Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.checkmate > #168174 > unrolled thread

Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
First post2018-05-26 05:03 -0400
Last post2018-05-29 23:34 -0400
Articles 20 on this page of 431 — 26 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate


Contents

  Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-26 05:03 -0400
    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:30 -0400
      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 19:59 +0000
        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:56 -0400
          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 22:24 +0000
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-26 16:46 -0600
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:26 -0500
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 23:35 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:46 -0500
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-26 18:20 -0600
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 20:26 -0500
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 20:57 -0500
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:35 +0200
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:05 -0500
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:29 -0700
                              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
                                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:51 -0700
                                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:27 -0500
                                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:36 -0700
                                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
                                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-26 22:21 -0700
                                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:46 -0700
                              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:26 -0500
                                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:33 -0700
                                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-05-27 12:08 +0100
                                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:41 -0700
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:15 +0000
                              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:46 -0700
                                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:59 -0600
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 08:50 -0500
                              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:40 -0700
                                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 23:19 +0200
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:58 -0600
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 08:50 -0500
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:38 +0000
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 19:44 -0600
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:48 -0700
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:28 -0500
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:38 -0700
            Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 18:30 -0700
              Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
                Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 18:54 -0700
                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-27 02:04 +0000
                    Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:36 +0200
                      Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:07 -0500
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:11 -0400
                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
                    Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
                      Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:32 -0500
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:51 -0700
                      Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:16 +0000
                        Nadegda must be proud. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-27 00:44 -0700
                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:43 -0400
                            "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-27 02:49 -0700
                              Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:38 -0400
                              Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:30 -0400
                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:29 -0400
                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 17:16 -0700
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:08 +0000
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:21 -0600
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:08 -0400
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-29 21:36 -0400
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 19:43 -0700
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-31 19:13 -0400
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-07 07:00 -0500
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 12:06 +0000
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-10 09:36 -0400
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-10 13:07 -0400
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-11 02:41 +0000
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:43 -0700
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-13 00:33 +0000
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 17:36 -0700
                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-16 21:16 +0000
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 14:22 -0700
                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-16 21:29 +0000
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 14:36 -0700
                                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-16 21:56 +0000
                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:50 -0700
                                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-18 00:38 +0000
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 17:59 -0700
                                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-18 01:05 +0000
                                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:08 -0700
                                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:58 -0700
                                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:02 -0700
                                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:57 -0700
                                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:01 -0700
                                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:06 -0700
                                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:08 -0700
                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-16 22:51 +0000
                                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:57 -0700
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 17:43 -0700
                                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 17:53 -0700
                                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 18:52 -0700
                                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 18:58 -0700
                                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 19:51 -0700
                                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-16 17:05 -0600
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-16 23:30 +0000
                                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-16 17:41 -0600
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-16 19:40 -0400
                                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-16 17:42 -0600
                                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 20:26 -0400
                                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 17:41 -0700
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 17:51 -0700
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-16 23:11 -0400
                                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-17 05:25 -0600
                                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-17 09:26 -0400
                                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-17 07:28 -0600
                                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-17 10:03 -0400
                                                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-17 08:06 -0600
                                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-17 10:31 -0400
                                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-17 11:05 -0400
                                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-17 12:27 -0400
                                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-18 00:39 +0000
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:00 -0700
                                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-18 01:06 +0000
                                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:11 -0700
                                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:01 -0700
                                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:04 -0700
                                                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 19:15 -0700
                                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:59 -0700
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:00 -0700
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 18:55 -0700
                                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:20 -0700
                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:27 -0700
                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:53 -0700
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 14:43 -0700
                                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 14:48 -0700
                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 14:51 -0700
                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:19 -0700
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 15:52 -0700
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-13 06:55 +0000
                                        BlueEyed Feminism. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-10 12:06 -0700
                                          Re: BlueEyed Feminism. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-13 00:28 +0000
                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:41 +0000
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 19:53 -0600
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 21:12 -0600
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 06:03 +0000
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 00:11 -0600
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 16:47 -0700
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:51 +0000
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 22:26 -0500
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 04:28 +0000
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:59 -0400
                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:13 -0400
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:28 -0600
                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:31 -0400
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:43 -0600
                                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 11:20 -0400
                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 09:46 -0600
                                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:12 +0000
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:23 -0600
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 13:02 -0400
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:36 -0400
                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:15 +0000
