Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #200505 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-03 12:44 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-09-10 11:02 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 50 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-03 12:44 -0400
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 10:40 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-06 13:28 -0400
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 12:17 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-09-08 15:22 -0400
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-08 20:27 +0000
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 14:55 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-09 13:56 -0400
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-09 11:10 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-10 10:37 -0400
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 10:34 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-10 12:19 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 13:24 -0600
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. aaa <jeo@somewhere.org> - 2018-09-10 16:31 -0400
Genesis' creation story in is about leaving home to start a family. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-10 14:22 -0700
Re: Genesis' creation story in is about leaving home to start a family. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-11 00:11 -0500
Re: Genesis' creation story in is about leaving home to start a family. Gronk <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-16 14:40 -0600
Eve was the wife, it was incestuous. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-16 16:41 -0700
Re: Eve was the wife, it was incestuous. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 17:08 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-10 17:32 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. aaa <jeo@somewhere.org> - 2018-09-10 22:19 -0400
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-11 10:07 -0400
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-11 13:29 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 11:25 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-09 11:51 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-10 10:57 -0400
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-10 11:05 -0400
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-10 09:18 -0600
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-10 12:22 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-10 15:51 +0000
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-10 12:24 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 13:28 -0600
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-10 12:50 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 13:56 -0600
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-10 13:29 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-10 15:01 -0600
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-10 15:30 -0600
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 10:37 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-11 10:07 -0400
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 07:24 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-11 10:59 -0400
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-11 16:37 +0000
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-11 10:57 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-11 13:30 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 14:34 -0600
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-11 13:19 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-11 14:44 -0600
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-09 19:00 +0000
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-09 12:18 -0700
Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-10 11:02 -0400
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-03 12:44 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: The pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. |
| Message-ID | <sbkqodhbp8vnsf8t9p8akid946r0c2mmon@4ax.com> |
On Sat, 1 Sep 2018, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >On 9/1/2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Thu, 30 Aug 2018, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >>> In article <r06eod9jskjbivic1lb7ggshov6gcsb19b@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>> On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 08:13:25 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: >>>>> "Odd" [sic] replied ( to me ): >>>>>>> Pink holes are outside of our observable universe. >>>>>> >>>>>> For someone who claims to be grateful about lacking sex, >>>>>> you sure think about it a lot. >>>>> >>>>> All around the world... Dictators, Robots, Bishops, Ayatollahs, >>>>> Authoritarians, Censors and Moderators are _all in agreement: >>>>> you should _ not see: Jeff-Relf.Me/Urethral.Opening.JPG >>>>> >>>>> Notice how the pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. >>>>> >>>>> Most women aren't aware of this, not even the "educated" ones. >>>>> >>>>> On "SexPlanations" (YouTube), Ms. Lindsey Doe's drawing >>>>> (wrongly) suggests that the pee "hole" ( sans shaft ) >>>>> is halfway between the rim of the vagina and the clit. >>>>> >>>>> Like me, porn actresses are fully aware, of course; >>>>> but knowing this, as I do, and fearlessly talking about it, as I do, >>>>> doesn't mean I need to keep touching the real thing. >>>>> -- Personally, I can't be "lonely" enough. >>>> >>>> <...