Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.checkmate > #205378 > unrolled thread

Trillion dollar deficit

Started byNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
First post2018-09-17 04:51 +0000
Last post2018-09-17 22:51 -0400
Articles 20 on this page of 324 — 17 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate

Contents

  Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-17 04:51 +0000
    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 08:54 -0600
      Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 11:15 -0400
        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 09:50 -0600
        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 13:16 -0600
          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:21 +0000
            Re: DId Checkmate rape someone in his high school? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Trillion dollar deficit โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-17 14:46 -0500
              Re: DId Checkmate rape someone in his high school? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 15:12 -0600
                Re: DId Checkmate rape someone in his high school? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 16:22 -0600
                  Re: DId Checkmate rape someone in his high school? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:20 -0600
              Re: DId Checkmate rape someone in his high school? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 07:34 +0000
                Re: ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ DId Checkmate rape someone in his high school? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„  Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-18 10:50 -0500
            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 14:56 -0600
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 17:41 -0400
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 15:50 -0600
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 18:42 -0400
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 12:01 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 11:05 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 12:59 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:18 -0600
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 15:55 -0600
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-17 23:38 +0100
            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 15:11 -0600
            Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-17 23:16 +0100
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-17 23:45 +0100
            Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 11:49 -0500
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 11:04 -0600
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 12:58 -0500
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:21 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:17 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:13 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 17:06 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-19 20:32 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:18 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-20 13:11 -0400
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:23 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-20 17:52 -0400
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:06 -0600
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:16 +0000
                                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:18 -0600
                                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:13 -0600
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-20 18:21 -0400
                                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 19:16 -0600
                                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 18:37 -0700
                                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 23:04 -0700
                                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 09:06 -0400
                                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:15 -0600
                                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-21 12:03 -0700
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 21:19 -0600
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 12:24 -0500
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:00 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 19:14 +0000
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:32 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:03 +0000
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:08 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 14:53 -0700
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 15:17 -0700
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:05 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:10 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-20 23:35 +0100
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 21:50 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 23:39 -0700
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 11:42 -0400
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:17 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-21 13:10 -0700
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 16:35 -0400
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-21 16:25 -0700
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 21:53 +0100
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:14 +0000
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 23:45 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:07 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:17 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:16 -0500
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-25 12:16 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:30 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-22 12:20 -0700
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:31 -0500
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:31 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 19:59 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-25 13:07 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:16 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:34 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 12:17 -0400
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:24 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:26 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:17 -0600
                      Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Trillion dollar deficit โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-19 09:45 -0500
                        Re: รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„  Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowfla ke รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snow flake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ S nowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ Trillion d ollar deficit รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowfla ke รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snow flake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ S nowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowfla ke รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-19 09:50 -0500
                        Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snow Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 09:01 -0600
                          Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snow โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-19 22:00 -0500
                        Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Trillion dollar deficit โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-23 11:46 -0700
                          Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-23 18:29 -0500
                            Re: รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„  Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowfla ke รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snow flake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ S nowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ ? Snowflak e ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowf lake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Sn owflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowfla ke ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowfla ke ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snow flake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? S nowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? รขยย„ Snow flake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ S nowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowfla ke รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snow flake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ S nowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„รขยย„ Snowflake รขยย„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-23 18:40 -0500
                          Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 09:57 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 20:17 +0100
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-19 11:20 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 15:32 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 16:20 -0500
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:16 -0600
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 11:31 -0600
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-18 14:26 -0400
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:22 -0600
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 08:45 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 10:57 -0400
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 09:03 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 11:29 -0400
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 11:19 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 15:17 -0400
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-21 17:06 -0700
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 11:48 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:53 -0600
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-21 17:05 -0700
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-21 17:05 -0700
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:19 +0000
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 17:07 -0600
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 12:56 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:16 +0000
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 17:07 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 23:30 +0000
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 08:30 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 09:00 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 12:07 -0400
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 11:19 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 01:39 +0000
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Tommy <tom@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 17:34 +0000
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:28 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 19:53 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 09:11 -0400
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:26 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 20:09 +0100
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 18:09 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:05 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:30 -0600
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:04 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:24 -0500
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-19 11:22 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-19 20:49 +0000
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:20 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:22 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:19 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-21 02:26 +0000
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 17:57 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-22 04:08 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:24 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 17:02 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:38 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 13:43 -0600
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 05:18 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 20:10 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:55 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 23:23 +0100
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 23:40 +0100
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 23:54 +0100
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 00:08 +0100
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit g8dgc <g8dgc@noneya.none> - 2018-09-22 18:53 -0400
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit tripeco.2@parody.personae.invalid (Tr!pe) - 2018-09-22 23:57 +0100
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 23:54 +0100
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 00:29 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 00:10 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 05:21 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 06:13 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 14:36 +0100
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 08:32 -0600
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-23 11:06 -0400
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 08:11 +0100
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:00 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-23 12:02 -0700
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:15 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:27 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 12:13 -0400
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:23 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 01:44 +0000
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 20:17 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 19:16 +0000
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:34 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:01 +0000
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:09 -0600
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 09:08 -0400
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit tripeco.2@parody.personae.invalid (Tr!pe) - 2018-09-21 20:22 +0100
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:12 +0000
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:34 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:05 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:14 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 11:43 -0700
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:35 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:22 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:36 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:41 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit % <perscent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 04:30 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit invalid@invalid.invalid (ร) - 2018-09-23 08:45 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:36 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:33 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:21 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:32 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 19:13 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 13:45 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 11:23 -0400
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:27 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 13:21 -0400
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 13:10 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 16:23 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 13:53 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:25 -0600
                        Please fact-check your assertions vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-24 03:05 +0000
                          Re: Please fact-check your assertions mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-24 01:42 -0400
                            Re: Please fact-check your assertions Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-23 23:10 -0700
                          Re: Please fact-check your assertions vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-24 07:17 +0000
                            Re: Please fact-check your assertions Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:44 -0600
                            Re: Please fact-check your assertions kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 12:23 -0400
                              Re: Please fact-check your assertions Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:30 -0600
                              Re: Please fact-check your assertions snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 19:41 +0100
                                Re: Please fact-check your assertions snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 23:36 +0100
                          Re: Please fact-check your assertions kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 12:18 -0400
                            Re: Please fact-check your assertions Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:29 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-25 12:19 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 12:25 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 12:16 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-25 19:32 -0500
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-26 11:45 -0500
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-26 18:49 -0500
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 09:06 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:07 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:33 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-23 23:31 -0700
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-24 06:52 -0400
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:43 -0600
                            Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Trillion dollar deficit โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:47 -0500
                              Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:14 -0600
                                Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Trillion dollar deficit ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 11:46 -0500
                                  Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 11:58 -0500
                                    Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 14:34 -0500
                                      Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 14:59 -0500
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 12:37 -0400
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:03 +0000
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 17:53 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-22 04:06 +0000
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 13:57 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 13:58 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:09 +0000
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:18 -0600
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-19 20:34 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 20:15 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 18:07 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:19 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:21 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:17 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:41 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:18 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-22 11:44 -0400
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:44 -0500
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:08 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:32 -0500
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-18 14:18 -0400
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:22 -0500
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-18 14:41 -0400
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:22 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-18 16:44 -0400
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:48 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-18 16:57 -0400
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 17:03 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-18 19:23 -0400
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 08:30 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-19 11:20 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 14:21 -0600
            Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 12:18 -0500
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 11:31 -0600
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:14 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-18 19:35 +0100
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:23 +0000
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-18 17:08 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 23:31 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 08:32 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 12:08 -0400
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 11:20 -0600
                              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 01:39 +0000
                                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 20:16 -0600
                                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:45 -0400
                                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:20 -0600
                                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 11:22 -0400
                                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:41 -0600
                                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 12:22 -0400
                                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:23 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-20 23:06 +0100
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:15 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-20 23:41 +0100
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-20 12:38 -0500
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 19:18 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:26 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:24 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 15:25 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 21:59 +0000
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 16:09 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:25 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-22 01:40 -0500
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:23 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 13:42 -0600
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-22 16:11 -0400
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:42 -0600
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 05:17 +0000
                            Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 06:12 -0600
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-23 14:33 -0500
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-19 11:18 -0500
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-19 20:39 +0100
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 16:06 -0400
                        Re: Trillion dollar deficit vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-19 21:09 +0000
                          Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 17:33 -0400
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:14 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-21 17:56 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:21 +0000
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 13:17 -0500
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-09-18 15:39 -0500
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:24 -0600
    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:13 -0700
      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 13:15 -0600
        Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 17:53 -0400
          Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 15:54 -0600
            Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 18:16 -0400
              Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 16:22 -0600
                Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 18:46 -0400
                  Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:06 -0600
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:29 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 19:55 -0600
                      Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 22:18 -0400
                    Re: Trillion dollar deficit mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 22:51 -0400

