Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #154911 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-04-07 10:33 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-04-07 07:57 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 160 — 26 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-07 10:33 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-07 09:48 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-07 11:23 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-07 10:33 -0500
" Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-07 12:05 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-07 17:51 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 18:26 -0700
" Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-07 20:40 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 20:52 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-07 21:00 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-08 04:05 +0000
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 21:07 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 21:06 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-08 07:24 +0200
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-08 11:54 -0400
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-08 12:29 -0400
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 19:33 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-04-09 21:06 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-10 08:32 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-07 11:43 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-07 12:34 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-07 12:52 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-07 11:58 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-08 16:55 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-04-09 21:10 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-12 06:40 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-11 19:24 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-04-12 19:59 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-15 08:13 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-15 08:48 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-18 11:19 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-08 16:54 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 09:04 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-08 11:29 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 12:22 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 11:22 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 12:17 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-08 12:29 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 23:46 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 14:10 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 11:28 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 11:32 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 11:05 -0500
Air causes cancer. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-09 10:54 -0700
Re: Air causes cancer. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 17:29 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-09 13:12 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 14:29 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-09 13:33 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 16:44 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-11 23:45 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-12 16:46 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-12 15:03 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-12 20:11 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-14 11:11 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-14 09:18 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-14 21:31 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-15 12:50 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-12 10:12 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-04-12 20:06 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-15 00:48 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-15 18:03 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-16 08:58 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 02:00 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-16 19:11 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 09:57 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 13:01 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-17 07:17 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 21:44 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-17 14:08 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-17 11:35 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-04-17 17:55 +0100
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-18 06:00 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-17 22:40 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-18 09:15 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-17 20:03 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-17 19:32 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-18 01:36 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 18:46 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-17 22:36 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-18 11:01 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-18 11:33 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-18 11:21 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-18 10:59 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-18 16:02 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-18 23:47 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-18 18:49 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-19 18:52 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-19 23:39 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 16:45 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 16:57 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-20 12:25 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-16 08:34 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 09:59 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 13:09 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-16 13:17 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-16 11:29 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-16 19:13 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-16 13:20 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 14:33 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 17:11 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <rjac@TheWor1d.com> - 2018-04-16 14:45 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 The Jews <jews@world-doomination.org> - 2018-04-16 17:11 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-17 01:34 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 13:04 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 17:07 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 16:59 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-16 22:31 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-16 15:46 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 20:50 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 21:46 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-17 05:52 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 21:14 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-18 12:47 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <rjac@TheWor1d.com> - 2018-04-16 14:43 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 The Jews <jews@world-doomination.org> - 2018-04-16 17:13 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sick old pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "Ron Jacobson") <fsturluogh5@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 08:27 +0000
Al Gore fangirl, "kensi", taps out. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-16 15:25 -0700
Re: Al Gore fangirl, "kensi", taps out. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 21:51 -0500
Re: Al Gore fangirl, "kensi", taps out. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-16 22:24 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-04-18 00:22 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 21:39 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-04-18 05:21 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 13:37 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-18 14:55 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-18 23:48 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-18 18:56 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-19 11:44 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-19 18:52 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-18 11:06 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-18 11:34 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 12:20 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-16 19:14 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 14:56 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 17:13 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-09 04:33 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 06:17 +1000
Does smoking cause cancer? (was: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-09 01:43 +0200
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 19:34 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-09 10:52 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <rjac@TheWor1d.com> - 2018-04-09 07:59 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-09 11:05 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 13:36 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 17:34 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 16:58 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 The Equalizer <coming4you@never.invalid.net> - 2018-04-09 22:58 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 17:39 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 @ "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <rjac@TheWor1d.com> - 2018-04-09 13:05 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 @ Sick old pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "Ron Jacobson") <fsturluogh5@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 21:27 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 @ "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-11 10:27 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-04-10 11:25 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-04-10 16:48 +0100
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-10 08:50 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-04-10 16:58 +0100
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-11 23:47 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-11 17:53 -0600
In some Turkish bazar, somewhere... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-09 10:04 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 08:14 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 04:53 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-04-07 07:57 -0700
Page 8 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]
| From | "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-09 11:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <paga1n$iu6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #155462 |
"jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew
aliash)" wrote in message
news:isvmcdp65avubp92169css9evqed94kpjr@4ax.com...
