Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.checkmate > #205378 > unrolled thread

Trillion dollar deficit

Started byNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
First post2018-09-17 04:51 +0000
Last post2018-09-17 22:51 -0400
Articles 20 on this page of 324 — 17 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate

Contents

  Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-17 04:51 +0000
    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 08:54 -0600
      Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 11:15 -0400
        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 09:50 -0600
        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 13:16 -0600
          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:21 +0000
            Re: DId Checkmate rape someone in his high school? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Trillion dollar deficit โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-17 14:46 -0500
              Re: DId Checkmate rape someone in his high school? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 15:12 -0600
                Re: DId Checkmate rape someone in his high school? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 16:22 -0600
                  Re: DId Checkmate rape someone in his high school? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:20 -0600
              Re: DId Checkmate rape someone in his high school? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 07:34 +0000
                Re: ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ DId Checkmate rape someone in his high school? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„  Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-18 10:50 -0500
            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 14:56 -0600
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 17:41 -0400
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 15:50 -0600
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 18:42 -0400
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 12:01 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 11:05 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 12:59 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:18 -0600
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 15:55 -0600
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-17 23:38 +0100
            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 15:11 -0600
            Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-17 23:16 +0100
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-17 23:45 +0100
            Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 11:49 -0500
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 11:04 -0600
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 12:58 -0500
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:21 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:17 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:13 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 17:06 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-19 20:32 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:18 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-20 13:11 -0400
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:23 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-20 17:52 -0400
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:06 -0600
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:16 +0000
                                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:18 -0600
                                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:13 -0600
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-20 18:21 -0400
                                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 19:16 -0600
                                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 18:37 -0700
                                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 23:04 -0700
                                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 09:06 -0400
                                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:15 -0600
                                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-21 12:03 -0700
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 21:19 -0600
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 12:24 -0500
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:00 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 19:14 +0000
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:32 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:03 +0000
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:08 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 14:53 -0700
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 15:17 -0700
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:05 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:10 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-20 23:35 +0100
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 21:50 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 23:39 -0700
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 11:42 -0400
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:17 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-21 13:10 -0700
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 16:35 -0400
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-21 16:25 -0700
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 21:53 +0100
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:14 +0000
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 23:45 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:07 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:17 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:16 -0500
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-25 12:16 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:30 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-22 12:20 -0700
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:31 -0500
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:31 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 19:59 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-25 13:07 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:16 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:34 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 12:17 -0400
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:24 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:26 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:17 -0600
                      Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Trillion dollar deficit โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-19 09:45 -0500
                        Re: รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„  Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowfla ke รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snow flake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ S nowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ Trillion d ollar deficit รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowfla ke รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snow flake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ S nowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowfla ke รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-19 09:50 -0500
                        Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snow Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 09:01 -0600
                          Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snow โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-19 22:00 -0500
                        Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Trillion dollar deficit โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-23 11:46 -0700
                          Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-23 18:29 -0500
                            Re: รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„  Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowfla ke รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snow flake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ S nowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ ? Snowflak e ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowf lake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Sn owflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowfla ke ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowfla ke ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snow flake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? S nowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? รขยย„ Snow flake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ S nowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowfla ke รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snow flake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ S nowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-23 18:40 -0500
                          Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 09:57 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 20:17 +0100
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-19 11:20 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 15:32 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 16:20 -0500
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:16 -0600
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 11:31 -0600
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-18 14:26 -0400
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:22 -0600
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 08:45 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 10:57 -0400
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 09:03 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 11:29 -0400
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 11:19 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 15:17 -0400
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-21 17:06 -0700
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 11:48 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:53 -0600
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-21 17:05 -0700
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-21 17:05 -0700
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:19 +0000
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 17:07 -0600
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 12:56 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:16 +0000
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 17:07 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 23:30 +0000
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 08:30 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 09:00 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 12:07 -0400
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 11:19 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 01:39 +0000
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Tommy <tom@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 17:34 +0000
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:28 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 19:53 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 09:11 -0400
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:26 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 20:09 +0100
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 18:09 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:05 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:30 -0600
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:04 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:24 -0500
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-19 11:22 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-19 20:49 +0000
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:20 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:22 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:19 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-21 02:26 +0000
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 17:57 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-22 04:08 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:24 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 17:02 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:38 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 13:43 -0600
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 05:18 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 20:10 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:55 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 23:23 +0100
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 23:40 +0100
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 23:54 +0100
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 00:08 +0100
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit g8dgc <g8dgc@noneya.none> - 2018-09-22 18:53 -0400
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit tripeco.2@parody.personae.invalid (Tr!pe) - 2018-09-22 23:57 +0100
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 23:54 +0100
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 00:29 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 00:10 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 05:21 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 06:13 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 14:36 +0100
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 08:32 -0600
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-23 11:06 -0400
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 08:11 +0100
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:00 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-23 12:02 -0700
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:15 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:27 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 12:13 -0400
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:23 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 01:44 +0000
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 20:17 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 19:16 +0000
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:34 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:01 +0000
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:09 -0600
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 09:08 -0400
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit tripeco.2@parody.personae.invalid (Tr!pe) - 2018-09-21 20:22 +0100
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:12 +0000
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:34 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:05 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:14 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 11:43 -0700
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:35 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:22 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:36 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:41 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit % <perscent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 04:30 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit invalid@invalid.invalid (ร) - 2018-09-23 08:45 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:36 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:33 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:21 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:32 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 19:13 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 13:45 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 11:23 -0400
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:27 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 13:21 -0400
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 13:10 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 16:23 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 13:53 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:25 -0600
                        Please fact-check your assertions vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-24 03:05 +0000
                          Re: Please fact-check your assertions mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-24 01:42 -0400
                            Re: Please fact-check your assertions Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-23 23:10 -0700
                          Re: Please fact-check your assertions vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-24 07:17 +0000
                            Re: Please fact-check your assertions Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:44 -0600
                            Re: Please fact-check your assertions kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 12:23 -0400
                              Re: Please fact-check your assertions Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:30 -0600
                              Re: Please fact-check your assertions snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 19:41 +0100
                                Re: Please fact-check your assertions snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 23:36 +0100
                          Re: Please fact-check your assertions kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 12:18 -0400
                            Re: Please fact-check your assertions Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:29 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-25 12:19 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 12:25 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 12:16 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-25 19:32 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-26 11:45 -0500
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-26 18:49 -0500
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 09:06 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:07 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:33 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-23 23:31 -0700
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-24 06:52 -0400
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:43 -0600
                            Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Trillion dollar deficit โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:47 -0500
                              Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:14 -0600
                                Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 11:46 -0500
                                  Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 11:58 -0500
                                    Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 14:34 -0500
                                      Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 14:59 -0500
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 12:37 -0400
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:03 +0000
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 17:53 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-22 04:06 +0000
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 13:57 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 13:58 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:09 +0000
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:18 -0600
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-19 20:34 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 20:15 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 18:07 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:19 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:21 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:17 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:41 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:18 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-22 11:44 -0400
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:44 -0500
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:08 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:32 -0500
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-18 14:18 -0400
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:22 -0500
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-18 14:41 -0400
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:22 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-18 16:44 -0400
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:48 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-18 16:57 -0400
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 17:03 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-18 19:23 -0400
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 08:30 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-19 11:20 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:21 -0600
            Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 12:18 -0500
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 11:31 -0600
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:14 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-18 19:35 +0100
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:23 +0000
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 17:08 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 23:31 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 08:32 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 12:08 -0400
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 11:20 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 01:39 +0000
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 20:16 -0600
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:45 -0400
                                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:20 -0600
                                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 11:22 -0400
                                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:41 -0600
                                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 12:22 -0400
                                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:23 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-20 23:06 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:15 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-20 23:41 +0100
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-20 12:38 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 19:18 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:26 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:24 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:25 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 21:59 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:09 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:25 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:40 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:23 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 13:42 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-22 16:11 -0400
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:42 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 05:17 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 06:12 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:33 -0500
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-19 11:18 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-19 20:39 +0100
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 16:06 -0400
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-19 21:09 +0000
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 17:33 -0400
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:14 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 17:56 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:21 +0000
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:17 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 15:39 -0500
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:24 -0600
    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:13 -0700
      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 13:15 -0600
        Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 17:53 -0400
          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 15:54 -0600
            Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 18:16 -0400
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 16:22 -0600
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 18:46 -0400
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:06 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:29 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:55 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 22:18 -0400
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 22:51 -0400

