Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #205113 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-16 07:49 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-09-18 09:11 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 306 — 29 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-16 07:49 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-16 10:48 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-16 11:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <%@%> - 2018-09-16 08:24 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-16 11:51 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <%@%> - 2018-09-16 08:55 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 11:09 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-16 10:41 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-16 08:56 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 13:14 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 10:31 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-16 13:56 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-17 05:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 02:37 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-17 23:15 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-18 05:57 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 09:19 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-18 09:21 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-18 14:27 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 12:41 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-18 11:48 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-18 19:20 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:50 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-18 23:55 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-09-18 17:06 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 21:11 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-18 21:19 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 06:22 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-19 11:27 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 11:32 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 12:03 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-19 13:11 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 16:05 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 01:46 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 20:18 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 22:31 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-19 22:21 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:08 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:41 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:07 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:22 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 09:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 15:15 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 10:33 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 17:59 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 16:41 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:47 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 16:11 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:48 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:47 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:11 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 11:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:36 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 08:42 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 12:06 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:38 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 08:41 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-24 09:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 12:32 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-25 10:23 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 11:31 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 09:35 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:50 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 12:11 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 20:13 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 16:23 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 20:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:51 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 17:20 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 03:23 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:54 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:47 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:10 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 15:06 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 14:58 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 06:19 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:04 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:42 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-09-21 20:51 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:02 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:23 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 15:21 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:10 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-22 10:19 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:10 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 12:12 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:40 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 08:44 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:50 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 09:05 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-23 12:38 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-23 11:58 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-23 18:03 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 11:45 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 19:11 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-20 20:44 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-20 17:47 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:04 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:12 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-20 18:43 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 16:31 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-20 22:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 19:09 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 09:14 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:38 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:26 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:13 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:15 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 17:59 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:38 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 23:23 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 00:02 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 17:20 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 05:08 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:02 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:47 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:01 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:44 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:22 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:51 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 05:43 