>On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 10:52:03 -0400, circumcised pro-semitic cunt kensi
><kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>On 4/8/2018 4:17 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>> On 9/04/2018 2:17 AM, benj wrote:
>>
>>[snip most of epic SPNAKage of ko0ky benj]
>>
>>Keep up the good work!
>>
>>> **It has nothing to do with grammar and everything to do with attempting
>>> to establish what you actually believe.
>>
>>There's no such thing as "what benj actually believes". High-RWA types
>>like him outsource ontological queries to the likes of Fox News and
>>Breitbart, rather than build their own in-house ontologies and query
>>those. He quite literally does not *have* a worldview. Nor does Trump,
>>nor do the lot of them. It's part of what makes them such kOoks.
>>
>>Instead they have external "fonts of truth(iness)" on speed-dial, with
>>maybe some internal caching. But this caching isn't a true self-managed
>>ontology, because they do no gardening of it, as is apparent when (as
>>always) it ends up being a mass of contradictions and
>>empirically-invalidated nonsense (such as climate change denial).
>>
>>See:
>>https://theauthoritarians.org/donald-trump-and-authoritarian-followers/
>>
>>"They are highly dogmatic. Because /they have mainly gotten their
>>beliefs from the authorities in their lives, rather than think things
>>out for themselves/, they have no real defense when facts or events
>>indicate they are wrong. So they just dig in their heels and refuse to
>>change."
>>
>>(emphasis added)
>STFU cunt.
She has no credibility on these newsgroups.
Jeff Jacoby has plenty of credibility.
http://www.jeffjacoby.com/20620/the-blessings-of-climate-change
The blessings of climate change
by Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Globe
December 6, 2017
POINT HOPE, ALASKA, is tiny and ill-provisioned, an Arctic backwater so
inaccessible that basic groceries have to be flown in and gasoline can only
be brought in by barge during the summer. The town is remote not only
geographically, but also digitally: Its internet connection is so slow that
teachers must spend hours downloading course material that most of us could
pull off the internet in minutes.
Because of climate change, the once-forbidding sea route through the Arctic
Circle has been opening up sooner and for a longer period each summer.
But Point Hope's luck is changing. High-speed internet is coming, and with
it the benefits of ties to the world: Improved education and health care,
more options for consumers, new customers for local artists, and a chance to
attract tourists.
All thanks to global warming.
The New York Times reported Sunday that Quintillion, a global communications
company, is taking advantage of melting sea ice to build a faster digital
link between Europe and Asia by positioning high-speed internet cables
beneath the Arctic Ocean. Until recently, cable-laying ships couldn't get
too far north, but climate change has meant less ice north of the Bering
Strait. Consequently, Point Hope is now a stop on Quintillion's shipping
route, and the company is supplying the town with broadband service. That
means a better life for residents of one of the nation's most isolated
communities.
In the church of climate alarmism, there may be no heresy more dangerous
than the idea that the world will benefit from warming. Zealous preachers
seek to scare their flock with forecasts of catastrophe, horror, and threats
to civilization. Anyone who demurs is denounced as an apostate: an
anti-science "denier."
But the truth — the inconvenient truth, to coin a phrase — is that while
climate change brings negatives, it brings positives too. Polar melting may
cause dislocation for those who live in low-lying coastal areas, but it will
also lead to safe commercial shipping in formerly inhospitable northern
seas, and to economic opportunity for high-latitude residents in places like
Point Hope.
Shifts in climate are like shifts in the economy: They invariably spell good
news for some and bad news for others. Falling interest rates are a blessing
to homebuyers but a curse to savers; a strong dollar helps consumers buying
imports but hinders exporters selling abroad. In the same way, changes in
climate generate winners and losers. Some of global warming's effects will
be disagreeable; others will be very welcome.
Worldwide, cold kills 20 times as many people as heat, so a warming planet
will save lives. A plethora of data confirms the greater deadliness of cold
weather, even in countries with very different climate patterns. One study
of mortality rates, for example, found that deaths from cold outnumbered
those from heat by a ratio of 33-to-2 in Australia, and 61-to-3 in Britain.
