Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #59825 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-13 19:28 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-07-15 18:26 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 129 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-13 19:28 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-14 13:45 +1000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-14 23:12 +0000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-14 19:19 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-15 00:00 +0000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-14 18:24 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-14 17:46 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-14 20:49 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-14 17:37 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-14 17:36 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-14 17:33 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-14 17:38 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-15 21:21 +1000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-14 17:35 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-15 21:20 +1000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 14:17 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-15 21:28 +0000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 15:28 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-15 22:47 +0000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-15 17:08 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 16:53 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> - 2016-07-15 23:17 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 23:03 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-16 08:01 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> - 2016-07-16 08:46 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-16 17:54 +0100
-- I Don't Understand Much Mathematics Either But I Did on 1 June 2003 Have This Momentary Whimsical Inspiration dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2016-07-17 03:25 +1000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-16 07:58 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-17 00:36 +0000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> - 2016-07-17 00:25 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-17 22:11 +0000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> - 2016-07-19 19:54 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-20 15:36 +1000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-16 15:57 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-18 08:49 +1000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-18 07:00 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-07-18 16:41 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-18 00:23 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-18 20:32 +1000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-18 11:57 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-18 11:55 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-07-18 16:38 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-18 19:28 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-18 10:23 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Mr.SmartyPants DoW #4" <banmilk@hotmail.com> - 2016-07-18 12:17 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-18 14:12 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-18 16:30 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@Dow.#6> - 2016-07-31 15:48 -0500
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@Dow.#6> - 2016-07-31 15:48 -0500
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 13:55 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-31 17:09 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 15:19 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-08-01 11:36 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-08-01 20:44 +0000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 14:02 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-08-01 22:09 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-08-01 06:24 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-08-02 06:09 +0200
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Mr.SmartyPants DoW #4" <banmilk@hotmail.com> - 2016-07-18 12:20 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-18 19:34 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 06:25 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5" <noemail@none.not> - 2016-07-19 09:59 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-21 15:59 +0200
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 06:30 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-19 16:14 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 08:54 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> - 2016-07-19 10:45 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 10:09 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> - 2016-07-19 11:58 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-07-19 13:29 -0500
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-19 14:57 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 13:07 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-07-19 15:18 -0500
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 13:22 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-19 16:57 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-07-19 17:08 -0500
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-07-19 17:05 -0500
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-19 16:55 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-07-19 17:06 -0500
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-19 22:48 +0000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-19 17:53 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 10:16 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-19 22:49 +0000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 17:04 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> - 2016-07-19 18:10 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 17:16 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> - 2016-07-19 18:31 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 18:38 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> - 2016-07-19 20:01 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-07-19 19:11 -0700
Nad's Dilemma... Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-20 22:48 -0700
Re: Nad's Dilemma... Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-21 07:45 +0100
Re: Nad's Dilemma... Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 19:23 -0700
Re: Nad's Dilemma... Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-21 20:30 -0700
Re: Nad's Dilemma... Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 23:45 -0700
Re: Nad's Dilemma... Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-22 08:53 +0100
Re: Nad's Dilemma... Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-21 17:24 +1000
Re: Nad's Dilemma... Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-21 17:33 +1000
Re: Nad's Dilemma... Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-21 11:57 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 07:41 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skidaddle@chote.com> - 2016-07-19 11:57 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-07-19 19:27 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-19 13:06 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 07:36 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> - 2016-07-19 19:56 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 07:45 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> - 2016-07-20 06:38 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-20 17:21 +0100
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-20 15:36 +1000
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-15 19:10 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-15 17:14 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 17:08 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-15 19:05 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-15 17:09 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-15 19:24 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-15 17:41 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-15 19:48 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-15 18:11 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 17:04 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-15 20:08 -0400
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 17:12 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> - 2016-07-15 18:17 -0600
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 17:56 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@Dow.#6> - 2016-07-31 16:08 -0500
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@Dow.#6> - 2016-07-31 16:08 -0500
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-17 23:34 +0200
