Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #167697 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-24 09:38 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-05-31 21:34 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 103 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-24 09:38 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 09:47 -0700
Michael Glasser's Marxism/Feminism. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-24 10:19 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 18:04 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 15:13 -0700
Feminists suck on the BoobTube. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-24 20:28 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-24 18:28 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 15:45 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 07:39 -0500
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 07:55 -0500
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 09:17 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 08:57 -0500
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:13 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 12:15 -0500
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:33 -0600
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 16:49 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:23 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 18:17 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-26 07:43 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:44 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-27 14:14 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 13:44 -0600
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:12 -0500
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 11:38 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:45 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:44 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 13:55 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 15:03 -0500
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:30 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 13:24 -0500
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 11:32 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 16:43 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:24 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:29 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:27 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:04 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-25 10:26 -0600
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 12:21 -0500
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-25 16:12 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 18:02 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:30 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:44 -0700
Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 01:45 -0700
Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:32 -0400
Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:43 -0700
Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 13:51 -0500
Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 11:58 -0700
They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 16:51 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 16:55 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 20:40 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 17:41 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 21:16 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 18:30 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:35 -0500
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-29 17:36 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 07:39 -0500
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 07:01 -0600
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 10:40 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 15:06 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 14:50 -0500
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 08:29 -0500
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:02 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:29 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 20:50 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 09:05 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 06:57 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-27 11:44 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 12:15 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:17 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 10:21 -0600
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:33 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 13:52 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 11:02 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 13:51 -0600
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-27 14:24 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 13:52 -0600
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:13 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-28 09:49 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:51 -0500
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-28 14:49 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 16:14 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:29 -0500
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-29 17:40 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 15:01 +0200
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 16:09 -0600
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-30 09:14 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 07:57 -0500
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-30 05:59 +0200
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:23 -0500
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-29 07:57 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 09:44 -0600
Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:43 -0700
Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 11:19 -0600
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 11:35 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:45 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 13:54 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 11:01 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-31 21:34 +0000
Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-30 10:40 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. |
| Message-ID | <fn860rFla6iU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #169618 |