Page 7 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 17  Next page →

#206107

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-19 09:00 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.360c126e62eae7e998996b@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#206087
In article <bjqc70.a8h.17.21@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says...
> 
> On 2018-09-19 7:30 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <pns1rb$7hs$13@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> > says...
> >>
> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 17:07:03 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> >>
> >>> In article <pnrtfo$7hs$5@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> >>> says...
> >>>>
> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >>>> melt!
> >>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 12:56:28 -0500, pandora wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 12:56:19 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:49:41 -0500, pandora <pandora@peak.org>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than other
> >>>>>>> jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> His record IS spotless.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So far.
> >>>>
> >>>> Have to disagree with you this time, pandora. He's guilty of at least 3
> >>>> counts of perjury ... that we know of. *And* probably of attempted
> >>>> rape.
> >>>
> >>> Not true<SPANK>
> >>
> >> https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/09/brett-kavanaugh-lies-senate-
> >> testimony-supreme-court.html
> > 
> > Nice snippage, an automatic loss for you.
> > 
> hey you what do you thinking you're doing ,
> what's the big idea of trolling here in my group where i troll the trolls

I am new and just testing the waters.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206120

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-09-19 12:07 -0400
Message-ID<pnts80$1b6i$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#206087
On 9/19/2018 10:30 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 17:07:03 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>>>> Have to disagree with you this time, pandora. He's guilty of at least 3
>>>> counts of perjury ... that we know of. *And* probably of attempted
>>>> rape.
>>>
>>> Not true<SPANK>
>>
>> https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/09/brett-kavanaugh-lies-senate-
>> testimony-supreme-court.html
> 
> Ni<SMACKAK00K!>

Either rebut the link or capitulate to Nadegda, you kOOk.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206151

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-19 11:19 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.360c3311d20ebb9e98996f@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#206120
In article <pnts80$1b6i$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
> 
> On 9/19/2018 10:30 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 17:07:03 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
> >>>> Have to disagree with you this time, pandora. He's guilty of at least 3
> >>>> counts of perjury ... that we know of. *And* probably of attempted
> >>>> rape.
> >>>
> >>> Not true<SPANK>
> >>
> >> https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/09/brett-kavanaugh-lies-senate-
> >> testimony-supreme-court.html
> > 
> > Ni<SMACKAK00K!>
> 
> Either rebut the link or capitulate to Nadegda, you kOOk.

No need, you snipped so you automatically lose also.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206265

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-09-20 01:39 +0000
Message-ID<pnutnr$e0i$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#206151
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 11:19:30 -0600, Skeeter wrote:

> In article <pnts80$1b6i$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
> @gmail.nospam.invalid says...
>> 
>> On 9/19/2018 10:30 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 17:07:03 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>> >>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>> >>>> Have to disagree with you this time, pandora. He's guilty of at
>> >>>> least 3 counts of perjury ... that we know of. *And* probably of
>> >>>> attempted rape.
>> >>>
>> >>> Not true<SPANK>
>> >>
>> >> https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/09/brett-kavanaugh-lies-
senate-
>> >> testimony-supreme-court.html
>> > 
>> > Ni<SMACKAK00K!>
>> 
>> Either rebut the link or capitulate to Nadegda, you kOOk.
> 
> No ne<SMACKAKOOK!>

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/09/brett-kavanaugh-lies-senate-testimony-supreme-court.html

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206160

FromTommy <tom@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-19 17:34 +0000
Message-ID<XnsA96275CDFCB96skeetinvalidinvalid@46.165.242.75>
In reply to#205975
Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in news:pns1rb$7hs$13@dont-
email.me:

> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, 
melt!
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 17:07:03 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> 
>> In article <pnrtfo$7hs$5@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
>> says...
>>> 
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt!
>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 12:56:28 -0500, pandora wrote:
>>> 
>>> > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 12:56:19 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>> > 
>>> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:49:41 -0500, pandora <pandora@peak.org>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> 
>>> >> 
>>> >>>The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than 
other
>>> >>>jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
>>> >> 
>>> >> His record IS spotless.
>>> > 
>>> > So far.
>>> 
>>> Have to disagree with you this time, pandora. He's guilty of at 
least 3
>>> counts of perjury ... that we know of. *And* probably of attempted
>>> rape.
>> 
>> Not true<SPANK>
> 
> https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/09/brett-kavanaugh-lies-
senate-
> testimony-supreme-court.html
> 

You keep losing...LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206431

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-20 15:28 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.360dbee11128c2379899ac@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#205961
In article <MPG.360d92117b1fe079994ab9@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
@gmail.com says...
> 
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
> Checkmate!  In article <aoo7qd5kph6j4l0cfmris3nuib0mh4pc91@4ax.com>, 
> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
> 
> 
> > 
> > On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 19:46:23 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > <...>
> > 
> > >He's been checked out by the FBI six times during his career, and passed 
> > >with flying colors, but now the Democraps are playing dirty politics 
> > >Clinton-style.  This shit disgusts me.
> > 
> > That some political hack female thinks she can
> > demand and receive an instant FBI investigation 
> > for alleged clothes-pulling 36 years ago at a drinking 
> > party and to have almost every Democrat support her
> > bogus claim is what disgusts me.  These Democrats
> > will stop at nothing - no matter how sleazy and 
> > immoral while they point the immorality finger
> > at somebody Cavanaugh) who might stand in the 
> > way of them butchering more babies and furthering 
> > their communist agenda.
> 
> Hillary's response was a far cry from what she had to say on all the many 
> occasions that Billary was accused of unwanted sexual advances, and even 
> actual rape.  She's  done a complete 180, as if no one would notice.

