Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #59132 > unrolled thread
| Started by | BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-01 17:53 +1000 |
| Last post | 2016-07-12 11:09 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 62 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Ebay has turned to shit BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-01 17:53 +1000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Chicken F*cker DOW #4 <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-01 19:07 +0100
Re: Ebay has turned to shit BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-02 22:08 +1000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-03 06:53 +1000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-03 07:05 +0100
Re: Ebay has turned to shit BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-03 21:03 +1000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-05 20:57 +0000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-06 04:41 +0100
Re: Ebay has turned to shit BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-06 22:48 +1000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-06 17:53 +0100
Re: Ebay has turned to shit BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-07 20:33 +1000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-07 15:54 +0100
Re: Ebay has turned to shit BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-08 01:01 +1000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-07 16:51 +0100
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-07 20:00 +0000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-08 13:14 +1000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-08 07:10 +0100
Re: Ebay has turned to shit BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-08 19:15 +1000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit "Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5" <noemail@none.not> - 2016-07-07 12:18 -0400
Re: Ebay has turned to shit BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-08 13:15 +1000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-07 19:59 +0000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-07-07 12:03 -0400
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-07 17:22 +0100
Re: Ebay has turned to shit "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-07-07 12:44 -0400
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-07 17:55 +0100
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Skeeter DoW #8 <skt@skt.invalid> - 2016-07-07 10:29 -0600
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-07 17:53 +0100
Re: Ebay has turned to shit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-06 11:29 -0400
Re: Ebay has turned to shit "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-06 11:59 -0700
Re: Ebay has turned to shit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-06 15:16 -0400
Re: Ebay has turned to shit "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-06 12:19 -0700
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-06 19:32 +0000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-07 12:01 -0400
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-07 20:01 +0000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-08 12:42 -0400
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-08 19:25 +0000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-09 12:09 -0400
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-09 20:45 +0000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-10 13:23 -0400
Re: Ebay has turned to shit "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-10 11:56 -0700
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-10 22:26 +0000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-10 15:37 -0700
Re: Ebay has turned to shit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-11 05:33 -0400
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-11 20:57 +0000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-12 05:22 -0400
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-12 22:23 +0000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-13 13:54 -0400
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-13 21:36 +0000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-14 13:35 -0400
Re: Ebay has turned to shit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-07-14 22:38 +0100
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-15 00:17 +0000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-15 21:26 +1000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-15 21:13 +0000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-15 18:59 -0400
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-16 11:32 +0100
Re: Ebay has turned to shit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-15 12:57 -0400
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-15 21:19 +0000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-06 19:02 +0000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-09 12:02 -0400
