Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #206336 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-20 09:26 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-09-27 12:07 -0700 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 44 participants
Thread has 1405 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1405 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:26 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:25 -0600
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 18:30 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 20:44 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 18:45 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:26 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 21:42 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:30 -0400
Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 06:51 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 15:53 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 12:00 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:49 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 13:15 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 13:01 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:27 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:20 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-22 14:27 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:53 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:34 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 19:06 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 15:07 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 15:11 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 07:18 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 12:35 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 09:09 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:46 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:59 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 20:58 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 14:01 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 14:30 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 23:21 +0100
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:27 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:28 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 13:00 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:28 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:06 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:00 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:31 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:38 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:28 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:30 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 07:19 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:22 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:13 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 17:19 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 15:33 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 15:40 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 19:33 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:46 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:00 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:53 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:35 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:02 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:12 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:17 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:14 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:28 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-26 09:20 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:55 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:52 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:17 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 00:23 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 06:17 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 09:13 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 11:19 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 17:12 +0100
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 12:40 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 18:51 +0100
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:20 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 22:58 +0100
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 10:43 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 12:48 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:07 -0600
Re: â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 12:49 -0500
Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:19 -0600
Re: â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 13:28 -0500
Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:30 -0600
Re: ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦâ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 12:42 -0500
Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOC Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:18 -0600
Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOC Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-27 18:53 +0000
Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOC Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 13:04 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 12:50 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 11:08 -0600
Re: â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 10:34 -0500
Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snow Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 10:44 -0600
Re: â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snow â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 12:37 -0500
Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:17 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:06 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 10:08 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 10:31 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:46 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 10:48 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 12:37 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 07:52 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 11:21 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 09:32 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:32 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 09:36 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:24 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 15:19 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:20 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 04:39 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:50 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:56 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:55 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:14 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:31 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 09:15 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 11:25 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-27 18:56 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 15:04 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 21:57 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:34 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 13:06 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 19:39 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 19:52 -0500
Inflation is immoral. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 02:52 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:33 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:12 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:17 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:49 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:44 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 13:51 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:59 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:40 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 22:36 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:23 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:15 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:38 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 20:22 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 07:15 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-02 15:10 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-02 23:00 +0100
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:10 -0500
Re: Today, the Democrats believe that people can commit crimes as long as they vote for them SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 13:21 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 10:05 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 15:23 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-04 08:14 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 08:07 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-04 12:57 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:04 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:57 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 10:52 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 09:43 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:37 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 12:26 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 12:34 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 17:05 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 17:03 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:10 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 13:19 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:53 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:43 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 10:15 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:50 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:22 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:54 -0700
I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 03:56 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 15:34 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:58 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:00 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 21:47 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:05 -0700
Re: â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 20:31 -0500
Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snow Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 19:57 -0600
Re: â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â ? Snowflake ?? Snow â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-28 09:57 -0500
Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? ? Snowflake ?? Snow ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:04 -0600
Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 20:23 +0100
Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 14:34 -0600
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 08:52 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 07:59 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:04 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:12 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:45 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:55 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:27 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:03 -0600
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:27 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:43 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:39 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:10 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 23:29 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Catalina" <Catalina@beach.sun> - 2018-09-30 02:39 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 01:25 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-28 02:02 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 06:47 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 18:18 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:31 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 18:56 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 18:57 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 20:30 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 14:31 -0600
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:37 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:51 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:40 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:05 -0600
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:08 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-29 14:23 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 10:52 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-29 18:55 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 13:18 -0600
