Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.checkmate > #206336 > unrolled thread

Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
First post2018-09-20 09:26 -0400
Last post2018-10-01 13:34 -0400
Articles 20 on this page of 1000+ — 43 participants
Thread has 1006 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed.

Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate | Browse in flat view

Thread has 1006 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.


Contents

  Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:26 -0400
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:25 -0600
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 18:30 -0400
      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 20:44 -0500
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 18:45 -0700
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:26 -0400
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 21:42 -0500
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:30 -0400
              Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 06:51 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 15:53 +0000
                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 12:00 -0400
                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:49 -0600
                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 13:15 -0500
                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 13:01 -0600
                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:27 -0400
                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:20 -0700
                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-22 14:27 +0000
                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:53 +0000
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:34 -0600
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 19:06 -0500
                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 15:07 -0700
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 15:11 -0700
                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 07:18 -0500
                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 12:35 +0000
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 09:09 -0500
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:46 -0500
                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:59 -0700
                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 20:58 +0000
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 14:01 -0700
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 14:30 -0700
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 23:21 +0100
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0400
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0500
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:27 +0000
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:28 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 13:00 +0000
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:28 -0500
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:06 -0500
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:00 +0000
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:31 -0400
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:38 -0600
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:28 -0400
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:30 -0600
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 07:19 -0700
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:22 +0000
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:13 -0700
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 17:19 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 15:33 -0700
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 15:40 -0700
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 19:33 -0400
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:46 -0700
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:00 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:53 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:35 -0500
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:02 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:12 -0400
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:17 +0000
                                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:14 +0000
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:28 -0700
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-26 09:20 -0400
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:55 +0000
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:52 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:17 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 00:23 -0500
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 06:17 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 09:13 -0600
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 11:19 -0400
                                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 17:12 +0100
                                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 12:40 -0500
                                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 18:51 +0100
                                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:20 -0600
                                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 22:58 +0100
                                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 10:43 -0600
                                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 12:48 -0400
                                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:07 -0600
                                                        Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 12:49 -0500
                                                          Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:19 -0600
                                                            Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 13:28 -0500
                                                              Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:30 -0600
                                                      Re: ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄  Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 12:42 -0500
                                                        Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOC Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:18 -0600
                                                          Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOC Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-27 18:53 +0000
                                                            Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOC Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 13:04 -0600
                                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 12:50 -0400
                                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:08 -0600
                                                Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 10:34 -0500
                                                  Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snow Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 10:44 -0600
                                                    Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snow ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 12:37 -0500
                                                      Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:17 -0600
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:06 -0700
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 10:08 -0400
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 10:31 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:46 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 10:48 -0500
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 12:37 -0500
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 07:52 -0500
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 11:21 -0400
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 09:32 -0600
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:32 -0500
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 09:36 -0600
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:24 -0500
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 15:19 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:20 -0700
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 04:39 -0400
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:50 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:56 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:55 -0500
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:14 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:31 -0400
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 09:15 -0600
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 11:25 -0400
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-27 18:56 +0000
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 15:04 -0400
                                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 21:57 +0000
                                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:34 -0400
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 13:06 -0600
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 19:39 -0400
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 19:52 -0500
                                              Inflation is immoral. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 02:52 -0700
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:33 +0000
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:12 -0700
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:17 -0500
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:49 +0000
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:44 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 13:51 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:59 -0500
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:40 -0600
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 22:36 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:23 -0700
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:15 -0700
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:38 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:04 -0700
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:57 -0700
                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 10:52 -0500
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 09:43 -0700
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:37 -0500
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 12:26 -0700
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 12:34 -0700
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 17:05 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 17:03 -0700
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:10 +0000
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 13:19 -0700
                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:53 -0600
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:43 -0500
                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:15 -0600
                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:50 -0600
                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:22 +0000
                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:54 -0700
                      I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 03:56 -0700
                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 15:34 +0000
                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:58 +0000
                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:00 +0000
                              Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 21:47 +0000
                                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:05 -0700
                                  Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 20:31 -0500
                                    Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snow Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 19:57 -0600
                                      Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snow ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-28 09:57 -0500
                                        Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? Snow ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:04 -0600
                                          Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 20:23 +0100
                                          Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 14:34 -0600
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 08:52 -0400
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 07:59 -0500
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:04 -0400
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:12 -0400
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:45 -0400
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:55 -0400
                                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:27 -0400
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:03 -0600
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:27 +0000
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:43 -0400
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:39 +0100
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:10 -0400
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 23:29 -0500
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Catalina" <Catalina@beach.sun> - 2018-09-30 02:39 -0400
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 01:25 -0700
                                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-28 02:02 +0000
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 06:47 -0500
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 18:18 +0000
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:31 +0000
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 18:56 +0100
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 18:57 +0000
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 20:30 +0100
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 14:31 -0600
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:37 -0700
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:51 +0000
                                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:40 -0400
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:05 -0600
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:08 -0400
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 -0700
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-29 14:23 +0000
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 10:52 -0700
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-29 18:55 +0000
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 13:18 -0600
                                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-29 19:43 +0000
                                              Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 18:54 -0600
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 12:41 -0700
                                            Being _ relatively poor isn't a real problem. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-29 15:25 -0700
                                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:29 -0600
                                              Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 21:48 -0400
                                                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 23:16 -0700
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0600
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-29 12:43 -0400
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 10:53 -0600
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-29 12:56 -0400
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 10:57 -0600
                                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-29 12:58 -0400
                                              Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 11:30 -0600
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-29 14:00 -0400
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-29 20:12 +0100
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 17:33 -0700
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:17 +0000
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:08 -0700
                                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:26 +0000
                                              Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:36 -0700
                                                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:42 +0000
                                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 22:13 -0700
                                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:33 +0000
                                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 12:50 -0700
                                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:18 +0000
                                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:22 -0700
                                                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
                          We need to eat more. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 09:38 -0700
                            Re: We need to eat more. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 +0000
                              "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 10:09 -0700
                                Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:10 +0000
                                  Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0400
                                    Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:19 +0000
                                    Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:58 -0500
                                      Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:16 -0600
                                      Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0500
                                    Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:04 -0700
                                      Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 -0700
                                        If you're fucking, you're stupid. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 17:14 -0700
                                          Re: If you're fucking, you're stupid. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:39 -0700
                                        Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:01 -0700
                                          Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:47 -0400
                                            Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:59 -0400
                                            Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 11:37 -0700
                                              Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 19:00 +0000
                                                Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 14:32 -0600
                                            Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:12 -0400
                                      Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 21:44 -0700
                                        Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 22:01 -0700
                                          Artificial penises and testosterone implants. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 05:01 -0700
                                            Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:17 -0700
                                              Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 23:42 -0400
                                                Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:56 -0700
                                      Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:26 +0000
                                        Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:30 -0400
                                        I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 09:38 -0700
                                          Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:41 -0400
                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 19:09 +0100
                                          Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:04 -0400
                                          Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:47 +0000
                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 21:52 +0000
                                              If I were super attractive... Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 15:04 -0700
                                                Re: If I were super attractive... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 18:08 -0400
                                                Re: If I were super attractive... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 22:08 +0000
                                                  Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:10 +0000
                                                    Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 15:52 -0700
                                                      Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:55 +0000
                                                        Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:00 -0700
                                                          Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:05 +0000
                                                            Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:15 -0700
                                                              Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:22 +0000
                                                                Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:24 -0700
                                                                  Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:28 +0000
                                                                    Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:31 -0700
                                                                      Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:37 +0000
                                                  The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 15:15 -0700
                                                    Re: The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:18 +0000
                                                Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:09 +0000
                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-28 17:29 -0500
