Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #210450 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Darlene Jacobsen <jacodar242@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-10-02 18:12 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-10-03 07:52 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 76 — 9 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Darlene Jacobsen <jacodar242@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 18:12 -0700
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Darlene Jacobsen <jacodar242@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 18:17 -0700
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 19:18 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Darlene Jacobsen <jacodar242@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 18:18 -0700
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Darlene Jacobsen <jacodar242@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 18:36 -0700
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 19:44 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:53 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-03 10:06 -0400
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:32 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 16:31 -0500
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 16:46 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 19:25 -0500
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-04 00:21 -0500
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 07:50 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-04 12:11 -0500
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 11:43 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-04 13:52 -0500
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-04 15:18 -0400
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-04 16:44 -0500
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 19:38 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-04 11:55 -0700
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-04 15:21 -0400
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-04 12:47 -0700
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 20:59 +0100
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 22:10 +0100
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-04 16:45 -0500
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-04 16:40 -0500
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-04 15:24 -0700
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 22:19 +0100
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 22:32 +0100
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 22:49 +0100
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:42 -0400
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-04 21:15 -0700
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-10-05 09:30 +0100
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-05 09:28 +0100
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-04 16:54 -0500
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-04 16:43 -0500
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-04 19:37 -0500
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 19:47 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 20:03 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 19:43 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-05 01:31 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-05 08:48 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 07:47 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-04 11:09 -0400
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 11:41 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-04 14:08 -0400
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 19:34 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-04 22:01 -0400
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 20:17 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 07:49 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 21:52 -0500
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:58 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 16:44 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 17:10 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 07:44 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 11:42 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 19:38 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 20:16 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-04 22:09 -0500
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-04 23:14 -0400
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-04 20:17 -0700
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-04 23:58 -0400
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 21:27 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-04 23:45 -0400
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-05 03:32 -0500
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-05 12:26 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-05 14:57 -0400
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-05 15:09 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-05 15:08 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-10-03 19:52 +0100
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Darlene Jacobsen <jacodar242@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 18:23 -0700
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Darlene Jacobsen <jacodar242@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 18:28 -0700
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 19:33 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 19:43 -0600
Re: SPEAKING OF KAVANAGH Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:52 -0600
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-04 19:43 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36206fbcdc6bdd2f989e0e@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #210810 |
In article <MPG.36200b5cf2cb86aa994dc1@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1 @gmail.com says... > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <4uocrdlko4vg6dqk6khj5qa5kr1do55847@4ax.com>, > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > > > > > On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 11:58:45 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > > > In an article pandora@peak.org says... > > >> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018, Checkmate wrote: > > >> > In an article pandora@peak.org says... > > >> >> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018, Skeeter wrote: > > >> >> > In an article pandora@peak.org says... > > >> >> >> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018, mixed nuts wrote: > > >> >> >> > On 10/3/2018, Skeeter wrote: > > >> >> >> >> In an article jacodar242@gmail.com says... > > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> >>> His lips were pursed throughout most of his testimony... > > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> >>> Pursed Lips which are pulled inwards from all directions are an > > >> >> >> >>> indication of tension and may indicate frustration or > > >> >> >> >>> disapproval. > > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> >>> Pursed lips are a classic sign of anger, including when it is > > >> >> >> >>> suppressed. It is effectively holding the mouth shut to prevent > > >> >> >> >>> the person saying what they feel like saying. This may also be > > >> >> >> >>> an indication of lying or withholding the truth as the person > > >> >> >> >>> stops themselves from telling the truth. > > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> >>> Pursed lips can also indicate a person who is thinking and who > > >> >> >> >>> is deciding between possible options. Deciding and disapproval > > >> >> >> >>> are both evaluative actions, which is the common core of > > >> >> >> >>> lip-pursing. > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> I would be angry to if some cheating assholes tried to destroy my > > >> >> >> >> life. > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > You'd think a future judge would be smart enough to get an NDA. > > >> >> >> > I'm wondering if he should have gone to a different private prep > > >> >> >> > school. Phillips Andover or something like that where they teach > > >> >> >> > people to be presidents and supreme court people who don't get > > >> >> >> > investigated very much so they don't have to get angry on tv. > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> Perhaps he got angry cause he has something to hide? > > >> >> > > > >> >> > You hope that's true, How about if your family got death threats and > > >> >> > your life was destroyed over something that may or may not have > > >> >> > happened. Would you be angry? > > >> >> > > >> >> I might be upset but if I had nothing to hide, I