Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #165694 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-16 10:44 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-05-20 13:47 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 196 — 26 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-16 10:44 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 10:47 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-16 18:46 +0000
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 12:17 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-16 20:41 +0000
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 13:47 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-16 16:37 -0600
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 15:57 -0700
An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-18 14:15 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-18 19:32 +0000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-18 20:16 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. OT de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-19 10:25 +1000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-18 22:09 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 19:16 -0700
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-19 12:02 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-19 12:09 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-19 10:33 -0600
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:44 +0000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 17:28 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-19 03:37 +0000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 20:42 -0700
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-19 12:07 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-19 12:35 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-19 12:40 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-19 22:22 +0000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-19 21:34 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-20 03:15 +0000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-20 12:18 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-20 12:38 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:42 +0000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 17:26 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 16:42 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-17 00:30 +0000
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 17:34 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-05-17 05:07 +0000
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-17 19:48 +0000
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-17 13:53 -0600
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Anglo.Saxon <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-17 20:56 +0000
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 17:47 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 22:44 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-17 12:34 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 10:01 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-05-17 12:10 -0500
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-17 13:28 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-24 09:47 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-24 13:05 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-24 10:41 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-17 11:10 -0600
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-17 13:39 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-17 11:52 -0600
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-17 19:49 +0000
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-20 10:52 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-20 12:23 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-20 12:26 -0400
"Sex at Dawn" by Chris Ryan. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-20 10:01 -0700
Re: "Sex at Dawn" by Chris Ryan. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-20 23:38 -0400
Re: "Sex at Dawn" by Chris Ryan. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-21 00:11 -0400
Re: "Sex at Dawn" by Chris Ryan. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-21 04:33 +0000
Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-20 23:33 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-05-21 07:22 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 12:10 -0400
Nature herself punishes perverts. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-21 09:33 -0700
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-21 10:47 -0600
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-05-21 18:16 +0000
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-21 12:59 -0600
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-21 19:03 +0000
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 13:04 -0700
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-21 14:22 -0600
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-21 21:29 +0000
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-21 15:43 -0600
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 15:47 -0700
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-21 19:14 -0400
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 16:16 -0700
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 20:19 -0400
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 12:06 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Nature herself punishes perverts. ❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-05-21 14:30 -0500
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-21 20:56 +0100
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-21 23:05 +0100
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 16:11 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-21 09:08 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-21 09:31 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 12:37 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-21 10:50 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 12:05 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-21 19:05 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-21 13:36 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 13:05 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 16:24 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-24 11:01 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 16:15 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-21 21:30 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-21 15:41 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-22 03:29 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-21 23:23 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-24 11:01 -0400
