Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #230496 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-11-27 05:16 -0500 |
| Last post | 2018-11-29 18:48 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 85 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: By definition, geniuses are rare. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 05:16 -0500
Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-27 06:33 -0800
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 06:08 -0500
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 09:51 -0800
Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-28 06:37 -0800
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 07:44 -0700
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:48 -0500
99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-28 07:39 -0800
Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 12:00 -0500
Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 10:03 -0700
Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:37 -0500
Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:36 -0500
Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:35 -0500
The graviton, string theory, and bullshit worlds. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-29 06:19 -0800
Re: The graviton, string theory, and bullshit worlds. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 10:21 -0500
We don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-29 08:31 -0800
Re: We don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 06:11 -0500
Kensi's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-30 05:09 -0800
Re: Relf's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:29 -0500
Re: Relf's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 21:00 +0000
Re: Relf's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:27 -0500
Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-30 13:46 -0800
Re: Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-30 16:41 -0600
Re: Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:28 -0500
Kensi is the KoOky one. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-01 06:28 -0800
Re: Kensi is the KoOky one. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 09:33 -0500
See ? ! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-01 06:48 -0800
Re: See ? ! kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 09:55 -0500
I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-01 07:04 -0800
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:27 -0500
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 12:13 -0500
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:09 +0000
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:18 -0800
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-02 09:31 -0500
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:35 -0700
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-02 14:47 -0800
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:51 -0700
Re: See ? ! kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:27 -0500
Re: See ? ! "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 11:47 -0500
Re: See ? ! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 10:48 -0700
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:43 -0700
Re: See ? ! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:10 +0000
Re: See ? ! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 07:17 -0600
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-03 08:05 -0700
Re: See ? ! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 10:48 -0700
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:44 -0700
Re: See ? ! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 12:49 -0700
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:54 -0700
Re: See ? ! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 13:02 -0700
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 15:10 -0700
Re: See ? ! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 15:22 -0700
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 18:43 -0700
Re: Kensi is the KoOky one. Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 21:52 -0600
Re: Kensi is the KoOky one. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 12:09 -0500
Re: Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:51 -0700
Re: Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-01 11:48 -0600
Re: Kensi's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 12:28 -0500
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 15:23 -0800
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 12:33 -0600
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-28 15:54 -0500
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 18:51 -0800
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-28 13:54 -0800
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 14:57 -0700
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-28 20:26 -0600
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:45 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 05:17 -0800
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-29 09:43 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:49 -0500
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:08 -0700
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-29 17:40 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 16:15 -0600
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:08 -0700
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 16:17 -0600
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 17:22 -0500
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 07:46 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 00:55 -0700
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-30 09:49 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:50 -0700
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-30 09:59 -0600
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:49 -0500
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 20:08 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 13:19 -0700
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 12:09 -0800
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 12:48 -0800
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:48 -0700
Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 Next page →
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 07:27 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Relf's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. |
| Message-ID | <pttuna$fkc$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #231823 |
On 11/30/2018 4:00 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 11:29:31 -0500, kensi wrote: > >> On 11/30/2018 8:09 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> !> The Copenhagen Interpretation was right; and it still is. >> >> KoOkiness l3v3l: Rayo's number. > > I'm not even going to ask. I'm instead going to presume this is a likely > typo of "R'Lyeh's number" LOL > and leave it at that. :) OK, I'll wait until you have gotten more Tylenol then. *snicker* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-30 13:46 -0800 |
| Subject | Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.30--1.46pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #231742 |