wouldn't be angry. If > > >> >> the woman was lying, that is. If she was, I feel sorry for her. He, > > >> >> however, allowed himself to be put in the public eye and therefore her > > >> >> accusations needed to be heard. They were. And now? > > >> > > > >> > Now we're hearing how Ford lied. She claimed she was so traumatized > > >> > that she only felt "safe" installing two front doors to her house, when > > >> > records show she used the second door to turn part of her Palo Alto > > >> > house into an illegal rental. > > >> > > >> Is that really relevant? > > > > > >When a witness intentionally lies about having to put in a second door > > >because she was so emotionally traumatized, and then we find out that the > > >second door was really installed so she could rent out part of the house > > >to someone else, it's very relevant. Also, she lived in a 500 square > > >foot apartment with only one door at one time, so there goes the > > >Kavanaugh-induced "claustrophobia" claim. > > > > > >> > Then there was the "fear of flying" excuse, which fell apart when she > > >> > admitted she flies to other places all the time. > > >> > > >> I absolutely hate to fly but I do, now and then when the occasion makes > > >> it necessary. I get intense panic attacks and nearly pass out. > > > > > >She said she absolutely could not fly, yet under questioning, we find out > > >she flew every year, including in some small planes island-hopping around > > >Hawaii. Proof that she lies when she finds it convenient to do so. > > > > > >> > I knew the dirt would come to the surface once it got out there. It > > >> > always does, and I think there'll be more. > > >> > > >> Well, at least the FBI is doing another investigation, no? That *should* > > >> make both sides feel better. > > > > > >One might like to think so, but as predicted, the Democrats still aren't > > >satisfied, because it was just another stall tactic. > > > > Why do you continue trying to convince this anti-American > > foreigner who made up her mind that Kavanaugh is guilty > > of rape that she's not a warped leftist. Nothing you say > > will change her delusional mind. > > > > And, actually, what she believes doesn't matter because > > she's just another damned foreign ingrate who doesn't > > know when to butt out when it's none of her business. > > It's obvious that those who were against Kavanaugh from the beginning, > had no intention of ever looking at the facts or showing any objectivity. > Nadsington pronounced him "guilty" the same day the accusations came out. > I just hoped that some of the people who said they had an open mind but > wanted to hear the facts, actually meant it. I'd like to see Ford, > Avanaughty, Sweatnick, and the rest of those perjurers and character > assassins prosecuted, or this shit will only get worse in the future. I > can't wait for the Red Tide to crush the Libtards this November, and > early polls predict that's exactly what they've done to themselves with > this blatant dishonesty. The left hurt itself with this charade. Did you see the protesters in DC today? They looked just like unemployed welfare babys and when interviewed about the judge, they either had no idea what the hell to say or they parroted CNN word for word.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-05 01:31 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3620c14fab856ef7989e2d@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #211008 |
In article <MPG.36209be15d736227994df8@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1 @gmail.com says... > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <MPG.36206fbcdc6bdd2f989e0e@reader.albasani.net>, > skeet@invalid.invalid says... > > > > > > In article <MPG.36200b5cf2cb86aa994dc1@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1 > > @gmail.com says... > > > > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > > Checkmate! In article <4uocrdlko4vg6dqk6khj5qa5kr1do55847@4ax.com>, > > > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 11:58:45 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > In an article pandora@peak.org says... > > > > >> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018, Checkmate wrote: > > > > >> > In an article pandora@peak.org says... > > > > >> >> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018, Skeeter wrote: > > > > >> >> > In an article pandora@peak.org says... > > > > >> >> >> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018, mixed nuts wrote: > > > > >> >> >> > On 10/3/2018, Skeeter wrote: > > > > >> >> >> >> In an article jacodar242@gmail.com says... > > > > >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> His lips were pursed throughout most of his testimony... > > > > >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> Pursed Lips which are pulled inwards from all directions are an > > > > >> >> >> >>> indication of tension and may indicate frustration or > > > > >> >> >> >>> disapproval. > > > > >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> Pursed lips are a classic sign of anger, including when it is > > > > >> >> >> >>> suppressed. It is effectively holding the mouth shut to prevent > > > > >> >> >> >>> the person saying what they feel like saying. This may also be > > > > >> >> >> >>> an indication of lying or withholding the truth as the person > > > > >> >> >> >>> stops themselves from telling the truth. > > > > >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> >>> Pursed lips can also indicate a person who is thinking and who > > > > >> >> >> >>> is deciding between possible options. Deciding and disapproval > > > > >> >> >> >>> are both evaluative actions, which is the common core of > > > > >> >> >> >>> lip-pursing. > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> >> I would be angry to if some cheating assholes tried to destroy my > > > > >> >> >> >> life. > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > You'd think a future judge would be smart enough to get an NDA. > > > > >> >> >> > I'm wondering if he should have gone to a different private prep > > > > >> >> >> > school. Phillips Andover or something like that where they teach > > > > >> >> >> > people to be presidents and supreme court people who don't get > > > > >> >> >> > investigated very much so they don't have to get angry on tv. > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> Perhaps he got angry cause he has something to hide? > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > You hope that's true, How about if your family got death threats and > > > > >> >> > your life was destroyed over something that may or may not have > > > > >> >> > happened. Would you be angry? > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> I might be upset but if I had nothing to hide, I wouldn't be angry. If > > > > >> >> the woman was lying, that is. If she was, I feel sorry for her. He, > > > > >> >> however, allowed himself to be put in the public eye and therefore her > > > > >> >> accusations needed to be heard. They were. And now? > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Now we're hearing how Ford lied. She claimed she was so traumatized > > > > >> > that she only felt "safe" installing two front doors to her house, when > > > > >> > records show she used the second door to turn part of her Palo Alto > > > > >> > house into an illegal rental. > > > > >> > > > > >> Is that really relevant? > > > > > > > > > >When a witness intentionally lies about having to put in a second door > > > > >because she was so emotionally traumatized, and then we find out that the > > > > >second door was really installed so she could rent out part of the house > > > > >to someone else, it's very relevant. Also, she lived in a 500 square > > > > >foot apartment with only one door at one time, so there goes the > > > > >Kavanaugh-induced "claustrophobia" claim. > > > > > > > > > >> > Then there was the "fear of flying" excuse, which fell apart when she > > > > >> > admitted she flies to other places all the time. > > > > >> > > > > >> I absolutely hate to fly but I do, now and then when the occasion makes > > > > >> it necessary. I get intense panic attacks and nearly pass out. > > > > > > > > > >She said she absolutely could not fly, yet under questioning, we find out > > > > >she flew every year, including in some small planes island-hopping around > > > > >Hawaii. Proof that she lies when she finds it convenient to do so. > > > > > > > > > >> > I knew the dirt would come to the surface once it got out there. It > > > > >> > always does, and I think there'll be more. > > > > >> > > > > >> Well, at least the FBI is doing another investigation, no? That *should* > > > > >> make both sides feel better. > > > > > > > > > >One might like to think so, but as predicted, the Democrats still aren't > > > > >satisfied, because it was just another stall tactic. > > > > > > > > Why