Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #240077 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-22 20:50 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-12-24 10:25 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 207 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-22 20:50 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 13:59 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-24 00:35 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 17:43 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-24 17:25 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 10:31 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-24 20:00 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 13:02 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-24 21:16 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 14:23 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-24 21:46 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 14:48 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-25 01:09 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 18:37 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-25 19:58 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 13:09 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-25 20:46 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 13:51 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-25 22:57 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 15:59 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 23:43 -0800
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 05:46 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-25 18:25 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 11:28 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 12:36 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-25 19:44 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 12:56 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-25 19:59 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 13:06 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 19:44 -0800
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 06:02 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 14:32 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 07:38 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 16:23 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 09:32 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 17:13 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 10:15 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 11:40 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 11:45 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 11:47 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 11:53 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 18:57 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 06:50 +1100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 16:13 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 18:57 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 12:08 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 16:12 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 16:21 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 18:57 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 12:09 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-26 11:48 -0800
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 12:50 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 20:12 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 07:20 +1100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 20:59 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:48 +1100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 22:50 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 11:11 +1100
Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> - 2018-12-27 01:23 +0100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 15:50 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 23:08 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 11:22 +1100
Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> - 2018-12-27 01:38 +0100
Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> - 2018-12-27 00:27 +0100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 16:29 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 16:32 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 11:31 +1100
Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> - 2018-12-27 01:39 +0100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 17:40 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 19:31 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 14:07 +1100
Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> - 2018-12-27 09:59 +0100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 15:43 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 09:21 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 16:58 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 10:10 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 17:16 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 10:18 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:31 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 17:43 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:49 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 18:32 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 11:37 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 11:31 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:10 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 17:15 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:32 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 17:43 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:48 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 09:26 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 16:56 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:08 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 01:02 -0800
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 04:33 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-27 14:25 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:42 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-27 18:16 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 05:50 +1100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 12:33 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-27 20:12 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 13:20 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-27 20:13 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 13:20 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 09:07 +1100
Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> - 2018-12-27 23:49 +0100
Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> - 2018-12-27 22:49 +0100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 12:32 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-27 20:13 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 13:23 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 15:42 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 09:21 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 09:26 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 16:57 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:09 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 17:16 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:30 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 17:44 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:49 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 18:32 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 11:36 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Terry Casey <k.type@example.invalid> - 2018-12-29 14:32 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <bzs@TheWor1d.cam> - 2018-12-26 12:08 -0800
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 20:12 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 07:19 +1100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 21:00 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:49 +1100
Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> - 2018-12-27 00:30 +0100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 16:31 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 13:25 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 20:59 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 14:16 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 22:11 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 15:13 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 15:20 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 10:02 +1100
Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> - 2018-12-27 00:31 +0100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 23:06 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 16:27 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 15:44 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 09:28 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 09:35 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 16:56 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:08 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 11:17 +1100
Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> - 2018-12-27 01:25 +0100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:56 +1100
Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> - 2018-12-27 00:32 +0100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 14:33 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 08:27 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 15:39 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 08:40 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 08:46 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 08:53 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 09:31 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 11:38 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 11:42 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 11:45 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 11:49 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 18:52 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 12:07 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 16:09 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 16:22 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 18:49 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 11:54 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 18:59 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 16:20 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 11:39 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 18:59 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 06:56 +1100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 22:12 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:58 +1100
Re: Lonely Psychotic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL Peeler <sociopath's@nightmare.invalid> - 2018-12-27 00:33 +0100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 16:25 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 15:45 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 09:22 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 16:57 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 10:09 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 17:16 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 10:20 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:32 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-28 17:43 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:46 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 06:07 +1100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 05:59 +1100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <bzs@TheWor1d.cam> - 2018-12-26 07:52 -0800
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 11:37 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <bzs@TheWor1d.cam> - 2018-12-26 10:46 -0800
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 22:13 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 16:34 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 05:55 +1100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-26 18:58 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 06:54 +1100