Page 3 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 17  Next page →

#206723

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-21 10:13 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.360ec6901d1119099899ee@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#206488
In article <MPG.360e1fcf56cc850994af5@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
@gmail.com says...
> 
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
> Checkmate!  In article <po1671$e0i$24@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> @gmail.invalid says...
> 
> 
> > > Scam= The left paying some gal make a statement to stop the Supreme
> > > court decision.
> > 
> > Proof, kook?
> 
> I expect we're going to find out a lot of "interesting" things about that 
> woman... Ms Ford.  Wait for it...

Now she is making the demands on how an interview should be conducted. 
What a set up. So obvious.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206495

Frommixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie>
Date2018-09-20 18:21 -0400
Message-ID<po16hi$uqe$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#206474
On 9/20/2018 6:06 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <po14qv$rq0$2@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie
> says...
>>
>> On 9/20/2018 5:23 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <po0kbp$1vos$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>>>>
>>>> On 9/20/2018 11:18 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <MPG.360cfaba8fa6d056994a99@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
>>>>> @gmail.com says...
>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>>>>> Checkmate!  In article <vbednTjb2NU6ZT_GnZ2dnUU7-
>>>>>> SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:17:09 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <CsWdnb5pWpGB3zzGnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>>>>>>>> pandora@peak.org says...
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:16:43 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>>>>>>>>>> by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnYppWpFNoTzGnZ2dnUU7-
>>>>>>>>>> audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:04:53 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>> pandora@peak.org says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posts by Checkmate!  In article <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess hobnobbing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with white supremacists, abysmal conditions in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concentration camps in the southwest, attacks on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> programs to combat climate change, attacks on women
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and minorities, attacks on the poor, attacks on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> citizenship rights of minorities, brain drains,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adverse court rulings, cooperating witnesses,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In other words, just another week in the Trump regime:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from Deutsche
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bank. Uh-oh!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyday now foil hat collector.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Manafort's going to tell the truth and there won't be any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collusion and even if there is, it's not illegal when The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> President does it, and if it is then Manafort's lying and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3,000 Puerto Ricans didn't die so The President gets A+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for his amazing management skills!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then date
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> graped him!!!!2!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret" letter from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a "sekret" so<SPANK>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/kavanaugh-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> allegations-ford-palo-alto.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor.  Most
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people get attracted to that field because of their own issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Now she claims she never told anyone because she was afraid
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he'd "kill" her.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high school
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ever touches other people's naughty parts, and if they do, they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should never ever be employed by anyone.  Are you prepared to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> live in a world where you can lose your job anytime someone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> utters some accusation that you did something naughty 35 years
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago in high school?  Did YOU ever do anything naughty in high
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> school, Ko0k?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than
>>>>>>>>>>>>> other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And I bet if the other judges were vetted this hard there would be
>>>>>>>>>>>> some crap. But its only about the left stomping their feet.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You believe that if you want.  Your *spin* on things shows your
>>>>>>>>>>> personal bias.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Everybody has dirty laundry, if you look close enough.  Using this
>>>>>>>>>> vague accusation as a valid reason to deny someone a job, suggests
>>>>>>>>>> that no one could ever get a job if someone else wanted to derail it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The JOB is as a Supreme Court Judge!  What if the accusation is true?
>>>>>>>>> Would YOU support someone as a Supreme Court Justice who had committed
>>>>>>>>> such a crime?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Beats the hell out of blow jobs in the Whitehouse.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If that's what you want to believe.  Personally, I consider attempted
>>>>>>> rape and consensual sex to be two different things.  YMMV.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> She just trashed the man's reputation, and had the nerve to say she
>>>>>> doesn't remember when it happened, where it happened, who else was there,
>>>>>> how she got there, and how she got home.  She  promised to testify,  but
>>>>>> when they went out of their way to help her testify by whatever manner
>>>>>> she was comfortable with,  she started stalling.  Now it appears that she
>>>>>> doesn't intend to testify or provide ANY details of this alleged incident
>>>>>> at all.  There is absolutely nothing to give credence to her claim, if
>>>>>> she can't or won't provide ANYTHING that might make her story believable.
>>>>>> I think she simply has mental problems and the Democrats are trying to
>>>>>> use her for their own political purposes.  It's disappointing that you
>>>>>> apparently lack any sense of fairness or objectivity whatsoever on this
>>>>>> matter.
>>>>>
>>>>> The only way the disgusting left can win is to lie and cheat, it's so
>>>>> obvious.
>>>>
>>>> We graduated from Trump University with masters degrees in scamming and
>>>> conning suckers and getting on tv a lot for free.
>>>
>>> Or trying to be funny to hide the hate.
>>
>> So many suckers.  So many scammers.  It's like watching tv sitcoms.
> 
> Scam= The left paying some gal make a statement to stop the Supreme
> court decision.

Who paid?  Where's the proof?