do you continue trying to convince this anti-American > > > > foreigner who made up her mind that Kavanaugh is guilty > > > > of rape that she's not a warped leftist. Nothing you say > > > > will change her delusional mind. > > > > > > > > And, actually, what she believes doesn't matter because > > > > she's just another damned foreign ingrate who doesn't > > > > know when to butt out when it's none of her business. > > > > > > It's obvious that those who were against Kavanaugh from the beginning, > > > had no intention of ever looking at the facts or showing any objectivity. > > > Nadsington pronounced him "guilty" the same day the accusations came out. > > > I just hoped that some of the people who said they had an open mind but > > > wanted to hear the facts, actually meant it. I'd like to see Ford, > > > Avanaughty, Sweatnick, and the rest of those perjurers and character > > > assassins prosecuted, or this shit will only get worse in the future. I > > > can't wait for the Red Tide to crush the Libtards this November, and > > > early polls predict that's exactly what they've done to themselves with > > > this blatant dishonesty. > > > > The left hurt itself with this charade. Did you see the protesters in DC > > today? They looked just like unemployed welfare babys and when > > interviewed about the judge, they either had no idea what the hell to > > say or they parroted CNN word for word. > > They looked just like the rabid pieces of shit at the antifa protests. > Did you see the fat dyke with the black lipstick and the nose ring? Made > me wanna puke... and Elizabeth Warren... what a whiny little twat she is! > At least half of them looked like a freak show, and all of them > proclaiming Kavanaugh is guilty, based on nothing but an empty, unproven > accusation made by that old Ford hag who was proven to be a liar on > several occasions, but everybody's afraid to come right out and say it, > because she's (allegedly) a "survivor" of something... what, nobody > really knows. > > Today, another elevator scene. This time the accoster was some screechy > blond with the sides of her head shaved. She looked like a total dyke, > and her voice was like fingernails on a chalkboard. I guess we need a > new law that makes it illegal to harass people in public due to their > political affiliation or position. Hell, I thought our existing civil > rights laws already covered that sort of thing. > > The lefter they get, the righter I get. Wait until next month, when they > see how they've motivated the rest of us. > > Oh, and I just learned something about Senator Blumenthal. That piece of > shit lied, and claimed he had served in Danang, Vietnam. Politifact > tells a different story: > > "Blumenthal enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserves in 1970. Until then, > five deferments had kept him out of the war. Getting a coveted slot in > the reserves reduced the chance of battlefield deployment. Blumenthal > went through basic training and served six years in the Washington, D.C > area and Connecticut." > > IOW, "Danang Dick" is a fake, guilty of stolen valor. How does an > asshole like that get to be a Senator? Booker is guilty of the same thing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-05 08:48 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.362127b1b68fbdb9989e34@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #211070 |
In article <MPG.3620b70021b64d16994e06@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1 @gmail.com says... > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <MPG.3620c14fab856ef7989e2d@reader.albasani.net>, > skeet@invalid.invalid says... > > > > > > In article <MPG.36209be15d736227994df8@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1 > > @gmail.com says... > > > > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > > Checkmate! In article <MPG.36206fbcdc6bdd2f989e0e@reader.albasani.net>, > > > skeet@invalid.invalid says... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In article <MPG.36200b5cf2cb86aa994dc1@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1 > > > > @gmail.com says... > > > > > > > > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > > > > Checkmate! In article <4uocrdlko4vg6dqk6khj5qa5kr1do55847@4ax.com>, > > > > > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 11:58:45 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > In an article pandora@peak.org says... > > > > > > >> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018, Checkmate wrote: > > > > > > >> > In an article pandora@peak.org says... > > > > > > >> >> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018, Skeeter wrote: > > > > > > >> >> > In an article pandora@peak.org says... > > > > > > >> >> >> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018, mixed nuts wrote: > > > > > > >> >> >> > On 10/3/2018, Skeeter wrote: > > > > > > >> >> >> >> In an article jacodar242@gmail.com says... > > > > > > >> >> >> >>> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>> His lips were pursed throughout most of his testimony... > > > > > > >> >> >> >>> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>> Pursed Lips which are pulled inwards from all directions are an > > > > > > >> >> >> >>> indication of tension and may indicate frustration or > > > > > > >> >> >> >>> disapproval. > > > > > > >> >> >> >>> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>> Pursed lips are a classic sign of anger, including when it is > > > > > > >> >> >> >>> suppressed. It is effectively holding the mouth shut to prevent > > > > > > >> >> >> >>> the person saying what they feel like saying. This may also be > > > > > > >> >> >> >>> an indication of lying or withholding the truth as the person > > > > > > >> >> >> >>> stops themselves from telling the truth. > > > > > > >> >> >> >>> > > > > > > >> >> >> >>> Pursed lips can also indicate a person who is thinking and who > > > > > > >> >> >> >>> is deciding between possible options. Deciding and disapproval > > > > > > >> >> >> >>> are both evaluative actions, which is the common core of > > > > > > >> >> >> >>> lip-pursing. > > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> I would be angry to if some cheating assholes tried to destroy my > > > > > > >> >> >> >> life. > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> >> > You'd think a future judge would be smart enough to get an NDA. > > > > > > >> >> >> > I'm wondering if he should have gone to a different private prep > > > > > > >> >> >> > school. Phillips Andover or something like that where they teach > > > > > > >> >> >> > people to be presidents and supreme court people who don't get > > > > > > >> >> >> > investigated very much so they don't have to get angry on tv. > > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> >> Perhaps he got angry cause he has something to hide? > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > You hope that's true, How about if your family got death threats and > > > > > > >> >> > your life was destroyed over something that may or may not have > > > > > > >> >> > happened. Would you be angry? > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> I might be upset but if I had nothing to hide, I wouldn't be angry. If > > > > > > >> >> the woman was lying, that is. If she was, I feel sorry for her. He, > > > > > > >> >> however, allowed himself to be put in the public eye and therefore her > > > > > > >> >> accusations needed to be heard. They were. And now? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > Now we're hearing how Ford lied. She claimed she was so traumatized > > > > > > >> > that she only felt "safe" installing two front doors to her house, when > > > > > > >> > records show she used the second door to turn part of her Palo Alto > > > > > > >> > house into an illegal rental. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Is that really relevant? > > > > > > > > > > > > > >When a witness intentionally lies about having to put in a second door > > > > > > >because she was so emotionally traumatized, and then we find out that the > > > > > > >second door was really installed so she could rent out part of the house > > > > > > >to someone else, it's very relevant. Also, she lived in a 500 square > > > > > > >foot apartment with only one door at one time, so there goes the > > > > > > >Kavanaugh-induced "claustrophobia" claim. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Then there was the "fear of flying" excuse, which fell apart when she > > > > > > >> > admitted she flies to other places all the time. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> I absolutely hate to fly but I do, now and then when the occasion makes > > > > > > >> it necessary. I get intense panic attacks and nearly pass out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >She said she absolutely could not fly, yet under questioning, we find out > > > > > > >she flew every year, including in some small planes island-hopping around > > > > > > >Hawaii. Proof that she lies when she finds it convenient to do so. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > I knew the dirt would come to the surface once it got out there. It > > > > > > >> > always does, and I think there'll be more. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Well, at least the FBI is doing another investigation, no? That *should* > > > > > > >> make both sides feel better. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >One might like to think so, but as predicted, the Democrats still aren't > > > > > > >satisfied, because it was just another stall tactic. > > > > > > > > > > > > Why do you continue trying to convince this anti-American > > > > > > foreigner who made up her mind that Kavanaugh is guilty > > > > > > of rape that she's not a warped leftist. Nothing you say > > > > > > will change her delusional mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > And, actually, what she believes doesn't matter because > > > > > > she's just another damned foreign ingrate who doesn't > > > > > > know when to butt out when it's none of her business. > > > > > > > > > > It's obvious that those who were against Kavanaugh from the beginning, > > > > > had no intention of ever looking at the facts or showing any objectivity. > > > > > Nadsington pronounced him "guilty" the same day the accusations came out. > > > > > I just hoped that some of the people who said they had an open mind but > > > > > wanted to hear the facts, actually meant it. I'd like to see Ford, > > > > > Avanaughty, Sweatnick, and the rest of those perjurers and character > > > > > assassins prosecuted, or this shit will only get worse in the future. I > > > > > can't wait for the Red Tide to crush the Libtards this November, and > > > > > early polls predict that's exactly what they've done to themselves with > > > > > this blatant dishonesty. > > > > > > > > The left hurt itself with this charade. Did you see the protesters in DC > > > > today? They looked just like unemployed welfare babys and when > > > > interviewed about the judge, they either had no idea what the hell to > > > > say or they parroted CNN word for word. > > > > > > They looked just like the rabid pieces of shit at the antifa protests. > > > Did you see the fat dyke with the black lipstick and the nose ring? Made > > > me wanna puke... and Elizabeth Warren... what a whiny little twat she is! > > > At least half of them looked like a freak show, and all of them > > > proclaiming Kavanaugh is guilty, based on nothing but an empty, unproven > > > accusation made by that old Ford hag who was proven to be a liar on > > > several occasions, but everybody's afraid to come right out and say it, > > > because she's (allegedly) a "survivor" of something... what, nobody > > > really knows. > > > > > > Today, another elevator scene. This time the accoster was some screechy > > > blond with the sides of her head shaved. She looked like a total dyke, > > > and her voice was like fingernails on a chalkboard. I guess we need a > > > new law that makes it illegal to harass people in public due to their > > > political affiliation or position. Hell, I thought our existing civil > > > rights laws already covered that sort of thing. > > > > > > The lefter they get, the righter I get. Wait until next month, when they > > > see how they've motivated the rest of us. > > > > > > Oh, and I just learned something about Senator Blumenthal. That piece of > > > shit lied, and claimed he had served in Danang, Vietnam. Politifact > > > tells a different story: > > > > > > "Blumenthal enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserves in 1970. Until then, > > > five deferments had kept him out of the war. Getting a coveted slot in > > > the reserves reduced the chance of battlefield deployment. Blumenthal > > > went through basic training and served six years in the Washington, D.C > > > area and Connecticut." > > > > > > IOW, "Danang Dick" is a fake, guilty of stolen valor. How does an > > > asshole like that get to be a Senator? > > > > Booker is guilty of the same thing. > > He's another self-righteous hypocrite. None of them have any business > pointing fingers at anybody else... and complaining that they "need more > time to investigate," when that Feinstein bitch sat on the story for two > fucking months? I can't even believe she had the gall to make an issue > out of THAT. Booker lied about his Vietnam experience, but it's ok for a Democrat to lie but a Republican better not do any drinking while in college.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-04 07:47 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361fc7f6f8c60717989dd6@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #210788 |
In article <DKudneNmsdNhwCjGnZ2dnUU7-QWdnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says... > > On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 16:46:31 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > > > In article <_-idndN305mLqCjGnZ2dnUU7-UudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, > > pandora@peak.org says... > >> > >> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 10:06:34 -0400, mixed nuts wrote: > >> > >> > On 10/3/2018 9:53 AM, Skeeter wrote: > >> >> In article <6375ada5-cb07-4bad-9e86-4e398e5d35b3@googlegroups.com>, > >> >> jacodar242@gmail.com says... > >> >>> > >> >>> His lips were pursed throughout most of his testimony... > >> >>> > >> >>> Pursed Lips which are pulled inwards from all directions are an > >> >>> indication of tension and may indicate frustration or disapproval. > >> >>> > >> >>> Pursed lips are a classic sign of anger, including when it is > >> >>> suppressed. It is effectively holding the mouth shut to prevent the > >> >>> person saying what they feel like saying. This may also be an > >> >>> indication of lying or withholding the truth as the person stops > >> >>> themselves from telling the truth. > >> >>> > >> >>> Pursed lips can also indicate a person who is thinking and who is > >> >>> deciding between possible options. Deciding and disapproval are > >> >>> both evaluative actions, which is the common core of lip-pursing. > >> >> > >> >> I would be angry to if some cheating assholes tried to destroy my > >> >> life. > >> > > >> > You'd think a future judge would be smart enough to get an NDA. I'm > >> > wondering if he should have gone to a different private prep school. > >> > Phillips Andover or something like that where they teach people to be > >> > presidents and supreme court people who don't get investigated very > >> > much so they don't have to get angry on tv. > >> > >> Perhaps he got angry cause he has something to hide? > > > > You hope that's true, How about if your family got death threats and > > your life was destroyed over something that may or may not have > > happened. Would you be angry? > > I might be upset but if I had nothing to hide, I wouldn't be angry. If > the woman was lying, that is. If she was, I feel sorry for her. He, > however, allowed himself to be put in the public eye and therefore her > accusations needed to be heard. They were. And now? And now the 7th investigation is complete and there was nothing, but the demos are still crying...delay and hate...nothing more. Feinstien knew it was a hoax, it was last minute bait so they could try and get their way. It hurt them, have you seen the polls?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-04 11:09 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pp5aev$1lg0$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #210842 |
