Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.checkmate > #205378 > unrolled thread

Trillion dollar deficit

Started byNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
First post2018-09-17 04:51 +0000
Last post2018-09-17 22:51 -0400
Articles 20 on this page of 324 — 17 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate

Contents

  Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-17 04:51 +0000
    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 08:54 -0600
      Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 11:15 -0400
        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 09:50 -0600
        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 13:16 -0600
          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:21 +0000
            Re: DId Checkmate rape someone in his high school? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Trillion dollar deficit โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-17 14:46 -0500
              Re: DId Checkmate rape someone in his high school? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 15:12 -0600
                Re: DId Checkmate rape someone in his high school? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 16:22 -0600
                  Re: DId Checkmate rape someone in his high school? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:20 -0600
              Re: DId Checkmate rape someone in his high school? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 07:34 +0000
                Re: ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ DId Checkmate rape someone in his high school? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„  Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-18 10:50 -0500
            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 14:56 -0600
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 17:41 -0400
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 15:50 -0600
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 18:42 -0400
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 12:01 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 11:05 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 12:59 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:18 -0600
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 15:55 -0600
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-17 23:38 +0100
            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 15:11 -0600
            Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-17 23:16 +0100
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-17 23:45 +0100
            Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 11:49 -0500
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 11:04 -0600
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 12:58 -0500
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:21 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:17 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:13 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 17:06 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-19 20:32 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:18 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-20 13:11 -0400
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:23 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-20 17:52 -0400
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:06 -0600
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:16 +0000
                                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:18 -0600
                                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:13 -0600
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-20 18:21 -0400
                                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 19:16 -0600
                                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 18:37 -0700
                                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 23:04 -0700
                                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 09:06 -0400
                                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:15 -0600
                                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-21 12:03 -0700
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 21:19 -0600
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 12:24 -0500
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:00 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 19:14 +0000
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:32 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:03 +0000
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:08 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 14:53 -0700
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 15:17 -0700
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:05 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:10 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-20 23:35 +0100
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 21:50 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 23:39 -0700
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 11:42 -0400
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:17 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-21 13:10 -0700
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 16:35 -0400
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-21 16:25 -0700
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 21:53 +0100
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:14 +0000
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 23:45 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:07 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:17 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:16 -0500
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-25 12:16 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:30 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-22 12:20 -0700
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:31 -0500
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:31 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 19:59 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-25 13:07 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:16 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:34 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 12:17 -0400
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:24 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:26 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:17 -0600
                      Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Trillion dollar deficit โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-19 09:45 -0500
                        Re: รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„  Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowfla ke รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snow flake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ S nowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ Trillion d ollar deficit รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowfla ke รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snow flake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ S nowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowfla ke รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-19 09:50 -0500
                        Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snow Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 09:01 -0600
                          Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snow โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-19 22:00 -0500
                        Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Trillion dollar deficit โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-23 11:46 -0700
                          Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-23 18:29 -0500
                            Re: รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„  Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowfla ke รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snow flake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ S nowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ ? Snowflak e ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowf lake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Sn owflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowfla ke ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowfla ke ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snow flake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? S nowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? รขยย„ Snow flake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ S nowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowfla ke รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snow flake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ S nowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-23 18:40 -0500
                          Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 09:57 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 20:17 +0100
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-19 11:20 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 15:32 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 16:20 -0500
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:16 -0600
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 11:31 -0600
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-18 14:26 -0400
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:22 -0600
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 08:45 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 10:57 -0400
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 09:03 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 11:29 -0400
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 11:19 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 15:17 -0400
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-21 17:06 -0700
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 11:48 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:53 -0600
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-21 17:05 -0700
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-21 17:05 -0700
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:19 +0000
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 17:07 -0600
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 12:56 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:16 +0000
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 17:07 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 23:30 +0000
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 08:30 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 09:00 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 12:07 -0400
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 11:19 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 01:39 +0000
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Tommy <tom@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 17:34 +0000
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:28 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 19:53 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 09:11 -0400
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:26 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 20:09 +0100
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 18:09 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:05 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:30 -0600
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:04 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:24 -0500
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-19 11:22 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-19 20:49 +0000
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:20 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:22 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:19 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-21 02:26 +0000
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 17:57 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-22 04:08 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:24 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 17:02 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:38 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 13:43 -0600
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 05:18 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 20:10 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:55 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 23:23 +0100
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 23:40 +0100
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 23:54 +0100
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 00:08 +0100
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit g8dgc <g8dgc@noneya.none> - 2018-09-22 18:53 -0400
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit tripeco.2@parody.personae.invalid (Tr!pe) - 2018-09-22 23:57 +0100
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 23:54 +0100
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 00:29 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 00:10 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 05:21 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 06:13 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 14:36 +0100
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 08:32 -0600
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-23 11:06 -0400
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 08:11 +0100
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:00 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-23 12:02 -0700
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:15 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:27 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 12:13 -0400
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:23 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 01:44 +0000
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 20:17 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 19:16 +0000
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:34 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:01 +0000
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:09 -0600
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 09:08 -0400
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit tripeco.2@parody.personae.invalid (Tr!pe) - 2018-09-21 20:22 +0100
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:12 +0000
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:34 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:05 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:14 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 11:43 -0700
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:35 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:22 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:36 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:41 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit % <perscent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 04:30 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit invalid@invalid.invalid (ร) - 2018-09-23 08:45 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:36 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:33 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:21 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:32 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 19:13 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 13:45 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 11:23 -0400
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:27 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 13:21 -0400
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 13:10 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 16:23 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 13:53 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:25 -0600
                        Please fact-check your assertions vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-24 03:05 +0000
                          Re: Please fact-check your assertions mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-24 01:42 -0400
                            Re: Please fact-check your assertions Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-23 23:10 -0700
                          Re: Please fact-check your assertions vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-24 07:17 +0000
                            Re: Please fact-check your assertions Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:44 -0600
                            Re: Please fact-check your assertions kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 12:23 -0400
                              Re: Please fact-check your assertions Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:30 -0600
                              Re: Please fact-check your assertions snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 19:41 +0100
                                Re: Please fact-check your assertions snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 23:36 +0100
                          Re: Please fact-check your assertions kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 12:18 -0400
                            Re: Please fact-check your assertions Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:29 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-25 12:19 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 12:25 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 12:16 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-25 19:32 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-26 11:45 -0500
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-26 18:49 -0500
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 09:06 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:07 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:33 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-23 23:31 -0700
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-24 06:52 -0400
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:43 -0600
                            Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Trillion dollar deficit โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:47 -0500
                              Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:14 -0600
                                Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 11:46 -0500
                                  Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 11:58 -0500
                                    Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 14:34 -0500
                                      Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 14:59 -0500
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 12:37 -0400
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:03 +0000
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 17:53 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-22 04:06 +0000
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 13:57 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 13:58 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:09 +0000
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:18 -0600
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-19 20:34 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 20:15 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 18:07 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:19 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:21 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:17 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:41 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:18 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-22 11:44 -0400
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:44 -0500
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:08 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:32 -0500
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-18 14:18 -0400
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:22 -0500
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-18 14:41 -0400
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:22 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-18 16:44 -0400
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:48 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-18 16:57 -0400
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 17:03 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-18 19:23 -0400
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 08:30 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-19 11:20 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:21 -0600
            Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 12:18 -0500
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 11:31 -0600
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:14 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-18 19:35 +0100
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:23 +0000
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 17:08 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 23:31 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 08:32 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 12:08 -0400
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 11:20 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 01:39 +0000
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 20:16 -0600
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:45 -0400
                                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:20 -0600
                                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 11:22 -0400
                                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:41 -0600
                                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 12:22 -0400
                                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:23 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-20 23:06 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:15 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-20 23:41 +0100
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-20 12:38 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 19:18 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:26 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:24 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:25 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 21:59 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:09 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:25 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:40 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:23 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 13:42 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-22 16:11 -0400
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:42 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 05:17 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 06:12 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:33 -0500
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-19 11:18 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-19 20:39 +0100
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 16:06 -0400
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-19 21:09 +0000
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 17:33 -0400
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:14 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 17:56 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:21 +0000
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:17 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 15:39 -0500
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:24 -0600
    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:13 -0700
      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 13:15 -0600
        Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 17:53 -0400
          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 15:54 -0600
            Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 18:16 -0400
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 16:22 -0600
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 18:46 -0400
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:06 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:29 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:55 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 22:18 -0400
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 22:51 -0400

Page 13 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13] 14 15 … 17  Next page →

#206264

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2018-09-19 20:34 -0500
Message-ID<vbednTvb2NWTZD_GnZ2dnUU7-SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#205907
On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:18:51 -0600, Skeeter wrote:

