Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.checkmate > #206336 > unrolled thread

Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
First post2018-09-20 09:26 -0400
Last post2018-10-01 13:34 -0400
Articles 20 on this page of 1000+ — 43 participants
Thread has 1006 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed.

Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate | Browse in flat view

Thread has 1006 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.


Contents

  Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:26 -0400
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:25 -0600
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 18:30 -0400
      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 20:44 -0500
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 18:45 -0700
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:26 -0400
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 21:42 -0500
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:30 -0400
              Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 06:51 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 15:53 +0000
                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 12:00 -0400
                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:49 -0600
                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 13:15 -0500
                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 13:01 -0600
                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:27 -0400
                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:20 -0700
                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-22 14:27 +0000
                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:53 +0000
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:34 -0600
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 19:06 -0500
                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 15:07 -0700
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 15:11 -0700
                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 07:18 -0500
                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 12:35 +0000
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 09:09 -0500
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:46 -0500
                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:59 -0700
                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 20:58 +0000
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 14:01 -0700
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 14:30 -0700
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 23:21 +0100
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0400
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0500
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:27 +0000
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:28 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 13:00 +0000
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:28 -0500
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:06 -0500
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:00 +0000
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:31 -0400
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:38 -0600
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:28 -0400
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:30 -0600
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 07:19 -0700
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:22 +0000
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:13 -0700
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 17:19 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 15:33 -0700
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 15:40 -0700
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 19:33 -0400
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:46 -0700
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:00 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:53 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:35 -0500
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:02 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:12 -0400
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:17 +0000
                                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:14 +0000
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:28 -0700
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-26 09:20 -0400
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:55 +0000
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:52 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:17 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 00:23 -0500
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 06:17 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 09:13 -0600
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 11:19 -0400
                                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 17:12 +0100
                                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 12:40 -0500
                                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 18:51 +0100
                                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:20 -0600
                                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 22:58 +0100
                                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 10:43 -0600
                                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 12:48 -0400
                                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:07 -0600
                                                        Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 12:49 -0500
                                                          Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:19 -0600
                                                            Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 13:28 -0500
                                                              Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:30 -0600
                                                      Re: ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄  Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 12:42 -0500
                                                        Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOC Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:18 -0600
                                                          Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOC Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-27 18:53 +0000
                                                            Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOC Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 13:04 -0600
                                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 12:50 -0400
                                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:08 -0600
                                                Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 10:34 -0500
                                                  Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snow Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 10:44 -0600
                                                    Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snow ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 12:37 -0500
                                                      Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:17 -0600
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:06 -0700
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 10:08 -0400
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 10:31 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:46 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 10:48 -0500
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 12:37 -0500
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 07:52 -0500
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 11:21 -0400
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 09:32 -0600
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:32 -0500
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 09:36 -0600
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:24 -0500
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 15:19 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:20 -0700
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 04:39 -0400
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:50 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:56 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:55 -0500
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:14 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:31 -0400
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 09:15 -0600
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 11:25 -0400
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-27 18:56 +0000
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 15:04 -0400
                                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 21:57 +0000
                                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:34 -0400
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 13:06 -0600
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 19:39 -0400
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 19:52 -0500
                                              Inflation is immoral. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 02:52 -0700
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:33 +0000
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:12 -0700
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:17 -0500
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:49 +0000
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:44 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 13:51 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:59 -0500
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:40 -0600
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 22:36 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:23 -0700
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:15 -0700
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:38 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:04 -0700
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:57 -0700
                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 10:52 -0500
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 09:43 -0700
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:37 -0500
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 12:26 -0700
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 12:34 -0700
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 17:05 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 17:03 -0700
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:10 +0000
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 13:19 -0700
                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:53 -0600
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:43 -0500
                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:15 -0600
                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:50 -0600
                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:22 +0000
                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:54 -0700
                      I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 03:56 -0700
                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 15:34 +0000
                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:58 +0000
                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:00 +0000
                              Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 21:47 +0000
                                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:05 -0700
                                  Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 20:31 -0500
                                    Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snow Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 19:57 -0600
                                      Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snow ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-28 09:57 -0500
                                        Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? Snow ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:04 -0600
                                          Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 20:23 +0100
                                          Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 14:34 -0600
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 08:52 -0400
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 07:59 -0500
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:04 -0400
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:12 -0400
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:45 -0400
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:55 -0400
                                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:27 -0400
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:03 -0600
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:27 +0000
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:43 -0400
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:39 +0100
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:10 -0400
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 23:29 -0500
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Catalina" <Catalina@beach.sun> - 2018-09-30 02:39 -0400
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 01:25 -0700
                                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-28 02:02 +0000
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 06:47 -0500
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 18:18 +0000
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:31 +0000
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 18:56 +0100
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 18:57 +0000
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 20:30 +0100
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 14:31 -0600
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:37 -0700
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:51 +0000
                                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:40 -0400
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:05 -0600
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:08 -0400
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 -0700
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-29 14:23 +0000
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 10:52 -0700
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-29 18:55 +0000
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 13:18 -0600
                                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-29 19:43 +0000
                                              Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 18:54 -0600
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 12:41 -0700
                                            Being _ relatively poor isn't a real problem. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-29 15:25 -0700
                                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:29 -0600
                                              Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 21:48 -0400
                                                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 23:16 -0700
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0600
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-29 12:43 -0400
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 10:53 -0600
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-29 12:56 -0400
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 10:57 -0600
                                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-29 12:58 -0400
                                              Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 11:30 -0600
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-29 14:00 -0400
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-29 20:12 +0100
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 17:33 -0700
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:17 +0000
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:08 -0700
                                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:26 +0000
                                              Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:36 -0700
                                                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:42 +0000
                                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 22:13 -0700
                                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:33 +0000
                                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 12:50 -0700
                                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:18 +0000
                                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:22 -0700
                                                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
                          We need to eat more. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 09:38 -0700
                            Re: We need to eat more. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 +0000
                              "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 10:09 -0700
                                Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:10 +0000
                                  Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0400
                                    Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:19 +0000
                                    Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:58 -0500
                                      Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:16 -0600
                                      Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0500
                                    Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:04 -0700
                                      Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 -0700
                                        If you're fucking, you're stupid. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 17:14 -0700
                                          Re: If you're fucking, you're stupid. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:39 -0700
                                        Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:01 -0700
                                          Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:47 -0400
                                            Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:59 -0400
                                            Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 11:37 -0700
                                              Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 19:00 +0000
                                                Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 14:32 -0600
                                            Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:12 -0400
                                      Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 21:44 -0700
                                        Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 22:01 -0700
                                          Artificial penises and testosterone implants. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 05:01 -0700
                                            Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:17 -0700
                                              Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 23:42 -0400
                                                Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:56 -0700
                                      Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:26 +0000
                                        Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:30 -0400
                                        I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 09:38 -0700
                                          Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:41 -0400
                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 19:09 +0100
                                          Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:04 -0400
                                          Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:47 +0000
                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 21:52 +0000
                                              If I were super attractive... Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 15:04 -0700
                                                Re: If I were super attractive... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 18:08 -0400
                                                Re: If I were super attractive... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 22:08 +0000
                                                  Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:10 +0000
                                                    Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 15:52 -0700
                                                      Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:55 +0000
                                                        Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:00 -0700
                                                          Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:05 +0000
                                                            Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:15 -0700
                                                              Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:22 +0000
                                                                Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:24 -0700
                                                                  Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:28 +0000
                                                                    Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:31 -0700
                                                                      Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:37 +0000
                                                  The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 15:15 -0700
                                                    Re: The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:18 +0000
                                                Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:09 +0000
                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-28 17:29 -0500
                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 +0000
                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:23 -0700
                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:28 -0700
                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:49 -0700
                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:55 +0000
                                                      Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:19 -0700
                                                        Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-30 02:48 +0000
                                                          Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:28 +0000
                                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:45 -0700
                                                              Was she looking for love ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-29 20:55 -0700
                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:59 -0700
                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:11 -0400
                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:35 +0000
                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:42 -0700
                                                                    Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 05:22 -0700
                                                                      I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 07:34 -0700
                                                                        Re: I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
                                                                        Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 20:37 -0700
                                                                          Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:21 +0000
                                                                            Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 22:25 -0700
                                                                              Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:40 +0000
                                                                                Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:15 -0700
                                                                                Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:42 -0600
                                                                          Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 10:01 -0700
                                                                            Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0500
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 15:00 -0400
                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:02 -0700
                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:57 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:01 -0400
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:00 -0700
                                                                            Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 15:52 -0400
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 16:02 -0500
                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:04 -0400
                                                                          Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 12:59 -0700
                                                                            Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:13 -0700
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:18 -0400
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 16:22 -0500
                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:37 -0700
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 22:30 +0100
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:34 -0700
                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:40 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:42 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:49 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:53 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:54 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:02 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:06 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0700
                                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:21 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:26 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:29 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:33 -0700
                                                                                                        Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:36 -0700
                                                                                                          Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:28 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:32 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:03 -0700
                                                                      Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:13 -0400
                                                                        Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 07:33 -0500
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:29 -0400
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:19 -0400
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:26 -0400
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:59 +0000
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:40 -0700
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-09-30 17:52 -0500
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 13:11 -0700
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:22 -0400
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:25 +0000
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:01 +0000
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:04 -0700
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:28 -0600
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:39 -0400
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:08 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:03 +0000
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:07 -0700
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:53 -0400
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:12 -0700
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:31 -0700
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:55 -0700
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 09:02 -0600
                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:26 -0400
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 16:05 +0000
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:23 -0400
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 23:07 +0000
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:11 -0400
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0700
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 18:19 -0500
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:22 -0400
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:40 -0700
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:43 -0500
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:42 -0500
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:32 -0700
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 13:44 -0400
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 13:57 -0400
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:05 -0400
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:20 -0400