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:17 +0200
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:23 -0600
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:13 -0400
                                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:11 -0400
                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:46 -0600
                                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:45 -0400
                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:25 -0400
                                                            Body Shaming ? I smell a feminist. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-30 13:04 -0700
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 05:57 -0600
                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:16 +0000
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:18 +0200
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:24 -0600
                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-29 17:07 -0400
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:22 -0600
                                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:16 -0400
                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:49 -0600
                                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:50 -0400
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:07 +0000
                                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:52 -0400
                                                            " White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-30 13:27 -0700
                                                              Re: " White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0700
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:17 -0400
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:48 -0700
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:15 -0400
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:29 -0600
                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:17 +0000
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:19 +0200
                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:27 -0600
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:31 +0000
                                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:35 +0200
                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-29 17:11 -0400
                                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:22 -0600
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:46 -0600
                                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:51 -0600
                                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:59 -0600
                                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 16:08 -0600
                                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:36 -0600
                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0400
                                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:49 -0600
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
                                                                  "kensi" is not smarter than the market. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-31 05:47 -0700
                                                                    Re: "kensi" is not smarter than the market. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 05:25 -0400
                                                                      "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-01 05:42 -0700
                                                                        Re: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 09:48 -0400
                                                                          You know fuck all, trust me. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-01 07:01 -0700
                                                                            Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 10:36 -0400
                                                                              Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 09:48 -0500
                                                                                India digs porn; China can't see most of the Internet. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-01 08:42 -0700
                                                                                Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-06-01 09:41 -0700
                                                                                Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 19:28 -0400
                                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 20:22 -0400
                                                                              Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-01 08:49 -0600
                                                                                Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-01 17:51 +0100
                                                                                Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 12:18 +0200
                                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-01 13:22 -0600
                                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 12:33 +0200
                                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 12:58 -0700
                                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 14:56 +0200
                                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-06-03 11:55 -0400
                                                                                Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:09 +0000
                                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:28 -0400
                                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 11:26 -0600
                                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 10:41 +0200
                                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-02 19:38 +0100
                                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 11:43 +0200
                                                                                          Re: You know fuck all, trust me. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-06-02 21:02 +0100
                                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:49 -0400
                                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 11:52 -0600
                                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:56 -0400
                                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-06-03 11:56 -0400
                                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 20:31 +0000
                                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:36 -0700
                                                                                          Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 20:37 +0000
                                                                                            Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:42 -0700
                                                                                            Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-03 15:22 -0600
                                                                                              Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 22:25 +0100
                                                                                                Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-04 04:48 +0000
                                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
                                                                              The job market. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-01 08:18 -0700
                                                                                Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:10 +0000
                                                                                  Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:29 -0400
                                                                                    Re: The job market. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:49 -0400
                                                                                      Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:28 -0400
                                                                                        Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:00 +0000
                                                                                          Re: The job market. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 14:03 -0700
                                                                                          Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 14:32 -0700
                                                                                            Re: The job market. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 17:19 -0600
                                                                                          Re: The job market. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 17:18 -0600
                                                                                          Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:55 -0400
                                                                                            Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 00:05 +0000
                                                                                              Re: The job market. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 18:20 -0600
                                                                                                Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:56 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: The job market. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-06-03 04:03 +0000
                                                                                                    Re: The job market. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 22:07 -0600
                                                                                                  Re: The job market. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-06-03 12:02 -0400
                                                                                                    Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 12:45 -0700
                                                                                              Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:54 -0700
                                                                                                Re: The job market. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-06-03 11:59 -0400
                                                                                                Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 20:31 +0000
                                                                                                  Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 14:16 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 23:04 +0100
                                                                                                      Re: The job market. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:08 -0700
                                                                                                        Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 23:11 +0100
                                                                                                      Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 01:35 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: The job market. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-04 09:01 -0400
                                                                                      Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:34 -0400
                                                                                  Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
