Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.checkmate > #168174 > unrolled thread

Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
First post2018-05-26 05:03 -0400
Last post2018-05-29 23:34 -0400
Articles 20 on this page of 431 — 26 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate


Contents

  Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-26 05:03 -0400
    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:30 -0400
      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 19:59 +0000
        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:56 -0400
          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 22:24 +0000
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-26 16:46 -0600
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:26 -0500
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 23:35 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:46 -0500
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-26 18:20 -0600
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 20:26 -0500
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 20:57 -0500
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:35 +0200
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:05 -0500
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:29 -0700
                              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
                                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:51 -0700
                                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:27 -0500
                                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:36 -0700
                                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
                                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-26 22:21 -0700
                                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:46 -0700
                              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:26 -0500
                                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:33 -0700
                                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-05-27 12:08 +0100
                                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:41 -0700
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:15 +0000
                              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:46 -0700
                                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:59 -0600
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 08:50 -0500
                              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:40 -0700
                                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 23:19 +0200
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:58 -0600
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 08:50 -0500
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:38 +0000
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 19:44 -0600
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:48 -0700
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:28 -0500
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:38 -0700
            Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 18:30 -0700
              Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
                Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 18:54 -0700
                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-27 02:04 +0000
                    Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:36 +0200
                      Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:07 -0500
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:11 -0400
                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
                    Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
                      Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:32 -0500
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:51 -0700
                      Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:16 +0000
                        Nadegda must be proud. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-27 00:44 -0700
                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:43 -0400
                            "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-27 02:49 -0700
                              Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:38 -0400
                              Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:30 -0400
                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:29 -0400
                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 17:16 -0700
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:08 +0000
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:21 -0600
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:08 -0400
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-29 21:36 -0400
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 19:43 -0700
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-31 19:13 -0400
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-07 07:00 -0500
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 12:06 +0000
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-10 09:36 -0400
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-10 13:07 -0400
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-11 02:41 +0000
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:43 -0700
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-13 00:33 +0000
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 17:36 -0700
                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-16 21:16 +0000
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 14:22 -0700
                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-16 21:29 +0000
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 14:36 -0700
                                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-16 21:56 +0000
                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:50 -0700
                                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-18 00:38 +0000
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 17:59 -0700
                                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-18 01:05 +0000
                                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:08 -0700
                                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:58 -0700
                                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:02 -0700
                                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:57 -0700
                                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:01 -0700
                                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:06 -0700
                                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:08 -0700
                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-16 22:51 +0000
                                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:57 -0700
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 17:43 -0700
                                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 17:53 -0700
                                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 18:52 -0700
                                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 18:58 -0700
                                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 19:51 -0700
                                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-16 17:05 -0600
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-16 23:30 +0000
                                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-16 17:41 -0600
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-16 19:40 -0400
                                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-16 17:42 -0600
                                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 20:26 -0400
                                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 17:41 -0700
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 17:51 -0700
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-16 23:11 -0400
                                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-17 05:25 -0600
                                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-17 09:26 -0400
                                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-17 07:28 -0600
                                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-17 10:03 -0400
                                                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-17 08:06 -0600
                                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-17 10:31 -0400
                                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-17 11:05 -0400
                                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-17 12:27 -0400
                                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-18 00:39 +0000
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:00 -0700
                                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-18 01:06 +0000
                                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:11 -0700
                                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:01 -0700
                                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:04 -0700
                                                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:15 -0700
                                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:59 -0700
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:00 -0700
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:55 -0700
                                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:20 -0700
                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:27 -0700
                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:53 -0700
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 14:43 -0700
                                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 14:48 -0700
                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 14:51 -0700
                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:19 -0700
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:52 -0700
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-13 06:55 +0000
                                        BlueEyed Feminism. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-10 12:06 -0700
                                          Re: BlueEyed Feminism. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-13 00:28 +0000
                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:41 +0000
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 19:53 -0600
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 21:12 -0600
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 06:03 +0000
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 00:11 -0600
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 16:47 -0700
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:51 +0000
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 22:26 -0500
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 04:28 +0000
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:59 -0400
                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:13 -0400
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:28 -0600
                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:31 -0400
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:43 -0600
                                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 11:20 -0400
                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 09:46 -0600
                                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:12 +0000
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:23 -0600
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 13:02 -0400
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:36 -0400
                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:15 +0000
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:17 +0200
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:23 -0600
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:13 -0400
                                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:11 -0400
                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:46 -0600
                                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:45 -0400
                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:25 -0400
                                                            Body Shaming ? I smell a feminist. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-30 13:04 -0700
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 05:57 -0600
                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:16 +0000
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:18 +0200
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:24 -0600
                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-29 17:07 -0400
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:22 -0600
                                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:16 -0400
                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:49 -0600
                                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:50 -0400
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:07 +0000
                                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:52 -0400
                                                            " White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-30 13:27 -0700
                                                              Re: " White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0700
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:17 -0400
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:48 -0700
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:15 -0400
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:29 -0600
                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:17 +0000
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:19 +0200
                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:27 -0600
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:31 +0000
                                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:35 +0200
                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-29 17:11 -0400
                                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:22 -0600
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:46 -0600
                                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:51 -0600
                                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:59 -0600
                                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 16:08 -0600
                                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:36 -0600
                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0400
                                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:49 -0600
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
                                                                  "kensi" is not smarter than the market. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-31 05:47 -0700
                                                                    Re: "kensi" is not smarter than the market. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 05:25 -0400
                                                                      "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-01 05:42 -0700
                                                                        Re: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 09:48 -0400
                                                                          You know fuck all, trust me. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-01 07:01 -0700
                                                                            Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 10:36 -0400
                                                                              Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 09:48 -0500
                                                                                India digs porn; China can't see most of the Internet. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-01 08:42 -0700
                                                                                Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-06-01 09:41 -0700
                                                                                Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 19:28 -0400
                                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 20:22 -0400
                                                                              Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-01 08:49 -0600
                                                                                Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-01 17:51 +0100
                                                                                Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 12:18 +0200
                                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-01 13:22 -0600
                                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 12:33 +0200
                                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 12:58 -0700
                                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 14:56 +0200
                                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-06-03 11:55 -0400
                                                                                Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:09 +0000
                                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:28 -0400
                                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 11:26 -0600
                                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 10:41 +0200
