Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.checkmate > #206336 > unrolled thread

Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
First post2018-09-20 09:26 -0400
Last post2018-10-01 13:34 -0400
Articles 20 on this page of 1000+ — 43 participants
Thread has 1006 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed.

Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate | Browse in flat view

Thread has 1006 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.


Contents

  Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:26 -0400
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:25 -0600
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 18:30 -0400
      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 20:44 -0500
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 18:45 -0700
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:26 -0400
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 21:42 -0500
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:30 -0400
              Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 06:51 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 15:53 +0000
                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 12:00 -0400
                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:49 -0600
                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 13:15 -0500
                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 13:01 -0600
                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:27 -0400
                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:20 -0700
                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-22 14:27 +0000
                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:53 +0000
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:34 -0600
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 19:06 -0500
                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 15:07 -0700
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 15:11 -0700
                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 07:18 -0500
                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 12:35 +0000
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 09:09 -0500
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:46 -0500
                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:59 -0700
                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 20:58 +0000
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 14:01 -0700
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 14:30 -0700
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 23:21 +0100
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0400
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0500
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:27 +0000
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:28 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 13:00 +0000
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:28 -0500
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:06 -0500
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:00 +0000
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:31 -0400
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:38 -0600
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:28 -0400
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:30 -0600
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 07:19 -0700
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:22 +0000
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:13 -0700
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 17:19 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 15:33 -0700
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 15:40 -0700
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 19:33 -0400
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:46 -0700
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:00 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:53 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:35 -0500
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:02 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:12 -0400
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:17 +0000
                                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:14 +0000
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:28 -0700
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-26 09:20 -0400
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:55 +0000
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:52 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:17 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 00:23 -0500
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 06:17 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 09:13 -0600
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 11:19 -0400
                                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 17:12 +0100
                                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 12:40 -0500
                                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 18:51 +0100
                                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:20 -0600
                                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 22:58 +0100
                                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 10:43 -0600
                                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 12:48 -0400
                                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:07 -0600
                                                        Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 12:49 -0500
                                                          Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:19 -0600
                                                            Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 13:28 -0500
                                                              Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:30 -0600
                                                      Re: ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„  Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 12:42 -0500
                                                        Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOC Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:18 -0600
                                                          Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOC Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-27 18:53 +0000
                                                            Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOC Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 13:04 -0600
                                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 12:50 -0400
                                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:08 -0600
                                                Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 10:34 -0500
                                                  Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snow Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 10:44 -0600
                                                    Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snow โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 12:37 -0500
                                                      Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:17 -0600
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:06 -0700
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 10:08 -0400
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 10:31 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:46 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 10:48 -0500
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 12:37 -0500
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 07:52 -0500
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 11:21 -0400
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 09:32 -0600
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:32 -0500
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 09:36 -0600
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:24 -0500
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 15:19 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:20 -0700
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 04:39 -0400
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:50 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:56 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:55 -0500
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:14 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:31 -0400
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 09:15 -0600
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 11:25 -0400
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-27 18:56 +0000
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 15:04 -0400
                                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 21:57 +0000
                                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:34 -0400
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 13:06 -0600
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 19:39 -0400
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 19:52 -0500
                                              Inflation is immoral. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 02:52 -0700
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:33 +0000
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:12 -0700
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:17 -0500
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:49 +0000
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:44 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 13:51 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:59 -0500
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:40 -0600
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 22:36 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:23 -0700
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:15 -0700
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:38 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:04 -0700
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:57 -0700
                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 10:52 -0500
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 09:43 -0700
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:37 -0500
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 12:26 -0700
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 12:34 -0700
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 17:05 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 17:03 -0700
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:10 +0000
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 13:19 -0700
                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:53 -0600
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:43 -0500
                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:15 -0600
                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:50 -0600
                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:22 +0000
                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:54 -0700
                      I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 03:56 -0700
                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 15:34 +0000
                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:58 +0000
                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:00 +0000
                              Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 21:47 +0000
                                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:05 -0700
                                  Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 20:31 -0500
                                    Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snow Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 19:57 -0600
                                      Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snow โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-28 09:57 -0500
                                        Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? Snow ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:04 -0600
                                          Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 20:23 +0100
                                          Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 14:34 -0600
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 08:52 -0400
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 07:59 -0500
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:04 -0400
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:12 -0400
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:45 -0400
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:55 -0400
                                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:27 -0400
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:03 -0600
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:27 +0000
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:43 -0400
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:39 +0100
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:10 -0400
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 23:29 -0500
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Catalina" <Catalina@beach.sun> - 2018-09-30 02:39 -0400
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 01:25 -0700
                                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-28 02:02 +0000
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 06:47 -0500
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 18:18 +0000
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:31 +0000
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 18:56 +0100
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 18:57 +0000
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 20:30 +0100
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 14:31 -0600
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:37 -0700
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:51 +0000
                                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:40 -0400
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:05 -0600
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:08 -0400
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 -0700
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-29 14:23 +0000
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 10:52 -0700
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-29 18:55 +0000
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 13:18 -0600
                                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-29 19:43 +0000
                                              Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 18:54 -0600
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 12:41 -0700
                                            Being _ relatively poor isn't a real problem. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-29 15:25 -0700
                                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:29 -0600
                                              Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 21:48 -0400
                                                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 23:16 -0700
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0600
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-29 12:43 -0400
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 10:53 -0600
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-29 12:56 -0400
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 10:57 -0600
                                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-29 12:58 -0400
                                              Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 11:30 -0600
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-29 14:00 -0400
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-29 20:12 +0100
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 17:33 -0700
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:17 +0000
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:08 -0700
                                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:26 +0000
                                              Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:36 -0700
                                                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:42 +0000
                                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 22:13 -0700
                                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:33 +0000
                                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 12:50 -0700
                                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:18 +0000
                                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:22 -0700
                                                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
                          We need to eat more. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 09:38 -0700
                            Re: We need to eat more. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 +0000
                              "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 10:09 -0700
                                Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:10 +0000
                                  Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0400
                                    Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:19 +0000
                                    Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:58 -0500
                                      Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:16 -0600
                                      Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0500
                                    Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:04 -0700
                                      Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 -0700
                                        If you're fucking, you're stupid. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 17:14 -0700
                                          Re: If you're fucking, you're stupid. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:39 -0700
                                        Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:01 -0700
                                          Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:47 -0400
                                            Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:59 -0400
                                            Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 11:37 -0700
                                              Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 19:00 +0000
                                                Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 14:32 -0600
                                            Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:12 -0400
                                      Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 21:44 -0700
                                        Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 22:01 -0700
                                          Artificial penises and testosterone implants. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 05:01 -0700
                                            Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:17 -0700
                                              Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 23:42 -0400
                                                Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:56 -0700
                                      Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:26 +0000
                                        Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:30 -0400
                                        I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 09:38 -0700
                                          Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:41 -0400
                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 19:09 +0100
                                          Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:04 -0400
                                          Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:47 +0000
                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 21:52 +0000
                                              If I were super attractive... Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 15:04 -0700
                                                Re: If I were super attractive... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 18:08 -0400
                                                Re: If I were super attractive... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 22:08 +0000
                                                  Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:10 +0000
                                                    Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 15:52 -0700
                                                      Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:55 +0000
                                                        Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:00 -0700
                                                          Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:05 +0000
                                                            Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:15 -0700
                                                              Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:22 +0000
                                                                Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:24 -0700
                                                                  Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:28 +0000
                                                                    Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:31 -0700
                                                                      Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:37 +0000
                                                  The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 15:15 -0700
                                                    Re: The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:18 +0000
                                                Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:09 +0000
                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-28 17:29 -0500
                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 +0000
                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:23 -0700
                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:28 -0700
                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:49 -0700
                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:55 +0000
                                                      Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:19 -0700
                                                        Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-30 02:48 +0000
                                                          Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:28 +0000
                                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:45 -0700
                                                              Was she looking for love ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-29 20:55 -0700
                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:59 -0700
                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:11 -0400
                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:35 +0000
                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:42 -0700
                                                                    Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 05:22 -0700
                                                                      I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 07:34 -0700
                                                                        Re: I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
                                                                        Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 20:37 -0700
                                                                          Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:21 +0000
                                                                            Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 22:25 -0700
                                                                              Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:40 +0000
                                                                                Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:15 -0700
                                                                                Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:42 -0600
                                                                          Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 10:01 -0700
                                                                            Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0500
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 15:00 -0400
                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:02 -0700
                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:57 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:01 -0400
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:00 -0700
                                                                            Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 15:52 -0400
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 16:02 -0500
                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:04 -0400
                                                                          Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 12:59 -0700
                                                                            Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:13 -0700
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:18 -0400
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 16:22 -0500
                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:37 -0700
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 22:30 +0100
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:34 -0700
                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:40 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:42 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:49 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:53 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:54 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:02 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:06 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0700
                                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:21 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:26 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:29 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:33 -0700
                                                                                                        Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:36 -0700
                                                                                                          Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:28 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:32 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:03 -0700
                                                                      Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:13 -0400
                                                                        Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 07:33 -0500
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:29 -0400
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:19 -0400
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:26 -0400
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:59 +0000
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:40 -0700
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-09-30 17:52 -0500
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 13:11 -0700
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:22 -0400
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:25 +0000
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:01 +0000
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:04 -0700
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:28 -0600
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:39 -0400
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:08 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:03 +0000
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:07 -0700
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:53 -0400
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:12 -0700
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:31 -0700
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:55 -0700
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 09:02 -0600
                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:26 -0400
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 16:05 +0000
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:23 -0400
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 23:07 +0000
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:11 -0400
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0700
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 18:19 -0500
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:22 -0400
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:40 -0700
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:43 -0500
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:42 -0500
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:32 -0700
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 13:44 -0400
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 13:57 -0400
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:05 -0400
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:20 -0400