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 11:51 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 15:13 -0400
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:06 +0000
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0400
                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:20 +0000
                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:34 -0400
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 21:49 +0100
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-30 14:00 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:13 +0100
                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:22 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:27 +0100
                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:38 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:44 +0100
                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:52 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 23:00 +0100
                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 15:06 -0700
                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
                                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
                                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 02:52 -0700
                                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 12:56 +0100
                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 05:46 -0700
                                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 13:58 +0100
                                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 06:42 -0700
                                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 17:11 +0100
                                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 10:35 -0700
                                                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 18:42 +0100
                                                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:44 -0400
                                                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:03 +0100
                                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0400
                                                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 11:07 -0700
                                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:12 -0400
                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0400
                                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:07 +0100
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:10 +0000
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:57 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:09 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:01 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:30 -0600
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:35 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:12 +0000
                                                                                    Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:22 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:31 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:43 +0000
                                                                                            Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:12 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:27 -0600
                                                                                              Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:11 -0500
                                                                                                Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:09 -0400
                                                                                            The Sex, Drugs, and Alcohol Party ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 06:06 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:25 -0600
                                                                                        Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 05:14 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 08:50 -0500
                                                                                            Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:33 -0600
                                                                                              Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 10:22 -0500
                                                                                                Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snow Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 11:21 -0600
                                                                                                  Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snow ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 13:23 -0500
                                                                                                    Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:38 -0600
                                                                                              Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-01 14:00 -0400
                                                                                                Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:07 -0400
                                                                                            Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:32 -0600
                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:56 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0600
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:44 +0000
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 13:57 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:24 -0600
                                                                                Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 14:02 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:06 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:14 +0000
                                                                                    Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 19:31 -0700
                                                                                    Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 19:32 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:24 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:21 -0600
                                                                                        Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:47 -0400
                                                                                            Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:15 -0500
                                                                                      Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:31 +0000
                                                                                    Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:42 -0700
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0600
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-30 11:15 -0700
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:19 -0400
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0400
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:44 -0700
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:46 +0000
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:06 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 05:55 -0500
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:40 -0700
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:36 -0600
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 10:49 -0400
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:03 +0000
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:34 -0700
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:42 -0400
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:54 -0700
                                                                            Greg, the incel. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0700
                                                                              Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:27 -0700
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:16 +0000
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:35 -0600
                                                                          If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
                                                                            Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:17 +0000
                                                                              If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 19:41 -0700
                                                                                Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:26 +0000
                                                                                  Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:23 -0600
                                                                                  Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 05:54 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:49 -0400
                                                                                Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 08:05 +0100
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:15 +0000
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:54 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:36 +0000
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:35 -0600
                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 11:17 -0400
                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 17:17 +0100
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Scatboi g8dgc <g8dgc@noneya.none> - 2018-10-01 12:38 -0400
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? g8dgc <g8dgc@noneya.none> - 2018-10-01 13:11 -0400
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 18:17 +0100
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:42 -0700
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:33 -0600
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:49 -0600
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:01 +0000
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:10 -0400
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:22 +0000
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:39 -0700
                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:17 -0700
                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:09 -0400
                                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:34 +0000
                                                                Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 06:25 -0700
                                                                  Re: Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:07 +0000
                                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 09:03 -0600
                                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:37 -0700
                                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:47 -0700
                                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 09:26 -0400
                                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:21 -0400
                                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:27 -0400
                                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:19 -0700
                                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:08 -0500
                                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-10-01 17:19 +0100
                                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:43 -0700
                                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:48 -0400
                                                                      Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
                                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:02 -0700
                                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0600
                                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 09:01 -0600
                                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:09 +0000
                                                          Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 09:00 -0600
                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:18 -0700
                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-29 19:41 -0400
                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:44 -0700
                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-09-29 19:55 -0400
                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:58 -0700
                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:21 +0000
                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0700
                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:48 -0700
                                  More children is always better ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 10:23 -0700
                            Re: We need to eat more. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 11:12 -0700
                              Re: We need to eat more. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 14:27 -0400
                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 09:09 -0600
                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:14 -0400
                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 21:18 +0000
                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:45 -0700
                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:18 -0700
                        The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 20:57 -0700
                          Re: The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 21:46 -0700
                            "IllGotten" gains. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 01:46 -0700
                              Re: "IllGotten" gains. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0400
                              Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0700
                                Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:41 -0700
                                  Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 17:02 -0700
                                    Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:11 -0700
                            Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 02:06 -0700
                              Re: Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:37 -0400
                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:14 -0700
                      The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 20:40 -0700
              Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 15:47 -0700
                Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-24 09:53 +0000
                  Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 11:36 -0400
                    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:54 -0600
                    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 17:03 -0700
                      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:05 -0700
                        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 17:09 -0700
                          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:11 -0700
                            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:29 -0700
                    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 21:08 -0700
                    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-28 10:07 +0000
                      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 10:33 -0500
                        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:41 -0400
                          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:02 -0600
                          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:23 -0700
                            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 23:43 -0500
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 21:06 -0500
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 19:07 -0700
          No one wants to pay. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-20 19:35 -0700
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:49 -0400
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 22:18 -0500
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 01:56 -0600
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-09-21 03:31 -0700
        Progressive, Marxist, Collectivist, Jim Jones. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-20 19:14 -0700
          Re: Progressive, Marxist, Collectivist, Jim Jones. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:33 -0400
            It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 06:40 -0700
              Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 11:10 -0400
                Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:44 -0400
                A good answer ?! Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 09:18 -0700
                  Re: A good answer ?! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:17 -0400
                Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:34 -0600
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:10 -0700
      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:36 -0400
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-22 01:31 -0400
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 03:18 -0400
      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:35 -0400
        The leaders fornicated the poor, in their death camps. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 07:07 -0700
          Re: The leaders fornicated the poor, in their death camps. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 03:46 +0000
            You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 21:31 -0700
              Re: You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 11:58 -0400
              Re: You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:55 +0000
                Re: You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:35 -0600
                Libtard's thievery. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 11:33 -0700
                  Re: Libtard's thievery. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 19:08 +0000
                    Libtard's thievery. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 12:28 -0700
                      Relf's poverty. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 05:23 +0000
                        The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 23:02 -0700
                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 02:38 -0400
                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:31 -0400
                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 08:40 -0600
                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-23 16:06 +0000
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 12:10 -0400
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 09:15 -0700
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-23 12:46 -0400
                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-23 10:44 -0700
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 09:15 -0700
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 18:32 +0100
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 10:37 -0700
                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 18:48 +0100
                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 19:05 +0100
                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 19:19 +0100
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 11:37 -0400
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:55 -0600
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-24 12:04 -0400
                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 13:29 -0700
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-23 16:47 -0400
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 22:43 -0500
                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 00:01 -0400
                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 09:49 -0500
                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 11:05 -0400
                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 11:24 -0400
                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:23 +0000
                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:25 -0600
                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 11:48 -0400
                                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:54 -0600
                                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 18:37 -0400
                                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 09:16 -0600
                                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-27 11:20 -0400
                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 10:50 -0600
                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 13:14 -0400
                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-27 14:38 -0400
                                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 14:46 -0400
                                                            Re: ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄  Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 13:53 -0500
                                                              Re: ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 12:10 -0700
                                                                Re: ðŸ”ÂŦðŸ”ÂŦðŸ”ÂŦÃĒ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER  SHOOTER ALERT! ÃĒ°ðŸ”ÂŦðŸ”ÂŦðŸ”ÂŦ Sir Gerg teh Yech h Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht maes ter.fake>" ðŸ”ÂŦðŸ”ÂŦðŸ”ÂŦÃĒ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ÃĒ°ðŸ”ÂŦðŸ”ÂŦðŸ”ÂŦÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowfla ke ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snow flake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ S nowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowfla ke ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snow flake ÃĒ„ The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowfla ke ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snow flake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ S nowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowfla ke ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snow flake ÃĒ„ÃĒ„ Snowflake ÃĒ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 17:23 -0500
                                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-27 15:23 -0400
                                                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 11:21 +0100
                                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 13:05 -0600
                                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-27 12:07 -0700
                                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 22:01 +0000
                                                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-27 15:05 -0700
                                                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 16:26 -0600
                                                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-27 18:31 -0400
                                                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 23:09 +0000
                                                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 19:52 -0600
                                                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-28 13:18 -0400
                                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 10:42 -0700
                                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-28 14:08 -0400
                                                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:56 -0600
                                                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-28 15:17 -0400
                                                                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:20 -0600
                                                                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 14:08 -0700
                                                                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:11 -0600
                                                                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 14:17 -0700
                                                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 14:45 -0700
                                                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 16:52 -0600
                                                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 20:55 -0700
                                                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 16:51 -0600
                                                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-29 08:09 +0000
                                                                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-28 19:45 -0400
                                                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 17:54 -0600
                                                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 17:54 -0600
                                                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-28 20:55 -0400
                                                                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 19:39 -0600
                                                                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-28 23:11 -0400
                                                                                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 21:16 -0600
                                                                                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 21:21 -0600
                                                                                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-29 00:17 -0400
                                                                                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-29 09:06 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 10:37 -0600
                                                                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-29 12:58 -0400
                                                                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 11:30 -0600
                                                                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-29 18:57 +0000
                                                                                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 13:20 -0600
                                                                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-29 12:13 -0700
                                                                                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-29 08:26 +0000
                                                                                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 10:37 -0600
                                                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:56 -0600
                                                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-28 15:11 -0400
                                                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 19:52 -0600
                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-26 08:51 -0700
                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:38 +0000
                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:54 -0600
                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:20 +0000
                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 20:55 +0000
                                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:02 -0700
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 21:33 +0000
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 17:53 -0400
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:37 -0600
                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:16 -0500
                          2006-2008 were tough years for me. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-23 00:20 -0700
                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 21:29 +0000
                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 17:55 -0400
                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:29 +0000
                              What's your (taxed) job, hypocrite ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-23 19:52 -0700
                                Re: What's your (taxed) job, hypocrite ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 15:14 +0000
                                  Re: What's your (taxed) job, hypocrite ? Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:32 -0500
                                    I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-24 09:01 -0700
                                      Re: I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:11 +0000
                                        Re: I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-09-24 16:18 -0400
                                          Re: I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 13:25 -0700
                                        The LessBad option. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-24 15:17 -0700
                                          Re: The LessBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 01:43 +0000
                                            Re: The LessBad option. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 20:48 -0500