On 5/30/18 5:39 AM, chrisv wrote: > Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > >> chrisv wrote: >>> >>> benj wrote: >>>> >>>> Libs on the other hand never have those kind of productive jobs so they >>>> are far more prone to racism and sexism though their bullshit usually >>>> covers their crimes quite nicely. >>> >>> Jeezez, you are filthy. "Libs" never have productive jobs, eh? >>> >>> Who do you hope to fool, which such obvious lying? >>> >>> You need not respond. I won't read it. I know that you will just >>> lie. >>> >>>> (further lies snipped, unread) >> >> "benj" is a total dolt or a programmed bot. You decide which. > > Total dolt. Even if "libs" didn't have productive jobs, why would > that make them "far more prone to racism and sexism"? > > You just don't see that kind of shameless lying, and brain-dead > illogic, from the left. It seems to always come from the right, > especially the lies. > > Their favorite attack is "You're a leftist because you're poor and > want to leach off those who work!" Note the obvious parallels to the > Wintrolls' attacks against Free software advocates. > There are plenty of "advocates" who push bigotry (just as there are plenty who push back against it). -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-30 15:06 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. |
| Message-ID | <_CCPC.85639$eR.22533@fx30.iad> |
| In reply to | #169707 |
On 5/30/2018 1:40 PM, Snit wrote: > On 5/30/18 5:39 AM, chrisv wrote: >> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >> >>> chrisv wrote: >>>> >>>> benj wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Libs on the other hand never have those kind of productive jobs so >>>>> they >>>>> are far more prone to racism and sexism though their bullshit usually >>>>> covers their crimes quite nicely. >>>> >>>> Jeezez, you are filthy. "Libs" never have productive jobs, eh? >>>> >>>> Who do you hope to fool, which such obvious lying? >>>> >>>> You need not respond. I won't read it. I know that you will just >>>> lie. >>>> >>>>> (further lies snipped, unread) >>> >>> "benj" is a total dolt or a programmed bot. You decide which. >> >> Total dolt. Even if "libs" didn't have productive jobs, why would >> that make them "far more prone to racism and sexism"? Start with name calling, that's always an ethical and honest debate on the left, right? When you don't do anything productive and rely on your "wits" (read bullshit) to get what you have, then you must use any trick in the book to 'sell" your product. It's one of the rules of acquisition that bullshit always has the highest mark-up. >> You just don't see that kind of shameless lying, and brain-dead >> illogic, from the left. It seems to always come from the right, >> especially the lies. Standrd Left. They fantasy left ALWAYS accuses anyone who points out their methods of using the very methods that they employ. A careful examination of left statements vs those on the right show that the right values honesty and integrity while the left mostly appreciates clever lies and propaganda. >> Their favorite attack is "You're a leftist because you're poor and >> want to leach off those who work!" Note the obvious parallels to the >> Wintrolls' attacks against Free software advocates. bullshit. Free software is given away by the people who created it. (which is fine and a worthy contribution to human civilization) while lefty libs like to steal what OTHER PEOPLE have created because 1. Fantasy is the ONLY thing they have the ability to create. and 2. They consider themselves smarter than everyone else hence better suited to determine the best way the money of other people should be distributed. Simple as that. > There are plenty of "advocates" who push bigotry (just as there are > plenty who push back against it). And then there is the left who PRETEND to push back against it while cleverly hiding their own agenda of racism and bigotry. just ask Bill Cosby what happens to you when you start pushing back against lib double secret racism and bigotry.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-30 14:50 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. |
| Message-ID | <a5vtgd58ieffebe5cl22eup9873ls47392@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #169738 |
benj wrote: >>> Total dolt. Even if "libs" didn't have productive jobs, why would >>> that make them "far more prone to racism and sexism"? > >Start with name calling, that's always an ethical and honest debate on >the left, right? But it's you who started, with the idiotic, dishonest, attacks, "benj". You've got no right to whine that you've been called a "dolt" in response. >When you don't do anything productive But many "libs" are productive, "benj", making your claim, that "libs" never do anything productive, a lie. > and rely on your (remaining gibberish snipped, unread) No one denies that idleness and dependance are "bad", "benj", but no amount of propaganda will convince me that it makes people "far more prone to racism and sexism". It's absurd, made-up nonsense. Idiot. -- '(Linux is) designed for a "community"????????????????????? Hahahahha. Whats that? A group of people who dont want to buy anything????' - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-31 08:29 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. |
| Message-ID | <vu0ugdh7q5kj8e8dmarqu4j289ig83o3pl@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #169740 |
chrisv wrote: >No one denies that idleness and dependance are "bad", "benj", but no >amount of propaganda will convince me that it makes people "far more >prone to racism and sexism". It's absurd, made-up nonsense. It's about as stupid as when the lying asshole "-hh" claimed that I was dissatisfied with the success that I have had in my career. His evidence? The "bitter" attitude that I display in cola. Really? What's the connection? Are there no successful people who are "bitter"? Could there not be some other reason that I am "bitter"? I mean, only a *shameless* jackasshole, like -highhorse", would attack with such idiocy. P.S. Watch for the lying asshole to assert that my bringing this up again is yet more "evidence" to support his claim. That's the caliber of his "logic". Nope. It's only yet another example of him being a stupid lying asshole. Like his Photoshop idiocy, and his anti-choice idiocy. -- "So are 348 different Linux choices a good thing? I really doubt it." - lying asshole "-hh"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-31 10:02 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. |
| Message-ID | <fnao5qF5v5mU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #169819 |
On 5/31/18 6:29 AM, chrisv wrote:
> chrisv wrote:
>
>> No one denies that idleness and dependance are "bad", "benj", but no
>> amount of propaganda will convince me that it makes people "far more
>> prone to racism and sexism". It's absurd, made-up nonsense.
>
> It's about as stupid as when the lying asshole "-hh" claimed that I
> was dissatisfied with the success that I have had in my career.
>
> His evidence? The "bitter" attitude that I display in cola.
>
> Really? What's the connection? Are there no successful people who
> are "bitter"? Could there not be some other reason that I am
> "bitter"?
>
> I mean, only a *shameless* jackasshole, like -highhorse", would attack
> with such idiocy.
>
> P.S. Watch for the lying asshole to assert that my bringing this up
> again is yet more "evidence" to support his claim. That's the caliber
> of his "logic". Nope. It's only yet another example of him being a
> stupid lying asshole. Like his Photoshop idiocy, and his anti-choice
> idiocy.