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:06 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 16:44 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:40 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 08:44 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 19:01 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-22 20:32 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:47 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:29 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:23 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:28 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 09:27 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:58 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:03 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:23 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:50 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 14:54 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 13:00 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 15:07 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:47 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 22:25 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 03:37 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:45 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:45 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 19:02 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 13:39 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:42 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 08:45 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:52 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 09:06 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-23 18:05 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:37 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:47 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:03 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:43 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 16:00 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:12 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:01 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 19:35 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:49 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:12 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 16:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:20 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 20:22 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:33 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 20:53 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:42 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:32 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-22 00:24 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 01:17 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:05 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:41 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 03:35 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 16:07 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:56 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:15 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:50 -0400
Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 07:12 -0700
Re: Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:40 -0400
Re: Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 12:04 -0400
Re: Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:49 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:08 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:07 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:03 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 19:38 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:58 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 21:14 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 16:08 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 17:27 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:50 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:37 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:43 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 19:52 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 01:57 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 14:42 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:54 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:31 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:53 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 05:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:18 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:48 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:12 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-09-22 18:15 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:31 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-09-22 23:23 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:54 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:29 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:12 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:05 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-20 18:17 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:06 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:52 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:08 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:12 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:05 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:52 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 16:59 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:02 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:46 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 19:52 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:12 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:53 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:13 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 19:39 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:09 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:31 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-20 23:46 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:55 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:01 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:15 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:26 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:52 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-18 14:38 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-09-18 15:49 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 13:08 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-19 00:00 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 06:38 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-19 10:13 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 01:07 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 01:00 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 11:51 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-20 23:46 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:56 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:20 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:15 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 19:44 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:42 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:57 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:34 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 03:40 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-22 01:49 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:53 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:21 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 06:10 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:00 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 00:29 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 05:54 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:09 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 11:44 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:40 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:23 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 10:13 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 09:55 -0600