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-09 20:46 +0000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-05 20:51 +0000
Re: Ebay has turned to shit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-07-12 11:09 +0100
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-10 22:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nlui2t$mg6$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #59668 |
On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 13:23:25 -0400, kensi wrote: > On 09/07/2016 4:45 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> On Sat, 09 Jul 2016 12:09:16 -0400, kensi wrote: >> >>> Don't believe them! Don't trust them! The only odd-numbered Trek to >>> truly suck was IX. >>> >>> *snicker* >> >> Aren't you forgetting something? If my surmise is correct, Star Trek I >> and Star Trek V still cling to Paramount's neck like a pair of Tiberian >> bats. > > IX was worse that V, No. > and I was great, Are you mad? > so I guess they'll soon be moving you to the Federation funny farm. > Yes, poor friend, it seems you're fruity as a nutcake. You're suffering from a Vulcan mind meld, Doctor. :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-10 15:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.31ec6df8302b29ad98d958@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #59677 |
In article <nlui2t$mg6$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 13:23:25 -0400, kensi wrote: > > > On 09/07/2016 4:45 PM, Nadegda wrote: > >> On Sat, 09 Jul 2016 12:09:16 -0400, kensi wrote: > >> > >>> Don't believe them! Don't trust them! The only odd-numbered Trek to > >>> truly suck was IX. > >>> > >>> *snicker* > >> > >> Aren't you forgetting something? If my surmise is correct, Star Trek I > >> and Star Trek V still cling to Paramount's neck like a pair of Tiberian > >> bats. > > > > IX was worse that V, > > No. > > > and I was great, > > Are you mad? > > > so I guess they'll soon be moving you to the Federation funny farm. > > Yes, poor friend, it seems you're fruity as a nutcake. > > You're suffering from a Vulcan mind meld, Doctor. > > :) Captain's Log, AD: 3033, Solarus the 18th, 09:07 Hrs. Tell Scotty I beamed down to Earth to take a shit. BBS -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new Honorary FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ&feature=youtu.be
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-11 05:33 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nlvp4g$12kk$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #59677 |
On 10/07/2016 6:26 PM, Nadegda wrote: > On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 13:23:25 -0400, kensi wrote: >> IX was worse that V, > > No. How can you *say* that? The only thing better about IX was the special effects. >> and I was great, > > Are you mad? I repeat: ST:TMP was great. >> so I guess they'll soon be moving you to the Federation funny farm. >> Yes, poor friend, it seems you're fruity as a nutcake. > > You're suffering from a Vulcan mind meld, Doctor. > > :) Yes, now that we've got them right where they want us. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-11 20:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nm117n$mg6$41@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #59696 |
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 05:33:02 -0400, kensi wrote: > On 10/07/2016 6:26 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 13:23:25 -0400, kensi wrote: >>> IX was worse that V, >> >> No. > > How can you *say* that? The only thing better about IX was the special > effects. The only thing *worse* about IX was the special effects. >>> and I was great, >> >> Are you mad? > > I repeat: ST:TMP was great. I'll take that as a "yes". :) >>> so I guess they'll soon be moving you to the Federation funny farm. >>> Yes, poor friend, it seems you're fruity as a nutcake. >> >> You're suffering from a Vulcan mind meld, Doctor. >> >> :) > > Yes, now that we've got them right where they want us. Oh no, she's quoting from it now! There's only one antidote. "Admiral, if we were to assume these whales were ours to do with as we please, we would be as guilty as those who caused their extinction."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-12 05:22 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nm2crr$tt5$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #59703 |
On 11/07/2016 4:57 PM, Nadegda wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 05:33:02 -0400, kensi wrote: >> Yes, now that we've got them right where they want us. > > Oh no, she's quoting from it now! *evil snicker* > There's only one antidote. > > "Admiral, if we were to assume these whales were ours to do with as we > please, we would be as guilty as those who caused their extinction." "He insisted we go first, sir. Said something about first seeing how it scrambled *our* molecules." -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-12 22:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nm3qlf$5er$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #59717 |