The left protect their own while stating out loud how bad other people 
are for doing the same things.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206568

FromLunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-20 19:53 -0600
Message-ID<iaYoD.72791$cL2.30461@fx43.iad>
In reply to#205961
On 9/20/2018 2:14 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <o4v7qdh5in1hqf1sf14emoogfeievb1rf9@4ax.com>,
> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
> 
> 
>>
>> On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 12:17:14 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> In article <aoo7qd5kph6j4l0cfmris3nuib0mh4pc91@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
>>>> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <...>
>>>>
>>>>> He's been checked out by the FBI six times during his career, and passed
>>>>> with flying colors, but now the Democraps are playing dirty politics
>>>>> Clinton-style.  This shit disgusts me.
>>>>
>>>> That some political hack female thinks she can
>>>> demand and receive an instant FBI investigation
>>>> for alleged clothes-pulling 36 years ago at a drinking
>>>> party and to have almost every Democrat support her
>>>> bogus claim is what disgusts me.  These Democrats
>>>> will stop at nothing - no matter how sleazy and
>>>> immoral while they point the immorality finger
>>>> at somebody Cavanaugh) who might stand in the
>>>> way of them butchering more babies and furthering
>>>> their communist agenda.
>>>
>>> Hillary's response was a far cry from what she had to say on all the many
>>> occasions that Billary was accused of unwanted sexual advances, and even
>>> actual rape.  She's  done a complete 180, as if no one would notice.
>>
>> I wish Hillary would stroke out...
> 
> Asswurm first.  I get him a little closer every day.
> 

This place is turning into alt.usenet.kooks

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206670

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-09-21 09:11 -0400
Message-ID<po2qkv$1ca1$4@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#206568
On 9/20/2018 9:53 PM, Lunar Opticfibre wrote:
> On 9/20/2018 2:14 PM, Checkmate wrote:
>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>> Checkmate!ย  In article <o4v7qdh5in1hqf1sf14emoogfeievb1rf9@4ax.com>,
>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
>>> I wish Hillary would stroke out...
>>
>> Asswurm first.ย  I get him a little closer every day.
> 
> This place is turning into alt.usenet.kooks

Yeah, since aioe blocked it two years ago I turned this place into a 
clone of it so I can still spnak k0oks. I hope you appreciate the hard 
work and effort, by Nadegda and myself, that went into this project.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206730

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-21 10:26 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.360ec9a11f577fd09899f3@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#206670
In article <po2qkv$1ca1$4@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
> 
> On 9/20/2018 9:53 PM, Lunar Opticfibre wrote:
> > On 9/20/2018 2:14 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> >> Checkmate!ย  In article <o4v7qdh5in1hqf1sf14emoogfeievb1rf9@4ax.com>,
> >> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
> >>> I wish Hillary would stroke out...
> >>
> >> Asswurm first.ย  I get him a little closer every day.
> > 
> > This place is turning into alt.usenet.kooks
> 
> Yeah, since aioe blocked it two years ago I turned this place into a 
> clone of it so I can still spnak k0oks. I hope you appreciate the hard 
> work and effort, by Nadegda and myself, that went into this project.

You have certainly lived up to being a certifiable kook.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206816

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2018-09-21 20:09 +0100
Message-ID<1nvhu3u.1c3zzubvtqtoN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#206670
Paul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist Professor 
"kensi" Kensington Fu.D. outfit confidently declared: 

> On 9/20/2018 9:53 PM, Lunar Opticfibre wrote:

[...]

> > This place is turning into alt.usenet.kooks
> 
> Yeah, since aioe blocked it two years ago I turned this place into a 
> clone of it so I can still spnak k0oks. I hope you appreciate the hard
> work and effort, by Nadegda and myself, that went into this project.
>

Here, Ko0ky!  Ko0ky-Ko0ky-Ko0ky-Po0!...  Good Ko0ky, have a bone.

-- 
^ร^     My pet rock Gordon doesn't like pets.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206957

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2018-09-21 18:09 -0500
Message-ID<PKOdnS5lH5qE5zjGnZ2dnUU7-SednZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#205961
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 19:46:23 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <MPG.360b330050e708b1989950@reader.albasani.net>,
> skeet@invalid.invalid says...
> 
> 
> 
>> In article <pnrtfo$7hs$5@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
>> says...
>> > 
>> > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> > melt!
>> > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 12:56:28 -0500, pandora wrote:
>> > 
>> > > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 12:56:19 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>> > > 
>> > >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:49:41 -0500, pandora <pandora@peak.org>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> 
>> > >> 
>> > >>>The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than
>> > >>>other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
>> > >> 
>> > >> His record IS spotless.
>> > > 
>> > > So far.
>> > 
>> > Have to disagree with you this time, pandora. He's guilty of at least
>> > 3 counts of perjury ... that we know of. *And* probably of attempted
>> > rape.
>> 
>> Not true nor proven.
> 
> He's been checked out by the FBI six times during his career, and passed
> with flying colors, but now the Democraps are playing dirty politics
> Clinton-style.  

You have proof of this?

>This shit disgusts me.

Your bias disgusts me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#207614

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2018-09-23 14:05 -0500
Message-ID<t4idnaBbhPphfjrGnZ2dnUU7-Y-dnZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#206957
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 17:58:32 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <PKOdnS5lH5qE5zjGnZ2dnUU7-
> SednZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> 
> 
> 
>> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 19:46:23 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> 
>> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>> > by Checkmate!  In article
>> > <MPG.360b330050e708b1989950@reader.albasani.net>,
>> > skeet@invalid.invalid says...
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> >> In article <pnrtfo$7hs$5@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
>> >> says...
>> >> > 
>> >> > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> >> > melt!
>> >> > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 12:56:28 -0500, pandora wrote:
>> >> > 
>> >> > > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 12:56:19 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq.
>> >> > > wrote:
>> >> > > 
>> >> > >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:49:41 -0500, pandora <pandora@peak.org>
>> >> > >> wrote:
>> >> > >> 
>> >> > >> 
>> >> > >>>The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than
>> >> > >>>other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
>> >> > >> 
>> >> > >> His record IS spotless.
>> >> > > 
>> >> > > So far.
>> >> > 
>> >> > Have to disagree with you this time, pandora. He's guilty of at
>> >> > least 3 counts of perjury ... that we know of. *And* probably of
>> >> > attempted rape.
>> >> 
>> >> Not true nor proven.
>> > 
>> > He's been checked out by the FBI six times during his career, and
>> > passed with flying colors, but now the Democraps are playing dirty
>> > politics Clinton-style.
>> 
>> You have proof of this?
> 
> Yes, but you probably won't hear about it on CNN, and if you did, you'd
> choose not to believe it anyway.  Do the Strzok-Page memos, where they
> openly discussed ways to sabotage the Trump campaign, using their
> positions in the FBI to help accomplish this, ring a bell?  How about
> the way Paula Jones and many others were treated during the numerous
> Clinton sex scandals?  Do you think there might be a double standard
> going on here?  Do you think political parties might have anything to do
> with who gets smeared and who gets a pass?

I never declared it was impossible.  I await the truth to come out.  

> 
>> >This shit disgusts me.
>> 
>> Your bias disgusts me.
> 
> Back atcha...

