Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #168174 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-26 05:03 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-05-29 23:34 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 227 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-26 05:03 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:30 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 19:59 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:56 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 22:24 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-26 16:46 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:26 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 23:35 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:46 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-26 18:20 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 20:26 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 20:57 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:35 +0200
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:05 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:29 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:51 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:27 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:36 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-26 22:21 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:46 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:26 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:33 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-05-27 12:08 +0100
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:41 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:15 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:46 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:59 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 08:50 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:40 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 23:19 +0200
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:58 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 08:50 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:38 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 19:44 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:48 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:28 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:38 -0700
Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 18:30 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 18:54 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-27 02:04 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:36 +0200
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:07 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:11 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:32 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:51 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:16 +0000
Nadegda must be proud. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-27 00:44 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:43 -0400
"kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-27 02:49 -0700
Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:38 -0400
Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:30 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:29 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 17:16 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:08 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:21 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:08 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-29 21:36 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 19:43 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-31 19:13 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:41 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 19:53 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 21:12 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 06:03 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 00:11 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 16:47 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:51 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 22:26 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 04:28 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:59 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:13 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:28 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:31 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:43 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 11:20 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 09:46 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:12 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:23 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 13:02 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:36 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:15 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:17 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:23 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:13 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:11 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:46 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:45 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:25 -0400
Body Shaming ? I smell a feminist. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-30 13:04 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 05:57 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:16 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:18 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:24 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-29 17:07 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:22 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:16 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:49 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:50 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:52 -0400
" White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-30 13:27 -0700
Re: " White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:17 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:48 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:15 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:29 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:17 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:19 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:27 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:31 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:35 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-29 17:11 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:22 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:46 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:51 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:59 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 16:08 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:36 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:49 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
"kensi" is not smarter than the market. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-31 05:47 -0700
Why does this concern you, exactly ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-30 14:43 -0700
Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:41 -0400
Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-31 05:12 -0700
Re: Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:03 -0700
Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 20:14 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:33 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:42 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:50 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:00 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:21 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:26 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:49 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:18 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:43 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:19 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:28 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:36 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:43 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:08 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:52 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:18 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-05-27 11:33 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:42 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 19:53 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 21:12 -0600