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 16:11 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 08:21 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-23 20:41 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-24 12:08 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 05:54 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-24 13:55 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 06:57 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-24 14:10 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 07:15 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-24 17:24 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 10:30 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-24 20:00 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-24 08:58 -0700
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> - 2018-12-24 17:23 +0000
Re: How [in God's name] can those Chinese water heaters work? William Gothberg <WG@internet.com> - 2018-12-24 10:25 -0700
Page 5 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 11 Next page →
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 10:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bs2d87.oad.17.7@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #242416 |
On 2018-12-28 10:43 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: > On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:31:31 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2018-12-28 10:16 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:10:35 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> In article <op.zuqr2zb27uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan>, >>>> William_Gothberg@internet.co.is says... >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 16:21:44 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In article <op.zuqomatu7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan>, >>>>>> William_Gothberg@internet.co.is says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 02:31:49 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In article <g8ikqkFj6psU1@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>>>> rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com >>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:brtoka.uos.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 4:29 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>>>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>>>>>>>> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>>>>>>>> reading >>>>>>>>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > says... >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles >>>>>>>>>>>>> when >>>>>>>>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article >>>>>>>>>>>>> <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 >>>>>>>>>>>>> -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 >>>>>>>>>>>>> -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 >>>>>>>>>>>>> -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., >>>>>>>>>>>>> William >>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in >>>>>>>>>>>>> that trick >>>>>>>>>>>>> cyclist bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know >>>>>>>>>>>>> what it is >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's >>>>>>>>>>>>> heard of >>>>>>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak >>>>>>>>>>>>> for them >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless >>>>>>>>>>>>> ignorant twat. >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish >>>>>>>>>>>>> you were >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful >>>>>>>>>>>>> than you. >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact >>>>>>>>>>>>> generally >>>>>>>>>>>>> you're a burden >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the >>>>>>>>>>>>> largest of >>>>>>>>>>>>> my endless >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts >>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>> alcoholics >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said >>>>>>>>>>>>> Catholicoholics. >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those >>>>>>>>>>>>> programs, you >>>>>>>>>>>>> just ease it off >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they >>>>>>>>>>>>> can score >>>>>>>>>>>>> some dope from. >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back >>>>>>>>>>>>> and drink >>>>>>>>>>>>> right in the >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean >>>>>>>>>>>>> up , >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for >>>>>>>>>>>>> a year >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court >>>>>>>>>>>>> made them >>>>>>>>>>>>> go. >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a >>>>>>>>>>>>> problem. >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>>>>>>>>>> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug >>>>>>>>>>>>> addiction >>>>>>>>>>>>> programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> how do they make them stay their >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No swinging doors here. Once you enter you can't leave until >>>>>>>>>>> you are >>>>>>>>>>> clean. The law say they are responsible for you once you enter >>>>>>>>>>> and if >>>>>>>>>>> they let you leave while you still have something in your >>>>>>>>>>> system and get >>>>>>>>>>> hurt they can hold the detox responsible. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> mandated recovery , i wonder how successful that is >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Only detox is like that, not the treatment centers. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hopeless. Not even 1 in 50. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You have proof? Or maybe you're just spouting off. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Have you not noticed % is running out of brain cells? >>>>>> >>>>>> He sure isn't getting any from your direction. >>>>> >>>>> If I gave him one of mine it would overload his own and cause >>>>> spontaneous combustion. However if you're willing to video that for >>>>> youtube and share half the dividends.... >>>> >>>> So you admit that just one more would overload, thereby saying he >>>> already had some making you a liar. >>> >>> I said RUNNING OUT, what part of running out = zero in your language? >> >> the part where you lied > > Quote this part. do your own research
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 18:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <op.zuqwgsrt7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan> |
| In reply to | #242423 |
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:49:16 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2018-12-28 10:43 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: >> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:31:31 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2018-12-28 10:16 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:10:35 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <op.zuqr2zb27uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan>, >>>>> William_Gothberg@internet.co.is says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 16:21:44 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> In article <op.zuqomatu7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan>, >>>>>>> William_Gothberg@internet.co.is says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 02:31:49 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In article <g8ikqkFj6psU1@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>>>>> rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:brtoka.uos.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 4:29 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading >>>>>>>>>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles >>>>>>>>>>>>>> when >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., >>>>>>>>>>>>>> William >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that trick >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cyclist bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what it is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's >>>>>>>>>>>>>> heard of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for them >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignorant twat. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you were >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful >>>>>>>>>>>>>> than you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact >>>>>>>>>>>>>> generally >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're a burden >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> largest of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> my endless >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> alcoholics >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Catholicoholics. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those >>>>>>>>>>>>>> programs, you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> just ease it off >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they >>>>>>>>>>>>>> can score >>>>>>>>>>>>>> some dope from. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and drink >>>>>>>>>>>>>> right in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean >>>>>>>>>>>>>> up , >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a year >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court >>>>>>>>>>>>>> made them >>>>>>>>>>>>>> go. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug >>>>>>>>>>>>>> addiction >>>>>>>>>>>>>> programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> how do they make them stay their >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> No swinging doors here. Once you enter you can't leave until >>>>>>>>>>>> you are >>>>>>>>>>>> clean. The law say they are responsible for you once you enter >>>>>>>>>>>> and if >>>>>>>>>>>> they let you leave while you still have something in your >>>>>>>>>>>> system and get >>>>>>>>>>>> hurt they can hold the detox responsible. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> mandated recovery , i wonder how successful that is >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Only detox is like that, not the treatment centers. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hopeless. Not even 1 in 50. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You have proof? Or maybe you're just spouting off. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Have you not noticed % is running out of brain cells? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> He sure isn't getting any from your direction. >>>>>> >>>>>> If I gave him one of mine it would overload his own and cause >>>>>> spontaneous combustion. However if you're willing to video that for >>>>>> youtube and share half the dividends.... >>>>> >>>>> So you admit that just one more would overload, thereby saying he >>>>> already had some making you a liar. >>>> >>>> I said RUNNING OUT, what part of running out = zero in your language? >>> >>> the part where you lied >> >> Quote this part. > > do your own research You bore me. [NO CARRIER]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 11:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bs2g2g.ecr.19.4@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #242442 |
