Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #165694 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-16 10:44 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-05-20 13:47 -0700 |
| Articles | 16 on this page of 196 — 26 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-16 10:44 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 10:47 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-16 18:46 +0000
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 12:17 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-16 20:41 +0000
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 13:47 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-16 16:37 -0600
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 15:57 -0700
An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-18 14:15 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-18 19:32 +0000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-18 20:16 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. OT de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-19 10:25 +1000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-18 22:09 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 19:16 -0700
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-19 12:02 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-19 12:09 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-19 10:33 -0600
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:44 +0000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 17:28 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-19 03:37 +0000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 20:42 -0700
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-19 12:07 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-19 12:35 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-19 12:40 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-19 22:22 +0000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-19 21:34 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-20 03:15 +0000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-20 12:18 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-20 12:38 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:42 +0000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 17:26 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 16:42 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-17 00:30 +0000
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 17:34 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-05-17 05:07 +0000
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-17 19:48 +0000
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-17 13:53 -0600
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Anglo.Saxon <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-17 20:56 +0000
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 17:47 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 22:44 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-17 12:34 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 10:01 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-05-17 12:10 -0500
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-17 13:28 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-24 09:47 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-24 13:05 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-24 10:41 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-17 11:10 -0600
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-17 13:39 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-17 11:52 -0600
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-17 19:49 +0000
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-20 10:52 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-20 12:23 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-20 12:26 -0400
"Sex at Dawn" by Chris Ryan. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-20 10:01 -0700
Re: "Sex at Dawn" by Chris Ryan. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-20 23:38 -0400
Re: "Sex at Dawn" by Chris Ryan. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-21 00:11 -0400
Re: "Sex at Dawn" by Chris Ryan. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-21 04:33 +0000
Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-20 23:33 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-05-21 07:22 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 12:10 -0400
Nature herself punishes perverts. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-21 09:33 -0700
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-21 10:47 -0600
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-05-21 18:16 +0000
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-21 12:59 -0600
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-21 19:03 +0000
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 13:04 -0700
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-21 14:22 -0600
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-21 21:29 +0000
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-21 15:43 -0600
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 15:47 -0700
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-21 19:14 -0400
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 16:16 -0700
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 20:19 -0400
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 12:06 -0700
Re: ā Snowflake ā Nature herself punishes perverts. ā Snowflake ā Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus š¶ē¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-05-21 14:30 -0500
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-21 20:56 +0100
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-21 23:05 +0100
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 16:11 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-21 09:08 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-21 09:31 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 12:37 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-21 10:50 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 12:05 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-21 19:05 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-21 13:36 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 13:05 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 16:24 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-24 11:01 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 16:15 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-21 21:30 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-21 15:41 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-22 03:29 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-21 23:23 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-24 11:01 -0400
