Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #200476 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-03 12:19 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-09-09 13:35 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 205 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-03 12:19 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 09:22 -0700
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 09:28 -0700
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-03 17:56 -0500
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 15:58 -0700
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 10:07 -0700
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 10:17 -0700
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 13:16 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-03 23:15 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-04 15:28 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-04 19:13 -0500
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-05 12:22 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <teandson@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 09:30 -0700
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 09:51 -0700
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 11:16 -0700
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-05 21:36 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-05 22:47 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-09-05 16:19 -0700
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-05 23:20 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-05 23:36 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-06 03:13 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-06 04:42 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 23:33 -0700
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-06 12:10 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 09:52 -0700
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-06 18:12 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-06 21:42 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-06 23:17 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-07 00:11 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-06 19:38 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-07 05:09 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-07 06:18 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-07 04:36 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-07 16:59 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-07 12:20 -0500
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-08 03:52 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-08 04:06 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-08 04:38 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-08 05:18 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-08 06:02 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-08 08:28 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 12:19 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-08 11:44 -0500
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-08 12:52 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-08 12:27 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-08 20:09 +0100
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 15:10 -0700
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-08 23:31 +0100
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-08 21:30 -0500
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-09 08:56 +0100
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-09 01:13 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-09 08:50 +0100
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 11:16 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-09 19:03 +0100
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 10:56 -0700
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-09 19:26 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-09 13:56 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 11:12 -0700
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-10 10:37 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-08 17:51 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 11:03 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-08 20:15 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-09 01:14 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-09 14:54 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-09 10:30 -0500
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-09 13:06 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-09 12:05 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-09 19:28 +0000
When you show only one side, you're biased. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-09 19:51 -0700
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-08 08:25 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-06 02:13 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-06 12:12 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-06 16:37 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 23:30 -0700
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-07 06:39 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-07 04:47 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-07 06:53 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-07 05:08 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-07 07:23 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-07 07:27 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-08 03:53 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-07 22:31 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 21:45 -0700
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-08 08:27 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 21:44 -0700
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-08 04:49 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-08 08:26 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 12:16 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-09 14:49 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-09 13:08 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-09 12:07 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-09 19:30 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-09 16:36 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-10 00:24 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-10 05:26 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 13:51 -0700
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-09 17:07 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 15:10 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-07 08:12 -0500
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-09 14:50 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-09 13:09 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-09 12:09 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 13:20 -0700
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-10 09:45 -0500
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 01:39 -0700
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-06 08:14 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-06 12:13 -0400
Vasectomies are taboo, even in the porn industry. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-06 09:49 -0700
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 10:45 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-06 09:47 -0500
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-06 09:59 -0500
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-06 12:15 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-06 12:09 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-06 17:33 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-06 12:42 -0500
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-06 16:35 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-07 00:15 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-06 19:39 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-07 06:41 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-05 20:05 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 19:39 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 16:41 -0700
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-06 12:08 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-06 21:43 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-06 16:34 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-08 15:22 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-06 21:44 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-05 20:04 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-05 21:48 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-05 22:24 -0500
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-08 12:49 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-09 14:52 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-09 13:11 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-09 12:11 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-09 19:31 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-09 16:37 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-10 00:07 +0100
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 17:49 -0700
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-10 08:28 +0100
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 00:44 -0700
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Scatboi g8dgc <g8dgc@noneya.none> - 2018-09-10 08:48 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-10 13:49 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-10 19:38 +0100