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 11:51 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 15:13 -0400
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:06 +0000
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0400
                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:20 +0000
                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:34 -0400
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 21:49 +0100
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-30 14:00 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:13 +0100
                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:22 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:27 +0100
                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:38 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:44 +0100
                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:52 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 23:00 +0100
                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 15:06 -0700
                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
                                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
                                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 02:52 -0700
                                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 12:56 +0100
                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 05:46 -0700
                                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 13:58 +0100
                                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 06:42 -0700
                                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 17:11 +0100
                                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 10:35 -0700
                                                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 18:42 +0100
                                                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:44 -0400
                                                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:03 +0100
                                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0400
                                                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 11:07 -0700
                                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:12 -0400
                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0400
                                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:07 +0100
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:10 +0000
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:57 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:09 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:01 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:30 -0600
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:35 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:12 +0000
                                                                                    Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:22 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:31 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:43 +0000
                                                                                            Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:12 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:27 -0600
                                                                                              Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:11 -0500
                                                                                                Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:09 -0400
                                                                                            The Sex, Drugs, and Alcohol Party ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 06:06 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:25 -0600
                                                                                        Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 05:14 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 08:50 -0500
                                                                                            Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:33 -0600
                                                                                              Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 10:22 -0500
                                                                                                Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snow Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 11:21 -0600
                                                                                                  Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snow โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 13:23 -0500
                                                                                                    Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:38 -0600
                                                                                              Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-01 14:00 -0400
                                                                                                Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:07 -0400
                                                                                            Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:32 -0600
                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:56 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0600
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:44 +0000
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 13:57 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:24 -0600
                                                                                Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 14:02 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:06 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:14 +0000
                                                                                    Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 19:31 -0700
                                                                                    Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 19:32 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:24 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:21 -0600
                                                                                        Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:47 -0400
                                                                                            Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:15 -0500
                                                                                      Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:31 +0000
                                                                                    Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:42 -0700
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0600
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-30 11:15 -0700
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:19 -0400
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0400
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:44 -0700
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:46 +0000
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:06 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 05:55 -0500
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:40 -0700
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:36 -0600
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 10:49 -0400
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:03 +0000
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:34 -0700
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:42 -0400
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:54 -0700
                                                                            Greg, the incel. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0700
                                                                              Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:27 -0700
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:16 +0000
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:35 -0600
                                                                          If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
                                                                            Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:17 +0000
                                                                              If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 19:41 -0700
                                                                                Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:26 +0000
                                                                                  Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:23 -0600
                                                                                  Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 05:54 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:49 -0400
                                                                                Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 08:05 +0100
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:15 +0000
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:54 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:36 +0000
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:35 -0600
                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 11:17 -0400
                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 17:17 +0100
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Scatboi g8dgc <g8dgc@noneya.none> - 2018-10-01 12:38 -0400
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? g8dgc <g8dgc@noneya.none> - 2018-10-01 13:11 -0400
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 18:17 +0100
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:42 -0700
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:33 -0600
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:49 -0600
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:01 +0000
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:10 -0400
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:22 +0000
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:39 -0700
                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:17 -0700
                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:09 -0400
                                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:34 +0000
                                                                Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 06:25 -0700
                                                                  Re: Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:07 +0000
                                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 09:03 -0600
                                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:37 -0700
                                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:47 -0700
                                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 09:26 -0400
                                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:21 -0400
                                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:27 -0400
                                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:19 -0700
                                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:08 -0500
                                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-10-01 17:19 +0100
                                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:43 -0700
                                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:48 -0400
                                                                      Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
                                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:02 -0700
                                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0600
                                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 09:01 -0600
                                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:09 +0000
                                                          Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 09:00 -0600
                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:18 -0700
                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-29 19:41 -0400
                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:44 -0700
                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-09-29 19:55 -0400
                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:58 -0700
                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:21 +0000
                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0700
                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:48 -0700
                                  More children is always better ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 10:23 -0700
                            Re: We need to eat more. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 11:12 -0700
                              Re: We need to eat more. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 14:27 -0400
                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 09:09 -0600
                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:14 -0400
                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 21:18 +0000
                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:45 -0700
                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:18 -0700
                        The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 20:57 -0700
                          Re: The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 21:46 -0700
                            "IllGotten" gains. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 01:46 -0700
                              Re: "IllGotten" gains. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0400
                              Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0700
                                Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:41 -0700
                                  Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 17:02 -0700
                                    Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:11 -0700
                            Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 02:06 -0700
                              Re: Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:37 -0400
                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:14 -0700
                      The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 20:40 -0700
              Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 15:47 -0700
                Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-24 09:53 +0000
                  Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 11:36 -0400
                    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:54 -0600
                    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 17:03 -0700
                      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:05 -0700
                        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 17:09 -0700
                          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:11 -0700
                            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:29 -0700
                    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 21:08 -0700
                    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-28 10:07 +0000
                      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 10:33 -0500
                        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:41 -0400
                          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:02 -0600
                          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:23 -0700
                            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 23:43 -0500
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 21:06 -0500
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 19:07 -0700
          No one wants to pay. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-20 19:35 -0700
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:49 -0400
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 22:18 -0500
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 01:56 -0600
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-09-21 03:31 -0700
        Progressive, Marxist, Collectivist, Jim Jones. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-20 19:14 -0700
          Re: Progressive, Marxist, Collectivist, Jim Jones. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:33 -0400
            It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 06:40 -0700
              Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 11:10 -0400
                Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:44 -0400
                A good answer ?! Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 09:18 -0700
                  Re: A good answer ?! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:17 -0400
                Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:34 -0600
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:10 -0700
      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:36 -0400
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-22 01:31 -0400
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 03:18 -0400
      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:35 -0400
        The leaders fornicated the poor, in their death camps. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 07:07 -0700
          Re: The leaders fornicated the poor, in their death camps. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 03:46 +0000
            You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 21:31 -0700
              Re: You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 11:58 -0400
              Re: You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:55 +0000
                Re: You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:35 -0600
                Libtard's thievery. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 11:33 -0700
                  Re: Libtard's thievery. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 19:08 +0000
                    Libtard's thievery. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 12:28 -0700
                      Relf's poverty. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 05:23 +0000
                        The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 23:02 -0700
                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 02:38 -0400
                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:31 -0400
                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 08:40 -0600
                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-23 16:06 +0000
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 12:10 -0400
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 09:15 -0700
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-23 12:46 -0400
                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-23 10:44 -0700
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 09:15 -0700
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 18:32 +0100
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 10:37 -0700
                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 18:48 +0100
                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 19:05 +0100
                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 19:19 +0100
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 11:37 -0400
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:55 -0600
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-24 12:04 -0400
                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 13:29 -0700
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-23 16:47 -0400
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 22:43 -0500
                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 00:01 -0400
                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 09:49 -0500
                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 11:05 -0400
                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 11:24 -0400
                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:23 +0000
                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:25 -0600
                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 11:48 -0400
                                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:54 -0600
                                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 18:37 -0400
                                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 09:16 -0600
                                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-27 11:20 -0400
                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 10:50 -0600
                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 13:14 -0400
                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-27 14:38 -0400
                                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 14:46 -0400
                                                            Re: ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„  Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 13:53 -0500
                                                              Re: ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 12:10 -0700
                                                                Re: รฐยŸย”ยซรฐยŸย”ยซรฐยŸย”ยซรขยยฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER  SHOOTER ALERT! รขยยฐรฐยŸย”ยซรฐยŸย”ยซรฐยŸย”ยซ Sir Gerg teh Yech h Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht maes ter.fake>" รฐยŸย”ยซรฐยŸย”ยซรฐยŸย”ยซรขยยฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! รขยยฐรฐยŸย”ยซรฐยŸย”ยซรฐยŸย”ยซรขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowfla ke รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snow flake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ S nowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowfla ke รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snow flake รขยย„ The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowfla ke รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snow flake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ S nowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowfla ke รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snow flake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 17:23 -0500
                                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-27 15:23 -0400
                                                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 11:21 +0100
                                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 13:05 -0600
                                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-27 12:07 -0700
                                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 22:01 +0000
                                                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-27 15:05 -0700
                                                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 16:26 -0600
                                                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-27 18:31 -0400
                                                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 23:09 +0000
                                                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 19:52 -0600
                                                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-28 13:18 -0400
                                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 10:42 -0700
                                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-28 14:08 -0400
                                                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:56 -0600
                                                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-28 15:17 -0400
                                                                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:20 -0600
                                                                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 14:08 -0700
                                                                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:11 -0600
                                                                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 14:17 -0700
                                                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 14:45 -0700
                                                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 16:52 -0600
                                                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 20:55 -0700
                                                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 16:51 -0600
                                                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-29 08:09 +0000
                                                                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-28 19:45 -0400
                                                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 17:54 -0600
                                                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 17:54 -0600
                                                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-28 20:55 -0400
                                                                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 19:39 -0600
                                                                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-28 23:11 -0400
                                                                                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 21:16 -0600
                                                                                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 21:21 -0600
                                                                                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-29 00:17 -0400
                                                                                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-29 09:06 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 10:37 -0600
                                                                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-29 12:58 -0400
                                                                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 11:30 -0600
                                                                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-29 18:57 +0000
                                                                                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 13:20 -0600
                                                                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-29 12:13 -0700
                                                                                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-29 08:26 +0000
                                                                                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 10:37 -0600
                                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:56 -0600
                                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-28 15:11 -0400
                                                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 19:52 -0600
                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-26 08:51 -0700
                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:38 +0000
                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:54 -0600
                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:20 +0000
                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 20:55 +0000
                                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:02 -0700
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 21:33 +0000
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 17:53 -0400
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:37 -0600
                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:16 -0500
                          2006-2008 were tough years for me. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-23 00:20 -0700
                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 21:29 +0000
                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 17:55 -0400
                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:29 +0000
                              What's your (taxed) job, hypocrite ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-23 19:52 -0700
                                Re: What's your (taxed) job, hypocrite ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 15:14 +0000
                                  Re: What's your (taxed) job, hypocrite ? Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:32 -0500
                                    I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-24 09:01 -0700
                                      Re: I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:11 +0000
                                        Re: I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-09-24 16:18 -0400
                                          Re: I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 13:25 -0700
                                        The LessBad option. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-24 15:17 -0700
                                          Re: The LessBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 01:43 +0000