Of 2,000 weather-related deaths in America tallied by the Centers for
Disease Control, 63 percent were caused by excessive cold vs. 31 percent
caused by excessive heat.
A warming planet will also be a greener planet. Is a greener planet. Rising
levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere have already led to "persistent
and widespread increase" in leaf cover — i.e., greening — across as much as
half of the world's vegetated regions, according to a study published in
Nature last year.
Over the past 35 years, there has been an increase in world greenery equal
in area to twice the continental United States. Some of Africa's most
inhospitable deserts have begun to bloom again.
Alarmists mindlessly condemn atmospheric CO2 as "carbon pollution," but
carbon dioxide is essential to the health and grown of plant life.
NASA satellites show that over the past 35 years, there has been an increase
in world greenery equal in area to twice the continental United States.
Climate change has been a particular blessing in Africa, where the "Sahel
greening" has significantly reduced famine.
The effects of climate change range from the obvious (lower heating bills)
to the subtle (more habitat for moose and endangered sharks). Territory
formerly deemed too forbiddingly cold will grow more temperate — and
valuable. Delicacies from lobster to blueberries may become more plentiful.
Bottom line? Global warming will bring gains as well as losses, upsides no
less than downsides. Climate science isn't a black-and-white morality tale.
Our climate discourse shouldn't be either.
(Jeff Jacoby is a columnist for The Boston Globe).
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-09 19:19 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nn08ba.7p8vni29le7hN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #155521 |
Michael Ejercito <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote: ["kensi"] > She has no credibility on these newsgroups. > > Jeff Jacoby has plenty of credibility. > > <http://www.jeffjacoby.com/20620/the-blessings-of-climate-change> > That's an interesting, well-balanced article, thanks for the link. -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com> My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-09 13:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pagbs8$17gi$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #155528 |
On 4/9/2018 1:19 PM, Sn!pe wrote: > Michael Ejercito <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote: > > ["kensi"] > >> She has no credibility on these newsgroups. >> >> Jeff Jacoby has plenty of credibility. >> >> <http://www.jeffjacoby.com/20620/the-blessings-of-climate-change> >> > > That's an interesting, well-balanced article, thanks for the link. > from the article; "Alarmists mindlessly condemn atmospheric CO2 as "carbon pollution," but carbon dioxide is essential to the health and grown of plant life. NASA satellites show that over the past 35 years, there has been an increase in world greenery equal in area to twice the continental United States. Climate change has been a particular blessing in Africa, where the "Sahel greening" has significantly reduced famine. The effects of climate change range from the obvious (lower heating bills) to the subtle (more habitat for moose and endangered sharks). Territory formerly deemed too forbiddingly cold will grow more temperate — and valuable. Delicacies from lobster to blueberries may become more plentiful. Bottom line? Global warming will bring gains as well as losses, upsides no less than downsides. Climate science isn't a black-and-white morality tale. Our climate discourse shouldn't be either."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-09 17:34 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <p%QyC.964$yK2.559@fx16.iad> |
| In reply to | #155534 |
On 4/9/2018 2:36 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 4/9/2018 1:19 PM, Sn!pe wrote: >> Michael Ejercito <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> ["kensi"] >> >>> She has no credibility on these newsgroups. >>> >>> Jeff Jacoby has plenty of credibility. >>> >>> <http://www.jeffjacoby.com/20620/the-blessings-of-climate-change> >>> >> >> That's an interesting, well-balanced article, thanks for the link. >> > > from the article; > > > "Alarmists mindlessly condemn atmospheric CO2 as "carbon pollution," but > carbon dioxide is essential to the health and grown of plant life. > > NASA satellites show that over the past 35 years, there has been an > increase in world greenery equal in area to twice the continental United > States. Climate change has been a particular blessing in Africa, where > the "Sahel greening" has significantly reduced famine. > > The effects of climate change range from the obvious (lower heating > bills) to the subtle (more habitat for moose and endangered