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Ms Kitty DoW #6" <Kitty@Dow.#6> - 2016-07-31 16:07 -0500
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 21:07 -0700
Re: Chicken Fucker CHoW #4, Claims He Doesn't Need Binky's Help "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-07-15 18:26 -0400
Page 2 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 Next page →
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-15 16:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.31f3175524f410b698da2a@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #60026 |
In article <nmbp6g$e19$25@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:28:47 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > > > In article <nmbkhr$e19$22@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > > says... > > > > > > > >> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:17:44 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > >> > >> > In article <9G3iz.3211$Pz4.702@fx03.iad>, r0llinThru@none.invalid > >> > says... > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> Durrbs <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >> >> >On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:28:29 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> // > >> >> >> If I may ask, given your claim to have a long history in AUK, and > >> >> >> by extension, an "heir to the FNVW throne," what other nyms might > >> >> >> any of us have known you under? > >> >> > > >> >> >That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to guess. > >> >> >I've dropped enough clues over the years, including that I was > >> >> >there at the very beginning, and my involvement in coming up with > >> >> >one of the original core awards... > >> >> > >> >> ..so 'says' the k00k who has to G00gle up to find the cmsg for AUK > >> >> when both Adam Kerman and I have the original posted cmsg at hand > >> >> :-> > >> >> > >> >> for those with the memory cells... both "Alien" and [tor]Phoenix > >> >> also made these claims, in my recall a virtual parallel of rhetoric. > >> >> Anyone who was around when Phoenix 'retired' knows neither "Alien" > >> >> nor that faux(imposter) 'Phoenix' invention of Paul's were even > >> >> present in AUK.. in fact as recently pointed to it was during the > >> >> reign of Bob Larter that Paul was dragged into AUK... his "birth".. > >> >> if you like :-/ > >> >> > >> >> soooo.. yep,, more bullsh!te from the Pembroke Pud Puller :----D > >> > > >> > Yep, that's pretty-much my impression of it all, and the point I was > >> > driving up Nad's ass. Nads came in here and immediately went to > >> > setting up shop as if S/H/IT was entitled to do so, and everyone was > >> > supposed to be impressed with someone who only alluded to some > >> > unproven credentials. When I pressed for something a little more > >> > substantial, Nads had to resort to mysterious "clues," as if > >> > anybody's buying any of it. That's why none of this bullshit is > >> > flying with anybody here, and that's also why S/H/IT is failing so > >> > badly. > >> > >> For someone who is "failing so badly" I sure seem to have *your* > >> panties in a twist, and a lot of other kooks melting quite > >> spectacularly, particularly dolf and murphy. > > > > I'm simply stating the obvious... after three months of your "FNVW, > > party of one" routine, you're still a party of one. > > Are you *still* terrible at math? Me + kensi + Bill Jillians + Yads makes > four. > > <snicker> Where IS this Kensi you speak of? Yads, I don't see. I believe he's been in my killfile for years... does he still post in AUK? You live in a state of denial, but please don't change... some people are enjoying it. -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new Honorary FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ&feature=youtu.be
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-15 23:17 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nmcg20$22r$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #60026 |
On 2016-07-15 4:47 PM, Nadegda wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:28:47 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > >> In article <nmbkhr$e19$22@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >> says... >> >> >> >>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:17:44 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>> >>>> In article <9G3iz.3211$Pz4.702@fx03.iad>, r0llinThru@none.invalid >>>> says... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Durrbs <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:28:29 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>>>>> >>>>> // >>>>>>> If I may ask, given your claim to have a long history in AUK, and >>>>>>> by extension, an "heir to the FNVW throne," what other nyms might >>>>>>> any of us have known you under? >>>>>> >>>>>> That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to guess. >>>>>> I've dropped enough clues over the years, including that I was >>>>>> there at the very beginning, and my involvement in coming up with >>>>>> one of the original core awards... >>>>> >>>>> ..so 'says' the k00k who has to G00gle up to find the cmsg for AUK >>>>> when both Adam Kerman and I have the original posted cmsg at hand >>>>> :-> >>>>> >>>>> for those with the memory cells... both "Alien" and [tor]Phoenix >>>>> also made these claims, in my recall a virtual parallel of rhetoric. >>>>> Anyone who was around when Phoenix 'retired' knows neither "Alien" >>>>> nor that faux(imposter) 'Phoenix' invention of Paul's were even >>>>> present in AUK.. in fact as recently pointed to it was during the >>>>> reign of Bob Larter that Paul was dragged into AUK... his "birth".. >>>>> if you like :-/ >>>>> >>>>> soooo.. yep,, more bullsh!te from the Pembroke Pud Puller :----D >>>> >>>> Yep, that's pretty-much my impression of it all, and the point I was >>>> driving up Nad's ass. Nads came in here and immediately went to >>>> setting up shop as if S/H/IT was entitled to do so, and everyone was >>>> supposed to be impressed with someone who only alluded to some >>>> unproven credentials. When I pressed for something a little more >>>> substantial, Nads had to resort to mysterious "clues," as if >>>> anybody's buying any of it. That's why none of this bullshit is >>>> flying with anybody here, and that's also why S/H/IT is failing so >>>> badly. >>> >>> For someone who is "failing so badly" I sure seem to have *your* >>> panties in a twist, and a lot of other kooks melting quite >>> spectacularly, particularly dolf and murphy. >> >> I'm simply stating the obvious... after three months of your "FNVW, >> party of one" routine, you're still a party of one. > > Are you *still* terrible at math? Me + kensi + Bill Jillians + Yads makes > four. > > <snicker> > Yads? Waaaaaayyyyyyy too much dope smoking going on and if you think the chicken fucker is your "ally" you better check your back for knives before sitting down, you might cut your upholstery. -- The was a old guy named binky Whose thumb began to smell stinky He made his mom gasp, pulling it out of his ass And stuck it in his mouth like a Twinkie. Anonymous So why can't you accept that he's an idiot and move on? Bill Jillians (Formosa'd by Checkmate)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-15 23:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.31f36e02baa9a49098da4a@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #60091 |
In article <nmcg20$22r$1@dont-email.me>, hidefromu@nospamhush.com says... > > On 2016-07-15 4:47 PM, Nadegda wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:28:47 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > > > >> In article <nmbkhr$e19$22@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > >> says... > >> > >> > >> > >>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:17:44 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > >>> > >>>> In article <9G3iz.3211$Pz4.702@fx03.iad>, r0llinThru@none.invalid > >>>> says... > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> Durrbs <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:28:29 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>> // > >>>>>>> If I may ask, given your claim to have a long history in AUK, and > >>>>>>> by extension, an "heir to the FNVW throne," what other nyms might > >>>>>>> any of us have known you under? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to guess. > >>>>>> I've dropped enough clues over the years, including that I was > >>>>>> there at the very beginning, and my involvement in coming up with > >>>>>> one of the original core awards... > >>>>> > >>>>> ..so 'says' the k00k who has to G00gle up to find the cmsg for AUK > >>>>> when both Adam Kerman and I have the original posted cmsg at hand > >>>>> :-> > >>>>> > >>>>> for those with the memory cells... both "Alien" and [tor]Phoenix > >>>>> also made these claims, in my recall a virtual parallel of rhetoric. > >>>>> Anyone who was around when Phoenix 'retired' knows neither "Alien" > >>>>> nor that faux(imposter) 'Phoenix' invention of Paul's were even > >>>>> present in AUK.. in fact as recently pointed to it was during the > >>>>> reign of Bob Larter that Paul was dragged into AUK... his "birth".. > >>>>> if you like :-/ > >>>>> > >>>>> soooo.. yep,, more bullsh!te from the Pembroke Pud Puller :----D > >>>> > >>>> Yep, that's pretty-much my impression of it all, and the point I was > >>>> driving up Nad's ass. Nads came in here and immediately went to > >>>> setting up shop as if S/H/IT was entitled to do so, and everyone was > >>>> supposed to be impressed with someone who only alluded to some > >>>> unproven credentials. When I pressed for something a little more > >>>> substantial, Nads had to resort to mysterious "clues," as if > >>>> anybody's buying any of it. That's why none of this bullshit is > >>>> flying with anybody here, and that's also why S/H/IT is failing so > >>>> badly. > >>> > >>> For someone who is "failing so badly" I sure seem to have *your* > >>> panties in a twist, and a lot of other kooks melting quite > >>> spectacularly, particularly dolf and murphy. > >> > >> I'm simply stating the obvious... after three months of your "FNVW, > >> party of one" routine, you're still a party of one. > > > > Are you *still* terrible at math? Me + kensi + Bill Jillians + Yads makes > > four. > > > > <snicker> > > > > Yads? Waaaaaayyyyyyy too much dope smoking going on and if you think > the chicken fucker is your "ally" you better check your back for knives > before sitting down, you might cut your upholstery. It still adds up to one, AFAIC. -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, Official Ko0K Wrangler AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-16 08:01 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <wmy$lvFKvdiXFwDx@btinternet.com> |
| In reply to | #60092 |
In message <MPG.31f36e02baa9a49098da4a@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes >In article <nmcg20$22r$1@dont-email.me>, hidefromu@nospamhush.com >says... > > >> >> On 2016-07-15 4:47 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:28:47 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >> > >> >> In article <nmbkhr$e19$22@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >> >> says... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:17:44 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> In article <9G3iz.3211$Pz4.702@fx03.iad>, r0llinThru@none.invalid >> >>>> says... >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>> Durrbs <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >>>>>> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:28:29 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> // >> >>>>>>> If I may ask, given your claim to have a long history in AUK, and >> >>>>>>> by extension, an "heir to the FNVW throne," what other nyms might >> >>>>>>> any of us have known you under? >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to guess. >> >>>>>> I've dropped enough clues over the years, including that I was >> >>>>>> there at the very beginning, and my involvement in coming up with >> >>>>>> one of the original core awards... >> >>>>> >> >>>>> ..so 'says' the k00k who has to G00gle up to find the cmsg for AUK >> >>>>> when both Adam Kerman and I have the original posted cmsg at hand >> >>>>> :-> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> for those with the memory cells... both "Alien" and [tor]Phoenix >> >>>>> also made these claims, in my recall a virtual parallel of rhetoric. >> >>>>> Anyone who was around when Phoenix 'retired' knows neither "Alien" >> >>>>> nor that faux(imposter) 'Phoenix' invention of Paul's were even >> >>>>> present in AUK.. in fact as recently pointed to it was during the >> >>>>> reign of Bob Larter that Paul was dragged into AUK... his "birth".. >> >>>>> if you like :-/ >> >>>>> >> >>>>> soooo.. yep,, more bullsh!te from the Pembroke Pud Puller :----D >> >>>> >> >>>> Yep, that's pretty-much my impression of it all, and the point I was >> >>>> driving up Nad's ass. Nads came in here and immediately went to >> >>>> setting up shop as if S/H/IT was entitled to do so, and everyone was >> >>>> supposed to be impressed with someone who only alluded to some >> >>>> unproven credentials. When I pressed for something a little more >> >>>> substantial, Nads had to resort to mysterious "clues," as if >> >>>> anybody's buying any of it. That's why none of this bullshit is >> >>>> flying with anybody here, and that's also why S/H/IT is failing so >> >>>> badly. >> >>> >> >>> For someone who is "failing so badly" I sure seem to have *your* >> >>> panties in a twist, and a lot of other kooks melting quite >> >>> spectacularly, particularly dolf and murphy. >> >> >> >> I'm simply stating the obvious... after three months of your "FNVW, >> >> party of one" routine, you're still a party of one. >> > >> > Are you *still* terrible at math? Me + kensi + Bill Jillians + Yads makes >> > four. >> > >> > <snicker> >> > >> >> Yads? Waaaaaayyyyyyy too much dope smoking going on and if you think >> the chicken fucker is your "ally" you better check your back for knives >> before sitting down, you might cut your upholstery. > >It still adds up to one, AFAIC. > I wouldn't put too much reliance on the honesty of Idlehands. The man who can't even say what the "mistake" PV made was! -- Bill Jillians (Formosa'd by Checkmate) http://www.mindfulselfcompassion.org/meditations_downloads.php (Mindful Self Compassion - Christopher Germer) "actually I was told I was getting a DoW# for being a "breath of fresh air." - Mister Smartypants in AUK. Most Boring poster ever (along with Fakey) "Better quality than Sw, MM, MSp, idlehands and Doctor WTF combined." Dave "Yads" Yaderley Janitor's BFF #4 #shitcanjillians Taking Over USENET 1 newsgroup at a time. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-16 08:46 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nmdhbi$110$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #60092 |
On 2016-07-16 12:03 AM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > In article <nmcg20$22r$1@dont-email.me>, hidefromu@nospamhush.com > says... > > >> >> On 2016-07-15 4:47 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:28:47 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>> >>>> In article <nmbkhr$e19$22@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>> says... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:17:44 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In article <9G3iz.3211$Pz4.702@fx03.iad>, r0llinThru@none.invalid >>>>>> says... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Durrbs <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:28:29 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> // >>>>>>>>> If I may ask, given your claim to have a long history in AUK, and >>>>>>>>> by extension, an "heir to the FNVW throne," what other nyms might >>>>>>>>> any of us have known you under? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to guess. >>>>>>>> I've dropped enough clues over the years, including that I was >>>>>>>> there at the very beginning, and my involvement in coming up with >>>>>>>> one of the original core awards... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ..so 'says' the k00k who has to G00gle up to find the cmsg for AUK >>>>>>> when both Adam Kerman and I have the original posted cmsg at hand >>>>>>> :-> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> for those with the memory cells... both "Alien" and [tor]Phoenix >>>>>>> also made these claims, in my recall a virtual parallel of rhetoric. >>>>>>> Anyone who was around when Phoenix 'retired' knows neither "Alien" >>>>>>> nor that faux(imposter) 'Phoenix' invention of Paul's were even >>>>>>> present in AUK.. in fact as recently pointed to it was during the >>>>>>> reign of Bob Larter that Paul was dragged into AUK... his "birth".. >>>>>>> if you like :-/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> soooo.. yep,, more bullsh!te from the Pembroke Pud Puller :----D >>>>>> >>>>>> Yep, that's pretty-much my impression of it all, and the point I was >>>>>> driving up Nad's ass. Nads came in here and immediately went to >>>>>> setting up shop as if S/H/IT was entitled to do so, and everyone was >>>>>> supposed to be impressed with someone who only alluded to some >>>>>> unproven credentials. When I pressed for something a little more >>>>>> substantial, Nads had to resort to mysterious "clues," as if >>>>>> anybody's buying any of it. That's why none of this bullshit is >>>>>> flying with anybody here, and that's also why S/H/IT is failing so >>>>>> badly. >>>>> >>>>> For someone who is "failing so badly" I sure seem to have *your* >>>>> panties in a twist, and a lot of other kooks melting quite >>>>> spectacularly, particularly dolf and murphy. >>>> >>>> I'm simply stating the obvious... after three months of your "FNVW, >>>> party of one" routine, you're still a party of one. >>> >>> Are you *still* terrible at math? Me + kensi + Bill Jillians + Yads makes >>> four. >>> >>> <snicker> >>> >> >> Yads? Waaaaaayyyyyyy too much dope smoking going on and if you think >> the chicken fucker is your "ally" you better check your back for knives >> before sitting down, you might cut your upholstery. > > It still adds up to one, AFAIC. > It does indeed, binky only does what the chicken fucker tells him and the chicken fucker's only friend seems to be nads so it all adds up to 1. -- The was a old guy named binky Whose thumb began to smell stinky He made his mom gasp, pulling it out of his ass And stuck it in his mouth like a Twinkie. Anonymous So why can't you accept that he's an idiot and move on? Bill Jillians (Formosa'd by Checkmate)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-16 17:54 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <8Z3M6OWebmiXFwx7@btinternet.com> |