On 10/4/2018 9:47 AM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <DKudneNmsdNhwCjGnZ2dnUU7-QWdnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, > pandora@peak.org says... >> >> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 16:46:31 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >> >>> In article <_-idndN305mLqCjGnZ2dnUU7-UudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, >>> pandora@peak.org says... >>>> >>>> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 10:06:34 -0400, mixed nuts wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 10/3/2018 9:53 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> In article <6375ada5-cb07-4bad-9e86-4e398e5d35b3@googlegroups.com>, >>>>>> jacodar242@gmail.com says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> His lips were pursed throughout most of his testimony... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Pursed Lips which are pulled inwards from all directions are an >>>>>>> indication of tension and may indicate frustration or disapproval. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Pursed lips are a classic sign of anger, including when it is >>>>>>> suppressed. It is effectively holding the mouth shut to prevent the >>>>>>> person saying what they feel like saying. This may also be an >>>>>>> indication of lying or withholding the truth as the person stops >>>>>>> themselves from telling the truth. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Pursed lips can also indicate a person who is thinking and who is >>>>>>> deciding between possible options. Deciding and disapproval are >>>>>>> both evaluative actions, which is the common core of lip-pursing. >>>>>> >>>>>> I would be angry to if some cheating assholes tried to destroy my >>>>>> life. >>>>> >>>>> You'd think a future judge would be smart enough to get an NDA. I'm >>>>> wondering if he should have gone to a different private prep school. >>>>> Phillips Andover or something like that where they teach people to be >>>>> presidents and supreme court people who don't get investigated very >>>>> much so they don't have to get angry on tv. >>>> >>>> Perhaps he got angry cause he has something to hide? >>> >>> You hope that's true, How about if your family got death threats and >>> your life was destroyed over something that may or may not have >>> happened. Would you be angry? >> >> I might be upset but if I had nothing to hide, I wouldn't be angry. If >> the woman was lying, that is. If she was, I feel sorry for her. He, >> however, allowed himself to be put in the public eye and therefore her >> accusations needed to be heard. They were. And now? > > And now the 7th investigation is complete and there was nothing, but the > demos are still crying...delay and hate...nothing more. > > Feinstien knew it was a hoax, it was last minute bait so they could try > and get their way. It hurt them, have you seen the polls? Kavanaugh was confirmed in August by the Federalist Society. All the hokum is to get really angry conservatives on tv so the really angry righty christian evangelical gun people will vote 'em back in office so their lives won't be destroyed. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-04 11:41 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361ffec3a7a708f7989dfd@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #210868 |
In article <pp5aev$1lg0$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... > > On 10/4/2018 9:47 AM, Skeeter wrote: > > In article <DKudneNmsdNhwCjGnZ2dnUU7-QWdnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, > > pandora@peak.org says... > >> > >> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 16:46:31 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > >> > >>> In article <_-idndN305mLqCjGnZ2dnUU7-UudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, > >>> pandora@peak.org says... > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 10:06:34 -0400, mixed nuts wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On 10/3/2018 9:53 AM, Skeeter wrote: > >>>>>> In article <6375ada5-cb07-4bad-9e86-4e398e5d35b3@googlegroups.com>, > >>>>>> jacodar242@gmail.com says... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> His lips were pursed throughout most of his testimony... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Pursed Lips which are pulled inwards from all directions are an > >>>>>>> indication of tension and may indicate frustration or disapproval. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Pursed lips are a classic sign of anger, including when it is > >>>>>>> suppressed. It is effectively holding the mouth shut to prevent the > >>>>>>> person saying what they feel like saying. This may also be an > >>>>>>> indication of lying or withholding the truth as the person stops > >>>>>>> themselves from telling the truth. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Pursed lips can also indicate a person who is thinking and who is > >>>>>>> deciding between possible options. Deciding and disapproval are > >>>>>>> both evaluative actions, which is the common core of lip-pursing. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I would be angry to if some cheating assholes tried to destroy my > >>>>>> life. > >>>>> > >>>>> You'd think a future judge would be smart enough to get an NDA. I'm > >>>>> wondering if he should have gone to a different private prep school. > >>>>> Phillips Andover or something like that where they teach people to be > >>>>> presidents and supreme court people who don't get investigated very > >>>>> much so they don't have to get angry on tv. > >>>> > >>>> Perhaps he got angry cause he has something to hide? > >>> > >>> You hope that's true, How about if your family got death threats and > >>> your life was destroyed over something that may or may not have > >>> happened. Would you be angry? > >> > >> I might be upset but if I had nothing to hide, I wouldn't be angry. If > >> the woman was lying, that is. If she was, I feel sorry for her. He, > >> however, allowed himself to be put in the public eye and therefore her > >> accusations needed to be heard. They were. And now? > > > > And now the 7th investigation is complete and there was nothing, but the > > demos are still crying...delay and hate...nothing more. > > > > Feinstien knew it was a hoax, it was last minute bait so they could try > > and get their way. It hurt them, have you seen the polls? > > Kavanaugh was confirmed in August by the Federalist Society. All the > hokum is to get really angry conservatives on tv so the really angry > righty christian evangelical gun people will vote 'em back in office so > their lives won't be destroyed. He won.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-04 14:08 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pp5kuo$a2m$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #210903 |
On 10/4/2018 1:41 PM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pp5aev$1lg0$1@gioia.aioe.org>, > melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >> On 10/4/2018 9:47 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <DKudneNmsdNhwCjGnZ2dnUU7-QWdnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, >>> pandora@peak.org says... >>>> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 16:46:31 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <_-idndN305mLqCjGnZ2dnUU7-UudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, >>>>> pandora@peak.org says... >>>>>> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 10:06:34 -0400, mixed nuts wrote: >>>>>>> On 10/3/2018 9:53 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> In article <6375ada5-cb07-4bad-9e86-4e398e5d35b3@googlegroups.com>, >>>>>>>> jacodar242@gmail.com says... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> His lips were pursed throughout most of his testimony... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Pursed Lips which are pulled inwards from all directions are an >>>>>>>>> indication of tension and may indicate frustration or disapproval. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Pursed lips are a classic sign of anger, including when it is >>>>>>>>> suppressed. It is effectively holding the mouth shut to prevent the >>>>>>>>> person saying what they feel like saying. This may also be an >>>>>>>>> indication of lying or withholding the truth as the person stops >>>>>>>>> themselves from telling the truth. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Pursed lips can also indicate a person who is thinking and who is >>>>>>>>> deciding between possible options. Deciding and disapproval are >>>>>>>>> both evaluative actions, which is the common core of lip-pursing. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I would be angry to if some cheating assholes tried to destroy my >>>>>>>> life. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You'd think a future judge would be smart enough to get an NDA. I'm >>>>>>> wondering if he should have gone to a different private prep school. >>>>>>> Phillips Andover or something like that where they teach people to be >>>>>>> presidents and supreme court people who don't get investigated very >>>>>>> much so they don't have to get angry on tv. >>>>>> >>>>>> Perhaps he got angry cause he has something to hide? >>>>> >>>>> You hope that's true, How about if your family got death threats and >>>>> your life was destroyed over something that may or may not have >>>>> happened. Would you be angry? >>>> >>>> I might be upset but if I had nothing to hide, I wouldn't be angry. If >>>> the woman was lying, that is. If she was, I feel sorry for her. He, >>>> however, allowed himself to be put in the public eye and therefore her >>>> accusations needed to be heard. They were. And now? >>> >>> And now the 7th investigation is complete and there was nothing, but the >>> demos are still crying...delay and hate...nothing more. >>> >>> Feinstien knew it was a hoax, it was last minute bait so they could try >>> and get their way. It hurt them, have you seen the polls? >> >> Kavanaugh was confirmed in August by the Federalist Society. All the >> hokum is to get really angry conservatives on tv so the really angry >> righty christian evangelical gun people will vote 'em back in office so >> their lives won't be destroyed. > > He won. He had to. If he hadn't won, his life would have been destroyed and he would have been very very sad. Then America would be sad. Very very very sad. It would have been very unfair. And pestilence would come. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-04 19:34 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36206d94ae175f50989e0b@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #210917 |