On 2018-12-28 11:32 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: > On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:49:16 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2018-12-28 10:43 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:31:31 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2018-12-28 10:16 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:10:35 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In article <op.zuqr2zb27uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan>, >>>>>> William_Gothberg@internet.co.is says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 16:21:44 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In article <op.zuqomatu7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan>, >>>>>>>> William_Gothberg@internet.co.is says... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 02:31:49 -0000, Skeeter >>>>>>>>> <chico@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In article <g8ikqkFj6psU1@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>>>>>> rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:brtoka.uos.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 4:29 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goggles >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> William >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> William >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that trick >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cyclist bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what it is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everyone's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> heard of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for them >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignorant twat. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generally >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're a burden >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> largest of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my endless >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alcoholics >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Catholicoholics. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> programs, you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just ease it off >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can score >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some dope from. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and drink >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clean >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up , >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a year >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> made them >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> go. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addiction >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> how do they make them stay their >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No swinging doors here. Once you enter you can't leave until >>>>>>>>>>>>> you are >>>>>>>>>>>>> clean. The law say they are responsible for you once you enter >>>>>>>>>>>>> and if >>>>>>>>>>>>> they let you leave while you still have something in your >>>>>>>>>>>>> system and get >>>>>>>>>>>>> hurt they can hold the detox responsible. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> mandated recovery , i wonder how successful that is >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Only detox is like that, not the treatment centers. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hopeless. Not even 1 in 50. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You have proof? Or maybe you're just spouting off. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Have you not noticed % is running out of brain cells? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> He sure isn't getting any from your direction. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If I gave him one of mine it would overload his own and cause >>>>>>> spontaneous combustion. However if you're willing to video that for >>>>>>> youtube and share half the dividends.... >>>>>> >>>>>> So you admit that just one more would overload, thereby saying he >>>>>> already had some making you a liar. >>>>> >>>>> I said RUNNING OUT, what part of running out = zero in your language? >>>> >>>> the part where you lied >>> >>> Quote this part. >> >> do your own research > > You bore me. [NO CARRIER] tough shit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 11:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36901a092fc142d6841@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #242416 |
In article <op.zuqt7iwo7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan>, William_Gothberg@internet.co.is says... > >On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:31:31 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2018-12-28 10:16 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:10:35 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> In article <op.zuqr2zb27uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan>, >>>> William_Gothberg@internet.co.is says... >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 16:21:44 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In article <op.zuqomatu7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan>, >>>>>> William_Gothberg@internet.co.is says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 02:31:49 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In article <g8ikqkFj6psU1@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>>>> rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com >>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:brtoka.uos.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 4:29 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>>>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>>>>>>>> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>>>>>>>> reading >>>>>>>>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > says... >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles >>>>>>>>>>>>> when >>>>>>>>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article >>>>>>>>>>>>> <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 >>>>>>>>>>>>> -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 >>>>>>>>>>>>> -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in >>>>>>>>>>>>> that trick >>>>>>>>>>>>> cyclist bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know >>>>>>>>>>>>> what it is >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's >>>>>>>>>>>>> heard of >>>>>>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak >>>>>>>>>>>>> for them >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless >>>>>>>>>>>>> ignorant twat. >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish >>>>>>>>>>>>> you were >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful >>>>>>>>>>>>> than you. >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact >>>>>>>>>>>>> generally >>>>>>>>>>>>> you're a burden >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the >>>>>>>>>>>>> largest of >>>>>>>>>>>>> my endless >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and >>>>>>>>>>>>> alcoholics >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said >>>>>>>>>>>>> Catholicoholics. >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those >>>>>>>>>>>>> programs, you >>>>>>>>>>>>> just ease it off >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they >>>>>>>>>>>>> can score >>>>>>>>>>>>> some dope from. >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back >>>>>>>>>>>>> and drink >>>>>>>>>>>>> right in the >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean >>>>>>>>>>>>> up , >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for >>>>>>>>>>>>> a year >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court >>>>>>>>>>>>> made them >>>>>>>>>>>>> go. >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>>>>>>>>>> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug >>>>>>>>>>>>> addiction >>>>>>>>>>>>> programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> how do they make them stay their >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No swinging doors here. Once you enter you can't leave until >>>>>>>>>>> you are >>>>>>>>>>> clean. The law say they are responsible for you once you enter >>>>>>>>>>> and if >>>>>>>>>>> they let you leave while you still have something in your >>>>>>>>>>> system and get >>>>>>>>>>> hurt they can hold the detox responsible. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> mandated recovery , i wonder how successful that is >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Only detox is like that, not the treatment centers. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hopeless. Not even 1 in 50. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You have proof? Or maybe you're just spouting off. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Have you not noticed % is running out of brain cells? >>>>>> >>>>>> He sure isn't getting any from your direction. >>>>> >>>>> If I gave him one of mine it would overload his own and cause >>>>> spontaneous combustion. However if you're willing to video that for >>>>> youtube and share half the dividends.... >>>> >>>> So you admit that just one more would overload, thereby saying he >>>> already had some making you a liar. >>> >>> I said RUNNING OUT, what part of running out = zero in your language? >> >> the part where you lied > >Quote this part. "this part"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 10:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bs2b06.cno.19.6@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #242358 |
On 2018-12-28 9:58 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: > On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 16:21:44 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> In article <op.zuqomatu7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan>, >> William_Gothberg@internet.co.is says... >>> >>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 02:31:49 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> In article <g8ikqkFj6psU1@mid.individual.net>, rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com >>>> says... >>>>> >>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:brtoka.uos.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>> On 2018-12-26 4:29 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>>>> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> < > says... >>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William >>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William >>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % >>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William >>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 -0000, % >>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William >>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 >>>>>>>>> -0000, % >>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William >>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in >>>>>>>>> that trick >>>>>>>>> cyclist bullshit. >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know >>>>>>>>> what it is >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's >>>>>>>>> heard of >>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak >>>>>>>>> for them >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant >>>>>>>>> twat. >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish >>>>>>>>> you were >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful >>>>>>>>> than you. >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact >>>>>>>>> generally >>>>>>>>> you're a burden >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the >>>>>>>>> largest of >>>>>>>>> my endless >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and >>>>>>>>> alcoholics >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said Catholicoholics. >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those >>>>>>>>> programs, you >>>>>>>>> just ease it off >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can >>>>>>>>> score >>>>>>>>> some dope from. >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and >>>>>>>>> drink >>>>>>>>> right in the >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean up , >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a >>>>>>>>> year >>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court >>>>>>>>> made them >>>>>>>>> go. >>>>>>>>> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>>>>>>>> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>>>>>> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug addiction >>>>>>>>> programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> how do they make them stay their >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No swinging doors here. Once you enter you can't leave until you are >>>>>>> clean. The law say they are responsible for you once you enter >>>>>>> and if >>>>>>> they let you leave while you still have something in your system >>>>>>> and get >>>>>>> hurt they can hold the detox responsible. >>>>>>> >>>>>> mandated recovery , i wonder how successful that is >>>> >>>> Only detox is like that, not the treatment centers. >>>>> >>>>> Hopeless. Not even 1 in 50. >>>> >>>> You have proof? Or maybe you're just spouting off. >>> >>> Have you not noticed % is running out of brain cells? >> >> He sure isn't getting any from your direction. > > If I gave him one of mine it would overload his own and cause > spontaneous combustion. However if you're willing to video that for > youtube and share half the dividends.... there is nothing you have that i would want or accept
