Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #161918 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-03 16:38 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-05-04 04:32 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 149 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-03 16:38 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-03 20:10 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-03 18:13 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-03 20:19 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-03 18:22 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-03 20:44 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 22:18 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-12 09:26 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-12 07:32 -0600
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 01:48 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-03 21:55 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 01:57 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-03 22:03 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-03 21:24 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-03 20:25 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Brennus <brennus@allia.org> - 2018-05-04 04:40 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 04:13 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 01:16 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 23:06 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 02:56 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-05 06:58 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 12:29 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 15:14 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-06 06:13 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-06 09:10 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-06 09:23 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-06 11:30 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-06 12:31 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-06 23:13 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 11:02 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Brennus <brennus@allia.org> - 2018-05-07 17:04 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 12:36 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:25 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 14:52 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 20:19 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 13:28 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 17:21 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 16:17 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 21:04 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 20:31 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 08:21 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 20:22 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 18:25 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:33 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 22:55 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 06:06 -0400
Magnetic South wanders around and varies. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-08 07:41 -0700
Re: Magnetic South wanders around and varies. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:36 -0400
Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-08 10:15 -0700
Re: Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:02 -0400
Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-09 08:55 -0700
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 19:25 +0000
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 15:06 -0500
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 22:18 +0000
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 15:24 -0700
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-09 18:25 -0500
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 16:51 -0700
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-09 19:09 -0500
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 17:17 -0700
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-09 21:09 -0500
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 19:17 -0700
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-10 08:13 +0100
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-09 16:33 -0600
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 21:21 -0500
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 09:06 -0400
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 07:08 -0600
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 09:18 -0500
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 10:54 -0400
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 08:58 -0600
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 11:00 -0400
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 10:22 -0500
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 20:34 +0000
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 16:18 -0600
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 22:47 +0000
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 09:25 -0600
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 10:21 -0500
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 20:36 +0000
Re: Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 15:01 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 09:53 -0500
Cars used to kill the young, more than anything else. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-08 08:19 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 08:24 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:39 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 15:08 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 19:56 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 17:21 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:23 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:29 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 23:18 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 19:05 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 17:10 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-08 19:22 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 17:35 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:04 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 15:03 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 22:22 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:06 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 22:38 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:07 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 20:26 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 18:27 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 22:05 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 