Gregory Hall condems himself. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-24 10:14 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-24 13:21 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 18:31 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-05-24 22:39 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-24 17:50 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 20:37 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-24 18:43 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-25 04:47 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-25 07:42 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:49 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 10:40 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-25 11:08 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-25 09:23 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 12:08 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 17:45 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:53 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-25 16:12 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 18:11 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-26 11:41 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-25 21:49 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-25 16:01 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-25 23:41 +0100
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-26 11:42 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:47 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 10:32 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-24 11:52 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-24 17:50 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 20:25 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-25 00:09 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-25 00:32 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 21:52 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-25 04:49 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 10:42 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-25 05:34 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-25 00:03 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 10:57 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-25 11:24 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:55 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-25 12:41 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-25 21:50 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-25 16:01 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-25 22:16 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-25 16:26 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 03:41 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-25 23:56 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 06:39 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-26 04:25 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 03:52 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-26 06:04 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 19:57 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:50 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 13:08 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is all Neal Warren can hope for unless he fucks Debbie "shebeast" Carrick LOL! turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-05-28 11:35 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:14 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:11 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 19:58 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-26 14:07 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 22:27 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-26 16:42 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 23:34 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-26 18:18 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:39 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 07:07 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:47 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 19:51 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 02:00 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 21:10 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-26 21:36 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-26 18:45 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 07:05 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-27 12:47 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. rachel <goldarachel@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 16:16 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 17:21 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-27 20:10 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. rachel <goldarachel@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 17:14 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-05-28 16:50 -0500
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:54 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 22:28 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 20:15 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 20:03 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:34 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:32 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 15:15 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-25 07:49 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:58 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:58 -0400
We can't help them, the damage has been done. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-25 11:41 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 12:07 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-24 09:49 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-24 11:01 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-24 13:26 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-20 13:44 -0600
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 13:03 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-24 11:01 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-24 13:27 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-25 16:12 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 15:26 -0700
Re: Craptain Kneel Warren is the fugliest faggot on Usenet! turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-05-28 11:43 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 20:16 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 14:14 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television rachel <goldarachel@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 13:47 -0700
Page 3 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 10 Next page →