sharks). > Territory formerly deemed too forbiddingly cold will grow more temperate > — and valuable. Delicacies from lobster to blueberries may become more > plentiful. > > Bottom line? Global warming will bring gains as well as losses, upsides > no less than downsides. Climate science isn't a black-and-white morality > tale. Our climate discourse shouldn't be either." > Hey, Sergio, CO2 most definitely IS a pollutant. Yeah, we all know how beneficial it plants and stuff, but that doesn't matter. What is and is not a Pollutant is determined by EPA regulations. And they SPECIFICALLY made CO2 a "pollutant". Why? Because the EPA may not regulate gasses that are not pollutants. So they simply declared CO2 a pollutant so they would have the authority to "regulate" it. This is truth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-09 16:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pagnlf$1s8o$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #155619 |
On 4/9/2018 4:34 PM, benj wrote: > On 4/9/2018 2:36 PM, Sergio wrote: >> On 4/9/2018 1:19 PM, Sn!pe wrote: >>> Michael Ejercito <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> ["kensi"] >>> >>>> She has no credibility on these newsgroups. >>>> >>>> Jeff Jacoby has plenty of credibility. >>>> >>>> <http://www.jeffjacoby.com/20620/the-blessings-of-climate-change> >>>> >>> >>> That's an interesting, well-balanced article, thanks for the link. >>> >> >> from the article; >> >> >> "Alarmists mindlessly condemn atmospheric CO2 as "carbon pollution," but >> carbon dioxide is essential to the health and grown of plant life. >> >> NASA satellites show that over the past 35 years, there has been an >> increase in world greenery equal in area to twice the continental United >> States. Climate change has been a particular blessing in Africa, where >> the "Sahel greening" has significantly reduced famine. >> >> The effects of climate change range from the obvious (lower heating >> bills) to the subtle (more habitat for moose and endangered sharks). >> Territory formerly deemed too forbiddingly cold will grow more temperate >> — and valuable. Delicacies from lobster to blueberries may become more >> plentiful. >> >> Bottom line? Global warming will bring gains as well as losses, upsides >> no less than downsides. Climate science isn't a black-and-white morality >> tale. Our climate discourse shouldn't be either." >> > Hey, Sergio, CO2 most definitely IS a pollutant. Yeah, we all know how > beneficial it plants and stuff, but that doesn't matter. What is and is > not a Pollutant is determined by EPA regulations. And they SPECIFICALLY > made CO2 a "pollutant". Why? Because the EPA may not regulate gasses > that are not pollutants. So they simply declared CO2 a pollutant so they > would have the authority to "regulate" it. This is truth. That was crazy, and they did that without considering it is needed to make plants grow. Obama was going to use it to shut down coal plants, and Obama's EPA were cowboys/cowgirls, trying to impress short sighted leftist. all marching in unison off the cliff, sig Obama, without addressing nor understanding the real problems,
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Equalizer <coming4you@never.invalid.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-09 22:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pagr6u$q4f$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #155626 |
Sergio: > That was crazy, and they did that without considering it is needed to > make plants grow. What is even more crazy than that? Well, it is your assumption that plants depend on man made CO2! So how has plant life evolved on this planet over the last 3 billion years w/o the greedy hoards of multi billionaire corporate coal/oil magnates and their brain washed (brain dead) climate change denialist propaganda drones! > Obama was going to use it to shut down coal plants, > and Obama's EPA were cowboys/cowgirls, trying to impress short sighted > leftist. all marching in unison off the cliff, sig Obama, without > addressing nor understanding the real problems, The real problems? So you do reckon that CO2 emission is the only thing that happens during burning fossil fuels? If so, than you know bugger all about human/animal health and the effects of particle emissions and chemical pollution. Oh, and BTW have you ever contemplated on the real value of our carbon/ hydrocarbon sources before your advocacy for burning that damned thing up until there is nothing left to support manufacturing, specially in the steal and chemical industries for future generations??? Conclusion: Virulent rightardism has fucked up your brain real good! Go and suckle on Trump's cock!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-09 17:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3535a7ab23eec63f993680@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #155644 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pagr6u$q4f$1@dont-email.me>, coming4you@never.invalid.net says... > Trump's cock! > Are you gay for Trump? -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <rjac@TheWor1d.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-09 13:05 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 @ |