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-10 21:12 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-10 22:43 +0100
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-10 21:55 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-10 23:11 +0100
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-11 00:21 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-10 19:43 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-11 08:44 +0100
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-11 04:29 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-11 09:55 +0100
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-11 05:22 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-10 16:22 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-10 15:07 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-10 21:29 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-10 15:36 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-10 22:51 +0100
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-10 22:03 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-10 23:17 +0100
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-11 00:22 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-10 19:44 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-10 16:21 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-11 00:23 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-10 19:46 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-11 03:02 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-11 03:33 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-11 09:00 +0100
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-11 04:31 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-11 05:20 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-11 20:14 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-11 14:52 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-12 07:15 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-12 08:47 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-12 21:16 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-12 15:24 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-12 15:35 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-12 21:49 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-12 17:04 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-13 00:32 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-12 20:53 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-13 05:43 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-12 21:19 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-12 15:26 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-12 21:50 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-12 17:05 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-13 11:34 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-14 00:13 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-14 08:44 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-14 12:03 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-14 19:49 +0100
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-14 21:38 +0100
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-09-16 12:17 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with Esqueer Neal Warren's cock sucking? turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-09-16 12:52 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with Esqueer Neal Warren's cock sucking? g8dgc <g8dgc@noneya.none> - 2018-09-16 13:26 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with Esqueer Neal Warren's cock sucking? turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-09-16 14:35 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-15 04:37 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-11 05:18 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-11 01:25 +0000
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-10 19:47 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds turkey <turkey@invallid.none> - 2018-09-11 16:26 -0400
Re: Esqueer frogging was Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-09-12 05:12 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-13 15:28 -0400
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-10 15:33 -0600
Re: Climate change is interfering with internal clocks of birds Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 13:35 -0700
Page 9 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 Next page →
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-11 00:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pn71ri$8fe$71@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #203391 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 23:17:40 +0100, Sn!pe wrote: > [foam] > >> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 22:51:42 +0100, Sn!pe wrote: >> > >> > [...] >> > >> >> More feminine In between More >> >> masculine >> >> 1. Genetic sex XX XO XY, XXY, >> >> XYY 2. Anatomic sex Female parts Intersex >> >> Male parts 3. Gender identity Feminine >> >> Nonbinary/genderfluid Masculine 4. Gender expression Dresses >> >> etc. Unisex clothes etc. Beard etc. 5. Sexual orientation >> >> Androphilic Bisexual Gynephilic >> >> >> >> Maybe even six: >> >> >> >> 6. Sexual style Prefers receptive Either way Prefers >> >> active >> >> >> >> And maybe more. >> > >> > [...] >> > >> > What a load of [ahem] bollocks; >> >> Proof, bigoted kook? >> >> (And there is the third own-goal in Cr!pes's hat-trick. SPNAK! >> <snicker>) >> >> (Kensi's link reposted for the edification of ignoramuses.) >> >><http://itspronouncedabnormal.com/2015/03/the-genderbread-person-v3/> > > You shoul<MUSHROOM CLOUD!> That's not proof, bigoted kook. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-10 19:44 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3600cbfcccc74a3e9897ad@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #203443 |
In article <pn71ri$8fe$71@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 23:17:40 +0100, Sn!pe wrote: > > > [foam] > > > >> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 22:51:42 +0100, Sn!pe wrote: > >> > > >> > [...] > >> > > >> >> More feminine In between More > >> >> masculine > >> >> 1. Genetic sex XX XO XY, XXY, > >> >> XYY 2. Anatomic sex Female parts Intersex > >> >> Male parts 3. Gender identity Feminine > >> >> Nonbinary/genderfluid Masculine 4. Gender expression Dresses > >> >> etc. Unisex clothes etc. Beard etc. 5. Sexual orientation > >> >> Androphilic Bisexual Gynephilic > >> >> > >> >> Maybe even six: > >> >> > >> >> 6. Sexual style Prefers receptive Either way Prefers > >> >> active > >> >> > >> >> And maybe more. > >> > > >> > [...] > >> > > >> > What a load of [ahem] bollocks; > >> > >> Proof, bigoted kook? > >> > >> (And there is the third own-goal in Cr!pes's hat-trick. SPNAK! > >> <snicker>) > >> > >> (Kensi's link reposted for the edification of ignoramuses.) > >> > >><http://itspronouncedabnormal.com/2015/03/the-genderbread-person-v3/> > > > > You shoul<MUSHROOM CLOUD!> > > That's not proof, bigoted kook. More snipping, or "redacting" as the cheating left would call it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-10 16:21 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36009c5893658a5698979b@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #203388 |
In article <pn6pod$8fe$64@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 22:51:42 +0100, Sn!pe wrote: > > >> More feminine In between More > >> masculine > >> 1. Genetic sex XX XO XY, XXY, XYY > >> 2. Anatomic sex Female parts Intersex Male parts > >> 3. Gender identity Feminine Nonbinary/genderfluid Masculine > >> 4. Gender expression Dresses etc. Unisex clothes etc. Beard etc. > >> 5. Sexual orientation Androphilic Bisexual Gynephilic > >> > >> Maybe even six: > >> > >> 6. Sexual style Prefers receptive Either way Prefers active > >> > >> And maybe more. > > > > [...] > > > > What a load of [ahem] bollocks; > > Proof, bigoted kook? > > (And there is the third own-goal in Cr!pes's hat-trick. SPNAK! <snicker>) > > (Kensi's link reposted for the edification of ignoramuses.) > > http://itspronouncedmetrosexual.com/2015/03/the-genderbread-person-v3/ The name of the site shows biased and retardation.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-11 00:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pn71tg$8fe$72@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #203393 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:21:30 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pn6pod$8fe$64@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > says... > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 22:51:42 +0100, Sn!pe wrote: >> >> >> More feminine In between More >> >> masculine >> >> 1. Genetic sex XX XO XY, XXY, >> >> XYY 2. Anatomic sex Female parts Intersex >> >> Male parts 3. Gender identity Feminine >> >> Nonbinary/genderfluid Masculine 4. Gender expression Dresses >> >> etc. Unisex clothes etc. Beard etc. 5. Sexual orientation >> >> Androphilic Bisexual Gynephilic >> >> >> >> Maybe even six: >> >> >> >> 6. Sexual style Prefers receptive Either way Prefers >> >> active >> >> >> >> And maybe more. >> > >> > [...] >> > >> > What a load of [ahem] bollocks; >> >> Proof, bigoted kook? >> >> (And there is the third own-goal in Cr!pes's hat-trick. SPNAK! >> <snicker>) >> >> (Kensi's link reposted for the edification of ignoramuses.) >> >> http://itspronouncedmetrosexual.com/2015/03/the-genderbread-person-v3/ > > The name of the site shows biased and retardation. That isn't proof, bigoted kook. It's just more bigoted opinionation from you. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-10 19:46 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3600cc4b7f7b619b9897ae@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #203444 |
