Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #170020 > unrolled thread
| Started by | !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-06-01 08:08 -0500 |
| Last post | 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 274 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-01 08:08 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:35 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 19:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:53 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 21:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:51 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 22:35 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 17:16 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 21:10 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 01:39 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 22:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 19:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:30 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:34 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 20:47 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 22:01 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 19:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:28 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:27 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:38 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:53 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 20:28 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 22:39 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:33 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:19 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:18 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-02 04:54 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-02 05:06 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:54 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 03:41 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:11 -0700
The Supreme Court got it wrong. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 06:51 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:59 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:43 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:25 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:28 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:45 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:08 -0600
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-03 23:24 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 01:12 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:15 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:37 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 10:48 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:00 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 13:27 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:32 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 16:58 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 21:38 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:49 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 03:49 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:45 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 22:47 -0600
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 05:40 +0000
Permission to breath ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 19:10 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:13 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:07 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 20:10 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:53 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 22:03 -0600
Re: Permission to breath ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 23:33 -0400
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:42 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-03 07:57 -0400
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:08 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:07 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:36 -0600
Clarity. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-03 08:52 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 03:46 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:53 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 22:59 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 23:19 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-03 09:10 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:31 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:12 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:26 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:37 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:10 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:54 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 22:19 -0500
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 20:58 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-07 00:24 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 05:43 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-07 05:45 -0600
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-08 07:17 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 00:21 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 16:07 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:30 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-10 01:32 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 18:34 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:50 -0700
"Natural Rights" aren't always wonderful. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 19:02 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:49 -0700
Depressed Losers, slaughtering consert goers, is "natural" ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 12:21 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 02:18 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:25 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:38 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:43 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:16 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 09:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:53 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-02 01:20 -0400
Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 06:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 10:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 13:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 19:05 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 18:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 19:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 21:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 22:34 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-03 07:59 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 04:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-03 14:02 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 01:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 09:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 13:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-03 15:21 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 16:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 16:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 17:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 18:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 18:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 03:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-04 17:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 15:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 04:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 16:41 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 16:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 17:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 17:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-03 18:51 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 01:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-03 20:11 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 18:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 18:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 03:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 12:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 12:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 00:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 01:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 17:37 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 20:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:30 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:02 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:02 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 17:59 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 15:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:24 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 16:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:44 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:42 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-04 17:27 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 15:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-04 23:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:51 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 07:19 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 08:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 09:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:51 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 13:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 17:02 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 17:56 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 22:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 18:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 07:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:27 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 16:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 08:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:32 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:34 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-06 19:03 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 17:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 17:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:15 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:41 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:24 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:17 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:08 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:01 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:32 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-08 05:15 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 06:41 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:49 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 07:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 21:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:07 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Page 9 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 14 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 17:13 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnjehcFq01uU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170850 |
On 6/3/18 5:05 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: > On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 16:47:21 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > > >> To you because it does not fit your bias. Sure. For those of us who want >> to gain an understanding with limited bias, however, it is of value. Sure. > > Of course it has value for you. You're all about trying to define the > 2A to your agenda. What agenda do you even mean? ...>>> It's not. Confiscation is inherent in ANY gun control movement. You >>> know that. >> >> We have plenty of gun laws without confiscation. Your claim is simply >> not true. > > It's 100% accurate. Do you deny the existence of gun laws that do not speak of confiscation? ... >> Ah, more word twisting on your part. > > LOL > > That's funny. > > Gun grabbers *LOVE* to shriek about how gun owners "don't want any > research" Why bring up gun grabbers, and if you do join me in wanting research this is a good thing. What are you disagreeing with though? ... > I love my 'facts" but not yours. There are not your facts and mine, there are merely facts. > Example: From one side of their mouths, gun-grabbers will state that > almost the entire country wants more gun control; out of the other > side of their mouth they'll claim this small NRA lobby somehow > "controls" congressional votes. > > Too funny. What gun grabbers and why bring them up? Your ability to focus is quite poor. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 18:31 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <6d59hdprj77p73od0o6gimavj3l2mep23r@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #170852 |
