Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #168174 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-26 05:03 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-05-29 23:34 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 431 — 26 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-26 05:03 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:30 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 19:59 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:56 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 22:24 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-26 16:46 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:26 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 23:35 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:46 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-26 18:20 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 20:26 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 20:57 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:35 +0200
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:05 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:29 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:51 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:27 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:36 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-26 22:21 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:46 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:26 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:33 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-05-27 12:08 +0100
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:41 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:15 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:46 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:59 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 08:50 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:40 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 23:19 +0200
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:58 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 08:50 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:38 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 19:44 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:48 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:28 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:38 -0700
Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 18:30 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 18:54 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-27 02:04 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:36 +0200
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:07 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:11 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:32 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:51 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:16 +0000
Nadegda must be proud. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-27 00:44 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:43 -0400
"kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-27 02:49 -0700
Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:38 -0400
Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:30 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:29 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 17:16 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:08 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:21 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:08 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-29 21:36 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 19:43 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-31 19:13 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-07 07:00 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 12:06 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-10 09:36 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-10 13:07 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-11 02:41 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:43 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-13 00:33 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 17:36 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-16 21:16 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 14:22 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-16 21:29 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 14:36 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-16 21:56 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:50 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-18 00:38 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 17:59 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-18 01:05 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:08 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:58 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:02 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:57 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:01 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:06 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:08 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-16 22:51 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:57 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 17:43 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 17:53 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 18:52 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 18:58 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 19:51 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-16 17:05 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-16 23:30 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-16 17:41 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-16 19:40 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-16 17:42 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 20:26 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 17:41 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 17:51 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-16 23:11 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-17 05:25 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-17 09:26 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-17 07:28 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-17 10:03 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-17 08:06 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-17 10:31 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-17 11:05 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-17 12:27 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-18 00:39 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:00 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-18 01:06 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:11 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:01 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:04 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:15 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:59 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:00 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:55 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:20 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:27 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:53 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 14:43 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 14:48 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 14:51 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:19 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:52 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-13 06:55 +0000
BlueEyed Feminism. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-10 12:06 -0700
Re: BlueEyed Feminism. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-13 00:28 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:41 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 19:53 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 21:12 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 06:03 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 00:11 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 16:47 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:51 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 22:26 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 04:28 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:59 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:13 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:28 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:31 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:43 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 11:20 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 09:46 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:12 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:23 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 13:02 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:36 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:15 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:17 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:23 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:13 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:11 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:46 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:45 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:25 -0400
Body Shaming ? I smell a feminist. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-30 13:04 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 05:57 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:16 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:18 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:24 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-29 17:07 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:22 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:16 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:49 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:50 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:07 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:52 -0400