                                                                              Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:07 -0400
                                                                              Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 19:27 -0400
                                                                                Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 20:21 -0400
                                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:12 +0000
                                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:41 -0400
                                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:52 -0400
                                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:32 -0400
                                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-06-03 15:23 -0400
                                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 21:22 +0100
                                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:26 -0700
                                                                                          Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 21:32 +0100
                                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
                                                                              Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-06-01 19:53 -0500
                                                                            Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 09:44 -0500
                                                                              Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:14 +0000
                                                                                Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:47 -0400
                                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:02 +0000
                                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:58 -0400
                                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 00:07 +0000
                                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 18:20 -0600
                                                                          Re: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:35 -0400
                                                              Why does this concern you, exactly ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-30 14:43 -0700
                                                                Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:41 -0400
                                                                  Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-31 05:12 -0700
                                                                    Re: Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:03 -0700
                                                                  Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 20:14 +0000
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:33 +0200
                                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:42 -0600
                                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:50 +0200
                                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:00 -0600
                                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 15:21 -0600
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:26 -0600
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:49 -0400
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:18 -0400
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:43 -0400
                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:19 +0000
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:28 -0600
                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:36 +0200
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:43 -0600
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:08 -0700
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:52 +0000
                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:18 -0400
                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-05-27 11:33 -0500
                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:42 +0000
                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 19:53 -0600
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 21:12 -0600
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:38 -0400
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:30 -0400
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:12 -0700
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 19:40 -0500
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 18:38 -0700
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:09 -0500
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:56 -0700
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 22:20 -0400
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:24 -0500
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 19:29 +0200
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 23:25 -0400
                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 11:02 +0000
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:52 -0700
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-27 12:10 +0100
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:13 -0400
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 11:26 -0500
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:04 -0700
                              Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 23:18 +0200
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 11:02 +0000
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:30 -0700
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:43 -0700
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 05:39 +0000
                              Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 02:33 -0400
                                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 06:50 +0000
                                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 00:53 -0700
                                    Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-09 01:48 +0000
                                      Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 19:14 -0700
                                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 11:44 -0400
                              Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 23:43 -0700
                                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 07:28 -0700
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 11:57 +0000
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 05:38 +0000
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 02:26 -0400
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 12:00 +0000
                              Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-11 02:47 +0000
                                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:50 -0700
                                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-11 05:49 -0600
                                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-11 08:01 -0400
                                    Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-11 06:07 -0600
                                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-13 00:30 +0000
                                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 21:19 -0700
                                    Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-16 21:17 +0000
                                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-12 23:27 -0500
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:55 -0700
                  Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:30 -0500
                    Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:18 +0000
                      Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:41 -0700
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 07:09 -0600
                  Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-27 11:43 -0400
                    Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 10:17 -0600
                      Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-27 13:11 -0400
                        Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 11:17 -0600
                  Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:43 +0000
                    Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:10 -0700
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                  Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:18 -0400
                    Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:32 -0400
                      Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 08:36 -0600
                      Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:55 +0000
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:34 +0000
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:22 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:52 -0400
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:54 -0400
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:37 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:05 +0000
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 18:02 -0600
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:08 -0400
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 18:25 -0600
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-03 10:59 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-02 18:01 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-06 01:38 +0000
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-06 03:49 +0000
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-06 06:44 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-06 16:18 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 10:53 +0000
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-07 07:58 -0400
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-06-06 07:39 -0600
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-06-06 17:39 -0500
        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 14:05 -0700
          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:20 -0400
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 08:37 -0600
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:39 -0400
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 08:48 -0600
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-28 17:32 +0100
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 13:38 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-28 11:51 -0600
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:57 +0000
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:55 -0400
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:19 -0400
                              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:30 -0600
                              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:50 -0400
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:03 -0600
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:03 -0600
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 14:46 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 15:16 -0400
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:22 -0400
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 06:31 -0600
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-29 16:20 +0100
                              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 09:43 -0600
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:56 -0400
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:22 +0000
                              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-29 14:37 -0600
                                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:34 -0400
                                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-30 11:50 -0600
                                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:23 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 19:40 -0400
      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-04 19:33 +1000
        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:20 -0400
    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-29 23:34 -0400