Fusion, solar, and the graviton. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 02:14 -0700
Re: Fusion, solar, and the graviton. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:25 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 00:49 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-22 12:42 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:30 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-22 14:34 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-22 13:38 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:32 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:23 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-20 23:42 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 09:05 -0400
Re: Kensi has Mad Max dreams Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:09 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:25 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:01 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:36 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-16 23:24 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 02:25 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 08:13 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 09:15 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-17 12:43 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 11:54 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-17 12:59 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-17 13:06 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:35 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-17 15:43 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:51 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-18 01:36 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-18 11:39 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 12:43 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-18 13:53 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 15:55 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-17 15:59 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-17 15:00 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 13:08 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 15:28 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-17 23:22 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-17 23:07 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-09-18 01:19 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 09:11 -0400
Page 10 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 16 Next page →
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 11:40 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. |
| Message-ID | <po33d7$1vem$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #206696 |
On 9/21/2018 10:12 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > "kensi" [sic] wrote: >> instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change- >> the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html > > Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin, can do the same thing, I'm told. > "instantly-rechargeable-battery"!!!! BwaHahahahahaha! "kensi" has a "Ph.D." in physics? Bwahahahahaha! Fucking left wing ignorant insane journalist!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 12:04 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. |
| Message-ID | <po34pe$2si$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #206704 |
On 9/21/2018 11:40 AM, benj wrote: > "instantly-rechargeable-battery"!!!! > > BwaHahahahahaha! > > "kensi" has a "Ph.D." in physics? > > Bwahahahahaha! > > Fucking left wing ignorant insane journalist! https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html I will keep reposting this link as long as it continues to be clear that you haven't read word one of the article there. Whether your ignorance is eventually corrected is entirely up to you, of course, but I have ensured you at least have that option, should you choose to accept it. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 10:49 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.360ecf21816c6d90989a04@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #206715 |
In article <po34pe$2si$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html > > I will keep reposting this link as long as it continues to be clear that > you haven't read word one of the article there. > He has you in meltdown mode.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 10:08 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.360ec54eae0ae66e9899ea@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #206662 |
In article <po2pej$1at4$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > > On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: > > by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and > > "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and their > > education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". Voltage, current > > and power (and I won't even mention battery chemistry) are clearly well > > beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I have pointed out many times, > > and is proved here) do not do quantity. To them a couple of amps to > > charge a cellphone is the same as the massive current needed to recharge > > your Tesla. But they are so mentally ill they can't even imagine that > > their fantasies are utter nonsense even when their noses are rubbed in > > the stink. > > Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? > > https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html > > Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? You're losing...LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 18:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1kof7f-vvi.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #206662 |
In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: >> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and >> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and their >> education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". Voltage, current >> and power (and I won't even mention battery chemistry) are clearly well >> beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I have pointed out many times, >> and is proved here) do not do quantity. To them a couple of amps to >> charge a cellphone is the same as the massive current needed to recharge >> your Tesla. But they are so mentally ill they can't even imagine that >> their fantasies are utter nonsense even when their noses are rubbed in >> the stink. > > Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? > > https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html > > Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically rebuilding the battery. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 13:03 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <9gbpD.108839$LK2.43239@fx36.iad> |