>
chrisv:
-----
That thing won't even acknowledge that virtual desktops are a very
nice feature. It claims that they require "too much configuration".
You see, they require that you decide how to organize things on the
desktops.
In other words, in order to enjoy the benefit of a tool, you must
actually use the tool.
Sheesh.
-----
You lied about my views there. Why?
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-30 13:29 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. |
| Message-ID | <fn8fsrFn8m1U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #169738 |
On 5/30/18 12:06 PM, benj wrote: > On 5/30/2018 1:40 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 5/30/18 5:39 AM, chrisv wrote: >>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>> >>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>> >>>>> benj wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Libs on the other hand never have those kind of productive jobs so >>>>>> they >>>>>> are far more prone to racism and sexism though their bullshit usually >>>>>> covers their crimes quite nicely. >>>>> >>>>> Jeezez, you are filthy. "Libs" never have productive jobs, eh? >>>>> >>>>> Who do you hope to fool, which such obvious lying? >>>>> >>>>> You need not respond. I won't read it. I know that you will just >>>>> lie. >>>>> >>>>>> (further lies snipped, unread) >>>> >>>> "benj" is a total dolt or a programmed bot. You decide which. >>> >>> Total dolt. Even if "libs" didn't have productive jobs, why would >>> that make them "far more prone to racism and sexism"? > > Start with name calling, that's always an ethical and honest debate on > the left, right? When you don't do anything productive and rely on your > "wits" (read bullshit) to get what you have, then you must use any trick > in the book to 'sell" your product. It's one of the rules of acquisition > that bullshit always has the highest mark-up. > >>> You just don't see that kind of shameless lying, and brain-dead >>> illogic, from the left. It seems to always come from the right, >>> especially the lies. > > Standrd Left. They fantasy left ALWAYS accuses anyone who points out > their methods of using the very methods that they employ. A careful > examination of left statements vs those on the right show that the right > values honesty and integrity while the left mostly appreciates clever > lies and propaganda. > >>> Their favorite attack is "You're a leftist because you're poor and >>> want to leach off those who work!" Note the obvious parallels to the >>> Wintrolls' attacks against Free software advocates. > > bullshit. Free software is given away by the people who created it. > (which is fine and a worthy contribution to human civilization) while > lefty libs like to steal what OTHER PEOPLE have created because 1. > Fantasy is the ONLY thing they have the ability to create. and 2. They > consider themselves smarter than everyone else hence better suited to > determine the best way the money of other people should be distributed. > Simple as that. > >> There are plenty of "advocates" who push bigotry (just as there are >> plenty who push back against it). > > And then there is the left who PRETEND to push back against it while > cleverly hiding their own agenda of racism and bigotry. just ask Bill > Cosby what happens to you when you start pushing back against lib double > secret racism and bigotry. You claim those who push back against bigotry are pretending. I will not speak for others, but *I* am not. I reject the rights push for special entitlements. Keep in mind the main differences between liberal and conservative world views: * Liberals: support equal rights and environmental protection, with a focus on investing in the future and building a stronger tie between hard work / productivity and financial reward. Additionally, Liberals want evidence-based regulation and oversight to help ensure clean air and water, safe food, and human rights. This includes following the scientific evidence about climate change and food safety, and things like setting levels of lead and other harmful substances allowed, and even to wanting to do research to reduce the harm of tools such as cars and guns and swimming pools. This is a form of control, and conservatives are right to note that. And they are right to note that sometimes these measures are taken too far. * Conservative: support special entitlements for whites, Christians, males, heterosexuals, and the wealthy, with a focus on redistributing wealth to the very richest in the nation with the idea that this will somehow help others. Conservatives want regulation and oversight based on their own feelings and what they believe has historically existed (which is often incorrect), or even just based on their own religion. This includes controlling which consenting adults can marry each other, what a woman can do with her own body, and even insisting the government gets to define YOUR gender. They also work to create regulations on voting to limit who can vote, for if the people truly get a voice they know their ideas are less likely to be accepted. Liberals are right to call conservatives out on this also being a form of control and, I think, a less defensible one. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-26 20:50 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. |
| Message-ID | <GhnOC.50878$3R1.15538@fx16.iad> |
| In reply to | #168426 |