-- 
Grizzly H.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206557

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-20 19:16 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.360df46e506ad9a89899cd@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#206495
In article <po16hi$uqe$1@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie 
says...
> 
> On 9/20/2018 6:06 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <po14qv$rq0$2@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie
> > says...
> >>
> >> On 9/20/2018 5:23 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <po0kbp$1vos$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
> >>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 9/20/2018 11:18 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <MPG.360cfaba8fa6d056994a99@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
> >>>>> @gmail.com says...
> >>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> >>>>>> Checkmate!  In article <vbednTjb2NU6ZT_GnZ2dnUU7-
> >>>>>> SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> >>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:17:09 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>> In article <CsWdnb5pWpGB3zzGnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
> >>>>>>>> pandora@peak.org says...
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:16:43 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
> >>>>>>>>>> by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnYppWpFNoTzGnZ2dnUU7-
> >>>>>>>>>> audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:04:53 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> In article <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> pandora@peak.org says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> posts by Checkmate!  In article <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess hobnobbing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with white supremacists, abysmal conditions in the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concentration camps in the southwest, attacks on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> programs to combat climate change, attacks on women
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and minorities, attacks on the poor, attacks on the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> citizenship rights of minorities, brain drains,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adverse court rulings, cooperating witnesses,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In other words, just another week in the Trump regime:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from Deutsche
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bank. Uh-oh!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyday now foil hat collector.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Manafort's going to tell the truth and there won't be any
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collusion and even if there is, it's not illegal when The
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> President does it, and if it is then Manafort's lying and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3,000 Puerto Ricans didn't die so The President gets A+
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for his amazing management skills!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then date
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> graped him!!!!2!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret" letter from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a "sekret" so<SPANK>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/kavanaugh-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> allegations-ford-palo-alto.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor.  Most
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> people get attracted to that field because of their own issues.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Now she claims she never told anyone because she was afraid
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> he'd "kill" her.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high school
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ever touches other people's naughty parts, and if they do, they
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> should never ever be employed by anyone.  Are you prepared to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> live in a world where you can lose your job anytime someone
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> utters some accusation that you did something naughty 35 years
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago in high school?  Did YOU ever do anything naughty in high
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> school, Ko0k?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> And I bet if the other judges were vetted this hard there would be
> >>>>>>>>>>>> some crap. But its only about the left stomping their feet.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> You believe that if you want.  Your *spin* on things shows your
> >>>>>>>>>>> personal bias.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Everybody has dirty laundry, if you look close enough.  Using this
> >>>>>>>>>> vague accusation as a valid reason to deny someone a job, suggests
> >>>>>>>>>> that no one could ever get a job if someone else wanted to derail it.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The JOB is as a Supreme Court Judge!  What if the accusation is true?
> >>>>>>>>> Would YOU support someone as a Supreme Court Justice who had committed
> >>>>>>>>> such a crime?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Beats the hell out of blow jobs in the Whitehouse.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If that's what you want to believe.  Personally, I consider attempted
> >>>>>>> rape and consensual sex to be two different things.  YMMV.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> She just trashed the man's reputation, and had the nerve to say she
> >>>>>> doesn't remember when it happened, where it happened, who else was there,
> >>>>>> how she got there, and how she got home.  She  promised to testify,  but
> >>>>>> when they went out of their way to help her testify by whatever manner
> >>>>>> she was comfortable with,  she started stalling.  Now it appears that she
> >>>>>> doesn't intend to testify or provide ANY details of this alleged incident
> >>>>>> at all.  There is absolutely nothing to give credence to her claim, if
> >>>>>> she can't or won't provide ANYTHING that might make her story believable.
> >>>>>> I think she simply has mental problems and the Democrats are trying to
> >>>>>> use her for their own political purposes.  It's disappointing that you
> >>>>>> apparently lack any sense of fairness or objectivity whatsoever on this
> >>>>>> matter.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The only way the disgusting left can win is to lie and cheat, it's so
> >>>>> obvious.
> >>>>
> >>>> We graduated from Trump University with masters degrees in scamming and
> >>>> conning suckers and getting on tv a lot for free.
> >>>
> >>> Or trying to be funny to hide the hate.
> >>
> >> So many suckers.  So many scammers.  It's like watching tv sitcoms.
> > 
> > Scam= The left paying some gal make a statement to stop the Supreme
> > court decision.
> 
> Who paid?  Where's the proof?

In the same place Nads proof that he's guilty.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206564

FromJanithor <Janithor@comcast.net>
Date2018-09-20 18:37 -0700
Message-ID<po1i0j$b15$2@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#206495
x-no-archive: yes

On 9/20/2018 3:21 PM, mixed nuts wrote:
> On 9/20/2018 6:06 PM, Skeeter wrote:

>> Scam= The left paying some gal make a statement to stop the Supreme
>> court decision.
> 
> Who paid?ย  Where's the proof?

Right next to the proof that Kavanaugh assaulted that woman, Ms. Ford.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206618

FromJanithor <Janithor@comcast.net>
Date2018-09-20 23:04 -0700
Message-ID<po21li$sde$1@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#206564
x-no-archive: yes

On 9/20/2018 10:39 PM, Catalina wrote:
> "Janithor" <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:po1i0j$b15$2@news.albasani.net...
>> x-no-archive: yes
>>
>> On 9/20/2018 3:21 PM, mixed nuts wrote:
>>> On 9/20/2018 6:06 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>
>>>> Scam= The left paying some gal make a statement to stop the Supreme
>>>> court decision.
>>>
>>> Who paid? Where's the proof?
>>
>> Right next to the proof that Kavanaugh assaulted that woman, Ms. Ford.
> 
> Do a search on "Christine Blasey Ford" +Dewey +Beach +bar +scene

Yeah, this whole thing stinks.  It's all politics.  I'm so glad Obama 
didn't get to stack the court completely with wise Latinas.

> {welcome back, janithor}

Gracias.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206668

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-09-21 09:06 -0400
Message-ID<po2qcd$1ca1$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#206618
On 9/21/2018 2:04 AM, Janithor wrote:
> Yeah, this whole thing stinks.ย  It's all politics.ย  I'm so glad Obama 
> didn't get to stack the court completely with wise Latinas.

Misogyny noted. Racism noted. Get back to us when you have a real 
argument to make.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206725

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-21 10:15 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.360ec71c684e2da99899f0@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#206668
In article <po2qcd$1ca1$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
> 
> On 9/21/2018 2:04 AM, Janithor wrote:
> > Yeah, this whole thing stinks.ย  It's all politics.ย  I'm so glad Obama 
> > didn't get to stack the court completely with wise Latinas.
> 
> Misogyny noted. Racism noted. Get back to us when you have a real 
> argument to make.

You do the same MmmK?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206809

FromJanithor <Janithor@comcast.net>
Date2018-09-21 12:03 -0700
Message-ID<po3f9v$837$1@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#206668
x-no-archive: yes

On 9/21/2018 6:06 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 9/21/2018 2:04 AM, Janithor wrote:
>> Yeah, this whole thing stinks.ย  It's all politics.ย  I'm so glad Obama 
>> didn't get to stack the court completely with wise Latinas.
> 
> Misogyny noted. Racism noted. Get back to us when you have a real 
> argument to make.

Ha, you didn't record it!