                                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-02 19:38 +0100
                                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 11:43 +0200
                                                                                          Re: You know fuck all, trust me. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-02 21:02 +0100
                                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:49 -0400
                                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 11:52 -0600
                                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:56 -0400
                                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-06-03 11:56 -0400
                                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 20:31 +0000
                                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:36 -0700
                                                                                          Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 20:37 +0000
                                                                                            Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:42 -0700
                                                                                            Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-03 15:22 -0600
                                                                                              Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 22:25 +0100
                                                                                                Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-04 04:48 +0000
                                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
                                                                              The job market. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-01 08:18 -0700
                                                                                Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:10 +0000
                                                                                  Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:29 -0400
                                                                                    Re: The job market. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:49 -0400
                                                                                      Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:28 -0400
                                                                                        Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:00 +0000
                                                                                          Re: The job market. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 14:03 -0700
                                                                                          Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 14:32 -0700
                                                                                            Re: The job market. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 17:19 -0600
                                                                                          Re: The job market. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 17:18 -0600
                                                                                          Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:55 -0400
                                                                                            Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 00:05 +0000
                                                                                              Re: The job market. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 18:20 -0600
                                                                                                Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:56 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: The job market. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-06-03 04:03 +0000
                                                                                                    Re: The job market. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 22:07 -0600
                                                                                                  Re: The job market. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-06-03 12:02 -0400
                                                                                                    Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 12:45 -0700
                                                                                              Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:54 -0700
                                                                                                Re: The job market. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-06-03 11:59 -0400
                                                                                                Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 20:31 +0000
                                                                                                  Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 14:16 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 23:04 +0100
                                                                                                      Re: The job market. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:08 -0700
                                                                                                        Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 23:11 +0100
                                                                                                      Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 01:35 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: The job market. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-04 09:01 -0400
                                                                                      Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:34 -0400
                                                                                  Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
                                                                              Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:07 -0400
                                                                              Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 19:27 -0400
                                                                                Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 20:21 -0400
                                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:12 +0000
                                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:41 -0400
                                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:52 -0400
                                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:32 -0400
                                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-06-03 15:23 -0400
                                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 21:22 +0100
                                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:26 -0700
                                                                                          Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 21:32 +0100
                                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
                                                                              Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-06-01 19:53 -0500
                                                                            Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 09:44 -0500
                                                                              Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:14 +0000
                                                                                Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:47 -0400
                                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:02 +0000
                                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:58 -0400
                                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 00:07 +0000
                                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 18:20 -0600
                                                                          Re: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:35 -0400
                                                              Why does this concern you, exactly ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-30 14:43 -0700
                                                                Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:41 -0400
                                                                  Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-31 05:12 -0700
                                                                    Re: Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:03 -0700
                                                                  Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 20:14 +0000
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:33 +0200
                                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:42 -0600
                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:50 +0200
                                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:00 -0600
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:21 -0600
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:26 -0600
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:49 -0400
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:18 -0400
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:43 -0400
                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:19 +0000
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:28 -0600
                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:36 +0200
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:43 -0600
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:08 -0700
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:52 +0000
                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:18 -0400
                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-05-27 11:33 -0500
                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:42 +0000
                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 19:53 -0600
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 21:12 -0600
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:38 -0400
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:30 -0400
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:12 -0700
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 19:40 -0500
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 18:38 -0700
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:09 -0500
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:56 -0700
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 22:20 -0400
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:24 -0500
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 19:29 +0200
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 23:25 -0400
                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 11:02 +0000
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:52 -0700
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-27 12:10 +0100
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:13 -0400
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 11:26 -0500
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:04 -0700
                              Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 23:18 +0200
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 11:02 +0000
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:30 -0700
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:43 -0700
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 05:39 +0000
                              Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 02:33 -0400
                                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 06:50 +0000
                                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 00:53 -0700
                                    Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-09 01:48 +0000
                                      Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 19:14 -0700
                                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 11:44 -0400
                              Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 23:43 -0700
                                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 07:28 -0700
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 11:57 +0000
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 05:38 +0000
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 02:26 -0400
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 12:00 +0000
                              Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-11 02:47 +0000
                                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:50 -0700
                                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-11 05:49 -0600
                                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-11 08:01 -0400
                                    Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-11 06:07 -0600
                                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-13 00:30 +0000
                                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 21:19 -0700
                                    Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-16 21:17 +0000
                                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-12 23:27 -0500
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:55 -0700
                  Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:30 -0500
                    Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:18 +0000
                      Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:41 -0700
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 07:09 -0600
                  Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-27 11:43 -0400
                    Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 10:17 -0600
                      Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-27 13:11 -0400
                        Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 11:17 -0600
                  Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:43 +0000
                    Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:10 -0700
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                  Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:18 -0400
                    Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:32 -0400
                      Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 08:36 -0600
                      Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:55 +0000
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:34 +0000
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:22 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:52 -0400
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:54 -0400
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:37 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:05 +0000
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 18:02 -0600
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:08 -0400
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 18:25 -0600
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-03 10:59 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 18:01 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-06 01:38 +0000
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-06 03:49 +0000
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-06 06:44 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-06 16:18 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 10:53 +0000
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-07 07:58 -0400
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-06 07:39 -0600
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-06-06 17:39 -0500
        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 14:05 -0700
          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:20 -0400
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 08:37 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:39 -0400
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 08:48 -0600
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-28 17:32 +0100
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 13:38 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 11:51 -0600
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:57 +0000
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:55 -0400
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:19 -0400
                              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:30 -0600
                              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:50 -0400
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:03 -0600
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:03 -0600
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 14:46 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 15:16 -0400
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:22 -0400
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:31 -0600
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-29 16:20 +0100
                              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 09:43 -0600
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:56 -0400
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:22 +0000
                              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:37 -0600
                                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:34 -0400
                                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:50 -0600
                                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:23 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 19:40 -0400
      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-04 19:33 +1000
        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:20 -0400
    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-29 23:34 -0400