| In reply to | #206779 |
On 9/21/2018 12:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: >>> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and >>> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and their >>> education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". Voltage, current >>> and power (and I won't even mention battery chemistry) are clearly well >>> beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I have pointed out many times, >>> and is proved here) do not do quantity. To them a couple of amps to >>> charge a cellphone is the same as the massive current needed to recharge >>> your Tesla. But they are so mentally ill they can't even imagine that >>> their fantasies are utter nonsense even when their noses are rubbed in >>> the stink. >> >> Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? >> >> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html >> >> Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? > > Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about > replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically rebuilding > the battery. Yes, and it would involve a whole new national infrastructure to store, collect transport, recycle, and redistribute those electrolytes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 19:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <5utf7f-noj.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #206810 |
In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: > On 9/21/2018 12:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: >>>> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and >>>> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and their >>>> education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". Voltage, current >>>> and power (and I won't even mention battery chemistry) are clearly well >>>> beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I have pointed out many times, >>>> and is proved here) do not do quantity. To them a couple of amps to >>>> charge a cellphone is the same as the massive current needed to recharge >>>> your Tesla. But they are so mentally ill they can't even imagine that >>>> their fantasies are utter nonsense even when their noses are rubbed in >>>> the stink. >>> >>> Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? >>> >>> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html >>> >>> Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? >> >> Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about >> replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically rebuilding >> the battery. > > Yes, and it would involve a whole new national infrastructure > to store, collect transport, recycle, and redistribute those > electrolytes. Don't confuse the eco warrior children with petty details. Next you will be noting that the electrolytes of all usefull batteries are toxic and caustic. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 13:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.360efb6222804972994b41@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #206835 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <5utf7f-noj.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... > > In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: > > On 9/21/2018 12:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>> On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: > >>>> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and > >>>> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and their > >>>> education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". Voltage, current > >>>> and power (and I won't even mention battery chemistry) are clearly well > >>>> beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I have pointed out many times, > >>>> and is proved here) do not do quantity. To them a couple of amps to > >>>> charge a cellphone is the same as the massive current needed to recharge > >>>> your Tesla. But they are so mentally ill they can't even imagine that > >>>> their fantasies are utter nonsense even when their noses are rubbed in > >>>> the stink. > >>> > >>> Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? > >>> > >>> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html > >>> > >>> Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? > >> > >> Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about > >> replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically rebuilding > >> the battery. > > > > Yes, and it would involve a whole new national infrastructure > > to store, collect transport, recycle, and redistribute those > > electrolytes. > > Don't confuse the eco warrior children with petty details. > > Next you will be noting that the electrolytes of all usefull batteries > are toxic and caustic. I wonder how you'd "change the electrolyte" in a few thousand Tesla cells about the size of AA batteries? -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 21:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ri3g7f-ofk.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #206890 |
In sci.physics Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <5utf7f-noj.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... > > >> >> In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >> > On 9/21/2018 12:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: >> >>>> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and >> >>>> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and their >> >>>> education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". Voltage, current >> >>>> and power (and I won't even mention battery chemistry) are clearly well >> >>>> beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I have pointed out many times, >> >>>> and is proved here) do not do quantity. To them a couple of amps to >> >>>> charge a cellphone is the same as the massive current needed to recharge >> >>>> your Tesla. But they are so mentally ill they can't even imagine that >> >>>> their fantasies are utter nonsense even when their noses are rubbed in >> >>>> the stink. >> >>> >> >>> Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? >> >>> >> >>> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html >> >>> >> >>> Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? >> >> >> >> Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about >> >> replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically rebuilding >> >> the battery. >> > >> > Yes, and it would involve a whole new national infrastructure >> > to store, collect transport, recycle, and redistribute those >> > electrolytes. >> >> Don't confuse the eco warrior children with petty details. >> >> Next you will be noting that the electrolytes of all usefull batteries >> are toxic and caustic. > > I wonder how you'd "change the electrolyte" in a few thousand Tesla cells > about the size of AA batteries? Very carefully while wearing a hazmat suit. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 16:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <po6b0k$10ve$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #206890 |
