Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #200505 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-03 12:44 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-09-10 11:02 -0400 |
| Articles | 10 on this page of 50 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-03 12:44 -0400
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 10:40 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-06 13:28 -0400
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 12:17 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-09-08 15:22 -0400
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-08 20:27 +0000
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 14:55 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-09 13:56 -0400
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-09 11:10 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-10 10:37 -0400
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 10:34 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-10 12:19 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 13:24 -0600
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. aaa <jeo@somewhere.org> - 2018-09-10 16:31 -0400
Genesis' creation story in is about leaving home to start a family. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-10 14:22 -0700
Re: Genesis' creation story in is about leaving home to start a family. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-11 00:11 -0500
Re: Genesis' creation story in is about leaving home to start a family. Gronk <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-16 14:40 -0600
Eve was the wife, it was incestuous. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-16 16:41 -0700
Re: Eve was the wife, it was incestuous. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 17:08 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-10 17:32 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. aaa <jeo@somewhere.org> - 2018-09-10 22:19 -0400
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-11 10:07 -0400
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-11 13:29 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 11:25 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-09 11:51 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-10 10:57 -0400
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-10 11:05 -0400
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-10 09:18 -0600
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-10 12:22 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-10 15:51 +0000
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-10 12:24 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 13:28 -0600
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-10 12:50 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 13:56 -0600
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-10 13:29 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-10 15:01 -0600
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-10 15:30 -0600
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 10:37 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-11 10:07 -0400
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 07:24 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-11 10:59 -0400
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-11 16:37 +0000
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-11 10:57 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-11 13:30 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 14:34 -0600
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-11 13:19 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-11 14:44 -0600
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-09 19:00 +0000
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-09 12:18 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-10 11:02 -0400
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-11 10:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pn8l8b$rno$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #203589 |
On 9/11/2018 10:24 AM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <kbgfpd1n0npj6u2ocms62qaf5i0e7lpqog@4ax.com>, > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > >> >> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 10:37:47 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> <...> >> >>> But how could humans evolve over millions of years, when the Earth is >>> only 6,000 years old? That explanation doesn't work. As I recall the >>> story of Adam and Eve, they were the first and ONLY humans. >> >> I don't know for sure about the veracity of >> the 6,000 year time frame. But, 6,000 or 60,000, >> it doesn't really matter at all. >> >> What matters is God created man in His image >> and he did so well after man not in His image >> evolved or was evolving. >> >> Apparently, appearance-wise the two were quite >> similar. This tells me "God's image" pertains >> more to the brain/mind than to the physical >> body. Adam originally did not know good and >> evil. His knowledge of good and evil came later >> when Eve tempted him and he learned it. >> >> Evolved man was inherently evil, knew the difference >> and actually embraced evil. > > I've never seen anything in the bible that says there were other humans > around at the time he supposedly created Adam and Eve, and why would he > need to use a rib from Adam to create Eve? He didn't need one to create > Adam. Admit it, the whole story is just stupid. But absolutely true! -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-11 16:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1bSlD.66149$MN2.31262@fx02.iad> |
| In reply to | #203594 |