| In reply to | #60101 |
In message <nmdhbi$110$1@dont-email.me>, Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> writes >On 2016-07-16 12:03 AM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >> In article <nmcg20$22r$1@dont-email.me>, hidefromu@nospamhush.com >> says... >> >> >>> >>> On 2016-07-15 4:47 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:28:47 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <nmbkhr$e19$22@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>> says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:17:44 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> In article <9G3iz.3211$Pz4.702@fx03.iad>, r0llinThru@none.invalid >>>>>>> says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Durrbs <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:28:29 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> // >>>>>>>>>> If I may ask, given your claim to have a long history in AUK, and >>>>>>>>>> by extension, an "heir to the FNVW throne," what other nyms might >>>>>>>>>> any of us have known you under? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to guess. >>>>>>>>> I've dropped enough clues over the years, including that I was >>>>>>>>> there at the very beginning, and my involvement in coming up with >>>>>>>>> one of the original core awards... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ..so 'says' the k00k who has to G00gle up to find the cmsg for AUK >>>>>>>> when both Adam Kerman and I have the original posted cmsg at hand >>>>>>>> :-> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> for those with the memory cells... both "Alien" and [tor]Phoenix >>>>>>>> also made these claims, in my recall a virtual parallel of rhetoric. >>>>>>>> Anyone who was around when Phoenix 'retired' knows neither "Alien" >>>>>>>> nor that faux(imposter) 'Phoenix' invention of Paul's were even >>>>>>>> present in AUK.. in fact as recently pointed to it was during the >>>>>>>> reign of Bob Larter that Paul was dragged into AUK... his "birth".. >>>>>>>> if you like :-/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> soooo.. yep,, more bullsh!te from the Pembroke Pud Puller :----D >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yep, that's pretty-much my impression of it all, and the point I was >>>>>>> driving up Nad's ass. Nads came in here and immediately went to >>>>>>> setting up shop as if S/H/IT was entitled to do so, and everyone was >>>>>>> supposed to be impressed with someone who only alluded to some >>>>>>> unproven credentials. When I pressed for something a little more >>>>>>> substantial, Nads had to resort to mysterious "clues," as if >>>>>>> anybody's buying any of it. That's why none of this bullshit is >>>>>>> flying with anybody here, and that's also why S/H/IT is failing so >>>>>>> badly. >>>>>> >>>>>> For someone who is "failing so badly" I sure seem to have *your* >>>>>> panties in a twist, and a lot of other kooks melting quite >>>>>> spectacularly, particularly dolf and murphy. >>>>> >>>>> I'm simply stating the obvious... after three months of your "FNVW, >>>>> party of one" routine, you're still a party of one. >>>> >>>> Are you *still* terrible at math? Me + kensi + Bill Jillians + Yads makes >>>> four. >>>> >>>> <snicker> >>>> >>> >>> Yads? Waaaaaayyyyyyy too much dope smoking going on and if you think >>> the chicken fucker is your "ally" you better check your back for knives >>> before sitting down, you might cut your upholstery. >> >> It still adds up to one, AFAIC. >> > >It does indeed, binky only does what the chicken fucker tells him and >the chicken fucker's only friend seems to be nads so it all adds up to >1. > > > I won't tell your ma you failed 2nd Grade Maths. -- Bill Jillians (Formosa'd by Checkmate) http://www.mindfulselfcompassion.org/meditations_downloads.php (Mindful Self Compassion - Christopher Germer) "actually I was told I was getting a DoW# for being a "breath of fresh air." - Mister Smartypants in AUK. Most Boring poster ever (along with Fakey) "Better quality than Sw, MM, MSp, idlehands and Doctor WTF combined." Dave "Yads" Yaderley Janitor's BFF #4 #shitcanjillians Taking Over USENET 1 newsgroup at a time. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-17 03:25 +1000 |
| Subject | -- I Don't Understand Much Mathematics Either But I Did on 1 June 2003 Have This Momentary Whimsical Inspiration |
| Message-ID | <24GdnQLK1pWa8xfKnZ2dnUU7-Q_NnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #60102 |
On 17/07/2016 02:54, Bill Jillians wrote: > In message <nmdhbi$110$1@dont-email.me>, Idlehands > <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> writes >> On 2016-07-16 12:03 AM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>> In article <nmcg20$22r$1@dont-email.me>, hidefromu@nospamhush.com >>> says... >>> >>> >>>> >>>> On 2016-07-15 4:47 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:28:47 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In article <nmbkhr$e19$22@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>>> says... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:17:44 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In article <9G3iz.3211$Pz4.702@fx03.iad>, r0llinThru@none.invalid >>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Durrbs <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:28:29 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> // >>>>>>>>>>> If I may ask, given your claim to have a long history in AUK, >>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>> by extension, an "heir to the FNVW throne," what other nyms >>>>>>>>>>> might >>>>>>>>>>> any of us have known you under? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to >>>>>>>>>> guess. >>>>>>>>>> I've dropped enough clues over the years, including that I was >>>>>>>>>> there at the very beginning, and my involvement in coming up with >>>>>>>>>> one of the original core awards... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ..so 'says' the k00k who has to G00gle up to find the cmsg for AUK >>>>>>>>> when both Adam Kerman and I have the original posted cmsg at hand >>>>>>>>> :-> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> for those with the memory cells... both "Alien" and [tor]Phoenix >>>>>>>>> also made these claims, in my recall a virtual parallel of >>>>>>>>> rhetoric. >>>>>>>>> Anyone who was around when Phoenix 'retired' knows neither "Alien" >>>>>>>>> nor that faux(imposter) 'Phoenix' invention of Paul's were even >>>>>>>>> present in AUK.. in fact as recently pointed to it was during the >>>>>>>>> reign of Bob Larter that Paul was dragged into AUK... his >>>>>>>>> "birth".. >>>>>>>>> if you like :-/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> soooo.. yep,, more bullsh!te from the Pembroke Pud Puller :----D >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yep, that's pretty-much my impression of it all, and the point I >>>>>>>> was >>>>>>>> driving up Nad's ass. Nads came in here and immediately went to >>>>>>>> setting up shop as if S/H/IT was entitled to do so, and everyone >>>>>>>> was >>>>>>>> supposed to be impressed with someone who only alluded to some >>>>>>>> unproven credentials. When I pressed for something a little more >>>>>>>> substantial, Nads had to resort to mysterious "clues," as if >>>>>>>> anybody's buying any of it. That's why none of this bullshit is >>>>>>>> flying with anybody here, and that's also why S/H/IT is failing so >>>>>>>> badly. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For someone who is "failing so badly" I sure seem to have *your* >>>>>>> panties in a twist, and a lot of other kooks melting quite >>>>>>> spectacularly, particularly dolf and murphy. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm simply stating the obvious... after three months of your "FNVW, >>>>>> party of one" routine, you're still a party of one. >>>>> >>>>> Are you *still* terrible at math? Me + kensi + Bill Jillians + Yads >>>>> makes >>>>> four. >>>>> >>>>> <snicker> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yads? Waaaaaayyyyyyy too much dope smoking going on and if you think >>>> the chicken fucker is your "ally" you better check your back for knives >>>> before sitting down, you might cut your upholstery. >>> >>> It still adds up to one, AFAIC. >>> >> >> It does indeed, binky only does what the chicken fucker tells him and >> the chicken fucker's only friend seems to be nads so it all adds up to 1. >> >> >> > > I won't tell your ma you failed 2nd Grade Maths. > Could you explain it to me? - https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzRmc7Bm7indNEZkMG1KeThTWUU GRAPPLE - Epistemological Hermeneutic An empirical-inductive & meta-physical deductive model P (Shared Hemispheric View) = P (V1) * P (V2 | V1) or P (V2) * P (V1 | V2)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-16 07:58 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <7WL95NFtsdiXFwg$@btinternet.com> |