On 9/21/2018 3:58 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <5utf7f-noj.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... > > >> >> In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >>> On 9/21/2018 12:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and >>>>>> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and their >>>>>> education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". Voltage, current >>>>>> and power (and I won't even mention battery chemistry) are clearly well >>>>>> beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I have pointed out many times, >>>>>> and is proved here) do not do quantity. To them a couple of amps to >>>>>> charge a cellphone is the same as the massive current needed to recharge >>>>>> your Tesla. But they are so mentally ill they can't even imagine that >>>>>> their fantasies are utter nonsense even when their noses are rubbed in >>>>>> the stink. >>>>> >>>>> Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? >>>>> >>>>> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html >>>>> >>>>> Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? >>>> >>>> Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about >>>> replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically rebuilding >>>> the battery. >>> >>> Yes, and it would involve a whole new national infrastructure >>> to store, collect transport, recycle, and redistribute those >>> electrolytes. >> >> Don't confuse the eco warrior children with petty details. >> >> Next you will be noting that the electrolytes of all usefull batteries >> are toxic and caustic. > > I wonder how you'd "change the electrolyte" in a few thousand Tesla cells > about the size of AA batteries? > I think there are 22,000 AA batteries in a Tesla Car battery.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 17:27 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ascdqdthcuo2gsku0qi9flk6pv89e60k0a@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #207350 |
On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 16:08:41 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >I think there are 22,000 AA batteries in a Tesla Car battery. Hmm, that's twice as many as in kensiNads' vibrator... -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall If a woman stumbles upon a fact that is opposed to her intuition she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, she has feelings that give her a reason to act in accordance with her intuition, she will embrace them as the Gospel. -- Capt. Neal ®
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 22:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nvjwq8.1ao1vdov17pN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #207356 |
Sir Gergory Hall, Esq. <nelly@fake.yacht_maester> gurgled: > On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 16:08:41 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: > > > >I think there are 22,000 AA batteries in a Tesla Car battery. > > Hmm, that's twice as many as in kensiNads' vibrator... [snigger] -- ^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just sniggered too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 17:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po6cm5$13oh$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #207350 |
On 9/22/2018 5:08 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 9/21/2018 3:58 PM, Checkmate wrote: >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <5utf7f-noj.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... >> >> >>> >>> In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >>>> On 9/21/2018 12:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and >>>>>>> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and their >>>>>>> education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". Voltage, current >>>>>>> and power (and I won't even mention battery chemistry) are clearly well >>>>>>> beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I have pointed out many times, >>>>>>> and is proved here) do not do quantity. To them a couple of amps to >>>>>>> charge a cellphone is the same as the massive current needed to recharge >>>>>>> your Tesla. But they are so mentally ill they can't even imagine that >>>>>>> their fantasies are utter nonsense even when their noses are rubbed in >>>>>>> the stink. >>>>>> >>>>>> Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html >>>>>> >>>>>> Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? >>>>> >>>>> Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about >>>>> replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically rebuilding >>>>> the battery. >>>> >>>> Yes, and it would involve a whole new national infrastructure >>>> to store, collect transport, recycle, and redistribute those >>>> electrolytes. >>> >>> Don't confuse the eco warrior children with petty details. >>> >>> Next you will be noting that the electrolytes of all usefull batteries >>> are toxic and caustic. >> >> I wonder how you'd "change the electrolyte" in a few thousand Tesla cells >> about the size of AA batteries? >> > > I think there are 22,000 AA batteries in a Tesla Car battery. > changing the electrolyte in a Tesla "battery" is simple. You just Drive a fork lift up to the car, lift the old battery out and drop a new charged battery in and bingo! You've "instantly" changed the electrolyte! Some "climate change" journalist "explained" this advanced science to me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 13:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pobb8r$v9e$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #207358 |
On 9/22/2018 4:37 PM, benj wrote: > On 9/22/2018 5:08 PM, Sergio wrote: >> On 9/21/2018 3:58 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <5utf7f-noj.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... >>> >>> >>>> >>>> In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >>>>> On 9/21/2018 12:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and >>>>>>>> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and >>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>> education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". Voltage, >>>>>>>> current >>>>>>>> and power (and I won't even mention battery chemistry) are >>>>>>>> clearly well >>>>>>>> beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I have pointed out many >>>>>>>> times, >>>>>>>> and is proved here) do not do quantity. To them a couple of amps to >>>>>>>> charge a cellphone is the same as the massive current needed to >>>>>>>> recharge >>>>>>>> your Tesla. But they are so mentally ill they can't even imagine >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> their fantasies are utter nonsense even when their noses are >>>>>>>> rubbed in >>>>>>>> the stink. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about >>>>>> replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically rebuilding >>>>>> the battery. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, and it would involve a whole new national infrastructure >>>>> to store, collect transport, recycle, and redistribute those >>>>> electrolytes. >>>> >>>> Don't confuse the eco warrior children with petty details. >>>> >>>> Next you will be noting that the electrolytes of all usefull batteries >>>> are toxic and caustic. >>> >>> I wonder how you'd "change the electrolyte" in a few thousand Tesla >>> cells >>> about the size of AA batteries? >>> >> >> I think there are 22,000 AA batteries in a Tesla Car battery. >> > > changing the electrolyte in a Tesla "battery" is simple. You just Drive > a fork lift up to the car, lift the old battery out and drop a new > charged battery in and bingo! You've "instantly" changed the electrolyte! > > Some "climate change" journalist "explained" this advanced science to me. I'm sure there is a you tube video that shows them crushing all the 22,000 AA battories to get out the valuable electrolites, and using the leftovers as lawn fertilizer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 19:52 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pobtb8$1qj2$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #207895 |