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-29 19:43 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 18:54 -0600
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 12:41 -0700
Being _ relatively poor isn't a real problem. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-29 15:25 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:29 -0600
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 21:48 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 23:16 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0600
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-29 12:43 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 10:53 -0600
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-29 12:56 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 10:57 -0600
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-29 12:58 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 11:30 -0600
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-29 14:00 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-29 20:12 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 17:33 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:17 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:08 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:26 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:36 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:42 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 22:13 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:33 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 12:50 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:18 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:22 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 18:26 -0700
We need to eat more. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 09:38 -0700
Re: We need to eat more. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 +0000
"Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 10:09 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:10 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:19 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:58 -0500
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:16 -0600
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0500
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:04 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 -0700
If you're fucking, you're stupid. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 17:14 -0700
Re: If you're fucking, you're stupid. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:39 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:01 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:47 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:59 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 11:37 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 19:00 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 14:32 -0600
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:12 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 21:44 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 22:01 -0700
Artificial penises and testosterone implants. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 05:01 -0700
Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:17 -0700
Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 23:42 -0400
Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:56 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:26 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:30 -0400
I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 09:38 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:41 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 19:09 +0100
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:04 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:47 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 21:52 +0000
If I were super attractive... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 15:04 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 18:08 -0400
Re: If I were super attractive... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 22:08 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:10 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 15:52 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:55 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:00 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:05 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:15 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:22 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:24 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:28 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:31 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:37 +0000
The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 15:15 -0700
Re: The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:18 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:09 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-28 17:29 -0500
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:23 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:28 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:49 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:55 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:19 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-30 02:48 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:28 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:45 -0700
Was she looking for love ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-29 20:55 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:59 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:11 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:35 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:42 -0700
Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 05:22 -0700
I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 07:34 -0700
Re: I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 20:37 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:21 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 22:25 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:40 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:15 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:08 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:19 -0600
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:26 -0700
Did Diogenes ever find his honest man ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 20:34 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:42 -0600
Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 10:01 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 15:00 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:02 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:57 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:01 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:09 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:30 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 21:15 -0500
I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 20:43 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-02 15:34 -0500
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 09:02 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 06:45 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 08:50 -0500
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 14:15 +0000
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 08:23 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-03 10:22 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:28 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 09:30 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 19:18 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 14:22 -0500
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:39 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 21:58 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:05 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:31 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:37 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-04 20:55 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? roach <roach4994@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 20:00 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:00 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 15:52 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 16:02 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:04 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 17:20 -0600
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:46 -0600
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:08 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-01 21:15 -0700
Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 12:59 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:13 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:18 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 16:22 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:37 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 22:30 +0100
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:34 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:40 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:42 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:49 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:53 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:54 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:02 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:06 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:21 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:26 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:29 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:33 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:36 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:41 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:46 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:57 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:00 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 21:27 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. John of Patmos <jpatmos1318@gmXil.com> - 2018-10-02 07:59 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 13:46 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:49 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 14:10 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 17:29 -0600
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 17:24 -0600
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:28 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:32 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:40 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:45 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:54 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:59 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:33 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:46 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 21:35 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:03 -0700
Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:13 -0400
Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 07:33 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:29 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:19 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:26 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:59 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-09-30 17:52 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 13:11 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:22 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:25 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:01 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:04 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:28 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:42 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:53 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 10:06 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:46 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 16:51 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:39 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:08 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:03 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-01 23:22 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:09 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:02 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 14:16 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:25 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 14:35 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:18 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:22 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:04 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 13:09 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 11:34 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SWD <swd@whitehouse.gov> - 2018-10-03 18:15 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:19 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 16:38 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:50 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:59 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:17 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:27 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:58 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 20:12 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-04 06:51 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 07:55 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-05 03:52 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 22:50 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 09:10 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 04:57 -0400