                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 +0000
                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:23 -0700
                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:28 -0700
                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:49 -0700
                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:55 +0000
                                                      Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:19 -0700
                                                        Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-30 02:48 +0000
                                                          Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:28 +0000
                                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:45 -0700
                                                              Was she looking for love ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-29 20:55 -0700
                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:59 -0700
                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:11 -0400
                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:35 +0000
                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:42 -0700
                                                                    Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 05:22 -0700
                                                                      I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 07:34 -0700
                                                                        Re: I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
                                                                        Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 20:37 -0700
                                                                          Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:21 +0000
                                                                            Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 22:25 -0700
                                                                              Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:40 +0000
                                                                                Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:15 -0700
                                                                                Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:42 -0600
                                                                          Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 10:01 -0700
                                                                            Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0500
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 15:00 -0400
                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:02 -0700
                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:57 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:01 -0400
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:00 -0700
                                                                            Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 15:52 -0400
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 16:02 -0500
                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:04 -0400
                                                                          Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 12:59 -0700
                                                                            Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:13 -0700
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:18 -0400
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 16:22 -0500
                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:37 -0700
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 22:30 +0100
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:34 -0700
                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:40 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:42 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:49 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:53 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:54 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:02 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:06 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0700
                                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:21 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:26 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:29 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:33 -0700
                                                                                                        Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:36 -0700
                                                                                                          Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:28 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:32 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:03 -0700
                                                                      Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:13 -0400
                                                                        Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 07:33 -0500
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:29 -0400
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:19 -0400
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:26 -0400
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:59 +0000
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:40 -0700
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-09-30 17:52 -0500
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 13:11 -0700
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:22 -0400
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:25 +0000
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:01 +0000
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:04 -0700
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:28 -0600
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:39 -0400
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:08 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:03 +0000
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:07 -0700
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:53 -0400
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:12 -0700
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:31 -0700
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:55 -0700
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 09:02 -0600
                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:26 -0400
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 16:05 +0000
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:23 -0400
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 23:07 +0000
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:11 -0400
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0700
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 18:19 -0500
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:22 -0400
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:40 -0700
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:43 -0500
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:42 -0500
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:32 -0700
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 13:44 -0400
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 13:57 -0400
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:05 -0400
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:20 -0400
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 11:51 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 15:13 -0400
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:06 +0000
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0400
                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:20 +0000
                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:34 -0400
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 21:49 +0100
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-30 14:00 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:13 +0100
                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:22 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:27 +0100
                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:38 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:44 +0100
                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:52 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 23:00 +0100
                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 15:06 -0700
                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
                                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
                                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 02:52 -0700
                                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 12:56 +0100
                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 05:46 -0700
                                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 13:58 +0100
                                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 06:42 -0700
                                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 17:11 +0100
                                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 10:35 -0700
                                                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 18:42 +0100
                                                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:44 -0400
                                                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:03 +0100
                                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0400
                                                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 11:07 -0700
                                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:12 -0400
                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0400
                                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:07 +0100
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:10 +0000
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:57 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:09 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:01 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:30 -0600
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:35 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:12 +0000
                                                                                    Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:22 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:31 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:43 +0000
                                                                                            Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:12 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:27 -0600
                                                                                              Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:11 -0500
                                                                                                Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:09 -0400
                                                                                            The Sex, Drugs, and Alcohol Party ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 06:06 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:25 -0600
                                                                                        Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 05:14 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 08:50 -0500
                                                                                            Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:33 -0600
                                                                                              Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 10:22 -0500
                                                                                                Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snow Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 11:21 -0600
                                                                                                  Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snow ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 13:23 -0500
                                                                                                    Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:38 -0600
                                                                                              Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-01 14:00 -0400
                                                                                                Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:07 -0400
                                                                                            Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:32 -0600
                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:56 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0600
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:44 +0000
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 13:57 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:24 -0600
                                                                                Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 14:02 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:06 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:14 +0000
                                                                                    Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 19:31 -0700
                                                                                    Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 19:32 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:24 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:21 -0600
                                                                                        Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:47 -0400
                                                                                            Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:15 -0500
                                                                                      Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:31 +0000
                                                                                    Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:42 -0700
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0600
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-30 11:15 -0700
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:19 -0400
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0400
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:44 -0700
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:46 +0000
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:06 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 05:55 -0500
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:40 -0700
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:36 -0600
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 10:49 -0400
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:03 +0000
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:34 -0700
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:42 -0400
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:54 -0700
                                                                            Greg, the incel. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0700
                                                                              Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:27 -0700
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:16 +0000
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:35 -0600
                                                                          If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
                                                                            Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:17 +0000
                                                                              If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 19:41 -0700
                                                                                Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:26 +0000
                                                                                  Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:23 -0600
                                                                                  Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 05:54 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:49 -0400
                                                                                Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 08:05 +0100
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:15 +0000
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:54 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:36 +0000
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:35 -0600
                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 11:17 -0400
                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 17:17 +0100
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Scatboi g8dgc <g8dgc@noneya.none> - 2018-10-01 12:38 -0400
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? g8dgc <g8dgc@noneya.none> - 2018-10-01 13:11 -0400
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 18:17 +0100
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:42 -0700
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:33 -0600
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:49 -0600
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:01 +0000
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:10 -0400
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:22 +0000
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:39 -0700
                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:17 -0700
                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:09 -0400
                                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:34 +0000
                                                                Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 06:25 -0700
                                                                  Re: Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:07 +0000
                                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 09:03 -0600
                                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:37 -0700
                                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:47 -0700
                                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 09:26 -0400
                                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:21 -0400
                                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:27 -0400
                                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:19 -0700
                                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:08 -0500
                                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-10-01 17:19 +0100
                                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:43 -0700
                                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:48 -0400
                                                                      Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
                                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:02 -0700
                                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0600
                                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 09:01 -0600
                                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:09 +0000
                                                          Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 09:00 -0600
                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:18 -0700
                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-29 19:41 -0400
                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:44 -0700
                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-09-29 19:55 -0400
                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:58 -0700
                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:21 +0000
                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0700
                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:48 -0700
                                  More children is always better ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 10:23 -0700
                            Re: We need to eat more. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 11:12 -0700
                              Re: We need to eat more. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 14:27 -0400
                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 09:09 -0600
                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:14 -0400
                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 21:18 +0000
                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:45 -0700
                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:18 -0700
                        The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 20:57 -0700
                          Re: The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 21:46 -0700
                            "IllGotten" gains. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 01:46 -0700
                              Re: "IllGotten" gains. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0400
                              Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0700
                                Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:41 -0700
                                  Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 17:02 -0700
                                    Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:11 -0700
                            Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 02:06 -0700
                              Re: Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:37 -0400
                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:14 -0700
                      The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 20:40 -0700
              Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 15:47 -0700
                Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-24 09:53 +0000
                  Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 11:36 -0400
                    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:54 -0600
                    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 17:03 -0700
                      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:05 -0700
                        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 17:09 -0700
                          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:11 -0700
                            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:29 -0700
                    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 21:08 -0700
                    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-28 10:07 +0000
                      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 10:33 -0500
                        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:41 -0400
                          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:02 -0600
                          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:23 -0700
                            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 23:43 -0500
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 21:06 -0500
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 19:07 -0700
          No one wants to pay. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-20 19:35 -0700
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:49 -0400
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 22:18 -0500
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 01:56 -0600
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-09-21 03:31 -0700
        Progressive, Marxist, Collectivist, Jim Jones. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-20 19:14 -0700
          Re: Progressive, Marxist, Collectivist, Jim Jones. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:33 -0400
            It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 06:40 -0700
              Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 11:10 -0400
                Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:44 -0400
                A good answer ?! Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 09:18 -0700
                  Re: A good answer ?! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:17 -0400
                Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:34 -0600
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:10 -0700
      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:36 -0400
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-22 01:31 -0400
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 03:18 -0400
      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:35 -0400
        The leaders fornicated the poor, in their death camps. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 07:07 -0700
          Re: The leaders fornicated the poor, in their death camps. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 03:46 +0000
            You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 21:31 -0700
              Re: You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 11:58 -0400
              Re: You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:55 +0000
                Re: You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:35 -0600
                Libtard's thievery. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 11:33 -0700
                  Re: Libtard's thievery. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 19:08 +0000
                    Libtard's thievery. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 12:28 -0700
                      Relf's poverty. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 05:23 +0000
                        The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 23:02 -0700
                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 02:38 -0400
                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:31 -0400
                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 08:40 -0600
                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-23 16:06 +0000
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 12:10 -0400
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 09:15 -0700
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-23 12:46 -0400
                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-23 10:44 -0700
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 09:15 -0700
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 18:32 +0100
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 10:37 -0700
                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 18:48 +0100
                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 19:05 +0100
                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 19:19 +0100
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 11:37 -0400
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:55 -0600
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-24 12:04 -0400
                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 13:29 -0700
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-23 16:47 -0400
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 22:43 -0500
                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 00:01 -0400
                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 09:49 -0500
                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 11:05 -0400
                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 11:24 -0400
                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:23 +0000
                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:25 -0600
                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 11:48 -0400
                                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:54 -0600
                                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 18:37 -0400
                                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 09:16 -0600
                                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-27 11:20 -0400
                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 10:50 -0600
                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 13:14 -0400
                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-27 14:38 -0400
                                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 14:46 -0400
                                                            Re: ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄  Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 13:53 -0500
                                                              Re: ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 12:10 -0700
                                                                Re: ðŸ”ÂŦðŸ”ÂŦðŸ”ÂŦÃĒ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER  SHOOTER ALERT! ÃĒ°ðŸ”ÂŦðŸ”ÂŦðŸ”ÂŦ Sir Gerg teh Yech h Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht maes ter.fake>" ðŸ”ÂŦðŸ”ÂŦðŸ”ÂŦÃĒ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ÃĒ°ðŸ”ÂŦðŸ”ÂŦðŸ”ÂŦÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowfla ke ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snow flake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ S nowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowfla ke ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snow flake ÃĒ„ The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowfla ke ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snow flake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ S nowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowfla ke ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snow flake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 17:23 -0500
                                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-27 15:23 -0400
                                                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 11:21 +0100
                                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 13:05 -0600
                                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-27 12:07 -0700
                                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 22:01 +0000
                                                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-27 15:05 -0700
                                                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 16:26 -0600
                                                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-27 18:31 -0400
                                                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 23:09 +0000
                                                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 19:52 -0600
                                                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-28 13:18 -0400
                                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 10:42 -0700
                                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-28 14:08 -0400
                                                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:56 -0600
                                                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-28 15:17 -0400
                                                                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:20 -0600
                                                                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 14:08 -0700
                                                                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:11 -0600
                                                                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 14:17 -0700
                                                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 14:45 -0700
                                                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 16:52 -0600
                                                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 20:55 -0700
                                                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 16:51 -0600
                                                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-29 08:09 +0000
                                                                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-28 19:45 -0400
                                                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 17:54 -0600
                                                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 17:54 -0600
                                                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-28 20:55 -0400
                                                                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 19:39 -0600
                                                                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-28 23:11 -0400
                                                                                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 21:16 -0600
                                                                                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 21:21 -0600
                                                                                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-29 00:17 -0400
                                                                                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-29 09:06 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 10:37 -0600
                                                                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-29 12:58 -0400
                                                                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 11:30 -0600
                                                                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-29 18:57 +0000
                                                                                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 13:20 -0600
                                                                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-29 12:13 -0700
                                                                                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-29 08:26 +0000
                                                                                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 10:37 -0600
                                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:56 -0600
                                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-28 15:11 -0400
                                                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 19:52 -0600
                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-26 08:51 -0700
                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:38 +0000
                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:54 -0600
                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:20 +0000
                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 20:55 +0000
                                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:02 -0700
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 21:33 +0000
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 17:53 -0400
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:37 -0600
                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:16 -0500
                          2006-2008 were tough years for me. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-23 00:20 -0700
                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 21:29 +0000
                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 17:55 -0400
                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:29 +0000
                              What's your (taxed) job, hypocrite ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-23 19:52 -0700
                                Re: What's your (taxed) job, hypocrite ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 15:14 +0000
                                  Re: What's your (taxed) job, hypocrite ? Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:32 -0500
                                    I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-24 09:01 -0700
                                      Re: I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:11 +0000
                                        Re: I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-09-24 16:18 -0400
                                          Re: I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 13:25 -0700
                                        The LessBad option. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-24 15:17 -0700
                                          Re: The LessBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 01:43 +0000
                                            Re: The LessBad option. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 20:48 -0500
                                            Re: The LessBad option. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:11 -0600
                                            "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 02:47 -0700
                                              Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 08:05 -0500
                                                I walk everywhere. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 07:16 -0700
                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:23 -0400
                                                    Greg can't fathom how sober I am, and have been. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 07:31 -0700
                                                      Re: Greg can't fathom how sober I am, and have been. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:49 -0400
                                                        I'm sensitive to light, like my mom; it's a Swiss thing. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 07:59 -0700
                                                          Re: I'm sensitive to light, like my mom; it's a Swiss thing. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:04 -0400
                                                          Re: Your theory is full of holes... Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:15 -0500
                                                          Re: I'm sensitive to light, like my mom; it's a Swiss thing. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:04 -0400
                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:41 +0000
                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:50 -0500
                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 12:13 -0600
                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 11:17 -0700
                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 21:50 +0000
                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:54 -0700
                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 13:37 -0500
                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 09:28 -0500
                                                    You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 07:41 -0700
                                                      Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:50 -0400
                                                        Hare Krishna, Hare Rama, Hare Jesus. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 08:02 -0700
                                                          Re: Hare Krishna, Hare Rama, Hare Jesus. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:08 -0400
                                                        Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-25 11:08 -0400
                                                        Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:43 +0000
                                                          Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:51 -0500
                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:35 +0000
                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:48 -0500
                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 12:50 -0400
                                                      Re: ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ I walk everywhere. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄  Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:52 -0500
                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 21:41 +0000
                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 17:48 -0400
                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 21:52 +0000
                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:54 -0700
                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:14 -0400
                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 19:01 -0400
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 00:51 +0000
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:52 -0700
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 03:18 +0000
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:51 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 06:58 -0700
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:19 -0700
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 09:33 -0500
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:45 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-26 08:56 -0700
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:59 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 12:24 -0400
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:45 -0600
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:46 -0700
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 11:52 -0500
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:32 -0700
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:48 +0000
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:01 -0700
                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 16:59 -0700
                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:00 -0700
                                                          The GasPump lines. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 17:06 -0700
                                                            Re: The GasPump lines. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 17:46 -0700
                                                            Re: The GasPump lines. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-25 22:53 -0400
                                                              Re: The GasPump lines. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-25 19:56 -0700
                                                                Re: The GasPump lines. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:16 -0400
                                                                  Re: The GasPump lines. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 10:59 -0400
                                                                    Re: The GasPump lines. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 11:12 -0400
                                                                    Re: The GasPump lines. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:23 -0600
                                                                      Re: The GasPump lines. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 11:44 -0400
                                                                        Re: The GasPump lines. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:44 -0600
                                                                          Re: The GasPump lines. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 17:52 -0400
                                                                            Re: The GasPump lines. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 16:25 -0600
                                                              Summer of 1979. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-26 02:45 -0700
                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 21:45 -0400
                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 19:35 -0700
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:47 -0400
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 06:52 -0700
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:19 -0700
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 12:06 -0700