20:42 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 10:36 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 11:48 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 11:03 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:28 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 20:50 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:35 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 21:18 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 03:30 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 23:00 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 06:08 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 09:56 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 08:26 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:40 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 15:36 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 19:58 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Skeeter <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-08 14:02 -0600
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 13:10 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 20:12 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 17:34 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:23 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:25 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 17:24 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 23:19 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 22:20 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:09 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 20:34 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 15:15 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:40 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 14:56 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 13:49 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:37 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:27 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 15:02 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 20:45 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:37 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 22:32 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 10:01 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 15:06 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 20:55 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-03 21:23 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-03 20:26 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 04:14 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-04 09:35 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Brennus <brennus@allia.org> - 2018-05-04 16:56 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 21:06 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Brennus <brennus@allia.org> - 2018-05-04 04:34 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Brennus <brennus@allia.org> - 2018-05-04 04:32 +0000
Page 3 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 08:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MDgIC.96478$o43.14621@fx33.iad> |
| In reply to | #163273 |
On 5/7/2018 9:31 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 5/7/2018 8:04 PM, benj wrote: >> On 5/7/2018 6:21 PM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 5/7/2018 3:19 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 14:52:55 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 5/7/2018 2:25 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>> melt! >>>>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 11:02:46 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5/6/2018 6:13 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>>> melt! >>>>>>>> On Sun, 06 May 2018 12:31:20 -0500, 卐ergio wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:30 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Nazi's are Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck >>>>>>>>>>> (pothead) >>>>>>>>>>> Schumer >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day >>>>>>>>>> as guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and you are card carrying member of the Democratic Socialist party >>>>>>>>> of Old Lady "poodle dog" Pelosie, and Chuck "stoner" Schumer, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and you and nads always call people that disagree with your extreme >>>>>>>>> views as "Nazis", because you're both "shallow thinkers", your bong >>>>>>>>> is calling you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Suggesting a return to 1950s-era economic policy aimed at building >>>>>>>> and supporting domestic productivity and taxing away rents isn't >>>>>>>> "extreme", >>>>>>>> kooky ... unless you think Eisenhower was a far left radical who >>>>>>>> made >>>>>>>> Stalin look moderate or something equally ridiculous. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Meanwhile, you're hardly one to be accusing others of having extreme >>>>>>>> views, not after your remarks the other day about Jews. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> those are your thoughts, not mine. >>>>>> >>>>>> You're denying saying someone should "get his Jew ass" out of >>>>>> somewhere >>>>>> the other day? >>>>> >>>>> Your Leader, Nancy "poodle dog" Pelosi, barked that at Al "the perv" >>>>> Frankin when he grabbed her knarly 80 year old deflated butt, in the >>>>> weekly closed democratic "party" session. Al, said it was sort of an >>>>> accident. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> I worked in Israel for IDF subcontractor, had a great time, they are >>>>>>> like a large family and treat you as one of their own. >>>>>> >>>>>> "I'm not racist! Some of my friends are Jewish!" >>>>> >>>>> is that what you post on Facebook ? >>>>> >>>>> <snip crap> >>>> >>>> Spin, deflect, deny, and IKY -- that's all you've got, isn't it? >>>> >>> >>> you still dancing ? >>> >>> you bringing up Eisenhower, Stalin, *only old folks* remember them, then >>> your 1950's tax rates, Pothead Chuck Schumer, then your Leader Pelosi + >>> perv Al Frankin assengrabbin, and Obama's hatred of Israel... no wonder >>> everyone left the building... >>> >>> perhaps you should take the time to write it down first, collect your >>> thoughts, and organize them. then post. Instead of knee jerking >>> covering kensi pupa pure propaganda postings. >>> >>> so, where did you get your degree, and what in ? >>> >> You think maybe Nad's degree is old enough that it's no longer any good? > > there are still thousands of jobs for COBOL, they pay big money now to > those that know, as nobody is left, all on walkers, or gone. It is very > ugly language too, (interesting on Indeed Cobol jobs-- the companies > that have jobs open Wallmart eCommerce!, hopefully it is only for > developing interfaces to stone age databases companies) > >> Did STalin and Eisenhower have computers back then? Weren't they called >> "slide rules"? > > I think those two had 'others' use pencil and paper, the old fashion > way, or an adding machine. > > slide rules were only understood and used by only by the most gifted, > intelligent and professional of people. > If you've ever seen division taking place on a mechanical calculator it's something to behold! chunk-a-tah, chunk-a-tah!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 20:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pctih1$ula$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #163355 |