> In article <MPG.360ae211ca2a70b9994a29@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
> @gmail.com says...
>> 
>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>> Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnYZpWpHYozzGnZ2dnUU7-
>> audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:16:01 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> > 
>> > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> > > posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7-
>> > > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> > >> 
>> > >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> > >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>,
>> > >> > nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says...
>> > >> > 
>> > >> > 
>> > >> > 
>> > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>> > >> >> snowflakes,
>> > >> >> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>> > >> >> 
>> > >> >> > In article <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
>> > >> >> > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
>> > >> >> >> 
>> > >> >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> > >> >> >> reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> > >> >> >> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>> > >> >> >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>> > >> >> >> 
>> > >> >> >> 
>> > >> >> >> 
>> > >> >> >> > On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> > >> >> >> > > In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
>> > >> >> >> > > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>> > >> >> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >> > >> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess hobnobbing
>> > >> >> >> > >> with white supremacists, abysmal conditions in the
>> > >> >> >> > >> concentration camps in the southwest, attacks on
>> > >> >> >> > >> programs to combat climate change, attacks on women and
>> > >> >> >> > >> minorities, attacks on the poor, attacks on the
>> > >> >> >> > >> citizenship rights of minorities, brain drains, adverse
>> > >> >> >> > >> court rulings, cooperating witnesses,
>> > >> >> >> > >> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
>> > >> >> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >> > >> In other words, just another week in the Trump regime:
>> > >> >> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >> > >> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
>> > >> >> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >> > >> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from Deutsche Bank.
>> > >> >> >> > >> Uh-oh!
>> > >> >> >> > > 
>> > >> >> >> > > anyday now foil hat collector.
>> > >> >> >> > 
>> > >> >> >> > Manafort's going to tell the truth and there won't be any
>> > >> >> >> > collusion and even if there is, it's not illegal when The
>> > >> >> >> > President does it, and if it is then Manafort's lying and
>> > >> >> >> > 3,000 Puerto Ricans didn't die so The President gets A+
>> > >> >> >> > for his amazing management skills!
>> > >> >> >> 
>> > >> >> >> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then date
>> > >> >> >> graped him!!!!2!
>> > >> >> > 
>> > >> >> > It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret" letter from a
>> > >> >> > "sekret"
>> > >> >> > so<SPANK>
>> > >> >> 
>> > >> >> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
>> > >> >> 
>> > >> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/kavanaugh-
>> > allegations-
>> > >> ford-
>> > >> >> palo-alto.html
>> > >> > 
>> > >> > Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor.  Most
>> > >> > people get attracted to that field because of their own issues. 
>> > >> > Now she claims she never told anyone because she was afraid he'd
>> > >> > "kill" her.
>> > >> > Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high school
>> > >> > ever touches other people's naughty parts, and if they do, they
>> > >> > should never ever be employed by anyone.  Are you prepared to
>> > >> > live in a world where you can lose your job anytime someone
>> > >> > utters some accusation that you did something naughty 35 years
>> > >> > ago in high school?  Did YOU ever do anything naughty in high
>> > >> > school, Ko0k?
>> > >> 
>> > >> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than
>> > >> other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
>> > > 
>> > > Does a person's reputation become spotted with the flimsiest of
>> > > accusations alone... suddenly popping up after 36 years?
>> > 
>> > The accusation(s) must be investigated, yes.  Especially for as
>> > important a job as a Supreme Court Justice.
>> > 
>> > If so, NO one
>> > > would have a spotless reputation... ever.
>> > 
>> > Possibly.  However, I don't believe that everyone would be accused of
>> > attempted rape in their past.
>> > 
>> > This woman is unsure where or
>> > > when this happened, and the third party she claims was there, says
>> > > he never witnessed any such incident anywhere.  Her accounts of the
>> > > alleged incident have varied at different times.  She claims she
>> > > just "remembered" it after decades had passed.  There's not a
>> > > scintilla of evidence from anyone to suggest this actually
>> > > happened.  NO one should be judged by something this vague and
>> > > vacuous.
>> > 
>> > The claim will be investigated as it should be, especially for as
>> > important a position as a Supreme Court Judge.
>> 
>> The point is, the Democrats have already decided he's guilty... not out
>> of any effort to be fair or objective, but simply because Trump is the
>> President and nominated him.
> 
> BINGO!

Your right to have that opinion and that's all it is at this point.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206278

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-19 20:15 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.360cb0bf3a1e222d989989@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#206264
In article <vbednTvb2NWTZD_GnZ2dnUU7-SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, 
pandora@peak.org says...
> 
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:18:51 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> 
> > In article <MPG.360ae211ca2a70b9994a29@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
> > @gmail.com says...
> >> 
> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> >> Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnYZpWpHYozzGnZ2dnUU7-
> >> audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:16:01 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> >> > 
> >> > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> >> > > posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7-
> >> > > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> >> > >> 
> >> > >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> >> > >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>,
> >> > >> > nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says...
> >> > >> > 
> >> > >> > 
> >> > >> > 
> >> > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> >> > >> >> snowflakes,
> >> > >> >> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> >> > >> >> 
> >> > >> >> > In article <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
> >> > >> >> > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
> >> > >> >> >> 
> >> > >> >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
> >> > >> >> >> reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
> >> > >> >> >> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
> >> > >> >> >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
> >> > >> >> >> 
> >> > >> >> >> 
> >> > >> >> >> 
> >> > >> >> >> > On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >> > >> >> >> > > In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
> >> > >> >> >> > > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
> >> > >> >> >> > >>
> >> > >> >> >> > >> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess hobnobbing
> >> > >> >> >> > >> with white supremacists, abysmal conditions in the
> >> > >> >> >> > >> concentration camps in the southwest, attacks on
> >> > >> >> >> > >> programs to combat climate change, attacks on women and
> >> > >> >> >> > >> minorities, attacks on the poor, attacks on the
> >> > >> >> >> > >> citizenship rights of minorities, brain drains, adverse
> >> > >> >> >> > >> court rulings, cooperating witnesses,
> >> > >> >> >> > >> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
> >> > >> >> >> > >>
> >> > >> >> >> > >> In other words, just another week in the Trump regime:
> >> > >> >> >> > >>
> >> > >> >> >> > >> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
> >> > >> >> >> > >>
> >> > >> >> >> > >> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from Deutsche Bank.
> >> > >> >> >> > >> Uh-oh!
> >> > >> >> >> > > 
> >> > >> >> >> > > anyday now foil hat collector.
> >> > >> >> >> > 
> >> > >> >> >> > Manafort's going to tell the truth and there won't be any
> >> > >> >> >> > collusion and even if there is, it's not illegal when The
> >> > >> >> >> > President does it, and if it is then Manafort's lying and
> >> > >> >> >> > 3,000 Puerto Ricans didn't die so The President gets A+
> >> > >> >> >> > for his amazing management skills!
> >> > >> >> >> 
> >> > >> >> >> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then date
> >> > >> >> >> graped him!!!!2!
> >> > >> >> > 
> >> > >> >> > It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret" letter from a
> >> > >> >> > "sekret"
> >> > >> >> > so<SPANK>
> >> > >> >> 
> >> > >> >> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
> >> > >> >> 
> >> > >> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/kavanaugh-
> >> > allegations-
> >> > >> ford-
> >> > >> >> palo-alto.html
> >> > >> > 
> >> > >> > Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor.  Most
> >> > >> > people get attracted to that field because of their own issues. 
> >> > >> > Now she claims she never told anyone because she was afraid he'd
> >> > >> > "kill" her.
> >> > >> > Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high school
> >> > >> > ever touches other people's naughty parts, and if they do, they
> >> > >> > should never ever be employed by anyone.  Are you prepared to
> >> > >> > live in a world where you can lose your job anytime someone
> >> > >> > utters some accusation that you did something naughty 35 years
> >> > >> > ago in high school?  Did YOU ever do anything naughty in high
> >> > >> > school, Ko0k?
> >> > >> 
> >> > >> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than
> >> > >> other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
> >> > > 
> >> > > Does a person's reputation become spotted with the flimsiest of
> >> > > accusations alone... suddenly popping up after 36 years?
> >> > 
> >> > The accusation(s) must be investigated, yes.  Especially for as
> >> > important a job as a Supreme Court Justice.
> >> > 
> >> > If so, NO one
> >> > > would have a spotless reputation... ever.
> >> > 
> >> > Possibly.  However, I don't believe that everyone would be accused of
> >> > attempted rape in their past.
> >> > 
> >> > This woman is unsure where or
> >> > > when this happened, and the third party she claims was there, says
> >> > > he never witnessed any such incident anywhere.  Her accounts of the
> >> > > alleged incident have varied at different times.  She claims she
> >> > > just "remembered" it after decades had passed.  There's not a
> >> > > scintilla of evidence from anyone to suggest this actually
> >> > > happened.  NO one should be judged by something this vague and
> >> > > vacuous.
> >> > 
> >> > The claim will be investigated as it should be, especially for as
> >> > important a position as a Supreme Court Judge.
> >> 
> >> The point is, the Democrats have already decided he's guilty... not out
> >> of any effort to be fair or objective, but simply because Trump is the
> >> President and nominated him.
> > 
> > BINGO!
> 
> Your right to have that opinion and that's all it is at this point.