| In reply to | #60091 |
In message <nmcg20$22r$1@dont-email.me>, Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> writes >On 2016-07-15 4:47 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:28:47 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >> >>> In article <nmbkhr$e19$22@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>> says... >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:17:44 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <9G3iz.3211$Pz4.702@fx03.iad>, r0llinThru@none.invalid >>>>> says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Durrbs <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:28:29 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>> // >>>>>>>> If I may ask, given your claim to have a long history in AUK, and >>>>>>>> by extension, an "heir to the FNVW throne," what other nyms might >>>>>>>> any of us have known you under? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to guess. >>>>>>> I've dropped enough clues over the years, including that I was >>>>>>> there at the very beginning, and my involvement in coming up with >>>>>>> one of the original core awards... >>>>>> >>>>>> ..so 'says' the k00k who has to G00gle up to find the cmsg for AUK >>>>>> when both Adam Kerman and I have the original posted cmsg at hand >>>>>> :-> >>>>>> >>>>>> for those with the memory cells... both "Alien" and [tor]Phoenix >>>>>> also made these claims, in my recall a virtual parallel of rhetoric. >>>>>> Anyone who was around when Phoenix 'retired' knows neither "Alien" >>>>>> nor that faux(imposter) 'Phoenix' invention of Paul's were even >>>>>> present in AUK.. in fact as recently pointed to it was during the >>>>>> reign of Bob Larter that Paul was dragged into AUK... his "birth".. >>>>>> if you like :-/ >>>>>> >>>>>> soooo.. yep,, more bullsh!te from the Pembroke Pud Puller :----D >>>>> >>>>> Yep, that's pretty-much my impression of it all, and the point I was >>>>> driving up Nad's ass. Nads came in here and immediately went to >>>>> setting up shop as if S/H/IT was entitled to do so, and everyone was >>>>> supposed to be impressed with someone who only alluded to some >>>>> unproven credentials. When I pressed for something a little more >>>>> substantial, Nads had to resort to mysterious "clues," as if >>>>> anybody's buying any of it. That's why none of this bullshit is >>>>> flying with anybody here, and that's also why S/H/IT is failing so >>>>> badly. >>>> >>>> For someone who is "failing so badly" I sure seem to have *your* >>>> panties in a twist, and a lot of other kooks melting quite >>>> spectacularly, particularly dolf and murphy. >>> >>> I'm simply stating the obvious... after three months of your "FNVW, >>> party of one" routine, you're still a party of one. >> >> Are you *still* terrible at math? Me + kensi + Bill Jillians + Yads makes >> four. >> >> <snicker> >> > >Yads? Waaaaaayyyyyyy too much dope smoking going on and if you think >the chicken fucker is your "ally" you better check your back for knives >before sitting down, you might cut your upholstery. > > > You say that all the time. Proof? Oh yeah .... your imagination. -- Bill Jillians (Formosa'd by Checkmate) http://www.mindfulselfcompassion.org/meditations_downloads.php (Mindful Self Compassion - Christopher Germer) "actually I was told I was getting a DoW# for being a "breath of fresh air." - Mister Smartypants in AUK. Most Boring poster ever (along with Fakey) "Better quality than Sw, MM, MSp, idlehands and Doctor WTF combined." Dave "Yads" Yaderley Janitor's BFF #4 #shitcanjillians Taking Over USENET 1 newsgroup at a time. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-17 00:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nmeju7$e19$50@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #60091 |
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 23:17:53 -0600, Idlehands wrote: > On 2016-07-15 4:47 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:28:47 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >> >>> In article <nmbkhr$e19$22@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>> says... >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:17:44 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <9G3iz.3211$Pz4.702@fx03.iad>, r0llinThru@none.invalid >>>>> says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Durrbs <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:28:29 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>> // >>>>>>>> If I may ask, given your claim to have a long history in AUK, and >>>>>>>> by extension, an "heir to the FNVW throne," what other nyms might >>>>>>>> any of us have known you under? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to >>>>>>> guess. I've dropped enough clues over the years, including that I >>>>>>> was there at the very beginning, and my involvement in coming up >>>>>>> with one of the original core awards... >>>>>> >>>>>> ..so 'says' the k00k who has to G00gle up to find the cmsg for AUK >>>>>> when both Adam Kerman and I have the original posted cmsg at hand >>>>>> :-> >>>>>> >>>>>> for those with the memory cells... both "Alien" and [tor]Phoenix >>>>>> also made these claims, in my recall a virtual parallel of >>>>>> rhetoric. Anyone who was around when Phoenix 'retired' knows >>>>>> neither "Alien" nor that faux(imposter) 'Phoenix' invention of >>>>>> Paul's were even present in AUK.. in fact as recently pointed to it >>>>>> was during the reign of Bob Larter that Paul was dragged into >>>>>> AUK... his "birth".. if you like :-/ >>>>>> >>>>>> soooo.. yep,, more bullsh!te from the Pembroke Pud Puller :----D >>>>> >>>>> Yep, that's pretty-much my impression of it all, and the point I was >>>>> driving up Nad's ass. Nads came in here and immediately went to >>>>> setting up shop as if S/H/IT was entitled to do so, and everyone was >>>>> supposed to be impressed with someone who only alluded to some >>>>> unproven credentials. When I pressed for something a little more >>>>> substantial, Nads had to resort to mysterious "clues," as if >>>>> anybody's buying any of it. That's why none of this bullshit is >>>>> flying with anybody here, and that's also why S/H/IT is failing so >>>>> badly. >>>> >>>> For someone who is "failing so badly" I sure seem to have *your* >>>> panties in a twist, and a lot of other kooks melting quite >>>> spectacularly, particularly dolf and murphy. >>> >>> I'm simply stating the obvious... after three months of your "FNVW, >>> party of one" routine, you're still a party of one. >> >> Are you *still* terrible at math? Me + kensi + Bill Jillians + Yads >> makes four. >> >> <snicker> > > Yads? Waaaaaayyyyyyy too much dope smoking going on and if you think > the chicken fucker is your "ally" you better check your back for knives > before sitting down, you might cut your upholstery. Given your stalkerish behavior towards both of them (didn't you win a kook award for obsessing over Yads back in 2012 or thereabouts?) you'll pardon me if I take your advice with a whole shaker of salt as coming from a biased source. <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-17 00:25 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nmf8di$8r1$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #60153 |