On 5/26/2018 8:40 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote: > On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:51:48 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: > >>>>> [ Hillary would ] reduce income redistribution to the rich >>>> >>>> Are you saying somehow that the guv is >>>> forcing poor folks to pay up to the rich? >>> >>> In direct and indirect ways... absolutely. >> >> Hillary and Mike hate men because they earn more, generally. >> >> They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. > > Men don't earn more and those "statistics" showing that women's pay is > lower is complete and utter crap because they don't factor in the fact > that women generally work fewer hours and and take more time off. For > the same role, the pay is identical. > Nads and "Kanzi" say: "Why tell the truth when a Lie will do?"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 09:05 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. |
| Message-ID | <30blgdhlid3k8d5jhac2srt8i8ehkoqmao@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #168428 |
On Sat, 26 May 2018 20:50:36 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >On 5/26/2018 8:40 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote: >> On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:51:48 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: >> >>>>>> [ Hillary would ] reduce income redistribution to the rich >>>>> >>>>> Are you saying somehow that the guv is >>>>> forcing poor folks to pay up to the rich? >>>> >>>> In direct and indirect ways... absolutely. >>> >>> Hillary and Mike hate men because they earn more, generally. >>> >>> They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. >> >> Men don't earn more and those "statistics" showing that women's pay is >> lower is complete and utter crap because they don't factor in the fact >> that women generally work fewer hours and and take more time off. For >> the same role, the pay is identical. >> >Nads and "Kanzi" say: "Why tell the truth when a Lie will do?" I used to think differently, but the worst things to happen to democracy are the decisions to give people who didn't own land the right to vote and later women. Land owners SHOULD have a say in who runs a place whether they own 2 square feet or 200,000 but if people are on welfare, renting or doing nothing of worth, they shouldn't have a say. If the land owner is a woman, she should have a vote too because she has a lot to lose from incompetence but a woman who stays at home and "takes care" of her nine children from seven different fathers on the taxpayer's dime should sit down and shut the Hell up. The fact that so many useless idiots have a say in who runs the country is the reason why we're now considering the "rights" of people who consciously cut their own balls off to become a woman, why we allowed two men who can't have children and don't care about religion the right to marry and why we believe that white police officers are senselessly shooting "innocent" blacks despite the fact that the statistics and reality say otherwise.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 06:57 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. |
| Message-ID | <fmvrqjF3c9dU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #168535 |
On 5/27/18 6:05 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote: > On Sat, 26 May 2018 20:50:36 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > >> On 5/26/2018 8:40 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote: >>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:51:48 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: >>> >>>>>>> [ Hillary would ] reduce income redistribution to the rich >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you saying somehow that the guv is >>>>>> forcing poor folks to pay up to the rich? >>>>> >>>>> In direct and indirect ways... absolutely. >>>> >>>> Hillary and Mike hate men because they earn more, generally. >>>> >>>> They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. >>> >>> Men don't earn more and those "statistics" showing that women's pay is >>> lower is complete and utter crap because they don't factor in the fact >>> that women generally work fewer hours and and take more time off. For >>> the same role, the pay is identical. >>> >> Nads and "Kanzi" say: "Why tell the truth when a Lie will do?" > > I used to think differently, but the worst things to happen to > democracy are the decisions to give people who didn't own land the > right to vote and later women. Land owners SHOULD have a say in who > runs a place whether they own 2 square feet or 200,000 but if people > are on welfare, renting or doing nothing of worth, they shouldn't have > a say. If the land owner is a woman, she should have a vote too > because she has a lot to lose from incompetence but a woman who stays > at home and "takes care" of her nine children from seven different > fathers on the taxpayer's dime should sit down and shut the Hell up. > > The fact that so many useless idiots have a say in who runs the > country is the reason why we're now considering the "rights" of people > who consciously cut their own balls off to become a woman, why we > allowed two men who can't have children and don't care about religion > the right to marry and why we believe that white police officers are > senselessly shooting "innocent" blacks despite the fact that the > statistics and reality say otherwise. > All men (people). It means something. Right now even with the poor having a vote they and the middle class have their income redistributed to the rich. Why would you want to push a system that increases such inequality? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 11:44 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. |