Only the blind see it otherwise.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206955

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2018-09-21 18:07 -0500
Message-ID<PKOdnS9lH5oG5DjGnZ2dnUU7-SednZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#206278
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 20:15:47 -0600, Skeeter wrote:

> In article <vbednTvb2NWTZD_GnZ2dnUU7-SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
> pandora@peak.org says...
>> 
>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:18:51 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>> 
>> > In article <MPG.360ae211ca2a70b9994a29@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
>> > @gmail.com says...
>> >> 
>> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>> >> by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnYZpWpHYozzGnZ2dnUU7-
>> >> audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:16:01 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> > 
>> >> > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> >> > > posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7-
>> >> > > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> > > 
>> >> > > 
>> >> > > 
>> >> > >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> > >> 
>> >> > >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >> > >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> > >> > <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid
>> >> > >> > says...
>> >> > >> > 
>> >> > >> > 
>> >> > >> > 
>> >> > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>> >> > >> >> snowflakes,
>> >> > >> >> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>> >> > >> >> 
>> >> > >> >> > In article <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
>> >> > >> >> > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
>> >> > >> >> >> 
>> >> > >> >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >> > >> >> >> reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> > >> >> >> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>> >> > >> >> >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>> >> > >> >> >> 
>> >> > >> >> >> 
>> >> > >> >> >> 
>> >> > >> >> >> > On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> >> > >> >> >> > > In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
>> >> > >> >> >> > > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>> >> > >> >> >> > >>
>> >> > >> >> >> > >> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess
>> >> > >> >> >> > >> hobnobbing with white supremacists, abysmal
>> >> > >> >> >> > >> conditions in the concentration camps in the
>> >> > >> >> >> > >> southwest, attacks on programs to combat climate
>> >> > >> >> >> > >> change, attacks on women and minorities, attacks on
>> >> > >> >> >> > >> the poor, attacks on the citizenship rights of
>> >> > >> >> >> > >> minorities, brain drains, adverse court rulings,
>> >> > >> >> >> > >> cooperating witnesses,
>> >> > >> >> >> > >> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
>> >> > >> >> >> > >>
>> >> > >> >> >> > >> In other words, just another week in the Trump
>> >> > >> >> >> > >> regime:
>> >> > >> >> >> > >>
>> >> > >> >> >> > >> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
>> >> > >> >> >> > >>
>> >> > >> >> >> > >> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from Deutsche
>> >> > >> >> >> > >> Bank.
>> >> > >> >> >> > >> Uh-oh!
>> >> > >> >> >> > > 
>> >> > >> >> >> > > anyday now foil hat collector.
>> >> > >> >> >> > 
>> >> > >> >> >> > Manafort's going to tell the truth and there won't be
>> >> > >> >> >> > any collusion and even if there is, it's not illegal
>> >> > >> >> >> > when The President does it, and if it is then
>> >> > >> >> >> > Manafort's lying and 3,000 Puerto Ricans didn't die so
>> >> > >> >> >> > The President gets A+ for his amazing management
>> >> > >> >> >> > skills!
>> >> > >> >> >> 
>> >> > >> >> >> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then date
>> >> > >> >> >> graped him!!!!2!
>> >> > >> >> > 
>> >> > >> >> > It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret" letter
>> >> > >> >> > from a "sekret"
>> >> > >> >> > so<SPANK>
>> >> > >> >> 
>> >> > >> >> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
>> >> > >> >> 
>> >> > >> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/kavanaugh-
>> >> > allegations-
>> >> > >> ford-
>> >> > >> >> palo-alto.html
>> >> > >> > 
>> >> > >> > Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor.  Most
>> >> > >> > people get attracted to that field because of their own
>> >> > >> > issues. Now she claims she never told anyone because she was
>> >> > >> > afraid he'd "kill" her.
>> >> > >> > Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high school
>> >> > >> > ever touches other people's naughty parts, and if they do,
>> >> > >> > they should never ever be employed by anyone.  Are you
>> >> > >> > prepared to live in a world where you can lose your job
>> >> > >> > anytime someone utters some accusation that you did something
>> >> > >> > naughty 35 years ago in high school?  Did YOU ever do
>> >> > >> > anything naughty in high school, Ko0k?
>> >> > >> 
>> >> > >> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than
>> >> > >> other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
>> >> > > 
>> >> > > Does a person's reputation become spotted with the flimsiest of
>> >> > > accusations alone... suddenly popping up after 36 years?
>> >> > 
>> >> > The accusation(s) must be investigated, yes.  Especially for as
>> >> > important a job as a Supreme Court Justice.
>> >> > 
>> >> > If so, NO one
>> >> > > would have a spotless reputation... ever.
>> >> > 
>> >> > Possibly.  However, I don't believe that everyone would be accused
>> >> > of attempted rape in their past.
>> >> > 
>> >> > This woman is unsure where or
>> >> > > when this happened, and the third party she claims was there,
>> >> > > says he never witnessed any such incident anywhere.  Her
>> >> > > accounts of the alleged incident have varied at different times.
>> >> > >  She claims she just "remembered" it after decades had passed. 
>> >> > > There's not a scintilla of evidence from anyone to suggest this
>> >> > > actually happened.  NO one should be judged by something this
>> >> > > vague and vacuous.
>> >> > 
>> >> > The claim will be investigated as it should be, especially for as
>> >> > important a position as a Supreme Court Judge.
>> >> 
>> >> The point is, the Democrats have already decided he's guilty... not
>> >> out of any effort to be fair or objective, but simply because Trump
>> >> is the President and nominated him.
>> > 
>> > BINGO!
>> 
>> Your right to have that opinion and that's all it is at this point.
> 
> Only the blind see it otherwise.

Only the biased believe with no investigation.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206369

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-20 09:19 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.360d6861e288c77098999b@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#206264
In article <MPG.360cfc2b10dcf17a994a9b@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
@gmail.com says...
> 
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
> Checkmate!  In article <vbednTvb2NWTZD_GnZ2dnUU7-
> SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> 
> 
> > 
> > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:18:51 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> > 
> > > In article <MPG.360ae211ca2a70b9994a29@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
> > > @gmail.com says...
> > >> 
> > >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > >> Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnYZpWpHYozzGnZ2dnUU7-
> > >> audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:16:01 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> > >> > 
> > >> > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> > >> > > posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7-
> > >> > > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > 
> > >> > >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> > >> > >> 
> > >> > >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> > >> > >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>,
> > >> > >> > nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says...
> > >> > >> > 
> > >> > >> > 
> > >> > >> > 
> > >> > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> > >> > >> >> snowflakes,
> > >> > >> >> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> > >> > >> >> 
> > >> > >> >> > In article <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
> > >> > >> >> > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
> > >> > >> >> >> 
> > >> > >> >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
> > >> > >> >> >> reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
> > >> > >> >> >> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
> > >> > >> >> >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
> > >> > >> >> >> 
> > >> > >> >> >> 
> > >> > >> >> >> 
> > >> > >> >> >> > On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> > >> > >> >> >> > > In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
> > >> > >> >> >> > > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
> > >> > >> >> >> > >>
> > >> > >> >> >> > >> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess hobnobbing
> > >> > >> >> >> > >> with white supremacists, abysmal conditions in the
> > >> > >> >> >> > >> concentration camps in the southwest, attacks on
> > >> > >> >> >> > >> programs to combat climate change, attacks on women and
> > >> > >> >> >> > >> minorities, attacks on the poor, attacks on the
> > >> > >> >> >> > >> citizenship rights of minorities, brain drains, adverse
> > >> > >> >> >> > >> court rulings, cooperating witnesses,
> > >> > >> >> >> > >> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
> > >> > >> >> >> > >>
> > >> > >> >> >> > >> In other words, just another week in the Trump regime:
> > >> > >> >> >> > >>
> > >> > >> >> >> > >> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
> > >> > >> >> >> > >>
> > >> > >> >> >> > >> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from Deutsche Bank.
> > >> > >> >> >> > >> Uh-oh!
> > >> > >> >> >> > > 
> > >> > >> >> >> > > anyday now foil hat collector.
> > >> > >> >> >> > 
> > >> > >> >> >> > Manafort's going to tell the truth and there won't be any
> > >> > >> >> >> > collusion and even if there is, it's not illegal when The
> > >> > >> >> >> > President does it, and if it is then Manafort's lying and
> > >> > >> >> >> > 3,000 Puerto Ricans didn't die so The President gets A+
> > >> > >> >> >> > for his amazing management skills!
> > >> > >> >> >> 
> > >> > >> >> >> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then date
> > >> > >> >> >> graped him!!!!2!
> > >> > >> >> > 
> > >> > >> >> > It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret" letter from a
> > >> > >> >> > "sekret"
> > >> > >> >> > so<SPANK>
> > >> > >> >> 
> > >> > >> >> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
> > >> > >> >> 
> > >> > >> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/kavanaugh-
> > >> > allegations-
> > >> > >> ford-
> > >> > >> >> palo-alto.html
> > >> > >> > 
> > >> > >> > Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor.  Most
> > >> > >> > people get attracted to that field because of their own issues. 
> > >> > >> > Now she claims she never told anyone because she was afraid he'd
> > >> > >> > "kill" her.
> > >> > >> > Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high school
> > >> > >> > ever touches other people's naughty parts, and if they do, they
> > >> > >> > should never ever be employed by anyone.  Are you prepared to
> > >> > >> > live in a world where you can lose your job anytime someone
> > >> > >> > utters some accusation that you did something naughty 35 years
> > >> > >> > ago in high school?  Did YOU ever do anything naughty in high
> > >> > >> > school, Ko0k?
> > >> > >> 
> > >> > >> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than
> > >> > >> other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > Does a person's reputation become spotted with the flimsiest of
> > >> > > accusations alone... suddenly popping up after 36 years?
> > >> > 
> > >> > The accusation(s) must be investigated, yes.  Especially for as
> > >> > important a job as a Supreme Court Justice.
> > >> > 
> > >> > If so, NO one
> > >> > > would have a spotless reputation... ever.
> > >> > 
> > >> > Possibly.  However, I don't believe that everyone would be accused of
> > >> > attempted rape in their past.
> > >> > 
> > >> > This woman is unsure where or
> > >> > > when this happened, and the third party she claims was there, says
> > >> > > he never witnessed any such incident anywhere.  Her accounts of the
> > >> > > alleged incident have varied at different times.  She claims she
> > >> > > just "remembered" it after decades had passed.  There's not a
> > >> > > scintilla of evidence from anyone to suggest this actually
> > >> > > happened.  NO one should be judged by something this vague and
> > >> > > vacuous.
> > >> > 
> > >> > The claim will be investigated as it should be, especially for as
> > >> > important a position as a Supreme Court Judge.
> > >> 
> > >> The point is, the Democrats have already decided he's guilty... not out
> > >> of any effort to be fair or objective, but simply because Trump is the
> > >> President and nominated him.
> > > 
> > > BINGO!
> > 
> > Your right to have that opinion and that's all it is at this point.
> 
> It didn't seem to be "right" when I said it.