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:10 +0000
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-09-26 17:38 -0400
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:39 -0700
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:26 -0700
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:27 -0700
                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:41 +0000
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:01 -0400
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:45 -0400
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:56 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 09:13 -0700
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:07 -0400
                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 12:22 -0700
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:26 -0400
                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:46 -0700
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 16:51 -0400
                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 21:10 +0000
                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:20 -0700
                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:22 -0400
                                                                              Kensi prefers science, and is biased. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 05:15 -0700
                                                                                Re: Kensi prefers science, and is biased. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 19:43 -0400
                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 09:11 +0100
                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 02:20 -0700
                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 14:04 +0100
                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 07:12 -0700
                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 17:25 +0100
                                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 12:36 -0400
                                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 17:52 +0100
                                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 11:08 -0700
                                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 19:45 +0100
                                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 14:53 -0400
                                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-27 19:19 +0000
                                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 12:38 -0700
                                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 23:46 +0100
                                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 15:53 -0700
                                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 11:21 +0100
                                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 03:50 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:06 +0100
                                                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 10:20 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 13:25 -0400
                                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 09:21 -0400
                                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:00 -0400
                                                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:13 -0400
                                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 11:11 -0700
                                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 19:13 -0700
                                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 11:21 +0100
                                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 03:48 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:23 +0100
                                                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 11:19 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 14:24 -0400
                                                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 20:21 +0100
                                                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 23:15 -0700
                                                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 10:20 +0100
                                                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 20:16 +0100
                                                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 12:31 -0700
                                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 09:20 -0400
                                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 06:52 -0700
                                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 10:05 -0400
                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 09:55 -0400
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:47 -0600
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 12:32 -0400
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:10 -0400
                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensinqton01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:23 -0400
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:53 -0400
                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:23 -0700
                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 16:37 -0400
                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 20:58 +0000
                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:05 -0400
                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:07 -0700
                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 21:15 +0000
                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda - 2018-09-26 14:21 -0700
                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:27 -0400
                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:51 -0600
                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:49 -0600
                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:30 -0700
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 09:21 -0500
                                                                      Re: ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ I walk everywhere. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄  Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 15:21 -0500
                                                                        Re: ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ I walk everywhere. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 14:31 -0700
                                                                          Re: ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ I walk everywhere. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:33 -0700
                                                                          Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:41 -0400
                                                                            Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:42 -0700
                                                                        Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  ????? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? I walk everywhere. ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:52 -0600
                                                                          Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  ????? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? I walk everywhere. ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 22:46 -0500
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:48 -0600
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 09:14 -0700
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 16:26 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 21:00 +0000
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:04 -0700
                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:50 -0700
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 12:05 -0700
                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 22:19 -0700
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:25 -0700
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:44 -0600
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-27 02:02 +0000
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:27 -0700
                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 12:13 -0600
                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:54 -0400
                                              Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 20:38 +0000
                                                "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 13:51 -0700
                                                  Re: "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:53 -0700
                                                  Re: "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:12 -0400
                                                Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 17:23 -0400
                                                  Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:28 -0700
                                                  Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:17 -0400
                                                    Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:06 -0500
                                                      Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:48 -0400
                                                Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. John of Patmos <jpatmos1318@gmXil.com> - 2018-09-29 21:51 +0000
                                                  Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:14 -0700
                                                    Steve Petruzzellis  (was: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.) snit <usnet@iminsane.net> - 2018-09-29 19:16 -0400
                                                      Re: Steve Petruzzellis  (was: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.) Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 19:01 -0600
                                                      Re: Steve Petruzzellis  (was: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:26 +0000
                                                        Re: Steve Petruzzellis snit <usnet@iminsane.net> - 2018-09-29 21:49 -0400
                                                          Re: Steve Petruzzellis Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:56 +0000
                                                            Re: Steve Petruzzellis Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:19 -0700
                                                              Re: Steve Petruzzellis Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:29 +0000
                                                                Re: Steve Petruzzellis "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 09:04 -0400
                                                            Re: Steve Petruzzellis benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:04 -0400
                                                        Re: Steve Petruzzellis Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:20 -0700
                                                          Re: Steve Petruzzellis Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:29 +0000
                                                            Re: Steve Petruzzellis Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:44 -0700
                                                  Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:23 +0000
                                                    Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 22:00 -0400
                                                      Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:30 +0000
                                                        Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 10:33 +0100
                                                    Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-30 03:24 +0000
                                                      Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:37 +0000
                                                        Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:43 -0700
                                                          Willful ignorance. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 05:34 -0700
                                                        Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-30 21:42 +0000
                                                          Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:47 -0700
                                                          Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 14:56 -0700
                                                          Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:21 +0000
                                                            Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:35 -0700
                                                              Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:44 +0000
                                                                Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:07 -0700
                                                                Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:44 -0600
                                                              Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 10:10 -0500
                                                        Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 08:16 +0100
                                                          Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:57 -0700
                                                            Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
                                                              Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 02:56 -0700
                                                          Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:03 -0700
                                                            Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 18:14 +0100
                                                              Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:25 -0400
                                                                Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 18:37 +0100
                                                                  Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:43 -0400
                                                                    Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:11 +0100
                                                                      Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 12:26 -0700
                                                                Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:50 -0700
                                                                  Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:54 -0400
                                                                    Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:13 +0100
                                                                      Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:20 -0400
                                                                    Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:35 -0700
                                                            Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:14 -0400
                                                            Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ "God" has punished Nadegda for this. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 12:14 -0500
                                                              Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 11:25 -0600
                                                                Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:35 -0400
                        Re: Relf's poverty. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 02:34 -0400
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-22 01:33 -0400
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 08:07 -0400
            Kensi shuns science. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 05:51 -0700
              Relf shuns science. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:57 +0000
                Re: Relf shuns science. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:37 -0600
                  Re: Relf shuns science. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 20:04 +0100
                    Re: Relf shuns science. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 13:47 -0600
                  Re: Relf shuns science. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 19:09 +0000
                    Re: Relf shuns science. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 20:17 +0100
                      Re: Relf shuns science. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 05:25 +0000
                        Re: Relf shuns science. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 10:08 +0100
                          Re: Relf shuns science. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 21:35 +0000
                            Re: Relf shuns science. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 23:26 +0100
                              Re: Relf shuns science. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:40 +0000
                                Re: Relf shuns science. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 23:53 +0100
                                  Re: Relf shuns science. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 16:01 -0700
                                  Re: Relf shuns science. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 09:16 -0500
                                Re: Relf shuns science. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:15 -0600
                                Re: Relf shuns science. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 11:47 -0400
                                  Re: Relf shuns science. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:52 -0500
                                  Re: Relf shuns science. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:16 -0600
                            Re: Relf shuns science. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 00:20 +0100
                              Re: Relf shuns science. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 11:49 -0400
                                Re: Relf shuns science. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:16 -0600
                                  Re: Relf shuns science. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 19:32 +0100
                                    Re: Relf shuns science. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:15 +0000
                                      Re: Relf shuns science. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 23:10 +0100
                                        Re: Relf shuns science. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 01:44 +0000
                                          Re: Relf shuns science. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:11 -0600
                                            Re: Relf shuns science. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 12:26 -0600
                                          Re: Relf shuns science. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 07:43 -0400
                                            Re: Relf shuns science. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 11:24 -0400
                                              Re: Relf shuns science. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 09:32 -0600
                                                Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Relf shuns science. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:51 -0500
                                                  Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Relf shuns science. ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 12:12 -0600
                                                    Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Relf shuns science. ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 13:14 -0500
                                                      Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflak Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 12:27 -0600
                                                    Re: ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄  Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 13:43 -0500
                                              Re: Relf shuns science. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 12:28 -0500
                                              Re: Relf shuns science. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:12 -0400
                    Re: Relf shuns science. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 13:47 -0600
                Looking in the mirror. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 11:43 -0700
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:15 -0600
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-22 10:47 -0400
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-22 10:20 -0700
              Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-22 21:59 -0400
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-21 15:15 +0000
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 12:54 +0000
      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:34 -0400
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 08:40 -0600
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:53 -0400
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 09:09 -0600
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 18:00 +0000
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-09-23 19:11 +0100
            All you need is hate... hate, hate, hate. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-23 11:43 -0700
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 21:38 +0000
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:16 -0600
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 19:41 -0400
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-30 03:18 +0000
      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Catalina" <Catalina@beach.sun> - 2018-09-30 02:44 -0400
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-10-01 11:27 +0000
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 10:17 -0400
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-01 13:34 -0400