On 9/24/2018 2:43 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 9/22/2018 4:37 PM, benj wrote: >> On 9/22/2018 5:08 PM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 9/21/2018 3:58 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>> Checkmate! In article <5utf7f-noj.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 9/21/2018 12:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and >>>>>>>>> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and >>>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>>> education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". Voltage, >>>>>>>>> current >>>>>>>>> and power (and I won't even mention battery chemistry) are >>>>>>>>> clearly well >>>>>>>>> beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I have pointed out many >>>>>>>>> times, >>>>>>>>> and is proved here) do not do quantity. To them a couple of amps to >>>>>>>>> charge a cellphone is the same as the massive current needed to >>>>>>>>> recharge >>>>>>>>> your Tesla. But they are so mentally ill they can't even imagine >>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>> their fantasies are utter nonsense even when their noses are >>>>>>>>> rubbed in >>>>>>>>> the stink. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about >>>>>>> replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically rebuilding >>>>>>> the battery. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, and it would involve a whole new national infrastructure >>>>>> to store, collect transport, recycle, and redistribute those >>>>>> electrolytes. >>>>> >>>>> Don't confuse the eco warrior children with petty details. >>>>> >>>>> Next you will be noting that the electrolytes of all usefull batteries >>>>> are toxic and caustic. >>>> >>>> I wonder how you'd "change the electrolyte" in a few thousand Tesla >>>> cells >>>> about the size of AA batteries? >>>> >>> >>> I think there are 22,000 AA batteries in a Tesla Car battery. >>> >> >> changing the electrolyte in a Tesla "battery" is simple. You just Drive >> a fork lift up to the car, lift the old battery out and drop a new >> charged battery in and bingo! You've "instantly" changed the electrolyte! >> >> Some "climate change" journalist "explained" this advanced science to me. > > I'm sure there is a you tube video that shows them crushing all the > 22,000 AA battories to get out the valuable electrolites, and using the > leftovers as lawn fertilizer. > If you've ever taken a Li-Ion cell apart, you'd know that the electrolyte would doubtless kill any lawn and im experience does not smell too healthy for humans either. That is what makes electric cars "green". Ask Nads.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-25 01:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <poc4ld$mhp$41@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #207947 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 19:52:10 -0400, benj wrote: > If you've ever taken a Li-Ion cell apart, you'd know that the > electrolyte would doubtless kill any lawn and im experience does not > smell too healthy for humans either. That is what makes electric cars Guess what happens if you pour gasoline over a lawn? At least Li-Ion electrolyte is normally in a sealed container, rather than being sloshed all over the place in little red containers or being squirted out of nozzles and shipped about in giant tanker trucks that occasionally get involved in traffic accidents. Did you know that, unlike a typical place where an electrical socket used to reside, when a filling station closes down they have to clean up the lot in hazmat gear like a mini Superfund site and cart the soil and stuff off for special disposal and then bring in new fresh soil and other crap just to make it a vacant lot again before something else can be built there? -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-25 14:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <poe33e$1if3$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #207947 |
On 9/24/2018 6:52 PM, benj wrote: > On 9/24/2018 2:43 PM, Sergio wrote: >> On 9/22/2018 4:37 PM, benj wrote: >>> On 9/22/2018 5:08 PM, Sergio wrote: >>>> On 9/21/2018 3:58 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>> posts by >>>>> Checkmate! In article <5utf7f-noj.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/21/2018 12:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and >>>>>>>>>> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and >>>>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>>>> education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". Voltage, >>>>>>>>>> current >>>>>>>>>> and power (and I won't even mention battery chemistry) are >>>>>>>>>> clearly well >>>>>>>>>> beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I have pointed out many >>>>>>>>>> times, >>>>>>>>>> and is proved here) do not do quantity. To them a couple of >>>>>>>>>> amps to >>>>>>>>>> charge a cellphone is the same as the massive current needed to >>>>>>>>>> recharge >>>>>>>>>> your Tesla. But they are so mentally ill they can't even imagine >>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>> their fantasies are utter nonsense even when their noses are >>>>>>>>>> rubbed in >>>>>>>>>> the stink. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about >>>>>>>> replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically >>>>>>>> rebuilding >>>>>>>> the battery. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, and it would involve a whole new national infrastructure >>>>>>> to store, collect transport, recycle, and redistribute those >>>>>>> electrolytes. >>>>>> >>>>>> Don't confuse the eco warrior children with petty details. >>>>>> >>>>>> Next you will be noting that the electrolytes of all usefull >>>>>> batteries >>>>>> are toxic and caustic. >>>>> >>>>> I wonder how you'd "change the electrolyte" in a few thousand Tesla >>>>> cells >>>>> about the size of AA batteries? >>>>> >>>> >>>> I think there are 22,000 AA batteries in a Tesla Car battery. >>>> >>> >>> changing the electrolyte in a Tesla "battery" is simple. You just Drive >>> a fork lift up to the car, lift the old battery out and drop a new >>> charged battery in and bingo! You've "instantly" changed the >>> electrolyte! >>> >>> Some "climate change" journalist "explained" this advanced science to >>> me. >> >> I'm sure there is a you tube video that shows them crushing all the >> 22,000 AA battories to get out the valuable electrolites, and using the >> leftovers as lawn fertilizer. >> > If you've ever taken a Li-Ion cell apart, you'd know that the > electrolyte would doubtless kill any lawn and im experience does not > smell too healthy for humans either. That is what makes electric cars > "green". Ask Nads. a company I worked for about 1980, we used the first lithium D cells, the did not have a diode or vent in them, so occasionally one would blow