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 12:34 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <sd7pfd5c4gk73jmu32fp1qdcei59bm9ssp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #165775 |
On Wed, 16 May 2018 18:46:37 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >On Wed, 16 May 2018 10:47:12 -0700, Checkmate wrote: <...> >> Rachael Maddow is a carpet muncher. > >Even were that true -- so what? It IS true and the so what is as follows: Who the hell gives a shred of credibility to a damned lesbian? Lezbos ain't worth a second look . . . or listen. Hell, lezbos aren't worth a first listen. Such perverts! -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall "Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. (There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 10:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3567555b7c5817cb993a50@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #165929 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <sd7pfd5c4gk73jmu32fp1qdcei59bm9ssp@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > On Wed, 16 May 2018 18:46:37 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >On Wed, 16 May 2018 10:47:12 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > <...> > >> Rachael Maddow is a carpet muncher. > > > >Even were that true -- so what? > > It IS true and the so what is as follows: > Who the hell gives a shred of credibility > to a damned lesbian? Lezbos ain't worth > a second look . . . or listen. Hell, lezbos > aren't worth a first listen. Such perverts! The Butchy appearance, the fast-talking, the snarky little smirks... I can't stand the bitch. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pandora <pandora@peak.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 12:10 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1cqdnUq1GIsFKmDHnZ2dnUU7-YWdnZ2d@scnresearch.com> |
| In reply to | #165931 |
On Thu, 17 May 2018 10:01:49 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <sd7pfd5c4gk73jmu32fp1qdcei59bm9ssp@4ax.com>, > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > > >> On Wed, 16 May 2018 18:46:37 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >On Wed, 16 May 2018 10:47:12 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> <...> >> >> Rachael Maddow is a carpet muncher. >> > >> >Even were that true -- so what? >> >> It IS true and the so what is as follows: >> Who the hell gives a shred of credibility to a damned lesbian? Lezbos >> ain't worth a second look . . . or listen. Hell, lezbos aren't worth a >> first listen. Such perverts! > > The Butchy appearance, the fast-talking, the snarky little smirks... I > can't stand the bitch. I like her so there.....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 13:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pdke4t$jg8$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #165931 |
On 5/17/2018 1:01 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <sd7pfd5c4gk73jmu32fp1qdcei59bm9ssp@4ax.com>, > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >> On Wed, 16 May 2018 18:46:37 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 10:47:12 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> <...> >>>> Rachael Maddow is a carpet muncher. >>> >>> Even were that true -- so what? >> >> It IS true and the so what is as follows: >> Who the hell gives a shred of credibility >> to a damned lesbian? Lezbos ain't worth >> a second look . . . or listen. Hell, lezbos >> aren't worth a first listen. Such perverts! > > The Butchy appearance, the fast-talking, the snarky little smirks... I > can't stand the bitch. Would you let her drive your diesel pickup truck? -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 09:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pe6qc4$h92$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #165942 |
x-no-archive: yes On 5/17/2018 10:28 AM, mixed nuts wrote: > On 5/17/2018 1:01 PM, Checkmate wrote: >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <sd7pfd5c4gk73jmu32fp1qdcei59bm9ssp@4ax.com>, >> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 18:46:37 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 10:47:12 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>> <...> >>>>> Rachael Maddow is a carpet muncher. >>>> >>>> Even were that true -- so what? >>> >>> It IS true and the so what is as follows: >>> Who the hell gives a shred of credibility >>> to a damned lesbian? Lezbos ain't worth >>> a second look . . . or listen. Hell, lezbos >>> aren't worth a first listen. Such perverts! >> >> The Butchy appearance, the fast-talking, the snarky little smirks... I >> can't stand the bitch. > > Would you let her drive your diesel pickup truck? I think she makes $8,000,000/yr. Being "compassionate" sounds like a pretty good gig.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 13:05 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pe6rch$gmk$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #167701 |
On 5/24/2018 12:47 PM, Janithor wrote: > x-no-archive: yes > > On 5/17/2018 10:28 AM, mixed nuts wrote: >> On 5/17/2018 1:01 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <sd7pfd5c4gk73jmu32fp1qdcei59bm9ssp@4ax.com>, >>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 18:46:37 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 10:47:12 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>> <...> >>>>>> Rachael Maddow is a carpet muncher. >>>>> >>>>> Even were that true -- so what? >>>> >>>> It IS true and the so what is as follows: >>>> Who the hell gives a shred of credibility >>>> to a damned lesbian? Lezbos ain't worth >>>> a second look . . . or listen. Hell, lezbos >>>> aren't worth a first listen. Such perverts! >>> >>> The Butchy appearance, the fast-talking, the snarky little smirks... I >>> can't stand the bitch. >> >> Would you let her drive your diesel pickup truck? > > I think she makes $8,000,000/yr. Being "compassionate" sounds like a > pretty good gig. She's got Jeanine Pirro beat by a lot. Tomi Lahren too. And she likely doesn't get cussed out when she goes for brunch at the local pancake house. If she were more manly, but didn't harass the nubile honeys and get stuck with settlements, she could go full asshole, become the next Bill O'Reilly and triple her income. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 10:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pe6tfk$aul$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #167706 |
