Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #170017 > unrolled thread
| Started by | !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-06-01 08:00 -0500 |
| Last post | 2018-06-05 18:51 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 244 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-01 08:00 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 06:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:28 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 19:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:27 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 21:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:44 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:19 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:23 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 20:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 22:09 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 21:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-03 23:48 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 13:44 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:19 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 23:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 13:57 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-04 02:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:58 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 22:19 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 20:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:26 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 14:00 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 22:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:39 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 07:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 15:20 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:34 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-05 22:57 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-07 15:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 16:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-07 20:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 06:41 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-08 08:29 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 08:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:16 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-08 08:30 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 14:07 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 17:07 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 16:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 16:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:15 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 22:13 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 20:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:41 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-05 02:29 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 07:50 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 07:41 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-05 10:38 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 10:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 12:55 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 07:58 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 08:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 11:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-06-05 14:58 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 12:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 13:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 14:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 17:21 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 17:43 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-05 22:44 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:49 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:45 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 17:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 22:42 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 18:21 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:46 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:45 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:36 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 18:05 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 22:55 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 21:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-09 02:13 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 23:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 06:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:16 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 08:28 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:50 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 09:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 10:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 10:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 20:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 21:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-10 14:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 14:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 14:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 15:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 17:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-09 13:42 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-09 16:24 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-09 17:31 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 23:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-10 00:21 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-10 05:26 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 05:52 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 23:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-10 07:04 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-10 04:35 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 08:36 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 11:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 12:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 12:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 15:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 15:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-10 01:39 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 08:36 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-10 15:46 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 15:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 18:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-09 12:22 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 10:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-09 13:22 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Corwin Esterness <woolcross@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 10:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-09 13:31 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 10:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-09 12:00 -0600
Truth Avoidance. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 12:11 -0700