On 2016-07-16 6:36 PM, Nadegda wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 23:17:53 -0600, Idlehands wrote: > >> On 2016-07-15 4:47 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:28:47 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>> >>>> In article <nmbkhr$e19$22@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>> says... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:17:44 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In article <9G3iz.3211$Pz4.702@fx03.iad>, r0llinThru@none.invalid >>>>>> says... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Durrbs <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:28:29 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> // >>>>>>>>> If I may ask, given your claim to have a long history in AUK, and >>>>>>>>> by extension, an "heir to the FNVW throne," what other nyms might >>>>>>>>> any of us have known you under? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to >>>>>>>> guess. I've dropped enough clues over the years, including that I >>>>>>>> was there at the very beginning, and my involvement in coming up >>>>>>>> with one of the original core awards... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ..so 'says' the k00k who has to G00gle up to find the cmsg for AUK >>>>>>> when both Adam Kerman and I have the original posted cmsg at hand >>>>>>> :-> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> for those with the memory cells... both "Alien" and [tor]Phoenix >>>>>>> also made these claims, in my recall a virtual parallel of >>>>>>> rhetoric. Anyone who was around when Phoenix 'retired' knows >>>>>>> neither "Alien" nor that faux(imposter) 'Phoenix' invention of >>>>>>> Paul's were even present in AUK.. in fact as recently pointed to it >>>>>>> was during the reign of Bob Larter that Paul was dragged into >>>>>>> AUK... his "birth".. if you like :-/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> soooo.. yep,, more bullsh!te from the Pembroke Pud Puller :----D >>>>>> >>>>>> Yep, that's pretty-much my impression of it all, and the point I was >>>>>> driving up Nad's ass. Nads came in here and immediately went to >>>>>> setting up shop as if S/H/IT was entitled to do so, and everyone was >>>>>> supposed to be impressed with someone who only alluded to some >>>>>> unproven credentials. When I pressed for something a little more >>>>>> substantial, Nads had to resort to mysterious "clues," as if >>>>>> anybody's buying any of it. That's why none of this bullshit is >>>>>> flying with anybody here, and that's also why S/H/IT is failing so >>>>>> badly. >>>>> >>>>> For someone who is "failing so badly" I sure seem to have *your* >>>>> panties in a twist, and a lot of other kooks melting quite >>>>> spectacularly, particularly dolf and murphy. >>>> >>>> I'm simply stating the obvious... after three months of your "FNVW, >>>> party of one" routine, you're still a party of one. >>> >>> Are you *still* terrible at math? Me + kensi + Bill Jillians + Yads >>> makes four. >>> >>> <snicker> >> >> Yads? Waaaaaayyyyyyy too much dope smoking going on and if you think >> the chicken fucker is your "ally" you better check your back for knives >> before sitting down, you might cut your upholstery. > > Given your stalkerish behavior towards both of them (didn't you win a > kook award for obsessing over Yads back in 2012 or thereabouts?) you'll > pardon me if I take your advice with a whole shaker of salt as coming > from a biased source. > > <snicker> > Poor nads, now trying to dole out "awards" retroactively, how sad and pathetic is this. I don't suppose the all powerful FNVW could post proof of this so-called award? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL -- The was a old guy named binky Whose thumb began to smell stinky He made his mom gasp, pulling it out of his ass And stuck it in his mouth like a Twinkie. Anonymous So why can't you accept that he's an idiot and move on? Bill Jillians (Formosa'd by Checkmate)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-17 22:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nmgvqc$e19$59@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #60165 |
On Sun, 17 Jul 2016 00:25:56 -0600, Idlehands wrote: > On 2016-07-16 6:36 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 23:17:53 -0600, Idlehands wrote: >> >>> On 2016-07-15 4:47 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:28:47 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <nmbkhr$e19$22@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>> says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:17:44 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> In article <9G3iz.3211$Pz4.702@fx03.iad>, r0llinThru@none.invalid >>>>>>> says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Durrbs <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:28:29 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> // >>>>>>>>>> If I may ask, given your claim to have a long history in AUK, >>>>>>>>>> and by extension, an "heir to the FNVW throne," what other nyms >>>>>>>>>> might any of us have known you under? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to >>>>>>>>> guess. I've dropped enough clues over the years, including that >>>>>>>>> I was there at the very beginning, and my involvement in coming >>>>>>>>> up with one of the original core awards... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ..so 'says' the k00k who has to G00gle up to find the cmsg for >>>>>>>> AUK when both Adam Kerman and I have the original posted cmsg at >>>>>>>> hand :-> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> for those with the memory cells... both "Alien" and [tor]Phoenix >>>>>>>> also made these claims, in my recall a virtual parallel of >>>>>>>> rhetoric. Anyone who was around when Phoenix 'retired' knows >>>>>>>> neither "Alien" nor that faux(imposter) 'Phoenix' invention of >>>>>>>> Paul's were even present in AUK.. in fact as recently pointed to >>>>>>>> it was during the reign of Bob Larter that Paul was dragged into >>>>>>>> AUK... his "birth".. if you like :-/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> soooo.. yep,, more bullsh!te from the Pembroke Pud Puller :----D >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yep, that's pretty-much my impression of it all, and the point I >>>>>>> was driving up Nad's ass. Nads came in here and immediately went >>>>>>> to setting up shop as if S/H/IT was entitled to do so, and >>>>>>> everyone was supposed to be impressed with someone who only >>>>>>> alluded to some unproven credentials. When I pressed for something >>>>>>> a little more substantial, Nads had to resort to mysterious >>>>>>> "clues," as if anybody's buying any of it. That's why none of >>>>>>> this bullshit is flying with anybody here, and that's also why >>>>>>> S/H/IT is failing so badly. >>>>>> >>>>>> For someone who is "failing so badly" I sure seem to have *your* >>>>>> panties in a twist, and a lot of other kooks melting quite >>>>>> spectacularly, particularly dolf and murphy. >>>>> >>>>> I'm simply stating the obvious... after three months of your "FNVW, >>>>> party of one" routine, you're still a party of one. >>>> >>>> Are you *still* terrible at math? Me + kensi + Bill Jillians + Yads >>>> makes four. >>>> >>>> <snicker> >>> >>> Yads? Waaaaaayyyyyyy too much dope smoking going on and if you think >>> the chicken fucker is your "ally" you better check your back for >>> knives before sitting down, you might cut your upholstery. >> >> Given your stalkerish behavior towards both of them (didn't you win a >> kook award for obsessing over Yads back in 2012 or thereabouts?) you'll >> pardon me if I take your advice with a whole shaker of salt as coming >> from a biased source. >> >> <snicker> > > Poor nads, now trying to dole out "awards" retroactively, how sad and > pathetic is this. I don't suppose the all powerful FNVW could post > proof of this so-called award? Unfortunately, Google Groups isn't what it once was, and my efforts to dig the old winner post up have drawn a blank. But I think it was an Itchy and Scratchy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 19:54 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nmmlki$mug$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #60193 |
On 2016-07-17 4:11 PM, Nadegda wrote: > On Sun, 17 Jul 2016 00:25:56 -0600, Idlehands wrote: > >> On 2016-07-16 6:36 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 23:17:53 -0600, Idlehands wrote: >>> >>>> On 2016-07-15 4:47 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:28:47 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In article <nmbkhr$e19$22@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>>> says... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:17:44 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In article <9G3iz.3211$Pz4.702@fx03.iad>, r0llinThru@none.invalid >>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Durrbs <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:28:29 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> // >>>>>>>>>>> If I may ask, given your claim to have a long history in AUK, >>>>>>>>>>> and by extension, an "heir to the FNVW throne," what other nyms >>>>>>>>>>> might any of us have known you under? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to >>>>>>>>>> guess. I've dropped enough clues over the years, including that >>>>>>>>>> I was there at the very beginning, and my involvement in coming >>>>>>>>>> up with one of the original core awards... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ..so 'says' the k00k who has to G00gle up to find the cmsg for >>>>>>>>> AUK when both Adam Kerman and I have the original posted cmsg at >>>>>>>>> hand :-> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> for those with the memory cells... both "Alien" and [tor]Phoenix >>>>>>>>> also made these claims, in my recall a virtual parallel of >>>>>>>>> rhetoric. Anyone who was around when Phoenix 'retired' knows >>>>>>>>> neither "Alien" nor that faux(imposter) 'Phoenix' invention of >>>>>>>>> Paul's were even present in AUK.. in fact as recently pointed to >>>>>>>>> it was during the reign of Bob Larter that Paul was dragged into >>>>>>>>> AUK... his "birth".. if you like :-/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> soooo.. yep,, more bullsh!te from the Pembroke Pud Puller :----D >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yep, that's pretty-much my impression of it all, and the point I >>>>>>>> was driving up Nad's ass. Nads came in here and immediately went >>>>>>>> to setting up shop as if S/H/IT was entitled to do so, and >>>>>>>> everyone was supposed to be impressed with someone who only >>>>>>>> alluded to some unproven credentials. When I pressed for something >>>>>>>> a little more substantial, Nads had to resort to mysterious >>>>>>>> "clues," as if anybody's buying any of it. That's why none of >>>>>>>> this bullshit is flying with anybody here, and that's also why >>>>>>>> S/H/IT is failing so badly. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For someone who is "failing so badly" I sure seem to have *your* >>>>>>> panties in a twist, and a lot of other kooks melting quite >>>>>>> spectacularly, particularly dolf and murphy. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm simply stating the obvious... after three months of your "FNVW, >>>>>> party of one" routine, you're still a party of one. >>>>> >>>>> Are you *still* terrible at math? Me + kensi + Bill Jillians + Yads >>>>> makes four. >>>>> >>>>> <snicker> >>>> >>>> Yads? Waaaaaayyyyyyy too much dope smoking going on and if you think >>>> the chicken fucker is your "ally" you better check your back for >>>> knives before sitting down, you might cut your upholstery. >>> >>> Given your stalkerish behavior towards both of them (didn't you win a >>> kook award for obsessing over Yads back in 2012 or thereabouts?) you'll >>> pardon me if I take your advice with a whole shaker of salt as coming >>> from a biased source. >>> >>> <snicker> >> >> Poor nads, now trying to dole out "awards" retroactively, how sad and >> pathetic is this. I don't suppose the all powerful FNVW could post >> proof of this so-called award? > > Unfortunately, Google Groups isn't what it once was, and my efforts to > dig the old winner post up have drawn a blank. But I think it was an > Itchy and Scratchy. > Winner of what? -- The was a old guy named binky Whose thumb began to smell stinky He made his mom gasp, pulling it out of his ass And stuck it in his mouth like a Twinkie. Anonymous So why can't you accept that he's an idiot and move on? Bill Jillians (Formosa'd by Checkmate)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-20 15:36 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <85Ejz.15537$Pl5.4676@fx40.iad> |
| In reply to | #60424 |
Idlehands <hidefromu@nospamhush.com> wrote in: <nmmlki$mug$1@dont-email.me> >On 2016-07-17 4:11 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> On Sun, 17 Jul 2016 00:25:56 -0600, Idlehands wrote: >> // >>> Poor nads, now trying to dole out "awards" retroactively, how sad and >>> pathetic is this. I don't suppose the all powerful FNVW could post >>> proof of this so-called award? >> >> Unfortunately, Google Groups isn't what it once was, and my efforts to >> dig the old winner post up have drawn a blank. But I think it was an >> Itchy and Scratchy. >> > >Winner of what? winner of "Busted 10LB G00gle Groper" 'award' ... tis all Paul has, that and bot scripts. Some artful insightful Netizen,, huh? -- fup set [please maintain froups x-Pstd line unless "fup set" is 0n] *** Paul Derbyshire enters AFN http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=124317053000 [Ray Banana] "How long have you [Seamus] been using Windows". *** Paul Derbyshire 'leaves' AFN http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=131069032500 "The name is Seamus, and I, unlike you, am in fact a decorated veteran. I was in 'nam.".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-16 15:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.31f45bac6bd0e8dd98da5d@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #60026 |
In article <nmedu5$e19$37@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > On Sat, 16 Jul 2016 10:31:17 +0100, Bill Jillians wrote: > > > In message <29dfd6b9-cc90-4d93-bdc4-6d90e06d5721@googlegroups.com>, "Mr. > > Smartypants DoW #4, Supreme Fuckhead" <bunghole-jonnie@lycos.com> writes > >>On Friday, July 15, 2016 at 4:47:45 PM UTC-6, Nadegda wrote: > >>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:28:47 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > >>> > >>> > In article <nmbkhr$e19$22@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > >>> > says... > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> >> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:17:44 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> > In article <9G3iz.3211$Pz4.702@fx03.iad>, r0llinThru@none.invalid > >>> >> > says... > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> >> Durrbs <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >>> >> >> >On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:28:29 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> // > >>> >> >> >> If I may ask, given your claim to have a long history in AUK, > >>> >> >> >> and by extension, an "heir to the FNVW throne," what other > >>> >> >> >> nyms might any of us have known you under? > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >That's strictly need-to-know. Though it shouldn't be hard to > >>> >> >> >guess. I've dropped enough clues over the years, including that > >>> >> >> >I was there at the very beginning, and my involvement in coming > >>> >> >> >up with one of the original core awards... > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> ..so 'says' the k00k who has to G00gle up to find the cmsg for > >>> >> >> AUK when both Adam Kerman and I have the original posted cmsg at > >>> >> >> hand :-> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> for those with the memory cells... both "Alien" and [tor]Phoenix > >>> >> >> also made these claims, in my recall a virtual parallel of > >>> >> >> rhetoric. Anyone who was around when Phoenix 'retired' knows > >>> >> >> neither "Alien" nor that faux(imposter) 'Phoenix' invention of > >>> >> >> Paul's were even present in AUK.. in fact as recently pointed to > >>> >> >> it was during the reign of Bob Larter that Paul was dragged into > >>> >> >> AUK... his "birth".. if you like :-/ > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> soooo.. yep,, more bullsh!te from the Pembroke Pud Puller :----D > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Yep, that's pretty-much my impression of it all, and the point I > >>> >> > was driving up Nad's ass. Nads came in here and immediately went > >>> >> > to setting up shop as if S/H/IT was entitled to do so, and > >>> >> > everyone was supposed to be impressed with someone who only > >>> >> > alluded to some unproven credentials. When I pressed for > >>> >> > something a little more substantial, Nads had to resort to > >>> >> > mysterious "clues," as if anybody's buying any of it. That's why > >>> >> > none of this bullshit is flying with anybody here, and that's > >>> >> > also why S/H/IT is failing so badly. > >>> >> > >>> >> For someone who is "failing so badly" I sure seem to have *your* > >>> >> panties in a twist, and a lot of other kooks melting quite > >>> >> spectacularly, particularly dolf and murphy. > >>> > > >>> > I'm simply stating the obvious... after three months of your "FNVW, > >>> > party of one" routine, you're still a party of one. > >>> > >>> Are you *still* terrible at math? Me + kensi + Bill Jillians + Yads > >>> makes four. > >>> > >>> <snicker> > >> > >>So you're trying to run a crooked game! Yads has several kook awards to > >>his name making him a CERTIFIED KOOK. He's therefore ineligible to vote > >>so are you going to cut him from the voters' list? > > > > So you admit he has the right to run these awards its just how he does > > it that you object to? > > Who is this "he" you speak of? The current FNVW team consists of two > women. You're only "two women" in your head, Paul... -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, Official Ko0K Wrangler AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 08:49 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <jZTiz.2312$E07.644@fx07.iad> |
| In reply to | #60026 |
