Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #432319 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2020-11-06 17:47 +0000 |
| Last post | 2020-11-10 08:24 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 144 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
A feminist win Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2020-11-06 17:47 +0000
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-06 10:59 -0700
Re: A feminist win Skeeter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-06 11:02 -0700
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-06 11:09 -0700
Re: A feminist win Skeeter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-06 11:12 -0700
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-06 11:20 -0700
Re: A feminist win The Right And The Powerful <power2019@gmail.com> - 2020-11-06 18:44 -0600
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-06 17:59 -0700
Re: A feminist win The Right And The Powerful <power2019@gmail.com> - 2020-11-07 13:03 -0600
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-06 12:07 -0800
Re: A feminist win Skeeter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-06 16:30 -0700
Re: A feminist win Raven <raven@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-06 18:38 -0500
Re: A feminist win Skeeter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-06 17:03 -0700
Re: A feminist win Raven <raven@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-06 19:16 -0500
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-06 16:46 -0700
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-07 01:18 -0800
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-07 01:17 -0800
Re: A feminist win Skeeter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-07 07:44 -0700
Re: A feminist win snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2020-11-07 14:58 +0000
Re: A feminist win Raven <raven@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-07 11:28 -0500
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-07 11:18 -0700
Re: A feminist win Raven <raven@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-07 13:29 -0500
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-07 11:38 -0700
Re: A feminist win Raven <raven@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-07 13:46 -0500
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-07 11:48 -0700
Re: A feminist win Raven <raven@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-07 13:49 -0500
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-07 11:55 -0700
Re: A feminist win Raven <raven@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-07 13:56 -0500
Re: A feminist win kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2020-11-06 22:12 -0500
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-07 01:09 -0800
Re: A feminist win kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2020-11-08 22:13 -0500
Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-09 03:16 +0000
Re: A feminist win kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2020-11-08 22:23 -0500
De-radicalization rehab clinics (was Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-09 03:47 +0000
Re: De-radicalization rehab clinics (was Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-09 20:41 +0000
Re: De-radicalization rehab clinics (was Re: A feminist win Skeeter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-10 08:22 -0700
Re: De-radicalization rehab clinics (was Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-10 12:49 -0800
Re: De-radicalization rehab clinics (was Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-10 14:06 -0700
Re: De-radicalization rehab clinics (was Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-10 23:42 +0000
Re: De-radicalization rehab clinics (was Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-10 22:27 -0800
Re: De-radicalization rehab clinics (was Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-11 20:19 +0000
Re: De-radicalization rehab clinics (was Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 13:47 -0800
Re: De-radicalization rehab clinics tripeco.2@parody.personae.invalid (Tr!pe) - 2020-11-11 22:06 +0000
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-08 23:39 -0800
Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-09 20:42 +0000
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-09 15:20 -0800
Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-10 01:08 +0000
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-09 18:11 -0700
qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-10 01:39 +0000
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2020-11-09 17:47 -0800
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-10 01:53 +0000
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2020-11-09 17:57 -0800
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-09 19:16 -0700
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-10 02:41 +0000
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-09 19:49 -0700
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2020-11-09 19:05 -0800
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-10 03:14 +0000
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-09 22:06 -0800
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2020-11-09 22:09 -0800
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-09 22:37 -0800
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Skeeter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-10 09:43 -0700
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-09 19:15 -0700
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-09 22:05 -0800
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-10 23:46 +0000
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-11 00:36 +0000
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-10 17:44 -0700
