Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #169806 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-31 05:22 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-06-04 23:17 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 672 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Slaughtering concert goers. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-31 05:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 12:06 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 15:49 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-31 20:12 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 17:20 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 16:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 19:57 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 17:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 21:38 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 02:42 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:22 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 17:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:07 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:15 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 08:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 09:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 22:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 00:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 11:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 14:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:58 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-05-31 19:49 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-05-31 17:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 02:39 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:13 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 03:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 08:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 08:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 11:59 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Slaughtering concert goers. ❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 14:07 -0500
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-01 13:13 -0600
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 14:21 -0500
Re: ? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ? Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-01 13:55 -0600
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 12:56 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-01 23:35 +0100
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-01 23:57 +0100
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-02 00:07 +0100
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-01 20:29 -0400
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-02 08:32 +0100
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-02 08:32 +0100
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 09:51 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-02 18:09 +0100
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-01 17:10 -0600
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-02 00:13 +0100
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 18:50 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:00 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:29 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:47 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 00:18 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 09:14 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:48 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 14:28 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:14 -0400
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 00:18 +0000
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 00:18 +0000
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 21:20 -0400
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 19:03 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:26 +0000
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 19:45 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:54 +0000
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 20:58 -0600
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 20:57 -0600
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 20:04 -0700
Re: ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ? Slaughtering concert goers. ? Snowflake ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-02 08:15 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 12:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 17:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 17:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 18:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 18:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:11 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 04:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:12 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 00:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:31 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:39 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 18:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:14 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:19 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:26 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 19:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:15 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 20:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:32 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:34 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:32 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 20:26 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-01 18:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-01 08:08 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:35 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 19:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:53 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 21:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:51 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 22:35 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 17:16 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 21:10 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 01:39 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 22:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 19:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:30 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:34 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 20:47 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-02 22:01 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 19:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:28 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:27 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:38 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 02:53 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 20:28 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 22:39 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:33 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:19 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:18 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-02 04:54 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-02 05:06 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 22:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:54 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 03:41 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:11 -0700
The Supreme Court got it wrong. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 06:51 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:59 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:43 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:25 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:28 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:45 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:08 -0600
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-03 23:24 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 01:12 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:15 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:37 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 10:48 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:00 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 13:27 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:32 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 16:58 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 21:38 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:49 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 03:49 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:45 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 22:47 -0600
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 05:40 +0000
Permission to breath ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 19:10 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:13 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:07 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 20:10 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:53 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 22:03 -0600
Re: Permission to breath ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 23:33 -0400
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:42 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-03 07:57 -0400
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:08 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:07 -0700
Re: Permission to breath ? Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:36 -0600
Clarity. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-03 08:52 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-03 03:46 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:53 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 22:59 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 23:19 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-03 09:10 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:31 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:12 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:26 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:37 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:10 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:54 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 22:19 -0500
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 20:58 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-07 00:24 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 05:43 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-07 05:45 -0600
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-08 07:17 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 00:21 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 16:07 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:30 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-10 01:32 +0000
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 18:34 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:50 -0700
"Natural Rights" aren't always wonderful. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 19:02 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:49 -0700
Depressed Losers, slaughtering consert goers, is "natural" ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 12:21 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 02:18 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:25 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:38 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:43 -0700
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:16 -0400
Re: The Supreme Court got it wrong. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 09:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:53 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-02 01:20 -0400
Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-02 06:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 10:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 10:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 13:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 13:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-02 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 19:05 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 18:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 19:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 20:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 21:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 21:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 22:34 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-03 07:59 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 04:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 12:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-03 14:02 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 01:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 09:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 13:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-03 15:21 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 16:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 16:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 17:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 18:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 18:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 03:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-04 17:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 15:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 04:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 11:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 11:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 12:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 16:41 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 16:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 17:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 17:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 17:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-03 18:51 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 01:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-03 20:11 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-03 18:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 18:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 03:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 08:40 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 12:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 12:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 00:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 01:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:21 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 17:37 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 20:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:30 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:02 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:02 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 17:59 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 15:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:24 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 16:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:44 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:42 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-04 17:27 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 15:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-04 23:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:51 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 07:19 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 08:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 09:37 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:51 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 13:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 17:02 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 17:56 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 22:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 18:48 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 07:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:27 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 16:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 08:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:32 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-06 15:34 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-06 19:03 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 17:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 17:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:15 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:41 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:24 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:17 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:08 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:01 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:32 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-08 05:15 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 06:41 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:49 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 07:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 21:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers like a meat packing service. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:07 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:31 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 21:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 02:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:51 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-01 08:00 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 06:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 21:28 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 19:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 23:27 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 21:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-02 01:44 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:19 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:23 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 20:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 22:09 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 21:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-03 23:48 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 13:44 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:19 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 23:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 13:57 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-04 02:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:58 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 22:19 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 20:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:26 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 14:00 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 22:45 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:39 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 07:48 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 15:20 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:34 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-05 22:57 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-07 15:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 16:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-07 20:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 06:41 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-08 08:29 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 08:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:16 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-08 08:30 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-04 21:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 00:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 14:07 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 13:27 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-04 17:07 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 16:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-04 16:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:15 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 22:13 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-04 20:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:41 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 06:11 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-05 02:29 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 07:50 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 07:41 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-05 10:38 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 10:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 12:55 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 07:58 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 08:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 11:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-06-05 14:58 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 12:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 13:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 14:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 14:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:47 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 17:21 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 17:43 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-05 22:44 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:04 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:49 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:45 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 15:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 17:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 22:42 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 18:21 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:46 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 21:45 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 19:13 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:36 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 21:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 18:05 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 22:55 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:47 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 21:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 21:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 22:44 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 22:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-09 02:13 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 23:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 06:22 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:16 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 08:28 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:50 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 09:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 10:29 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 10:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-09 20:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 21:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-10 14:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 14:54 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 14:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 15:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 17:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-09 13:42 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-09 16:24 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 15:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-09 17:31 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 23:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-10 00:21 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-10 05:26 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 05:52 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 23:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-10 07:04 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-10 04:35 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 08:36 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 11:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 12:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 12:34 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 15:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 15:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-10 01:39 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 08:36 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-06-10 15:46 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 15:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 18:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-09 12:22 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 10:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-09 13:22 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Corwin Esterness <woolcross@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 10:25 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-09 13:31 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 10:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-09 12:00 -0600