In article <pn71tg$8fe$72@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:21:30 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > > > In article <pn6pod$8fe$64@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > > says... > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> melt! On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 22:51:42 +0100, Sn!pe wrote: > >> > >> >> More feminine In between More > >> >> masculine > >> >> 1. Genetic sex XX XO XY, XXY, > >> >> XYY 2. Anatomic sex Female parts Intersex > >> >> Male parts 3. Gender identity Feminine > >> >> Nonbinary/genderfluid Masculine 4. Gender expression Dresses > >> >> etc. Unisex clothes etc. Beard etc. 5. Sexual orientation > >> >> Androphilic Bisexual Gynephilic > >> >> > >> >> Maybe even six: > >> >> > >> >> 6. Sexual style Prefers receptive Either way Prefers > >> >> active > >> >> > >> >> And maybe more. > >> > > >> > [...] > >> > > >> > What a load of [ahem] bollocks; > >> > >> Proof, bigoted kook? > >> > >> (And there is the third own-goal in Cr!pes's hat-trick. SPNAK! > >> <snicker>) > >> > >> (Kensi's link reposted for the edification of ignoramuses.) > >> > >> http://itspronouncedmetrosexual.com/2015/03/the-genderbread-person-v3/ > > > > The name of the site shows biased and retardation. > > That isn't proof, bigoted kook. It's just more bigoted opinionation from > you. Proof of what? You moron. You got a dick, you're a male, simple.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-11 03:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pn7b78$8fe$81@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #203480 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 19:46:07 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > Proof of what? You moron. You got a dick, you're a male, simple. But you might be a cishet man, a gay or bi man, a transwoman, or etc ... Here. I'll post the link again. The one that seems to be causing the right so much butthurt: http://itspronouncedmetrosexual.com/2015/03/the-genderbread-person-v3/ -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-11 03:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pn7d2v$8fe$84@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #203489 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 20:19:51 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <pn7b78$8fe$81@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > @gmail.invalid says... > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 19:46:07 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >> >> > Proof of what? You moron. You got a dick, you're a male, simple. >> >> But you might be a cishet man, a gay or bi man, a transwoman, or etc >> ... >> >> Here. I'll post the link again. The one that seems to be causing the >> right so much butthurt: >> >> http://itspronouncedmetrosexual.com/2015/03/the-genderbread-person-v3/ > > Are these situations covered in the DSM where they belong? Transphobia noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-11 09:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nuygqt.1tyma3s1det697N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #203492 |
Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > Paul "Mr Abnormal" Derbyshire in his Nazedga costume pompously postulated: > > On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 20:19:51 -0700, Checkmate wrote: [...] > > > Are these situations covered in the DSM where they belong? > > > > > > > Transphobia noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make. > > > > I have a real argument: Little boys who think they're really girls, and > little girls who think they're really boys, are really fucking abnormal > nutjobs. > Here's an example of what can happen when societal acceptance of a "lifestyle choice" goes wrong: <http://tinyurl.com/ya9dgxj8> <https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/09/06/transgender-person-accused-rape-remanded-female-prison-sexually/> -- ^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-11 04:31 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pn7ugt$1hk0$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #203492 |
On 9/11/2018 3:42 AM, Checkmate wrote: > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 20:19:51 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >>>> http://itspronouncedmetrosexual.com/2015/03/the-genderbread-person-v3/ >>> >>> Are these situations covered in the DSM where they belong? >> >> Transphobia noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make. > > I have a real argument: Little boys who think they're really girls, and > little girls who think they're really boys, are really fucking abnormal > nutjobs. That's not an argument, it's just a transphobic statement of opinion. An argument would attempt to establish the truth of a proposition by one or more steps of inference from some set of premises. I don't see anything resembling either premises or steps of inference in your bigoted missive. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-11 05:20 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.360152f37be5e2cd9897ba@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #203531 |
In article <pn7ugt$1hk0$4@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > > On 9/11/2018 3:42 AM, Checkmate wrote: > > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > >> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 20:19:51 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > >>>> http://itspronouncedmetrosexual.com/2015/03/the-genderbread-person-v3/ > >>> > >>> Are these situations covered in the DSM where they belong? > >> > >> Transphobia noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make. > > > > I have a real argument: Little boys who think they're really girls, and > > little girls who think they're really boys, are really fucking abnormal > > nutjobs. > > That's not an argument, it's just a transphobic statement of opinion. An > argument would attempt to establish the truth of a proposition by one or > more steps of inference from some set of premises. I don't see anything > resembling either premises or steps of inference in your bigoted missive. Now that you're done puking all over usenet, just remember, a dick..you are a male.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-11 20:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pn97md$1jj$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #203531 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 06:59:41 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <pn7ugt$1hk0$4@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 > @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > > > >> On 9/11/2018 3:42 AM, Checkmate wrote: >> > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >> >> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 20:19:51 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >> >>>> http://itspronouncedmetrosexual.com/2015/03/the-genderbread-person- v3/ >> >>> >> >>> Are these situations covered in the DSM where they belong? >> >> >> >> Transphobia noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to >> >> make. >> > >> > I have a real argument: Little boys who think they're really girls, >> > and little girls who think they're really boys, are really fucking >> > abnormal nutjobs. >> >> That's not an argument, it's just a transphobic statement of opinion. >> An argument would attempt to establish the truth of a proposition by >> one or more steps of inference from some set of premises. I don't see >> anything resembling either premises or steps of inference in your >> bigoted missive. > > "Normal" is what most of the population is and does. If you look at any > of these freaks, watch how they act, observe their appearance, or listen > to the things they say, they're anything BUT normal. They're a tiny > fraction, way less than 1% of the population, which makes them abnormal. > Jeffrey Dahmer was mentally ill, because most of us don't go around > drilling holes in people's heads and eating them. A key difference being, Dahmer was dangerous. > These people also have major psychiatric issues. People with major > physical birth defects like extra limbs or two heads aren't considered > normal. Why would someone who's convinced they are what they're not, Why do you say they are not what they say they are? > and acts flamboyantly bizarre So, an entire sex acts flamboyantly bizarre, in your view, but it's only a problem (somehow, even though no-one gets hurt) if someone of the other biological sex acts the same way? > be considered normal within the realm of what society generally > accepts as sane? These people are mentally defective, and I'll bet > they're listed in the DSM as such. Not anymore. Same with homosexuals and bisexuals. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-11 14:52 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3601d8face4a02cc9897dd@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #203659 |
