes, that would include more >> ocean rain, but how can you possibly say it would not >> also include more landfall rain? > > It's education apparently stopped at about the third grade. > education is not important when it comes to rain
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 20:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <7d2g7f-kak.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #206870 |
In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2018-09-21 1:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >>> On 9/21/2018 1:43 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2018-09-21 12:40 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> On 9/21/2018 10:05 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>> On 9/21/2018 11:33 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/21/2018 8:18 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>> Climate scientists found that the Colorado River's diminishing flow >>>>>>>> over the last century is largely due to rising temperatures >>>>>>>> evaporating the river: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://mashable.com/article/colorado-river-drought-global-warming/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Mashable"!!! Bwhahahahaha! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nobody is supposed to notice that evaporation is caused by larger >>>>>>> areas of water behind the dam that<SPANK> >>>>>> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. >>>>>> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, >>>>>> as a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. >>>>>> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). >>>>> >>>>> Would not a global temperature increase result in more >>>>> evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor >>>>> in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more >>>>> rainfall over land? >>>>> >>>> no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level >>> >>> Virtually all rain on land originates as water vapor >>> from ocean evaporation. More evaporation = greater >>> humidity = more rain. Yes, that would include more >>> ocean rain, but how can you possibly say it would not >>> also include more landfall rain? >> >> It's education apparently stopped at about the third grade. >> > education is not important when it comes to rain Yet again, the comprehension and composition skills of a third grader. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 14:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.360effffddb906b994b49@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #206893 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <7d2g7f-kak.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... > > In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 2018-09-21 1:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: > >>> On 9/21/2018 1:43 PM, % wrote: > >>>> On 2018-09-21 12:40 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > >>>>> On 9/21/2018 10:05 AM, kensi wrote: > >>>>>> On 9/21/2018 11:33 AM, benj wrote: > >>>>>>> On 9/21/2018 8:18 AM, kensi wrote: > >>>>>>>> Climate scientists found that the Colorado River's diminishing flow > >>>>>>>> over the last century is largely due to rising temperatures > >>>>>>>> evaporating the river: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> https://mashable.com/article/colorado-river-drought-global-warming/ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> "Mashable"!!! Bwhahahahaha! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Nobody is supposed to notice that evaporation is caused by larger > >>>>>>> areas of water behind the dam that<SPANK> > >>>>>> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. > >>>>>> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, > >>>>>> as a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. > >>>>>> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). > >>>>> > >>>>> Would not a global temperature increase result in more > >>>>> evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor > >>>>> in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more > >>>>> rainfall over land? > >>>>> > >>>> no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level > >>> > >>> Virtually all rain on land originates as water vapor > >>> from ocean evaporation. More evaporation = greater > >>> humidity = more rain. Yes, that would include more > >>> ocean rain, but how can you possibly say it would not > >>> also include more landfall rain? > >> > >> It's education apparently stopped at about the third grade. > >> > > education is not important when it comes to rain > > Yet again, the comprehension and composition skills of a third grader. He can do this indefinitely... -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 14:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bk0e6p.aeh.17.4@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #206893 |
On 2018-09-21 1:54 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 2018-09-21 1:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >>>> On 9/21/2018 1:43 PM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2018-09-21 12:40 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 9/21/2018 10:05 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/21/2018 11:33 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>> On 9/21/2018 8:18 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>> Climate scientists found that the Colorado River's diminishing flow >>>>>>>>> over the last century is largely due to rising temperatures >>>>>>>>> evaporating the river: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://mashable.com/article/colorado-river-drought-global-warming/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Mashable"!!! Bwhahahahaha! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nobody is supposed to notice that evaporation is caused by larger >>>>>>>> areas of water behind the dam that<SPANK> >>>>>>> Evaporation of a water body scales with the top side surface area. >>>>>>> Volume scales as surface area times depth. Ergo evaporation losses, >>>>>>> as a fraction of volume, are *reduced* for deep water bodies (e.g. >>>>>>> reservoirs) compared to shallow ones (e.g. rivers). >>>>>> >>>>>> Would not a global temperature increase result in more >>>>>> evaporation from ocean surfaces, putting more water vapor >>>>>> in the atmosphere, which would eventually lead to more >>>>>> rainfall over land? >>>>>> >>>>> no it goes back into the ocean and raises the level >>>> >>>> Virtually all rain on land originates as water vapor >>>> from ocean evaporation. More evaporation = greater >>>> humidity = more rain. Yes, that would include more >>>> ocean rain, but how can you possibly say it would not >>>> also include more landfall rain? >>> >>> It's education apparently stopped at about the third grade. >>> >> education is not important when it comes to rain > > Yet again, the comprehension and composition skills of a third grader. > and more from doctor rerun
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 23:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g0lbqgFcbaaU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #206893 |
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 20:54:31 +0000, jimp wrote:
> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2018-09-21 1:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> It's education apparently stopped at about the third grade.