She likes me better...neener

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#207097

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2018-09-22 01:21 -0500
Message-ID<PKOdnSVlH5rtQjjGnZ2dnUU7-SednZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#206369
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 09:19:22 -0600, Skeeter wrote:

> In article <MPG.360cfc2b10dcf17a994a9b@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
> @gmail.com says...
>> 
>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>> Checkmate!  In article <vbednTvb2NWTZD_GnZ2dnUU7-
>> SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:18:51 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>> > 
>> > > In article <MPG.360ae211ca2a70b9994a29@news.altopia.com>,
>> > > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
>> > >> 
>> > >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> > >> posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnYZpWpHYozzGnZ2dnUU7-
>> > >> audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> > >> 
>> > >> 
>> > >> 
>> > >> > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:16:01 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> > >> > 
>> > >> > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> > >> > > posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7-
>> > >> > > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> > >> > > 
>> > >> > > 
>> > >> > > 
>> > >> > >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> > >> > >> 
>> > >> > >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> > >> > >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> > >> > >> > <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid
>> > >> > >> > says...
>> > >> > >> > 
>> > >> > >> > 
>> > >> > >> > 
>> > >> > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>> > >> > >> >> snowflakes,
>> > >> > >> >> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>> > >> > >> >> 
>> > >> > >> >> > In article
>> > >> > >> >> > <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
>> > >> > >> >> > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
>> > >> > >> >> >> 
>> > >> > >> >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> > >> > >> >> >> reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> > >> > >> >> >> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>> > >> > >> >> >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>> > >> > >> >> >> 
>> > >> > >> >> >> 
>> > >> > >> >> >> 
>> > >> > >> >> >> > On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> > >> > >> >> >> > > In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
>> > >> > >> >> >> > > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>> > >> > >> >> >> > >>
>> > >> > >> >> >> > >> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess
>> > >> > >> >> >> > >> hobnobbing with white supremacists, abysmal
>> > >> > >> >> >> > >> conditions in the concentration camps in the
>> > >> > >> >> >> > >> southwest, attacks on programs to combat climate
>> > >> > >> >> >> > >> change, attacks on women and minorities, attacks
>> > >> > >> >> >> > >> on the poor, attacks on the citizenship rights of
>> > >> > >> >> >> > >> minorities, brain drains, adverse court rulings,
>> > >> > >> >> >> > >> cooperating witnesses,
>> > >> > >> >> >> > >> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
>> > >> > >> >> >> > >>
>> > >> > >> >> >> > >> In other words, just another week in the Trump
>> > >> > >> >> >> > >> regime:
>> > >> > >> >> >> > >>
>> > >> > >> >> >> > >> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
>> > >> > >> >> >> > >>
>> > >> > >> >> >> > >> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from Deutsche
>> > >> > >> >> >> > >> Bank.
>> > >> > >> >> >> > >> Uh-oh!
>> > >> > >> >> >> > > 
>> > >> > >> >> >> > > anyday now foil hat collector.
>> > >> > >> >> >> > 
>> > >> > >> >> >> > Manafort's going to tell the truth and there won't be
>> > >> > >> >> >> > any collusion and even if there is, it's not illegal
>> > >> > >> >> >> > when The President does it, and if it is then
>> > >> > >> >> >> > Manafort's lying and 3,000 Puerto Ricans didn't die
>> > >> > >> >> >> > so The President gets A+ for his amazing management
>> > >> > >> >> >> > skills!
>> > >> > >> >> >> 
>> > >> > >> >> >> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then
>> > >> > >> >> >> date graped him!!!!2!
>> > >> > >> >> > 
>> > >> > >> >> > It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret" letter
>> > >> > >> >> > from a "sekret"
>> > >> > >> >> > so<SPANK>
>> > >> > >> >> 
>> > >> > >> >> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
>> > >> > >> >> 
>> > >> > >> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/kavanaugh-
>> > >> > allegations-
>> > >> > >> ford-
>> > >> > >> >> palo-alto.html
>> > >> > >> > 
>> > >> > >> > Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor.  Most
>> > >> > >> > people get attracted to that field because of their own
>> > >> > >> > issues. Now she claims she never told anyone because she
>> > >> > >> > was afraid he'd "kill" her.
>> > >> > >> > Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high
>> > >> > >> > school ever touches other people's naughty parts, and if
>> > >> > >> > they do, they should never ever be employed by anyone.  Are
>> > >> > >> > you prepared to live in a world where you can lose your job
>> > >> > >> > anytime someone utters some accusation that you did
>> > >> > >> > something naughty 35 years ago in high school?  Did YOU
>> > >> > >> > ever do anything naughty in high school, Ko0k?
>> > >> > >> 
>> > >> > >> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than
>> > >> > >> other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
>> > >> > > 
>> > >> > > Does a person's reputation become spotted with the flimsiest
>> > >> > > of accusations alone... suddenly popping up after 36 years?
>> > >> > 
>> > >> > The accusation(s) must be investigated, yes.  Especially for as
>> > >> > important a job as a Supreme Court Justice.
>> > >> > 
>> > >> > If so, NO one
>> > >> > > would have a spotless reputation... ever.
>> > >> > 
>> > >> > Possibly.  However, I don't believe that everyone would be
>> > >> > accused of attempted rape in their past.
>> > >> > 
>> > >> > This woman is unsure where or
>> > >> > > when this happened, and the third party she claims was there,
>> > >> > > says he never witnessed any such incident anywhere.  Her
>> > >> > > accounts of the alleged incident have varied at different
>> > >> > > times.  She claims she just "remembered" it after decades had
>> > >> > > passed.  There's not a scintilla of evidence from anyone to
>> > >> > > suggest this actually happened.  NO one should be judged by
>> > >> > > something this vague and vacuous.
>> > >> > 
>> > >> > The claim will be investigated as it should be, especially for
>> > >> > as important a position as a Supreme Court Judge.
>> > >> 
>> > >> The point is, the Democrats have already decided he's guilty...
>> > >> not out of any effort to be fair or objective, but simply because
>> > >> Trump is the President and nominated him.
>> > > 
>> > > BINGO!
>> > 
>> > Your right to have that opinion and that's all it is at this point.
>> 
>> It didn't seem to be "right" when I said it.
> 
> She likes me better...neener

At this point in time, I don't particularly either one of you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#207215