Re: Kensi admits to vandalism Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:04 -0600
Re: Kensi does not admit to vandalism kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:35 -0400
Re: Kensi does not admit to vandalism Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:48 -0600
Re: Kensi does not admit to vandalism kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:53 -0400
Re: Kensi does not admit to vandalism Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:59 -0600
Re: Kensi does not admit to vandalism snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:33 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:30 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 09:15 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Andrew Grant Carrick <9904.Blue.Bonnet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 18:56 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 16:49 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 09:07 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 06:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 11:37 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:52 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 12:08 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 09:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 19:26 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 14:32 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 16:47 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:05 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:08 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:42 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 15:33 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 06:18 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:10 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 15:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 06:17 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 17:36 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 10:53 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 19:10 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 12:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 20:51 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 15:56 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-10-04 22:13 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-05 03:55 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 10:08 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-05 02:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 06:57 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 12:48 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 09:04 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 14:19 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-05 07:01 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-05 10:36 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 17:45 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 10:43 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 17:49 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 16:42 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:49 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:16 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 15:30 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 19:21 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 17:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 20:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 13:05 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 14:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 17:58 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:01 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 19:27 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 12:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 14:04 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 14:14 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:04 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:17 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:27 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:34 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:45 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 22:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:49 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-04 06:58 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 08:45 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 13:05 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 02:12 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-04 05:15 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:41 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 07:56 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-05 03:58 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-05 03:24 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 06:58 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 16:24 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:32 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:14 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 18:32 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 15:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Checkmate" <ricksabian1@qmail.com> - 2018-10-03 18:39 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:12 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 18:17 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:07 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:53 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:12 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:55 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 09:02 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:26 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 16:05 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 23:07 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:11 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 18:19 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:22 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:43 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:42 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 13:44 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 13:57 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:05 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:20 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 11:51 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 15:13 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:06 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:20 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:34 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 21:49 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-30 14:00 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:13 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:22 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:27 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:44 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:52 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 23:00 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 15:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 02:52 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 12:56 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 05:46 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 13:58 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 06:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 17:11 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 10:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 18:42 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:44 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:03 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 11:07 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:12 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:07 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 00:47 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:49 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 22:59 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:33 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 00:28 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-02 07:42 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:52 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-02 09:59 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 14:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:10 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:09 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:01 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:50 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 10:08 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:30 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:51 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 10:09 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:49 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 16:52 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 00:47 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:57 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-03 10:08 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:33 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:37 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:46 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:50 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:55 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:57 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 09:01 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:12 +0000
Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:22 +0000
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:31 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:43 +0000
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:12 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:27 -0600
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:11 -0500
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:09 -0400
The Sex, Drugs, and Alcohol Party ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 06:06 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:25 -0600
Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 05:14 -0700
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 08:50 -0500
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:33 -0600
Re: â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 10:22 -0500
Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snow Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 11:21 -0600
Re: â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â ? Snowflake ?? Snow â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 13:23 -0500
Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:38 -0600
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-01 14:00 -0400
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:07 -0400
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:54 +0000
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 10:26 -0600
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0700
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:32 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:56 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:44 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 13:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 17:19 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:27 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:37 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:24 -0600
Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 14:02 -0700
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:06 -0700
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:14 +0000
Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:31 -0700
Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:32 -0700
Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:24 +0000
Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:21 -0600
Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0700
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:47 -0400