In article <pp5kuo$a2m$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... > > On 10/4/2018 1:41 PM, Skeeter wrote: > > In article <pp5aev$1lg0$1@gioia.aioe.org>, > > melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... > >> On 10/4/2018 9:47 AM, Skeeter wrote: > >>> In article <DKudneNmsdNhwCjGnZ2dnUU7-QWdnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, > >>> pandora@peak.org says... > >>>> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 16:46:31 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > >>>>> In article <_-idndN305mLqCjGnZ2dnUU7-UudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, > >>>>> pandora@peak.org says... > >>>>>> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 10:06:34 -0400, mixed nuts wrote: > >>>>>>> On 10/3/2018 9:53 AM, Skeeter wrote: > >>>>>>>> In article <6375ada5-cb07-4bad-9e86-4e398e5d35b3@googlegroups.com>, > >>>>>>>> jacodar242@gmail.com says... > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> His lips were pursed throughout most of his testimony... > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Pursed Lips which are pulled inwards from all directions are an > >>>>>>>>> indication of tension and may indicate frustration or disapproval. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Pursed lips are a classic sign of anger, including when it is > >>>>>>>>> suppressed. It is effectively holding the mouth shut to prevent the > >>>>>>>>> person saying what they feel like saying. This may also be an > >>>>>>>>> indication of lying or withholding the truth as the person stops > >>>>>>>>> themselves from telling the truth. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Pursed lips can also indicate a person who is thinking and who is > >>>>>>>>> deciding between possible options. Deciding and disapproval are > >>>>>>>>> both evaluative actions, which is the common core of lip-pursing. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I would be angry to if some cheating assholes tried to destroy my > >>>>>>>> life. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You'd think a future judge would be smart enough to get an NDA. I'm > >>>>>>> wondering if he should have gone to a different private prep school. > >>>>>>> Phillips Andover or something like that where they teach people to be > >>>>>>> presidents and supreme court people who don't get investigated very > >>>>>>> much so they don't have to get angry on tv. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Perhaps he got angry cause he has something to hide? > >>>>> > >>>>> You hope that's true, How about if your family got death threats and > >>>>> your life was destroyed over something that may or may not have > >>>>> happened. Would you be angry? > >>>> > >>>> I might be upset but if I had nothing to hide, I wouldn't be angry. If > >>>> the woman was lying, that is. If she was, I feel sorry for her. He, > >>>> however, allowed himself to be put in the public eye and therefore her > >>>> accusations needed to be heard. They were. And now? > >>> > >>> And now the 7th investigation is complete and there was nothing, but the > >>> demos are still crying...delay and hate...nothing more. > >>> > >>> Feinstien knew it was a hoax, it was last minute bait so they could try > >>> and get their way. It hurt them, have you seen the polls? > >> > >> Kavanaugh was confirmed in August by the Federalist Society. All the > >> hokum is to get really angry conservatives on tv so the really angry > >> righty christian evangelical gun people will vote 'em back in office so > >> their lives won't be destroyed. > > > > He won. > > He had to. If he hadn't won, his life would have been destroyed and he > would have been very very sad. Then America would be sad. Very very > very sad. It would have been very unfair. And pestilence would come. He won
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-04 22:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pp6gm0$1nir$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #211004 |
On 10/4/2018 9:34 PM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pp5kuo$a2m$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie > says... >> >> On 10/4/2018 1:41 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <pp5aev$1lg0$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>>> On 10/4/2018 9:47 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <DKudneNmsdNhwCjGnZ2dnUU7-QWdnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, >>>>> pandora@peak.org says... >>>>>> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 16:46:31 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> In article <_-idndN305mLqCjGnZ2dnUU7-UudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, >>>>>>> pandora@peak.org says... >>>>>>>> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 10:06:34 -0400, mixed nuts wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 10/3/2018 9:53 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In article <6375ada5-cb07-4bad-9e86-4e398e5d35b3@googlegroups.com>, >>>>>>>>>> jacodar242@gmail.com says... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> His lips were pursed throughout most of his testimony... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Pursed Lips which are pulled inwards from all directions are an >>>>>>>>>>> indication of tension and may indicate frustration or disapproval. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Pursed lips are a classic sign of anger, including when it is >>>>>>>>>>> suppressed. It is effectively holding the mouth shut to prevent the >>>>>>>>>>> person saying what they feel like saying. This may also be an >>>>>>>>>>> indication of lying or withholding the truth as the person stops >>>>>>>>>>> themselves from telling the truth. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Pursed lips can also indicate a person who is thinking and who is >>>>>>>>>>> deciding between possible options. Deciding and disapproval are >>>>>>>>>>> both evaluative actions, which is the common core of lip-pursing. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I would be angry to if some cheating assholes tried to destroy my >>>>>>>>>> life. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You'd think a future judge would be smart enough to get an NDA. I'm >>>>>>>>> wondering if he should have gone to a different private prep school. >>>>>>>>> Phillips Andover or something like that where they teach people to be >>>>>>>>> presidents and supreme court people who don't get investigated very >>>>>>>>> much so they don't have to get angry on tv. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Perhaps he got angry cause he has something to hide? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You hope that's true, How about if your family got death threats and >>>>>>> your life was destroyed over something that may or may not have >>>>>>> happened. Would you be angry? >>>>>> >>>>>> I might be upset but if I had nothing to hide, I wouldn't be angry. If >>>>>> the woman was lying, that is. If she was, I feel sorry for her. He, >>>>>> however, allowed himself to be put in the public eye and therefore her >>>>>> accusations needed to be heard. They were. And now? >>>>> >>>>> And now the 7th investigation is complete and there was nothing, but the >>>>> demos are still crying...delay and hate...nothing more. >>>>> >>>>> Feinstien knew it was a hoax, it was last minute bait so they could try >>>>> and get their way. It hurt them, have you seen the polls? >>>> >>>> Kavanaugh was confirmed in August by the Federalist Society. All the >>>> hokum is to get really angry conservatives on tv so the really angry >>>> righty christian evangelical gun people will vote 'em back in office so >>>> their lives won't be destroyed. >>> >>> He won. >> >> He had to. If he hadn't won, his life would have been destroyed and he >> would have been very very sad. Then America would be sad. Very very >> very sad. It would have been very unfair. And pestilence would come. > > He won Of course he did. Everybody's a winner now. Great Presidents are winning so much they're getting tired of going for ice cream and having huge inaugurations with millions of people! Mueller's very jealous too. He didn't even have an inauguration like the true winners get and he certainly doesn't get 2 scoops. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-04 20:17 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.362077a5b9a3cb43989e19@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #211013 |