Truth Avoidance. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-09 12:11 -0700
Re: Truth Avoidance. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-09 12:20 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 09:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-09 21:12 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 14:31 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Horace <skinnydude@a1c.org> - 2018-06-09 18:41 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 15:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:36 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 16:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 16:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 16:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-09 17:56 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-09 17:57 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Bill (not Jillians) DOW #3" <noemail@none.not> - 2018-06-09 20:06 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-12 00:11 +0100
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 17:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 17:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-09 20:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 23:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-10 08:36 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 11:53 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 00:16 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 12:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:20 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 16:43 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 16:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:33 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:05 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 18:06 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:11 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-06 04:17 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-06 19:03 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-07 05:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-07 22:05 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 19:15 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:05 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:49 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 18:45 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 16:46 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 17:57 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-05 18:03 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:04 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:23 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-05 17:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:03 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:52 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-07 15:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-07 16:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:18 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-08 08:14 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-08 11:55 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 23:07 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 20:50 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 17:00 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:12 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 17:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:07 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 17:38 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 17:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-05 22:45 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-06 04:18 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-06 15:05 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 16:59 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-08 07:17 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 17:10 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-06-05 18:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-05 20:36 -0500
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-05 18:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 09:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 07:39 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:29 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 11:09 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 17:20 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 14:35 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-01 23:08 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-01 23:15 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 11:26 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 11:42 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 14:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:37 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 17:57 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 19:04 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 18:30 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-02 18:51 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-06-02 19:32 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 19:00 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:09 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:12 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 22:32 +0000
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:59 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:24 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:01 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-03 19:51 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 16:56 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-03 20:21 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 17:24 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-03 23:36 -0400
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-03 18:53 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:14 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-06-03 20:28 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:58 -0600
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 21:02 -0700
Re: Slaughtering concert goers. !Jones <jones@fobahor.com> - 2018-06-04 23:17 -0500
Page 8 of 34 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 34 Next page →
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 19:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bas9gb.fp2.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #170602 |
On 2018-06-02 7:27 PM, simon singh wrote: > On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 18:51:20 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> On 6/2/18 6:10 PM, Horace wrote: >>> On 3 Jun 2018 00:47:01 GMT, Snit wrote: >>> >>>> simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:12:55 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/1/18 10:51 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:fnejjaFs6f7U2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 8:53 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>> You have been shown, and have no counter, for the fact that >>>>>>>>>> "bear arms" is used only in specific contexts... that do NOT >>>>>>>>>> include self defense. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No, you have used examples that only show that, but one can bear >>>>>>>>> arms for a multitude of reasons including self defense. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Indeed, it would be utterly necessary for you to be able to carry >>>>>>>>> for your own defense, because otherwise how could you possibly >>>>>>>>> carry to defend others? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Further, wouldn't you among those that need to be defended? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Finally it would be utterly stupid to tell people they could have >>>>>>>>> guns....but then tell them they couldn't have those guns with >>>>>>>>> them when they were needed. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Indeed, I think this quotation directly addresses your claim. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a >>>>>>>>> nature. >>>>>>>>> They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to >>>>>>>>> commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted >>>>>>>>> and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage >>>>>>>>> than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked >>>>>>>>> with greater confidence than an armed man." >>>>>>>>> - Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century >>>>>>>>> criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That quote does not have the phrase in question! It is not >>>>>>>> relevant to the question about the phrase! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Carrying of arms = bearing arms. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've shown that. >>>>>> >>>>>> You have claimed it... but not backed this uncommon use which is >>>>>> contrary to the context provided IN the second amendment itself. >>>>> >>>>> So now after you refuse to back up your claims of the police asking >>>>> Steve Carroll to stop harassing you on usenet, you are complaining >>>>> that someone else isn't backing up their claims? >>>>> Hilarious snit. >>>>> Are you hitting the glue bag again? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Gee, I stop responding to Carroll and socks start obsessing over me. >>>> >>>> What a shock! >>> >>> No matter what your drugged up mind is telling you, nobody is obsessing >>> over you snit. This is your coping mechanism kicking in when you are >>> cornered. And you know you have been backed into a corner with no way >>> out other than to admit you made a statement you are unable to prove as >>> being truthful. >>> Simon Sing has you backed into a corner and the rest of the group is >>> laughing at your extremely poor attempts at saving your own hide. >>> All in a day's work, right snit? >>> >>> >> If you are not obsessing over me stop posting your fantasies about me. >> >> But you will not. > > You are a sick person snit. > Get help. > Better yet, get a job. Your family will thank you for it. > >> This is 100% predictable. > > Yes you are. > this snit guy sure has your number doesn't he
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 02:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pevkac$8me$8@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #170605 |