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 17:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <op.zuqswi1m7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan> |
| In reply to | #242376 |
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:10:50 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2018-12-28 9:58 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: >> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 16:21:44 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> >>> In article <op.zuqomatu7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan>, >>> William_Gothberg@internet.co.is says... >>>> >>>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 02:31:49 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <g8ikqkFj6psU1@mid.individual.net>, rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com >>>>> says... >>>>>> >>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:brtoka.uos.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 4:29 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>>>>> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>> < > says... >>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William >>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 >>>>>>>>>> -0000, % >>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in >>>>>>>>>> that trick >>>>>>>>>> cyclist bullshit. >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know >>>>>>>>>> what it is >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's >>>>>>>>>> heard of >>>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak >>>>>>>>>> for them >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant >>>>>>>>>> twat. >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish >>>>>>>>>> you were >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful >>>>>>>>>> than you. >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact >>>>>>>>>> generally >>>>>>>>>> you're a burden >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the >>>>>>>>>> largest of >>>>>>>>>> my endless >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and >>>>>>>>>> alcoholics >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said Catholicoholics. >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those >>>>>>>>>> programs, you >>>>>>>>>> just ease it off >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can >>>>>>>>>> score >>>>>>>>>> some dope from. >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and >>>>>>>>>> drink >>>>>>>>>> right in the >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean up , >>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a >>>>>>>>>> year >>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court >>>>>>>>>> made them >>>>>>>>>> go. >>>>>>>>>> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>>>>>>>>> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>>>>>>> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug addiction >>>>>>>>>> programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> how do they make them stay their >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No swinging doors here. Once you enter you can't leave until you are >>>>>>>> clean. The law say they are responsible for you once you enter >>>>>>>> and if >>>>>>>> they let you leave while you still have something in your system >>>>>>>> and get >>>>>>>> hurt they can hold the detox responsible. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> mandated recovery , i wonder how successful that is >>>>> >>>>> Only detox is like that, not the treatment centers. >>>>>> >>>>>> Hopeless. Not even 1 in 50. >>>>> >>>>> You have proof? Or maybe you're just spouting off. >>>> >>>> Have you not noticed % is running out of brain cells? >>> >>> He sure isn't getting any from your direction. >> >> If I gave him one of mine it would overload his own and cause >> spontaneous combustion. However if you're willing to video that for >> youtube and share half the dividends.... > > > there is nothing you have that i would want or accept Agreed, your brain cells would be scared of mine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 10:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bs2c7u.ha4.17.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #242384 |
On 2018-12-28 10:15 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: > On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:10:50 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2018-12-28 9:58 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 16:21:44 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> In article <op.zuqomatu7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan>, >>>> William_Gothberg@internet.co.is says... >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 02:31:49 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In article <g8ikqkFj6psU1@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>> rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com >>>>>> says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:brtoka.uos.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 4:29 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>> In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>>>>>> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>>>>>> reading >>>>>>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>>>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>> < > says... >>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles >>>>>>>>>>> when >>>>>>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article >>>>>>>>>>> <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William >>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 >>>>>>>>>>> -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 >>>>>>>>>>> -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in >>>>>>>>>>> that trick >>>>>>>>>>> cyclist bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know >>>>>>>>>>> what it is >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's >>>>>>>>>>> heard of >>>>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak >>>>>>>>>>> for them >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant >>>>>>>>>>> twat. >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish >>>>>>>>>>> you were >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful >>>>>>>>>>> than you. >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact >>>>>>>>>>> generally >>>>>>>>>>> you're a burden >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the >>>>>>>>>>> largest of >>>>>>>>>>> my endless >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and >>>>>>>>>>> alcoholics >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said >>>>>>>>>>> Catholicoholics. >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those >>>>>>>>>>> programs, you >>>>>>>>>>> just ease it off >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can >>>>>>>>>>> score >>>>>>>>>>> some dope from. >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and >>>>>>>>>>> drink >>>>>>>>>>> right in the >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean >>>>>>>>>>> up , >>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a >>>>>>>>>>> year >>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court >>>>>>>>>>> made them >>>>>>>>>>> go. >>>>>>>>>>> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>>>>>>>>>> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>>>>>>>> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug >>>>>>>>>>> addiction >>>>>>>>>>> programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> how do they make them stay their >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No swinging doors here. Once you enter you can't leave until >>>>>>>>> you are >>>>>>>>> clean. The law say they are responsible for you once you enter >>>>>>>>> and if >>>>>>>>> they let you leave while you still have something in your system >>>>>>>>> and get >>>>>>>>> hurt they can hold the detox responsible. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> mandated recovery , i wonder how successful that is >>>>>> >>>>>> Only detox is like that, not the treatment centers. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hopeless. Not even 1 in 50. >>>>>> >>>>>> You have proof? Or maybe you're just spouting off. >>>>> >>>>> Have you not noticed % is running out of brain cells? >>>> >>>> He sure isn't getting any from your direction. >>> >>> If I gave him one of mine it would overload his own and cause >>> spontaneous combustion. However if you're willing to video that for >>> youtube and share half the dividends.... >> >> >> there is nothing you have that i would want or accept > > Agreed, your brain cells would be scared of mine. i said nothing
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 17:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <op.zuqt621a7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan> |
| In reply to | #242405 |
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:32:03 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2018-12-28 10:15 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: >> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:10:50 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2018-12-28 9:58 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 16:21:44 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <op.zuqomatu7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan>, >>>>> William_Gothberg@internet.co.is says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 02:31:49 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> In article <g8ikqkFj6psU1@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>>> rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com >>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:brtoka.uos.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 4:29 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>>>>>>> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>>>>>>> reading >>>>>>>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>>>>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>> < > says... >>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles >>>>>>>>>>>> when >>>>>>>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article >>>>>>>>>>>> <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 >>>>>>>>>>>> -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 >>>>>>>>>>>> -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in >>>>>>>>>>>> that trick >>>>>>>>>>>> cyclist bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know >>>>>>>>>>>> what it is >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's >>>>>>>>>>>> heard of >>>>>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak >>>>>>>>>>>> for them >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant >>>>>>>>>>>> twat. >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish >>>>>>>>>>>> you were >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful >>>>>>>>>>>> than you. >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact >>>>>>>>>>>> generally >>>>>>>>>>>> you're a burden >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the >>>>>>>>>>>> largest of >>>>>>>>>>>> my endless >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and >>>>>>>>>>>> alcoholics >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said >>>>>>>>>>>> Catholicoholics. >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those >>>>>>>>>>>> programs, you >>>>>>>>>>>> just ease it off >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can >>>>>>>>>>>> score >>>>>>>>>>>> some dope from. >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and >>>>>>>>>>>> drink >>>>>>>>>>>> right in the >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean >>>>>>>>>>>> up , >>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a >>>>>>>>>>>> year >>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court >>>>>>>>>>>> made them >>>>>>>>>>>> go. >>>>>>>>>>>> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>>>>>>>>>>> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>>>>>>>>> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug >>>>>>>>>>>> addiction >>>>>>>>>>>> programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> how do they make them stay their >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No swinging doors here. Once you enter you can't leave until >>>>>>>>>> you are >>>>>>>>>> clean. The law say they are responsible for you once you enter >>>>>>>>>> and if >>>>>>>>>> they let you leave while you still have something in your system >>>>>>>>>> and get >>>>>>>>>> hurt they can hold the detox responsible. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> mandated recovery , i wonder how successful that is >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Only detox is like that, not the treatment centers. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hopeless. Not even 1 in 50. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You have proof? Or maybe you're just spouting off. >>>>>> >>>>>> Have you not noticed % is running out of brain cells? >>>>> >>>>> He sure isn't getting any from your direction. >>>> >>>> If I gave him one of mine it would overload his own and cause >>>> spontaneous combustion. However if you're willing to video that for >>>> youtube and share half the dividends.... >>> >>> >>> there is nothing you have that i would want or accept >> >> Agreed, your brain cells would be scared of mine. > > i said nothing Did your brain cells pass out?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 10:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bs2d6f.oad.17.6@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #242415 |