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 05:22:01 -0400, kensi wrote: > On 11/07/2016 4:57 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 05:33:02 -0400, kensi wrote: >>> Yes, now that we've got them right where they want us. >> >> Oh no, she's quoting from it now! > > *evil snicker* > >> There's only one antidote. >> >> "Admiral, if we were to assume these whales were ours to do with as we >> please, we would be as guilty as those who caused their extinction." > > "He insisted we go first, sir. Said something about first seeing how it > scrambled *our* molecules." Oh yeah? Well double dumbass on you! :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-13 13:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nm5v9i$dkv$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #59739 |
On 12/07/2016 6:23 PM, Nadegda wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 05:22:01 -0400, kensi wrote: >> On 11/07/2016 4:57 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 05:33:02 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>> Yes, now that we've got them right where they want us. >>> >>> Oh no, she's quoting from it now! >> >> *evil snicker* >> >>> There's only one antidote. >>> >>> "Admiral, if we were to assume these whales were ours to do with as we >>> please, we would be as guilty as those who caused their extinction." >> >> "He insisted we go first, sir. Said something about first seeing how it >> scrambled *our* molecules." > > Oh yeah? Well double dumbass on you! :) Spock, you haven't changed a bit. You're just as warm and sociable as ever. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-13 21:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nm6c8h$5er$33@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #59779 |
On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:54:56 -0400, kensi wrote: > On 12/07/2016 6:23 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 05:22:01 -0400, kensi wrote: >>> On 11/07/2016 4:57 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 05:33:02 -0400, kensi wrote: >>>>> Yes, now that we've got them right where they want us. >>>> >>>> Oh no, she's quoting from it now! >>> >>> *evil snicker* >>> >>>> There's only one antidote. >>>> >>>> "Admiral, if we were to assume these whales were ours to do with as >>>> we please, we would be as guilty as those who caused their >>>> extinction." >>> >>> "He insisted we go first, sir. Said something about first seeing how >>> it scrambled *our* molecules." >> >> Oh yeah? Well double dumbass on you! :) > > Spock, you haven't changed a bit. You're just as warm and sociable as > ever. Nor have you, Doctor, as your continued predilection for irrelevancy demonstrates.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-14 13:35 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nm8ig8$23s$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #59795 |
On 13/07/2016 5:36 PM, Nadegda wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:54:56 -0400, kensi wrote: >> On 12/07/2016 6:23 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Oh yeah? Well double dumbass on you! :) >> >> Spock, you haven't changed a bit. You're just as warm and sociable as >> ever. > > Nor have you, Doctor, as your continued predilection for irrelevancy > demonstrates. B-b-bb-bbut ... but Nadegda, that's an ST:TMP quote! "Your child is having a tantrum, Mr. Spock!" <-- could refer to many of the k00ks heareabouts right now, murphy in particular though. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-14 22:38 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1mqeete.vudmd71ltw762N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #59865 |
[xpost: +auk] Ken, Madedna's Hot Squeeze <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> blurted: > > [pink noise] > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ> EOT -- ^Ï^. My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-15 00:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nm9a2f$5er$90@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #59865 |
On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:35:01 -0400, kensi wrote: > On 13/07/2016 5:36 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:54:56 -0400, kensi wrote: >>> On 12/07/2016 6:23 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> Oh yeah? Well double dumbass on you! :) >>> >>> Spock, you haven't changed a bit. You're just as warm and sociable as >>> ever. >> >> Nor have you, Doctor, as your continued predilection for irrelevancy >> demonstrates. > > B-b-bb-bbut ... but Nadegda, that's an ST:TMP quote! Yes, I know. I just couldn't resist. Of course you probably *planned* that by choosing that line that had that pithy comeback, you devil. <snicker> > "Your child is having a tantrum, Mr. Spock!" <-- could refer to many of > the k00ks heareabouts right now, murphy in particular though. Or maybe my excuse should be this instead: "Just a moment, Captain, sir. I'll explain what happened. Your revered Admiral Nogura invoked a little-known, seldom-used reserve activation clause. In simpler language, Captain, they drafted me!"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-15 21:26 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <BL3iz.3389$Cf6.1865@fx41.iad> |