Re: Truth Avoidance. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-09 12:20 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 21:12 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-09 18:41 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 15:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 16:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 16:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-09 17:56 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-09 17:57 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Bill (not Jillians) DOW #3" <noemail@none.not> - 2018-06-09 20:06 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-12 00:11 +0100
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 17:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 17:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 23:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 08:36 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 11:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 00:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 12:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 16:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-06 04:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-06 19:03 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-07 05:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-07 22:05 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 19:15 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:05 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:49 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:45 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 17:57 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 18:03 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 17:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-07 15:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 16:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:18 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 08:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 11:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:07 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 17:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 17:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 22:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-06 04:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 16:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:17 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 18:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:36 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:51 -0700
Page 10 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 Next page →
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-09 16:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bbeelq.ebs.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #172841 |
On 2018-06-09 4:43 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/9/18 4:42 PM, % wrote: >> On 2018-06-09 4:36 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 6/9/18 3:46 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2018-06-09 3:41 PM, Horace wrote: >>>>> On 9 Jun 2018 21:12:35 GMT, vallor wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit >>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the best >>>>>>>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of things. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new >>>>>>>>>>>> interpretation in >>>>>>>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the first >>>>>>>>>>> time >>>>>>>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that's the one! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually do with >>>>>>>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few >>>>>>>>> specific keywords. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to back the >>>>>>>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have >>>>>>> posted >>>>>>> your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is >>>>>>> that. Rinse >>>>>>> and repeat. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. >>>>>> >>>>>> And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've >>>>>> definitely prevailed in the discussion. >>>>> >>>>> At this point Michael Glasser aka snit has become a laughing stock. >>>>> >>>> well isn't that cool i just found out i'm that too >>> >>> LOL! >>> >> we could start an elusive club > > I am already in the chicken stock club. It is a soup-er group! > > i'm a member of the the compulsive rhymers club , okey-dokey.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-09 17:56 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <g8qohdpb209che2tdmoask7269jc5usb31@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #172846 |
On Sat, 9 Jun 2018 16:50:49 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2018-06-09 4:43 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 6/9/18 4:42 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2018-06-09 4:36 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 6/9/18 3:46 PM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2018-06-09 3:41 PM, Horace wrote: >>>>>> On 9 Jun 2018 21:12:35 GMT, vallor wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit >>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the best >>>>>>>>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of things. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new >>>>>>>>>>>>> interpretation in >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the first >>>>>>>>>>>> time >>>>>>>>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that's the one! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually do with >>>>>>>>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few >>>>>>>>>> specific keywords. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to back the >>>>>>>>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have >>>>>>>> posted >>>>>>>> your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is >>>>>>>> that. Rinse >>>>>>>> and repeat. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've >>>>>>> definitely prevailed in the discussion. >>>>>> >>>>>> At this point Michael Glasser aka snit has become a laughing stock. >>>>>> >>>>> well isn't that cool i just found out i'm that too >>>> >>>> LOL! >>>> >>> we could start an elusive club >> >> I am already in the chicken stock club. It is a soup-er group! >> >> >i'm a member of the the compulsive rhymers club , okey-dokey. Im a member of the redundant posters club.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-09 17:57 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <s9qohdpn79qvle84irue3isjlr27m5cj8n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #172849 |
On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 17:56:24 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> wrote: >On Sat, 9 Jun 2018 16:50:49 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >>On 2018-06-09 4:43 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 6/9/18 4:42 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2018-06-09 4:36 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 6/9/18 3:46 PM, % wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-06-09 3:41 PM, Horace wrote: >>>>>>> On 9 Jun 2018 21:12:35 GMT, vallor wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit >>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the best >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of things. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new >>>>>>>>>>>>>> interpretation in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the first >>>>>>>>>>>>> time >>>>>>>>>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that's the one! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually do with >>>>>>>>>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few >>>>>>>>>>> specific keywords. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to back the >>>>>>>>>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have >>>>>>>>> posted >>>>>>>>> your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is >>>>>>>>> that. Rinse >>>>>>>>> and repeat. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've >>>>>>>> definitely prevailed in the discussion. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> At this point Michael Glasser aka snit has become a laughing stock. >>>>>>> >>>>>> well isn't that cool i just found out i'm that too >>>>> >>>>> LOL! >>>>> >>>> we could start an elusive club >>> >>> I am already in the chicken stock club. It is a soup-er group! >>> >>> >>i'm a member of the the compulsive rhymers club , okey-dokey. > >Im a member of the redundant posters club. Im a member of the redundant posters club