Janithor = 1
Paul = 0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206603

FromLunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-20 21:19 -0600
Message-ID<hrZoD.137172$tK2.61974@fx42.iad>
In reply to#206474
On 9/20/2018 4:06 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <po14qv$rq0$2@gioia.aioe.org>, melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie
> says...
>>
>> On 9/20/2018 5:23 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <po0kbp$1vos$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>>>>
>>>> On 9/20/2018 11:18 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <MPG.360cfaba8fa6d056994a99@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
>>>>> @gmail.com says...
>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>>>>> Checkmate!  In article <vbednTjb2NU6ZT_GnZ2dnUU7-
>>>>>> SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:17:09 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <CsWdnb5pWpGB3zzGnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>>>>>>>> pandora@peak.org says...
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:16:43 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>>>>>>>>>> by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnYppWpFNoTzGnZ2dnUU7-
>>>>>>>>>> audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:04:53 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>> pandora@peak.org says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posts by Checkmate!  In article <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess hobnobbing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with white supremacists, abysmal conditions in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concentration camps in the southwest, attacks on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> programs to combat climate change, attacks on women
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and minorities, attacks on the poor, attacks on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> citizenship rights of minorities, brain drains,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adverse court rulings, cooperating witnesses,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In other words, just another week in the Trump regime:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from Deutsche
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bank. Uh-oh!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyday now foil hat collector.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Manafort's going to tell the truth and there won't be any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collusion and even if there is, it's not illegal when The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> President does it, and if it is then Manafort's lying and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3,000 Puerto Ricans didn't die so The President gets A+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for his amazing management skills!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then date
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> graped him!!!!2!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret" letter from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a "sekret" so<SPANK>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/kavanaugh-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> allegations-ford-palo-alto.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor.  Most
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people get attracted to that field because of their own issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Now she claims she never told anyone because she was afraid
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he'd "kill" her.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high school
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ever touches other people's naughty parts, and if they do, they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should never ever be employed by anyone.  Are you prepared to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> live in a world where you can lose your job anytime someone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> utters some accusation that you did something naughty 35 years
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago in high school?  Did YOU ever do anything naughty in high
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> school, Ko0k?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than
>>>>>>>>>>>>> other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And I bet if the other judges were vetted this hard there would be
>>>>>>>>>>>> some crap. But its only about the left stomping their feet.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You believe that if you want.  Your *spin* on things shows your
>>>>>>>>>>> personal bias.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Everybody has dirty laundry, if you look close enough.  Using this
>>>>>>>>>> vague accusation as a valid reason to deny someone a job, suggests
>>>>>>>>>> that no one could ever get a job if someone else wanted to derail it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The JOB is as a Supreme Court Judge!  What if the accusation is true?
>>>>>>>>> Would YOU support someone as a Supreme Court Justice who had committed
>>>>>>>>> such a crime?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Beats the hell out of blow jobs in the Whitehouse.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If that's what you want to believe.  Personally, I consider attempted
>>>>>>> rape and consensual sex to be two different things.  YMMV.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> She just trashed the man's reputation, and had the nerve to say she
>>>>>> doesn't remember when it happened, where it happened, who else was there,
>>>>>> how she got there, and how she got home.  She  promised to testify,  but
>>>>>> when they went out of their way to help her testify by whatever manner
>>>>>> she was comfortable with,  she started stalling.  Now it appears that she
>>>>>> doesn't intend to testify or provide ANY details of this alleged incident
>>>>>> at all.  There is absolutely nothing to give credence to her claim, if
>>>>>> she can't or won't provide ANYTHING that might make her story believable.
>>>>>> I think she simply has mental problems and the Democrats are trying to
>>>>>> use her for their own political purposes.  It's disappointing that you
>>>>>> apparently lack any sense of fairness or objectivity whatsoever on this
>>>>>> matter.
>>>>>
>>>>> The only way the disgusting left can win is to lie and cheat, it's so
>>>>> obvious.
>>>>
>>>> We graduated from Trump University with masters degrees in scamming and
>>>> conning suckers and getting on tv a lot for free.
>>>
>>> Or trying to be funny to hide the hate.
>>
>> So many suckers.  So many scammers.  It's like watching tv sitcoms.
> 
> 
> Scam= The left paying some gal make a statement to stop the Supreme
> court decision.
> 

I went to one of these high schools back in the 60s.  Different state, 
same concept.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#207582

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2018-09-23 12:24 -0500
Message-ID<t4idna9bhPrBUTrGnZ2dnUU7-Y-dnZ2d@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#206454
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 17:52:30 -0400, mixed nuts wrote:

> On 9/20/2018 5:23 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>> In article <po0kbp$1vos$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>>>
>>> On 9/20/2018 11:18 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>> In article <MPG.360cfaba8fa6d056994a99@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
>>>> @gmail.com says...
>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>>>>> by Checkmate!  In article <vbednTjb2NU6ZT_GnZ2dnUU7-
>>>>> SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:17:09 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <CsWdnb5pWpGB3zzGnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>>>>>>> pandora@peak.org says...
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:16:43 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>>>>>>>> posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnYppWpFNoTzGnZ2dnUU7-
>>>>>>>>> audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:04:53 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>> pandora@peak.org says...
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid
>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess hobnobbing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with white supremacists, abysmal conditions in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concentration camps in the southwest, attacks on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> programs to combat climate change, attacks on women
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and minorities, attacks on the poor, attacks on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> citizenship rights of minorities, brain drains,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adverse court rulings, cooperating witnesses,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In other words, just another week in the Trump regime:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from Deutsche
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bank. Uh-oh!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyday now foil hat collector.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Manafort's going to tell the truth and there won't be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any collusion and even if there is, it's not illegal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when The President does it, and if it is then Manafort's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lying and 3,000 Puerto Ricans didn't die so The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> President gets A+ for his amazing management skills!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then date
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> graped him!!!!2!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret" letter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from a "sekret" so<SPANK>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/kavanaugh-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> allegations-ford-palo-alto.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor.  Most
>>>>>>>>>>>>> people get attracted to that field because of their own
>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    Now she claims she never told anyone because she was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    afraid
>>>>>>>>>>>>> he'd "kill" her.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high school
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ever touches other people's naughty parts, and if they do,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> they should never ever be employed by anyone.  Are you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> prepared to live in a world where you can lose your job
>>>>>>>>>>>>> anytime someone utters some accusation that you did
>>>>>>>>>>>>> something naughty 35 years ago in high school?  Did YOU ever
>>>>>>>>>>>>> do anything naughty in high school, Ko0k?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than
>>>>>>>>>>>> other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And I bet if the other judges were vetted this hard there
>>>>>>>>>>> would be some crap. But its only about the left stomping their
>>>>>>>>>>> feet.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You believe that if you want.  Your *spin* on things shows your
>>>>>>>>>> personal bias.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Everybody has dirty laundry, if you look close enough.  Using
>>>>>>>>> this vague accusation as a valid reason to deny someone a job,
>>>>>>>>> suggests that no one could ever get a job if someone else wanted
>>>>>>>>> to derail it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The JOB is as a Supreme Court Judge!  What if the accusation is
>>>>>>>> true? Would YOU support someone as a Supreme Court Justice who
>>>>>>>> had committed such a crime?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Beats the hell out of blow jobs in the Whitehouse.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If that's what you want to believe.  Personally, I consider
>>>>>> attempted rape and consensual sex to be two different things. 
>>>>>> YMMV.
>>>>>
>>>>> She just trashed the man's reputation, and had the nerve to say she
>>>>> doesn't remember when it happened, where it happened, who else was
>>>>> there,
>>>>> how she got there, and how she got home.  She  promised to testify, 
>>>>> but when they went out of their way to help her testify by whatever
>>>>> manner she was comfortable with,  she started stalling.  Now it
>>>>> appears that she doesn't intend to testify or provide ANY details of
>>>>> this alleged incident at all.  There is absolutely nothing to give
>>>>> credence to her claim, if she can't or won't provide ANYTHING that
>>>>> might make her story believable.
>>>>> I think she simply has mental problems and the Democrats are trying
>>>>> to use her for their own political purposes.  It's disappointing
>>>>> that you apparently lack any sense of fairness or objectivity
>>>>> whatsoever on this matter.
>>>>
>>>> The only way the disgusting left can win is to lie and cheat, it's so
>>>> obvious.
>>>
>>> We graduated from Trump University with masters degrees in scamming
>>> and conning suckers and getting on tv a lot for free.
>> 
>> Or trying to be funny to hide the hate.
> 
> So many suckers.  So many scammers.  It's like watching tv sitcoms.