Page 15 of 22 — ← Prev page 1 … 13 14 [15] 16 17 … 22  Next page →


#170802 — Re: You know fuck all, trust me.

Fromonion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on)
Date2018-06-03 21:32 +0100
SubjectRe: You know fuck all, trust me.
Message-ID<1npu94t.1y1ey4n1ukge32N%onion@anon.invalid>
In reply to#170799
% <persent@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 2018-06-03 1:22 PM, Mr On!on wrote:
> > Sir Gergory Hall,  Esq.<greghall@yacht_maester.fake>  wrote:
> > 
> >> Well, that sure leaves you out, Nads.
> >>
> >> Smackdown!!
> >>
> > knob of butter
> > 
> 
> What is a knob of butter? Where did that measurement come ...
> https://www.quora.com/What-is-a-knob-of-butter-Where-did-that...
> English and Irish cooks use the term "knob" to mean a small piece of 
> butter placed atop a roast, so that the butter melts over the entire 
> piece of meat. Cooking is filled with approximations, most of which will
> work just fine. I like butter so my knob of butter may be much bigger
> than your knob of butter.
>

Gerg has a small knob of butter.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#170944 — Re: You know fuck all, trust me.

Fromonion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on)
Date2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
SubjectRe: You know fuck all, trust me.
Message-ID<1npvh5e.1m64cx513ej77mN%onion@anon.invalid>
In reply to#170257
Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:

> Or perhaps she knows better than to give away any information that might
> be used to hunt her down IRL, like any savvy woman on the net.

hormones in turmoil   [points, laughs]

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#170195 — Re: You know fuck all, trust me.

FromBricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
Date2018-06-01 19:53 -0500
SubjectRe: You know fuck all, trust me.
Message-ID<deq3hdl3sl3h1f17qt48366eui26ebqkgj@4ax.com>
In reply to#170044
On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 10:36:54 -0400, kensi
<kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:

>On 6/1/2018 10:01 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>> "kensi" replied:
>>>> It's a (job) market.
>>>> Even if _most_ people don't want the job, some do.
>>>>
>>>> You ("kensi") think you're some kind of AllKnowing God,
>>>> so damn smart that none of the rest of us should be allowed to think.
>>>
>>> No, I just know scams and ripoffs when I see them.
>> 
>> You know fuck all, trust me.
>
>That's not what the faculty thought when they granted me my Ph.D. ...
>
>> You're just arrogant, patronizing.
>
>I see you have run out of actual arguments to substantiate your 
>position. (Which you never did state clearly, by the way.)
>
>I win.
>
>*snicker*

Sure you have a PhD and post to newsgroups to improve your debating
skills.  Sure you do.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#170048 — Re: You know fuck all, trust me.