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Skeeter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-10 19:39 -0700
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-11 03:15 +0000
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2020-11-09 23:26 -0500
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-09 22:09 -0800
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-10 23:45 +0000
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2020-11-10 22:35 -0500
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Skeeter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-10 09:42 -0700
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-10 12:53 -0800
Re: qanon and Trumpism is a destructive cult (was Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-10 23:47 +0000
Re: A feminist win kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2020-11-09 23:21 -0500
Re: A feminist win Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2020-11-09 20:26 -0800
Re: A feminist win kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2020-11-09 23:39 -0500
Re: A feminist win Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2020-11-09 21:25 -0800
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-09 21:49 -0800
Re: A feminist win Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2020-11-09 21:56 -0800
Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-10 23:49 +0000
Re: A feminist win Skeeter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-10 12:26 -0700
Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-11 06:15 +0000
Re: A feminist win Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2020-11-11 00:34 -0600
Re: A feminist win "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> - 2020-11-11 12:53 -0600
Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-11 19:22 +0000
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 12:30 -0700
Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-11 19:35 +0000
Re: A feminist win "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> - 2020-11-11 15:39 -0600
Re: A feminist win Skeeter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-11 12:12 -0700
Re: â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â A feminist win â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â (Was: A feminist win) Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2020-11-11 13:20 -0600
Re: â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â A feminist win â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â (Was: A feminist win) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 12:23 -0700
Re: â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â A feminist win â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â (Was: A feminist win) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-11 19:25 +0000
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-09 21:27 -0700
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-09 21:58 -0800
Re: A feminist win Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2020-11-09 22:05 -0800
Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-10 23:50 +0000
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-10 22:29 -0800
Re: A feminist win Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2020-11-11 17:28 +0000
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 11:15 -0700
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 11:39 -0800
Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-11 20:35 +0000
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 13:42 -0800
Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-11 23:17 +0000
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 17:42 -0800
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 19:21 -0700
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 19:22 -0800
Re: A feminist win kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2020-11-11 22:24 -0500
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 19:32 -0800
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 20:36 -0700
Re: A feminist win kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2020-11-11 23:23 -0500
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 21:27 -0800
Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-12 20:08 +0000
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-12 13:29 -0800
Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-12 22:00 +0000
Re: A feminist win Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2020-11-12 17:03 -0600
Re: A feminist win Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2020-11-12 15:27 -0800
Re: A feminist win snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2020-11-12 23:32 +0000
Re: A feminist win kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2020-11-12 22:57 -0500
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-12 21:41 -0700
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-12 17:06 -0800
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 20:31 -0700
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 21:25 -0800
Re: A feminist win kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2020-11-11 22:06 -0500
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 19:23 -0800
Re: A feminist win kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2020-11-11 22:27 -0500
Re: A feminist win Paul - 2020-11-11 20:32 -0700
Re: A feminist win Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2020-11-11 19:37 -0800
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 21:26 -0800
Re: A feminist win Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2020-11-11 21:25 -0800
Re: A feminist win "Scout" <me4guns@centurylink.removeme.this2.net> - 2020-11-12 07:45 -0500
Re: A feminist win Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2020-11-12 20:10 +0000
