Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #170020 > unrolled thread
| Started by | !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-06-01 08:08 -0500 |
| Last post | 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 274 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-01 08:08 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:35 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 19:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:53 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 21:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:51 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 22:35 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 17:16 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 21:10 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 01:39 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 22:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 19:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:30 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:34 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 20:47 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 22:01 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 19:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:28 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:27 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:38 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:53 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 20:28 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 22:39 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:33 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:19 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:18 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-02 04:54 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-02 05:06 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:54 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 03:41 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:11 -0700
The Supreme Court got it wrong. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 06:51 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:59 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:43 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:25 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:28 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:45 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:08 -0600
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-03 23:24 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 01:12 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:15 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:37 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 10:48 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:00 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 13:27 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:32 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 16:58 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 21:38 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:49 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 03:49 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:45 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 22:47 -0600
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 05:40 +0000
Permission to breath ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 19:10 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:13 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:07 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 20:10 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:53 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 22:03 -0600
Re: Permission to breath ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 23:33 -0400
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:42 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-03 07:57 -0400
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:08 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:07 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:36 -0600
Clarity. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-03 08:52 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 03:46 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:53 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 22:59 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 23:19 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-03 09:10 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:31 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:12 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:26 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:37 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:10 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:54 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 22:19 -0500
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 20:58 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-07 00:24 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 05:43 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-07 05:45 -0600
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-08 07:17 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 00:21 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 16:07 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:30 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-10 01:32 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 18:34 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:50 -0700
"Natural Rights" aren't always wonderful. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 19:02 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:49 -0700
Depressed Losers, slaughtering consert goers, is "natural" ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 12:21 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 02:18 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:25 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:38 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:43 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:16 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 09:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:53 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-02 01:20 -0400
Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 06:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 10:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 13:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 19:05 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 18:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 19:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 21:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 22:34 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-03 07:59 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 04:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-03 14:02 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 01:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 09:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 13:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-03 15:21 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 16:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 16:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 17:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 18:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 18:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 03:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-04 17:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 15:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 04:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 16:41 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 16:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 17:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 17:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-03 18:51 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 01:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-03 20:11 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 18:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 18:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 03:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 12:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 12:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 00:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 01:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 17:37 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 20:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:30 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:02 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:02 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 17:59 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 15:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:24 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 16:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:44 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:42 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-04 17:27 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 15:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-04 23:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:51 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 07:19 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 08:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 09:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:51 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 13:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 17:02 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 17:56 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 22:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 18:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 07:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:27 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 16:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 08:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:32 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:34 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-06 19:03 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 17:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 17:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:15 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:41 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:24 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:17 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:08 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:01 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:32 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-08 05:15 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 06:41 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:49 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 07:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 21:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:07 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Page 3 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 14 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-01 22:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnemk6Fsn82U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170264 |
On 6/1/18 9:54 PM, vallor wrote: > On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:53:44 -0400, Scout wrote: > >> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >> news:fnecu9Fr49cU3@mid.individual.net... > >> >>> The second amendment specifically mentions the militia and NO other >>> context. >> >> Bullshit. It mentions the context of the right of the people. >> >> Which right, BTW, is not tied to ANY militia context. >> > > A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free > State, the right of the *PEOPLE* to *KEEP* and *BEAR* Arms, shall not be > infringed. [emph. added] > > *PEOPLE* > > Now get back in your clown car, Snit. > Militia. Bear arms. Those words and terms have meaning. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 05:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fnemv5FsksjU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170265 |
On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:00:54 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 6/1/18 9:54 PM, vallor wrote: >> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:53:44 -0400, Scout wrote: >> >>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>> news:fnecu9Fr49cU3@mid.individual.net... >> >> >>>> The second amendment specifically mentions the militia and NO other >>>> context. >>> >>> Bullshit. It mentions the context of the right of the people. >>> >>> Which right, BTW, is not tied to ANY militia context. >>> >>> >> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free >> State, the right of the *PEOPLE* to *KEEP* and *BEAR* Arms, shall not >> be infringed. [emph. added] >> >> *PEOPLE* >> >> Now get back in your clown car, Snit. >> > Militia. > > Bear arms. > > Those words and terms have meaning. The SC has determined that the clauses in question are explanations, not limitations. This is a *RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE*. But you already knew that, didn't you? That's what I like about you: your attention to detail. -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-01 22:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnen49Fsn82U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170269 |