In article <pn97md$1jj$6@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > be considered normal within the realm of what society generally > > accepts as sane? These people are mentally defective, and I'll bet > > they're listed in the DSM as such. > > Not anymore. Same with homosexuals and bisexuals. > You don't know that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-12 07:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pnaedk$1jj$29@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #203659 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 14:48:47 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <pn97md$1jj$6@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > @gmail.invalid says... > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 06:59:41 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >> > by Checkmate! In article <pn7ugt$1hk0$4@gioia.aioe.org>, >> > kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >> > >> >> On 9/11/2018 3:42 AM, Checkmate wrote: >> >> > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >> >> >> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 20:19:51 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >> >>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >> >> >>>> http://itspronouncedmetrosexual.com/2015/03/the-genderbread- person- >> v3/ >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Are these situations covered in the DSM where they belong? >> >> >> >> >> >> Transphobia noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument >> >> >> to make. >> >> > >> >> > I have a real argument: Little boys who think they're really >> >> > girls, >> >> > and little girls who think they're really boys, are really fucking >> >> > abnormal nutjobs. >> >> >> >> That's not an argument, it's just a transphobic statement of >> >> opinion. >> >> An argument would attempt to establish the truth of a proposition by >> >> one or more steps of inference from some set of premises. I don't >> >> see anything resembling either premises or steps of inference in >> >> your bigoted missive. >> > >> > "Normal" is what most of the population is and does. If you look at >> > any of these freaks, watch how they act, observe their appearance, or >> > listen to the things they say, they're anything BUT normal. They're >> > a tiny fraction, way less than 1% of the population, which makes them >> > abnormal. >> > Jeffrey Dahmer was mentally ill, because most of us don't go around >> > drilling holes in people's heads and eating them. >> >> A key difference being, Dahmer was dangerous. > > Did you read the article posted yesterday about the British he-she queer > who was thrown into a women's jail (although he was really a male) and > sexually assaulted some of the female inmates? Do you see the problem with your comparison? You're tarring an entire large and diverse group of human beings with the actions of one. >> > These people also have major psychiatric issues. People with major >> > physical birth defects like extra limbs or two heads aren't >> > considered normal. Why would someone who's convinced they are what >> > they're not, >> >> Why do you say they are not what they say they are? > > If I say I'm a giraffe, does that make it so? Is being a giraffe all in the head? >> > and acts flamboyantly bizarre >> >> So, an entire sex acts flamboyantly bizarre, in your view, but it's >> only a problem (somehow, even though no-one gets hurt) if someone of >> the other biological sex acts the same way? > > HUH? You heard me. >> > be considered normal within the realm of what society generally >> > accepts as sane? These people are mentally defective, and I'll bet >> > they're listed in the DSM as such. >> >> Not anymore. Same with homosexuals and bisexuals. > > There are plenty of homos in the world. Enough, I suppose, that you > could consider them within the realm of normalcy. Unless there's a > chromosome abnormality to provide a plausible scientific explanation for > the confusion, there doesn't appear to be any explanation for this > minute segment of the population to be gender queer unless there's some > underlying mental abnormality. Does it have to have a known cause before you will accept it and have tolerance for the people thus affected? Now, I'm all for scientific curiosity ... but I sense this is more, that you are demanding some sort of *justification* for people to not conform to some set of norms that *you* wish for some reason to impose on everyone. Why not just live and let live? > What pisses me off, is the ones who go around demanding that I refer to > them by a pronoun that doesn't match what they really are. Circular reasoning detected. You must first answer my earlier question, "Why do you say they are not what they say they are?", before you can proceed under the assumption that "what they really are" "doesn't match" anything. > I will never refer to Bruce Jenner as "Kaitlin," or refer to him as > "she" or "her". Why do you show such disrespect to someone who has done you no harm? -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-12 08:47 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3602d508d5fc29ac9897f2@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #203791 |
In article <pnaedk$1jj$29@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 14:48:47 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > Checkmate! In article <pn97md$1jj$6@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > > @gmail.invalid says... > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> melt! On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 06:59:41 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> > >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts > >> > by Checkmate! In article <pn7ugt$1hk0$4@gioia.aioe.org>, > >> > kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >> > > >> >> On 9/11/2018 3:42 AM, Checkmate wrote: > >> >> > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > >> >> >> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 20:19:51 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> >> >>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > >> >> >>>> http://itspronouncedmetrosexual.com/2015/03/the-genderbread- > person- > >> v3/ > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> Are these situations covered in the DSM where they belong? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Transphobia noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument > >> >> >> to make. > >> >> > > >> >> > I have a real argument: Little boys who think they're really > >> >> > girls, > >> >> > and little girls who think they're really boys, are really fucking > >> >> > abnormal nutjobs. > >> >> > >> >> That's not an argument, it's just a transphobic statement of > >> >> opinion. > >> >> An argument would attempt to establish the truth of a proposition by > >> >> one or more steps of inference from some set of premises. I don't > >> >> see anything resembling either premises or steps of inference in > >> >> your bigoted missive. > >> > > >> > "Normal" is what most of the population is and does. If you look at > >> > any of these freaks, watch how they act, observe their appearance, or > >> > listen to the things they say, they're anything BUT normal. They're > >> > a tiny fraction, way less than 1% of the population, which makes them > >> > abnormal. > >> > Jeffrey Dahmer was mentally ill, because most of us don't go around > >> > drilling holes in people's heads and eating them. > >> > >> A key difference being, Dahmer was dangerous. > > > > Did you read the article posted yesterday about the British he-she queer > > who was thrown into a women's jail (although he was really a male) and > > sexually assaulted some of the female inmates? > > Do you see the problem with your comparison? You're tarring an entire > large and diverse group of human beings with the actions of one. > > >> > These people also have major psychiatric issues. People with major > >> > physical birth defects like extra limbs or two heads aren't > >> > considered normal. Why would someone who's convinced they are what > >> > they're not, > >> > >> Why do you say they are not what they say they are? > > > > If I say I'm a giraffe, does that make it so? > > Is being a giraffe all in the head? > > >> > and acts flamboyantly bizarre > >> > >> So, an entire sex acts flamboyantly bizarre, in your view, but it's > >> only a problem (somehow, even though no-one gets hurt) if someone of > >> the other biological sex acts the same way? > > > > HUH? > > You heard me. > > >> > be considered normal within the realm of what society generally > >> > accepts as sane? These people are mentally defective, and I'll bet > >> > they're listed in the DSM as such. > >> > >> Not anymore. Same with homosexuals and bisexuals. > > > > There are plenty of homos in the world. Enough, I suppose, that you > > could consider them within the realm of normalcy. Unless there's a > > chromosome abnormality to provide a plausible scientific explanation for > > the confusion, there doesn't appear to be any explanation for this > > minute segment of the population to be gender queer unless there's some > > underlying mental abnormality. > > Does it have to have a known cause before you will accept it and have > tolerance for the people thus affected? > > Now, I'm all for scientific curiosity ... but I sense this is more, that > you are demanding some sort of *justification* for people to not conform > to some set of norms that *you* wish for some reason to impose on > everyone. Why not just live and let live? > > > What pisses me off, is the ones who go around demanding that I refer to > > them by a pronoun that doesn't match what they really are. > > Circular reasoning detected. You must first answer my earlier question, > "Why do you say they are not what they say they are?", before you can > proceed under the assumption that "what they really are" "doesn't match" > anything. > > > I will never refer to Bruce Jenner as "Kaitlin," or refer to him as > > "she" or "her". > > Why do you show such disrespect to someone who has done you no harm? If you got a dick, you're a male...simple huh?