FromYour Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2018-06-01 09:44 -0500
SubjectRe: You know fuck all, trust me.
Message-ID<8PWdnWIIN9l7xozGnZ2dnUU7-IvNnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#170032
On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 07:01:15 -0700 (Seattle), LO AND BEHOLD;
"Jeff-Relf.Me  @." determined that the following was of great
importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
<Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.1--7.01am.Seattle.2018>:
 
>"kensi" replied:
>>>It's a (job) market. Even if _most_ people don't want the job, some do. 
>>>You ("kensi") think you're some kind of AllKnowing God, so damn smart
>>>that none of the rest of us should be allowed to think.
>>No, I just know scams and ripoffs when I see them.
>
>You know fuck all, trust me. You're just arrogant, patronizing.

<IRONY ALERT>

-- 
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA

"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this 
seems to be the new norm in the world.  It's spreading like a cancer, 
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil.  We need to put an 
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell 
everywhere.  We need to get these people out of every civilized 
country, and there's only one way to do it.  IOW, we have to become 
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) 

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working.  We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too.  One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode 

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#170258 — Re: You know fuck all, trust me.

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-06-02 04:14 +0000
SubjectRe: You know fuck all, trust me.
Message-ID<pet5in$bad$7@dont-email.me>
In reply to#170048
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 09:44:54 -0500, Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy
Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 wrote:

> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 07:01:15 -0700 (Seattle), LO AND BEHOLD;
> "Jeff-Relf.Me  @." determined that the following was of great importance
> and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.1--7.01am.Seattle.2018>:
>  
>>"kensi" replied:
>>>>It's a (job) market. Even if _most_ people don't want the job, some
>>>>do.
>>>>You ("kensi") think you're some kind of AllKnowing God, so damn smart
>>>>that none of the rest of us should be allowed to think.
>>>No, I just know scams and ripoffs when I see them.
>>
>>You know fuck all, trust me. You're just arrogant, patronizing.
> 
> <IRONY ALERT>

When I hit Relf's barf aimed at kensi, the HDMonitor temperature alarm 
went off and briefly registered over a hundred degrees *centigrade* (not 
Fahrenheit) on my irony meter, but it survived.

This time.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#170415 — Re: You know fuck all, trust me.

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-06-02 11:47 -0400
SubjectRe: You know fuck all, trust me.
Message-ID<h_yQC.267406$LR2.118901@fx41.iad>
In reply to#170258
On 6/2/2018 12:14 AM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 09:44:54 -0500, Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy
> Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 07:01:15 -0700 (Seattle), LO AND BEHOLD;
>> "Jeff-Relf.Me  @." determined that the following was of great importance
>> and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
>> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.1--7.01am.Seattle.2018>:
>>   
>>> "kensi" replied:
>>>>> It's a (job) market. Even if _most_ people don't want the job, some
>>>>> do.
>>>>> You ("kensi") think you're some kind of AllKnowing God, so damn smart
>>>>> that none of the rest of us should be allowed to think.
>>>> No, I just know scams and ripoffs when I see them.
>>>
>>> You know fuck all, trust me. You're just arrogant, patronizing.
>>
>> <IRONY ALERT>
> 
> When I hit Relf's barf aimed at kensi, the HDMonitor temperature alarm
> went off and briefly registered over a hundred degrees *centigrade* (not
> Fahrenheit) on my irony meter, but it survived.
> 
> This time.
> 
HDM Monitor alarm? No such scientific device. No surprise.
But we need to know if your fantasy "HDM" is English, Spanish or German.
German would suit you best.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#170512 — Re: You know fuck all, trust me.

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-06-02 21:02 +0000
SubjectRe: You know fuck all, trust me.
Message-ID<pev0lt$bad$13@dont-email.me>
In reply to#170415
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 11:47:09 -0400, benj wrote:

> On 6/2/2018 12:14 AM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt!
>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 09:44:54 -0500, Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy
>> Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 wrote:
>> 
>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 07:01:15 -0700 (Seattle), LO AND BEHOLD;
>>> "Jeff-Relf.Me  @." determined that the following was of great
>>> importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
>>> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.1--7.01am.Seattle.2018>:
>>>   
>>>> "kensi" replied:
>>>>>> It's a (job) market. Even if _most_ people don't want the job, some
>>>>>> do.
>>>>>> You ("kensi") think you're some kind of AllKnowing God, so damn
>>>>>> smart that none of the rest of us should be allowed to think.
>>>>> No, I just know scams and ripoffs when I see them.
>>>>
>>>> You know fuck all, trust me. You're just arrogant, patronizing.
>>>
>>> <IRONY ALERT>
>> 
>> When I hit Relf's barf aimed at kensi, the HDMonitor temperature alarm
>> went off and briefly registered over a hundred degrees *centigrade*
>> (not Fahrenheit) on my irony meter, but it survived.
>> 
>> This time.
>
> HDM Monitor alarm? No such scientific device. No surprise.

https://www.cpuid.com/softwares/hwmonitor.html

> But we need to know if your fantasy "HDM" is English, Spanish or German.
> German would suit you best.