I understand.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#207739

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-23 20:30 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.3611fa1757fe21b4989a94@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#207614
In article <t4idnaBbhPphfjrGnZ2dnUU7-Y-dnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, 
pandora@peak.org says...
> 
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 17:58:32 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> 
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate!  In article <PKOdnS5lH5qE5zjGnZ2dnUU7-
> > SednZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 19:46:23 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> >> 
> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
> >> > by Checkmate!  In article
> >> > <MPG.360b330050e708b1989950@reader.albasani.net>,
> >> > skeet@invalid.invalid says...
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> >> In article <pnrtfo$7hs$5@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> >> >> says...
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >> >> > melt!
> >> >> > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 12:56:28 -0500, pandora wrote:
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 12:56:19 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq.
> >> >> > > wrote:
> >> >> > > 
> >> >> > >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:49:41 -0500, pandora <pandora@peak.org>
> >> >> > >> wrote:
> >> >> > >> 
> >> >> > >> 
> >> >> > >>>The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than
> >> >> > >>>other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
> >> >> > >> 
> >> >> > >> His record IS spotless.
> >> >> > > 
> >> >> > > So far.
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Have to disagree with you this time, pandora. He's guilty of at
> >> >> > least 3 counts of perjury ... that we know of. *And* probably of
> >> >> > attempted rape.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Not true nor proven.
> >> > 
> >> > He's been checked out by the FBI six times during his career, and
> >> > passed with flying colors, but now the Democraps are playing dirty
> >> > politics Clinton-style.
> >> 
> >> You have proof of this?
> > 
> > Yes, but you probably won't hear about it on CNN, and if you did, you'd
> > choose not to believe it anyway.  Do the Strzok-Page memos, where they
> > openly discussed ways to sabotage the Trump campaign, using their
> > positions in the FBI to help accomplish this, ring a bell?  How about
> > the way Paula Jones and many others were treated during the numerous
> > Clinton sex scandals?  Do you think there might be a double standard
> > going on here?  Do you think political parties might have anything to do
> > with who gets smeared and who gets a pass?
> 
> I never declared it was impossible.  I await the truth to come out.  
> 
> > 
The truth will never come out, she don't remember anything, her 
"witnesses" don't even remember being there and he says he didn't do it. 
It's a stall attempt.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#205832

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2018-09-18 13:04 -0500
Message-ID<CsWdnYZpWpHYozzGnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#205802
On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:16:01 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7-
> audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> 
> 
> 
>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> 
>> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>> > by Checkmate!  In article <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>> > @gmail.invalid says...
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> >> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> > In article <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
>> >> > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> >> >> posts by Checkmate!  In article <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>> >> >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> > On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> >> >> > > In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
>> >> >> > > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> > >> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess hobnobbing with
>> >> >> > >> white supremacists, abysmal conditions in the concentration
>> >> >> > >> camps in the southwest, attacks on programs to combat
>> >> >> > >> climate change, attacks on women and minorities, attacks on
>> >> >> > >> the poor, attacks on the citizenship rights of minorities,
>> >> >> > >> brain drains, adverse court rulings, cooperating witnesses,
>> >> >> > >> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> > >> In other words, just another week in the Trump regime:
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> > >> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> > >> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from Deutsche Bank.
>> >> >> > >> Uh-oh!
>> >> >> > > 
>> >> >> > > anyday now foil hat collector.
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > Manafort's going to tell the truth and there won't be any
>> >> >> > collusion and even if there is, it's not illegal when The
>> >> >> > President does it, and if it is then Manafort's lying and 3,000
>> >> >> > Puerto Ricans didn't die so The President gets A+ for his
>> >> >> > amazing management skills!
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then date graped
>> >> >> him!!!!2!
>> >> > 
>> >> > It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret" letter from a
>> >> > "sekret"
>> >> > so<SPANK>
>> >> 
>> >> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
>> >> 
>> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/kavanaugh-
allegations-
>> ford-
>> >> palo-alto.html
>> > 
>> > Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor.  Most people
>> > get attracted to that field because of their own issues.  Now she
>> > claims she never told anyone because she was afraid he'd "kill" her. 
>> > Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high school ever
>> > touches other people's naughty parts, and if they do, they should
>> > never ever be employed by anyone.  Are you prepared to live in a
>> > world where you can lose your job anytime someone utters some
>> > accusation that you did something naughty 35 years ago in high
>> > school?  Did YOU ever do anything naughty in high school, Ko0k?
>> 
>> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than other
>> jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
> 
> Does a person's reputation become spotted with the flimsiest of
> accusations alone... suddenly popping up after 36 years?  

The accusation(s) must be investigated, yes.  Especially for as important 
a job as a Supreme Court Justice.

If so, NO one
> would have a spotless reputation... ever.  

Possibly.  However, I don't believe that everyone would be accused of 
attempted rape in their past.

This woman is unsure where or
> when this happened, and the third party she claims was there, says he
> never witnessed any such incident anywhere.  Her accounts of the alleged
> incident have varied at different times.  She claims she just
> "remembered" it after decades had passed.  There's not a scintilla of
> evidence from anyone to suggest this actually happened.  NO one should
> be judged by something this vague and vacuous.

The claim will be investigated as it should be, especially for as 
important a position as a Supreme Court Judge.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#205845

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2018-09-18 13:24 -0500
Message-ID<CsWdnbhpWpFk3zzGnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#205832
On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:21:43 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnYZpWpHYozzGnZ2dnUU7-
> audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> 
> 
> 
>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:16:01 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> 
>> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>> > by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7-
>> > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>,
>> >> > nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says...
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>> >> >> snowflakes,
>> >> >> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> > In article <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
>> >> >> > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> >> >> >> posts by Checkmate!  In article <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>> >> >> >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> > On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> >> >> >> > > In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
>> >> >> >> > > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> > >> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess hobnobbing
>> >> >> >> > >> with white supremacists, abysmal conditions in the
>> >> >> >> > >> concentration camps in the southwest, attacks on programs
>> >> >> >> > >> to combat climate change, attacks on women and
>> >> >> >> > >> minorities, attacks on the poor, attacks on the
>> >> >> >> > >> citizenship rights of minorities, brain drains, adverse
>> >> >> >> > >> court rulings, cooperating witnesses,
>> >> >> >> > >> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
>> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> > >> In other words, just another week in the Trump regime:
>> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> > >> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
>> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> > >> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from Deutsche Bank.
>> >> >> >> > >> Uh-oh!
>> >> >> >> > > 
>> >> >> >> > > anyday now foil hat collector.
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > Manafort's going to tell the truth and there won't be any
>> >> >> >> > collusion and even if there is, it's not illegal when The
>> >> >> >> > President does it, and if it is then Manafort's lying and
>> >> >> >> > 3,000 Puerto Ricans didn't die so The President gets A+ for
>> >> >> >> > his amazing management skills!
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then date
>> >> >> >> graped him!!!!2!
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret" letter from a
>> >> >> > "sekret"
>> >> >> > so<SPANK>
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/kavanaugh-
>> allegations-
>> >> ford-
>> >> >> palo-alto.html
>> >> > 
>> >> > Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor.  Most people
>> >> > get attracted to that field because of their own issues.  Now she
>> >> > claims she never told anyone because she was afraid he'd "kill"
>> >> > her.
>> >> > Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high school ever
>> >> > touches other people's naughty parts, and if they do, they should
>> >> > never ever be employed by anyone.  Are you prepared to live in a
>> >> > world where you can lose your job anytime someone utters some
>> >> > accusation that you did something naughty 35 years ago in high
>> >> > school?  Did YOU ever do anything naughty in high school, Ko0k?
>> >> 
>> >> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than other
>> >> jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
>> > 
>> > Does a person's reputation become spotted with the flimsiest of
>> > accusations alone... suddenly popping up after 36 years?
>> 
>> The accusation(s) must be investigated, yes.  Especially for as
>> important a job as a Supreme Court Justice.
>> 
>> If so, NO one
>> > would have a spotless reputation... ever.
>> 
>> Possibly.  However, I don't believe that everyone would be accused of
>> attempted rape in their past.
>> 
>> This woman is unsure where or
>> > when this happened, and the third party she claims was there, says he
>> > never witnessed any such incident anywhere.  Her accounts of the
>> > alleged incident have varied at different times.  She claims she just
>> > "remembered" it after decades had passed.  There's not a scintilla of
>> > evidence from anyone to suggest this actually happened.  NO one
>> > should be judged by something this vague and vacuous.
>> 
>> The claim will be investigated as it should be, especially for as
>> important a position as a Supreme Court Judge.
> 
> The point is, the Democrats have already decided he's guilty... not out
> of any effort to be fair or objective, but simply because Trump is the
> President and nominated him.