| Message-ID | <6rhncdtjkli6nc2j1fld5vmq3nq625imad@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #155528 |
On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 19:19:58 +0100, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote: >NOT Michael Ejercito <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote: > >["kensi"] > >> She has no credibility on these newsgroups. >> >> Jeff Jacoby has plenty of credibility. >> >> <http://www.jeffjacoby.com/20620/the-blessings-of-climate-change> >> > >That's an interesting, well-balanced article, thanks for the link. It's a pile of plagiarised jew shite. And gook Ejershito likes to zsuck Jeff Kakobstein's fat jew rectum. -- "You are full of shit. You'll never convince any of us real Jews that there is no Jewish look. I know my people and I can see their Jewishness. Susan is not a Jew. If you want to get down her panties just ask her she'll let you. She's a non-Jew." Message-ID: <bfbdb526-1042-4e8e-a39f-98d379739ef2@z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com> "You can try all you want and get all the plastic surgery you want but you'll never look like one of us because you are not a Jew. You are an Irish Shiksa that Isn't even a righteous non-Jew a Ger Tzadeck You are VEEDMUS amongst us and are a gentile. I would not be surprised if you ever go to Eretz Israel and spout off your non-senseical lies that a Jew doesn't kill you or a gentile murder you. You are wicked because you antagonize and lie about the Tzadeckim. The best place for you is scrubbing toilets and urinals in a gymnasium that is predominate used by Negros." Message-ID: <ee17d097-89f7-4e72-a41a-afcf650c2062@p2g2000prn.googlegroups.com> - drug-fucked jew wannabe Y-chi Netfish, mocking neo-jew Suzy KKKohen's attempted 'conversion' to the jew race "Warren is not well. He's a non-Jewish mental patient who usually declines to take his medications. Please keep this in mind when viewing future posts." Message-ID: <JZQTk.1726$mi4.491@nwrddc02.gnilink.net> - neo-jew 'convert' Suzy KKKohen, mocking drug-fucked jew wannabe Y-chi Netfish's claim to be a jew
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sick old pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "Ron Jacobson") <fsturluogh5@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-09 21:27 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 @ |
| Message-ID | <paglsc$92i$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #155585 |
In article <6rhncdtjkli6nc2j1fld5vmq3nq625imad@4ax.com>,
A shiteating cowardly nazoid sub-louse PEDO named Andrew "Andrzej"
Baron (aka "Ron Jacobson"/etc") wrote:
> It's a pile of plagiarised shite.
So EAT it, nazoid sub-louse... like Shitler did!
Yes folks, FOUR leading experts concluded: Shitler ate shit!
-------------------------------------------------------------
"He is an extreme masochist who derives sexual pleasure from
having a woman squat over him while she uriniates or defecates
on his face."
Quoted from
"A Psychological Analysis of Adolph Hitler"
Walter C. Langer, Harvard
With the collaboration of
Prof. Henry A. Murr, Harvard Psychological Clinic
Dr. Ernst Kris, New School for Social Research
Dr. Bertram D. Lawin, New York Psychoanalytic Institute
http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/h/hitler-adolf/oss-papers/text/oss-profile-04-06.html
Some believe that he [Hitler] is entirely immune from such impulses.
Some believe that he is a chronic masturbator. Some believe that
he derives his sexual pleasure [Page 138] through voyeurism. Many
believe that he is completely impotent. Others, and these are perhaps
in the majority, that he is homosexual. It is probably true that he is
impotent but he is certainiy not homosexual in the ordinary sense of
the term. His perversion has quite a different nature which few have
guessed. He is an extreme masochist who derives sexual pleasure from
having a woman squat over him while she uriniates or defecates on his
face. (Strasser, 919; see also 931, 932)*
[*Note: There may be some people who would question the reliability of
any information given by Otto Strasser because of his reputation. It
is perhaps because of his reputation that he came by this information
which had been so carefully guarded. He also supplied the interviewer
with a great deal of other information concerning Hitler which
checked very closely with that of other informants. As far as this
study is concerned we have no reason to question his sincerity.]