On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 17:13:30 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >What agenda do you even mean? Wow. Just wow. You really do have trouble following a thread. >...>>> It's not. Confiscation is inherent in ANY gun control movement. You >>>> know that. >>> >>> We have plenty of gun laws without confiscation. Your claim is simply >>> not true. >> >> It's 100% accurate. > >Do you deny the existence of gun laws that do not speak of confiscation? ROFLMAO Are you really this dense? >> LOL >> >> That's funny. >> >> Gun grabbers *LOVE* to shriek about how gun owners "don't want any >> research" > >Why bring up gun grabbers Because there's only two sides to this issue. Gun grabbers are on one side. Americans are on the other. >> I love my 'facts" but not yours. > >There are not your facts and mine, there are merely facts. [chuckle] >> Example: From one side of their mouths, gun-grabbers will state that >> almost the entire country wants more gun control; out of the other >> side of their mouth they'll claim this small NRA lobby somehow >> "controls" congressional votes. >> >> Too funny. > >What gun grabbers You're really having trouble with this concept, aren't you?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 18:40 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnjjkqFqq66U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170852 |
Klaus snipped a lot so responding to my own post where the context is still here. On 6/3/18 5:13 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/3/18 5:05 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 16:47:21 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >> >>> To you because it does not fit your bias. Sure. For those of us who want >>> to gain an understanding with limited bias, however, it is of value. >>> Sure. >> >> Of course it has value for you. You're all about trying to define the >> 2A to your agenda. > > What agenda do you even mean? Klaus could not name any agenda at all. Turns out he made that up to troll me. > ...>>> It's not. Confiscation is inherent in ANY gun control movement. You >>>> know that. >>> >>> We have plenty of gun laws without confiscation. Your claim is simply >>> not true. >> >> It's 100% accurate. > > Do you deny the existence of gun laws that do not speak of confiscation? Klaus had no answer to this, only insults. > ... > >>> Ah, more word twisting on your part. >> >> LOL >> >> That's funny. >> >> Gun grabbers *LOVE* to shriek about how gun owners "don't want any >> research" > > Why bring up gun grabbers, and if you do join me in wanting research > this is a good thing. What are you disagreeing with though? Klaus expressed his black and white world view where there are only "two sides" on this complex issue... and then insisted that ALL Americans are on one side. Completely delusional of him. > ... > >> I love my 'facts" but not yours. > > There are not your facts and mine, there are merely facts. Klaus had nothing of value to add here, and no explanation for his confusion of what a fact even is. >> Example: From one side of their mouths, gun-grabbers will state that >> almost the entire country wants more gun control; out of the other >> side of their mouth they'll claim this small NRA lobby somehow >> "controls" congressional votes. >> >> Too funny. > > What gun grabbers and why bring them up? Your ability to focus is quite > poor. Klaus could not say which gun grabbers he meant, and then twisted things to try to put me on the defensive. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 03:44 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <h06ahdlgvj168lq8i2i4eb41ij7org23jt@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #170864 |
On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 18:40:41 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >Klaus Snit is now responding to himself. That's a sign.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 08:39 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnl4q6F577rU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170864 |
On 6/3/18 6:40 PM, Snit wrote: > Klaus snipped a lot so responding to my own post where the context is > still here. > > On 6/3/18 5:13 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 6/3/18 5:05 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 16:47:21 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> To you because it does not fit your bias. Sure. For those of us who >>>> want >>>> to gain an understanding with limited bias, however, it is of value. >>>> Sure. >>> >>> Of course it has value for you. You're all about trying to define the >>> 2A to your agenda. >> >> What agenda do you even mean? > > Klaus could not name any agenda at all. Turns out he made that up to > troll me. > >> ...>>> It's not. Confiscation is inherent in ANY gun control movement. >> You >>>>> know that. >>>> >>>> We have plenty of gun laws without confiscation. Your claim is simply >>>> not true. >>> >>> It's 100% accurate. >> >> Do you deny the existence of gun laws that do not speak of confiscation? > > Klaus had no answer to this, only insults. Klaus still has no answer for this. >> ... >> >>>> Ah, more word twisting on your part. >>> >>> LOL >>> >>> That's funny. >>> >>> Gun grabbers *LOVE* to shriek about how gun owners "don't want any >>> research" >> >> Why bring up gun grabbers, and if you do join me in wanting research >> this is a good thing. What are you disagreeing with though? > > Klaus expressed his black and white world view where there are only "two > sides" on this complex issue... and then insisted that ALL Americans are > on one side. Completely delusional of him. Klaus had no comment on this. >> ... >> >>> I love my 'facts" but not yours. >> >> There are not your facts and mine, there are merely facts. > > Klaus had nothing of value to add here, and no explanation for his > confusion of what a fact even is. Klaus has no comment on this. >>> Example: From one side of their mouths, gun-grabbers will state that >>> almost the entire country wants more gun control; out of the other >>> side of their mouth they'll claim this small NRA lobby somehow >>> "controls" congressional votes. >>> >>> Too funny. >> >> What gun grabbers and why bring them up? Your ability to focus is >> quite poor. > > Klaus could not say which gun grabbers he meant, and then twisted things > to try to put me on the defensive. Klaus has no comment on this. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 17:37 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <kiiRC.382342$nq5.146881@fx36.iad> |
| In reply to | #170743 |