And you know this how?  You're  a mind reader now?  Or just showing your 
bias?  I suggest we take a wait and see stance.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206131

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2018-09-19 11:22 -0500
Message-ID<vbednT3b2NUv6j_GnZ2dnUU7-SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#205845
On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:41:35 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnbhpWpFk3zzGnZ2dnUU7-
> audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> 
> 
> 
>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:21:43 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> 
>> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>> > by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnYZpWpHYozzGnZ2dnUU7-
>> > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:16:01 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7-
>> >> > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> >> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>,
>> >> >> > nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says...
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>> >> >> >> snowflakes,
>> >> >> >> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> > In article <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
>> >> >> >> > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >> >> >> >> reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> >> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>> >> >> >> >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> > On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> > > In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
>> >> >> >> >> > > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> > >> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess hobnobbing
>> >> >> >> >> > >> with white supremacists, abysmal conditions in the
>> >> >> >> >> > >> concentration camps in the southwest, attacks on
>> >> >> >> >> > >> programs to combat climate change, attacks on women
>> >> >> >> >> > >> and minorities, attacks on the poor, attacks on the
>> >> >> >> >> > >> citizenship rights of minorities, brain drains,
>> >> >> >> >> > >> adverse court rulings, cooperating witnesses,
>> >> >> >> >> > >> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
>> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> > >> In other words, just another week in the Trump regime:
>> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> > >> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
>> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> > >> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from Deutsche
>> >> >> >> >> > >> Bank. Uh-oh!
>> >> >> >> >> > > 
>> >> >> >> >> > > anyday now foil hat collector.
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> > Manafort's going to tell the truth and there won't be any
>> >> >> >> >> > collusion and even if there is, it's not illegal when The
>> >> >> >> >> > President does it, and if it is then Manafort's lying and
>> >> >> >> >> > 3,000 Puerto Ricans didn't die so The President gets A+
>> >> >> >> >> > for his amazing management skills!
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then date
>> >> >> >> >> graped him!!!!2!
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret" letter from
>> >> >> >> > a "sekret"
>> >> >> >> > so<SPANK>
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/kavanaugh-
>> >> allegations-
>> >> >> ford-
>> >> >> >> palo-alto.html
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor.  Most
>> >> >> > people get attracted to that field because of their own issues.
>> >> >> >  Now she claims she never told anyone because she was afraid
>> >> >> > he'd "kill" her.
>> >> >> > Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high school
>> >> >> > ever touches other people's naughty parts, and if they do, they
>> >> >> > should never ever be employed by anyone.  Are you prepared to
>> >> >> > live in a world where you can lose your job anytime someone
>> >> >> > utters some accusation that you did something naughty 35 years
>> >> >> > ago in high school?  Did YOU ever do anything naughty in high
>> >> >> > school, Ko0k?
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than
>> >> >> other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
>> >> > 
>> >> > Does a person's reputation become spotted with the flimsiest of
>> >> > accusations alone... suddenly popping up after 36 years?
>> >> 
>> >> The accusation(s) must be investigated, yes.  Especially for as
>> >> important a job as a Supreme Court Justice.
>> >> 
>> >> If so, NO one
>> >> > would have a spotless reputation... ever.
>> >> 
>> >> Possibly.  However, I don't believe that everyone would be accused
>> >> of attempted rape in their past.
>> >> 
>> >> This woman is unsure where or
>> >> > when this happened, and the third party she claims was there, says
>> >> > he never witnessed any such incident anywhere.  Her accounts of
>> >> > the alleged incident have varied at different times.  She claims
>> >> > she just "remembered" it after decades had passed.  There's not a
>> >> > scintilla of evidence from anyone to suggest this actually
>> >> > happened.  NO one should be judged by something this vague and
>> >> > vacuous.
>> >> 
>> >> The claim will be investigated as it should be, especially for as
>> >> important a position as a Supreme Court Judge.
>> > 
>> > The point is, the Democrats have already decided he's guilty... not
>> > out of any effort to be fair or objective, but simply because Trump
>> > is the President and nominated him.
>> 
>> And you know this how?  You're  a mind reader now?  Or just showing
>> your bias?  I suggest we take a wait and see stance.
> 
> Nads has already convicted him, and so have virtually all the Democratic
> leaders in various news articles.  To continue this discussion with you
> at this point, is beyond the limits of my patience.  Perhaps you should
> go out and do some gardening.

I'm terribly sorry that discussing things with someone who has a 
different opinion is so upsetting to you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206185

Fromvallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
Date2018-09-19 20:49 +0000
Message-ID<g0fr28F5r93U3@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#206131
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:42:14 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <vbednT3b2NUv6j_GnZ2dnUU7-
> SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> 
> 
> 
>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:41:35 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> 
>> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>> > by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnbhpWpFk3zzGnZ2dnUU7-
>> > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:21:43 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnYZpWpHYozzGnZ2dnUU7-
>> >> > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:16:01 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> >> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7-
>> >> >> > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> > <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid
>> >> >> >> > says...
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>> >> >> >> >> snowflakes,
>> >> >> >> >> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> > In article <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
>> >> >> >> >> > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >> >> >> >> >> reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> >> >> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> hobnobbing with white supremacists, abysmal
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> conditions in the concentration camps in the
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> southwest, attacks on programs to combat climate
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> change, attacks on women and minorities, attacks on
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> the poor, attacks on the citizenship rights of
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> minorities, brain drains, adverse court rulings,
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> cooperating witnesses,
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> In other words, just another week in the Trump
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> regime:
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from Deutsche
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Bank. Uh-oh!
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > anyday now foil hat collector.
>> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Manafort's going to tell the truth and there won't be
>> >> >> >> >> >> > any collusion and even if there is, it's not illegal
>> >> >> >> >> >> > when The President does it, and if it is then
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Manafort's lying and 3,000 Puerto Ricans didn't die so
>> >> >> >> >> >> > The President gets A+ for his amazing management
>> >> >> >> >> >> > skills!
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then date
>> >> >> >> >> >> graped him!!!!2!
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> > It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret" letter
>> >> >> >> >> > from a "sekret"
>> >> >> >> >> > so<SPANK>
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/kavanaugh-
>> >> >> allegations-
>> >> >> >> ford-
>> >> >> >> >> palo-alto.html
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor.  Most
>> >> >> >> > people get attracted to that field because of their own
>> >> >> >> > issues.
>> >> >> >> >  Now she claims she never told anyone because she was afraid
>> >> >> >> > he'd "kill" her.
>> >> >> >> > Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high school
>> >> >> >> > ever touches other people's naughty parts, and if they do,
>> >> >> >> > they should never ever be employed by anyone.  Are you
>> >> >> >> > prepared to live in a world where you can lose your job
>> >> >> >> > anytime someone utters some accusation that you did
>> >> >> >> > something naughty 35 years ago in high school?  Did YOU ever
>> >> >> >> > do anything naughty in high school, Ko0k?
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than
>> >> >> >> other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > Does a person's reputation become spotted with the flimsiest of
>> >> >> > accusations alone... suddenly popping up after 36 years?
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> The accusation(s) must be investigated, yes.  Especially for as
>> >> >> important a job as a Supreme Court Justice.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> If so, NO one
>> >> >> > would have a spotless reputation... ever.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Possibly.  However, I don't believe that everyone would be
>> >> >> accused of attempted rape in their past.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> This woman is unsure where or
>> >> >> > when this happened, and the third party she claims was there,
>> >> >> > says he never witnessed any such incident anywhere.  Her
>> >> >> > accounts of the alleged incident have varied at different
>> >> >> > times.  She claims she just "remembered" it after decades had
>> >> >> > passed.  There's not a scintilla of evidence from anyone to
>> >> >> > suggest this actually happened.  NO one should be judged by
>> >> >> > something this vague and vacuous.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> The claim will be investigated as it should be, especially for as
>> >> >> important a position as a Supreme Court Judge.
>> >> > 
>> >> > The point is, the Democrats have already decided he's guilty...
>> >> > not out of any effort to be fair or objective, but simply because
>> >> > Trump is the President and nominated him.
>> >> 
>> >> And you know this how?  You're  a mind reader now?  Or just showing
>> >> your bias?  I suggest we take a wait and see stance.
>> > 
>> > Nads has already convicted him, and so have virtually all the
>> > Democratic leaders in various news articles.  To continue this
>> > discussion with you at this point, is beyond the limits of my
>> > patience.  Perhaps you should go out and do some gardening.
>> 
>> I'm terribly sorry that discussing things with someone who has a
>> different opinion is so upsetting to you.
> 
> You lack any objectivity about this.  You automatically oppose
> Kavanaugh,
> despite the lack of any details or facts from his accuser, simply
> because you hate Trump.  A fact you make quite clear every day, despite
> the fact you're not even a citizen of this country.