> >>>> >>>> Eww. No wonder so many men nowadays turn gay. >>> >>> I think you're suffering from Vagiphopia. >> >> Not ALL vaginas. Just the old, smelly ones that >> have outlived their usefulness. IMO, any vagina >> over about 25 years of age is no longer desirable. >> >> Any vagina that has passed a baby no matter the >> age is also shot all to hell as it is stretched and >> doesn't adequately grip and excite a penis. >> >A friend of mine who is onto such things assures me while sex post >childbirth is "different" it is clearly not ruined. Yes, different as in undesirable unless a man is truly desperate. Why expose one's self to potential venereal diseases for the sake of a vagina that no longer does what it's supposed to do, feels like it was meant to feel? Women need to learn their sexuality has certain limits. The intended purpose is for child bearing. A man who wants several children just has to ignore the fact that the vagina is no longer primarily for his pleasure but for her reproduction. Women are more like throw-away containers. Once the contents (baby) are dispensed, the container has marginal utility. -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall "Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. (There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-03 10:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.35f711ec37b07a24994829@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #200505 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <sbkqodhbp8vnsf8t9p8akid946r0c2mmon@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > On Sat, 1 Sep 2018, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: > >On 9/1/2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >> On Thu, 30 Aug 2018, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> In article <r06eod9jskjbivic1lb7ggshov6gcsb19b@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >>>> On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 08:13:25 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: > >>>>> "Odd" [sic] replied ( to me ): > >>>>>>> Pink holes are outside of our observable universe. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> For someone who claims to be grateful about lacking sex, > >>>>>> you sure think about it a lot. > >>>>> > >>>>> All around the world... Dictators, Robots, Bishops, Ayatollahs, > >>>>> Authoritarians, Censors and Moderators are _all in agreement: > >>>>> you should _ not see: Jeff-Relf.Me/Urethral.Opening.JPG > >>>>> > >>>>> Notice how the pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. > >>>>> > >>>>> Most women aren't aware of this, not even the "educated" ones. > >>>>> > >>>>> On "SexPlanations" (YouTube), Ms. Lindsey Doe's drawing > >>>>> (wrongly) suggests that the pee "hole" ( sans shaft ) > >>>>> is halfway between the rim of the vagina and the clit. > >>>>> > >>>>> Like me, porn actresses are fully aware, of course; > >>>>> but knowing this, as I do, and fearlessly talking about it, as I do, > >>>>> doesn't mean I need to keep touching the real thing. > >>>>> -- Personally, I can't be "lonely" enough. > >>>> > >>>> <...> > >>>> > >>>> Eww. No wonder so many men nowadays turn gay. > >>> > >>> I think you're suffering from Vagiphopia. > >> > >> Not ALL vaginas. Just the old, smelly ones that > >> have outlived their usefulness. IMO, any vagina > >> over about 25 years of age is no longer desirable. > >> > >> Any vagina that has passed a baby no matter the > >> age is also shot all to hell as it is stretched and > >> doesn't adequately grip and excite a penis. > >> > >A friend of mine who is onto such things assures me while sex post > >childbirth is "different" it is clearly not ruined. > > Yes, different as in undesirable unless a man is > truly desperate. Why expose one's self to potential > venereal diseases for the sake of a vagina that no > longer does what it's supposed to do, feels like it > was meant to feel? Women need to learn their > sexuality has certain limits. The intended purpose > is for child bearing. A man who wants several > children just has to ignore the fact that the vagina > is no longer primarily for his pleasure but for her > reproduction. > > Women are more like throw-away containers. Once > the contents (baby) are dispensed, the container > has marginal utility. A fuck is a fuck. They sew that thing back up again. After my wife gave birth, I asked the doctor if I should come in for a fitting before they stitched her up, but they got it right anyway. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-06 13:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <6ih0pdp1nt2plduesvemi9nikcfvbib6bp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #200535 |
On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 10:40:35 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > Sir, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >> On Sat, 1 Sep 2018, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >> >On 9/1/2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> >> On Thu, 30 Aug 2018, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Sir, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >> >>>> On Wed, 29 Aug 2018, Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: >> >>>>> "Odd" [sic] replied ( to me ): >> >>>>>>> Pink holes are outside of our observable universe. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> For someone who claims to be grateful about lacking sex, >> >>>>>> you sure think about it a lot. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> All around the world... Dictators, Robots, Bishops, Ayatollahs, >> >>>>> Authoritarians, Censors and Moderators are _all in agreement: >> >>>>> you should _ not see: Jeff-Relf.Me/Urethral.Opening.JPG >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Notice how the pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Most women aren't aware of this, not even the "educated" ones. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On "SexPlanations" (YouTube), Ms. Lindsey Doe's drawing >> >>>>> (wrongly) suggests that the pee "hole" ( sans shaft ) >> >>>>> is halfway between the rim of the vagina and the clit. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Like me, porn actresses are fully aware, of course; >> >>>>> but knowing this, as I do, and fearlessly talking about it, as I do, >> >>>>> doesn't mean I need to keep touching the real thing. >> >>>>> -- Personally, I can't be "lonely" enough. >> >>>> >> >>>> <...