On 6/3/2018 2:03 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/3/18 4:02 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 18:53:02 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 6/2/18 6:25 PM, max headroom wrote: >>>> In news:fngs46Fb1d7U6@mid.individual.net, >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> typed: >>>> >>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 13:29:48 -0700, Snit >>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/2/18 1:27 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:57:54 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 6/2/18 10:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:14:41 -0700, Snit >>>>>>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/2/18 6:27 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> A well regulated Militia [ no comma ] >>>>>>>>>>>>> being necessary to the security of a free State, ... >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Or, more clearly: " For The State's Militia, ... " >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>>>>>>>>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And when stating "no comma", keep in mind there were something >>>>>>>>>>> like seven different versions of the second amendment with >>>>>>>>>>> different commas and capitalization. >>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cool- how many of the say "The right of the state"???? >>>> >>>>>>>>> I do not think that phrase is in the constitution >>>> >>>>>>>> Correct. >>>> >>>>>>> Are you just looking for specific phrases or are you trying to get >>>>>>> to a point? I suspect you are trying to say that since that phrase >>>>>>> is not there this means the concept of what the states can do (what >>>>>>> they have rights to do) is not there. Is that correct? If not did >>>>>>> you have a broader point? >>>> >>>>>> No, you're not even close. >>>> >>>>>> It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's >>>>>> right, not the feds' right. >>>> >>>>> That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough. >>>> >>>> It's supported by the Supreme Court of the United States of America. >>>> Now show us your hand. >>>> >>>> Oh, right. You already did. >> >> ================================================== >> ================================================== >> ================= WARNING! ======================== >> GOAL POST MOVES AHEAD! >> ================= WARNING! ======================== >> ================================================== >> ================================================== >> >> >>> Well, the SCOTUS also talked of limits,[..] >> >> People's right. Got anything else? >> > Sure. Things such as the actual meaning of the words / phrases, the > dislike of judicial activism, etc. > > Remember, my views are clear and easy to support: > > * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much > exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed > action". Self-defense is "armed action". > * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of > the country which were never, as far as I can find, > challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it > a hard sale to say they were against the second > amendment. Because the Second Amendment was not "encorporated" which meant states and cities could pass laws. > * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported > the states rights view. Supreme court settled the issue (also civil war) > * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from > mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun > laws. Utter garbage and hate propaganda. NRA does not benefit from Mass shootings. Leftists seeking legislation for public disarmament benefit from public responses to shootings. NRA benefits from leftist efforts to repeal bill of rights and citizen resistance to that effort which scares honest gun owners into memberships and donations. THank you SNIT. > * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on > arms... what one could call "infringements". There are limits given by the definition of the right. But those limitations are not the arbitrary tyranny of government permission that you are promoting. > * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as > we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything > else that is tied to death and injuries. Everyone is for more and better real science. However when those with a political agenda produce pseudoscience papers to further their political agendas trying to use public respect for science by producing junk science propaganda, science and the public are the losers. > * I back evidence-based policies. Everyone backs evidence-based policies. Too bad there s so little of it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 15:54 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnlu8lFa432U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #171162 |
On 6/4/18 2:37 PM, benj wrote: ... >> Remember, my views are clear and easy to support: >> >> * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much >> exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed >> action". > > Self-defense is "armed action". If you can give a good reason why we should ignore the way the term "bear arms" was used at the time of the writing of the constitution I would love to hear it. If not I think we should stick with that meaning. >> * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of >> the country which were never, as far as I can find, >> challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it >> a hard sale to say they were against the second >> amendment. > > Because the Second Amendment was not "encorporated" which meant states > and cities could pass laws. And they still can. Sure. >> * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported >> the states rights view. > > Supreme court settled the issue (also civil war) The civil war has little to do with this, but, sure, the activist judges on the Supreme Court pushed a redefinition which IS law in a 5:4 decision. I do get that. It is not in dispute. Not sure why you mention it. >> * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from >> mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun >> laws. > > Utter garbage and hate propaganda. NRA does not benefit from Mass > shootings. Leftists seeking legislation for public disarmament benefit > from public responses to shootings. NRA benefits from leftist efforts to > repeal bill of rights and citizen resistance to that effort which scares > honest gun owners into memberships and donations. THank you SNIT. Your denial of simple facts, which I offered strong support for in a recent post, is not of any value. Nor is your name calling and insults -- your feelings of wanting to put others down to feel better about yourself is not of interest to me. >> * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on >> arms... what one could call "infringements". > > There are limits given by the definition of the right. But those > limitations are not the arbitrary tyranny of government permission that > you are promoting. I am promoting evidence-based policy. Can you explain why you think that is a bad thing? >> * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as >> we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything >> else that is tied to death and injuries. > > Everyone is for more and better real science. However when those with a > political agenda produce pseudoscience papers to further their political > agendas trying to use public respect for science by producing junk > science propaganda, science and the public are the losers. I am not interested in conspiracy theories. >> * I back evidence-based policies. > > Everyone backs evidence-based policies. > Too bad there s so little of it. Above you claim my support for evidence-based policies is "arbitrary tyranny of government permission". Here you seem to back it. Can you explain? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 04:01 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <5ki7hd9qi6e8enuta128vd0ecak1eun58a@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #170565 |