Page 8 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 50  Next page →


#207904 — Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-09-24 20:10 +0000
SubjectRe: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.
Message-ID<pobgbv$mhp$31@dont-email.me>
In reply to#207892
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 13:37:54 -0500, Sergio wrote:

> who decides content and what is carried?  Apple? Google? Tweeter?
> Facebook?   They need to be regulated.

Hello, Sergio, we're here from the Party. We're going to need to see your 
Republican membership card.

<snip, snip, snip, confetti>

We can't allow you to keep that. Not after you suggested ... <sotto voce> 
regulating big businesses </sotto voce> ... that sort of heresy simply 
cannot be tolerated. You are hereby excommunicated for the cardinal sin of 
using the "R" word without preceding it with "de-" or a word like 
"dismantling".

Now get the fuck out of our sight, apostate!

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#207910 — Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-24 13:19 -0700
SubjectRe: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.
Message-ID<bk86e5.c42.19.2@news.alt.net>
In reply to#207904
.

vetoed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#207833 — Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-24 09:53 -0600
SubjectRe: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.
Message-ID<MPG.3612b6688a37bd3f989ab2@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#207807
In article <g0scauFqeotU2@mid.individual.net>, 
usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says...
> NOBODY has a right to abuse others. NOBODY. Does not matter what 
> political side you are on.
> 
> 

Tell that to the dumbocrats and the abuse they give conservitives.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#207819 — Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.

FromYour Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2018-09-24 10:43 -0500
SubjectRe: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.
Message-ID<Ed-dnVIkavmNmzTGnZ2dnUU7-I_NnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#207780
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:35:17 GMT, LO AND BEHOLD; "SilverSlimer
<silver@slim.er>" determined that the following was of great importance
and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
<9S4qD.118460$lM2.103829@fx39.iad>:
 
>On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:18:12 -0500, chrisv wrote:
>
>>benj wrote: 
>>>chrisv wrote:
>>>>Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>kkensington01
>>>>>>Sure they are. It's just that the criminals they're sanctuaries for are 
>>>>>>called "pillars of the community", live on Nob Hill, and rob the working
>>>>>>poor and rifle through little old ladies' pension funds.
>>>>>And kensi spins it completely out of control....again.
>>>>Let me guess:  You're a stupid right-winger.
>>>Let me guess: You think communism really can work if only YOU are put in
>>>charge of it this time?
>>YA stupid right-winger. 
>>>I think that's called insane.
>>Having fun knocking-down that straw man, right-winger?
>
>As you attack people from the right, I must ask you: are you in favour
>of corporations such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Twitter censoring
>the views of conservative individuals? Similarly, are you in favour of 
>corporations such as PayPal prohibiting people such as Alex Jones from
>doing business? 

they censor all sorts of stuff from all sorts of political stances.  that most of the problems are potential legally-actionable threats of violence and racist foamy terroristic nonsense from conservatives seems to be a problem that you should take up with your conservative allies, and not with private corporations.  private corporations aren't the government and aren't held to the constitution for their internal protocols.  they can censor anything they please on their platform - especially if they might be sued for hosting or enabling hate speech and threats from degenerate low-lifes.

alex jones is free to start his own corporation for disseminating his hate. (which obviously he already has)

-- 
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA

"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this 
seems to be the new norm in the world.  It's spreading like a cancer, 
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil.  We need to put an 
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell 
everywhere.  We need to get these people out of every civilized 
country, and there's only one way to do it.  IOW, we have to become 
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) 

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working.  We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too.  One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode 

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#207841 — Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-24 10:15 -0600
SubjectRe: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.
Message-ID<MPG.3612bb99664fe34f989ac6@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#207819
In article <Ed-dnVIkavmNmzTGnZ2dnUU7-I_NnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
127.0.0.1 says...
> 
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:35:17 GMT, LO AND BEHOLD; "SilverSlimer
> <silver@slim.er>" determined that the following was of great importance
> and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
> <9S4qD.118460$lM2.103829@fx39.iad>:
>  
> >On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:18:12 -0500, chrisv wrote:
> >
> >>benj wrote: 
> >>>chrisv wrote:
> >>>>Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>kkensington01
> >>>>>>Sure they are. It's just that the criminals they're sanctuaries for are 
> >>>>>>called "pillars of the community", live on Nob Hill, and rob the working
> >>>>>>poor and rifle through little old ladies' pension funds.
> >>>>>And kensi spins it completely out of control....again.
> >>>>Let me guess:  You're a stupid right-winger.
> >>>Let me guess: You think communism really can work if only YOU are put in
> >>>charge of it this time?
> >>YA stupid right-winger. 
> >>>I think that's called insane.
> >>Having fun knocking-down that straw man, right-winger?
> >
> >As you attack people from the right, I must ask you: are you in favour
> >of corporations such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Twitter censoring
> >the views of conservative individuals? Similarly, are you in favour of 
> >corporations such as PayPal prohibiting people such as Alex Jones from
> >doing business? 
> 
> they censor all sorts of stuff from all sorts of political stances.  that most of the problems are potential legally-actionable threats of violence and racist foamy terroristic nonsense from conservatives seems to be a problem that you should take up with your conservative allies, and not with private corporations.  private corporations aren't the government and aren't held to the constitution for their internal protocols.  they can censor anything they please on their 
platform - especially if they might be sued for hosting or enabling hate speech and threats from degenerate low-lifes.
> 
> alex jones is free to start his own corporation for disseminating his hate. (which obviously he already has)

You been drinking again?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#207829 — Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-24 09:50 -0600
SubjectRe: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.
Message-ID<MPG.3612b5cec54567e5989ab1@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#207779
In article <e7lhqdt6or7035h4l50d9utqgvp51bqr09@4ax.com>, 
chrisv@nospam.invalid says...
> 
> benj wrote:
> 
> > chrisv wrote:
> >> Skeeter wrote:
> >>> kkensington01
> >>>>
> >>>> Sure they are. It's just that the criminals they're sanctuaries for are
> >>>> called "pillars of the community", live on Nob Hill, and rob the working
> >>>> poor and rifle through little old ladies' pension funds.
> >>>
> >>> And kensi spins it completely out of control....again.
> >> 
> >> Let me guess:  You're a stupid right-winger.
> > 
> >Let me guess: You think communism really can work if only YOU are put in 
> >charge of it this time? 
> 
> YA stupid right-winger.
> 
> >I think that's called insane.
> 
> Having fun knocking-down that straw man, right-winger?

Name calling, so left of you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#207038 — Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-09-22 02:22 +0000
SubjectRe: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.
Message-ID<po491i$d3v$14@dont-email.me>
In reply to#206776
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 13:15:33 -0500, chrisv wrote:

> Skeeter wrote:
> 
>> kkensington01
>>>
>>>
>>> > And yet no conservative-controlled city in the world is a sanctuary
>>> > for criminals...
>>> 
>>> Sure they are. It's just that the criminals they're sanctuaries for
>>> are called "pillars of the community", live on Nob Hill, and rob the
>>> working poor and rifle through little old ladies' pension funds.
>>
>>And kensi spins it completely out of control....again.
> 
> Let me guess:  You're a stupid right-winger.

DING DING DING!

Ladies and gentlemen, we have a winner ...

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208604 — Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-26 21:54 -0700
SubjectRe: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free.
Message-ID<MPG.36160253e9b0255b994c69@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#206712
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <po34in$2si$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...