> >> >>>> >> >>>> Eww. No wonder so many men nowadays turn gay. >> >>> >> >>> I think you're suffering from Vagiphopia. >> >> >> >> Not ALL vaginas. Just the old, smelly ones that >> >> have outlived their usefulness. IMO, any vagina >> >> over about 25 years of age is no longer desirable. >> >> >> >> Any vagina that has passed a baby no matter the >> >> age is also shot all to hell as it is stretched and >> >> doesn't adequately grip and excite a penis. >> >> >> >A friend of mine who is onto such things assures me while sex post >> >childbirth is "different" it is clearly not ruined. >> >> Yes, different as in undesirable unless a man is >> truly desperate. Why expose one's self to potential >> venereal diseases for the sake of a vagina that no >> longer does what it's supposed to do, feels like it >> was meant to feel? Women need to learn their >> sexuality has certain limits. The intended purpose >> is for child bearing. A man who wants several >> children just has to ignore the fact that the vagina >> is no longer primarily for his pleasure but for her >> reproduction. >> >> Women are more like throw-away containers. Once >> the contents (baby) are dispensed, the container >> has marginal utility. > >A fuck is a fuck. They sew that thing back up again. After my wife gave >birth, I asked the doctor if I should come in for a fitting before they >stitched her up, but they got it right anyway. Yah, like I want to feel scar tissue scraping up and down my sensitive erect penis. -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall "Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. (There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-06 12:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.35fb1d2019047373994885@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #201595 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <6ih0pdp1nt2plduesvemi9nikcfvbib6bp@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 10:40:35 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sir, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >> On Sat, 1 Sep 2018, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >On 9/1/2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >> >> On Thu, 30 Aug 2018, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> Sir, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >> >>>> On Wed, 29 Aug 2018, Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: > >> >>>>> "Odd" [sic] replied ( to me ): > >> >>>>>>> Pink holes are outside of our observable universe. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> For someone who claims to be grateful about lacking sex, > >> >>>>>> you sure think about it a lot. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> All around the world... Dictators, Robots, Bishops, Ayatollahs, > >> >>>>> Authoritarians, Censors and Moderators are _all in agreement: > >> >>>>> you should _ not see: Jeff-Relf.Me/Urethral.Opening.JPG > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Notice how the pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Most women aren't aware of this, not even the "educated" ones. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> On "SexPlanations" (YouTube), Ms. Lindsey Doe's drawing > >> >>>>> (wrongly) suggests that the pee "hole" ( sans shaft ) > >> >>>>> is halfway between the rim of the vagina and the clit. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Like me, porn actresses are fully aware, of course; > >> >>>>> but knowing this, as I do, and fearlessly talking about it, as I do, > >> >>>>> doesn't mean I need to keep touching the real thing. > >> >>>>> -- Personally, I can't be "lonely" enough. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> <...> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Eww. No wonder so many men nowadays turn gay. > >> >>> > >> >>> I think you're suffering from Vagiphopia. > >> >> > >> >> Not ALL vaginas. Just the old, smelly ones that > >> >> have outlived their usefulness. IMO, any vagina > >> >> over about 25 years of age is no longer desirable. > >> >> > >> >> Any vagina that has passed a baby no matter the > >> >> age is also shot all to hell as it is stretched and > >> >> doesn't adequately grip and excite a penis. > >> >> > >> >A friend of mine who is onto such things assures me while sex post > >> >childbirth is "different" it is clearly not ruined. > >> > >> Yes, different as in undesirable unless a man is > >> truly desperate. Why expose one's self to potential > >> venereal diseases for the sake of a vagina that no > >> longer does what it's supposed to do, feels like it > >> was meant to feel? Women need to learn their > >> sexuality has certain limits. The intended purpose > >> is for child bearing. A man who wants several > >> children just has to ignore the fact that the vagina > >> is no longer primarily for his pleasure but for her > >> reproduction. > >> > >> Women are more like throw-away containers. Once > >> the contents (baby) are dispensed, the container > >> has marginal utility. > > > >A fuck is a fuck. They sew that thing back up again. After my wife gave > >birth, I asked the doctor if I should come in for a fitting before they > >stitched her up, but they got it right anyway. > > Yah, like I want to feel scar tissue scraping > up and down my sensitive erect penis. I'm sure those days are long over in your case. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-08 15:22 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <v366pddlpjq1q1ak959q1bbvum7a5a4nps@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #201694 |
On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 12:17:28 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > Sir greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >> On Mon, 3 Sep 2018, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Sir greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >> >> On Sat, 1 Sep 2018, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > On 9/1/2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, 30 Aug 2018, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> Sir greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >> >> >>>> On Wed, 29 Aug 2018, Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: >> >> >>>>> "Odd" [sic] replied ( to me ): >> >> >>>>>>> Pink holes are outside of our observable universe. >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> For someone who claims to be grateful about lacking sex, >> >> >>>>>> you sure think about it a lot. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> All around the world... Dictators, Robots, Bishops, Ayatollahs, >> >> >>>>> Authoritarians, Censors and Moderators are _all in agreement: >> >> >>>>> you should _ not see: Jeff-Relf.Me/Urethral.Opening.JPG >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> Notice how the pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> Most women aren't aware of this, not even the "educated" ones. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> On "SexPlanations" (YouTube), Ms. Lindsey Doe's drawing >> >> >>>>> (wrongly) suggests that the pee "hole" ( sans shaft ) >> >> >>>>> is halfway between the rim of the vagina and the clit. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> Like me, porn actresses are fully aware, of course; >> >> >>>>> but knowing this, as I do, and fearlessly talking about it, as I do, >> >> >>>>> doesn't mean I need to keep touching the real thing. >> >> >>>>> -- Personally, I can't be "lonely" enough. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> <...> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Eww. No wonder so many men nowadays turn gay. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> I think you're suffering from Vagiphopia. >> >> >> >> >> >> Not ALL vaginas. Just the old, smelly ones that >> >> >> have outlived their usefulness. IMO, any vagina >> >> >> over about 25 years of age is no longer desirable. >> >> >> >> >> >> Any vagina that has passed a baby no matter the >> >> >> age is also shot all to hell as it is stretched and >> >> >> doesn't adequately grip and excite a penis. >> >> >> >> >> >A friend of mine who is onto such things assures me while sex post >> >> >childbirth is "different" it is clearly not ruined. >> >> >> >> Yes, different as in undesirable unless a man is >> >> truly desperate. Why expose one's self to potential >> >> venereal diseases for the sake of a vagina that no >> >> longer does what it's supposed to do, feels like it >> >> was meant to feel? Women need to learn their >> >> sexuality has certain limits. The intended purpose >> >> is for child bearing. A man who wants several >> >> children just has to ignore the fact that the vagina >> >> is no longer primarily for his pleasure but for her >> >> reproduction. >> >> >> >> Women are more like throw-away containers. Once >> >> the contents (baby) are dispensed, the container >> >> has marginal utility. >> > >> >A fuck is a fuck. They sew that thing back up again. After my wife gave >> >birth, I asked the doctor if I should come in for a fitting before they >> >stitched her up, but they got it right anyway. >> >> Yah, like I want to feel scar tissue scraping >> up and down my sensitive erect penis. > >I'm sure those days are long over in your case. "You know nothing, Jon Snow!" P.S. Spoiler alert: Turns out Jon Snow is really a Targaryen. (mother is Lady Arryn, father Raegar Targaryen) So, when he fucks Daenerys he's fucking his biological sister. -- The Mountain
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-08 20:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <GgWkD.16801$rK2.460@fx28.iad> |
| In reply to | #202647 |
On Sat, 08 Sep 2018 15:22:03 -0400, Ser Gregor Clegane wrote: > On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 12:17:28 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Sir greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>> On Mon, 3 Sep 2018, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > Sir greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>> >> On Sat, 1 Sep 2018, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> > On 9/1/2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> >> >> On Thu, 30 Aug 2018, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> Sir greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>> >> >>>> On Wed, 29 Aug 2018, Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: >>> >> >>>>> "Odd" [sic] replied ( to me ): >>> >> >>>>>>> Pink holes are outside of our observable universe. >>> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>> For someone who claims to be grateful about lacking sex, >>> >> >>>>>> you sure think about it a lot. >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> All around the world... Dictators, Robots, Bishops, >>> >> >>>>> Ayatollahs, Authoritarians, Censors and Moderators are _all >>> >> >>>>> in agreement: >>> >> >>>>> you should _ not see: Jeff-Relf.Me/Urethral.Opening.JPG >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> Notice how the pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> Most women aren't aware of this, not even the "educated" >>> >> >>>>> ones. >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> On "SexPlanations" (YouTube), Ms. Lindsey Doe's drawing >>> >> >>>>> (wrongly) suggests that the pee "hole" ( sans shaft ) >>> >> >>>>> is halfway between the rim of the vagina and the clit. >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> Like me, porn actresses are fully aware, of course; >>> >> >>>>> but knowing this, as I do, and fearlessly talking about it, >>> >> >>>>> as I do, >>> >> >>>>> doesn't mean I need to keep touching the real thing. >>> >> >>>>> -- Personally, I can't be "lonely" enough. >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> <...> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> Eww. No wonder so many men nowadays turn gay. >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> I think you're suffering from Vagiphopia. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Not ALL vaginas. Just the old, smelly ones that have outlived >>> >> >> their usefulness. IMO, any vagina over about 25 years of age is >>> >> >> no longer desirable. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Any vagina that has passed a baby no matter the age is also shot >>> >> >> all to hell as it is stretched and doesn't adequately grip and >>> >> >> excite a penis. >>> >> >> >>> >> >A friend of mine who is onto such things assures me while sex post >>> >> >childbirth is "different" it is clearly not ruined. >>> >> >>> >> Yes, different as in undesirable unless a man is truly desperate. >>> >> Why expose one's self to potential venereal diseases for the sake >>> >> of a vagina that no longer does what it's supposed to do, feels >>> >> like it was meant to feel? Women need to learn their sexuality has >>> >> certain limits. The intended purpose is for child bearing. A man >>> >> who wants several children just has to ignore the fact that the >>> >> vagina is no longer primarily for his pleasure but for her >>> >> reproduction. >>> >> >>> >> Women are more like throw-away containers. Once the contents (baby) >>> >> are dispensed, the container has marginal utility. >>> > >>> >A fuck is a fuck. They sew that thing back up again. After my wife >>> >gave birth, I asked the doctor if I should come in for a fitting >>> >before they stitched her up, but they got it right anyway. >>> >>> Yah, like I want to feel scar tissue scraping up and down my sensitive >>> erect penis. >> >>I'm sure those days are long over in your case. > > "You know nothing, Jon Snow!" > > P.S. Spoiler alert: Turns out Jon Snow is really a Targaryen. (mother is > Lady Arryn, father Raegar Targaryen) So, when he fucks Daenerys he's > fucking his biological sister. Except that incest in the Targaryan family is very common. -- SilverSlimer FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate Absolute centrist, proud Catholic