| Message-ID | <peekpq$9qj$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #168535 |
Doomsdrzej wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > I used to think differently, but the worst things to happen to > democracy are the decisions to give people who didn't own land the > right to vote and later women. Land owners SHOULD have a say in who > runs a place whether they own 2 square feet or 200,000 but if people > are on welfare, renting or doing nothing of worth, they shouldn't have > a say. If the land owner is a woman, she should have a vote too > because she has a lot to lose from incompetence but a woman who stays > at home and "takes care" of her nine children from seven different > fathers on the taxpayer's dime should sit down and shut the Hell up. Oh. My. God. -- Debian Hint #30: Documentation can be made available at http://localhost/ by installing the 'doc-base' and 'doc-central' packages and their dependencies.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 12:15 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. |
| Message-ID | <0cmlgdt94fsl9dtplltt7ro0dl91kr6mts@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #168579 |
On Sun, 27 May 2018 11:44:40 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >Doomsdrzej wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> I used to think differently, but the worst things to happen to >> democracy are the decisions to give people who didn't own land the >> right to vote and later women. Land owners SHOULD have a say in who >> runs a place whether they own 2 square feet or 200,000 but if people >> are on welfare, renting or doing nothing of worth, they shouldn't have >> a say. If the land owner is a woman, she should have a vote too >> because she has a lot to lose from incompetence but a woman who stays >> at home and "takes care" of her nine children from seven different >> fathers on the taxpayer's dime should sit down and shut the Hell up. > >Oh. My. God. Voting should be a privilege, not a right.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 09:17 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. |
| Message-ID | <fn041iF4v0tU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #168584 |
On 5/27/18 9:15 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote: > On Sun, 27 May 2018 11:44:40 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom > <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > >> Doomsdrzej wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> I used to think differently, but the worst things to happen to >>> democracy are the decisions to give people who didn't own land the >>> right to vote and later women. Land owners SHOULD have a say in who >>> runs a place whether they own 2 square feet or 200,000 but if people >>> are on welfare, renting or doing nothing of worth, they shouldn't have >>> a say. If the land owner is a woman, she should have a vote too >>> because she has a lot to lose from incompetence but a woman who stays >>> at home and "takes care" of her nine children from seven different >>> fathers on the taxpayer's dime should sit down and shut the Hell up. >> >> Oh. My. God. > > Voting should be a privilege, not a right. > This is a common view of Republicans and others on the right... hence why they push laws to make it harder to vote, esp. for the poor and the elderly and others they consider undesirable. At least you admit it. I guess I commend you for that, even if your view is reprehensible. Oh, and if you have to earn the right to vote, why not include a basic competency test of which YOU would surely fail? Oh. Because you would fail it. You want to deny OTHERS rights and have special entitlements for yourself. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 10:21 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. |
| Message-ID | <0nmlgdlnd8p707dqsnnv33o81do5m8n2tr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #168587 |
On Sun, 27 May 2018 09:17:54 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >This is a common view of Republicans and others on the right... hence >why they push laws to make it harder to vote, esp. for the poor and the >elderly and others they consider undesirable. > >At least you admit it. I guess I commend you for that, even if your view >is reprehensible. > >Oh, and if you have to earn the right to vote, why not include a basic >competency test of which YOU would surely fail? Oh. Because you would >fail it. You want to deny OTHERS rights and have special entitlements >for yourself. Is the left still going to let illegal and felons vote? Oh yea, and the dead people? Fucking hypocrites.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 12:33 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. |
| Message-ID | <J5BOC.237131$ll2.111470@fx35.iad> |
| In reply to | #168579 |
On 5/27/2018 11:44 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > Doomsdrzej wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> I used to think differently, but the worst things to happen to >> democracy are the decisions to give people who didn't own land the >> right to vote and later women. Land owners SHOULD have a say in who >> runs a place whether they own 2 square feet or 200,000 but if people >> are on welfare, renting or doing nothing of worth, they shouldn't have >> a say. If the land owner is a woman, she should have a vote too >> because she has a lot to lose from incompetence but a woman who stays >> at home and "takes care" of her nine children from seven different >> fathers on the taxpayer's dime should sit down and shut the Hell up. > > Oh. My. God. > Truth slicing through the lib brain like a red-hot axe.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 13:52 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. |