On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 19:32:09 -0700, % wrote: > On 2018-06-02 7:27 PM, simon singh wrote: >> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 18:51:20 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> On 6/2/18 6:10 PM, Horace wrote: >>>> On 3 Jun 2018 00:47:01 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:12:55 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/1/18 10:51 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:fnejjaFs6f7U2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 8:53 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>> You have been shown, and have no counter, for the fact that >>>>>>>>>>> "bear arms" is used only in specific contexts... that do NOT >>>>>>>>>>> include self defense. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No, you have used examples that only show that, but one can >>>>>>>>>> bear arms for a multitude of reasons including self defense. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Indeed, it would be utterly necessary for you to be able to >>>>>>>>>> carry for your own defense, because otherwise how could you >>>>>>>>>> possibly carry to defend others? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Further, wouldn't you among those that need to be defended? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Finally it would be utterly stupid to tell people they could >>>>>>>>>> have guns....but then tell them they couldn't have those guns >>>>>>>>>> with them when they were needed. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Indeed, I think this quotation directly addresses your claim. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a >>>>>>>>>> nature. >>>>>>>>>> They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined >>>>>>>>>> to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the >>>>>>>>>> assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to >>>>>>>>>> encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be >>>>>>>>>> attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." >>>>>>>>>> - Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century >>>>>>>>>> criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That quote does not have the phrase in question! It is not >>>>>>>>> relevant to the question about the phrase! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Carrying of arms = bearing arms. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I've shown that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You have claimed it... but not backed this uncommon use which is >>>>>>> contrary to the context provided IN the second amendment itself. >>>>>> >>>>>> So now after you refuse to back up your claims of the police asking >>>>>> Steve Carroll to stop harassing you on usenet, you are complaining >>>>>> that someone else isn't backing up their claims? >>>>>> Hilarious snit. >>>>>> Are you hitting the glue bag again? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Gee, I stop responding to Carroll and socks start obsessing over me. >>>>> >>>>> What a shock! >>>> >>>> No matter what your drugged up mind is telling you, nobody is >>>> obsessing over you snit. This is your coping mechanism kicking in >>>> when you are cornered. And you know you have been backed into a >>>> corner with no way out other than to admit you made a statement you >>>> are unable to prove as being truthful. >>>> Simon Sing has you backed into a corner and the rest of the group is >>>> laughing at your extremely poor attempts at saving your own hide. >>>> All in a day's work, right snit? >>>> >>>> >>> If you are not obsessing over me stop posting your fantasies about me. >>> >>> But you will not. >> >> You are a sick person snit. >> Get help. >> Better yet, get a job. Your family will thank you for it. >> >>> This is 100% predictable. >> >> Yes you are. >> > this snit guy sure has your number doesn't he You might want to read this: http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 19:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <basa4i.fp2.17.8@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #170606 |
On 2018-06-02 7:38 PM, simon singh wrote: > On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 19:32:09 -0700, % wrote: > >> On 2018-06-02 7:27 PM, simon singh wrote: >>> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 18:51:20 -0700, Snit wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/2/18 6:10 PM, Horace wrote: >>>>> On 3 Jun 2018 00:47:01 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:12:55 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 10:51 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:fnejjaFs6f7U2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 8:53 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>>> You have been shown, and have no counter, for the fact that >>>>>>>>>>>> "bear arms" is used only in specific contexts... that do NOT >>>>>>>>>>>> include self defense. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No, you have used examples that only show that, but one can >>>>>>>>>>> bear arms for a multitude of reasons including self defense. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Indeed, it would be utterly necessary for you to be able to >>>>>>>>>>> carry for your own defense, because otherwise how could you >>>>>>>>>>> possibly carry to defend others? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Further, wouldn't you among those that need to be defended? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Finally it would be utterly stupid to tell people they could >>>>>>>>>>> have guns....but then tell them they couldn't have those guns >>>>>>>>>>> with them when they were needed. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Indeed, I think this quotation directly addresses your claim. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a >>>>>>>>>>> nature. >>>>>>>>>>> They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined >>>>>>>>>>> to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the >>>>>>>>>>> assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to >>>>>>>>>>> encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be >>>>>>>>>>> attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." >>>>>>>>>>> - Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century >>>>>>>>>>> criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That quote does not have the phrase in question! It is not >>>>>>>>>> relevant to the question about the phrase! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Carrying of arms = bearing arms. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I've shown that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You have claimed it... but not backed this uncommon use which is >>>>>>>> contrary to the context provided IN the second amendment itself. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So now after you refuse to back up your claims of the police asking >>>>>>> Steve Carroll to stop harassing you on usenet, you are complaining >>>>>>> that someone else isn't backing up their claims? >>>>>>> Hilarious snit. >>>>>>> Are you hitting the glue bag again? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Gee, I stop responding to Carroll and socks start obsessing over me. >>>>>> >>>>>> What a shock! >>>>> >>>>> No matter what your drugged up mind is telling you, nobody is >>>>> obsessing over you snit. This is your coping mechanism kicking in >>>>> when you are cornered. And you know you have been backed into a >>>>> corner with no way out other than to admit you made a statement you >>>>> are unable to prove as being truthful. >>>>> Simon Sing has you backed into a corner and the rest of the group is >>>>> laughing at your extremely poor attempts at saving your own hide. >>>>> All in a day's work, right snit? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> If you are not obsessing over me stop posting your fantasies about me. >>>> >>>> But you will not. >>> >>> You are a sick person snit. >>> Get help. >>> Better yet, get a job. Your family will thank you for it. >>> >>>> This is 100% predictable. >>> >>> Yes you are. >>> >> this snit guy sure has your number doesn't he > > You might want to read this: > > http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html > > http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html > > http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html > no , i don't want to read that i just wanna , watch him run you around like he's doing
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 02:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pevl79$8me$11@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #170610 |
On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 19:42:55 -0700, % wrote: > On 2018-06-02 7:38 PM, simon singh wrote: >> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 19:32:09 -0700, % wrote: >> >>> On 2018-06-02 7:27 PM, simon singh wrote: >>>> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 18:51:20 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 6/2/18 6:10 PM, Horace wrote: >>>>>> On 3 Jun 2018 00:47:01 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:12:55 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 10:51 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:fnejjaFs6f7U2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 8:53 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>>>> You have been shown, and have no counter, for the fact that >>>>>>>>>>>>> "bear arms" is used only in specific contexts... that do NOT >>>>>>>>>>>>> include self defense. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> No, you have used examples that only show that, but one can >>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms for a multitude of reasons including self defense. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Indeed, it would be utterly necessary for you to be able to >>>>>>>>>>>> carry for your own defense, because otherwise how could you >>>>>>>>>>>> possibly carry to defend others? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Further, wouldn't you among those that need to be defended? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Finally it would be utterly stupid to tell people they could >>>>>>>>>>>> have guns....but then tell them they couldn't have those guns >>>>>>>>>>>> with them when they were needed. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Indeed, I think this quotation directly addresses your claim. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a >>>>>>>>>>>> nature. >>>>>>>>>>>> They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor >>>>>>>>>>>> determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse >>>>>>>>>>>> for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve >>>>>>>>>>>> rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed >>>>>>>>>>>> man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed >>>>>>>>>>>> man." >>>>>>>>>>>> - Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century >>>>>>>>>>>> criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That quote does not have the phrase in question! It is not >>>>>>>>>>> relevant to the question about the phrase! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Carrying of arms = bearing arms. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I've shown that. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You have claimed it... but not backed this uncommon use which is >>>>>>>>> contrary to the context provided IN the second amendment itself. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So now after you refuse to back up your claims of the police >>>>>>>> asking Steve Carroll to stop harassing you on usenet, you are >>>>>>>> complaining that someone else isn't backing up their claims? >>>>>>>> Hilarious snit. >>>>>>>> Are you hitting the glue bag again? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Gee, I stop responding to Carroll and socks start obsessing over >>>>>>> me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What a shock! >>>>>> >>>>>> No matter what your drugged up mind is telling you, nobody is >>>>>> obsessing over you snit. This is your coping mechanism kicking in >>>>>> when you are cornered. And you know you have been backed into a >>>>>> corner with no way out other than to admit you made a statement you >>>>>> are unable to prove as being truthful. >>>>>> Simon Sing has you backed into a corner and the rest of the group >>>>>> is laughing at your extremely poor attempts at saving your own >>>>>> hide. All in a day's work, right snit? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> If you are not obsessing over me stop posting your fantasies about >>>>> me. >>>>> >>>>> But you will not. >>>> >>>> You are a sick person snit. >>>> Get help. >>>> Better yet, get a job. Your family will thank you for it. >>>> >>>>> This is 100% predictable. >>>> >>>> Yes you are. >>>> >>> this snit guy sure has your number doesn't he >> >> You might want to read this: >> >> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >> >> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >> >> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >> > no , i don't want to read that i just wanna , > watch him run you around like he's doing I'm laughing my ass off. You know why? Six months from now when he starts trolling in another group claiming he is honest and honorable, this thread and the others will be right there in Google to show he is a troll and not a very good one. Again, if you really want entertainment, read the links. You'll be laughing too instead of being one of the 0.005 percent of usenet posters who have support snit. BTW, you'll have a real hard time finding them or anyone who has supported snit for more than a couple of days. Shall I add you to the list?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 19:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <basb0l.bn6.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #170616 |
On 2018-06-02 7:53 PM, simon singh wrote: > On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 19:42:55 -0700, % wrote: > >> On 2018-06-02 7:38 PM, simon singh wrote: >>> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 19:32:09 -0700, % wrote: >>> >>>> On 2018-06-02 7:27 PM, simon singh wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 18:51:20 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/2/18 6:10 PM, Horace wrote: >>>>>>> On 3 Jun 2018 00:47:01 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:12:55 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 10:51 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:fnejjaFs6f7U2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 8:53 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have been shown, and have no counter, for the fact that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "bear arms" is used only in specific contexts... that do NOT >>>>>>>>>>>>>> include self defense. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No, you have used examples that only show that, but one can >>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms for a multitude of reasons including self defense. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Indeed, it would be utterly necessary for you to be able to >>>>>>>>>>>>> carry for your own defense, because otherwise how could you >>>>>>>>>>>>> possibly carry to defend others? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Further, wouldn't you among those that need to be defended? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Finally it would be utterly stupid to tell people they could >>>>>>>>>>>>> have guns....but then tell them they couldn't have those guns >>>>>>>>>>>>> with them when they were needed. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Indeed, I think this quotation directly addresses your claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a >>>>>>>>>>>>> nature. >>>>>>>>>>>>> They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor >>>>>>>>>>>>> determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse >>>>>>>>>>>>> for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve >>>>>>>>>>>>> rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed >>>>>>>>>>>>> man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed >>>>>>>>>>>>> man." >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century >>>>>>>>>>>>> criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> That quote does not have the phrase in question! It is not >>>>>>>>>>>> relevant to the question about the phrase! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Carrying of arms = bearing arms. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I've shown that. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You have claimed it... but not backed this uncommon use which is >>>>>>>>>> contrary to the context provided IN the second amendment itself. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So now after you refuse to back up your claims of the police >>>>>>>>> asking Steve Carroll to stop harassing you on usenet, you are >>>>>>>>> complaining that someone else isn't backing up their claims? >>>>>>>>> Hilarious snit. >>>>>>>>> Are you hitting the glue bag again? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Gee, I stop responding to Carroll and socks start obsessing over >>>>>>>> me. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What a shock! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No matter what your drugged up mind is telling you, nobody is >>>>>>> obsessing over you snit. This is your coping mechanism kicking in >>>>>>> when you are cornered. And you know you have been backed into a >>>>>>> corner with no way out other than to admit you made a statement you >>>>>>> are unable to prove as being truthful. >>>>>>> Simon Sing has you backed into a corner and the rest of the group >>>>>>> is laughing at your extremely poor attempts at saving your own >>>>>>> hide. All in a day's work, right snit? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> If you are not obsessing over me stop posting your fantasies about >>>>>> me. >>>>>> >>>>>> But you will not. >>>>> >>>>> You are a sick person snit. >>>>> Get help. >>>>> Better yet, get a job. Your family will thank you for it. >>>>> >>>>>> This is 100% predictable. >>>>> >>>>> Yes you are. >>>>> >>>> this snit guy sure has your number doesn't he >>> >>> You might want to read this: >>> >>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>> >>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >>> >>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>> >> no , i don't want to read that i just wanna , >> watch him run you around like he's doing > > I'm laughing my ass off. > You know why? > Six months from now when he starts trolling in another group claiming he > is honest and honorable, this thread and the others will be right there > in Google to show he is a troll and not a very good one. > > Again, if you really want entertainment, read the links. You'll be > laughing too instead of being one of the 0.005 percent of usenet posters > who have support snit. > BTW, you'll have a real hard time finding them or anyone who has > supported snit for more than a couple of days. > Shall I add you to the list? > your list is a series of fake people , they're even listed in alphabetical order , i don't give a shit who you add to where , i just thought i'd point out that , he really knows how to make you go mental
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 20:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnh4hoFcb78U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170616 |
On 6/2/18 7:53 PM, simon singh wrote: > On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 19:42:55 -0700, % wrote: > >> On 2018-06-02 7:38 PM, simon singh wrote: >>> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 19:32:09 -0700, % wrote: >>> >>>> On 2018-06-02 7:27 PM, simon singh wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 18:51:20 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/2/18 6:10 PM, Horace wrote: >>>>>>> On 3 Jun 2018 00:47:01 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:12:55 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 10:51 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:fnejjaFs6f7U2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 8:53 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have been shown, and have no counter, for the fact that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "bear arms" is used only in specific contexts... that do NOT >>>>>>>>>>>>>> include self defense. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No, you have used examples that only show that, but one can >>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms for a multitude of reasons including self defense. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Indeed, it would be utterly necessary for you to be able to >>>>>>>>>>>>> carry for your own defense, because otherwise how could you >>>>>>>>>>>>> possibly carry to defend others? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Further, wouldn't you among those that need to be defended? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Finally it would be utterly stupid to tell people they could >>>>>>>>>>>>> have guns....but then tell them they couldn't have those guns >>>>>>>>>>>>> with them when they were needed. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Indeed, I think this quotation directly addresses your claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a >>>>>>>>>>>>> nature. >>>>>>>>>>>>> They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor >>>>>>>>>>>>> determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse >>>>>>>>>>>>> for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve >>>>>>>>>>>>> rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed >>>>>>>>>>>>> man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed >>>>>>>>>>>>> man." >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century >>>>>>>>>>>>> criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> That quote does not have the phrase in question! It is not >>>>>>>>>>>> relevant to the question about the phrase! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Carrying of arms = bearing arms. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I've shown that. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You have claimed it... but not backed this uncommon use which is >>>>>>>>>> contrary to the context provided IN the second amendment itself. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So now after you refuse to back up your claims of the police >>>>>>>>> asking Steve Carroll to stop harassing you on usenet, you are >>>>>>>>> complaining that someone else isn't backing up their claims? >>>>>>>>> Hilarious snit. >>>>>>>>> Are you hitting the glue bag again? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Gee, I stop responding to Carroll and socks start obsessing over >>>>>>>> me. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What a shock! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No matter what your drugged up mind is telling you, nobody is >>>>>>> obsessing over you snit. This is your coping mechanism kicking in >>>>>>> when you are cornered. And you know you have been backed into a >>>>>>> corner with no way out other than to admit you made a statement you >>>>>>> are unable to prove as being truthful. >>>>>>> Simon Sing has you backed into a corner and the rest of the group >>>>>>> is laughing at your extremely poor attempts at saving your own >>>>>>> hide. All in a day's work, right snit? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> If you are not obsessing over me stop posting your fantasies about >>>>>> me. >>>>>> >>>>>> But you will not. >>>>> >>>>> You are a sick person snit. >>>>> Get help. >>>>> Better yet, get a job. Your family will thank you for it. >>>>> >>>>>> This is 100% predictable. >>>>> >>>>> Yes you are. >>>>> >>>> this snit guy sure has your number doesn't he >>> >>> You might want to read this: >>> >>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>> >>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >>> >>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>> >> no , i don't want to read that i just wanna , >> watch him run you around like he's doing > > I'm laughing my ass off. > You know why? > Six months from now when he starts trolling in another group claiming he > is honest and honorable, this thread and the others will be right there > in Google to show he is a troll and not a very good one. > > Again, if you really want entertainment, read the links. You'll be > laughing too instead of being one of the 0.005 percent of usenet posters > who have support snit. > BTW, you'll have a real hard time finding them or anyone who has > supported snit for more than a couple of days. > Shall I add you to the list? > I would be a horrid troll... no practice nor desire to do so. What I am good at, though, is being honest. This is why it is predictable you will fail to quote me lying as often in a year as I can show you lying in a day. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 20:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bascqb.u9i.19.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #170635 |