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-08 14:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.35fde5445797558f9948b7@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #202647 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <v366pddlpjq1q1ak959q1bbvum7a5a4nps@4ax.com>, sergregor@lannistermail.raven says... > > On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 12:17:28 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sir greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >> On Mon, 3 Sep 2018, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Sir greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >> >> On Sat, 1 Sep 2018, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > On 9/1/2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, 30 Aug 2018, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >>> Sir greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >> >> >>>> On Wed, 29 Aug 2018, Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: > >> >> >>>>> "Odd" [sic] replied ( to me ): > >> >> >>>>>>> Pink holes are outside of our observable universe. > >> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>>>> For someone who claims to be grateful about lacking sex, > >> >> >>>>>> you sure think about it a lot. > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> All around the world... Dictators, Robots, Bishops, Ayatollahs, > >> >> >>>>> Authoritarians, Censors and Moderators are _all in agreement: > >> >> >>>>> you should _ not see: Jeff-Relf.Me/Urethral.Opening.JPG > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> Notice how the pee _ shaft hangs down into the vagina. > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> Most women aren't aware of this, not even the "educated" ones. > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> On "SexPlanations" (YouTube), Ms. Lindsey Doe's drawing > >> >> >>>>> (wrongly) suggests that the pee "hole" ( sans shaft ) > >> >> >>>>> is halfway between the rim of the vagina and the clit. > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> Like me, porn actresses are fully aware, of course; > >> >> >>>>> but knowing this, as I do, and fearlessly talking about it, as I do, > >> >> >>>>> doesn't mean I need to keep touching the real thing. > >> >> >>>>> -- Personally, I can't be "lonely" enough. > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> <...> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> Eww. No wonder so many men nowadays turn gay. > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> I think you're suffering from Vagiphopia. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Not ALL vaginas. Just the old, smelly ones that > >> >> >> have outlived their usefulness. IMO, any vagina > >> >> >> over about 25 years of age is no longer desirable. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Any vagina that has passed a baby no matter the > >> >> >> age is also shot all to hell as it is stretched and > >> >> >> doesn't adequately grip and excite a penis. > >> >> >> > >> >> >A friend of mine who is onto such things assures me while sex post > >> >> >childbirth is "different" it is clearly not ruined. > >> >> > >> >> Yes, different as in undesirable unless a man is > >> >> truly desperate. Why expose one's self to potential > >> >> venereal diseases for the sake of a vagina that no > >> >> longer does what it's supposed to do, feels like it > >> >> was meant to feel? Women need to learn their > >> >> sexuality has certain limits. The intended purpose > >> >> is for child bearing. A man who wants several > >> >> children just has to ignore the fact that the vagina > >> >> is no longer primarily for his pleasure but for her > >> >> reproduction. > >> >> > >> >> Women are more like throw-away containers. Once > >> >> the contents (baby) are dispensed, the container > >> >> has marginal utility. > >> > > >> >A fuck is a fuck. They sew that thing back up again. After my wife gave > >> >birth, I asked the doctor if I should come in for a fitting before they > >> >stitched her up, but they got it right anyway. > >> > >> Yah, like I want to feel scar tissue scraping > >> up and down my sensitive erect penis. > > > >I'm sure those days are long over in your case. > > "You know nothing, Jon Snow!" > > P.S. Spoiler alert: Turns out Jon Snow is really > a Targaryen. (mother is Lady Arryn, father > Raegar Targaryen) So, when he fucks Daenerys > he's fucking his biological sister. According to the Adam and Eve fairytale, we're ALL the products of incest. One of the many flaws in the X-tian pile of dogma. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-09 13:56 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <b439pdl78fnr1es55lhpljolkcoig2dmju@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #202711 |
On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 14:55:54 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >According to the Adam and Eve fairytale, we're ALL the products of >incest. One of the many flaws in the X-tian pile of dogma. It is clear you never took the time to study the Bible or you wouldn't make such a stupid claim. Adam and Eve were NOT brother and sister. Their male children took wives who were not their relatives. Read Genesis please. -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall "Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. (There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-09 11:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fvl607Fo1u5U18@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #202898 |