Kensi replied: > > You're making useless, unfalsifiable assumptions ( bullshit worlds ), > > and you're straying far from accepted science ( Lambda, CDM ). > > If so, then I'm in distinguished company. Everett, Wheeler, Hawking, > Deutsch, DeWitt, Tipler, Albrecht, Zurek, Polley, Sebens, Carroll, > Vaidman, Lockwood, Tegmark ... Because science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ > > The Copenhagen Interpretation was right; and it still is. > > KoOkiness l3v3l: Rayo's number. ...she said, contemplating her life.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-30 16:41 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ |
| Message-ID | <RYOdnXNn_t8AIZzBnZ2dnUU7-cHNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #231830 |
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:46:58 -0800 (Seattle), LO AND BEHOLD; Jeff-Relf.Me @. determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.30--1.46pm.Seattle.2018>: โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Kensi replied: โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก You're making useless, unfalsifiable assumptions ( bullshit worlds ), โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก and you're straying far from accepted science ( Lambda, CDM ). โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก If so, then I'm in distinguished company. Everett, Wheeler, Hawking, โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Deutsch, DeWitt, Tipler, Albrecht, Zurek, Polley, Sebens, Carroll, โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Vaidman, Lockwood, Tegmark ... โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Because science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ does it sell better than fossil fuels do, k0ok? is the science fiction industry propped up by taxpayer subsidies? <snip> -- [THIS POAST HAS PASSED TRIMCHECKยฎ VALIDATION] THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 07:28 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ |
| Message-ID | <pttup7$fkc$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #231830 |
On 11/30/2018 4:46 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Kensi replied: >>> You're making useless, unfalsifiable assumptions ( bullshit worlds ), >>> and you're straying far from accepted science ( Lambda, CDM ). >> >> If so, then I'm in distinguished company. Everett, Wheeler, Hawking, >> Deutsch, DeWitt, Tipler, Albrecht, Zurek, Polley, Sebens, Carroll, >> Vaidman, Lockwood, Tegmark ... > > Because science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ > >>> The Copenhagen Interpretation was right; and it still is. >> >> KoOkiness l3v3l: Rayo's number. > > ...she said, contemplating her life. OK, since you're evidently reduced to IKYABWAIs now let's just consider the matter closed shall we? *does a little victory dance* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 06:28 -0800 |
| Subject | Kensi is the KoOky one. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Dec.1--6.28am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #231918 |
You're the KoOky one, Kensi. IKYABWAI was a valid argument when I was 8; and it still is. You're talking to yourself, telling yourself to be less of a KoOk. Nothing could be less "KoOky" than qBism, The Copenhagen Interpretation, Einstein, and Lambda. > [Kensi] *does a little victory dance* That's more your thing, not mine; I prefer science.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 09:33 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Kensi is the KoOky one. |
| Message-ID | <ptu63v$s47$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #231943 |
On 12/1/2018 9:28 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > You're the KoOky one, Kensi. > > IKYABWAI was a valid argument when I was 8; and it still is. That might have something to do with the fact that you're still 8. *snicker* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 06:48 -0800 |
| Subject | See ? ! |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Dec.1--6.48am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #231947 |
Kensi replied: > > IKYABWAI was a valid argument when I was 8; and it still is. > > That might have something to do with the fact that you're still 8. Now you're telling us that you are immature too, not just koOky. See ? ! > *snicker* Very mature.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 09:55 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: See ? ! |
| Message-ID | <ptu7cg$ud7$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #231955 |
On 12/1/2018 9:48 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Kensi replied: >>> IKYABWAI was a valid argument when I was 8; and it still is. >> >> That might have something to do with the fact that you're still 8. > > Now you're telling us that you are immature too, not just koOky. The Ph.D. diploma hanging above my desk reveals the truth about which of us is the immature one, Jeff "Single Digit Mental Age" Relf. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 07:04 -0800 |
| Subject | I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Dec.1--7.04am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #231956 |
Kensi replied: > > Now you're telling us that you are immature too, not just koOky. > > The Ph.D. diploma hanging above my desk reveals the truth about which of > us is the immature one, Jeff "Single Digit Mental Age" Relf. On the Internet, you can be anyone you want. I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 11:27 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. |
| Message-ID | <ptucoq$16ub$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #231959 |
On 12/1/2018 10:04 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Kensi replied: >>> Now you're telling us that you are immature too, not just koOky. >> >> The Ph.D. diploma hanging above my desk reveals the truth about which of >> us is the immature one, Jeff "Single Digit Mental Age" Relf. > > On the Internet, you can be anyone you want. > > I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. In a pig's eye! *snicker* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 12:13 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. |
| Message-ID | <ptufgj$1cqo$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #231959 |
On 12/1/2018 10:04 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Kensi replied: >>> Now you're telling us that you are immature too, not just koOky. >> >> The Ph.D. diploma hanging above my desk reveals the truth about which of >> us is the immature one, Jeff "Single Digit Mental Age" Relf. > > On the Internet, you can be anyone you want. > > I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. > "kensi"? Ph.D. diploma? Desk? Bwahahahahaha! On the Internet all the anonymous ones can have a Ph.D. above their desk simply by saying so. That is how their world works.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 02:09 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. |