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-22 09:17 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.36100b0f565ea573989a2d@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#207097
In article <PKOdnSVlH5rtQjjGnZ2dnUU7-SednZ2d@scnresearch.com>, 
pandora@peak.org says...
> 
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 09:19:22 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> 
> > In article <MPG.360cfc2b10dcf17a994a9b@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
> > @gmail.com says...
> >> 
> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> >> Checkmate!  In article <vbednTvb2NWTZD_GnZ2dnUU7-
> >> SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:18:51 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> >> > 
> >> > > In article <MPG.360ae211ca2a70b9994a29@news.altopia.com>,
> >> > > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
> >> > >> 
> >> > >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> >> > >> posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnYZpWpHYozzGnZ2dnUU7-
> >> > >> audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> >> > >> 
> >> > >> 
> >> > >> 
> >> > >> > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:16:01 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> >> > >> > 
> >> > >> > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> >> > >> > > posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7-
> >> > >> > > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> >> > >> > > 
> >> > >> > > 
> >> > >> > > 
> >> > >> > >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> >> > >> > >> 
> >> > >> > >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
> >> > >> > >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
> >> > >> > >> > <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid
> >> > >> > >> > says...
> >> > >> > >> > 
> >> > >> > >> > 
> >> > >> > >> > 
> >> > >> > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> >> > >> > >> >> snowflakes,
> >> > >> > >> >> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> >> > >> > >> >> 
> >> > >> > >> >> > In article
> >> > >> > >> >> > <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
> >> > >> > >> >> > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
> >> > >> > >> >> >> 
> >> > >> > >> >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
> >> > >> > >> >> >> reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
> >> > >> > >> >> >> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
> >> > >> > >> >> >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
> >> > >> > >> >> >> 
> >> > >> > >> >> >> 
> >> > >> > >> >> >> 
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > > In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >>
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> hobnobbing with white supremacists, abysmal
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> conditions in the concentration camps in the
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> southwest, attacks on programs to combat climate
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> change, attacks on women and minorities, attacks
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> on the poor, attacks on the citizenship rights of
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> minorities, brain drains, adverse court rulings,
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> cooperating witnesses,
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >>
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> In other words, just another week in the Trump
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> regime:
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >>
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >>
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from Deutsche
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> Bank.
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> Uh-oh!
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > > 
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > > anyday now foil hat collector.
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > 
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > Manafort's going to tell the truth and there won't be
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > any collusion and even if there is, it's not illegal
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > when The President does it, and if it is then
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > Manafort's lying and 3,000 Puerto Ricans didn't die
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > so The President gets A+ for his amazing management
> >> > >> > >> >> >> > skills!
> >> > >> > >> >> >> 
> >> > >> > >> >> >> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then
> >> > >> > >> >> >> date graped him!!!!2!
> >> > >> > >> >> > 
> >> > >> > >> >> > It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret" letter
> >> > >> > >> >> > from a "sekret"
> >> > >> > >> >> > so<SPANK>
> >> > >> > >> >> 
> >> > >> > >> >> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
> >> > >> > >> >> 
> >> > >> > >> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/kavanaugh-
> >> > >> > allegations-
> >> > >> > >> ford-
> >> > >> > >> >> palo-alto.html
> >> > >> > >> > 
> >> > >> > >> > Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor.  Most
> >> > >> > >> > people get attracted to that field because of their own
> >> > >> > >> > issues. Now she claims she never told anyone because she
> >> > >> > >> > was afraid he'd "kill" her.
> >> > >> > >> > Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high
> >> > >> > >> > school ever touches other people's naughty parts, and if
> >> > >> > >> > they do, they should never ever be employed by anyone.  Are
> >> > >> > >> > you prepared to live in a world where you can lose your job
> >> > >> > >> > anytime someone utters some accusation that you did
> >> > >> > >> > something naughty 35 years ago in high school?  Did YOU
> >> > >> > >> > ever do anything naughty in high school, Ko0k?
> >> > >> > >> 
> >> > >> > >> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than
> >> > >> > >> other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
> >> > >> > > 
> >> > >> > > Does a person's reputation become spotted with the flimsiest
> >> > >> > > of accusations alone... suddenly popping up after 36 years?
> >> > >> > 
> >> > >> > The accusation(s) must be investigated, yes.  Especially for as
> >> > >> > important a job as a Supreme Court Justice.
> >> > >> > 
> >> > >> > If so, NO one
> >> > >> > > would have a spotless reputation... ever.
> >> > >> > 
> >> > >> > Possibly.  However, I don't believe that everyone would be
> >> > >> > accused of attempted rape in their past.
> >> > >> > 
> >> > >> > This woman is unsure where or
> >> > >> > > when this happened, and the third party she claims was there,
> >> > >> > > says he never witnessed any such incident anywhere.  Her
> >> > >> > > accounts of the alleged incident have varied at different
> >> > >> > > times.  She claims she just "remembered" it after decades had
> >> > >> > > passed.  There's not a scintilla of evidence from anyone to
> >> > >> > > suggest this actually happened.  NO one should be judged by
> >> > >> > > something this vague and vacuous.
> >> > >> > 
> >> > >> > The claim will be investigated as it should be, especially for
> >> > >> > as important a position as a Supreme Court Judge.
> >> > >> 
> >> > >> The point is, the Democrats have already decided he's guilty...
> >> > >> not out of any effort to be fair or objective, but simply because
> >> > >> Trump is the President and nominated him.
> >> > > 
> >> > > BINGO!
> >> > 
> >> > Your right to have that opinion and that's all it is at this point.
> >> 
> >> It didn't seem to be "right" when I said it.
> > 
> > She likes me better...neener
> 
> At this point in time, I don't particularly either one of you.

Thanks for proving the left "hate" agenda.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#207637

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2018-09-23 14:41 -0500
Message-ID<t4idnd5bhPr1cTrGnZ2dnUU7-Y-dnZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#207215
On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 09:17:55 -0600, Skeeter wrote:

> In article <PKOdnSVlH5rtQjjGnZ2dnUU7-SednZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
> pandora@peak.org says...
>> 
>> On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 09:19:22 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>> 
>> > In article <MPG.360cfc2b10dcf17a994a9b@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
>> > @gmail.com says...
>> >> 
>> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>> >> by Checkmate!  In article <vbednTvb2NWTZD_GnZ2dnUU7-
>> >> SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:18:51 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>> >> > 
>> >> > > In article <MPG.360ae211ca2a70b9994a29@news.altopia.com>,
>> >> > > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
>> >> > >> 
>> >> > >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> >> > >> posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnYZpWpHYozzGnZ2dnUU7-
>> >> > >> audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> > >> 
>> >> > >> 
>> >> > >> 
>> >> > >> > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:16:01 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> > >> > 
>> >> > >> > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >> > >> > > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> > >> > > <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7- audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>> >> > >> > > pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> > >> > > 
>> >> > >> > > 
>> >> > >> > > 
>> >> > >> > >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> > >> > >> 
>> >> > >> > >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >> > >> > >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> > >> > >> > <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid
>> >> > >> > >> > says...
>> >> > >> > >> > 
>> >> > >> > >> > 
>> >> > >> > >> > 
>> >> > >> > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>> >> > >> > >> >> snowflakes,
>> >> > >> > >> >> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter
>> >> > >> > >> >> wrote:
>> >> > >> > >> >> 
>> >> > >> > >> >> > In article
>> >> > >> > >> >> > <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
>> >> > >> > >> >> > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> 
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> when reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> 
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> 
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> 
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > > In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >>
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> hobnobbing with white supremacists, abysmal
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> conditions in the concentration camps in the
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> southwest, attacks on programs to combat
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> climate change, attacks on women and
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> minorities, attacks on the poor, attacks on the
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> citizenship rights of minorities, brain drains,
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> adverse court rulings, cooperating witnesses,
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >>
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> In other words, just another week in the Trump
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> regime:
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >>
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >>
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> Deutsche Bank.
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> Uh-oh!
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > > 
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > > anyday now foil hat collector.
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > 
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > Manafort's going to tell the truth and there won't
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > be any collusion and even if there is, it's not
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > illegal when The President does it, and if it is
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > then Manafort's lying and 3,000 Puerto Ricans
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > didn't die so The President gets A+ for his
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> > amazing management skills!
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> 
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then
>> >> > >> > >> >> >> date graped him!!!!2!
>> >> > >> > >> >> > 
>> >> > >> > >> >> > It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret"
>> >> > >> > >> >> > letter from a "sekret"
>> >> > >> > >> >> > so<SPANK>
>> >> > >> > >> >> 
>> >> > >> > >> >> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
>> >> > >> > >> >> 
>> >> > >> > >> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/
kavanaugh-
>> >> > >> > allegations-
>> >> > >> > >> ford-
>> >> > >> > >> >> palo-alto.html
>> >> > >> > >> > 
>> >> > >> > >> > Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor. 
>> >> > >> > >> > Most people get attracted to that field because of their
>> >> > >> > >> > own issues. Now she claims she never told anyone because
>> >> > >> > >> > she was afraid he'd "kill" her.
>> >> > >> > >> > Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high
>> >> > >> > >> > school ever touches other people's naughty parts, and if
>> >> > >> > >> > they do, they should never ever be employed by anyone. 
>> >> > >> > >> > Are you prepared to live in a world where you can lose
>> >> > >> > >> > your job anytime someone utters some accusation that you
>> >> > >> > >> > did something naughty 35 years ago in high school?  Did
>> >> > >> > >> > YOU ever do anything naughty in high school, Ko0k?
>> >> > >> > >> 
>> >> > >> > >> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different
>> >> > >> > >> than other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
>> >> > >> > > 
>> >> > >> > > Does a person's reputation become spotted with the
>> >> > >> > > flimsiest of accusations alone... suddenly popping up after
>> >> > >> > > 36 years?
>> >> > >> > 
>> >> > >> > The accusation(s) must be investigated, yes.  Especially for
>> >> > >> > as important a job as a Supreme Court Justice.
>> >> > >> > 
>> >> > >> > If so, NO one
>> >> > >> > > would have a spotless reputation... ever.
>> >> > >> > 
>> >> > >> > Possibly.  However, I don't believe that everyone would be
>> >> > >> > accused of attempted rape in their past.
>> >> > >> > 
>> >> > >> > This woman is unsure where or
>> >> > >> > > when this happened, and the third party she claims was
>> >> > >> > > there, says he never witnessed any such incident anywhere. 
>> >> > >> > > Her accounts of the alleged incident have varied at
>> >> > >> > > different times.  She claims she just "remembered" it after
>> >> > >> > > decades had passed.  There's not a scintilla of evidence
>> >> > >> > > from anyone to suggest this actually happened.  NO one
>> >> > >> > > should be judged by something this vague and vacuous.
>> >> > >> > 
>> >> > >> > The claim will be investigated as it should be, especially
>> >> > >> > for as important a position as a Supreme Court Judge.
>> >> > >> 
>> >> > >> The point is, the Democrats have already decided he's guilty...
>> >> > >> not out of any effort to be fair or objective, but simply
>> >> > >> because Trump is the President and nominated him.
>> >> > > 
>> >> > > BINGO!
>> >> > 
>> >> > Your right to have that opinion and that's all it is at this
>> >> > point.
>> >> 
>> >> It didn't seem to be "right" when I said it.
>> > 
>> > She likes me better...neener
>> 
>> At this point in time, I don't particularly either one of you.
> 
> Thanks for proving the left "hate" agenda.