                                            Re: The LessBad option. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 20:48 -0500
                                            Re: The LessBad option. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:11 -0600
                                            "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 02:47 -0700
                                              Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 08:05 -0500
                                                I walk everywhere. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 07:16 -0700
                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:23 -0400
                                                    Greg can't fathom how sober I am, and have been. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 07:31 -0700
                                                      Re: Greg can't fathom how sober I am, and have been. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:49 -0400
                                                        I'm sensitive to light, like my mom; it's a Swiss thing. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 07:59 -0700
                                                          Re: I'm sensitive to light, like my mom; it's a Swiss thing. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:04 -0400
                                                          Re: Your theory is full of holes... Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:15 -0500
                                                          Re: I'm sensitive to light, like my mom; it's a Swiss thing. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:04 -0400
                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:41 +0000
                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:50 -0500
                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 12:13 -0600
                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 11:17 -0700
                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 21:50 +0000
                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:54 -0700
                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 13:37 -0500
                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 09:28 -0500
                                                    You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 07:41 -0700
                                                      Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:50 -0400
                                                        Hare Krishna, Hare Rama, Hare Jesus. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 08:02 -0700
                                                          Re: Hare Krishna, Hare Rama, Hare Jesus. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:08 -0400
                                                        Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-25 11:08 -0400
                                                        Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:43 +0000
                                                          Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:51 -0500
                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:35 +0000
                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:48 -0500
                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 12:50 -0400
                                                      Re: ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ I walk everywhere. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„  Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:52 -0500
                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 21:41 +0000
                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 17:48 -0400
                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 21:52 +0000
                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:54 -0700
                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:14 -0400
                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 19:01 -0400
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 00:51 +0000
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:52 -0700
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 03:18 +0000
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:51 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 06:58 -0700
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:19 -0700
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 09:33 -0500
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:45 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-26 08:56 -0700
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:59 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 12:24 -0400
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:45 -0600
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:46 -0700
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 11:52 -0500
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:32 -0700
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:48 +0000
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:01 -0700
                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 16:59 -0700
                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:00 -0700
                                                          The GasPump lines. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 17:06 -0700
                                                            Re: The GasPump lines. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 17:46 -0700
                                                            Re: The GasPump lines. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-25 22:53 -0400
                                                              Re: The GasPump lines. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-25 19:56 -0700
                                                                Re: The GasPump lines. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:16 -0400
                                                                  Re: The GasPump lines. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 10:59 -0400
                                                                    Re: The GasPump lines. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 11:12 -0400
                                                                    Re: The GasPump lines. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:23 -0600
                                                                      Re: The GasPump lines. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 11:44 -0400
                                                                        Re: The GasPump lines. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:44 -0600
                                                                          Re: The GasPump lines. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 17:52 -0400
                                                                            Re: The GasPump lines. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 16:25 -0600
                                                              Summer of 1979. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-26 02:45 -0700
                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 21:45 -0400
                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 19:35 -0700
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:47 -0400
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 06:52 -0700
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:19 -0700
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 12:06 -0700
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:10 +0000
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-09-26 17:38 -0400
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:39 -0700
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:26 -0700
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:27 -0700
                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:41 +0000
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:01 -0400
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:45 -0400
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:56 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 09:13 -0700
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:07 -0400
                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 12:22 -0700
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:26 -0400
                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:46 -0700
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 16:51 -0400
                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 21:10 +0000
                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:20 -0700
                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:22 -0400
                                                                              Kensi prefers science, and is biased. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 05:15 -0700
                                                                                Re: Kensi prefers science, and is biased. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 19:43 -0400
                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 09:11 +0100
                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 02:20 -0700
                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 14:04 +0100
                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 07:12 -0700
                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 17:25 +0100
                                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 12:36 -0400
                                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 17:52 +0100
                                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 11:08 -0700
                                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 19:45 +0100
                                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 14:53 -0400
                                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-27 19:19 +0000
                                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 12:38 -0700
                                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 23:46 +0100
                                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 15:53 -0700
                                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 11:21 +0100
                                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 03:50 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:06 +0100
                                                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 10:20 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 13:25 -0400
                                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 09:21 -0400
                                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:00 -0400
                                                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:13 -0400
                                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 11:11 -0700
                                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 19:13 -0700
                                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 11:21 +0100
                                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 03:48 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:23 +0100
                                                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 11:19 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 14:24 -0400
                                                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 20:21 +0100
                                                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 23:15 -0700
                                                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 10:20 +0100
                                                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 20:16 +0100
                                                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 12:31 -0700
                                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 09:20 -0400
                                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 06:52 -0700
                                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 10:05 -0400
                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 09:55 -0400
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:47 -0600
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 12:32 -0400
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:10 -0400
                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensinqton01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:23 -0400
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:53 -0400
                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:23 -0700
                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 16:37 -0400
                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 20:58 +0000
                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:05 -0400
                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:07 -0700
                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 21:15 +0000
                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda - 2018-09-26 14:21 -0700
                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:27 -0400
                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:51 -0600
                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:49 -0600
                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:30 -0700
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 09:21 -0500
                                                                      Re: ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ I walk everywhere. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„  Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 15:21 -0500
                                                                        Re: ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ I walk everywhere. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 14:31 -0700
                                                                          Re: ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ I walk everywhere. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:33 -0700
                                                                          Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:41 -0400
                                                                            Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:42 -0700
                                                                        Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  ????? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? I walk everywhere. ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:52 -0600
                                                                          Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  ????? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? I walk everywhere. ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 22:46 -0500
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:48 -0600
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 09:14 -0700
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 16:26 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 21:00 +0000
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:04 -0700
                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:50 -0700
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 12:05 -0700
                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 22:19 -0700
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:25 -0700
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:44 -0600
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-27 02:02 +0000
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:27 -0700
                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 12:13 -0600
                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:54 -0400
                                              Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 20:38 +0000
                                                "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 13:51 -0700
                                                  Re: "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:53 -0700
                                                  Re: "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:12 -0400
                                                Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 17:23 -0400
                                                  Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:28 -0700
                                                  Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:17 -0400
                                                    Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:06 -0500
                                                      Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:48 -0400
                                                Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. John of Patmos <jpatmos1318@gmXil.com> - 2018-09-29 21:51 +0000
                                                  Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:14 -0700
                                                    Steve Petruzzellis  (was: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.) snit <usnet@iminsane.net> - 2018-09-29 19:16 -0400
                                                      Re: Steve Petruzzellis  (was: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.) Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 19:01 -0600
                                                      Re: Steve Petruzzellis  (was: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:26 +0000
                                                        Re: Steve Petruzzellis snit <usnet@iminsane.net> - 2018-09-29 21:49 -0400
                                                          Re: Steve Petruzzellis Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:56 +0000
                                                            Re: Steve Petruzzellis Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:19 -0700
                                                              Re: Steve Petruzzellis Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:29 +0000
                                                                Re: Steve Petruzzellis "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 09:04 -0400
                                                            Re: Steve Petruzzellis benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:04 -0400
                                                        Re: Steve Petruzzellis Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:20 -0700
                                                          Re: Steve Petruzzellis Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:29 +0000
                                                            Re: Steve Petruzzellis Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:44 -0700
                                                  Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:23 +0000
                                                    Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 22:00 -0400
                                                      Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:30 +0000
                                                        Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 10:33 +0100
                                                    Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-30 03:24 +0000
                                                      Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:37 +0000
                                                        Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:43 -0700
                                                          Willful ignorance. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 05:34 -0700
                                                        Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-30 21:42 +0000
                                                          Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:47 -0700
                                                          Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 14:56 -0700
                                                          Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:21 +0000
                                                            Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:35 -0700
                                                              Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:44 +0000
                                                                Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:07 -0700
                                                                Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:44 -0600
                                                              Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 10:10 -0500
                                                        Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 08:16 +0100
                                                          Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:57 -0700
                                                            Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
                                                              Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 02:56 -0700
                                                          Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:03 -0700
                                                            Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 18:14 +0100
                                                              Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:25 -0400
                                                                Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 18:37 +0100
                                                                  Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:43 -0400
                                                                    Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:11 +0100
                                                                      Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 12:26 -0700
                                                                Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:50 -0700
                                                                  Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:54 -0400
                                                                    Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:13 +0100
                                                                      Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:20 -0400
                                                                    Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:35 -0700
                                                            Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:14 -0400
                                                            Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ "God" has punished Nadegda for this. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 12:14 -0500
                                                              Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 11:25 -0600
                                                                Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:35 -0400
                        Re: Relf's poverty. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 02:34 -0400
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-22 01:33 -0400
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 08:07 -0400
            Kensi shuns science. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 05:51 -0700
              Relf shuns science. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:57 +0000
                Re: Relf shuns science. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:37 -0600
                  Re: Relf shuns science. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 20:04 +0100
                    Re: Relf shuns science. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 13:47 -0600
                  Re: Relf shuns science. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 19:09 +0000
                    Re: Relf shuns science. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 20:17 +0100
                      Re: Relf shuns science. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 05:25 +0000
                        Re: Relf shuns science. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 10:08 +0100
                          Re: Relf shuns science. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 21:35 +0000
                            Re: Relf shuns science. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 23:26 +0100
                              Re: Relf shuns science. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:40 +0000
                                Re: Relf shuns science. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 23:53 +0100
                                  Re: Relf shuns science. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 16:01 -0700
                                  Re: Relf shuns science. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 09:16 -0500
                                Re: Relf shuns science. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:15 -0600
                                Re: Relf shuns science. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 11:47 -0400
                                  Re: Relf shuns science. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:52 -0500
                                  Re: Relf shuns science. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:16 -0600
                            Re: Relf shuns science. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 00:20 +0100
                              Re: Relf shuns science. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 11:49 -0400
                                Re: Relf shuns science. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:16 -0600
                                  Re: Relf shuns science. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 19:32 +0100
                                    Re: Relf shuns science. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:15 +0000
                                      Re: Relf shuns science. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 23:10 +0100
                                        Re: Relf shuns science. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 01:44 +0000
                                          Re: Relf shuns science. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:11 -0600
                                            Re: Relf shuns science. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 12:26 -0600
                                          Re: Relf shuns science. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 07:43 -0400
                                            Re: Relf shuns science. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 11:24 -0400
                                              Re: Relf shuns science. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 09:32 -0600
                                                Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Relf shuns science. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:51 -0500
                                                  Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Relf shuns science. ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 12:12 -0600
                                                    Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Relf shuns science. ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 13:14 -0500
                                                      Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflak Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 12:27 -0600
                                                    Re: ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„  Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 13:43 -0500
                                              Re: Relf shuns science. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 12:28 -0500
                                              Re: Relf shuns science. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:12 -0400
                    Re: Relf shuns science. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 13:47 -0600
                Looking in the mirror. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 11:43 -0700
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:15 -0600
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-22 10:47 -0400
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-22 10:20 -0700
              Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-22 21:59 -0400
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-21 15:15 +0000
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 12:54 +0000
      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:34 -0400
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 08:40 -0600
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:53 -0400
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 09:09 -0600
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 18:00 +0000
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class invalid@invalid.invalid (ร) - 2018-09-23 19:11 +0100
            All you need is hate... hate, hate, hate. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-23 11:43 -0700
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 21:38 +0000
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:16 -0600
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 19:41 -0400
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-30 03:18 +0000
      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Catalina" <Catalina@beach.sun> - 2018-09-30 02:44 -0400
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-10-01 11:27 +0000
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 10:17 -0400
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-01 13:34 -0400