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bill (not Jillians) DOW #3" <noemail@none.not> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-09 20:06 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <AMSdndBRWbrm9oHGnZ2dnUU7-evNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #172851 |
On 6/9/2018 7:57 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 17:56:24 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 > <fnvw@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sat, 9 Jun 2018 16:50:49 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2018-06-09 4:43 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 6/9/18 4:42 PM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2018-06-09 4:36 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 6/9/18 3:46 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>> On 2018-06-09 3:41 PM, Horace wrote: >>>>>>>> On 9 Jun 2018 21:12:35 GMT, vallor wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit >>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the best >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of things. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interpretation in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the first >>>>>>>>>>>>>> time >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that's the one! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually do with >>>>>>>>>>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few >>>>>>>>>>>> specific keywords. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to back the >>>>>>>>>>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have >>>>>>>>>> posted >>>>>>>>>> your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is >>>>>>>>>> that. Rinse >>>>>>>>>> and repeat. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've >>>>>>>>> definitely prevailed in the discussion. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> At this point Michael Glasser aka snit has become a laughing stock. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> well isn't that cool i just found out i'm that too >>>>>> >>>>>> LOL! >>>>>> >>>>> we could start an elusive club >>>> >>>> I am already in the chicken stock club. It is a soup-er group! >>>> >>>> >>> i'm a member of the the compulsive rhymers club , okey-dokey. >> >> Im a member of the redundant posters club. > Im a member of the redundant posters club Noted and recorded: Also forwarded to the Department of Redundancy Department.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-12 00:11 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nq99qh.19zvrmq98z4mtN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #172857 |
Bill (not Jillians) DOW #3 <noemail@none.not> wrote: [...] > >>>>> we could start an elusive club > >>>> > >>>> I am already in the chicken stock club. It is a soup-er group! > >>>> > >>> i'm a member of the the compulsive rhymers club , okey-dokey. > >> > >> Im a member of the redundant posters club. > > Im a member of the redundant posters club > > Noted and recorded: > > Also forwarded to the Department of Redundancy Department. I tautologically twice taught the tautologists two times. -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com> My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-09 17:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fo38g1Fq1qfU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #172846 |
On 6/9/18 4:50 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-06-09 4:43 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 6/9/18 4:42 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2018-06-09 4:36 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 6/9/18 3:46 PM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2018-06-09 3:41 PM, Horace wrote: >>>>>> On 9 Jun 2018 21:12:35 GMT, vallor wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit >>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the best >>>>>>>>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of things. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new >>>>>>>>>>>>> interpretation in >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the >>>>>>>>>>>> first time >>>>>>>>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that's the one! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually do >>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few >>>>>>>>>> specific keywords. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to back the >>>>>>>>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have >>>>>>>> posted >>>>>>>> your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is >>>>>>>> that. Rinse >>>>>>>> and repeat. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've >>>>>>> definitely prevailed in the discussion. >>>>>> >>>>>> At this point Michael Glasser aka snit has become a laughing stock. >>>>>> >>>>> well isn't that cool i just found out i'm that too >>>> >>>> LOL! >>>> >>> we could start an elusive club >> >> I am already in the chicken stock club. It is a soup-er group! >> >> > i'm a member of the the compulsive rhymers club , okey-dokey. Ah, you are a poet and are not even aware of the fact. Something like that. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-09 17:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bbefsp.mhr.19.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #172859 |
On 2018-06-09 5:08 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/9/18 4:50 PM, % wrote: >> On 2018-06-09 4:43 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 6/9/18 4:42 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2018-06-09 4:36 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 6/9/18 3:46 PM, % wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-06-09 3:41 PM, Horace wrote: >>>>>>> On 9 Jun 2018 21:12:35 GMT, vallor wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit >>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> best >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new >>>>>>>>>>>>>> interpretation in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the >>>>>>>>>>>>> first time >>>>>>>>>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that's the one! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually do >>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few >>>>>>>>>>> specific keywords. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to back >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have >>>>>>>>> posted >>>>>>>>> your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is >>>>>>>>> that. Rinse >>>>>>>>> and repeat. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've >>>>>>>> definitely prevailed in the discussion. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> At this point Michael Glasser aka snit has become a laughing >>>>>>> stock. >>>>>>> >>>>>> well isn't that cool i just found out i'm that too >>>>> >>>>> LOL! >>>>> >>>> we could start an elusive club >>> >>> I am already in the chicken stock club. It is a soup-er group! >>> >>> >> i'm a member of the the compulsive rhymers club , okey-dokey. > > Ah, you are a poet and are not even aware of the fact. > > Something like that. :) > this isn't going to go anywhere