On 5/8/2018 7:21 AM, benj wrote: > On 5/7/2018 9:31 PM, Sergio wrote: >> On 5/7/2018 8:04 PM, benj wrote: >>> On 5/7/2018 6:21 PM, Sergio wrote: >>>> On 5/7/2018 3:19 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! >>>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 14:52:55 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 5/7/2018 2:25 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>> melt! >>>>>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 11:02:46 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 5/6/2018 6:13 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>>>> melt! >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 06 May 2018 12:31:20 -0500, 卐ergio wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:30 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Nazi's are Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck >>>>>>>>>>>> (pothead) >>>>>>>>>>>> Schumer >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the >>>>>>>>>>> other day >>>>>>>>>>> as guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> and you are card carrying member of the Democratic Socialist >>>>>>>>>> party >>>>>>>>>> of Old Lady "poodle dog" Pelosie, and Chuck "stoner" Schumer, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> and you and nads always call people that disagree with your >>>>>>>>>> extreme >>>>>>>>>> views as "Nazis", because you're both "shallow thinkers", your >>>>>>>>>> bong >>>>>>>>>> is calling you. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Suggesting a return to 1950s-era economic policy aimed at building >>>>>>>>> and supporting domestic productivity and taxing away rents isn't >>>>>>>>> "extreme", >>>>>>>>> kooky ... unless you think Eisenhower was a far left radical who >>>>>>>>> made >>>>>>>>> Stalin look moderate or something equally ridiculous. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Meanwhile, you're hardly one to be accusing others of having >>>>>>>>> extreme >>>>>>>>> views, not after your remarks the other day about Jews. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> those are your thoughts, not mine. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You're denying saying someone should "get his Jew ass" out of >>>>>>> somewhere >>>>>>> the other day? >>>>>> >>>>>> Your Leader, Nancy "poodle dog" Pelosi, barked that at Al "the perv" >>>>>> Frankin when he grabbed her knarly 80 year old deflated butt, in the >>>>>> weekly closed democratic "party" session. Al, said it was sort of an >>>>>> accident. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> I worked in Israel for IDF subcontractor, had a great time, they >>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>> like a large family and treat you as one of their own. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "I'm not racist! Some of my friends are Jewish!" >>>>>> >>>>>> is that what you post on Facebook ? >>>>>> >>>>>> <snip crap> >>>>> >>>>> Spin, deflect, deny, and IKY -- that's all you've got, isn't it? >>>>> >>>> >>>> you still dancing ? >>>> >>>> you bringing up Eisenhower, Stalin, *only old folks* remember them, >>>> then >>>> your 1950's tax rates, Pothead Chuck Schumer, then your Leader Pelosi + >>>> perv Al Frankin assengrabbin, and Obama's hatred of Israel... no wonder >>>> everyone left the building... >>>> >>>> perhaps you should take the time to write it down first, collect your >>>> thoughts, and organize them. then post. Instead of knee jerking >>>> covering kensi pupa pure propaganda postings. >>>> >>>> so, where did you get your degree, and what in ? >>>> >>> You think maybe Nad's degree is old enough that it's no longer any good? >> >> there are still thousands of jobs for COBOL, they pay big money now to >> those that know, as nobody is left, all on walkers, or gone. It is very >> ugly language too, (interesting on Indeed Cobol jobs-- the companies >> that have jobs open Wallmart eCommerce!, hopefully it is only for >> developing interfaces to stone age databases companies) >> >>> Did STalin and Eisenhower have computers back then? Weren't they called >>> "slide rules"? >> >> I think those two had 'others' use pencil and paper, the old fashion >> way, or an adding machine. >> >> slide rules were only understood and used by only by the most gifted, >> intelligent and professional of people. >> > If you've ever seen division taking place on a mechanical calculator > it's something to behold! chunk-a-tah, chunk-a-tah! those mechanical engineers get an A+, and most of those parts are nickel steel, so the dont wear out, and you cannot drill them. (no need to ask why I was trying to drill a hole in a mechanical calculator part, it had probably 700 or more parts.)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 18:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b8q87h.6bh.17.7@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #163610 |
On 2018-05-08 6:22 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 5/8/2018 7:21 AM, benj wrote: >> On 5/7/2018 9:31 PM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 5/7/2018 8:04 PM, benj wrote: >>>> On 5/7/2018 6:21 PM, Sergio wrote: >>>>> On 5/7/2018 3:19 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>> melt! >>>>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 14:52:55 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5/7/2018 2:25 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>>> melt! >>>>>>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 11:02:46 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 5/6/2018 6:13 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>>>>> melt! >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 06 May 2018 12:31:20 -0500, 卐ergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:30 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nazi's are Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck >>>>>>>>>>>>> (pothead) >>>>>>>>>>>>> Schumer >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the >>>>>>>>>>>> other day >>>>>>>>>>>> as guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> and you are card carrying member of the Democratic Socialist >>>>>>>>>>> party >>>>>>>>>>> of Old Lady "poodle dog" Pelosie, and Chuck "stoner" Schumer, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> and you and nads always call people that disagree with your >>>>>>>>>>> extreme >>>>>>>>>>> views as "Nazis", because you're both "shallow thinkers", your >>>>>>>>>>> bong >>>>>>>>>>> is calling you. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Suggesting a return to 1950s-era economic policy aimed at building >>>>>>>>>> and supporting domestic productivity and taxing away rents isn't >>>>>>>>>> "extreme", >>>>>>>>>> kooky ... unless you think Eisenhower was a far left radical who >>>>>>>>>> made >>>>>>>>>> Stalin look moderate or something equally ridiculous. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile, you're hardly one to be accusing others of having >>>>>>>>>> extreme >>>>>>>>>> views, not after your remarks the other day about Jews. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> those are your thoughts, not mine. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You're denying saying someone should "get his Jew ass" out of >>>>>>>> somewhere >>>>>>>> the other day? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Your Leader, Nancy "poodle dog" Pelosi, barked that at Al "the perv" >>>>>>> Frankin when he grabbed her knarly 80 year old deflated butt, in the >>>>>>> weekly closed democratic "party" session. Al, said it was sort of an >>>>>>> accident. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I worked in Israel for IDF subcontractor, had a great time, they >>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>> like a large family and treat you as one of their own. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "I'm not racist! Some of my friends are Jewish!" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> is that what you post on Facebook ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <snip crap> >>>>>> >>>>>> Spin, deflect, deny, and IKY -- that's all you've got, isn't it? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> you still dancing ? >>>>> >>>>> you bringing up Eisenhower, Stalin, *only old folks* remember them, >>>>> then >>>>> your 1950's tax rates, Pothead Chuck Schumer, then your Leader Pelosi + >>>>> perv Al Frankin assengrabbin, and Obama's hatred of Israel... no wonder >>>>> everyone left the building... >>>>> >>>>> perhaps you should take the time to write it down first, collect your >>>>> thoughts, and organize them. then post. Instead of knee jerking >>>>> covering kensi pupa pure propaganda postings. >>>>> >>>>> so, where did you get your degree, and what in ? >>>>> >>>> You think maybe Nad's degree is old enough that it's no longer any good? >>> >>> there are still thousands of jobs for COBOL, they pay big money now to >>> those that know, as nobody is left, all on walkers, or gone. It is very >>> ugly language too, (interesting on Indeed Cobol jobs-- the companies >>> that have jobs open Wallmart eCommerce!, hopefully it is only for >>> developing interfaces to stone age databases companies) >>> >>>> Did STalin and Eisenhower have computers back then? Weren't they called >>>> "slide rules"? >>> >>> I think those two had 'others' use pencil and paper, the old fashion >>> way, or an adding machine. >>> >>> slide rules were only understood and used by only by the most gifted, >>> intelligent and professional of people. >>> >> If you've ever seen division taking place on a mechanical calculator >> it's something to behold! chunk-a-tah, chunk-a-tah! > > those mechanical engineers get an A+, and most of those parts are nickel > steel, so the dont wear out, and you cannot drill them. (no need to ask > why I was trying to drill a hole in a mechanical calculator part, it had > probably 700 or more parts.) > everything can be drilled
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 01:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pcqupb$k5f$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #163244 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 07 May 2018 17:21:10 -0500, Sergio wrote: > you bringing up Eisenhower, Stalin, *only old folks* remember them, Those who do not remember history are doomed to repeat it. > so, where did you get your degree, and what in ? Did you miss kensi's post just a short time ago that said mine was in computer science? Oh, wait, you can't have, because you frothed at it. History, hell, you don't even seem to remember things that happened more than a few *hours* ago. :P -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-07 22:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.355adbab89deeaf993939@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #163274 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pcqupb$k5f$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Mon, 07 May 2018 17:21:10 -0500, Sergio wrote: > > > you bringing up Eisenhower, Stalin, *only old folks* remember them, > > Those who do not remember history are doomed to repeat it. History tells us that those who DO remember history are also doomed to repeat it. Those who understand the true nature of humanity understand that. This is why I keep telling you that whether climate change is caused my human activity or not is purely academic, because our nature and our needs have us locked into what's easiest, profitable (for some) and convenient (for all). You simply can't sustain a human population of 8 billion people without huge demand and consumption of the resources derived from planet Earth. Nature eventually rights what's wrong on her own time schedule. We are incapable of pulling that off. Much will be said, little will be done. Too little, too late. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 06:06 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pcrsr8$4kv$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #163329 |
On 5/8/2018 1:55 AM, Checkmate wrote: > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Mon, 07 May 2018 17:21:10 -0500, Sergio wrote: >> >>> you bringing up Eisenhower, Stalin, *only old folks* remember them, >> >> Those who do not remember history are doomed to repeat it. > > History tells us that those who DO remember history are also doomed to > repeat it. Those who understand the true nature of humanity understand > that. Then why is now so very different from, say, 1000 years ago? Because eventually, someone did learn from history. > This is why I keep telling you that whether climate change is caused my > human activity or not is purely academic, because our nature and our > needs have us locked into what's easiest, profitable (for some) and > convenient (for all). If your nihilistic reasoning were correct, we'd still be destroying the ozone with CFCs and the peregrine falcon would be extinct from all the ongoing DDT use. But your nihilistic reasoning is not meant to be correct, is it? It's meant to let you stick your head in the sand and ignore the world's problems without guilt. Your self-deceiving kind are almost worse than the overtly kleptocratic and sociopathic CEO/politician types. You want to know why? Because though at least you're not *actively* being part of the problem, you're far more numerous than those who are. It recalls to mind what MLK Jr. once said about the "white moderate". > Much will be said, little will be done. Too little, too late. Cynics like you said that about CFCs and DDT, too. They were wrong. You are wrong. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 07:41 -0700 |