I never said I hated you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#207216

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-22 09:18 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.36100b385132d669989a2e@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#207097
In article <MPG.360f87d339796a62994b74@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
@gmail.com says...
> 
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
> Checkmate!  In article <PKOdnSVlH5rtQjjGnZ2dnUU7-
> SednZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> 
> 
> > 
> > On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 09:19:22 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> > 
> > > In article <MPG.360cfc2b10dcf17a994a9b@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
> > > @gmail.com says...
> > >> 
> > >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > >> Checkmate!  In article <vbednTvb2NWTZD_GnZ2dnUU7-
> > >> SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:18:51 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> > >> > 
> > >> > > In article <MPG.360ae211ca2a70b9994a29@news.altopia.com>,
> > >> > > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
> > >> > >> 
> > >> > >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> > >> > >> posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnYZpWpHYozzGnZ2dnUU7-
> > >> > >> audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> > >> > >> 
> > >> > >> 
> > >> > >> 
> > >> > >> > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:16:01 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> > >> > >> > 
> > >> > >> > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> > >> > >> > > posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7-
> > >> > >> > > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> > >> > >> > > 
> > >> > >> > > 
> > >> > >> > > 
> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> > >> > >> > >> 
> > >> > >> > >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
> > >> > >> > >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
> > >> > >> > >> > <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid
> > >> > >> > >> > says...
> > >> > >> > >> > 
> > >> > >> > >> > 
> > >> > >> > >> > 
> > >> > >> > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> > >> > >> > >> >> snowflakes,
> > >> > >> > >> >> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> > >> > >> > >> >> 
> > >> > >> > >> >> > In article
> > >> > >> > >> >> > <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
> > >> > >> > >> >> > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> 
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> 
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> 
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> 
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > > In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > >>
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> hobnobbing with white supremacists, abysmal
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> conditions in the concentration camps in the
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> southwest, attacks on programs to combat climate
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> change, attacks on women and minorities, attacks
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> on the poor, attacks on the citizenship rights of
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> minorities, brain drains, adverse court rulings,
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> cooperating witnesses,
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > >>
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> In other words, just another week in the Trump
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> regime:
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > >>
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > >>
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from Deutsche
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> Bank.
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> Uh-oh!
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > > 
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > > anyday now foil hat collector.
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > 
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > Manafort's going to tell the truth and there won't be
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > any collusion and even if there is, it's not illegal
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > when The President does it, and if it is then
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > Manafort's lying and 3,000 Puerto Ricans didn't die
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > so The President gets A+ for his amazing management
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > skills!
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> 
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then
> > >> > >> > >> >> >> date graped him!!!!2!
> > >> > >> > >> >> > 
> > >> > >> > >> >> > It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret" letter
> > >> > >> > >> >> > from a "sekret"
> > >> > >> > >> >> > so<SPANK>
> > >> > >> > >> >> 
> > >> > >> > >> >> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
> > >> > >> > >> >> 
> > >> > >> > >> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/kavanaugh-
> > >> > >> > allegations-
> > >> > >> > >> ford-
> > >> > >> > >> >> palo-alto.html
> > >> > >> > >> > 
> > >> > >> > >> > Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor.  Most
> > >> > >> > >> > people get attracted to that field because of their own
> > >> > >> > >> > issues. Now she claims she never told anyone because she
> > >> > >> > >> > was afraid he'd "kill" her.
> > >> > >> > >> > Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high
> > >> > >> > >> > school ever touches other people's naughty parts, and if
> > >> > >> > >> > they do, they should never ever be employed by anyone.  Are
> > >> > >> > >> > you prepared to live in a world where you can lose your job
> > >> > >> > >> > anytime someone utters some accusation that you did
> > >> > >> > >> > something naughty 35 years ago in high school?  Did YOU
> > >> > >> > >> > ever do anything naughty in high school, Ko0k?
> > >> > >> > >> 
> > >> > >> > >> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than
> > >> > >> > >> other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
> > >> > >> > > 
> > >> > >> > > Does a person's reputation become spotted with the flimsiest
> > >> > >> > > of accusations alone... suddenly popping up after 36 years?
> > >> > >> > 
> > >> > >> > The accusation(s) must be investigated, yes.  Especially for as
> > >> > >> > important a job as a Supreme Court Justice.
> > >> > >> > 
> > >> > >> > If so, NO one
> > >> > >> > > would have a spotless reputation... ever.
> > >> > >> > 
> > >> > >> > Possibly.  However, I don't believe that everyone would be
> > >> > >> > accused of attempted rape in their past.
> > >> > >> > 
> > >> > >> > This woman is unsure where or
> > >> > >> > > when this happened, and the third party she claims was there,
> > >> > >> > > says he never witnessed any such incident anywhere.  Her
> > >> > >> > > accounts of the alleged incident have varied at different
> > >> > >> > > times.  She claims she just "remembered" it after decades had
> > >> > >> > > passed.  There's not a scintilla of evidence from anyone to
> > >> > >> > > suggest this actually happened.  NO one should be judged by
> > >> > >> > > something this vague and vacuous.
> > >> > >> > 
> > >> > >> > The claim will be investigated as it should be, especially for
> > >> > >> > as important a position as a Supreme Court Judge.
> > >> > >> 
> > >> > >> The point is, the Democrats have already decided he's guilty...
> > >> > >> not out of any effort to be fair or objective, but simply because
> > >> > >> Trump is the President and nominated him.
> > >> > > 
> > >> > > BINGO!
> > >> > 
> > >> > Your right to have that opinion and that's all it is at this point.
> > >> 
> > >> It didn't seem to be "right" when I said it.
> > > 
> > > She likes me better...neener
> > 
> > At this point in time, I don't particularly either one of you.
> 
> At this point in time, I don't particularly care, one way or the other.  
> I'm not here just to please you.