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-09 20:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fo3kf6FrvfqU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #172862 |
On 6/9/18 5:11 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-06-09 5:08 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 6/9/18 4:50 PM, % wrote: >>> On 2018-06-09 4:43 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 6/9/18 4:42 PM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2018-06-09 4:36 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 6/9/18 3:46 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>> On 2018-06-09 3:41 PM, Horace wrote: >>>>>>>> On 9 Jun 2018 21:12:35 GMT, vallor wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit >>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> best >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interpretation in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> first time >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that's the one! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually >>>>>>>>>>>> do with >>>>>>>>>>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few >>>>>>>>>>>> specific keywords. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to >>>>>>>>>>> back the >>>>>>>>>>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have >>>>>>>>>> posted >>>>>>>>>> your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is >>>>>>>>>> that. Rinse >>>>>>>>>> and repeat. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've >>>>>>>>> definitely prevailed in the discussion. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> At this point Michael Glasser aka snit has become a laughing >>>>>>>> stock. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> well isn't that cool i just found out i'm that too >>>>>> >>>>>> LOL! >>>>>> >>>>> we could start an elusive club >>>> >>>> I am already in the chicken stock club. It is a soup-er group! >>>> >>>> >>> i'm a member of the the compulsive rhymers club , okey-dokey. >> >> Ah, you are a poet and are not even aware of the fact. >> >> Something like that. :) >> > this isn't going to go anywhere It should just go. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-09 23:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.35866b206d9cb723993d05@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #172862 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <bbefsp.mhr.19.3@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > On 2018-06-09 5:08 PM, Snit wrote: > > On 6/9/18 4:50 PM, % wrote: > >> On 2018-06-09 4:43 PM, Snit wrote: > >>> On 6/9/18 4:42 PM, % wrote: > >>>> On 2018-06-09 4:36 PM, Snit wrote: > >>>>> On 6/9/18 3:46 PM, % wrote: > >>>>>> On 2018-06-09 3:41 PM, Horace wrote: > >>>>>>> On 9 Jun 2018 21:12:35 GMT, vallor wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, > >>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... > >>>>>>>>>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit > >>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> best > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> interpretation in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> first time > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that's the one! > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually do > >>>>>>>>>>> with > >>>>>>>>>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few > >>>>>>>>>>> specific keywords. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to back > >>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have > >>>>>>>>> posted > >>>>>>>>> your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is > >>>>>>>>> that. Rinse > >>>>>>>>> and repeat. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've > >>>>>>>> definitely prevailed in the discussion. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> At this point Michael Glasser aka snit has become a laughing > >>>>>>> stock. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> well isn't that cool i just found out i'm that too > >>>>> > >>>>> LOL! > >>>>> > >>>> we could start an elusive club > >>> > >>> I am already in the chicken stock club. It is a soup-er group! > >>> > >>> > >> i'm a member of the the compulsive rhymers club , okey-dokey. > > > > Ah, you are a poet and are not even aware of the fact. > > > > Something like that. :) > > > this isn't going to go anywhere Even YOU figured that out. I guess that confirms it real good. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 08:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fo4683FhreU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #172911 |
Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <bbefsp.mhr.19.3@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com > says... > > >> >> On 2018-06-09 5:08 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 6/9/18 4:50 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2018-06-09 4:43 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 6/9/18 4:42 PM, % wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-06-09 4:36 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/9/18 3:46 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2018-06-09 3:41 PM, Horace wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 9 Jun 2018 21:12:35 GMT, vallor wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> best >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interpretation in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first time >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that's the one! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually do >>>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few >>>>>>>>>>>>> specific keywords. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to back >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have >>>>>>>>>>> posted >>>>>>>>>>> your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is >>>>>>>>>>> that. Rinse >>>>>>>>>>> and repeat. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've >>>>>>>>>> definitely prevailed in the discussion. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> At this point Michael Glasser aka snit has become a laughing >>>>>>>>> stock. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> well isn't that cool i just found out i'm that too >>>>>>> >>>>>>> LOL! >>>>>>> >>>>>> we could start an elusive club >>>>> >>>>> I am already in the chicken stock club. It is a soup-er group! >>>>> >>>>> >>>> i'm a member of the the compulsive rhymers club , okey-dokey. >>> >>> Ah, you are a poet and are not even aware of the fact. >>> >>> Something like that. :) >>> >> this isn't going to go anywhere > > Even YOU figured that out. I guess that confirms it real good. > Well.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 11:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bbghkn.9qe.19.9@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #172911 |