Although this perversion is not a common one, it is not unknown in
clinical work, particularly in its incipient stages. The four
collaborators on this study, in addition to Dr. De Saussure who
learned of the perversion from other sources, have all had experience
with cases of this type. All five agree that their information as
given is probably true in view of their clinical experience and their
knowledge of Hitler's character. In the following section further
evidence of its validition will be cited. At the present moment it is
sufficient to recognize the influence that this perversion must have
on the conscious mental life of Hitler.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-11 10:27 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 @ |
| Message-ID | <palgig$kon$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #155585 |
"jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew
aliash)" wrote in message
news:6rhncdtjkli6nc2j1fld5vmq3nq625imad@4ax.com...
>On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 19:19:58 +0100, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
>>NOT Michael Ejercito <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>["kensi"]
>>
>>> She has no credibility on these newsgroups.
>>>
>>> Jeff Jacoby has plenty of credibility.
>>>
>>> <http://www.jeffjacoby.com/20620/the-blessings-of-climate-change>
>>>
>>
>>That's an interesting, well-balanced article, thanks for the link.
>It's a pile of plagiarised jew shite. And gook Ejershito likes to
>zsuck Jeff Kakobstein's fat jew rectum.
You have no evidence of plagiarism.
Michael
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-10 11:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <hsmncdditq9ju8t7onaldbrr74n6r9a57s@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #155528 |
On Mon, 9 Apr 2018, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) mewed... >Michael Ejercito <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote: > >["kensi"] > >> She has no credibility on these newsgroups. >> >> Jeff Jacoby has plenty of credibility. >> >> <http://www.jeffjacoby.com/20620/the-blessings-of-climate-change> > >That's an interesting, well-balanced article, thanks for the link. He gets zero thanks from Yours Truly. Why? Because he posted a link and was too lazy and rude to summarize the contents so those of us who *might* be interested at least had an inkling whether or not it was worth logging on. Why do so many on Usenet act like commensalism is de rigueur? The only benefit of Ejercito's post is to himself. He apparently likes to hear himself talk but is less than percipient. -- The Mountain
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-10 16:48 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nn1vz4.1k5u7nw13ketsdN%onion@anon.invalid> |
| In reply to | #155794 |
Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> wrote: > On Mon, 9 Apr 2018, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) mewed... > >Michael Ejercito <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >["kensi"] > > > >> She has no credibility on these newsgroups. > >> > >> Jeff Jacoby has plenty of credibility. > >> > >> <http://www.jeffjacoby.com/20620/the-blessings-of-climate-change> > > > >That's an interesting, well-balanced article, thanks for the link. > > He gets zero thanks from Yours Truly. Why? Because he > posted a link and was too lazy and rude to summarize the > contents so those of us who *might* be interested at > least had an inkling whether or not it was worth logging > on. > > Why do so many on Usenet act like commensalism is de > rigueur? The only benefit of Ejercito's post is to himself. > He apparently likes to hear himself talk but is less than > percipient. > <https://imgflip.com/i/283non> -- \|/ (((Ï))) U+97F1 Wearing an On!on on his belt, which was the style at the time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-10 08:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b6fc1k.rd8.17.5@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #155820 |
On 2018-04-10 8:48 AM, Mr On!on wrote: > Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> wrote: > >> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) mewed... >>> Michael Ejercito <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> ["kensi"] >>> >>>> She has no credibility on these newsgroups. >>>> >>>> Jeff Jacoby has plenty of credibility. >>>> >>>> <http://www.jeffjacoby.com/20620/the-blessings-of-climate-change> >>> >>> That's an interesting, well-balanced article, thanks for the link. >> >> He gets zero thanks from Yours Truly. Why? Because he >> posted a link and was too lazy and rude to summarize the >> contents so those of us who *might* be interested at >> least had an inkling whether or not it was worth logging >> on. >> >> Why do so many on Usenet act like commensalism is de >> rigueur? The only benefit of Ejercito's post is to himself. >> He apparently likes to hear himself talk but is less than >> percipient. >> > > <https://imgflip.com/i/283non> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJ-4cKFVC34
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-10 16:58 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nn1wgb.nhbpm717qjft5N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #155821 |