On 3 Jun 2018 00:47:03 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 13:29:48 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 6/2/18 1:27 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:57:54 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 6/2/18 10:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:14:41 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/2/18 6:27 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>>>>>> A well regulated Militia [ no comma ] >>>>>>>>> being necessary to the security of a free State, ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Or, more clearly: " For The State's Militia, ... " >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>>>>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> And when stating "no comma", keep in mind there were something like >>>>>>> seven different versions of the second amendment with different commas >>>>>>> and capitalization. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cool- how many of the say "The right of the state"???? >>>>>> >>>>> I do not think that phrase is in the constitution >>>> >>>> Correct. >>>> >>> Are you just looking for specific phrases or are you trying to get to a >>> point? I suspect you are trying to say that since that phrase is not >>> there this means the concept of what the states can do (what they have >>> rights to do) is not there. Is that correct? If not did you have a >>> broader point? >> >> No, you're not even close. >> >> It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's >> right, not the feds' right. >> > >That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough. That's what it says, if you're capable of reading.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 11:02 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fniop0Fm0isU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170682 |
On 6/3/18 4:01 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: > On 3 Jun 2018 00:47:03 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 13:29:48 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/2/18 1:27 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:57:54 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/2/18 10:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:14:41 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 6/2/18 6:27 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>>>>>>> A well regulated Militia [ no comma ] >>>>>>>>>> being necessary to the security of a free State, ... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Or, more clearly: " For The State's Militia, ... " >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>>>>>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And when stating "no comma", keep in mind there were something like >>>>>>>> seven different versions of the second amendment with different commas >>>>>>>> and capitalization. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cool- how many of the say "The right of the state"???? >>>>>>> >>>>>> I do not think that phrase is in the constitution >>>>> >>>>> Correct. >>>>> >>>> Are you just looking for specific phrases or are you trying to get to a >>>> point? I suspect you are trying to say that since that phrase is not >>>> there this means the concept of what the states can do (what they have >>>> rights to do) is not there. Is that correct? If not did you have a >>>> broader point? >>> >>> No, you're not even close. >>> >>> It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's >>> right, not the feds' right. >>> >> >> That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough. > > That's what it says, if you're capable of reading. > Ah, the ol' it is as you say because you say so. Very convincing! Thanks! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 11:13 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <7tb8hddejo1m6gcjd1h9ba7868hpgu9t01@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #170742 |
On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 11:02:08 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 6/3/18 4:01 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >> On 3 Jun 2018 00:47:03 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> wrote: >>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 13:29:48 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 6/2/18 1:27 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:57:54 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/2/18 10:38 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 10:14:41 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 6/2/18 6:27 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> A well regulated Militia [ no comma ] >>>>>>>>>>> being necessary to the security of a free State, ... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Or, more clearly: " For The State's Militia, ... " >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Clearly, no "Militia" should include depressed gunmen >>>>>>>>>> slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And when stating "no comma", keep in mind there were something like >>>>>>>>> seven different versions of the second amendment with different commas >>>>>>>>> and capitalization. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cool- how many of the say "The right of the state"???? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I do not think that phrase is in the constitution >>>>>> >>>>>> Correct. >>>>>> >>>>> Are you just looking for specific phrases or are you trying to get to a >>>>> point? I suspect you are trying to say that since that phrase is not >>>>> there this means the concept of what the states can do (what they have >>>>> rights to do) is not there. Is that correct? If not did you have a >>>>> broader point? >>>> >>>> No, you're not even close. >>>> >>>> It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's >>>> right, not the feds' right. >>>> >>> >>> That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough. >> >> That's what it says, if you're capable of reading. >> >Ah, the ol' it is as you say because you say so. Very convincing! No, it's the old "It is because that's what it says." I don't care if you're convinced.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 11:39 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fniqvoFm0isU7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170750 |