Indeed.  Of course, Summer programming is usually pretty boring, but this 
year we have Kavanaugh.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#207667

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-09-23 22:00 +0000
Message-ID<po92dj$mhp$19@dont-email.me>
In reply to#206427
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:23:52 -0600, Skeeter wrote:

> In article <po0kbp$1vos$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>> 
>> On 9/20/2018 11:18 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> > In article <MPG.360cfaba8fa6d056994a99@news.altopia.com>, ricksabian1
>> > @gmail.com says...
>> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>> >> by Checkmate!  In article <vbednTjb2NU6ZT_GnZ2dnUU7-
>> >> SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> >>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:17:09 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>> >>>> In article <CsWdnb5pWpGB3zzGnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>> >>>> pandora@peak.org says...
>> >>>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:16:43 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> >>>>>> posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnYppWpFNoTzGnZ2dnUU7-
>> >>>>>> audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> >>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:04:53 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> In article <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>> >>>>>>>> pandora@peak.org says...
>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >>>>>>>>>> reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >>>>>>>>>> <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid
>> >>>>>>>>>> says...
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>> >>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes,
>> >>>>>>>>>>> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> In article <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess hobnobbing
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with white supremacists, abysmal conditions in the
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concentration camps in the southwest, attacks on
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> programs to combat climate change, attacks on women
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and minorities, attacks on the poor, attacks on the
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> citizenship rights of minorities, brain drains,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adverse court rulings, cooperating witnesses,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In other words, just another week in the Trump regime:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from Deutsche
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bank. Uh-oh!
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyday now foil hat collector.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Manafort's going to tell the truth and there won't be
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> any collusion and even if there is, it's not illegal
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> when The President does it, and if it is then Manafort's
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> lying and 3,000 Puerto Ricans didn't die so The
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> President gets A+ for his amazing management skills!
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then date
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> graped him!!!!2!
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret" letter
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> from a "sekret" so<SPANK>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/kavanaugh-
>> >>>>>>>>>>> allegations-ford-palo-alto.html
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor.  Most
>> >>>>>>>>>> people get attracted to that field because of their own
>> >>>>>>>>>> issues.
>> >>>>>>>>>>   Now she claims she never told anyone because she was
>> >>>>>>>>>>   afraid
>> >>>>>>>>>> he'd "kill" her.
>> >>>>>>>>>> Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high school
>> >>>>>>>>>> ever touches other people's naughty parts, and if they do,
>> >>>>>>>>>> they should never ever be employed by anyone.  Are you
>> >>>>>>>>>> prepared to live in a world where you can lose your job
>> >>>>>>>>>> anytime someone utters some accusation that you did
>> >>>>>>>>>> something naughty 35 years ago in high school?  Did YOU ever
>> >>>>>>>>>> do anything naughty in high school, Ko0k?
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than
>> >>>>>>>>> other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> And I bet if the other judges were vetted this hard there
>> >>>>>>>> would be some crap. But its only about the left stomping their
>> >>>>>>>> feet.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> You believe that if you want.  Your *spin* on things shows your
>> >>>>>>> personal bias.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Everybody has dirty laundry, if you look close enough.  Using
>> >>>>>> this vague accusation as a valid reason to deny someone a job,
>> >>>>>> suggests that no one could ever get a job if someone else wanted
>> >>>>>> to derail it.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> The JOB is as a Supreme Court Judge!  What if the accusation is
>> >>>>> true? Would YOU support someone as a Supreme Court Justice who
>> >>>>> had committed such a crime?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Beats the hell out of blow jobs in the Whitehouse.
>> >>>
>> >>> If that's what you want to believe.  Personally, I consider
>> >>> attempted rape and consensual sex to be two different things. 
>> >>> YMMV.
>> >>
>> >> She just trashed the man's reputation, and had the nerve to say she
>> >> doesn't remember when it happened, where it happened, who else was
>> >> there,
>> >> how she got there, and how she got home.  She  promised to testify, 
>> >> but when they went out of their way to help her testify by whatever
>> >> manner she was comfortable with,  she started stalling.  Now it
>> >> appears that she doesn't intend to testify or provide ANY details of
>> >> this alleged incident at all.  There is absolutely nothing to give
>> >> credence to her claim, if she can't or won't provide ANYTHING that
>> >> might make her story believable.
>> >> I think she simply has mental problems and the Democrats are trying
>> >> to use her for their own political purposes.  It's disappointing
>> >> that you apparently lack any sense of fairness or objectivity
>> >> whatsoever on this matter.
>> > 
>> > The only way the disgusting left can win is to lie and cheat, it's so
>> > obvious.
>> 
>> We graduated from Trump University with masters degrees in scamming and
>> conning suckers and getting on tv a lot for free.
> 
> Or trying to be funny to hide the hate.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/23/alt-right-online-humor-
as-a-weapon-facism

https://washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/septoct-2012/why-arent-
conservatives-funny/

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/rationally-speaking/200905/
conservatives-lack-sense-humor-study-finds

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2012/11/24/1164467/-Right-Wing-Humor-
Explained

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206399

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-09-20 19:14 +0000
Message-ID<po0rji$e0i$12@dont-email.me>
In reply to#206259
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 01:31:31 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <vbednTjb2NU6ZT_GnZ2dnUU7-
> SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> 
> 
> 
>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:17:09 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>> 
>> > In article <CsWdnb5pWpGB3zzGnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>> > pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> 
>> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:16:43 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnYppWpFNoTzGnZ2dnUU7-
>> >> > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:04:53 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> > In article <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>> >> >> > pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> > <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid
>> >> >> >> > says...
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>> >> >> >> >> snowflakes,
>> >> >> >> >> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> > In article <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
>> >> >> >> >> > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >> >> >> >> >> reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> >> >> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> hobnobbing with white supremacists, abysmal
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> conditions in the concentration camps in the
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> southwest, attacks on programs to combat climate
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> change, attacks on women and minorities, attacks on
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> the poor, attacks on the citizenship rights of
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> minorities, brain drains, adverse court rulings,
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> cooperating witnesses,
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> In other words, just another week in the Trump
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> regime:
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from Deutsche
>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Bank. Uh-oh!
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > > anyday now foil hat collector.
>> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Manafort's going to tell the truth and there won't be
>> >> >> >> >> >> > any collusion and even if there is, it's not illegal
>> >> >> >> >> >> > when The President does it, and if it is then
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Manafort's lying and 3,000 Puerto Ricans didn't die so
>> >> >> >> >> >> > The President gets A+ for his amazing management
>> >> >> >> >> >> > skills!
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then date
>> >> >> >> >> >> graped him!!!!2!
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> > It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret" letter
>> >> >> >> >> > from a "sekret"
>> >> >> >> >> > so<SPANK>
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/kavanaugh-
>> >> >> allegations-
>> >> >> >> ford-
>> >> >> >> >> palo-alto.html
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor.  Most
>> >> >> >> > people get attracted to that field because of their own
>> >> >> >> > issues.
>> >> >> >> >  Now she claims she never told anyone because she was afraid
>> >> >> >> > he'd "kill" her.
>> >> >> >> > Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high school
>> >> >> >> > ever touches other people's naughty parts, and if they do,
>> >> >> >> > they should never ever be employed by anyone.  Are you
>> >> >> >> > prepared to live in a world where you can lose your job
>> >> >> >> > anytime someone utters some accusation that you did
>> >> >> >> > something naughty 35 years ago in high school?  Did YOU ever
>> >> >> >> > do anything naughty in high school, Ko0k?
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than
>> >> >> >> other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > And I bet if the other judges were vetted this hard there would
>> >> >> > be some crap. But its only about the left stomping their feet.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> You believe that if you want.  Your *spin* on things shows your
>> >> >> personal bias.
>> >> > 
>> >> > Everybody has dirty laundry, if you look close enough.  Using this
>> >> > vague accusation as a valid reason to deny someone a job, suggests
>> >> > that no one could ever get a job if someone else wanted to derail
>> >> > it.
>> >> 
>> >> The JOB is as a Supreme Court Judge!  What if the accusation is
>> >> true? Would YOU support someone as a Supreme Court Justice who had
>> >> committed such a crime?
>> > 
>> > Beats the hell out of blow jobs in the Whitehouse.
>> 
>> If that's what you want to believe.  Personally, I consider attempted
>> rape and consensual sex to be two different things.  YMMV.
> 
> She just trashed the man's reputation,

He did that himself, when he committed the crime.