Non sequitur.

People who aren't citizens of the United States are certainly welcome to 
dislike Trump.

And this idea that pandora mustn't speak her opinions is odious.  If the 
best argument you can offer is "shut up", what does that say about your 
own discussion?

-- 
-v

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206370

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-20 09:20 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.360d689114c0b79998999c@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#206185
In article <MPG.360d23f7a3203338994aa9@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
@gmail.com says...
> 
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
> Checkmate!  In article <g0fr28F5r93U3@mid.individual.net>, 
> vallor@cultnix.org says...
> 
> 
> > 
> > On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:42:14 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> > 
> > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > > Checkmate!  In article <vbednT3b2NUv6j_GnZ2dnUU7-
> > > SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:41:35 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> > >> 
> > >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
> > >> > by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnbhpWpFk3zzGnZ2dnUU7-
> > >> > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> > >> > 
> > >> > 
> > >> > 
> > >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:21:43 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> > >> >> 
> > >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> > >> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnYZpWpHYozzGnZ2dnUU7-
> > >> >> > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> > >> >> > 
> > >> >> > 
> > >> >> > 
> > >> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:16:01 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> > >> >> >> 
> > >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> > >> >> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7-
> > >> >> >> > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> > >> >> >> > 
> > >> >> >> > 
> > >> >> >> > 
> > >> >> >> >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> > >> >> >> >> 
> > >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
> > >> >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
> > >> >> >> >> > <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid
> > >> >> >> >> > says...
> > >> >> >> >> > 
> > >> >> >> >> > 
> > >> >> >> >> > 
> > >> >> >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> > >> >> >> >> >> snowflakes,
> > >> >> >> >> >> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> > >> >> >> >> >> 
> > >> >> >> >> >> > In article <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
> > >> >> >> >> >> > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > > In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> hobnobbing with white supremacists, abysmal
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> conditions in the concentration camps in the
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> southwest, attacks on programs to combat climate
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> change, attacks on women and minorities, attacks on
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> the poor, attacks on the citizenship rights of
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> minorities, brain drains, adverse court rulings,
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> cooperating witnesses,
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> In other words, just another week in the Trump
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> regime:
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from Deutsche
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Bank. Uh-oh!
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > > 
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > > anyday now foil hat collector.
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > Manafort's going to tell the truth and there won't be
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > any collusion and even if there is, it's not illegal
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > when The President does it, and if it is then
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > Manafort's lying and 3,000 Puerto Ricans didn't die so
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > The President gets A+ for his amazing management
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > skills!
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then date
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> graped him!!!!2!
> > >> >> >> >> >> > 
> > >> >> >> >> >> > It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret" letter
> > >> >> >> >> >> > from a "sekret"
> > >> >> >> >> >> > so<SPANK>
> > >> >> >> >> >> 
> > >> >> >> >> >> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
> > >> >> >> >> >> 
> > >> >> >> >> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/kavanaugh-
> > >> >> >> allegations-
> > >> >> >> >> ford-
> > >> >> >> >> >> palo-alto.html
> > >> >> >> >> > 
> > >> >> >> >> > Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor.  Most
> > >> >> >> >> > people get attracted to that field because of their own
> > >> >> >> >> > issues.
> > >> >> >> >> >  Now she claims she never told anyone because she was afraid
> > >> >> >> >> > he'd "kill" her.
> > >> >> >> >> > Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high school
> > >> >> >> >> > ever touches other people's naughty parts, and if they do,
> > >> >> >> >> > they should never ever be employed by anyone.  Are you
> > >> >> >> >> > prepared to live in a world where you can lose your job
> > >> >> >> >> > anytime someone utters some accusation that you did
> > >> >> >> >> > something naughty 35 years ago in high school?  Did YOU ever
> > >> >> >> >> > do anything naughty in high school, Ko0k?
> > >> >> >> >> 
> > >> >> >> >> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than
> > >> >> >> >> other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
> > >> >> >> > 
> > >> >> >> > Does a person's reputation become spotted with the flimsiest of
> > >> >> >> > accusations alone... suddenly popping up after 36 years?
> > >> >> >> 
> > >> >> >> The accusation(s) must be investigated, yes.  Especially for as
> > >> >> >> important a job as a Supreme Court Justice.
> > >> >> >> 
> > >> >> >> If so, NO one
> > >> >> >> > would have a spotless reputation... ever.
> > >> >> >> 
> > >> >> >> Possibly.  However, I don't believe that everyone would be
> > >> >> >> accused of attempted rape in their past.
> > >> >> >> 
> > >> >> >> This woman is unsure where or
> > >> >> >> > when this happened, and the third party she claims was there,
> > >> >> >> > says he never witnessed any such incident anywhere.  Her
> > >> >> >> > accounts of the alleged incident have varied at different
> > >> >> >> > times.  She claims she just "remembered" it after decades had
> > >> >> >> > passed.  There's not a scintilla of evidence from anyone to
> > >> >> >> > suggest this actually happened.  NO one should be judged by
> > >> >> >> > something this vague and vacuous.
> > >> >> >> 
> > >> >> >> The claim will be investigated as it should be, especially for as
> > >> >> >> important a position as a Supreme Court Judge.
> > >> >> > 
> > >> >> > The point is, the Democrats have already decided he's guilty...
> > >> >> > not out of any effort to be fair or objective, but simply because
> > >> >> > Trump is the President and nominated him.
> > >> >> 
> > >> >> And you know this how?  You're  a mind reader now?  Or just showing
> > >> >> your bias?  I suggest we take a wait and see stance.
> > >> > 
> > >> > Nads has already convicted him, and so have virtually all the
> > >> > Democratic leaders in various news articles.  To continue this
> > >> > discussion with you at this point, is beyond the limits of my
> > >> > patience.  Perhaps you should go out and do some gardening.
> > >> 
> > >> I'm terribly sorry that discussing things with someone who has a
> > >> different opinion is so upsetting to you.
> > > 
> > > You lack any objectivity about this.  You automatically oppose
> > > Kavanaugh,
> > > despite the lack of any details or facts from his accuser, simply
> > > because you hate Trump.  A fact you make quite clear every day, despite
> > > the fact you're not even a citizen of this country.
> > 
> > Non sequitur.
> > 
> > People who aren't citizens of the United States are certainly welcome to 
> > dislike Trump.
> > 
> > And this idea that pandora mustn't speak her opinions is odious.  If the 
> > best argument you can offer is "shut up", what does that say about your 
> > own discussion?
> 
> Shut up.