On 2018-12-28 10:43 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: > On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:32:03 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2018-12-28 10:15 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:10:50 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2018-12-28 9:58 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 16:21:44 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In article <op.zuqomatu7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan>, >>>>>> William_Gothberg@internet.co.is says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 02:31:49 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In article <g8ikqkFj6psU1@mid.individual.net>, >>>>>>>> rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com >>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:brtoka.uos.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 4:29 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>>>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>>>>>>>> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>>>>>>>> reading >>>>>>>>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > says... >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles >>>>>>>>>>>>> when >>>>>>>>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article >>>>>>>>>>>>> <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 >>>>>>>>>>>>> -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 >>>>>>>>>>>>> -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William >>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 >>>>>>>>>>>>> -0000, % >>>>>>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., >>>>>>>>>>>>> William >>>>>>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in >>>>>>>>>>>>> that trick >>>>>>>>>>>>> cyclist bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know >>>>>>>>>>>>> what it is >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's >>>>>>>>>>>>> heard of >>>>>>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak >>>>>>>>>>>>> for them >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant >>>>>>>>>>>>> twat. >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish >>>>>>>>>>>>> you were >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful >>>>>>>>>>>>> than you. >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact >>>>>>>>>>>>> generally >>>>>>>>>>>>> you're a burden >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the >>>>>>>>>>>>> largest of >>>>>>>>>>>>> my endless >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts >>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>> alcoholics >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said >>>>>>>>>>>>> Catholicoholics. >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those >>>>>>>>>>>>> programs, you >>>>>>>>>>>>> just ease it off >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can >>>>>>>>>>>>> score >>>>>>>>>>>>> some dope from. >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back >>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>> drink >>>>>>>>>>>>> right in the >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean >>>>>>>>>>>>> up , >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a >>>>>>>>>>>>> year >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court >>>>>>>>>>>>> made them >>>>>>>>>>>>> go. >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a >>>>>>>>>>>>> problem. >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>>>>>>>>>> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug >>>>>>>>>>>>> addiction >>>>>>>>>>>>> programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> how do they make them stay their >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No swinging doors here. Once you enter you can't leave until >>>>>>>>>>> you are >>>>>>>>>>> clean. The law say they are responsible for you once you enter >>>>>>>>>>> and if >>>>>>>>>>> they let you leave while you still have something in your system >>>>>>>>>>> and get >>>>>>>>>>> hurt they can hold the detox responsible. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> mandated recovery , i wonder how successful that is >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Only detox is like that, not the treatment centers. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hopeless. Not even 1 in 50. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You have proof? Or maybe you're just spouting off. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Have you not noticed % is running out of brain cells? >>>>>> >>>>>> He sure isn't getting any from your direction. >>>>> >>>>> If I gave him one of mine it would overload his own and cause >>>>> spontaneous combustion. However if you're willing to video that for >>>>> youtube and share half the dividends.... >>>> >>>> >>>> there is nothing you have that i would want or accept >>> >>> Agreed, your brain cells would be scared of mine. >> >> i said nothing > > Did your brain cells pass out? how can you ask that after saying i don't have any , damn you suck at usenet
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 09:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bs28dq.35o.17.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #242321 |
On 2018-12-28 8:43 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: > On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 02:31:49 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> In article <g8ikqkFj6psU1@mid.individual.net>, rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com >> says... >>> >>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:brtoka.uos.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>> On 2018-12-26 4:29 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>> says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> < >>>>>>> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>> < > says... >>>>>>> < > >>>>>>> < > >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % >>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 -0000, % >>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William >>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 -0000, % >>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William >>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in that >>>>>>> trick >>>>>>> cyclist bullshit. >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know what >>>>>>> it is >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's >>>>>>> heard of >>>>>>> it. >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak for >>>>>>> them >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant twat. >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish you >>>>>>> were >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful than >>>>>>> you. >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact >>>>>>> generally >>>>>>> you're a burden >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the >>>>>>> largest of >>>>>>> my endless >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and >>>>>>> alcoholics >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said Catholicoholics. >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those programs, you >>>>>>> just ease it off >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can score >>>>>>> some dope from. >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and >>>>>>> drink >>>>>>> right in the >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean up , >>>>>>> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a year >>>>>>> < > >>>>>>> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court made >>>>>>> them >>>>>>> go. >>>>>>> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>>>>>> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>>>> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug addiction >>>>>>> programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>>>> >>>>>> how do they make them stay their >>>>> >>>>> No swinging doors here. Once you enter you can't leave until you are >>>>> clean. The law say they are responsible for you once you enter and if >>>>> they let you leave while you still have something in your system >>>>> and get >>>>> hurt they can hold the detox responsible. >>>>> >>>> mandated recovery , i wonder how successful that is >> >> Only detox is like that, not the treatment centers. >>> >>> Hopeless. Not even 1 in 50. >> >> You have proof? Or maybe you're just spouting off. > > Have you not noticed % is running out of brain cells? who needs them to talk to you
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 16:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <op.zuqr0md77uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan> |
| In reply to | #242342 |