What the hell are you smoking?

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#170537 — Re: You know fuck all, trust me.

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-06-02 19:58 -0400
SubjectRe: You know fuck all, trust me.
Message-ID<kbGQC.310941$DS3.288072@fx42.iad>
In reply to#170512
On 6/2/2018 5:02 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 11:47:09 -0400, benj wrote:
> 
>> On 6/2/2018 12:14 AM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt!
>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 09:44:54 -0500, Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy
>>> Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 07:01:15 -0700 (Seattle), LO AND BEHOLD;
>>>> "Jeff-Relf.Me  @." determined that the following was of great
>>>> importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
>>>> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.1--7.01am.Seattle.2018>:
>>>>    
>>>>> "kensi" replied:
>>>>>>> It's a (job) market. Even if _most_ people don't want the job, some
>>>>>>> do.
>>>>>>> You ("kensi") think you're some kind of AllKnowing God, so damn
>>>>>>> smart that none of the rest of us should be allowed to think.
>>>>>> No, I just know scams and ripoffs when I see them.
>>>>>
>>>>> You know fuck all, trust me. You're just arrogant, patronizing.
>>>>
>>>> <IRONY ALERT>
>>>
>>> When I hit Relf's barf aimed at kensi, the HDMonitor temperature alarm
>>> went off and briefly registered over a hundred degrees *centigrade*
>>> (not Fahrenheit) on my irony meter, but it survived.
>>>
>>> This time.
>>
>> HDM Monitor alarm? No such scientific device. No surprise.
> 
> https://www.cpuid.com/softwares/hwmonitor.html
> 
>> But we need to know if your fantasy "HDM" is English, Spanish or German.
>> German would suit you best.
> 
> What the hell are you smoking?
> 
Zip! The sound of educated wit flying right over Nads' pointy little 
head. You know if you weren't so fat and lazy you could actually look up 
the quips that go right over your head instead of showing the world what 
an idiot you are by admiring you are ignorant. OK?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#170544 — Re: You know fuck all, trust me.

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-06-03 00:07 +0000
SubjectRe: You know fuck all, trust me.
Message-ID<pevbf9$bad$19@dont-email.me>
In reply to#170537
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 19:58:57 -0400, benj wrote:

> On 6/2/2018 5:02 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt!
>> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 11:47:09 -0400, benj wrote:
>> 
>>> On 6/2/2018 12:14 AM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>> melt!
>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 09:44:54 -0500, Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy
>>>> Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 07:01:15 -0700 (Seattle), LO AND BEHOLD;
>>>>> "Jeff-Relf.Me  @." determined that the following was of great
>>>>> importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
>>>>> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.1--7.01am.Seattle.2018>:
>>>>>    
>>>>>> "kensi" replied:
>>>>>>>> It's a (job) market. Even if _most_ people don't want the job,
>>>>>>>> some do.
>>>>>>>> You ("kensi") think you're some kind of AllKnowing God, so damn
>>>>>>>> smart that none of the rest of us should be allowed to think.
>>>>>>> No, I just know scams and ripoffs when I see them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You know fuck all, trust me. You're just arrogant, patronizing.
>>>>>
>>>>> <IRONY ALERT>
>>>>
>>>> When I hit Relf's barf aimed at kensi, the HDMonitor temperature
>>>> alarm went off and briefly registered over a hundred degrees
>>>> *centigrade* (not Fahrenheit) on my irony meter, but it survived.
>>>>
>>>> This time.
>>>
>>> HDM Monitor alarm? No such scientific device. No surprise.
>> 
>> https://www.cpuid.com/softwares/hwmonitor.html
>> 
>>> But we need to know if your fantasy "HDM" is English, Spanish or
>>> German.
>>> German would suit you best.
>> 
>> What the hell are you smoking?
>
> Zip! The sound of educated wit flying right over Nads' pointy little
> head. You know if you weren't so fat and lazy you could actually look up
> the quips that go right over your head instead of showing the world what
> an idiot you are by admiring you are ignorant. OK?

By ... admiring ... whaaa?

I'll repeat: What the hell are you smoking?!

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#170555 — Re: You know fuck all, trust me.

FromSkeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-06-02 18:20 -0600
SubjectRe: You know fuck all, trust me.
Message-ID<m2d6hdli05k6e2nlrmtflfepkp5kia6o6b@4ax.com>
In reply to#170544
On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 00:07:05 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
<nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:

>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 19:58:57 -0400, benj wrote:
>
>> On 6/2/2018 5:02 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt!
>>> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 11:47:09 -0400, benj wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 6/2/2018 12:14 AM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>> melt!
>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 09:44:54 -0500, Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy
>>>>> Whistle Holder Emeritus ?? wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 07:01:15 -0700 (Seattle), LO AND BEHOLD;
>>>>>> "Jeff-Relf.Me  @." determined that the following was of great
>>>>>> importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
>>>>>> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.1--7.01am.Seattle.2018>:
>>>>>>    
>>>>>>> "kensi" replied:
>>>>>>>>> It's a (job) market. Even if _most_ people don't want the job,
>>>>>>>>> some do.
>>>>>>>>> You ("kensi") think you're some kind of AllKnowing God, so damn
>>>>>>>>> smart that none of the rest of us should be allowed to think.
>>>>>>>> No, I just know scams and ripoffs when I see them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You know fuck all, trust me. You're just arrogant, patronizing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <IRONY ALERT>
>>>>>
>>>>> When I hit Relf's barf aimed at kensi, the HDMonitor temperature
>>>>> alarm went off and briefly registered over a hundred degrees
>>>>> *centigrade* (not Fahrenheit) on my irony meter, but it survived.
>>>>>
>>>>> This time.
>>>>
>>>> HDM Monitor alarm? No such scientific device. No surprise.
>>> 
>>> https://www.cpuid.com/softwares/hwmonitor.html
>>> 
>>>> But we need to know if your fantasy "HDM" is English, Spanish or
>>>> German.
>>>> German would suit you best.
>>> 
>>> What the hell are you smoking?
>>
>> Zip! The sound of educated wit flying right over Nads' pointy little
>> head. You know if you weren't so fat and lazy you could actually look up
>> the quips that go right over your head instead of showing the world what
>> an idiot you are by admiring you are ignorant. OK?
>
>By ... admiring ... whaaa?
>
>I'll repeat: What the hell are you smoking?!


You got SMACKED DOWN again!!!!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#170076 — Re: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God,

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-06-01 13:35 -0400
SubjectRe: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God,
Message-ID<iufQC.179844$o43.107454@fx33.iad>
In reply to#170027
On 6/1/2018 9:48 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 6/1/2018 8:42 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>> "kensi" replied:
>>>>> the job described at the link actually has /net negative pay/
>>>>> due to the costs it will incur for the sucker who signs up for it.
>>>>
>>>> You're not smarter than the (job) market.
>>>
>>> The fuck's that supposed to mean, k0Oky?
>>
>> It's a (job) market.
>> Even if _most_ people don't want the job, some do.
>>
>> You ("kensi") think you're some kind of AllKnowing God,
>> so damn smart that none of the rest of us should be allowed to think.
> 
> No, I just know scams and ripoffs when I see them.
> 
Right on, "Kanzi"! If there is ANYTHING you lefty libs have expert 
knowledge of it is scams and ripoffs. Look at your expertise in the 
global warming scam and CO2 tax ripoff!

As for knowing anything else, well Rolf is hardly one to judge on that 
count. However I can vouch for your ignorance. Trust me folks.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#169765 — Why does this concern you, exactly ?

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2018-05-30 14:43 -0700
SubjectWhy does this concern you, exactly ?
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@May.30--2.43pm.Seattle.2018>
In reply to#169704
"kensi" replied:
> > > > they want more money than a job is worth
> > >
> > > No, they just want it to pay enough to actually cover
> > > an adult's cost of living in the area where the job is located.
> 
> counterpunch.org/2017/07/11/jobs-you-cant-afford-to-take/

Why does this concern you, exactly ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#169796 — Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ?

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-05-31 05:41 -0400
SubjectRe: Why does this concern you, exactly ?
Message-ID<peofvo$1lc2$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#169765
On 5/30/2018 5:43 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> "kensi" replied:
>>>>> they want more money than a job is worth
>>>>
>>>> No, they just want it to pay enough to actually cover
>>>> an adult's cost of living in the area where the job is located.
>>
>> counterpunch.org/2017/07/11/jobs-you-cant-afford-to-take/
> 
> Why does this concern you, exactly ?

It should concern all of us who value the continuation of some semblance 
of civilization. Because if this bullshit keeps getting worse, sooner or 
later there will be an armed revolt...

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#169805 — Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose.

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2018-05-31 05:12 -0700
SubjectFeminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@May.31--5.12am.Seattle.2018>
In reply to#169796
Speaking of low wages, with less taxes and regulations, "kensi" replied:
> if this bullshit keeps getting worse, 
> sooner or later there will be an armed revolt...

Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#169851 — Re: Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose.