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:15 -0500
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:00 +0000
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:26 -0400
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:51 +0000
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:53 -0700
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 18:15 -0400
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:16 -0700
Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:31 +0000
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-30 11:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:19 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:44 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:46 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 05:55 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:02 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:36 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 10:49 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:04 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 17:02 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 18:04 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 18:21 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 18:34 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 19:52 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:10 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-10-02 09:59 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-01 21:12 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 19:53 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-01 23:10 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 10:11 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 13:22 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 16:43 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-01 23:35 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-01 21:22 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:28 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:06 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:09 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 10:10 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:53 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:03 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:34 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:42 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:54 -0700
Greg, the incel. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:27 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-01 20:27 -0500
Re: Greg, the incel. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 21:49 -0400
Re: Greg, the incel. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 04:10 +0000
Re: Greg, the incel. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:14 -0400
Re: Greg, the incel. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:07 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:53 +0000
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:57 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. Darlene Jacobsen <jacodar242@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:21 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 00:48 +0000
Re: Greg, the incel. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:51 -0600
Re: Greg, the incel. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-03 12:57 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. Darlene Jacobsen <jacodar242@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:49 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-03 10:02 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-02 15:36 -0500
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:39 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:19 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:30 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:16 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:35 -0600
If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:17 +0000
If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:41 -0700
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:26 +0000
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:23 -0600
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:08 +0000
Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 05:54 -0700
Re: Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:49 -0400
Re: Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:09 +0000
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 08:05 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:15 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:36 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:35 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 11:17 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 17:17 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Scatboi g8dgc <g8dgc@noneya.none> - 2018-10-01 12:38 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? g8dgc <g8dgc@noneya.none> - 2018-10-01 13:11 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 18:17 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:17 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:21 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:57 -0700
Trump is a salesman. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 21:37 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 22:06 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 06:44 +0000
Re: Trump is a salesman. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 10:12 -0600
Re: Trump is a salesman. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:29 -0400
Trump could sell accusations to a Dr. Ford. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-02 12:53 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 15:08 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:17 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:56 +0000
Take your kids and friends with you, please. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 21:45 -0700
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:30 -0400
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 15:35 -0400
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:16 -0700
China's Slave Trade. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-02 13:01 -0700
Re: China's Slave Trade. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:10 -0700
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:16 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-02 14:44 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 11:11 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:14 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-10-02 14:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 16:46 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 22:22 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 18:28 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:18 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 00:53 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 20:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 04:11 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:59 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:38 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:47 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:50 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:56 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 16:48 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 17:09 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 19:49 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-04 19:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-04 22:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-05 10:15 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 20:55 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:59 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 00:56 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:00 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-03 10:15 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:33 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-03 10:09 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-03 14:25 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:11 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:39 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:48 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 10:52 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-03 08:57 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:48 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 16:50 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:04 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:58 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:10 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:45 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 16:48 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-02 12:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 15:45 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:22 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:33 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 16:48 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:58 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:49 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:48 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:54 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 10:05 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:33 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:49 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:01 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:10 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:22 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:39 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:17 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:22 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 22:01 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:09 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:34 +0000
Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 06:25 -0700
Re: Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:07 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 09:03 -0600
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:37 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:47 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 09:26 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:21 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:27 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:19 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:08 -0500
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-10-01 17:19 +0100
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:43 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:48 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:24 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:48 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 13:42 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:02 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0600
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 09:01 -0600
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:09 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 22:36 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 06:46 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 10:28 -0600
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 22:05 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 16:59 -0600
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 09:00 -0600
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:18 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-29 19:41 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:44 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-09-29 19:55 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:58 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:21 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:48 -0700
More children is always better ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 10:23 -0700
Re: We need to eat more. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 11:12 -0700
Re: We need to eat more. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 14:27 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 09:09 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:14 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 21:18 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:45 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:18 -0700
The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 20:57 -0700
Re: The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 21:46 -0700
"IllGotten" gains. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 01:46 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0400