                                            Re: The LessBad option. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:11 -0600
                                            "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 02:47 -0700
                                              Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 08:05 -0500
                                                I walk everywhere. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 07:16 -0700
                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:23 -0400
                                                    Greg can't fathom how sober I am, and have been. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 07:31 -0700
                                                      Re: Greg can't fathom how sober I am, and have been. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:49 -0400
                                                        I'm sensitive to light, like my mom; it's a Swiss thing. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 07:59 -0700
                                                          Re: I'm sensitive to light, like my mom; it's a Swiss thing. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:04 -0400
                                                          Re: Your theory is full of holes... Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:15 -0500
                                                          Re: I'm sensitive to light, like my mom; it's a Swiss thing. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:04 -0400
                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:41 +0000
                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:50 -0500
                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 12:13 -0600
                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 11:17 -0700
                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 21:50 +0000
                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:54 -0700
                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 13:37 -0500
                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 09:28 -0500
                                                    You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 07:41 -0700
                                                      Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:50 -0400
                                                        Hare Krishna, Hare Rama, Hare Jesus. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 08:02 -0700
                                                          Re: Hare Krishna, Hare Rama, Hare Jesus. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:08 -0400
                                                        Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-25 11:08 -0400
                                                        Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:43 +0000
                                                          Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:51 -0500
                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:35 +0000
                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:48 -0500
                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 12:50 -0400
                                                      Re: ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ I walk everywhere. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄  Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:52 -0500
                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 21:41 +0000
                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 17:48 -0400
                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 21:52 +0000
                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:54 -0700
                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:14 -0400
                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 19:01 -0400
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 00:51 +0000
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:52 -0700
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 03:18 +0000
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:51 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 06:58 -0700
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:19 -0700
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 09:33 -0500
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:45 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-26 08:56 -0700
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:59 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 12:24 -0400
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:45 -0600
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:46 -0700
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 11:52 -0500
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:32 -0700
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:48 +0000
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:01 -0700
                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 16:59 -0700
                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:00 -0700
                                                          The GasPump lines. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 17:06 -0700
                                                            Re: The GasPump lines. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 17:46 -0700
                                                            Re: The GasPump lines. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-25 22:53 -0400
                                                              Re: The GasPump lines. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-25 19:56 -0700
                                                                Re: The GasPump lines. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:16 -0400
                                                                  Re: The GasPump lines. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 10:59 -0400
                                                                    Re: The GasPump lines. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 11:12 -0400
                                                                    Re: The GasPump lines. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:23 -0600
                                                                      Re: The GasPump lines. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 11:44 -0400
                                                                        Re: The GasPump lines. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:44 -0600
                                                                          Re: The GasPump lines. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 17:52 -0400
                                                                            Re: The GasPump lines. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 16:25 -0600
                                                              Summer of 1979. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-26 02:45 -0700
                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 21:45 -0400
                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 19:35 -0700
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:47 -0400
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 06:52 -0700
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:19 -0700
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 12:06 -0700
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:10 +0000
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-09-26 17:38 -0400
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:39 -0700
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:26 -0700
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:27 -0700
                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:41 +0000
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:01 -0400
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:45 -0400
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:56 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 09:13 -0700
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:07 -0400
                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 12:22 -0700
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:26 -0400
                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:46 -0700
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 16:51 -0400
                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 21:10 +0000
                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:20 -0700
                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:22 -0400
                                                                              Kensi prefers science, and is biased. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 05:15 -0700
                                                                                Re: Kensi prefers science, and is biased. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 19:43 -0400
                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 09:11 +0100
                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 02:20 -0700
                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 14:04 +0100
                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 07:12 -0700
                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 17:25 +0100
                                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 12:36 -0400
                                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 17:52 +0100
                                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 11:08 -0700
                                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 19:45 +0100
                                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 14:53 -0400
                                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-27 19:19 +0000
                                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 12:38 -0700
                                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 23:46 +0100
                                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 15:53 -0700
                                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 11:21 +0100
                                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 03:50 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:06 +0100
                                                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 10:20 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 13:25 -0400
                                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 09:21 -0400
                                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:00 -0400
                                                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:13 -0400
                                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 11:11 -0700
                                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 19:13 -0700
                                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 11:21 +0100
                                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 03:48 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:23 +0100
                                                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 11:19 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 14:24 -0400
                                                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 20:21 +0100
                                                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 23:15 -0700
                                                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 10:20 +0100
                                                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 20:16 +0100
                                                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 12:31 -0700
                                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 09:20 -0400
                                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 06:52 -0700
                                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 10:05 -0400
                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 09:55 -0400
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:47 -0600
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 12:32 -0400
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:10 -0400
                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensinqton01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:23 -0400
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:53 -0400
                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:23 -0700
                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 16:37 -0400
                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 20:58 +0000
                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:05 -0400
                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:07 -0700
                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 21:15 +0000
                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda - 2018-09-26 14:21 -0700
                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:27 -0400
                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:51 -0600
                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:49 -0600
                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:30 -0700
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 09:21 -0500
                                                                      Re: ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ I walk everywhere. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄  Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 15:21 -0500
                                                                        Re: ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ I walk everywhere. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 14:31 -0700
                                                                          Re: ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ I walk everywhere. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:33 -0700
                                                                          Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:41 -0400
                                                                            Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:42 -0700
                                                                        Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  ????? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? I walk everywhere. ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:52 -0600
                                                                          Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  ????? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? I walk everywhere. ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 22:46 -0500
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:48 -0600
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 09:14 -0700
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 16:26 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 21:00 +0000
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:04 -0700
                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:50 -0700
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 12:05 -0700
                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 22:19 -0700
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:25 -0700
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:44 -0600
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-27 02:02 +0000
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:27 -0700
                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 12:13 -0600
                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:54 -0400
                                              Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 20:38 +0000
                                                "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 13:51 -0700
                                                  Re: "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:53 -0700
                                                  Re: "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:12 -0400
                                                Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 17:23 -0400
                                                  Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:28 -0700
                                                  Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:17 -0400
                                                    Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:06 -0500
                                                      Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:48 -0400
                                                Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. John of Patmos <jpatmos1318@gmXil.com> - 2018-09-29 21:51 +0000
                                                  Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:14 -0700
                                                    Steve Petruzzellis  (was: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.) snit <usnet@iminsane.net> - 2018-09-29 19:16 -0400
                                                      Re: Steve Petruzzellis  (was: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.) Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 19:01 -0600
                                                      Re: Steve Petruzzellis  (was: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:26 +0000
                                                        Re: Steve Petruzzellis snit <usnet@iminsane.net> - 2018-09-29 21:49 -0400
                                                          Re: Steve Petruzzellis Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:56 +0000
                                                            Re: Steve Petruzzellis Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:19 -0700
                                                              Re: Steve Petruzzellis Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:29 +0000
                                                                Re: Steve Petruzzellis "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 09:04 -0400
                                                            Re: Steve Petruzzellis benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:04 -0400
                                                        Re: Steve Petruzzellis Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:20 -0700
                                                          Re: Steve Petruzzellis Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:29 +0000
                                                            Re: Steve Petruzzellis Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:44 -0700
                                                  Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:23 +0000
                                                    Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 22:00 -0400
                                                      Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:30 +0000
                                                        Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 10:33 +0100
                                                    Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-30 03:24 +0000
                                                      Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:37 +0000
                                                        Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:43 -0700
                                                          Willful ignorance. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 05:34 -0700
                                                        Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-30 21:42 +0000
                                                          Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:47 -0700
                                                          Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 14:56 -0700
                                                          Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:21 +0000
                                                            Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:35 -0700
                                                              Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:44 +0000
                                                                Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:07 -0700
                                                                Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:44 -0600
                                                              Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 10:10 -0500
                                                        Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 08:16 +0100
                                                          Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:57 -0700
                                                            Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
                                                              Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 02:56 -0700
                                                          Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:03 -0700
                                                            Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 18:14 +0100
                                                              Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:25 -0400
                                                                Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 18:37 +0100
                                                                  Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:43 -0400
                                                                    Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:11 +0100
                                                                      Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 12:26 -0700
                                                                Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:50 -0700
                                                                  Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:54 -0400
                                                                    Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:13 +0100
                                                                      Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:20 -0400
                                                                    Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:35 -0700
                                                            Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:14 -0400
                                                            Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ "God" has punished Nadegda for this. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 12:14 -0500
                                                              Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 11:25 -0600
                                                                Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:35 -0400
                        Re: Relf's poverty. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 02:34 -0400
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-22 01:33 -0400
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 08:07 -0400
            Kensi shuns science. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 05:51 -0700
              Relf shuns science. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:57 +0000
                Re: Relf shuns science. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:37 -0600
                  Re: Relf shuns science. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 20:04 +0100
                    Re: Relf shuns science. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 13:47 -0600
                  Re: Relf shuns science. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 19:09 +0000
                    Re: Relf shuns science. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 20:17 +0100
                      Re: Relf shuns science. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 05:25 +0000
                        Re: Relf shuns science. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 10:08 +0100
                          Re: Relf shuns science. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 21:35 +0000
                            Re: Relf shuns science. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 23:26 +0100
                              Re: Relf shuns science. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:40 +0000
                                Re: Relf shuns science. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 23:53 +0100
                                  Re: Relf shuns science. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 16:01 -0700
                                  Re: Relf shuns science. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 09:16 -0500
                                Re: Relf shuns science. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:15 -0600
                                Re: Relf shuns science. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 11:47 -0400
                                  Re: Relf shuns science. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:52 -0500
                                  Re: Relf shuns science. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:16 -0600
                            Re: Relf shuns science. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 00:20 +0100
                              Re: Relf shuns science. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 11:49 -0400
                                Re: Relf shuns science. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:16 -0600
                                  Re: Relf shuns science. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 19:32 +0100
                                    Re: Relf shuns science. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:15 +0000
                                      Re: Relf shuns science. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 23:10 +0100
                                        Re: Relf shuns science. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 01:44 +0000
                                          Re: Relf shuns science. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:11 -0600
                                            Re: Relf shuns science. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 12:26 -0600
                                          Re: Relf shuns science. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 07:43 -0400
                                            Re: Relf shuns science. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 11:24 -0400
                                              Re: Relf shuns science. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 09:32 -0600
                                                Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Relf shuns science. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:51 -0500
                                                  Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Relf shuns science. ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 12:12 -0600
                                                    Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Relf shuns science. ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 13:14 -0500
                                                      Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflak Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 12:27 -0600
                                                    Re: ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  ⏰ðŸ”ŦðŸ”ŦðŸ”Ŧ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄  Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 13:43 -0500
                                              Re: Relf shuns science. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðŸķįŽ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 12:28 -0500
                                              Re: Relf shuns science. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:12 -0400
                    Re: Relf shuns science. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 13:47 -0600
                Looking in the mirror. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 11:43 -0700
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:15 -0600
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-22 10:47 -0400
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-22 10:20 -0700
              Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-22 21:59 -0400
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-21 15:15 +0000
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 12:54 +0000
      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:34 -0400
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 08:40 -0600
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:53 -0400
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 09:09 -0600
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 18:00 +0000
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-09-23 19:11 +0100
            All you need is hate... hate, hate, hate. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-23 11:43 -0700
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 21:38 +0000
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 20:16 -0600
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 19:41 -0400
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-30 03:18 +0000
      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Catalina" <Catalina@beach.sun> - 2018-09-30 02:44 -0400
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-10-01 11:27 +0000
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 10:17 -0400
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-01 13:34 -0400