% <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2018-04-10 8:48 AM, Mr On!on wrote: > > Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) mewed... > >>> Michael Ejercito <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> ["kensi"] > >>> > >>>> She has no credibility on these newsgroups. > >>>> > >>>> Jeff Jacoby has plenty of credibility. > >>>> > >>>> <http://www.jeffjacoby.com/20620/the-blessings-of-climate-change> > >>> > >>> That's an interesting, well-balanced article, thanks for the link. > >>> > >> > >> He gets zero thanks from Yours Truly. Why? Because he > >> posted a link and was too lazy and rude to summarize the > >> contents so those of us who *might* be interested at > >> least had an inkling whether or not it was worth logging > >> on. > >> > >> Why do so many on Usenet act like commensalism is de > >> rigueur? The only benefit of Ejercito's post is to himself. > >> He apparently likes to hear himself talk but is less than > >> percipient. > >> > > > > <https://imgflip.com/i/283non> > > > > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJ-4cKFVC34> > Right on, lol. -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com> My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-11 23:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pam6pr$7h4$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #155462 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 07:59:02 -0700, pedophile wrote: > On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 10:52:03 -0400, circumcised pro-semitic cunt kensi > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>On 4/8/2018 4:17 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> On 9/04/2018 2:17 AM, benj wrote: >> >>[snip most of epic SPNAKage of ko0ky benj] >> >>Keep up the good work! >> >>> **It has nothing to do with grammar and everything to do with >>> attempting to establish what you actually believe. >> >>There's no such thing as "what benj actually believes". High-RWA types >>like him outsource ontological queries to the likes of Fox News and >>Breitbart, rather than build their own in-house ontologies and query >>those. He quite literally does not *have* a worldview. Nor does Trump, >>nor do the lot of them. It's part of what makes them such kOoks. >> >>Instead they have external "fonts of truth(iness)" on speed-dial, with >>maybe some internal caching. But this caching isn't a true self-managed >>ontology, because they do no gardening of it, as is apparent when (as >>always) it ends up being a mass of contradictions and >>empirically-invalidated nonsense (such as climate change denial). >> >>See: >>https://theauthoritarians.org/donald-trump-and-authoritarian-followers/ >> >>"They are highly dogmatic. Because /they have mainly gotten their >>beliefs from the authorities in their lives, rather than think things >>out for themselves/, they have no real defense when facts or events >>indicate they are wrong. So they just dig in their heels and refuse to >>change." >> >>(emphasis added) > > STFU cunt. [improperly delimited .sig deleted] Hi, kooky. I've mostly been ignoring you lately, because, frankly, you're boring. But you mostly keep to your own threads. I find it interesting that you felt the need to pop into this one to froth at kensi. Duck that quacks the loudest is the one that got shot? <snicker> -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-11 17:53 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <pu7tcdpk9892kuoprccuk98rslnluugrid@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #156153 |
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 23:47:07 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 07:59:02 -0700, pedophile wrote: > >> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 10:52:03 -0400, circumcised pro-semitic cunt kensi >> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> >>>On 4/8/2018 4:17 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 9/04/2018 2:17 AM, benj wrote: >>> >>>[snip most of epic SPNAKage of ko0ky benj] >>> >>>Keep up the good work! >>> >>>> **It has nothing to do with grammar and everything to do with >>>> attempting to establish what you actually believe. >>> >>>There's no such thing as "what benj actually believes". High-RWA types >>>like him outsource ontological queries to the likes of Fox News and >>>Breitbart, rather than build their own in-house ontologies and query >>>those. He quite literally does not *have* a worldview. Nor does Trump, >>>nor do the lot of them. It's part of what makes them such kOoks. >>> >>>Instead they have external "fonts of truth(iness)" on speed-dial, with >>>maybe some internal caching. But this caching isn't a true self-managed >>>ontology, because they do no gardening of it, as is apparent when (as >>>always) it ends up being a mass of contradictions and >>>empirically-invalidated nonsense (such as climate change denial). >>> >>>See: >>>https://theauthoritarians.org/donald-trump-and-authoritarian-followers/ >>> >>>"They are highly dogmatic. Because /they have mainly gotten their >>>beliefs from the authorities in their lives, rather than think things >>>out for themselves/, they have no real defense when facts or events >>>indicate they are wrong. So they just dig in their heels and refuse to >>>change." >>> >>>(emphasis added) >> >> STFU cunt. >[improperly delimited .sig deleted] > >Hi, kooky. I've mostly been ignoring you lately, because, frankly, you're >boring. But you mostly keep to your own threads. I find it interesting >that you felt the need to pop into this one to froth at kensi. > >Duck that quacks the loudest is the one that got shot? > ><snicker> Dead ducks don't quack. now run along little one.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-09 10:04 -0700 |
| Subject | In some Turkish bazar, somewhere... |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.9--10.04am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #155459 |
> [ Trumpettes don't think for themselves ]
In some Turkish bazar, somewhere:
kensi: Disarm everyone.