When did becoming a democrat mean you had to lose your mind also?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#207235

Frommixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie>
Date2018-09-22 11:44 -0400
Message-ID<po5o0g$11i$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#207097
On 9/22/2018 2:21 AM, pandora wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 09:19:22 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> 
>> In article <MPG.360cfc2b10dcf17a994a9b@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
>> @gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>> Checkmate!  In article <vbednTvb2NWTZD_GnZ2dnUU7-
>>> SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:18:51 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <MPG.360ae211ca2a70b9994a29@news.altopia.com>,
>>>>> ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>>>>> posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnYZpWpHYozzGnZ2dnUU7-
>>>>>> audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:16:01 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>>>>>>> posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7-
>>>>>>>> audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>>>>>>>>>> reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>>>>>>>>>> <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid
>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes,
>>>>>>>>>>> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>>>> <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>> ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hobnobbing with white supremacists, abysmal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conditions in the concentration camps in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> southwest, attacks on programs to combat climate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change, attacks on women and minorities, attacks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the poor, attacks on the citizenship rights of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minorities, brain drains, adverse court rulings,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cooperating witnesses,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In other words, just another week in the Trump
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regime:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from Deutsche
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bank.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Uh-oh!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyday now foil hat collector.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Manafort's going to tell the truth and there won't be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any collusion and even if there is, it's not illegal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when The President does it, and if it is then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Manafort's lying and 3,000 Puerto Ricans didn't die
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so The President gets A+ for his amazing management
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> skills!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then
>>>>>>>>>>>>> date graped him!!!!2!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret" letter
>>>>>>>>>>>> from a "sekret"
>>>>>>>>>>>> so<SPANK>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/kavanaugh-
>>>>>>> allegations-
>>>>>>>>> ford-
>>>>>>>>>>> palo-alto.html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor.  Most
>>>>>>>>>> people get attracted to that field because of their own
>>>>>>>>>> issues. Now she claims she never told anyone because she
>>>>>>>>>> was afraid he'd "kill" her.
>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high
>>>>>>>>>> school ever touches other people's naughty parts, and if
>>>>>>>>>> they do, they should never ever be employed by anyone.  Are
>>>>>>>>>> you prepared to live in a world where you can lose your job
>>>>>>>>>> anytime someone utters some accusation that you did
>>>>>>>>>> something naughty 35 years ago in high school?  Did YOU
>>>>>>>>>> ever do anything naughty in high school, Ko0k?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than
>>>>>>>>> other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does a person's reputation become spotted with the flimsiest
>>>>>>>> of accusations alone... suddenly popping up after 36 years?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The accusation(s) must be investigated, yes.  Especially for as
>>>>>>> important a job as a Supreme Court Justice.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If so, NO one
>>>>>>>> would have a spotless reputation... ever.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Possibly.  However, I don't believe that everyone would be
>>>>>>> accused of attempted rape in their past.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This woman is unsure where or
>>>>>>>> when this happened, and the third party she claims was there,
>>>>>>>> says he never witnessed any such incident anywhere.  Her
>>>>>>>> accounts of the alleged incident have varied at different
>>>>>>>> times.  She claims she just "remembered" it after decades had
>>>>>>>> passed.  There's not a scintilla of evidence from anyone to
>>>>>>>> suggest this actually happened.  NO one should be judged by
>>>>>>>> something this vague and vacuous.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The claim will be investigated as it should be, especially for
>>>>>>> as important a position as a Supreme Court Judge.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The point is, the Democrats have already decided he's guilty...
>>>>>> not out of any effort to be fair or objective, but simply because
>>>>>> Trump is the President and nominated him.
>>>>>
>>>>> BINGO!
>>>>
>>>> Your right to have that opinion and that's all it is at this point.
>>>
>>> It didn't seem to be "right" when I said it.
>>
>> She likes me better...neener
> 
> At this point in time, I don't particularly either one of you.

So many pink pussy hats to knit.  And so many serapes and ponchos for 
the protestors in the colors of the countries of the caravan people. 
All made from the finest imported Canadian yarn. ;)

-- 
Grizzly H.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#207639

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2018-09-23 14:44 -0500
Message-ID<t4idndhbhPq5cDrGnZ2dnUU7-Y-dnZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#207235
On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 11:44:10 -0400, mixed nuts wrote:

> On 9/22/2018 2:21 AM, pandora wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 09:19:22 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>> 
>>> In article <MPG.360cfc2b10dcf17a994a9b@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
>>> @gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>>>> by Checkmate!  In article <vbednTvb2NWTZD_GnZ2dnUU7-
>>>> SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:18:51 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <MPG.360ae211ca2a70b9994a29@news.altopia.com>,
>>>>>> ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>>>>>> posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnYZpWpHYozzGnZ2dnUU7-
>>>>>>> audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:16:01 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>>>>>>>> posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7-
>>>>>>>>> audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>>>>>>>>>> posts by Checkmate!  In article <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>> nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes,
>>>>>>>>>>>> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess hobnobbing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with white supremacists, abysmal conditions in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concentration camps in the southwest, attacks on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> programs to combat climate change, attacks on women and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minorities, attacks on the poor, attacks on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> citizenship rights of minorities, brain drains, adverse
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> court rulings, cooperating witnesses,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In other words, just another week in the Trump regime:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from Deutsche Bank.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Uh-oh!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyday now foil hat collector.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Manafort's going to tell the truth and there won't be any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collusion and even if there is, it's not illegal when The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> President does it, and if it is then Manafort's lying and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3,000 Puerto Ricans didn't die so The President gets A+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for his amazing management skills!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then date
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> graped him!!!!2!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret" letter from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a "sekret"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> so<SPANK>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/kavanaugh-
>>>>>>>> allegations-
>>>>>>>>>> ford-
>>>>>>>>>>>> palo-alto.html
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor.  Most
>>>>>>>>>>> people get attracted to that field because of their own
>>>>>>>>>>> issues. Now she claims she never told anyone because she was
>>>>>>>>>>> afraid he'd "kill" her.
>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high school
>>>>>>>>>>> ever touches other people's naughty parts, and if they do,
>>>>>>>>>>> they should never ever be employed by anyone.  Are you
>>>>>>>>>>> prepared to live in a world where you can lose your job
>>>>>>>>>>> anytime someone utters some accusation that you did something
>>>>>>>>>>> naughty 35 years ago in high school?  Did YOU ever do anything
>>>>>>>>>>> naughty in high school, Ko0k?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than
>>>>>>>>>> other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Does a person's reputation become spotted with the flimsiest of
>>>>>>>>> accusations alone... suddenly popping up after 36 years?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The accusation(s) must be investigated, yes.  Especially for as
>>>>>>>> important a job as a Supreme Court Justice.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If so, NO one
>>>>>>>>> would have a spotless reputation... ever.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Possibly.  However, I don't believe that everyone would be
>>>>>>>> accused of attempted rape in their past.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This woman is unsure where or
>>>>>>>>> when this happened, and the third party she claims was there,
>>>>>>>>> says he never witnessed any such incident anywhere.  Her
>>>>>>>>> accounts of the alleged incident have varied at different times.
>>>>>>>>>  She claims she just "remembered" it after decades had passed. 
>>>>>>>>> There's not a scintilla of evidence from anyone to suggest this
>>>>>>>>> actually happened.  NO one should be judged by something this
>>>>>>>>> vague and vacuous.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The claim will be investigated as it should be, especially for as
>>>>>>>> important a position as a Supreme Court Judge.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The point is, the Democrats have already decided he's guilty...
>>>>>>> not out of any effort to be fair or objective, but simply because
>>>>>>> Trump is the President and nominated him.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BINGO!
>>>>>
>>>>> Your right to have that opinion and that's all it is at this point.
>>>>
>>>> It didn't seem to be "right" when I said it.
>>>
>>> She likes me better...neener
>> 
>> At this point in time, I don't particularly either one of you.
> 
> So many pink pussy hats to knit.  And so many serapes and ponchos for
> the protestors in the colors of the countries of the caravan people. All
> made from the finest imported Canadian yarn. ;)

:-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#205834

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2018-09-18 13:08 -0500
Message-ID<CsWdnYBpWpGDojzGnZ2dnUU7-asAAAAA@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#205802
On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 13:23:04 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:

> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:16:01 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>Does a person's reputation become spotted with the flimsiest of
>>accusations alone... suddenly popping up after 36 years?  If so, NO one
>>would have a spotless reputation... ever.  This woman is unsure where or
>>when this happened, and the third party she claims was there, says he
>>never witnessed any such incident anywhere.  Her accounts of the alleged
>>incident have varied at different times.  She claims she just
>>"remembered" it after decades had passed.  There's not a scintilla of
>>evidence from anyone to suggest this actually happened.  NO one should
>>be judged by something this vague and vacuous.
> 
> Misandrists and leftists like Pandora 

I am not a misandrist.  I love men.

totally lack any semblance of
> common sense and fair play. They are indoctrinated, biased, and most of
> all hypocrites.

I am the won who believes we should wait and see what comes out of this 
situation.  You're the one who has already decided.
 
> They live by a double-standard. One set of rules for them and theirs and
> another stricter set of rules for everybody else.

You are speaking of yourself here.
 
> They are what's wrong with America. I would like to see them all washed
> out to sea or swallowed up by an earthquake.