On 9/9/18 10:56 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 14:55:54 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> According to the Adam and Eve fairytale, we're ALL the products of >> incest. One of the many flaws in the X-tian pile of dogma. > > It is clear you never took the time to study the > Bible or you wouldn't make such a stupid claim. > > Adam and Eve were NOT brother and sister. > Their male children took wives who were not > their relatives. Read Genesis please. > They "took wives". Yikes. And from where... there parents and they were the only humans around! But, sure, the two creation stories in Genesis make no sense. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-10 10:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <svuapdpp12i3caq4tbsi5qkfuapuek4brl@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #202921 |
On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 11:10:15 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >On 9/9/18 10:56 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 14:55:54 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> According to the Adam and Eve fairytale, we're ALL the products of >>> incest. One of the many flaws in the X-tian pile of dogma. >> >> It is clear you never took the time to study the >> Bible or you wouldn't make such a stupid claim. >> >> Adam and Eve were NOT brother and sister. >> Their male children took wives who were not >> their relatives. Read Genesis please. >> >They "took wives". Yikes. And from where... there parents and they were >the only humans around! Not so, try reading Genesis with comprehension. Adam was the first *man* who was created in God's image. Eve was made using a rib from Adam so Eve was NOT created in God's image but in partial image of Adam. In heaven there are "Sons of God" and some of these, found human women comely and bred with them producing viable offspring. Some were said to be giants. (Yes, there were human women other than the offspring of Adam and Eve) Those humans evolved and were not created by God in His image. It could even be those other humans were Homo habilis, Homo erectus, Homo neaderthalis, etc. The latest DNA research has recently discovered some of our human DNA contains DNA from yet another human sub species (Homo denosovian?). >But, sure, the two creation stories in Genesis make no sense. The one that doesn't make sense to me and is invalidated by DNA studies is how Noah and his three children and wives who were the only humanity to survive the flood are solely responsible for all of modern humanity... The flood story must be some sort of allegory, IMO. -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall "Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. (There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-10 10:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36004b0e5e9965fd9948de@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #203186 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <svuapdpp12i3caq4tbsi5qkfuapuek4brl@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 11:10:15 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >On 9/9/18 10:56 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >> On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 14:55:54 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> According to the Adam and Eve fairytale, we're ALL the products of > >>> incest. One of the many flaws in the X-tian pile of dogma. > >> > >> It is clear you never took the time to study the > >> Bible or you wouldn't make such a stupid claim. > >> > >> Adam and Eve were NOT brother and sister. > >> Their male children took wives who were not > >> their relatives. Read Genesis please. > >> > >They "took wives". Yikes. And from where... there parents and they were > >the only humans around! > > Not so, try reading Genesis with comprehension. > > Adam was the first *man* who was created in > God's image. Eve was made using a rib from > Adam so Eve was NOT created in God's image > but in partial image of Adam. > > In heaven there are "Sons of God" and some of > these, found human women comely and bred with them > producing viable offspring. Some were said to be > giants. (Yes, there were human women other than the > offspring of Adam and Eve) Those humans evolved and > were not created by God in His image. > > It could even be those other humans were Homo habilis, > Homo erectus, Homo neaderthalis, etc. The latest > DNA research has recently discovered some of our > human DNA contains DNA from yet another human > sub species (Homo denosovian?). > > >But, sure, the two creation stories in Genesis make no sense. > > The one that doesn't make sense to me and is > invalidated by DNA studies is how Noah and his > three children and wives who were the only humanity > to survive the flood are solely responsible for all > of modern humanity... The flood story must be some > sort of allegory, IMO. All of those stories are fairytales... mythology for the dim-witted and gullible masses who couldn't even see the obvious flaws in the story. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-10 12:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fvnud6FbibeU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #203186 |
On 9/10/18 7:37 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 11:10:15 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 9/9/18 10:56 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 14:55:54 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> According to the Adam and Eve fairytale, we're ALL the products of >>>> incest. One of the many flaws in the X-tian pile of dogma. >>> >>> It is clear you never took the time to study the >>> Bible or you wouldn't make such a stupid claim. >>> >>> Adam and Eve were NOT brother and sister. >>> Their male children took wives who were not >>> their relatives. Read Genesis please. >>> >> They "took wives". Yikes. And from where... there parents and they were >> the only humans around! > > Not so, try reading Genesis with comprehension. Ah, see how you make the assumption I have not. It shows an arrogance that is quite telling. > Adam was the first *man* who was created in > God's image. Are you suggesting other men existed who were not made in the same image? > Eve was made using a rib from > Adam so Eve was NOT created in God's image > but in partial image of Adam. Yeah, the whole thing is absurd. I have read it. > In heaven there are "Sons of God" and some of > these, found human women comely and bred with