In article <pp6gm0$1nir$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... > > On 10/4/2018 9:34 PM, Skeeter wrote: > > In article <pp5kuo$a2m$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie > > says... > >> > >> On 10/4/2018 1:41 PM, Skeeter wrote: > >>> In article <pp5aev$1lg0$1@gioia.aioe.org>, > >>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... > >>>> On 10/4/2018 9:47 AM, Skeeter wrote: > >>>>> In article <DKudneNmsdNhwCjGnZ2dnUU7-QWdnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, > >>>>> pandora@peak.org says... > >>>>>> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 16:46:31 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > >>>>>>> In article <_-idndN305mLqCjGnZ2dnUU7-UudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, > >>>>>>> pandora@peak.org says... > >>>>>>>> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 10:06:34 -0400, mixed nuts wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On 10/3/2018 9:53 AM, Skeeter wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> In article <6375ada5-cb07-4bad-9e86-4e398e5d35b3@googlegroups.com>, > >>>>>>>>>> jacodar242@gmail.com says... > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> His lips were pursed throughout most of his testimony... > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Pursed Lips which are pulled inwards from all directions are an > >>>>>>>>>>> indication of tension and may indicate frustration or disapproval. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Pursed lips are a classic sign of anger, including when it is > >>>>>>>>>>> suppressed. It is effectively holding the mouth shut to prevent the > >>>>>>>>>>> person saying what they feel like saying. This may also be an > >>>>>>>>>>> indication of lying or withholding the truth as the person stops > >>>>>>>>>>> themselves from telling the truth. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Pursed lips can also indicate a person who is thinking and who is > >>>>>>>>>>> deciding between possible options. Deciding and disapproval are > >>>>>>>>>>> both evaluative actions, which is the common core of lip-pursing. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I would be angry to if some cheating assholes tried to destroy my > >>>>>>>>>> life. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> You'd think a future judge would be smart enough to get an NDA. I'm > >>>>>>>>> wondering if he should have gone to a different private prep school. > >>>>>>>>> Phillips Andover or something like that where they teach people to be > >>>>>>>>> presidents and supreme court people who don't get investigated very > >>>>>>>>> much so they don't have to get angry on tv. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Perhaps he got angry cause he has something to hide? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You hope that's true, How about if your family got death threats and > >>>>>>> your life was destroyed over something that may or may not have > >>>>>>> happened. Would you be angry? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I might be upset but if I had nothing to hide, I wouldn't be angry. If > >>>>>> the woman was lying, that is. If she was, I feel sorry for her. He, > >>>>>> however, allowed himself to be put in the public eye and therefore her > >>>>>> accusations needed to be heard. They were. And now? > >>>>> > >>>>> And now the 7th investigation is complete and there was nothing, but the > >>>>> demos are still crying...delay and hate...nothing more. > >>>>> > >>>>> Feinstien knew it was a hoax, it was last minute bait so they could try > >>>>> and get their way. It hurt them, have you seen the polls? > >>>> > >>>> Kavanaugh was confirmed in August by the Federalist Society. All the > >>>> hokum is to get really angry conservatives on tv so the really angry > >>>> righty christian evangelical gun people will vote 'em back in office so > >>>> their lives won't be destroyed. > >>> > >>> He won. > >> > >> He had to. If he hadn't won, his life would have been destroyed and he > >> would have been very very sad. Then America would be sad. Very very > >> very sad. It would have been very unfair. And pestilence would come. > > > > He won > > Of course he did. > > Everybody's a winner now. Great Presidents are winning so much they're > getting tired of going for ice cream and having huge inaugurations with > millions of people! > > Mueller's very jealous too. He didn't even have an inauguration like > the true winners get and he certainly doesn't get 2 scoops. And he's mad cuz his "collusion" crap went to hell.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-04 07:49 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361fc83cc484aef989dd7@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #210788 |
In article <MPG.361f227898a14deb994dab@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1 @gmail.com says... > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <DKudneNmsdNhwCjGnZ2dnUU7- > QWdnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says... > > > > > > On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 16:46:31 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > > > > > In article <_-idndN305mLqCjGnZ2dnUU7-UudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, > > > pandora@peak.org says... > > >> > > >> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 10:06:34 -0400, mixed nuts wrote: > > >> > > >> > On 10/3/2018 9:53 AM, Skeeter wrote: > > >> >> In article <6375ada5-cb07-4bad-9e86-4e398e5d35b3@googlegroups.com>, > > >> >> jacodar242@gmail.com says... > > >> >>> > > >> >>> His lips were pursed throughout most of his testimony... > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Pursed Lips which are pulled inwards from all directions are an > > >> >>> indication of tension and may indicate frustration or disapproval. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Pursed lips are a classic sign of anger, including when it is > > >> >>> suppressed. It is effectively holding the mouth shut to prevent the > > >> >>> person saying what they feel like saying. This may also be an > > >> >>> indication of lying or withholding the truth as the person stops > > >> >>> themselves from telling the truth. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Pursed lips can also indicate a person who is thinking and who is > > >> >>> deciding between possible options. Deciding and disapproval are > > >> >>> both evaluative actions, which is the common core of lip-pursing. > > >> >> > > >> >> I would be angry to if some cheating assholes tried to destroy my > > >> >> life. > > >> > > > >> > You'd think a future judge would be smart enough to get an NDA. I'm > > >> > wondering if he should have gone to a different private prep school. > > >> > Phillips Andover or something like that where they teach people to be > > >> > presidents and supreme court people who don't get investigated very > > >> > much so they don't have to get angry on tv. > > >> > > >> Perhaps he got angry cause he has something to hide? > > > > > > You hope that's true, How about if your family got death threats and > > > your life was destroyed over something that may or may not have > > > happened. Would you be angry? > > > > I might be upset but if I had nothing to hide, I wouldn't be angry. If > > the woman was lying, that is. If she was, I feel sorry for her. He, > > however, allowed himself to be put in the public eye and therefore her > > accusations needed to be heard. They were. And now? > > Now we're hearing how Ford lied. She claimed she was so traumatized that > she only felt "safe" installing two front doors to her house, when > records show she used the second door to turn part of her Palo Alto house > into an illegal rental. > > Then there was the "fear of flying" excuse, which fell apart when she > admitted she flies to other places all the time. > > I knew the dirt would come to the surface once it got out there. It > always does, and I think there'll be more. Her own ex said she was lying. But he's a male so he's prolly lying...right?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pandora <pandora@peak.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 21:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <foGdnaUPXL_nHSjGnZ2dnUU7-Y-dnZ2d@scnresearch.com> |
| In reply to | #210763 |