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-12 21:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pnbvmm$1jj$45@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #203820 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 08:47:58 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pnaedk$1jj$29@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > says... >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >> On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 14:48:47 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >> > by Checkmate! In article <pn97md$1jj$6@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >> > @gmail.invalid says... >> > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> >> melt! On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 06:59:41 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >> >> > posts by Checkmate! In article <pn7ugt$1hk0$4@gioia.aioe.org>, >> >> > kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >> >> > >> >> >> On 9/11/2018 3:42 AM, Checkmate wrote: >> >> >> > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >> >> >> >> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 20:19:51 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >> >> >>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >> >> >> >>>> http://itspronouncedmetrosexual.com/2015/03/the-genderbread- >> person- >> >> v3/ >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> Are these situations covered in the DSM where they belong? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Transphobia noted. Get back to us when you have a real >> >> >> >> argument to make. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I have a real argument: Little boys who think they're really >> >> >> > girls, >> >> >> > and little girls who think they're really boys, are really >> >> >> > fucking abnormal nutjobs. >> >> >> >> >> >> That's not an argument, it's just a transphobic statement of >> >> >> opinion. >> >> >> An argument would attempt to establish the truth of a proposition >> >> >> by one or more steps of inference from some set of premises. I >> >> >> don't see anything resembling either premises or steps of >> >> >> inference in your bigoted missive. >> >> > >> >> > "Normal" is what most of the population is and does. If you look >> >> > at any of these freaks, watch how they act, observe their >> >> > appearance, or listen to the things they say, they're anything BUT >> >> > normal. They're a tiny fraction, way less than 1% of the >> >> > population, which makes them abnormal. >> >> > Jeffrey Dahmer was mentally ill, because most of us don't go >> >> > around drilling holes in people's heads and eating them. >> >> >> >> A key difference being, Dahmer was dangerous. >> > >> > Did you read the article posted yesterday about the British he-she >> > queer who was thrown into a women's jail (although he was really a >> > male) and sexually assaulted some of the female inmates? >> >> Do you see the problem with your comparison? You're tarring an entire >> large and diverse group of human beings with the actions of one. >> >> >> > These people also have major psychiatric issues. People with >> >> > major physical birth defects like extra limbs or two heads aren't >> >> > considered normal. Why would someone who's convinced they are >> >> > what they're not, >> >> >> >> Why do you say they are not what they say they are? >> > >> > If I say I'm a giraffe, does that make it so? >> >> Is being a giraffe all in the head? >> >> >> > and acts flamboyantly bizarre >> >> >> >> So, an entire sex acts flamboyantly bizarre, in your view, but it's >> >> only a problem (somehow, even though no-one gets hurt) if someone of >> >> the other biological sex acts the same way? >> > >> > HUH? >> >> You heard me. >> >> >> > be considered normal within the realm of what society generally >> >> > accepts as sane? These people are mentally defective, and I'll >> >> > bet they're listed in the DSM as such. >> >> >> >> Not anymore. Same with homosexuals and bisexuals. >> > >> > There are plenty of homos in the world. Enough, I suppose, that you >> > could consider them within the realm of normalcy. Unless there's a >> > chromosome abnormality to provide a plausible scientific explanation >> > for the confusion, there doesn't appear to be any explanation for >> > this minute segment of the population to be gender queer unless >> > there's some underlying mental abnormality. >> >> Does it have to have a known cause before you will accept it and have >> tolerance for the people thus affected? >> >> Now, I'm all for scientific curiosity ... but I sense this is more, >> that you are demanding some sort of *justification* for people to not >> conform to some set of norms that *you* wish for some reason to impose >> on everyone. Why not just live and let live? >> >> > What pisses me off, is the ones who go around demanding that I refer >> > to them by a pronoun that doesn't match what they really are. >> >> Circular reasoning detected. You must first answer my earlier question, >> "Why do you say they are not what they say they are?", before you can >> proceed under the assumption that "what they really are" "doesn't >> match" >> anything. >> >> > I will never refer to Bruce Jenner as "Kaitlin," or refer to him as >> > "she" or "her". >> >> Why do you show such disrespect to someone who has done you no harm? > > If you got a dick, you're a male...simple huh? But you might still be either a man or a woman. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-12 15:24 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.360331f04113e3798980e@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #203938 |
In article <pnbvmm$1jj$45@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 08:47:58 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > > > In article <pnaedk$1jj$29@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > > says... > >> > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> melt! > >> On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 14:48:47 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> > >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts > >> > by Checkmate! In article <pn97md$1jj$6@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > >> > @gmail.invalid says... > >> > > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> >> melt! On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 06:59:41 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading > >> >> > posts by Checkmate! In article <pn7ugt$1hk0$4@gioia.aioe.org>, > >> >> > kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >> >> > > >> >> >> On 9/11/2018 3:42 AM, Checkmate wrote: > >> >> >> > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > >> >> >> >> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 20:19:51 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> >> >> >>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > >> >> >> >>>> http://itspronouncedmetrosexual.com/2015/03/the-genderbread- > >> person- > >> >> v3/ > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> Are these situations covered in the DSM where they belong? > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Transphobia noted. Get back to us when you have a real > >> >> >> >> argument to make. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > I have a real argument: Little boys who think they're really > >> >> >> > girls, > >> >> >> > and little girls who think they're really boys, are really > >> >> >> > fucking abnormal nutjobs. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> That's not an argument, it's just a transphobic statement of > >> >> >> opinion. > >> >> >> An argument would attempt to establish the truth of a proposition > >> >> >> by one or more steps of inference from some set of premises. I > >> >> >> don't see anything resembling either premises or steps of > >> >> >> inference in your bigoted missive. > >> >> > > >> >> > "Normal" is what most of the population is and does. If you look > >> >> > at any of these freaks, watch how they act, observe their > >> >> > appearance, or listen to the things they say, they're anything BUT > >> >> > normal. They're a tiny fraction, way less than 1% of the > >> >> > population, which makes them abnormal. > >> >> > Jeffrey Dahmer was mentally ill, because most of us don't go > >> >> > around drilling holes in people's heads and eating them. > >> >> > >> >> A key difference being, Dahmer was dangerous. > >> > > >> > Did you read the article posted yesterday about the British he-she > >> > queer who was thrown into a women's jail (although he was really a > >> > male) and sexually assaulted some of the female inmates? > >> > >> Do you see the problem with your comparison? You're tarring an entire > >> large and diverse group of human beings with the actions of one. > >> > >> >> > These people also have major psychiatric issues. People with > >> >> > major physical birth defects like extra limbs or two heads aren't > >> >> > considered normal. Why would someone who's convinced they are > >> >> > what they're