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:41 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 17:02 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:11 -0700
Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 02:06 -0700
Re: Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:37 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:14 -0700
The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 20:40 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 15:47 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-24 09:53 +0000
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 11:36 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:54 -0600
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 17:03 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:05 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 17:09 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:11 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:29 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 21:08 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-28 10:07 +0000
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 10:33 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:41 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:02 -0600
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:23 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 23:43 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 21:06 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 19:07 -0700
No one wants to pay. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-20 19:35 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:49 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 22:18 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 01:56 -0600
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-09-21 03:31 -0700
Progressive, Marxist, Collectivist, Jim Jones. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-20 19:14 -0700
Re: Progressive, Marxist, Collectivist, Jim Jones. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:33 -0400
It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 06:40 -0700
Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 11:10 -0400
Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:44 -0400
A good answer ?! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 09:18 -0700
Re: A good answer ?! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:17 -0400
Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:34 -0600
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:10 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:36 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-22 01:31 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 03:18 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:35 -0400
The leaders fornicated the poor, in their death camps. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 07:07 -0700
Re: The leaders fornicated the poor, in their death camps. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 03:46 +0000
You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 21:31 -0700
Re: You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 11:58 -0400
Re: You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:55 +0000
Re: You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:35 -0600
Libtard's thievery. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 11:33 -0700
Re: Libtard's thievery. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 19:08 +0000
Libtard's thievery. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 12:28 -0700
Relf's poverty. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 05:23 +0000
The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 23:02 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 02:38 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:31 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 08:40 -0600
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-23 16:06 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 12:10 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 09:15 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-23 12:46 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-23 10:44 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 09:15 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 18:32 +0100
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 10:37 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 18:48 +0100
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 19:05 +0100
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 19:19 +0100
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 11:37 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:55 -0600
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-24 12:04 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 13:29 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-23 16:47 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 22:43 -0500
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 00:01 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 09:49 -0500
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 11:05 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 11:24 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:23 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:25 -0600
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 11:48 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:54 -0600
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 18:37 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 09:16 -0600
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-27 11:20 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 10:50 -0600
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 13:14 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-27 14:38 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 14:46 -0400
Re: ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦâ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 13:53 -0500
Re: ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦâ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 12:10 -0700
Re: ðÂÂÂŦðÂÂÂŦðÂÂÂŦÃĒ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ÃĒ°ðÂÂÂŦðÂÂÂŦðÂÂÂŦ Sir Gerg teh Yech h Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht maes ter.fake>" ðÂÂÂŦðÂÂÂŦðÂÂÂŦÃĒ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ÃĒ°ðÂÂÂŦðÂÂÂŦðÂÂÂŦÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒ ÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowfla ke ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snow flake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ S nowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒ ÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowfla ke ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snow flake ÃĒ The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. ÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowfla ke ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snow flake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ S nowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒ ÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowfla ke ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snow flake ÃĒÂÂÃĒ Snowflake ÃĒ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 17:23 -0500
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-27 15:23 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 11:21 +0100
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 13:05 -0600
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-27 12:07 -0700
Page 39 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 37 38 [39] 40 41 … 50 Next page →
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 08:35 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361bde9a46599f0e989d1f@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #209834 |
In article <yppsD.31103$X82.27503@fx22.iad>, silver@slim.er says... > > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 23:54:50 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > Checkmate! In article <pos00i$mhp$122@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > > @gmail.invalid says... > > > > > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:34:08 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> > >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts > >> > by Checkmate! In article <pora76$mhp$108@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > >> > @gmail.invalid says... > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> >> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 10:32:34 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading > >> >> > posts by Checkmate! In article > >> >> > <djq1rdt4na60fld5d79059fe0evo3n256v@4ax.com>, > >> >> > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 05:35:12, Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> >On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:55:02, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > >> >> >> >> Why did Dr Ford go into a private bedroom with a drunk man ? > >> >> >> >> Was she looking for love ? > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >Irrelevant. Going into someone's bedroom with someone does not > >> >> >> >amount to giving consent. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Wrong! It amounts to a willingness to be petted up to including > >> >> >> sexual intercourse just like going into a shower amounts to a > >> >> >> willingness to get wet. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> You liberal feminists seem to think NONE of your actions have > >> >> >> consequences. You would be wrong about that... > >> >> > > >> >> > Little girl thought it was okay to attend and participate in a > >> >> > drinking party at age 15, and spends the next 36 years of her life > >> >> > trying to get over the trauma of another drunken boy attempting to > >> >> > make sexual advances towards her... which, by her own account, > >> >> > amounted to some inappropriate roughhousing. The second guy jumps > >> >> > on the bed, they all fall onto the floor, and she runs out of the > >> >> > room. The two boys laugh, and don't even pursue her like one might > >> >> > expect. Instead, they laugh and "ping-pong" down the stairs. That > >> >> > sounds like a bunch of teens behaving badly, but it doesn't sound > >> >> > like they intended to forcibly rape her, or they wouldn't have > >> >> > wandered off to find some other mischief to get into. IOW, > >> >> > she didn't get raped, she got scared... and this is enough to > >> >> > consume the next 36 years of her life? She's not even willing to > >> >> > accept ANY responsibility for her own lack of good judgment. > >> >> > >> >> What a load of victim-blaming bullshit. > >> >> > >> >> Tell me, kooky, are you saying that just out of partisan support for > >> >> Trump and Kavanofuckingway? Or are you saying that because you have > >> >> been pushy with reluctant women in the past yourself, and are quite > >> >> averse to the thought that maybe you came close to, or actually did, > >> >> commit rape. > >> > > >> > I've never forced myself on anyone, you paranoid Ko0k. In fact, in > >> > my much younger years I was fooling around in bed with a girl, and we > >> > were just about to do The Deed, when she said she would, but only if > >> > I told her I loved her first. I told her I wouldn't say that because > >> > I didn't. > >> > She still slept with me that night, but I honored her wishes and > >> > didn't try to pork her. A friend of mine ran into her years later, > >> > and tried to hit on her. He told me all she could do was keep asking > >> > about me. If I had lied to her just to get sex, I doubt that she > >> > would have even remembered me. You seem to be under the assumption > >> > that anyone with a dick is a rapist. If it isn't given freely and > >> > willingly, I don't want it. > >> > >> So it's just partisan bullshit then. Gotcha. You won't do anything even > >> remotely rapey yourself, but you will wholeheartedly support the > >> rapepublican party and rapey assholes within it like Kavanaugh, Roy > >> Moore, > >> and of course the Tangerine Tyrant itself. :P > > > > "Partisan bullshit"? What about at least half a dozen Democrats who > > have done far worse, much more recently (than what's ALLEGED with > > Kavanaugh), and with much more proof? What is it about Kavanaugh that > > trips your trigger? It certainly isn't any evidence that's even > > remotely provable. Is it the fact that he's not a Democrat, like out > > former Commander-In- Briefs, William Jefferson Clinton... or is it the > > possibility that Kavanaugh might potentially overturn Roe V Wade and > > take control of whatever might be baking in your oven some day? > > Bill Clinton flat out raped women and the Democrats refused to hear it > and Keith Allison beat the crap out of his wife and they once again don't > care. Anyone who believes that Democrats actually care about female > victims is a fool. They only care about gaining as much power as possible > and they will gladly throw innocent people under the bus with rape, > sexism or racism allegations to do it. > > Bill Clinton should be in jail, as should his wife and Keith Ellison. > However, they're left-wing so they're going to be protected at all costs > by their fellow leftist politicians, the media, the music industry, the > movie industry and so on. To Hell with all of them. Well said.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 11:17 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Message-ID | <3ie4rddhnlvqfi0m219ul8r9speaokurn8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #209847 |