Besides, *what* reputation? He's a Republican. It already doesn't get any 
worse than that.

> She  promised to testify,  but when they went out of their way to help
> her testify by whatever manner she was comfortable with,  she started
> stalling.  Now it appears that she doesn't intend to testify or provide
> ANY details of this alleged incident at all.  There is absolutely
> nothing to give credence to her claim, if she can't or won't provide
> ANYTHING that might make her story believable.
> I think she simply has mental problems and the Democrats are trying to
> use her for their own political purposes.  It's disappointing that you
> apparently lack any sense of fairness or objectivity whatsoever on this
> matter.

Jeez, does she need to have a giant neon sign over her head with the words 
"HELP, I'M BEING BLACKMAILED! WITNESS TAMPERING!" and an arrow pointing 
down? She's threatening to derail a process being pushed by a large number 
of very powerful, very wealthy men. It'd be shocking if she *wasn't* 
subjected to serious attempts at witness intimidation, blackmail, or 
bribery.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206435

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-20 15:32 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.360dbfce6b68ba0f9899ad@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#206399
In article <po0rji$e0i$12@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
says...
> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 01:31:31 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> 
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate!  In article <vbednTjb2NU6ZT_GnZ2dnUU7-
> > SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:17:09 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> >> 
> >> > In article <CsWdnb5pWpGB3zzGnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
> >> > pandora@peak.org says...
> >> >> 
> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:16:43 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> >> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnYppWpFNoTzGnZ2dnUU7-
> >> >> > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:04:53 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> > In article <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
> >> >> >> > pandora@peak.org says...
> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
> >> >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
> >> >> >> >> > <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid
> >> >> >> >> > says...
> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> >> >> >> >> >> snowflakes,
> >> >> >> >> >> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> > In article <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
> >> >> >> >> >> > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
> >> >> >> >> >> >> reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
> >> >> >> >> >> >> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
> >> >> >> >> >> >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> hobnobbing with white supremacists, abysmal
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> conditions in the concentration camps in the
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> southwest, attacks on programs to combat climate
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> change, attacks on women and minorities, attacks on
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> the poor, attacks on the citizenship rights of
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> minorities, brain drains, adverse court rulings,
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> cooperating witnesses,
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> In other words, just another week in the Trump
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> regime:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from Deutsche
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Bank. Uh-oh!
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > anyday now foil hat collector.
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Manafort's going to tell the truth and there won't be
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > any collusion and even if there is, it's not illegal
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > when The President does it, and if it is then
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Manafort's lying and 3,000 Puerto Ricans didn't die so
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > The President gets A+ for his amazing management
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > skills!
> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then date
> >> >> >> >> >> >> graped him!!!!2!
> >> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> >> > It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret" letter
> >> >> >> >> >> > from a "sekret"
> >> >> >> >> >> > so<SPANK>
> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/kavanaugh-
> >> >> >> allegations-
> >> >> >> >> ford-
> >> >> >> >> >> palo-alto.html
> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> > Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor.  Most
> >> >> >> >> > people get attracted to that field because of their own
> >> >> >> >> > issues.
> >> >> >> >> >  Now she claims she never told anyone because she was afraid
> >> >> >> >> > he'd "kill" her.
> >> >> >> >> > Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high school
> >> >> >> >> > ever touches other people's naughty parts, and if they do,
> >> >> >> >> > they should never ever be employed by anyone.  Are you
> >> >> >> >> > prepared to live in a world where you can lose your job
> >> >> >> >> > anytime someone utters some accusation that you did
> >> >> >> >> > something naughty 35 years ago in high school?  Did YOU ever
> >> >> >> >> > do anything naughty in high school, Ko0k?
> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different than
> >> >> >> >> other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> > And I bet if the other judges were vetted this hard there would
> >> >> >> > be some crap. But its only about the left stomping their feet.
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> You believe that if you want.  Your *spin* on things shows your
> >> >> >> personal bias.
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Everybody has dirty laundry, if you look close enough.  Using this
> >> >> > vague accusation as a valid reason to deny someone a job, suggests
> >> >> > that no one could ever get a job if someone else wanted to derail
> >> >> > it.
> >> >> 
> >> >> The JOB is as a Supreme Court Judge!  What if the accusation is
> >> >> true? Would YOU support someone as a Supreme Court Justice who had
> >> >> committed such a crime?
> >> > 
> >> > Beats the hell out of blow jobs in the Whitehouse.
> >> 
> >> If that's what you want to believe.  Personally, I consider attempted
> >> rape and consensual sex to be two different things.  YMMV.
> > 
> > She just trashed the man's reputation,
> 
> He did that himself, when he committed the crime.

What crime has he committed? Where is the proof?
Anyday now?  <snickers>
> 
> Besides, *what* reputation? He's a Republican. It already doesn't get any 
> worse than that.

No bias on your part...oh no.
> 
> > She  promised to testify,  but when they went out of their way to help
> > her testify by whatever manner she was comfortable with,  she started
> > stalling.  Now it appears that she doesn't intend to testify or provide
> > ANY details of this alleged incident at all.  There is absolutely
> > nothing to give credence to her claim, if she can't or won't provide
> > ANYTHING that might make her story believable.
> > I think she simply has mental problems and the Democrats are trying to
> > use her for their own political purposes.  It's disappointing that you
> > apparently lack any sense of fairness or objectivity whatsoever on this
> > matter.
> 
> Jeez, does she need to have a giant neon sign over her head with the words 
> "HELP, I'M BEING BLACKMAILED! WITNESS TAMPERING!" and an arrow pointing 
> down? She's threatening to derail a process being pushed by a large number 
> of very powerful, very wealthy men. It'd be shocking if she *wasn't* 
> subjected to serious attempts at witness intimidation, blackmail, or 
> bribery.

Or a large payment to say what she is saying.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206469

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-09-20 22:03 +0000
Message-ID<po15ej$e0i$18@dont-email.me>
In reply to#206435
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:32:15 -0600, Skeeter wrote:

> In article <po0rji$e0i$12@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> says...
>> Besides, *what* reputation? He's a Republican. It already doesn't get
>> any worse than that.
> 
> No bias on your part...oh no.

Republicans are against women's rights, against minorities being treated 
as equals, in favor of genocidal policies like forced family separations, 
and hostile to the working poor.

Being a Republican is objectively bad.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206477

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-20 16:08 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.360dc8479b8b317d9899be@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#206469
In article <po15ej$e0i$18@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
says...
> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:32:15 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> 
> > In article <po0rji$e0i$12@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> > says...
> >> Besides, *what* reputation? He's a Republican. It already doesn't get
> >> any worse than that.
> > 
> > No bias on your part...oh no.
> 
> Republicans are against women's rights, against minorities being treated 
> as equals, in favor of genocidal policies like forced family separations, 
> and hostile to the working poor.