Gregory Hall condems himself. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-24 10:14 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-24 13:21 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 18:31 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-05-24 22:39 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-24 17:50 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 20:37 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-24 18:43 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-25 04:47 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-25 07:42 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:49 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 10:40 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-25 11:08 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-25 09:23 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 12:08 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 17:45 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:53 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-25 16:12 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 18:11 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-26 11:41 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-25 21:49 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-25 16:01 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-25 23:41 +0100
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-26 11:42 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:47 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 10:32 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-24 11:52 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-24 17:50 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 20:25 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-25 00:09 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-25 00:32 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 21:52 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-25 04:49 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 10:42 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-25 05:34 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-25 00:03 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 10:57 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-25 11:24 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:55 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-25 12:41 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-25 21:50 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-25 16:01 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-25 22:16 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-25 16:26 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 03:41 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-25 23:56 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 06:39 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-26 04:25 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 03:52 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-26 06:04 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 19:57 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:50 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 13:08 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is all Neal Warren can hope for unless he fucks Debbie "shebeast" Carrick LOL! turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-05-28 11:35 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:14 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:11 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 19:58 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-26 14:07 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 22:27 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-26 16:42 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 23:34 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-26 18:18 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:39 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 07:07 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:47 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 19:51 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 02:00 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 21:10 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-26 21:36 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-26 18:45 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 07:05 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-27 12:47 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. rachel <goldarachel@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 16:16 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 17:21 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-27 20:10 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. rachel <goldarachel@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 17:14 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-05-28 16:50 -0500
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:54 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 22:28 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 20:15 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 20:03 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:34 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:32 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 15:15 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-25 07:49 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:58 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:58 -0400
We can't help them, the damage has been done. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-25 11:41 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 12:07 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-24 09:49 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-24 11:01 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-24 13:26 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-20 13:44 -0600
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 13:03 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-24 11:01 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-24 13:27 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-25 16:12 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 15:26 -0700
Re: Craptain Kneel Warren is the fugliest faggot on Usenet! turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-05-28 11:43 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 20:16 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 14:14 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television rachel <goldarachel@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 13:47 -0700
Page 10 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 13:58 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. |
| Message-ID | <pe9isf$121p$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #167956 |
On 5/25/2018 11:58 AM, benj wrote: > The "theory of Evolution" is an attempt to extrapolate the observed > genetic response of some organisms to environment to "explain" the > origin of all living things including humans. This extrapolation has > very slim evidence supporting it. I wouldn't characterize it as "very slim", but even if we were to concede your claim here, it is still far more evidence than exists to support your alternative, to wit, "a great bearded white d00d in the sky waved his magic wand and conjured it all up out of thin air!" Evolution also makes useful /predictions/, about what we will see and what will happen in various situations (e.g. that bacteria will become resistant to antibiotics). What useful predictions does "bearded white d00d in the sky who can literally make anything at all happen on a whim" make? That "theory" doesn't seem to constrain what-can-happen at all! -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 11:41 -0700 |