Yes, those who believe as you do are what's wrong with America.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#207102

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2018-09-22 01:32 -0500
Message-ID<PKOdnSBlH5pxfDjGnZ2dnUU7-SednZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#205834
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:35:42 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <bjocio.tlm.17.30@news.alt.net>,
> persent@gmail.com says...
> 
> 
> 
>> On 2018-09-18 11:08 AM, pandora wrote:
>> > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 13:23:04 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>> > 
>> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:16:01 -0700, Checkmate
>> >> <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Does a person's reputation become spotted with the flimsiest of
>> >>> accusations alone... suddenly popping up after 36 years?  If so, NO
>> >>> one would have a spotless reputation... ever.  This woman is unsure
>> >>> where or when this happened, and the third party she claims was
>> >>> there, says he never witnessed any such incident anywhere.  Her
>> >>> accounts of the alleged incident have varied at different times. 
>> >>> She claims she just "remembered" it after decades had passed. 
>> >>> There's not a scintilla of evidence from anyone to suggest this
>> >>> actually happened.  NO one should be judged by something this vague
>> >>> and vacuous.
>> >>
>> >> Misandrists and leftists like Pandora
>> > 
>> > I am not a misandrist.  I love men.
>> > 
>> > totally lack any semblance of
>> >> common sense and fair play. They are indoctrinated, biased, and most
>> >> of all hypocrites.
>> > 
>> > I am the won who believes we should wait and see what comes out of
>> > this situation.  You're the one who has already decided.
>> >   
>> >> They live by a double-standard. One set of rules for them and theirs
>> >> and another stricter set of rules for everybody else.
>> > 
>> > You are speaking of yourself here.
>> >   
>> >> They are what's wrong with America. I would like to see them all
>> >> washed out to sea or swallowed up by an earthquake.
>> > 
>> > Yes, those who believe as you do are what's wrong with America.
>> > 
>> freakin ay
> 
> That doesn't stop Canadians from wanting to live here, though.

Fewer and fewer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#205841

Frommixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie>
Date2018-09-18 14:18 -0400
Message-ID<pnrfh6$1f83$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#205802
On 9/18/2018 12:49 PM, pandora wrote:
> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than other
> jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.

Only if you're trying to put the criminals in jail.  If you want your 
criminals out free, doing crime but not the time, you need a crooked judge.

-- 
Grizzly H.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#205844

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2018-09-18 13:22 -0500
Message-ID<CsWdnblpWpHX3zzGnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#205841
On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:18:14 -0400, mixed nuts wrote:

> On 9/18/2018 12:49 PM, pandora wrote:
>> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than other
>> jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
> 
> Only if you're trying to put the criminals in jail.  If you want your
> criminals out free, doing crime but not the time, you need a crooked
> judge.

It seems to me that many would prefer that.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#205861

Frommixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie>
Date2018-09-18 14:41 -0400
Message-ID<pnrgsh$1i5t$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#205844
On 9/18/2018 2:22 PM, pandora wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:18:14 -0400, mixed nuts wrote:
>> On 9/18/2018 12:49 PM, pandora wrote:
>>> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than other
>>> jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
>>
>> Only if you're trying to put the criminals in jail.  If you want your
>> criminals out free, doing crime but not the time, you need a crooked
>> judge.
> 
> It seems to me that many would prefer that.

Sometimes it's absolutely necessary, if you become president, and have 
been committing financial fraud and tax fraud and laundering money for 
criminals and selling your country to the highest bidder and need to 
become the fascist dictator because you get very upset when you're not 
the center of attention.

-- 
Grizzly H.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#205909

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-18 14:22 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.360b0c605f9cf288989941@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#205861
In article <pnrgsh$1i5t$1@gioia.aioe.org>, 
melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
> 
> On 9/18/2018 2:22 PM, pandora wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:18:14 -0400, mixed nuts wrote:
> >> On 9/18/2018 12:49 PM, pandora wrote:
> >>> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than other
> >>> jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
> >>
> >> Only if you're trying to put the criminals in jail.  If you want your
> >> criminals out free, doing crime but not the time, you need a crooked
> >> judge.
> > 
> > It seems to me that many would prefer that.
> 
> Sometimes it's absolutely necessary, if you become president, and have 
> been committing financial fraud and tax fraud and laundering money for 
> criminals and selling your country to the highest bidder and need to 
> become the fascist dictator because you get very upset when you're not 
> the center of attention.


And still no proof....yawn

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#205923

Frommixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie>
Date2018-09-18 16:44 -0400
Message-ID<pnro2o$1unm$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#205909
On 9/18/2018 4:22 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <pnrgsh$1i5t$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>> On 9/18/2018 2:22 PM, pandora wrote:
>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:18:14 -0400, mixed nuts wrote:
>>>> On 9/18/2018 12:49 PM, pandora wrote:
>>>>> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than other
>>>>> jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
>>>>
>>>> Only if you're trying to put the criminals in jail.  If you want your
>>>> criminals out free, doing crime but not the time, you need a crooked
>>>> judge.
>>>
>>> It seems to me that many would prefer that.
>>
>> Sometimes it's absolutely necessary, if you become president, and have
>> been committing financial fraud and tax fraud and laundering money for
>> criminals and selling your country to the highest bidder and need to
>> become the fascist dictator because you get very upset when you're not
>> the center of attention.
> 
> And still no proof....yawn

Paraphrasing the great and powerful The President, Donald J. Trump:

I am the evidence. I am an expert in evidence, I am considered a 
world-class expert in evidence, so when you say where is the evidence, I 
am the evidence.

-- 
Grizzly H.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#205924

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-18 14:48 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.360b128f5b83852498994c@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#205923
In article <pnro2o$1unm$1@gioia.aioe.org>, 
melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
> 
> On 9/18/2018 4:22 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <pnrgsh$1i5t$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
> > melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
> >> On 9/18/2018 2:22 PM, pandora wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:18:14 -0400, mixed nuts wrote:
> >>>> On 9/18/2018 12:49 PM, pandora wrote:
> >>>>> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than other
> >>>>> jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
> >>>>
> >>>> Only if you're trying to put the criminals in jail.  If you want your
> >>>> criminals out free, doing crime but not the time, you need a crooked
> >>>> judge.
> >>>
> >>> It seems to me that many would prefer that.
> >>
> >> Sometimes it's absolutely necessary, if you become president, and have
> >> been committing financial fraud and tax fraud and laundering money for
> >> criminals and selling your country to the highest bidder and need to
> >> become the fascist dictator because you get very upset when you're not
> >> the center of attention.
> > 
> > And still no proof....yawn
> 
> Paraphrasing the great and powerful The President, Donald J. Trump:
> 
> I am the evidence. I am an expert in evidence, I am considered a 
> world-class expert in evidence, so when you say where is the evidence, I 
> am the evidence.

But still no proof...ok then.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#205927

Frommixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie>
Date2018-09-18 16:57 -0400
Message-ID<pnrorf$1vt3$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#205924
On 9/18/2018 4:48 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <pnro2o$1unm$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>> On 9/18/2018 4:22 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <pnrgsh$1i5t$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>>>> On 9/18/2018 2:22 PM, pandora wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:18:14 -0400, mixed nuts wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/18/2018 12:49 PM, pandora wrote:
>>>>>>> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than other
>>>>>>> jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Only if you're trying to put the criminals in jail.  If you want your
>>>>>> criminals out free, doing crime but not the time, you need a crooked
>>>>>> judge.
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems to me that many would prefer that.
>>>>
>>>> Sometimes it's absolutely necessary, if you become president, and have
>>>> been committing financial fraud and tax fraud and laundering money for
>>>> criminals and selling your country to the highest bidder and need to
>>>> become the fascist dictator because you get very upset when you're not
>>>> the center of attention.
>>>
>>> And still no proof....yawn
>>
>> Paraphrasing the great and powerful The President, Donald J. Trump:
>>
>> I am the evidence. I am an expert in evidence, I am considered a
>> world-class expert in evidence, so when you say where is the evidence, I
>> am the evidence.
> 
> But still no proof...ok then.

We could ask the expert in evidence to submit to sworn testimony, but, 
if anyone asks him any question at all, he'll lie, and that would put 
him in a perjury trap.

-- 
Grizzly H.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#205959

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-18 17:03 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.360b324225ca8d3798994e@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#205927
In article <pnrorf$1vt3$1@gioia.aioe.org>, 
melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
> 
> On 9/18/2018 4:48 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <pnro2o$1unm$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
> > melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
> >> On 9/18/2018 4:22 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <pnrgsh$1i5t$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
> >>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
> >>>> On 9/18/2018 2:22 PM, pandora wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:18:14 -0400, mixed nuts wrote:
> >>>>>> On 9/18/2018 12:49 PM, pandora wrote:
> >>>>>>> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than other
> >>>>>>> jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Only if you're trying to put the criminals in jail.  If you want your
> >>>>>> criminals out free, doing crime but not the time, you need a crooked
> >>>>>> judge.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It seems to me that many would prefer that.
> >>>>
> >>>> Sometimes it's absolutely necessary, if you become president, and have
> >>>> been committing financial fraud and tax fraud and laundering money for
> >>>> criminals and selling your country to the highest bidder and need to
> >>>> become the fascist dictator because you get very upset when you're not
> >>>> the center of attention.
> >>>
> >>> And still no proof....yawn
> >>
> >> Paraphrasing the great and powerful The President, Donald J. Trump:
> >>
> >> I am the evidence. I am an expert in evidence, I am considered a
> >> world-class expert in evidence, so when you say where is the evidence, I
> >> am the evidence.
> > 
> > But still no proof...ok then.
> 
> We could ask the expert in evidence to submit to sworn testimony, but, 
> if anyone asks him any question at all, he'll lie, and that would put 
> him in a perjury trap.

So no proof then...ok

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 13 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13] 14 15 … 17  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate

csiph-web