" White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-30 13:27 -0700
Re: " White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:17 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:48 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:15 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:29 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:17 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:19 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:27 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:31 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:35 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-29 17:11 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:22 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:46 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:51 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:59 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 16:08 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:36 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:49 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
"kensi" is not smarter than the market. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-31 05:47 -0700
Re: "kensi" is not smarter than the market. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 05:25 -0400
"kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-01 05:42 -0700
Re: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 09:48 -0400
You know fuck all, trust me. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-01 07:01 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 10:36 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 09:48 -0500
India digs porn; China can't see most of the Internet. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-01 08:42 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-06-01 09:41 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 19:28 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 20:22 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-01 08:49 -0600
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-01 17:51 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 12:18 +0200
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-01 13:22 -0600
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 12:33 +0200
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 12:58 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 14:56 +0200
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-06-03 11:55 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:09 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:28 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 11:26 -0600
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 10:41 +0200
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-02 19:38 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 11:43 +0200
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-02 21:02 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:49 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 11:52 -0600
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:56 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-06-03 11:56 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 20:31 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:36 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 20:37 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:42 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-03 15:22 -0600
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 22:25 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-04 04:48 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
The job market. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-01 08:18 -0700
Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:10 +0000
Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:29 -0400
Re: The job market. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:49 -0400
Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:28 -0400
Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:00 +0000
Re: The job market. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 14:03 -0700
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 14:32 -0700
Re: The job market. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 17:19 -0600
Re: The job market. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 17:18 -0600
Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:55 -0400
Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 00:05 +0000
Re: The job market. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 18:20 -0600
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:56 -0700
Re: The job market. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-06-03 04:03 +0000
Re: The job market. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 22:07 -0600
Re: The job market. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-06-03 12:02 -0400
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 12:45 -0700
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:54 -0700
Re: The job market. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-06-03 11:59 -0400
Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 20:31 +0000
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 14:16 -0700
Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 23:04 +0100
Re: The job market. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:08 -0700
Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 23:11 +0100
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 01:35 -0700
Re: The job market. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-04 09:01 -0400
Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:34 -0400
Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:07 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 19:27 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 20:21 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:12 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:41 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:52 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:32 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-06-03 15:23 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 21:22 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:26 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 21:32 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-06-01 19:53 -0500
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 09:44 -0500
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:14 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:47 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:02 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:58 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 00:07 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 18:20 -0600
Re: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:35 -0400
Why does this concern you, exactly ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-30 14:43 -0700
Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:41 -0400
Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-31 05:12 -0700
Re: Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:03 -0700
Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 20:14 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:33 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:42 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:50 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:00 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:21 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:26 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:49 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:18 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:43 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:19 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:28 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:36 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:43 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:08 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:52 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:18 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-05-27 11:33 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:42 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 19:53 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 21:12 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:38 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:30 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:12 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 19:40 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 18:38 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:09 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:56 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 22:20 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:24 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 19:29 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 23:25 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 11:02 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:52 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-27 12:10 +0100
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:13 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 11:26 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:04 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 23:18 +0200