Page 5 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 50  Next page →


#208745 — Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOC

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-27 12:18 -0600
SubjectRe: ???? POTENTIAL CLOC
Message-ID<MPG.3616ccde8d3b1713989bfd@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#208732
In article <1eadnTpR1eELizDGnZ2dnUU7-VHNnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
127.0.0.1 says...
> 
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 12:48:29 -0400, LO AND BEHOLD; "Sir Gerg teh Yechh
> Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>""
> determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently 
> decided to freely share it with us in
> <5c2qqd9j85dhnj16v7ua2gfo4s7qm9tn9l@4ax.com>:
>  
> >On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 10:43:46 -0600, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
> >wrote:
> >>In article
> >><26tpqd54f7jtpfi2kr2il03bnis1qivdnt@4ax.com>,greghall@yacht_maester.fak
> >>e says...
> >>>On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 09:13:59 -0600, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
> >>>wrote: 
> >>>>I saw that, was wondering if maybe the รฐลธยยถ woke up and decided to use a
> >>>>new reader, you know? a real one?
> >>>Your client.  User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4 My irony meter just 
> >>>reduced itself to hot shrapnel.
> >>My puter crashed, if you wanted to be kind enough to send me agent again
> >>I will be in your debt.
> >
> >If you were too stoned to save it on a thumb drive or otherwise back it 
> >up then you are just SOL.  
> 
> yabut... he's looking for a new reader... you know... a real one.

I didn't think you would get so upset that you have to post hump.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208758 — Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOC

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-09-27 18:53 +0000
SubjectRe: ???? POTENTIAL CLOC
Message-ID<poj8vg$mhp$63@dont-email.me>
In reply to#208745
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 12:18:26 -0600, Skeeter wrote:

> I didn't think you would get so upset that you have to post hump<FOOM!>

Gah, this thread is *murder* on irony meters...

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208763 — Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOC

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-27 13:04 -0600
SubjectRe: ???? POTENTIAL CLOC
Message-ID<MPG.3616d7b71aa01b20989c0c@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#208758
In article <poj8vg$mhp$63@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
says...
> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 12:18:26 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> 
> > I didn't think you would get so upset that you have to post hump<FOOM!>
> 
> Gah, this thread is *murder* on irony meters...

she says as she post humps.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208715 — Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.