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:38 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:30 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:12 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 19:40 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 18:38 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:09 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:56 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 22:20 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:24 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 19:29 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 23:25 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:52 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-27 12:10 +0100
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:13 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 11:26 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:04 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 23:18 +0200
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:55 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:30 -0500
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:18 +0000
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:41 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 07:09 -0600
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-27 11:43 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 10:17 -0600
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-27 13:11 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 11:17 -0600
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:43 +0000
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:10 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:18 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:32 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 08:36 -0600
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:55 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:34 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 14:05 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:20 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 08:37 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:39 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 08:48 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-28 17:32 +0100
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 13:38 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 11:51 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:57 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:55 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:19 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:30 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:50 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:03 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:03 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 14:46 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 15:16 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:22 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:31 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-29 16:20 +0100
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 09:43 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:56 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:22 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:37 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:34 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:50 -0600
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:23 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 19:40 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-29 23:34 -0400
Page 3 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 12 Next page →
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-26 20:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3573ca7990beaf00993b50@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #168414 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <h3rjgdpthnl8stkfoj3cdi39sl9npi9taa@4ax.com>, bricked@barkingspiders.com says... > > On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:24:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > > >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > >On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:56:49 -0400, benj wrote: > > > >> On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote: > >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >>> melt! > >>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote: > >>>>> Rice ? the staple food of billions ? will become less nutritious as > >>>>> carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study suggests: > >>>>> > >>>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is- > >having- > >>> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice > >>>> > >>>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians starving! > >>>> Oh wait. That's not worse... > >>> > >>> Fuck off, racist scum. > >> > >> Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair of > >> "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by the > >> billions of people overload on the planet? > > > >It's been well established that affording women full rights, including > >economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to move about > >unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive autonomy and ready > >access to contraception and health care; results in a great reduction in > >birth rates. So liberating the women of the world will achieve the needed > >population reductions without resort to such horrific means as mass murder. > > > >But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be able to > >treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world is going to > >hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded congested cities... > > You're Uncle Steve's wife. (He posts in alt.slack) Oh, and like Uncle > Steve you can't answer a civil question but you > double-triple-quadruple down on your maniacal murmurings. Uncle Steve once said he was going to piss on my grave when I died... so I've got THAT going for me. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-26 23:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <luckgdhkrs7723p1e4td2r3i3f4gsqcjri@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #168484 |
On Sat, 26 May 2018 20:48:42 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >Checkmate! In article <h3rjgdpthnl8stkfoj3cdi39sl9npi9taa@4ax.com>, >bricked@barkingspiders.com says... > > >> >> On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:24:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >> >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> >On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:56:49 -0400, benj wrote: >> > >> >> On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> >>> melt! >> >>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote: >> >>>>> Rice ? the staple food of billions ? will become less nutritious as >> >>>>> carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study suggests: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is- >> >having- >> >>> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice >> >>>> >> >>>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians starving! >> >>>> Oh wait. That's not worse... >> >>> >> >>> Fuck off, racist scum. >> >> >> >> Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair of >> >> "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by the >> >> billions of people overload on the planet? >> > >> >It's been well established that affording women full rights, including >> >economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to move about >> >unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive autonomy and ready >> >access to contraception and health care; results in a great reduction in >> >birth rates. So liberating the women of the world will achieve the needed >> >population reductions without resort to such horrific means as mass murder. >> > >> >But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be able to >> >treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world is going to >> >hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded congested cities... >> >> You're Uncle Steve's wife. (He posts in alt.slack) Oh, and like Uncle >> Steve you can't answer a civil question but you >> double-triple-quadruple down on your maniacal murmurings. > >Uncle Steve once said he was going to piss on my grave when I died... so >I've got THAT going for me. It will make the weeds bloom.