not, > >> >> > >> >> Why do you say they are not what they say they are? > >> > > >> > If I say I'm a giraffe, does that make it so? > >> > >> Is being a giraffe all in the head? > >> > >> >> > and acts flamboyantly bizarre > >> >> > >> >> So, an entire sex acts flamboyantly bizarre, in your view, but it's > >> >> only a problem (somehow, even though no-one gets hurt) if someone of > >> >> the other biological sex acts the same way? > >> > > >> > HUH? > >> > >> You heard me. > >> > >> >> > be considered normal within the realm of what society generally > >> >> > accepts as sane? These people are mentally defective, and I'll > >> >> > bet they're listed in the DSM as such. > >> >> > >> >> Not anymore. Same with homosexuals and bisexuals. > >> > > >> > There are plenty of homos in the world. Enough, I suppose, that you > >> > could consider them within the realm of normalcy. Unless there's a > >> > chromosome abnormality to provide a plausible scientific explanation > >> > for the confusion, there doesn't appear to be any explanation for > >> > this minute segment of the population to be gender queer unless > >> > there's some underlying mental abnormality. > >> > >> Does it have to have a known cause before you will accept it and have > >> tolerance for the people thus affected? > >> > >> Now, I'm all for scientific curiosity ... but I sense this is more, > >> that you are demanding some sort of *justification* for people to not > >> conform to some set of norms that *you* wish for some reason to impose > >> on everyone. Why not just live and let live? > >> > >> > What pisses me off, is the ones who go around demanding that I refer > >> > to them by a pronoun that doesn't match what they really are. > >> > >> Circular reasoning detected. You must first answer my earlier question, > >> "Why do you say they are not what they say they are?", before you can > >> proceed under the assumption that "what they really are" "doesn't > >> match" > >> anything. > >> > >> > I will never refer to Bruce Jenner as "Kaitlin," or refer to him as > >> > "she" or "her". > >> > >> Why do you show such disrespect to someone who has done you no harm? > > > > If you got a dick, you're a male...simple huh? > > But you might still be either a man or a woman. Nope, if you got a dick you are a man.....no matter what your warpped mind might tell you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-12 15:35 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36033497846999b5989816@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #203948 |
In article <bj8ls3.jv3.17.10@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > On 2018-09-12 2:24 PM, Skeeter wrote: > > In article <pnbvmm$1jj$45@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > > says... > >> > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > >> On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 08:47:58 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > >> > >>> In article <pnaedk$1jj$29@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > >>> says... > >>>> > >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >>>> melt! > >>>> On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 14:48:47 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts > >>>>> by Checkmate! In article <pn97md$1jj$6@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > >>>>> @gmail.invalid says... > >>>>> > >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >>>>>> melt! On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 06:59:41 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading > >>>>>>> posts by Checkmate! In article <pn7ugt$1hk0$4@gioia.aioe.org>, > >>>>>>> kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 9/11/2018 3:42 AM, Checkmate wrote: > >>>>>>>>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 20:19:51 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://itspronouncedmetrosexual.com/2015/03/the-genderbread- > >>>> person- > >>>>>> v3/ > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Are these situations covered in the DSM where they belong? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Transphobia noted. Get back to us when you have a real > >>>>>>>>>> argument to make. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I have a real argument: Little boys who think they're really > >>>>>>>>> girls, > >>>>>>>>> and little girls who think they're really boys, are really > >>>>>>>>> fucking abnormal nutjobs. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> That's not an argument, it's just a transphobic statement of > >>>>>>>> opinion. > >>>>>>>> An argument would attempt to establish the truth of a proposition > >>>>>>>> by one or more steps of inference from some set of premises. I > >>>>>>>> don't see anything resembling either premises or steps of > >>>>>>>> inference in your bigoted missive. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> "Normal" is what most of the population is and does. If you look > >>>>>>> at any of these freaks, watch how they act, observe their > >>>>>>> appearance, or listen to the things they say, they're anything BUT > >>>>>>> normal. They're a tiny fraction, way less than 1% of the > >>>>>>> population, which makes them abnormal. > >>>>>>> Jeffrey Dahmer was mentally ill, because most of us don't go > >>>>>>> around drilling holes in people's heads and eating them. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> A key difference being, Dahmer was dangerous. > >>>>> > >>>>> Did you read the article posted yesterday about the British he-she > >>>>> queer who was thrown into a women's jail (although he was really a > >>>>> male) and sexually assaulted some of the female inmates? > >>>> > >>>> Do you see the problem with your comparison? You're tarring an entire > >>>> large and diverse group of human beings with the actions of one. > >>>> > >>>>>>> These people also have major psychiatric issues. People with > >>>>>>> major physical birth defects like extra limbs or two heads aren't > >>>>>>> considered normal. Why would someone who's convinced they are > >>>>>>> what they're not, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Why do you say they are not what they say they are? > >>>>> > >>>>> If I say I'm a giraffe, does that make it so? > >>>> > >>>> Is being a giraffe all in the head? > >>>> > >>>>>>> and acts flamboyantly bizarre > >>>>>> > >>>>>> So, an entire sex acts flamboyantly bizarre, in your view, but it's > >>>>>> only a problem (somehow, even though no-one gets hurt) if someone of > >>>>>> the other biological sex acts the same way? > >>>>> > >>>>> HUH? > >>>> > >>>> You heard me. > >>>> > >>>>>>> be considered normal within the realm of what society generally > >>>>>>> accepts as sane? These people are mentally defective, and I'll > >>>>>>> bet they're listed in the DSM as such. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Not anymore. Same with homosexuals and bisexuals. > >>>>> > >>>>> There are plenty of homos in the world. Enough, I suppose, that you > >>>>> could consider them within the realm of normalcy. Unless there's a > >>>>> chromosome abnormality to provide a plausible scientific explanation > >>>>> for the confusion, there doesn't appear to be any explanation for > >>>>> this minute segment of the population to be gender queer unless > >>>>> there's some underlying mental abnormality. > >>>> > >>>> Does it have to have a known cause before you will accept it and have > >>>> tolerance for the people thus affected? > >>>> > >>>> Now, I'm all for scientific curiosity ... but I sense this is more, > >>>> that you are demanding some sort of *justification* for people to not > >>>> conform to some set of norms that *you* wish for some reason to impose > >>>> on everyone. Why not just live and let live? > >>>> > >>>>> What pisses me off, is the ones who go around demanding that I refer > >>>>> to them by a pronoun that doesn't match what they really are. > >>>> > >>>> Circular reasoning detected. You must first answer my earlier question, > >>>> "Why do you say they are not what they say they are?", before you can > >>>> proceed under the assumption that "what they really are" "doesn't > >>>> match" > >>>> anything. > >>>> > >>>>> I will never refer to Bruce Jenner as "Kaitlin," or refer to him as > >>>>> "she" or "her". > >>>> > >>>> Why do you show such disrespect to someone who has done you no harm? > >>> > >>> If you got a dick, you're a male...simple huh? > >> > >> But you might still be either a man or a woman. > > > > Nope, if you got a dick you are a man.....no matter what your warpped > > mind might tell you. > > > does this mean i can go fk myself PLeze do