> 
> On 9/21/2018 11:53 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> > And yet no conservative-controlled city in the world is a sanctuary for
> > criminals...
> 
> Sure they are. It's just that the criminals they're sanctuaries for are 
> called "pillars of the community", live on Nob Hill, and rob the working 
> poor and rifle through little old ladies' pension funds.
> 
> To conservatives, *that* you are a criminal isn't the important thing. 
> It's *how* you commit your crimes, and who your victims are. If you 
> steal from a corporate chain store's cash register with a gun, or rape 
> some rich old lady in some alley at knife point, they want you in jail. 
> If you rob non-wealthy people with a pen while wearing a three-piece 
> suit and rape your female employees by pressuring them into unwanted sex 
> and maybe spiking their drinks, you're a "good old boy" and get invited 
> to be their golfing buddy at the country club.

Doncha just HATE men?

-- 
Checkmate ÂŪ 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright ÂĐ 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208630 — I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se.

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2018-09-27 03:56 -0700
SubjectI avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.27--3.56am.Seattle.2018>
In reply to#208604
> > rape your employees by pressuring them into unwanted sex 
> 
> Doncha just HATE men?

I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se.

The wealth and intelligence of a nation is reflected
in its birth rate -- from Singapore (.83/woman) and Macau, 
at the top, to Niger (6.49/woman) and Angola at the bottom.
  Jeff-Relf.Me/Global.Fertility.Rates.1970.2014.PNG

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208684 — Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se.

FromMelzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com>
Date2018-09-27 15:34 +0000
SubjectRe: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se.
Message-ID<OL6rD.272428$cw.831@fx39.am4>
In reply to#208630
On 2018-09-27, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
>> > rape your employees by pressuring them into unwanted sex 
>> 
>> Doncha just HATE men?
>
> I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se.

I have letter from my daughter on working desk ;p
She says `you are best daddy in the world` ;)

>
> The wealth and intelligence of a nation is reflected
> in its birth rate -- from Singapore (.83/woman) and Macau, 
> at the top, to Niger (6.49/woman) and Angola at the bottom.
>   Jeff-Relf.Me/Global.Fertility.Rates.1970.2014.PNG
At birth rate less then 2/woman nation will dissapear eventually and be
replaced with nation that has more then that..


-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208693 — Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se.

FromSilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>
Date2018-09-27 15:58 +0000
SubjectRe: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se.
Message-ID<P67rD.65536$9O2.8023@fx03.iad>
In reply to#208684
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:34:06 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote:

> On 2018-09-27, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
>>> > rape your employees by pressuring them into unwanted sex
>>> 
>>> Doncha just HATE men?
>>
>> I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se.
> 
> I have letter from my daughter on working desk ;p She says `you are best
> daddy in the world` ;)
> 
> 
>> The wealth and intelligence of a nation is reflected in its birth rate
>> -- from Singapore (.83/woman) and Macau,
>> at the top, to Niger (6.49/woman) and Angola at the bottom.
>>   Jeff-Relf.Me/Global.Fertility.Rates.1970.2014.PNG
> At birth rate less then 2/woman nation will dissapear eventually and be
> replaced with nation that has more then that..

Yep, low IQ "people" from the African continent will populate Europe soon 
if today's youth doesn't wake up and realize that women were given too 
much power and influence and consequently destroyed society itself as 
well as any motivation one might have to fix it.



-- 
SilverSlimer
FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate
Absolute centrist, proud Catholic

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208717 — Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se.

FromMelzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com>
Date2018-09-27 17:00 +0000
SubjectRe: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se.
Message-ID<818rD.249198$Wx.215079@fx37.am4>
In reply to#208693
On 2018-09-27, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:34:06 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote:
>
>> On 2018-09-27, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
>>>> > rape your employees by pressuring them into unwanted sex
>>>> 
>>>> Doncha just HATE men?
>>>
>>> I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se.
>> 
>> I have letter from my daughter on working desk ;p She says `you are best
>> daddy in the world` ;)
>> 
>> 
>>> The wealth and intelligence of a nation is reflected in its birth rate
>>> -- from Singapore (.83/woman) and Macau,
>>> at the top, to Niger (6.49/woman) and Angola at the bottom.
>>>   Jeff-Relf.Me/Global.Fertility.Rates.1970.2014.PNG
>> At birth rate less then 2/woman nation will dissapear eventually and be
>> replaced with nation that has more then that..
>
> Yep, low IQ "people" from the African continent will populate Europe soon 
> if today's youth doesn't wake up and realize that women were given too 
> much power and influence and consequently destroyed society itself as 
> well as any motivation one might have to fix it.

That's true. Woman on west now does not think in terms of children and
family, rather how to drive career.
Popularisation of LGBT does not helps the matter..
>
>
>


-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208820 — Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se.

FromSilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>
Date2018-09-27 21:47 +0000
SubjectRe: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se.
Message-ID<KdcrD.95931$vJ1.1535@fx05.iad>
In reply to#208717
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 17:00:52 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote:

> On 2018-09-27, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:34:06 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote:
>>
>>> On 2018-09-27, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
>>>>> > rape your employees by pressuring them into unwanted sex
>>>>> 
>>>>> Doncha just HATE men?
>>>>
>>>> I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se.
>>> 
>>> I have letter from my daughter on working desk ;p She says `you are
>>> best daddy in the world` ;)
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> The wealth and intelligence of a nation is reflected in its birth
>>>> rate -- from Singapore (.83/woman) and Macau,
>>>> at the top, to Niger (6.49/woman) and Angola at the bottom.
>>>>   Jeff-Relf.Me/Global.Fertility.Rates.1970.2014.PNG
>>> At birth rate less then 2/woman nation will dissapear eventually and
>>> be replaced with nation that has more then that..
>>
>> Yep, low IQ "people" from the African continent will populate Europe
>> soon if today's youth doesn't wake up and realize that women were given
>> too much power and influence and consequently destroyed society itself
>> as well as any motivation one might have to fix it.
> 
> That's true. Woman on west now does not think in terms of children and
> family, rather how to drive career.
> Popularisation of LGBT does not helps the matter..

All of today's problems can be traced back to the leftist push, since the 
1950s, for feminism. While it may have empowered a few at the very 
beginning, the real consequence of it is increased divorce, increased 
male suicide, a feminization of men in general, an absolute of false 
allegations which are enough to destroy the lives of men (see Kavanaugh) 
and so on. Are women any happier now than they were back then though? Not 
even. Depression among women is much higher than it used to be because 
they be have suppressed their natural instincts to reproduce and have a 
family and they have therefore become lonely, empty old hags as the men 
have become shells.

Feminism must be destroyed and if it means removing a woman's right to 
vote, SO BE IT.

-- 
SilverSlimer
FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate
Absolute centrist, proud Catholic

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208870 — Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se.

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-27 18:05 -0700
SubjectRe: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se.
Message-ID<MPG.36171e346898382d994c78@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#208820
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <KdcrD.95931$vJ1.1535@fx05.iad>, silver@slim.er 
says...