On 2018-06-02 8:10 PM, Snit wrote: > On 6/2/18 7:53 PM, simon singh wrote: >> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 19:42:55 -0700, % wrote: >> >>> On 2018-06-02 7:38 PM, simon singh wrote: >>>> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 19:32:09 -0700, % wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2018-06-02 7:27 PM, simon singh wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 18:51:20 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/2/18 6:10 PM, Horace wrote: >>>>>>>> On 3 Jun 2018 00:47:01 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:12:55 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 10:51 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:fnejjaFs6f7U2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 8:53 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have been shown, and have no counter, for the fact that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "bear arms" is used only in specific contexts... that do NOT >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include self defense. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, you have used examples that only show that, but one can >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms for a multitude of reasons including self defense. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Indeed, it would be utterly necessary for you to be able to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> carry for your own defense, because otherwise how could you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> possibly carry to defend others? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Further, wouldn't you among those that need to be defended? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Finally it would be utterly stupid to tell people they could >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have guns....but then tell them they couldn't have those guns >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with them when they were needed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Indeed, I think this quotation directly addresses your claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> nature. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor >>>>>>>>>>>>>> determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed >>>>>>>>>>>>>> man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed >>>>>>>>>>>>>> man." >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century >>>>>>>>>>>>>> criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That quote does not have the phrase in question! It is not >>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant to the question about the phrase! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Carrying of arms = bearing arms. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I've shown that. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You have claimed it... but not backed this uncommon use which is >>>>>>>>>>> contrary to the context provided IN the second amendment itself. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So now after you refuse to back up your claims of the police >>>>>>>>>> asking Steve Carroll to stop harassing you on usenet, you are >>>>>>>>>> complaining that someone else isn't backing up their claims? >>>>>>>>>> Hilarious snit. >>>>>>>>>> Are you hitting the glue bag again? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Gee, I stop responding to Carroll and socks start obsessing over >>>>>>>>> me. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What a shock! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No matter what your drugged up mind is telling you, nobody is >>>>>>>> obsessing over you snit. This is your coping mechanism kicking in >>>>>>>> when you are cornered. And you know you have been backed into a >>>>>>>> corner with no way out other than to admit you made a statement you >>>>>>>> are unable to prove as being truthful. >>>>>>>> Simon Sing has you backed into a corner and the rest of the group >>>>>>>> is laughing at your extremely poor attempts at saving your own >>>>>>>> hide. All in a day's work, right snit? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you are not obsessing over me stop posting your fantasies about >>>>>>> me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But you will not. >>>>>> >>>>>> You are a sick person snit. >>>>>> Get help. >>>>>> Better yet, get a job. Your family will thank you for it. >>>>>>> This is 100% predictable. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes you are. >>>>>> >>>>> this snit guy sure has your number doesn't he >>>> >>>> You might want to read this: >>>> >>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>>> >>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >>>> >>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>>> >>> no , i don't want to read that i just wanna , >>> watch him run you around like he's doing >> >> I'm laughing my ass off. >> You know why? >> Six months from now when he starts trolling in another group claiming he >> is honest and honorable, this thread and the others will be right there >> in Google to show he is a troll and not a very good one. >> >> Again, if you really want entertainment, read the links. You'll be >> laughing too instead of being one of the 0.005 percent of usenet posters >> who have support snit. >> BTW, you'll have a real hard time finding them or anyone who has >> supported snit for more than a couple of days. >> Shall I add you to the list? >> > I would be a horrid troll... no practice nor desire to do so. > > What I am good at, though, is being honest. This is why it is > predictable you will fail to quote me lying as often in a year as I can > show you lying in a day. > i think he ran off when no one took his side
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 21:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnh9l5Fd558U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170637 |
On 6/2/18 8:28 PM, % wrote: >>>>> >>>> no , i don't want to read that i just wanna , >>>> watch him run you around like he's doing >>> >>> I'm laughing my ass off. >>> You know why? >>> Six months from now when he starts trolling in another group claiming he >>> is honest and honorable, this thread and the others will be right there >>> in Google to show he is a troll and not a very good one. >>> >>> Again, if you really want entertainment, read the links. You'll be >>> laughing too instead of being one of the 0.005 percent of usenet posters >>> who have support snit. >>> BTW, you'll have a real hard time finding them or anyone who has >>> supported snit for more than a couple of days. >>> Shall I add you to the list? >>> >> I would be a horrid troll... no practice nor desire to do so. >> >> What I am good at, though, is being honest. This is why it is >> predictable you will fail to quote me lying as often in a year as I >> can show you lying in a day. >> > i think he ran off when no one took his side Bullies do not handle not having people backing them well. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 22:39 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <17s6hd9th38tacgghb4rdupsev65s8b026@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #170669 |
On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 21:37:57 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 6/2/18 8:28 PM, % wrote: >>>>>> >>>>> no , i don't want to read that i just wanna , >>>>> watch him run you around like he's doing >>>> >>>> I'm laughing my ass off. >>>> You know why? >>>> Six months from now when he starts trolling in another group claiming he >>>> is honest and honorable, this thread and the others will be right there >>>> in Google to show he is a troll and not a very good one. >>>> >>>> Again, if you really want entertainment, read the links. You'll be >>>> laughing too instead of being one of the 0.005 percent of usenet posters >>>> who have support snit. >>>> BTW, you'll have a real hard time finding them or anyone who has >>>> supported snit for more than a couple of days. >>>> Shall I add you to the list? >>>> >>> I would be a horrid troll... no practice nor desire to do so. >>> >>> What I am good at, though, is being honest. This is why it is >>> predictable you will fail to quote me lying as often in a year as I >>> can show you lying in a day. >>> >> i think he ran off when no one took his side > >Bullies do not handle not having people backing them well. Is that why you ran....oh wait, you can't be a bully, bullys have balls.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 21:33 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <hbo6hd54gmqor3e9nh4k1ee9prj16i1ioe@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #170635 |
On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 20:10:48 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 6/2/18 7:53 PM, simon singh wrote: >> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 19:42:55 -0700, % wrote: >> >>> On 2018-06-02 7:38 PM, simon singh wrote: >>>> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 19:32:09 -0700, % wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2018-06-02 7:27 PM, simon singh wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 18:51:20 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/2/18 6:10 PM, Horace wrote: >>>>>>>> On 3 Jun 2018 00:47:01 GMT, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> simon singh <ss1988singh980@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:12:55 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 10:51 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:fnejjaFs6f7U2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/18 8:53 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have been shown, and have no counter, for the fact that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "bear arms" is used only in specific contexts... that do NOT >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include self defense. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, you have used examples that only show that, but one can >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bear arms for a multitude of reasons including self defense. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Indeed, it would be utterly necessary for you to be able to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> carry for your own defense, because otherwise how could you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> possibly carry to defend others? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Further, wouldn't you among those that need to be defended? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Finally it would be utterly stupid to tell people they could >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have guns....but then tell them they couldn't have those guns >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with them when they were needed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Indeed, I think this quotation directly addresses your claim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> nature. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor >>>>>>>>>>>>>> determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed >>>>>>>>>>>>>> man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed >>>>>>>>>>>>>> man." >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century >>>>>>>>>>>>>> criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That quote does not have the phrase in question! It is not >>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant to the question about the phrase! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Carrying of arms = bearing arms. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I've shown that. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You have claimed it... but not backed this uncommon use which is >>>>>>>>>>> contrary to the context provided IN the second amendment itself. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So now after you refuse to back up your claims of the police >>>>>>>>>> asking Steve Carroll to stop harassing you on usenet, you are >>>>>>>>>> complaining that someone else isn't backing up their claims? >>>>>>>>>> Hilarious snit. >>>>>>>>>> Are you hitting the glue bag again? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Gee, I stop responding to Carroll and socks start obsessing over >>>>>>>>> me. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What a shock! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No matter what your drugged up mind is telling you, nobody is >>>>>>>> obsessing over you snit. This is your coping mechanism kicking in >>>>>>>> when you are cornered. And you know you have been backed into a >>>>>>>> corner with no way out other than to admit you made a statement you >>>>>>>> are unable to prove as being truthful. >>>>>>>> Simon Sing has you backed into a corner and the rest of the group >>>>>>>> is laughing at your extremely poor attempts at saving your own >>>>>>>> hide. All in a day's work, right snit? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you are not obsessing over me stop posting your fantasies about >>>>>>> me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But you will not. >>>>>> >>>>>> You are a sick person snit. >>>>>> Get help. >>>>>> Better yet, get a job. Your family will thank you for it. >>>>>> >>>>>>> This is 100% predictable. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes you are. >>>>>> >>>>> this snit guy sure has your number doesn't he >>>> >>>> You might want to read this: >>>> >>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >>>> >>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html >>>> >>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html >>>> >>> no , i don't want to read that i just wanna , >>> watch him run you around like he's doing >> >> I'm laughing my ass off. >> You know why? >> Six months from now when he starts trolling in another group claiming he >> is honest and honorable, this thread and the others will be right there >> in Google to show he is a troll and not a very good one. >> >> Again, if you really want entertainment, read the links. You'll be >> laughing too instead of being one of the 0.005 percent of usenet posters >> who have support snit. >> BTW, you'll have a real hard time finding them or anyone who has >> supported snit for more than a couple of days. >> Shall I add you to the list? >> >I would be a horrid troll... no practice nor desire to do so. > >What I am good at, though, is being honest. This is why it is >predictable you will fail to quote me lying as often in a year as I can >show you lying in a day. You just lied. I win.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-08 07:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <73tkhdl8ir0gn2cifjo8ib9vvdjd6i4u4h@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #170575 |
Horace wrote: >On 3 Jun 2018 00:47:01 GMT, Snit wrote: *plonk*
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-08 07:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <avskhdlgn0usmi758av396dvva7psptbiu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #170524 |
simon singh wrote: >On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:12:55 -0700, Snit wrote: *plonk*
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 04:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fnem8cFsksjU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170249 |
On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:53:44 -0400, Scout wrote: > "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message > news:fnecu9Fr49cU3@mid.individual.net... > >> The second amendment specifically mentions the militia and NO other >> context. > > Bullshit. It mentions the context of the right of the people. > > Which right, BTW, is not tied to ANY militia context. > A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the *PEOPLE* to *KEEP* and *BEAR* Arms, shall not be infringed. [emph. added] *PEOPLE* Now get back in your clown car, Snit. -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-01 22:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnemk6Fsn82U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170264 |
On 6/1/18 9:54 PM, vallor wrote: > On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:53:44 -0400, Scout wrote: > >> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >> news:fnecu9Fr49cU3@mid.individual.net... > >> >>> The second amendment specifically mentions the militia and NO other >>> context. >> >> Bullshit. It mentions the context of the right of the people. >> >> Which right, BTW, is not tied to ANY militia context. >> > > A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free > State, the right of the *PEOPLE* to *KEEP* and *BEAR* Arms, shall not be > infringed. [emph. added] > > *PEOPLE* > > Now get back in your clown car, Snit. > Militia. Bear arms. Those words and terms have meaning. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 05:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fnemv5FsksjU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170265 |
On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:00:54 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 6/1/18 9:54 PM, vallor wrote: >> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:53:44 -0400, Scout wrote: >> >>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>> news:fnecu9Fr49cU3@mid.individual.net... >> >> >>>> The second amendment specifically mentions the militia and NO other >>>> context. >>> >>> Bullshit. It mentions the context of the right of the people. >>> >>> Which right, BTW, is not tied to ANY militia context. >>> >>> >> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free >> State, the right of the *PEOPLE* to *KEEP* and *BEAR* Arms, shall not >> be infringed. [emph. added] >> >> *PEOPLE* >> >> Now get back in your clown car, Snit. >> > Militia. > > Bear arms. > > Those words and terms have meaning. The SC has determined that the clauses in question are explanations, not limitations. This is a *RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE*. But you already knew that, didn't you? That's what I like about you: your attention to detail. -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-01 22:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnen49Fsn82U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170269 |
On 6/1/18 10:06 PM, vallor wrote: > On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:00:54 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> On 6/1/18 9:54 PM, vallor wrote: >>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:53:44 -0400, Scout wrote: >>> >>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>> news:fnecu9Fr49cU3@mid.individual.net... >>> >>> >>>>> The second amendment specifically mentions the militia and NO other >>>>> context. >>>> >>>> Bullshit. It mentions the context of the right of the people. >>>> >>>> Which right, BTW, is not tied to ANY militia context. >>>> >>>> >>> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free >>> State, the right of the *PEOPLE* to *KEEP* and *BEAR* Arms, shall not >>> be infringed. [emph. added] >>> >>> *PEOPLE* >>> >>> Now get back in your clown car, Snit. >>> >> Militia. >> >> Bear arms. >> >> Those words and terms have meaning. > > The SC has determined that the clauses in question are explanations, not > limitations. This is a *RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE*. Sure: in a 5:4 decision judicial activism "won". Even then they noted limits. It is about "the licensing requirement insofar as it prohibits carrying an unlicensed firearm in the home, and the trigger-lock requirement insofar as it prohibits the use of functional firearms in the home." It is about having a common handgun in your home, not about carrying one around, no less other arms. It even specifically speaks of acceptance of "limits the type of weapon to which the right applies to those used by the militia, i.e., those in common use for lawful purposes". It also notes that "the Second Amendment right is not unlimited" and specifically states "It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose" and that this does not mean we cannot have "laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms" and it "finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons". > But you already knew that, didn't you? That's what I like about you: > your attention to detail. I did know that. Sure. I also knew the meaning of "bear arms": <https://goo.gl/N9wtKB> ----- A search of Brigham Young University’s new online Corpus of Founding Era American English, with more than 95,000 texts and 138 million words, yields 281 instances of the phrase “bear arms.” BYU’s Corpus of Early Modern English, with 40,000 texts and close to 1.3 billion words, shows 1,572 instances of the phrase. Subtracting about 350 duplicate matches, that leaves about 1,500 separate occurrences of “bear arms” in the 17th and 18th centuries, and only a handful don’t refer to war, soldiering or organized, armed action. These databases confirm that the natural meaning of “bear arms” in the framers’ day was military. But we shouldn’t need big data to tell us this. “Bear arms” has never worked comfortably with the language of personal self-defense, hunting or target practice. ----- Curious if you knew that. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 01:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <petbkc$atj$8@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #170270 |
"Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message news:fnen49Fsn82U4@mid.individual.net... > On 6/1/18 10:06 PM, vallor wrote: >> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:00:54 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> On 6/1/18 9:54 PM, vallor wrote: >>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:53:44 -0400, Scout wrote: >>>> >>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:fnecu9Fr49cU3@mid.individual.net... >>>> >>>> >>>>>> The second amendment specifically mentions the militia and NO other >>>>>> context. >>>>> >>>>> Bullshit. It mentions the context of the right of the people. >>>>> >>>>> Which right, BTW, is not tied to ANY militia context. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free >>>> State, the right of the *PEOPLE* to *KEEP* and *BEAR* Arms, shall not >>>> be infringed. [emph. added] >>>> >>>> *PEOPLE* >>>> >>>> Now get back in your clown car, Snit. >>>> >>> Militia. >>> >>> Bear arms. >>> >>> Those words and terms have meaning. >> >> The SC has determined that the clauses in question are explanations, not >> limitations. This is a *RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE*. > > Sure: in a 5:4 decision judicial activism "won". Even then they noted > limits. It is about "the licensing requirement insofar as it prohibits > carrying an unlicensed firearm in the home, and the trigger-lock > requirement insofar as it prohibits the use of functional firearms in the > home." It's confirmed.....another Rudy sockpuppet.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-01 23:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fneqsnFtdvgU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170287 |