Proof? I am not against womens rights, my best friend is a minority.

No family seperations except when said family breaks the law.
> 
> Being a Republican is objectively bad.


You and Maxine Waters ought to get a room.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206456

FromJanithor <Janithor@comcast.net>
Date2018-09-20 14:53 -0700
Message-ID<po14t6$m6r$4@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#206399
x-no-archive: yes

On 9/20/2018 2:28 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 13:29:20 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> <...>
> 
>> You don't malign a good man's character, then admit you don't know when
>> it happened, where it happened, who else was there, how she got there,
>> how she got home, and then just leave it at that.  If we tolerate this,
>> no man is ever going to be safe from the rantings of some mentally ill
>> lunatic.  She chose to make this accusation, she promised to submit to
>> questioning, given the fact that she's provided NO details at all, and
>> claims she doesn't remember anything at all, and now she thinks she can
>> just crawl back into the woodwork and leave a serious and totally
>> unsubstantiated allegation floating over this guy's head for the rest of
>> his life.  She OWES him... and all of America, SOME sort of explanation.
> 
> You display remarkable common sense and clarity on this issue.
> 
> Keep up the good work.

Wood you even say he's erudite?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206490

FromJanithor <Janithor@comcast.net>
Date2018-09-20 15:17 -0700
Message-ID<po168s$nf5$1@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#206456
x-no-archive: yes

On 9/20/2018 3:14 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:53:42 -0700, Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote:
>> On 9/20/2018 2:28 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>> On Thu, 20 Sep 2018, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> <...>
>>>
>>>> You don't malign a good man's character, then admit you don't know when
>>>> it happened, where it happened, who else was there, how she got there,
>>>> how she got home, and then just leave it at that.  If we tolerate this,
>>>> no man is ever going to be safe from the rantings of some mentally ill
>>>> lunatic.  She chose to make this accusation, she promised to submit to
>>>> questioning, given the fact that she's provided NO details at all, and
>>>> claims she doesn't remember anything at all, and now she thinks she can
>>>> just crawl back into the woodwork and leave a serious and totally
>>>> unsubstantiated allegation floating over this guy's head for the rest of
>>>> his life.  She OWES him... and all of America, SOME sort of explanation.
>>>
>>> You display remarkable common sense and clarity on this issue.
>>>
>>> Keep up the good work.
>>
>> Wood you even say he's erudite?
> 
> Sorry, but myself and Sn!pe have a lock on erudition
> in these groups. There just isn't a whole lot left for
> the Checkmate but he does well with the dregs that
> we have left him.

What about our dear Colonel?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206471

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-09-20 22:05 +0000
Message-ID<po15ih$e0i$19@dont-email.me>
In reply to#206399
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 13:29:20 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <po0rji$e0i$12@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> @gmail.invalid says...
> 
> 
> 
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt! On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 01:31:31 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> 
>> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>> > by Checkmate!  In article <vbednTjb2NU6ZT_GnZ2dnUU7-
>> > SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:17:09 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> > In article <CsWdnb5pWpGB3zzGnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>> >> > pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:16:43 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> >> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnYppWpFNoTzGnZ2dnUU7-
>> >> >> > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:04:53 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> > In article
>> >> >> >> > <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
>> >> >> >> > pandora@peak.org says...
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> >> >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> >> > <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid
>> >> >> >> >> > says...
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>> >> >> >> >> >> snowflakes,
>> >> >> >> >> >> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > In article
>> >> >> >> >> >> > <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> when reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> hobnobbing with white supremacists, abysmal
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> conditions in the concentration camps in the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> southwest, attacks on programs to combat climate
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> change, attacks on women and minorities, attacks
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> on the poor, attacks on the citizenship rights
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> of minorities, brain drains, adverse court
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> rulings, cooperating witnesses,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> In other words, just another week in the Trump
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> regime:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Deutsche Bank. Uh-oh!
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > anyday now foil hat collector.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Manafort's going to tell the truth and there won't
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > be any collusion and even if there is, it's not
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > illegal when The President does it, and if it is
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > then Manafort's lying and 3,000 Puerto Ricans
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > didn't die so The President gets A+ for his amazing
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > management skills!
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> date graped him!!!!2!
>> >> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> >> > It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret" letter
>> >> >> >> >> >> > from a "sekret"
>> >> >> >> >> >> > so<SPANK>
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
>> >> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/kavanaugh-
>> >> >> >> allegations-
>> >> >> >> >> ford-
>> >> >> >> >> >> palo-alto.html
>> >> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> >> > Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor. 
>> >> >> >> >> > Most people get attracted to that field because of their
>> >> >> >> >> > own issues.
>> >> >> >> >> >  Now she claims she never told anyone because she was
>> >> >> >> >> >  afraid
>> >> >> >> >> > he'd "kill" her.
>> >> >> >> >> > Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high
>> >> >> >> >> > school ever touches other people's naughty parts, and if
>> >> >> >> >> > they do, they should never ever be employed by anyone. 
>> >> >> >> >> > Are you prepared to live in a world where you can lose
>> >> >> >> >> > your job anytime someone utters some accusation that you
>> >> >> >> >> > did something naughty 35 years ago in high school?  Did
>> >> >> >> >> > YOU ever do anything naughty in high school, Ko0k?
>> >> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> >> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different
>> >> >> >> >> than other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
>> >> >> >> > 
>> >> >> >> > And I bet if the other judges were vetted this hard there
>> >> >> >> > would be some crap. But its only about the left stomping
>> >> >> >> > their feet.
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> >> >> You believe that if you want.  Your *spin* on things shows
>> >> >> >> your personal bias.
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > Everybody has dirty laundry, if you look close enough.  Using
>> >> >> > this vague accusation as a valid reason to deny someone a job,
>> >> >> > suggests that no one could ever get a job if someone else
>> >> >> > wanted to derail it.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> The JOB is as a Supreme Court Judge!  What if the accusation is
>> >> >> true? Would YOU support someone as a Supreme Court Justice who
>> >> >> had committed such a crime?
>> >> > 
>> >> > Beats the hell out of blow jobs in the Whitehouse.
>> >> 
>> >> If that's what you want to believe.  Personally, I consider
>> >> attempted rape and consensual sex to be two different things.  YMMV.
>> > 
>> > She just trashed the man's reputation,
>> 
>> He did that himself, when he committed the crime.
>> 
>> Besides, *what* reputation? He's a Republican. It already doesn't get
>> any worse than that.
>> 
>> > She  promised to testify,  but when they went out of their way to
>> > help her testify by whatever manner she was comfortable with,  she
>> > started stalling.  Now it appears that she doesn't intend to testify
>> > or provide ANY details of this alleged incident at all.  There is
>> > absolutely nothing to give credence to her claim, if she can't or
>> > won't provide ANYTHING that might make her story believable.
>> > I think she simply has mental problems and the Democrats are trying
>> > to use her for their own political purposes.  It's disappointing that
>> > you apparently lack any sense of fairness or objectivity whatsoever
>> > on this matter.
>> 
>> Jeez, does she need to have a giant neon sign over her head with the
>> words "HELP, I'M BEING BLACKMAILED! WITNESS TAMPERING!" and an arrow
>> pointing down? She's threatening to derail a process being pushed by a
>> large number of very powerful, very wealthy men. It'd be shocking if
>> she *wasn't* subjected to serious attempts at witness intimidation,
>> blackmail, or bribery.
> 
> You don't malign a good man's character, then admit you don't know when
> it happened, where it happened, who else was there, how she got there,
> how she got home, and then just leave it at that.  If we tolerate this,
> no man is ever going to be safe from the rantings of some mentally ill
> lunatic.