| Subject | We can't help them, the damage has been done. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.25--11.41am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #167984 |
In the Garden of Eden story, "God" is the father, the parent; and Adam, his child, had to leave when he discovered sex. Greg and Ben's desire to be "God, the Father" has been their down fall. We can't help them, the damage has been done. "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-21 12:07 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. |
| Message-ID | <P8CMC.118481$R51.112196@fx03.iad> |
| In reply to | #166982 |
On 5/21/2018 2:33 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>> Two days ago, Holly Randall interviewed "Sex at Dawn" author, >>> Chris Ryan; see: YouTube.COM/watch?v=M9_iNW_JOYA >>> 337 views, no comments and 9 likes ( one from me ). >> >> [insult] > > Who breeds more ? poor, African Muslims or rich Japanese ? > "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. > > To woo a girl, one must woo her tribe; > but what if they're BlueEyed sorority sisters ? > > Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. > Perfection is the enemy of the LeastBad; > so hold your nose, and go for it. > But Rolf it's so hard to get to know the "true personality" of a rubber pussy!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 09:49 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. |
| Message-ID | <pe6qea$h92$2@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #166982 |
x-no-archive: yes On 5/20/2018 11:33 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>> Two days ago, Holly Randall interviewed "Sex at Dawn" author, >>> Chris Ryan; see: YouTube.COM/watch?v=M9_iNW_JOYA >>> 337 views, no comments and 9 likes ( one from me ). >> >> [insult] > > Who breeds more ? poor, African Muslims or rich Japanese ? > "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. > > To woo a girl, one must woo her tribe; > but what if they're BlueEyed sorority sisters ? > > Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. > Perfection is the enemy of the LeastBad; > so hold your nose, and go for it. lol god I love Usenet.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 11:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mvtbgdpkn71n8v4u7mhu2vgbmmos1ujnic@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #166712 |
On Sun, 20 May 2018 12:26:04 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 5/20/2018 10:52 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Thu, 17 May 2018 19:49:21 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> Are ... are you k'laming that lesbians are somehow inherently >>> untrustworthy? On what basis? >> >> A woman who wants another woman as a love >> interest is totally fucked in the head. > >Proof, ko0k? Fucked in the head is to want to copulate with the same sex. No further proof is needed. >> It's not natural. > >Wrong: >https://io9.gizmodo.com/5889691/female-bonobos-have-gay-sex-to-improve-their-social-status > >Also >https://www.pride.com/lesbian2015/6/08/5-lesbian-animals-you-never-knew-played-your-team Anecdotal evidence proves nothing. Some scientist YOU are! >> It's freakish. > >Sometimes freakish is good. Sometimes . . . >> It's sinful and an abomination. > >According to one particular religion, which belongs in the dustbin of >history, perhaps. LOL. Some dustbin as it contains billions of intelligent and successful human beings. >> Such as these definitely cannot be trusted. > >Why not? You never did address Nadegda's question. Did so answer it! Nads typed: "Are ... are you k'laming that lesbians are somehow inherently untrustworthy? On what basis?" I said they can't be trusted because they are totally fucked in the head. Would you trust somebody who was fucked in the head. >Let's put this in more concrete terms. Suppose you run across a random >instance of a lesbian couple. Both are proudly out -- there's no closet >involved here (on which basis you could otherwise argue a history of >deceptive behavior). What is your evidence that, say, they are more >likely to go back on a deal or welch on a bet they lost than any random >pair of people? Please elaborate. Since they don't embrace the reality that sexual desire for same sex is abnormal then how can they be trusted to honor any other kind of social norm? IOW, their norm is abnormal. -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall "Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. (There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 13:26 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pe6skh$j13$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #167672 |
On 5/24/2018 11:01 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Sun, 20 May 2018 12:26:04 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 5/20/2018 10:52 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> On Thu, 17 May 2018 19:49:21 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>> Are ... are you k'laming that lesbians are somehow inherently >>>> untrustworthy? On what basis? >>> >>> A woman who wants another woman as a love >>> interest is totally fucked in the head. >> >> Proof, ko0k? > > Fucked in the head is to want to copulate with > the same sex. No further proof is needed. That's the fallacy of "begging the question". You have simply restated your conclusion, not proved it. >>> It's sinful and an abomination. >> >> According to one particular religion, which belongs in the dustbin of >> history, perhaps. > > LOL. Some dustbin as it contains billions of intelligent > and successful human beings. Not nearly as intelligent (q.v. the Flynn effect) or successful as modern humans. They didn't have the knowledge, math, or engineering abilities to fly, to build half-kilometer-tall skyscrapers, to join the British Isles to mainland Europe with a tunnel, and to put people on the *freaking moon*. > I said they can't be trusted because they are totally fucked > in the head. Would you trust somebody who was fucked in > the head. That would depend. But you have still failed to prove your "fucked in the head" k'lame. Unsurprisingly, since it's incorrect. > Since they don't embrace the reality that sexual > desire for same sex is abnormal then how can they > be trusted to honor any other kind of social norm? Since your premise is factually wrong, your conclusion does not follow from your argument. > IOW, their norm is abnormal. That's your opinion. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-20 13:44 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <LekMC.238377$DS3.10992@fx42.iad> |
| In reply to | #166674 |
On 5/20/2018 8:52 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > A woman who wants another woman as a love > interest is totally fucked in the head. You're a tad confused about female anatomy. :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-20 13:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b9p9sd.kui.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #166825 |