From"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>
Date2018-09-27 12:50 -0400
SubjectRe: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.
Message-ID<ff2qqdl7c2fev22ur54r6g4klkbh2vi0ag@4ax.com>
In reply to#208708
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 10:43:46 -0600, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>In article <26tpqd54f7jtpfi2kr2il03bnis1qivdnt@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 09:13:59 -0600, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>> >I saw that, was wondering if maybe the puppy woke up and decided to use 
>> >a new reader, you know? a real one?
>> 
>> Your client.  User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4
>> 
>> My irony meter just reduced itself to hot shrapnel.
>
>My puter crashed, if you wanted to be kind enough to send me agent again 
>I will be in your debt.

Here's a clue. Gmail saves things forever. Unless you were
stupid enough to delete it, it will still be saved way back in
your Gmail account. Go fetch! 

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

If a woman stumbles upon a fact that is opposed to her intuition 
she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is 
overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, 
she has feelings that give her a reason to act in accordance with 
her intuition, she will embrace them as the Gospel. -- Capt. Neal ยฎ

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208720 — Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-27 11:08 -0600
SubjectRe: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.
Message-ID<MPG.3616bc84b9e75bc1989bf9@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#208715
In article <ff2qqdl7c2fev22ur54r6g4klkbh2vi0ag@4ax.com>, 
greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
> 
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 10:43:46 -0600, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >In article <26tpqd54f7jtpfi2kr2il03bnis1qivdnt@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
> >> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 09:13:59 -0600, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >I saw that, was wondering if maybe the puppy woke up and decided to use 
> >> >a new reader, you know? a real one?
> >> 
> >> Your client.  User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4
> >> 
> >> My irony meter just reduced itself to hot shrapnel.
> >
> >My puter crashed, if you wanted to be kind enough to send me agent again 
> >I will be in your debt.
> 
> Here's a clue. Gmail saves things forever. Unless you were
> stupid enough to delete it, it will still be saved way back in
> your Gmail account. Go fetch! 

I keep my email clean, so it's prolly gone.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208686 — Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„

FromYour Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2018-09-27 10:34 -0500
SubjectRe: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„
Message-ID<4OidnXi-2ajtZTHGnZ2dnUU7-L3NnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#208662
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 09:13:59 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter Fake
News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter
<skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of great
importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
<MPG.3616a1a33c210f63989bd9@reader.albasani.net>:
 
>In article <g137fnF813rU2@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org
>says...
>>On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 13:52:01 -0500, Your Friendly Neighbourhood ๐Ÿถ
>>Whistle Holder Emeritus ?? wrote: 
>>>On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 17:55:14 GMT, LO AND BEHOLD; "SilverSlimer
>>><silver@slim.er>" determined that the following was of great importance
>>>and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
>>><6KPqD.180431$4S3.125562@fx47.iad>: 
>>>>On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 09:20:01 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: 
>>>>>SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>>>On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 06:58:30 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>>>>SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>>>>>Obviously, if you search for Alex Jones, it might actually find him but 
>>>>>>>>look for articles on Hillary Clinton and you'll notice that anything
>>>>>>>>from Infowars is entirely omitted.
>>>>>>>Why offer low-quality links on the very first page?
>>>>>>Considering how often the mainstream media lies, I'm not sure why anyone
>>>>>>would consider them to be of high quality. Compared to things like The 
>>>>>>New York Times and The Washington Post, Infowars is pretty damned
>>>>>>accurate.
>>>>>Like when they peddled that "Hillary child porn ring" thing? Sorry, k00k
>>>>>sites don't make for quality results.
>>>>I, for one, completely believe that there is indeed a child pornography 
>>>>ring politicians are taking advantage of. You might want to start with
>>>>this and start asking yourself _why_ Bill Clinton would go on those
>>>>trips. Hillary participated as well and apparently enjoyed being eaten 
>>>>out by children.
>>>><http://gawker.com/flight-logs-put-clinton-dershowitz-on-
>>>>pedophile-billio-1681039971> Apparently, Barack Obama doesn't do the
>>>>stuff with children but loves to be around men... a little too much.
>>>><https://www.wnd.com/2012/09/claim-
>>>>obama-hid-gay-life-to-become-president/> -
>>>><https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=z4pwiGuG5r4>
>>>so all it takes is a post on a gossip site and a youtube video to
>>>convince you of anything? how's that working out for you?  are you
>>>getting better at denying the apollo moon landing every day as we get
>>>more "information" about that particular nutter conspiracy theory?
>>OH SHIT OH SHIT THE CLOUD PEOPLE GOT PUPPY WHISTLE THERE'S NO SNOWFLAKE 
>>IN HIS SUBJECT LINE NO SNOWFLAKE! NO SNOWFLAKE!  WAKE UP, SHEEPLE,
>>THEY'RE COMING FOR YOU NEXT!!1!@!
>
>I saw that, was wondering if maybe the ๐Ÿถ woke up and decided to use a
>new reader, you know? a real one?

you'd still whine even if i used a 2 decade old POS reader like you do.

-- 
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA

"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this 
seems to be the new norm in the world.  It's spreading like a cancer, 
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil.  We need to put an 
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell 
everywhere.  We need to get these people out of every civilized 
country, and there's only one way to do it.  IOW, we have to become 
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) 

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working.  We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too.  One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode 

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208709 — Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snow

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-27 10:44 -0600
SubjectRe: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snow
Message-ID<MPG.3616b6ee21f1f546989be6@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#208686
In article <4OidnXi-2ajtZTHGnZ2dnUU7-L3NnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
127.0.0.1 says...
> 
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 09:13:59 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter Fake
> News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter
> <skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of great
> importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
> <MPG.3616a1a33c210f63989bd9@reader.albasani.net>:
>  
> >In article <g137fnF813rU2@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org
> >says...
> >>On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 13:52:01 -0500, Your Friendly Neighbourhood รฐลธยยถ
> >>Whistle Holder Emeritus ?? wrote: 
> >>>On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 17:55:14 GMT, LO AND BEHOLD; "SilverSlimer
> >>><silver@slim.er>" determined that the following was of great importance
> >>>and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
> >>><6KPqD.180431$4S3.125562@fx47.iad>: 
> >>>>On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 09:20:01 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: 
> >>>>>SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> >>>>>>On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 06:58:30 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> >>>>>>>SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> >>>>>>>>Obviously, if you search for Alex Jones, it might actually find him but 
> >>>>>>>>look for articles on Hillary Clinton and you'll notice that anything
> >>>>>>>>from Infowars is entirely omitted.
> >>>>>>>Why offer low-quality links on the very first page?
> >>>>>>Considering how often the mainstream media lies, I'm not sure why anyone
> >>>>>>would consider them to be of high quality. Compared to things like The 
> >>>>>>New York Times and The Washington Post, Infowars is pretty damned
> >>>>>>accurate.
> >>>>>Like when they peddled that "Hillary child porn ring" thing? Sorry, k00k
> >>>>>sites don't make for quality results.
> >>>>I, for one, completely believe that there is indeed a child pornography 
> >>>>ring politicians are taking advantage of. You might want to start with
> >>>>this and start asking yourself _why_ Bill Clinton would go on those
> >>>>trips. Hillary participated as well and apparently enjoyed being eaten 
> >>>>out by children.
> >>>><http://gawker.com/flight-logs-put-clinton-dershowitz-on-
> >>>>pedophile-billio-1681039971> Apparently, Barack Obama doesn't do the
> >>>>stuff with children but loves to be around men... a little too much.
> >>>><https://www.wnd.com/2012/09/claim-
> >>>>obama-hid-gay-life-to-become-president/> -
> >>>><https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=z4pwiGuG5r4>
> >>>so all it takes is a post on a gossip site and a youtube video to
> >>>convince you of anything? how's that working out for you?  are you
> >>>getting better at denying the apollo moon landing every day as we get
> >>>more "information" about that particular nutter conspiracy theory?
> >>OH SHIT OH SHIT THE CLOUD PEOPLE GOT PUPPY WHISTLE THERE'S NO SNOWFLAKE 
> >>IN HIS SUBJECT LINE NO SNOWFLAKE! NO SNOWFLAKE!  WAKE UP, SHEEPLE,
> >>THEY'RE COMING FOR YOU NEXT!!1!@!
> >
> >I saw that, was wondering if maybe the รฐลธยยถ woke up and decided to use a
> >new reader, you know? a real one?
> 
> you'd still whine even if i used a 2 decade old POS reader like you do.