| In reply to | #59898 |
Duurbs <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:35:01 -0400, kxxxxi wrote: > // >> "Your child xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> xxxxxxxxxxxxx, murphy xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >Or maybe my excuse should be this instead: > >"Just a moment, Captain, sir. I'll explain what happened. Your revered >Admiral Nogura invoked a little-known, seldom-used reserve activation >clause. In simpler language, Captain, they drafted me!" no... what actually was the case,, what ewe wish to deny Paul .. is -- "Just a moment, Captain ..ouch .!... Checkmate cut my d!ck off in reserve activation to then stuff same up my ars3 with a MURPHY TWIST.. that very child I abhore and fear" /snortles sciFi is so fskn shallow -- brainwise :-/ -- fup set [please maintain froups x-Pstd line unless "fup set" is 0n] *** Paul Derbyshire enters AFN http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=124317053000 [Ray Banana] "How long have you [Seamus] been using Windows". *** Paul Derbyshire 'leaves' AFN http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=131069032500 "The name is Seamus, and I, unlike you, am in fact a decorated veteran. I was in 'nam.".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-15 21:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nmbjmi$e19$16@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #59955 |
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 21:26:26 +1000, BBB DoW #14 (Pie Gurl) PiG@yahoo.com WINNER - Kook of the Year 2015 wrote: > Duurbs <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:35:01 -0400, kxxxxi wrote: >> > // >>> "Your child xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> xxxxxxxxxxxxx, murphy xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Your continued susceptibility to pants-wetting terror at the mere sight of kensi's name is noted, kook.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-15 18:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <giqiobdh3756hhrsft31uk6jac7ld0cq7r@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #60010 |
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 21:13:54 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 21:26:26 +1000, BBB DoW #14 (Pie Gurl) PiG@yahoo.com >WINNER - Kook of the Year 2015 wrote: > >> Duurbs <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:35:01 -0400, kxxxxi wrote: >>> >> // >>>> "Your child xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> xxxxxxxxxxxxx, murphy xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >Your continued susceptibility to pants-wetting terror at the mere sight >of kensi's name is noted, kook. Since this is Usenet it means that Phlatty cannot *sight* kensi. You blundered when you typed *sight* when you should have typed *cite*. HTH -- Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. "It is my learned opinion that a man should not mince words just to spare the sensibilities of the thin-skinned or the ignorant."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-16 11:32 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <WpUGGeOR1giXFwWy@btinternet.com> |
| In reply to | #59955 |
In message <BL3iz.3389$Cf6.1865@fx41.iad>, BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> writes >Duurbs <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:35:01 -0400, kxxxxi wrote: >> >// >>> "Your child xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> xxxxxxxxxxxxx, murphy xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >>Or maybe my excuse should be this instead: >> >>"Just a moment, Captain, sir. I'll explain what happened. Your revered >>Admiral Nogura invoked a little-known, seldom-used reserve activation >>clause. In simpler language, Captain, they drafted me!" > >no... what actually was the case,, what ewe wish to deny Paul .. is -- > >"Just a moment, Captain ..ouch .!... Checkmate cut my d!ck off in reserve >activation to then stuff same up my ars3 with a MURPHY TWIST.. that >very child I abhore and fear" > > >/snortles > >sciFi is so fskn shallow -- brainwise :-/ > Oh I dunno. "New Maps of Hell" and all that. -- Bill Jillians (Formosa'd by Checkmate) http://www.mindfulselfcompassion.org/meditations_downloads.php (Mindful Self Compassion - Christopher Germer) "actually I was told I was getting a DoW# for being a "breath of fresh air." - Mister Smartypants in AUK. Most Boring poster ever (along with Fakey) "Better quality than Sw, MM, MSp, idlehands and Doctor WTF combined." Dave "Yads" Yaderley Janitor's BFF #4 #shitcanjillians Taking Over USENET 1 newsgroup at a time. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-15 12:57 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nmb4ln$1nst$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #59898 |