Page 11 of 22 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 22  Next page →


#169704 — Re: Nadegda must be proud.

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-05-30 13:33 -0400
SubjectRe: Nadegda must be proud.
Message-ID<pemn8e$u13$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#169482
On 5/29/2018 4:36 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 14:27:57 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>>> they want more money than a job is worth
>>
>> No, they just want it to pay enough to actually cover an adult's cost of
>> living in the area where the job is located.
> 
> People want morons like you to feed them, they are brought up to be
> lazy and expecting. There are plenty of jobs, I would work for meager
> wages than sit on my ass collecting dole money while crying about it
> all the time. California comes to mind.

https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/07/11/jobs-you-cant-afford-to-take/

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#169712 — Re: Nadegda must be proud.

FromSkeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-05-30 11:49 -0600
SubjectRe: Nadegda must be proud.
Message-ID<b1ptgdtfo189l67dqjd7ne3of4lgr5lc91@4ax.com>
In reply to#169704
On Wed, 30 May 2018 13:33:01 -0400, kensi
<kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:

>On 5/29/2018 4:36 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 14:27:57 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>>>> they want more money than a job is worth
>>>
>>> No, they just want it to pay enough to actually cover an adult's cost of
>>> living in the area where the job is located.
>> 
>> People want morons like you to feed them, they are brought up to be
>> lazy and expecting. There are plenty of jobs, I would work for meager
>> wages than sit on my ass collecting dole money while crying about it
>> all the time. California comes to mind.
>
>https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/07/11/jobs-you-cant-afford-to-take/


Then you take 2 or look for something else...ya maroon.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#169800 — Re: Nadegda must be proud.

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
SubjectRe: Nadegda must be proud.
Message-ID<peogk5$1nht$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#169712
On 5/30/2018 1:49 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2018 13:33:01 -0400, kensi
> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/07/11/jobs-you-cant-afford-to-take/
> 
> Then you take 2 or look for something else...ya maroon.

You were already spanked silly on this a few days ago. And besides, the 
job described at the link actually has /net negative pay/ due to the 
costs it will incur for the sucker who actually signs up for it. Oh, 
*and* as the article (which you obviously did not read and probably did 
not even skim properly) described, that job is virtually incompatible 
with holding any other job simultaneously.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#169807 — "kensi" is not smarter than the market.

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2018-05-31 05:47 -0700
Subject"kensi" is not smarter than the market.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@May.31--5.47am.Seattle.2018>
In reply to#169800
"kensi" replied:
> > > counterpunch.org/2017/07/11/jobs-you-cant-afford-to-take/
> > 
> > Then you take 2 or look for something else...ya maroon.
> 
> the job described at the link actually has /net negative pay/ 
> due to the costs it will incur for the sucker who signs up for it.

You're not smarter than the market.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#170002 — Re: "kensi" is not smarter than the market.

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-06-01 05:25 -0400
SubjectRe: "kensi" is not smarter than the market.
Message-ID<per3el$21o$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#169807
On 5/31/2018 8:47 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> "kensi" replied:
>>>> counterpunch.org/2017/07/11/jobs-you-cant-afford-to-take/
>>>
>>> Then you take 2 or look for something else...ya maroon.
>>
>> the job described at the link actually has /net negative pay/
>> due to the costs it will incur for the sucker who signs up for it.
> 
> You're not smarter than the market.

The fuck's that supposed to mean, k0Oky?

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#170016 — "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God,

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2018-06-01 05:42 -0700
Subject"kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God,
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.1--5.42am.Seattle.2018>
In reply to#170002
"kensi" replied:
> > > the job described at the link actually has /net negative pay/
> > > due to the costs it will incur for the sucker who signs up for it.
> > 
> > You're not smarter than the (job) market.
> 
> The fuck's that supposed to mean, k0Oky?

It's a (job) market.
Even if _most_ people don't want the job, some do.