What does age have to do with it?

usenet is usenet

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208730 — Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snow โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„

FromYour Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2018-09-27 12:37 -0500
SubjectRe: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snow โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„
Message-ID<aZOdneLwyo30iDDGnZ2dnUU7-cXNnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#208709
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 10:44:47 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter Fake
News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter
<skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of great
importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
<MPG.3616b6ee21f1f546989be6@reader.albasani.net>:
 
>In article <4OidnXi-2ajtZTHGnZ2dnUU7-L3NnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
>127.0.0.1 says...
>>On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 09:13:59 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter Fake
>>News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter
>><skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of great
>>importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
>><MPG.3616a1a33c210f63989bd9@reader.albasani.net>: 
>>>In article <g137fnF813rU2@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org
>>>says...
>>>>On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 13:52:01 -0500, Your Friendly Neighbourhood ๐Ÿถ
>>>>Whistle Holder Emeritus ?? wrote: 
>>>>>On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 17:55:14 GMT, LO AND BEHOLD; "SilverSlimer
>>>>><silver@slim.er>" determined that the following was of great importance
>>>>>and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
>>>>><6KPqD.180431$4S3.125562@fx47.iad>: 
>>>>>>On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 09:20:01 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: 
>>>>>>>SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>>>>>On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 06:58:30 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>>>>>>SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>>>>>>>Obviously, if you search for Alex Jones, it might actually find him but 
>>>>>>>>>>look for articles on Hillary Clinton and you'll notice that anything
>>>>>>>>>>from Infowars is entirely omitted.
>>>>>>>>>Why offer low-quality links on the very first page?
>>>>>>>>Considering how often the mainstream media lies, I'm not sure why anyone
>>>>>>>>would consider them to be of high quality. Compared to things like The 
>>>>>>>>New York Times and The Washington Post, Infowars is pretty damned
>>>>>>>>accurate.
>>>>>>>Like when they peddled that "Hillary child porn ring" thing? Sorry, k00k
>>>>>>>sites don't make for quality results.
>>>>>>I, for one, completely believe that there is indeed a child pornography 
>>>>>>ring politicians are taking advantage of. You might want to start with
>>>>>>this and start asking yourself _why_ Bill Clinton would go on those
>>>>>>trips. Hillary participated as well and apparently enjoyed being eaten 
>>>>>>out by children.
>>>>>><http://gawker.com/flight-logs-put-clinton-dershowitz-on-
>>>>>>pedophile-billio-1681039971> Apparently, Barack Obama doesn't do the
>>>>>>stuff with children but loves to be around men... a little too much.
>>>>>><https://www.wnd.com/2012/09/claim-
>>>>>>obama-hid-gay-life-to-become-president/> -
>>>>>><https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=z4pwiGuG5r4>
>>>>>so all it takes is a post on a gossip site and a youtube video to
>>>>>convince you of anything? how's that working out for you?  are you
>>>>>getting better at denying the apollo moon landing every day as we get
>>>>>more "information" about that particular nutter conspiracy theory?
>>>>OH SHIT OH SHIT THE CLOUD PEOPLE GOT PUPPY WHISTLE THERE'S NO SNOWFLAKE 
>>>>IN HIS SUBJECT LINE NO SNOWFLAKE! NO SNOWFLAKE!  WAKE UP, SHEEPLE,
>>>>THEY'RE COMING FOR YOU NEXT!!1!@!
>>>I saw that, was wondering if maybe the ๐Ÿถ woke up and decided to use a
>>>new reader, you know? a real one?
>>you'd still whine even if i used a 2 decade old POS reader like you do.
>
>What does age have to do with it?

so are you running Windows 95?

if no, then why did you upgrade?

>usenet is usenet

and i guess "windows is windows"?

do you have a hat full of logical fallacies that you're pulling this crap out of?

-- 
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA

"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this 
seems to be the new norm in the world.  It's spreading like a cancer, 
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil.  We need to put an 
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell 
everywhere.  We need to get these people out of every civilized 
country, and there's only one way to do it.  IOW, we have to become 
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) 

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working.  We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too.  One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode 

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208744 — Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-27 12:17 -0600
SubjectRe: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake
Message-ID<MPG.3616ccb7afad8bd5989bfc@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#208730
In article <aZOdneLwyo30iDDGnZ2dnUU7-cXNnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
127.0.0.1 says...
> 
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 10:44:47 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter Fake
> News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter
> <skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of great
> importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
> <MPG.3616b6ee21f1f546989be6@reader.albasani.net>:
>  
> >In article <4OidnXi-2ajtZTHGnZ2dnUU7-L3NnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
> >127.0.0.1 says...
> >>On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 09:13:59 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter Fake
> >>News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter
> >><skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of great
> >>importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
> >><MPG.3616a1a33c210f63989bd9@reader.albasani.net>: 
> >>>In article <g137fnF813rU2@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org
> >>>says...
> >>>>On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 13:52:01 -0500, Your Friendly Neighbourhood รฐลธยยถ
> >>>>Whistle Holder Emeritus ?? wrote: 
> >>>>>On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 17:55:14 GMT, LO AND BEHOLD; "SilverSlimer
> >>>>><silver@slim.er>" determined that the following was of great importance
> >>>>>and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
> >>>>><6KPqD.180431$4S3.125562@fx47.iad>: 
> >>>>>>On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 09:20:01 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: 
> >>>>>>>SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> >>>>>>>>On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 06:58:30 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> >>>>>>>>>>Obviously, if you search for Alex Jones, it might actually find him but 
> >>>>>>>>>>look for articles on Hillary Clinton and you'll notice that anything
> >>>>>>>>>>from Infowars is entirely omitted.
> >>>>>>>>>Why offer low-quality links on the very first page?
> >>>>>>>>Considering how often the mainstream media lies, I'm not sure why anyone
> >>>>>>>>would consider them to be of high quality. Compared to things like The 
> >>>>>>>>New York Times and The Washington Post, Infowars is pretty damned
> >>>>>>>>accurate.
> >>>>>>>Like when they peddled that "Hillary child porn ring" thing? Sorry, k00k
> >>>>>>>sites don't make for quality results.
> >>>>>>I, for one, completely believe that there is indeed a child pornography 
> >>>>>>ring politicians are taking advantage of. You might want to start with
> >>>>>>this and start asking yourself _why_ Bill Clinton would go on those
> >>>>>>trips. Hillary participated as well and apparently enjoyed being eaten 
> >>>>>>out by children.
> >>>>>><http://gawker.com/flight-logs-put-clinton-dershowitz-on-
> >>>>>>pedophile-billio-1681039971> Apparently, Barack Obama doesn't do the
> >>>>>>stuff with children but loves to be around men... a little too much.
> >>>>>><https://www.wnd.com/2012/09/claim-
> >>>>>>obama-hid-gay-life-to-become-president/> -
> >>>>>><https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=z4pwiGuG5r4>
> >>>>>so all it takes is a post on a gossip site and a youtube video to
> >>>>>convince you of anything? how's that working out for you?  are you
> >>>>>getting better at denying the apollo moon landing every day as we get
> >>>>>more "information" about that particular nutter conspiracy theory?
> >>>>OH SHIT OH SHIT THE CLOUD PEOPLE GOT PUPPY WHISTLE THERE'S NO SNOWFLAKE 
> >>>>IN HIS SUBJECT LINE NO SNOWFLAKE! NO SNOWFLAKE!  WAKE UP, SHEEPLE,
> >>>>THEY'RE COMING FOR YOU NEXT!!1!@!
> >>>I saw that, was wondering if maybe the รฐลธยยถ woke up and decided to use a
> >>>new reader, you know? a real one?
> >>you'd still whine even if i used a 2 decade old POS reader like you do.
> >
> >What does age have to do with it?
> 
> so are you running Windows 95?
> 
> if no, then why did you upgrade?

Usenet is usenet you moron, it hasn't changed.
> 
> >usenet is usenet
> 
> and i guess "windows is windows"?

Lib logic, you said that, not me.
> 
> do you have a hat full of logical fallacies that you're pulling this crap out of?


Must be using yours, usenet has not changed, no need to update.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208607 — Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-26 22:06 -0700
SubjectRe: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.
Message-ID<MPG.3616052f55d6a4df994c6c@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#208433
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <6KPqD.180431$4S3.125562@fx47.iad>, silver@slim.er 
says...