Duurbs <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:28:47 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: // >> I'm simply stating the obvious... after three months of your "FNVW, >> party of one" routine, you're still a party of one. > >Are you *still* terrible at math? Me + kensi + Bill Jillians + Yads makes >four. > ><sniff> Me + Me + AC/DC k00k + who? Paul...yer calculator has to be solar powered AND shoved in yer arse. -- fup set [please maintain froups x-Pstd line unless "fup set" is 0n] *** Paul Derbyshire enters AFN http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=124317053000 [Ray Banana] "How long have you [Seamus] been using Windows". *** Paul Derbyshire 'leaves' AFN http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=131069032500 "The name is Seamus, and I, unlike you, am in fact a decorated veteran. I was in 'nam.".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 07:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r8IZD5GmBHjXFwoC@btinternet.com> |
| In reply to | #60206 |
In message <jZTiz.2312$E07.644@fx07.iad>, BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> writes >Duurbs <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:28:47 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: >// >>> I'm simply stating the obvious... after three months of your "FNVW, >>> party of one" routine, you're still a party of one. >> >>Are you *still* terrible at math? Me + kensi + Bill Jillians + Yads makes >>four. >> >><sniff> > >Me + Me + AC/DC k00k + who? > >Paul...yer calculator has to be solar powered AND shoved in yer arse. What's with the AC/DC kook shit? You are clearly going into free meltdown. -- Bill Jillians (Formosa'd by Checkmate) http://www.mindfulselfcompassion.org/meditations_downloads.php (Mindful Self Compassion - Christopher Germer) "actually I was told I was getting a DoW# for being a "breath of fresh air." - Mister Smartypants in AUK. Most Boring poster ever (along with Fakey) "Better quality than Sw, MM, MSp, idlehands and Doctor WTF combined." Dave "Yads" Yaderley Janitor's BFF #4 #shitcanjillians Taking Over USENET 1 newsgroup at a time. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 16:41 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1mqlcxx.orvnzz1oaot3fN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #60248 |
Jill Billians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> wrote: > In message <jZTiz.2312$E07.644@fx07.iad>, BBB DoW #14 > <r0llinThru@none.invalid> writes > >Duurbs <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >>On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:28:47 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > >// > >>> I'm simply stating the obvious... after three months of your "FNVW, > >>> party of one" routine, you're still a party of one. > >> > >>Are you *still* terrible at math? Me + kensi + Bill Jillians + Yads makes > >>four. > >> > >><sniff> > > > >Me + Me + AC/DC k00k + who? > > > >Paul...yer calculator has to be solar powered AND shoved in yer arse. > > What's with the AC/DC kook shit? You are clearly going into free > meltdown. > heh. heheheheh... -- ^Ï^. My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 00:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.31f623ccb45bf6e198da8b@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #60026 |
In article <dtpEXZGj$GjXFw+I@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 @btinternet.com says... > > In message <MPG.31f5b1892c0bb60a98da85@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate, > DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes > >In article <ra1oobda5ms6ovm0nvug1bdrtfntgj2slp@4ax.com>, > >greghall@yacht_master.fake says... > > > > > >> > >> On Sun, 17 Jul 2016 22:11:51 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > >><nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >> >On Sun, 17 Jul 2016 07:38:31 +0100, Bill Jillians wrote: > >> > >> <...> > >> > >> >> Sorry .... force of habit ... this newsgroup is pretty much male > >> >> dominated. > >> > > >> >Correction: it used to be. > >> > > >> ><snicker> > >> > >> You really do need to try to understand that Checkmate is the > >> dominant force in AUK - at least in his own mind. LOL. > > > >Except that it's YOUR mind that keeps claiming that. > > > > Well I still think that when Checkmate says jump certain Dows of low > status and significance obviously say "How High". > > That's probably everyone from DOW#4 and below. I don't recall asking anyone to jump. There is NO "leader" in AUK, despite a certain ko0k's claim to be an FNVW... and that's not working out very well. -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, Official Ko0K Wrangler AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 20:32 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <Pf2jz.11277$Cd.926@fx08.iad> |
| In reply to | #60249 |
"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: >In article <dtpEXZGj$GjXFw+I@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 >@btinternet.com says... >> In message <MPG.31f5b1892c0bb60a98da85@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate, >> DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes >> >In article <ra1oobda5ms6ovm0nvug1bdrtfntgj2slp@4ax.com>, >> >greghall@yacht_master.fake says... >> >> On Sun, 17 Jul 2016 22:11:51 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> >><nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >> >On Sun, 17 Jul 2016 07:38:31 +0100, Bill Jillians wrote: >> >> >> >> <...> >> >> >> >> >> Sorry .... force of habit ... this newsgroup is pretty much male >> >> >> dominated. >> >> > >> >> >Correction: it used to be. >> >> > >> >> ><snicker> >> >> >> >> You really do need to try to understand that Checkmate is the >> >> dominant force in AUK - at least in his own mind. LOL. >> > >> >Except that it's YOUR mind that keeps claiming that. >> > >> >> Well I still think that when Checkmate says jump certain Dows of low >> status and significance obviously say "How High". >> >> That's probably everyone from DOW#4 and below. > >I don't recall asking anyone to jump. There is NO "leader" in AUK, >despite a certain ko0k's claim to be an FNVW... and that's not working >out very well. true+true+true... and might I just note the rest reads as working through very well... a certain 'calm' even . In that atmosphere perhaps Duurbs will have an ephiphany and BBK find masking tape... gob-stopper quality? -- fup set [please maintain froups x-Pstd line unless "fup set" is 0n] *** Paul Derbyshire enters AFN http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=124317053000 [Ray Banana] "How long have you [Seamus] been using Windows". *** Paul Derbyshire 'leaves' AFN http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=131069032500 "The name is Seamus, and I, unlike you, am in fact a decorated veteran. I was in 'nam.".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 11:57 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <Qj1nUyITYLjXFwPw@btinternet.com> |
| In reply to | #60250 |
In message <Pf2jz.11277$Cd.926@fx08.iad>, BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> writes >"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: >>In article <dtpEXZGj$GjXFw+I@btinternet.com>, willaim.jillians649 >>@btinternet.com says... >>> In message <MPG.31f5b1892c0bb60a98da85@news.altopia.com>, "Checkmate, >>> DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> writes >>> >In article <ra1oobda5ms6ovm0nvug1bdrtfntgj2slp@4ax.com>, >>> >greghall@yacht_master.fake says... >>> >> On Sun, 17 Jul 2016 22:11:51 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>> >><nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> >> >On Sun, 17 Jul 2016 07:38:31 +0100, Bill Jillians wrote: >>> >> >>> >> <...> >>> >> >>> >> >> Sorry .... force of habit ... this newsgroup is pretty much male >>> >> >> dominated. >>> >> > >>> >> >Correction: it used to be. >>> >> > >>> >> ><snicker> >>> >> >>> >> You really do need to try to understand that Checkmate is the >>> >> dominant force in AUK - at least in his own mind. LOL. >>> > >>> >Except that it's YOUR mind that keeps claiming that. >>> > >>> >>> Well I still think that when Checkmate says jump certain Dows of low >>> status and significance obviously say "How High". >>> >>> That's probably everyone from DOW#4 and below. >> >>I don't recall asking anyone to jump. There is NO "leader" in AUK, >>despite a certain ko0k's claim to be an FNVW... and that's not working >>out very well. > >true+true+true... and might I just note the rest reads as working through >very well... a certain 'calm' even . See Checkie ... even Murphy sits up and begs when he hears his masters voice. >In that atmosphere perhaps Duurbs will have an ephiphany and BBK >find masking tape... gob-stopper quality? > > -- Bill Jillians (Formosa'd by Checkmate) http://www.mindfulselfcompassion.org/meditations_downloads.php (Mindful Self Compassion - Christopher Germer) "actually I was told I was getting a DoW# for being a "breath of fresh air." - Mister Smartypants in AUK. Most Boring poster ever (along with Fakey) "Better quality than Sw, MM, MSp, idlehands and Doctor WTF combined." Dave "Yads" Yaderley Janitor's BFF #4 #shitcanjillians Taking Over USENET 1 newsgroup at a time. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web