them > producing viable offspring. What verse are you referencing? > Some were said to be > giants. (Yes, there were human women other than the > offspring of Adam and Eve) Those humans evolved and > were not created by God in His image. What verse? Not just a reference to giants but to back your idea that humans bred with them. > It could even be those other humans were Homo habilis, > Homo erectus, Homo neaderthalis, etc. The latest > DNA research has recently discovered some of our > human DNA contains DNA from yet another human > sub species (Homo denosovian?). We are talking science... we are talking about the Bible. And SOME people have DNA from those groups... but so what? >> But, sure, the two creation stories in Genesis make no sense. > > The one that doesn't make sense to me and is > invalidated by DNA studies is how Noah and his > three children and wives who were the only humanity > to survive the flood are solely responsible for all > of modern humanity... The flood story must be some > sort of allegory, IMO. The whole bible is just stories passed down ... and most from other sources. It is a horrid tool for teaching morality. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-10 13:24 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <bj35uv.ffe.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #203315 |
On 2018-09-10 1:19 PM, Snit wrote: > On 9/10/18 7:37 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 11:10:15 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >>> On 9/9/18 10:56 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>> On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 14:55:54 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> According to the Adam and Eve fairytale, we're ALL the products of >>>>> incest. One of the many flaws in the X-tian pile of dogma. >>>> >>>> It is clear you never took the time to study the >>>> Bible or you wouldn't make such a stupid claim. >>>> >>>> Adam and Eve were NOT brother and sister. >>>> Their male children took wives who were not >>>> their relatives. Read Genesis please. >>>> >>> They "took wives". Yikes. And from where... there parents and they were >>> the only humans around! >> >> Not so, try reading Genesis with comprehension. > > Ah, see how you make the assumption I have not. It shows an arrogance > that is quite telling. > >> Adam was the first *man* who was created in >> God's image. > > Are you suggesting other men existed who were not made in the same image? > >> Eve was made using a rib from >> Adam so Eve was NOT created in God's image >> but in partial image of Adam. > > Yeah, the whole thing is absurd. I have read it. > >> In heaven there are "Sons of God" and some of >> these, found human women comely and bred with them >> producing viable offspring. > > What verse are you referencing? > >> Some were said to be >> giants. (Yes, there were human women other than the >> offspring of Adam and Eve) Those humans evolved and >> were not created by God in His image. > > What verse? Not just a reference to giants but to back your idea that > humans bred with them. > >> It could even be those other humans were Homo habilis, >> Homo erectus, Homo neaderthalis, etc. The latest >> DNA research has recently discovered some of our >> human DNA contains DNA from yet another human >> sub species (Homo denosovian?). > > We are talking science... we are talking about the Bible. And SOME > people have DNA from those groups... but so what? > >>> But, sure, the two creation stories in Genesis make no sense. >> >> The one that doesn't make sense to me and is >> invalidated by DNA studies is how Noah and his >> three children and wives who were the only humanity >> to survive the flood are solely responsible for all >> of modern humanity... The flood story must be some >> sort of allegory, IMO. > > The whole bible is just stories passed down ... and most from other > sources. It is a horrid tool for teaching morality. > > i thought this was about the length of grik's throat , the pee shaft
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | aaa <jeo@somewhere.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-10 16:31 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pn6kan$3r7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #203315 |
On 09/10/2018 03:19 PM, Snit wrote: > On 9/10/18 7:37 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 11:10:15 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >>> On 9/9/18 10:56 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>> On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 14:55:54 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> According to the Adam and Eve fairytale, we're ALL the products of >>>>> incest. One of the many flaws in the X-tian pile of dogma. >>>> >>>> It is clear you never took the time to study the >>>> Bible or you wouldn't make such a stupid claim. >>>> >>>> Adam and Eve were NOT brother and sister. >>>> Their male children took wives who were not >>>> their relatives. Read Genesis please. >>>> >>> They "took wives". Yikes. And from where... there parents and they were >>> the only humans around! >> >> Not so, try reading Genesis with comprehension. > > Ah, see how you make the assumption I have not. It shows an arrogance > that is quite telling. > >> Adam was the first *man* who was created in >> God's image. > > Are you suggesting other men existed who were not made in the same image? > >> Eve was made using a rib from >> Adam so Eve was NOT created in God's image >> but in partial image of Adam. > > Yeah, the whole thing is absurd. I have read it. > >> In heaven there are "Sons of God" and some of >> these, found human women comely and bred with them >> producing viable offspring. > > What verse are you referencing? > >> Some were said to be >> giants. (Yes, there were human women other than the >> offspring of Adam and Eve) Those humans evolved and >> were not created by God in His image. > > What verse? Not just a reference to giants but to back your idea that > humans bred with them. > >> It could even be those other humans were Homo habilis, >> Homo erectus, Homo neaderthalis, etc. The latest >> DNA research has recently discovered some of our >> human DNA contains DNA from yet another human >> sub species (Homo denosovian?). > > We are talking science... we are talking about the Bible. And SOME > people have DNA from those groups... but so what? > >>> But, sure, the two creation stories in Genesis make no sense. >> >> The one that doesn't make sense to me and is >> invalidated by DNA studies is how Noah and his >> three children and wives who were the only humanity >> to survive the flood are solely responsible for all >> of modern humanity... The flood story must be some >> sort of allegory, IMO. > > The whole bible is just stories passed down ... and most from other > sources. It is a horrid tool for teaching morality. That's only because it's horrid reflection of humans learning God's morality. > > -- God's spiritual evidence: Truth, love, wisdom, compassion, knowledge, consciousness, intelligence, happiness, faith, courage, justice, peace, freedom, and life itself.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-10 14:22 -0700 |