> 
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 09:20:01 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> 
> > SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> > 
> >> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 06:58:30 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> >>
> >>> SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> >>> 
> >>>> Obviously, if you search for Alex Jones, it might actually find him
> >>>> but look for articles on Hillary Clinton and you'll notice that
> >>>> anything from Infowars is entirely omitted.
> >>> 
> >>> Why offer low-quality links on the very first page?
> >>
> >> Considering how often the mainstream media lies, I'm not sure why
> >> anyone would consider them to be of high quality.
> >>
> >> Compared to things like The New York Times and The Washington Post,
> >> Infowars is pretty damned accurate.
> > 
> > Like when they peddled that "Hillary child porn ring" thing?
> > 
> > Sorry, k00k sites don't make for quality results.
> 
> I, for one, completely believe that there is indeed a child pornography 
> ring politicians are taking advantage of. You might want to start with 
> this and start asking yourself _why_ Bill Clinton would go on those 
> trips. Hillary participated as well and apparently enjoyed being eaten 
> out by children. <http://gawker.com/flight-logs-put-clinton-dershowitz-on-
> pedophile-billio-1681039971>
> 
> Apparently, Barack Obama doesn't do the stuff with children but loves to 
> be around men... a little too much. <https://www.wnd.com/2012/09/claim-
> obama-hid-gay-life-to-become-president/> - <https://www.youtube.com/watch?
> v=z4pwiGuG5r4>

His wife has shoulders like a linebacker.

-- 
Checkmate ยฎ 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright ยฉ 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208649 — Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.

From"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>
Date2018-09-27 10:08 -0400
SubjectRe: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.
Message-ID<dvopqdd4r7v0d5vhljan3jn3d4k32caem1@4ax.com>
In reply to#208607
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 22:06:26 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
>In article <6KPqD.180431$4S3.125562@fx47.iad>, silver@slim.er says...
>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2018, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> > SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>> >> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 06:58:30 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> >>> SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>> >>> 
>> >>>> Obviously, if you search for Alex Jones, it might actually find him
>> >>>> but look for articles on Hillary Clinton and you'll notice that
>> >>>> anything from Infowars is entirely omitted.
>> >>> 
>> >>> Why offer low-quality links on the very first page?
>> >>
>> >> Considering how often the mainstream media lies, I'm not sure why
>> >> anyone would consider them to be of high quality.
>> >>
>> >> Compared to things like The New York Times and The Washington Post,
>> >> Infowars is pretty damned accurate.
>> > 
>> > Like when they peddled that "Hillary child porn ring" thing?
>> > 
>> > Sorry, k00k sites don't make for quality results.
>> 
>> I, for one, completely believe that there is indeed a child pornography 
>> ring politicians are taking advantage of. You might want to start with 
>> this and start asking yourself _why_ Bill Clinton would go on those 
>> trips. Hillary participated as well and apparently enjoyed being eaten 
>> out by children. <http://gawker.com/flight-logs-put-clinton-dershowitz-on-
>> pedophile-billio-1681039971>
>> 
>> Apparently, Barack Obama doesn't do the stuff with children but loves to 
>> be around men... a little too much. <https://www.wnd.com/2012/09/claim-
>> obama-hid-gay-life-to-become-president/> - <https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>> v=z4pwiGuG5r4>
>
>His wife has shoulders like a linebacker.

And and a fat ass like Hillary Clinton.

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

If a woman stumbles upon a fact that is opposed to her intuition 
she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is 
overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, 
she has feelings that give her a reason to act in accordance with 
her intuition, she will embrace them as the Gospel. -- Capt. Neal ยฎ

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208683 — Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-09-27 10:31 -0500
SubjectRe: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.
Message-ID<poit65$1qc2$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#208607
On 9/27/2018 12:06 AM, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
> Checkmate!  In article <6KPqD.180431$4S3.125562@fx47.iad>, silver@slim.er 
> says...
> 
> 
>>
>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 09:20:01 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 06:58:30 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Obviously, if you search for Alex Jones, it might actually find him
>>>>>> but look for articles on Hillary Clinton and you'll notice that
>>>>>> anything from Infowars is entirely omitted.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why offer low-quality links on the very first page?
>>>>
>>>> Considering how often the mainstream media lies, I'm not sure why
>>>> anyone would consider them to be of high quality.
>>>>
>>>> Compared to things like The New York Times and The Washington Post,
>>>> Infowars is pretty damned accurate.
>>>
>>> Like when they peddled that "Hillary child porn ring" thing?
>>>
>>> Sorry, k00k sites don't make for quality results.
>>
>> I, for one, completely believe that there is indeed a child pornography 
>> ring politicians are taking advantage of. You might want to start with 
>> this and start asking yourself _why_ Bill Clinton would go on those 
>> trips. Hillary participated as well and apparently enjoyed being eaten 
>> out by children. <http://gawker.com/flight-logs-put-clinton-dershowitz-on-
>> pedophile-billio-1681039971>
>>
>> Apparently, Barack Obama doesn't do the stuff with children but loves to 
>> be around men... a little too much. <https://www.wnd.com/2012/09/claim-
>> obama-hid-gay-life-to-become-president/> - <https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>> v=z4pwiGuG5r4>
> 
> His wife has shoulders like a linebacker.
> 

having lunch here;

https://f9.pmo.ee/hsj59gwjNyzQbpeE2r-9_7zh7uE=/685x410/smart/nginx/o/2011/03/17/540078t1hfe29.jpg

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208689 — Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.

FromSilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>
Date2018-09-27 15:46 +0000
SubjectRe: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.
Message-ID<YW6rD.65532$9O2.41149@fx03.iad>
In reply to#208607
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 22:06:26 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <6KPqD.180431$4S3.125562@fx47.iad>,
> silver@slim.er says...
> 
> 
> 
>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 09:20:01 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> 
>> > SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>> > 
>> >> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 06:58:30 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>> >>> 
>> >>>> Obviously, if you search for Alex Jones, it might actually find
>> >>>> him but look for articles on Hillary Clinton and you'll notice
>> >>>> that anything from Infowars is entirely omitted.
>> >>> 
>> >>> Why offer low-quality links on the very first page?
>> >>
>> >> Considering how often the mainstream media lies, I'm not sure why
>> >> anyone would consider them to be of high quality.
>> >>
>> >> Compared to things like The New York Times and The Washington Post,
>> >> Infowars is pretty damned accurate.
>> > 
>> > Like when they peddled that "Hillary child porn ring" thing?
>> > 
>> > Sorry, k00k sites don't make for quality results.
>> 
>> I, for one, completely believe that there is indeed a child pornography
>> ring politicians are taking advantage of. You might want to start with
>> this and start asking yourself _why_ Bill Clinton would go on those
>> trips. Hillary participated as well and apparently enjoyed being eaten
>> out by children.
>> <http://gawker.com/flight-logs-put-clinton-dershowitz-on-
>> pedophile-billio-1681039971>
>> 
>> Apparently, Barack Obama doesn't do the stuff with children but loves
>> to be around men... a little too much.
>> <https://www.wnd.com/2012/09/claim-
>> obama-hid-gay-life-to-become-president/> -
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>> v=z4pwiGuG5r4>
> 
> His wife has shoulders like a linebacker.

I'm fairly convinced that Michelle is as much a female as Rupaul is.

-- 
SilverSlimer
FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate
Absolute centrist, proud Catholic

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208691 — Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.

FromYour Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2018-09-27 10:48 -0500
SubjectRe: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.
Message-ID<Euydnex8VI1OZjHGnZ2dnUU7-VXNnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#208689
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:46:00 GMT, LO AND BEHOLD; "SilverSlimer
<silver@slim.er>" determined that the following was of great importance
and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
<YW6rD.65532$9O2.41149@fx03.iad>:
 
>On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 22:06:26 -0700, ๐Ÿ’ฉ wrote:
>
>>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
>>๐Ÿ’ฉ!  In article <6KPqD.180431$4S3.125562@fx47.iad>, silver@slim.er
>>says... 
>>>On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 09:20:01 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: 
>>>>SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: 
>>>>>On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 06:58:30 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: 
>>>>>>SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: 
>>>>>>>Obviously, if you search for Alex Jones, it might actually find him but 
>>>>>>>look for articles on Hillary Clinton and you'll notice that anything
>>>>>>>from Infowars is entirely omitted.
>>>>>>Why offer low-quality links on the very first page?
>>>>>Considering how often the mainstream media lies, I'm not sure why anyone
>>>>>would consider them to be of high quality. Compared to things like The 
>>>>>New York Times and The Washington Post, Infowars is pretty damned
>>>>>accurate.
>>>>Like when they peddled that "Hillary child porn ring" thing? Sorry, k00k
>>>>sites don't make for quality results.
>>>I, for one, completely believe that there is indeed a child pornography 
>>>ring politicians are taking advantage of. You might want to start with
>>>this and start asking yourself _why_ Bill Clinton would go on those
>>>trips. Hillary participated as well and apparently enjoyed being eaten 
>>>out by children.
>>><http://gawker.com/flight-logs-put-clinton-dershowitz-on-
>>>pedophile-billio-1681039971> Apparently, Barack Obama doesn't do the
>>>stuff with children but loves to be around men... a little too much.
>>><https://www.wnd.com/2012/09/claim-
>>>obama-hid-gay-life-to-become-president/> -
>>><https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=z4pwiGuG5r4>
>>His wife has shoulders like a linebacker.
>
>I'm fairly convinced that Michelle is as much a female as Rupaul is. 

so do you think about trannies all of the time like alex jones, then?