On 6/3/18 11:13 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>> Are you just looking for specific phrases or are you trying to get to a >>>>>> point? I suspect you are trying to say that since that phrase is not >>>>>> there this means the concept of what the states can do (what they have >>>>>> rights to do) is not there. Is that correct? If not did you have a >>>>>> broader point? >>>>> No, you're not even close. >>>>> >>>>> It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's >>>>> right, not the feds' right. >>>>> >>>> That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough. >>> That's what it says, if you're capable of reading. >>> >> Ah, the ol' it is as you say because you say so. Very convincing! > No, it's the old "It is because that's what it says." I don't care if > you're convinced. You are welcome to have an unsupported opinion. It is not as though you owe me or anyone else an explanation. Just do not expect me to be convinced by your emotion. I tend to stick to evidence on such matters. * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed action". * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of the country which were never, as far as I can find, challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it a hard sale to say they were against the second amendment. * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported the states rights view. * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun laws. * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on arms... what one could call "infringements". * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything else that is tied to death and injuries. * I back evidence-based policies. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 11:54 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <v8e8hdt4ml7tutaandcdbhuu1q0rs1q1gr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #170755 |
On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 11:39:52 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 6/3/18 11:13 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>> Are you just looking for specific phrases or are you trying to get to a >>>>>>> point? I suspect you are trying to say that since that phrase is not >>>>>>> there this means the concept of what the states can do (what they have >>>>>>> rights to do) is not there. Is that correct? If not did you have a >>>>>>> broader point? >>>>>> No, you're not even close. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's >>>>>> right, not the feds' right. >>>>>> >>>>> That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough. >>>> That's what it says, if you're capable of reading. >>>> >>> Ah, the ol' it is as you say because you say so. Very convincing! >> No, it's the old "It is because that's what it says." I don't care if >> you're convinced. > >You are welcome to have an unsupported opinion. Just as you're welcome to have an opinion supported by bullshit. In the end, you will lose, just like you people always do.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 12:05 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnisfrFm0j7U10@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170758 |
On 6/3/18 11:54 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: > On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 11:39:52 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > >> On 6/3/18 11:13 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>> Are you just looking for specific phrases or are you trying to get to a >>>>>>>> point? I suspect you are trying to say that since that phrase is not >>>>>>>> there this means the concept of what the states can do (what they have >>>>>>>> rights to do) is not there. Is that correct? If not did you have a >>>>>>>> broader point? >>>>>>> No, you're not even close. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's >>>>>>> right, not the feds' right. >>>>>>> >>>>>> That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough. >>>>> That's what it says, if you're capable of reading. >>>>> >>>> Ah, the ol' it is as you say because you say so. Very convincing! >>> No, it's the old "It is because that's what it says." I don't care if >>> you're convinced. >> >> You are welcome to have an unsupported opinion. > > Just as you're welcome to have an opinion supported by bullshit. > > In the end, you will lose, just like you people always do. > Lose what? Are you suggesting that evidence-based policy will not with the day and that the US will remain an effective oligarchy? If so, you may very well be right. At the same time my support of equal rights has been growing since the start of the country, and has continued to grow -- at least in some areas -- even in the last few years. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 16:41 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <54v8hdh5crs136gsqkertpurb0cmc60o19@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #170763 |
On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 12:05:31 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 6/3/18 11:54 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 11:39:52 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 6/3/18 11:13 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>> Are you just looking for specific phrases or are you trying to get to a >>>>>>>>> point? I suspect you are trying to say that since that phrase is not >>>>>>>>> there this means the concept of what the states can do (what they have >>>>>>>>> rights to do) is not there. Is that correct? If not did you have a >>>>>>>>> broader point? >>>>>>>> No, you're not even close. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's >>>>>>>> right, not the feds' right. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough. >>>>>> That's what it says, if you're capable of reading. >>>>>> >>>>> Ah, the ol' it is as you say because you say so. Very convincing! >>>> No, it's the old "It is because that's what it says." I don't care if >>>> you're convinced. >>> >>> You are welcome to have an unsupported opinion. >> >> Just as you're welcome to have an opinion supported by bullshit. >> >> In the end, you will lose, just like you people always do. >> >Lose what? Really? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 16:48 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnjd1kFpochU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170843 |