| Message-ID | <5lrlgdhdrutp731se1nn1j5gd0u7b25ev8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #168597 |
On Sun, 27 May 2018 12:33:33 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >On 5/27/2018 11:44 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >> Doomsdrzej wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> I used to think differently, but the worst things to happen to >>> democracy are the decisions to give people who didn't own land the >>> right to vote and later women. Land owners SHOULD have a say in who >>> runs a place whether they own 2 square feet or 200,000 but if people >>> are on welfare, renting or doing nothing of worth, they shouldn't have >>> a say. If the land owner is a woman, she should have a vote too >>> because she has a lot to lose from incompetence but a woman who stays >>> at home and "takes care" of her nine children from seven different >>> fathers on the taxpayer's dime should sit down and shut the Hell up. >> >> Oh. My. God. >> >Truth slicing through the lib brain like a red-hot axe. Yeah, I didn't expect Chris to see things from my perspective. The reality here is that democracies need to be in a situation where the voters will elect people based on their qualifications and with a logical desire to improve the area's economic and social conditions rather than vote for whoever seems nicest from a purely emotional point of view. Just look at how people voted between Trump and HilLIARy for reference: Trump voters hated what Obama had done with the place in eight years with the millions of jobs lost, the increased crime and deteriorating education and simpye said "no more;" HilLIARy voters chose her despite her obvious corruption because the alternative was a "bad man" who didn't behave like a "gentleman" and allowed women to walk all over him. Hell, the media coddling to these morons spent an inordinate amount of time and money trying to make him look like a "mean" person because they knew they could manipulate women that way. It failed to keep him out of the White House but it definitely worked with women in general. Had land owners been the only ones voting, Trump wouldn't have lost a single state. Even California would have been his as the people voting against him in high numbers there don't own a thing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 11:02 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. |
| Message-ID | <fn0a5rF67okU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #168635 |
On 5/27/18 10:52 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote: > On Sun, 27 May 2018 12:33:33 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > >> On 5/27/2018 11:44 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>> Doomsdrzej wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>> >>>> I used to think differently, but the worst things to happen to >>>> democracy are the decisions to give people who didn't own land the >>>> right to vote and later women. Land owners SHOULD have a say in who >>>> runs a place whether they own 2 square feet or 200,000 but if people >>>> are on welfare, renting or doing nothing of worth, they shouldn't have >>>> a say. If the land owner is a woman, she should have a vote too >>>> because she has a lot to lose from incompetence but a woman who stays >>>> at home and "takes care" of her nine children from seven different >>>> fathers on the taxpayer's dime should sit down and shut the Hell up. >>> >>> Oh. My. God. >>> >> Truth slicing through the lib brain like a red-hot axe. > > Yeah, I didn't expect Chris to see things from my perspective. No reasonable person would give into your demands for special entitlements. And apparently Ahlstrom does not either. > The > reality here is that democracies need to be in a situation where the > voters will elect people based on their qualifications and with a > logical desire to improve the area's economic and social conditions > rather than vote for whoever seems nicest from a purely emotional > point of view. And yet here you are, backing Trump. Should we deny you the right to vote because you go against what you just said? > Just look at how people voted between Trump and > HilLIARy for reference: Trump voters hated what Obama had done with > the place in eight years with the millions of jobs lost, Jobs and the economy improved under Obama. > the increased > crime Crime decreased under Obama. > and deteriorating education and simpye said "no more;" HilLIARy > voters chose her despite her obvious corruption because the > alternative was a "bad man" who didn't behave like a "gentleman" and > allowed women to walk all over him. And was unqualified and bigoted and is working to harm America in many ways. > Hell, the media coddling to these > morons spent an inordinate amount of time and money trying to make him > look like a "mean" person because they knew they could manipulate > women that way. It failed to keep him out of the White House but it > definitely worked with women in general. The media did not force Trump to say and do what he did. And does. > Had land owners been the only ones voting, Trump wouldn't have lost a > single state. Even California would have been his as the people voting > against him in high numbers there don't own a thing. So this is about pushing your political views, not about what is doing what is right. Got it. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 13:51 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. |