-- 
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA

"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this 
seems to be the new norm in the world.  It's spreading like a cancer, 
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil.  We need to put an 
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell 
everywhere.  We need to get these people out of every civilized 
country, and there's only one way to do it.  IOW, we have to become 
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) 

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working.  We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too.  One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode 

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208729 — Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-09-27 12:37 -0500
SubjectRe: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.
Message-ID<poj4h8$8gn$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#208691
On 9/27/2018 10:48 AM, Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder
Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:46:00 GMT, LO AND BEHOLD; "SilverSlimer
> <silver@slim.er>" determined that the following was of great importance
> and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
> <YW6rD.65532$9O2.41149@fx03.iad>:
>  
>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 22:06:26 -0700, ๐Ÿ’ฉ wrote:
>>
>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
>>> ๐Ÿ’ฉ!  In article <6KPqD.180431$4S3.125562@fx47.iad>, silver@slim.er
>>> says... 
>>>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 09:20:01 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: 
>>>>> SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: 
>>>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 06:58:30 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: 
>>>>>>> SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: 
>>>>>>>> Obviously, if you search for Alex Jones, it might actually find him but 
>>>>>>>> look for articles on Hillary Clinton and you'll notice that anything
>>>>>>> >from Infowars is entirely omitted.
>>>>>>> Why offer low-quality links on the very first page?
>>>>>> Considering how often the mainstream media lies, I'm not sure why anyone
>>>>>> would consider them to be of high quality. Compared to things like The 
>>>>>> New York Times and The Washington Post, Infowars is pretty damned
>>>>>> accurate.
>>>>> Like when they peddled that "Hillary child porn ring" thing? Sorry, k00k
>>>>> sites don't make for quality results.
>>>> I, for one, completely believe that there is indeed a child pornography 
>>>> ring politicians are taking advantage of. You might want to start with
>>>> this and start asking yourself _why_ Bill Clinton would go on those
>>>> trips. Hillary participated as well and apparently enjoyed being eaten 
>>>> out by children.
>>>> <http://gawker.com/flight-logs-put-clinton-dershowitz-on-
>>>> pedophile-billio-1681039971> Apparently, Barack Obama doesn't do the
>>>> stuff with children but loves to be around men... a little too much.
>>>> <https://www.wnd.com/2012/09/claim-
>>>> obama-hid-gay-life-to-become-president/> -
>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=z4pwiGuG5r4>
>>> His wife has shoulders like a linebacker.
>>
>> I'm fairly convinced that Michelle is as much a female as Rupaul is. 
> 
> so do you think about trannies all of the time like alex jones, then?


Alex Jones peek-a-booed his nards to Nads 34 years ago, in some bar
somewhere, somebody said, and she got hot over his tranny-ism,
unverified sources could have said, sometime.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208030 — Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2018-09-25 07:52 -0500
SubjectRe: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.
Message-ID<uv8kqd1r85r29u7i9tbmujfdg0qfdnqocp@4ax.com>
In reply to#207922
SilverSlimer wrote:

>It's the same with videos 
>from conservatives on Facebook. Even when you look for the exact title of 
>a video, it'll show you results from CNN, Reuters and the New York Times 
>before it shows you Paul Joseph Watson or Mark Dice even though they were 
>the ones who produced a video with that exact title. 

I don't doubt that there is a bias.  On the other hand, I'm certain
that with a little digging, people can find the stuff that Google
"hid".  I'm certain that there are Web sites, which are cheap and easy
to set up, by the way, that link to things of interest to *any*
political point of view.

The Internet is a big place.  If it's not illegal, you can get it.
With a determined effort, even things that are illegal are obtainable.

>Absolutely and no person who advocates for freedom should enable any of 
>them.

That would be, IMO, rather extremist, to boycott all of those
services.  The same goes for Microsoft products.  As much as I feel
the situation is far from ideal, it's just too much a sacrifice to
refuse to use them altogether.

Things can be found on Amazon, or Ebay, that would not be able to be
found, otherwise.  Windows runs almost any kind of software
imaginable.  If you're going to find long-lost friends, Facebook is
where you will find them.

There are good, understandable, not-at-all-evil reasons why society
"standardizes" on some of these services.  It just sucks that, once
established, they kind of "own" their markets and leave consumers with
little "real" choice.

I am not going to fight these forces, by refusing to use the same
services that "everyone else" does.  I like them, for the same reasons
that "everyone else" does.  No, that does not make me a "hypocrite",
just because I'm aware of the drawbacks of the situation.

-- 
"Because they expect to have everything given to them for free."  -
Dunce Rabbit, lying shamelessly

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208084 — Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-09-25 11:21 -0400
SubjectRe: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.
Message-ID<podjpq$lfl$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#208030
On 9/25/2018 8:52 AM, chrisv wrote:
> There are good, understandable, not-at-all-evil reasons why society
> "standardizes" on some of these services.

Network externalities.

> It just sucks that, once established, they kind of "own" their markets
> and leave consumers with little "real" choice.

I'm all for regulating natural monopolies. The shocker is hearing right 
wingers say the same thing. Normally they're all deregulation, 
laissez-faire, and corporate fatcats รผber alles, but as soon as a 
corporation decides not to host their favorite conspiracy theorist, 
suddenly it's bring on big government!

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208091 — Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-25 09:32 -0600
SubjectRe: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.
Message-ID<MPG.361402e0a1a9db35989b2a@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#208084
In article <podjpq$lfl$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
> I'm all for regulating natural monopolies. The shocker is hearing right 
> wingers say the same thing. Normally they're all deregulation, 
> laissez-faire, and corporate fatcats รผber alles, but as soon as a 
> corporation decides not to host their favorite conspiracy theorist, 
> suddenly it's bring on big government!
> 

Only losers who don't have cry about people who do have.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208092 — Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.

FromYour Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2018-09-25 10:32 -0500
SubjectRe: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.
Message-ID<6uednYEyz-uWyDfGnZ2dnUU7-WXNnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#208084
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 11:21:27 -0400, LO AND BEHOLD; "kensi
<kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>" determined that the following was
of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us
in <podjpq$lfl$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
 
>On 9/25/2018 8:52 AM, chrisv wrote:
>>There are good, understandable, not-at-all-evil reasons why society
>>"standardizes" on some of these services.
>
>Network externalities.
>
>>It just sucks that, once established, they kind of "own" their markets
>>and leave consumers with little "real" choice.
>
>I'm all for regulating natural monopolies. The shocker is hearing right 
>wingers say the same thing. Normally they're all deregulation,
>laissez-faire, and corporate fatcats รผber alles, but as soon as a
>corporation decides not to host their favorite conspiracy theorist,
>suddenly it's bring on big government! 

they have pretty much always used big government as their safety net while telling others that they should stop asking for help.  especially since the reagan era when corporate taxation dropped to an all-time low and the lower and middle-class had to pick up the tab.

-- 
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA

"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this 
seems to be the new norm in the world.  It's spreading like a cancer, 
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil.  We need to put an 
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell 
everywhere.  We need to get these people out of every civilized 
country, and there's only one way to do it.  IOW, we have to become 
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) 

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working.  We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too.  One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode 

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208099 — Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-25 09:36 -0600
SubjectRe: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.
Message-ID<MPG.361403f8b0b8435b989b2f@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#208092
In article <6uednYEyz-uWyDfGnZ2dnUU7-WXNnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
127.0.0.1 says...
> they have pretty much always used big government as their safety net
> 

Leave the demos outta this.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 5 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 50  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate


csiph-web