On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 17:25:54 -0700, % wrote: > On 2018-10-03 5:22 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 16:46:31 -0600, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> >> wrote: >>> Skankdora, pandora@peak.org says... >> >> <...> >> >>>> Perhaps he got angry cause he has something to hide? >>> >>> You hope that's true, How about if your family got death threats and >>> your life was destroyed over something that may or may not have >>> happened. Would you be angry? >> >> Pandora doesn't have a life and her family has disowned her. >> > says the guy who had to copy how i live and has no family to get > disowned by He's such a liar! I'm seeing most of my family this weekend as it is my grandson's birthday on Sunday. (He's getting a sweater.) :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 08:58 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361e8704ee3b1e39989dc3@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #210524 |
In article <hsl9rdppbt390g70p0edf0c8eu0ap9j6qf@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 07:53:28 -0600, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: > > > >I would be angry to if some cheating assholes tried to destroy my life. > > In your case they wouldn't have to work too hard at it. LOL! I own 4 places, you rent one.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 16:44 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361ef44bf4bc4cc7989dcc@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #210588 |
In article <24n9rd528nf8e4d39c3mb68f5dsbgmvd1f@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 08:58:29 -0600, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >In article <hsl9rdppbt390g70p0edf0c8eu0ap9j6qf@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >> On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 07:53:28 -0600, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> > >> >I would be angry to if some cheating assholes tried to destroy my life. > >> > >> In your case they wouldn't have to work too hard at it. LOL! > > > >I own 4 places, you rent one. > > I OWN one. Paid cash for it. I can do that because > I don't spend my money on pot. Neither do I, I grow my own.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 17:10 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361efa5b4f0dbad1989dd4@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #210762 |
In article <0rhardhuhgd0qjs3kvra2fn1gvam7ckn8h@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 16:44:51 -0600, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >In an article, Sir greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >> On Wed, 3 Oct 2018, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> >In a post, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >> >> On Wed, 3 Oct 2018, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >I would be angry to if some cheating assholes tried to destroy my life. > >> >> > >> >> In your case they wouldn't have to work too hard at it. LOL! > >> > > >> >I own 4 places, you rent one. > >> > >> I OWN one. Paid cash for it. I can do that because > >> I don't spend my money on pot. > > > >Neither do I, I grow my own. > > But, that's only been in the past couple years > since the potheads in Colorado got it legalized. > > All the money you used to waste buying it could > have bought you a decent house like Checkmate's > instead of four cheesy little single-wides. Just because it wasn't legal doesn't people weren't growing it. That's why they made it legal, they lost the war, only problem is making it legal knocked the bottom out of prices, what was once 400 bucks is now had for 80 to 100 bucks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-04 07:44 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361fc74a5d07c7c6989dd5@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #210766 |
In article <vqmardpar94j2fdqrrq95is4qld0122ai3@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 17:10:38 -0600, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: > > > >Just because it wasn't legal doesn't people weren't growing it. That's > >why they made it legal, they lost the war, only problem is making it > >legal knocked the bottom out of prices, what was once 400 bucks is now > >had for 80 to 100 bucks. > > That's STILL a giant gyp. It should be about 20 bucks > an ounce. Why do you care?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-04 11:42 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361ffedd738b0e36989dfe@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #210841 |
In article <0cccrddodg1v4vbv6qb2v50tsqsq2d7drp@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 07:44:59 -0600, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >In article <vqmardpar94j2fdqrrq95is4qld0122ai3@4ax.com, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >> On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 17:10:38 -0600, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> > >> >Just because it wasn't legal doesn't people weren't growing it. That's > >> >why they made it legal, they lost the war, only problem is making it > >> >legal knocked the bottom out of prices, what was once 400 bucks is now > >> >had for 80 to 100 bucks. > >> > >> That's STILL a giant gyp. It should be about 20 bucks > >> an ounce. > > > >Why do you care? > > Because I sure don't want you welfare bums spending > my taxpayer dollar on your freaking pot addiction. I grow my own.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-04 19:38 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36206e77b416563d989e0c@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #210904 |
In article <immcrd12jaenou3rc51l5iqrt6fe8tofu7@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 11:42:14 -0600, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >In article <0cccrddodg1v4vbv6qb2v50tsqsq2d7drp@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >> On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 07:44:59 -0600, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> >In article <vqmardpar94j2fdqrrq95is4qld0122ai3@4ax.com, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >> >> On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 17:10:38 -0600, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >Just because it wasn't legal doesn't people weren't growing it. That's > >> >> >why they made it legal, they lost the war, only problem is making it > >> >> >legal knocked the bottom out of prices, what was once 400 bucks is now > >> >> >had for 80 to 100 bucks. > >> >> > >> >> That's STILL a giant gyp. It should be about 20 bucks > >> >> an ounce. > >> > > >> >Why do you care? > >> > >> Because I sure don't want you welfare bums spending > >> my taxpayer dollar on your freaking pot addiction. > > > >I grow my own. > > In that case, you should be more altruistic. Pandora > has often stated that she'd like to smoke some good > quality pot. So, send her some of your best. Maybe > it will be so good that she overdoses and strokes out. Not one time has anyone ODed on weed. But I would be happy to share my grow knowledge with her, she seems to be a gardener of sorts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-04 20:16 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3620775b7fb23ea8989e18@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #211005 |
In article <atgdrd1sege4v3ii5ni0itf61kadcu7ltv@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 19:38:16 -0600, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: > > <...> > > >Not one time has anyone ODed on weed. But I would be happy to share my > >grow knowledge with her, she seems to be a gardener of sorts. > > Please do. I know where she lives and I can keep > track of what's growing in her garden using Google > Earth. I'd love nothing better than to have her > arrested and thrown into the slammer. You do realize Google Earth photos are about a year old.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pandora <pandora@peak.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-04 22:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <Y8ydnaLrGeV8SCvGnZ2dnUU7-LmdnZ2d@scnresearch.com> |
| In reply to | #211019 |
On Thu, 04 Oct 2018 20:16:15 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > In article <atgdrd1sege4v3ii5ni0itf61kadcu7ltv@4ax.com>, > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >> >> On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 19:38:16 -0600, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> >> wrote: >> >> <...> >> >> >Not one time has anyone ODed on weed. But I would be happy to share my >> >grow knowledge with her, she seems to be a gardener of sorts. >> >> Please do. I know where she lives and I can keep track of what's >> growing in her garden using Google Earth. I'd love nothing better than >> to have her arrested and thrown into the slammer. > > You do realize Google Earth photos are about a year old. More than that. As well, it's legal to grow one's own here now. I may do just that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web