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 08:35:31 -0600, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: <big trim> >Well said. Poorly trimmed, asshole! -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall If a woman stumbles upon a fact that is opposed to her intuition she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, she has feelings that give her a reason to act in accordance with her intuition, she will embrace them as the Gospel. -- Capt. Neal ÂŪ
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 17:17 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Message-ID | <1nw05b1.mxih2z19jd4ufN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #209856 |
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: > Poorly trimmed asshole! You want fur around it? You ain't gettin' feathers. -- ^Ã^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Scatboi g8dgc <g8dgc@noneya.none> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 12:38 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Message-ID | <U3ssD.49707$rK2.22792@fx28.iad> |
| In reply to | #209865 |
On 10/1/2018 12:17 PM, Sn!pe wrote: > Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: > >> Poorly trimmed asshole! > > You want fur around it? You ain't gettin' feathers. > You mammy gimme good head. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | g8dgc <g8dgc@noneya.none> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 13:11 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Message-ID | <q9l4rdd09cgtfrcen82hgvgt7r3if96tkj@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #209865 |
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 17:17:05 +0100, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote: >Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: > >> Poorly trimmed asshole! > >You want fur around it? You ain't gettin' feathers. You mamma gimme good head. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 18:17 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Message-ID | <1nw0828.111dprzix8hvfN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #209871 |
Crapstain Nelly the fake g8dgc <nelly@noneya.none> sincerely squeaked: > On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 17:17:05 +0100, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote: > > > Sir Gergory Hall, Esq. <nelly@fake.yacht_maester> grotesquely gurgled: > > > >> Poorly trimmed asshole! > > > >You want fur around it? You ain't gettin' feathers. > > You mamma gimme good head. > LOL So good, we saw it twice. -- ^Ã^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 10:42 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361bfc4b99f77475994d0a@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #209834 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <yppsD.31103$X82.27503@fx22.iad>, silver@slim.er says... > > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 23:54:50 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > Checkmate! In article <pos00i$mhp$122@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > > @gmail.invalid says... > > > > > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:34:08 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> > >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts > >> > by Checkmate! In article <pora76$mhp$108@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > >> > @gmail.invalid says... > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> >> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 10:32:34 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading > >> >> > posts by Checkmate! In article > >> >> > <djq1rdt4na60fld5d79059fe0evo3n256v@4ax.com>, > >> >> > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 05:35:12, Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> >On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:55:02, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > >> >> >> >> Why did Dr Ford go into a private bedroom with a drunk man ? > >> >> >> >> Was she looking for love ? > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >Irrelevant. Going into someone's bedroom with someone does not > >> >> >> >amount to giving consent. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Wrong! It amounts to a willingness to be petted up to including > >> >> >> sexual intercourse just like going into a shower amounts to a > >> >> >> willingness to get wet. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> You liberal feminists seem to think NONE of your actions have > >> >> >> consequences. You would be wrong about that... > >> >> > > >> >> > Little girl thought it was okay to attend and participate in a > >> >> > drinking party at age 15, and spends the next 36 years of her life > >> >> > trying to get over the trauma of another drunken boy attempting to > >> >> > make sexual advances towards her... which, by her own account, > >> >> > amounted to some inappropriate roughhousing. The second guy jumps > >> >> > on the bed, they all fall onto the floor, and she runs out of the > >> >> > room. The two boys laugh, and don't even pursue her like one might > >> >> > expect. Instead, they laugh and "ping-pong" down the stairs. That > >> >> > sounds like a bunch of teens behaving badly, but it doesn't sound > >> >> > like they intended to forcibly rape her, or they wouldn't have > >> >> > wandered off to find some other mischief to get into. IOW, > >> >> > she didn't get raped, she got scared... and this is enough to > >> >> > consume the next 36 years of her life? She's not even willing to > >> >> > accept ANY responsibility for her own lack of good judgment. > >> >> > >> >> What a load of victim-blaming bullshit. > >> >> > >> >> Tell me, kooky, are you saying that just out of partisan support for > >> >> Trump and Kavanofuckingway? Or are you saying that because you have > >> >> been pushy with reluctant women in the past yourself, and are quite > >> >> averse to the thought that maybe you came close to, or actually did, > >> >> commit rape. > >> > > >> > I've never forced myself on anyone, you paranoid Ko0k. In fact, in > >> > my much younger years I was fooling around in bed with a girl, and we > >> > were just about to do The Deed, when she said she would, but only if > >> > I told her I loved her first. I told her I wouldn't say that because > >> > I didn't. > >> > She still slept with me that night, but I honored her wishes and > >> > didn't try to pork her. A friend of mine ran into her years later, > >> > and tried to hit on her. He told me all she could do was keep asking > >> > about me. If I had lied to her just to get sex, I doubt that she > >> > would have even remembered me. You seem to be under the assumption > >> > that anyone with a dick is a rapist. If it isn't given freely and > >> > willingly, I don't want it. > >> > >> So it's just partisan bullshit then. Gotcha. You won't do anything even > >> remotely rapey yourself, but you will wholeheartedly support the > >> rapepublican party and rapey assholes within it like Kavanaugh, Roy > >> Moore, > >> and of course the Tangerine Tyrant itself. :P > > > > "Partisan bullshit"? What about at least half a dozen Democrats who > > have done far worse, much more recently (than what's ALLEGED with > > Kavanaugh), and with much more proof? What is it about Kavanaugh that > > trips your trigger? It certainly isn't any evidence that's even > > remotely provable. Is it the fact that he's not a Democrat, like out > > former Commander-In- Briefs, William Jefferson Clinton... or is it the > > possibility that Kavanaugh might potentially overturn Roe V Wade and > > take control of whatever might be baking in your oven some day? > > Bill Clinton flat out raped women and the Democrats refused to hear it > and Keith Allison beat the crap out of his wife and they once again don't > care. Anyone who believes that Democrats actually care about female > victims is a fool. They only care about gaining as much power as possible > and they will gladly throw innocent people under the bus with rape, > sexism or racism allegations to do it. > > Bill Clinton should be in jail, as should his wife and Keith Ellison. > However, they're left-wing so they're going to be protected at all costs > by their fellow leftist politicians, the media, the music industry, the > movie industry and so on. To Hell with all of them. Precisely! Hypocrites, every one of 'em! -- Checkmate ÂŪ Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright ÂĐ 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Message-ID | <pouakc$v7j$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #209889 |
On 10/1/2018 10:42 AM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <yppsD.31103$X82.27503@fx22.iad>, silver@slim.er > says... > > >> >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 23:54:50 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <pos00i$mhp$122@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>> @gmail.invalid says... >>> >>> >>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:34:08 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>> >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>>> by Checkmate! In article <pora76$mhp$108@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 10:32:34 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>> posts by Checkmate! In article >>>>>>> <djq1rdt4na60fld5d79059fe0evo3n256v@4ax.com>, >>>>>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 05:35:12, Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:55:02, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Why did Dr Ford go into a private bedroom with a drunk man ? >>>>>>>>>> Was she looking for love ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Irrelevant. Going into someone's bedroom with someone does not >>>>>>>>> amount to giving consent. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Wrong! It amounts to a willingness to be petted up to including >>>>>>>> sexual intercourse just like going into a shower amounts to a >>>>>>>> willingness to get wet. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You liberal feminists seem to think NONE of your actions have >>>>>>>> consequences. You would be wrong about that... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Little girl thought it was okay to attend and participate in a >>>>>>> drinking party at age 15, and spends the next 36 years of her life >>>>>>> trying to get over the trauma of another drunken boy attempting to >>>>>>> make sexual advances towards her... which, by her own account, >>>>>>> amounted to some inappropriate roughhousing. The second guy jumps >>>>>>> on the bed, they all fall onto the floor, and she runs out of the >>>>>>> room. The two boys laugh, and don't even pursue her like one might >>>>>>> expect. Instead, they laugh and "ping-pong" down the stairs. That >>>>>>> sounds like a bunch of teens behaving badly, but it doesn't sound >>>>>>> like they intended to forcibly rape her, or they wouldn't have >>>>>>> wandered off to find some other mischief to get into. IOW, >>>>>>> she didn't get raped, she got scared... and this is enough to >>>>>>> consume the next 36 years of her life? She's not even willing to >>>>>>> accept ANY responsibility for her own lack of good judgment. >>>>>> >>>>>> What a load of victim-blaming bullshit. >>>>>> >>>>>> Tell me, kooky, are you saying that just out of partisan support for >>>>>> Trump and Kavanofuckingway? Or are you saying that because you have >>>>>> been pushy with reluctant women in the past yourself, and are quite >>>>>> averse to the thought that maybe you came close to, or actually did, >>>>>> commit rape. >>>>> >>>>> I've never forced myself on anyone, you paranoid Ko0k. In fact, in >>>>> my much younger years I was fooling around in bed with a girl, and we >>>>> were just about to do The Deed, when she said she would, but only if >>>>> I told her I loved her first. I told her I wouldn't say that because >>>>> I didn't. >>>>> She still slept with me that night, but I honored her wishes and >>>>> didn't try to pork her. A friend of mine ran into her years later, >>>>> and tried to hit on her. He told me all she could do was keep asking >>>>> about me. If I had lied to her just to get sex, I doubt that she >>>>> would have even remembered me. You seem to be under the assumption >>>>> that anyone with a dick is a rapist. If it isn't given freely and >>>>> willingly, I don't want it. >>>> >>>> So it's just partisan bullshit then. Gotcha. You won't do anything even >>>> remotely rapey yourself, but you will wholeheartedly support the >>>> rapepublican party and rapey assholes within it like Kavanaugh, Roy >>>> Moore, >>>> and of course the Tangerine Tyrant itself. :P >>> >>> "Partisan bullshit"? What about at least half a dozen Democrats who >>> have done far worse, much more recently (than what's ALLEGED with >>> Kavanaugh), and with much more proof? What is it about Kavanaugh that >>> trips your trigger? It certainly isn't any evidence that's even >>> remotely provable. Is it the fact that he's not a Democrat, like out >>> former Commander-In- Briefs, William Jefferson Clinton... or is it the >>> possibility that Kavanaugh might potentially overturn Roe V Wade and >>> take control of whatever might be baking in your oven some day? >> >> Bill Clinton flat out raped women and the Democrats refused to hear it >> and Keith Allison beat the crap out of his wife and they once again don't >> care. Anyone who believes that Democrats actually care about female >> victims is a fool. They only care about gaining as much power as possible >> and they will gladly throw innocent people under the bus with rape, >> sexism or racism allegations to do it. >> >> Bill Clinton should be in jail, as should his wife and Keith Ellison. >> However, they're left-wing so they're going to be protected at all costs >> by their fellow leftist politicians, the media, the music industry, the >> movie industry and so on. To Hell with all of them. > > Precisely! Hypocrites, every one of 'em! > Still looking forward into fantasy land where there is an actual serious investigation into Juanita and William...