On 6/1/18 10:06 PM, vallor wrote: > On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:00:54 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> On 6/1/18 9:54 PM, vallor wrote: >>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:53:44 -0400, Scout wrote: >>> >>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>> news:fnecu9Fr49cU3@mid.individual.net... >>> >>> >>>>> The second amendment specifically mentions the militia and NO other >>>>> context. >>>> >>>> Bullshit. It mentions the context of the right of the people. >>>> >>>> Which right, BTW, is not tied to ANY militia context. >>>> >>>> >>> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free >>> State, the right of the *PEOPLE* to *KEEP* and *BEAR* Arms, shall not >>> be infringed. [emph. added] >>> >>> *PEOPLE* >>> >>> Now get back in your clown car, Snit. >>> >> Militia. >> >> Bear arms. >> >> Those words and terms have meaning. > > The SC has determined that the clauses in question are explanations, not > limitations. This is a *RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE*. Sure: in a 5:4 decision judicial activism "won". Even then they noted limits. It is about "the licensing requirement insofar as it prohibits carrying an unlicensed firearm in the home, and the trigger-lock requirement insofar as it prohibits the use of functional firearms in the home." It is about having a common handgun in your home, not about carrying one around, no less other arms. It even specifically speaks of acceptance of "limits the type of weapon to which the right applies to those used by the militia, i.e., those in common use for lawful purposes". It also notes that "the Second Amendment right is not unlimited" and specifically states "It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose" and that this does not mean we cannot have "laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms" and it "finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons". > But you already knew that, didn't you? That's what I like about you: > your attention to detail. I did know that. Sure. I also knew the meaning of "bear arms": <https://goo.gl/N9wtKB> ----- A search of Brigham Young University’s new online Corpus of Founding Era American English, with more than 95,000 texts and 138 million words, yields 281 instances of the phrase “bear arms.” BYU’s Corpus of Early Modern English, with 40,000 texts and close to 1.3 billion words, shows 1,572 instances of the phrase. Subtracting about 350 duplicate matches, that leaves about 1,500 separate occurrences of “bear arms” in the 17th and 18th centuries, and only a handful don’t refer to war, soldiering or organized, armed action. These databases confirm that the natural meaning of “bear arms” in the framers’ day was military. But we shouldn’t need big data to tell us this. “Bear arms” has never worked comfortably with the language of personal self-defense, hunting or target practice. ----- Curious if you knew that. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 01:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <petbkc$atj$8@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #170270 |
"Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message news:fnen49Fsn82U4@mid.individual.net... > On 6/1/18 10:06 PM, vallor wrote: >> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:00:54 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> On 6/1/18 9:54 PM, vallor wrote: >>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:53:44 -0400, Scout wrote: >>>> >>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:fnecu9Fr49cU3@mid.individual.net... >>>> >>>> >>>>>> The second amendment specifically mentions the militia and NO other >>>>>> context. >>>>> >>>>> Bullshit. It mentions the context of the right of the people. >>>>> >>>>> Which right, BTW, is not tied to ANY militia context. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free >>>> State, the right of the *PEOPLE* to *KEEP* and *BEAR* Arms, shall not >>>> be infringed. [emph. added] >>>> >>>> *PEOPLE* >>>> >>>> Now get back in your clown car, Snit. >>>> >>> Militia. >>> >>> Bear arms. >>> >>> Those words and terms have meaning. >> >> The SC has determined that the clauses in question are explanations, not >> limitations. This is a *RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE*. > > Sure: in a 5:4 decision judicial activism "won". Even then they noted > limits. It is about "the licensing requirement insofar as it prohibits > carrying an unlicensed firearm in the home, and the trigger-lock > requirement insofar as it prohibits the use of functional firearms in the > home." It's confirmed.....another Rudy sockpuppet.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fneqsnFtdvgU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170287 |
On 6/1/18 10:54 PM, Scout wrote: > > > "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message > news:fnen49Fsn82U4@mid.individual.net... >> On 6/1/18 10:06 PM, vallor wrote: >>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:00:54 -0700, Snit wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/1/18 9:54 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:53:44 -0400, Scout wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:fnecu9Fr49cU3@mid.individual.net... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> The second amendment specifically mentions the militia and NO other >>>>>>> context. >>>>>> >>>>>> Bullshit. It mentions the context of the right of the people. >>>>>> >>>>>> Which right, BTW, is not tied to ANY militia context. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free >>>>> State, the right of the *PEOPLE* to *KEEP* and *BEAR* Arms, shall not >>>>> be infringed. [emph. added] >>>>> >>>>> *PEOPLE* >>>>> >>>>> Now get back in your clown car, Snit. >>>>> >>>> Militia. >>>> >>>> Bear arms. >>>> >>>> Those words and terms have meaning. >>> >>> The SC has determined that the clauses in question are explanations, not >>> limitations. This is a *RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE*. >> >> Sure: in a 5:4 decision judicial activism "won". Even then they noted >> limits. It is about "the licensing requirement insofar as it prohibits >> carrying an unlicensed firearm in the home, and the trigger-lock >> requirement insofar as it prohibits the use of functional firearms in >> the home." > > It's confirmed.....another Rudy sockpuppet. > > > Here is what you seem to want to refute but cannot: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/antonin-scalia-was-wrong-about-the-meaning-of-bear-arms/2018/05/21/9243ac66-5d11-11e8-b2b8-08a538d9dbd6_story.html ----- A search of Brigham Young University’s new online Corpus of Founding Era American English, with more than 95,000 texts and 138 million words, yields 281 instances of the phrase “bear arms.” BYU’s Corpus of Early Modern English, with 40,000 texts and close to 1.3 billion words, shows 1,572 instances of the phrase. Subtracting about 350 duplicate matches, that leaves about 1,500 separate occurrences of “bear arms” in the 17th and 18th centuries, and only a handful don’t refer to war, soldiering or organized, armed action. These databases confirm that the natural meaning of “bear arms” in the framers’ day was military. But we shouldn’t need big data to tell us this. “Bear arms” has never worked comfortably with the language of personal self-defense, hunting or target practice. ----- -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 03:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fnh6aeFcefgU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170297 |