Page 46 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 44 45 [46] 47 48 … 50  Next page →


#209419 — Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.

Frombenj <benj.fake@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-29 22:00 -0400
SubjectRe: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Message-ID<popan3$5dq$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#209401
On 9/29/2018 9:23 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 21:51:11 +0000, John of Patmos wrote:
> 
>> Nadegda wrote:
>>
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt!
>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:47:25 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>>>
>>>> You (Nadegda) replied ( to me ):
>>>>>> I'm progressive, but not in the way you are, Nadegda.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have to pay income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes (10%),
>>>>>> etc.;
>>>>>> if you get your way, I'll have to pay even more.  If you don't
>>>>>> mind,
>>>>>> I'd rather not pay these women to popout irresponsible nut jobs.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's not progressive, kook.  That's standard right-wing misogyny
>>>>> and "I've got mine so fuck you" economic right-wingism.
>>>>
>>>> "God" has punished you for this, your sins; I rejoice.
>>>
>>> Oh, really? I haven't noticed any "punishment". Let alone from your
>>> non-existent sky pixie.
>>
>> ATHEIST!!
> 
> Yep!
> 
> You may now commence shriveling up like a vampire exposed to garlic.
> 
> <snicker>
> 
>> You're one of them too! It's that kensi, she's a bad influence
>> on you!
> 
> No, she's a very good influence on me, but that's irrelevant, since I came
> by my atheism independently. It's religious kooks like you who are a bad
> influence, as religious indoctrination leads eventually to division and
> strife and bigotry and war.
> 
Nads you are truly the complete package. Youembrace every stupidity from 
global warming, to Feminism, to Marxism, to equality of outcome and 
embracing atheism is just the icing on your stupidity cake.

History and misinterpretation not withstanding, Religion properly 
understood is an expression of highly advanced science. YOU are now the 
bishops refusing to look through Galileo's telescope. I'm afraid there 
is no hope for you. You COULD read about your ignorance in my book, but 
like Odd you are determined to stay stupid. So be it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#209442 — Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-09-30 03:30 +0000
SubjectRe: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Message-ID<popg0s$mhp$98@dont-email.me>
In reply to#209419
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 22:00:06 -0400, benj wrote:

> On 9/29/2018 9:23 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt! On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 21:51:11 +0000, John of Patmos wrote:
>> 
>>> Nadegda wrote:
>>>
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>> melt!
>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:47:25 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You (Nadegda) replied ( to me ):
>>>>>>> I'm progressive, but not in the way you are, Nadegda.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have to pay income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes (10%),
>>>>>>> etc.;
>>>>>>> if you get your way, I'll have to pay even more.  If you don't
>>>>>>> mind,
>>>>>>> I'd rather not pay these women to popout irresponsible nut jobs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's not progressive, kook.  That's standard right-wing misogyny
>>>>>> and "I've got mine so fuck you" economic right-wingism.
>>>>>
>>>>> "God" has punished you for this, your sins; I rejoice.
>>>>
>>>> Oh, really? I haven't noticed any "punishment". Let alone from your
>>>> non-existent sky pixie.
>>>
>>> ATHEIST!!
>> 
>> Yep!
>> 
>> You may now commence shriveling up like a vampire exposed to garlic.
>> 
>> <snicker>
>> 
>>> You're one of them too! It's that kensi, she's a bad influence on you!
>> 
>> No, she's a very good influence on me, but that's irrelevant, since I
>> came by my atheism independently. It's religious kooks like you who are
>> a bad influence, as religious indoctrination leads eventually to
>> division and strife and bigotry and war.
>
> Nads you are truly the complete package. Youembrace every stupidity from
> global warming, to Feminism, to Marxism, to equality of outcome and
> embracing atheism is just the icing on your stupidity cake.
>
> History and misinterpretation not withstanding, Religion properly
> understood is an expression of highly advanced science. YOU are now the
> bishops refusing to look through Galileo's telescope. I'm afraid there
> is no hope for you. You COULD read about your ignorance in my book, but
> like Odd you are determined to stay stupid. So be it.

Your disapproval fills me with pride.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#209495 — Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2018-09-30 10:33 +0100
SubjectRe: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Message-ID<1nvxrsl.1vh5y2rvoi2jgN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#209442
Paul "IQ 180" Derbyshire in his Nerdegda frock pompously pronounced:

> Your disapproval fills me with pride.

"Pride goes before destruction, and 
 a haughty spirit before a fall", young man.

-- 
^Ï^     My pet rock Gordon just tut-tutted.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#209437 — Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.

Fromvallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
Date2018-09-30 03:24 +0000
SubjectRe: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Message-ID<g1au09Fm8o5U4@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#209401
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 01:23:38 +0000, Nadegda wrote:

> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 21:51:11 +0000, John of Patmos wrote:
> 
>> Nadegda wrote:
>> 
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt!
>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:47:25 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>>> 
>>>> You (Nadegda) replied ( to me ):
>>>>> > I'm progressive, but not in the way you are, Nadegda.
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > I have to pay income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes (10%),
>>>>> > etc.;
>>>>> > if you get your way, I'll have to pay even more.  If you don't
>>>>> > mind,
>>>>> > I'd rather not pay these women to popout irresponsible nut jobs.
>>>>> 
>>>>> That's not progressive, kook.  That's standard right-wing misogyny
>>>>> and "I've got mine so fuck you" economic right-wingism.
>>>> 
>>>> "God" has punished you for this, your sins; I rejoice.
>>> 
>>> Oh, really? I haven't noticed any "punishment". Let alone from your
>>> non-existent sky pixie.
>> 
>> ATHEIST!!
> 
> Yep!
> 
> You may now commence shriveling up like a vampire exposed to garlic.
> 
> <snicker>
> 
>> You're one of them too! It's that kensi, she's a bad influence on you!
> 
> No, she's a very good influence on me, but that's irrelevant, since I
> came by my atheism independently. It's religious kooks like you who are
> a bad influence, as religious [extremism] leads eventually to
> division and strife and bigotry and war.

You misspelled "religious extremism".  FTFU.

(I am of course assuming you would call any sort of religious education 
"indoctrination" -- which turns out not to be a mainstream position...)

-- 
-v

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#209446 — Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-09-30 03:37 +0000
SubjectRe: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Message-ID<popgec$mhp$100@dont-email.me>
In reply to#209437
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 03:24:58 +0000, vallor wrote:

> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 01:23:38 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
> 
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt!
>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 21:51:11 +0000, John of Patmos wrote:
>> 
>>> Nadegda wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>> melt!
>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:47:25 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> You (Nadegda) replied ( to me ):
>>>>>> > I'm progressive, but not in the way you are, Nadegda.
>>>>>> > 
>>>>>> > I have to pay income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes (10%),
>>>>>> > etc.;
>>>>>> > if you get your way, I'll have to pay even more.  If you don't
>>>>>> > mind,
>>>>>> > I'd rather not pay these women to popout irresponsible nut jobs.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> That's not progressive, kook.  That's standard right-wing misogyny
>>>>>> and "I've got mine so fuck you" economic right-wingism.
>>>>> 
>>>>> "God" has punished you for this, your sins; I rejoice.
>>>> 
>>>> Oh, really? I haven't noticed any "punishment". Let alone from your
>>>> non-existent sky pixie.
>>> 
>>> ATHEIST!!
>> 
>> Yep!
>> 
>> You may now commence shriveling up like a vampire exposed to garlic.
>> 
>> <snicker>
>> 
>>> You're one of them too! It's that kensi, she's a bad influence on you!
>> 
>> No, she's a very good influence on me, but that's irrelevant, since I
>> came by my atheism independently. It's religious kooks like you who are
>> a bad influence, as religious [extremism] leads eventually to division
>> and strife and bigotry and war.
> 
> You misspelled "religious extremism".  FTFU.

I misspelled nothing.

> (I am of course assuming you would call any sort of religious education
> "indoctrination" -- which turns out not to be a mainstream position...)

Who says I hold mainstream positions?

I mean just *look* at the mess that's been made by people holding 
mainstream positions.

Here, have some Martin Luther King:

http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45a/060.html

----------
First, I must confess that over the last few years I have been gravely 
disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the 
regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the 
stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux 
Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to 
justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a 
positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I 
agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods 
of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable 
for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who 
constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season."

Shallow understanding from people of goodwill is more frustrating than 
absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is 
much more bewildering than outright rejection.
----------

That goes for all the people with "mainstream positions" advising not only 
the Negro but the woman, the Hispanic, the LGBTQ person, the immigrant, 
and the working class person to wait until a "more convenient season".

No. We've (and I fall into three of the above categories) had enough 
delays. The *planet* has had enough delays, to judge by the worsening 
symptoms of climate change. The time for more radical politics is NOW.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#209463 — Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-09-29 22:43 -0700
SubjectRe: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Message-ID<g1b649FrnmoU2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#209446
On 9/29/18 8:37 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 03:24:58 +0000, vallor wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 01:23:38 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
>>
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt!
>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 21:51:11 +0000, John of Patmos wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nadegda wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>> melt!
>>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:47:25 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> You (Nadegda) replied ( to me ):
>>>>>>>> I'm progressive, but not in the way you are, Nadegda.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have to pay income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes (10%),
>>>>>>>> etc.;
>>>>>>>> if you get your way, I'll have to pay even more.  If you don't
>>>>>>>> mind,
>>>>>>>> I'd rather not pay these women to popout irresponsible nut jobs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's not progressive, kook.  That's standard right-wing misogyny
>>>>>>> and "I've got mine so fuck you" economic right-wingism.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "God" has punished you for this, your sins; I rejoice.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, really? I haven't noticed any "punishment". Let alone from your
>>>>> non-existent sky pixie.
>>>>
>>>> ATHEIST!!
>>>
>>> Yep!
>>>
>>> You may now commence shriveling up like a vampire exposed to garlic.
>>>
>>> <snicker>
>>>
>>>> You're one of them too! It's that kensi, she's a bad influence on you!
>>>
>>> No, she's a very good influence on me, but that's irrelevant, since I
>>> came by my atheism independently. It's religious kooks like you who are
>>> a bad influence, as religious [extremism] leads eventually to division
>>> and strife and bigotry and war.
>>
>> You misspelled "religious extremism".  FTFU.
> 
> I misspelled nothing.
> 
>> (I am of course assuming you would call any sort of religious education
>> "indoctrination" -- which turns out not to be a mainstream position...)
> 
> Who says I hold mainstream positions?
> 
> I mean just *look* at the mess that's been made by people holding
> mainstream positions.
> 
> Here, have some Martin Luther King:
> 
> http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45a/060.html
> 
> ----------
> First, I must confess that over the last few years I have been gravely
> disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the
> regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the
> stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux
> Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to
> justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a
> positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I
> agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods
> of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable
> for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who
> constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season."
> 
> Shallow understanding from people of goodwill is more frustrating than
> absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is
> much more bewildering than outright rejection.
> ----------
> 
> That goes for all the people with "mainstream positions" advising not only
> the Negro but the woman, the Hispanic, the LGBTQ person, the immigrant,
> and the working class person to wait until a "more convenient season".
> 
> No. We've (and I fall into three of the above categories) had enough
> delays. The *planet* has had enough delays, to judge by the worsening
> symptoms of climate change. The time for more radical politics is NOW.
> 

Agreed.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#209500 — Willful ignorance.