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-02 03:17 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Message-ID | <pouo0j$at2$16@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #209775 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 23:54:50 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <pos00i$mhp$122@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > @gmail.invalid says... > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:34:08 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >> > by Checkmate! In article <pora76$mhp$108@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >> > @gmail.invalid says... >> > >> > >> > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> >> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 10:32:34 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >> >> > posts by Checkmate! In article >> >> > <djq1rdt4na60fld5d79059fe0evo3n256v@4ax.com>, >> >> > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 05:35:12, Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:55:02, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> >> >> >> Why did Dr Ford go into a private bedroom with a drunk man ? >> >> >> >> Was she looking for love ? >> >> >> > >> >> >> >Irrelevant. Going into someone's bedroom with someone does not >> >> >> >amount to giving consent. >> >> >> >> >> >> Wrong! It amounts to a willingness to be petted up to including >> >> >> sexual intercourse just like going into a shower amounts to a >> >> >> willingness to get wet. >> >> >> >> >> >> You liberal feminists seem to think NONE of your actions have >> >> >> consequences. You would be wrong about that... >> >> > >> >> > Little girl thought it was okay to attend and participate in a >> >> > drinking party at age 15, and spends the next 36 years of her life >> >> > trying to get over the trauma of another drunken boy attempting to >> >> > make sexual advances towards her... which, by her own account, >> >> > amounted to some inappropriate roughhousing. The second guy jumps >> >> > on the bed, they all fall onto the floor, and she runs out of the >> >> > room. The two boys laugh, and don't even pursue her like one might >> >> > expect. Instead, they laugh and "ping-pong" down the stairs. That >> >> > sounds like a bunch of teens behaving badly, but it doesn't sound >> >> > like they intended to forcibly rape her, or they wouldn't have >> >> > wandered off to find some other mischief to get into. IOW, >> >> > she didn't get raped, she got scared... and this is enough to >> >> > consume the next 36 years of her life? She's not even willing to >> >> > accept ANY responsibility for her own lack of good judgment. >> >> >> >> What a load of victim-blaming bullshit. >> >> >> >> Tell me, kooky, are you saying that just out of partisan support for >> >> Trump and Kavanofuckingway? Or are you saying that because you have >> >> been pushy with reluctant women in the past yourself, and are quite >> >> averse to the thought that maybe you came close to, or actually did, >> >> commit rape. >> > >> > I've never forced myself on anyone, you paranoid Ko0k. In fact, in >> > my much younger years I was fooling around in bed with a girl, and we >> > were just about to do The Deed, when she said she would, but only if >> > I told her I loved her first. I told her I wouldn't say that because >> > I didn't. >> > She still slept with me that night, but I honored her wishes and >> > didn't try to pork her. A friend of mine ran into her years later, >> > and tried to hit on her. He told me all she could do was keep asking >> > about me. If I had lied to her just to get sex, I doubt that she >> > would have even remembered me. You seem to be under the assumption >> > that anyone with a dick is a rapist. If it isn't given freely and >> > willingly, I don't want it. >> >> So it's just partisan bullshit then. Gotcha. You won't do anything even >> remotely rapey yourself, but you will wholeheartedly support the >> rapepublican party and rapey assholes within it like Kavanaugh, Roy >> Moore, >> and of course the Tangerine Tyrant itself. :P > > "Partisan bullshit"? What about at least half a dozen Democrats who > have done far worse, much more recently (than what's ALLEGED with > Kavanaugh), and with much more proof? Which doesn't quite add up to the quarter-dozen Rapepublicans named Trump, Moore, and Kavanaugh, of whom the first two ogled underage girls (Trump ogled *naked* underage girls) and the third is implicated in two gang rapes and one attempted gang rape. Funny how pedophilia particularly seems to be a Rapepublican specialty, eh? The worst you can pin on the entirety of the Dem politician population is a couple of probable rapes and a bunch of groping, harassment, and other comparatively small-potatoes stuff. Which is all beside the point. The Democratic party is *bad*. The Rapepublican party is *much, much worse*. We really need either a massive reform of the Democratic party or a viable third party to arise. > What is it about Kavanaugh that trips your trigger? I could ask you, and all the other rightards in the world, the same question. Why are the lot of you so willing to go to the wall to defend that privileged little git? Assholes like him are a dime a dozen, especially in the GOP upper echelons. There are other candidates Trump could nominate most of whom would be as bad or worse without being (as easily proved to be) rapists...but it's Kavanaugh or bust. Why pick that particular hill to die on? I can only imagine that a lot of right wingers see more than a bit of themselves in Kavanaugh; either in their own past peccadilloes, or else in their self image of who they *want* to be. > It certainly isn't any evidence that's even remotely provable. Is it the > fact that he's not a Democrat, like out former Commander-In- Briefs, > William Jefferson Clinton... or is it the possibility that Kavanaugh > might potentially overturn Roe V Wade and take control of whatever might > be baking in your oven some day? Kavanaugh will never have that control. If he ascends to the Supreme Court, that's it, I'm gone. The United States of America will be a lost cause, at least for the next 20 years and possibly forever. Reactionaries locked into positions of authority and power-diving the country right into bedrock. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 21:21 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Message-ID | <YuBsD.165250$cL2.51990@fx43.iad> |
| In reply to | #210157 |
On 10/1/2018 9:17 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 23:54:50 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <pos00i$mhp$122@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >> @gmail.invalid says... >> >> >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:34:08 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>> >>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>> by Checkmate! In article <pora76$mhp$108@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 10:32:34 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>> posts by Checkmate! In article >>>>>> <djq1rdt4na60fld5d79059fe0evo3n256v@4ax.com>, >>>>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 05:35:12, Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:55:02, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>>>>>>> Why did Dr Ford go into a private bedroom with a drunk man ? >>>>>>>>> Was she looking for love ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Irrelevant. Going into someone's bedroom with someone does not >>>>>>>> amount to giving consent. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Wrong! It amounts to a willingness to be petted up to including >>>>>>> sexual intercourse just like going into a shower amounts to a >>>>>>> willingness to get wet. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You liberal feminists seem to think NONE of your actions have >>>>>>> consequences. You would be wrong about that... >>>>>> >>>>>> Little girl thought it was okay to attend and participate in a >>>>>> drinking party at age 15, and spends the next 36 years of her life >>>>>> trying to get over the trauma of another drunken boy attempting to >>>>>> make sexual advances towards her... which, by her own account, >>>>>> amounted to some inappropriate roughhousing. The second guy jumps >>>>>> on the bed, they all fall onto the floor, and she runs out of the >>>>>> room. The two boys laugh, and don't even pursue her like one might >>>>>> expect. Instead, they laugh and "ping-pong" down the stairs. That >>>>>> sounds like a bunch of teens behaving badly, but it doesn't sound >>>>>> like they intended to forcibly rape her, or they wouldn't have >>>>>> wandered off to find some other mischief to get into. IOW, >>>>>> she didn't get raped, she got scared... and this is enough to >>>>>> consume the next 36 years of her life? She's not even willing to >>>>>> accept ANY responsibility for her own lack of good judgment. >>>>> >>>>> What a load of victim-blaming bullshit. >>>>> >>>>> Tell me, kooky, are you saying that just out of partisan support for >>>>> Trump and Kavanofuckingway? Or are you saying that because you have >>>>> been pushy with reluctant women in the past yourself, and are quite >>>>> averse to the thought that maybe you came close to, or actually did, >>>>> commit rape. >>>> >>>> I've never forced myself on anyone, you paranoid Ko0k. In fact, in >>>> my much younger years I was fooling around in bed with a girl, and we >>>> were just about to do The Deed, when she said she would, but only if >>>> I told her I loved her first. I told her I wouldn't say that because >>>> I didn't. >>>> She still slept with me that night, but I honored her wishes and >>>> didn't try to pork her. A friend of mine ran into her years later, >>>> and tried to hit on her. He told me all she could do was keep asking >>>> about me. If I had lied to her just to get sex, I doubt that she >>>> would have even remembered me. You seem to be under the assumption >>>> that anyone with a dick is a rapist. If it isn't given freely and >>>> willingly, I don't want it. >>> >>> So it's just partisan bullshit then. Gotcha. You won't do anything even >>> remotely rapey yourself, but you will wholeheartedly support the >>> rapepublican party and rapey assholes within it like Kavanaugh, Roy >>> Moore, >>> and of course the Tangerine Tyrant itself. :P >> >> "Partisan bullshit"? What about at least half a dozen Democrats who >> have done far worse, much more recently (than what's ALLEGED with >> Kavanaugh), and with much more proof? > > Which doesn't quite add up to the quarter-dozen Rapepublicans named Trump, > Moore, and Kavanaugh, of whom the first two ogled underage girls (Trump > ogled *naked* underage girls) and the third is implicated in two gang > rapes and one attempted gang rape. > > Funny how pedophilia particularly seems to be a Rapepublican specialty, > eh? The worst you can pin on the entirety of the Dem politician population > is a couple of probable rapes and a bunch of groping, harassment, and > other comparatively small-potatoes stuff. > > Which is all beside the point. The Democratic party is *bad*. The > Rapepublican party is *much, much worse*. We really need either a massive > reform of the Democratic party or a viable third party to arise. > >> What is it about Kavanaugh that trips your trigger? > > I could ask you, and all the other rightards in the world, the same > question. Why are the lot of you so willing to go to the wall to defend > that privileged little git? Assholes like him are a dime a dozen, > especially in the GOP upper echelons. There are other candidates Trump > could nominate most of whom would be as bad or worse without being (as > easily proved to be) rapists...but it's Kavanaugh or bust. Why pick that > particular hill to die on? I can only imagine that a lot of right wingers > see more than a bit of themselves in Kavanaugh; either in their own past > peccadilloes, or else in their self image of who they *want* to be. > >> It certainly isn't any evidence that's even remotely provable. Is it the >> fact that he's not a Democrat, like out former Commander-In- Briefs, >> William Jefferson Clinton... or is it the possibility that Kavanaugh >> might potentially overturn Roe V Wade and take control of whatever might >> be baking in your oven some day? > > Kavanaugh will never have that control. If he ascends to the Supreme > Court, that's it, I'm gone. The United States of America will be a lost > cause, at least for the next 20 years and possibly forever. Reactionaries > locked into positions of authority and power-diving the country right into > bedrock. > Typical contard drinking the Fox koolaid. You just keep on worshipping Trump all of you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 20:57 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Message-ID | <pouqbi$5t1$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #210159 |