On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 10:59:13 -0400, mixed nuts wrote: > On 9/11/2018 10:24 AM, Checkmate wrote: >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <kbgfpd1n0npj6u2ocms62qaf5i0e7lpqog@4ax.com>, >> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >> >> >> >>> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 10:37:47 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> <...> >>> >>>> But how could humans evolve over millions of years, when the Earth is >>>> only 6,000 years old? That explanation doesn't work. As I recall >>>> the story of Adam and Eve, they were the first and ONLY humans. >>> >>> I don't know for sure about the veracity of the 6,000 year time frame. >>> But, 6,000 or 60,000, >>> it doesn't really matter at all. >>> >>> What matters is God created man in His image and he did so well after >>> man not in His image evolved or was evolving. >>> >>> Apparently, appearance-wise the two were quite similar. This tells me >>> "God's image" pertains more to the brain/mind than to the physical >>> body. Adam originally did not know good and evil. His knowledge of >>> good and evil came later when Eve tempted him and he learned it. >>> >>> Evolved man was inherently evil, knew the difference and actually >>> embraced evil. >> >> I've never seen anything in the bible that says there were other humans >> around at the time he supposedly created Adam and Eve, and why would he >> need to use a rib from Adam to create Eve? He didn't need one to >> create Adam. Admit it, the whole story is just stupid. > > But absolutely true! Back then, if you had suggested to people that they are mostly a creature evolved from monkeys (something they were probably never exposed to anyway), you probably would have been cast out of society as a demon. The Adam and Eve story is therefore more acceptable. However, let's not forget that Evolution is a theory. It's more believable than the Creation story, but still an assumption. -- SilverSlimer FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate Absolute centrist, proud Catholic
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-11 10:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fvqe13Fr3j7U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #203612 |
On 9/11/18 9:37 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 10:59:13 -0400, mixed nuts wrote: > >> On 9/11/2018 10:24 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <kbgfpd1n0npj6u2ocms62qaf5i0e7lpqog@4ax.com>, >>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 10:37:47 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> <...> >>>> >>>>> But how could humans evolve over millions of years, when the Earth is >>>>> only 6,000 years old? That explanation doesn't work. As I recall >>>>> the story of Adam and Eve, they were the first and ONLY humans. >>>> >>>> I don't know for sure about the veracity of the 6,000 year time frame. >>>> But, 6,000 or 60,000, >>>> it doesn't really matter at all. >>>> >>>> What matters is God created man in His image and he did so well after >>>> man not in His image evolved or was evolving. >>>> >>>> Apparently, appearance-wise the two were quite similar. This tells me >>>> "God's image" pertains more to the brain/mind than to the physical >>>> body. Adam originally did not know good and evil. His knowledge of >>>> good and evil came later when Eve tempted him and he learned it. >>>> >>>> Evolved man was inherently evil, knew the difference and actually >>>> embraced evil. >>> >>> I've never seen anything in the bible that says there were other humans >>> around at the time he supposedly created Adam and Eve, and why would he >>> need to use a rib from Adam to create Eve? He didn't need one to >>> create Adam. Admit it, the whole story is just stupid. >> >> But absolutely true! > > Back then, if you had suggested to people that they are mostly a creature > evolved from monkeys (something they were probably never exposed to > anyway), you probably would have been cast out of society as a demon. The > Adam and Eve story is therefore more acceptable. Evolved from monkeys? And they did not write about evolution because the story came far before that understanding. > However, let's not forget that Evolution is a theory. It's more > believable than the Creation story, but still an assumption. A theory is a LOT more than an "assumption". A whole lot more. It is something that has withstood plenty of inquiry and has been shown to fit the facts time and time again. In colloquial terms it is a fact. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-11 13:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fvqmvdFt078U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #203589 |
On 9/11/18 7:24 AM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <kbgfpd1n0npj6u2ocms62qaf5i0e7lpqog@4ax.com>, > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > >> >> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 10:37:47 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> <...> >> >>> But how could humans evolve over millions of years, when the Earth is >>> only 6,000 years old? That explanation doesn't work. As I recall the >>> story of Adam and Eve, they were the first and ONLY humans. >> >> I don't know for sure about the veracity of >> the 6,000 year time frame. But, 6,000 or 60,000, >> it doesn't really matter at all. >> >> What matters is God created man in His image >> and he did so well after man not in His image >> evolved or was evolving. >> >> Apparently, appearance-wise the two were quite >> similar. This tells me "God's image" pertains >> more to the brain/mind than to the physical >> body. Adam originally did not know good and >> evil. His knowledge of good and evil came later >> when Eve tempted him and he learned it. >> >> Evolved man was inherently evil, knew the difference >> and actually embraced evil. > > I've never seen anything in the bible that says there were other humans > around at the time he supposedly created Adam and Eve, and why would he > need to use a rib from Adam to create Eve? He didn't need one to create > Adam. Admit it, the whole story is just stupid. > Pretty much. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-11 14:34 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <bj5ueu.jqj.19.4@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #203675 |