| Subject | Genesis' creation story in is about leaving home to start a family. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.10--2.22pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #203329 |
Genesis' creation story in is about leaving home to start a family.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-11 00:11 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Genesis' creation story in is about leaving home to start a family. |
| Message-ID | <ufmdnZ-ThNz40wrGnZ2dnUU7-W_NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #203361 |
On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 14:22:01 -0700 (Seattle), LO AND BEHOLD; "Jeff-Relf.Me @." determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.10--2.22pm.Seattle.2018>: >Genesis' creation story in is about leaving home to start a family. he seems to have an invisible touch. -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gronk <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-16 14:40 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Genesis' creation story in is about leaving home to start a family. |
| Message-ID | <pnmf3b$1jt$5@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #203361 |
Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Genesis' creation story in is about leaving home to start a family. > To find a wife?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-16 16:41 -0700 |
| Subject | Eve was the wife, it was incestuous. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.16--4.41pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #205258 |
> > Genesis' creation story in is about leaving home to start a family. > > To find a wife? No, Eve was the wife, it was incestuous.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-16 17:08 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Eve was the wife, it was incestuous. |
| Message-ID | <bjjgsd.9ct.19.8@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #205291 |
On 2018-09-16 4:41 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>> Genesis' creation story in is about leaving home to start a family. >> >> To find a wife? > > No, Eve was the wife, it was incestuous. > no it was unisex
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-10 17:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fvogotFf5qcU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #203329 |
On 9/10/18 1:31 PM, aaa wrote: > On 09/10/2018 03:19 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 9/10/18 7:37 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 11:10:15 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>>> On 9/9/18 10:56 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 14:55:54 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> According to the Adam and Eve fairytale, we're ALL the products of >>>>>> incest. One of the many flaws in the X-tian pile of dogma. >>>>> >>>>> It is clear you never took the time to study the >>>>> Bible or you wouldn't make such a stupid claim. >>>>> >>>>> Adam and Eve were NOT brother and sister. >>>>> Their male children took wives who were not >>>>> their relatives. Read Genesis please. >>>>> >>>> They "took wives". Yikes. And from where... there parents and they were >>>> the only humans around! >>> >>> Not so, try reading Genesis with comprehension. >> >> Ah, see how you make the assumption I have not. It shows an arrogance >> that is quite telling. >> >>> Adam was the first *man* who was created in >>> God's image. >> >> Are you suggesting other men existed who were not made in the same image? >> >>> Eve was made using a rib from >>> Adam so Eve was NOT created in God's image >>> but in partial image of Adam. >> >> Yeah, the whole thing is absurd. I have read it. >> >>> In heaven there are "Sons of God" and some of >>> these, found human women comely and bred with them >>> producing viable offspring. >> >> What verse are you referencing? >> >>> Some were said to be >>> giants. (Yes, there were human women other than the >>> offspring of Adam and Eve) Those humans evolved and >>> were not created by God in His image. >> >> What verse? Not just a reference to giants but to back your idea that >> humans bred with them. >> >>> It could even be those other humans were Homo habilis, >>> Homo erectus, Homo neaderthalis, etc. The latest >>> DNA research has recently discovered some of our >>> human DNA contains DNA from yet another human >>> sub species (Homo denosovian?). >> >> We are talking science... we are talking about the Bible. And SOME >> people have DNA from those groups... but so what? >> >>>> But, sure, the two creation stories in Genesis make no sense. >>> >>> The one that doesn't make sense to me and is >>> invalidated by DNA studies is how Noah and his >>> three children and wives who were the only humanity >>> to survive the flood are solely responsible for all >>> of modern humanity... The flood story must be some >>> sort of allegory, IMO. >> >> The whole bible is just stories passed down ... and most from other >> sources. It is a horrid tool for teaching morality. > > That's only because it's horrid reflection of humans learning God's > morality. It is a set of books written from about 6000 to 2000 years ago, then heavily edited and altered and translated. Not much of it applies to the modern world view (though some basics like not killing do, even the ten commandments -- whichever version you go with -- largely does not apply). -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web