up, like a 1/4 stick of dynomite. we had square electronic signposts in LA, and a cop broght one back, now spherical, and said looks like someone blew this up ! we agreeded. had a few go off at the plant too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 01:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <po47cp$d3v$8@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #206835 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 19:38:13 +0000, chimp wrote: > In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >> On 9/21/2018 12:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: >>>>> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and >>>>> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and >>>>> their education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". >>>>> Voltage, current and power (and I won't even mention battery >>>>> chemistry) are clearly well beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I >>>>> have pointed out many times, and is proved here) do not do quantity. >>>>> To them a couple of amps to charge a cellphone is the same as the >>>>> massive current needed to recharge your Tesla. But they are so >>>>> mentally ill they can't even imagine that their fantasies are utter >>>>> nonsense even when their noses are rubbed in the stink. >>>> >>>> Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? >>>> >>>> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly- rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid- automobiles.html >>>> >>>> Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? >>> >>> Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about >>> replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically rebuilding >>> the battery. Proof you don't understand flow batteries. That *is* how you recharge flow batteries, dolt. >> Yes, and it would involve a whole new national infrastructure to store, >> collect transport, recycle, and redistribute those electrolytes. The article quite clearly states that the existing fossil fuel transport infrastructure could be repurposed to deal with their proposed chemistry. > Don't confuse the eco warrior children with petty details. > > Next you will be noting that the electrolytes of all usefull batteries > are toxic and caustic. And gasoline, its additives, and other chemicals used and transported by the fossil fuel industry are all nice and safe such that you would have no problem with a baby taking a bath in the stuff? <eyeroll> I don't even know why kensi continues to stick around this place. *I* can barely understand the more technical bits of the things she's interested in, and everyone else here is evidently a top-tier candidate for a learning disability diagnosis. If *I* get this frustrated trying to explain things to the dunces who have taken over sci.physics I can only imagine how much worse it must be for her... -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 02:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <s4mg7f-bkm.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #207030 |
In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 19:38:13 +0000, chimp wrote: > >> In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >>> On 9/21/2018 12:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and >>>>>> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and >>>>>> their education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". >>>>>> Voltage, current and power (and I won't even mention battery >>>>>> chemistry) are clearly well beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I >>>>>> have pointed out many times, and is proved here) do not do quantity. >>>>>> To them a couple of amps to charge a cellphone is the same as the >>>>>> massive current needed to recharge your Tesla. But they are so >>>>>> mentally ill they can't even imagine that their fantasies are utter >>>>>> nonsense even when their noses are rubbed in the stink. >>>>> >>>>> Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? >>>>> >>>>> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly- > rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid- > automobiles.html >>>>> >>>>> Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? >>>> >>>> Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about >>>> replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically rebuilding >>>> the battery. > > Proof you don't understand flow batteries. That *is* how you recharge flow > batteries, dolt. Replacing part of a battery would be called rebuilding the battery, illiterate dolt. >>> Yes, and it would involve a whole new national infrastructure to store, >>> collect transport, recycle, and redistribute those electrolytes. > > The article quite clearly states that the existing fossil fuel transport > infrastructure could be repurposed to deal with their proposed chemistry. Sure it could, all it would take is sufficient pixie dust. >> Don't confuse the eco warrior children with petty details. >> >> Next you will be noting that the electrolytes of all usefull batteries >> are toxic and caustic. > > And gasoline, its additives, and other chemicals used and transported by > the fossil fuel industry are all nice and safe such that you would have no > problem with a baby taking a bath in the stuff? What moron said anything about a baby taking a bath in anything? > <eyeroll> > > I don't even know why kensi continues to stick around this place. Because it is an obsessed eco warrior with a savior delusion. <snip babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 02:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <po4aqs$d3v$18@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #207041 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 02:31:24 +0000, chimp wrote: > In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 19:38:13 +0000, chimp wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >>>> On 9/21/2018 12:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and >>>>>>> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and >>>>>>> their education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". >>>>>>> Voltage, current and power (and I won't even mention battery >>>>>>> chemistry) are clearly well beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as >>>>>>> I have pointed out many times, and is proved here) do not do >>>>>>> quantity. >>>>>>> To them a couple of amps to charge a cellphone is the same as the >>>>>>> massive current needed to recharge your Tesla. But they are so >>>>>>> mentally ill they can't even imagine that their fantasies are >>>>>>> utter nonsense even when their noses are rubbed in the stink. >>>>>> >>>>>> Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly- >> rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid- >> automobiles.html >>>>>> >>>>>> Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? >>>>> >>>>> Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about >>>>> replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically rebuilding >>>>> the battery. >> >> Proof you don't understand flow batteries. That *is* how you recharge >> flow batteries, dolt. > > Replacing part of a battery would be called rebuilding the battery, > illiterate dolt. Yeah, sure. Oh, and a helpful reminder: on your way to work Monday morning, don't forget to stop at a Texaco to rebuild your car's gas tank ... -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 16 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web