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 16:26:54 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2018-12-28 8:43 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: >> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 02:31:49 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> >>> In article <g8ikqkFj6psU1@mid.individual.net>, rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com >>> says... >>>> >>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:brtoka.uos.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>>> On 2018-12-26 4:29 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>>> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>> < > says... >>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % >>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 -0000, % >>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William >>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 -0000, % >>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William >>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in that >>>>>>>> trick >>>>>>>> cyclist bullshit. >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know what >>>>>>>> it is >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's >>>>>>>> heard of >>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak for >>>>>>>> them >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant twat. >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish you >>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful than >>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact >>>>>>>> generally >>>>>>>> you're a burden >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the >>>>>>>> largest of >>>>>>>> my endless >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and >>>>>>>> alcoholics >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said Catholicoholics. >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those programs, you >>>>>>>> just ease it off >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can score >>>>>>>> some dope from. >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and >>>>>>>> drink >>>>>>>> right in the >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean up , >>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a year >>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court made >>>>>>>> them >>>>>>>> go. >>>>>>>> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>>>>>>> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>>>>> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug addiction >>>>>>>> programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> how do they make them stay their >>>>>> >>>>>> No swinging doors here. Once you enter you can't leave until you are >>>>>> clean. The law say they are responsible for you once you enter and if >>>>>> they let you leave while you still have something in your system >>>>>> and get >>>>>> hurt they can hold the detox responsible. >>>>>> >>>>> mandated recovery , i wonder how successful that is >>> >>> Only detox is like that, not the treatment centers. >>>> >>>> Hopeless. Not even 1 in 50. >>> >>> You have proof? Or maybe you're just spouting off. >> >> Have you not noticed % is running out of brain cells? > > > who needs them to talk to you Sorry, I can't find the start of your sentence.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 10:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bs2asi.cno.19.4@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #242355 |
On 2018-12-28 9:56 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: > On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 16:26:54 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2018-12-28 8:43 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 02:31:49 -0000, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> In article <g8ikqkFj6psU1@mid.individual.net>, rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com >>>> says... >>>>> >>>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:brtoka.uos.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>>>> On 2018-12-26 4:29 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>>>> Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>> < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> < > says... >>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William >>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % >>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William >>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 -0000, % >>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William >>>>>>>>> Gothberg >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 >>>>>>>>> -0000, % >>>>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William >>>>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in that >>>>>>>>> trick >>>>>>>>> cyclist bullshit. >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know what >>>>>>>>> it is >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's >>>>>>>>> heard of >>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak for >>>>>>>>> them >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant >>>>>>>>> twat. >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish you >>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful than >>>>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact >>>>>>>>> generally >>>>>>>>> you're a burden >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the >>>>>>>>> largest of >>>>>>>>> my endless >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and >>>>>>>>> alcoholics >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said Catholicoholics. >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those >>>>>>>>> programs, you >>>>>>>>> just ease it off >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can >>>>>>>>> score >>>>>>>>> some dope from. >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and >>>>>>>>> drink >>>>>>>>> right in the >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean up , >>>>>>>>> < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a >>>>>>>>> year >>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>> < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court made >>>>>>>>> them >>>>>>>>> go. >>>>>>>>> < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>>>>>>>> < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>>>>>> < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug addiction >>>>>>>>> programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> how do they make them stay their >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No swinging doors here. Once you enter you can't leave until you are >>>>>>> clean. The law say they are responsible for you once you enter >>>>>>> and if >>>>>>> they let you leave while you still have something in your system >>>>>>> and get >>>>>>> hurt they can hold the detox responsible. >>>>>>> >>>>>> mandated recovery , i wonder how successful that is >>>> >>>> Only detox is like that, not the treatment centers. >>>>> >>>>> Hopeless. Not even 1 in 50. >>>> >>>> You have proof? Or maybe you're just spouting off. >>> >>> Have you not noticed % is running out of brain cells? >> >> >> who needs them to talk to you > > Sorry, I can't find the start of your sentence. don't be sorry
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 01:02 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368e34f2a8b4ed3c995d10@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #241817 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... < < On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by < > Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com < > says... < > < > < > < < > < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: < > < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by < > < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com < > < > says... < > < > < > < > < > < > @@@@@ < > < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: < > < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by < > < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com < > < > @@@@@ > says... < > < > @@@@@ > < > < > @@@@@ > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in that trick cyclist bullshit. < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know what it is < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's heard of it. < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak for them < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant twat. < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish you were < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful than you. < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact generally you're a burden < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the largest of my endless < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and alcoholics < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said Catholicoholics. < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those programs, you just ease it off < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan < > < > @@@@@ > < > < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can score some dope from. < > < > @@@@@ > < > < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and drink right in the < > < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean up , < > < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a year < > < > < > < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court made them go. < > < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. < > < > courts can't mandate that they go and , < > < there are no door locks you can leave anytime < > < > In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug addiction < > programs, and make them pay for it too. < > < how do they make them stay their They have to bring proof back to the court that they attended as required, or they stay fucked. I think their licenses get suspended too. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 04:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <brv2r0.3bm.19.7@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #241988 |
On 2018-12-27 2:02 a.m., Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com > says... > > > < > < On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: > < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > < > Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com > < > says... > < > > < > > < > < > < > < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: > < > < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > < > < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com > < > < > says... > < > < > > < > < > > < > < > @@@@@ > < > < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: > < > < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > < > < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com > < > < > @@@@@ > says... > < > < > @@@@@ > > < > < > @@@@@ > > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in that trick cyclist bullshit. > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know what it is > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's heard of it. > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak for them > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant twat. > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish you were > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful than you. > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact generally you're a burden > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the largest of my endless > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and alcoholics > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said Catholicoholics. > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those programs, you just ease it off > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , > < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan > < > < > @@@@@ > > < > < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can score some dope from. > < > < > @@@@@ > > < > < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and drink right in the > < > < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean up , > < > < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a year > < > < > > < > < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court made them go. > < > < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. > < > < > courts can't mandate that they go and , > < > < there are no door locks you can leave anytime > < > > < > In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug addiction > < > programs, and make them pay for it too. > < > > < how do they make them stay their > > They have to bring proof back to the court that they attended as > required, or they stay fucked. I think their licenses get suspended too. > it's an anonymous program
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "William Gothberg" <"William Gothberg"@internet.co.is> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 14:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <op.zuoqbydqo5piw3@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan> |
| In reply to | #242002 |