On 2018-09-11 2:30 PM, Snit wrote: > On 9/11/18 7:24 AM, Checkmate wrote: >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <kbgfpd1n0npj6u2ocms62qaf5i0e7lpqog@4ax.com>, >> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >> >> >>> >>> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 10:37:47 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> <...> >>> >>>> But how could humans evolve over millions of years, when the Earth is >>>> only 6,000 years old? That explanation doesn't work. As I recall the >>>> story of Adam and Eve, they were the first and ONLY humans. >>> >>> I don't know for sure about the veracity of >>> the 6,000 year time frame. But, 6,000 or 60,000, >>> it doesn't really matter at all. >>> >>> What matters is God created man in His image >>> and he did so well after man not in His image >>> evolved or was evolving. >>> >>> Apparently, appearance-wise the two were quite >>> similar. This tells me "God's image" pertains >>> more to the brain/mind than to the physical >>> body. Adam originally did not know good and >>> evil. His knowledge of good and evil came later >>> when Eve tempted him and he learned it. >>> >>> Evolved man was inherently evil, knew the difference >>> and actually embraced evil. >> >> I've never seen anything in the bible that says there were other humans >> around at the time he supposedly created Adam and Eve, and why would he >> need to use a rib from Adam to create Eve? He didn't need one to create >> Adam. Admit it, the whole story is just stupid. >> > Pretty much. > if i believe and its true , lucky me , if you don't believe and it is true you're in a lot of shit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-11 13:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fvqmaaFsqquU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #203586 |
On 9/11/18 7:07 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 10:37:47 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > > <...> > >> But how could humans evolve over millions of years, when the Earth is >> only 6,000 years old? That explanation doesn't work. As I recall the >> story of Adam and Eve, they were the first and ONLY humans. > > I don't know for sure about the veracity of > the 6,000 year time frame. But, 6,000 or 60,000, > it doesn't really matter at all. > > What matters is God created man in His image > and he did so well after man not in His image > evolved or was evolving. > > Apparently, appearance-wise the two were quite > similar. This tells me "God's image" pertains > more to the brain/mind than to the physical > body. I have the brain of a god. Cool! > Adam originally did not know good and > evil. His knowledge of good and evil came later > when Eve tempted him and he learned it. Right... because in the Bible having knowledge was a bad thing... something only Satan would want you to have. LOL! > Evolved man was inherently evil, knew the difference > and actually embraced evil. Trump supporters? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-11 14:44 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3601d705c070860c9897d8@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #203662 |
In article <fvqmaaFsqquU2@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > > Evolved man was inherently evil, knew the difference > > and actually embraced evil. > > Trump supporters? > Obsession and butthurt noted.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-09 19:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <J5elD.27781$SN2.18978@fx38.iad> |
| In reply to | #202898 |
On Sun, 09 Sep 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 14:55:54 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >>According to the Adam and Eve fairytale, we're ALL the products of >>incest. One of the many flaws in the X-tian pile of dogma. > > It is clear you never took the time to study the Bible or you wouldn't > make such a stupid claim. > > Adam and Eve were NOT brother and sister. > Their male children took wives who were not their relatives. Read > Genesis please. If Adam and Eve were the first two people and they both had male children, one has to wonder where the wives came from. To say the least, I'm not a big fan of the Old Testament. -- SilverSlimer FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate Absolute centrist, proud Catholic
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-09 12:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fvla0kFpinbU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #202934 |
On 9/9/18 12:00 PM, SilverSlimer wrote: > On Sun, 09 Sep 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >> On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 14:55:54 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >>> According to the Adam and Eve fairytale, we're ALL the products of >>> incest. One of the many flaws in the X-tian pile of dogma. >> >> It is clear you never took the time to study the Bible or you wouldn't >> make such a stupid claim. >> >> Adam and Eve were NOT brother and sister. >> Their male children took wives who were not their relatives. Read >> Genesis please. > > If Adam and Eve were the first two people and they both had male > children, one has to wonder where the wives came from. > > To say the least, I'm not a big fan of the Old Testament. > The Christian texts are as absurd and teach as much evil as the Muslim ones. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-10 11:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <5r1dpdt8c2qdhndfcehpc2gkch2d0j7oba@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #202934 |
On Sun, 09 Sep 2018 19:00:57 GMT, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: >On Sun, 09 Sep 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >> On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 14:55:54 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >>>According to the Adam and Eve fairytale, we're ALL the products of >>>incest. One of the many flaws in the X-tian pile of dogma. >> >> It is clear you never took the time to study the Bible or you wouldn't >> make such a stupid claim. >> >> Adam and Eve were NOT brother and sister. >> Their male children took wives who were not their relatives. Read >> Genesis please. > >If Adam and Eve were the first two people and they both had male >children, one has to wonder where the wives came from. > >To say the least, I'm not a big fan of the Old Testament. Message-ID: <ld1dpd50l4kpdfd9iqlujgbksuk1uloiqs@4ax.com> -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall "Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. (There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web