| Message-ID | <cr2mgd1s8edsvorsl0sf1fe9ko5i5ai773@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #168643 |
On Sun, 27 May 2018 11:02:35 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 5/27/18 10:52 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote: >> On Sun, 27 May 2018 12:33:33 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> >>> On 5/27/2018 11:44 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>> Doomsdrzej wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>>> >>>>> I used to think differently, but the worst things to happen to >>>>> democracy are the decisions to give people who didn't own land the >>>>> right to vote and later women. Land owners SHOULD have a say in who >>>>> runs a place whether they own 2 square feet or 200,000 but if people >>>>> are on welfare, renting or doing nothing of worth, they shouldn't have >>>>> a say. If the land owner is a woman, she should have a vote too >>>>> because she has a lot to lose from incompetence but a woman who stays >>>>> at home and "takes care" of her nine children from seven different >>>>> fathers on the taxpayer's dime should sit down and shut the Hell up. >>>> >>>> Oh. My. God. >>>> >>> Truth slicing through the lib brain like a red-hot axe. >> >> Yeah, I didn't expect Chris to see things from my perspective. > >No reasonable person would give into your demands for special entitlements. > >And apparently Ahlstrom does not either. > >> The >> reality here is that democracies need to be in a situation where the >> voters will elect people based on their qualifications and with a >> logical desire to improve the area's economic and social conditions >> rather than vote for whoever seems nicest from a purely emotional >> point of view. > >And yet here you are, backing Trump. Should we deny you the right to >vote because you go against what you just said? As compared to lying Hillary who had no agenda at all? > >> Just look at how people voted between Trump and >> HilLIARy for reference: Trump voters hated what Obama had done with >> the place in eight years with the millions of jobs lost, > >Jobs and the economy improved under Obama. > HAHAHAHA!!!!! >> the increased >> crime > >Crime decreased under Obama. You don't get out much do you? > >> and deteriorating education and simpye said "no more;" HilLIARy >> voters chose her despite her obvious corruption because the >> alternative was a "bad man" who didn't behave like a "gentleman" and >> allowed women to walk all over him. > >And was unqualified and bigoted and is working to harm America in many ways. let's see proof, I have never heard Trump say anything against gays, blacks or any other thing like that. What I do see is the left spinning his words around to make it look that way. Fucking lefty hypocrites. > >> Hell, the media coddling to these >> morons spent an inordinate amount of time and money trying to make him >> look like a "mean" person because they knew they could manipulate >> women that way. It failed to keep him out of the White House but it >> definitely worked with women in general. > >The media did not force Trump to say and do what he did. And does. No, The media spins around what he does to make it look bad, That's what butthurt sore losers do when they lose. > >> Had land owners been the only ones voting, Trump wouldn't have lost a >> single state. Even California would have been his as the people voting >> against him in high numbers there don't own a thing. > >So this is about pushing your political views, not about what is doing >what is right. Got it. Unlike the left who could give a shit if this country burns down rather than have Trump sitting there.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 14:24 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. |
| Message-ID | <peeu5g$5ho$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #168597 |
benj wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On 5/27/2018 11:44 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >> Doomsdrzej wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> I used to think differently, but the worst things to happen to >>> democracy are the decisions to give people who didn't own land the >>> right to vote and later women. Land owners SHOULD have a say in who >>> runs a place whether they own 2 square feet or 200,000 but if people >>> are on welfare, renting or doing nothing of worth, they shouldn't have >>> a say. If the land owner is a woman, she should have a vote too >>> because she has a lot to lose from incompetence but a woman who stays >>> at home and "takes care" of her nine children from seven different >>> fathers on the taxpayer's dime should sit down and shut the Hell up. >> >> Oh. My. God. >> > Truth slicing through the lib brain like a red-hot axe. LOL at the "lib brain". That's just "brain" to you, "benj". I know plenty of "conservatives" who get doled out money for not working, and somehow they can afford all the appurtenances of the working man, such as 60" 4K TVs. Not to mention the land-owning people who live on floodplains or near the Mexican border and expect the government to pony up to protect them from their freedom of choice. Or the anti-government people in Montana who let their forests get logged into kindling, yet don't want to pay the forestry service to manage them, and then howl to the high heavens that the government should spend money to protect them from the raging forest fires that result. -- It is so very hard to be an on-your-own-take-care-of-yourself-because-there-is-no-one-else-to-do-it-for-you grown-up.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 13:52 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. |