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2018-09-30 05:34 -0700
SubjectWillful ignorance.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.30--5.34am.Seattle.2018>
In reply to#209463
Nadegda, then BotBoy:
> > to judge by the worsening symptoms of climate change.
> > The time for more radical politics is NOW.
> 
> Agreed.

"Willful ignorance" pops into my mind, when I hear you two.

4.5 billion years ago, the surface of earth was molten.
33 million years ago, the poles were tropical, not icy.
Plants _ love warmth and carbon dioxide.

The Unibomber makes mainstream environmentalists look like
Donald Trump on steroids -- and they remind me of Jim Jones
( I'm not drinking their KoolAid ).

Ask them for a working example of "progressive collectivism",
and they don't mention JonesTown, or Venezuela, or North Korea;
no, they say BlueEyed Norway -- very Hitleresque.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#209644 — Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.

Fromvallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
Date2018-09-30 21:42 +0000
SubjectRe: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Message-ID<g1cua2F7dt5U4@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#209446
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 03:37:49 +0000, Nadegda wrote:

> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 03:24:58 +0000, vallor wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 01:23:38 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
>> 
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt!
>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 21:51:11 +0000, John of Patmos wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Nadegda wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>> melt!
>>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:47:25 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> You (Nadegda) replied ( to me ):
>>>>>>> > I'm progressive, but not in the way you are, Nadegda.
>>>>>>> > 
>>>>>>> > I have to pay income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes (10%),
>>>>>>> > etc.;
>>>>>>> > if you get your way, I'll have to pay even more.  If you don't
>>>>>>> > mind,
>>>>>>> > I'd rather not pay these women to popout irresponsible nut jobs.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> That's not progressive, kook.  That's standard right-wing misogyny
>>>>>>> and "I've got mine so fuck you" economic right-wingism.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> "God" has punished you for this, your sins; I rejoice.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Oh, really? I haven't noticed any "punishment". Let alone from your
>>>>> non-existent sky pixie.
>>>> 
>>>> ATHEIST!!
>>> 
>>> Yep!
>>> 
>>> You may now commence shriveling up like a vampire exposed to garlic.
>>> 
>>> <snicker>
>>> 
>>>> You're one of them too! It's that kensi, she's a bad influence on
>>>> you!
>>> 
>>> No, she's a very good influence on me, but that's irrelevant, since I
>>> came by my atheism independently. It's religious kooks like you who
>>> are a bad influence, as religious [extremism] leads eventually to
>>> division and strife and bigotry and war.
>> 
>> You misspelled "religious extremism".  FTFU.
> 
> I misspelled nothing.
> 
>> (I am of course assuming you would call any sort of religious education
>> "indoctrination" -- which turns out not to be a mainstream position...)
> 
> Who says I hold mainstream positions?
> 
> I mean just *look* at the mess that's been made by people holding
> mainstream positions.
> 
> Here, have some Martin Luther King:
> 
> http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45a/060.html
> 
> ----------
> First, I must confess that over the last few years I have been gravely
> disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the
> regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the
> stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku
> Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than
> to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension
> to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly
> says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your
> methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the
> timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and
> who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient
> season."
> 
> Shallow understanding from people of goodwill is more frustrating than
> absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance
> is much more bewildering than outright rejection.
> ----------
> 
> That goes for all the people with "mainstream positions" advising not
> only the Negro but the woman, the Hispanic, the LGBTQ person, the
> immigrant, and the working class person to wait until a "more convenient
> season".
> 
> No. We've (and I fall into three of the above categories) had enough
> delays. The *planet* has had enough delays, to judge by the worsening
> symptoms of climate change. The time for more radical politics is NOW.

Strawman.

I'm talking about religious education.  Since secular K-12 tends to be 
missing any kind of moral instruction, something needs to fill the gap.  
For many parents, that is either sending kids to parochial schools, or 
having them attend after-school programs.

There's a fine line between "education" and "indoctrination".  Heck, I'd 
be happy if parents sent their children to some after-school program of 
secular humanist discussions.  Right now, there is a secular gap in moral 
instruction -- but there needs to be some kind of education that 
cultivates children's consciences.

Otherwise, they grow up to ignore their consciences, which leads to all 
sorts of social ills.

Look at Skeeter and Gerg, for example.

Finally, I'll leave you with a definition:  "morals are the ethics of 
conscience".

-- 
-v

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#209646 — Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-30 14:47 -0700
SubjectRe: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Message-ID<bko5pu.d19.17.1@news.alt.net>
In reply to#209644
On 2018-09-30 2:42 PM, vallor wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 03:37:49 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
> 
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 03:24:58 +0000, vallor wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 01:23:38 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
>>>
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>> melt!
>>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 21:51:11 +0000, John of Patmos wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:47:25 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You (Nadegda) replied ( to me ):
>>>>>>>>> I'm progressive, but not in the way you are, Nadegda.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have to pay income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes (10%),
>>>>>>>>> etc.;
>>>>>>>>> if you get your way, I'll have to pay even more.  If you don't
>>>>>>>>> mind,
>>>>>>>>> I'd rather not pay these women to popout irresponsible nut jobs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's not progressive, kook.  That's standard right-wing misogyny
>>>>>>>> and "I've got mine so fuck you" economic right-wingism.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "God" has punished you for this, your sins; I rejoice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, really? I haven't noticed any "punishment". Let alone from your
>>>>>> non-existent sky pixie.
>>>>>
>>>>> ATHEIST!!
>>>>
>>>> Yep!
>>>>
>>>> You may now commence shriveling up like a vampire exposed to garlic.
>>>>
>>>> <snicker>
>>>>
>>>>> You're one of them too! It's that kensi, she's a bad influence on
>>>>> you!
>>>>
>>>> No, she's a very good influence on me, but that's irrelevant, since I
>>>> came by my atheism independently. It's religious kooks like you who
>>>> are a bad influence, as religious [extremism] leads eventually to
>>>> division and strife and bigotry and war.
>>>
>>> You misspelled "religious extremism".  FTFU.
>>
>> I misspelled nothing.
>>
>>> (I am of course assuming you would call any sort of religious education
>>> "indoctrination" -- which turns out not to be a mainstream position...)
>>
>> Who says I hold mainstream positions?
>>
>> I mean just *look* at the mess that's been made by people holding
>> mainstream positions.
>>
>> Here, have some Martin Luther King:
>>
>> http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45a/060.html
>>
>> ----------
>> First, I must confess that over the last few years I have been gravely
>> disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the
>> regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the
>> stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku
>> Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than
>> to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension
>> to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly
>> says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your
>> methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the
>> timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and
>> who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient
>> season."
>>
>> Shallow understanding from people of goodwill is more frustrating than
>> absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance
>> is much more bewildering than outright rejection.
>> ----------
>>
>> That goes for all the people with "mainstream positions" advising not
>> only the Negro but the woman, the Hispanic, the LGBTQ person, the
>> immigrant, and the working class person to wait until a "more convenient
>> season".
>>
>> No. We've (and I fall into three of the above categories) had enough
>> delays. The *planet* has had enough delays, to judge by the worsening
>> symptoms of climate change. The time for more radical politics is NOW.
> 
> Strawman.
> 
> I'm talking about religious education.  Since secular K-12 tends to be
> missing any kind of moral instruction, something needs to fill the gap.
> For many parents, that is either sending kids to parochial schools, or
> having them attend after-school programs.
> 
> There's a fine line between "education" and "indoctrination".  Heck, I'd
> be happy if parents sent their children to some after-school program of
> secular humanist discussions.  Right now, there is a secular gap in moral
> instruction -- but there needs to be some kind of education that
> cultivates children's consciences.
> 
> Otherwise, they grow up to ignore their consciences, which leads to all
> sorts of social ills.
> 
> Look at Skeeter and Gerg, for example.
> 
> Finally, I'll leave you with a definition:  "morals are the ethics of
> conscience".
> 
LOL , skeeter and gerg

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#209649 — Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-09-30 14:56 -0700
SubjectRe: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Message-ID<g1cv4oF8s80U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#209644
On 9/30/18 2:42 PM, vallor wrote:
...
>> No. We've (and I fall into three of the above categories) had enough
>> delays. The *planet* has had enough delays, to judge by the worsening
>> symptoms of climate change. The time for more radical politics is NOW.
> 
> Strawman.
> 
> I'm talking about religious education.  Since secular K-12 tends to be
> missing any kind of moral instruction, something needs to fill the gap.

They CAN and SHOULD be teaching basic morals of respect, etc. (though it 
is true they often fail in this area).

> For many parents, that is either sending kids to parochial schools, or
> having them attend after-school programs.

Or PARENTING. My kids have a good set of morals from their home.

> There's a fine line between "education" and "indoctrination".  Heck, I'd
> be happy if parents sent their children to some after-school program of
> secular humanist discussions.  Right now, there is a secular gap in moral
> instruction -- but there needs to be some kind of education that
> cultivates children's consciences.
> 
> Otherwise, they grow up to ignore their consciences, which leads to all
> sorts of social ills.
> 
> Look at Skeeter and Gerg, for example.
> 
> Finally, I'll leave you with a definition:  "morals are the ethics of
> conscience".
> 


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#209746 — Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-10-01 02:21 +0000
SubjectRe: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Message-ID<pos0b8$mhp$125@dont-email.me>
In reply to#209644
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 21:42:26 +0000, vallor wrote:

> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 03:37:49 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
> 
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt!
>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 03:24:58 +0000, vallor wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 01:23:38 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>> melt!
>>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 21:51:11 +0000, John of Patmos wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Nadegda wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:47:25 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You (Nadegda) replied ( to me ):
>>>>>>>> > I'm progressive, but not in the way you are, Nadegda.
>>>>>>>> > 
>>>>>>>> > I have to pay income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes (10%),
>>>>>>>> > etc.;
>>>>>>>> > if you get your way, I'll have to pay even more.  If you don't
>>>>>>>> > mind,
>>>>>>>> > I'd rather not pay these women to popout irresponsible nut
>>>>>>>> > jobs.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> That's not progressive, kook.  That's standard right-wing
>>>>>>>> misogyny and "I've got mine so fuck you" economic right-wingism.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> "God" has punished you for this, your sins; I rejoice.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Oh, really? I haven't noticed any "punishment". Let alone from your
>>>>>> non-existent sky pixie.
>>>>> 
>>>>> ATHEIST!!
>>>> 
>>>> Yep!
>>>> 
>>>> You may now commence shriveling up like a vampire exposed to garlic.
>>>> 
>>>> <snicker>
>>>> 
>>>>> You're one of them too! It's that kensi, she's a bad influence on
>>>>> you!
>>>> 
>>>> No, she's a very good influence on me, but that's irrelevant, since I
>>>> came by my atheism independently. It's religious kooks like you who
>>>> are a bad influence, as religious [extremism] leads eventually to
>>>> division and strife and bigotry and war.
>>> 
>>> You misspelled "religious extremism".  FTFU.
>> 
>> I misspelled nothing.
>> 
>>> (I am of course assuming you would call any sort of religious
>>> education "indoctrination" -- which turns out not to be a mainstream
>>> position...)
>> 
>> Who says I hold mainstream positions?
>> 
>> I mean just *look* at the mess that's been made by people holding
>> mainstream positions.
>> 
>> Here, have some Martin Luther King:
>> 
>> http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45a/060.html
>> 
>> ----------
>> First, I must confess that over the last few years I have been gravely
>> disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the
>> regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the
>> stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku
>> Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order"
>> than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of
>> tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who
>> constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't
>> agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels
>> he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the
>> myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more
>> convenient season."
>> 
>> Shallow understanding from people of goodwill is more frustrating than
>> absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance
>> is much more bewildering than outright rejection.
>> ----------
>> 
>> That goes for all the people with "mainstream positions" advising not
>> only the Negro but the woman, the Hispanic, the LGBTQ person, the
>> immigrant, and the working class person to wait until a "more
>> convenient season".
>> 
>> No. We've (and I fall into three of the above categories) had enough
>> delays. The *planet* has had enough delays, to judge by the worsening
>> symptoms of climate change. The time for more radical politics is NOW.
> 
> Strawman.
> 
> I'm talking about religious education.  Since secular K-12 tends to be
> missing any kind of moral instruction, something needs to fill the gap.
> For many parents, that is either sending kids to parochial schools, or
> having them attend after-school programs.
> 
> There's a fine line between "education" and "indoctrination".  Heck, I'd
> be happy if parents sent their children to some after-school program of
> secular humanist discussions.  Right now, there is a secular gap in
> moral instruction -- but there needs to be some kind of education that
> cultivates children's consciences.
> 
> Otherwise, they grow up to ignore their consciences, which leads to all
> sorts of social ills.
> 
> Look at Skeeter and Gerg, for example.
> 
> Finally, I'll leave you with a definition:  "morals are the ethics of
> conscience".

I don't disagree. But meanwhile women, LGBTQ, POC, and others continue to 
need justice, and should not have to wait out of a misguided desire for 
"incrementalism". You saw what happened in 2016: reformers ran on a 
glacially-slow-incrementalist platform after deliberately sabotaging a 
slightly-faster-incrementalist, and Trump got into the fucking White House.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#209768 — Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-30 23:35 -0700
SubjectRe: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Message-ID<MPG.361b60126d50971e994cfa@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#209746
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <pos0b8$mhp$125@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 21:42:26 +0000, vallor wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 03:37:49 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
> > 
> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >> melt!
> >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 03:24:58 +0000, vallor wrote:
> >> 
> >>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 01:23:38 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >>>> melt!
> >>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 21:51:11 +0000, John of Patmos wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>>> Nadegda wrote:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >>>>>> melt!
> >>>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:47:25 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> You (Nadegda) replied ( to me ):
> >>>>>>>> > I'm progressive, but not in the way you are, Nadegda.
> >>>>>>>> > 
> >>>>>>>> > I have to pay income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes (10%),
> >>>>>>>> > etc.;
> >>>>>>>> > if you get your way, I'll have to pay even more.  If you don't
> >>>>>>>> > mind,
> >>>>>>>> > I'd rather not pay these women to popout irresponsible nut
> >>>>>>>> > jobs.
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> That's not progressive, kook.  That's standard right-wing
> >>>>>>>> misogyny and "I've got mine so fuck you" economic right-wingism.
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> "God" has punished you for this, your sins; I rejoice.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Oh, really? I haven't noticed any "punishment". Let alone from your
> >>>>>> non-existent sky pixie.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> ATHEIST!!
> >>>> 
> >>>> Yep!
> >>>> 
> >>>> You may now commence shriveling up like a vampire exposed to garlic.
> >>>> 
> >>>> <snicker>
> >>>> 
> >>>>> You're one of them too! It's that kensi, she's a bad influence on
> >>>>> you!
> >>>> 
> >>>> No, she's a very good influence on me, but that's irrelevant, since I
> >>>> came by my atheism independently. It's religious kooks like you who
> >>>> are a bad influence, as religious [extremism] leads eventually to
> >>>> division and strife and bigotry and war.
> >>> 
> >>> You misspelled "religious extremism".  FTFU.
> >> 
> >> I misspelled nothing.
> >> 
> >>> (I am of course assuming you would call any sort of religious
> >>> education "indoctrination" -- which turns out not to be a mainstream
> >>> position...)
> >> 
> >> Who says I hold mainstream positions?
> >> 
> >> I mean just *look* at the mess that's been made by people holding
> >> mainstream positions.
> >> 
> >> Here, have some Martin Luther King:
> >> 
> >> http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45a/060.html
> >> 
> >> ----------
> >> First, I must confess that over the last few years I have been gravely
> >> disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the
> >> regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the
> >> stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku
> >> Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order"
> >> than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of
> >> tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who
> >> constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't
> >> agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels
> >> he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the
> >> myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more
> >> convenient season."
> >> 
> >> Shallow understanding from people of goodwill is more frustrating than
> >> absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance
> >> is much more bewildering than outright rejection.
> >> ----------
> >> 
> >> That goes for all the people with "mainstream positions" advising not
> >> only the Negro but the woman, the Hispanic, the LGBTQ person, the
> >> immigrant, and the working class person to wait until a "more
> >> convenient season".
> >> 
> >> No. We've (and I fall into three of the above categories) had enough
> >> delays. The *planet* has had enough delays, to judge by the worsening
> >> symptoms of climate change. The time for more radical politics is NOW.
> > 
> > Strawman.
> > 
> > I'm talking about religious education.  Since secular K-12 tends to be
> > missing any kind of moral instruction, something needs to fill the gap.
> > For many parents, that is either sending kids to parochial schools, or
> > having them attend after-school programs.
> > 
> > There's a fine line between "education" and "indoctrination".  Heck, I'd
> > be happy if parents sent their children to some after-school program of
> > secular humanist discussions.  Right now, there is a secular gap in
> > moral instruction -- but there needs to be some kind of education that
> > cultivates children's consciences.
> > 
> > Otherwise, they grow up to ignore their consciences, which leads to all
> > sorts of social ills.
> > 
> > Look at Skeeter and Gerg, for example.
> > 
> > Finally, I'll leave you with a definition:  "morals are the ethics of
> > conscience".
> 
> I don't disagree. But meanwhile women, LGBTQ, POC, and others continue to 
> need justice, and should not have to wait out of a misguided desire for 
> "incrementalism". You saw what happened in 2016: reformers ran on a 
> glacially-slow-incrementalist platform after deliberately sabotaging a 
> slightly-faster-incrementalist, and Trump got into the fucking White House.

Now you've got a psychotic psychologist setting the progress made by 
legitimate abuse victims back with her bullshit confabulations from half 
a lifetime ago, so how bou dat?

-- 
Checkmate ÂŪ 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright ÂĐ 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#209773 — Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-10-01 06:44 +0000
SubjectRe: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Message-ID<posfok$mhp$133@dont-email.me>
In reply to#209768
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 23:35:39 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <pos0b8$mhp$125@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> @gmail.invalid says...
> 
> 
> 
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 21:42:26 +0000, vallor wrote:
>> 
>> > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 03:37:49 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
>> > 
>> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> >> melt!
>> >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 03:24:58 +0000, vallor wrote:
>> >> 
>> >>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 01:23:38 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
>> >>> 
>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> >>>> melt!
>> >>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 21:51:11 +0000, John of Patmos wrote:
>> >>>> 
>> >>>>> Nadegda wrote:
>> >>>>> 
>> >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>> >>>>>> snowflakes, melt!
>> >>>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:47:25 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>> >>>>>> 
>> >>>>>>> You (Nadegda) replied ( to me ):
>> >>>>>>>> > I'm progressive, but not in the way you are, Nadegda.
>> >>>>>>>> > 
>> >>>>>>>> > I have to pay income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes
>> >>>>>>>> > (10%),
>> >>>>>>>> > etc.;
>> >>>>>>>> > if you get your way, I'll have to pay even more.  If you
>> >>>>>>>> > don't mind,
>> >>>>>>>> > I'd rather not pay these women to popout irresponsible nut
>> >>>>>>>> > jobs.
>> >>>>>>>> 
>> >>>>>>>> That's not progressive, kook.  That's standard right-wing
>> >>>>>>>> misogyny and "I've got mine so fuck you" economic
>> >>>>>>>> right-wingism.
>> >>>>>>> 
>> >>>>>>> "God" has punished you for this, your sins; I rejoice.
>> >>>>>> 
>> >>>>>> Oh, really? I haven't noticed any "punishment". Let alone from
>> >>>>>> your non-existent sky pixie.
>> >>>>> 
>> >>>>> ATHEIST!!
>> >>>> 
>> >>>> Yep!
>> >>>> 
>> >>>> You may now commence shriveling up like a vampire exposed to
>> >>>> garlic.
>> >>>> 
>> >>>> <snicker>
>> >>>> 
>> >>>>> You're one of them too! It's that kensi, she's a bad influence on
>> >>>>> you!
>> >>>> 
>> >>>> No, she's a very good influence on me, but that's irrelevant,
>> >>>> since I came by my atheism independently. It's religious kooks
>> >>>> like you who are a bad influence, as religious [extremism] leads
>> >>>> eventually to division and strife and bigotry and war.
>> >>> 
>> >>> You misspelled "religious extremism".  FTFU.
>> >> 
>> >> I misspelled nothing.
>> >> 
>> >>> (I am of course assuming you would call any sort of religious
>> >>> education "indoctrination" -- which turns out not to be a
>> >>> mainstream position...)
>> >> 
>> >> Who says I hold mainstream positions?
>> >> 
>> >> I mean just *look* at the mess that's been made by people holding
>> >> mainstream positions.
>> >> 
>> >> Here, have some Martin Luther King:
>> >> 
>> >> http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45a/060.html
>> >> 
>> >> ----------
>> >> First, I must confess that over the last few years I have been
>> >> gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached
>> >> the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in
>> >> the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or
>> >> the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to
>> >> "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the
>> >> absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of
>> >> justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek,
>> >> but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who
>> >> paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's
>> >> freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises
>> >> the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season."
>> >> 
>> >> Shallow understanding from people of goodwill is more frustrating
>> >> than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm
>> >> acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.
>> >> ----------
>> >> 
>> >> That goes for all the people with "mainstream positions" advising
>> >> not only the Negro but the woman, the Hispanic, the LGBTQ person,
>> >> the immigrant, and the working class person to wait until a "more
>> >> convenient season".
>> >> 
>> >> No. We've (and I fall into three of the above categories) had enough
>> >> delays. The *planet* has had enough delays, to judge by the
>> >> worsening symptoms of climate change. The time for more radical
>> >> politics is NOW.
>> > 
>> > Strawman.
>> > 
>> > I'm talking about religious education.  Since secular K-12 tends to
>> > be missing any kind of moral instruction, something needs to fill the
>> > gap. For many parents, that is either sending kids to parochial
>> > schools, or having them attend after-school programs.
>> > 
>> > There's a fine line between "education" and "indoctrination".  Heck,
>> > I'd be happy if parents sent their children to some after-school
>> > program of secular humanist discussions.  Right now, there is a
>> > secular gap in moral instruction -- but there needs to be some kind
>> > of education that cultivates children's consciences.
>> > 
>> > Otherwise, they grow up to ignore their consciences, which leads to
>> > all sorts of social ills.
>> > 
>> > Look at Skeeter and Gerg, for example.
>> > 
>> > Finally, I'll leave you with a definition:  "morals are the ethics of
>> > conscience".
>> 
>> I don't disagree. But meanwhile women, LGBTQ, POC, and others continue
>> to need justice, and should not have to wait out of a misguided desire
>> for "incrementalism". You saw what happened in 2016: reformers ran on a
>> glacially-slow-incrementalist platform after deliberately sabotaging a
>> slightly-faster-incrementalist, and Trump got into the fucking White
>> House.
> 
> Now you've got a psychotic