On 6/3/18 4:41 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: > On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 12:05:31 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > >> On 6/3/18 11:54 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 11:39:52 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/3/18 11:13 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Are you just looking for specific phrases or are you trying to get to a >>>>>>>>>> point? I suspect you are trying to say that since that phrase is not >>>>>>>>>> there this means the concept of what the states can do (what they have >>>>>>>>>> rights to do) is not there. Is that correct? If not did you have a >>>>>>>>>> broader point? >>>>>>>>> No, you're not even close. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's the people's right, not the militia's right, not the state's >>>>>>>>> right, not the feds' right. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That is your unsupported opinion. Fair enough. >>>>>>> That's what it says, if you're capable of reading. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Ah, the ol' it is as you say because you say so. Very convincing! >>>>> No, it's the old "It is because that's what it says." I don't care if >>>>> you're convinced. >>>> >>>> You are welcome to have an unsupported opinion. >>> >>> Just as you're welcome to have an opinion supported by bullshit. >>> >>> In the end, you will lose, just like you people always do. >>> >> Lose what? > > Really? > > LOL > I have no idea what game you are playing... nor the rules of how one wins or loses. Cannot say I really care. Here is, on the topic, much of what I do care about: * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed action". * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of the country which were never, as far as I can find, challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it a hard sale to say they were against the second amendment. * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported the states rights view. * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun laws. * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on arms... what one could call "infringements". * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything else that is tied to death and injuries. * I back evidence-based policies. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 17:07 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <3j09hddselo950rfa0eialpv87ceh4qrou@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #170845 |
On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 16:48:04 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> In the end, you will lose, just like you people always do. >>>> >>> Lose what? >> >> Really? >> >> LOL >> >I have no idea what game you are playing... Of COURSE you don't. [chuckle] I'll explain, then. It's us [Americans] versus you [unAmerican gun grabbers] It's always been that way, and it will always BE that way. Its win or lose-- you either get our guns, or you don't. You pretending you don't understand this simple fact is quite telling.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 17:14 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnjejeFq01uU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170851 |
On 6/3/18 5:07 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: > On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 16:48:04 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > > >>>>> In the end, you will lose, just like you people always do. >>>>> >>>> Lose what? >>> >>> Really? >>> >>> LOL >>> >> I have no idea what game you are playing... > > Of COURSE you don't. > > [chuckle] > > > I'll explain, then. > > It's us [Americans] versus you [unAmerican gun grabbers] I am an American and I have not spoken of grabbing any guns. Maybe you have me confused with someone else? > It's always been that way, and it will always BE that way. > > Its win or lose-- you either get our guns, or you don't. > > You pretending you don't understand this simple fact is quite telling. Not interested in your trolling game. To get back to the topic: * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed action". * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of the country which were never, as far as I can find, challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it a hard sale to say they were against the second amendment. * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported the states rights view. * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun laws. * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on arms... what one could call "infringements". * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything else that is tied to death and injuries. * I back evidence-based policies. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 17:17 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <baum0b.8fq.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #170853 |
On 2018-06-03 5:14 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/3/18 5:07 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 16:48:04 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >> >>>>>> In the end, you will lose, just like you people always do. >>>>>> >>>>> Lose what? >>>> >>>> Really? >>>> >>>> LOL >>>> >>> I have no idea what game you are playing... >> >> Of COURSE you don't. >> >> [chuckle] >> >> >> I'll explain, then. >> >> It's us [Americans] versus you [unAmerican gun grabbers] > > I am an American and I have not spoken of grabbing any guns. Maybe you > have me confused with someone else? > >> It's always been that way, and it will always BE that way. >> >> Its win or lose-- you either get our guns, or you don't. >> >> You pretending you don't understand this simple fact is quite telling. > > Not interested in your trolling game. To get back to the topic: > > * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much > exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed > action". > > * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of > the country which were never, as far as I can find, > challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it > a hard sale to say they were against the second > amendment. > > * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported > the states rights view. > > * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from > mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun > laws. > > * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on > arms... what one could call "infringements". > > * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as > we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything > else that is tied to death and injuries. > > * I back evidence-based policies. > > > > we dealt with this already its all solved now , any debating after this means , you're just too old ladies that like to bitch