On 14/07/2016 8:17 PM, Nadegda wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:35:01 -0400, kensi wrote: >> B-b-bb-bbut ... but Nadegda, that's an ST:TMP quote! > > Yes, I know. I just couldn't resist. Of course you probably *planned* > that by choosing that line that had that pithy comeback, you devil. *snicker* > Or maybe my excuse should be this instead: > > "Just a moment, Captain, sir. I'll explain what happened. Your revered > Admiral Nogura invoked a little-known, seldom-used reserve activation > clause. In simpler language, Captain, they drafted me!" ST:TMP *again*?! *snicker* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-15 21:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nmbk1r$e19$18@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #59979 |
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:57:23 -0400, kensi wrote: > On 14/07/2016 8:17 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:35:01 -0400, kensi wrote: >>> B-b-bb-bbut ... but Nadegda, that's an ST:TMP quote! >> >> Yes, I know. I just couldn't resist. Of course you probably *planned* >> that by choosing that line that had that pithy comeback, you devil. > > *snicker* > >> Or maybe my excuse should be this instead: >> >> "Just a moment, Captain, sir. I'll explain what happened. Your revered >> Admiral Nogura invoked a little-known, seldom-used reserve activation >> clause. In simpler language, Captain, they drafted me!" > > ST:TMP *again*?! > > *snicker* You got me. :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-06 19:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nljkkp$3iv$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #59366 |
On Wed, 06 Jul 2016 11:29:07 -0400, kensi wrote: > On 05/07/2016 4:57 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> On Sun, 03 Jul 2016 21:03:03 +1000, BBB DoW #14 (Pie Gurl) >> PiG@yahoo.com WINNER - Kook of the Year 2012 wrote: >> >>> Obviously it has,, for you it is a platform for inventing a new >>> reality. >> >> Oh no. It seems murphy has once again embarked on a campaign to >> violently destroy every irony meter that comes within a mile of one of >> his articles. >> >> Hey, kensi, got a spare? > > What? You think I'm going to lend you my last one after what keeps > happening to yours? > > *snicker* Yeah, you're right. When you're right, you're right. I found another supplier anyway. The pesky thing's finding an insurance company willing to cover my irony meters. For some *peculiar* reason none seem to want me for a client!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-09 12:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nlr76e$183k$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #59304 |
On 05/07/2016 4:57 PM, Nadegda wrote: > On Sun, 03 Jul 2016 21:03:03 +1000, BBB DoW #14 (Pie Gurl) PiG@yahoo.com > WINNER - Kook of the Year 2012 wrote: > >> You never were going to... only because you haven't an original cert to >> work with AND yer waaay nEt-Dumb to even attempt building a forgery. > > Then you won't mind accepting the following challenge, kook: post a > perfect header forgery of Sn!pe to either AUK or AFC by sundown Friday > (Pacific summer time). If you have not done so by then ... well, you can > guess the consequences. Fail. NOMINATION: murphy for Coward of the Month for July, for bragging about his Usenet forgery abilities and then chickening out when challenged by Nadegda to prove his skills, and for responding to another challenge by Nadegda (<nlh70j$sgh$10@dont-email.me>) to produce MIDs proving ongoing net-abuse to justify murphy's ongoing vendetta with a textwall of screed (<_V_fz.1570$y32.788@fx02.iad>) utterly devoid of MIDs or anything else remotely resembling evidence. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-09 20:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nlrnqp$lqb$22@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #59588 |
On Sat, 09 Jul 2016 12:02:22 -0400, kensi wrote: > On 05/07/2016 4:57 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> On Sun, 03 Jul 2016 21:03:03 +1000, BBB DoW #14 (Pie Gurl) >> PiG@yahoo.com WINNER - Kook of the Year 2012 wrote: >> >>> You never were going to... only because you haven't an original cert >>> to work with AND yer waaay nEt-Dumb to even attempt building a >>> forgery. >> >> Then you won't mind accepting the following challenge, kook: post a >> perfect header forgery of Sn!pe to either AUK or AFC by sundown Friday >> (Pacific summer time). If you have not done so by then ... well, you >> can guess the consequences. > > Fail. > > NOMINATION: murphy for Coward of the Month for July, for bragging about > his Usenet forgery abilities and then chickening out when challenged by > Nadegda to prove his skills, and for responding to another challenge by > Nadegda (<nlh70j$sgh$10@dont-email.me>) to produce MIDs proving ongoing > net-abuse to justify murphy's ongoing vendetta with a textwall of screed > (<_V_fz.1570$y32.788@fx02.iad>) utterly devoid of MIDs or anything else > remotely resembling evidence. Seconded. Now let's see if we can "scare" him up some competition among the other kooks. <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web