On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 11:33:08 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2018-12-27 2:02 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >> says... >> >> >> < >> < On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> < > Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >> < > says... >> < > >> < > >> < > < >> < > < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >> < > < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> < > < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >> < > < > says... >> < > < > >> < > < > >> < > < > @@@@@ >> < > < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >> < > < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> < > < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >> < > < > @@@@@ > says... >> < > < > @@@@@ > >> < > < > @@@@@ > >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in that trick cyclist bullshit. >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know what it is >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's heard of it. >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak for them >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant twat. >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish you were >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful than you. >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact generally you're a burden >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the largest of my endless >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and alcoholics >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said Catholicoholics. >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those programs, you just ease it off >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >> < > < > @@@@@ > >> < > < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can score some dope from. >> < > < > @@@@@ > >> < > < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and drink right in the >> < > < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean up , >> < > < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a year >> < > < > >> < > < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court made them go. >> < > < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >> < > < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >> < > < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >> < > >> < > In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug addiction >> < > programs, and make them pay for it too. >> < > >> < how do they make them stay their >> >> They have to bring proof back to the court that they attended as >> required, or they stay fucked. I think their licenses get suspended too. >> > it's an anonymous program Depends on the country and the judge.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 09:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <brvkvp.csm.17.8@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #242019 |
On 2018-12-27 7:25 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: > On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 11:33:08 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2018-12-27 2:02 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >>> says... >>> >>> >>> < >>> < On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>> posts by >>> < > Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>> persent@gmail.com >>> < > says... >>> < > >>> < > >>> < > < >>> < > < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>> < > < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>> reading posts by >>> < > < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>> persent@gmail.com >>> < > < > says... >>> < > < > >>> < > < > >>> < > < > @@@@@ >>> < > < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>> < > < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles >>> when reading posts by >>> < > < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article >>> <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >>> < > < > @@@@@ > says... >>> < > < > @@@@@ > >>> < > < > @@@@@ > >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg >>> wrote: >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William Gothberg >>> wrote: >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William >>> Gothberg wrote: >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % >>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William >>> Gothberg wrote: >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 -0000, % >>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William >>> Gothberg wrote: >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 -0000, >>> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William >>> Gothberg wrote: >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in that >>> trick cyclist bullshit. >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know what >>> it is >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's >>> heard of it. >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak for >>> them >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant twat. >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish you >>> were >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful than >>> you. >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact >>> generally you're a burden >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the >>> largest of my endless >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and >>> alcoholics >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said Catholicoholics. >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those programs, >>> you just ease it off >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>> < > < > @@@@@ > >>> < > < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can >>> score some dope from. >>> < > < > @@@@@ > >>> < > < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and >>> drink right in the >>> < > < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean up , >>> < > < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a year >>> < > < > >>> < > < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court made >>> them go. >>> < > < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>> < > < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>> < > < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>> < > >>> < > In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug addiction >>> < > programs, and make them pay for it too. >>> < > >>> < how do they make them stay their >>> >>> They have to bring proof back to the court that they attended as >>> required, or they stay fucked. I think their licenses get suspended >>> too. >>> >> it's an anonymous program > > Depends on the country and the judge. that doesn't change the program
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 18:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <op.zuo01uog7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan> |
| In reply to | #242052 |
On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 16:42:53 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2018-12-27 7:25 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: >> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 11:33:08 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2018-12-27 2:02 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>> Checkmate! In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >>>> says... >>>> >>>> >>>> < >>>> < On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>> posts by >>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>> persent@gmail.com >>>> < > says... >>>> < > >>>> < > >>>> < > < >>>> < > < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>> < > < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>> reading posts by >>>> < > < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>> persent@gmail.com >>>> < > < > says... >>>> < > < > >>>> < > < > >>>> < > < > @@@@@ >>>> < > < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles >>>> when reading posts by >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article >>>> <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > says... >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg >>>> wrote: >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William Gothberg >>>> wrote: >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William >>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % >>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William >>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 -0000, % >>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William >>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 -0000, >>>> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William >>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in that >>>> trick cyclist bullshit. >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know what >>>> it is >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's >>>> heard of it. >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak for >>>> them >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant twat. >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish you >>>> were >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful than >>>> you. >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact >>>> generally you're a burden >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the >>>> largest of my endless >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and >>>> alcoholics >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said Catholicoholics. >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those programs, >>>> you just ease it off >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can >>>> score some dope from. >>>> < > < > @@@@@ > >>>> < > < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and >>>> drink right in the >>>> < > < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean up , >>>> < > < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a year >>>> < > < > >>>> < > < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court made >>>> them go. >>>> < > < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>>> < > < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>> < > < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>> < > >>>> < > In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug addiction >>>> < > programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>> < > >>>> < how do they make them stay their >>>> >>>> They have to bring proof back to the court that they attended as >>>> required, or they stay fucked. I think their licenses get suspended >>>> too. >>>> >>> it's an anonymous program >> >> Depends on the country and the judge. > > that doesn't change the program You think all countries have the same program?!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-28 05:50 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <g8kl8hF1uutU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #242105 |
"William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> wrote in message news:op.zuo01uog7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan... > On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 16:42:53 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2018-12-27 7:25 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 11:33:08 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2018-12-27 2:02 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>>> by >>>>> Checkmate! In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, >>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>> says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> < >>>>> < On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>> posts by >>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>> < > says... >>>>> < > >>>>> < > >>>>> < > < >>>>> < > < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>> < > < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>> reading posts by >>>>> < > < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>> < > < > says... >>>>> < > < > >>>>> < > < > >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles >>>>> when reading posts by >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article >>>>> <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>> wrote: >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>> wrote: >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William >>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % >>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William >>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 -0000, % >>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William >>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 -0000, >>>>> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William >>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in that >>>>> trick cyclist bullshit. >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know what >>>>> it is >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's >>>>> heard of it. >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak for >>>>> them >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant >>>>> twat. >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish you >>>>> were >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful than >>>>> you. >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact >>>>> generally you're a burden >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the >>>>> largest of my endless >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and >>>>> alcoholics >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said Catholicoholics. >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those programs, >>>>> you just ease it off >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can >>>>> score some dope from. >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and >>>>> drink right in the >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean up , >>>>> < > < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a >>>>> year >>>>> < > < > >>>>> < > < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court made >>>>> them go. >>>>> < > < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>>>> < > < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>> < > < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>> < > >>>>> < > In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug addiction >>>>> < > programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>> < > >>>>> < how do they make them stay their >>>>> >>>>> They have to bring proof back to the court that they attended as >>>>> required, or they stay fucked. I think their licenses get suspended >>>>> too. >>>>> >>>> it's an anonymous program >>> >>> Depends on the country and the judge. >> >> that doesn't change the program > > You think all countries have the same program?! He's talking about the program he is involved with.