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-05-31 10:03 -0700
SubjectRe: Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose.
Message-ID<fnao7oF5v5mU3@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#169805
On 5/31/18 5:12 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> Speaking of low wages, with less taxes and regulations, "kensi" replied:
>> if this bullshit keeps getting worse,
>> sooner or later there will be an armed revolt...
> 
> Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose.
> 

Seriously, what are you even talking about here? I am not familiar with 
this conspiracy theory.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#169913 — Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ?

FromAvenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com>
Date2018-05-31 20:14 +0000
SubjectRe: Why does this concern you, exactly ?
Message-ID<XnsA8F3A5289DDDgreyghost471bazinga@85.214.115.223>
In reply to#169796
kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in news:peofvo$1lc2$2
@gioia.aioe.org:

> On 5/30/2018 5:43 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>> "kensi" replied:
>>>>>> they want more money than a job is worth
>>>>>
>>>>> No, they just want it to pay enough to actually cover
>>>>> an adult's cost of living in the area where the job is located.
>>>
>>> counterpunch.org/2017/07/11/jobs-you-cant-afford-to-take/
>> 
>> Why does this concern you, exactly ?
> 
> It should concern all of us who value the continuation of some semblance 
> of civilization. Because if this bullshit keeps getting worse, sooner or 
> later there will be an armed revolt...
> 

Make sure to announce it so we know it's happening.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#169480 — Re: Nadegda must be proud.

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-29 13:33 +0200
SubjectRe: Nadegda must be proud.
Message-ID<bah312.9lk.17.1@news.alt.net>
In reply to#169477
On 2018-05-29 10:27 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:19:34 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2018-05-29 10:17 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 06:29:31 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 08:15:43 -0400, kensi
>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 5/29/2018 4:48 AM, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Productive capacity is only increasing because automation and
>>>>>> processes have made production more efficient and economical.  What
>>>>>> would you propose as a "solution"... featherbedding?  How is today's
>>>>>> production efficiency due to more efficient methods of production
>>>>>> suddenly a new issue?  It's been going on at least as long as Eli
>>>>>> Whitney's cotton gin. Do you think the latest smart phones that
>>>>>> everyone just HAS to have, could be as compact and feature-packed as
>>>>>> they are without the very technology that you decry, but are probably
>>>>>> personally benefiting from at the same time?
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't see where Nadegda decried technology, k0ok. Only where she
>>>>> lamented that the gains in productivity are distributed extremely
>>>>> unevenly, without a fair share going to labor.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please point to where she indicated the former, rather than the latter,
>>>>> koOk.
>>>>
>>>> So she's crying because her income won't allow her to have these things?
>>>
>>> I'm not crying. You are, snowflake.
>>>
>>>> Get a better job.
>>>
>>> I have a good job already. But lots of people don't, and can't find one in
>>> this economy -- an economy that's going to get worse before it gets better:
>>>
>>> http://www.bbc.com/news/business-44287455
>>>
>> get two jobs
> 
> I worked 3 at one time, that's 2 that someone could have had, there
> are people hiring all the time around here, problem is people are to
> lazy, they want more money than a job is worth and find it easier to
> let the left feed them.
> 
its hard to do that here you get stared at

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#169490 — Re: Nadegda must be proud.

FromSkeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-05-29 14:42 -0600
SubjectRe: Nadegda must be proud.
Message-ID<hoergd9k3md89ub9hvdlj5df3stjvkgmk7@4ax.com>
In reply to#169480
On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:33:57 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 2018-05-29 10:27 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:19:34 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2018-05-29 10:17 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 06:29:31 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 08:15:43 -0400, kensi
>>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/29/2018 4:48 AM, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Productive capacity is only increasing because automation and
>>>>>>> processes have made production more efficient and economical.  What
>>>>>>> would you propose as a "solution"... featherbedding?  How is today's
>>>>>>> production efficiency due to more efficient methods of production
>>>>>>> suddenly a new issue?  It's been going on at least as long as Eli
>>>>>>> Whitney's cotton gin. Do you think the latest smart phones that
>>>>>>> everyone just HAS to have, could be as compact and feature-packed as
>>>>>>> they are without the very technology that you decry, but are probably
>>>>>>> personally benefiting from at the same time?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't see where Nadegda decried technology, k0ok. Only where she
>>>>>> lamented that the gains in productivity are distributed extremely
>>>>>> unevenly, without a fair share going to labor.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please point to where she indicated the former, rather than the latter,
>>>>>> koOk.
>>>>>
>>>>> So she's crying because her income won't allow her to have these things?
>>>>
>>>> I'm not crying. You are, snowflake.
>>>>
>>>>> Get a better job.
>>>>
>>>> I have a good job already. But lots of people don't, and can't find one in
>>>> this economy -- an economy that's going to get worse before it gets better:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.bbc.com/news/business-44287455
>>>>
>>> get two jobs
>> 
>> I worked 3 at one time, that's 2 that someone could have had, there
>> are people hiring all the time around here, problem is people are to
>> lazy, they want more money than a job is worth and find it easier to
>> let the left feed them.
>> 
>its hard to do that here you get stared at

People are more proud of themselves there, todays generation is lazy.
they want everything handed to them.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#169492 — Re: Nadegda must be proud.