> 
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 17:00:52 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote:
> 
> > On 2018-09-27, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:34:06 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 2018-09-27, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
> >>>>> > rape your employees by pressuring them into unwanted sex
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Doncha just HATE men?
> >>>>
> >>>> I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se.
> >>> 
> >>> I have letter from my daughter on working desk ;p She says `you are
> >>> best daddy in the world` ;)
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>>> The wealth and intelligence of a nation is reflected in its birth
> >>>> rate -- from Singapore (.83/woman) and Macau,
> >>>> at the top, to Niger (6.49/woman) and Angola at the bottom.
> >>>>   Jeff-Relf.Me/Global.Fertility.Rates.1970.2014.PNG
> >>> At birth rate less then 2/woman nation will dissapear eventually and
> >>> be replaced with nation that has more then that..
> >>
> >> Yep, low IQ "people" from the African continent will populate Europe
> >> soon if today's youth doesn't wake up and realize that women were given
> >> too much power and influence and consequently destroyed society itself
> >> as well as any motivation one might have to fix it.
> > 
> > That's true. Woman on west now does not think in terms of children and
> > family, rather how to drive career.
> > Popularisation of LGBT does not helps the matter..
> 
> All of today's problems can be traced back to the leftist push, since the 
> 1950s, for feminism. While it may have empowered a few at the very 
> beginning, the real consequence of it is increased divorce, increased 
> male suicide, a feminization of men in general, an absolute of false 
> allegations which are enough to destroy the lives of men (see Kavanaugh) 
> and so on. Are women any happier now than they were back then though? Not 
> even. Depression among women is much higher than it used to be because 
> they be have suppressed their natural instincts to reproduce and have a 
> family and they have therefore become lonely, empty old hags as the men 
> have become shells.
> 
> Feminism must be destroyed and if it means removing a woman's right to 
> vote, SO BE IT.

If you snapped a girl's bra strap back in the sixth grade, she might sue 
you fifty years later for "ruining her whole life".

-- 
Checkmate ÂŪ 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright ÂĐ 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208881 — Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄

FromYour Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2018-09-27 20:31 -0500
SubjectRe: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄
Message-ID<wcWdnfJIU9f7GTDGnZ2dnUU7-KPNnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#208870
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 18:05:34 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "The Anti-Muslim
Wannabe Homegrown Terrorist Posting as "ðŸ’Đ <ricksabian1@gmail.com>"" 
determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently
decided to freely share it with us in
<MPG.36171e346898382d994c78@news.altopia.com>:
 
>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
>ðŸ’Đ!  In article <KdcrD.95931$vJ1.1535@fx05.iad>, silver@slim.er
>says...
>
>
>>On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 17:00:52 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote: 
>>>On 2018-09-27, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
>>>>On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:34:06 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote: 
>>>>>On 2018-09-27, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
>>>>>>>>rape your employees by pressuring them into unwanted sex
>>>>>>>Doncha just HATE men?
>>>>>>I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se.
>>>>>I have letter from my daughter on working desk ;p She says `you are best
>>>>>daddy in the world` ;) 
>>>>>>The wealth and intelligence of a nation is reflected in its birth rate
>>>>>>-- from Singapore (.83/woman) and Macau, at the top, to Niger
>>>>>>(6.49/woman) and Angola at the bottom.  
>>>>>>Jeff-Relf.Me/Global.Fertility.Rates.1970.2014.PNG
>>>>>At birth rate less then 2/woman nation will dissapear eventually and be 
>>>>>replaced with nation that has more then that..
>>>>Yep, low IQ "people" from the African continent will populate Europe
>>>>soon if today's youth doesn't wake up and realize that women were given
>>>>too much power and influence and consequently destroyed society itself 
>>>>as well as any motivation one might have to fix it.
>>>That's true. Woman on west now does not think in terms of children and
>>>family, rather how to drive career. Popularisation of LGBT does not
>>>helps the matter..
>>All of today's problems can be traced back to the leftist push, since
>>the 1950s, for feminism. While it may have empowered a few at the very 
>>beginning, the real consequence of it is increased divorce, increased
>>male suicide, a feminization of men in general, an absolute of false
>>allegations which are enough to destroy the lives of men (see
>>Kavanaugh) and so on. Are women any happier now than they were back
>>then though? Not even. Depression among women is much higher than it
>>used to be because they be have suppressed their natural instincts to
>>reproduce and have a family and they have therefore become lonely,
>>empty old hags as the men have become shells. Feminism must be
>>destroyed and if it means removing a woman's right to vote, SO BE IT.
>
>If you snapped a girl's bra strap back in the sixth grade, she might sue
>you fifty years later for "ruining her whole life". 

is that when you did that?

-- 
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA

"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this 
seems to be the new norm in the world.  It's spreading like a cancer, 
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil.  We need to put an 
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell 
everywhere.  We need to get these people out of every civilized 
country, and there's only one way to do it.  IOW, we have to become 
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) 

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working.  We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too.  One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode 

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208888 — Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snow

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-27 19:57 -0600
SubjectRe: ? Snowflake ?? Snow
Message-ID<MPG.3617385c4b1cd3d5989c41@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#208881
In article <wcWdnfJIU9f7GTDGnZ2dnUU7-KPNnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
127.0.0.1 says...
> 
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 18:05:34 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "The Anti-Muslim
> Wannabe Homegrown Terrorist Posting as "ðÅļ?ÂĐ <ricksabian1@gmail.com>"" 
> determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently
> decided to freely share it with us in
> <MPG.36171e346898382d994c78@news.altopia.com>:
>  
> >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
> >ðÅļ?ÂĐ!  In article <KdcrD.95931$vJ1.1535@fx05.iad>, silver@slim.er
> >says...
> >
> >
> >>On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 17:00:52 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote: 
> >>>On 2018-09-27, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
> >>>>On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:34:06 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote: 
> >>>>>On 2018-09-27, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>rape your employees by pressuring them into unwanted sex
> >>>>>>>Doncha just HATE men?
> >>>>>>I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se.
> >>>>>I have letter from my daughter on working desk ;p She says `you are best
> >>>>>daddy in the world` ;) 
> >>>>>>The wealth and intelligence of a nation is reflected in its birth rate
> >>>>>>-- from Singapore (.83/woman) and Macau, at the top, to Niger
> >>>>>>(6.49/woman) and Angola at the bottom.  
> >>>>>>Jeff-Relf.Me/Global.Fertility.Rates.1970.2014.PNG
> >>>>>At birth rate less then 2/woman nation will dissapear eventually and be 
> >>>>>replaced with nation that has more then that..
> >>>>Yep, low IQ "people" from the African continent will populate Europe
> >>>>soon if today's youth doesn't wake up and realize that women were given
> >>>>too much power and influence and consequently destroyed society itself 
> >>>>as well as any motivation one might have to fix it.
> >>>That's true. Woman on west now does not think in terms of children and
> >>>family, rather how to drive career. Popularisation of LGBT does not
> >>>helps the matter..
> >>All of today's problems can be traced back to the leftist push, since
> >>the 1950s, for feminism. While it may have empowered a few at the very 
> >>beginning, the real consequence of it is increased divorce, increased
> >>male suicide, a feminization of men in general, an absolute of false
> >>allegations which are enough to destroy the lives of men (see
> >>Kavanaugh) and so on. Are women any happier now than they were back
> >>then though? Not even. Depression among women is much higher than it
> >>used to be because they be have suppressed their natural instincts to
> >>reproduce and have a family and they have therefore become lonely,
> >>empty old hags as the men have become shells. Feminism must be
> >>destroyed and if it means removing a woman's right to vote, SO BE IT.
> >
> >If you snapped a girl's bra strap back in the sixth grade, she might sue
> >you fifty years later for "ruining her whole life". 
> 
> is that when you did that?