Proof, kook?

> psychologist setting the progress made by legitimate abuse victims back

Proof, kook?

> with her bullshit

Proof, kook?

> confabulations

Proof, kook?

> from half a lifetime ago, so how bou dat?

See above.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#209785 — Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-10-01 00:07 -0700
SubjectRe: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Message-ID<MPG.361b678bb3736d3a994d03@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#209773
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <posfok$mhp$133@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 23:35:39 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> 
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate!  In article <pos0b8$mhp$125@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> > @gmail.invalid says...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 21:42:26 +0000, vallor wrote:
> >> 
> >> > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 03:37:49 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
> >> > 
> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >> >> melt!
> >> >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 03:24:58 +0000, vallor wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 01:23:38 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
> >> >>> 
> >> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >> >>>> melt!
> >> >>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 21:51:11 +0000, John of Patmos wrote:
> >> >>>> 
> >> >>>>> Nadegda wrote:
> >> >>>>> 
> >> >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> >> >>>>>> snowflakes, melt!
> >> >>>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:47:25 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> >> >>>>>> 
> >> >>>>>>> You (Nadegda) replied ( to me ):
> >> >>>>>>>> > I'm progressive, but not in the way you are, Nadegda.
> >> >>>>>>>> > 
> >> >>>>>>>> > I have to pay income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes
> >> >>>>>>>> > (10%),
> >> >>>>>>>> > etc.;
> >> >>>>>>>> > if you get your way, I'll have to pay even more.  If you
> >> >>>>>>>> > don't mind,
> >> >>>>>>>> > I'd rather not pay these women to popout irresponsible nut
> >> >>>>>>>> > jobs.
> >> >>>>>>>> 
> >> >>>>>>>> That's not progressive, kook.  That's standard right-wing
> >> >>>>>>>> misogyny and "I've got mine so fuck you" economic
> >> >>>>>>>> right-wingism.
> >> >>>>>>> 
> >> >>>>>>> "God" has punished you for this, your sins; I rejoice.
> >> >>>>>> 
> >> >>>>>> Oh, really? I haven't noticed any "punishment". Let alone from
> >> >>>>>> your non-existent sky pixie.
> >> >>>>> 
> >> >>>>> ATHEIST!!
> >> >>>> 
> >> >>>> Yep!
> >> >>>> 
> >> >>>> You may now commence shriveling up like a vampire exposed to
> >> >>>> garlic.
> >> >>>> 
> >> >>>> <snicker>
> >> >>>> 
> >> >>>>> You're one of them too! It's that kensi, she's a bad influence on
> >> >>>>> you!
> >> >>>> 
> >> >>>> No, she's a very good influence on me, but that's irrelevant,
> >> >>>> since I came by my atheism independently. It's religious kooks
> >> >>>> like you who are a bad influence, as religious [extremism] leads
> >> >>>> eventually to division and strife and bigotry and war.
> >> >>> 
> >> >>> You misspelled "religious extremism".  FTFU.
> >> >> 
> >> >> I misspelled nothing.
> >> >> 
> >> >>> (I am of course assuming you would call any sort of religious
> >> >>> education "indoctrination" -- which turns out not to be a
> >> >>> mainstream position...)
> >> >> 
> >> >> Who says I hold mainstream positions?
> >> >> 
> >> >> I mean just *look* at the mess that's been made by people holding
> >> >> mainstream positions.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Here, have some Martin Luther King:
> >> >> 
> >> >> http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45a/060.html
> >> >> 
> >> >> ----------
> >> >> First, I must confess that over the last few years I have been
> >> >> gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached
> >> >> the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in
> >> >> the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or
> >> >> the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to
> >> >> "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the
> >> >> absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of
> >> >> justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek,
> >> >> but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who
> >> >> paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's
> >> >> freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises
> >> >> the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season."
> >> >> 
> >> >> Shallow understanding from people of goodwill is more frustrating
> >> >> than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm
> >> >> acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.
> >> >> ----------
> >> >> 
> >> >> That goes for all the people with "mainstream positions" advising
> >> >> not only the Negro but the woman, the Hispanic, the LGBTQ person,
> >> >> the immigrant, and the working class person to wait until a "more
> >> >> convenient season".
> >> >> 
> >> >> No. We've (and I fall into three of the above categories) had enough
> >> >> delays. The *planet* has had enough delays, to judge by the
> >> >> worsening symptoms of climate change. The time for more radical
> >> >> politics is NOW.
> >> > 
> >> > Strawman.
> >> > 
> >> > I'm talking about religious education.  Since secular K-12 tends to
> >> > be missing any kind of moral instruction, something needs to fill the
> >> > gap. For many parents, that is either sending kids to parochial
> >> > schools, or having them attend after-school programs.
> >> > 
> >> > There's a fine line between "education" and "indoctrination".  Heck,
> >> > I'd be happy if parents sent their children to some after-school
> >> > program of secular humanist discussions.  Right now, there is a
> >> > secular gap in moral instruction -- but there needs to be some kind
> >> > of education that cultivates children's consciences.
> >> > 
> >> > Otherwise, they grow up to ignore their consciences, which leads to
> >> > all sorts of social ills.
> >> > 
> >> > Look at Skeeter and Gerg, for example.
> >> > 
> >> > Finally, I'll leave you with a definition:  "morals are the ethics of
> >> > conscience".
> >> 
> >> I don't disagree. But meanwhile women, LGBTQ, POC, and others continue
> >> to need justice, and should not have to wait out of a misguided desire
> >> for "incrementalism". You saw what happened in 2016: reformers ran on a
> >> glacially-slow-incrementalist platform after deliberately sabotaging a
> >> slightly-faster-incrementalist, and Trump got into the fucking White
> >> House.
> > 
> > Now you've got a psychotic
> 
> Proof, kook?
> 
> > psychologist setting the progress made by legitimate abuse victims back
> 
> Proof, kook?
> 
> > with her bullshit
> 
> Proof, kook?
> 
> > confabulations
> 
> Proof, kook?
> 
> > from half a lifetime ago, so how bou dat?
> 
> See above.

NO!  AND I ME*8N IT!

-- 
Checkmate ÂŪ 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright ÂĐ 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#209820 — Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-10-01 05:44 -0600
SubjectRe: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Message-ID<MPG.361bb69264f068f8989d18@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#209773
In article <posfok$mhp$133@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
says...
> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 23:35:39 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
> 
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate!  In article <pos0b8$mhp$125@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> > @gmail.invalid says...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 21:42:26 +0000, vallor wrote:
> >> 
> >> > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 03:37:49 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
> >> > 
> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >> >> melt!
> >> >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 03:24:58 +0000, vallor wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 01:23:38 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
> >> >>> 
> >> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >> >>>> melt!
> >> >>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 21:51:11 +0000, John of Patmos wrote:
> >> >>>> 
> >> >>>>> Nadegda wrote:
> >> >>>>> 
> >> >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> >> >>>>>> snowflakes, melt!
> >> >>>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:47:25 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> >> >>>>>> 
> >> >>>>>>> You (Nadegda) replied ( to me ):
> >> >>>>>>>> > I'm progressive, but not in the way you are, Nadegda.
> >> >>>>>>>> > 
> >> >>>>>>>> > I have to pay income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes
> >> >>>>>>>> > (10%),
> >> >>>>>>>> > etc.;
> >> >>>>>>>> > if you get your way, I'll have to pay even more.  If you
> >> >>>>>>>> > don't mind,
> >> >>>>>>>> > I'd rather not pay these women to popout irresponsible nut
> >> >>>>>>>> > jobs.
> >> >>>>>>>> 
> >> >>>>>>>> That's not progressive, kook.  That's standard right-wing
> >> >>>>>>>> misogyny and "I've got mine so fuck you" economic
> >> >>>>>>>> right-wingism.
> >> >>>>>>> 
> >> >>>>>>> "God" has punished you for this, your sins; I rejoice.
> >> >>>>>> 
> >> >>>>>> Oh, really? I haven't noticed any "punishment". Let alone from
> >> >>>>>> your non-existent sky pixie.
> >> >>>>> 
> >> >>>>> ATHEIST!!
> >> >>>> 
> >> >>>> Yep!
> >> >>>> 
> >> >>>> You may now commence shriveling up like a vampire exposed to
> >> >>>> garlic.
> >> >>>> 
> >> >>>> <snicker>
> >> >>>> 
> >> >>>>> You're one of them too! It's that kensi, she's a bad influence on
> >> >>>>> you!
> >> >>>> 
> >> >>>> No, she's a very good influence on me, but that's irrelevant,
> >> >>>> since I came by my atheism independently. It's religious kooks
> >> >>>> like you who are a bad influence, as religious [extremism] leads
> >> >>>> eventually to division and strife and bigotry and war.
> >> >>> 
> >> >>> You misspelled "religious extremism".  FTFU.
> >> >> 
> >> >> I misspelled nothing.
> >> >> 
> >> >>> (I am of course assuming you would call any sort of religious
> >> >>> education "indoctrination" -- which turns out not to be a
> >> >>> mainstream position...)
> >> >> 
> >> >> Who says I hold mainstream positions?
> >> >> 
> >> >> I mean just *look* at the mess that's been made by people holding
> >> >> mainstream positions.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Here, have some Martin Luther King:
> >> >> 
> >> >> http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45a/060.html
> >> >> 
> >> >> ----------
> >> >> First, I must confess that over the last few years I have been
> >> >> gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached
> >> >> the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in
> >> >> the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or
> >> >> the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to
> >> >> "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the
> >> >> absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of
> >> >> justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek,
> >> >> but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who
> >> >> paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's
> >> >> freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises
> >> >> the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season."
> >> >> 
> >> >> Shallow understanding from people of goodwill is more frustrating
> >> >> than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm
> >> >> acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.
> >> >> ----------
> >> >> 
> >> >> That goes for all the people with "mainstream positions" advising
> >> >> not only the Negro but the woman, the Hispanic, the LGBTQ person,
> >> >> the immigrant, and the working class person to wait until a "more
> >> >> convenient season".
> >> >> 
> >> >> No. We've (and I fall into three of the above categories) had enough
> >> >> delays. The *planet* has had enough delays, to judge by the
> >> >> worsening symptoms of climate change. The time for more radical
> >> >> politics is NOW.
> >> > 
> >> > Strawman.
> >> > 
> >> > I'm talking about religious education.  Since secular K-12 tends to
> >> > be missing any kind of moral instruction, something needs to fill the
> >> > gap. For many parents, that is either sending kids to parochial
> >> > schools, or having them attend after-school programs.
> >> > 
> >> > There's a fine line between "education" and "indoctrination".  Heck,
> >> > I'd be happy if parents sent their children to some after-school
> >> > program of secular humanist discussions.  Right now, there is a
> >> > secular gap in moral instruction -- but there needs to be some kind
> >> > of education that cultivates children's consciences.
> >> > 
> >> > Otherwise, they grow up to ignore their consciences, which leads to
> >> > all sorts of social ills.
> >> > 
> >> > Look at Skeeter and Gerg, for example.
> >> > 
> >> > Finally, I'll leave you with a definition:  "morals are the ethics of
> >> > conscience".
> >> 
> >> I don't disagree. But meanwhile women, LGBTQ, POC, and others continue
> >> to need justice, and should not have to wait out of a misguided desire
> >> for "incrementalism". You saw what happened in 2016: reformers ran on a
> >> glacially-slow-incrementalist platform after deliberately sabotaging a
> >> slightly-faster-incrementalist, and Trump got into the fucking White
> >> House.
> > 
> > Now you've got a psychotic
> 
> Proof, kook?
> 
> > psychologist setting the progress made by legitimate abuse victims back
> 
> Proof, kook?
> 
> > with her bullshit
> 
> Proof, kook?
> 
> > confabulations
> 
> Proof, kook?
> 
> > from half a lifetime ago, so how bou dat?
> 
> See above.