x-no-archive: yes On 5/24/2018 10:05 AM, mixed nuts wrote: > On 5/24/2018 12:47 PM, Janithor wrote: >> x-no-archive: yes >> >> On 5/17/2018 10:28 AM, mixed nuts wrote: >>> On 5/17/2018 1:01 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>> Checkmate! In article <sd7pfd5c4gk73jmu32fp1qdcei59bm9ssp@4ax.com>, >>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 18:46:37 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 10:47:12 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> <...> >>>>>>> Rachael Maddow is a carpet muncher. >>>>>> >>>>>> Even were that true -- so what? >>>>> >>>>> It IS true and the so what is as follows: >>>>> Who the hell gives a shred of credibility >>>>> to a damned lesbian? Lezbos ain't worth >>>>> a second look . . . or listen. Hell, lezbos >>>>> aren't worth a first listen. Such perverts! >>>> >>>> The Butchy appearance, the fast-talking, the snarky little smirks... I >>>> can't stand the bitch. >>> >>> Would you let her drive your diesel pickup truck? >> >> I think she makes $8,000,000/yr. Being "compassionate" sounds like a >> pretty good gig. > > She's got Jeanine Pirro beat by a lot. Tomi Lahren too. And she likely > doesn't get cussed out when she goes for brunch at the local pancake house. > > If she were more manly, but didn't harass the nubile honeys and get > stuck with settlements, she could go full asshole, become the next Bill > O'Reilly and triple her income. Dodge and evasion noted and recorded. Maybe Checky can archive this one.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 11:10 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <9rdrfdtqd24elbi6eo4s1nftu5j9i0n306@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #165929 |
On Thu, 17 May 2018 12:34:48 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: >On Wed, 16 May 2018 18:46:37 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>On Wed, 16 May 2018 10:47:12 -0700, Checkmate wrote: ><...> >>> Rachael Maddow is a carpet muncher. >> >>Even were that true -- so what? > >It IS true and the so what is as follows: >Who the hell gives a shred of credibility >to a damned lesbian? Lezbos ain't worth >a second look . . . or listen. Hell, lezbos >aren't worth a first listen. Such perverts! They like women, there is that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 13:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pdkens$kgm$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #165936 |
On 5/17/2018 1:10 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > On Thu, 17 May 2018 12:34:48 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." > <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: > >> On Wed, 16 May 2018 18:46:37 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 10:47:12 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> <...> >>>> Rachael Maddow is a carpet muncher. >>> >>> Even were that true -- so what? >> >> It IS true and the so what is as follows: >> Who the hell gives a shred of credibility >> to a damned lesbian? Lezbos ain't worth >> a second look . . . or listen. Hell, lezbos >> aren't worth a first listen. Such perverts! > > They like women, there is that. But, will they pay you $130K after they grab you by the pussy? -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 11:52 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <0bgrfdp59335ekl697fhbr6ao3vr3l3b20@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #165947 |
On Thu, 17 May 2018 13:39:05 -0400, mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: >On 5/17/2018 1:10 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >> On Thu, 17 May 2018 12:34:48 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." >> <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 18:46:37 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 10:47:12 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>> <...> >>>>> Rachael Maddow is a carpet muncher. >>>> >>>> Even were that true -- so what? >>> >>> It IS true and the so what is as follows: >>> Who the hell gives a shred of credibility >>> to a damned lesbian? Lezbos ain't worth >>> a second look . . . or listen. Hell, lezbos >>> aren't worth a first listen. Such perverts! >> >> They like women, there is that. > >But, will they pay you $130K after they grab you by the pussy? Most do.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-17 19:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pdkmc1$o01$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #165929 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 17 May 2018 12:34:48 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Wed, 16 May 2018 18:46:37 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>On Wed, 16 May 2018 10:47:12 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > <...> >>> Rachael Maddow is a carpet muncher. >> >>Even were that true -- so what? > > It IS true and the so what is as follows: > Who the hell gives a shred of credibility to a damned lesbian? Are ... are you k'laming that lesbians are somehow inherently untrustworthy? On what basis? -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-20 10:52 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <k6a1gdhtksfel4e35kb02marpji6224npi@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #165975 |
On Thu, 17 May 2018 19:49:21 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >On Thu, 17 May 2018 12:34:48 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Wed, 16 May 2018 18:46:37 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda<nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>On Wed, 16 May 2018 10:47:12 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> <...> >>>> Rachael Maddow is a carpet muncher. >>> >>>Even were that true -- so what? >> >> It IS true and the so what is as follows: >> Who the hell gives a shred of credibility to a damned lesbian? > >Are ... are you k'laming that lesbians are somehow inherently >untrustworthy? On what basis? A woman who wants another woman as a love interest is totally fucked in the head. It's not natural. It's freakish. It's sinful and an abomination. Such as these definitely cannot be trusted. -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall "Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. (There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-20 12:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <gihMC.100505$oR2.18725@fx25.iad> |
| In reply to | #166674 |