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-29 13:50 +0200
SubjectRe: Nadegda must be proud.
Message-ID<bah40i.ihh.17.1@news.alt.net>
In reply to#169490
On 2018-05-29 10:42 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:33:57 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2018-05-29 10:27 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:19:34 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2018-05-29 10:17 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 06:29:31 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 08:15:43 -0400, kensi
>>>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/29/2018 4:48 AM, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Productive capacity is only increasing because automation and
>>>>>>>> processes have made production more efficient and economical.  What
>>>>>>>> would you propose as a "solution"... featherbedding?  How is today's
>>>>>>>> production efficiency due to more efficient methods of production
>>>>>>>> suddenly a new issue?  It's been going on at least as long as Eli
>>>>>>>> Whitney's cotton gin. Do you think the latest smart phones that
>>>>>>>> everyone just HAS to have, could be as compact and feature-packed as
>>>>>>>> they are without the very technology that you decry, but are probably
>>>>>>>> personally benefiting from at the same time?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't see where Nadegda decried technology, k0ok. Only where she
>>>>>>> lamented that the gains in productivity are distributed extremely
>>>>>>> unevenly, without a fair share going to labor.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please point to where she indicated the former, rather than the latter,
>>>>>>> koOk.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So she's crying because her income won't allow her to have these things?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not crying. You are, snowflake.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Get a better job.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a good job already. But lots of people don't, and can't find one in
>>>>> this economy -- an eonomy that's going to get worse before it gets better:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.bbc.com/news/business-44287455
>>>>>
>>>> get two jobs
>>>
>>> I worked 3 at one time, that's 2 that someone could have had, there
>>> are people hiring all the time around here, problem is people are to
>>> lazy, they want more money than a job is worth and find it easier to
>>> let the left feed them.
>>>
>> its hard to do that here you get stared at
> 
> People are more proud of themselves there, todays generation is lazy.
> they want everything handed to them.
> 
they hand you stuff here to ,
an axe a shovel the reins to a pull team

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#169494 — Re: Nadegda must be proud.

FromSkeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-05-29 15:00 -0600
SubjectRe: Nadegda must be proud.
Message-ID<gofrgdphe53o270d0u595n7m29mpna77bu@4ax.com>
In reply to#169492
On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:50:45 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 2018-05-29 10:42 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:33:57 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2018-05-29 10:27 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:19:34 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2018-05-29 10:17 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 06:29:31 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 08:15:43 -0400, kensi
>>>>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5/29/2018 4:48 AM, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Productive capacity is only increasing because automation and
>>>>>>>>> processes have made production more efficient and economical.  What
>>>>>>>>> would you propose as a "solution"... featherbedding?  How is today's
>>>>>>>>> production efficiency due to more efficient methods of production
>>>>>>>>> suddenly a new issue?  It's been going on at least as long as Eli
>>>>>>>>> Whitney's cotton gin. Do you think the latest smart phones that
>>>>>>>>> everyone just HAS to have, could be as compact and feature-packed as
>>>>>>>>> they are without the very technology that you decry, but are probably
>>>>>>>>> personally benefiting from at the same time?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't see where Nadegda decried technology, k0ok. Only where she
>>>>>>>> lamented that the gains in productivity are distributed extremely
>>>>>>>> unevenly, without a fair share going to labor.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please point to where she indicated the former, rather than the latter,
>>>>>>>> koOk.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So she's crying because her income won't allow her to have these things?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not crying. You are, snowflake.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Get a better job.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have a good job already. But lots of people don't, and can't find one in
>>>>>> this economy -- an eonomy that's going to get worse before it gets better:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.bbc.com/news/business-44287455
>>>>>>
>>>>> get two jobs
>>>>
>>>> I worked 3 at one time, that's 2 that someone could have had, there
>>>> are people hiring all the time around here, problem is people are to
>>>> lazy, they want more money than a job is worth and find it easier to
>>>> let the left feed them.
>>>>
>>> its hard to do that here you get stared at
>> 
>> People are more proud of themselves there, todays generation is lazy.
>> they want everything handed to them.
>> 
>they hand you stuff here to ,
>an axe a shovel the reins to a pull team

eggzactly

I know 3 construction companys hiring right now, 2 little markets with
help wanted signs, the mill is always looking, and there is always the
military, i know idiots whining because they don't get enough food
stamps and leap. makes you wanna scream.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 15 of 22 — ← Prev page 1 … 13 14 [15] 16 17 … 22  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate


csiph-web