| Subject | Magnetic South wanders around and varies. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.8--7.41am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #163341 |
> If your nihilistic reasoning were correct, > we'd still be destroying the ozone with CFCs Only according to you, the political propagandist. Where's your DoubleBlind study ? nowhere, because it can't be done. Magnetic South wanders around and varies. > the peregrine falcon would be extinct from all the ongoing DDT use. Again, no proof, never.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 12:36 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Magnetic South wanders around and varies. |
| Message-ID | <pcsjml$1e6u$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #163377 |
On 5/8/2018 10:41 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> If your nihilistic reasoning were correct, >> we'd still be destroying the ozone with CFCs > > Only according to you, the political propagandist. > Where's your DoubleBlind study ? nowhere, because it can't be done. > Magnetic South wanders around and varies. Objection: relevance? -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 10:15 -0700 |
| Subject | Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.8--10.15am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #163398 |
> > > destroying the ozone with CFCs > > > > Where's your DoubleBlind study ? it can't be done. > > Magnetic South wanders around and varies. > > Objection: relevance? Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer, and it ( Magnetic South ) moves around, varies.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 07:02 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer. |
| Message-ID | <pcukh1$gbt$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #163412 |
On 5/8/2018 1:15 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>> destroying the ozone with CFCs >>> >>> Where's your DoubleBlind study ? it can't be done. >>> Magnetic South wanders around and varies. >> >> Objection: relevance? > > Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer, > and it ( Magnetic South ) moves around, varies. Wrong. Ultraviolet light combined with certain chemicals (such as CFCs) destroys the ozone layer. The ozone hole is in the antarctic because there's a vortex of air there at the stratosphere that traps things like CFCs and concentrates them. Nothing to do with magnetism. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 08:55 -0700 |
| Subject | Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.9--8.55am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #163679 |
> >>>> destroying the ozone with CFCs > >>> > >>> Where's your DoubleBlind study ? it can't be done. > >>> Magnetic South wanders around and varies. > > > > Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer, > > and it ( Magnetic South ) moves around, varies. > > Wrong. Ultraviolet light combined with certain chemicals (such as CFCs) > destroys the ozone layer. The ozone hole is in the antarctic because > there's a vortex of air there at the stratosphere that traps things like > CFCs and concentrates them. Nothing to do with magnetism. From WikiPedia: On March 3, 2005, the journal Nature published an article linking 2004's unusually large Arctic ozone hole to solar wind activity. As winters that are colder are more affected, at times, there is an ozone hole over Tibet. In 2006, a 2.5 million square kilometer ozone hole was detected over Tibet. Also again in 2011 an ozone hole appeared over mountainous regions of Tibet, Xinjiang, Qinghai and the Hindu Kush, along with an unprecedented hole over the Arctic, though the Tibet one is far less intense than the ones over the Arctic or Antarctic.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 19:25 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <pcvhv3$aep$10@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #163743 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Wed, 09 May 2018 08:55:44 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> >>>> destroying the ozone with CFCs >> >>> >> >>> Where's your DoubleBlind study ? it can't be done. >> >>> Magnetic South wanders around and varies. >> > >> > Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer, >> > and it ( Magnetic South ) moves around, varies. >> >> Wrong. Ultraviolet light combined with certain chemicals (such as CFCs) >> destroys the ozone layer. The ozone hole is in the antarctic because >> there's a vortex of air there at the stratosphere that traps things >> like CFCs and concentrates them. Nothing to do with magnetism. > > From WikiPedia: > > On March 3, 2005, the journal Nature published an article linking > 2004's unusually large Arctic ozone hole to solar wind activity. > > As winters that are colder are more affected, > at times, there is an ozone hole over Tibet. > In 2006, a 2.5 million square kilometer ozone hole was detected over > Tibet. > > Also again in 2011 an ozone hole appeared over mountainous regions of > Tibet, > Xinjiang, Qinghai and the Hindu Kush, along with an unprecedented hole > over the Arctic, though the Tibet one is far less intense than the > ones over the Arctic or Antarctic. Solar activity peaks are accompanied by increases in shortwave radiation as well, aren't they? So there'd be increased UV to cause ozone destruction. (Right when you need it most!) -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 15:06 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <pcvkc4$aob$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #163799 |