On 5/20/2018 10:52 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Thu, 17 May 2018 19:49:21 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> On Thu, 17 May 2018 12:34:48 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 18:46:37 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda<nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 10:47:12 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>> <...> >>>>> Rachael Maddow is a carpet muncher. >>>> >>>> Even were that true -- so what? >>> >>> It IS true and the so what is as follows: >>> Who the hell gives a shred of credibility to a damned lesbian? >> >> Are ... are you k'laming that lesbians are somehow inherently >> untrustworthy? On what basis? > > A woman who wants another woman as a love > interest is totally fucked in the head. It's > not natural. It's freakish. It's sinful and > an abomination. Such as these definitely cannot > be trusted. > It's called "feminism" Sir, Greg and is as natural as interspecies marriage.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-20 12:26 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pds7is$lps$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #166674 |
On 5/20/2018 10:52 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Thu, 17 May 2018 19:49:21 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> Are ... are you k'laming that lesbians are somehow inherently >> untrustworthy? On what basis? > > A woman who wants another woman as a love > interest is totally fucked in the head. Proof, ko0k? > It's not natural. Wrong: https://io9.gizmodo.com/5889691/female-bonobos-have-gay-sex-to-improve-their-social-status Also https://www.pride.com/lesbian2015/6/08/5-lesbian-animals-you-never-knew-played-your-team > It's freakish. Sometimes freakish is good. > It's sinful and an abomination. According to one particular religion, which belongs in the dustbin of history, perhaps. > Such as these definitely cannot be trusted. Why not? You never did address Nadegda's question. Let's put this in more concrete terms. Suppose you run across a random instance of a lesbian couple. Both are proudly out -- there's no closet involved here (on which basis you could otherwise argue a history of deceptive behavior). What is your evidence that, say, they are more likely to go back on a deal or welch on a bet they lost than any random pair of people? Please elaborate. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-20 10:01 -0700 |
| Subject | "Sex at Dawn" by Chris Ryan. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.20--10.01am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #166712 |
> io9.Gizmodo.COM/5889691/female-bonobos-have-gay-sex-to-improve-their-social-status Toss food into a room full of Chimps and the dominate males get most of it; if a female is in heat, she'll get more food ( food for sex ). Do the same with Bonobos, and they all have sex first, to settle it. Lesbian Bonobos help each other raise the kids; Chimps don't do this, they kill other's kids. Two days ago, Holly Randall interviewed "Sex at Dawn" author, Chris Ryan; see: YouTube.COM/watch?v=M9_iNW_JOYA 337 views, no comments and 9 likes ( one from me ).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-20 23:38 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: "Sex at Dawn" by Chris Ryan. |
| Message-ID | <kbrMC.129653$mS3.5424@fx04.iad> |
| In reply to | #166738 |
On 5/20/2018 1:01 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> io9.Gizmodo.COM/5889691/female-bonobos-have-gay-sex-to-improve-their-social-status > > Toss food into a room full of Chimps and the dominate males get most of it; > if a female is in heat, she'll get more food ( food for sex ). > > Do the same with Bonobos, and they all have sex first, to settle it. > Lesbian Bonobos help each other raise the kids; > Chimps don't do this, they kill other's kids. > > Two days ago, Holly Randall interviewed "Sex at Dawn" author, > Chris Ryan; see: YouTube.COM/watch?v=M9_iNW_JOYA > 337 views, no comments and 9 likes ( one from me ). > "Kanzi" is a bonobo and a lesbian too from what I hear.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-21 00:11 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: "Sex at Dawn" by Chris Ryan. |
| Message-ID | <pdtgtt$med$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #166970 |
On 5/20/2018 11:38 PM, benj wrote: >> >> > "Kanzi" is a bonobo and a lesbian too from what I hear. I don't think she's going to share her cookie with you no matter how much you jump around. Maybe you should try banging some oil drums with your head. -- Dinsdale
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-21 04:33 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: "Sex at Dawn" by Chris Ryan. |
| Message-ID | <pdti6p$jjt$30@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #166970 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sun, 20 May 2018 23:38:48 -0400, benj wrote: > On 5/20/2018 1:01 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>> io9.Gizmodo.COM/5889691/female-bonobos-have-gay-sex-to-improve-their- social-status >> >> Toss food into a room full of Chimps and the dominate males get most of >> it; >> if a female is in heat, she'll get more food ( food for sex ). >> >> Do the same with Bonobos, and they all have sex first, to settle it. >> Lesbian Bonobos help each other raise the kids; >> Chimps don't do this, they kill other's kids. >> >> Two days ago, Holly Randall interviewed "Sex at Dawn" author, >> Chris Ryan; see: YouTube.COM/watch?v=M9_iNW_JOYA 337 views, no >> comments and 9 likes ( one from me ). > > "Kanzi" is a bonobo and a lesbian too from what I hear. Fanfic -- kensi pwns you. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-20 23:33 -0700 |
| Subject | Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.20--11.33pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #166970 |
> > Two days ago, Holly Randall interviewed "Sex at Dawn" author, > > Chris Ryan; see: YouTube.COM/watch?v=M9_iNW_JOYA > > 337 views, no comments and 9 likes ( one from me ). > > [insult] Who breeds more ? poor, African Muslims or rich Japanese ? "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. To woo a girl, one must woo her tribe; but what if they're BlueEyed sorority sisters ? Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Perfection is the enemy of the LeastBad; so hold your nose, and go for it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-21 07:22 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. |
| Message-ID | <pdts35$i6j$2@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #166982 |
On Sun, 20 May 2018 23:33:55 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> > Two days ago, Holly Randall interviewed "Sex at Dawn" author, >> > Chris Ryan; see: YouTube.COM/watch?v=M9_iNW_JOYA 337 views, no >> > comments and 9 likes ( one from me ). >> >> [insult] > > Who breeds more ? poor, African Muslims or rich Japanese ? > "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. > > To woo a girl, one must woo her tribe; > but what if they're BlueEyed sorority sisters ? > > Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. > Perfection is the enemy of the LeastBad; > so hold your nose, and go for it. Are you one o' them "incel" weirdos, by any chance?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web