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 11:02 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:30 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:43 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 05:39 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 02:33 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 06:50 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 00:53 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-09 01:48 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 19:14 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 11:44 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 23:43 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 07:28 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 11:57 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 05:38 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 02:26 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 12:00 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-11 02:47 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:50 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-11 05:49 -0600
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-11 08:01 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-11 06:07 -0600
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-13 00:30 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 21:19 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-16 21:17 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-12 23:27 -0500
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:55 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:30 -0500
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:18 +0000
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:41 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 07:09 -0600
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-27 11:43 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 10:17 -0600
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-27 13:11 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 11:17 -0600
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:43 +0000
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:10 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:18 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:32 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 08:36 -0600
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:55 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:34 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:22 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:52 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:54 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:37 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:05 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 18:02 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:08 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 18:25 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-03 10:59 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 18:01 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-06 01:38 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-06 03:49 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-06 06:44 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-06 16:18 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 10:53 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-07 07:58 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-06 07:39 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-06-06 17:39 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 14:05 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:20 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 08:37 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:39 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 08:48 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-28 17:32 +0100
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 13:38 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 11:51 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:57 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:55 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:19 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:30 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:50 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:03 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:03 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 14:46 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 15:16 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:22 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:31 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-29 16:20 +0100
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 09:43 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:56 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:22 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:37 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:34 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:50 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:23 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 19:40 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-04 19:33 +1000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:20 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-29 23:34 -0400
Page 9 of 22 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 22 Next page →
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 12:36 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <UkfPC.162680$T14.110874@fx44.iad> |
| In reply to | #169247 |
Trigger warning: The following post may contain language and truth that Leftwing Libs may find emotionally negative and unpleasant. On 5/29/2018 8:13 AM, kensi wrote: > On 5/29/2018 6:59 AM, benj wrote: > >> If only we could just get some guns and take what the rich have and >> give it to the poor America could be a worker's paradise like the >> USSR, China under Mao, Cambodia under Pol Pot, Cuba, North Korea, >> Norway and on and one. In spite of Nads, undying dedication and >> efforts America still trails the rest of the world and wins the >> "biggest shithole" prize! > > US has regressed to developing nation status, MIT economist warns > > https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-developing-nation-regressing-economy-poverty-donald-trump-mit-economist-peter-temin-a7694726.html > > > It's official: the United States is a Third World country > > https://www.univision.com/univision-news/opinion/its-official-the-united-states-is-a-third-world-country > > > This is what happens when there is insufficient public investment, in > infrastructure, in parks and cities, and in people. This is what happens > when governments bend over backwards on behalf of capital and ignore > every other stakeholder in society. > So, "Kanzi" your idea is that only "public investment" meaning stealing money from the productive people in society and using it for wonderful things like parks and picking up trash along the highways (which the "poor" people threw out of their car windows) can make America great. That is the problem is it not? You say the non-productive poor people who are living off the work of others are ALSO "stakeholders" in this country? I mean what could possibly go wrong with your plan? I love your lib idea of the "proof" of that now the U.S. ia "officially" a Third world country. Namely: "Here is the *evidence*. How many times have people in Latin America, in response to the troubles that their countries faced, said “we need a strong leader.” That is the solution for which many Americans cast their ballots on Election Day as they expressed their disgust with the dysfunctionality of Washington." "They assumed that someone like Donald Trump, who pretends to be a strong leader, is going to fix everything and make their lives better. And just like those in Latin America who have expressed similar sentiments over so many years, they could not be more wrong." Om other words the sole "proof" is based upon the drooling blather of Rocket Man Dennis Jett a former diplomat in Argentina and lefty professor. Yeah, he viewed first hand how leftist government quickly turned Latin America from shitholes with people walking to the U.S. to "find a better life" into worker utopias where now all Trump supporters are walking to South Amrerica to find jobs in the "socialist miracles" To show just how ignorant and dishonest the pair of you are just note his "proof" quote: "Usually in Latin America a new president enters office with sky-high approval ratings. Then as he proves incapable of changing much of anything, those ratings start to decline until he leaves office with his approval in the low teens, if not single digits. " So the "proof" the two of you have that America is "officially" Third World is Trump's dazzling approval rating? Bwhahahaha! Obviously all "evidence" only resides in your commie fantasies! Both of you morons need to go by the dispensary and have the nurz give you your meds.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 20:15 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <pekccv$ooj$34@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #169357 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 29 May 2018 12:36:54 -0400, benj wrote: > Trigger warning: The following post may contain language and truth that > Leftwing Libs may find emotionally negative and unpleasant. > > > On 5/29/2018 8:13 AM, kensi wrote: >> On 5/29/2018 6:59 AM, benj wrote: >> >>> If only we could just get some guns and take what the rich have and >>> give it to the poor America could be a worker's paradise like the >>> USSR, China under Mao, Cambodia under Pol Pot, Cuba, North Korea, >>> Norway and on and one. In spite of Nads, undying dedication and >>> efforts America still trails the rest of the world and wins the >>> "biggest shithole" prize! >> >> US has regressed to developing nation status, MIT economist warns >> >> https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-developing-nation- regressing-economy-poverty-donald-trump-mit-economist-peter-temin- a7694726.html >> >> >> It's official: the United States is a Third World country >> >> https://www.univision.com/univision-news/opinion/its-official-the- united-states-is-a-third-world-country >> >> >> This is what happens when there is insufficient public investment, in >> infrastructure, in parks and cities, and in people. This is what >> happens when governments bend over backwards on behalf of capital and >> ignore every other stakeholder in society. > > So, "Kanzi" your idea is that only "public investment" meaning stealing > money from the productive people in society and using it for wonderful > things like parks and picking up trash along the highways No, *kensi*'s idea is to tax the *idle rich* to pay for the common good and to *subsidize* the productive people in society (that part by raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour). -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 13:17 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <bah21i.ndb.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #169459 |