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 03:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.35742a636d84594b993b56@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #168491 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <luckgdhkrs7723p1e4td2r3i3f4gsqcjri@4ax.com>, bricked@barkingspiders.com says... > > On Sat, 26 May 2018 20:48:42 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > >Checkmate! In article <h3rjgdpthnl8stkfoj3cdi39sl9npi9taa@4ax.com>, > >bricked@barkingspiders.com says... > > > > > >> > >> On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:24:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >> > >> >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > >> >On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:56:49 -0400, benj wrote: > >> > > >> >> On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote: > >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> >>> melt! > >> >>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote: > >> >>>>> Rice ? the staple food of billions ? will become less nutritious as > >> >>>>> carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study suggests: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is- > >> >having- > >> >>> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians starving! > >> >>>> Oh wait. That's not worse... > >> >>> > >> >>> Fuck off, racist scum. > >> >> > >> >> Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair of > >> >> "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by the > >> >> billions of people overload on the planet? > >> > > >> >It's been well established that affording women full rights, including > >> >economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to move about > >> >unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive autonomy and ready > >> >access to contraception and health care; results in a great reduction in > >> >birth rates. So liberating the women of the world will achieve the needed > >> >population reductions without resort to such horrific means as mass murder. > >> > > >> >But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be able to > >> >treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world is going to > >> >hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded congested cities... > >> > >> You're Uncle Steve's wife. (He posts in alt.slack) Oh, and like Uncle > >> Steve you can't answer a civil question but you > >> double-triple-quadruple down on your maniacal murmurings. > > > >Uncle Steve once said he was going to piss on my grave when I died... so > >I've got THAT going for me. > > It will make the weeds bloom. But he may very well die before me, dashing all his hopes and dreams. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-26 18:30 -0700 |
| Subject | Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.26--6.30pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #168398 |
Nadegda replied: > > > > it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians starving! > > > > Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "kensi" the pair of > > "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by > > the billions of people overload on the planet ? > > It's been well established that affording women full rights, including > economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to move about > unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive autonomy and ready > access to contraception and health care; results in a great reduction in > birth rates. So liberating the women of the world will achieve the needed > population reductions without resort to such horrific means as mass murder. > > But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be able to > treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world is going to > hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded congested cities... Women are doing all the work, on the feminist front, while I sit back and enjoy the benefits; it's almost criminal. In Christina Aguilera's latest video, " Fall In Line ", she rejects sex and returns to The Garden of Eden. Michael Rotondo, the 30 year old who famously got evicted from his parents' home, was avoiding child support, I'm sure; the eviction came immediately after he lost visitation rights. CamSoda offered him 1,000$/month, for up to 6 months, if he'd livestream 24/7; he rejected it, of course. Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is main loser here, because she has to deal with the 8 year old; oddly, she's off the radar. The Washington Post says: one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home. 12.5 percent of women that age live at home. Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades, roughly doubling since 1960. more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in at least 130 years.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. |
| Message-ID | <ped25j$v0b$21@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #168440 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:30:12 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > Nadegda replied: >> > > > it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians starving! >> > >> > Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "kensi" the pair of >> > "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by >> > the billions of people overload on the planet ? >> >> It's been well established that affording women full rights, including >> economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to move about >> unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive autonomy and ready >> access to contraception and health care; results in a great reduction >> in birth rates. So liberating the women of the world will achieve the >> needed population reductions without resort to such horrific means as >> mass murder. >> >> But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be able >> to treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world is going >> to hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded congested >> cities... > > Women are doing all the work, on the feminist front, > while I sit back and enjoy the benefits; it's almost criminal. > > In Christina Aguilera's latest video, " Fall In Line ", > she rejects sex and returns to The Garden of Eden. > > Michael Rotondo, the 30 year old who famously got evicted from his > parents' home, was avoiding child support, I'm sure; the eviction came > immediately after he lost visitation rights. > > CamSoda offered him 1,000$/month, for up to 6 months, > if he'd livestream 24/7; he rejected it, of course. > > Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is main loser here, > because she has to deal with the 8 year old; > oddly, she's off the radar. > > The Washington Post says: > > one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home. > > 12.5 percent of women that age live at home. > > Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades, roughly > doubling since 1960. > > more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than > with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in at least > 130 years. Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing- affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world? -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-26 18:54 -0700 |
| Subject | Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.26--6.54pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #168443 |
Nadegda replied ( to me ): > > Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here, > > because she has to deal with the 8 year old; > > oddly, she's off the radar. > > > > The Washington Post says: > > one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home. > > 12.5 percent of women that age live at home. > > Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades. > > more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than > > with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 years. > > Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing- > affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world? Same with the Eastern world, kook. Rents here, where I live, in Seattle, rise about 8% per year; however, this is because people love big, exciting cities. Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 02:04 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. |
| Message-ID | <8noOC.194534$I77.112687@fx44.am4> |
| In reply to | #168451 |