yea! what he said!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#207098

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2018-09-22 01:22 -0500
Message-ID<PKOdnSRlH5o5QjjGnZ2dnUU7-SednZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#206370
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 09:20:02 -0600, Skeeter wrote:

> In article <MPG.360d23f7a3203338994aa9@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
> @gmail.com says...
>> 
>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>> Checkmate!  In article <g0fr28F5r93U3@mid.individual.net>,
>> vallor@cultnix.org says...
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> > On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:42:14 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> > 
>> > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> > > posts by Checkmate!  In article <vbednT3b2NUv6j_GnZ2dnUU7-
>> > > SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:41:35 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> > >> 
>> > >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> > >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnbhpWpFk3zzGnZ2dnUU7-
>> > >> > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> > >> > 
>> > >> > 
>> > >> > 
>> > >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:21:43 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> > >> >> 
>> > >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> > >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> > >> >> > <CsWdnYZpWpHYozzGnZ2dnUU7- audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>> > >> >> > pandora@peak.org says...
>> > >> >> > 
>> > >> >> > 
>> > >> >> > 
>> > >> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:16:01 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> > >> >> >> 
>> > >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> > >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> > >> >> >> > <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7- audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>> > >> >> >> > pandora@peak.org says...
>> > >> >> >> > 
>> > >> >> >> > 
>> > >> >> >> > 
>> > >> >> >> >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> > >> >> >> >> 
>> > >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> > >> >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> > >> >> >> >> > <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>> > >> >> >> >> > @gmail.invalid says...
>> > >> >> >> >> > 
>> > >> >> >> >> > 
>> > >> >> >> >> > 
>> > >> >> >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>> > >> >> >> >> >> snowflakes,
>> > >> >> >> >> >> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter
>> > >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> > >> >> >> >> >> 
>> > >> >> >> >> >> > In article
>> > >> >> >> >> >> > <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
>> > >> >> >> >> >> > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> when reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > > In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> hobnobbing with white supremacists, abysmal
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> conditions in the concentration camps in the
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> southwest, attacks on programs to combat
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> climate change, attacks on women and
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> minorities, attacks on the poor, attacks on
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> the citizenship rights of minorities, brain
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> drains, adverse court rulings, cooperating
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> witnesses,
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> In other words, just another week in the Trump
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> regime:
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Deutsche Bank. Uh-oh!
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > > 
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > > anyday now foil hat collector.
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > Manafort's going to tell the truth and there
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > won't be any collusion and even if there is, it's
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > not illegal when The President does it, and if it
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > is then Manafort's lying and 3,000 Puerto Ricans
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > didn't die so The President gets A+ for his
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > amazing management skills!
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then
>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> date graped him!!!!2!
>> > >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> > >> >> >> >> >> > It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret"
>> > >> >> >> >> >> > letter from a "sekret"
>> > >> >> >> >> >> > so<SPANK>
>> > >> >> >> >> >> 
>> > >> >> >> >> >> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
>> > >> >> >> >> >> 
>> > >> >> >> >> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/
kavanaugh-
>> > >> >> >> allegations-
>> > >> >> >> >> ford-
>> > >> >> >> >> >> palo-alto.html
>> > >> >> >> >> > 
>> > >> >> >> >> > Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor. 
>> > >> >> >> >> > Most people get attracted to that field because of
>> > >> >> >> >> > their own issues.
>> > >> >> >> >> >  Now she claims she never told anyone because she was
>> > >> >> >> >> >  afraid
>> > >> >> >> >> > he'd "kill" her.
>> > >> >> >> >> > Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high
>> > >> >> >> >> > school ever touches other people's naughty parts, and
>> > >> >> >> >> > if they do, they should never ever be employed by
>> > >> >> >> >> > anyone.  Are you prepared to live in a world where you
>> > >> >> >> >> > can lose your job anytime someone utters some
>> > >> >> >> >> > accusation that you did something naughty 35 years ago
>> > >> >> >> >> > in high school?  Did YOU ever do anything naughty in
>> > >> >> >> >> > high school, Ko0k?
>> > >> >> >> >> 
>> > >> >> >> >> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different
>> > >> >> >> >> than other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
>> > >> >> >> > 
>> > >> >> >> > Does a person's reputation become spotted with the
>> > >> >> >> > flimsiest of accusations alone... suddenly popping up
>> > >> >> >> > after 36 years?
>> > >> >> >> 
>> > >> >> >> The accusation(s) must be investigated, yes.  Especially for
>> > >> >> >> as important a job as a Supreme Court Justice.
>> > >> >> >> 
>> > >> >> >> If so, NO one
>> > >> >> >> > would have a spotless reputation... ever.
>> > >> >> >> 
>> > >> >> >> Possibly.  However, I don't believe that everyone would be
>> > >> >> >> accused of attempted rape in their past.
>> > >> >> >> 
>> > >> >> >> This woman is unsure where or
>> > >> >> >> > when this happened, and the third party she claims was
>> > >> >> >> > there, says he never witnessed any such incident anywhere.
>> > >> >> >> >  Her accounts of the alleged incident have varied at
>> > >> >> >> > different times.  She claims she just "remembered" it
>> > >> >> >> > after decades had passed.  There's not a scintilla of
>> > >> >> >> > evidence from anyone to suggest this actually happened. 
>> > >> >> >> > NO one should be judged by something this vague and
>> > >> >> >> > vacuous.
>> > >> >> >> 
>> > >> >> >> The claim will be investigated as it should be, especially
>> > >> >> >> for as important a position as a Supreme Court Judge.
>> > >> >> > 
>> > >> >> > The point is, the Democrats have already decided he's
>> > >> >> > guilty... not out of any effort to be fair or objective, but
>> > >> >> > simply because Trump is the President and nominated him.
>> > >> >> 
>> > >> >> And you know this how?  You're  a mind reader now?  Or just
>> > >> >> showing your bias?  I suggest we take a wait and see stance.
>> > >> > 
>> > >> > Nads has already convicted him, and so have virtually all the
>> > >> > Democratic leaders in various news articles.  To continue this
>> > >> > discussion with you at this point, is beyond the limits of my
>> > >> > patience.  Perhaps you should go out and do some gardening.
>> > >> 
>> > >> I'm terribly sorry that discussing things with someone who has a
>> > >> different opinion is so upsetting to you.
>> > > 
>> > > You lack any objectivity about this.  You automatically oppose
>> > > Kavanaugh,
>> > > despite the lack of any details or facts from his accuser, simply
>> > > because you hate Trump.  A fact you make quite clear every day,
>> > > despite the fact you're not even a citizen of this country.
>> > 
>> > Non sequitur.
>> > 
>> > People who aren't citizens of the United States are certainly welcome
>> > to dislike Trump.
>> > 
>> > And this idea that pandora mustn't speak her opinions is odious.  If
>> > the best argument you can offer is "shut up", what does that say
>> > about your own discussion?
>> 
>> Shut up.
> 
> 
> yea! what he said!