On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 22:33:24 +0000, simon singh wrote: > On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:13:43 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> On 6/1/18 10:54 PM, Scout wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>> news:fnen49Fsn82U4@mid.individual.net... >>>> On 6/1/18 10:06 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:00:54 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/1/18 9:54 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:53:44 -0400, Scout wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:fnecu9Fr49cU3@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The second amendment specifically mentions the militia and NO >>>>>>>>> other context. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bullshit. It mentions the context of the right of the people. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Which right, BTW, is not tied to ANY militia context. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a >>>>>>> free State, the right of the *PEOPLE* to *KEEP* and *BEAR* Arms, >>>>>>> shall not be infringed. [emph. added] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *PEOPLE* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Now get back in your clown car, Snit. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Militia. >>>>>> >>>>>> Bear arms. >>>>>> >>>>>> Those words and terms have meaning. >>>>> >>>>> The SC has determined that the clauses in question are explanations, >>>>> not limitations. This is a *RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE*. >>>> >>>> Sure: in a 5:4 decision judicial activism "won". Even then they noted >>>> limits. It is about "the licensing requirement insofar as it >>>> prohibits carrying an unlicensed firearm in the home, and the >>>> trigger-lock requirement insofar as it prohibits the use of >>>> functional firearms in the home." >>> >>> It's confirmed.....another Rudy sockpuppet. >>> >>> >>> >> Here is what you seem to want to refute but cannot: >> >> https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/antonin-scalia-was-wrong-about- > the-meaning-of-bear-arms/2018/05/21/9243ac66-5d11-11e8- > b2b8-08a538d9dbd6_story.html >> ----- >> A search of Brigham Young University’s new online Corpus of Founding >> Era >> > Snit has just gone into "Rainman Mode" where he repeats the same invalid > statements over and over again hoping they will somehow become truth. > For those that don't know, it's usually a sign that snit is high on > medication once again. > Other signs are where he uses phrases like "I commend you", which is his > narcissistic BPD rearing it's ugly head. Boring and "not interested" are > other terms he uses when he has run a troll dry and can milk it no > longer. > > For those who are not aware, snit is one of usenet's most prolific > trolls. He has been trolling literally 24x7x365 for over a decade. Why? > He has no job, he is mentally ill and has nothing better to do with his > life. > There are web pages devoted to the snit troll. > Read here for more information about snit. > > http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html > http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html https://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html#nauseam Argumentum ad nauseam This is the incorrect belief that an assertion is more likely to be true, or is more likely to be accepted as true, the more often it is heard. So an Argumentum ad Nauseam is one that employs constant repetition in asserting something; saying the same thing over and over again until you're sick of hearing it. On the Net, your argument is often less likely to be heard if you repeat it over and over again, as people will tend to put you in their kill files. -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 21:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnh83iFcu9kU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170646 |
On 6/2/18 8:41 PM, vallor wrote: > On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 22:33:24 +0000, simon singh wrote: > >> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:13:43 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> On 6/1/18 10:54 PM, Scout wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>> news:fnen49Fsn82U4@mid.individual.net... >>>>> On 6/1/18 10:06 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:00:54 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/1/18 9:54 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:53:44 -0400, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:fnecu9Fr49cU3@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The second amendment specifically mentions the militia and NO >>>>>>>>>> other context. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bullshit. It mentions the context of the right of the people. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Which right, BTW, is not tied to ANY militia context. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a >>>>>>>> free State, the right of the *PEOPLE* to *KEEP* and *BEAR* Arms, >>>>>>>> shall not be infringed. [emph. added] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *PEOPLE* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Now get back in your clown car, Snit. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Militia. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bear arms. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Those words and terms have meaning. >>>>>> >>>>>> The SC has determined that the clauses in question are explanations, >>>>>> not limitations. This is a *RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE*. >>>>> >>>>> Sure: in a 5:4 decision judicial activism "won". Even then they noted >>>>> limits. It is about "the licensing requirement insofar as it >>>>> prohibits carrying an unlicensed firearm in the home, and the >>>>> trigger-lock requirement insofar as it prohibits the use of >>>>> functional firearms in the home." >>>> >>>> It's confirmed.....another Rudy sockpuppet. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Here is what you seem to want to refute but cannot: >>> >>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/antonin-scalia-was-wrong-about- >> the-meaning-of-bear-arms/2018/05/21/9243ac66-5d11-11e8- >> b2b8-08a538d9dbd6_story.html >>> ----- >>> A search of Brigham Young University’s new online Corpus of Founding >>> Era >>> >> Snit has just gone into "Rainman Mode" where he repeats the same invalid >> statements over and over again hoping they will somehow become truth. >> For those that don't know, it's usually a sign that snit is high on >> medication once again. >> Other signs are where he uses phrases like "I commend you", which is his >> narcissistic BPD rearing it's ugly head. Boring and "not interested" are >> other terms he uses when he has run a troll dry and can milk it no >> longer. >> >> For those who are not aware, snit is one of usenet's most prolific >> trolls. He has been trolling literally 24x7x365 for over a decade. Why? >> He has no job, he is mentally ill and has nothing better to do with his >> life. >> There are web pages devoted to the snit troll. >> Read here for more information about snit. >> >> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html > > > https://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html#nauseam > > Argumentum ad nauseam > This is the incorrect belief that an assertion is more likely to be true, > or is more likely to be accepted as true, the more often it is heard. So > an Argumentum ad Nauseam is one that employs constant repetition in > asserting something; saying the same thing over and over again until > you're sick of hearing it. If Carroll and these odd socks who have shown up to defend him REALLY believed I did as they say they would quote these alleged lies. Of course, when I note this Carroll dredges up ancient debates from a year or more ago -- often from 2004 or so. Then he claims a "win" if I do not rehash these same debates. Even better would be just to move the hell on. Give up on his flooding and trolling and obsessing over me and simply talk tech. But that will NEVER happen. > On the Net, your argument is often less likely to be heard if you repeat > it over and over again, as people will tend to put you in their kill > files. > Not in COLA... seems that is what many thrive on. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 06:51 -0700 |
| Subject | The Supreme Court got it wrong. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.2--6.51am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #170269 |
> > Militia. Bear arms. These words have meaning. > > The SC has determined that the clauses in question are explanations, > not limitations. This is a *RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE*. The Supreme Court got it wrong. Americans may keep and bear Arms For The State's Militia . Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 11:59 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. |
| Message-ID | <3azQC.316732$1e7.309457@fx38.iad> |
| In reply to | #170379 |
On 6/2/2018 9:51 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>> Militia. Bear arms. These words have meaning. >> >> The SC has determined that the clauses in question are explanations, >> not limitations. This is a *RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE*. > > The Supreme Court got it wrong. > > Americans may keep and bear Arms For The State's Militia . > > Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen > slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. > Right, Rolf. WAIT! I got it! Lets have Congress pass a law that makes murder a crime? No doubt the terrorists in the NRA will fight that idea! I think you'll find, Rolf, that unless Congress passes "common sense" laws that disarm all citizens "we" will continue shooting school children and other innocents until the message is loud and clear!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 10:43 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. |
| Message-ID | <fng39aF6gapU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170418 |
On 6/2/18 8:59 AM, benj wrote: > On 6/2/2018 9:51 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>> Militia. Bear arms. These words have meaning. >>> >>> The SC has determined that the clauses in question are explanations, >>> not limitations. This is a *RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE*. >> >> The Supreme Court got it wrong. >> >> Americans may keep and bear Arms For The State's Militia . >> >> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >> > Right, Rolf. WAIT! I got it! Lets have Congress pass a law that makes > murder a crime? No doubt the terrorists in the NRA will fight that idea! > > I think you'll find, Rolf, that unless Congress passes "common sense" > laws that disarm all citizens "we" will continue shooting school > children and other innocents until the message is loud and clear! Why jump to the idea of disarming all citizens? What makes you think that is common sense? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 16:25 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. |
| Message-ID | <C3DQC.130747$np1.17132@fx06.iad> |
| In reply to | #170461 |
On 6/2/2018 1:43 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/2/18 8:59 AM, benj wrote: >> On 6/2/2018 9:51 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>> Militia. Bear arms. These words have meaning. >>>> >>>> The SC has determined that the clauses in question are explanations, >>>> not limitations. This is a *RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE*. >>> >>> The Supreme Court got it wrong. >>> >>> Americans may keep and bear Arms For The State's Militia . >>> >>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >>> >> Right, Rolf. WAIT! I got it! Lets have Congress pass a law that makes >> murder a crime? No doubt the terrorists in the NRA will fight that idea! >> >> I think you'll find, Rolf, that unless Congress passes "common sense" >> laws that disarm all citizens "we" will continue shooting school >> children and other innocents until the message is loud and clear! > > Why jump to the idea of disarming all citizens? What makes you think > that is common sense? > I was told by all those making the same arguments you are that it was common sense. Don't you agree? Pass laws that ban gun ownership for all potential shooters and you stop all the masscres at schools and concerts. Isn't that just common sense?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 13:28 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. |
| Message-ID | <fngcvmF8a4tU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170498 |
On 6/2/18 1:25 PM, benj wrote: > On 6/2/2018 1:43 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 6/2/18 8:59 AM, benj wrote: >>> On 6/2/2018 9:51 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>>> Militia. Bear arms. These words have meaning. >>>>> >>>>> The SC has determined that the clauses in question are explanations, >>>>> not limitations. This is a *RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE*. >>>> >>>> The Supreme Court got it wrong. >>>> >>>> Americans may keep and bear Arms For The State's Militia . >>>> >>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >>>> >>> Right, Rolf. WAIT! I got it! Lets have Congress pass a law that makes >>> murder a crime? No doubt the terrorists in the NRA will fight that idea! >>> >>> I think you'll find, Rolf, that unless Congress passes "common sense" >>> laws that disarm all citizens "we" will continue shooting school >>> children and other innocents until the message is loud and clear! >> >> Why jump to the idea of disarming all citizens? What makes you think >> that is common sense? >> > I was told by all those making the same arguments you are that it was > common sense. I do not see those posts. Can you provide a link? This thread is in multiple groups so maybe there are those who did not even have their messages posted where I am reading. > Don't you agree? Pass laws that ban gun ownership for all > potential shooters and you stop all the masscres at schools and > concerts. Isn't that just common sense? How so? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 19:45 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. |