On 5/9/2018 2:25 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 09 May 2018 08:55:44 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > >>>>>>> destroying the ozone with CFCs >>>>>> >>>>>> Where's your DoubleBlind study ? it can't be done. >>>>>> Magnetic South wanders around and varies. >>>> >>>> Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer, >>>> and it ( Magnetic South ) moves around, varies. >>> >>> Wrong. Ultraviolet light combined with certain chemicals (such as CFCs) >>> destroys the ozone layer. The ozone hole is in the antarctic because >>> there's a vortex of air there at the stratosphere that traps things >>> like CFCs and concentrates them. Nothing to do with magnetism. >> >> From WikiPedia: >> >> On March 3, 2005, the journal Nature published an article linking >> 2004's unusually large Arctic ozone hole to solar wind activity. >> >> As winters that are colder are more affected, >> at times, there is an ozone hole over Tibet. >> In 2006, a 2.5 million square kilometer ozone hole was detected over >> Tibet. >> >> Also again in 2011 an ozone hole appeared over mountainous regions of >> Tibet, >> Xinjiang, Qinghai and the Hindu Kush, along with an unprecedented hole >> over the Arctic, though the Tibet one is far less intense than the >> ones over the Arctic or Antarctic. > > Solar activity peaks are accompanied by increases in shortwave radiation > as well, aren't they? So there'd be increased UV to cause ozone > destruction. (Right when you need it most!) > UV is good, it kills the germs/fungus on the surface of the earth daily, which allows life to exist in higher forms.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 22:18 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <pcvs3e$aep$18@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #163824 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Wed, 09 May 2018 15:06:21 -0500, Sergio wrote: > On 5/9/2018 2:25 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >> On Wed, 09 May 2018 08:55:44 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> >>>>>>>> destroying the ozone with CFCs >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Where's your DoubleBlind study ? it can't be done. >>>>>>> Magnetic South wanders around and varies. >>>>> >>>>> Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer, >>>>> and it ( Magnetic South ) moves around, varies. >>>> >>>> Wrong. Ultraviolet light combined with certain chemicals (such as >>>> CFCs) >>>> destroys the ozone layer. The ozone hole is in the antarctic because >>>> there's a vortex of air there at the stratosphere that traps things >>>> like CFCs and concentrates them. Nothing to do with magnetism. >>> >>> From WikiPedia: >>> >>> On March 3, 2005, the journal Nature published an article linking >>> 2004's unusually large Arctic ozone hole to solar wind activity. >>> >>> As winters that are colder are more affected, >>> at times, there is an ozone hole over Tibet. >>> In 2006, a 2.5 million square kilometer ozone hole was detected over >>> Tibet. >>> >>> Also again in 2011 an ozone hole appeared over mountainous regions >>> of Tibet, >>> Xinjiang, Qinghai and the Hindu Kush, along with an unprecedented >>> hole over the Arctic, though the Tibet one is far less intense than >>> the ones over the Arctic or Antarctic. >> >> Solar activity peaks are accompanied by increases in shortwave >> radiation as well, aren't they? So there'd be increased UV to cause >> ozone destruction. (Right when you need it most!) > > UV is good, > it kills the germs/fungus on the surface of the earth daily, which > allows life to exist in higher forms. I don't even know where to begin with debunking this. It's short, but that just makes the wrongness extremely concentrated. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 15:24 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <b8si02.aar.17.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #163854 |
On 2018-05-09 3:18 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 09 May 2018 15:06:21 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >> On 5/9/2018 2:25 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 08:55:44 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>> destroying the ozone with CFCs >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Where's your DoubleBlind study ? it can't be done. >>>>>>>> Magnetic South wanders around and varies. >>>>>> >>>>>> Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer, >>>>>> and it ( Magnetic South ) moves around, varies. >>>>> >>>>> Wrong. Ultraviolet light combined with certain chemicals (such as >>>>> CFCs) >>>>> destroys the ozone layer. The ozone hole is in the antarctic because >>>>> there's a vortex of air there at the stratosphere that traps things >>>>> like CFCs and concentrates them. Nothing to do with magnetism. >>>> >>>> From WikiPedia: >>>> >>>> On March 3, 2005, the journal Nature published an article linking >>>> 2004's unusually large Arctic ozone hole to solar wind activity. >>>> >>>> As winters that are colder are more affected, >>>> at times, there is an ozone hole over Tibet. >>>> In 2006, a 2.5 million square kilometer ozone hole was detected over >>>> Tibet. >>>> >>>> Also again in 2011 an ozone hole appeared over mountainous regions >>>> of Tibet, >>>> Xinjiang, Qinghai and the Hindu Kush, along with an unprecedented >>>> hole over the Arctic, though the Tibet one is far less intense than >>>> the ones over the Arctic or Antarctic. >>> >>> Solar activity peaks are accompanied by increases in shortwave >>> radiation as well, aren't they? So there'd be increased UV to cause >>> ozone destruction. (Right when you need it most!) >> >> UV is good, >> it kills the germs/fungus on the surface of the earth daily, which >> allows life to exist in higher forms. > > I don't even know where to begin with debunking this. It's short, but that > just makes the wrongness extremely concentrated. > if you research before you speak you may not be so wrong so much
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 18:25 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <uo07fd9bfbiqi18enslevbukm9ih5pgg9e@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #163858 |
On Wed, 9 May 2018 15:24:33 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2018-05-09 3:18 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Wed, 09 May 2018 15:06:21 -0500, Sergio wrote: >> >>> On 5/9/2018 2:25 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! >>>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 08:55:44 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>> destroying the ozone with CFCs >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Where's your DoubleBlind study ? it can't be done. >>>>>>>>> Magnetic South wanders around and varies. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer, >>>>>>> and it ( Magnetic South ) moves around, varies. >>>>>> >>>>>> Wrong. Ultraviolet light combined with certain chemicals (such as >>>>>> CFCs) >>>>>> destroys the ozone layer. The ozone hole is in the antarctic because >>>>>> there's a vortex of air there at the stratosphere that traps things >>>>>> like CFCs and concentrates them. Nothing to do with magnetism. >>>>> >>>>> From WikiPedia: >>>>> >>>>> On March 3, 2005, the journal Nature published an article linking >>>>> 2004's unusually large Arctic ozone hole to solar wind activity. >>>>> >>>>> As winters that are colder are more affected, >>>>> at times, there is an ozone hole over Tibet. >>>>> In 2006, a 2.5 million square kilometer ozone hole was detected over >>>>> Tibet. >>>>> >>>>> Also again in 2011 an ozone hole appeared over mountainous regions >>>>> of Tibet, >>>>> Xinjiang, Qinghai and the Hindu Kush, along with an unprecedented >>>>> hole over the Arctic, though the Tibet one is far less intense than >>>>> the ones over the Arctic or Antarctic. >>>> >>>> Solar activity peaks are accompanied by increases in shortwave >>>> radiation as well, aren't they? So there'd be increased UV to cause >>>> ozone destruction. (Right when you need it most!) >>> >>> UV is good, >>> it kills the germs/fungus on the surface of the earth daily, which >>> allows life to exist in higher forms. >> >> I don't even know where to begin with debunking this. It's short, but that >> just makes the wrongness extremely concentrated. >> >if you research before you speak you may not be so wrong so much She spends too much time trying to convince people that she's not Kensi and vice versa.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 16:51 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <b8sn2g.77s.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #163876 |
On 2018-05-09 4:25 PM, Bricked wrote: > On Wed, 9 May 2018 15:24:33 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2018-05-09 3:18 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 15:06:21 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/9/2018 2:25 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! >>>>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 08:55:44 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> destroying the ozone with CFCs >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Where's your DoubleBlind study ? it can't be done. >>>>>>>>>> Magnetic South wanders around and varies. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer, >>>>>>>> and it ( Magnetic South ) moves around, varies. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Wrong. Ultraviolet light combined with certain chemicals (such as >>>>>>> CFCs) >>>>>>> destroys the ozone layer. The ozone hole is in the antarctic because >>>>>>> there's a vortex of air there at the stratosphere that traps things >>>>>>> like CFCs and concentrates them. Nothing to do with magnetism. >>>>>> >>>>>> From WikiPedia: >>>>>> >>>>>> On March 3, 2005, the journal Nature published an article linking >>>>>> 2004's unusually large Arctic ozone hole to solar wind activity. >>>>>> >>>>>> As winters that are colder are more affected, >>>>>> at times, there is an ozone hole over Tibet. >>>>>> In 2006, a 2.5 million square kilometer ozone hole was detected over >>>>>> Tibet. >>>>>> >>>>>> Also again in 2011 an ozone hole appeared over mountainous regions >>>>>> of Tibet, >>>>>> Xinjiang, Qinghai and the Hindu Kush, along with an unprecedented >>>>>> hole over the Arctic, though the Tibet one is far less intense than >>>>>> the ones over the Arctic or Antarctic. >>>>> >>>>> Solar activity peaks are accompanied by increases in shortwave >>>>> radiation as well, aren't they? So there'd be increased UV to cause >>>>> ozone destruction. (Right when you need it most!) >>>> >>>> UV is good, >>>> it kills the germs/fungus on the surface of the earth daily, which >>>> allows life to exist in higher forms. >>> >>> I don't even know where to begin with debunking this. It's short, but that >>> just makes the wrongness extremely concentrated. >>> >> if you research before you speak you may not be so wrong so much > > She spends too much time trying to convince people that she's not > Kensi and vice versa. > that sounds like a great way to spend your happy internet experience
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 19:09 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <kc37fd1seea5ms2e744cf55fevjqu2qgc9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #163884 |
On Wed, 9 May 2018 16:51:12 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2018-05-09 4:25 PM, Bricked wrote: >> On Wed, 9 May 2018 15:24:33 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2018-05-09 3:18 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 15:06:21 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 5/9/2018 2:25 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>> melt! >>>>>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 08:55:44 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> destroying the ozone with CFCs >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Where's your DoubleBlind study ? it can't be done. >>>>>>>>>>> Magnetic South wanders around and varies. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer, >>>>>>>>> and it ( Magnetic South ) moves around, varies. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Wrong. Ultraviolet light combined with certain chemicals (such as >>>>>>>> CFCs) >>>>>>>> destroys the ozone layer. The ozone hole is in the antarctic because >>>>>>>> there's a vortex of air there at the stratosphere that traps things >>>>>>>> like CFCs and concentrates them. Nothing to do with magnetism. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From WikiPedia: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On March 3, 2005, the journal Nature published an article linking >>>>>>> 2004's unusually large Arctic ozone hole to solar wind activity. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As winters that are colder are more affected, >>>>>>> at times, there is an ozone hole over Tibet. >>>>>>> In 2006, a 2.5 million square kilometer ozone hole was detected over >>>>>>> Tibet. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also again in 2011 an ozone hole appeared over mountainous regions >>>>>>> of Tibet, >>>>>>> Xinjiang, Qinghai and the Hindu Kush, along with an unprecedented >>>>>>> hole over the Arctic, though the Tibet one is far less intense than >>>>>>> the ones over the Arctic or Antarctic. >>>>>> >>>>>> Solar activity peaks are accompanied by increases in shortwave >>>>>> radiation as well, aren't they? So there'd be increased UV to cause >>>>>> ozone destruction. (Right when you need it most!) >>>>> >>>>> UV is good, >>>>> it kills the germs/fungus on the surface of the earth daily, which >>>>> allows life to exist in higher forms. >>>> >>>> I don't even know where to begin with debunking this. It's short, but that >>>> just makes the wrongness extremely concentrated. >>>> >>> if you research before you speak you may not be so wrong so much >> >> She spends too much time trying to convince people that she's not >> Kensi and vice versa. >> >that sounds like a great way to spend your happy internet experience Round and round. Over and over.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 17:17 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <b8soiu.n82.19.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #163895 |