On 10/1/2018 8:21 PM, Lunar Opticfibre wrote: > On 10/1/2018 9:17 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 23:54:50 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <pos00i$mhp$122@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>> @gmail.invalid says... >>> >>> >>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:34:08 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>> >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>>> by Checkmate! In article <pora76$mhp$108@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 10:32:34 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>> posts by Checkmate! In article >>>>>>> <djq1rdt4na60fld5d79059fe0evo3n256v@4ax.com>, >>>>>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 05:35:12, Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:55:02, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Why did Dr Ford go into a private bedroom with a drunk man ? >>>>>>>>>> Was she looking for love ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Irrelevant. Going into someone's bedroom with someone does not >>>>>>>>> amount to giving consent. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Wrong! It amounts to a willingness to be petted up to including >>>>>>>> sexual intercourse just like going into a shower amounts to a >>>>>>>> willingness to get wet. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You liberal feminists seem to think NONE of your actions have >>>>>>>> consequences. You would be wrong about that... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Little girl thought it was okay to attend and participate in a >>>>>>> drinking party at age 15, and spends the next 36 years of her life >>>>>>> trying to get over the trauma of another drunken boy attempting to >>>>>>> make sexual advances towards her... which, by her own account, >>>>>>> amounted to some inappropriate roughhousing. The second guy jumps >>>>>>> on the bed, they all fall onto the floor, and she runs out of the >>>>>>> room. The two boys laugh, and don't even pursue her like one might >>>>>>> expect. Instead, they laugh and "ping-pong" down the stairs. That >>>>>>> sounds like a bunch of teens behaving badly, but it doesn't sound >>>>>>> like they intended to forcibly rape her, or they wouldn't have >>>>>>> wandered off to find some other mischief to get into. IOW, >>>>>>> she didn't get raped, she got scared... and this is enough to >>>>>>> consume the next 36 years of her life? She's not even willing to >>>>>>> accept ANY responsibility for her own lack of good judgment. >>>>>> >>>>>> What a load of victim-blaming bullshit. >>>>>> >>>>>> Tell me, kooky, are you saying that just out of partisan support for >>>>>> Trump and Kavanofuckingway? Or are you saying that because you have >>>>>> been pushy with reluctant women in the past yourself, and are quite >>>>>> averse to the thought that maybe you came close to, or actually did, >>>>>> commit rape. >>>>> >>>>> I've never forced myself on anyone, you paranoid Ko0k. In fact, in >>>>> my much younger years I was fooling around in bed with a girl, and we >>>>> were just about to do The Deed, when she said she would, but only if >>>>> I told her I loved her first. I told her I wouldn't say that because >>>>> I didn't. >>>>> She still slept with me that night, but I honored her wishes and >>>>> didn't try to pork her. A friend of mine ran into her years later, >>>>> and tried to hit on her. He told me all she could do was keep asking >>>>> about me. If I had lied to her just to get sex, I doubt that she >>>>> would have even remembered me. You seem to be under the assumption >>>>> that anyone with a dick is a rapist. If it isn't given freely and >>>>> willingly, I don't want it. >>>> >>>> So it's just partisan bullshit then. Gotcha. You won't do anything even >>>> remotely rapey yourself, but you will wholeheartedly support the >>>> rapepublican party and rapey assholes within it like Kavanaugh, Roy >>>> Moore, >>>> and of course the Tangerine Tyrant itself. :P >>> >>> "Partisan bullshit"? What about at least half a dozen Democrats who >>> have done far worse, much more recently (than what's ALLEGED with >>> Kavanaugh), and with much more proof? >> >> Which doesn't quite add up to the quarter-dozen Rapepublicans named >> Trump, >> Moore, and Kavanaugh, of whom the first two ogled underage girls (Trump >> ogled *naked* underage girls) and the third is implicated in two gang >> rapes and one attempted gang rape. >> >> Funny how pedophilia particularly seems to be a Rapepublican specialty, >> eh? The worst you can pin on the entirety of the Dem politician >> population >> is a couple of probable rapes and a bunch of groping, harassment, and >> other comparatively small-potatoes stuff. >> >> Which is all beside the point. The Democratic party is *bad*. The >> Rapepublican party is *much, much worse*. We really need either a massive >> reform of the Democratic party or a viable third party to arise. >> >>> What is it about Kavanaugh that trips your trigger? >> >> I could ask you, and all the other rightards in the world, the same >> question. Why are the lot of you so willing to go to the wall to defend >> that privileged little git? Assholes like him are a dime a dozen, >> especially in the GOP upper echelons. There are other candidates Trump >> could nominate most of whom would be as bad or worse without being (as >> easily proved to be) rapists...but it's Kavanaugh or bust. Why pick that >> particular hill to die on? I can only imagine that a lot of right wingers >> see more than a bit of themselves in Kavanaugh; either in their own past >> peccadilloes, or else in their self image of who they *want* to be. >> >>> It certainly isn't any evidence that's even remotely provable. Is it the >>> fact that he's not a Democrat, like out former Commander-In- Briefs, >>> William Jefferson Clinton... or is it the possibility that Kavanaugh >>> might potentially overturn Roe V Wade and take control of whatever might >>> be baking in your oven some day? >> >> Kavanaugh will never have that control. If he ascends to the Supreme >> Court, that's it, I'm gone. The United States of America will be a lost >> cause, at least for the next 20 years and possibly forever. Reactionaries >> locked into positions of authority and power-diving the country right >> into >> bedrock. >> > > Typical contard drinking the Fox koolaid. You just keep on > worshipping Trump all of you. Is Trump a total moron, a genius, or some sort of strange "hybrid"?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 21:37 -0700 |
| Subject | Trump is a salesman. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.1--9.37pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #210175 |
> Is Trump a total moron, a genius, or some sort of strange "hybrid"? Trump is a salesman.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 22:06 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Trump is a salesman. |
| Message-ID | <pouucj$qdf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #210186 |
On 10/1/2018 9:37 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> Is Trump a total moron, a genius, or some sort of strange "hybrid"? > > Trump is a salesman. > Can a salesman be quantified wrt (moron, genius, strange "hybrid")?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-02 06:44 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Trump is a salesman. |
| Message-ID | <pov43q$at2$23@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #210186 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 21:37:31 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> Is Trump a total moron, a genius, or some sort of strange "hybrid"? > > Trump is a salesman. More specifically, of the used-car variety. <snicker> -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-02 10:12 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Trump is a salesman. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361d46de3b2f907b989d70@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #210198 |
In article <pov43q$at2$23@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 21:37:31 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > > >> Is Trump a total moron, a genius, or some sort of strange "hybrid"? > > > > Trump is a salesman. > > More specifically, of the used-car variety. > > <snicker> He's got more than you got...LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-02 15:29 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Trump is a salesman. |
| Message-ID | <pp0gu9$1q56$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #210186 |
On 10/2/2018 12:37 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> Is Trump a total moron, a genius, or some sort of strange "hybrid"? > > Trump is a salesman. > And judging from the professional level of his bullshit, I'd say a damn good one, too!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-02 12:53 -0700 |
| Subject | Trump could sell accusations to a Dr. Ford. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.2--0.53pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #210287 |
> > Trump is a salesman. > > And judging from the professional level of his bullshit, > I'd say a damn good one, too! Right, Trump could sell accusations to a Dr. Ford.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-02 15:08 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Trump is a salesman. |
| Message-ID | <7gj7rd9ftao4q4tucgpocmsqlj1u86ngcs@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #210287 |
benj wrote: > Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> >> Trump is a salesman. > >And judging from the professional level of his bullshit, I'd say a damn >good one, too! I like a healthy orange glow, so have ordered a case of Trump Tan! -- "the poorest of the poor would rather steal Windows than use legal Linux." - some dumb fsck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-02 10:17 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Message-ID | <dev6rd9mu2tfg5ql4vn2u18bj42ei0ik29@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #210175 |
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 20:57:38 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote: <...> >Is Trump a total moron, a genius, or some sort of strange "hybrid" More like the second coming... -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall If a woman stumbles upon a fact that is opposed to her intuition she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, she has feelings that give her a reason to act in accordance with her intuition, she will embrace them as the Gospel. -- Capt. Neal ÂŪ
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-02 21:56 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Message-ID | <pp0phj$1of$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #210222 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 10:17:13 -0400, Stinky Gregzzly Hell, Rapist wrote: > On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 20:57:38 -0700, "Chris M. Thomasson" > <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote: > > <...> > >>Is Trump a total moron, a genius, or some sort of strange "hybrid" > > More like the second coming... Patmos claims he's the Antichrist. That's far more believable than your codswallop. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 39 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 37 38 [39] 40 41 … 50 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web