On 2018-05-29 10:15 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 29 May 2018 12:36:54 -0400, benj wrote: > >> Trigger warning: The following post may contain language and truth that >> Leftwing Libs may find emotionally negative and unpleasant. >> >> >> On 5/29/2018 8:13 AM, kensi wrote: >>> On 5/29/2018 6:59 AM, benj wrote: >>> >>>> If only we could just get some guns and take what the rich have and >>>> give it to the poor America could be a worker's paradise like the >>>> USSR, China under Mao, Cambodia under Pol Pot, Cuba, North Korea, >>>> Norway and on and one. In spite of Nads, undying dedication and >>>> efforts America still trails the rest of the world and wins the >>>> "biggest shithole" prize! >>> >>> US has regressed to developing nation status, MIT economist warns >>> >>> https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-developing-nation- > regressing-economy-poverty-donald-trump-mit-economist-peter-temin- > a7694726.html >>> >>> >>> It's official: the United States is a Third World country >>> >>> https://www.univision.com/univision-news/opinion/its-official-the- > united-states-is-a-third-world-country >>> >>> >>> This is what happens when there is insufficient public investment, in >>> infrastructure, in parks and cities, and in people. This is what >>> happens when governments bend over backwards on behalf of capital and >>> ignore every other stakeholder in society. >> >> So, "Kanzi" your idea is that only "public investment" meaning stealing >> money from the productive people in society and using it for wonderful >> things like parks and picking up trash along the highways > > No, *kensi*'s idea is to tax the *idle rich* to pay for the common good > and to *subsidize* the productive people in society (that part by raising > the minimum wage to $15 an hour). > where i live that is the minimum wage
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 14:23 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <nldrgdhgoi6llnlr4ongvasrd9ubevf3a6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #169459 |
On Tue, 29 May 2018 20:15:28 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Tue, 29 May 2018 12:36:54 -0400, benj wrote: > >> Trigger warning: The following post may contain language and truth that >> Leftwing Libs may find emotionally negative and unpleasant. >> >> >> On 5/29/2018 8:13 AM, kensi wrote: >>> On 5/29/2018 6:59 AM, benj wrote: >>> >>>> If only we could just get some guns and take what the rich have and >>>> give it to the poor America could be a worker's paradise like the >>>> USSR, China under Mao, Cambodia under Pol Pot, Cuba, North Korea, >>>> Norway and on and one. In spite of Nads, undying dedication and >>>> efforts America still trails the rest of the world and wins the >>>> "biggest shithole" prize! >>> >>> US has regressed to developing nation status, MIT economist warns >>> >>> https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-developing-nation- >regressing-economy-poverty-donald-trump-mit-economist-peter-temin- >a7694726.html >>> >>> >>> It's official: the United States is a Third World country >>> >>> https://www.univision.com/univision-news/opinion/its-official-the- >united-states-is-a-third-world-country >>> >>> >>> This is what happens when there is insufficient public investment, in >>> infrastructure, in parks and cities, and in people. This is what >>> happens when governments bend over backwards on behalf of capital and >>> ignore every other stakeholder in society. >> >> So, "Kanzi" your idea is that only "public investment" meaning stealing >> money from the productive people in society and using it for wonderful >> things like parks and picking up trash along the highways > >No, *kensi*'s idea is to tax the *idle rich* to pay for the common good >and to *subsidize* the productive people in society (that part by raising >the minimum wage to $15 an hour). Never work, you work you earn, the better you work, the better you earn.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 20:13 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <21mPC.119683$pK.109550@fx13.iad> |
| In reply to | #169459 |
Trigger warning: The following post may contain language and truth that Leftwing Libs may find emotionally negative and unpleasant. On 5/29/2018 4:15 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 29 May 2018 12:36:54 -0400, benj wrote: > >> Trigger warning: The following post may contain language and truth that >> Leftwing Libs may find emotionally negative and unpleasant. >> >> >> On 5/29/2018 8:13 AM, kensi wrote: >>> On 5/29/2018 6:59 AM, benj wrote: >>> >>>> If only we could just get some guns and take what the rich have and >>>> give it to the poor America could be a worker's paradise like the >>>> USSR, China under Mao, Cambodia under Pol Pot, Cuba, North Korea, >>>> Norway and on and one. In spite of Nads, undying dedication and >>>> efforts America still trails the rest of the world and wins the >>>> "biggest shithole" prize! >>> >>> US has regressed to developing nation status, MIT economist warns >>> >>> https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-developing-nation- > regressing-economy-poverty-donald-trump-mit-economist-peter-temin- > a7694726.html >>> >>> >>> It's official: the United States is a Third World country >>> >>> https://www.univision.com/univision-news/opinion/its-official-the- > united-states-is-a-third-world-country >>> >>> >>> This is what happens when there is insufficient public investment, in >>> infrastructure, in parks and cities, and in people. This is what >>> happens when governments bend over backwards on behalf of capital and >>> ignore every other stakeholder in society. >> >> So, "Kanzi" your idea is that only "public investment" meaning stealing >> money from the productive people in society and using it for wonderful >> things like parks and picking up trash along the highways > > No, *kensi*'s idea is to tax the *idle rich* to pay for the common good > and to *subsidize* the productive people in society (that part by raising > the minimum wage to $15 an hour). > What makes you think the rich are "idle"? Are you saying the your leftist gun-grabbing pals Soros and Bloomberg just got rich by sitting on their asses? That's not even true for Trump. You need to spend some time reading Ayn Rand to learn why your leftist philosophy is total bullshit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-30 13:11 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <pemlvp$rpc$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #169529 |
On 5/29/2018 8:13 PM, benj wrote: > What makes you think the rich are "idle"? They derive most of their wealth from passive income, rather than a salary earned by actually, you know, *working*. > Are you saying the your leftist gun-grabbing pals Soros and Bloomberg > just got rich by sitting on their asses? Yes. > That's not even true for Trump. The hell you say. He inherited most of what he has from Fred Trump, for fuck's sake. It doesn't get much more passive than that. And you can tell from his "physique", if I may use that term loosely, that he's never done any heavy lifting in his life. > You need to spend some time reading Ayn Rand to learn why your leftist > philosophy is total bullshit. It's funny you should say "Ayn Rand" and "bullshit" in the same sentence: http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2015/10/ayn-rands-philosophy-who-needs-it-is-bullshit/ -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-30 11:46 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <8ootgdhkgmp2kp1ibcepj50tgp7in4r0rv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #169694 |
On Wed, 30 May 2018 13:11:21 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 5/29/2018 8:13 PM, benj wrote: > >> What makes you think the rich are "idle"? > >They derive most of their wealth from passive income, rather than a >salary earned by actually, you know, *working*. So? That's what investing and getting rich is about. > >> Are you saying the your leftist gun-grabbing pals Soros and Bloomberg >> just got rich by sitting on their asses? > >Yes. Not a lick of work? >> That's not even true for Trump. > >The hell you say. He inherited most of what he has from Fred Trump, for >fuck's sake. It doesn't get much more passive than that. And you can >tell from his "physique", if I may use that term loosely, that he's >never done any heavy lifting in his life. He doesn't have to do any lifting, he can pay people to do it. As for the money, maybe daddy left him some, but he has done wonders with it, and the book deals, daddy didn't do that. > >> You need to spend some time reading Ayn Rand to learn why your leftist >> philosophy is total bullshit. > >It's funny you should say "Ayn Rand" and "bullshit" in the same sentence: > >http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2015/10/ayn-rands-philosophy-who-needs-it-is-bullshit/ Of course you use a far left site to cite....idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-31 05:45 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <peog7i$1lc2$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #169710 |