On 2018-05-27, Jeff-Relf.Me @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote: > Nadegda replied ( to me ): >> > Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here, >> > because she has to deal with the 8 year old; >> > oddly, she's off the radar. >> > >> > The Washington Post says: >> > one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home. >> > 12.5 percent of women that age live at home. >> > Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades. >> > more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than >> > with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 years. >> >> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing- >> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world? > > Same with the Eastern world, kook. > > Rents here, where I live, in Seattle, rise about 8% per year; > however, this is because people love big, exciting cities. > Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. I think that prices of renting and real estates are artificially high, as here in Serbia no one can earn for apartment in lifetime for average wage. Eg you need around 1300 euros for square meter and average wage is around 300 euros. That is why people usually live with parents and very rarelly one can sepparate. -- press any key to continue or any other to quit...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 04:36 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. |
| Message-ID | <ba9r4o.1gd.19.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #168453 |
On 2018-05-27 4:04 AM, Melzzzzz wrote: > On 2018-05-27, Jeff-Relf.Me @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote: >> Nadegda replied ( to me ): >>>> Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here, >>>> because she has to deal with the 8 year old; >>>> oddly, she's off the radar. >>>> >>>> The Washington Post says: >>>> one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home. >>>> 12.5 percent of women that age live at home. >>>> Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades. >>>> more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than >>>> with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 years. >>> >>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing- >>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world? >> >> Same with the Eastern world, kook. >> >> Rents here, where I live, in Seattle, rise about 8% per year; >> however, this is because people love big, exciting cities. >> Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. > I think that prices of renting and real estates are artificially high, > as here in Serbia no one can earn for apartment in lifetime for average > wage. Eg you need around 1300 euros for square meter and average wage is > around 300 euros. That is why people usually live with parents and very > rarelly one can sepparate. > but they all drive cadillacs
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-26 22:07 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. |
| Message-ID | <938kgdpdjgl8djs8j3m3btjqat9u80gscq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #168458 |
On Sun, 27 May 2018 04:36:39 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2018-05-27 4:04 AM, Melzzzzz wrote: >> On 2018-05-27, Jeff-Relf.Me @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote: >>> Nadegda replied ( to me ): >>>>> Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here, >>>>> because she has to deal with the 8 year old; >>>>> oddly, she's off the radar. >>>>> >>>>> The Washington Post says: >>>>> one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home. >>>>> 12.5 percent of women that age live at home. >>>>> Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades. >>>>> more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than >>>>> with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 years. >>>> >>>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing- >>>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world? >>> >>> Same with the Eastern world, kook. >>> >>> Rents here, where I live, in Seattle, rise about 8% per year; >>> however, this is because people love big, exciting cities. >>> Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. >> I think that prices of renting and real estates are artificially high, >> as here in Serbia no one can earn for apartment in lifetime for average >> wage. Eg you need around 1300 euros for square meter and average wage is >> around 300 euros. That is why people usually live with parents and very >> rarelly one can sepparate. >> >but they all drive cadillacs I drive a Ford 150, a Lexus AND.. a Toyota. Outta my way.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 12:11 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. |
| Message-ID | <eNAOC.318505$PE5.191650@fx37.iad> |
| In reply to | #168470 |
On 5/26/2018 11:07 PM, Bricked wrote: > On Sun, 27 May 2018 04:36:39 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2018-05-27 4:04 AM, Melzzzzz wrote: >>> On 2018-05-27, Jeff-Relf.Me @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote: >>>> Nadegda replied ( to me ): >>>>>> Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here, >>>>>> because she has to deal with the 8 year old; >>>>>> oddly, she's off the radar. >>>>>> >>>>>> The Washington Post says: >>>>>> one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home. >>>>>> 12.5 percent of women that age live at home. >>>>>> Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades. >>>>>> more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than >>>>>> with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 years. >>>>> >>>>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing- >>>>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world? >>>> >>>> Same with the Eastern world, kook. >>>> >>>> Rents here, where I live, in Seattle, rise about 8% per year; >>>> however, this is because people love big, exciting cities. >>>> Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. >>> I think that prices of renting and real estates are artificially high, >>> as here in Serbia no one can earn for apartment in lifetime for average >>> wage. Eg you need around 1300 euros for square meter and average wage is >>> around 300 euros. That is why people usually live with parents and very >>> rarelly one can sepparate. >>> >> but they all drive cadillacs > > I drive a Ford 150, a Lexus AND.. a Toyota. Outta my way. > Hey Nads! This is not one of your bullshit socialist countries. THIS IS AMERICA! I don't think three cars is too many! (I used to drive 4 but now I've only got 2)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. |
| Message-ID | <ped7t6$v0b$25@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #168451 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:54:11 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > Nadegda replied ( to me ): >> > Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here, >> > because she has to deal with the 8 year old; >> > oddly, she's off the radar. >> > >> > The Washington Post says: >> > one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home. >> > 12.5 percent of women that age live at home. >> > Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades. >> > more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than >> > with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 >> > years. >> >> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing- >> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world? > > Same with the Eastern world, kook. Who are you calling "kook", kook? -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. |
| Message-ID | <ot8kgd9onf6l8jtss47k9v3mhbb8keuuoh@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #168473 |
On Sun, 27 May 2018 03:15:50 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:54:11 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > >> Nadegda replied ( to me ): >>> > Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here, >>> > because she has to deal with the 8 year old; >>> > oddly, she's off the radar. >>> > >>> > The Washington Post says: >>> > one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home. >>> > 12.5 percent of women that age live at home. >>> > Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades. >>> > more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than >>> > with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 >>> > years. >>> >>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing- >>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world? >> >> Same with the Eastern world, kook. > >Who are you calling "kook", kook? Shut up kook.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3573c62af52051bc993b4e@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #168475 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <ot8kgd9onf6l8jtss47k9v3mhbb8keuuoh@4ax.com>, bricked@barkingspiders.com says... > > On Sun, 27 May 2018 03:15:50 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > > >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > >On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:54:11 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > > > >> Nadegda replied ( to me ): > >>> > Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here, > >>> > because she has to deal with the 8 year old; > >>> > oddly, she's off the radar. > >>> > > >>> > The Washington Post says: > >>> > one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home. > >>> > 12.5 percent of women that age live at home. > >>> > Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades. > >>> > more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than > >>> > with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 > >>> > years. > >>> > >>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing- > >>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world? > >> > >> Same with the Eastern world, kook. > > > >Who are you calling "kook", kook? > > Shut up kook. Excellent retort. I'm in awe. No, really. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-26 23:32 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. |