| Message-ID | <T_FQC.265911$ll2.30599@fx35.iad> |
| In reply to | #170501 |
On 6/2/2018 4:28 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/2/18 1:25 PM, benj wrote: >> On 6/2/2018 1:43 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 6/2/18 8:59 AM, benj wrote: >>>> On 6/2/2018 9:51 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>>>> Militia. Bear arms. These words have meaning. >>>>>> >>>>>> The SC has determined that the clauses in question are explanations, >>>>>> not limitations. This is a *RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE*. >>>>> >>>>> The Supreme Court got it wrong. >>>>> >>>>> Americans may keep and bear Arms For The State's Militia . >>>>> >>>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >>>>> >>>> Right, Rolf. WAIT! I got it! Lets have Congress pass a law that >>>> makes murder a crime? No doubt the terrorists in the NRA will fight >>>> that idea! >>>> >>>> I think you'll find, Rolf, that unless Congress passes "common >>>> sense" laws that disarm all citizens "we" will continue shooting >>>> school children and other innocents until the message is loud and >>>> clear! >>> >>> Why jump to the idea of disarming all citizens? What makes you think >>> that is common sense? >>> >> I was told by all those making the same arguments you are that it was >> common sense. > > I do not see those posts. Can you provide a link? This thread is in > multiple groups so maybe there are those who did not even have their > messages posted where I am reading. > >> Don't you agree? Pass laws that ban gun ownership for all potential >> shooters and you stop all the masscres at schools and concerts. Isn't >> that just common sense? > > How so? > I"m asking YOUR opinion, Eliza. All you do is ask questions. How do you feel about giving your personal opinion?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. |
| Message-ID | <fngs46Fb1d7U5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170533 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 6/2/2018 4:28 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 6/2/18 1:25 PM, benj wrote: >>> On 6/2/2018 1:43 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 6/2/18 8:59 AM, benj wrote: >>>>> On 6/2/2018 9:51 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>>>>> Militia. Bear arms. These words have meaning. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The SC has determined that the clauses in question are explanations, >>>>>>> not limitations. This is a *RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE*. >>>>>> >>>>>> The Supreme Court got it wrong. >>>>>> >>>>>> Americans may keep and bear Arms For The State's Militia . >>>>>> >>>>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >>>>>> >>>>> Right, Rolf. WAIT! I got it! Lets have Congress pass a law that >>>>> makes murder a crime? No doubt the terrorists in the NRA will fight >>>>> that idea! >>>>> >>>>> I think you'll find, Rolf, that unless Congress passes "common >>>>> sense" laws that disarm all citizens "we" will continue shooting >>>>> school children and other innocents until the message is loud and >>>>> clear! >>>> >>>> Why jump to the idea of disarming all citizens? What makes you think >>>> that is common sense? >>>> >>> I was told by all those making the same arguments you are that it was >>> common sense. >> >> I do not see those posts. Can you provide a link? This thread is in >> multiple groups so maybe there are those who did not even have their >> messages posted where I am reading. >> >>> Don't you agree? Pass laws that ban gun ownership for all potential >>> shooters and you stop all the masscres at schools and concerts. Isn't >>> that just common sense? >> >> How so? >> > I"m asking YOUR opinion, Eliza. All you do is ask questions. > How do you feel about giving your personal opinion? > > I disagree with your view there. Thought that was clear.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 16:08 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. |
| Message-ID | <uFZQC.150634$R51.20242@fx03.iad> |
| In reply to | #170498 |
On 6/2/2018 2:25 PM, benj wrote: > On 6/2/2018 1:43 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 6/2/18 8:59 AM, benj wrote: >>> On 6/2/2018 9:51 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>>> Militia. Bear arms. These words have meaning. >>>>> >>>>> The SC has determined that the clauses in question are explanations, >>>>> not limitations. This is a *RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE*. >>>> >>>> The Supreme Court got it wrong. >>>> >>>> Americans may keep and bear Arms For The State's Militia . >>>> >>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >>>> >>> Right, Rolf. WAIT! I got it! Lets have Congress pass a law that makes >>> murder a crime? No doubt the terrorists in the NRA will fight that idea! >>> >>> I think you'll find, Rolf, that unless Congress passes "common sense" >>> laws that disarm all citizens "we" will continue shooting school >>> children and other innocents until the message is loud and clear! >> >> Why jump to the idea of disarming all citizens? What makes you think >> that is common sense? >> > I was told by all those making the same arguments you are that it was > common sense. Don't you agree? Pass laws that ban gun ownership for all > potential shooters and you stop all the masscres at schools and > concerts. Isn't that just common sense? Pass laws that ban alcohol and marijuana ownership for all potential users and you stop all drunk driving and pot-induced car accidents. Isn't that just common sense? Oh, wait, we've tried those things and they don't work either. Never mind.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. |
| Message-ID | <fnj8k6Fp1jcU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170831 |
Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> wrote: > On 6/2/2018 2:25 PM, benj wrote: >> On 6/2/2018 1:43 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 6/2/18 8:59 AM, benj wrote: >>>> On 6/2/2018 9:51 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>>>> Militia. Bear arms. These words have meaning. >>>>>> >>>>>> The SC has determined that the clauses in question are explanations, >>>>>> not limitations. This is a *RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE*. >>>>> >>>>> The Supreme Court got it wrong. >>>>> >>>>> Americans may keep and bear Arms For The State's Militia . >>>>> >>>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >>>>> >>>> Right, Rolf. WAIT! I got it! Lets have Congress pass a law that makes >>>> murder a crime? No doubt the terrorists in the NRA will fight that idea! >>>> >>>> I think you'll find, Rolf, that unless Congress passes "common sense" >>>> laws that disarm all citizens "we" will continue shooting school >>>> children and other innocents until the message is loud and clear! >>> >>> Why jump to the idea of disarming all citizens? What makes you think >>> that is common sense? >>> >> I was told by all those making the same arguments you are that it was >> common sense. Don't you agree? Pass laws that ban gun ownership for all >> potential shooters and you stop all the masscres at schools and >> concerts. Isn't that just common sense? > > Pass laws that ban alcohol and marijuana ownership > for all potential users and you stop all drunk > driving and pot-induced car accidents. Isn't that > just common sense? > Oh, wait, we've tried those things and they don't > work either. Never mind. > > We have made policy that has greatly reduced vehicular death. The success there has been amazing even with more miles driven. We should use the same model and have evidence based regulation, licensing, registration, limits, etc. Evidence based requires research of course. Without it we cannot target the laws well. The NRA and most gun owners show no understanding of improvement to our targeting.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 23:24 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. |
| Message-ID | <pf2r07$h14$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #170836 |
In news:fnj8k6Fp1jcU1@mid.individual.net, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> wrote: >> On 6/2/2018 2:25 PM, benj wrote: >>> On 6/2/2018 1:43 PM, Snit wrote: >>>> On 6/2/18 8:59 AM, benj wrote: >>>>> On 6/2/2018 9:51 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>>>>> Militia. Bear arms. These words have meaning. >>>>>>> The SC has determined that the clauses in question are >>>>>>> explanations, not limitations. This is a *RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE*. >>>>>> The Supreme Court got it wrong. >>>>>> Americans may keep and bear Arms For The State's Militia . >>>>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >>>>> Right, Rolf. WAIT! I got it! Lets have Congress pass a law that >>>>> makes murder a crime? No doubt the terrorists in the NRA will >>>>> fight that idea! >>>>> I think you'll find, Rolf, that unless Congress passes "common >>>>> sense" laws that disarm all citizens "we" will continue shooting >>>>> school children and other innocents until the message is loud and >>>>> clear! >>>> Why jump to the idea of disarming all citizens? What makes you >>>> think that is common sense? >>> I was told by all those making the same arguments you are that it >>> was common sense. Don't you agree? Pass laws that ban gun ownership >>> for all potential shooters and you stop all the masscres at schools >>> and concerts. Isn't that just common sense? >> Pass laws that ban alcohol and marijuana ownership >> for all potential users and you stop all drunk >> driving and pot-induced car accidents. Isn't that >> just common sense? >> Oh, wait, we've tried those things and they don't >> work either. Never mind. > We have made policy that has greatly reduced vehicular death. The > success there has been amazing even with more miles driven. > We should use the same model and have evidence based regulation, > licensing, registration, limits, etc. > Evidence based requires research of course. Without it we cannot > target the laws well. The NRA and most gun owners show no > understanding of improvement to our targeting. Then let the Department of Justice do it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 01:12 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. |
| Message-ID | <fnkajiF667U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170905 |
On 6/3/18 11:24 PM, max headroom wrote: > In news:fnj8k6Fp1jcU1@mid.individual.net, > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > >> Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> On 6/2/2018 2:25 PM, benj wrote: >>>> On 6/2/2018 1:43 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 6/2/18 8:59 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>> On 6/2/2018 9:51 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Militia. Bear arms. These words have meaning. > >>>>>>>> The SC has determined that the clauses in question are >>>>>>>> explanations, not limitations. This is a *RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE*. > >>>>>>> The Supreme Court got it wrong. > >>>>>>> Americans may keep and bear Arms For The State's Militia . > >>>>>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>>>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. > >>>>>> Right, Rolf. WAIT! I got it! Lets have Congress pass a law that >>>>>> makes murder a crime? No doubt the terrorists in the NRA will >>>>>> fight that idea! > >>>>>> I think you'll find, Rolf, that unless Congress passes "common >>>>>> sense" laws that disarm all citizens "we" will continue shooting >>>>>> school children and other innocents until the message is loud and >>>>>> clear! > >>>>> Why jump to the idea of disarming all citizens? What makes you >>>>> think that is common sense? > >>>> I was told by all those making the same arguments you are that it >>>> was common sense. Don't you agree? Pass laws that ban gun ownership >>>> for all potential shooters and you stop all the masscres at schools >>>> and concerts. Isn't that just common sense? > >>> Pass laws that ban alcohol and marijuana ownership >>> for all potential users and you stop all drunk >>> driving and pot-induced car accidents. Isn't that >>> just common sense? >>> Oh, wait, we've tried those things and they don't >>> work either. Never mind. > >> We have made policy that has greatly reduced vehicular death. The >> success there has been amazing even with more miles driven. > >> We should use the same model and have evidence based regulation, >> licensing, registration, limits, etc. > >> Evidence based requires research of course. Without it we cannot >> target the laws well. The NRA and most gun owners show no >> understanding of improvement to our targeting. > > Then let the Department of Justice do it. > > Do they do research on other health and safety issues? If so then I am fine with them doing research here, too. Absolutely! Heck, let the NRA also fund research (though given their built in bias of benefiting from gun sales and gun violence we should be wary of it). -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 21:15 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. |