So *any* woman who makes a rape allegation is to be dismissed as a 
"mentally ill lunatic", you misogynistic cockwomble? Or only if the 
accused is a prominent white Anglo-Saxon protestant heterosexual male 
Republican?

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206480

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-20 16:10 -0600
Message-ID<MPG.360dc8dbe41d418e9899c1@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#206471
In article <po15ih$e0i$19@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
says...
> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 13:29:20 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> 
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate!  In article <po0rji$e0i$12@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> > @gmail.invalid says...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >> melt! On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 01:31:31 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> >> 
> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
> >> > by Checkmate!  In article <vbednTjb2NU6ZT_GnZ2dnUU7-
> >> > SudnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:17:09 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> > In article <CsWdnb5pWpGB3zzGnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
> >> >> > pandora@peak.org says...
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:16:43 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> >> >> >> > posts by Checkmate!  In article <CsWdnYppWpFNoTzGnZ2dnUU7-
> >> >> >> > audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>, pandora@peak.org says...
> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:04:53 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> > In article
> >> >> >> >> > <CsWdnY1pWpE4sTzGnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@scnresearch.com>,
> >> >> >> >> > pandora@peak.org says...
> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:41:10 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
> >> >> >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
> >> >> >> >> >> > <pnousc$eon$32@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid
> >> >> >> >> >> > says...
> >> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> >> >> >> >> >> >> snowflakes,
> >> >> >> >> >> >> melt! On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:16:27 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > In article
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <MPG.36099cf398caef199949e0@news.altopia.com>,
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > ricksabian1 @gmail.com says...
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> when reading posts by Checkmate!  In article
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <pnogff$inp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 9/17/2018 10:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > In article <pnnbso$eon$15@dont-email.me>,
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Trillion dollar deficits, Trump appointess
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> hobnobbing with white supremacists, abysmal
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> conditions in the concentration camps in the
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> southwest, attacks on programs to combat climate
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> change, attacks on women and minorities, attacks
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> on the poor, attacks on the citizenship rights
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> of minorities, brain drains, adverse court
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> rulings, cooperating witnesses,
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> and oh yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> In other words, just another week in the Trump
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> regime:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> https://theweeklylist.org/weekly-list/week-96/
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> P.S. Mueller has subpoenaed records from
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> Deutsche Bank. Uh-oh!
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > anyday now foil hat collector.
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Manafort's going to tell the truth and there won't
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > be any collusion and even if there is, it's not
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > illegal when The President does it, and if it is
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > then Manafort's lying and 3,000 Puerto Ricans
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > didn't die so The President gets A+ for his amazing
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > management skills!
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Diane Feinstein slipped Kavanaugh a mickey and then
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> date graped him!!!!2!
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > It is to laugh watching Diane with her "sekret" letter
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > from a "sekret"
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > so<SPANK>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> She's gone public now. Kavanaugh is, hopefully, toast:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/us/politics/kavanaugh-
> >> >> >> >> allegations-
> >> >> >> >> >> ford-
> >> >> >> >> >> >> palo-alto.html
> >> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> >> > Not surprising the accuser is a psychology professor. 
> >> >> >> >> >> > Most people get attracted to that field because of their
> >> >> >> >> >> > own issues.
> >> >> >> >> >> >  Now she claims she never told anyone because she was
> >> >> >> >> >> >  afraid
> >> >> >> >> >> > he'd "kill" her.
> >> >> >> >> >> > Yeah, right. I'm going to believe that no one in high
> >> >> >> >> >> > school ever touches other people's naughty parts, and if
> >> >> >> >> >> > they do, they should never ever be employed by anyone. 
> >> >> >> >> >> > Are you prepared to live in a world where you can lose
> >> >> >> >> >> > your job anytime someone utters some accusation that you
> >> >> >> >> >> > did something naughty 35 years ago in high school?  Did
> >> >> >> >> >> > YOU ever do anything naughty in high school, Ko0k?
> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> The requirements for a Supreme Court Judge are different
> >> >> >> >> >> than other jobs.  His reputation has to be spotless.
> >> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> >> > And I bet if the other judges were vetted this hard there
> >> >> >> >> > would be some crap. But its only about the left stomping
> >> >> >> >> > their feet.
> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> You believe that if you want.  Your *spin* on things shows
> >> >> >> >> your personal bias.
> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> > Everybody has dirty laundry, if you look close enough.  Using
> >> >> >> > this vague accusation as a valid reason to deny someone a job,
> >> >> >> > suggests that no one could ever get a job if someone else
> >> >> >> > wanted to derail it.
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> The JOB is as a Supreme Court Judge!  What if the accusation is
> >> >> >> true? Would YOU support someone as a Supreme Court Justice who
> >> >> >> had committed such a crime?
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Beats the hell out of blow jobs in the Whitehouse.
> >> >> 
> >> >> If that's what you want to believe.  Personally, I consider
> >> >> attempted rape and consensual sex to be two different things.  YMMV.
> >> > 
> >> > She just trashed the man's reputation,
> >> 
> >> He did that himself, when he committed the crime.
> >> 
> >> Besides, *what* reputation? He's a Republican. It already doesn't get
> >> any worse than that.
> >> 
> >> > She  promised to testify,  but when they went out of their way to
> >> > help her testify by whatever manner she was comfortable with,  she
> >> > started stalling.  Now it appears that she doesn't intend to testify
> >> > or provide ANY details of this alleged incident at all.  There is
> >> > absolutely nothing to give credence to her claim, if she can't or
> >> > won't provide ANYTHING that might make her story believable.
> >> > I think she simply has mental problems and the Democrats are trying
> >> > to use her for their own political purposes.  It's disappointing that
> >> > you apparently lack any sense of fairness or objectivity whatsoever
> >> > on this matter.
> >> 
> >> Jeez, does she need to have a giant neon sign over her head with the
> >> words "HELP, I'M BEING BLACKMAILED! WITNESS TAMPERING!" and an arrow
> >> pointing down? She's threatening to derail a process being pushed by a
> >> large number of very powerful, very wealthy men. It'd be shocking if
> >> she *wasn't* subjected to serious attempts at witness intimidation,
> >> blackmail, or bribery.
> > 
> > You don't malign a good man's character, then admit you don't know when
> > it happened, where it happened, who else was there, how she got there,
> > how she got home, and then just leave it at that.  If we tolerate this,
> > no man is ever going to be safe from the rantings of some mentally ill
> > lunatic.
> 
> So *any* woman who makes a rape allegation is to be dismissed as a 
> "mentally ill lunatic", you misogynistic cockwomble? Or only if the 
> accused is a prominent white Anglo-Saxon protestant heterosexual male 
> Republican?

He never said that, but since as usual you have no refute you spin and 
make accusations.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#206503

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2018-09-20 23:35 +0100
Message-ID<1nvg9eo.1ft2kfvh6lmtsN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#206471
Paul "Mr Abnormal" Derbyshire in his Nazedga costume 
pompously pontificated:

[...]

> misogynistic cockwomble

[...]

Yay!  8/10 for style.

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWQMMPFtoG4>

-- 
^ร^     My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 17  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate

csiph-web