Your concern about dissenting opinions is duly noted.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#207217

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-22 09:19 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.36100b82f2aea1f5989a2f@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#207098
In article <PKOdnSRlH5o5QjjGnZ2dnUU7-SednZ2d@scnresearch.com>, 
pandora@peak.org says...
> 
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 09:20:02 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> 
> > In article <MPG.360d23f7a3203338994aa9@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
> > @gmail.com says...
> >> 
> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> >> Checkmate!  In article <g0fr28F5r93U3@mid.individual.net>,
> >> vallor@cultnix.org says...
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> > On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:42:14 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> >> > 
> >> > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> >> > > posts by Checkmate!  In article <vbednT3b2NUv6j_GnZ2dnUU7-
> >> > > SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:41:35 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> >> > >> 
> >> > >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> >> > >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnbhpWpFk3zzGnZ2dnUU7-
> >> > >> > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> >> > >> > 
> >> > >> > 
> >> > >> > 
> >> > >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:21:43 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> >> > >> >> 
> >> > >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
> >> > >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
> >> > >> >> > <CsWdnYZpWpHYozzGnZ2dnUU7- audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
> >> > >> >> > pandora@peak.org says...
> >> > >> >> > 
> >> > >> >> > 
> >> > >> >> > 
> >> > >> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:16:01 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> >> > >> >> >> 
> >> > >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
> >> > >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
> >> > >> >> >> > <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7- audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
> >> > >> >> >> > pandora@peak.org says...
> >> > >> >> >> > 
> >> > >> >> >> > 
> >> > >> >> >> > 
> >> > >> >> >> >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> >> > >> >> >> >> 
> >> > >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
> >> > >> >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
> >> > >> >> >> >> > <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> >> > >> >> >> >> > @gmail.invalid says...
> >> > >> >> >> >> > 
> >> > >> >> >> >> > 
> >> > >> >> >> >> > 
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> snowflakes,
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > In article
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> when reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > > In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> hobnobbing with white supremacists, abysmal
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> conditions in the concentration camps in the
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> southwest, attacks on programs to combat
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> climate change, attacks on women and
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> minorities, attacks on the poor, attacks on
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> the citizenship rights of minorities, brain
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> drains, adverse court rulings, cooperating
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> witnesses,
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> In other words, just another week in the Trump
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> regime:
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Deutsche Bank. Uh-oh!
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > > 
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > > anyday now foil hat collector.
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > Manafort's going to tell the truth and there
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > won't be any collusion and even if there is, it's
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > not illegal when The President does it, and if it
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > is then Manafort's lying and 3,000 Puerto Ricans
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > didn't die so The President gets A+ for his
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > amazing management skills!
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> date graped him!!!!2!
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret"
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > letter from a "sekret"
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > so<SPANK>
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/
> kavanaugh-
> >> > >> >> >> allegations-
> >> > >> >> >> >> ford-
> >> > >> >> >> >> >> palo-alto.html
> >> > >> >> >> >> > 
> >> > >> >> >> >> > Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor. 
> >> > >> >> >> >> > Most people get attracted to that field because of
> >> > >> >> >> >> > their own issues.
> >> > >> >> >> >> >  Now she claims she never told anyone because she was
> >> > >> >> >> >> >  afraid
> >> > >> >> >> >> > he'd "kill" her.
> >> > >> >> >> >> > Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high
> >> > >> >> >> >> > school ever touches other people's naughty parts, and
> >> > >> >> >> >> > if they do, they should never ever be employed by
> >> > >> >> >> >> > anyone.  Are you prepared to live in a world where you
> >> > >> >> >> >> > can lose your job anytime someone utters some
> >> > >> >> >> >> > accusation that you did something naughty 35 years ago
> >> > >> >> >> >> > in high school?  Did YOU ever do anything naughty in
> >> > >> >> >> >> > high school, Ko0k?
> >> > >> >> >> >> 
> >> > >> >> >> >> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different
> >> > >> >> >> >> than other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
> >> > >> >> >> > 
> >> > >> >> >> > Does a person's reputation become spotted with the
> >> > >> >> >> > flimsiest of accusations alone... suddenly popping up
> >> > >> >> >> > after 36 years?
> >> > >> >> >> 
> >> > >> >> >> The accusation(s) must be investigated, yes.  Especially for
> >> > >> >> >> as important a job as a Supreme Court Justice.
> >> > >> >> >> 
> >> > >> >> >> If so, NO one
> >> > >> >> >> > would have a spotless reputation... ever.
> >> > >> >> >> 
> >> > >> >> >> Possibly.  However, I don't believe that everyone would be
> >> > >> >> >> accused of attempted rape in their past.
> >> > >> >> >> 
> >> > >> >> >> This woman is unsure where or
> >> > >> >> >> > when this happened, and the third party she claims was
> >> > >> >> >> > there, says he never witnessed any such incident anywhere.
> >> > >> >> >> >  Her accounts of the alleged incident have varied at
> >> > >> >> >> > different times.  She claims she just "remembered" it
> >> > >> >> >> > after decades had passed.  There's not a scintilla of
> >> > >> >> >> > evidence from anyone to suggest this actually happened. 
> >> > >> >> >> > NO one should be judged by something this vague and
> >> > >> >> >> > vacuous.
> >> > >> >> >> 
> >> > >> >> >> The claim will be investigated as it should be, especially
> >> > >> >> >> for as important a position as a Supreme Court Judge.
> >> > >> >> > 
> >> > >> >> > The point is, the Democrats have already decided he's
> >> > >> >> > guilty... not out of any effort to be fair or objective, but
> >> > >> >> > simply because Trump is the President and nominated him.
> >> > >> >> 
> >> > >> >> And you know this how?  You're  a mind reader now?  Or just
> >> > >> >> showing your bias?  I suggest we take a wait and see stance.
> >> > >> > 
> >> > >> > Nads has already convicted him, and so have virtually all the
> >> > >> > Democratic leaders in various news articles.  To continue this
> >> > >> > discussion with you at this point, is beyond the limits of my
> >> > >> > patience.  Perhaps you should go out and do some gardening.
> >> > >> 
> >> > >> I'm terribly sorry that discussing things with someone who has a
> >> > >> different opinion is so upsetting to you.
> >> > > 
> >> > > You lack any objectivity about this.  You automatically oppose
> >> > > Kavanaugh,
> >> > > despite the lack of any details or facts from his accuser, simply
> >> > > because you hate Trump.  A fact you make quite clear every day,
> >> > > despite the fact you're not even a citizen of this country.
> >> > 
> >> > Non sequitur.
> >> > 
> >> > People who aren't citizens of the United States are certainly welcome
> >> > to dislike Trump.
> >> > 
> >> > And this idea that pandora mustn't speak her opinions is odious.  If
> >> > the best argument you can offer is "shut up", what does that say
> >> > about your own discussion?
> >> 
> >> Shut up.
> > 
> > 
> > yea! what he said!
> 
> Your concern about dissenting opinions is duly noted.

The problem is, democrappers consider an opinion a truth, as long as the 
opinion is from a democrapper.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 7 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 17  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate

csiph-web