Hey post humper, we used to do it all the time as kids.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#208972 — Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snow ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄

FromYour Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2018-09-28 09:57 -0500
SubjectRe: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snow ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄
Message-ID<ZvWdnV3hhunJ3DPGnZ2dnUU7-VPNnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#208888
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 19:57:01 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter Fake
News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter
<skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of great
importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
<MPG.3617385c4b1cd3d5989c41@reader.albasani.net>:
 
>In article <wcWdnfJIU9f7GTDGnZ2dnUU7-KPNnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
>127.0.0.1 says...
>>On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 18:05:34 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "The Anti-Muslim
>>Wannabe Homegrown Terrorist Posting as "ðŸ’Đ <ricksabian1@gmail.com>"" 
>>determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently
>>decided to freely share it with us in
>><MPG.36171e346898382d994c78@news.altopia.com>: 
>>>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
>>>ðŸ’Đ!  In article <KdcrD.95931$vJ1.1535@fx05.iad>, silver@slim.er
>>>says... 
>>>>On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 17:00:52 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote: 
>>>>>On 2018-09-27, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
>>>>>>On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:34:06 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote: 
>>>>>>>On 2018-09-27, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>rape your employees by pressuring them into unwanted sex
>>>>>>>>>Doncha just HATE men?
>>>>>>>>I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se.
>>>>>>>I have letter from my daughter on working desk ;p She says `you are best
>>>>>>>daddy in the world` ;) 
>>>>>>>>The wealth and intelligence of a nation is reflected in its birth rate
>>>>>>>>-- from Singapore (.83/woman) and Macau, at the top, to Niger
>>>>>>>>(6.49/woman) and Angola at the bottom. 
>>>>>>>>Jeff-Relf.Me/Global.Fertility.Rates.1970.2014.PNG
>>>>>>>At birth rate less then 2/woman nation will dissapear eventually and be 
>>>>>>>replaced with nation that has more then that..
>>>>>>Yep, low IQ "people" from the African continent will populate Europe
>>>>>>soon if today's youth doesn't wake up and realize that women were given
>>>>>>too much power and influence and consequently destroyed society itself 
>>>>>>as well as any motivation one might have to fix it.
>>>>>That's true. Woman on west now does not think in terms of children and
>>>>>family, rather how to drive career. Popularisation of LGBT does not
>>>>>helps the matter..
>>>>All of today's problems can be traced back to the leftist push, since
>>>>the 1950s, for feminism. While it may have empowered a few at the very 
>>>>beginning, the real consequence of it is increased divorce, increased
>>>>male suicide, a feminization of men in general, an absolute of false
>>>>allegations which are enough to destroy the lives of men (see
>>>>Kavanaugh) and so on. Are women any happier now than they were back
>>>>then though? Not even. Depression among women is much higher than it
>>>>used to be because they be have suppressed their natural instincts to
>>>>reproduce and have a family and they have therefore become lonely,
>>>>empty old hags as the men have become shells. Feminism must be
>>>>destroyed and if it means removing a woman's right to vote, SO BE IT.
>>>If you snapped a girl's bra strap back in the sixth grade, she might sue
>>>you fifty years later for "ruining her whole life". 
>>is that when you did that?
>
>Hey post humper, we used to do it all the time as kids.

i suppose you two should beware if you're ever (suppressed laughter) appointed to anything remotely important and visible to the general public, such as manager at a taco hut, for instance.

<guffaw>

-- 
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA

"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this 
seems to be the new norm in the world.  It's spreading like a cancer, 
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil.  We need to put an 
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell 
everywhere.  We need to get these people out of every civilized 
country, and there's only one way to do it.  IOW, we have to become 
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) 

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working.  We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too.  One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode 

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#209050 — Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? Snow ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-28 13:04 -0600
SubjectRe: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? Snow ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?
Message-ID<MPG.3618291c9589b896989c61@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#208972
In article <ZvWdnV3hhunJ3DPGnZ2dnUU7-VPNnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
127.0.0.1 says...
> 
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 19:57:01 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; "Skeeter Skeeter Fake
> News Bleater - Exploded Everyone's Irony Meters "Skeeter
> <skeet@invalid.invalid>"" determined that the following was of great
> importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
> <MPG.3617385c4b1cd3d5989c41@reader.albasani.net>:
>  
> >In article <wcWdnfJIU9f7GTDGnZ2dnUU7-KPNnZ2d@giganews.com>, root@
> >127.0.0.1 says...
> >>On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 18:05:34 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "The Anti-Muslim
> >>Wannabe Homegrown Terrorist Posting as "ðÅļ?ÂĐ <ricksabian1@gmail.com>"" 
> >>determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently
> >>decided to freely share it with us in
> >><MPG.36171e346898382d994c78@news.altopia.com>: 
> >>>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
> >>>ðÅļ?ÂĐ!  In article <KdcrD.95931$vJ1.1535@fx05.iad>, silver@slim.er
> >>>says... 
> >>>>On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 17:00:52 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote: 
> >>>>>On 2018-09-27, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
> >>>>>>On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:34:06 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote: 
> >>>>>>>On 2018-09-27, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>rape your employees by pressuring them into unwanted sex
> >>>>>>>>>Doncha just HATE men?
> >>>>>>>>I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se.
> >>>>>>>I have letter from my daughter on working desk ;p She says `you are best
> >>>>>>>daddy in the world` ;) 
> >>>>>>>>The wealth and intelligence of a nation is reflected in its birth rate
> >>>>>>>>-- from Singapore (.83/woman) and Macau, at the top, to Niger
> >>>>>>>>(6.49/woman) and Angola at the bottom. 
> >>>>>>>>Jeff-Relf.Me/Global.Fertility.Rates.1970.2014.PNG
> >>>>>>>At birth rate less then 2/woman nation will dissapear eventually and be 
> >>>>>>>replaced with nation that has more then that..
> >>>>>>Yep, low IQ "people" from the African continent will populate Europe
> >>>>>>soon if today's youth doesn't wake up and realize that women were given
> >>>>>>too much power and influence and consequently destroyed society itself 
> >>>>>>as well as any motivation one might have to fix it.
> >>>>>That's true. Woman on west now does not think in terms of children and
> >>>>>family, rather how to drive career. Popularisation of LGBT does not
> >>>>>helps the matter..
> >>>>All of today's problems can be traced back to the leftist push, since
> >>>>the 1950s, for feminism. While it may have empowered a few at the very 
> >>>>beginning, the real consequence of it is increased divorce, increased
> >>>>male suicide, a feminization of men in general, an absolute of false
> >>>>allegations which are enough to destroy the lives of men (see
> >>>>Kavanaugh) and so on. Are women any happier now than they were back
> >>>>then though? Not even. Depression among women is much higher than it
> >>>>used to be because they be have suppressed their natural instincts to
> >>>>reproduce and have a family and they have therefore become lonely,
> >>>>empty old hags as the men have become shells. Feminism must be
> >>>>destroyed and if it means removing a woman's right to vote, SO BE IT.
> >>>If you snapped a girl's bra strap back in the sixth grade, she might sue
> >>>you fifty years later for "ruining her whole life". 
> >>is that when you did that?
> >
> >Hey post humper, we used to do it all the time as kids.
> 
> i suppose you two should beware if you're ever (suppressed laughter) appointed to anything remotely important and visible to the general public, such as manager at a taco hut, for instance.
> 
> <guffaw>

See what I made you do?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#209059 — Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ??

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2018-09-28 20:23 +0100
SubjectRe: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ??
Message-ID<1nvutyf.5y3ytljxpfp5N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#209050
Sir Gergory Hall, Esq. <nelly@fake.yacht_maester> grotesquely gurgled:

> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 13:04:22 -0600, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> 
> >See what I made you do?
> 
> Another untrimmed, totally space-wasting post from Skeeter...

See what he made you do?

-- 
^Ï^     My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#209088 — Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ??

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-28 14:34 -0600
SubjectRe: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ??
Message-ID<MPG.36183e59d92145de989c73@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#209050
In article <g0vsqd51lo5e0feuuehgpcp6k9r7k4igdh@4ax.com>, 
greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
> 
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 13:04:22 -0600, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> 
> >See what I made you do?
> 
> Another untrimmed, totally space-wasting post from Skeeter...

I just responded to an unsnipped post.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 8 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 50  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate


csiph-web