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-12 21:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pnc1kc$1jj$59@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #203948 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:24:26 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pnbvmm$1jj$45@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > says... >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >> On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 08:47:58 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >> >> > In article <pnaedk$1jj$29@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >> > says... >> >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> >> melt! >> >> On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 14:48:47 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >> >> > posts by Checkmate! In article <pn97md$1jj$6@dont-email.me>, >> >> > nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... >> >> > >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >> >> >> snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 06:59:41 -0700, Checkmate >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >> >> >> > posts by Checkmate! In article <pn7ugt$1hk0$4@gioia.aioe.org>, >> >> >> > kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> On 9/11/2018 3:42 AM, Checkmate wrote: >> >> >> >> > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 20:19:51 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >> >> >> >>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >> >> >> >> >>>> http://itspronouncedmetrosexual.com/2015/03/the- genderbread- >> >> person- >> >> >> v3/ >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> Are these situations covered in the DSM where they belong? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Transphobia noted. Get back to us when you have a real >> >> >> >> >> argument to make. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > I have a real argument: Little boys who think they're >> >> >> >> > really girls, >> >> >> >> > and little girls who think they're really boys, are really >> >> >> >> > fucking abnormal nutjobs. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> That's not an argument, it's just a transphobic statement of >> >> >> >> opinion. >> >> >> >> An argument would attempt to establish the truth of a >> >> >> >> proposition by one or more steps of inference from some set of >> >> >> >> premises. I don't see anything resembling either premises or >> >> >> >> steps of inference in your bigoted missive. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > "Normal" is what most of the population is and does. If you >> >> >> > look at any of these freaks, watch how they act, observe their >> >> >> > appearance, or listen to the things they say, they're anything >> >> >> > BUT normal. They're a tiny fraction, way less than 1% of the >> >> >> > population, which makes them abnormal. >> >> >> > Jeffrey Dahmer was mentally ill, because most of us don't go >> >> >> > around drilling holes in people's heads and eating them. >> >> >> >> >> >> A key difference being, Dahmer was dangerous. >> >> > >> >> > Did you read the article posted yesterday about the British he-she >> >> > queer who was thrown into a women's jail (although he was really a >> >> > male) and sexually assaulted some of the female inmates? >> >> >> >> Do you see the problem with your comparison? You're tarring an >> >> entire large and diverse group of human beings with the actions of >> >> one. >> >> >> >> >> > These people also have major psychiatric issues. People with >> >> >> > major physical birth defects like extra limbs or two heads >> >> >> > aren't considered normal. Why would someone who's convinced >> >> >> > they are what they're not, >> >> >> >> >> >> Why do you say they are not what they say they are? >> >> > >> >> > If I say I'm a giraffe, does that make it so? >> >> >> >> Is being a giraffe all in the head? >> >> >> >> >> > and acts flamboyantly bizarre >> >> >> >> >> >> So, an entire sex acts flamboyantly bizarre, in your view, but >> >> >> it's only a problem (somehow, even though no-one gets hurt) if >> >> >> someone of the other biological sex acts the same way? >> >> > >> >> > HUH? >> >> >> >> You heard me. >> >> >> >> >> > be considered normal within the realm of what society generally >> >> >> > accepts as sane? These people are mentally defective, and I'll >> >> >> > bet they're listed in the DSM as such. >> >> >> >> >> >> Not anymore. Same with homosexuals and bisexuals. >> >> > >> >> > There are plenty of homos in the world. Enough, I suppose, that >> >> > you could consider them within the realm of normalcy. Unless >> >> > there's a chromosome abnormality to provide a plausible scientific >> >> > explanation for the confusion, there doesn't appear to be any >> >> > explanation for this minute segment of the population to be gender >> >> > queer unless there's some underlying mental abnormality. >> >> >> >> Does it have to have a known cause before you will accept it and >> >> have tolerance for the people thus affected? >> >> >> >> Now, I'm all for scientific curiosity ... but I sense this is more, >> >> that you are demanding some sort of *justification* for people to >> >> not conform to some set of norms that *you* wish for some reason to >> >> impose on everyone. Why not just live and let live? >> >> >> >> > What pisses me off, is the ones who go around demanding that I >> >> > refer to them by a pronoun that doesn't match what they really >> >> > are. >> >> >> >> Circular reasoning detected. You must first answer my earlier >> >> question, >> >> "Why do you say they are not what they say they are?", before you >> >> can proceed under the assumption that "what they really are" >> >> "doesn't match" >> >> anything. >> >> >> >> > I will never refer to Bruce Jenner as "Kaitlin," or refer to him >> >> > as "she" or "her". >> >> >> >> Why do you show such disrespect to someone who has done you no harm? >> > >> > If you got a dick, you're a male...simple huh? >> >> But you might still be either a man or a woman. > > Nope, if you got a dick you are a man. Nope. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-12 17:04 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.360349615b1c7259989824@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #203977 |
In article <pnc1kc$1jj$59@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:24:26 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > > > In article <pnbvmm$1jj$45@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > > says... > >> > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> melt! > >> On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 08:47:58 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > >> > >> > In article <pnaedk$1jj$29@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > >> > says... > >> >> > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> >> melt! > >> >> On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 14:48:47 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading > >> >> > posts by Checkmate! In article <pn97md$1jj$6@dont-email.me>, > >> >> > nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > >> >> > > >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, > >> >> >> snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 06:59:41 -0700, Checkmate > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading > >> >> >> > posts by Checkmate! In article <pn7ugt$1hk0$4@gioia.aioe.org>, > >> >> >> > kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> On 9/11/2018 3:42 AM, Checkmate wrote: > >> >> >> >> > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 20:19:51 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> >> >> >> >>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > >> >> >> >> >>>> http://itspronouncedmetrosexual.com/2015/03/the- > genderbread- > >> >> person- > >> >> >> v3/ > >> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >> >>> Are these situations covered in the DSM where they belong? > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> Transphobia noted. Get back to us when you have a real > >> >> >> >> >> argument to make. > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > I have a real argument: Little boys who think they're > >> >> >> >> > really girls, > >> >> >> >> > and little girls who think they're really boys, are really > >> >> >> >> > fucking abnormal nutjobs. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> That's not an argument, it's just a transphobic statement of > >> >> >> >> opinion. > >> >> >> >> An argument would attempt to establish the truth of a > >> >> >> >> proposition by one or more steps of inference from some set of > >> >> >> >> premises. I don't see anything resembling either premises or > >> >> >> >> steps of inference in your bigoted missive. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > "Normal" is what most of the population is and does. If you > >> >> >> > look at any of these freaks, watch how they act, observe their > >> >> >> > appearance, or listen to the things they say, they're anything > >> >> >> > BUT normal. They're a tiny fraction, way less than 1% of the > >> >> >> > population, which makes them abnormal. > >> >> >> > Jeffrey Dahmer was mentally ill, because most of us don't go > >> >> >> > around drilling holes in people's heads and eating them. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> A key difference being, Dahmer was dangerous. > >> >> > > >> >> > Did you read the article posted yesterday about the British he-she > >> >> > queer who was thrown into a women's jail (although he was really a > >> >> > male) and sexually assaulted some of the female inmates? > >> >> > >> >> Do you see the problem with your comparison? You're tarring an > >> >> entire large and diverse group of human beings with the actions of > >> >> one. > >> >> > >> >> >> > These people also have major psychiatric issues. People with > >> >> >> > major physical birth defects like extra limbs or two heads > >> >> >> > aren't considered normal. Why would someone who's convinced > >> >> >> > they are what they're not, > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Why do you say they are not what they say they are? > >> >> > > >> >> > If I say I'm a giraffe, does that make it so? > >> >> > >> >> Is being a giraffe all in the head? > >> >> > >> >> >> > and acts flamboyantly bizarre > >> >> >> > >> >> >> So, an entire sex acts flamboyantly bizarre, in your view, but > >> >> >> it's only a problem (somehow, even though no-one gets hurt) if > >> >> >> someone of the other biological sex acts the same way? > >> >> > > >> >> > HUH? > >> >> > >> >> You heard me. > >> >> > >> >> >> > be considered normal within the realm of what society generally > >> >> >> > accepts as sane? These people are mentally defective, and I'll > >> >> >> > bet they're listed in the DSM as such. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Not anymore. Same with homosexuals and bisexuals. > >> >> > > >> >> > There are plenty of homos in the world. Enough, I suppose, that > >> >> > you could consider them within the realm of normalcy. Unless > >> >> > there's a chromosome abnormality to provide a plausible scientific > >> >> > explanation for the confusion, there doesn't appear to be any > >> >> > explanation for this minute segment of the population to be gender > >> >> > queer unless there's some underlying mental abnormality. > >> >> > >> >> Does it have to have a known cause before you will accept it and > >> >> have tolerance for the people thus affected? > >> >> > >> >> Now, I'm all for scientific curiosity ... but I sense this is more, > >> >> that you are demanding some sort of *justification* for people to > >> >> not conform to some set of norms that *you* wish for some reason to > >> >> impose on everyone. Why not just live and let live? > >> >> > >> >> > What pisses me off, is the ones who go around demanding that I > >> >> > refer to them by a pronoun that doesn't match what they really > >> >> > are. > >> >> > >> >> Circular reasoning detected. You must first answer my earlier > >> >> question, > >> >> "Why do you say they are not what they say they are?", before you > >> >> can proceed under the assumption that "what they really are" > >> >> "doesn't match" > >> >> anything. > >> >> > >> >> > I will never refer to Bruce Jenner as "Kaitlin," or refer to him > >> >> > as "she" or "her". > >> >> > >> >> Why do you show such disrespect to someone who has done you no harm? > >> > > >> > If you got a dick, you're a male...simple huh? > >> > >> But you might still be either a man or a woman. > > > > Nope, if you got a dick you are a man. > > Nope. That's it? no reasoning?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-13 00:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pncb7l$1jj$73@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #204025 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 17:04:21 -0600, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pnc1kc$1jj$59@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > says... >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >> On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:24:26 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >> >> > In article <pnbvmm$1jj$45@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >> > says... >> >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> >> melt! >> >> On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 08:47:58 -0600, Skeeter wrote: >> >> >> >> > In article <pnaedk$1jj$29@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >> >> > says... >> >> >> >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >> >> >> snowflakes, melt! >> >> >> On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 14:48:47 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >> >> >> > posts by Checkmate! In article <pn97md$1jj$6@dont-email.me>, >> >> >> > nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >> >> >> >> snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 06:59:41 -0700, >> >> >> >> Checkmate wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >> >> >> >> > reading posts by Checkmate! In article >> >> >> >> > <pn7ugt$1hk0$4@gioia.aioe.org>, >> >> >> >> > kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> On 9/11/2018 3:42 AM, Checkmate wrote: >> >> >> >> >> > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 20:19:51 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >> >> >> >> >> >>>> http://itspronouncedmetrosexual.com/2015/03/the- >> genderbread- >> >> >> person- >> >> >> >> v3/ >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Are these situations covered in the DSM where they >> >> >> >> >> >>> belong? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Transphobia noted. Get back to us when you have a real >> >> >> >> >> >> argument to make. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > I have a real argument: Little boys who think they're >> >> >> >> >> > really girls, >> >> >> >> >> > and little girls who think they're really boys, are >> >> >> >> >> > really fucking abnormal nutjobs. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> That's not an argument, it's just a transphobic statement >> >> >> >> >> of opinion. >> >> >> >> >> An argument would attempt to establish the truth of a >> >> >> >> >> proposition by one or more steps of inference from some set >> >> >> >> >> of premises. I don't see anything resembling either >> >> >> >> >> premises or steps of inference in your bigoted missive. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > "Normal" is what most of the population is and does. If you >> >> >> >> > look at any of these freaks, watch how they act, observe >> >> >> >> > their appearance, or listen to the things they say, they're >> >> >> >> > anything BUT normal. They're a tiny fraction, way less than >> >> >> >> > 1% of the population, which makes them abnormal. >> >> >> >> > Jeffrey Dahmer was mentally ill, because most of us don't go >> >> >> >> > around drilling holes in people's heads and eating them. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> A key difference being, Dahmer was dangerous. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Did you read the article posted yesterday about the British >> >> >> > he-she queer who was thrown into a women's jail (although he >> >> >> > was really a male) and sexually assaulted some of the female >> >> >> > inmates? >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you see the problem with your comparison? You're tarring an >> >> >> entire large and diverse group of human beings with the actions >> >> >> of one. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > These people also have major psychiatric issues. People >> >> >> >> > with major physical birth defects like extra limbs or two >> >> >> >> > heads aren't considered normal. Why would someone who's >> >> >> >> > convinced they are what they're not, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Why do you say they are not what they say they are? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > If I say I'm a giraffe, does that make it so? >> >> >> >> >> >> Is being a giraffe all in the head? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > and acts flamboyantly bizarre >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> So, an entire sex acts flamboyantly bizarre, in your view, but >> >> >> >> it's only a problem (somehow, even though no-one gets hurt) if >> >> >> >> someone of the other biological sex acts the same way? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > HUH? >> >> >> >> >> >> You heard me. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > be considered normal within the realm of what society >> >> >> >> > generally accepts as sane? These people are mentally >> >> >> >> > defective, and I'll bet they're listed in the DSM as such. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Not anymore. Same with homosexuals and bisexuals. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > There are plenty of homos in the world. Enough, I suppose, >> >> >> > that you could consider them within the realm of normalcy. >> >> >> > Unless there's a chromosome abnormality to provide a plausible >> >> >> > scientific explanation for the confusion, there doesn't appear >> >> >> > to be any explanation for this minute segment of the population >> >> >> > to be gender queer unless there's some underlying mental >> >> >> > abnormality. >> >> >> >> >> >> Does it have to have a known cause before you will accept it and >> >> >> have tolerance for the people thus affected? >> >> >> >> >> >> Now, I'm all for scientific curiosity ... but I sense this is >> >> >> more, that you are demanding some sort of *justification* for >> >> >> people to not conform to some set of norms that *you* wish for >> >> >> some reason to impose on everyone. Why not just live and let >> >> >> live? >> >> >> >> >> >> > What pisses me off, is the ones who go around demanding that I >> >> >> > refer to them by a pronoun that doesn't match what they really >> >> >> > are. >> >> >> >> >> >> Circular reasoning detected. You must first answer my earlier >> >> >> question, >> >> >> "Why do you say they are not what they say they are?", before you >> >> >> can proceed under the assumption that "what they really are" >> >> >> "doesn't match" >> >> >> anything. >> >> >> >> >> >> > I will never refer to Bruce Jenner as "Kaitlin," or refer to >> >> >> > him as "she" or "her". >> >> >> >> >> >> Why do you show such disrespect to someone who has done you no >> >> >> harm? >> >> > >> >> > If you got a dick, you're a male...simple huh? >> >> >> >> But you might still be either a man or a woman. >> > >> > Nope, if you got a dick you are a man. >> >> Nope. > > That's it? no reasoning? It's a simple statement of observational fact. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web