^^^^^
>> education is not important when it comes to rain
> Yet again, the comprehension and composition skills of a third grader.
Is there irony here?
--
-v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 16:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bk0j4r.c9n.19.9@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #206954 |
On 2018-09-21 4:05 PM, vallor wrote: > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 20:54:31 +0000, jimp wrote: > >> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 2018-09-21 1:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>>> It's education apparently stopped at about the third grade. > ^^^^^ >>> education is not important when it comes to rain > >> Yet again, the comprehension and composition skills of a third grader. > > Is there irony here? > just someone who doesn't know what he's walking into
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 18:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.360f38e986b8498e994b62@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #206956 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <bk0j4r.c9n.19.9@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > On 2018-09-21 4:05 PM, vallor wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 20:54:31 +0000, jimp wrote: > > > >> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On 2018-09-21 1:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > > >>>> It's education apparently stopped at about the third grade. > > ^^^^^ > >>> education is not important when it comes to rain > > > >> Yet again, the comprehension and composition skills of a third grader. > > > > Is there irony here? > > > just someone who doesn't know what he's walking into Gee... you're pretty fuckin' scary. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 20:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po40rd$1g72$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #206954 |
On 9/21/2018 7:05 PM, vallor wrote: > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 20:54:31 +0000, jimp wrote: >> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 2018-09-21 1:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>>> It's education apparently stopped at about the third grade. > ^^^^^ >>> education is not important when it comes to rain > >> Yet again, the comprehension and composition skills of a third grader. > > Is there irony here? Its expert's talking. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 18:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.360f3a383d2fd990994b64@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #206977 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <po40rd$1g72$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... > > On 9/21/2018 7:05 PM, vallor wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 20:54:31 +0000, jimp wrote: > >> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On 2018-09-21 1:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > > >>>> It's education apparently stopped at about the third grade. > > ^^^^^ > >>> education is not important when it comes to rain > > > >> Yet again, the comprehension and composition skills of a third grader. > > > > Is there irony here? > > Its expert's talking. You forgot the orphaned and arbitrary comma: Its expert's , talking. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 17:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.360f2f126b72f592994b54@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #206954 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <g0lbqgFcbaaU1@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org says... > > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 20:54:31 +0000, jimp wrote: > > > In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2018-09-21 1:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > >>> It's education apparently stopped at about the third grade. > ^^^^^ > >> education is not important when it comes to rain > > > Yet again, the comprehension and composition skills of a third grader. > > Is there irony here? While it's true that the possessive form of "it" doesn't require an apostrophe, that seems awfully pedantic. I mean, the possessive form of everything-else-that-I-can-think-of requires one. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 04:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g0lt20FcbaaU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #206984 |
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 17:39:21 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <g0lbqgFcbaaU1@mid.individual.net>, > vallor@cultnix.org says... > > > >> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 20:54:31 +0000, jimp wrote: >> >> > In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 2018-09-21 1:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >> >>> It's education apparently stopped at about the third grade. >> ^^^^^ >> >> education is not important when it comes to rain >> >> > Yet again, the comprehension and composition skills of a third >> > grader. >> >> Is there irony here? > > While it's true that the possessive form of "it" doesn't require an > apostrophe, that seems awfully pedantic. I mean, the possessive form > of everything-else-that-I-can-think-of requires one. Possessive pronouns rarely have their words ending with apostrophes...sometimes not even with s's. One's proper grammar can almost always count on it. -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 11:17 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nvj0ly.t8jlnd250mssN%onion@anon.invalid> |
| In reply to | #206984 |
Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > In article <g0lbqgFcbaaU1@mid.individual.net>, > vallor@cultnix.org says... > > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 20:54:31 +0000, jimp wrote: > > > In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On 2018-09-21 1:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > > > >>> It's education apparently stopped at about the third grade. > > ^^^^^ > > >> education is not important when it comes to rain > > > > > Yet again, the comprehension and composition skills of a third grader. > > > > Is there irony here? > > While it's true that the possessive form of "it" doesn't require an > apostrophe, that seems awfully pedantic. I mean, the possessive form > of everything-else-that-I-can-think-of requires one. alt.possessive.its.has.no.apostrophe added. -- \|/ (((Ï))) U+97F1 Wearing an On!on on his belt, which was the style at the time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 15:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361068785b225393994bb0@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #207142 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <1nvj0ly.t8jlnd250mssN%onion@anon.invalid>, onion@anon.invalid says... > > Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > > > In article <g0lbqgFcbaaU1@mid.individual.net>, > > vallor@cultnix.org says... > > > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 20:54:31 +0000, jimp wrote: > > > > In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On 2018-09-21 1:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > > > > > >>> It's education apparently stopped at about the third grade. > > > ^^^^^ > > > >> education is not important when it comes to rain > > > > > > > Yet again, the comprehension and composition skills of a third grader. > > > > > > Is there irony here? > > > > While it's true that the possessive form of "it" doesn't require an > > apostrophe, that seems awfully pedantic. I mean, the possessive form > > of everything-else-that-I-can-think-of requires one. > > alt.possessive.its.has.no.apostrophe added. That's really a thing? -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-23 00:06 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nvk07p.klvwt57izxzzN%onion@anon.invalid> |
| In reply to | #207399 |
Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > In article <1nvj0ly.t8jlnd250mssN%onion@anon.invalid>, > onion@anon.invalid says... > > Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > > > In article <g0lbqgFcbaaU1@mid.individual.net>, > > > vallor@cultnix.org says... > > > > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 20:54:31 +0000, jimp wrote: > > > > > In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >> On 2018-09-21 1:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > > > > > > > >>> It's education apparently stopped at about the third grade. > > > > ^^^^^ > > > > >> education is not important when it comes to rain > > > > > > > > > Yet again, the comprehension and composition skills of a third grader. > > > > > > > > Is there irony here? > > > > > > While it's true that the possessive form of "it" doesn't require an > > > apostrophe, that seems awfully pedantic. I mean, the possessive form > > > of everything-else-that-I-can-think-of requires one. > > > > alt.possessive.its.has.no.apostrophe added. > > That's really a thing? Why, certainly, Stanley. apihna is a bit quiet these days, but it's still there. -- \|/ (((Ï))) U+97F1 Wearing an On!on on his belt, which was the style at the time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 16:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bk37nd.8uk.17.15@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #207407 |
On 2018-09-22 4:06 PM, Mr On!on wrote: > Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > >> In article <1nvj0ly.t8jlnd250mssN%onion@anon.invalid>, >> onion@anon.invalid says... >>> Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> In article <g0lbqgFcbaaU1@mid.individual.net>, >>>> vallor@cultnix.org says... >>>>> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 20:54:31 +0000, jimp wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2018-09-21 1:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> It's education apparently stopped at about the third grade. >>>>> ^^^^^ >>>>>>> education is not important when it comes to rain >>>>> >>>>>> Yet again, the comprehension and composition skills of a third grader. >>>>> >>>>> Is there irony here? >>>> >>>> While it's true that the possessive form of "it" doesn't require an >>>> apostrophe, that seems awfully pedantic. I mean, the possessive form >>>> of everything-else-that-I-can-think-of requires one. >>> >>> alt.possessive.its.has.no.apostrophe added. >> >> That's really a thing? > > Why, certainly, Stanley. > apihna is a bit quiet these days, but it's still there. > stanley , LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-23 00:27 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nvk15q.ze8tlc8bw0ddN%onion@anon.invalid> |
| In reply to | #207410 |
% <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2018-09-22 4:06 PM, Mr On!on wrote: > > Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> In article <1nvj0ly.t8jlnd250mssN%onion@anon.invalid>, > >> onion@anon.invalid says... > >>> Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> In article <g0lbqgFcbaaU1@mid.individual.net>, > >>>> vallor@cultnix.org says... > >>>>> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 20:54:31 +0000, jimp wrote: > >>>>>> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> On 2018-09-21 1:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>>>> It's education apparently stopped at about the third grade. > >>>>> ^^^^^ > >>>>>>> education is not important when it comes to rain > >>>>> > >>>>>> Yet again, the comprehension and composition skills of a third grader. > >>>>> > >>>>> Is there irony here? > >>>> > >>>> While it's true that the possessive form of "it" doesn't require an > >>>> apostrophe, that seems awfully pedantic. I mean, the possessive form > >>>> of everything-else-that-I-can-think-of requires one. > >>> > >>> alt.possessive.its.has.no.apostrophe added. > >> > >> That's really a thing? > > > > Why, certainly, Stanley. > > apihna is a bit quiet these days, but it's still there. > > > stanley , LOL This place is entirely Laurel & Hardy, except when it's Mutt & Jeff. -- \|/ (((Ï))) U+97F1 Wearing an On!on on his belt, which was the style at the time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web