On 2018-05-09 5:09 PM, Bricked wrote: > On Wed, 9 May 2018 16:51:12 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2018-05-09 4:25 PM, Bricked wrote: >>> On Wed, 9 May 2018 15:24:33 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2018-05-09 3:18 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 15:06:21 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 5/9/2018 2:25 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>> melt! >>>>>>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 08:55:44 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> destroying the ozone with CFCs >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Where's your DoubleBlind study ? it can't be done. >>>>>>>>>>>> Magnetic South wanders around and varies. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer, >>>>>>>>>> and it ( Magnetic South ) moves around, varies. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Wrong. Ultraviolet light combined with certain chemicals (such as >>>>>>>>> CFCs) >>>>>>>>> destroys the ozone layer. The ozone hole is in the antarctic because >>>>>>>>> there's a vortex of air there at the stratosphere that traps things >>>>>>>>> like CFCs and concentrates them. Nothing to do with magnetism. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> From WikiPedia: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On March 3, 2005, the journal Nature published an article linking >>>>>>>> 2004's unusually large Arctic ozone hole to solar wind activity. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As winters that are colder are more affected, >>>>>>>> at times, there is an ozone hole over Tibet. >>>>>>>> In 2006, a 2.5 million square kilometer ozone hole was detected over >>>>>>>> Tibet. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Also again in 2011 an ozone hole appeared over mountainous regions >>>>>>>> of Tibet, >>>>>>>> Xinjiang, Qinghai and the Hindu Kush, along with an unprecedented >>>>>>>> hole over the Arctic, though the Tibet one is far less intense than >>>>>>>> the ones over the Arctic or Antarctic. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Solar activity peaks are accompanied by increases in shortwave >>>>>>> radiation as well, aren't they? So there'd be increased UV to cause >>>>>>> ozone destruction. (Right when you need it most!) >>>>>> >>>>>> UV is good, >>>>>> it kills the germs/fungus on the surface of the earth daily, which >>>>>> allows life to exist in higher forms. >>>>> >>>>> I don't even know where to begin with debunking this. It's short, but that >>>>> just makes the wrongness extremely concentrated. >>>>> >>>> if you research before you speak you may not be so wrong so much >>> >>> She spends too much time trying to convince people that she's not >>> Kensi and vice versa. >>> >> that sounds like a great way to spend your happy internet experience > > > Round and round. Over and over. > that's how imbjr jerks off and how don posts
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 21:09 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. |
| Message-ID | <4ca7fd9iil5i4tnd5bm6q53ivh75mk82lg@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #163898 |
On Wed, 9 May 2018 17:17:02 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2018-05-09 5:09 PM, Bricked wrote: >> On Wed, 9 May 2018 16:51:12 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2018-05-09 4:25 PM, Bricked wrote: >>>> On Wed, 9 May 2018 15:24:33 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2018-05-09 3:18 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 15:06:21 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5/9/2018 2:25 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>>> melt! >>>>>>>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 08:55:44 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroying the ozone with CFCs >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Where's your DoubleBlind study ? it can't be done. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Magnetic South wanders around and varies. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer, >>>>>>>>>>> and it ( Magnetic South ) moves around, varies. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Wrong. Ultraviolet light combined with certain chemicals (such as >>>>>>>>>> CFCs) >>>>>>>>>> destroys the ozone layer. The ozone hole is in the antarctic because >>>>>>>>>> there's a vortex of air there at the stratosphere that traps things >>>>>>>>>> like CFCs and concentrates them. Nothing to do with magnetism. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> From WikiPedia: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On March 3, 2005, the journal Nature published an article linking >>>>>>>>> 2004's unusually large Arctic ozone hole to solar wind activity. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As winters that are colder are more affected, >>>>>>>>> at times, there is an ozone hole over Tibet. >>>>>>>>> In 2006, a 2.5 million square kilometer ozone hole was detected over >>>>>>>>> Tibet. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Also again in 2011 an ozone hole appeared over mountainous regions >>>>>>>>> of Tibet, >>>>>>>>> Xinjiang, Qinghai and the Hindu Kush, along with an unprecedented >>>>>>>>> hole over the Arctic, though the Tibet one is far less intense than >>>>>>>>> the ones over the Arctic or Antarctic. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Solar activity peaks are accompanied by increases in shortwave >>>>>>>> radiation as well, aren't they? So there'd be increased UV to cause >>>>>>>> ozone destruction. (Right when you need it most!) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> UV is good, >>>>>>> it kills the germs/fungus on the surface of the earth daily, which >>>>>>> allows life to exist in higher forms. >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't even know where to begin with debunking this. It's short, but that >>>>>> just makes the wrongness extremely concentrated. >>>>>> >>>>> if you research before you speak you may not be so wrong so much >>>> >>>> She spends too much time trying to convince people that she's not >>>> Kensi and vice versa. >>>> >>> that sounds like a great way to spend your happy internet experience >> >> >> Round and round. Over and over. >> >that's how imbjr jerks off and how don posts It's like they come here because they need to be made to feel UNIMPORTANT. Oops, sorry. Dang keyboard.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web