You ("kensi") think you're some kind of AllKnowing God,
so damn smart that none of the rest of us should be allowed to think. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#170027 — Re: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God,

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-06-01 09:48 -0400
SubjectRe: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God,
Message-ID<perirv$v96$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#170016
On 6/1/2018 8:42 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> "kensi" replied:
>>>> the job described at the link actually has /net negative pay/
>>>> due to the costs it will incur for the sucker who signs up for it.
>>>
>>> You're not smarter than the (job) market.
>>
>> The fuck's that supposed to mean, k0Oky?
> 
> It's a (job) market.
> Even if _most_ people don't want the job, some do.
> 
> You ("kensi") think you're some kind of AllKnowing God,
> so damn smart that none of the rest of us should be allowed to think.

No, I just know scams and ripoffs when I see them.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#170032 — You know fuck all, trust me.

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2018-06-01 07:01 -0700
SubjectYou know fuck all, trust me.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.1--7.01am.Seattle.2018>
In reply to#170027
"kensi" replied:
> > It's a (job) market.
> > Even if _most_ people don't want the job, some do.
> > 
> > You ("kensi") think you're some kind of AllKnowing God,
> > so damn smart that none of the rest of us should be allowed to think.
> 
> No, I just know scams and ripoffs when I see them.

You know fuck all, trust me.
You're just arrogant, patronizing.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#170044 — Re: You know fuck all, trust me.

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-06-01 10:36 -0400
SubjectRe: You know fuck all, trust me.
Message-ID<perlm8$14jj$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#170032
On 6/1/2018 10:01 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> "kensi" replied:
>>> It's a (job) market.
>>> Even if _most_ people don't want the job, some do.
>>>
>>> You ("kensi") think you're some kind of AllKnowing God,
>>> so damn smart that none of the rest of us should be allowed to think.
>>
>> No, I just know scams and ripoffs when I see them.
> 
> You know fuck all, trust me.

That's not what the faculty thought when they granted me my Ph.D. ...

> You're just arrogant, patronizing.

I see you have run out of actual arguments to substantiate your 
position. (Which you never did state clearly, by the way.)

I win.

*snicker*

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#170050 — Re: You know fuck all, trust me.

FromYour Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2018-06-01 09:48 -0500
SubjectRe: You know fuck all, trust me.
Message-ID<3sGdnVmUeYhEwYzGnZ2dnUU7-S_NnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#170044
On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 10:36:54 -0400, LO AND BEHOLD; "kensi
<kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>" determined that the following was
of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us
in <perlm8$14jj$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
 
>On 6/1/2018 10:01 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>"kensi" replied:
>>>>It's a (job) market. Even if _most_ people don't want the job, some do. 
>>>>You ("kensi") think you're some kind of AllKnowing God, so damn smart
>>>>that none of the rest of us should be allowed to think.
>>>No, I just know scams and ripoffs when I see them.
>>You know fuck all, trust me.
>
>That's not what the faculty thought when they granted me my Ph.D. ...

oh, i've met some ph.d's... there are plenty who know everything about one narrow field of study and can barely function in the world, otherwise.

i wouldn't let your Ph.D. get in the way of continuing to grow and learn as a human, if i were you.

>>You're just arrogant, patronizing.
>
>I see you have run out of actual arguments to substantiate your
>position. (Which you never did state clearly, by the way.)
>
>I win.
>
>*snicker* 

you're talking like a conservative now?

-- 
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA

"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this 
seems to be the new norm in the world.  It's spreading like a cancer, 
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil.  We need to put an 
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell 
everywhere.  We need to get these people out of every civilized 
country, and there's only one way to do it.  IOW, we have to become 
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) 

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working.  We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too.  One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode 

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#170063 — India digs porn; China can't see most of the Internet.

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2018-06-01 08:42 -0700
SubjectIndia digs porn; China can't see most of the Internet.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.1--8.42am.Seattle.2018>
In reply to#170050
Mr. "Your" [sic] replied to Ms. "kensi" [sic]:
> > > You ( "kensi" [sic] ) know fuck all about the job market.
> > > You're just arrogant, patronizing.
> >
> > I see you have run out of actual arguments to substantiate your
> > position. ( Which you never did state clearly, by the way. )
> > I win.  *snicker* 
> 
> you're talking like a conservative now?

This whole " I know better than the market; every detail, always. "
concept is what's wrong with feminists and communists.