| Message-ID | <35dkgdlp6n79da2e3bufbs2jqbcujrem5u@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #168481 |
On Sat, 26 May 2018 20:30:22 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >Checkmate! In article <ot8kgd9onf6l8jtss47k9v3mhbb8keuuoh@4ax.com>, >bricked@barkingspiders.com says... > > >> >> On Sun, 27 May 2018 03:15:50 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >> >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> >On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:54:11 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> > >> >> Nadegda replied ( to me ): >> >>> > Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here, >> >>> > because she has to deal with the 8 year old; >> >>> > oddly, she's off the radar. >> >>> > >> >>> > The Washington Post says: >> >>> > one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home. >> >>> > 12.5 percent of women that age live at home. >> >>> > Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades. >> >>> > more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than >> >>> > with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 >> >>> > years. >> >>> >> >>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing- >> >>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world? >> >> >> >> Same with the Eastern world, kook. >> > >> >Who are you calling "kook", kook? >> >> Shut up kook. > >Excellent retort. I'm in awe. > >No, really. Take your meds now and morning time, at the most you'll think you had a bad dream where you were beaten to death with no.2 pencils.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 03:51 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.35742d95216a47f3993b5b@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #168494 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <35dkgdlp6n79da2e3bufbs2jqbcujrem5u@4ax.com>, bricked@barkingspiders.com says... > > On Sat, 26 May 2018 20:30:22 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > >Checkmate! In article <ot8kgd9onf6l8jtss47k9v3mhbb8keuuoh@4ax.com>, > >bricked@barkingspiders.com says... > > > > > >> > >> On Sun, 27 May 2018 03:15:50 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >> > >> >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > >> >On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:54:11 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > >> > > >> >> Nadegda replied ( to me ): > >> >>> > Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here, > >> >>> > because she has to deal with the 8 year old; > >> >>> > oddly, she's off the radar. > >> >>> > > >> >>> > The Washington Post says: > >> >>> > one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home. > >> >>> > 12.5 percent of women that age live at home. > >> >>> > Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades. > >> >>> > more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than > >> >>> > with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 > >> >>> > years. > >> >>> > >> >>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing- > >> >>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world? > >> >> > >> >> Same with the Eastern world, kook. > >> > > >> >Who are you calling "kook", kook? > >> > >> Shut up kook. > > > >Excellent retort. I'm in awe. > > > >No, really. > > Take your meds now and morning time, at the most you'll think you had > a bad dream where you were beaten to death with no.2 pencils. I dreamed a Chihuahua was trying to hump my leg. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 05:16 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. |
| Message-ID | <pedevu$v0b$28@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #168475 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:19:49 -0500, Bricked wrote: > On Sun, 27 May 2018 03:15:50 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:54:11 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> >>> Nadegda replied ( to me ): >>>> > Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here, >>>> > because she has to deal with the 8 year old; >>>> > oddly, she's off the radar. >>>> > >>>> > The Washington Post says: >>>> > one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home. >>>> > 12.5 percent of women that age live at home. >>>> > Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades. >>>> > more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents >>>> > than with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in >>>> > 130 years. >>>> >>>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive >>>> housing- >>>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world? >>> >>> Same with the Eastern world, kook. >> >>Who are you calling "kook", kook? > > Shut up kook. Why don't you come over here and make me, kook? -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 00:44 -0700 |
| Subject | Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.27--0.44am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #168496 |
Nadegda: > > > > > Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing- > > > > > affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world? > > > > > > > > Same with the Eastern world, kook. > > > > > > Who are you calling "kook", kook ? > > > > Shut up kook. > > Why don't you come over here and make me, kook ? You (Nadegda) changed the topic from a big ass " child support, custody, visitation " battle between Michael Rotondo and his (anonymous) baby mama to: " Who's the bigger kook ? "; well done, you must be proud.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 05:43 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <peduk0$1upg$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #168501 |
On 5/27/2018 3:44 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Nadegda: >>>>>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing- >>>>>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world? >>>>> Same with the Eastern world, kook. >>>> Who are you calling "kook", kook ? >>> Shut up kook. >> Why don't you come over here and make me, kook ? > > You (Nadegda) changed the topic from a big ass > " child support, custody, visitation " battle between Michael Rotondo > and his (anonymous) baby mama to: " Who's the bigger kook ? "; > well done, you must be proud. No, she changed it to the housing affordability crisis. All she's heard from you on that topic since then has been: *crickets* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 02:49 -0700 |
| Subject | "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.27--2.49am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #168503 |
"kensi" replied ( to me ):
> > You (Nadegda) changed the topic from a big ass
> > " child support, custody, visitation " battle between Michael Rotondo
> > and his (anonymous) baby mama to: " Who's the bigger kook ? ";
> > well done, you must be proud.
>
> No, she changed it to the housing affordability crisis. All she's heard
> from you on that topic since then has been: *crickets*
On this topic, I replied:
> Rents here, where I live, in Seattle, rise about 8% per year;
> however, this is because people love big, exciting cities.
> Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
You ("kensi") should addition for "Shameless", the TV show.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 06:38 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. |
| Message-ID | <pee1re$455$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #168504 |
On 5/27/2018 5:49 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> On this topic, I replied:
>> Rents here, where I live, in Seattle, rise about 8% per year;
>> however, this is because people love big, exciting cities.
>> Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
"Move to Arkansas" (where there are no jobs!) is hardly a practical
answer to the housing affordability crisis, k0ok.
> You ("kensi") should addition for "Shameless", the TV show.
I should what for what? English, d00d. English.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web