| Message-ID | <pf52ql$n3l$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #170912 |
In news:fnkajiF667U2@mid.individual.net, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > On 6/3/18 11:24 PM, max headroom wrote: >> In news:fnj8k6Fp1jcU1@mid.individual.net, >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>> Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 6/2/2018 2:25 PM, benj wrote: >>>>> On 6/2/2018 1:43 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 6/2/18 8:59 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/2/2018 9:51 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Militia. Bear arms. These words have meaning. >>>>>>>>> The SC has determined that the clauses in question are >>>>>>>>> explanations, not limitations. This is a *RIGHT OF THE >>>>>>>>> PEOPLE*. >>>>>>>> The Supreme Court got it wrong. >>>>>>>> Americans may keep and bear Arms For The State's Militia . >>>>>>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>>>>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >>>>>>> Right, Rolf. WAIT! I got it! Lets have Congress pass a law that >>>>>>> makes murder a crime? No doubt the terrorists in the NRA will >>>>>>> fight that idea! >>>>>>> I think you'll find, Rolf, that unless Congress passes "common >>>>>>> sense" laws that disarm all citizens "we" will continue shooting >>>>>>> school children and other innocents until the message is loud >>>>>>> and clear! >>>>>> Why jump to the idea of disarming all citizens? What makes you >>>>>> think that is common sense? >>>>> I was told by all those making the same arguments you are that it >>>>> was common sense. Don't you agree? Pass laws that ban gun >>>>> ownership for all potential shooters and you stop all the >>>>> masscres at schools and concerts. Isn't that just common sense? >>>> Pass laws that ban alcohol and marijuana ownership >>>> for all potential users and you stop all drunk >>>> driving and pot-induced car accidents. Isn't that >>>> just common sense? >>>> Oh, wait, we've tried those things and they don't >>>> work either. Never mind. >>> We have made policy that has greatly reduced vehicular death. The >>> success there has been amazing even with more miles driven. >>> We should use the same model and have evidence based regulation, >>> licensing, registration, limits, etc. >>> Evidence based requires research of course. Without it we cannot >>> target the laws well. The NRA and most gun owners show no >>> understanding of improvement to our targeting. >> Then let the Department of Justice do it. > Do they do research on other health and safety issues?... No, they do research on CRIMES, and that's the real issue here-- lives lost to criminals who use guns in their crimes. AFAIK, accidental deaths due to gunshots continue to creep downward. Suicides are still a problem, but can a society that legalizes doctor-assisted suicide and champions "Death with Dignity" really bitch about the ultimate DIY project? > ... If so then I am fine with them doing research here, too. Absolutely! > Heck, let the NRA also fund research (though given their built in bias > of benefiting from gun sales and gun violence we should be wary of it). Given the CDC's history of advocating the elimination of privately-owned handguns, we should be wary of it, too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. |
| Message-ID | <fnmi0eFdcfbU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #171307 |
max headroom <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote: > In news:fnkajiF667U2@mid.individual.net, > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: > >> On 6/3/18 11:24 PM, max headroom wrote: >>> In news:fnj8k6Fp1jcU1@mid.individual.net, >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>> Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On 6/2/2018 2:25 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>> On 6/2/2018 1:43 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/2/18 8:59 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>> On 6/2/2018 9:51 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> Militia. Bear arms. These words have meaning. > >>>>>>>>>> The SC has determined that the clauses in question are >>>>>>>>>> explanations, not limitations. This is a *RIGHT OF THE >>>>>>>>>> PEOPLE*. > >>>>>>>>> The Supreme Court got it wrong. > >>>>>>>>> Americans may keep and bear Arms For The State's Militia . > >>>>>>>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>>>>>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. > >>>>>>>> Right, Rolf. WAIT! I got it! Lets have Congress pass a law that >>>>>>>> makes murder a crime? No doubt the terrorists in the NRA will >>>>>>>> fight that idea! > >>>>>>>> I think you'll find, Rolf, that unless Congress passes "common >>>>>>>> sense" laws that disarm all citizens "we" will continue shooting >>>>>>>> school children and other innocents until the message is loud >>>>>>>> and clear! > >>>>>>> Why jump to the idea of disarming all citizens? What makes you >>>>>>> think that is common sense? > >>>>>> I was told by all those making the same arguments you are that it >>>>>> was common sense. Don't you agree? Pass laws that ban gun >>>>>> ownership for all potential shooters and you stop all the >>>>>> masscres at schools and concerts. Isn't that just common sense? > >>>>> Pass laws that ban alcohol and marijuana ownership >>>>> for all potential users and you stop all drunk >>>>> driving and pot-induced car accidents. Isn't that >>>>> just common sense? >>>>> Oh, wait, we've tried those things and they don't >>>>> work either. Never mind. > >>>> We have made policy that has greatly reduced vehicular death. The >>>> success there has been amazing even with more miles driven. > >>>> We should use the same model and have evidence based regulation, >>>> licensing, registration, limits, etc. > >>>> Evidence based requires research of course. Without it we cannot >>>> target the laws well. The NRA and most gun owners show no >>>> understanding of improvement to our targeting. > >>> Then let the Department of Justice do it. > >> Do they do research on other health and safety issues?... > > No, they do research on CRIMES, and that's the real issue here-- lives > lost to criminals who use > guns in their crimes. > > AFAIK, accidental deaths due to gunshots continue to creep downward. > Suicides are still a problem, > but can a society that legalizes doctor-assisted suicide and champions > "Death with Dignity" really > bitch about the ultimate DIY project? > >> ... If so then I am fine with them doing research here, too. Absolutely! > >> Heck, let the NRA also fund research (though given their built in bias >> of benefiting from gun sales and gun violence we should be wary of it). > > Given the CDC's history of advocating the elimination of privately-owned > handguns, we should be wary > of it, too. > > > You changed the topic from health impacts to crimes. Interesting.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web