| Message-ID | <ptves5$cvr$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #232042 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 01 Dec 2018 12:13:57 -0500, benj wrote: > On 12/1/2018 10:04 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> Kensi replied: >>>> Now you're telling us that you are immature too, not just koOky. >>> >>> The Ph.D. diploma hanging above my desk reveals the truth about which >>> of us is the immature one, Jeff "Single Digit Mental Age" Relf. >> >> On the Internet, you can be anyone you want. >> >> I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. >> > "kensi"? Ph.D. diploma? Desk? > > Bwahahahahaha! > > On the Internet all the anonymous ones can have a Ph.D. above their desk > simply by saying so. That is how their world works. Are you calling kensi a liar? <cocks fist> -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 22:18 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.366d190aa5952065995993@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #232242 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <ptves5$cvr$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... @fart@ @fart@Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! @fart@On Sat, 01 Dec 2018 12:13:57 -0500, benj wrote: @fart@ @fart@> On 12/1/2018 10:04 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: @fart@>> Kensi replied: @fart@>>>> Now you're telling us that you are immature too, not just koOky. @fart@>>> @fart@>>> The Ph.D. diploma hanging above my desk reveals the truth about which @fart@>>> of us is the immature one, Jeff "Single Digit Mental Age" Relf. @fart@>> @fart@>> On the Internet, you can be anyone you want. @fart@>> @fart@>> I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. @fart@>> @fart@> "kensi"? Ph.D. diploma? Desk? @fart@> @fart@> Bwahahahahaha! @fart@> @fart@> On the Internet all the anonymous ones can have a Ph.D. above their desk @fart@> simply by saying so. That is how their world works. @fart@ @fart@Are you calling kensi a liar? @fart@ @fart@<cocks fist> I didn't think you had a cock, but enjoy yourself... -- Checkmate ยฎ Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright ยฉ 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 09:31 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. |
| Message-ID | <p1r70el8pqdpufagb214ahg9hpo8jp2tou@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #232268 |
On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 22:18:23 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >In article <ptves5$cvr$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >> Teh Checktard observed... <...> >><cocks fist> > >I didn't think you had a cock, but enjoy yourself... I think Paul typed it wrong. I'm sure he meant, "fists cock". LOL -- Yours Truly, Gregรธry Hall Message-ID: <MPG.365d48f8837fd68d99575a@news.altopia.com> "My time is correct. Maybe you forget to change your time to match mine the last time you forged me, punk." --Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <%@%> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 07:35 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. |
| Message-ID | <bptg42.f43.17.4@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #232365 |
On 2018-12-02 7:31 a.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 22:18:23 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >> In article <ptves5$cvr$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >>> Teh Checktard observed... > <...> >>> <cocks fist> >> >> I didn't think you had a cock, but enjoy yourself... > > I think Paul typed it wrong. I'm sure he meant, > "fists cock". LOL > no gerg will try to lead you all into , talking about cock so he can have , something exciting to whack off too
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 14:47 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.366e00dc61e5c8a19959b7@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #232367 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <bptg42.f43.17.4@news.alt.net>, %@% says... @ @ On 2018-12-02 7:31 a.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: @ > On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 22:18:23 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: @ >> In article <ptves5$cvr$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... @ >>> Teh Checktard observed... @ > <...> @ >>> <cocks fist> @ >> @ >> I didn't think you had a cock, but enjoy yourself... @ > @ > I think Paul typed it wrong. I'm sure he meant, @ > "fists cock". LOL @ > @ no gerg will try to lead you all into , @ talking about cock so he can have , @ something exciting to whack off too I was thinking about "Nail 'er Swift". That girl's got legs for miles. -- Checkmate ยฎ Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright ยฉ 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 08:51 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: See ? ! |
| Message-ID | <MPG.366c5c06856fff285@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #231956 |
In article <ptu7cg$ud7$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >On 12/1/2018 9:48 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> Kensi replied: >>>> IKYABWAI was a valid argument when I was 8; and it still is. >>> >>> That might have something to do with the fact that you're still 8. >> >> Now you're telling us that you are immature too, not just koOky. > >The Ph.D. diploma hanging above my desk reveals the truth about which of >us is the immature one, Jeff "Single Digit Mental Age" Relf. There is no diploma.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 11:27 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: See ? ! |
| Message-ID | <ptucpr$16ub$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #231997 |
On 12/1/2018 10:51 AM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <ptu7cg$ud7$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 > @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >> >> On 12/1/2018 9:48 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>> Kensi replied: >>>>> IKYABWAI was a valid argument when I was 8; and it still is. >>>> >>>> That might have something to do with the fact that you're still 8. >>> >>> Now you're telling us that you are immature too, not just koOky. >> >> The Ph.D. diploma hanging above my desk reveals the truth about which of >> us is the immature one, Jeff "Single Digit Mental Age" Relf. > > There is no diploma. Proof, koOk? (Added to the list of shit you need to back up before I answer you in that other thread.) -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 11:47 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: See ? ! |
| Message-ID | <nke50eptds4jsrk3dipnjg2vur3apiueq5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #232021 |
On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 11:27:38 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 12/1/2018 10:51 AM, Skeeter wrote: <...> >> There is no diploma. > >Proof, koOk? No, you made the assertion that you had your Ph.D. diploma on the wall above your desk. You need to ppostfu. Take a photo with your smart phone. Post the photo on some free photo sharing web site. -- Yours Truly, Gregรธry Hall Message-ID: <MPG.365d48f8837fd68d99575a@news.altopia.com> "My time is correct. Maybe you forget to change your time to match mine the last time you forged me, punk." --Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 10:48 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: See ? ! |
| Message-ID | <bpr729.kjc.17.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #232034 |
On 2018-12-01 9:47 a.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 11:27:38 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 12/1/2018 10:51 AM, Skeeter wrote: > > <...> > >>> There is no diploma. >> >> Proof, koOk? > > No, you made the assertion that you had your > Ph.D. diploma on the wall above your desk. You > need to ppostfu. Take a photo with your smart > phone. Post the photo on some free photo sharing > web site. > that's exactly what i did and i sent it to skeeter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web