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 12:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <brvuvv.cf2.19.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #242115 |
On 2018-12-27 11:50 a.m., Rod Speed wrote: > > > "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> wrote in message > news:op.zuo01uog7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan... >> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 16:42:53 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2018-12-27 7:25 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 11:33:08 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2018-12-27 2:02 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>> posts by >>>>>> Checkmate! In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, >>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>> says... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> < >>>>>> < On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>> posts by >>>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>> < > says... >>>>>> < > >>>>>> < > >>>>>> < > < >>>>>> < > < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>> < > < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>> < > < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>> < > < > says... >>>>>> < > < > >>>>>> < > < > >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles >>>>>> when reading posts by >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article >>>>>> <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William >>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % >>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William >>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 -0000, % >>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William >>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 -0000, >>>>>> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William >>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in that >>>>>> trick cyclist bullshit. >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know what >>>>>> it is >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's >>>>>> heard of it. >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak for >>>>>> them >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant >>>>>> twat. >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish you >>>>>> were >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful than >>>>>> you. >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact >>>>>> generally you're a burden >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the >>>>>> largest of my endless >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and >>>>>> alcoholics >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said >>>>>> Catholicoholics. >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those programs, >>>>>> you just ease it off >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can >>>>>> score some dope from. >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and >>>>>> drink right in the >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean >>>>>> up , >>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a >>>>>> year >>>>>> < > < > >>>>>> < > < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court made >>>>>> them go. >>>>>> < > < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>>>>> < > < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>>> < > < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>>> < > >>>>>> < > In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug addiction >>>>>> < > programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>>> < > >>>>>> < how do they make them stay their >>>>>> >>>>>> They have to bring proof back to the court that they attended as >>>>>> required, or they stay fucked. I think their licenses get suspended >>>>>> too. >>>>>> >>>>> it's an anonymous program >>>> >>>> Depends on the country and the judge. >>> >>> that doesn't change the program >> >> You think all countries have the same program?! > > He's talking about the program he is involved with. and that is also the same world wide
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 20:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <op.zuo6fb2j7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan> |
| In reply to | #242130 |
On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 19:33:39 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2018-12-27 11:50 a.m., Rod Speed wrote: >> >> >> "William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is> wrote in message >> news:op.zuo01uog7uplkq@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan... >>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 16:42:53 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2018-12-27 7:25 a.m., William Gothberg wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 11:33:08 -0000, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2018-12-27 2:02 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>> Checkmate! In article <brtbjk.pjt.17.1@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>> says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> < >>>>>>> < On 2018-12-26 12:48 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>> < > Checkmate! In article <brsjna.hr9.17.4@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>> < > says... >>>>>>> < > >>>>>>> < > >>>>>>> < > < >>>>>>> < > < On 2018-12-25 8:44 p.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> < > < > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>> < > < > Checkmate! In article <brpuce.7af.17.15@news.alt.net>, >>>>>>> persent@gmail.com >>>>>>> < > < > says... >>>>>>> < > < > >>>>>>> < > < > >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ On 2018-12-25 12:43 a.m., Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles >>>>>>> when reading posts by >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article >>>>>>> <bro9pc.1dn.19.4@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > says... >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On 2018-12-24 2:46 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 21:23:42 -0000, % >>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On 2018-12-24 2:16 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 20:02:02 -0000, % >>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> On 2018-12-24 1:00 p.m., William Gothberg >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:31:16 -0000, % >>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> On 2018-12-24 10:25 a.m., William >>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:43:04 -0000, % >>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-23 5:35 p.m., William >>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:59:08 -0000, % >>>>>>> <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-22 1:50 p.m., William >>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:22:26 -0000, >>>>>>> % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-21 6:55 p.m., William >>>>>>> Gothberg wrote: >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't tell me you believe in that >>>>>>> trick cyclist bullshit. >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>>> i can't tell you i don't know what >>>>>>> it is >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be ridiculous, everyone's >>>>>>> heard of it. >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>>> i'm not everyone nor do i speak for >>>>>>> them >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>>> Indeed, you're a clueless ignorant >>>>>>> twat. >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>>> i'm usefull then , don't you wish you >>>>>>> were >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> I'm probably 100 times more useful than >>>>>>> you. >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>> you serve no purpose at all in fact >>>>>>> generally you're a burden >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>> And your purpose would be? >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> i suppose my employment would be the >>>>>>> largest of my endless >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>> contributions >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> Which is? >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> i design recovery programs for addicts and >>>>>>> alcoholics >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > I thought that last word said >>>>>>> Catholicoholics. >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > And you don't need to design those programs, >>>>>>> you just ease it off >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > slowly, everybody knows that. >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ that's what they go to treatment for so , >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > @@@@@ they need a treatment plan >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > Maybe they really go there to meet people they can >>>>>>> score some dope from. >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ > >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ that's a guarantee sometimes they sit in the back and >>>>>>> drink right in the >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ detox , lots come for a few meals a rest up / clean >>>>>>> up , >>>>>>> < > < > @@@@@ the long term odds are 1 in 25 will stay sober for a >>>>>>> year >>>>>>> < > < > >>>>>>> < > < > I believe it. Most are probably there because the court made >>>>>>> them go. >>>>>>> < > < > You can't fix someone who doesn't think they have a problem. >>>>>>> < > < > courts can't mandate that they go and , >>>>>>> < > < there are no door locks you can leave anytime >>>>>>> < > >>>>>>> < > In the US, courts can require drug users to attend drug addiction >>>>>>> < > programs, and make them pay for it too. >>>>>>> < > >>>>>>> < how do they make them stay their >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They have to bring proof back to the court that they attended as >>>>>>> required, or they stay fucked. I think their licenses get suspended >>>>>>> too. >>>>>>> >>>>>> it's an anonymous program >>>>> >>>>> Depends on the country and the judge. >>>> >>>> that doesn't change the program >>> >>> You think all countries have the same program?! >> >> He's talking about the program he is involved with. > > and that is also the same world wide I doubt it, the UK is more stringent than that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web