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-12 13:18 -0700
Re: A feminist win "Scout" <me4guns@centurylink.removeme.this2.net> - 2020-11-13 07:21 -0500
Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-13 13:32 +0000
Re: A feminist win "Scout" <me4guns@centurylink.removeme.this2.net> - 2020-11-13 09:04 -0500
Re: A feminist win snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2020-11-13 18:07 +0000
Re: A feminist win % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-11-13 11:24 -0700
Re: A feminist win Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2020-11-13 08:55 -0600
Re: A feminist win vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2020-11-13 15:06 +0000
Re: A feminist win Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2020-11-13 09:33 -0600
Re: A feminist win snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2020-11-13 18:09 +0000
Re: A feminist win Skeeter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2020-11-10 08:24 -0700
Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-07 11:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <dk3duc.pdv.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #432558 |
On 2020-11-07 7:44 a.m., Skeeter wrote: > On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 01:17:28 -0800, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate. >> >> On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 16:30:55 -0700, Skeeter had the audacity to say the >> following: >> >> >>> >>> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 12:07:55 -0800, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>> Checkmate. >>>> >>>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 11:12:18 -0700, Skeeter had the audacity to say the >>>> following: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 11:09:23 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2020-11-06 11:02 a.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 17:47:59 -0000 (UTC), Libtard >>>>>>> <libtard@sandernistas.edu> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.vox.com/21547999/kamala-harris-first-woman-vice-president-black >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In case you're wondering how *that* happened: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.vox.com/2020/11/6/21534594/joe-biden-wins-2020-presidential-election >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yep. That's right. Pack your bags, Trump, because ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> shorturl.at/aszI6 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We get a nazi cunt for potus. yay >>>>>>> >>>>>> yay >>>>> >>>>> walked the dogs, been using oxygen at night and its working good. >>>> >>>> Do you have COPD now too? >>> >>> Don't know yet. Not getting enough oxygen at night. >> >> It could be anxiety if it only happens at night. > > I just old, shit happens. > you breathed a lot of fire smoke last year
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Raven <raven@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-07 13:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <NHBpH.220272$Li1.89356@fx11.iad> |
| In reply to | #432579 |
% has brought this to us : > On 2020-11-07 7:44 a.m., Skeeter wrote: >> On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 01:17:28 -0800, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate. >>> >>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 16:30:55 -0700, Skeeter had the audacity to say the >>> following: >>> >>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 12:07:55 -0800, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>>> Checkmate. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 11:12:18 -0700, Skeeter had the audacity to say the >>>>> following: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 11:09:23 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2020-11-06 11:02 a.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 17:47:59 -0000 (UTC), Libtard >>>>>>>> <libtard@sandernistas.edu> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://www.vox.com/21547999/kamala-harris-first-woman-vice-president-black >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In case you're wondering how *that* happened: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://www.vox.com/2020/11/6/21534594/joe-biden-wins-2020-presidential-election >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yep. That's right. Pack your bags, Trump, because ... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> shorturl.at/aszI6 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We get a nazi cunt for potus. yay >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> yay >>>>>> >>>>>> walked the dogs, been using oxygen at night and its working good. >>>>> >>>>> Do you have COPD now too? >>>> >>>> Don't know yet. Not getting enough oxygen at night. >>> >>> It could be anxiety if it only happens at night. >> >> I just old, shit happens. >> > you breathed a lot of fire smoke last year > Smoke brings Skeeter pleasure.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-07 11:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <dk3f4h.qdo.19.13@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #432584 |