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 17:21 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <fnjevsFq2cgU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170854 |
On 6/3/18 5:17 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-06-03 5:14 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 6/3/18 5:07 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 16:48:04 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>>> In the end, you will lose, just like you people always do. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Lose what? >>>>> >>>>> Really? >>>>> >>>>> LOL >>>>> >>>> I have no idea what game you are playing... >>> >>> Of COURSE you don't. >>> >>> [chuckle] >>> >>> >>> I'll explain, then. >>> >>> It's us [Americans] versus you [unAmerican gun grabbers] >> >> I am an American and I have not spoken of grabbing any guns. Maybe you >> have me confused with someone else? >> >>> It's always been that way, and it will always BE that way. >>> >>> Its win or lose-- you either get our guns, or you don't. >>> >>> You pretending you don't understand this simple fact is quite telling. >> >> Not interested in your trolling game. To get back to the topic: >> >> * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much >> exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed >> action". >> >> * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of >> the country which were never, as far as I can find, >> challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it >> a hard sale to say they were against the second >> amendment. >> >> * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported >> the states rights view. >> >> * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from >> mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun >> laws. >> >> * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on >> arms... what one could call "infringements". >> >> * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as >> we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything >> else that is tied to death and injuries. >> >> * I back evidence-based policies. >> >> >> >> > we dealt with this already its all solved now , > any debating after this means , > you're just too old ladies that like to bitch I have a STRONG tendency to feed those who troll. I am not suggesting it speaks well of me... and it very much often upsets those who are trolling. Someone in COLA has spent YEARS collecting quotes from those trolling, and some others (including their own socks), saying bad things about me... they post them over and over and over because they cannot actually back their derogatory claims about me. I suspect he will show up soon to share. As long as he keeps it here I have no real issue with it... but he started contacting my employer, co-workers, clients, family, neighbors, etc. Recently the police got involved and told him that such harassment is not acceptable. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 18:51 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. |
| Message-ID | <v539hdt0jiukpb4fuqocgvi048kf5cbu2n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #170855 |
On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 17:21:15 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 6/3/18 5:17 PM, % wrote: >> On 2018-06-03 5:14 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 6/3/18 5:07 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: >>>> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 16:48:04 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> In the end, you will lose, just like you people always do. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lose what? >>>>>> >>>>>> Really? >>>>>> >>>>>> LOL >>>>>> >>>>> I have no idea what game you are playing... >>>> >>>> Of COURSE you don't. >>>> >>>> [chuckle] >>>> >>>> >>>> I'll explain, then. >>>> >>>> It's us [Americans] versus you [unAmerican gun grabbers] >>> >>> I am an American and I have not spoken of grabbing any guns. Maybe you >>> have me confused with someone else? >>> >>>> It's always been that way, and it will always BE that way. >>>> >>>> Its win or lose-- you either get our guns, or you don't. >>>> >>>> You pretending you don't understand this simple fact is quite telling. >>> >>> Not interested in your trolling game. To get back to the topic: >>> >>> * The meaning / usage of "bear arms" (pretty much >>> exclusively for "war, soldiering or organized, armed >>> action". >>> >>> * Their were laws restricting firearms at the start of >>> the country which were never, as far as I can find, >>> challenged on second amendment grounds. This makes it >>> a hard sale to say they were against the second >>> amendment. >>> >>> * Most (though not all) relevant scholars have supported >>> the states rights view. >>> >>> * We should not allow the NRA, a group that benefits from >>> mass shootings and terrorism, to largely control our gun >>> laws. >>> >>> * We clearly do have, have had, and should have, limits on >>> arms... what one could call "infringements". >>> >>> * We should do more research on gun deaths and injuries, as >>> we do with vehicles, pools, food, and pretty much everything >>> else that is tied to death and injuries. >>> >>> * I back evidence-based policies. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> we dealt with this already its all solved now , >> any debating after this means , >> you're just too old ladies that like to bitch > >I have a STRONG tendency to feed those who troll. I am not suggesting it >speaks well of me... and it very much often upsets those who are trolling. Please explain this method in more depth. > >Someone in COLA has spent YEARS collecting quotes from those trolling, >and some others (including their own socks), saying bad things about >me... they post them over and over and over because they cannot actually >back their derogatory claims about me. What's a COLA > >I suspect he will show up soon to share. As long as he keeps it here I >have no real issue with it... but he started contacting my employer, >co-workers, clients, family, neighbors, etc. Recently the police got >involved and told him that such harassment is not acceptable. An outterfilther, oh yay
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web