On 5/30/2018 1:46 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 5/29/2018 8:13 PM, benj wrote: >>> What makes you think the rich are "idle"? >> >> They derive most of their wealth from passive income, rather than a >> salary earned by actually, you know, *working*. > > So? That's what investing and getting rich is about. Thank you for conceding my point that they are idle. SPNAK! on benj. >>> That's not even true for Trump. >> >> The hell you say. He inherited most of what he has from Fred Trump, for >> fuck's sake. It doesn't get much more passive than that. And you can >> tell from his "physique", if I may use that term loosely, that he's >> never done any heavy lifting in his life. > > He doesn't have to do any lifting, he can pay people to do it. Thank you for conceding my point that they are idle. SPNAK! on benj. > As for the money, maybe daddy left him some, but he has done wonders > with it, squandering nearly all of it including multiple bankruptcies each of which cost him whatever he'd had invested in the failed businesses! >> http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2015/10/ayn-rands-philosophy-who-needs-it-is-bullshit/ > > Of course you use a far left site to cite....idiot. It says "libertarians" in the name, dumbass. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-30 14:25 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <E0CPC.255493$ll2.35442@fx35.iad> |
| In reply to | #169694 |
Trigger warning: The following post may contain language and truth that Leftwing Libs may find emotionally negative and unpleasant. On 5/30/2018 1:11 PM, kensi wrote: > On 5/29/2018 8:13 PM, benj wrote: > >> What makes you think the rich are "idle"? > > They derive most of their wealth from passive income, rather than a > salary earned by actually, you know, *working*. So in your fantasy leftist "workers world" the only "income" permitted is by obeying the commands of someone else and groveling for whatever he deems to give you for your obedience. Now's there's the nice lefttist moron. >> Are you saying the your leftist gun-grabbing pals Soros and Bloomberg >> just got rich by sitting on their asses? > > Yes Ha! I'd love to see you as a Lib TRYING to run a big shipping enterprise or media conglomerate! There is nothing funnier than a bunch of yo lefty libs actually trying to do useful work. Fantasy does no better with the reality of work than it does with the reality of science. SNORT! I recall when a bunch of you libs near the university got together with the wondrous plan to start a food cooperative market. (we all know that communist ideals are the answer) The place as a pig sty and they nearly poisoned their customers until someone who actually knew some real knowledge pointed out that they were selling seed corn with fungicide one it colored day-glo because it's POISON! Duh. And you morons come here on the Internet as some anonymous voice that everyone is supposed to just believe just because you say it? You are all liars and fraudsters. >> That's not even true for Trump. > > The hell you say. He inherited most of what he has from Fred Trump, for > fuck's sake. It doesn't get much more passive than that. And you can > tell from his "physique", if I may use that term loosely, that he's > never done any heavy lifting in his life. Well it's obvious YOU have never done any "heavy lifting" with YOUR brain! And I'd bet your morbidly obese shape against trump's any day. Post a picture ms. secret voice and prove me wrong other wise shut the fuck up. Sure trump started with an inheritance. but given that he managed to go bankrupt more than once, it's clear he was able to get it all back. And now judging by the crooked Clinton's Post-white house, he's in line for a huge bunch of cash. Now THAT is getting money and doing nothing for it. Oh wait that's what you libs believe in, isn't it? Steal from the rich and give it out to those who you like? >> You need to spend some time reading Ayn Rand to learn why your leftist >> philosophy is total bullshit. > > It's funny you should say "Ayn Rand" and "bullshit" in the same sentence: > > http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2015/10/ayn-rands-philosophy-who-needs-it-is-bullshit/ Heh. I knew Rand would jerk your chain! You commies can't stand the thought of someone doing something to get rich without you stealing all that money because you "care". What a bunch of phonies. If ANYONE needs the oil fields turned back into the way they were before someone found them it's you. I sure hope you know how to drive an ox and cart, because that's just the kind of "green" transport you deserve.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-30 13:04 -0700 |
| Subject | Body Shaming ? I smell a feminist. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.30--1.04pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #169694 |
"kensi" wrote: > you can tell from Trump's "physique", > -- if I may use that term loosely -- > that he's never done any heavy lifting in his life. Body Shaming ? I smell a feminist.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 05:57 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <rvfqgdhigrh9p4jgu2drkiadph7fs99rfo@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #169229 |
On Tue, 29 May 2018 04:28:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Mon, 28 May 2018 22:26:00 -0500, Bricked wrote: > >> On Tue, 29 May 2018 02:51:56 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>On Mon, 28 May 2018 16:47:45 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>> >>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>> by Checkmate! In article <peg63n$ooj$21@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>Lots of people can't find work. >>>>> > >>>>> > Bullshit, there are jobs everywhere. >>>>> >>>>> Bullshit, automation is causing there to be less and less work >>>>> needing doing even as the population grows. >>>>> >>>>> >>Lots more can't find work that will actually pay their full living >>>>> >>expenses, >>>>> > >>>>> > Maybe they ought to lower their standards. >>>>> >>>>> Who died and made you arbiter of what the standard of living should >>>>> be? >>>>> Time was you could get a foot on the ladder with a menial labor job, >>>>> get a car and a starter house and also work your way up from that >>>>> start at your work getting promoted. Now a menial labor job is not >>>>> even enough for poverty-level subsistence -- you will DIE without >>>>> additional income from one source or another -- and there is no >>>>> upward ladder from most jobs. >>>>> >>>>> Why do you not object to this change? There was no public debate >>>>> about it. >>>>> No referendum held. It was simply imposed on the American people by >>>>> faceless bureaucrats in three-piece suits. It's the sort of thing >>>>> that happened in the Soviet Union. Why aren't you roaring mad about >>>>> it? >>>> >>>> Automation is just the natural progression of the industrial age. >>>> Technology is constantly changing, and people are constantly having to >>>> find ways to change with it. The complicated electronic toys we're >>>> all so addicted to could not be built by any other means. It's not >>>> "right" >>>> or "wrong," it just is. What would you do... make laws to ban this >>>> technology and watch the rest of the world blow right past us? If >>>> your job gets replaced by a robot, learn how to design, install, sell >>>> or repair robots. We're locked into change in every aspect of our >>>> lives. It's a matter of adaptation and survival. Some will make it, >>>> some will not. It's always been that way. Only the pace has >>>> quickened, and will continue to do so. At some point, the human race >>>> will have managed to destroy itself by being too greedy and too clever >>>> for its own good. I see no other outcome. >>> >>>Why should anyone's *survival* be in doubt, in *this* day and age when >>>productivity per capita, especially of basic necessities like food, is >>>sky- >>>high to the point our ancestors of even a century or two ago wouldn't >>>have dared dream of such a big increase? >>> >>>Oh, that's right, so a few anointed-ones can live high off the hog. :P >> >> You are full of shit. Go to even the most basic grocery store and if >> you avoid all the processed "foods" you can buy vegetable and animal >> products that kings and queens would only dream about in ages past. > >I believe that's what I just said. Which means there's no excuse for >pricing it out of the reach of people who "merely" work 40 hours of manual >labor a week and making it so that food security is only for stockbrokers, >doctors, and engineers. Same applies to shelter (there's more than enough >roofed-over space to house the planet's population comfortably, yet huge >echoing nearly-empty McMansions half of them with absentee landlords sit >around being used merely as the huge immobile poker chips of the casino >capitalists while people shiver in the fucking streets...). So others have stuff and you don't, that bothers you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 20:16 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <pekcen$ooj$35@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #169239 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 29 May 2018 05:57:12 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > On Tue, 29 May 2018 04:28:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>On Mon, 28 May 2018 22:26:00 -0500, Bricked wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 02:51:56 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>melt! >>>>On Mon, 28 May 2018 16:47:45 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>> >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>>> by Checkmate! In article <peg63n$ooj$21@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>Lots of people can't find work. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Bullshit, there are jobs everywhere. >>>>>> >>>>>> Bullshit, automation is causing there to be less and less work >>>>>> needing doing even as the population grows. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>Lots more can't find work that will actually pay their full >>>>>> >>living expenses, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Maybe they ought to lower their standards. >>>>>> >>>>>> Who died and made you arbiter of what the standard of living should >>>>>> be? >>>>>> Time was you could get a foot on the ladder with a menial labor >>>>>> job, >>>>>> get a car and a starter house and also work your way up from that >>>>>> start at your work getting promoted. Now a menial labor job is not >>>>>> even enough for poverty-level subsistence -- you will DIE without >>>>>> additional income from one source or another -- and there is no >>>>>> upward ladder from most jobs. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why do you not object to this change? There was no public debate >>>>>> about it. >>>>>> No referendum held. It was simply imposed on the American people by >>>>>> faceless bureaucrats in three-piece suits. It's the sort of thing >>>>>> that happened in the Soviet Union. Why aren't you roaring mad about >>>>>> it? >>>>> >>>>> Automation is just the natural progression of the industrial age. >>>>> Technology is constantly changing, and people are constantly having >>>>> to find ways to change with it. The complicated electronic toys >>>>> we're all so addicted to could not be built by any other means. >>>>> It's not "right" >>>>> or "wrong," it just is. What would you do... make laws to ban this >>>>> technology and watch the rest of the world blow right past us? If >>>>> your job gets replaced by a robot, learn how to design, install, >>>>> sell or repair robots. We're locked into change in every aspect of >>>>> our lives. It's a matter of adaptation and survival. Some will make >>>>> it, some will not. It's always been that way. Only the pace has >>>>> quickened, and will continue to do so. At some point, the human >>>>> race will have managed to destroy itself by being too greedy and too >>>>> clever for its own good. I see no other outcome. >>>> >>>>Why should anyone's *survival* be in doubt, in *this* day and age when >>>>productivity per capita, especially of basic necessities like food, is >>>>sky- >>>>high to the point our ancestors of even a century or two ago wouldn't >>>>have dared dream of such a big increase? >>>> >>>>Oh, that's right, so a few anointed-ones can live high off the hog. :P >>> >>> You are full of shit. Go to even the most basic grocery store and if >>> you avoid all the processed "foods" you can buy vegetable and animal >>> products that kings and queens would only dream about in ages past. >> >>I believe that's what I just said. Which means there's no excuse for >>pricing it out of the reach of people who "merely" work 40 hours of >>manual labor a week and making it so that food security is only for >>stockbrokers, >>doctors, and engineers. Same applies to shelter (there's more than >>enough roofed-over space to house the planet's population comfortably, >>yet huge echoing nearly-empty McMansions half of them with absentee >>landlords sit around being used merely as the huge immobile poker chips >>of the casino capitalists while people shiver in the fucking >>streets...). > > So others have stuff and you don't, that bothers you. I have stuff. More than average. But unlike some I am not blind to my privilege. I know darn well that lots of people lack the things I take for granted. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 13:18 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <bah241.ndb.19.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #169461 |
On 2018-05-29 10:16 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 29 May 2018 05:57:12 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > >> On Tue, 29 May 2018 04:28:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Mon, 28 May 2018 22:26:00 -0500, Bricked wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 02:51:56 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! >>>>> On Mon, 28 May 2018 16:47:45 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>>>> by Checkmate! In article <peg63n$ooj$21@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Lots of people can't find work. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bullshit, there are jobs everywhere. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bullshit, automation is causing there to be less and less work >>>>>>> needing doing even as the population grows. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Lots more can't find work that will actually pay their full >>>>>>>>> living expenses, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Maybe they ought to lower their standards. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Who died and made you arbiter of what the standard of living should >>>>>>> be? >>>>>>> Time was you could get a foot on the ladder with a menial labor >>>>>>> job, >>>>>>> get a car and a starter house and also work your way up from that >>>>>>> start at your work getting promoted. Now a menial labor job is not >>>>>>> even enough for poverty-level subsistence -- you will DIE without >>>>>>> additional income from one source or another -- and there is no >>>>>>> upward ladder from most jobs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why do you not object to this change? There was no public debate >>>>>>> about it. >>>>>>> No referendum held. It was simply imposed on the American people by >>>>>>> faceless bureaucrats in three-piece suits. It's the sort of thing >>>>>>> that happened in the Soviet Union. Why aren't you roaring mad about >>>>>>> it? >>>>>> >>>>>> Automation is just the natural progression of the industrial age. >>>>>> Technology is constantly changing, and people are constantly having >>>>>> to find ways to change with it. The complicated electronic toys >>>>>> we're all so addicted to could not be built by any other means. >>>>>> It's not "right" >>>>>> or "wrong," it just is. What would you do... make laws to ban this >>>>>> technology and watch the rest of the world blow right past us? If >>>>>> your job gets replaced by a robot, learn how to design, install, >>>>>> sell or repair robots. We're locked into change in every aspect of >>>>>> our lives. It's a matter of adaptation and survival. Some will make >>>>>> it, some will not. It's always been that way. Only the pace has >>>>>> quickened, and will continue to do so. At some point, the human >>>>>> race will have managed to destroy itself by being too greedy and too >>>>>> clever for its own good. I see no other outcome. >>>>> >>>>> Why should anyone's *survival* be in doubt, in *this* day and age when >>>>> productivity per capita, especially of basic necessities like food, is >>>>> sky- >>>>> high to the point our ancestors of even a century or two ago wouldn't >>>>> have dared dream of such a big increase? >>>>> >>>>> Oh, that's right, so a few anointed-ones can live high off the hog. :P >>>> >>>> You are full of shit. Go to even the most basic grocery store and if >>>> you avoid all the processed "foods" you can buy vegetable and animal >>>> products that kings and queens would only dream about in ages past. >>> >>> I believe that's what I just said. Which means there's no excuse for >>> pricing it out of the reach of people who "merely" work 40 hours of >>> manual labor a week and making it so that food security is only for >>> stockbrokers, >>> doctors, and engineers. Same applies to shelter (there's more than >>> enough roofed-over space to house the planet's population comfortably, >>> yet huge echoing nearly-empty McMansions half of them with absentee >>> landlords sit around being used merely as the huge immobile poker chips >>> of the casino capitalists while people shiver in the fucking >>> streets...). >> >> So others have stuff and you don't, that bothers you. > > I have stuff. More than average. But unlike some I am not blind to my > privilege. I know darn well that lots of people lack the things I take for > granted. > like kleenix in your bra
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 14:24 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <fndrgdth0rnnlucba9hvc3hd6p6h6f3a4u@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #169461 |
On Tue, 29 May 2018 20:16:23 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Tue, 29 May 2018 05:57:12 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > >> On Tue, 29 May 2018 04:28:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>On Mon, 28 May 2018 22:26:00 -0500, Bricked wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 02:51:56 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>melt! >>>>>On Mon, 28 May 2018 16:47:45 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>>>> by Checkmate! In article <peg63n$ooj$21@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>Lots of people can't find work. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Bullshit, there are jobs everywhere. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bullshit, automation is causing there to be less and less work >>>>>>> needing doing even as the population grows. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>Lots more can't find work that will actually pay their full >>>>>>> >>living expenses, >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Maybe they ought to lower their standards. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Who died and made you arbiter of what the standard of living should >>>>>>> be? >>>>>>> Time was you could get a foot on the ladder with a menial labor >>>>>>> job, >>>>>>> get a car and a starter house and also work your way up from that >>>>>>> start at your work getting promoted. Now a menial labor job is not >>>>>>> even enough for poverty-level subsistence -- you will DIE without >>>>>>> additional income from one source or another -- and there is no >>>>>>> upward ladder from most jobs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why do you not object to this change? There was no public debate >>>>>>> about it. >>>>>>> No referendum held. It was simply imposed on the American people by >>>>>>> faceless bureaucrats in three-piece suits. It's the sort of thing >>>>>>> that happened in the Soviet Union. Why aren't you roaring mad about >>>>>>> it? >>>>>> >>>>>> Automation is just the natural progression of the industrial age. >>>>>> Technology is constantly changing, and people are constantly having >>>>>> to find ways to change with it. The complicated electronic toys >>>>>> we're all so addicted to could not be built by any other means. >>>>>> It's not "right" >>>>>> or "wrong," it just is. What would you do... make laws to ban this >>>>>> technology and watch the rest of the world blow right past us? If >>>>>> your job gets replaced by a robot, learn how to design, install, >>>>>> sell or repair robots. We're locked into change in every aspect of >>>>>> our lives. It's a matter of adaptation and survival. Some will make >>>>>> it, some will not. It's always been that way. Only the pace has >>>>>> quickened, and will continue to do so. At some point, the human >>>>>> race will have managed to destroy itself by being too greedy and too >>>>>> clever for its own good. I see no other outcome. >>>>> >>>>>Why should anyone's *survival* be in doubt, in *this* day and age when >>>>>productivity per capita, especially of basic necessities like food, is >>>>>sky- >>>>>high to the point our ancestors of even a century or two ago wouldn't >>>>>have dared dream of such a big increase? >>>>> >>>>>Oh, that's right, so a few anointed-ones can live high off the hog. :P >>>> >>>> You are full of shit. Go to even the most basic grocery store and if >>>> you avoid all the processed "foods" you can buy vegetable and animal >>>> products that kings and queens would only dream about in ages past. >>> >>>I believe that's what I just said. Which means there's no excuse for >>>pricing it out of the reach of people who "merely" work 40 hours of >>>manual labor a week and making it so that food security is only for >>>stockbrokers, >>>doctors, and engineers. Same applies to shelter (there's more than >>>enough roofed-over space to house the planet's population comfortably, >>>yet huge echoing nearly-empty McMansions half of them with absentee >>>landlords sit around being used merely as the huge immobile poker chips >>>of the casino capitalists while people shiver in the fucking >>>streets...). >> >> So others have stuff and you don't, that bothers you. > >I have stuff. More than average. But unlike some I am not blind to my >privilege. I know darn well that lots of people lack the things I take for >granted. Either give them yours or help them find a job so they can get theirs.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 17:07 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <pekfec$12su$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #169472 |
On 5/29/2018 4:24 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > On Tue, 29 May 2018 20:16:23 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! On Tue, 29 May 2018 05:57:12 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 04:28:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>> snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 28 May 2018 22:26:00 -0500, Bricked >>>> wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 02:51:56 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>> snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 28 May 2018 16:47:45 -0700, >>>>>> Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>> reading posts by Checkmate! In article >>>>>>> <peg63n$ooj$21@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid >>>>>>> says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Lots of people can't find work. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bullshit, there are jobs everywhere. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bullshit, automation is causing there to be less and >>>>>>>> less work needing doing even as the population grows. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Lots more can't find work that will actually pay >>>>>>>>>> their full living expenses, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Maybe they ought to lower their standards. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Who died and made you arbiter of what the standard of >>>>>>>> living should be? Time was you could get a foot on the >>>>>>>> ladder with a menial labor job, get a car and a starter >>>>>>>> house and also work your way up from that start at your >>>>>>>> work getting promoted. Now a menial labor job is not >>>>>>>> even enough for poverty-level subsistence -- you will >>>>>>>> DIE without additional income from one source or >>>>>>>> another -- and there is no upward ladder from most >>>>>>>> jobs. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why do you not object to this change? There was no >>>>>>>> public debate about it. No referendum held. It was >>>>>>>> simply imposed on the American people by faceless >>>>>>>> bureaucrats in three-piece suits. It's the sort of >>>>>>>> thing that happened in the Soviet Union. Why aren't you >>>>>>>> roaring mad about it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Automation is just the natural progression of the >>>>>>> industrial age. Technology is constantly changing, and >>>>>>> people are constantly having to find ways to change with >>>>>>> it. The complicated electronic toys we're all so >>>>>>> addicted to could not be built by any other means. It's >>>>>>> not "right" or "wrong," it just is. What would you do... >>>>>>> make laws to ban this technology and watch the rest of >>>>>>> the world blow right past us? If your job gets replaced >>>>>>> by a robot, learn how to design, install, sell or repair >>>>>>> robots. We're locked into change in every aspect of our >>>>>>> lives. It's a matter of adaptation and survival. Some >>>>>>> will make it, some will not. It's always been that way. >>>>>>> Only the pace has quickened, and will continue to do so. >>>>>>> At some point, the human race will have managed to >>>>>>> destroy itself by being too greedy and too clever for its >>>>>>> own good. I see no other outcome. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why should anyone's *survival* be in doubt, in *this* day >>>>>> and age when productivity per capita, especially of basic >>>>>> necessities like food, is sky- high to the point our >>>>>> ancestors of even a century or two ago wouldn't have dared >>>>>> dream of such a big increase? >>>>>> >>>>>> Oh, that's right, so a few anointed-ones can live high off >>>>>> the hog. :P >>>>> >>>>> You are full of shit. Go to even the most basic grocery >>>>> store and if you avoid all the processed "foods" you can buy >>>>> vegetable and animal products that kings and queens would >>>>> only dream about in ages past. >>>> >>>> I believe that's what I just said. Which means there's no >>>> excuse for pricing it out of the reach of people who "merely" >>>> work 40 hours of manual labor a week and making it so that food >>>> security is only for stockbrokers, doctors, and engineers. Same >>>> applies to shelter (there's more than enough roofed-over space >>>> to house the planet's population comfortably, yet huge echoing >>>> nearly-empty McMansions half of them with absentee landlords >>>> sit around being used merely as the huge immobile poker chips >>>> of the casino capitalists while people shiver in the fucking >>>> streets...). >>> >>> So others have stuff and you don't, that bothers you. >> >> I have stuff. More than average. But unlike some I am not blind to >> my privilege. I know darn well that lots of people lack the things >> I take for granted. > > Either give them yours or help them find a job so they can get > theirs. Waitwait - Trump has created so many very good and very amazing jobs, even for the black and his friends the Hispanic people (except for the animals who come here illegally with their kids), that it would be rude and demeaning for someone to help them find a job (there are many jobs now that O'Bama isn't killing jobs with 17 years of Obamacare and high taxes). -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 15:22 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <43hrgdd3g3lsig7sfphrhiu6lvcovnbibv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #169496 |
On Tue, 29 May 2018 17:07:25 -0400, mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: >On 5/29/2018 4:24 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >> On Tue, 29 May 2018 20:16:23 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! On Tue, 29 May 2018 05:57:12 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 04:28:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>> snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 28 May 2018 22:26:00 -0500, Bricked >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 02:51:56 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>> snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 28 May 2018 16:47:45 -0700, >>>>>>> Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>>> reading posts by Checkmate! In article >>>>>>>> <peg63n$ooj$21@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid >>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Lots of people can't find work. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Bullshit, there are jobs everywhere. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bullshit, automation is causing there to be less and >>>>>>>>> less work needing doing even as the population grows. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Lots more can't find work that will actually pay >>>>>>>>>>> their full living expenses, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Maybe they ought to lower their standards. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Who died and made you arbiter of what the standard of >>>>>>>>> living should be? Time was you could get a foot on the >>>>>>>>> ladder with a menial labor job, get a car and a starter >>>>>>>>> house and also work your way up from that start at your >>>>>>>>> work getting promoted. Now a menial labor job is not >>>>>>>>> even enough for poverty-level subsistence -- you will >>>>>>>>> DIE without additional income from one source or >>>>>>>>> another -- and there is no upward ladder from most >>>>>>>>> jobs. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why do you not object to this change? There was no >>>>>>>>> public debate about it. No referendum held. It was >>>>>>>>> simply imposed on the American people by faceless >>>>>>>>> bureaucrats in three-piece suits. It's the sort of >>>>>>>>> thing that happened in the Soviet Union. Why aren't you >>>>>>>>> roaring mad about it? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Automation is just the natural progression of the >>>>>>>> industrial age. Technology is constantly changing, and >>>>>>>> people are constantly having to find ways to change with >>>>>>>> it. The complicated electronic toys we're all so >>>>>>>> addicted to could not be built by any other means. It's >>>>>>>> not "right" or "wrong," it just is. What would you do... >>>>>>>> make laws to ban this technology and watch the rest of >>>>>>>> the world blow right past us? If your job gets replaced >>>>>>>> by a robot, learn how to design, install, sell or repair >>>>>>>> robots. We're locked into change in every aspect of our >>>>>>>> lives. It's a matter of adaptation and survival. Some >>>>>>>> will make it, some will not. It's always been that way. >>>>>>>> Only the pace has quickened, and will continue to do so. >>>>>>>> At some point, the human race will have managed to >>>>>>>> destroy itself by being too greedy and too clever for its >>>>>>>> own good. I see no other outcome. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why should anyone's *survival* be in doubt, in *this* day >>>>>>> and age when productivity per capita, especially of basic >>>>>>> necessities like food, is sky- high to the point our >>>>>>> ancestors of even a century or two ago wouldn't have dared >>>>>>> dream of such a big increase? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Oh, that's right, so a few anointed-ones can live high off >>>>>>> the hog. :P >>>>>> >>>>>> You are full of shit. Go to even the most basic grocery >>>>>> store and if you avoid all the processed "foods" you can buy >>>>>> vegetable and animal products that kings and queens would >>>>>> only dream about in ages past. >>>>> >>>>> I believe that's what I just said. Which means there's no >>>>> excuse for pricing it out of the reach of people who "merely" >>>>> work 40 hours of manual labor a week and making it so that food >>>>> security is only for stockbrokers, doctors, and engineers. Same >>>>> applies to shelter (there's more than enough roofed-over space >>>>> to house the planet's population comfortably, yet huge echoing >>>>> nearly-empty McMansions half of them with absentee landlords >>>>> sit around being used merely as the huge immobile poker chips >>>>> of the casino capitalists while people shiver in the fucking >>>>> streets...). >>>> >>>> So others have stuff and you don't, that bothers you. >>> >>> I have stuff. More than average. But unlike some I am not blind to >>> my privilege. I know darn well that lots of people lack the things >>> I take for granted. >> >> Either give them yours or help them find a job so they can get >> theirs. > >Waitwait - Trump has created so many very good and very amazing jobs, >even for the black and his friends the Hispanic people (except for the >animals who come here illegally with their kids), that it would be rude >and demeaning for someone to help them find a job (there are many jobs >now that O'Bama isn't killing jobs with 17 years of Obamacare and high >taxes). That's what I been saying, there are jobs, todays idiots want everything handed to them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-30 13:16 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <pemm9f$sc4$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #169503 |
On 5/29/2018 5:22 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > That's what I been saying, there are jobs, todays idiots want > everything handed to them. No, we just want everyone (including blacks, women, etc.) to be able to play at the same difficulty level that white men got to play at in 1960. Same wages to cost of living ratio, same (inflation adjusted) housing costs, same kinds of job opportunities and job security, including being able to start in the mailroom and work your way up to corner office through, you know, hard work and dedication. End the MBA/law degree monopoly on decent-paying jobs with retirement plans and job security. Restore the blue collar unions. Etc. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-30 11:49 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <ssotgd1qbllp1mehi3thg6b6jelo52skj4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #169695 |
On Wed, 30 May 2018 13:16:30 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 5/29/2018 5:22 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > >> That's what I been saying, there are jobs, todays idiots want >> everything handed to them. > >No, we just want everyone (including blacks, women, etc.) to be able to >play at the same difficulty level that white men got to play at in 1960. OK so in 1960 we got about 2 bucks an hour, is that what you want them to get today? >Same wages to cost of living ratio, same (inflation adjusted) housing >costs, same kinds of job opportunities and job security, including being >able to start in the mailroom and work your way up to corner office >through, you know, hard work and dedication. End the MBA/law degree >monopoly on decent-paying jobs with retirement plans and job security. >Restore the blue collar unions. Etc. I agree with the blue collar thing, but this life is what you make of it, get a job, make it happen, the only people I see crying are the lazy welfare bums.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-31 05:50 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <peoggf$1nht$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #169711 |
On 5/30/2018 1:49 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 5/29/2018 5:22 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>> That's what I been saying, there are jobs, todays idiots want >>> everything handed to them. >> >> No, we just want everyone (including blacks, women, etc.) to be able to >> play at the same difficulty level that white men got to play at in 1960. > > OK so in 1960 we got about 2 bucks an hour, is that what you want them > to get today? Yep ... inflation adjusted, of course. (Comes out to $16.86, just a smidge more than the Fight for 15 folks are asking for.) > I agree with the blue collar thing, but this life is what you make of > it, get a job, make it happen, The same personal-responsibility bullshit. *sigh* When will you k0oks learn that life is, to a significant degree, blown around by the winds huffed out by the big and powerful forces, from storms to volcanoes to the rich and powerful who buy our elections and then set policy? And that "get a job" is an empty platitude in the labor market of recent decades? I've long since come to the conclusion that conservatism's emphasis on individual responsibility to oneself isn't actually about being responsible -- I've seen far too many conservatives using some version or another of "affluenza" to get out of penalties for various misdeeds, and whining that a rape conviction will ruin some "poor" athlete's "promising" life, etc. No, conservatism is actually about *shirking* one's responsibilities toward others. Always was and always will be. Which makes it morally bankrupt. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 04:07 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <pet55v$bad$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #169799 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 31 May 2018 08:48:17 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > On Thu, 31 May 2018 05:50:06 -0400, kensi > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>On 5/30/2018 1:49 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 5/29/2018 5:22 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>>>> That's what I been saying, there are jobs, todays idiots want >>>>> everything handed to them. >>>> >>>> No, we just want everyone (including blacks, women, etc.) to be able >>>> to play at the same difficulty level that white men got to play at in >>>> 1960. >>> >>> OK so in 1960 we got about 2 bucks an hour, is that what you want them >>> to get today? >> >>Yep ... inflation adjusted, of course. (Comes out to $16.86, just a >>smidge more than the Fight for 15 folks are asking for.) >> >>> I agree with the blue collar thing, but this life is what you make of >>> it, get a job, make it happen, >> >>The same personal-responsibility bullshit. *sigh* When will you k0oks >>learn that life is, to a significant degree, blown around by the winds >>huffed out by the big and powerful forces, from storms to volcanoes to >>the rich and powerful who buy our elections and then set policy? >> >>And that "get a job" is an empty platitude in the labor market of recent >>decades? >> >>I've long since come to the conclusion that conservatism's emphasis on >>individual responsibility to oneself isn't actually about being >>responsible -- I've seen far too many conservatives using some version >>or another of "affluenza" to get out of penalties for various misdeeds, >>and whining that a rape conviction will ruin some "poor" athlete's >>"promising" life, etc. >> >>No, conservatism is actually about *shirking* one's responsibilities >>toward others. Always was and always will be. Which makes it morally >>bankrupt. > > Are you done throwing up? Good now clean that up. So, what you're saying is you have no counterarguments *or* countervailing evidence whatsoever to bring to bear against kensi. Gotcha. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 22 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 22 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web