Trump: Arm everyone.
kensi: Nationalize everything.
Trump: Privatize.
kensi: You're nuts.
Trump: Read "Art of the Deal".
kensi: Repent, the end is near.
Trump: Now you're talking, Padawan.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-10 08:14 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fj26ukFgjv3U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #155459 |
On 10/04/2018 12:52 AM, kensi wrote: > On 4/8/2018 4:17 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 9/04/2018 2:17 AM, benj wrote: > > [snip most of epic SPNAKage of ko0ky benj] > > Keep up the good work! > >> **It has nothing to do with grammar and everything to do with >> attempting to establish what you actually believe. > > There's no such thing as "what benj actually believes". High-RWA types > like him outsource ontological queries to the likes of Fox News and > Breitbart, rather than build their own in-house ontologies and query > those. He quite literally does not *have* a worldview. Nor does Trump, > nor do the lot of them. It's part of what makes them such kOoks. > > Instead they have external "fonts of truth(iness)" on speed-dial, with > maybe some internal caching. But this caching isn't a true self-managed > ontology, because they do no gardening of it, as is apparent when (as > always) it ends up being a mass of contradictions and > empirically-invalidated nonsense (such as climate change denial). > > See: > https://theauthoritarians.org/donald-trump-and-authoritarian-followers/ > > "They are highly dogmatic. Because /they have mainly gotten their > beliefs from the authorities in their lives, rather than think things > out for themselves/, they have no real defense when facts or events > indicate they are wrong. So they just dig in their heels and refuse to > change." > > (emphasis added) > **That answers a lot of questions. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-10 04:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <HY_yC.43400$6_2.35103@fx41.iad> |
| In reply to | #155629 |
On 4/9/2018 6:14 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 10/04/2018 12:52 AM, kensi wrote: >> On 4/8/2018 4:17 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> On 9/04/2018 2:17 AM, benj wrote: >> >> [snip most of epic SPNAKage of ko0ky benj] >> >> Keep up the good work! >> >>> **It has nothing to do with grammar and everything to do with >>> attempting to establish what you actually believe. >> >> There's no such thing as "what benj actually believes". High-RWA types >> like him outsource ontological queries to the likes of Fox News and >> Breitbart, rather than build their own in-house ontologies and query >> those. He quite literally does not *have* a worldview. Nor does Trump, >> nor do the lot of them. It's part of what makes them such kOoks. >> >> Instead they have external "fonts of truth(iness)" on speed-dial, with >> maybe some internal caching. But this caching isn't a true >> self-managed ontology, because they do no gardening of it, as is >> apparent when (as always) it ends up being a mass of contradictions >> and empirically-invalidated nonsense (such as climate change denial). >> >> See: >> https://theauthoritarians.org/donald-trump-and-authoritarian-followers/ >> >> "They are highly dogmatic. Because /they have mainly gotten their >> beliefs from the authorities in their lives, rather than think things >> out for themselves/, they have no real defense when facts or events >> indicate they are wrong. So they just dig in their heels and refuse to >> change." >> >> (emphasis added) >> > > **That answers a lot of questions. > Pro propagandists Trevor and "kensi" stroke and support each other. Propaganda 101.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-07 07:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <paamas$8mg$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #154911 |
In news:paakrs$1fn6$1@gioia.aioe.org, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> typed: > A 1988 Royal Dutch Shell report recently published online shows that > the company knew decades ago what the impact of climate change would > be. ... The report, titled "The Greenhouse Effect," said the effects > of climate change would be notable by the late 20th Century and early > 21st: > https://globalnews.ca/news/4127757/shell-climate-change-report-1988/ <yawn>
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web