On 2018-06-09 11:55 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <bbefsp.mhr.19.3@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com > says... > > >> >> On 2018-06-09 5:08 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 6/9/18 4:50 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2018-06-09 4:43 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 6/9/18 4:42 PM, % wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-06-09 4:36 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/9/18 3:46 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2018-06-09 3:41 PM, Horace wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 9 Jun 2018 21:12:35 GMT, vallor wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> best >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interpretation in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first time >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that's the one! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually do >>>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few >>>>>>>>>>>>> specific keywords. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to back >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have >>>>>>>>>>> posted >>>>>>>>>>> your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is >>>>>>>>>>> that. Rinse >>>>>>>>>>> and repeat. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've >>>>>>>>>> definitely prevailed in the discussion. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> At this point Michael Glasser aka snit has become a laughing >>>>>>>>> stock. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> well isn't that cool i just found out i'm that too >>>>>>> >>>>>>> LOL! >>>>>>> >>>>>> we could start an elusive club >>>>> >>>>> I am already in the chicken stock club. It is a soup-er group! >>>>> >>>>> >>>> i'm a member of the the compulsive rhymers club , okey-dokey. >>> >>> Ah, you are a poet and are not even aware of the fact. >>> >>> Something like that. :) >>> >> this isn't going to go anywhere > > Even YOU figured that out. I guess that confirms it real good. > no problem it wasn't my post
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 00:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3586700ed686fbac993d09@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #172802 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <bbeasl.vc8.19.21@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > On 2018-06-09 3:41 PM, Horace wrote: > > On 9 Jun 2018 21:12:35 GMT, vallor wrote: > > > >> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: > >> > >>> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, > >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > >>> > >>>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: > >>>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message > >>>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... > >>>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit > >>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > >>>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: > >>> > >>>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. > >>> > >>>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the best > >>>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of things. > >>> > >>>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new interpretation in > >>>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! > >>> > >>>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the first time > >>>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... > >>> > >>>>>> Yeah, that's the one! > >>> > >>>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually do with > >>>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few > >>>>> specific keywords. > >>> > >>>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. > >>> > >>>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. > >>> > >>>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to back the > >>>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... > >>> > >>> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. > >>> > >>> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have posted > >>> your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is that. Rinse > >>> and repeat. > >>> > >>> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? > >> > >> I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. > >> > >> And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've > >> definitely prevailed in the discussion. > > > > At this point Michael Glasser aka snit has become a laughing stock. > > > well isn't that cool i just found out i'm that too I wasn't sure how to break it to you. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 12:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bbgi7h.9qe.19.15@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #172915 |
On 2018-06-10 12:16 AM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <bbeasl.vc8.19.21@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com > says... > > >> >> On 2018-06-09 3:41 PM, Horace wrote: >>> On 9 Jun 2018 21:12:35 GMT, vallor wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 09 Jun 2018 06:22:56 -0700, max headroom wrote: >>>> >>>>> In news:fo19ubFehauU1@mid.individual.net, >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/8/18 11:13 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>> "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:pffpgb$5bm$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>> In news:fo15klFcgkoU3@mid.individual.net, Snit >>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>>>>> On 6/8/18 10:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> All of it... because you can't. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Pick your favorite part. Or where you think you make the best >>>>>>>>>>> point. It gets tiring rehashing the same long list of things. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> My favorite part was when Scout blew your "new interpretation in >>>>>>>>>> 2008" lie out of the water! >>>>> >>>>>>>>> The Heller case is pretty easy to reference, and is the first time >>>>>>>>> the new interpretation was offered by the SCOTUS.... >>>>> >>>>>>>> Yeah, that's the one! >>>>> >>>>>>> Have you noticed how the responses have little to actually do with >>>>>>> what is actually being replied to other than referencing a few >>>>>>> specific keywords. >>>>> >>>>>>> But have fun with that programmed merry-go-round. >>>>> >>>>>>> I smacked down it's lies for the lurkers, if any, and moved on. >>>>> >>>>>> At this point there is no real discussion. I was asked to back the >>>>>> following points. I did. There was no real counter ... >>>>> >>>>> That you would acknowledge, much less try to refute. >>>>> >>>>> You are correct, though, that there is no discussion. You have posted >>>>> your claims, supported by various opinion cites, and that is that. Rinse >>>>> and repeat. >>>>> >>>>> Does that really work in sci.physics or comp.os.linux.advocacy? >>>> >>>> I don't think anybody takes "Snit" seriously at this point. >>>> >>>> And yes, you've got him reduced to ad nauseum fallacies, so you've >>>> definitely prevailed in the discussion. >>> >>> At this point Michael Glasser aka snit has become a laughing stock. >>> >> well isn't that cool i just found out i'm that too > > I wasn't sure how to break it to you. > it would be a lie if you said it anyway