On 6/1/18 10:54 PM, Scout wrote: > > > "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message > news:fnen49Fsn82U4@mid.individual.net... >> On 6/1/18 10:06 PM, vallor wrote: >>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:00:54 -0700, Snit wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/1/18 9:54 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:53:44 -0400, Scout wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:fnecu9Fr49cU3@mid.individual.net... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> The second amendment specifically mentions the militia and NO other >>>>>>> context. >>>>>> >>>>>> Bullshit. It mentions the context of the right of the people. >>>>>> >>>>>> Which right, BTW, is not tied to ANY militia context. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free >>>>> State, the right of the *PEOPLE* to *KEEP* and *BEAR* Arms, shall not >>>>> be infringed. [emph. added] >>>>> >>>>> *PEOPLE* >>>>> >>>>> Now get back in your clown car, Snit. >>>>> >>>> Militia. >>>> >>>> Bear arms. >>>> >>>> Those words and terms have meaning. >>> >>> The SC has determined that the clauses in question are explanations, not >>> limitations. This is a *RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE*. >> >> Sure: in a 5:4 decision judicial activism "won". Even then they noted >> limits. It is about "the licensing requirement insofar as it prohibits >> carrying an unlicensed firearm in the home, and the trigger-lock >> requirement insofar as it prohibits the use of functional firearms in >> the home." > > It's confirmed.....another Rudy sockpuppet. > > > Here is what you seem to want to refute but cannot: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/antonin-scalia-was-wrong-about-the-meaning-of-bear-arms/2018/05/21/9243ac66-5d11-11e8-b2b8-08a538d9dbd6_story.html ----- A search of Brigham Young University’s new online Corpus of Founding Era American English, with more than 95,000 texts and 138 million words, yields 281 instances of the phrase “bear arms.” BYU’s Corpus of Early Modern English, with 40,000 texts and close to 1.3 billion words, shows 1,572 instances of the phrase. Subtracting about 350 duplicate matches, that leaves about 1,500 separate occurrences of “bear arms” in the 17th and 18th centuries, and only a handful don’t refer to war, soldiering or organized, armed action. These databases confirm that the natural meaning of “bear arms” in the framers’ day was military. But we shouldn’t need big data to tell us this. “Bear arms” has never worked comfortably with the language of personal self-defense, hunting or target practice. ----- -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-03 03:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fnh6aeFcefgU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170297 |
On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 22:33:24 +0000, simon singh wrote: > On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:13:43 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> On 6/1/18 10:54 PM, Scout wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>> news:fnen49Fsn82U4@mid.individual.net... >>>> On 6/1/18 10:06 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:00:54 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/1/18 9:54 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:53:44 -0400, Scout wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:fnecu9Fr49cU3@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The second amendment specifically mentions the militia and NO >>>>>>>>> other context. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bullshit. It mentions the context of the right of the people. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Which right, BTW, is not tied to ANY militia context. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a >>>>>>> free State, the right of the *PEOPLE* to *KEEP* and *BEAR* Arms, >>>>>>> shall not be infringed. [emph. added] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *PEOPLE* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Now get back in your clown car, Snit. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Militia. >>>>>> >>>>>> Bear arms. >>>>>> >>>>>> Those words and terms have meaning. >>>>> >>>>> The SC has determined that the clauses in question are explanations, >>>>> not limitations. This is a *RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE*. >>>> >>>> Sure: in a 5:4 decision judicial activism "won". Even then they noted >>>> limits. It is about "the licensing requirement insofar as it >>>> prohibits carrying an unlicensed firearm in the home, and the >>>> trigger-lock requirement insofar as it prohibits the use of >>>> functional firearms in the home." >>> >>> It's confirmed.....another Rudy sockpuppet. >>> >>> >>> >> Here is what you seem to want to refute but cannot: >> >> https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/antonin-scalia-was-wrong-about- > the-meaning-of-bear-arms/2018/05/21/9243ac66-5d11-11e8- > b2b8-08a538d9dbd6_story.html >> ----- >> A search of Brigham Young University’s new online Corpus of Founding >> Era >> > Snit has just gone into "Rainman Mode" where he repeats the same invalid > statements over and over again hoping they will somehow become truth. > For those that don't know, it's usually a sign that snit is high on > medication once again. > Other signs are where he uses phrases like "I commend you", which is his > narcissistic BPD rearing it's ugly head. Boring and "not interested" are > other terms he uses when he has run a troll dry and can milk it no > longer. > > For those who are not aware, snit is one of usenet's most prolific > trolls. He has been trolling literally 24x7x365 for over a decade. Why? > He has no job, he is mentally ill and has nothing better to do with his > life. > There are web pages devoted to the snit troll. > Read here for more information about snit. > > http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html > http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html https://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html#nauseam Argumentum ad nauseam This is the incorrect belief that an assertion is more likely to be true, or is more likely to be accepted as true, the more often it is heard. So an Argumentum ad Nauseam is one that employs constant repetition in asserting something; saying the same thing over and over again until you're sick of hearing it. On the Net, your argument is often less likely to be heard if you repeat it over and over again, as people will tend to put you in their kill files. -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 21:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fnh83iFcu9kU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #170646 |
On 6/2/18 8:41 PM, vallor wrote: > On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 22:33:24 +0000, simon singh wrote: > >> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:13:43 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> On 6/1/18 10:54 PM, Scout wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>> news:fnen49Fsn82U4@mid.individual.net... >>>>> On 6/1/18 10:06 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:00:54 -0700, Snit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/1/18 9:54 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:53:44 -0400, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:fnecu9Fr49cU3@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The second amendment specifically mentions the militia and NO >>>>>>>>>> other context. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bullshit. It mentions the context of the right of the people. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Which right, BTW, is not tied to ANY militia context. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a >>>>>>>> free State, the right of the *PEOPLE* to *KEEP* and *BEAR* Arms, >>>>>>>> shall not be infringed. [emph. added] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *PEOPLE* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Now get back in your clown car, Snit. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Militia. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bear arms. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Those words and terms have meaning. >>>>>> >>>>>> The SC has determined that the clauses in question are explanations, >>>>>> not limitations. This is a *RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE*. >>>>> >>>>> Sure: in a 5:4 decision judicial activism "won". Even then they noted >>>>> limits. It is about "the licensing requirement insofar as it >>>>> prohibits carrying an unlicensed firearm in the home, and the >>>>> trigger-lock requirement insofar as it prohibits the use of >>>>> functional firearms in the home." >>>> >>>> It's confirmed.....another Rudy sockpuppet. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Here is what you seem to want to refute but cannot: >>> >>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/antonin-scalia-was-wrong-about- >> the-meaning-of-bear-arms/2018/05/21/9243ac66-5d11-11e8- >> b2b8-08a538d9dbd6_story.html >>> ----- >>> A search of Brigham Young University’s new online Corpus of Founding >>> Era >>> >> Snit has just gone into "Rainman Mode" where he repeats the same invalid >> statements over and over again hoping they will somehow become truth. >> For those that don't know, it's usually a sign that snit is high on >> medication once again. >> Other signs are where he uses phrases like "I commend you", which is his >> narcissistic BPD rearing it's ugly head. Boring and "not interested" are >> other terms he uses when he has run a troll dry and can milk it no >> longer. >> >> For those who are not aware, snit is one of usenet's most prolific >> trolls. He has been trolling literally 24x7x365 for over a decade. Why? >> He has no job, he is mentally ill and has nothing better to do with his >> life. >> There are web pages devoted to the snit troll. >> Read here for more information about snit. >> >> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html >> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html > > > https://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html#nauseam > > Argumentum ad nauseam > This is the incorrect belief that an assertion is more likely to be true, > or is more likely to be accepted as true, the more often it is heard. So > an Argumentum ad Nauseam is one that employs constant repetition in > asserting something; saying the same thing over and over again until > you're sick of hearing it. If Carroll and these odd socks who have shown up to defend him REALLY believed I did as they say they would quote these alleged lies. Of course, when I note this Carroll dredges up ancient debates from a year or more ago -- often from 2004 or so. Then he claims a "win" if I do not rehash these same debates. Even better would be just to move the hell on. Give up on his flooding and trolling and obsessing over me and simply talk tech. But that will NEVER happen. > On the Net, your argument is often less likely to be heard if you repeat > it over and over again, as people will tend to put you in their kill > files. > Not in COLA... seems that is what many thrive on. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 34 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 34 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web