On 2020-11-07 11:29 a.m., Raven wrote: > % has brought this to us : >> On 2020-11-07 7:44 a.m., Skeeter wrote: >>> On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 01:17:28 -0800, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>> Checkmate. >>>> >>>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 16:30:55 -0700, Skeeter had the audacity to say the >>>> following: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 12:07:55 -0800, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>> posts by >>>>>> Checkmate. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 11:12:18 -0700, Skeeter had the audacity to >>>>>> say the >>>>>> following: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 11:09:23 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2020-11-06 11:02 a.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 17:47:59 -0000 (UTC), Libtard >>>>>>>>> <libtard@sandernistas.edu> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.vox.com/21547999/kamala-harris-first-woman-vice-president-black >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In case you're wondering how *that* happened: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.vox.com/2020/11/6/21534594/joe-biden-wins-2020-presidential-election >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yep. That's right. Pack your bags, Trump, because ... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> shorturl.at/aszI6 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We get a nazi cunt for potus. yay >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> yay >>>>>>> >>>>>>> walked the dogs, been using oxygen at night and its working good. >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you have COPD now too? >>>>> >>>>> Don't know yet. Not getting enough oxygen at night. >>>> >>>> It could be anxiety if it only happens at night. >>> >>> I just old, shit happens. >>> >> you breathed a lot of fire smoke last year >> > Smoke brings Skeeter pleasure. thank you for addressing what skeeter does
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Raven <raven@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-07 13:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <IXBpH.406230$I15.305264@fx36.iad> |
| In reply to | #432594 |
% explained on 11/7/2020 : > On 2020-11-07 11:29 a.m., Raven wrote: >>> you breathed a lot of fire smoke last year >>> >> Smoke brings Skeeter pleasure. > > thank you for addressing what skeeter does > Don't mention it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-07 11:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <dk3fmi.qdo.19.25@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #432606 |
On 2020-11-07 11:46 a.m., Raven wrote: > % explained on 11/7/2020 : >> On 2020-11-07 11:29 a.m., Raven wrote: >>>> you breathed a lot of fire smoke last year >>>> >>> Smoke brings Skeeter pleasure. >> >> thank you for addressing what skeeter does >> > Don't mention it. and thank you for the post hump
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Raven <raven@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-07 13:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <I_BpH.191248$6L.102872@fx17.iad> |
| In reply to | #432609 |
% has brought this to us : > On 2020-11-07 11:46 a.m., Raven wrote: >> % explained on 11/7/2020 : >>> On 2020-11-07 11:29 a.m., Raven wrote: >>>>> you breathed a lot of fire smoke last year >>>>> >>>> Smoke brings Skeeter pleasure. >>> >>> thank you for addressing what skeeter does >>> >> Don't mention it. > > and thank you for the post hump > Your post count thanks me too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-07 11:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <dk3g40.pce.19.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #432612 |
On 2020-11-07 11:49 a.m., Raven wrote: > % has brought this to us : >> On 2020-11-07 11:46 a.m., Raven wrote: >>> % explained on 11/7/2020 : >>>> On 2020-11-07 11:29 a.m., Raven wrote: >>>>>> you breathed a lot of fire smoke last year >>>>>> >>>>> Smoke brings Skeeter pleasure. >>>> >>>> thank you for addressing what skeeter does >>>> >>> Don't mention it. >> >> and thank you for the post hump >> > Your post count thanks me too. there is none this month and you're off topic
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Raven <raven@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-07 13:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <S5CpH.406231$I15.323305@fx36.iad> |
| In reply to | #432623 |
% presented the following explanation : > On 2020-11-07 11:49 a.m., Raven wrote: >> % has brought this to us : >>> On 2020-11-07 11:46 a.m., Raven wrote: >>>> % explained on 11/7/2020 : >>>>> On 2020-11-07 11:29 a.m., Raven wrote: >>>>>>> you breathed a lot of fire smoke last year >>>>>>> >>>>>> Smoke brings Skeeter pleasure. >>>>> >>>>> thank you for addressing what skeeter does >>>>> >>>> Don't mention it. >>> >>> and thank you for the post hump >>> >> Your post count thanks me too. > > there is none this month and you're off topic > Didja ever get your reward for teh moast poasts?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-06 22:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ro53c0$1blu$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #432343 |
On 11/6/2020 3:07 PM, Checkmate wrote: > On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 11:12:18 -0700, Skeeter had the audacity to say the >> walked the dogs, been using oxygen at night and its working good. > > Do you have COPD now too? Here's hoping! *snicker* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-07 01:09 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3a1004455485d709897af@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #432495 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate. On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 22:12:55 -0500, kensi had the audacity to say the following: > > On 11/6/2020 3:07 PM, Checkmate wrote: > > On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 11:12:18 -0700, Skeeter had the audacity to say the > >> walked the dogs, been using oxygen at night and its working good. > > > > Do you have COPD now too? > > Here's hoping! > > *snicker* That's a rather fucked up thing to wish for. It was mere hours ago when you used your Nads sock to cheer about someone contracting the Chinese CCP virus. Aren't fee-males supposed to be more "compassionate"? -- Checkmate ÂŪ Copyright ÂĐ 2020 all rights reserved https://youtu.be/wT-8Dm1VThc *************************************************** "I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed..." --Vallor Message-ID: <hqhbp9F9i1dU4@mid.individual.net> *************************************************** "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me> *************************************************** AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-08 22:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <roac3u$1lo5$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #432524 |