Translation: I have no argument so I will post the old "proof kook"...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#209855 — Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-10-01 10:10 -0500
SubjectRe: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Message-ID<potdd5$hvh$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#209768
On 10/1/2018 1:35 AM, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
> Checkmate!  In article <pos0b8$mhp$125@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> @gmail.invalid says...
> 
> 
>>
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 21:42:26 +0000, vallor wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 03:37:49 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
>>>
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>> melt!
>>>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 03:24:58 +0000, vallor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 01:23:38 +0000, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 21:51:11 +0000, John of Patmos wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:47:25 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You (Nadegda) replied ( to me ):
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm progressive, but not in the way you are, Nadegda.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have to pay income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes (10%),
>>>>>>>>>>> etc.;
>>>>>>>>>>> if you get your way, I'll have to pay even more.  If you don't
>>>>>>>>>>> mind,
>>>>>>>>>>> I'd rather not pay these women to popout irresponsible nut
>>>>>>>>>>> jobs.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's not progressive, kook.  That's standard right-wing
>>>>>>>>>> misogyny and "I've got mine so fuck you" economic right-wingism.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "God" has punished you for this, your sins; I rejoice.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh, really? I haven't noticed any "punishment". Let alone from your
>>>>>>>> non-existent sky pixie.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ATHEIST!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yep!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You may now commence shriveling up like a vampire exposed to garlic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snicker>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're one of them too! It's that kensi, she's a bad influence on
>>>>>>> you!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, she's a very good influence on me, but that's irrelevant, since I
>>>>>> came by my atheism independently. It's religious kooks like you who
>>>>>> are a bad influence, as religious [extremism] leads eventually to
>>>>>> division and strife and bigotry and war.
>>>>>
>>>>> You misspelled "religious extremism".  FTFU.
>>>>
>>>> I misspelled nothing.
>>>>
>>>>> (I am of course assuming you would call any sort of religious
>>>>> education "indoctrination" -- which turns out not to be a mainstream
>>>>> position...)
>>>>
>>>> Who says I hold mainstream positions?
>>>>
>>>> I mean just *look* at the mess that's been made by people holding
>>>> mainstream positions.
>>>>
>>>> Here, have some Martin Luther King:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45a/060.html
>>>>
>>>> ----------
>>>> First, I must confess that over the last few years I have been gravely
>>>> disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the
>>>> regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the
>>>> stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku
>>>> Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order"
>>>> than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of
>>>> tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who
>>>> constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't
>>>> agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels
>>>> he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the
>>>> myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more
>>>> convenient season."
>>>>
>>>> Shallow understanding from people of goodwill is more frustrating than
>>>> absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance
>>>> is much more bewildering than outright rejection.
>>>> ----------
>>>>
>>>> That goes for all the people with "mainstream positions" advising not
>>>> only the Negro but the woman, the Hispanic, the LGBTQ person, the
>>>> immigrant, and the working class person to wait until a "more
>>>> convenient season".
>>>>
>>>> No. We've (and I fall into three of the above categories) had enough
>>>> delays. The *planet* has had enough delays, to judge by the worsening
>>>> symptoms of climate change. The time for more radical politics is NOW.
>>>
>>> Strawman.
>>>
>>> I'm talking about religious education.  Since secular K-12 tends to be
>>> missing any kind of moral instruction, something needs to fill the gap.
>>> For many parents, that is either sending kids to parochial schools, or
>>> having them attend after-school programs.
>>>
>>> There's a fine line between "education" and "indoctrination".  Heck, I'd
>>> be happy if parents sent their children to some after-school program of
>>> secular humanist discussions.  Right now, there is a secular gap in
>>> moral instruction -- but there needs to be some kind of education that
>>> cultivates children's consciences.
>>>
>>> Otherwise, they grow up to ignore their consciences, which leads to all
>>> sorts of social ills.
>>>
>>> Look at Skeeter and Gerg, for example.
>>>
>>> Finally, I'll leave you with a definition:  "morals are the ethics of
>>> conscience".
>>
>> I don't disagree. But meanwhile women, LGBTQ, POC, and others continue to 
>> need justice, and should not have to wait out of a misguided desire for 
>> "incrementalism". You saw what happened in 2016: reformers ran on a 
>> glacially-slow-incrementalist platform after deliberately sabotaging a 
>> slightly-faster-incrementalist, and Trump got into the fucking White House.
> 
> Now you've got a psychotic psychologist setting the progress made by 
> legitimate abuse victims back with her bullshit confabulations from half 
> a lifetime ago, so how bou dat?
> 

in her testimony she said "...it writes on the hippocampus...", WTF ?
so now we know she is lying.
many psychologists are recovering drug addicts.


I agree with above in thread

"I'm talking about religious education.  Since  K-12 tends to be
 missing any kind of moral instruction, something needs to fill the gap."

the morals Democrats push on our kids ?
	use POT
	sharpen narcissism skills
	lie, cheat, steal to get our way
	pay posters to disrupt the government
	keep the oldest gov officials as they cannot think straight
	keep all the Gov in Unions where they cannot be fired
	Raise Taxes on everything
	Dems know better than everybody else, including voters
	

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#209788 — Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2018-10-01 08:16 +0100
SubjectRe: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Message-ID<1nvzfz1.bnd1z6dwrtanN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#209446
Paul "IQ 180" Derbyshire in his Nerdegda frock pompously pronounced:

[...]

> That goes for all the people with "mainstream positions" advising not only
> the Negro but the woman, the Hispanic, the LGBTQ person, the immigrant,
> and the working class person to wait until a "more convenient season".
> 
> No. We've (and I fall into three of the above categories) had enough 
> delays. The *planet* has had enough delays, to judge by the worsening
> symptoms of climate change. The time for more radical politics is NOW.
>

Your list of categories is incomplete, it should be LGBTQACIRN.

Also, what about mere poseurs such as Tranvestites?  That's a 
topic on which you should be able to give us a definitive answer.

-- 
^Ï^     My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#209793 — Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.

FromSiri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
Date2018-10-01 01:57 -0700
SubjectRe: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Message-ID<chine.bleu-87F9CA.01571901102018@reader.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#209788
In article <1nvzfz1.bnd1z6dwrtanN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>,
 snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:

> Also, what about mere poseurs such as Tranvestites?  That's a 

They're in that creepy old mansion perverting Brad and Janet.

-- 
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.    @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'                                    /|\
An almond doesn't lactate.                        This post         / \
Yet another supercilious snowflake for justice.   insults Islam.  Mohammed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#209796 — Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
SubjectRe: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Message-ID<1nvzlo9.3d83f51vr6l1mN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#209793
Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:

> In article <1nvzfz1.bnd1z6dwrtanN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>,
>  snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
> 
> > Also, what about mere poseurs such as Tranvestites?  That's a 
> 
> They're in that creepy old mansion perverting Brad and Janet.

That crazy old Frank N. Furter; let's do the time warp again. 

-- 
^Ï^     My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#209799 — Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.

FromSiri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
Date2018-10-01 02:56 -0700
SubjectRe: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.
Message-ID<chine.bleu-C299C1.02560601102018@reader.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#209796
In article <1nvzlo9.3d83f51vr6l1mN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>,
 snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:

> Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > In article <1nvzfz1.bnd1z6dwrtanN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>,
> >  snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
> > 
> > > Also, what about mere poseurs such as Tranvestites?  That's a 
> > 
> > They're in that creepy old mansion perverting Brad and Janet.
> 
> That crazy old Frank N. Furter; let's do the time warp again.

I think Riffraff was the mission commander all along. He just let Furter think 
he was running the show. Sort of a musical version of the Ninth Configuration.

-- 
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.    @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'                                    /|\
An almond doesn't lactate.                        This post         / \
Yet another supercilious snowflake for justice.   insults Islam.  Mohammed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 46 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 44 45 [46] 47 48 … 50  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate


csiph-web