On 2018-05-20 12:44 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 5/20/2018 8:52 AM, Sir Gregory Hall,Ā Esq. wrote: > >> A woman who wants another woman as a love >> interest is totally fucked in the head. > > You're a tad confused about female anatomy.Ā :) in the head
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 11:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <59vbgdp4cek8imgj5ps9ooc6odpsfdkqpe@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #166825 |
On Sun, 20 May 2018 13:44:44 -0600, Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> wrote: >On 5/20/2018 8:52 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >> A woman who wants another woman as a love >> interest is totally fucked in the head. > >You're a tad confused about female anatomy. :) Cunnilingus is one way to be fucked in the head. LOL! -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall "Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. (There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 13:27 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pe6sli$j13$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #167675 |
On 5/24/2018 11:01 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > Cunnilingus is one way to be fucked in the head. And he wonders why no woman is interested in him ... -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 16:12 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <qclggd1r25pqm8e6vj8t0puu2l8i6bthkk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #167715 |
On Thu, 24 May 2018 13:27:10 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 5/24/2018 11:01 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> Cunnilingus is one way to be fucked in the head. > >And he wonders why no woman is interested in him ... That's an odd statement unless you are a man. Most women seem to enjoy cunnilingus, Paul, but I suppose you've never even had a woman? -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall "Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. (There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 15:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.35722d85af6df792993b36@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #168045 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <qclggd1r25pqm8e6vj8t0puu2l8i6bthkk@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > On Thu, 24 May 2018 13:27:10 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > > >On 5/24/2018 11:01 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >> Cunnilingus is one way to be fucked in the head. > > > >And he wonders why no woman is interested in him ... > > That's an odd statement unless you are a man. > > Most women seem to enjoy cunnilingus, Paul, but > I suppose you've never even had a woman? I don't even have a pussy, and I enjoy cunnilingus. -- Checkmate Ā® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright Ā© 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | turkey <turkey@invalid.none> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 11:43 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Craptain Kneel Warren is the fugliest faggot on Usenet! |
| Message-ID | <WsVOC.148748$mS3.112718@fx04.iad> |
| In reply to | #168045 |
On 5/25/2018 4:12 PM, Craptain Kneel Warren socked up as Sir Gregory Hall, Esqueer. wrote: > Most women seem to enjoy cunnilingus, Paul, but > I suppose you've never even had a woman? > Sir Gregory Hall, Esqueer wrote in Message-ID: <mu419d5t1e9p6or7a571d5n0po1t1mc9nn@4ax.com> "I told her (Miss Kitty) that she was so hawt that I decided to turn heterosexual." http://newsok.com/article/3542423 <---YAK!!! LOL!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-19 20:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b1871166-3e14-4690-9dc8-f117b42fd881@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #165744 |
On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 10:47:14 AM UTC-7, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <pdhg4b$1jqi$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 > @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > > > > To the extent that climate change reporters actually exist on TV?MSNBC's > > Rachel Maddow and Chris Hayes often cover climate stories, but cable > > news as a whole largely fails to?the Last Week Tonight host has proven > > himself among the smartest. He's mocked the absurdity of ?debating? > > climate change: > > > > Rachael Maddow is a carpet muncher. > > -- > Checkmate Ā® > Author, Humorist, Cynic > Philosopher, Humanitarian > Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars > Copyright Ā© 2018 > all rights reserved > > In loving memory of The Battle Kitten > May 2010-February 12, 2017 > > "There are many here among us, > who feel that life is but a joke." > > "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as > kensi." -Nadegda > Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me> fritos go with lunch
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-16 14:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <Jy_KC.47028$4M6.10643@fx27.iad> |
| In reply to | #165694 |
On 5/16/2018 10:44 AM, kensi wrote: > To the extent that climate change reporters actually exist on TVāMSNBC's > Rachel Maddow and Chris Hayes often cover climate stories, but cable > news as a whole largely fails toāthe Last Week Tonight host has proven > himself among the smartest. He's mocked the absurdity of ādebatingā > climate change: > > https://newrepublic.com/minutes/145563/john-oliver-best-climate-change-reporter-television The only thing John Oliver's mouth is good for is a cock holster for Donald Trump! Bwahahahahahaha! That has to be the funiest Lib joke EVER. Which is why I stole it! Come on you libs. LAUGH! you know you want to! Oliver pitted 97 "climate scientists" against 3 "deniers" and ended the climate debate forever (seeing as how all science is always decided by a majority vote of scientists and journalists).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rachel <goldarachel@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-20 13:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4c168234-b886-474a-a246-dc134f27030a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #165694 |
On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 7:44:29 AM UTC-7, kensi wrote: > To the extent that climate change reporters actually exist on TVāMSNBC's > Rachel Maddow and Chris Hayes often cover climate stories, but cable > news as a whole largely fails toāthe Last Week Tonight host has proven > himself among the smartest. He's mocked the absurdity of ādebatingā > climate change: > > https://newrepublic.com/minutes/145563/john-oliver-best-climate-change-reporter-television > > -- > "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain > the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks > "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade > in here." ~Checkmate i probably shouldn't say this, i'm in a bad mood, but re: john oliver... (and some of msnbc, like rachel) does he think climate change is funny, too?
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10]
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web