On 11/7/2020 4:09 AM, Checkmate wrote: > On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 22:12:55 -0500, kensi had the audacity to say the >> On 11/6/2020 3:07 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 11:12:18 -0700, Skeeter had the audacity to say the >>>> walked the dogs, been using oxygen at night and its working good. >>> >>> Do you have COPD now too? >> >> Here's hoping! >> >> *snicker* > > That's a rather fucked up thing to wish for. You seem to be forgetting that he's a Nazi. > It was mere hours ago when you used your Nads sock Proof, ko0k? -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-09 03:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <i0rqkmFl3ccU29@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #433025 |
On Sun, 08 Nov 2020 22:13:02 -0500, kensi wrote: > On 11/7/2020 4:09 AM, Checkmate wrote: >> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 22:12:55 -0500, kensi had the audacity to say the >>> On 11/6/2020 3:07 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 11:12:18 -0700, Skeeter had the audacity to say >>>> the >>>>> walked the dogs, been using oxygen at night and its working good. >>>> >>>> Do you have COPD now too? >>> >>> Here's hoping! >>> >>> *snicker* >> >> That's a rather fucked up thing to wish for. > > You seem to be forgetting that he's a Nazi. De-radicalization doesn't start by hoping the guy dies. -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-08 22:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <roacnc$1sav$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #433028 |
On 11/8/2020 10:16 PM, vallor wrote: > On Sun, 08 Nov 2020 22:13:02 -0500, kensi wrote: >> On 11/7/2020 4:09 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 22:12:55 -0500, kensi had the audacity to say the >>>> On 11/6/2020 3:07 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 11:12:18 -0700, Skeeter had the audacity to say >>>>> the >>>>>> walked the dogs, been using oxygen at night and its working good. >>>>> >>>>> Do you have COPD now too? >>>> >>>> Here's hoping! >>>> >>>> *snicker* >>> >>> That's a rather fucked up thing to wish for. >> >> You seem to be forgetting that he's a Nazi. > > De-radicalization doesn't start by hoping the guy dies. You try and de-radicalize that k0Ok if you wish. I'ma just going to go make popcorn and then sit back and watch. The results should be good for a few laughs, anyway. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-09 03:47 +0000 |
| Subject | De-radicalization rehab clinics (was Re: A feminist win |
| Message-ID | <i0rsdoFl3ccU32@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #433031 |
On Sun, 08 Nov 2020 22:23:25 -0500, kensi wrote: > On 11/8/2020 10:16 PM, vallor wrote: >> On Sun, 08 Nov 2020 22:13:02 -0500, kensi wrote: >>> On 11/7/2020 4:09 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>>> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 22:12:55 -0500, kensi had the audacity to say the >>>>> On 11/6/2020 3:07 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 11:12:18 -0700, Skeeter had the audacity to say >>>>>> the >>>>>>> walked the dogs, been using oxygen at night and its working good. >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you have COPD now too? >>>>> >>>>> Here's hoping! >>>>> >>>>> *snicker* >>>> >>>> That's a rather fucked up thing to wish for. >>> >>> You seem to be forgetting that he's a Nazi. >> >> De-radicalization doesn't start by hoping the guy dies. > > You try and de-radicalize that k0Ok if you wish. I'ma just going to go > make popcorn and then sit back and watch. The results should be good for > a few laughs, anyway. To put a finer point on it: As with any recovery procedure, one does not de-radicalize another person, but instead, they assist the other person in de-radicalizing themselves. I'm not talking about reeducation camps or other such horrors -- just rehab. Hell, I might see a business opportunity with this. "I see a great need." Wonder if I can get a grant from AI or something. -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-09 20:41 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: De-radicalization rehab clinics (was Re: A feminist win |
| Message-ID | <roc9hq$hqf$12@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #433043 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 09 Nov 2020 03:47:04 +0000, vallor wrote: > On Sun, 08 Nov 2020 22:23:25 -0500, kensi wrote: > >> On 11/8/2020 10:16 PM, vallor wrote: >>> On Sun, 08 Nov 2020 22:13:02 -0500, kensi wrote: >>>> On 11/7/2020 4:09 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 22:12:55 -0500, kensi had the audacity to say the >>>>>> On 11/6/2020 3:07 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 11:12:18 -0700, Skeeter had the audacity to say >>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> walked the dogs, been using oxygen at night and its working good. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you have COPD now too? >>>>>> >>>>>> Here's hoping! >>>>>> >>>>>> *snicker* >>>>> >>>>> That's a rather fucked up thing to wish for. >>>> >>>> You seem to be forgetting that he's a Nazi. >>> >>> De-radicalization doesn't start by hoping the guy dies. >> >> You try and de-radicalize that k0Ok if you wish. I'ma just going to go >> make popcorn and then sit back and watch. The results should be good for >> a few laughs, anyway. > > To put a finer point on it: As with any recovery procedure, one does not > de-radicalize another person, but instead, they assist the other person > in de-radicalizing themselves. > > I'm not talking about reeducation camps or other such horrors -- just > rehab. Hell, I might see a business opportunity with this. > > "I see a great need." Wonder if I can get a grant from AI or something. I was going to ask, "does it *look* like that kook has any interest in de-radicalizing himself???" but I see from posts elsewhere in this froup that he's just declared his intention to quit Fox cold-turkey. Maybe he actually will ... but I will remain skeptical until I see him take some concrete steps toward rehabilitating himself, and I expect the same will be true of kensi, who if anything is even more of a realist and empiricist than I am, being actually employed in the sciences and all. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Checkmate admits that, for all intents and purposes, he carries a teddy bear in public: <d6cnes.ket.17.19@news.alt.net>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-10 08:22 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: De-radicalization rehab clinics (was Re: A feminist win |
| Message-ID | <u0clqf5cok3oaojpldpq6loearallvpgla@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #433235 |
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 20:41:30 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Mon, 09 Nov 2020 03:47:04 +0000, vallor wrote: > >> On Sun, 08 Nov 2020 22:23:25 -0500, kensi wrote: >> >>> On 11/8/2020 10:16 PM, vallor wrote: >>>> On Sun, 08 Nov 2020 22:13:02 -0500, kensi wrote: >>>>> On 11/7/2020 4:09 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 22:12:55 -0500, kensi had the audacity to say the >>>>>>> On 11/6/2020 3:07 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 11:12:18 -0700, Skeeter had the audacity to say >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> walked the dogs, been using oxygen at night and its working good. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do you have COPD now too? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here's hoping! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *snicker* >>>>>> >>>>>> That's a rather fucked up thing to wish for. >>>>> >>>>> You seem to be forgetting that he's a Nazi. >>>> >>>> De-radicalization doesn't start by hoping the guy dies. >>> >>> You try and de-radicalize that k0Ok if you wish. I'ma just going to go >>> make popcorn and then sit back and watch. The results should be good for >>> a few laughs, anyway. >> >> To put a finer point on it: As with any recovery procedure, one does not >> de-radicalize another person, but instead, they assist the other person >> in de-radicalizing themselves. >> >> I'm not talking about reeducation camps or other such horrors -- just >> rehab. Hell, I might see a business opportunity with this. >> >> "I see a great need." Wonder if I can get a grant from AI or something. > >I was going to ask, "does it *look* like that kook has any interest in >de-radicalizing himself???" but I see from posts elsewhere in this froup >that he's just declared his intention to quit Fox cold-turkey. Maybe he >actually will ... but I will remain skeptical until I see him take some >concrete steps toward rehabilitating himself, and I expect the same will >be true of kensi, who if anything is even more of a realist and empiricist >than I am, being actually employed in the sciences and all. Excuse me but fuck you and your opinion.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-10 12:49 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: De-radicalization rehab clinics (was Re: A feminist win |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3a149cd1ef416bcb98988a@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #433539 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate. On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 08:22:24 -0700, Skeeter had the audacity to say the following: > > On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 20:41:30 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > > >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > >On Mon, 09 Nov 2020 03:47:04 +0000, vallor wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 08 Nov 2020 22:23:25 -0500, kensi wrote: > >> > >>> On 11/8/2020 10:16 PM, vallor wrote: > >>>> On Sun, 08 Nov 2020 22:13:02 -0500, kensi wrote: > >>>>> On 11/7/2020 4:09 AM, Checkmate wrote: > >>>>>> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 22:12:55 -0500, kensi had the audacity to say the > >>>>>>> On 11/6/2020 3:07 PM, Checkmate wrote: > >>>>>>>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 11:12:18 -0700, Skeeter had the audacity to say > >>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>> walked the dogs, been using oxygen at night and its working good. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Do you have COPD now too? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Here's hoping! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> *snicker* > >>>>>> > >>>>>> That's a rather fucked up thing to wish for. > >>>>> > >>>>> You seem to be forgetting that he's a Nazi. > >>>> > >>>> De-radicalization doesn't start by hoping the guy dies. > >>> > >>> You try and de-radicalize that k0Ok if you wish. I'ma just going to go > >>> make popcorn and then sit back and watch. The results should be good for > >>> a few laughs, anyway. > >> > >> To put a finer point on it: As with any recovery procedure, one does not > >> de-radicalize another person, but instead, they assist the other person > >> in de-radicalizing themselves. > >> > >> I'm not talking about reeducation camps or other such horrors -- just > >> rehab. Hell, I might see a business opportunity with this. > >> > >> "I see a great need." Wonder if I can get a grant from AI or something. > > > >I was going to ask, "does it *look* like that kook has any interest in > >de-radicalizing himself???" but I see from posts elsewhere in this froup > >that he's just declared his intention to quit Fox cold-turkey. Maybe he > >actually will ... but I will remain skeptical until I see him take some > >concrete steps toward rehabilitating himself, and I expect the same will > >be true of kensi, who if anything is even more of a realist and empiricist > >than I am, being actually employed in the sciences and all. > > > Excuse me but fuck you and your opinion. ... on a stick. -- Checkmate ÂŪ Copyright ÂĐ 2020 all rights reserved https://youtu.be/wT-8Dm1VThc *************************************************** "I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed..." --Vallor Message-ID: <hqhbp9F9i1dU4@mid.individual.net> *************************************************** "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me> *************************************************** AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-10 14:06 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: De-radicalization rehab clinics (was Re: A feminist win |
| Message-ID | <dkbktf.mll.19.5@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #433622 |
On 2020-11-10 1:49 p.m., Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate. > > On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 08:22:24 -0700, Skeeter had the audacity to say the > following: > > >> >> On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 20:41:30 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Mon, 09 Nov 2020 03:47:04 +0000, vallor wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 08 Nov 2020 22:23:25 -0500, kensi wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 11/8/2020 10:16 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 08 Nov 2020 22:13:02 -0500, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/7/2020 4:09 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 22:12:55 -0500, kensi had the audacity to say the >>>>>>>>> On 11/6/2020 3:07 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 11:12:18 -0700, Skeeter had the audacity to say >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> walked the dogs, been using oxygen at night and its working good. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Do you have COPD now too? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Here's hoping! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *snicker* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That's a rather fucked up thing to wish for. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You seem to be forgetting that he's a Nazi. >>>>>> >>>>>> De-radicalization doesn't start by hoping the guy dies. >>>>> >>>>> You try and de-radicalize that k0Ok if you wish. I'ma just going to go >>>>> make popcorn and then sit back and watch. The results should be good for >>>>> a few laughs, anyway. >>>> >>>> To put a finer point on it: As with any recovery procedure, one does not >>>> de-radicalize another person, but instead, they assist the other person >>>> in de-radicalizing themselves. >>>> >>>> I'm not talking about reeducation camps or other such horrors -- just >>>> rehab. Hell, I might see a business opportunity with this. >>>> >>>> "I see a great need." Wonder if I can get a grant from AI or something. >>> >>> I was going to ask, "does it *look* like that kook has any interest in >>> de-radicalizing himself???" but I see from posts elsewhere in this froup >>> that he's just declared his intention to quit Fox cold-turkey. Maybe he >>> actually will ... but I will remain skeptical until I see him take some >>> concrete steps toward rehabilitating himself, and I expect the same will >>> be true of kensi, who if anything is even more of a realist and empiricist >>> than I am, being actually employed in the sciences and all. >> >> >> Excuse me but fuck you and your opinion. > > ... on a stick. > gooo night eddie
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-10 23:42 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: De-radicalization rehab clinics (was Re: A feminist win |
| Message-ID | <rof8hn$dgt$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #433622 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 12:49:53 -0800, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate. > > On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 08:22:24 -0700, Skeeter had the audacity to say the > following: > > >> >> On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 20:41:30 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >> >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> >On Mon, 09 Nov 2020 03:47:04 +0000, vallor wrote: >> > >> >> On Sun, 08 Nov 2020 22:23:25 -0500, kensi wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 11/8/2020 10:16 PM, vallor wrote: >> >>>> On Sun, 08 Nov 2020 22:13:02 -0500, kensi wrote: >> >>>>> On 11/7/2020 4:09 AM, Checkmate wrote: >> >>>>>> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 22:12:55 -0500, kensi had the audacity to say the >> >>>>>>> On 11/6/2020 3:07 PM, Checkmate wrote: >> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 11:12:18 -0700, Skeeter had the audacity to say >> >>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>> walked the dogs, been using oxygen at night and its working good. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Do you have COPD now too? >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Here's hoping! >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> *snicker* >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> That's a rather fucked up thing to wish for. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> You seem to be forgetting that he's a Nazi. >> >>>> >> >>>> De-radicalization doesn't start by hoping the guy dies. >> >>> >> >>> You try and de-radicalize that k0Ok if you wish. I'ma just going to go >> >>> make popcorn and then sit back and watch. The results should be good for >> >>> a few laughs, anyway. >> >> >> >> To put a finer point on it: As with any recovery procedure, one does not >> >> de-radicalize another person, but instead, they assist the other person >> >> in de-radicalizing themselves. >> >> >> >> I'm not talking about reeducation camps or other such horrors -- just >> >> rehab. Hell, I might see a business opportunity with this. >> >> >> >> "I see a great need." Wonder if I can get a grant from AI or something. >> > >> >I was going to ask, "does it *look* like that kook has any interest in >> >de-radicalizing himself???" but I see from posts elsewhere in this froup >> >that he's just declared his intention to quit Fox cold-turkey. Maybe he >> >actually will ... but I will remain skeptical until I see him take some >> >concrete steps toward rehabilitating himself, and I expect the same will >> >be true of kensi, who if anything is even more of a realist and empiricist >> >than I am, being actually employed in the sciences and all. >> >> >> Excuse me but fuck you and your opinion. > > ... on a stick. Two for the price of one! And nicely foamed, both of you. SPNAK!! SPNAK!! <snicker> -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Checkmate admits that, for all intents and purposes, he carries a teddy bear in public: <d6cnes.ket.17.19@news.alt.net>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-11-10 22:27 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: De-radicalization rehab clinics (was Re: A feminist win |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3a152442a30fd87898989d@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #433662 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate. On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 23:42:48 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda had the audacity to say the following: > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 12:49:53 -0800, Checkmate wrote: > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > Checkmate. > > > > On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 08:22:24 -0700, Skeeter had the audacity to say the > > following: > > > > > >> > >> On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 20:41:30 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >> > >> >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > >> >On Mon, 09 Nov 2020 03:47:04 +0000, vallor wrote: > >> > > >> >> On Sun, 08 Nov 2020 22:23:25 -0500, kensi wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> On 11/8/2020 10:16 PM, vallor wrote: > >> >>>> On Sun, 08 Nov 2020 22:13:02 -0500, kensi wrote: > >> >>>>> On 11/7/2020 4:09 AM, Checkmate wrote: > >> >>>>>> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 22:12:55 -0500, kensi had the audacity to say the > >> >>>>>>> On 11/6/2020 3:07 PM, Checkmate wrote: > >> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 11:12:18 -0700, Skeeter had the audacity to say > >> >>>>>>>> the > >> >>>>>>>>> walked the dogs, been using oxygen at night and its working good. > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> Do you have COPD now too? > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Here's hoping! > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> *snicker* > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> That's a rather fucked up thing to wish for. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> You seem to be forgetting that he's a Nazi. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> De-radicalization doesn't start by hoping the guy dies. > >> >>> > >> >>> You try and de-radicalize that k0Ok if you wish. I'ma just going to go > >> >>> make popcorn and then sit back and watch. The results should be good for > >> >>> a few laughs, anyway. > >> >> > >> >> To put a finer point on it: As with any recovery procedure, one does not > >> >> de-radicalize another person, but instead, they assist the other person > >> >> in de-radicalizing themselves. > >> >> > >> >> I'm not talking about reeducation camps or other such horrors -- just > >> >> rehab. Hell, I might see a business opportunity with this. > >> >> > >> >> "I see a great need." Wonder if I can get a grant from AI or something. > >> > > >> >I was going to ask, "does it *look* like that kook has any interest in > >> >de-radicalizing himself???" but I see from posts elsewhere in this froup > >> >that he's just declared his intention to quit Fox cold-turkey. Maybe he > >> >actually will ... but I will remain skeptical until I see him take some > >> >concrete steps toward rehabilitating himself, and I expect the same will > >> >be true of kensi, who if anything is even more of a realist and empiricist > >> >than I am, being actually employed in the sciences and all. > >> > >> > >> Excuse me but fuck you and your opinion. > > > > ... on a stick. > > Two for the price of one! And nicely foamed, both of you. > > SPNAK!! > > SPNAK!! > > <snicker> I said three words. That's not even a bubble. -- Checkmate ÂŪ Copyright ÂĐ 2020 all rights reserved https://youtu.be/wT-8Dm1VThc *************************************************** "I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed..." --Vallor Message-ID: <hqhbp9F9i1dU4@mid.individual.net> *************************************************** "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me> *************************************************** AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web