Democratic India has sofware; Communist China has hardware.
India digs porn; China can't see most of the Internet.
Amazon and MicroSoft, in Seattle, aren't hardware vendors.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#170068 — Re: You know fuck all, trust me.

FromJanithor <Janithor@comcast.net>
Date2018-06-01 09:41 -0700
SubjectRe: You know fuck all, trust me.
Message-ID<persvh$nd1$1@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#170050
On 6/1/2018 7:48 AM, Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder 
Emeritus 🐶笛 wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 10:36:54 -0400, LO AND BEHOLD; "kensi
> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>" determined that the following was
> of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us
> in <perlm8$14jj$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
>   
>> On 6/1/2018 10:01 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>> "kensi" replied:
>>>>> It's a (job) market. Even if _most_ people don't want the job, some do.
>>>>> You ("kensi") think you're some kind of AllKnowing God, so damn smart
>>>>> that none of the rest of us should be allowed to think.
>>>> No, I just know scams and ripoffs when I see them.
>>> You know fuck all, trust me.
>>
>> That's not what the faculty thought when they granted me my Ph.D. ...
> 
> oh, i've met some ph.d's... there are plenty who know everything about one narrow field of study and can barely function in the world, otherwise.
> 
> i wouldn't let your Ph.D. get in the way of continuing to grow and learn as a human, if i were you.
> 
>>> You're just arrogant, patronizing.
>>
>> I see you have run out of actual arguments to substantiate your
>> position. (Which you never did state clearly, by the way.)
>>
>> I win.
>>
>> *snicker*
> 
> you're talking like a conservative now?

FNPWH = 1
Kensipaul = 0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#170175 — Re: You know fuck all, trust me.

From"Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net>
Date2018-06-01 19:28 -0400
SubjectRe: You know fuck all, trust me.
Message-ID<pesmee$d91$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#170050

"Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus🐶笛" 
<root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message 
news:3sGdnVmUeYhEwYzGnZ2dnUU7-S_NnZ2d@giganews.com...
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 10:36:54 -0400, LO AND BEHOLD; "kensi
> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>" determined that the following was
> of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us
> in <perlm8$14jj$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
>
>>On 6/1/2018 10:01 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>>"kensi" replied:
>>>>>It's a (job) market. Even if _most_ people don't want the job, some do.
>>>>>You ("kensi") think you're some kind of AllKnowing God, so damn smart
>>>>>that none of the rest of us should be allowed to think.
>>>>No, I just know scams and ripoffs when I see them.
>>>You know fuck all, trust me.
>>
>>That's not what the faculty thought when they granted me my Ph.D. ...
>
> oh, i've met some ph.d's... there are plenty who know everything about one 
> narrow field of study and can barely function in the world, otherwise.
>
> i wouldn't let your Ph.D. get in the way of continuing to grow and learn 
> as a human, if i were you.


I would just note that we apparently haven't hit kensi's narrow field of 
study yet.
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#170185 — Re: You know fuck all, trust me.

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-06-01 20:22 -0400
SubjectRe: You know fuck all, trust me.
Message-ID<LrlQC.267397$LR2.228290@fx41.iad>
In reply to#170175
On 6/1/2018 7:28 PM, Scout wrote:
> 
> 
> "Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus🐶笛" 
> <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message 
> news:3sGdnVmUeYhEwYzGnZ2dnUU7-S_NnZ2d@giganews.com...
>> On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 10:36:54 -0400, LO AND BEHOLD; "kensi
>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>" determined that the following was
>> of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us
>> in <perlm8$14jj$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
>>
>>> On 6/1/2018 10:01 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>>> "kensi" replied:
>>>>>> It's a (job) market. Even if _most_ people don't want the job, 
>>>>>> some do.
>>>>>> You ("kensi") think you're some kind of AllKnowing God, so damn smart
>>>>>> that none of the rest of us should be allowed to think.
>>>>> No, I just know scams and ripoffs when I see them.
>>>> You know fuck all, trust me.
>>>
>>> That's not what the faculty thought when they granted me my Ph.D. ...
>>
>> oh, i've met some ph.d's... there are plenty who know everything about 
>> one narrow field of study and can barely function in the world, 
>> otherwise.
>>
>> i wouldn't let your Ph.D. get in the way of continuing to grow and 
>> learn as a human, if i were you.
> 
> 
> I would just note that we apparently haven't hit kensi's narrow field of 
> study yet.
> 
> 
I'm guessing it's the "physics of journalism".