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 16:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pf76s1$75a$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #171586 |
In news:bb3m5g.j3i.17.1@news.alt.net, % <persent@gmail.com> typed: > On 2018-06-05 2:45 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 6/5/18 1:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>> In news:fno5uhFbpqgU8@mid.individual.net, >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>> On 6/5/18 11:56 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:11:42 -0700, Snit >>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> Even now the NRA is saying schools should have gun-carrying >>>>>> teachers! >>>>> Here's the liberal alternative: >>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pennsylvania-school-district-gives-teachers-small-baseball-bats-last-resort-n864986 >>>>> That's how dumb the leftists are. >>>> What a stupid idea... but much, much better than putting GUNS in >>>> class rooms. THAT idea is FAR worse. >>> If a crazed gunman bursts into the room in which you are trapped, >>> would you rather have a baseball >>> bat or a gun? >> I would rather NOT have more guns in the classroom given how it will >> surely lead to more kids being shot. You can twist that to say you >> want a gun if someone else has one, but when your "solution" is >> likely to lead to more harm than good it is not a good solution. > no one needs a gun unless they are going to kill something Sometimes things need killing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 16:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bb3sns.84b.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #171670 |
On 2018-06-05 4:20 PM, max headroom wrote: > In news:bb3m5g.j3i.17.1@news.alt.net, > % <persent@gmail.com> typed: > >> On 2018-06-05 2:45 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 6/5/18 1:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>> In news:fno5uhFbpqgU8@mid.individual.net, >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>> On 6/5/18 11:56 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:11:42 -0700, Snit >>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> Even now the NRA is saying schools should have gun-carrying >>>>>>> teachers! > >>>>>> Here's the liberal alternative: > >>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pennsylvania-school-district-gives-teachers-small-baseball-bats-last-resort-n864986 > >>>>>> That's how dumb the leftists are. > >>>>> What a stupid idea... but much, much better than putting GUNS in >>>>> class rooms. THAT idea is FAR worse. > >>>> If a crazed gunman bursts into the room in which you are trapped, >>>> would you rather have a baseball >>>> bat or a gun? > >>> I would rather NOT have more guns in the classroom given how it will >>> surely lead to more kids being shot. You can twist that to say you >>> want a gun if someone else has one, but when your "solution" is >>> likely to lead to more harm than good it is not a good solution. > >> no one needs a gun unless they are going to kill something > > Sometimes things need killing. > > name one
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 16:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pf7944$koj$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #171677 |
In news:bb3sns.84b.17.1@news.alt.net, % <persent@gmail.com> typed: > On 2018-06-05 4:20 PM, max headroom wrote: >> In news:bb3m5g.j3i.17.1@news.alt.net, >> % <persent@gmail.com> typed: >>> On 2018-06-05 2:45 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 6/5/18 1:02 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>>> In news:fno5uhFbpqgU8@mid.individual.net, >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>>>> On 6/5/18 11:56 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:11:42 -0700, Snit >>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> Even now the NRA is saying schools should have gun-carrying >>>>>>>> teachers! >>>>>>> Here's the liberal alternative: >>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pennsylvania-school-district-gives-teachers-small-baseball-bats-last-resort-n864986 >>>>>>> That's how dumb the leftists are. >>>>>> What a stupid idea... but much, much better than putting GUNS in >>>>>> class rooms. THAT idea is FAR worse. >>>>> If a crazed gunman bursts into the room in which you are trapped, >>>>> would you rather have a baseball >>>>> bat or a gun? >>>> I would rather NOT have more guns in the classroom given how it >>>> will surely lead to more kids being shot. You can twist that to >>>> say you want a gun if someone else has one, but when your >>>> "solution" is likely to lead to more harm than good it is not a >>>> good solution. >>> no one needs a gun unless they are going to kill something >> Sometimes things need killing. > name one Antifa.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 17:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnomsfFqa6rU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #171670 |
On 6/5/18 4:20 PM, max headroom wrote: ... >> no one needs a gun unless they are going to kill something > > Sometimes things need killing. > > Such as your repeated accusations of my being a "gun grabber" merely because I note I back evidence-based policies. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 17:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pf7aho$rj1$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #171704 |
In news:fnomsfFqa6rU2@mid.individual.net, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > On 6/5/18 4:20 PM, max headroom wrote: > ... >>> no one needs a gun unless they are going to kill something >> Sometimes things need killing. > Such as your repeated accusations of my being a "gun grabber" merely > because I note I back evidence-based policies. Please cite one instance of me calling you a "gun-grabber."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 18:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnoqafFbpqgU30@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #171718 |
On 6/5/18 5:33 PM, max headroom wrote: > In news:fnomsfFqa6rU2@mid.individual.net, > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > >> On 6/5/18 4:20 PM, max headroom wrote: >> ... >>>> no one needs a gun unless they are going to kill something > >>> Sometimes things need killing. > >> Such as your repeated accusations of my being a "gun grabber" merely >> because I note I back evidence-based policies. > > Please cite one instance of me calling you a "gun-grabber." > > Without digging back I may have confused you with Klaus. If so I apologize. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <dscehd54g48pvdbdtscfr7k8no3gjcqq6s@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #171728 |
On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 18:05:19 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 6/5/18 5:33 PM, max headroom wrote: >> In news:fnomsfFqa6rU2@mid.individual.net, >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >> >>> On 6/5/18 4:20 PM, max headroom wrote: >>> ... >>>>> no one needs a gun unless they are going to kill something >> >>>> Sometimes things need killing. >> >>> Such as your repeated accusations of my being a "gun grabber" merely >>> because I note I back evidence-based policies. >> >> Please cite one instance of me calling you a "gun-grabber." >> >> > >Without digging back I may have confused you with Klaus. If so I apologize. It was DEFINITELY me. You're a gun grabber.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web