| Message-ID | <v33mgd19rl29ptqg0nq2ks59tmcb42jeec@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #168663 |
On Sun, 27 May 2018 14:24:30 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >benj wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On 5/27/2018 11:44 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>> Doomsdrzej wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>> >>>> I used to think differently, but the worst things to happen to >>>> democracy are the decisions to give people who didn't own land the >>>> right to vote and later women. Land owners SHOULD have a say in who >>>> runs a place whether they own 2 square feet or 200,000 but if people >>>> are on welfare, renting or doing nothing of worth, they shouldn't have >>>> a say. If the land owner is a woman, she should have a vote too >>>> because she has a lot to lose from incompetence but a woman who stays >>>> at home and "takes care" of her nine children from seven different >>>> fathers on the taxpayer's dime should sit down and shut the Hell up. >>> >>> Oh. My. God. >>> >> Truth slicing through the lib brain like a red-hot axe. > >LOL at the "lib brain". That's just "brain" to you, "benj". > >I know plenty of "conservatives" who get doled out money >for not working, and somehow they can afford all the appurtenances >of the working man, such as 60" 4K TVs. > >Not to mention the land-owning people who live on floodplains or near >the Mexican border and expect the government to pony up to protect them >from their freedom of choice. > >Or the anti-government people in Montana who let their forests get logged >into kindling, yet don't want to pay the forestry service to manage them, >and then howl to the high heavens that the government should spend money to >protect them from the raging forest fires that result. Tissue?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 08:13 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. |
| Message-ID | <MnSOC.181362$nq5.34482@fx36.iad> |
| In reply to | #168663 |
On 5/27/2018 2:24 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > benj wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On 5/27/2018 11:44 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>> Doomsdrzej wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>> >>>> I used to think differently, but the worst things to happen to >>>> democracy are the decisions to give people who didn't own land the >>>> right to vote and later women. Land owners SHOULD have a say in who >>>> runs a place whether they own 2 square feet or 200,000 but if people >>>> are on welfare, renting or doing nothing of worth, they shouldn't have >>>> a say. If the land owner is a woman, she should have a vote too >>>> because she has a lot to lose from incompetence but a woman who stays >>>> at home and "takes care" of her nine children from seven different >>>> fathers on the taxpayer's dime should sit down and shut the Hell up. >>> >>> Oh. My. God. >>> >> Truth slicing through the lib brain like a red-hot axe. > > LOL at the "lib brain". That's just "brain" to you, "benj". Brain isn't exactly the right word is it? I mean a brain is a source of reason and logic which means that a "Lib brain" cannot exist. Let's call it the lib "fantasy generator". > I know plenty of "conservatives" who get doled out money > for not working, and somehow they can afford all the appurtenances > of the working man, such as 60" 4K TVs. Hey this is America. A person doesn't have to actually do any work to live a "better life". Libs prove it every day. It's why so many people (libs call them "immigrants") try to walk in here every day. > Not to mention the land-owning people who live on floodplains or near > the Mexican border and expect the government to pony up to protect them > from their freedom of choice. Or live in a bathtub below sea level in New Orleans, or on the beach in Florida or NJ, or on the side of an active volcano and then go on liberal TV blubbering their asses off about how they "lost everything" and want all the people smart enough to NOT live on the side of an active volcano or below sea level to pay for their horrible loss! And of course you libs all support this because you all CARE about other humans and their "suffering"! > Or the anti-government people in Montana who let their forests get logged > into kindling, yet don't want to pay the forestry service to manage them, > and then howl to the high heavens that the government should spend money to > protect them from the raging forest fires that result. Wait a minute, wasn't it the anti-Sovie... er... I mean anti-government people in Montana that got thrown in jail because a fire they started got away and burned some government waste land? Oh wait. That was a different state. No matter. Everyone knows that people actually producing things and growing animals and crops are all ignorant and must be told by their betters, namely ass-sitting non-working liberals exactly what they can and cannot do (for their own good, natch).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web