"ASStrophysics" ...get it?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#170051 — Re: You know fuck all, trust me.

FromSkeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-06-01 08:49 -0600
SubjectRe: You know fuck all, trust me.
Message-ID<57n2hd5nrc1e6quh26v323fruunplbqp0c@4ax.com>
In reply to#170044
On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 10:36:54 -0400, kensi
<kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:

>> 
>> You know fuck all, trust me.
>
>That's not what the faculty thought when they granted me my Ph.D. ...


But you don't have a PhD

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#170071 — Re: You know fuck all, trust me.

Fromonion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on)
Date2018-06-01 17:51 +0100
SubjectRe: You know fuck all, trust me.
Message-ID<1npq9kt.l82tvl1m76a27N%onion@anon.invalid>
In reply to#170051
Skeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 10:36:54 -0400, kensi
> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
> 
> >> 
> >> You know fuck all, trust me.
> >
> >That's not what the faculty thought when they granted me my Ph.D. ...
> 
> But you don't have a PhD

nope

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#170096 — Re: You know fuck all, trust me.

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-06-01 12:18 +0200
SubjectRe: You know fuck all, trust me.
Message-ID<baornu.sqn.19.2@news.alt.net>
In reply to#170051
On 2018-06-01 4:49 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 10:36:54 -0400, kensi
> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
> 
>>>
>>> You know fuck all, trust me.
>>
>> That's not what the faculty thought when they granted me my Ph.D. ...
> 
> 
> But you don't have a PhD
> 
and i'm not lending him mine

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#170101 — Re: You know fuck all, trust me.

FromSkeeter DoW #420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-06-01 13:22 -0600
SubjectRe: You know fuck all, trust me.
Message-ID<n673hd1cfrbi8vjdn844p1rp25nk4m8to3@4ax.com>
In reply to#170096
On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 12:18:42 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 2018-06-01 4:49 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>> On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 10:36:54 -0400, kensi
>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>>>
>>>> You know fuck all, trust me.
>>>
>>> That's not what the faculty thought when they granted me my Ph.D. ...
>> 
>> 
>> But you don't have a PhD
>> 
>and i'm not lending him mine


Not worth anything these days anyway.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#170107 — Re: You know fuck all, trust me.

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-06-01 12:33 +0200
SubjectRe: You know fuck all, trust me.
Message-ID<baosj3.63f.19.1@news.alt.net>
In reply to#170101
On 2018-06-01 9:22 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 12:18:42 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2018-06-01 4:49 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>>> On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 10:36:54 -0400, kensi
>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You know fuck all, trust me.
>>>>
>>>> That's not what the faculty thought when they granted me my Ph.D. ...
>>>
>>>
>>> But you don't have a PhD
>>>
>> and i'm not lending him mine
> 
> 
> Not worth anything these days anyway.
> 
not much really unless you go to some back woods out post some place

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#170130 — Re: You know fuck all, trust me.

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-06-01 12:58 -0700
SubjectRe: You know fuck all, trust me.
Message-ID<MPG.357b45366f9dacbc993be6@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#170101
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <n673hd1cfrbi8vjdn844p1rp25nk4m8to3@4ax.com>, 
fnvw@invalid.invalid says...


> 
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 12:18:42 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >On 2018-06-01 4:49 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
> >> On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 10:36:54 -0400, kensi
> >> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
> >> 
> >>>>
> >>>> You know fuck all, trust me.
> >>>
> >>> That's not what the faculty thought when they granted me my Ph.D. ...
> >> 
> >> 
> >> But you don't have a PhD
> >> 
> >and i'm not lending him mine
> 
> 
> Not worth anything these days anyway.

Asswurm couldn't even spell PhD, much less earn one with all of his 
intelligents.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 11 of 22 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 22  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate


csiph-web